Hubbry Logo
Algebraic function fieldAlgebraic function fieldMain
Open search
Algebraic function field
Community hub
Algebraic function field
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Algebraic function field
Algebraic function field
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, an algebraic function field (often abbreviated as function field) of variables over a field is a finitely generated field extension which has transcendence degree over .[1] Equivalently, an algebraic function field of variables over may be defined as a finite field extension of the field of rational functions in variables over .

Example

[edit]

As an example, in the polynomial ring consider the ideal generated by the irreducible polynomial and form the field of fractions of the quotient ring . This is a function field of one variable over ; it can also be written as (with degree 2 over ) or as (with degree 3 over ). We see that the degree of an algebraic function field is not a well-defined notion.

Category structure

[edit]

The algebraic function fields over form a category; the morphisms from function field to are the ring homomorphisms with for all in . All these morphisms are injective. If is a function field over of variables, and is a function field in variables, and , then there are no morphisms from to .

Function fields arising from varieties, curves and Riemann surfaces

[edit]

The function field of an algebraic variety of dimension over is an algebraic function field of variables over . Two varieties are birationally equivalent if and only if their function fields are isomorphic (but note that non-isomorphic varieties may have the same function field). Assigning to each variety its function field yields a duality (contravariant equivalence) between the category of varieties over (with dominant rational maps as morphisms) and the category of algebraic function fields over . The varieties considered here are to be taken in the scheme sense; they need not have any -rational points, like the curve defined over the real numbers.

The case (irreducible algebraic curves in the scheme sense) is especially important, since every function field of one variable over arises as the function field of a uniquely defined regular (i.e. non-singular) projective irreducible algebraic curve over . In fact, the function field yields a duality between the category of regular projective irreducible algebraic curves (with dominant regular maps as morphisms) and the category of function fields of one variable over .

The field of meromorphic functions defined on a connected Riemann surface is a function field of one variable over the complex numbers . In fact, yields a duality between the category of compact connected Riemann surfaces (with non-constant holomorphic maps as morphisms) and function fields of one variable over . A similar correspondence exists between compact connected Klein surfaces and function fields in one variable over .

Number fields and finite fields

[edit]

The function field analogy states that almost all theorems on number fields have a counterpart on function fields of one variable over a finite field, and these counterparts are frequently easier to prove (see analogue for irreducible polynomials over a finite field). In the context of this analogy, both number fields and function fields over finite fields are usually called "global fields".

The study of function fields over a finite field has applications in cryptography and error correcting codes. For example, the function field of an elliptic curve over a finite field (an important mathematical tool for public key cryptography) is an algebraic function field.

Function fields over the field of rational numbers play also an important role in solving inverse Galois problems.

Field of constants

[edit]

Given any algebraic function field over , we can consider the set of elements of which are algebraic over . These elements form a field, known as the field of constants of the algebraic function field.

For instance, is a function field of one variable over ; its field of constants is .

Valuations and places

[edit]

Key tools to study algebraic function fields are absolute values, valuations, places and their completions.

Given an algebraic function field of one variable, we define the notion of a valuation ring of : this is a subring of that contains and is different from and , and such that for any in we have or . Each such valuation ring is a discrete valuation ring and its maximal ideal is called a place of .

A discrete valuation of is a surjective function such that for all ,

  • ,
  • ,

and for all .

There are natural bijective correspondences between the set of valuation rings of , the set of places of , and the set of discrete valuations of . These sets can be given a natural topological structure: the Zariski–Riemann space of .

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , an algebraic function field over a field KK is a finitely generated of KK of transcendence degree one, equivalently a finite of the field K(x)K(x) where xx is transcendental over KK. These fields provide an algebraic framework for studying geometric objects such as algebraic , where the function field of a over KK is the field of rational functions on that curve, capturing its birational properties. The theory of algebraic function fields originates from connections between , —particularly compact Riemann surfaces—and , serving as function field analogs to number fields in the study of Diophantine equations and zeta functions. Key structures include the constant field (the algebraic closure of KK in the extension), places (discrete valuations corresponding to points on the associated curve), and divisors (formal sums of places), which enable the formulation of the Riemann-Roch theorem relating the dimension of spaces of functions with prescribed poles to the genus of the field. The genus gg, a fundamental invariant, measures the complexity of the curve and satisfies g=12deg(Diff(F))n+1g = \frac{1}{2} \deg(\mathrm{Diff}(F)) - n + 1, where n=[F:K(x)]n = [F : K(x)] and Diff(F)\mathrm{Diff}(F) is the different ideal. Algebraic function fields over finite fields have significant applications in coding theory, notably in the construction of algebraic-geometric codes (or Goppa codes), which achieve better parameters than classical codes by exploiting the geometry of curves with many rational points. They also play a role in cryptography, such as , and in arithmetic geometry through the study of the and class groups. For global function fields (over finite constant fields), the total number of places of degree 1 is finite, and the Riemann hypothesis for curves asserts that the zeta function has zeros and poles only on the critical line, mirroring properties in .

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

An algebraic function field over a base field kk is defined as a K/kK/k that is finitely generated as a and has transcendence degree one over kk, with the property that kk is algebraically closed in KK. This means that KK contains no algebraic elements over kk beyond those already in kk itself, ensuring that kk serves as the exact field of constants within KK. Such extensions capture the analogous to number fields but in a function-theoretic setting, where the transcendence degree of one reflects behavior similar to rational functions in a single variable. Equivalently, an algebraic function field K/kK/k can be characterized by the existence of an element xKx \in K that is transcendental over kk such that KK is a finite of the field k(x)k(x). Here, k(x)k(x) consists of quotients of in xx with coefficients in kk, and the algebraicity condition implies that every element of KK satisfies a polynomial equation with coefficients in k(x)k(x). This formulation emphasizes the finite-dimensionality of KK as a over k(x)k(x), distinguishing algebraic function fields from infinite algebraic extensions. In contrast to purely transcendental extensions, such as the rational function field k(x)k(x) itself, which has transcendence degree one but is not algebraic over any proper subfield of the same degree, an algebraic function field involves a non-trivial algebraic layer atop the transcendental base. This algebraic closure over k(x)k(x) introduces ramifications and branching phenomena, central to applications in and . The field of constants remains kk, as per the algebraic closure condition. The concept of algebraic function fields originated in the late through efforts to algebraize the of Riemann surfaces, notably in the 1882 paper by and Heinrich Weber, which treated of one variable using field-theoretic methods inspired by . The modern terminology "algebraic function field" was formalized in the early within , building on Weber's comprehensive algebraic frameworks.

Transcendence Degree and Generation

The transcendence degree of an algebraic function field KK over its constant field kk is precisely 1. This signifies that KK admits a transcendence basis consisting of a single element xKx \in K, which is algebraically independent over kk, such that KK is an of the k(x)k(x). The condition ensures that KK captures the structure of functions on a one-dimensional , distinguishing it from extensions of higher or zero transcendence degree. Finite generation further characterizes algebraic function fields: K/kK/k is a finitely generated field extension. Consequently, KK can be expressed as k(x1,,xn,y1,,ym)k(x_1, \dots, x_n, y_1, \dots, y_m), where the xix_i form a transcendence basis (with n=1n = 1 due to the transcendence degree) and each yjy_j satisfies an over k(x1,,xn,y1,,yj1)k(x_1, \dots, x_n, y_1, \dots, y_{j-1}). In practice, this reduces to adjoining finitely many algebraic elements to k(x)k(x), yielding a finite extension K/k(x)K/k(x) of degree at least 1. For instance, the rational function field k(x)k(x) exemplifies this with m=0m = 0. Lüroth's theorem elucidates the structure of intermediate fields within algebraic function fields. Specifically, if yy is algebraic over k(x)k(x), then any subfield LL satisfying k(x)Lk(x,y)k(x) \subseteq L \subseteq k(x,y) must be of the form k(z)k(z) for some zk(x,y)z \in k(x,y). This result implies that such intermediate extensions remain rational function fields, highlighting the rigidity of transcendence degree 1 extensions in this setting. In characteristic zero, the transcendence degree of 1 guarantees separability of the extension K/kK/k. To see this, note that k(x)/kk(x)/k is a purely , which is separable since the defining relation for xx has no multiple . The extension K/k(x)K/k(x) is then algebraic and finite (by finite generation); in characteristic zero, every over k(x)k(x) is separable because its is nonzero, ensuring distinct in the . Thus, minimal polynomials of generators over k(x)k(x) are separable, and the composite extension K/kK/k inherits separability as the tower of separable extensions.

Basic Properties

Field of Constants

In an algebraic function field K/kK/k of transcendence degree one, the field of constants, denoted kKk_K, is defined as the algebraic closure of the base field kk in KK. This subfield consists precisely of those elements in KK that are algebraic over kk, forming a field extension that captures the "constant" part of KK relative to kk. A fundamental property is that kKk_K is always a finite algebraic extension of kk. Moreover, if kk is algebraically closed, then kK=kk_K = k, which is thus algebraically closed and finite-dimensional over kk (of degree one). This finiteness ensures that kKk_K is a well-behaved invariant, often assumed to be the full constant field in geometric contexts where extensions are taken to be geometric (i.e., kK=kk_K = k). In characteristic zero, the field of constants admits a differential characterization: it coincides exactly with the kernel of a derivation on KK compatible with the field structure, such as one induced by a separating transcendence basis. Elements with zero derivative under this derivation are precisely those in kKk_K. As an illustrative example, consider the function field K=k(x,y)K = k(x, y) generated by the relation y2=x3+ax+by^2 = x^3 + a x + b, where a,bka, b \in k and the right-hand side has distinct roots (ensuring irreducibility over k(x)k(x)). In this case, if the defining equation yields an irreducible curve, then kK=kk_K = k. This arises because the extension K/k(x)K/k(x) is geometric, with no nontrivial algebraic elements over kk beyond kk itself.

Partial Fraction Decomposition

In an algebraic function field K/kK/k of transcendence degree one over a field kk, the elements of KK are referred to as rational functions and can be expressed as fractions f/gf/g, where ff and gg belong to the integral closure OK\mathcal{O}_K of kk in KK for some separating transcendental element xKkx \in K \setminus k. This integral closure OK\mathcal{O}_K consists of the elements integral over kk, forming a whose fraction field is KK. A fundamental property is that, relative to a separating transcendental xx, elements of KK admit representations analogous to partial fraction decompositions in the rational function field k(x)k(x). Locally at each place PP, every element yKy \in K has a unique expansion y=i=vP(y)citPiy = \sum_{i = v_P(y)}^{\infty} c_i t_P^i, where tPt_P is a uniformizer at PP and coefficients cic_i lie in the kPk_P at PP . This arises from the structure of the at PP and the finite K/k(x)K / k(x). For the case of algebraically closed constant field kk and degree-one places (rational points), a global decomposition takes the form y=f(x)+μi=1mμcμi(xbμ)iy = f(x) + \sum_{\mu} \sum_{i=1}^{m_{\mu}} \frac{c_{\mu i}}{(x - b_{\mu})^i}, where f(x)kf(x) \in k, the sum is over poles, bμkb_{\mu} \in k, and cμikc_{\mu i} \in k, with uniqueness following from local expansions and the . In separable extensions, the decomposition involves residues at the poles: the leading coefficient at a simple pole corresponds to the residue resP(ydx)kP\mathrm{res}_P(y \, dx) \in k_P, and the global residue theorem asserts that the sum of residues over all places (including infinity) vanishes, PresP(ydx)=0\sum_P \mathrm{res}_P(y \, dx) = 0, where the sum is interpreted in the constant field (equal to kk if geometrically closed). This residue map is well-defined due to separability, which ensures a nonzero differential dxdx. This decomposition sets up the connection to the Riemann-Roch theorem by providing a basis for the Riemann-Roch spaces L(D)={yK(y)+D0}{0}L(D) = \{ y \in K \mid (y) + D \geq 0 \} \cup \{0\}, where DD is a bounding the poles; the theorem states dimkL(D)=degD+1g+dimkL(KD)\dim_k L(D) = \deg D + 1 - g + \dim_k L(K - D), with gg the , and the expansions describe explicit elements in these spaces for effective divisors.

Examples and Constructions

Rational Function Fields

The rational function field over a field kk is defined as K=k(x)K = k(x), the field of fractions of the kk, where xx is an indeterminate transcendental over kk. This construction yields the simplest example of an algebraic function field, with elements expressed as ratios f(x)/g(x)f(x)/g(x) of polynomials f,gkf, g \in k where g0g \neq 0. Key properties of K=k(x)K = k(x) include a transcendence degree of 1 over kk, reflecting the single transcendental generator xx. The field of constants is the algebraic closure of kk inside KK, which coincides with kk if kk is algebraically closed. Additionally, KK has genus 0, indicating it is the function field of a curve of minimal complexity beyond the trivial case. The Autk(K)\mathrm{Aut}_k(K) of KK over kk is isomorphic to the projective PGL(2,k)\mathrm{PGL}(2, k), which acts faithfully on KK via linear fractional transformations of the form xax+bcx+dx \mapsto \frac{ax + b}{cx + d}, where a,b,c,dka, b, c, d \in k and adbc0ad - bc \neq 0. This action arises from the homomorphisms induced by invertible 2×22 \times 2 matrices over kk, modulo scalar multiples. Geometrically, K=k(x)K = k(x) is the function field associated to the projective line Pk1\mathbb{P}^1_k, the unique smooth projective of genus 0 over kk; its places correspond bijectively to the points of Pk1\mathbb{P}^1_k, including the finite places PαP_\alpha for αk\alpha \in k (where xα=0x - \alpha = 0) and the place at infinity PP_\infty (where 1/x=01/x = 0).

Function Fields from Curves

An algebraic function field arises naturally from a nonsingular projective CC defined over a field kk. For an irreducible CC over kk, the function field K(C)K(C) is defined as the field of rational functions on CC, which consists of quotients of regular functions on open affine subsets of CC, and it has transcendence degree 1 over kk. This construction links the algebraic structure of the field to the geometry of the , where K(C)K(C) captures the meromorphic functions on CC. In the affine setting, consider an affine model of the given by an in k[t,u]k[t, u]. The coordinate ring of this affine model is the integral closure of kk in K(C)K(C), which is a whose fraction field is K(C)K(C). This ring encodes the regular functions on the affine part of the , and its normalization ensures the model is nonsingular. A concrete example is provided by an , which is a nonsingular projective of 1. Consider the Weierstrass y2=x3+ax+by^2 = x^3 + a x + b over a field kk of characteristic not 2 or 3, where the is nonzero to ensure nonsingularity. The function field is K=k(x,y)K = k(x, y) subject to the relation y2x3axb=0y^2 - x^3 - a x - b = 0, a quadratic extension of the field k(x)k(x). Two curves CC and CC' over kk yield isomorphic function fields K(C)K(C)K(C) \cong K(C') if and only if CC and CC' are birationally equivalent, meaning there exists a rational map between them with rational inverses. This equivalence preserves the of the function field while allowing for different geometric realizations of the same field.

Geometric Connections

Algebraic Curves and Varieties

In , the function field of an integral variety VV over an kk is defined as the fraction field of the coordinate ring k[V]k[V] when VV is affine, consisting of rational functions on VV. This field, denoted K(V)K(V), captures the rational functions that are defined on VV, and it plays a central role in studying the birational properties of the variety. For a , the function field is the subfield of the fraction field of the homogeneous coordinate ring consisting of ratios of homogeneous elements of the same degree, which coincides with the fraction field of the coordinate ring of any dense affine open subset, ensuring consistency across affine covers. Algebraic curves, being one-dimensional varieties, correspond to function fields of transcendence degree one over kk. Specifically, if VV is an irreducible , then tr.degkK(V)=1\operatorname{tr.deg}_k K(V) = 1, meaning K(V)K(V) is a finitely generated of kk with a single transcendental element, often realized as the field of rational functions on a smooth model of the . Curves can be embedded as hypersurfaces in affine or ; for instance, a defined by a equation f(x,y)=0f(x,y) = 0 in A2\mathbb{A}^2 has function field k(x,y)/(f(x,y))k(x,y)/(f(x,y)), which is algebraic over k(x)k(x) or k(y)k(y). This transcendence degree distinguishes curves from higher-dimensional varieties, where tr.degkK(V)=dimV\operatorname{tr.deg}_k K(V) = \dim V. Singularities on a can be resolved through normalization, which produces a smooth model V~\tilde{V} birational to the original VV, sharing the same function field K(V)=K(V~)K(V) = K(\tilde{V}). The normalization map ν:V~V\nu: \tilde{V} \to V is an over the smooth locus, and the closure of k[V]k[V] in K(V)K(V) yields the coordinate ring of V~\tilde{V}. This process is unique up to , providing a smooth representative for the function field. A fundamental theorem states that two integral curves over kk are birationally equivalent if and only if their function fields are isomorphic as extensions of kk. Thus, function fields classify curves up to birational equivalence, grouping together varieties that differ only by rational maps defined on dense open sets. This equivalence underpins the birational classification of curves, where invariants like the genus are preserved within each class.

Riemann Surfaces

In the complex analytic setting, algebraic function fields of transcendence degree one over the field of complex numbers C\mathbb{C} are intimately connected to Riemann surfaces, which provide their geometric realization. Specifically, the field of meromorphic functions on a compact Riemann surface forms an algebraic function field over C\mathbb{C}, finitely generated and of transcendence degree one. Conversely, every such non-constant algebraic function field over C\mathbb{C} arises in this way from a unique compact Riemann surface up to biholomorphic equivalence. This bijection establishes a foundational link between algebraic and analytic approaches to function fields, allowing tools from complex analysis to illuminate algebraic properties and vice versa. A key aspect of this correspondence involves the uniformization of via branched covers of the P1(C)\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}). For a compact of g2g \geq 2, there exists a non-constant that induces a map to P1(C)\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}), with the function field being a finite extension of C(z)\mathbb{C}(z) of degree equal to the degree of the map. In the hyperelliptic case, which realizes many such surfaces, the extension is of degree 2, corresponding to a double cover branched at 2g+22g+2 points on P1(C)\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}); this structure follows from the Riemann-Hurwitz formula, which relates the genus to the branching data. Such representations highlight how algebraic relations in the function field encode the topology and complex structure of the surface. An illustrative example is the , a compact of 1, which serves as the analytic model for an . The function field of a is the quadratic extension C(z)/(w24z3+g2z+g3)\mathbb{C}(z)/(w^2 - 4z^3 + g_2 z + g_3), where g2,g3g_2, g_3 are invariants, realizing it as a degree-2 cover of P1(C)\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) branched at four points. Modular functions, such as the , parametrize these fields up to isomorphism, the to the broader of elliptic modular forms. This case exemplifies the , as the Weierstrass \wp-function generates the meromorphic functions on the surface. The historical development of this connection traces back to Bernhard Riemann's seminal 1857 paper, where he linked algebraic curves defined by polynomial equations to multi-sheeted Riemann surfaces, laying the groundwork for understanding function fields through their . Riemann's insights, though initially , were rigorously established in subsequent decades, forming the basis for modern treatments that unify and in the study of function fields.

Analytic and Arithmetic Tools

Valuations

In algebraic function fields, discrete valuations provide a local measure of orders of , essential for theorems and arithmetic properties. A discrete valuation on a field KK is a map v:KZ{}v: K \to \mathbb{Z} \cup \{\infty\} with v(0)=v(0) = \infty, vK:KZv|_{K^*}: K^* \to \mathbb{Z} surjective onto Z\mathbb{Z}, satisfying v(ab)=v(a)+v(b)v(ab) = v(a) + v(b) for all a,bKa, b \in K, v(a+b)min(v(a),v(b))v(a + b) \geq \min(v(a), v(b)) for all a,bKa, b \in K, and the value group v(K)v(K^*) isomorphic to Z\mathbb{Z}. The associated valuation ring is the subring Ov={fKv(f)0}{0}\mathcal{O}_v = \{ f \in K \mid v(f) \geq 0 \} \cup \{0\} of KK, which is a discrete valuation ring (DVR), and the maximal ideal is mv={fKv(f)>0}\mathfrak{m}_v = \{ f \in K \mid v(f) > 0 \}, with residue field κv=Ov/mv\kappa_v = \mathcal{O}_v / \mathfrak{m}_v. In an algebraic function field K/kK/k of transcendence degree 1 over a field kk, every non-trivial valuation trivial on kk (i.e., v(k)={0}v(k^*) = \{0\}) is discrete of rank 1. These valuations correspond bijectively to the non-zero prime ideals of the integral closure A\overline{A} of a polynomial ring A=kKA = k \subset K (with tKt \in K transcendental over kk), where A\overline{A} is a Dedekind domain; for a prime ideal pA\mathfrak{p} \subset \overline{A}, the valuation ring is the localization (A)p(\overline{A})_{\mathfrak{p}} and the valuation vpv_{\mathfrak{p}} is the normalized order function at p\mathfrak{p}. A example arises in the rational function field K=k(x)K = k(x), where the Gauss valuation vv_{\infty} (at ) is defined by v(f/g)=deggdegfv_{\infty}(f/g) = \deg g - \deg f for coprime polynomials f,gkf, g \in k with g0g \neq 0; this extends uniquely to any L/KL/K, yielding a discrete valuation on LL with ramification index and residue degree determined by the minimal of a primitive element.

Places and Divisors

In an F/kF/k of one variable over a constant field kk, places are the discrete valuation rings OPFO_P \subset F that are of finite type over kk (or equivalently, with residue field kPk_P a finite extension of kk). Equivalently, they correspond to discrete valuations vP:FZ{}v_P: F \to \mathbb{Z} \cup \{\infty\} that are trivial on kk, each defining a unique place with associated valuation ring OPO_P with mP={xOPvP(x)>0}m_P = \{ x \in O_P \mid v_P(x) > 0 \}, along with a residue field kP=OP/mPk_P = O_P / m_P. The degree of a place is given by deg(P)=[kP:k]\deg(P) = [k_P : k], which measures the extension degree of the residue field over the constant field. Geometrically, places correspond to the points of the (or, in the complex case, the ) associated with the function field. The divisor group Div(F)\operatorname{Div}(F) is the free abelian group generated by the set of all places of FF, consisting of formal finite sums D=PnPPD = \sum_P n_P P where the sum is over places PP, the coefficients nPZn_P \in \mathbb{Z}, and only finitely many nPn_P are nonzero. The support of DD is the finite set supp(D)={PnP0}\operatorname{supp}(D) = \{ P \mid n_P \neq 0 \}, and divisors capture the distribution of across the places. For any nonzero fFf \in F, the principal divisor is defined as div(f)=PvP(f)P\operatorname{div}(f) = \sum_P v_P(f) P, where the sum runs over all places PP (with only finitely many nonzero terms). The set of all principal divisors forms a Princ(F)Div(F)\operatorname{Princ}(F) \subseteq \operatorname{Div}(F), and every principal divisor has degree zero, reflecting the balance between the orders of . The degree of a divisor D=PnPPD = \sum_P n_P P is the integer deg(D)=PnPdeg(P)\deg(D) = \sum_P n_P \deg(P), providing a homomorphism deg:Div(F)Z\deg: \operatorname{Div}(F) \to \mathbb{Z} that is independent of the choice of places and crucial for studying the arithmetic of the function field. This degree function extends naturally to principal divisors, where deg(div(f))=0\deg(\operatorname{div}(f)) = 0 for all fF×f \in F^\times.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.