Hubbry Logo
Water of crystallizationWater of crystallizationMain
Open search
Water of crystallization
Community hub
Water of crystallization
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Water of crystallization
Water of crystallization
Water of crystallization
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, water(s) of crystallization or water(s) of hydration are water molecules that are present inside crystals. Water is often incorporated in the formation of crystals from aqueous solutions.[1] In some contexts, water of crystallization is the total mass of water in a substance at a given temperature and is mostly present in a definite (stoichiometric) ratio. Classically, "water of crystallization" refers to water that is found in the crystalline framework of a metal complex or a salt, which is not directly bonded to the metal cation.

Upon crystallization from water, or water-containing solvents, many compounds incorporate water molecules in their crystalline frameworks. Water of crystallization can generally be removed by heating a sample but the crystalline properties are often lost.

Compared to inorganic salts, proteins crystallize with large amounts of water in the crystal lattice. A water content of 50% is not uncommon for proteins.

Applications

[edit]

Knowledge of hydration is essential for calculating the masses for many compounds. The reactivity of many salt-like solids is sensitive to the presence of water. The hydration and dehydration of salts is central to the use of phase-change materials for energy storage.[2]

Position in the crystal structure

[edit]
Some hydrogen-bonding contacts in FeSO4·7H2O. This metal aquo complex crystallizes with water of hydration, which interacts with the sulfate and with the [Fe(H2O)6]2+ centers.

A salt with associated water of crystallization is known as a hydrate. The structure of hydrates can be quite elaborate, because of the existence of hydrogen bonds that define polymeric structures.[3] [4] Historically, the structures of many hydrates were unknown, and the dot in the formula of a hydrate was employed to specify the composition without indicating how the water is bound. Per IUPAC's recommendations, the middle dot is not surrounded by spaces when indicating a chemical adduct.[5] Examples:

  • CuSO4·5H2O – copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate
  • CoCl2·6H2O – cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate
  • SnCl2·2H2O – tin(II) (or stannous) chloride dihydrate

For many salts, the exact bonding of the water is unimportant because the water molecules are made labile upon dissolution. For example, an aqueous solution prepared from CuSO4·5H2O and anhydrous CuSO4 behave identically. Therefore, knowledge of the degree of hydration is important only for determining the equivalent weight: one mole of CuSO4·5H2O weighs more than one mole of CuSO4. In some cases, the degree of hydration can be critical to the resulting chemical properties. For example, anhydrous RhCl3 is not soluble in water and is relatively useless in organometallic chemistry whereas RhCl3·3H2O is versatile. Similarly, hydrated AlCl3 is a poor Lewis acid and thus inactive as a catalyst for Friedel-Crafts reactions. Samples of AlCl3 must therefore be protected from atmospheric moisture to preclude the formation of hydrates.

Structure of the polymeric [Ca(H2O)6]2+ center in crystalline calcium chloride hexahydrate. Three water ligands are terminal, three bridge. Two aspects of metal aquo complexes are illustrated: the high coordination number typical for Ca2+ and the role of water as a bridging ligand.

Crystals of hydrated copper(II) sulfate consist of [Cu(H2O)4]2+ centers linked to SO2−4 ions. Copper is surrounded by six oxygen atoms, provided by two different sulfate groups and four molecules of water. A fifth water resides elsewhere in the framework but does not bind directly to copper.[6] The cobalt chloride mentioned above occurs as [Co(H2O)6]2+ and Cl−. In tin chloride, each Sn(II) center is pyramidal (mean O/Cl−Sn−O/Cl angle is 83°) being bound to two chloride ions and one water. The second water in the formula unit is hydrogen-bonded to the chloride and to the coordinated water molecule. Water of crystallization is stabilized by electrostatic attractions, consequently hydrates are common for salts that contain +2 and +3 cations as well as −2 anions. In some cases, the majority of the weight of a compound arises from water. Glauber's salt, Na2SO4(H2O)10, is a white crystalline solid with greater than 50% water by weight.

Consider the case of nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate. This species has the formula NiCl2(H2O)6. Crystallographic analysis reveals that the solid consists of [trans-NiCl2(H2O)4] subunits that are hydrogen bonded to each other as well as two additional molecules of H2O. Thus one third of the water molecules in the crystal are not directly bonded to Ni2+, and these might be termed "water of crystallization".

Analysis

[edit]

The water content of most compounds can be determined with a knowledge of its formula. An unknown sample can be determined through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) where the sample is heated strongly, and the accurate weight of a sample is plotted against the temperature. The amount of water driven off is then divided by the molar mass of water to obtain the number of molecules of water bound to the salt.

Other solvents of crystallization

[edit]

Water is particularly common solvent to be found in crystals because it is small and polar. But all solvents can be found in some host crystals. Water is noteworthy because it is reactive, whereas other solvents such as benzene are considered to be chemically innocuous. Occasionally more than one solvent is found in a crystal, and often the stoichiometry is variable, reflected in the crystallographic concept of "partial occupancy". It is common and conventional for a chemist to "dry" a sample with a combination of vacuum and heat "to constant weight".

For other solvents of crystallization, analysis is conveniently accomplished by dissolving the sample in a deuterated solvent and analyzing the sample for solvent signals by NMR spectroscopy. Single crystal X-ray crystallography is often able to detect the presence of these solvents of crystallization as well. Other methods may be currently available.

Table of crystallization water in some inorganic halides

[edit]

In the table below are indicated the number of molecules of water per metal in various salts.[7][8]

Hydrated metal halides
and their formulas		 Coordination sphere
of the metal		 Equivalents of water of crystallization
that are not bound to M		 Remarks
Calcium chloride
CaCl2(H2O)6		 [Ca(μ-H2O)6(H2O)3]2+ none example of water as a bridging ligand[9]
Titanium(III) chloride
TiCl3(H2O)6		 trans-[TiCl2(H2O)4]+[10] two isomorphous with VCl3(H2O)6
Titanium(III) chloride
TiCl3(H2O)6		 [Ti(H2O)6]3+[10] none isomeric with [TiCl2(H2O)4]Cl.2H2O[11]
Zirconium(IV) fluoride
ZrF4(H2O)3		 (μ−F)2[ZrF3(H2O)3]2 none rare case where Hf and Zr differ[12]
Hafnium tetrafluoride
HfF4(H2O)3		 (μ−F)2[HfF2(H2O)2]n(H2O)n one rare case where Hf and Zr differ[12]
Vanadium(III) chloride
VCl3(H2O)6		 trans-[VCl2(H2O)4]+[10] two
Vanadium(III) bromide
VBr3(H2O)6		 trans-[VBr2(H2O)4]+[10] two
Vanadium(III) iodide
VI3(H2O)6		 [V(H2O)6]3+ none relative to Cl− and Br−, I− competes poorly
with water as a ligand for V(III)
Nb6Cl14(H2O)8 [Nb6Cl14(H2O)2] four
Chromium(III) chloride
CrCl3(H2O)6		 trans-[CrCl2(H2O)4]+ two dark green isomer, aka "Bjerrums's salt"
Chromium(III) chloride
CrCl3(H2O)6		 [CrCl(H2O)5]2+ one blue-green isomer
Chromium(II) chloride
CrCl2(H2O)4		 trans-[CrCl2(H2O)4] none square planar/tetragonal distortion
Chromium(III) chloride
CrCl3(H2O)6		 [Cr(H2O)6]3+ none violet isomer. isostructural with aluminium compound[13]
Manganese(II) chloride
MnCl2(H2O)6		 trans-[MnCl2(H2O)4] two
Manganese(II) chloride
MnCl2(H2O)4		 cis-[MnCl2(H2O)4] none cis molecular, the unstable trans isomer has also been detected[14]
Manganese(II) bromide
MnBr2(H2O)4		 cis-[MnBr2(H2O)4] none cis, molecular
Manganese(II) iodide
MnI2(H2O)4		 trans-[MnI2(H2O)4] none molecular, isostructural with FeCl2(H2O)4.[15]
Manganese(II) chloride
MnCl2(H2O)2		 trans-[MnCl4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging chloride
Manganese(II) bromide
MnBr2(H2O)2		 trans-[MnBr4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging bromide
Rhenium(III) chloride
Re3Cl9(H2O)4		 triangulo-[Re3Cl9(H2O)3] none heavy early metals form M-M bonds[16]
Iron(II) chloride
FeCl2(H2O)6		 trans-[FeCl2(H2O)4] two
Iron(II) chloride
FeCl2(H2O)4		 trans-[FeCl2(H2O)4] none molecular
Iron(II) bromide
FeBr2(H2O)4		 trans-[FeBr2(H2O)4] none molecular,[17] hydrates of FeI2 are not known
Iron(II) chloride
FeCl2(H2O)2		 trans-[FeCl4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging chloride
Iron(III) chloride
FeCl3(H2O)6		 trans-[FeCl2(H2O)4]+ two one of four hydrates of ferric chloride,[18] isostructural with Cr analogue
Iron(III) chloride
FeCl3(H2O)2.5		 cis-[FeCl2(H2O)4]+ two the dihydrate has a similar structure, both contain FeCl−4 anions.[18]
Cobalt(II) chloride
CoCl2(H2O)6		 trans-[CoCl2(H2O)4] two
Cobalt(II) bromide
CoBr2(H2O)6		 trans-[CoBr2(H2O)4] two
Cobalt(II) iodide
CoI2(H2O)6		 [Co(H2O)6]2+ none[19] iodide competes poorly with water
Cobalt(II) bromide
CoBr2(H2O)4		 trans-[CoBr2(H2O)4] none molecular[17]
Cobalt(II) chloride
CoCl2(H2O)4		 cis-[CoCl2(H2O)4] none note: cis molecular
Cobalt(II) chloride
CoCl2(H2O)2		 trans-[CoCl4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging chloride
Cobalt(II) bromide
CoBr2(H2O)2		 trans-[CoBr4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging bromide
Nickel(II) chloride
NiCl2(H2O)6		 trans-[NiCl2(H2O)4] two
Nickel(II) chloride
NiCl2(H2O)4		 cis-[NiCl2(H2O)4] none note: cis molecular[17]
Nickel(II) bromide
NiBr2(H2O)6		 trans-[NiBr2(H2O)4] two
Nickel(II) iodide
NiI2(H2O)6		 [Ni(H2O)6]2+ none[19] iodide competes poorly with water
Nickel(II) chloride
NiCl2(H2O)2		 trans-[NiCl4(H2O)2] none polymeric with bridging chloride
Platinum(IV) chloride
[Pt(H2O)2Cl4](H2O)3[20]		 trans-[PtCl4(H2O)2] 3 octahedral Pt centers; rare example of non-first row chloride-aquo complex
Platinum(IV) chloride
[Pt(H2O)3Cl3]Cl(H2O)0.5[21]		 fac-[PtCl3(H2O)3]+ 0.5 octahedral Pt centers; rare example of non-first row chloride-aquo complex
Copper(II) chloride
CuCl2(H2O)2		 [CuCl4(H2O)2]2 none tetragonally distorted
two long Cu-Cl distances
Copper(II) bromide
CuBr2(H2O)4		 [CuBr4(H2O)2]n two tetragonally distorted
two long Cu-Br distances[17]
Zinc(II) chloride
ZnCl2(H2O)1.33[22]		 2 ZnCl2 + ZnCl2(H2O)4 none coordination polymer with both tetrahedral and octahedral Zn centers
Zinc(II) chloride
ZnCl2(H2O)2.5[23]		 Cl3Zn(μ-Cl)Zn(H2O)5 none tetrahedral and octahedral Zn centers
Zinc(II) chloride
ZnCl2(H2O)3[22]		 [ZnCl4]2− & [Zn(H2O)6]2+ none tetrahedral and octahedral Zn centers
Zinc(II) chloride
ZnCl2(H2O)4.5[22]		 [ZnCl4]2− & [Zn(H2O)6]2+ three tetrahedral and octahedral Zn centers
Cadmium chloride
CdCl2·H2O[24]		 none water of crystallization is rare for heavy metal halides
Cadmium chloride
CdCl2·2.5H2O[25]		 CdCl5(H2O) & CdCl4(H2O)2 none
Cadmium chloride
CdCl2·4H2O[26] 		none octahedral
Cadmium bromide
CdBr2(H2O)4[27]		 [CdBr4(H2O)2 two octahedral Cd centers
Aluminum trichloride
AlCl3(H2O)6		 [Al(H2O)6]3+ none isostructural with the Cr(III) compound

Examples are rare for second and third row metals. No entries exist for Mo, W, Tc, Ru, Os, Rh, Ir, Pd, Hg, Au. AuCl3(H2O) has been invoked but its crystal structure has not been reported.

Hydrates of metal sulfates

[edit]

Transition metal sulfates form a variety of hydrates, each of which crystallizes in only one form. The sulfate group often binds to the metal, especially for those salts with fewer than six aquo ligands. The heptahydrates, which are often the most common salts, crystallize as monoclinic and the less common orthorhombic forms. In the heptahydrates, one water is in the lattice and the other six are coordinated to the ferrous center.[28] Many of the metal sulfates occur in nature, being the result of weathering of mineral sulfides.[29][30] Many monohydrates are known.[31]

Formula of
hydrated metal ion sulfate		 Coordination
sphere of the metal ion		 Equivalents of water of crystallization
that are not bound to M		 mineral name Remarks
MgSO4(H2O) [Mn(μ-H2O)(μ4,-κ1-SO4)4][31] none kieserite see Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn analogues
Substructure of MSO4(H2O), illustrating presence of bridging water and bridging sulfate (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn).
MgSO4(H2O)4 [Mg(H2O)4(κ′,κ1-SO4)]2 none sulfate is bridging ligand, 8-membered Mg2O4S2 rings[32]
MgSO4(H2O)6 [Mg(H2O)6] none hexahydrate common motif[29]
MgSO4(H2O)7 [Mg(H2O)6] one epsomite common motif[29]
TiOSO4(H2O) [Ti(μ-O)2(H2O)(κ1-SO4)3] none further hydration gives gels
VSO4(H2O)6 [V(H2O)6] none Adopts the hexahydrite motif[33]
VSO4(H2O)7 [V(H2O)6] one hexaaquo[34]
VOSO4(H2O)5 [VO(H2O)4(κ1-SO4)4] one
Cr(SO4)(H2O)3 [Cr(H2O)3(κ1-SO4)] none resembles Cu(SO4)(H2O)3[35]
Cr(SO4)(H2O)5 [Cr(H2O)4(κ1-SO4)2] one resembles Cu(SO4)(H2O)5[36]
Cr2(SO4)3(H2O)18 [Cr(H2O)6] six One of several chromium(III) sulfates
MnSO4(H2O) [Mn(μ-H2O)(μ4,-κ1-SO4)4][31] none szmikite see Fe, Co, Ni, Zn analogues
MnSO4(H2O)4 [Mn(μ-SO4)2(H2O)4][37] none Ilesitepentahydrate is called jôkokuite; the hexahydrate, the most rare, is called chvaleticeite with 8-membered ring Mn2(SO4)2 core
MnSO4(H2O)5 ? jôkokuite
MnSO4(H2O)6 ? Chvaleticeite
MnSO4(H2O)7 [Mn(H2O)6] one mallardite[30] see Mg analogue
FeSO4(H2O) [Fe(μ-H2O)(μ4-κ1-SO4)4][31] none see Mn, Co, Ni, Zn analogues
FeSO4(H2O)7 [Fe(H2O)6] one melanterite[30] see Mg analogue
FeSO4(H2O)4 [Fe(H2O)4(κ′,κ1-SO4)]2 none sulfate is bridging ligand, 8-membered Fe2O4S2 rings[32]
FeII(FeIII)2(SO4)4(H2O)14 [FeII(H2O)6]2+[FeIII(H2O)4(κ1-SO4)2]−
2		 none sulfates are terminal ligands on Fe(III)[38]
CoSO4(H2O) [Co(μ-H2O)(μ4-κ1-SO4)4][31] none see Mn, Fe, Ni, Zn analogues
CoSO4(H2O)6 [Co(H2O)6] none moorhouseite see Mg analogue
CoSO4(H2O)7 [Co(H2O)6] one bieberite[30] see Fe, Mg analogues
NiSO4(H2O) [Ni(μ-H2O)(μ4-κ1-SO4)4][31] none see Mn, Fe, Co, Zn analogues
NiSO4(H2O)6 [Ni(H2O)6] none retgersite One of several nickel sulfate hydrates[39]
NiSO4(H2O)7 [Ni(H2O)6] morenosite[30]
(NH4)2[Pt2(SO4)4(H2O)2] [Pt2(SO4)4(H2O)2]2− none Pt-Pt bonded Chinese lantern structure[40]
CuSO4(H2O)5 [Cu(H2O)4(κ1-SO4)2] one chalcantite sulfate is bridging ligand[41]
CuSO4(H2O)7 [Cu(H2O)6] one boothite[30]
ZnSO4(H2O) [Zn(μ-H2O)(μ4-κ1-SO4)4][31] none see Mn, Fe, Co, Ni analogues
ZnSO4(H2O)4 [Zn(H2O)4(κ′,κ1-SO4)]2 none sulfate is bridging ligand, 8-membered Zn2O4S2 rings[32][42]
ZnSO4(H2O)6 [Zn(H2O)6] none see Mg analogue[43]
ZnSO4(H2O)7 [Zn(H2O)6] one goslarite[30] see Mg analogue
CdSO4(H2O) [Cd(μ-H2O)2(κ1-SO4)4] none bridging water ligand[44]

Hydrates of metal nitrates

[edit]

Transition metal nitrates form a variety of hydrates. The nitrate anion often binds to the metal, especially for those salts with fewer than six aquo ligands. Nitrates are uncommon in nature, so few minerals are represented here. Hydrated ferrous nitrate has not been characterized crystallographically.

Formula of
hydrated metal ion nitrate		 Coordination
sphere of the metal ion		 Equivalents of water of crystallization
that are not bound to M		 Remarks
Cr(NO3)3(H2O)9 [Cr(H2O)6]3+ three octahedral configuration[45] isostructural with Fe(NO3)3(H2O)9
Mn(NO3)2(H2O)4 cis-[Mn(H2O)4(κ1-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration
Mn(NO3)2(H2O) [Mn(H2O)(μ-ONO2)5] none octahedral configuration
Mn(NO3)2(H2O)6 [Mn(H2O)6] none octahedral configuration[46]
Fe(NO3)3(H2O)9 [Fe(H2O)6]3+ three octahedral configuration[47] isostructural with Cr(NO3)3(H2O)9
Fe(NO3)3)(H2O)4 [Fe(H2O)3(κ2-O2NO)2]+ one pentagonal bipyramid[48]
Fe(NO3)3(H2O)5 [Fe(H2O)5(κ1-ONO2)]2+ none octahedral configuration[48]
Fe(NO3)3(H2O)6 [Fe(H2O)6]3+ none octahedral configuration[48]
Co(NO3)2(H2O)2 [Co(H2O)2(κ1-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration
Co(NO3)2(H2O)4 [Co(H2O)4(κ1-ONO2)2 none octahedral configuration
Co(NO3)2(H2O)6 [Co(H2O)6]2+ none octahedral configuration.[49]
α-Ni(NO3)2(H2O)4 cis-[Ni(H2O)4(κ1-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration.[50]
β-Ni(NO3)2(H2O)4 trans-[Ni(H2O)4(κ1-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration.[51]
Pd(NO3)2(H2O)2 trans-[Pd(H2O)2(κ1-ONO2)2] none square planar coordination geometry[52]
Cu(NO3)2(H2O) [Cu(H2O)(κ2-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration.
Cu(NO3)2(H2O)1.5 uncertain uncertain uncertain[53]
Cu(NO3)2(H2O)2.5 [Cu(H2O)2(κ1-ONO2)2] one square planar[54]
Cu(NO3)2(H2O)3 uncertain uncertain uncertain[55]
Cu(NO3)2(H2O)6 [Cu(H2O)6]2+ none octahedral configuration[56]
Zn(NO3)2(H2O)4 cis-[Zn(H2O)4(κ1-ONO2)2] none octahedral configuration.
Hg2(NO3)2(H2O)2 [H2O–Hg–Hg–OH2]2+ linear[57]
[edit]
  • Hydrated copper(II) sulfate is bright blue.
    Hydrated copper(II) sulfate is bright blue.
  • Anhydrous copper(II) sulfate has a light turquoise tint.
    Anhydrous copper(II) sulfate has a light turquoise tint.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Water of crystallization

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Water of crystallization refers to the water molecules that are chemically bound in fixed stoichiometric proportions within the of a compound, typically a salt or metal complex, forming what is known as a . These water molecules are integral to the lattice and are not merely adsorbed on the surface, distinguishing them from free or capillary . In hydrated compounds, the water occupies specific positions in the crystal lattice, stabilizing the structure through hydrogen bonding or coordination to metal ions, and the general formula is often represented as MX·nH₂O, where M is the cation, X the anion, and n the number of water molecules per formula unit. Common examples include copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O), which appears as blue crystals due to the hydrated form, and gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O), a naturally occurring mineral essential in construction. The degree of hydration (n) can vary for the same compound under different conditions, as seen with cobalt(II) chloride, which forms hexahydrate (CoCl₂·6H₂O, pink) or dihydrate (CoCl₂·2H₂O, purple) forms. Upon heating, water of crystallization can be removed, converting the hydrate to its anhydrous form, often accompanied by a color change or structural collapse, as the water is released as vapor without decomposing the compound. This dehydration process is reversible in many cases by exposing the anhydrous salt to moist air, allowing rehydration, and is a key method for determining the water content experimentally through mass loss measurements. In broader contexts, water of crystallization plays a critical role in pharmaceutical stability, material properties, and geological formations, influencing , reactivity, and mechanical behavior of crystals.

Fundamentals

Definition and Formation

Water of crystallization refers to water molecules that are stoichiometrically incorporated into the crystal lattice of a solid compound, forming a hydrate with a fixed composition, such as copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O). These water molecules are chemically bound within the crystalline structure, contributing to its stability and often forming hydrogen bonds with the host ions or molecules. Unlike free solvent water, this incorporated water is essential to the hydrate's formula and can be removed by heating to yield the anhydrous form without disrupting the overall ionic framework. The formation of water of crystallization typically occurs during the process from an , where or cooling leads to and the of the solid. As the solute ions or molecules organize into a lattice, water molecules are trapped in specific sites, becoming integral to the structure rather than remaining as unbound . This process is driven by the need for efficient packing and hydrogen bonding satisfaction in the crystal, resulting in definite hydrate stoichiometries that reflect the equilibrium conditions of temperature, concentration, and interactions. A key distinction exists between water of crystallization and adsorbed water: the former is stoichiometrically fixed within the lattice and requires moderate heating (often below 100°C) for removal, while adsorbed water is loosely held on the crystal surface through physical forces and evaporates more readily at ambient conditions. Adsorbed water does not contribute to the and can be present in hygroscopic materials that exhibit deliquescence, whereas water of crystallization is integral to the hydrate's identity and structural stability. This differentiation is evident in spectroscopic analyses, where both types show liquid absorption bands, but their thermal release profiles confirm the structural role of crystallization water. The concept of water of crystallization was first recognized in the 17th century through observations of —the spontaneous loss of water from hydrated salts—in compounds like Glauber's salt (Na₂SO₄·10H₂O), isolated by around 1625 from spring waters. By the , further studies on salt crystallization and solidified the understanding of stoichiometrically bound water as a distinct feature of many minerals and salts.

Properties of Hydrates

Hydrates exhibit distinct physical properties compared to their anhydrous counterparts, often arising from the incorporation of water molecules into the crystal lattice. For instance, copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O) appears as a bright blue crystalline solid due to the coordination of water ligands with the copper ion, whereas the anhydrous form (CuSO₄) is a white or pale green powder. Hydrates generally display higher solubility in water than their anhydrous forms because the water molecules facilitate dissociation upon dissolution, though this can vary with specific compounds. Additionally, hydrates often decompose at lower temperatures than their anhydrous counterparts due to the loss of water molecules, which weakens the lattice upon heating. The of hydrates is enhanced by the molecules, which integrate into the to satisfy bonding sites and improve overall packing efficiency, thereby reducing reactivity toward environmental factors. This stabilization can protect the compound from degradation, as the crystalline acts as a barrier against or oxidation in some cases, although excessive moisture may lead to phase transformations. Upon , the resulting form may exhibit increased reactivity, such as the CuSO₄ readily reacting with to reform the and generate heat. Thermal behavior of hydrates is characterized by endothermic processes, where is released as vapor upon heating, often without disrupting the ionic framework until higher temperatures. For example, (CaSO₄·2H₂O) undergoes dehydration at temperatures between 90–150°C to form the hemihydrate (CaSO₄·0.5H₂O), a process driven by the endothermic nature of breaking bonds in the lattice. This stepwise loss of typically occurs at specific temperature thresholds unique to each hydrate, influencing applications like plaster production. Certain hydrates demonstrate , the spontaneous loss of water of crystallization to the atmosphere in dry conditions, resulting in a powdery residue when the relative falls below the equilibrium of the hydrate. Conversely, deliquescent absorb atmospheric moisture until they dissolve into a solution, occurring when the relative exceeds the deliquescence relative (DRH) of the compound. For instance, decahydrate (Na₂CO₃·10H₂O) is efflorescent and loses water in low- environments, while dihydrate (CaCl₂·2H₂O) is deliquescent and forms a in humid air. These behaviors are governed by the hydrate's equilibrium relative (ERH) and impact storage and handling of such compounds.

Structural Aspects

Position in Crystal Lattice

In many crystalline hydrates, water molecules function as ligands, binding to central metal cations primarily through their oxygen atoms to form coordination complexes. This coordination is commonly octahedral in for first-row transition metals and alkaline earth ions, resulting in structures such as [\ceM(H2O)6]n+[ \ce{M(H2O)6]^{n+}} , where \ceM\ce{M} represents the metal cation and nn its charge. For example, in the crystal structure of hexahydrate (\ceMgBr2⋅6H2O\ce{MgBr2 \cdot 6H2O}), the \ceMg2+\ce{Mg^{2+}} is octahedrally coordinated by six molecules, with average \ceMg−O\ce{Mg-O} bond lengths of approximately 2.07 , contributing to the stability of the lattice through electrostatic interactions. Similar octahedral arrangements occur in hydrates like cobalt chloride hexahydrate (\ceCoCl2⋅6H2O\ce{CoCl2 \cdot 6H2O}), where the isolates the metal and influences the local electronic environment. Water molecules also engage in hydrogen bonding interactions with anions, other water molecules, or framework components, which play a key role in stabilizing the crystal lattice. These hydrogen bonds typically involve the donation of protons from 's hydroxyl groups to acceptor sites like oxygen atoms on anions, with bond lengths ranging from 2.7 to 3.2 and angles near 180° for linear bonds. In zeolites, such as zeolite A, water molecules occupy interstitial channels and form hydrogen-bonded networks that bridge tetrahedra, enhancing structural rigidity without direct metal coordination. In clathrate hydrates, water molecules create the primary lattice through a tetrahedral hydrogen-bonding arrangement, forming polyhedral cages that enclose non-polar guest molecules while maintaining lattice cohesion via O-H···O bonds averaging 2.76 . These interactions distribute charge and prevent lattice collapse, often leading to more compact packing than in forms. The integration of into the crystal lattice occurs either within the primary of metal ions or in sites, such as voids or channels, which directly impacts the overall and dimensions. In coordinated hydrates, water in the inner sphere contributes to higher local symmetry, like the octahedral sites around metals, whereas water in channel structures expands the lattice parameters; for instance, in decahydrate (\ceNa2SO4⋅10H2O\ce{Na2SO4 \cdot 10H2O}), waters occupy tunnels, increasing the volume compared to the phase and reducing from orthorhombic to monoclinic. This positional variability allows to fill packing inefficiencies, altering in hydrate-anhydrate pairs examined in structural databases. X-ray crystallography, often complemented by neutron diffraction for precise hydrogen positioning, reveals the exact locations of water molecules and distinguishes between isolated and networked configurations. Isolated water molecules, as seen in some metal-organic hydrates, occupy discrete sites without direct water-water contacts, coordinating solely to the host framework and appearing as localized peaks in diffraction maps. In contrast, networked water forms extended chains or sheets, evident in clathrates where data show ordered tetrahedral geometries with minimal disorder. Studies of magnesium hydrates, for example, use single-crystal analysis to map octahedral coordination alongside interstitial waters, demonstrating how these positions dictate phase stability and dehydration pathways.

Types of Hydration

Hydrates are primarily classified based on the stoichiometry of water molecules incorporated into the , where the number of water molecules per defines the type. Stoichiometric hydrates feature a fixed, well-defined ratio of water to the host compound, such as monohydrates (one water molecule, e.g., CuSO₄·H₂O), dihydrates (two water molecules), trihydrates, and higher forms like hemihydrates (half water molecule) or decahydrates (ten water molecules, e.g., Na₂CO₃·10H₂O). This classification reflects the precise integration of water into the lattice during under specific conditions of and , ensuring a consistent composition that distinguishes these from non-stoichiometric variants. A key distinction within hydrates lies between coordination water and lattice water, based on the bonding and positional role of the water molecules. Coordination water is directly bound to metal cations through coordinate covalent bonds, forming aqua complexes that contribute to the of the and stabilize the structure via strong interactions (e.g., in ion-associated hydrates where water molecules are tightly linked to metal centers). In contrast, lattice water occupies interstitial voids, channels, or planar sites within the framework, held in place primarily by hydrogen bonding networks rather than direct coordination to the host ions, allowing for potentially variable occupancy. This differentiation influences the stability and dehydration behavior, with coordination water often requiring higher energy to remove due to its stronger binding. Non-stoichiometric hydrates, such as zeolitic and clathrate types, deviate from fixed ratios and exhibit variable content influenced by environmental factors like relative humidity. Zeolitic hydrates occur in framework structures like aluminosilicates, where molecules reside reversibly in open pores or channels without altering the host lattice, enabling adsorption and desorption while maintaining structural integrity. Clathrate hydrates, , form cage-like polyhedral networks of hydrogen-bonded molecules that enclose guest species such as gases (e.g., or ), resulting in ice-like solids with compositions that vary based on occupancy of the cages rather than a strict . These structures highlight the role of in hosting and stabilizing non-polar guests through van der Waals forces, distinct from traditional ionic hydrates. Many compounds exhibit multiple hydration levels, transitioning between hydrated forms or to states under changes in , , or , often through stepwise . For instance, alums like potassium aluminum sulfate can exist as dodecahydrates (KAl(SO₄)₂·12H₂O) and progressively lose molecules upon heating, forming intermediate lower hydrates before reaching the form, with each transition involving disruption of bonds and lattice reorganization. These polymorphic hydrate states underscore the dynamic nature of incorporation, where the specific level depends on thermodynamic conditions during formation or processing.

Analytical Methods

Detection Techniques

One common qualitative method to detect water of crystallization involves heating tests, where gentle heating of the hydrate leads to dehydration, a powdery residue, or observable color changes indicative of dehydration. For instance, blue copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O) turns white upon mild heating as the coordinated water molecules are expelled, confirming the presence of hydrate water. This technique relies on the reversible or irreversible loss of water, distinguishing hydrates from anhydrous forms through visual or textural alterations without requiring advanced instrumentation. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy provides a spectroscopic confirmation of bound water by identifying characteristic O-H stretching vibrations. The broad absorption band in the 3200–3600 cm⁻¹ region is characteristic of hydrogen-bonded water molecules within the crystal lattice, helping to distinguish it from free liquid water or sharper bands from other hydroxyl groups. This method is particularly useful for organic and inorganic hydrates, as the position and intensity of the band reflect the coordination environment of the water. Vibrational spectroscopy, including IR, has been applied to monitor hydrate-anhydrate transitions during processing, highlighting its sensitivity to water of crystallization. X-ray crystallography offers definitive structural evidence for the presence and positioning of water molecules in hydrates through analysis of diffraction patterns and maps. Peaks in the corresponding to oxygen atoms of , often at occupancies less than 1, confirm their incorporation into the lattice, especially in high-resolution structures. This technique resolves hydration sites that may not be apparent in lower-resolution data, providing a three-dimensional map of interactions within the . It is widely used for both small-molecule and protein hydrates to validate the role of in stabilizing the . Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) detects dehydration events through , revealing endothermic peaks associated with the energy required to release of crystallization. These peaks, typically appearing at temperatures below the of the form, indicate the stepwise or concerted removal of bound , confirming presence. DSC is effective for distinguishing hydration states in pharmaceuticals and salts, as the peak onset and shape provide qualitative insights into binding strength. This method complements other techniques by linking thermal behavior directly to stability.

Quantitative Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a widely used thermal method to quantify the water of crystallization in hydrate samples by measuring the mass loss associated with water release during controlled heating. In TGA, a small sample (typically 2–5 mg) is placed in a thermogravimetric analyzer and heated at a constant rate, often under a nitrogen atmosphere, while the mass is continuously monitored; the percentage of water is calculated using the formula %H2O=(mass lostinitial mass)×100,\% \mathrm{H_2O} = \left( \frac{\text{mass lost}}{\text{initial mass}} \right) \times 100, where the mass loss corresponds to the dehydration step, typically occurring between 50–200°C depending on the hydrate stability. This method distinguishes bound water from other volatiles and is particularly effective for stoichiometric hydrates, providing data on both the total water content and the temperature of dehydration events. Karl Fischer titration offers a precise chemical approach for determining in crystalline , applicable to both volumetric and coulometric variants. In the volumetric method, the hydrate sample is dissolved in an anhydrous solvent like , and the released reacts stoichiometrically with iodine in the presence of and a base according to the reaction H2O+I2+SO2+3RN+C4H9OH→2RNHI+RNSO3C4H9OH,\mathrm{H_2O + I_2 + SO_2 + 3RN + C_4H_9OH \rightarrow 2RNHI + RNSO_3C_4H_9OH}, where the endpoint is detected electrochemically; the is derived from the titrant and its equivalence factor. The coulometric variant generates iodine electrochemically and is suited for lower s (<1%), making it ideal for partially hydrated samples; for hydrates, dissolution ensures all crystallization is accessible. This technique is highly specific to , avoiding interference from lattice-bound volatiles, and is standard in pharmaceutical analysis for hydrate stoichiometry. Elemental analysis, often combined with dehydration, enables the computation of empirical formulas for unknown hydrates by quantifying the elemental composition before and after water removal. The process involves heating the hydrate to constant mass to obtain the anhydrous residue, followed by combustion analysis to determine carbon, hydrogen, and other elements; the hydrogen content adjustment accounts for the dehydrated form, allowing inference of water molecules. For instance, in analyzing an unknown metal salt hydrate, the mass ratio of water to anhydrous salt is used to calculate the mole ratio, confirming the formula M·nH₂O. This method is complementary to , providing atomic-level verification when structural data is unavailable. The derivation of the hydration number n in the general formula M·nH₂O relies on mass ratios from dehydration experiments, such as those from TGA or gravimetric methods. First, the mass of water lost (m{H₂O}) is subtracted from the initial hydrate mass (m{hydrate}) to yield the anhydrous mass (m_{M}); moles of water and anhydrous compound are then calculated using their respective molar masses (18.02 g/mol for H₂O and M for the anhydrous salt), giving n=mH2O/18.02mM/M.n = \frac{m_{\mathrm{H_2O}} / 18.02}{m_{\mathrm{M}} / M}. For example, in copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O), a theoretical 2.50 g sample loses 0.90 g of water upon heating, leaving 1.60 g of anhydrous CuSO₄ (molar mass 159.61 g/mol); this yields moles of H₂O = 0.90 / 18.02 ≈ 0.050 mol and moles of CuSO₄ = 1.60 / 159.61 ≈ 0.010 mol, so n = 0.050 / 0.010 = 5, confirming the formula. This calculation assumes complete dehydration and is validated against known stoichiometries in seminal studies of inorganic hydrates.

Practical Applications

Industrial and Laboratory Uses

In industrial applications, water of crystallization plays a crucial role in desiccant materials, where hydrated forms of zeolites (commonly known as molecular sieves), such as zeolite 4A, are widely employed to absorb moisture from the air in packaging, storage, and transportation of sensitive goods like electronics and pharmaceuticals. These hydrates function by adsorbing water vapor onto their porous surfaces, preventing condensation and spoilage, and can be regenerated through heating to release the bound water, allowing reuse in dehumidification systems. A prominent example in construction is the use of gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O) in plaster and cement production, where controlled dehydration of the hydrate to hemihydrate (CaSO₄·0.5H₂O), known as plaster of Paris, occurs upon heating to approximately 120–150°C. Upon mixing with water, the hemihydrate rehydrates to reform the dihydrate, creating an interlocking crystal network that hardens into a rigid structure, essential for wall finishes, molds, and orthopedic casts. This reversible hydration-dehydration process leverages the water of crystallization to achieve setting times of 5–30 minutes, depending on additives, and contributes to the material's fire resistance and soundproofing properties in building applications. In laboratory settings, hydrated salts serve as convenient reagents that provide both the metal ions and bound water needed for various reactions, particularly in qualitative inorganic analysis. For instance, copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO₄·5H₂O) is heated to release water of hydration, demonstrating dehydration while producing the anhydrous form for further tests, and the released water can facilitate solution preparation without external sources. Hydrated salts like potassium aluminum sulfate dodecahydrate (KAl(SO₄)₂·12H₂O, or alum) are commonly used in flame tests, where the hydrate dissolves to yield ions that impart characteristic colors (e.g., violet for potassium) upon excitation in a Bunsen burner flame, aiding identification of cations in unknown samples. This utility stems from the hydrates' solubility and the ease of controlling water content to avoid dilution errors in analytical procedures. In pharmaceutical formulations, the hydrate form of active ingredients significantly influences drug stability, solubility, and bioavailability, often requiring careful control during manufacturing to optimize therapeutic efficacy. For example, many poorly soluble drugs, such as certain antibiotics and antivirals, form hydrates that exhibit lower aqueous solubility compared to their anhydrous counterparts, potentially reducing dissolution rates and gastrointestinal absorption. Regulatory guidelines emphasize evaluating hydrate polymorphs during development, as unintended hydration during storage can alter bioavailability; the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends comparative dissolution studies to ensure equivalence between hydrate and non-hydrate forms in generic drugs. Techniques like spray drying or milling are employed to stabilize preferred hydrate states, enhancing shelf-life and ensuring consistent release profiles in tablets and capsules.

Role in Material Science

In material science, water of crystallization plays a pivotal role in crystal engineering, particularly in the design of porous materials like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), where hydrated channels enable controlled guest molecule release and tunable porosity. For instance, in frameworks such as and MIL-101, water molecules occupy open channels that can be selectively removed to create high-surface-area structures for gas storage or drug delivery, with hydration states influencing framework flexibility and adsorption capacity. Engineers exploit these properties to synthesize water-stable MOFs via post-synthetic modifications, enhancing their utility in selective separations by shielding coordinatively unsaturated sites from hydrolytic degradation. Phase transitions between hydrated and anhydrous forms significantly alter material properties, such as electrical conductivity and magnetic behavior, enabling switchable functionalities in advanced devices. Dehydration of minerals like epidote and lawsonite reduces electrical conductivity by up to an order of magnitude due to the loss of proton-conducting pathways provided by water molecules, impacting applications in solid-state electrolytes. Similarly, in cyanido-bridged dysprosium frameworks, hydration-dehydration cycles reversibly switch single-molecule magnet behavior by modulating magnetic anisotropy through changes in coordination geometry. These transitions, often occurring at mild temperatures, allow for dynamic control over conductivity in lithium-ion conductors, where hydration of Li₂Sn₂S₅ boosts ionic diffusivity by three orders of magnitude to 5 × 10⁻⁷ cm² s⁻¹ and conductivity to 10⁻² S cm⁻¹. Hydrated salts serve as key precursors in sol-gel synthesis for nanomaterials, particularly ceramics, where the water content influences sol viscosity and hydrolysis rates, thereby controlling final particle size and morphology. In the preparation of oxide ceramics like alumina or titania, hydrated metal nitrates or chlorides facilitate uniform nucleation, yielding nanoparticles with sizes as small as 15-20 nm when processed in aqueous media, which enhances sinterability and mechanical properties. This approach is widely adopted for perovskites and ultra-high-temperature ceramics, as the controlled release of water during gelation promotes homogeneous microstructures without agglomeration. In environmental applications, water of crystallization in ion-exchange resins provides hydrated sites that facilitate selective ion removal for water purification. Cationic resins like those based on hydrated iron-alum oxides exhibit high affinity for phosphates and hardness ions such as calcium and magnesium, achieving removal efficiencies often over 90% for phosphates in wastewater treatment due to the swelling of hydrated polymer matrices that exposes exchangeable sites. These materials operate via reversible ion swapping, where water molecules stabilize the resin structure during regeneration cycles, ensuring long-term performance in demineralization processes.

Specific Examples

Hydrates of Inorganic Halides

Hydrates of inorganic halides often feature water molecules directly coordinated to metal cations, forming discrete aquo-complexes in the crystal lattice. This coordination arises from the high charge density of the metal ions, which enables strong electrostatic interactions with the oxygen lone pairs of water molecules. For instance, ferric chloride hexahydrate contains the octahedral [Fe(H₂O)₆]³⁺ cation, where the Fe³⁺ ion's small ionic radius and +3 charge facilitate tight binding of six water ligands. The stability and hydration number of these complexes vary systematically with the metal cation's charge and size. Ions with higher charge-to-radius ratios, such as those of transition metals like Fe³⁺ or Co²⁺, form stable high-coordinate hydrates, whereas larger cations with lower charges, like Na⁺, exhibit weak interactions that prevent stable hydrate formation in solids like NaCl. Common examples of these hydrates are summarized in the following table, highlighting their hydration numbers, colors (often indicative of d-d transitions in transition metal complexes), and approximate dehydration temperatures under standard conditions.
CompoundHydration NumberColorDehydration Temperature (°C)
FeCl₃·6H₂O6Brownish-yellowHydrolyzes >100
CoCl₂·6H₂O6Pink150–160 [web:59]
CuCl₂·2H₂O2Blue-green~100 [web:127]
CaCl₂·6H₂O6Colorless~200 (complete) [web:72]
MgCl₂·6H₂O6Colorless~100 [web:87]
Many of these hydrates, particularly those of alkaline earth metals, exhibit pronounced hygroscopic behavior, readily absorbing atmospheric moisture. hexahydrate, for example, is notably deliquescent, dissolving in absorbed to form a concentrated solution even at moderate relative humidities above 29%.

Hydrates of Metal Sulfates and Nitrates

Metal sulfate hydrates exhibit a range of hydration states, influenced by the size and charge density of the metal cation, which affects the coordination environment and stability of the crystal lattice. For instance, magnesium sulfate forms the heptahydrate MgSO₄·7H₂O, known as epsomite, where the Mg²⁺ ion is octahedrally coordinated by six water molecules, with the seventh water molecule participating in hydrogen bonding to link the structure. Similarly, copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate, CuSO₄·5H₂O, features a distorted octahedral coordination around Cu²⁺ with four equatorial water molecules and two axial sulfate oxygens, while the fifth water molecule forms hydrogen bonds bridging the complex and sulfate ions. Sodium sulfate decahydrate, Na₂SO₄·10H₂O or mirabilite, demonstrates higher hydration due to the larger Na⁺ ion size, accommodating ten water molecules that form a network stabilizing the sulfate tetrahedra through hydrogen bonds. In these structures, water molecules commonly act as bridges between the metal cations and the oxygen atoms of ions via hydrogen bonding, creating extended networks that enhance lattice stability. For example, in MgSO₄·7H₂O, hydrogen bonds connect the [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ octahedra to SO₄²⁻ ions, forming channels that influence behavior. This bridging pattern is recurrent across sulfate hydrates, differing from direct coordination seen in some systems by emphasizing interactions. Nitrate hydrates, such as magnesium nitrate hexahydrate Mg(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, typically display fewer stable hydration forms compared to sulfates, owing to the higher solubility of nitrates in water, which limits the persistence of solid phases. In Mg(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, the structure consists of solvent-shared ion pairs where [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ octahedra are linked to NO₃⁻ ions through hydrogen-bonded water bridges to nitrate oxygens, forming a layered arrangement with two hydration shells around the anion. This results in greater deliquescence and fewer polymorphic hydrates than observed in sulfates like MgSO₄, which can exist as hepta-, hexa-, and even undecahydrates under varying conditions. These hydrates find practical use in fertilizers, where hydrated forms of nitrates, such as calcium nitrate tetrahydrate derived from ammonium nitrate processes, provide soluble nitrogen sources for crops. Additionally, dehydration of sulfate hydrates, often by controlled heating, enables production of anhydrous salts for industrial applications; for example, iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate FeSO₄·7H₂O undergoes stepwise dehydration to yield anhydrous FeSO₄, recovering water as a byproduct in resource utilization processes.

Extensions

Organic Hydrates

Organic hydrates refer to crystalline forms of organic compounds that incorporate molecules into their lattice , often stabilizing the crystal through bonding networks rather than ionic interactions dominant in inorganic counterparts. Unlike inorganic salts, organic hydrates typically feature occupying channels or voids within molecular , where it participates in bonds with polar functional groups such as carbonyls, hydroxyls, or amines. Common examples include monohydrate (C₆H₈O₇·H₂O), where bridges carboxylic acid groups in an orthorhombic lattice, and monohydrate (C₇H₈N₄O₂·H₂O), a channel hydrate with aligned along the monoclinic . Other notable cases are dihydrate (C₂H₂O₄·2H₂O), isonicotinamide monohydrate, and monohydrate, each demonstrating 's role in filling interstitial spaces to enhance packing efficiency. The formation of organic hydrates presents unique challenges compared to inorganic ones, primarily due to the reliance on weaker van der Waals forces and over electrostatic attractions. These interactions make organic hydrates less thermodynamically stable, often leading to under ambient conditions or during processing, as molecules are more easily displaced by competing hydrogen bond donors or acceptors in the organic framework. Functional groups like ethers or esters participate minimally in hydrogen bonding with , reducing the propensity for hydrate formation in non-polar organics, while carboxylic acids or amides promote it through stronger O-H···O or N-H···O links. Sublimation under with controlled has been shown to facilitate hydrate crystallization for molecules like and , but often yields mixtures of hydrated and anhydrous phases unless quantity is optimized (e.g., 30 μL for ). In pharmaceuticals, organic hydrates play a critical role in drug polymorphism, influencing through altered and dissolution rates. For instance, monohydrate exhibits lower aqueous (approximately 2.99 mg/mL) than its form (8.75 mg/mL), enabling controlled release in formulations, though it risks to the more soluble phase under low , potentially affecting stability. Similarly, citric acid monohydrate's hydrate form impacts performance in tablets by modulating hygroscopicity and dissolution, with interconversion to citric acid observed at relative humidities below 75%. These polymorphic shifts necessitate careful control in manufacturing to maintain therapeutic efficacy. Analysis of organic hydrates requires specialized techniques to account for the volatility and thermal sensitivity of parent compounds, which can lead to sublimation or decomposition during standard methods. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) under controlled humidity quantifies water content by monitoring stepwise dehydration (e.g., approximately 9% mass loss for theophylline monohydrate, corresponding to its stoichiometric water content), while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) detects endothermic peaks for hydrate-specific melting or dehydration events around 80–100°C. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) confirms structural differences, such as unique peaks for theophylline monohydrate at 2θ = 12.1° and 26.5°, distinguishing it from anhydrous forms. For volatile organics, hyphenated methods like TGA-DSC or synchrotron XRPD coupled with thermal analysis minimize artifacts from mass loss.

Other Solvents of Crystallization

Solvates represent crystalline forms where solvent molecules, other than water, are incorporated into the lattice structure of a compound, paralleling the role of water in hydrates. These solvent molecules interact with the host compound through coordination bonds, hydrogen bonding, or van der Waals forces, stabilizing the crystal and altering its physicochemical properties. In coordination chemistry, solvates often form when non-aqueous solvents like or alcohols bind directly to metal centers, creating stable adducts that mimic hydrated species but with distinct bonding characteristics. Prominent examples include ammine complexes, where acts as the solvating . A classic case is hexaamminenickel(II) chloride, [Ni(NH₃)₆]Cl₂, in which six ammonia molecules coordinate octahedrally to the Ni²⁺ , forming a purple crystalline solid with enhanced stability compared to the aquo complex. In organic systems, solvates are common, as seen in the crystal structures of compounds like , where chloroform molecules occupy interstitial sites via weak interactions, leading to variable stoichiometries such as 1:1 or 3:1 host-to-solvent ratios. Alcohol solvates, such as those with or , frequently appear in pharmaceutical crystals; for instance, forms a monosolvate with ethanol through hydrogen bonding, resulting in a distinct polymorph with modified . Structurally, molecules in solvates occupy lattice positions analogous to those in hydrates, either coordinating to central atoms or filling voids to reinforce the framework. This integration often occurs via donor-acceptor interactions, as in ammine complexes where N-H bonds contribute to the , or through non-covalent forces in organic solvates like , which can lead to channel-like structures. Such arrangements significantly impact properties, including reduced in the parent and altered thermal stability, enabling selective phase behavior during desolvation. In applications, solvates play a key role in organometallic synthesis and purification by allowing the isolation of air- or moisture-sensitive that would otherwise decompose. For example, (THF) solvates of benzyl compounds stabilize reactive carbanions, providing intermediates for carbon-carbon bond formation in mediated reactions. Similarly, ammine solvates facilitate the purification of complexes through recrystallization, yielding analytically pure forms that retain the solvent for enhanced handling. These solvates thus enable the manipulation of reactive intermediates in synthetic routes, improving yield and selectivity in and .

References

  1. https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-water-crystallization-605786
  2. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803121246443
  3. https://www.savemyexams.com/a-level/chemistry/cie/25/revision-notes/2-atoms-molecules-and-stoichiometry/2-3-formulas/water-of-crystallisation/
  4. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_Arkansas_Little_Rock/Chem_1402%3A_General_Chemistry_1_(Kattoum)/Text/2%3A_Atoms%2C_Molecules%2C_and_Ions/2.12%3A_Hydrates
  5. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/bulletin/07/nbsbulletinv7n4p619_A2b.pdf
  6. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/cewctw-johann-glauber-alchemy-to-modern-chemistry/
  7. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Copper-sulfate-pentahydrate
  8. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp132-c4.pdf
  9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01186.x
  10. https://www.cochise.edu/_resources/pdfs/sds-library/science-douglas/Science-Douglas-SDS-24-Copper-II-Sulfate-Anhydrous-Fisher-Apr2022.pdf
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4525282/
  12. https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/cuso4tech.html
  13. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02404-z
  14. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.8b03476
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325821002612
  16. https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/19/2115/2019/acp-19-2115-2019.pdf
  17. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8015/2/3/14
  18. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%253A_General_Chemistry_%28Petrucci_et_al.%29/24%253A_Complex_Ions_and_Coordination_Compounds/24.04%253A_Isomerism
  19. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/36/9/2361/78889/Structure-of-the-Hydrogen-Bonded-Water-Molecule-in
  20. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2009/cp/b911600c
  21. https://www.mindat.org/min-2725.html
  22. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ce/c6ce00322b
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258313704_Crystal_structures_of_hydrates_of_simple_inorganic_salts_I_Water-rich_magnesium_halide_hydrates_MgCl28H2O_MgCl212H2O_MgBr26H2O_MgBr29H2O_MgI28H2O_and_MgI29H2O
  24. https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/2333/chapter/8602288/Natural-Zeolites-Crystal-chemistry-Occurrence
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/clathrate-hydrate
  26. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja1051445
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0254058414006312
  28. https://www.moorparkcollege.edu/sites/moorparkcollege/files/media/pdf_document/2020/chem_12_all_expts.pdf
  29. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00721
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022354915329531
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9905073/
  32. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci500662d
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2275713/
  34. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.9b04308
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7301361/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022354921005979
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7601571/
  38. https://www.metrohm.com/content/dam/metrohm/shared/documents/monographs/81085089EN.pdf
  39. https://www.mt.com/us/en/home/applications/Application_Browse_Laboratory_Analytics/Application_fam_browse_main/kf-titration-principle.html
  40. https://www.servicesforplastics.com/MoldingAcces/desicant.htm
  41. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1817405
  42. https://cigmat.cive.uh.edu/sites/cigmat/files/files/conference/poster/2022/7.pdf
  43. https://www.nist.gov/document/discov2002pdf
  44. https://www.moorparkcollege.edu/sites/moorparkcollege/files/media/pdf_document/2023/chem_12_all_expts.pdf
  45. https://chemlab.truman.edu/chemical-principles/chem130labsalum/
  46. https://www.fda.gov/media/71375/download
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6331817/
  48. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00746
  49. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/sc/d3sc06076d
  50. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB013767
  51. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jacs.9b09103
  52. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/ta/d1ta04736a
  53. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/mh/c5mh00260e
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8700921/
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-022-00188-9
  56. https://www.watertechnologies.com/handbook/chapter-08-ion-exchange
  57. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ic2018693
  58. http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=4082
  59. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Calcium-Chloride-Hexahydrate
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838122400147X
  61. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/18903/1/18903.pdf
  62. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/nj/d2nj00169a
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009250915003607
  64. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08730
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254116302182
  66. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2022/cp/d2cp01828d
  67. https://www.atlasagro.ag/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Atlas-Agro-Nitrate-Fertilizers-for-Crop-Production.pdf
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040603107002687
  69. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/ce/d3ce00732d
  70. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00353
  71. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cg060557b
  72. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2017/ce/c6ce02119k
  73. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/17/3/271
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378517389901920
  75. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00124
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0928098704000260
  77. https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/36776-Thermal-Analysis-A-Review-of-Techniques-and-Applications-in-the-Pharmaceutical-Sciences/
  78. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02549
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/solvate
  80. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ic300202f
  81. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Hexaamminenickel_II_chloride
  82. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/11/4/342
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5947486/
  84. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/getauthorversionpdf/d0ce01749c
  85. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chem.202103430
  86. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10269327
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.