Hubbry Logo
Artificial rupture of membranesArtificial rupture of membranesMain
Open search
Artificial rupture of membranes
Community hub
Artificial rupture of membranes
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Artificial rupture of membranes
Artificial rupture of membranes
Artificial rupture of membranes
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Artificial rupture of membranes
Other namesamniotomy
SpecialtyObstetrics
ICD-9-CM73.0

Artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), also known as an amniotomy, is performed by a midwife or obstetrician and was once thought to be an effective means to induce or accelerate labor. The membranes can be ruptured using a specialized tool, such as an amnihook or amnicot, or they may be ruptured by the proceduralist's finger. The different techniques for artificial rupture of membranes have not been extensively compared in the literature. In one study comparing amnihook versus amnicot for artificial rupture of membranes, use of an amnicot was associated with fewer neonatal scalp lacerations.[1]

With the amnihook method, a sterile plastic hook is inserted into the vagina and used to puncture the membranes containing the amniotic fluid. With the membranes punctured, amniotic fluid is able to escape from the uterus and exit the vagina. The absence of a fluid buffer between the fetus and uterus stimulates uterine contractions, which are also promoted by the rush of prostaglandins from the amniotic fluid.

Medical uses

[edit]

There are four main reasons for performing an amniotomy:

1. To induce labor or augment uterine activity, despite evidence showing lack of effectiveness. A 2013 Cochrane Review concluded, that "the evidence showed no shortening of the length of first stage of labour and a possible increase in caesarean section. Routine amniotomy is not recommended as part of standard labour management and care."[2] Another Cochrane Review could not draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of using amniotomy as a means of induction when comparing amniotomy alone vs. expected management or amniotomy alone vs. oxytocin alone.[3]

2. To enable the doctor or midwife to monitor the baby's heartbeat internally. A scalp electrode is placed against the baby's head and an ECG of the baby's heart beat can be directly recorded. This provides a much more reliable indication of the fetal well being than external monitoring alone. Internal fetal monitoring is often performed if there is a complication such as maternal disease, or if there is fetal distress or if the mother is being induced.

3. To check the color of the fluid. If there is a suspicion of the presence of meconium (the contents of the baby's bowel), certain preparations must be made. Suctioning must be set up and more personnel are required to be in attendance.

4. To avoid having the baby aspirate the contents of the amniotic sac at the moment of birth. Most often, the amniotic sac will break of its own accord, most often by the beginning of the second stage of labor. If it remains intact, it is sure to break with maternal pushing efforts. But in a rare case, the baby can be born with an intact bag that must be quickly broken to allow the baby to breathe.

In some cases, the amniotic sac may also be broken if the mother can feel the sac bulging, and is feeling pressure in her vagina due to this.

There is no good evidence as of 2014 regarding if antibiotics before the procedure affects outcomes.[4]

Risks

[edit]

1. The baby may turn to a breech position, making birth more difficult if the membranes are ruptured before head engagement.[5]
2. There is an increased risk of umbilical cord prolapse.[5]
3. There is an increased risk of infection if there is a prolonged time between rupture and birth.[5]

Criteria

[edit]

There are certain criteria for an amniotomy to be performed:[citation needed]
1. The mother should have no contraindications for vaginal delivery.
2. The mother should be in labor or have an indication for delivery.
3. The head should be engaged (0 station or more).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Artificial rupture of membranes

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Artificial rupture of membranes (), commonly referred to as amniotomy, is an obstetric procedure in which a healthcare provider intentionally punctures the to release the , thereby facilitating the induction or augmentation of labor. This intervention, which has been utilized for several centuries in labor management, is typically performed when the is partially dilated and the is engaged in the to minimize complications. The primary indications for ARM include promoting in cases of , assisting with the placement of internal fetal monitoring devices such as scalp electrodes or intrauterine pressure catheters, and as part of active labor management protocols. Contraindications encompass fetal malpresentation, vasa previa, suspected velamentous insertion, an unengaged , unstable fetal lie, or patient refusal, as these conditions heighten the risk of adverse outcomes like cord or fetal distress. The procedure itself involves a sterile vaginal examination to confirm fetal , followed by the use of an amniotomy hook or a protected finger to rupture the membranes, with a gush of clear confirming success. According to the 2024 ACOG Guideline, ARM is recommended for patients undergoing or augmentation, as it shortens labor duration by approximately 5 hours (mean difference -4.95 hours; 95% CI, -8.12 to -1.78) and increases the rate of within 24 hours without increasing cesarean delivery rates or other risks. However, evidence from systematic reviews indicates limited high-quality data supporting its use as a standalone induction method, with no significant reduction in cesarean rates compared to alternatives like prostaglandins. Potential risks include chorioamnionitis if membrane rupture is prolonged and (particularly if the fetal head is high), though the 2024 ACOG guideline indicates no overall increased risk of maternal , severe hemorrhage, trauma, or cord prolapse when performed appropriately; variable fetal decelerations may also occur. Overall, clinical guidelines emphasize , weighing individual benefits against risks, and integration with other labor augmentation strategies for optimal outcomes.

Definition and Background

Definition

Artificial rupture of membranes (ARM), also known as amniotomy, is an obstetric intervention involving the deliberate puncture of the to release , often referred to colloquially as "breaking the water." This procedure is performed by a healthcare provider to facilitate labor progression and is typically conducted when the is sufficiently dilated and the fetal presenting part is engaged in the . Amniotomy specifically denotes the intentional tearing of the amniotic membranes using a specialized instrument, such as an amniohook—a rigid, hooked device designed for precise application during vaginal examination. The release of during this process is thought to promote by liberating endogenous prostaglandins from the decidual lining and , which enhance cervical ripening and myometrial activity. Anatomically, the comprises the thin, double-layered : the inner , a translucent avascular layer in direct contact with the , and the outer , which adheres to the uterine and provides structural support. In the third trimester, these membranes fully enclose the within the , containing approximately 800–1,000 mL of that cushions the and maintains a stable intrauterine environment.

Historical Context

The practice of artificial rupture of membranes, known as amniotomy, traces its origins to ancient obstetrics, with early descriptions recorded by Soranus of Ephesus in the second century AD as part of methods to induce or augment labor in cases of delayed progression. However, the procedure entered modern medical literature in the mid-18th century when English obstetrician Thomas Denman first detailed it in 1756, advocating its use to shorten spontaneous labor and emphasizing the need for caution to avoid complications such as infection. Denman's work marked a shift toward deliberate intervention in labor dynamics, building on earlier anatomical understandings of the amniotic sac. By the , amniotomy had become more routinely employed in Western , particularly for managing obstructed labor and inducing delivery in women with pelvic deformities to prevent fetal macrosomia. This period saw increased adoption amid broader advancements in surgical , including the development of specialized instruments like , which complemented the procedure by facilitating access to the membranes. The technique's application was often reserved for high-risk cases, reflecting the era's limited practices and higher maternal mortality rates. In the mid-20th century, following World War II, artificial rupture of membranes was standardized as a core component of labor management in Western medicine, driven by the expansion of hospital-based deliveries, improved hygiene, and the introduction of electronic fetal monitoring. A pivotal milestone occurred in the 1950s and 1960s with its incorporation into active management of labor protocols pioneered by Kieran O'Driscoll and colleagues at Dublin's National Maternity Hospital. This approach, first formally described in 1970, promoted early amniotomy alongside strict diagnostic criteria and oxytocin augmentation to prevent prolonged labor, significantly influencing global obstetric standards and reducing cesarean delivery rates in low-risk pregnancies.

Procedure

Preparation and Technique

Prior to performing artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), is obtained from the patient after discussing the procedure, its purpose, and potential sensations involved. Continuous fetal monitoring is established using electronic fetal monitoring or to assess fetal before, during, and after the procedure. A sterile vaginal examination is conducted to confirm and to verify that the fetal presenting part—usually the vertex—is engaged in the and well-applied to the . The patient is positioned with knees flexed and hips slightly elevated, often with absorbent pads placed underneath to manage fluid release. Sterile gloves are worn, and the and are cleansed with an such as 10% . The procedure is performed during a vaginal examination, with two fingers of the non-dominant hand inserted into the to guide the instrument and protect surrounding tissues. The primary tool for AROM is an amniohook—a long, sterile plastic instrument with a small hooked tip. An , a forceps-like device, may be used as an alternative to grasp and tear the membranes. The amniohook is gently advanced alongside the guiding fingers toward the forebag of the , positioned just beyond the internal cervical os, and the hooked tip is used to puncture the membranes with a scratching or pulling motion. Alternatively, an can be inserted and its tips drawn across the taut membrane to create a tear. Insertion must be shallow to avoid deep penetration that could lead to , and the procedure is ideally timed with a to minimize this risk. Upon rupture, is released, and its volume, color, and odor are immediately assessed—clear and odorless fluid is normal, while meconium-stained or blood-tinged fluid prompts further evaluation. In resource-limited settings, variations include using an improvised tool such as half of a as a makeshift hook, or enlarging the initial puncture digitally with a gloved finger after initial tearing. A —a protective sheath worn over the index or —can also be used to snag and rupture the membranes directly during the digital exam. Throughout, the guiding hand remains in place briefly post-rupture to confirm the absence of cord prolapse by palpating for any descent.

Timing and Setting

Artificial rupture of membranes, also known as amniotomy, is ideally performed during the active phase of labor to augment progress or in the early latent phase for , particularly when the is favorable. This timing aligns with guidelines emphasizing early intervention to shorten labor duration without increasing cesarean delivery rates, based on high-quality evidence from randomized trials. A favorable reduces the need for prior mechanical or pharmacological ripening agents. The procedure requires a hospital-based labor and delivery suite to ensure immediate access to emergency interventions, including continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and intravenous access for fluid administration or medications. Post-amniotomy monitoring is essential to detect complications such as cord prolapse or fetal distress, with intrauterine catheters recommended if external monitoring proves inadequate. Amniotomy is not advised for home births, as the loss of the amniotic barrier heightens infection risk and limits rapid response to adverse events in non-sterile, non-equipped environments. The amniotomy itself is a brief intervention, typically lasting 1-2 minutes, involving a sterile vaginal examination and use of an amniotomy hook to rupture the membranes under direct visualization. Following the procedure, labor progression is assessed , with contractions often intensifying. of and fetal well-being guides subsequent management, such as oxytocin augmentation if needed.

Indications

Artificial rupture of membranes (ARM), also known as amniotomy, is used to induce labor in non-laboring patients when expectant management may compromise maternal or fetal well-being, typically in combination with other methods such as oxytocin. It is commonly applied in post-term pregnancies, defined as at or beyond 41 weeks, where the risk of perinatal morbidity increases. Additionally, ARM is indicated for medical necessities such as , which can lead to severe maternal and , or intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR), where threatens fetal health. These indications align with guidelines recommending timely induction to mitigate risks like or neonatal complications. Other indications include assisting with the placement of internal fetal monitoring devices such as scalp electrodes or intrauterine pressure catheters. The mechanism of ARM in involves the deliberate rupture of the using an amniohook or similar instrument, resulting in the efflux of and the release of endogenous s from the and . This biochemical cascade stimulates myometrial contractility, initiating uterine contractions, while the reduced volume allows greater descent, applying direct pressure to the to facilitate and dilation. The surge, evidenced by rapid plasma concentration increases post-procedure, enhances the responsiveness of the to subsequent stimuli like oxytocin. Success rates for ARM in labor induction are notably high when combined with oxytocin augmentation, particularly in patients with a favorable cervical (≥6). Studies indicate high rates of progression to active labor and , reducing the overall induction-to-delivery interval compared to oxytocin alone. This enhances contraction efficiency without significantly increasing cesarean rates, though outcomes depend on cervical readiness and gestational factors. The procedure is typically performed after initial cervical assessment, as detailed in standard protocols.

Labor Augmentation

Artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), also known as amniotomy, is employed as a method to augment labor in cases of dystocia or a prolonged latent phase, where spontaneous contractions have begun but are inadequate to progress efficiently. This intervention is particularly indicated when labor has stalled despite the onset of regular contractions, aiming to expedite the process without immediately resorting to pharmacologic agents alone. In such scenarios, AROM helps address functional dystocia by facilitating mechanical and biochemical changes that support labor advancement. The physiological basis for using AROM in labor augmentation involves the release of , which triggers the production of prostaglandins from the and , thereby enhancing uterine contractility and contraction strength. Additionally, the procedure allows for direct application of pressure from the fetal presenting part—typically the head—against the , promoting further dilation and engaging the Ferguson reflex, a neuroendocrine response that stimulates endogenous oxytocin release from the , thereby increasing myometrial sensitivity to oxytocin. This combination of prostaglandin-mediated stimulation and reflex-induced oxytocin surge works synergistically to intensify contractions and facilitate fetal descent. AROM often serves an adjunctive role in labor augmentation, frequently combined with intravenous oxytocin to achieve a synergistic effect that more effectively shortens labor duration compared to either method alone. This paired approach is recommended when initial spontaneous labor progress is suboptimal, as oxytocin augments contraction frequency and intensity while AROM provides the mechanical and biochemical priming. While this combination can optimize outcomes, it carries general risks such as or , as detailed in dedicated sections on complications.

Contraindications and Patient Selection

Exclusion Criteria

Artificial rupture of membranes, also known as amniotomy, is contraindicated in certain clinical scenarios to avoid serious maternal and fetal risks such as hemorrhage, cord prolapse, and infection transmission. These exclusion criteria are divided into absolute and relative categories, guiding clinicians in patient selection to ensure safety during or augmentation.

Absolute Contraindications

Absolute contraindications preclude the procedure entirely due to high risk of immediate harm. These include complete placenta previa, where the placenta covers the cervical os, as rupture could precipitate severe maternal hemorrhage. Vasa previa, characterized by fetal blood vessels traversing the membranes over the cervical os, is another absolute exclusion, as it risks fetal exsanguination upon membrane rupture. Suspected velamentous insertion is also an absolute contraindication due to the potential for vessels to rupture. Fetal malpresentation, such as transverse lie, and unstable fetal lie increase risks of complications like cord prolapse. An unengaged presenting part—typically the not descended into the —increases the likelihood of , a life-threatening for the . Active infection contraindicates amniotomy because it heightens the risk of transmission through exposure to lesions during labor. Known infection with a high (>1,000 copies/mL) is generally managed with cesarean delivery to minimize mother-to-child transmission risk, making procedures like ARM inappropriate in such cases.

Relative Contraindications

Relative contraindications warrant careful consideration and may allow the procedure under specific conditions, such as close monitoring or alternative management, but generally increase complication risks. Breech presentation prior to full is a relative exclusion, as it heightens the potential for cord or entanglement during rupture. The rationale for these exclusions centers on preventing cord in unbuffered presentations, hemorrhage from vascular anomalies, and spread in immunocompromised or infectious states, emphasizing individualized .

Assessment Protocols

Assessment protocols for artificial rupture of membranes (ARM) begin with a thorough pre-procedure to confirm suitability and minimize risks. A sterile speculum or digital is performed to assess , effacement, and fetal station, ensuring the fetal head is engaged in the and the membranes are accessible. imaging is often utilized to verify fetal , position, and the absence of anomalies such as vasa previa, particularly if the pelvic exam is inconclusive. Laboratory screening for infections, including group B (GBS) status, is essential; universal antenatal screening at 36 0/7 to 37 6/7 weeks of guides the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis upon membrane rupture to prevent . Fetal well-being must be confirmed prior to ARM, especially in cases of or augmentation. A non-stress test (NST), monitoring fetal reactivity for at least 20-30 minutes, is commonly employed to detect accelerations indicative of a healthy ; a reactive NST supports proceeding with the procedure. Alternatively, a (BPP) may be used, combining NST with evaluation of fetal breathing, movement, tone, and volume; a score of 8/10 or higher is reassuring. These assessments help identify any fetal distress that could be exacerbated by ARM. Informed consent is a critical component, involving a detailed discussion between the healthcare provider and the patient about the procedure's benefits, such as accelerating labor progression, potential risks including infection or , and alternatives like expectant management or pharmacological induction methods. This shared decision-making process ensures the patient understands the implications and voluntarily agrees, aligning with ethical standards for obstetric interventions.

Risks and Complications

Immediate Complications

Artificial rupture of membranes (ARM), also known as amniotomy, can lead to several immediate complications arising directly from the procedure, primarily due to the sudden release of and potential mechanical disruption during membrane puncture. These short-term risks occur during or shortly after the intervention and necessitate prompt recognition and management to safeguard maternal and fetal well-being. One of the most serious immediate complications is , where the cord descends into the birth canal ahead of the presenting part following membrane rupture. The overall incidence of cord prolapse is approximately 0.1% to 0.6% of pregnancies, with rates ranging from 0.11% to 0.40% specifically after ARM or spontaneous ; this risk is elevated in non-cephalic presentations, such as breech, where incidence exceeds 1%. Cord prolapse compresses the umbilical vessels, compromising fetal oxygenation and often requiring immediate cesarean delivery to prevent perinatal morbidity or mortality. Fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities, such as variable decelerations, frequently emerge immediately after ARM due to reduced volume, which increases the likelihood of compression. These decelerations manifest as abrupt drops in FHR, reflecting transient fetal hypoxia from cord occlusion, and are more common in the initial period following fluid loss. typically involves maternal repositioning to relieve cord pressure, with continuous FHR monitoring to assess resolution; persistent changes may prompt further evaluation or expedited delivery. While immediate complications like these are relatively uncommon, ARM also carries a brief risk of ascending , though detailed infectious sequelae are addressed elsewhere.

Infectious and Long-Term Risks

Artificial rupture of membranes () can facilitate ascending bacterial from the into the , potentially leading to chorioamnionitis, an intra-amniotic characterized by maternal fever, uterine tenderness, and elevated count. The risk of clinical chorioamnionitis is particularly elevated when the duration of ruptured membranes exceeds 18-24 hours, as prolonged exposure allows bacterial proliferation; studies indicate that early ARM (before 4 cm ) does not significantly increase this risk compared to later intervention. Neonatal sepsis represents a key infectious complication following ARM, primarily through vertical transmission from maternal chorioamnionitis or prolonged rupture, with early-onset sepsis risk increasing after 24 hours of membrane rupture. In cases of group B (GBS) colonization, intrapartum prophylaxis is recommended to mitigate this risk, as GBS-positive mothers with ruptured membranes face heightened rates without treatment. Prophylactic measures are especially critical in preterm or prolonged scenarios, where incidence can approach 1-5% without intervention. Long-term risks associated with ARM primarily stem from infectious sequelae, including a debated link to (CP) in the offspring, particularly when rupture duration exceeds 24 hours, with adjusted s around 1.6 (95% CI 1.19-2.18) for term births after . This association may reflect underlying inflammation rather than ARM itself, though chorioamnionitis exposure elevates CP risk 2- to 12-fold in term infants. For , postpartum risk is marginally increased post-ARM, especially in cesarean deliveries (adjusted ~1.2-1.5), manifesting as fever and due to persistent bacterial ascension. Overall, these long-term outcomes underscore the importance of minimizing rupture duration to under 24 hours.

Clinical Evidence and Outcomes

Efficacy Data

Clinical studies have demonstrated that artificial rupture of membranes (), often combined with oxytocin, can effectively augment labor progression. A key analyzed 14 randomized controlled trials involving over 8,000 women in spontaneous labor, finding that early ARM with immediate oxytocin infusion reduced the risk of cesarean delivery compared to routine care, with a (RR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.79–1.01). This effect was more pronounced in prevention trials aimed at avoiding delay, where the RR was 0.87 (95% CI 0.77–0.99). Regarding labor duration, the same reported that early and oxytocin shortened overall labor by an average of 1.28 hours (95% CI -1.97 to -0.59) and the first stage by 1.57 hours (95% CI -2.14 to -1.01). In induction settings, alone has been associated with successful , for example, one study of women undergoing induction reported an 81.3% rate with alone. Efficacy varies based on patient characteristics. ARM is more effective in women with a favorable cervix (Bishop score ≥6), as it facilitates faster transition to active labor and reduces time to delivery without increasing cesarean rates. In nulliparous women, while ARM shortens labor duration, the overall success in achieving vaginal delivery is somewhat lower compared to multiparous women due to inherently longer baseline labor times. Recent systematic reviews (as of 2025) confirm that reduces labor duration compared to spontaneous rupture without increasing cesarean section rates, though early amniotomy may be associated with higher postpartum hemorrhage risk.

Comparative Studies

Mechanical methods for induction, such as balloon catheters (with or without ARM and oxytocin), demonstrate similar efficacy to pharmacological methods like prostaglandins in achieving , with no significant difference in cesarean section rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09 for balloon versus vaginal PGE2 across 28 trials involving 6619 women). These mechanical approaches are associated with lower costs due to their simplicity and lack of need for expensive medications, and they exhibit reduced risks of hyperstimulation with fetal changes compared to prostaglandins (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.19 overall). Compared to expectant , ARM significantly reduces the overall duration of labor; in a 2014 randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction, early ARM shortened the time from 4 cm dilation to delivery by 143 minutes (329 minutes versus 472 minutes, P < 0.001). However, this approach increases the rate of interventions, including cesarean deliveries (40.2% versus 29.5%, P < 0.001), potentially due to heightened fetal monitoring needs post-rupture. The trade-off highlights ARM's role in accelerating labor progression at the expense of potentially more operative interventions, as supported by systematic reviews confirming modest reductions in first-stage labor duration without broad impacts on maternal or neonatal morbidity. Relative to expectant , ARM provides controlled timing to initiate or augment labor, which can prevent delays in unfavorable cervixes, but requires monitoring for risk, particularly chorioamnionitis, if labor prolongation exceeds 18-24 hours post-rupture. Studies indicate no significant difference in overall rates in uncomplicated cases (10.2% for early ARM versus 13.2% for expectant , P = 0.12). This underscores the importance of timely delivery following ARM to mitigate ascending pathways.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470167/
  2. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/clinical-practice-guideline/articles/2024/01/first-and-second-stage-labor-management
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8456329/
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564403/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8363560/
  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532888/
  7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541089/
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002416
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11299146/
  10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4720762/
  11. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/24270-amniotomy
  12. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1997932-technique
  13. https://medicalguidelines.msf.org/en/viewport/ONC/english/5-3-artificial-rupture-of-the-membranes-51416971.html
  14. https://www.jaypeedigital.com/eReader/chapter/9788180619274/ch5
  15. https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/induction-of-labor-at-39-weeks
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470368/
  17. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2019/02/approaches-to-limit-intervention-during-labor-and-birth
  18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459264/
  19. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(23)00081-9/fulltext
  20. https://teachmeobgyn.com/labour/delivery/induction-of-labour/
  21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(77)80087-0
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2988803/
  23. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1997932-overview
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6638113/
  25. https://rep.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/rep/131/6/1310989.xml
  26. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-15.05
  27. https://elsevier.health/en-US/preview/reproductive-health/artificial-rupture-of-membranes-ce
  28. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2018/09/labor-and-delivery-management-of-women-with-human-immunodeficiency-virus-infection
  29. https://www.seslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/artificalrupturemembranes2020.pdf
  30. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/02/prevention-of-group-b-streptococcal-early-onset-disease-in-newborns
  31. https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/fulltext/2019/02000/acog_committee_opinion_no__766__approaches_to.44.aspx
  32. https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/umbilical-cord-prolapse-green-top-guideline-no-50/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10823388/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8317528/
  35. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/08/intrapartum-management-of-intraamniotic-infection
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4897382/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469888/
  38. https://publications.aap.org/pediatricsinreview/article/44/1/14/190319/Early-Onset-Sepsis-in-Newborns
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6995227/
  40. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/197709
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3618675/
  42. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006794.pub4
  43. https://www.2minutemedicine.com/artificial-rupture-of-membranes-alone-is-effective-for-induction-in-women-with-previous-c-section/
  44. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286037
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11840793/
  46. https://karger.com/goi/article/doi/10.1159/000544831/923597/Early-versus-Late-Amniotomy-for-Induction-of-Labor
  47. https://www.cochrane.org/CD001233/PREG_mechanical-methods-induction-labour
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2014/628452
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.