Hubbry Logo
AtractaspididaeAtractaspididaeMain
Open search
Atractaspididae
Community hub
Atractaspididae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Atractaspididae
Atractaspididae
Atractaspididae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Atractaspididae
Temporal range: Pliocene - Present,[1] 4.1–0 Ma
↓
Atractaspis engaddensis
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Serpentes
Superfamily: Elapoidea
Family: Atractaspididae
Günther, 1858
Synonyms
  • Aparallactinae

The Atractaspididae (atractaspidids) are a family of venomous snakes[2] found in Africa and the Middle East, commonly called mole vipers, stiletto snakes, or burrowing asps. Currently, 12 genera are recognized.[3]

Description

[edit]

This family includes many genera formerly classed in other families and subfamilies, on the basis of fang type. It includes fangless (aglyphous), rear-fanged (opisthoglyphous), fixed-fanged (proteroglyphous), and viper-like (solenoglyphous) species. Early molecular and physiological data linking this subfamily to others were ambiguous and often contradictory, which means the taxonomy of this subfamily has been highly contentious. The nominate family, Atractaspididae, has itself been moved to and from other taxa, such as potentially forming a trichotomy with Elapidae and Colubridae,[4] reinforcing the ambiguity of this subfamily.

Geographic range

[edit]

This subfamily is found in Africa and the Middle East.[5][6][7][8]

Venom

[edit]

Many of these snakes are inoffensive or far too small to envenomate a person effectively. However, some can inflict severe tissue necrosis; e.g. if the victim's thumb is bitten, the tip of that digit may be lost. Relapses may occur long after the bite.[9][10][medical citation needed] The bites of stiletto snakes are often exceptionally painful.[11][12]

Very few deaths have resulted from accidents with these snakes, although large individuals of Atractaspis microlepidota and other long-glanded species are very likely to be dangerous.[13] Some of the long-fanged species are able to stab their prey (or an unfortunate human) even while their mouths are closed, and the typical grasp used by herpetologists to securely hold venomous snakes is not safe for this group.[14][15] This ability to stab sideways even with a closed mouth is the basis for an English name used for some of them: "side-stabbing snakes" or "side-stabbers".[6]

Genera

[edit]
Subfamily Atractaspidinae -- 13 Genera
Genus[3] Taxon author[3] Species
Count[3] 		Common name Geographic range
Amblyodipsas W. Peters, 1857 9 glossy snakes Africa
Aparallactus A. Smith, 1849 11 centipede-eaters Africa
Atractaspis A. Smith, 1849 15 burrowing asps, stiletto snakes[3] Africa, Middle-East
Brachyophis Mocquard, 1888 1 Revoil's short snake Africa
Chilorhinophis F. Werner, 1907 3 Africa
Hypoptophis Boulenger, 1908 1 African bighead snake Africa
Homoroselaps[16] Jan, 1858 2 harlequin snakes Southern Africa
Macrelaps Boulenger, 1896 1 Natal black snake Africa
Micrelaps Boettger, 1880 4 two-headed snakes Africa, Middle-East
Poecilopholis Boulenger, 1903 1 Cameroon racer Africa
Polemon Jan, 1858 13 snake-eaters Africa
Xenocalamus Günther, 1868 5 quill-snouted snakes Africa

Taxonomy

[edit]

This family was previously classified as a subfamily of the Colubridae: the Aparallactinae.[5]

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Atractaspididae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Atractaspididae is a family of venomous elapoid snakes distinguished by their primarily lifestyle, unique side-stabbing delivery in certain genera, and to subterranean environments across and the . Comprising 12 genera and approximately 68 species, this family represents an ancient African radiation, with diversification peaking during the and epochs.

Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Position

Atractaspididae, established by Günther in , belongs to the superfamily and is sometimes classified as the subfamily Atractaspidinae within the broader family (Colubroidea), though it is often treated as a distinct family due to its specialized traits. The taxonomic status remains debated in recent literature. Key genera include (with about 22 species, known for proteroglyphous fangs), Amblyodipsas, Xenocalamus, and Homoroselaps, which exhibit varying degrees of specialization. Phylogenetically, Atractaspididae forms a monophyletic within , with its position relative to and other advanced snake groups debated; when treated as a subfamily within Lamprophiidae, diversification from related lineages occurred around 29 million years ago in the early .

Morphology and Adaptations

These snakes typically feature slender, cylindrical bodies ranging from 20 cm to under 1 m in length, smooth and shiny scales without apical pits, small or vestigial eyes with round pupils, indistinct necks, and short tails that aid in burrowing. is common, with females often larger than males in species like . A defining feature is the specialized : rear or front fangs that can rotate outward for lateral strikes, allowing without fully opening the mouth—a suited to narrow burrows and defensive behaviors against intruders.

Distribution, Ecology, and Venom

Atractaspididae are predominantly distributed in , with outliers in the , , the , and southwestern , inhabiting diverse environments from arid deserts to humid forests but favoring loose soil for burrowing. Largely nocturnal and secretive, they emerge rarely except during rains or at night, preying on elongate vertebrates such as amphisbaenians, skinks, and other snakes, which they subdue using or . is oviparous, with clutch sizes varying from 2 to 19 eggs depending on the species. Their venom is highly potent, featuring sarafotoxins—endothelin-like peptides that induce severe cardiovascular effects like and —and is medically significant for humans, causing painful bites with systemic symptoms. Despite their ecological role in controlling and populations, many species face threats from habitat loss, though specific conservation statuses remain understudied.

Morphology and Description

Physical Characteristics

Atractaspididae snakes exhibit a characteristically cylindrical body form suited to their primarily habits, with elongated trunks and short tails that facilitate navigation through loose and litter. These snakes are limb-reduced, possessing no external limbs, and their bodies are covered in smooth scales that reduce friction during burrowing, though some genera display weakly keeled dorsal scales for added traction. Adult body lengths vary widely across the , typically ranging from 20 cm to over 100 cm, with some exceeding 1 m, depending on the and ; for instance, members of the genus often attain lengths of up to 80 cm, while smaller genera like Homoroselaps, which generally reach up to 65 cm. The head of Atractaspididae is typically small and indistinct from the neck, featuring a pointed that aids in wedging through substrate, and small eyes with reduced vision adapted for low-light, subterranean environments. In some genera, such as , the head is more distinctly separated from the body, enhancing maneuverability during foraging. Eye size is notably diminutive across the family, often with round pupils, reflecting their adaptation to a life spent mostly underground. Coloration in Atractaspididae is predominantly cryptic, featuring earth tones like browns, grays, and blacks that provide against soil and rocky substrates. Many display uniform dark dorsal patterns for blending into environments, with variations including a purplish gloss on the scales of Amblyodipsas or contrasting black-and-white banding in certain taxa. Ventral surfaces are often paler, ranging from white to cream, aiding in concealment when partially exposed. Scalation patterns are key for taxonomic identification within the family, with dorsal scale rows at midbody commonly numbering 15-17, though ranging up to 21-25 in some species like Atractaspis aterrima. Ventral scale counts vary by genus, typically 150-300 in Atractaspis (e.g., 239-299 in A. aterrima) and higher in more elongate forms, while subcaudal scales are divided and number 20-60. These features, including smooth dorsal scales without apical pits, contribute to the family's streamlined profile.

Specialized Adaptations

Atractaspididae exhibit remarkable diversity in fang morphology across their genera, reflecting adaptations to varied predatory strategies in environments. While some aparallactine genera possess aglyphous lacking specialized venom-conducting structures, others display opisthoglyphous rear for during prey . In contrast, Homoroselaps features proteroglyphous fixed front similar to elapids, and the genus is characterized by solenoglyphous hinged front that enable precise delivery. This fang variation, with an ancestral state of rear fangs in the subfamily, underscores the family's evolutionary flexibility in injection mechanisms. Particularly in , the fangs are mounted on short maxillae that articulate uniquely with the prefrontal bone, allowing independent mobility and lateral protrusion even when the mouth remains closed. This configuration is supported by powerful adductor muscles, which facilitate a side-stabbing strike to envenomate prey in confined burrows without fully opening the , minimizing exposure during predation. The elongated, cylindrical body form further enhances burrowing efficiency, with a streamlined and reinforced naso-frontal providing structural integrity against resistance during underground locomotion. Sensory adaptations in Atractaspididae are tuned to low-light, subterranean conditions, featuring reduced orbits and optic foramina that indicate poorly developed eyes ill-suited for visual prey detection. Instead, a well-developed , supported by an enlarged vomeronasal cupola, enables enhanced chemosensory perception through tongue-flicking to locate prey via chemical cues in dark environments. Locomotion in Atractaspididae is facilitated by specialized ventral scale arrangements, which are narrower and more numerous than in snakes, allowing greater lateral flexibility and reduced friction during rectilinear burrowing movements. This, combined with smooth, non-keeled dorsal scales in high row counts (up to 37 in some species), permits efficient navigation through tight soil tunnels without the need for pronounced undulation. These traits collectively support a dominated by subsurface and predation.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The family Atractaspididae is primarily distributed across (including the ), and the , ranging from and in the northwest to in the south, and extending eastward to the . This distribution encompasses diverse regions including the , savannas, and arid zones, with the highest concentrated in central and eastern Africa. Recent surveys have confirmed presences in peripheral areas like and , underscoring ongoing discoveries. Within the family, the genus exhibits the broadest range, occurring throughout and into the , with species documented in countries such as , , , and . In contrast, Macrelaps is restricted to , specifically the eastern coastal regions of , including and the provinces. The genus Homoroselaps is even more localized, found exclusively in and adjacent , primarily in the eastern and northern provinces. The family's evolutionary history traces its origins to during the early , with significant diversification occurring between the and epochs, driven by environmental changes such as the expansion of savannas. A notable recent addition to the known diversity is Atractaspis branchi, described in 2019 from western and southeastern , highlighting ongoing discoveries in West Africa's forested regions.

Ecological Niches

Atractaspididae, commonly known as burrowing asps or stiletto snakes, occupy predominantly niches across and parts of western , favoring loose, friable s that facilitate burrowing in environments such as savannas, woodlands, semi-deserts, and lowland forests. These are adapted to subterranean lifestyles, often residing in sandy or soft substrates where they can excavate tunnels or utilize existing burrows, or surface activity in open scrublands. Their distribution within these habitats is influenced by soil permeability, leading to concentrations in regions with minimal rocky outcrops or compacted earth that would hinder movement. Microhabitat preferences emphasize concealed, stable refugia such as beneath rocks, within leaf litter accumulations, or inside abandoned mounds and burrows, where levels support their cryptic existence while avoiding exposure to surface predators or extreme aridity. Species like preferentially exploit old mounds in grasslands for shelter, demonstrating an aversion to waterlogged or heavily flooded s that could collapse burrows or promote fungal growth incompatible with their physiology. This selective occupancy underscores their role in edaphic (-based) ecosystems, where they navigate narrow tunnels and contribute to through burrowing activities. In terms of symbiotic interactions, Atractaspididae function as key predators within food webs, exerting top-down control on populations of subterranean , amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals, which helps regulate structure and prevent in systems. For instance, their predation dynamics with squamate reptiles and nestlings in confined spaces maintain ecological balance in arid and semi-arid ecosystems, potentially enhancing by curbing pest species that damage vegetation or compete for resources. These interactions highlight their integral position in trophic cascades, particularly in habitats where surface predators are less effective. Conservation challenges for Atractaspididae stem primarily from habitat degradation through and across their African ranges, which fragment loose-soil environments essential for burrowing and reduce available microhabitats like termite mounds. No species are currently classified as endangered under IUCN criteria, though many remain due to their elusive, underground habits that complicate population assessments and monitoring efforts. Ongoing threats in regions like the and emphasize the need for habitat protection to sustain these understudied snakes.

Behavior and Life History

Activity and Foraging

Atractaspididae snakes lead predominantly lifestyles, remaining underground in burrows or soil for extended periods and surfacing infrequently, often only during favorable conditions such as high or after rainfall. Their activity is primarily nocturnal or crepuscular, with many species, including those in the genus , initiating at and continuing through the night until dawn; activity levels typically decline or cease during cooler winter months in arid regions. This subterranean and time-specific pattern minimizes exposure to predators and aligns with the availability of prey in low-light environments. Foraging in Atractaspididae centers on ambush predation, where individuals position themselves in burrows or loose soil to intercept passing prey without active pursuit. A key adaptation is the use of specialized for via sideways or backward strikes, allowing delivery of without fully opening the mouth—a strategy particularly evident in species, which can jab a single fang posteroventrally even while the head is buried or the body coiled. Diets vary by genus but emphasize elongated or prey suited to their underground habitat; for instance, individuals consume a generalist array including nestling , squamates, amphibians, centipedes, and , while Amblyodipsas polylepis specializes in , preying on other snakes and lizards, and genera like Aparallactus target such as centipedes. Defensive behaviors in Atractaspididae emphasize evasion and rapid counterattacks over overt displays, with many species coiling tightly to conceal the head or retreating into burrows while capable of delivering precise fang strikes backward along the body. In patterned species like certain Atractaspis, individuals may wave a brightly colored tail as a decoy to divert attention from the vulnerable head region during threats. The evolution of prey selection in Atractaspididae is closely tied to fang morphology and fossorial constraints, with diversification in diets occurring during the Miocene-Pliocene as lineages adapted to specific underground niches; for example, the proteroglyphous front fangs of Atractaspis facilitate handling larger vertebrate prey like small mammals in confined spaces, whereas rear-fanged genera such as Amblyodipsas and Macrelaps exploit reptilian prey through constriction-assisted envenomation. This fang plasticity has enabled opportunistic shifts from invertebrate to vertebrate diets, enhancing survival in resource-limited subterranean ecosystems.

Reproduction and Development

Most Atractaspididae snakes are oviparous, with one exception (Aparallactus jacksonii) being viviparous; females produce small clutches of relatively large eggs. Clutch sizes vary significantly among species, ranging from 2 to 19 eggs based on counts of vitellogenic follicles and oviductal eggs; for instance, Atractaspis bibronii typically produces 4–6 eggs, Amblyodipsas ventrimaculata 2–6 eggs, and Amblyodipsas polylepis larger clutches averaging higher than other congeners. Many species emerge from burrows during the breeding season to locate mates. Fecundity correlates with female body size, though interspecific differences suggest adaptations to local ecological constraints in their fossorial habitats. Sexual maturity in females is indicated by the presence of thick muscular oviducts, vitellogenic follicles, or oviductal eggs, while in males it is marked by enlarged testes or thickened . Eggs are laid in concealed sites such as moist burrows or abandoned mounds, where they undergo incubation for 6 to 8 weeks before . Hatchlings emerge fully independent, equipped with functional systems from birth.

Venom System

Composition and Properties

The venoms of Atractaspididae exhibit a complex biochemical profile dominated by a mixture of cytotoxins, hemotoxins, and neurotoxins tailored to their lifestyle and prey preferences. Cytotoxins, primarily three-finger toxins (3FTxs), constitute a significant portion and contribute to local tissue disruption through membrane destabilization and cell lysis. Hemotoxins, including phospholipases A2 (PLA2) and metalloproteinases (SVMPs), promote hemorrhagic effects by degrading components and inducing , with SVMPs of the P-III class being particularly abundant for facilitating tissue damage and prey digestion. Neurotoxins such as sarafotoxins, unique to the genus Atractaspis, are short peptides (21 ) that act as potent receptor agonists, triggering irreversible and without affecting skeletal neuromuscular transmission. Toxicity profiles vary across genera, reflecting adaptations for rapid prey immobilization in confined burrows versus secondary defensive roles. For instance, the intravenous LD50 of venom in mice is 0.06–0.075 mg/kg, underscoring its exceptional potency for subduing small mammals through cardiovascular collapse. This high lethality stems from evolutionary pressures favoring fast-acting toxins for ambushing nestling prey, as evidenced by positive selection on 3FTx sequences (ω = 1.75) that enhance cytotoxic efficiency, while hemotoxic components support post-envenomation tissue breakdown. In contrast, venoms from rear-fanged atractaspidids show moderated toxicity, prioritizing immobilization over immediate lethality. Venom production occurs in a specialized serous gland homologous to the Duvernoy's gland in colubrids, located posteriorly and connected via ducts to enlarged anterior fangs, enabling efficient synthesis by epithelial cells. Storage is limited compared to viperid venom glands, lacking extensive extracellular reservoirs or compressor musculature, which results in lower pressure delivery but sufficient yields for defensive jabs—typically higher in front-fanged genera like (up to several milligrams per extraction) than in rear-fanged relatives. Recent transcriptomic and proteomic analyses through 2024 have elucidated peptide sequences, revealing sarafotoxins' potential in cardiovascular therapeutics as selective receptor modulators for treating and . For example, sarafotoxin analogs inform the development of receptor antagonists like , which mitigate vasoconstrictive effects in preclinical models. These findings highlight the family's venoms as biodiscovery platforms, with inhibitors also explored for applications.

Delivery and Envenomation Effects

Atractaspididae employ a distinctive delivery system characterized by short, tubular that are highly protrusible and can be rotated laterally from the side of the closed , enabling a side-stabbing injection without fully opening the jaws. This mechanism allows for rapid, defensive or predatory strikes, often involving multiple jabs from a single fang, which facilitates even when the snake is held or in confined spaces. Dry bites, where no is injected, occur frequently in certain genera like , as the snakes can control release selectively during encounters. On prey, the induces rapid immobilization through cardiotoxic and cytotoxic actions, leading to cardiovascular and subsequent tissue that aids in subduing and digesting fossorial species such as amphisbaenians, skinks, and other small fossorial vertebrates. This swift onset of effects is particularly adapted for the family's burrowing , where quick prey dispatch in underground environments is essential. Human envenomations from Atractaspididae bites typically produce intense local symptoms, including severe pain, extensive swelling, blistering, and progressive at the bite site, which can necessitate surgical intervention or even in severe instances. Systemic effects are less common but may involve , hemorrhage, , , and respiratory distress due to cardiotoxic components. Fatalities are rare, with fewer than 10 documented cases across species like Atractaspis microlepidota and , often linked to delayed treatment or underlying factors. Documented medical cases highlight the challenges of management; for example, bites by in the have presented with pronounced local and numbness in reported incidents, underscoring the need for prompt symptomatic care. No specific exists for Atractaspididae envenomations, so treatment relies on supportive measures such as wound care, pain control, and monitoring for complications like secondary or .

Taxonomy and Classification

Evolutionary History

The Atractaspididae family originated in through divergence from colubroid ancestors during the early , approximately 29–33 million years ago (mya), with molecular divergence time estimates placing the stem age around 29 mya (24.8–31.4 mya confidence interval). This radiation is supported by the earliest colubroid-dominated snake fauna discovered in , from the Late Nsungwe Formation in the Rukwa Rift Basin of , which includes diverse colubroid vertebrae indicative of early diversification within the group, though no direct atractaspidid fossils have been identified. The family's origins are further evidenced by its predominantly sub-Saharan distribution, with a later dispersal event into western and the occurring in the late Miocene around 12.1 mya (7.8–17.6 mya). Phylogenetic analyses have solidified the family status of Atractaspididae within , with strong molecular support for its , including 96–100% bootstrap values and 98–99% posterior probabilities in concatenated datasets from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Historically classified as the subfamily Aparallactinae under , recent molecular phylogenies have elevated it to full family rank or placed it within the expanded , resolving longstanding debates over its affinities with elapids and viperids through shared synapomorphies like specialized venom delivery systems. For instance, 2019 phylogenomic studies incorporating ultraconserved elements confirmed Atractaspididae as a distinct sister to other elapoids, with subfamilies Atractaspidinae and Aparallactinae as robust sister groups (99% bootstrap support). The family was first established by Günther in 1858 for the genus , based on its unique dentition, with subsequent revisions in 2019 integrating multi-locus data to clarify contentious placements of genera like Homoroselaps and Macrelaps. Adaptive radiations within Atractaspididae occurred primarily during the to epochs, driven by climatic shifts toward xeric conditions and in , which promoted in fossorial niches. Key evolutionary innovations include the progression of fang morphology from ancestral rear-fanged (opistoglyphous) states in aparallactines to highly specialized, protractile front in atractaspidines, enabling side-stabbing and facilitating dietary shifts from amphisbaenians and skinks to more robust prey like . This fang evolution, linked to venom gland modifications, represents a convergent paralleling solenoglyphous systems in viperids, enhancing efficiency in confined burrows and contributing to the family's ecological specialization as secretive, nocturnal predators. These developments have influenced the current diversity of genera, underscoring the family's role in African snake evolution.

Genera and Species Diversity

The family Atractaspididae encompasses 12 genera and 68 species of primarily fossorial venomous snakes distributed across Africa and the Middle East. This diversity reflects adaptations to burrowing lifestyles, with the majority of genera concentrated in sub-Saharan regions. The genus Atractaspis, commonly known as stiletto snakes or burrowing asps, is the most speciose, containing around 22 species that are highly specialized venomous burrowers with unique side-stabbing fangs. Notable examples include the endemic Atractaspis duerdeni, the beaked burrowing asp restricted to arid regions of Namibia, Botswana, and South Africa. Other key genera include Amblyodipsas with 9 species of centipede-eaters, Homoroselaps (2 species of South African shield-nosed snakes characterized by their distinctive nasal scales), and Macrelaps (1 species, the Natal black snake, endemic to southern Africa). Recent taxonomic additions have expanded the known diversity, such as Atractaspis branchi, described in 2019 from western and southeastern based on morphological and genetic analyses distinguishing it from similar western African congeners. Species richness is highest in tropical , where environmental heterogeneity supports fossorial niches, though ongoing taxonomic revisions driven by genetic studies from 2019 onward suggest potential cryptic diversity and further adjustments to species boundaries (as of 2025).

References

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250067611_Biology_of_Burrowing_Asps_Atractaspididae_from_Southern_Africa
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231858097_Atractaspis_Serpentes_Atractaspididae_the_burrowing_asp_a_multidisciplinary_minireview
  3. http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/search.php?submit=Search&taxon=Atractaspididae
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24359415_First_record_of_human_envenomation_by_Atractaspis_congica_Peters_1877_Squamata_Atractaspididae
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469773/
  6. https://www.just.edu.jo/FacultiesandDepartments/FacultyofScienceandArts/Pages/Family-Atractaspididae-G%C3%BCnther-1858.aspx
  7. https://zse.pensoft.net/article/31488/element/4/458//
  8. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/african-burrowing-snakes-atractaspididae
  9. https://tetzoo.com/blog/2024/5/22/side-stabbing-stiletto-snakes-redux-for-2024
  10. https://biodb.com/taxa/atractaspididae/
  11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214889
  12. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=atractaspis&species=aterrima
  13. https://www.britannica.com/animal/burrowing-asp
  14. https://www.africansnakebiteinstitute.com/snake/spotted-harlequin-snake/
  15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-016-0332-9
  16. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=amblyodipsas&species=venustissima
  17. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214889
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7755084/
  19. https://zse.pensoft.net/article/31488/element/7/0/atractaspis/
  20. http://www.repfocus.dk/Atractaspis.html
  21. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/search.php?submit=Search&taxon=Atractaspis
  22. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Macrelaps&species=microlepidotus
  23. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Homoroselaps&species=lacteus
  24. https://zse.pensoft.net/article/31488/
  25. https://jksus.org/seasonal-food-composition-of-a-burrowing-asp-atractaspis-engaddensis-haas-1950-from-natural-habitats-of-an-arid-arabian-desert/
  26. https://animalia.bio/atractaspis-bibronii
  27. https://eajbsz.journals.ekb.eg/article_14299_7e80048fb0671dc7fb7ed7b998527397.pdf
  28. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-53-002.pdf
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282106644_The_Conservation_Status_and_Distribution_of_Reptiles_of_the_Arabian_Peninsula
  30. https://speciesstatus.sanbi.org/assessment/last-assessment/2818/
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391127708_Natural_History_Notes_Atractaspididae_Amblyodipsas_polylepis_polylepis_Bocage_1873_-_Common_Purple-glossed_Snake_Diet
  32. http://animals.jrank.org/pages/3878/African-Burrowing-Snakes-Atractaspididae-BEHAVIOR-REPRODUCTION.html
  33. https://animals.jrank.org/pages/3878/African-Burrowing-Snakes-Atractaspididae-BEHAVIOR-REPRODUCTION.html
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/5/11/1948
  35. https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/9/12/300
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9917609/
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6523505/
  38. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/225/7/jeb227348/274934/Venom-production-and-secretion-in-reptiles
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10605524/
  40. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.102.19.2434
  41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553151/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041010116301088
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041010122000113
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11442967/
  45. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216148
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3960104/
  47. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00237.x
  48. http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/search.php?genus=Atractaspis
  49. https://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/search.php?submit=Search&genus=Amblyodipsas
  50. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/1148893-Atractaspididae
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.