Hubbry Logo
Bell pitBell pitMain
Open search
Bell pit
Community hub
Bell pit
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Bell pit
Bell pit
Bell pit
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A collapsed bell pit, evidence of early coal mining in Middleton Woods
Cross section of a bell pit.
A line of bell pits following a lead seam. These are often mistaken for shake holes.

A bell pit is a primitive method of mining coal, iron ore, or other minerals lying near the surface.

Operation

[edit]

A shaft is sunk to reach the mineral which is excavated by miners, transported to the surface by a winch, and removed by means of a bucket, much like a well.[1] The bottom of the shaft is enlarged and a sloping roof is created as the desired mineral and surrounding rock is removed – giving its name because the pit in cross section resembles a bell.[2]

Typically, no supports were used, and mining continued outwards until the cavity became too dangerous or collapsed at which point another mine was started, often in close proximity.[1] This type of mine was in use in prehistoric times, the Middle Ages,[3] and a few continued in use until the early 20th century in the region around Ford, Northumberland. Such pits are common at prehistoric flint working sites such as Grime's Graves in Norfolk and also in the coal mining areas of Yorkshire, the Forest of Dean,[4] and Leicestershire.[3]

Bell pits often flooded due to a lack of a drainage system. This, together with the lack of support and the likelihood of collapse, meant they had a limited lifespan. The remains of bell pits can be identified by depressions left when they collapsed. In some places, they will follow a straight line as the seam of mineral is being followed. Bell pits were not an efficient way of extracting minerals as they only partially exploited the resources.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bell pit

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A bell pit is a primitive form of underground mining used to extract shallow deposits of minerals such as , , or lead, consisting of a narrow vertical shaft sunk into a seam and widened into a bell-shaped chamber. This method, one of the earliest known techniques for subsurface extraction, originated in medieval Britain and was widely employed until the 18th or , particularly in regions like the for lead and for and ironstone. In construction, miners dug the initial shaft using picks and shovels, descending via wooden ladders, and expanded it horizontally into a chamber while employing a hand-operated or jack roller to hoist and waste in buckets called kibbles. Minimal timbering was used for support, limiting the pit's depth to around 10-20 meters to avoid roof collapse, after which the workings were abandoned and a new shaft sunk nearby along the . This approach was suitable for shallow deposits in relatively flat , as steeper slopes required alternative methods like hushing, and it posed significant hazards including unstable ground and flooding. Today, bell pits are identified by chains of circular grassy depressions in the landscape, often backfilled with waste from adjacent workings, serving as archaeological evidence of early industrial activity in districts across . The technique's simplicity reflected the labor-intensive nature of pre-industrial , transitioning to more advanced systems like adits and deeper shafts as technology evolved in the .

History

Origins and Early Use

Bell pits represent one of the earliest known mining techniques in Britain, with shallow pit workings emerging during the Bronze Age around 2000 BCE as a rudimentary method for extracting minerals from shallow deposits. Archaeological evidence indicates that these primitive excavations were used for copper and lead mining, with radiocarbon dates from sites such as Ecton Hill in Staffordshire confirming activity between 1880 and 1630 BCE. At locations like Alderley Edge in Cheshire, shallow shafts up to 11 meters deep reveal early tool marks from antler picks and stone hammers, demonstrating the manual labor constraints that limited operations to surface-near ores. In the , archaeological evidence of bell pits dates to the medieval period, primarily for lead ore extraction along mineral veins in areas like Grassington Moor. These pits, typically 10 to 30 meters deep, followed the vein's dip and were widened at the base to maximize yield before collapse risks forced abandonment, leaving characteristic circular depressions visible today. Medieval miners targeted deposits using simple wedging and levering techniques, with spoil heaps and tool fragments providing key indicators of small-scale, opportunistic operations. By the Roman era (43–410 CE), was used in Britain for local smithing and lime burning, with fragments found at over 200 military and villa locations in regions such as the Mendips and northern coalfields. However, evidence for specific methods, including bell pits, remains limited and unverified, with operations constrained by manual methods to shallow depths of around 20 meters. Medieval accounts from the 13th century onward document reliance on bell pits for in Staffordshire's Coal Measures and Yorkshire's Namurian seams, as seen at Preston Moor Colliery with clusters of up to 200 shafts over 3 km. This early application highlighted bell pits' role in transitioning from surface gathering to subsurface before more advanced shaft techniques evolved.

Development and Regional Variations

During the , from the 11th to 15th centuries, bell pit mining expanded significantly in to meet rising demands for and iron amid early industrialization, particularly for and in burgeoning urban and monastic centers. This technique, involving shallow vertical shafts widened into bell-shaped chambers at the or seam, allowed small-scale extraction where seams outcropped near the surface, evolving from rudimentary prehistoric methods into a more systematic approach driven by feudal economies. The growth was fueled by the need for local resources in iron production and domestic heating, with operations often limited to depths of 10-20 meters to avoid collapse risks. Regional adaptations reflected local geology and resource priorities. In the , such as in , bell pits were used for extraction starting in the post-medieval period, with extensive networks of pits supporting early industrial activities like smithing and lime burning in wooded landscapes. For lead mining in the , bell pits took the form of linear alignments of circular depressions, typically 3-6 meters deep, following outcropping veins along hillsides, enabling efficient tracing of mineral lodes in the terrain. In contrast, bell pits in the forested region of , , and featured clustered shafts in clay deposits, adapted for extraction to supply bloomeries, with pits often spaced closely amid dense woodlands to minimize transport distances. Under feudal systems, bell pits were typically operated by small groups of laborers or lords for localized needs, employing only a handful of workers per site and relying on manual tools like picks and baskets, which constrained scale but suited manorial self-sufficiency. A notable surge occurred in the 13th century, linked to expanded monastic ironworking; for instance, historical document bell pit complexes tied to religious houses for furnace fuel and , as evidenced in medieval charters granting rights. This period marked a peak in technique refinement, with pits sometimes connected by shallow drifts for better access, though ventilation remained rudimentary.

Decline and Legacy

The decline of bell pit mining began in the late 18th century amid the Industrial Revolution, as shallow coal seams were exhausted and the demand for coal surged to fuel steam engines and factories. This shift necessitated deeper extraction methods, such as adits and drifts, which could access seams hundreds of feet below the surface, rendering the limited-depth bell pits increasingly obsolete. Economic pressures from the need for large-scale production further marginalized small, family-run bell pit operations, as industrial demands favored centralized collieries capable of higher output. Technological advancements accelerated this transition, particularly the adoption of steam-powered pumps like Thomas Newcomen's 1712 engine, which addressed flooding in deeper and enabled extraction from previously inaccessible reserves. Regulatory changes in Britain, starting with the 1842 Mines and Collieries Act and continuing through the 1850 Coal Mines Inspection Act, 1860 Regulation and Inspection of Mines Act, and later consolidations like the 1887 Coal Mines Regulation Act, imposed safety standards, inspection requirements, and operational restrictions that burdened primitive methods like bell pits with compliance costs they could not sustain. These acts, prompted by high accident rates in unregulated shallow workings, effectively pushed small-scale toward more structured, certified practices. Despite their obsolescence, bell pits left a profound legacy as precursors to modern shaft mining techniques, influencing the evolution of underground extraction by demonstrating early principles of vertical access and chamber expansion. Their hazardous conditions, including frequent collapses and flooding, shaped early labor practices and catalyzed the regulatory reforms that improved worker safety across the industry. Culturally, bell pits endure in landscapes as circular depressions and subsidence features, often visible in former mining regions, and have contributed to local place names evoking pits and mines; in some remote areas, such as Clyne Valley in Wales, they persisted into the early 20th century for personal coal supply before fully giving way to mechanized methods.

Design and Construction

Shaft Sinking Techniques

Shaft sinking in bell pit mining involved manual excavation to create a narrow vertical access point through the to the seam. Miners used basic hand tools such as picks and shovels to dig a circular shaft typically 1-2 meters in diameter, progressing downward in stages while removing spoil via buckets hoisted by a simple or wooden for access. This labor-intensive process relied entirely on human effort, with workers alternating between digging and haulage to maintain progress without mechanical assistance. Site selection was critical to the success and safety of , prioritizing locations near visible surface outcrops of the mineral seam to minimize excavation depth and removal. Stable geological conditions were essential to reduce the risk of collapses during sinking, with miners avoiding areas prone to loose or fractured rock that could destabilize the shaft walls. Depth was limited to 10-30 meters, constrained by the physical demands of manual haulage and the absence of powered , beyond which ventilation, stability, and worker endurance became unmanageable. To prevent cave-ins, temporary timbering or lining was employed, often consisting of wooden frames or props installed as the shaft advanced, providing essential support in unconsolidated ground. Excavated spoil was piled around the shaft , forming characteristic surface mounds that marked pit locations and facilitated drainage. Once the seam was reached, sinking transitioned to lateral extraction around the shaft base.

Chamber Formation Methods

Once the central shaft reached the target seam, miners initiated horizontal excavation at the base to form the characteristic bell-shaped chamber. This involved radially expanding the workings outward from the shaft bottom using manual hand tools, such as picks, shovels, wedges, and levers, to prise and remove or in a conical pattern. The process targeted thin seams typically under 2 meters thick, like the Brazilly seam at approximately 0.5 meters, which were accessible with primitive implements and required minimal overhead clearance. Excavation proceeded layer by layer to preserve roof integrity, with miners accessing the workspace via ladders or temporary platforms suspended in the shaft, ensuring they could work safely below the widening cavity. To mitigate collapse risks, full circular cuts were avoided; instead, selective undercutting and wedging targeted extractable material while leaving waste rock or unmined portions as informal supports or stumps around the perimeter. This approach allowed chambers to expand to widths of 3 to 12 meters at the base, though most remained under 10 meters to balance extraction volume against stability concerns in shallow depths less than 20 meters. Operations halted when the chamber became unstable due to roof sagging or , prompting abandonment and the sinking of a new adjacent shaft. The resulting bell profile maximized from near-surface deposits while distributing weight to reduce likelihood, a design evident in archaeological remnants such as clustered depressions and infilled hollows along historical outcrops. This method, prevalent in medieval and early post-medieval , relied on the seam's proximity to the surface and the miners' assessment of geological conditions to determine viable expansion limits.

Safety and Structural Features

Bell pits relied on natural rock pillars formed by the unexcavated margins of the chamber to provide primary support for the , with the characteristic aiding in load distribution by transferring weight to the surrounding stable ground. Minimal timber props were occasionally employed in slightly deeper workings to reinforce weak areas, though early examples often dispensed with them entirely due to the shallow nature of the excavations and limited availability of materials. This rudimentary approach prioritized the inherent strength of the enclosing rock mass over engineered supports. Structural failures in bell pits most commonly involved roof collapses triggered by over-extraction, which undermined the natural pillars and led to or "plump" holes at the surface. To mitigate this , miners practiced partial extraction, leaving unmined portions as natural supports while maximizing yield in primitive conditions. Access to the chamber was facilitated by or wooden ladders descended into the shaft, allowing miners to enter and exit manually, while basic signaling—often verbal shouts or simple bell pulls connected to surface windlasses—coordinated of materials via baskets or kibbles. These practices reflected the absence of formal regulations, as remained largely unregulated until the mid-19th century, when acts like the UK's Coal Mines Regulation Act of introduced initial safety standards. Geological suitability was paramount for bell pit viability, with operations confined to competent, near-surface rock formations that minimized instability and water ingress, as loose or fractured strata like shales could crumble prematurely and flood shallow workings.

Operation

Daily Mining Process

Miners typically descended the shallow shaft of a bell pit using wooden ladders, often in small groups to manage the confined space and limited access. At the chamber bottom, they began extraction by undercutting the seam face with iron picks to weaken the material, followed by driving wooden or iron wedges into cracks using heavy hammers or mauls to loosen larger blocks. For harder ores or resistant rock, workers employed fire-setting, heating the face with a controlled fire and then quenching it with water to induce thermal fracturing, facilitating easier removal with hand tools. The loosened ore was then shoveled into leather-lined baskets or wooden kibbles for subsequent handling. Daily operations followed long shifts dictated by daylight and manual labor constraints in these primitive workings. Bell pits were operated intermittently, with work ceasing and the site abandoned once the seam pinched out, stability diminished, or extraction became uneconomical, prompting miners to a new shaft nearby.

Extraction and Material Handling

In bell pit mining, once the or was loosened from the chamber walls using hand tools, workers loaded it into small baskets or kibbles attached to ropes for to the surface. These containers were hoisted vertically through the central shaft using a hand-operated or , often powered by one or two miners above ground or occasionally by animals such as horses for slightly deeper pits. The central shaft enabled this direct vertical , minimizing the need for horizontal conveyance underground and simplifying the overall extraction workflow. At the surface, the extracted material underwent manual sorting to separate valuable or from waste rock and . Workers used basic tools like picks and sieves to perform this labor-intensive process, discarding low-grade material while stockpiling the product for further use or sale. and waste were commonly repurposed for backfilling abandoned chambers to stabilize the ground and prevent , though in some cases, it supported local like . The system's capacity was inherently limited by the small size of the baskets, necessitating numerous trips to clear even modest amounts of material from the chamber. This required close coordination between underground miners, who signaled readiness for hoisting, and surface operators managing the to ensure safe and efficient lifts without overburdening the rudimentary equipment.

Ventilation and Worker Conditions

In bell pits, ventilation primarily depended on natural airflow through the open vertical shaft, which allowed fresh air to enter and stale air to exit due to the shallow depth of the workings, typically 10-20 below the surface. This passive system was sufficient for initial extraction but often proved inadequate as the chamber expanded, leading to stagnant air pockets and reduced oxygen levels. To supplement natural ventilation in slightly deeper or more enclosed sections, miners occasionally lit small fires at the base of the shaft, exploiting the principle of heated air rising to create a rudimentary that drew in cooler air from the surface. However, this method carried risks, as incomplete combustion could introduce smoke and into the workings, exacerbating air quality issues. Poor ventilation frequently resulted in the accumulation of "foul air," including () and , which limited the operational lifespan of individual pits and prompted their abandonment when conditions deteriorated. Worker conditions in bell pits were harsh, characterized by dim illumination from open-flame candles or lamps that provided minimal light for manual labor with picks and shovels, increasing the danger of unseen hazards. High humidity from groundwater seepage and the physical demands of climbing rope ladders or wooden steps for every entry and exit contributed to exhaustion, with shifts dictated by daylight, manual labor constraints, and harsh conditions. The workforce consisted mainly of local unskilled laborers, including women and children in medieval and early modern operations (prior to 19th-century bans), who performed tasks like hauling coal in baskets up the shaft, often working in family units without any protective equipment. Health impacts were predominantly short-term and acute, with risks of falls during ladder ascents, roof collapses in unstable chambers, and asphyxiation from oxygen depletion or toxic gases in poorly ventilated spaces. Miners relied on basic sensory cues, such as the smell of methane or physical symptoms like headaches, to detect foul air, as no advanced technology existed for monitoring; this dependence often led to delayed evacuations and sudden accidents. Long-term exposure to dust and damp conditions contributed to respiratory irritation, though the transient nature of bell pit work somewhat limited chronic effects compared to deeper mines.

Advantages and Limitations

Operational Benefits

Bell pits provided significant operational advantages in early , particularly for small-scale endeavors targeting shallow deposits. The method required low initial investment, relying solely on hand tools for excavation and dispensing with the need for expensive like pumps, rails, or mechanical hoists, which made it accessible to individual operators or small groups in resource-limited settings. Setup was notably rapid, with shafts typically sunk to depths of around 50 feet in a matter of weeks using basic techniques, enabling quick exploitation of outcropping seams before more advanced methods were feasible. This efficiency allowed miners to commence extraction soon after identifying a viable deposit, supporting opportunistic operations in areas without established networks. The technique's versatility extended to various shallow minerals, including , , and lead, and was well-suited to rural or forested terrains where large-scale was impractical. By working outward from a central shaft to diameters of up to 60 feet, bell pits achieved high recovery rates for thin, near-surface deposits—often extracting the majority of accessible material in a single chamber—thus providing an immediate local supply for essential uses such as fuel or on-site .

Technical Drawbacks

Bell pits were inherently restricted in depth, typically not exceeding 10 to 20 meters due to the challenges of manual haulage and escalating risks of from unsupported walls. As depths increased beyond this range, the physical demands of lifting and via ladders or simple baskets became inefficient and exhausting for workers, while the weight of overlying strata amplified instability, often rendering deeper operations impractical without advanced support systems that were unavailable in early eras. This limitation left substantial deeper resources inaccessible, confining extraction to near-surface deposits and necessitating the transition to more sophisticated methods like or shaft for greater depths. The method's reliance on manual labor further constrained productivity, yielding only small volumes of per pit—often measured in baskets carried by hand—which proved inadequate for the escalating industrial demands of the post-1700s . Without mechanized tools or efficient hoisting, output was bottlenecked by the slow pace of digging and transport, with workers limited to excavating modest chambers before ventilation issues or fatigue halted progress. Consequently, bell pits supported localized, subsistence-level extraction rather than sustained commercial production, contributing to their obsolescence as economies scaled up. Geologically, bell pits were viable only in stable, thin seams where the rock permitted bell-shaped chambers without immediate failure, but they faltered in irregular or variable strata, resulting in uneven extraction patterns and wasted resources. The technique's design assumed horizontal, consistent thin layers, leading to operational inefficiencies in formations with faults or variability that caused premature collapses or incomplete recovery. A core engineering flaw was the inability to effectively mine inclined or thick seams, as the unsupported, radial expansion from the shaft quickly destabilized in non-horizontal or thicker deposits, prompting frequent pit abandonment after partial extraction. In inclined seams, the downward pull exacerbated roof falls, while thicker layers lacked the natural arching support of thinner ones, limiting recoverable volumes and forcing miners to relocate rather than adapt the method. This selectivity underscored the bell pit's unsuitability for diverse geological settings, confining its application to optimal, shallow thin-seam environments.

Environmental and Safety Risks

Bell pit mining, an early shallow extraction method prevalent in medieval and post-medieval Britain, posed significant safety risks to workers due to its rudimentary design and lack of structural supports. Frequent collapses occurred as the bell-shaped chambers, typically 6 meters wide and excavated at depths up to 10 meters, were prone to roof failure from unstable overburden or inadequate propping, leading to injuries or fatalities among miners underground. Falls down open shafts, often 1 meter in diameter and left unsecured, were a primary hazard, with accidental entry resulting in near-certain injury or death, as documented in historical analyses of UK coal workings. Gas explosions, though less common in shallow pits than in deeper mines, arose from methane (firedamp) accumulation in poorly ventilated chambers, exacerbating the dangers in confined spaces where workers faced chronic exposure to toxic fumes. Environmentally, bell pit operations caused surface that formed craters known as crown holes, where the collapse of shallow voids deformed the landscape and disrupted soil stability, particularly in coal-bearing regions like the . Spoil heaps from excavated material led to , as unconsolidated waste piles were exposed to and runoff, accelerating sediment loss and altering local . Water contamination resulted from exposed seams containing , whose oxidation produced acidic drainage rich in sulfates and , polluting nearby and streams. Long-term effects of abandoned bell pits include persistent hazards from unfilled shafts and voids, which can suddenly collapse centuries later, endangering modern land users and infrastructure through subsidence or falls. In areas like the , the lack of reclamation left visible landscape scars—clusters of subsidence craters and spoil remnants—that fragment habitats and disrupt by creating barren, unstable ground unsuitable for native vegetation and wildlife. These unreclaimed sites continue to pose risks, such as hidden collapses, highlighting the enduring legacy of unregulated early mining practices.

Examples and Archaeological Evidence

Notable Historical Sites

Bell pits were a prominent feature of medieval lead mining in the , particularly from the 12th to 16th centuries, where they appear as linear alignments of circular depressions marking shallow shafts sunk into outcropping veins. These sites, concentrated in areas like , Arkengarthdale, , and , facilitated the extraction of ore close to the surface and are visible today as earthwork remnants across the landscape. In the coalfields, especially on , medieval bell pits provided evidence of early and iron on a large scale, with numerous shallow shafts documented through targeted archaeological investigations. These workings, dating to the post-medieval period in some clusters, reflect the initial exploitation of near-surface seams in the region before deeper mining techniques emerged. The of hosted bell pits for extraction from Roman times through the medieval period, utilizing shallow vertical shafts to access nodular and deposits in the clay beds of this wooded area. This method supported the region's long-standing iron industry, with pits often forming series of beehive-shaped excavations that left distinctive surface traces. Further examples appear in Clyne Valley, , where bell pits marked early coal workings from the up to the 19th, with surveys identifying 255 such remnants alongside later collieries, illustrating systematic shallow extraction near the surface. Sites like Middleton Park in exemplify clustered bell pits for , featuring extensive groups of bowl-shaped shaft mounds from medieval to early industrial periods, demonstrating organized extraction patterns over limited areas. Archaeological surveys since the 1970s have mapped numerous bell pit remnants across the , highlighting their widespread use in early mining landscapes.

Modern Interpretations and Preservation

Bell pits represent early small-scale mining operations limited by manual labor and shallow seams, resulting in localized extraction. Advancements in digital modeling, particularly surveys, enable virtual reconstructions of bell pit sites and reveal previously undocumented features by penetrating vegetation and soil cover to map subtle ground depressions. These technologies facilitate non-invasive analysis, allowing researchers to visualize underground structures and assess historical patterns without physical excavation. Preservation initiatives in the UK emphasize legal safeguards and public access, with many bell pit complexes designated as scheduled ancient monuments under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, which has protected such sites since the early 1980s by restricting development and requiring conservation plans. Notable examples include the Alnwick Moor bell pits in , a encompassing over 100 shafts from the 16th-17th centuries, preserved to maintain their archaeological integrity amid surrounding moorland. Heritage trails, such as those in the , integrate bell pit remnants into marked paths, promoting awareness of while guiding visitors away from unstable ground. Educational programs leverage bell pits to illustrate mining evolution and broader environmental consequences, with exhibits at institutions like the Museum of English Rural Life demonstrating rudimentary extraction techniques alongside discussions of early use's role in atmospheric . Recent post-2000 surveys employing aerial imagery and have uncovered hundreds of new sites, such as over 300 unrecorded bell pits in , supporting informed landscape management and enhanced protection strategies.

References

  1. https://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/exhibit/coal/technique/bellpit.htm
  2. https://www.mylearning.org/stories/lead-mining-in-the-yorkshire-dales/46
  3. https://www.oldminer.co.uk/mining-methods.html
  4. https://www.namho.org/documents/MINING_FRAMEWORK_Pt_one.pdf
  5. https://www2.bgs.ac.uk/mendips/minerals/coal2.html
  6. https://www2.bgs.ac.uk/mendips/more_info/coal_mining.htm
  7. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1019023
  8. http://w.dmm.org.uk/pitwork/html/coal_play.htm
  9. https://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/environment/Environment-and-countryside/HistoricEnvironment/Documents/CannockChaseDistrictHEA-Appendix2-CannockAreaHECZAssessments.pdf
  10. https://www.wealdeniron.org.uk/history/
  11. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/files/34499551/411102.pdf
  12. https://www.ourwarwickshire.org.uk/content/article/the-development-of-mining-in-warwickshire
  13. https://bilimakademisi.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Coal-Mines-in-the-Industrial-Revolution.pdf
  14. https://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/coal/early-coal-history-to-1900/the-steam-engine-the-industrial-revolution-and-coal.aspx
  15. https://thecommonroom.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Government-and-mining-Jan16.pdf
  16. https://brewminate.com/drifts-bells-and-shafts-a-history-of-coal-mining-since-the-ancient-world/
  17. https://www.cewales.org.uk/latest-news/unrecorded-shallow-coal-mining-swansea/
  18. https://clynevalleycommunityproject.uk/history/clyne-wood-bell-pits/
  19. https://kirkleescousins.co.uk/yorkshire-coal/
  20. http://www.dmm.org.uk/pitwork/html/history1.htm
  21. https://www.groundsure.com.au/using-lidar-to-spot-iron-mining-in-the-weald/
  22. https://gsia.org.uk/sites/reprints/2008/gi200837.pdf
  23. https://www.ncm.org.uk/app/uploads/2023/02/Early-Mining.pdf
  24. https://undergroundspecialist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/1-History-of-Welsh-Mining.pdf
  25. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/full/10.1144/EGSP29.11
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166111608707404
  27. https://www.choosehowyoumove.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/themed-walks-coalville-miners-heritage-trail.pdf
  28. https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/mining-history-how-did-safety-evolve-over-time
  29. https://www.firodaschool.ie/cmsfiles/coalminingincastlecomer/types/types.htm
  30. https://www.showcaves.com/english/explain/Mining/Fire.html
  31. https://www.suttonbeauty.org.uk/suttonhistory/mineworking/
  32. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/4556/1/Subsidence2008-Gunn-QJEGHv1.pdf
  33. https://lahs.archaeologyuk.org/Contrebis/13_2_Clare.pdf
  34. https://www.yas.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Resources/A%20Noble%20Scene%20of%20Industry/Thornes_West_Yorkshire_A_noble_scene_of_industry-Chapter%202.pdf
  35. https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?uid=609928&resourceID=19191
  36. http://w.dmm.org.uk/pitwork/html/history1.htm
  37. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/510070/1/WA92001.pdf
  38. https://www.culturenlmuseums.co.uk/story/the-cost-of-coal-the-story-of-mine-safety/
  39. https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/memoirs/docs/B06061.html
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342062682_Chapter_11_Coal_mining_subsidence_in_the_UK
  41. https://outofoblivion.org.uk/themes/industry/lead/
  42. http://www.lichfieldcivicsociety.org.uk/reports/1211_Chase_Coal.htm
  43. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/48588/48588-h/48588-h.htm
  44. https://www.namho.org/research/SECTION_5_Iron_20131209.pdf
  45. https://coflein.gov.uk/media/363/936/bma_059.pdf
  46. https://clynefarm.com/farm-history/
  47. https://www.fomp.co.uk/downloads/survey/finalreportpart1.pdf
  48. https://leedsga.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Middleton-Park-Mining-Trail.pdf
  49. https://www.fomp.co.uk/downloads/survey/finalreportpart2.pdf
  50. https://www.grm-uk.com/discovery-of-unrecorded-bell-pits-continues-to-generate-interest/
  51. https://www.earthsciencepartnership.co.uk/projects/shallow-coal-mining-in-swansea/
  52. https://www.grm-uk.com/finding-unrecorded-coal-mines-using-lidar-technology/
  53. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/46
  54. https://ancientmonuments.uk/104638-alnwick-moor-bell-pits-edlingham
  55. https://explorenorthpennines.org.uk/sites/default/files/activity/downloads/enp048.pdf
  56. https://merl.reading.ac.uk/explore/online-exhibitions/coal-mining-its-the-pits/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.