Hubbry Logo
CaltrainCaltrainMain
Open search
Caltrain
Community hub
Caltrain
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Caltrain
Caltrain
from Wikipedia

Caltrain
Cal in black letters, with train inscribed within a red circle, all letters italicized
A red and white electric train at a train station
A train at Millbrae station in 2024
Overview
OwnerPeninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
Area servedSanta Clara Valley
San Francisco Peninsula
Transit typeCommuter rail
Number of lines1 line[i]
5 services[ii]
Number of stations31 (list)
Daily ridership39,985 per Weekday (August 2025)
25,837 per Saturday (August 2025)
20,821 per Sunday (August 2025)[1]
Annual ridership7,201,600 (2024)[2]
HeadquartersSan Carlos, California
Websitecaltrain.com
Operation
Began operation1985 (as Caltrain)
1863 (as Peninsula Commute)
Operator(s)Southern Pacific (1870–1992)
Amtrak (1992–2012)
TransitAmerica Services (2012–present)
Reporting marksJPBX
Infrastructure managerUnion Pacific (Tamien–Gilroy)
CharacterCommuter railroad with level crossings; limited freight service
Number of vehicles29 locomotives and 134 passenger cars (in revenue service)[3]
Train length7 EMU Passenger Cars
Technical
System length77.2 mi (124.2 km)
No. of tracks2+[4]
Track gauge4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
ElectrificationOverhead line25 kV 60 Hz AC (San Francisco to Tamien)[5]
Top speed79 mph (127 km/h)
System map
Map Caltrain highlighted in red
The Portal
planned
enlarge…
0.0 mi
0 km
San Francisco enlarge…
N Judah T Third Street
1.7 mi
2.7 km
22nd Street
under I-280 (1961).svg I-280
Oakdale
proposed
3.9 mi
6.3 km
Paul Avenue
closed
T Third Street (Muni Metro)
5.0 mi
8 km
Bayshore
8.4 mi
13.5 km
Butler Road
closed
9.1 mi
14.6 km
South San Francisco
11.6 mi
18.7 km
San Bruno
Fare zone 1
Fare zone 2
13.5 mi
21.7 km
Millbrae enlarge…
Bay Area Rapid Transit San Francisco International Airport
15.0 mi
24.1 km
Broadway
weekends only
16.1 mi
25.9 km
Burlingame
17.8 mi
28.6 km
San Mateo
18.9 mi
30.4 km
Hayward Park
19.8 mi
31.9 km
Bay Meadows
closed
20.1 mi
32.3 km
Hillsdale
21.7 mi
34.9 km
Belmont
23.0 mi
37 km
San Carlos
25.3 mi
40.7 km
Redwood City
Fare zone 2
Fare zone 3
27.6 mi
44.4 km
Atherton
closed
28.7 mi
46.2 km
Menlo Park
29.9 mi
48.1 km
Palo Alto
30.6 mi
49.2 km
Stanford
game days only
31.6 mi
50.9 km
California Avenue
33.9 mi
54.6 km
San Antonio
34.7 mi
55.8 km
Castro
closed
36.1 mi
58.1 km
Mountain View
Orange Line (VTA)
38.6 mi
62.1 km
Sunnyvale
Fare zone 3
Fare zone 4
40.6 mi
65.3 km
Lawrence
44.1 mi
71 km
Santa Clara
AmtrakAltamont Corridor Express San Jose International Airport (via List of VTA bus routes#60)
45.5 mi
73.2 km
College Park
weekday limited
CEMOF
46.7 mi
75.2 km
San Jose Diridon enlarge…
AmtrakAltamont Corridor Express Green Line (VTA)
48.9 mi
78.7 km
Tamien
Blue Line (VTA)
Fare zone 4
Fare zone 5
weekday
commutes
52.2 mi
84 km
Capitol
55.5 mi
89.3 km
Blossom Hill
Fare zone 5
Fare zone 6
67.3 mi
108.3 km
Morgan Hill
71.0 mi
114.3 km
San Martin
77.2 mi
124.2 km
Gilroy
Castroville
planned
Salinas
under construction
Amtrak

Handicapped/disabled access All stops are accessible except
22nd Street, College Park, and Stanford

Caltrain (reporting mark JPBX) is a commuter rail line in California, serving the San Francisco Peninsula and Santa Clara Valley (Silicon Valley). The southern terminus is in San Jose at the Tamien station with weekday rush hour service running as far as Gilroy. The northern terminus of the line is in San Francisco at 4th and King Street. Caltrain has express, limited, and local services. There are 28 regular stops, one limited-service weekday-only stop (College Park), one weekend-only stop (Broadway), and one stop that is only served on football game days (Stanford). While average weekday ridership in 2019 exceeded 63,000, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been significant: in August 2025, Caltrain had an average weekday ridership of 39,985 passengers.[6]

Caltrain is governed by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB) which consists of agencies from the three counties served by Caltrain: Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo. Each member agency has three representatives on a nine-member Board of Directors. The member agencies are the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, and the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans).

Historically served by diesel locomotives, Caltrain has electrified 51 miles (82 km) of its route between 4th and King and Tamien and has transitioned to electric service, with diesel trains remaining in service between San Jose and Gilroy.[7]

History

[edit]

Southern Pacific service

[edit]
A Southern Pacific locomotive pulls a Peninsula Commute train past Bayshore in April 1985.

The original commuter railroad was built in 1863 under the authority of the San Francisco & San Jose Railroad;[8] it was purchased by Southern Pacific (SP) in 1870.

SP double-tracked the line in 1904 and rerouted it via the Bayshore Cutoff. After 1945, ridership declined with the rise in automobile use; in 1977 SP petitioned the state Public Utilities Commission to discontinue the commuter operation because of ongoing losses. California legislators wrote Assembly Bill 1853 in 1977 to allow local transit districts along the line to make bulk purchases of tickets for resale at a loss, subsidizing commuters reliant on the Peninsula Commute until 1980; more importantly, the bill also authorized Caltrans to begin negotiating with SP to operate the passenger rail service and acquire the right-of-way between San Bruno and Daly City.[9]

To preserve the commuter service, in 1980 Caltrans contracted with SP and began to subsidize the Peninsula Commute. Caltrans purchased new locomotives and rolling stock, replacing SP equipment in 1985. Caltrans also upgraded stations, added shuttle buses to nearby employers, and dubbed the operation CalTrain.

Joint Powers Board

[edit]
A Caltrain car manufactured by Nippon Sharyo

The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board was formed in 1987 to manage the line. Subsequently, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties commissioned Earth Metrics, Inc., to prepare an Environmental Impact Report on right-of-way acquisition and expansion of operations. With state and local funding, the PCJPB bought the railroad right of way between San Francisco and San Jose from SP in 1991. As SamTrans advanced most of the local fund used to purchased the right-of-way, it was also agreed that SamTrans would serve as the managing agency until San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties could repay their portions. The following year, PCJPB took responsibility for CalTrain operations and selected Amtrak as the contract operator. PCJPB extended the CalTrain service from San Jose to Gilroy, connecting to VTA light rail at Tamien station in San Jose.

In July 1995, CalTrain became accessible to passengers with wheelchairs, excepting 22nd Street station, which has no step-free access. Five months later, CalTrain increased the bicycle limit to 24 per train, making the service attractive to commuters in bicycle-friendly cities such as San Francisco and Palo Alto.

In July 1997, the current logo was adopted, and the official name became Caltrain, dropping the capitalized "T".[10]

In 1998, the San Francisco Municipal Railway extended the N Judah line from Market Street to the San Francisco Caltrain Station at 4th and King streets, providing a direct connection between Caltrain and the Muni Metro system. A year later, VTA extended its light rail service from north Santa Clara to the Mountain View station. Starting in 1999, Caltrain reconstructed several stations and upgraded tracks and level crossings under the "Ponderosa Project".[11]

In June 2003, a passenger connection for the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Caltrain systems opened at Millbrae station just south of the San Francisco International Airport.[12]

In 2008, Caltrain reached an all-time high of 98 trains each weekday.

Caltrain announced on August 19, 2011, a staff recommendation to sign a five-year, $62.5 million contract with TransitAmerica Services, after taking proposals from three other firms, including Amtrak California, which had provided operating employees since 1992.[13] The new operating contract was approved by the full Joint Powers Board at its scheduled September 1 meeting. TransitAmerica Services took over not only the conductor and engineer jobs on the trains, but also dispatching and maintenance of equipment, track, and right-of-way from Amtrak. On May 26, 2012, TransitAmerica took over full operations.[14]

Baby Bullet service

[edit]
Baby Bullet service was originally provided by MPI MP36PH-3C locomotives; they have since been replaced by new electric train sets, but still see service on the South County Connector.

In June 2004, Caltrain finished its two-year CTX (Caltrain Express) project for a new express service called the Baby Bullet. The project entailed new bypass tracks in Brisbane and Sunnyvale as well as a new centralized traffic control system. The Baby Bullet trains reduced travel time by stopping at only four or five stations between San Francisco and San Jose Diridon station; the express trains could overtake local trains at the two locations (near Bayshore and Lawrence stations) where passing loops were added. Travel time for about 46.75 miles between San Francisco and San Jose is 57 minutes (four stops), 59 minutes (five stops) or 61 minutes (six stops), compared to 1 hour 30 minutes for local trains. The Baby Bullets have the same top speed of 79 mph (127 km/h) as other trains, but fewer stops save time. The CTX project included the purchase of new Bombardier BiLevel Coaches along with MPI MP36PH-3C locomotives.[15] The Baby Bullets proved popular, but many riders had longer commutes on non-bullet trains, some of which would wait for Baby Bullet trains to pass.[16]

Budget crises

[edit]

In May 2005 Caltrain started a series of fare increases and schedule changes in response to a projected budget shortfall. The frequency of the popular Baby Bullet express trains was increased; two express trains were added in May and another ten were added in August. New Baby Bullet stops, Pattern B stops, were introduced. Another increase of $0.25 in basic fare came in January 2006.

On April 2, 2010, Caltrain announced the need to cut its services by around 50%, as it was required to cut $30 million from its $97 million budget because all three authorities that fund the line were facing financial problems themselves and $10 million a year in previous state funding had been cut. Revenues for both local and state agencies had been steadily declining, as well as ticket revenues at Caltrain itself, and had left all "beyond broke."[17]

On January 1, 2011, Caltrain cut four midday trains but upgraded four weekend trains to Baby Bullet service as a pilot program. This reduced its schedule from 90 to 86 trains each weekday. At the same time, it raised fares $0.25 and continued to contemplate cutting weekday service to 48 trains during commute hours only.[18] By April 2011, Caltrain's board had approved a budget with fare increases to take effect on July 1, 2011, and no service cuts. The budget gap would be closed with another $0.25 fare increase, a $1 parking fee increase to $4, and additional money from other transit agencies and the MTC.[19][20]

On February 17, 2017, California State Senator Jerry Hill introduced SB 797, which would permit the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board to submit a regional measure for sales tax increase of 18th of one cent to the voters in the three counties served by Caltrain.[21] The regional measure would require a two-thirds majority (aggregated among the three counties) to pass, and would provide Caltrain with a dedicated revenue source estimated at $100 million per year.[22] For comparison, in fiscal year 2016 (ending June 30, 2016), the operating expenses for Caltrain were $118 million, and farebox revenues were $87 million,[23] leaving approximately $31 million in expenses to be funded by the PCJPB through its member agencies and county government contributions. SB 797 passed the California State Senate in May, and the State Assembly in September,[24] and Governor Brown signed the bill into law in October.[25]

Caltrain parallels and provides an alternative to the congested Bayshore Freeway (US 101), seen here in San Mateo near Hillsdale Boulevard (2005)

Advocates for the increased tax cited its potential benefits to alleviate congestion along U.S. Route 101, which Carl Guardino quipped "has become so congested that we've changed its name to the '101 Parking Lot'."[26] Detractors pointed to Caltrain's bureaucracy and stated fares should be increased to improve services instead.[22] A poll of 1,200 voters in early May indicated support was strong enough to pass the sales tax increase,[27] if the tax would result in expanding ridership capacity.[28] The poll was sponsored by the Silicon Valley Leadership Group (SVLG), headed by Guardino, which predicted that daily ridership could rise to 250,000 with the improvements in service funded by the dedicated sales tax increase.[27] Potential capital projects which could use the dedicated funding include additional electric multiple units (making electric trains 8-EMU consists, rather than 6-EMU), extended boarding platforms, and the proposed Downtown Rail Extension (now known as The Portal) to the Salesforce Transit Center.[28] A dedicated tax was proposed in 2011, contemporaneously with the prior budget crisis, but polls at the time indicated insufficient support. After SVLG's May 2017 poll indicated strong support, they petitioned Hill to act.[28]

By early 2020, the joint powers board was planning to propose a one-eighth-cent sales tax for voter approval later in the year, to provide an estimated $108 million of dedicated funding for the system, which currently relies on rider fares for 70% of its revenue. This funding would have enabled Caltrain to run 168 trains per weekday, with rush-hour headways of 10 minutes, with the completion of electrification in 2022. BART-like service levels were projected to increase ridership significantly.[29]

In March 2020, Caltrain's ridership dropped by 95% due to the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in losses of $9 million per month. The joint powers board recast the sales tax proposal as a way to keep the system afloat. Due to the COVID-19 measures and subsequent loss of approximately 75% of its ridership, Caltrain discontinued Baby Bullet service starting March 17, 2020.[30] Two weeks later, due to continued loss of ridership, Caltrain further cut service from 92 to 42 trains per weekday, starting March 30.[31] Average weekday ridership plummeted from approximately 65,000 (pre-pandemic) to 1,300. By June 15, service was increased to 70 trains per weekday, and limited (skip-stop) service was reinstated;[32] later that month, ridership had recovered to 3,200 per weekday.[33] In July, after the San Francisco Board of Supervisors initially declined to consider the ballot proposal, citing concerns about the system's governance structure, Caltrain officials warned that the agency would run out of operating funds and be forced to suspend service by the end of the year.[34][35][36] In August, San Mateo County officials agreed to make Caltrain more independent from SamTrans in exchange for placing the sales tax on the ballot.[37] In November 2020, Measure RR passed which created dedicated funding of a one-eighth cent sales tax.[38] The schedule was adjusted again starting December 14, with slightly fewer weekday trains (68) but more frequent off-peak and weekend service to support essential workers.[39]

The number of weekday trains returned to 70 starting March 22, 2021, and the schedule was adjusted to facilitate transfers to BART at Millbrae.[40] Caltrain began operation with a new schedule that exceeds pre-pandemic service on August 30, 2021; there are 104 trains operated per weekday, including reinstated Baby Bullet service. Headways for popular stations are as low as 15 minutes during peak commute hours (6–9 a.m. and 4–7 p.m.) and 30 minutes throughout the day before 11 p.m. for most stations. The separate Saturday and Sunday schedules were consolidated into a single weekend schedule with 32 trains per weekend day. All stations have a maximum headway of 60 minutes, including weekends, except for a 90–120 minute gap between the earliest weekend trains. In addition, fares were cut in half for September.[41]

Gilroy service was increased to four weekday round trips on September 25, 2023.[42]

Modernization and electrification

[edit]

The Caltrain Modernization Program electrified the main line between San Francisco and the San Jose Tamien station, allowing transition from diesel-electric locomotive power to electric rolling stock.[43] Proponents said electrification would improve service times via faster acceleration, allow better scheduling and reduce air pollution and noise. Electrification would also allow future expansion to downtown San Francisco.[44] Electrified vehicles require less maintenance, but electrification will increase required track maintenance by about the same dollar amount, at least initially. The plan called to electrify the system between San Francisco 4th and King Street station and San Jose Tamien station. Originally scheduled for completion by 2020,[43][45] the first electric multiple unit services started on August 11, 2024,[46] with full electrification achieved and diesel trains retired on September 21, 2024.[47]

The electrification project between San Francisco and Tamien is the first phase, the second phase being from Tamien station to Gilroy.[48] Cost, excluding electric rolling stock, for the first phase was estimated at $471 million (2006 dollars). By 2016, costs had increased to $1.7 billion.[49] Notably, in 2021, Caltrain stated that the overall cost of electrification had risen to $2.44 billion.[50] As part of the Caltrain Modernization Program and mandated by the federal government, positive train control (PTC) was installed along the route between San Francisco and San Jose by late 2015.[51]

Caltrain planned to use lighter electric multiple units that do not comply with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) crashworthiness standards, but instead comply with the International Union of Railways (UIC) standards, on the electrified lines. The FRA granted Caltrain a waiver to operate these units, which were previously banned on mixed-use lines with other FRA-compliant rolling stock due to concerns over crashworthiness, after Caltrain submitted simulation data showing UIC-compliant rolling stock performed no worse or even better than FRA-compliant rolling stock in crashes.[52][53] Caltrain plans to retain its newer diesel-electric rolling stock for use on the Dumbarton Extension and service south of Tamien.

Stadler KISS for Caltrain near the U.S. assembly plant in Salt Lake City

Caltrain awarded the electrification and EMU contracts at the July 7, 2016, PCJPB board meeting to Balfour Beatty and Stadler Rail, respectively,[54] signaling the start of modernization efforts that will make Caltrain more akin to rapid-transit services such as Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) than traditional commuter services, and allow the future California High-Speed Rail trains to reach San Francisco utilizing Caltrain tracks. In August 2016, Caltrain ordered sixteen six-car double-decker Stadler KISS electric multiple unit sets from Stadler Rail.[5] The price is $166m for the 16 units, or $551m including an option of 96 more EMU cars.

However, the plans for an electrified Caltrain were put in jeopardy in February 2017 by the Trump administration when US Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao decided to indefinitely delay granting the federal funding for the Caltrain electrification project that had been approved by the Obama administration.[55] One month later, in March 2017, the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) sent a letter to Secretary Chao calling the Caltrain delay "concerning." In more than two decades, the APTA wrote, "no project has failed to secure final signature after successfully meeting evaluation criteria."[56] In February 2017,[57] Caltrain fired Parsons Transportation Group and sued them for delays in designing the custom technologies necessary for the PTC system. They then went on to sign a contract with Wabtec, who would offer them the industry-standard PTC system.[58]

Groundbreaking for electrification project, July 21, 2017

On April 30, legislators in the United States Congress included $100 million for the Caltrain electrification project in the proposed 2017 federal spending bill, which was signed into law by President Trump on May 6.[59] The $100 million represents the federal funding for fiscal year 2017 of the total $647 million grant, with the balance expected in future years. Secretary Chao claimed she could not sign the grant without the full grant being budgeted, which was disputed by Caltrain and both California Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris.[60] On May 22, the FTA announced its intent to sign the funding grant, restoring the final piece of funding for the electrification project.[61] The official grant was finally signed on May 23,[62] and Caltrain broke ground for the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project on July 21, 2017, in a ceremony attended by local and state officials at the Millbrae station.[63]

In December 2018, it was reported that Caltrain was again behind schedule in installing PTC for the rail corridor,[58] and had requested a two-year extension.[64] The Federal Railroad Administration certified Caltrain's PTC project in December 2020.[65] The first electric trainset was shipped to the Transportation Technology Center for testing in February 2021.[66] In June 2021, Caltrain announced the start of revenue service with electric multiple units would be delayed to late 2024.[67]

In February 2022, the last foundation required for the new overhead catenary system was completed, with the entire line planned to be energized by summer 2022. Testing of the line would then begin using a AEM-7 electric locomotive, with revenue service planned for 2024.[68] On March 10, 2022, a southbound train struck a contractor's crane in San Bruno, injuring 13 people.[69]

The last scheduled diesel trainset from San Jose to San Francisco on September 20, 2024

Caltrain began public operation of its electrified trainsets on August 11, 2024, with two trainsets, adding more each week until the full rollout of electric service between San Francisco and Tamien on September 21.[46][47] As part of the transition, a new schedule was implemented.[70] The new schedule provides for 104 trains on weekdays (52 in each direction) between San Francisco and San Jose Diridon, with local service running every 30 minutes, and alternating trains continuing to Tamien.[71] During weekday rush hours, local service is supplemented by express (stopping only at 22nd Street, South San Francisco, Millbrae, San Mateo, Hillsdale, Redwood City, Palo Alto, Mountain View and Sunnyvale) and limited-stop trains (running express between San Francisco and Redwood City, then local between Redwood City and San Jose). Diesel trains continue to be used for South County Connector service between San Jose and Gilroy, with 4 trains in each direction, with these trains scheduled to provide timed cross-platform transfers to and from limited-stop or express electric trains at Diridon. Weekend service was doubled to 66 trains (33 in each direction), with local service running every 30 minutes between San Francisco and San Jose Diridon, and alternating trains continuing to Tamien.[72]

Grade separation

[edit]
At-grade crossing at Meadow Drive in Palo Alto, California (2005)

As of February 2021, there were 41 vehicular at-grade crossings remaining along the PCJPB-owned right-of-way from San Francisco to Tamien:[73]: 13 

  • 2 in San Francisco: Mission Bay Dr, 16th St[74]
  • 29 in San Mateo County
    • South San Francisco: Linden Ave[75]
    • San Bruno: Scott St[76]
    • Millbrae: Center St
    • Burlingame: Broadway,[77] Oak Grove, North Lane, Howard Ave, Bayswater, Peninsula[iii]
    • San Mateo: Peninsula,[iii] Villa Terrace, Bellevue, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 9th
    • Redwood City: Whipple, Brewster, Broadway, Maple, Main, Chestnut[78]
    • Atherton: Fair Oaks Ln, Watkins
    • Menlo Park: Encinal, Glenwood, Oak Grove, Ravenswood[79]
  • 10 in Santa Clara County

In addition, there are 28 more at-grade crossings in Santa Clara County along the UP-owned right-of-way between Tamien and Gilroy, including crossings at Skyway Drive, Branham Lane, Chynoweth Avenue in south San Jose.[73]

Grade separation next to old tracks crossing 25th Avenue in San Mateo, California (2020)

The first grade separation project under PCJPB was completed in 1994, building a flyover for Oyster Point Boulevard in South San Francisco.[73]: 10  Additional grade separations were completed in 1995 (Fifth Ave in North Fair Oaks, depressed under rails), 1996 (Millbrae Ave in Millbrae, elevated above rails), and 1999 (Jefferson Ave in Redwood City, depressed under rails).[73]: 10  Grade separation projects near the Belmont and San Carlos stations (for Ralston, Harbor, Holly, Brittan, and Howard) were completed in 1995, and 2000;[73]: 10  these were "hybrid" crossings, executed as a combination of road depression and rails elevated on berms. The San Bruno station reconstruction was completed in 2014, separating the crossings at San Bruno, San Mateo, and Angus by elevating the rails on a long, curved berm.[73]: 10  In 2021, a similar hybrid grade separation project (25th, 28th, and 31st Avenues in San Mateo) was completed near the Hillsdale station, which was relocated north during the grade separation.[85]

In 2018, gates were down for an average of approximately 11 minutes at each crossing during a typical peak weekday commute hour.[73]: 7  The anticipated increase in rail traffic resulting from the completion of PCEP and implementation of CAHSR will result in additional road traffic delays for the remaining at-grade crossings along the Peninsula Corridor.

Proposed plans

[edit]

Integration with California High-Speed Rail

[edit]

The Caltrain line from Gilroy to San Francisco is part of the planned route of the California High-Speed Rail line. With the adaptation of the preferred alternative in July 2019 on the San Jose to Gilroy HSR section, dedicated HSR tracks are planned south and east of Gilroy station, while CAHSR trains would use a "blended" service, sharing tracks with Caltrain between San Francisco and Gilroy. Blended service CAHSR trains would travel at speeds up to 110 miles per hour (180 km/h) between Gilroy and San Francisco, and higher HSR speeds up to 220 miles per hour (350 km/h) south and east of Gilroy.[86]

Downtown San Francisco extension

[edit]
The Portal
future Second Transbay Tube
to Oakland
4th & King
Caltrain
expanding underground to
4th & Townsend

A 1.3 mi (2.1 km) tunnel has been proposed to extend Caltrain from its north end in San Francisco at 4th and King to the newly built Salesforce Transit Center,[87] closer to the job center of San Francisco and BART, Muni, Transbay AC Transit buses, and long-distance buses. As of 2012, only the structural "train box" below the Transbay Terminal had been funded and was being built.[88] In April 2012, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission decided to make the remainder of the $2.5 billion extension its top priority for federal funding.[89] The extension would also serve the California High-Speed Rail system.

An alternative proposal, by then-Mayor Ed Lee, would see the existing terminal and trains yards demolished, along with Interstate 280 in Mission Bay, and replaced with infill housing. Caltrain and high-speed rail would be extended to the Transbay Terminal in a new tunnel under Third Street.[90]

In April 2018, the alternative alignment through Mission Bay was rejected in favor of a revised alignment under Pennsylvania Avenue.[91] The new alignment would ultimately join the original alignment near 4th and King Station while tunneling under Pennsylvania Avenue from near 25th Street. As of 2023, the revised extension is projected to cost $6.7 billion and may not open for service until 2032.[92]

Dumbarton extension

[edit]

Caltrain has been chosen to provide commuter rail service on a to-be-rebuilt Dumbarton Rail Corridor across the San Francisco Bay between the Peninsula and Alameda County in the East Bay. This project would add four stations to the Caltrain system: Union City, Fremont-Centerville, Newark, and Menlo Park/East Palo Alto. The two obsolete swing bridges along the corridor would be replaced.[93] Dumbarton Rail was scheduled to start construction in 2009 after a 30-month environmental review and begin service in 2012.[94] SamTrans, one of Caltrain's member agencies, already owns the right-of-way for the Dumbarton Rail Bridge. The bridge has not been used since 1982, when it was still owned by Southern Pacific, and about 33% of the bridge collapsed due to an arson fire in 1998. However, the project's estimated cost doubled between 2004 and 2006, to US$600 million,[95] and is financially problematic.[96] In January 2009, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission instead applied the funds to the BART Warm Springs Extension project in Fremont, delaying the Dumbarton rail project for at least a decade.[97]

South of Gilroy extension

[edit]

Potential restoration of Del Monte-like service to Monterey had been identified as early as the Caltrans 1984–89 Rail passenger development plan. Amtrak declined to operate such service, but operations under Southern Pacific (by then running state-subsidized services) were studied with ridership forecast developed.[98] Extensions to Hollister have been proposed since at least 2003.[99]

Caltrain was approached by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to extend service south of Gilroy into Monterey County. A draft environmental impact report stated the lack of public transportation between Monterey County and the Bay Area has resulted in increased private commuter vehicle traffic.[100] Traffic on U.S. Route 101 was projected to rise by up to 56% in 2020 compared to 1998 levels, resulting in unstable traffic flow from the Salinas city limits to the Santa Clara County line as a result.[100]

The concept of a Caltrain extension to Monterey County has been considered since at least 1996, with the cities of Salinas and Watsonville considering rail station improvements and construction between 1996 and 1998, culminating in a TAMC-sponsored Extension of Caltrain Commuter Service to Monterey County Business Plan in 2000. The proposed extension would create new stations and stops in Pajaro (serving Watsonville in adjacent Santa Cruz County at an estimated cost of US$6,585,000 (equivalent to $10,271,000 in 2024))[100] and Castroville (at an estimated cost of US$11,150,000 (equivalent to $17,391,000 in 2024))[100] before terminating at the existing Salinas Amtrak station with Coast Starlight service. The Salinas station would be rebuilt as an intermodal station to connect commuter rail with Monterey-Salinas Transit buses. A layover yard would be added to accommodate Caltrain crews and maintenance, and the total cost of the Salinas improvements was estimated at US$39,705,000 (equivalent to $61,930,000 in 2024).[100] The cost of operating commuter rail from the anticipated start of service until 2030 was estimated at US$64,900,000 (equivalent to $101,228,000 in 2024) for two daily round trips, including an expansion to four round trips daily within ten years.[100]

This project depends on state and federal funding availability, a possible local sales tax measure, and an agreement with Union Pacific, the owner of the Salinas-to-Gilroy tracks and right-of-way. This project is managed by TAMC, who released the Final Environment Impact Report (EIR) for this project in 2006.[101] This would complement another plan to re-establish rail service last provided by Southern Pacific's Del Monte Express which operated between Monterey and San Francisco.

In 2009, Caltrain requested that TAMC approach other train operators. TAMC subsequently opened discussions with the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority and the Caltrans Division of Rail to extend Capitol Corridor service south from San Jose to Salinas using the same routing and stations.[102] The switch to Capitol Corridor was cited as an advantage, since CCJPA had experience with commuter trains sharing service on Union Pacific-owned freight right-of-way. Two Capitol Corridor trains would originate from Salinas in the mornings and run through to San Jose and on to Sacramento, with two evening trains making the return trip south to Salinas.[102]

By 2016, plans had shifted in favor of Amtrak California's Capitol Corridor to be the service extended to Salinas station.[103] However, with the awarding of Road Repair and Accountability Act funds in 2018, it was revealed that Caltrain again would operate to Salinas as the first commuter rail service with Capitol Corridor service to follow later.[104] As of March 2020, two daily Caltrain round trips were planned to begin in 2022 after the completion of the Salinas layover facility and trackwork at Gilroy. Future phases are proposed to add stations at Pajaro/Watsonville and Castroville, with the potential for up to six daily round trips.[105]

Oakdale infill station

[edit]
A southbound train passing the proposed station site (June 2018); the Quint Street Lead can be seen branching east from the northbound mainline.

A study from 1988 evaluated replacing the Paul Avenue station with a new station to the north, at either Williams, Palou, or Evans, as part of the effort to relocate the home port for USS Missouri (BB-63) to the Hunters Point Shipyard, and concluded that with the completion of the Downtown Rail Extension (now known as The Portal), daily ridership could increase to 2,400. However, without the Downtown Extension, ridership would be limited to less than 100. The 1988 study concluded the preferred site was at Evans Avenue.[106]

The Bayview Hunters Point Community Revitalization Concept Plan (March 2002) identified the Oakdale-Palou area as the community's preferred location for the Caltrain station.[107] With the completion of the Caltrain Express project, service to Paul Avenue was reduced and the station was closed in 2005.[108] A feasibility study that year proposed a replacement station just north of Oakdale Avenue, next to the City College of San Francisco Southeast Campus in Bayview, 1.0 mile (1.6 km) north of the former Paul Avenue station, connecting with multiple bus lines.[109]: 18  The station would be near the Quint Street Lead, which is used by freight trains moving east to the Intermodal Freight Rail Cargo Transfer Facility near Piers 90–96.[109]: 27  A follow-up study in 2014 predicted daily ridership of around 2,350.[110][111]

The Southeast Rail Station Study (SERSS) was released in June 2022 and was endorsed by the San Francisco Planning Commission on July 14.[112] SERSS recommended a new Bayview Station should be located between Oakdale and Jerrold, over alternatives at Evans or at Williams.[113]: 7 

Near the proposed station, the Caltrain line is grade-separated from Oakdale (which passes over the rail line) and Quint. Prior to 2016, the rail line was carried over Quint on a steel bridge originally constructed for the Bayshore Cutoff in the early 1900s. In preparation for a new Oakdale station, the bridge over Quint was removed on April 30 and replaced by a berm completed in July 2016, which severed Quint between Oakdale and Jerrold.[114] A new road has been proposed to reconnect Quint to Jerrold on land belonging to Union Pacific, west of the tracks.[115]

Infrastructure and service

[edit]

Right of way

[edit]
Bay Area regional commuter rail map; excludes metro (BART) and light rail (Muni Metro and VTA Light Rail) services

The Caltrain right of way between San Francisco and Tamien stations is owned and maintained by its operating agency, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB). PCJPB purchased the right of way from Southern Pacific (SP) in 1991, while SP maintained rights to inter-city passenger and freight trains. In exchange SP granted PCJPB rights to operate up to 6 trains per day between Tamien and Gilroy stations, later increased to 10 trains per day on a deal with SP's successor Union Pacific (UP) in 2005. Three round-trip freight trains operate daily over the line.[116]

Law enforcement services are provided by a division of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, under contract with PCJPB.[117][118]

Stations

[edit]

The system has 31 stations. 28 stations are served daily, one (Broadway) is served on weekends only, one (College Park) is served during Bellarmine College Preparatory's commute times on weekdays only, and one (Stanford) is served on Stanford University's football game days only. San Francisco 4th and King Street is the northern terminus of the system, while Gilroy is the southern terminus. However, most trains originate and terminate at Tamien. The five southernmost stations—Capitol, Blossom Hill, Morgan Hill, San Martin, and Gilroy—are served only on weekdays during commute times in the peak direction, going toward San Francisco in the morning and toward Gilroy in the afternoon.[119] Twelve stations were served by the express train service known as Baby Bullet, inaugurated in 2004 and discontinued in 2024.[120] Santa Clara station is not long enough to accommodate six-car trains without minor service impacts.[121] Seven stations (Millbrae, Burlingame, San Carlos, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, Santa Clara and San Jose Diridon) are listed on the National Register of Historic Places.[122]

A southbound train holds outside the old South San Francisco station while passengers board a northbound train on the narrow island platform in July 2018.

The Southern Pacific Railroad originally built many stations with a side platform on the west side of the tracks to serve southbound trains, plus a narrow island platform between tracks to serve northbound trains. To protect northbound passengers from being struck by southbound trains, Caltrain implemented a "hold-out rule" (GCOR 6.30): if a train is stopped for passengers, an approaching train on another track must wait outside the station.[123][124] This rule caused numerous delays, especially after the Caltrain Express project added Baby Bullet trains that pass through many stations without stopping. Most stations have been rebuilt (often as part of larger projects) with side platforms or wider island platforms, thus avoiding the hold-out rule. They have included Redwood City in 1995; San Carlos in the late 1990s; Downtown Mountain View, San Mateo, and Menlo Park in 2000; Sunnyvale in 2002; Millbrae in 2003; Hillsdale in 2005; Burlingame and California Avenue in 2008, Santa Clara in 2012, and South San Francisco in 2021.[125][126][127] Weekday service at Broadway and Atherton was eliminated in 2005 due to the hold-out rule, while College Park has only limited service. Atherton station was closed altogether in December 2020.[128]

Services

[edit]

The current services became effective on September 21, 2024:[70][71][72]

Service Train numbering scheme[70][71][72] Notes
Local 1xx All stops between San Francisco and San Jose, including service to Tamien on alternating trains and service to College Park on two trips.
Limited 4xx Skip-stop service in the northern part of the route with local service for stations south of Redwood City.
Express 5xx Limited stop service, completing the San Jose to San Francisco trip in 59 minutes.
Weekend Local 6xx All stops between San Francisco and San Jose, including service to Tamien on alternating trains, service to Broadway, and service to Stanford on game days
South County Connector 8xx 4× daily weekday only diesel service between Gilroy and San Jose with timed cross-platform transfers to and from Limited or Express trains.

Maintenance and operations facility

[edit]
Caltrain Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility

The Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility is the train maintenance yard and facility serving Caltrain, north of San Jose Diridon station in San Jose.[129] The US$140 million maintenance station began construction in 2004 and opened on September 29, 2007.[130][131] It consolidates much of Caltrain's maintenance and operations into one location.[132]

Operations

[edit]

The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board purchased the right of way between San Francisco and San Jose for $212 million from Southern Pacific in 1991 (equivalent to $489 million in 2024). Trackage rights with Union Pacific limit service south of Tamien to up to five round trips per weekday (four daily round trips operate as of 2024).[159]

Operating expenses and farebox recovery

[edit]

The operating expenses for fiscal year 2021 were $170,847,000. The fare revenue was $32,440,000, making the farebox recovery ratio 19.1%.[155] Operating expenses for fiscal year 2022 rose to $174,388,000 while fare revenue rose to $33,236,000, marking a modest gain in the farebox recovery ratio to 21%, still less than a third of pre-pandemic levels.[152][156]

Ridership

[edit]

Caltrain ridership more than doubled between 2005 and 2015.[160] Ridership growth has been linked to the expansion of businesses near Caltrain stations, a shift in attitudes against the use of cars for commuting, and the expansion Caltrain service which has included extra trains and the introduction of fast express services (Baby Bullet service).[161][162]

Performance

[edit]

According to the Rail and the California Economy study published in 2017, Caltrain Baby Bullet trains operate with a 95% on-time performance, defined as making stops within ten minutes of published schedules. In addition, Caltrain carries over 4,500 people per hour in each direction, equivalent to two freeway lanes in each direction. At current ridership levels, Caltrain directly removes 200 t (200 long tons; 220 short tons) of carbon dioxide emissions per day, displacing the equivalent of 10,000 vehicles per day, not counting any ancillary benefit from improved traffic flow resulting from reduced congestion.[163]

Ticketing

[edit]
Seat checks used to verify fare payment in the 1990s

Caltrain operates as a proof-of-payment system. Each rider must buy a ticket prior to boarding the train that may or may not be checked during the trip. Tickets can be purchased at ticket vending machines located at all stations, as well as on the Caltrain app.[164][165] Ticket windows located at San Jose Diridon and Fourth and King were closed in 2005.

One-way tickets expire four hours after purchase, but round-trip tickets ("day passes") are good for unlimited rides within their zone limit until the last train of the day. A joint adult Caltrain/VTA Day Pass, valid through Zone 3 and intended for service to Levi's Stadium, costs an additional $6 and covers fares on VTA buses and light rail, with the exception of VTA Express service. A Zone Upgrade may be purchased to augment a valid one-way ticket, day pass, or monthly pass at $2 per zone, valid for four hours after purchase and in one direction only. Discounted 8-ride tickets and monthly passes are available only with a Clipper card. Caltrain eliminated sales of the 8-ride ticket as of October 1, 2017; existing 8-ride tickets would be honored through the end of October.[166] Seniors (aged 65 years and older), children (aged 17 years or younger), disabled, and Medicare card holders are eligible for a discounted fare at approximately half price (varies depending on the ticket).[167][168]

Zone fare structure

[edit]

Caltrain stations are split into six zones. Zone 1 comprises all stations in San Francisco, plus South San Francisco and San Bruno stations in San Mateo County. Zone 2 comprises most stations in San Mateo County. Zone 3 comprises stations in northern Santa Clara County, plus Menlo Park station in San Mateo County. Zone 4 comprises stations in central Santa Clara County. Zones 5 and 6, which are used only during rush hour, comprise stations in southern Santa Clara County.

Fares for Caltrain service are based on the number of zones traveled, which is considered to be the number of zones "touched" between the origin and destination. For instance, a passenger that boards at a Zone 1 station and departs at a Zone 1 station is considered to travel within one zone. A passenger that boards at a Zone 2 station and departs at a Zone 4 station is considered to travel within three zones (Zones 2, 3, and 4).[167] When purchasing a ticket from the station ticket machine, the machine assumes the origin zone is the same as the station's zone, and prompts the passenger to select a destination zone, but the origin zone can be changed if necessary.[165]

Fare chart (as of April 28, 2021)[167]
Zones traveled Fare Type One Way[a] Day Pass[b] Zone Upgrade[a][c] Monthly[d]
TVM[e] Clipper TVM TVM Clipper
1 Regular 3.75 3.20 7.50 2.25/zone 96.00
Discount[f] 1.75 1.60 3.75 1.00/zone 48.00
2 Regular 6.00 5.45 12.00 2.25/zone 163.50
Discount[f] 2.75 2.60 6.00 1.00/zone 78.00
3 Regular 8.25 7.70 16.50 2.25/zone 231.00
Discount[f] 3.75 3.60 8.25 1.00/zone 108.00
4 Regular 10.50 9.95 21.00 2.25/zone 298.50
Discount[f] 4.75 4.60 10.50 1.00/zone 138.00
5 Regular 12.75 12.20 25.50 2.25/zone 366.00
Discount[f] 5.75 5.60 12.75 1.00/zone 168.00
6 Regular 15.00 14.45 30.00 2.25/zone 433.50
Discount[f] 6.75 6.60 15.00 1.00/zone 198.00
Notes
  1. ^ a b Valid 4 hours from time of purchase
  2. ^ Valid the on the day purchased, allows unlimited travel within the zones listed.
  3. ^ Valid one way, must be accompanied by another valid ticket. Not valid with 8-ride Ticket
  4. ^ Valid month of purchase.
  5. ^ Ticket Vending Machine
  6. ^ a b c d e f Eligible Discount Fare, applies to senior, disabled, youth, or Medicare. Conductor or fare inspector may request proof of age or eligibility.

Zone ticketing requires little infrastructure at the stations but can be expensive for passengers making a short trip that crosses a zone boundary (each zone is 13 miles long). Travel between Sunnyvale and Lawrence is a two-zone ride, since Sunnyvale is the southernmost station in Zone 3 and Lawrence is the northernmost station in Zone 4. A ride between Sunnyvale and Lawrence covers 2.0 miles (3.2 km) and costs $6, the same as San Francisco [Zone 1] to Redwood City [southernmost station in Zone 2], which covers a distance of 25.3 miles (40.7 km).

Payment

[edit]

In August 2009 Caltrain became the fifth public transit agency in the San Francisco Bay Area to implement the Clipper card.[169] Monthly passes are implemented exclusively through the Clipper card;[168] in addition, some employer-sponsored annual Go passes are implemented through the Clipper card, starting in January 2019.[170] All passengers who use the electronic Clipper card to ride (including holders of monthly and annual Go passes) must remember to "tag on" with their card prior to boarding and "tag off" with their card after exiting the train.[171] If they board the train without tagging on, they will be subject to the same fines as riders without a ticket.[165][171] Passengers with monthly passes must tag on and off at least once before the 15th of the month to activate the pass, unless the monthly pass was added through a physical card interaction at a retailer or add value machine.[168]

Without a pass, stored cash on the Clipper card may be used to purchase a one-way ticket. Clipper card users receive a $0.55 discount on the one way full fares.[167] When tagging on, the stored cash value on the Clipper card is debited the maximum one-way fare from the originating zone, where the card was tagged on prior to boarding the train. When tagging off, the stored cash value on the Clipper card is credited according to the destination zone when leaving the train; pass holders are credited the full amount that was debited when tagging off. If passengers who use the Clipper card fail to tag off when they exit the train, they will be charged "the highest cash fare from [their] point of origin", including pass holders.[172] Because of the initial maximum fare debit when tagging on, passengers are required to have at least $1.25 stored cash on the Clipper card to avoid exceeding the card's allowable negative value limit when boarding Caltrain.[173]

For example, if a passenger tags on and boards a northbound or southbound train at San Mateo (Zone 2), their Clipper card will be debited for a five-zone one-way fare (Zone 2 to Zone 6, which is the most distant theoretical destination from the origin point, a one-way fare debit of -$12.20); if that passenger travels south and tags off at Sunnyvale (Zone 3), their Clipper card will be credited for the three zones not traveled (Zones 4, 5, and 6; +$6.75 credit overall) so the net deduction from stored cash is a two-zone one-way fare (Zone 2 to 3, -$5.45 with Clipper cash discount), unless the passenger has a pass; in that case, the passenger would receive a $12.20 credit. In the example given, failing to tag off means the initial five-zone fare debit (Zone 2 to 6, -$12.20) would remain. Because pass holders are credited only when tagging off, pass holders also would be charged the five-zone fare debit if they forget to tag off.[173]

Those who use a clipper card hear one beep or see a light flash when they tag on to begin their journey and see two flashes with a double beep when they tag off to end their trip. Three beeps mean the card does not have valid fare.[173] This ensures Caltrain is universally accessible beyond many other Clipper card acceptance mechanisms.

In 2018, Caltrain rolled out a mobile app allowing riders to purchase fares from Android and iOS smartphones. The Caltrain Mobile app was written by moovel North America, which has written apps with similar functionality for Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency and San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.[174]

Fare enforcement

[edit]
Caltrain proof-of-payment system sign

Before 2018, passengers who were unable to show a viable ticket were subject to fines of up to $250 plus court fees.[164][165] Approximately 2,100 riders are given verbal warnings or written citations per month for fare evasion, and, while the old system was in place, an average of 15 incidents of violence against conductors occurred every month as a result of fare enforcement. This has led to trains being delayed while waiting for the police to respond.[175] The fines for fare evasion were collected by the superior court system of the county in which the ticket is issued, and were not returned to Caltrain.[176] The complexity of the ticketing system meant that up to 65% of issued fine tickets were later overturned in court.[175]

Caltrain moved to a more streamlined process of issuing citations, effective February 1, 2018.[177] Rather than writing the citation on the spot, which takes up to fifteen minutes, the conductor will scan the photo ID, and an administrative penalty will be mailed to the address on record, bypassing the civil superior court system. In addition, the cost of the fine decreased to $75 per infraction, and Caltrain will retain the fees.[175] However, passengers who accrue a third (or more) fare evasion citation will be subject to traditional fines and/or criminal penalties through the superior court system.[177]

Logos, markings, and liveries

[edit]

During the initial years as the state was assuming control (1980–1985), locomotives and rolling stock were leased from Southern Pacific. The leased "suburban" and "gallery" coaches continued to wear SP's standard dark grey. Locomotives wore SP's "Bloody Nose" paint scheme.

An experimental scheme was applied to SP/CDTX #3187 and three gallery cars (SP/CDTX #3700, 3701, 3702), unveiled on May 15, 1982;[178][179] the locomotive had a red nose and both locomotive and cars had the body painted silver (upper half) and dark blue (lower half) blue, separated by three stripes (blue, teal, and red). The scheme was nicknamed "Rainbow",[180] "Postal Service", or "Mailbox".[181]

When new equipment was introduced in 1985, CalTrain adopted a new logo and painted the newly acquired silver EMD F40PH locomotives with teal and blue stripes, matching the colors in the Caltrans logo.

After the new Caltrain logo was adopted in 1997, the F40PH locomotives were repainted to gray with a black roof, and the MPI MP36 locomotives ordered for Baby Bullet service wore gray with red accents.

Train numbering scheme

[edit]

Caltrain train #159 at Hayward Park, the 30th northbound local 1xx train; electronic headsign indicates train number and final destination (San Francisco).

Each train on the schedule is assigned a three-digit number indicating direction, sequence and stop pattern. With the transition to fully electric service between San Francisco and Tamien, using Stadler KISS EMUs, the entire three-digit train number and final destination are displayed on electronic destination signs visible on the leading (cab) car and the side windows of other cars. Caltrain adopted a modified train numbering scheme starting in September 2024:[70][71][72]

  • The first digit still indicates the service/stop pattern:
    • 1xx trains are weekday local trains that make all regular stops.
    • 4xx trains are weekday limited-service trains that run skip-stop between San Francisco and Redwood City, and local between Redwood City and San Jose Diridon.
    • 5xx trains are weekday express trains, similar to the legacy Baby Bullet trains with a few additional stops.
    • 6xx trains are weekend local trains that make all regular stops.
    • 8xx trains are South County Connector diesel services operating between San Jose and Gilroy.
  • The second and third digits are assigned sequentially within each stop pattern, starting from x01.
    • The second and third digits still indicate the direction of the train; odd-numbered trains run northbound, and even-numbered trains run southbound.
    • For example, 501 is the first northbound train that operates with the 5xx express service stop pattern, and 502 would be the first southbound train with the same 5xx stop pattern. Thus x03 is the second northbound train, x04 is the second southbound train, etc.

Legacy schemes

[edit]
Train number locations on locomotives (top row) and control cars (bottom row)

The practice of placarding train numbers, which provides basic information about the train's direction and type of service, dates back to when the trains were operated by Southern Pacific. The train number placard was displayed on each leading element (locomotive or cab car), using a physical or electronic sign which may be changed by the engineer. The train number should not be confused with the locomotive or equipment number, which is the 9xx number permanently stenciled on each locomotive, or the three or four-digit number similarly painted on each piece of rolling stock.

Until 2021

All train number placards were physical signs capable of displaying two digits only until the MPI MP36 locomotives entered service in 2004, which can display three digits on an electronic sign. Prior to 2021, two-digit physical train number placards reflected the sequential train number, which are the last two digits of the three-digit train number.

  • The first digit of the number posted on the trains indicated the stop pattern.[182][183]
    • The first digit for weekday trains was always 1, 2 or 3.[184]
      • 1xx trains were local trains that made all regular stops.
      • 2xx trains were limited-service trains that skipped some stations. Each limited-service train used one of three or four stop patterns: local south of Redwood City, local north of Redwood City, or express services with approximately double the number of stops compared to Baby Bullet trains. In general, the split-local limited trains offered timed transfers at Menlo Park and Redwood City.
      • 3xx trains were Baby Bullet trains, which made the fewest stops.
    • The first digit for weekend trains was always 4 or 8.[185]
      • 4xx trains were local trains that made all stops.
      • 8xx trains were Weekend Baby Bullet trains that made fewer stops.
  • The second and third digits indicated the sequence number of the train. For instance, x01 was the first train of the day.
    • These digits also indicated the direction of the train; odd-numbered trains run northbound, and even-numbered trains run southbound. Thus x02 is the first southbound train of the day, x03 is the second northbound train of the day, etc.
2021 – 2024
Caltrain F40PH-2CAT locomotive 915 with a two-digit placard "L5", indicating this is a 5xx limited-stop train

Between August 30, 2021, and September 2024, Caltrain used a modified numbering scheme.[182][183]

  • The first digit reflects the stopping pattern:
    • 1xx were local weekday trains making all regular stops
    • 2xx were local weekend trains making all regular stops
    • 3xx were limited weekday trains which skip selected stops, running local service between Lawrence and Redwood City
    • 4xx were limited weekday trains which skip selected stops, running local between San Mateo and San Bruno
    • 5xx were limited weekday trains which skip selected stops, running local between Palo Alto and Redwood City
    • 7xx were Baby Bullet/express weekday trains which have the fewest stops, either seven southbound or eight northbound stops between San Jose and San Francisco
  • The second and third digits are assigned sequentially within the service type
    • These continue to reflect the direction of travel, so even numbers = southbound and odd = northbound. For example, 504 is the second southbound train within the 5xx stopping pattern.

In addition, during this period, the information provided on the two-digit physical placards on the leading element of the train (either the control car, for northbound trains, or the locomotive, for southbound trains) was changed to provide the stop pattern only. Two-digit train placards combined the basic stopping scheme (L for local or limited, B for Baby Bullet service) with the first digit of the train number; for example, train 501 is the first northbound train with the 5xx limited stop pattern, and would carry "L5" on the physical placard; in the pre-2021 scheme, this train would have carried "01" instead.

Rolling stock

[edit]

Electric multiple units

[edit]

In August 2016, Caltrain awarded a $551 million contract to Stadler Rail, which would produce the trainsets needed for running on the electrified line. The award was for 96 Stadler KISS EMU cars arranged into 16 trainsets, scheduled to be delivered for testing by August 2019. Under the contract, Caltrain had the option to procure an additional 96 units in the future[186][187] for an additional $385 million.[188] In December 2018, Caltrain was reportedly carrying 65,000 passengers a day, and expected to have 240,000 daily riders in 2040. Therefore, after funding was received from the California State Transportation Agency's Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, Caltrain's board approved the purchase of additional cars from Stadler, increasing the order from 16 six-car sets to 19 seven-car sets.[189][190][191]

In August 2023, Caltrain exercised an option order for four additional seven-car EMU trainsets ($220 million) and a single four-car battery electric multiple unit (BEMU) trainset ($80 million). This will result in a fleet of 23 EMU trainsets, six diesel-hauled trainsets, and one BEMU trainset by 2030, with over 90% of service using electric trains. The BEMU trainset will be used on the non-electrified portion of the corridor between Tamien and Gilroy.[192][193]

New trains are double-decked and equipped for both 22-and-50.5-inch (559 and 1,283 mm) platform heights in anticipation of sharing facilities with California High-Speed Rail trains. The six-car EMU traisets would have been 515 feet 3 inches (157.05 m) long;[194] as delivered, the seven-car EMU trains are 598 ft 11.4 in (182.560 m).[195] Units can reach speeds of 110 mph (177 km/h), though operations will likely be limited to 79 miles per hour (127 km/h).[86]

Acceleration and deceleration of the EMUs are substantially better than the legacy diesel-electric trains. The legacy locomotives offer a starting tractive effort of 65,000 lbf (290 kN) for an EMD F40PH-2[196] and 85,000 lbf (380 kN) for an MPI M36PH-3C,[197] while a seven-car KISS EMU set has a starting tractive effort of 145,190 lbf (645.85 kN).[195]

The first Stadler KISS was completed by Stadler's Salt Lake City factory in July 2020.[198] It was taken to the Transportation Technology Center in Pueblo, Colorado, for high-speed testing.[199]

Caltrain began public operation of its electrified trainsets on August 11, 2024, with two trainsets, adding more trains each week until the full rollout of electric service on September 21.[46][47]

Electric multiple units of Caltrain
Builder Model Type Numbers Quantity Entered Service Notes Image
Stadler KISS EMU cab car 301–346 23 sets
(46 cars)
2024 #305 named for Anna Eshoo;[200][201] the truck away from the cab is powered.[195]
EMU passenger car 3011–3456 23 sets
(115 cars)
2024 Restrooms in 3xx1 cars; bicycle storage on 3xx2 and 3xx6 cars. Both trucks powered on 3xx1, 3xx3, and 3xx5 cars, as indicated by removal of vestibule seats.[195]
BEMU 1 set
(4 cars)
On order

Locomotives

[edit]

Prior to 1985, Caltrain used equipment leased from Southern Pacific, including SP/CDTX 3187, an EMD GP9 repainted in prototype Caltrain livery[202] and other locomotives that had been used for the Peninsula Commute service. Since 1985, Caltrain has used the following locomotives, which are almost all powered by diesel engines:[3]

Caltrain locomotives[203]
Builder Model Locomotive Numbers Years of Service Notes Image
MPI F40PH-2C 920–922 1998–present Cummins-powered HEP generators; underwent mid-life overhaul by MPI at Boise, Idaho between 2017 and 2020. Currently in service on the South County Connector.
MPI MP36PH-3C 923–928 2003–present Underwent mid-life overhaul by Alstom at Mare Island between 2020 and 2023. Currently in service on the South County Connector. No. 925 named after Jackie Speier.
EMD F40PH-2 902, 903, 907, 910, 914 1985–2024 Ordered new by Caltrans; Overhauled by Alstom in 1999; HEP generators retained original gear drive from main engine. Retired when electric service began. Most were sold to Lima, Peru, one likely to be preserved at the Southern California Railway Museum.[204][205]
EMD F40PH-2CAT 900, 901, 904–906, 908, 909, 911–913, 915–919 1985–2024 Originally F40PH-2s; ordered new by Caltrans; overhauled by Alstom in 1999 and HEP generators were converted to separate Caterpillar 6-cylinder engines. Units 918 and 919 entered service in 1987. Most retired when electric service began, remaining units retired later. All have been sold to Lima, Peru.[205] Three EMD F40PH-2CATs at San Francisco.
EMD GP9 3187 1980–1985 Experimental "Rainbow" livery, leased from SP during transition to Caltrain.
500, 501 1999–2013 Work train/yard switcher service. Leased, then purchased from Power Fluids & Metals in 2000 to support right-of-way rebuild under the Ponderosa Project.[206] 500 and 501 are ex-SP 3833 & SP 3842, respectively. Sold to Motive Power Resources late 2012, left Caltrain on March 8, 2013.
EMD MP15DC 503, 504 2003–present Work train/yard switcher service. 503 and 504 are ex-SP 2691 and 2692, respectively;[207][208] originally built 1974, sold 1994.[209]: 18 [210]: 96  EMD MP15DC #504.
EMD AEM-7AC 929, 938 2023–present Ex-Amtrak AEM-7AC units 929 and 938, used for testing electrification.

Caltrain also leased a number of Amtrak F40PH's in 1998 and 1999 while Caltrain's F40PH-2's were being overhauled.[citation needed]

Since September 2024, newer diesel locomotives have been retained for service between Gilroy and San Jose. Revenue service between San Francisco and Tamien is provided by electric multiple units. Older diesel locomotives (built before 1987) were sold to Lima, Peru.[205]

Legacy passenger cars

[edit]

Before the rollout of all-electric service between San Francisco and Tamien in September 2024, Caltrain diesel trains consisted of one locomotive and a five- or six-car consist. Trains ran in a puller configuration (led by the locomotive) towards San Jose and in a pusher configuration (led by the cab car) towards San Francisco, so the orientation of cars remained consistent.

Caltrain had 93 Nippon Sharyo bi-level Gallery-type cars and 41 Bombardier BiLevel Coaches in revenue service in 2017. Each revenue train consist was made up of a single type of car, i.e., the passenger cars in trains were either all gallery or all bilevel, never mixed. Of the Gallery cars, 66 were coaches and 27 were bike-accessible cab cars. Caltrans purchased the first 63 gallery cars in 1985 when it began subsidizing the commuter rail service. The other 30 were purchased by Caltrain in 2000, and the older cars were rebuilt by Nippon Sharyo around the same time.[3]

The first 17 Bombardier BiLevel Coaches were purchased as surplus from Sounder Commuter Rail in 2002, of which 10 are coaches, 5 are cab-bike cars, and 2 are cab-wheelchair cars.[3][211] Caltrain purchased an additional eight cars in 2008 to meet short-term passenger growth and to increase spare ratio. These Bombardier cars were initially only used on Baby Bullet express trains, but now also used on limited-stop and local trains.

Caltrain bought 14 remanufactured Budd Rail Diesel Car ("Boise Budd") single-level cars from Virginia Railway Express around 2000 for use on Special-Event trains.[212] A seven-car special train took fans to the first game at Pac Bell Park on March 31, 2000. The northbound train ran at an estimated 125% of capacity and skipped stops after Hillsdale because it was already well above seated capacity.[213] These cars were sold in 2005 after Bombardier cars were delivered and are now in service on the Grand Canyon Railway.[214]

JPBX 165, an ex-Metrolink car in Caltrain service

Caltrain purchased 16 used Bombardier BiLevel Coaches from Metrolink in 2014 to cope with increasing ridership by lengthening certain Bombardier sets from five to six cars.[215][216] The $15 million purchase was financed by a farebox revenue fund.[215] Since the cars had retired from Metrolink service, they required rehabilitation before being placed in service with Caltrain.[215] The ex-Metrolink cars were of older Series 1 and 2[215] that have riveted bodies, instead of the welded bodies in the Series 6 and 7 cars that Caltrain had purchased starting from 2002.[3][217]

Ex-Metrolink cars retained their Metrolink blue-on-white livery, but Metrolink logos were painted over and rolling stock numbers were repainted with JPBX numbers.[218] All five-car Bombardier sets were lengthened to six-car Bombardier sets using surplus ex-Metrolink cars in May 2015.[219] In July 2016, six-car Bombardier sets replaced some five-car gallery sets to relieve overcrowding.[220] In November 2016, Caltrain rolled out six-car gallery sets for certain trains to further relieve overcrowding; the longer trains were a temporary measures to increase capacity until more frequent service can be achieved with electrification.[221]

After September 2024, electric multiple units displaced the legacy diesel locomotive and passenger car fleet for service between San Francisco and Tamien. The newer MPI diesel locomotives and bilevel passenger cars have been retained for service on the southern segment between San Jose and Gilroy. 19 locomotives and 90 gallery cars, built between 1985 and 1987, have been sold at a nominal price of US$6 million to Lima, Peru, and will be used in a new commuter rail service;[205] the service is predicted to displace the equivalent of 4,000 cars per day between the eastern suburbs (Chosica) and the seashore (Callao) in the Lima metropolitan area.[222]

Passenger Cars of Caltrain[203][223][209]: 77–80 [210]: 91–95 
Builder Model Type Numbers Quantity Seats Entered Service Left Service Notes Image
Bombardier Bi-Level Trailer 220-226, 229-230 9 144 2002 present 220 & 226 built 2003. With accessible bathroom Bombardier consist at San Jose Diridon station.
231-236 6 140 2008 present
164; 165; 167; 169; 170-173; 175-182 16 149 2015 present With accessible bathroom.
Purchased from Metrolink.[224]
Originally built in 1997.
Cab-Bike 112-118 7 114 2002 present With accessible bathroom
119-120 2 114 2008 present
219 1 127 2002 present
Nippon Sharyo Gallery Trailer-Luggage 3800-3825 26 142 1985 2024 3842 built in 1987. Rebuilt by Nippon Sharyo 2001–02 Gallery cars at Millbrae
Trailer-Bike 3826-3835 10 108
Trailer 3836-3841 6 148
3842-3851 10 1986
3852-3865 14 120 2000 With wheelchair space and bathroom
Cab-Bike 4000-4020 21 97 1985 With bathroom
4021-4026 6 78 2000 With wheelchair space and bathroom
Budd Rail Diesel Car Trailer 400-403; 406-407; 410-411; 413, 415, 425, 428 12 2000 2005 Built in 1952, acquired in 2000 for use on special event trains. Engine removed. Sold to Grand Canyon Railway in 2005.[225]
Cab-Control 1400, 1406 2


Miscellaneous/Maintenance-of-Way

[edit]

Caltrain has several cars used for track maintenance, such as JPBX 505, a track geometry car. Some other rolling stock is infrequently used for special service, such as on the Holiday Train, an annual non-revenue train decorated with lights, carrying volunteer carolers, and making limited stops for toy donations.[226] The annual event began in 2001. It is sponsored by the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.[227][228]

Non-Revenue Rolling Stock of Caltrain[210]: 96–97 [229][230]
Builder Model Type Numbers Quantity Year Notes Image
Entered Service Left Service
Budd SPV-2000 Track geometry car 505 1 2007 present Ex-Federal Railroad Administration (DOTX T-10) Budd SPV-2000 at 4th and Townsend
Caboose 598, 599 2 2000 present Ex-SP Bay Window caboose, built 1974. Cabooses at 4th and Townsend yard
Flatcar 301–304 4 [data missing] present
701–704 4 [data missing] present Built 1975.
711MW, 712MW 2 [data missing] present Formerly from Golden Gate Railroad Museum; generally used for Holiday Train. Flatcars with Holiday Train decorations at 4th & Townsend
Max E530 Gondola 851 1 [data missing] present Built 1976.
Ballast hopper 601–606 6 [data missing] present Built 1975 & 1976. Overhauled 2000.
11309, 11315, 11341 3 [data missing] present Built 1957.
11362, 11369, 11379 3 [data missing] present Built 1954.
11542, 11573, 11579 3 [data missing] present Built 1971.
11583, 11604, 11612, 11654, 11706, 11723 6 [data missing] present Built 1978.
Difco M110 Side dump 881–883 3 [data missing] present Built 1978.

Bicycle access

[edit]
Bicycle car signage
"Bike Car" sign posted on gallery & bilevel cars
Bicycle graphics on EMU door windows

Caltrain was one of the first commuter rail services to add bicycle capacity to its trains, inaugurating bicycle service in 1992 by allowing four bikes on certain trains.[231] By 2016, up to 80 bicycles could be carried per train in two or three bike cars. After the EMU fleet entered revenue service in 2024, each seven-car train has two bike cars.

Bicycle policies

[edit]

Legacy gallery and bilevel passenger cars with bike racks have a yellow "Bike Car" sign posted on the exterior next to the door. EMU bike cars have white bicycles stenciled on the windows of the doors. Cyclists are required to tie their bicycle to the rack with the bungee cord provided, and must be racked so they do not protrude into the aisle. Each rack can accommodate four bicycles. Because the bikes are stacked together against the racks, most riders place a destination tag, available from a conductor, on their bicycles to optimize placement and minimize shuffling.[232][233]

Cyclists must be at least six years old, and cyclists younger than 12 must be accompanied by an adult and capable of carrying their own bike on and off the train.[232] Bicycles must be single-rider, with a maximum of 80 inches (2,000 mm) in length, and tandem or three-wheel bikes are not allowed. Bulky attachments such as training wheels, trailers, saddlebags, and baskets are similarly not allowed.[232] Folding bicycles are not restricted and can be carried on any car when folded; they may not be placed on seats or block aisles.[232]

History of bikes on Caltrain

[edit]

The initial pilot program launched in 1992 allowed up to four bikes per train for off-peak service, and bicycles were carried in the cab car (northernmost car). Bicycle capacity was expanded to twelve bikes per train for all trains in 1995, followed by a doubling to 24 bikes per train for all trains in 1996.[234] Only the cab/control car of each train consist was modified for bicycle service.[235]

Starting in 2001, additional gallery cars were modified for bicycle service.[234] Gallery cars modified for bicycle service removed seats from the lower level in the north half of the car, resulting in space to carry 32 bicycles per car. By 2006, Bombardier cars were also modified for bicycle service by partially removing seats from the lower level of the car, resulting in space to carry 16 bicycles per car.[231] Additional bicycle capacity was proposed by removing some seats from bicycle cars. Initially Caltrain rejected this idea because some trains are operated at seated capacity[236] and the seat removal would take space from other passengers. However, in early 2009 Caltrain announced that it would be expanding bicycle capacity by 8 spots by removing some seats in the bike cars, bringing bike capacity to 40 bikes on gallery cars and 24 bikes on Bombardier cars.[231] The expansion started several months later.[235] After this, bike capacity on trains has been expanded by increasing the number of bike cars in a consist, rather than further modifying cars.

A passenger secures a bicycle onboard Caltrain gallery car

In fall 2009, all Bombardier consists and some gallery consists substituted a second bike car for one of the passenger trailers. The remaining gallery consists continued with a single bike car,[237] resulting in a carrying capacity of 48 bicycles on Bombardier consists or 40–80 bicycles on gallery consists with one or two bike cars, respectively.[235] Due to demand, in 2011, the remaining gallery sets modified a passenger trailer to take bicycles, giving two bike cars to all consists, increasing capacity on all gallery consists to 80 bicycles per train.[238] 10 gallery trailer cars, 3826-3835, had their lower-level seats removed in 2011.[3][239] Although the Baby Bullet runs initially used five-car Bombardier consists, many of the Baby Bullet runs returned to five-car gallery sets due to their superior bicycle capacity, since demand for bicycle car access was high.

Prior to 2016, both Bombardier and gallery trains used five-car consists. With the purchase of Bombardier cars from Metrolink, Caltrain announced in January 2015 that roughly half of the additional ex-Metrolink cars will be converted to bike cars with capacity for 24 bikes, so some trains running Bombardier cars will be six-car consists, of which three will be bike cars.[240]

Six-car Bombardier consists started running in May 2015, but the third car was not converted for bike service until March 2016. Five of the Bombardier cars were refurbished as bike cars and entered service in March 2016. All Bombardier consists are now six-car sets with three bike cars and three passenger cars. The third bike car is just south of the existing southern bike car. The third bike car is being placed next to the other bike car to help conductors to manage bike capacity.[241] Official bike capacity for six-car Bombardier consists is 72 (24 bikes × 3 cars), comparable to the 80-bike capacity of five-car gallery consists (40 bikes × 2 cars).

The EMUs which began revenue service in 2024 have two bicycle cars with a total capacity of 72 bikes per train, carrying 36 bicycles in each car.

Capacity issues

[edit]
Bicyclists waiting to board Caltrain at Palo Alto station

The variation on bicycle capacity between trainsets generated criticisms from the bicycling community, as cyclists may be denied boarding when a train reaches its bicycle capacity. The Baby Bullets, favored by many cyclists, often used lower bike-capacity Bombardier cars and some cyclists had to wait for slower trains with higher-capacity gallery cars, or seek alternate transportation.[242]

Due to equipment rotation and maintenance concerns, Caltrain said in 2009 that it could not dedicate cars with higher bike capacity on trains with high bike demand.[237] Eventually, two bike cars were added to every train consist by 2011,[239] and in 2016, a third bike car was added to Bombardier consists.[243]

To provide an alternative to bringing bicycles on board the trains, Caltrain has installed bicycle lockers at most stations, and constructed a new bicycle station at the San Francisco station.[236] In early 2008, Caltrain sponsored Warm Planet bicycle station opened at the 4th and Townsend terminus. A bicycle station was open at the Palo Alto station from April 1999 to October 2004, and reopened in February 2007.[244] Nearly all stations have racks and/or lockers available to park bicycles.[245]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Caltrain is a service operating along the Peninsula Corridor in the of , providing passenger transportation from to San Jose with intermediate stops. The service, managed by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board—a of San Mateo, Santa Clara, and counties—traces its origins to the San Francisco and San Jose Railroad Company, which initiated passenger rail operations in 1863, making it the oldest continuously operating railroad west of the . Historically reliant on diesel locomotives, Caltrain underwent a major project that achieved substantial completion in May 2024 and commenced fully electrified mainline service on , 2024, introducing faster acceleration, reduced travel times, increased frequency, and elimination of diesel emissions along the corridor. This upgrade, funded through federal and state grants, replaced gallery cars and locomotives with electric multiple units capable of returning excess energy to , marking a significant enhancement in system performance and environmental impact mitigation. Post-, ridership has shown substantial growth, exceeding half a million passengers in December 2024 alone, reflecting improved appeal amid regional commuting demands. Key defining characteristics include its role in connecting major employment centers like tech hubs and San Francisco's urban core, with extensions for events at facilities such as and , alongside seven historic stations listed on the . The system's evolution from 19th-century steam operations to modern electric service underscores its adaptation to technological and demographic shifts, though it has faced challenges like funding dependencies and infrastructure upgrades inherent to public rail management.

History

Origins under Southern Pacific Railroad

The Peninsula rail corridor, which forms the backbone of what became Caltrain, originated with the incorporation of the San Francisco and San Jose Railroad in 1860, backed by funding from , San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties. Construction commenced in 1861, with the first train running from 's Mission Station to Mayfield (present-day California Avenue in Palo Alto) on October 17, 1863; regular service along this initial segment began in October 1863, requiring a two-hour journey and stagecoach connections for further travel to San Jose. The line's completion to San Jose occurred on January 16, 1864, marking the start of scheduled passenger operations with two daily weekday trains between (terminating at 18th and Valencia streets) and San Jose. This early service facilitated regional connectivity and economic growth, proving central to the development of the and South Bay areas by enabling efficient transport of passengers, goods, and agricultural products. In 1870, the San Francisco and San Jose Railroad was absorbed into the Southern Pacific Railroad, transferring control of the 47-mile route to the larger network. Under Southern Pacific ownership, passenger services continued and gradually formalized as commuter-oriented operations, known as the , with steam-powered trains handling peak-hour demands from Peninsula residents working in ; by the early 1900s, these runs had established a pattern of bidirectional service emphasizing reliability for daily commuters. The San Francisco terminal shifted to Third and Townsend streets in 1915, coinciding with infrastructure upgrades for the Panama-Pacific International Exposition, which enhanced capacity for growing ridership.

Transition to Joint Powers Board Governance

In the late 1970s, Southern Pacific Railroad incurred mounting losses on its service and signaled intent to end operations, prompting state intervention to sustain regional rail connectivity. In 1980, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) entered a with Southern Pacific to subsidize service continuation, marking the initial shift from fully private operation while Southern Pacific retained day-to-day management and equipment. This arrangement facilitated the introduction of Caltrain branding and a new fleet of locomotives and gallery cars in 1985, effectively transferring operational control to state oversight without immediate changes to track ownership. Local agencies recognized the need for long-term public governance amid ongoing subsidies and service vulnerabilities. In 1987, the Peninsula Corridor Study Joint Powers Board was established by San Mateo, Santa Clara, and counties to evaluate corridor improvements and acquisition feasibility. This interim entity laid groundwork for coordinated , culminating in October 1991 with the formation of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB) via a joint powers agreement among its three core members: the City and County of , San Mateo County Transit District (operating as ), and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The PCJPB's creation enabled direct public acquisition of the right-of-way from to San Jose from Southern Pacific, securing and under a multi-agency board structure for enhanced funding access, investment, and service reliability. Southern Pacific retained perpetual trackage rights for freight movements and any residual intercity passenger operations, preserving shared corridor use while transferring responsibilities to the JPB. This model, governed by joint powers authority statutes, distributes voting power proportionally among members based on ridership and financial contributions, fostering accountability to Peninsula communities without sole reliance on state subsidies. The transition stabilized Caltrain's future, averting private discontinuation risks and enabling subsequent expansions under public direction.

Expansion of Express Services and Baby Bullet Introduction

In response to increasing commuter demand and congestion on the corridor during the late 1990s and early 2000s, Caltrain initiated efforts to enhance express services by reducing travel times through infrastructure upgrades and optimized scheduling. The Caltrain Express Program (CTX), implemented between 2002 and 2004, focused on constructing passing sidings and additional track segments to enable faster express trains to overtake slower locals without delays. Key improvements included a third track at Millbrae station, rebuilt passing sidings at Bayshore station, and approximately 1.2 miles of new sidings near Redwood Junction in Redwood City, allowing for full-speed overtakes in these segments. These modifications, completed after two years of construction following four years of planning, addressed longstanding capacity constraints on the primarily two-track right-of-way. The program's centerpiece was the introduction of Baby Bullet express trains on June 7, 2004, which skipped intermediate stops to achieve end-to-end travel times of approximately 60 minutes between San Francisco and San Jose Diridon, compared to over 90 minutes for prior limited-stop services. Initial service comprised five northbound and five southbound Baby Bullet trains during peak commute hours, serving major stations such as San Jose Diridon, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Redwood City, Hillsdale, San Mateo, Millbrae, and San Francisco. To support the faster operations, Caltrain procured a new fleet including MotivePower MP36PH-3C locomotives and Bombardier bi-level passenger cars, replacing older equipment for improved acceleration and reliability. The upgrades also facilitated the restoration of weekend service, which had been suspended during construction. Post-launch, Baby Bullet service drove measurable ridership growth, with average weekday passengers rising 6.3% in the first year from 30,330 to 32,238, and cumulative increases exceeding 50% by 2009 as express options attracted more riders from highways. The service patterns prioritized high-demand corridors, though smaller stations experienced relative declines in boardings due to skipped stops, highlighting a between speed and . Subsequent schedule revisions expanded Baby Bullets to 22 daily peak trains by the mid-2000s, further embedding express operations into Caltrain's core offerings.

Recurrent Budget Shortfalls and Service Reductions

In the early 2000s, Caltrain faced operating deficits exceeding $13 million annually, prompting the introduction of the Baby Bullet express service in 2004 to improve efficiency through better crew and equipment utilization, thereby generating additional fare revenue to offset shortfalls. This initiative partially alleviated immediate pressures but highlighted the agency's structural reliance on subsidies from member counties and state transit funds, as farebox recovery consistently fell short of covering full operating costs. By 2009-2010, amid the , Caltrain's fiscal year 2010 budget projected a $2.7 million deficit that risked expanding to $30 million without intervention, driven by declining ridership and exhausted one-time reserves. In response, the agency implemented service reductions, including fewer peak-hour trains and elimination of some off-peak runs, while raising fares by up to 25% and deferring maintenance to balance the books. Projections indicated that absent and sustained funding, deficits could consume one-quarter of the operating budget by 2019 in inflation-adjusted terms. The pattern persisted into the , with a $23.5 million shortfall in 2016 mitigated through $5 million in state grants and $6 million in internal cuts, including administrative efficiencies and reduced non-essential spending. Further cuts loomed in 2011, as regional transit agencies withdrew $30 million in subsidies from Caltrain's $100 million budget, forcing evaluations of frequency reductions and potential service elimination south of San Jose. Post-2020, the exacerbated deficits to $18-31 million for fiscal year 2020 due to ridership plummeting by nearly half for frequent commuters, leading to temporary service suspensions and reliance on federal aid. By 2023, long-term forecasts warned of over $500 million in cumulative deficits through the decade without new revenue, prompting ongoing fare hikes and efficiency measures. As of fiscal year 2025 planning, potential reductions included hourly service only or weekend eliminations to address persistent gaps averaging 23% of operating expenses, underscoring the need for stable dedicated funding beyond fluctuating cap-and-trade allocations and local contributions.

Electrification Initiative and Diesel-to-Electric Transition

The Corridor Electrification (PCEP) aimed to replace Caltrain's diesel-powered operations with electric multiple units (EMUs) along the 51-mile route from to San Jose, enhancing acceleration, service frequency, and energy efficiency while reducing emissions. The project included installing a 25 kV AC overhead system to power the new fleet, enabling trains to reach speeds up to 79 mph with improved reliability over diesel locomotives. Planning for dated back to integration with , but federal funding commitments solidified in the 2010s, with the providing a full-funding grant agreement in 2016. Initial cost estimates reached $1.52 billion, but the adopted budget grew to $2.44 billion amid overruns, prompting the to classify PCEP as "At Risk" due to schedule delays and fiscal pressures. Challenges included a lawsuit from Atherton challenging tree removal and , which contributed to timeline extensions, though the project adhered to its revised schedule for . Electrification infrastructure was completed by mid-2024, allowing testing of the new EMUs, which feature capable of returning 23% of power to the grid or other trains. The diesel-to-electric transition occurred rapidly, with full electrified service launching on , 2024, ending diesel operations along the core corridor within weeks and phasing out legacy locomotives and bi-level cars. By 2025, ridership climbed to 9.1 million passengers, a 76% increase in June 2025 compared to the prior year, attributed to smoother rides, quieter operations, and expanded peak-hour frequencies. Air quality improved markedly, with studies recording an 89% reduction in carcinogen exposure for riders and a sharp drop in particulates from the elimination of . Despite early operational hiccups like equipment reliability issues, the shift has curtailed long-term environmental impacts and supported regional goals without compromising core service levels.

Infrastructure

Right-of-Way Characteristics and Track Ownership

The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB), which operates Caltrain, owns the railroad right-of-way and tracks from San Francisco's Fourth and King station to Tamien station in San Jose, encompassing approximately 51 miles of corridor. This ownership was established through the JPB's purchase of the Peninsula Corridor right-of-way from Southern Pacific on December 27, 1991. In a transaction approved by the Surface Transportation Board in May 2024, the JPB acquired full 100% interest in the line from the , including tracks, right-of-way, and related properties, resolving prior shared ownership arrangements under a 1991 real property agreement where had advanced purchase funds. South of Tamien, approximately two miles beyond the JPB-owned segment, owns the right-of-way, over which the JPB holds trackage rights extending service to Gilroy. The right-of-way features a double-track mainline configuration throughout the JPB-owned portion, supporting bidirectional operations with limited passing sidings to facilitate express services. Track infrastructure is designed for conventional speeds up to 79 mph, with compatibility for shared freight operations under Union Pacific trackage rights, though freight traffic is scheduled primarily at night to minimize conflicts. As part of the Caltrain Electrification Program, completed in 2024, the corridor received 25 kV AC overhead electrification across the full 51-mile JPB-owned segment, enabling operations and eliminating diesel emissions within this right-of-way. The alignment includes at-grade road crossings—over 90 historically, with ongoing projects to enhance safety and capacity—and short tunnel sections in , while the majority runs at-grade adjacent to highways like U.S. Route 101. This setup reflects the corridor's origins as a 19th-century freight and route, adapted for modern demands without full upgrades beyond blended system provisions.

Station Network and Accessibility Features

Caltrain operates a network of 32 stations along a 77.4-mile right-of-way extending from San Francisco to Gilroy, with daily service concentrated between the San Francisco terminus at 4th and King Street and San Jose Diridon Station. Local trains stop at all intermediate stations, including 22nd Street, Bayshore, Brisbane, South San Francisco, San Bruno, Millbrae, Burlingame, San Mateo, Hayward Park, Hillsdale, Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City, Atherton, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, California Avenue, San Antonio, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Lawrence, Santa Clara, and Tamien, while express services bypass select smaller stops to expedite travel. Limited weekday peak-hour extensions reach Gilroy, serving additional stations such as Blossom Hill, Capitol, and Morgan Hill. As of 2025, electrification enhancements have enabled more frequent service, with every station receiving at least one train per direction every 30 minutes and select high-demand locations seeing intervals as short as 15 minutes. Accessibility features at Caltrain stations prioritize ADA compliance where infrastructure allows, including wheelchair-accessible platforms equipped with ramps, mini-high platforms, or deployable lifts at compliant locations, alongside public address systems for announcements. Wheelchair-accessible stations encompass Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, California Avenue, San Antonio, and others along the core corridor, with backup lifts available at these sites for reliability. However, not all stations achieve full accessibility; for example, 22nd Street Station lacks elevators or ramps, relying on stairs, though feasibility studies and planned improvements under the Caltrain Modernization Program aim to install vertical circulation elements to bridge this gap. Caltrain's Station Access Policy mandates safe, well-maintained, and seamless connections favoring universal design, including enhanced pedestrian pathways and multimodal integrations, with ongoing upgrades tied to electrification projects. Onboard, all electric multiple units feature dedicated spaces for mobility devices, automated visual and audio announcements, priority seating, and ADA-compliant restrooms with touchless fixtures and baby-changing stations.

Maintenance Facilities and Grade Crossing Management

Caltrain's primary maintenance operations are conducted at the Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility (CEMOF), a 20-acre complex in San Jose, California, constructed on the site of the former Southern Pacific Lenzen Street roundhouse. This facility supports comprehensive fleet management, including routine inspections, heavy and light repairs, component overhauls, train washing, and secure storage on dedicated tracks. Specialized infrastructure, such as a water treatment plant and ground power systems, enables efficient servicing of both diesel and electric rolling stock. As part of the electrification program, CEMOF underwent upgrades to accommodate high-voltage equipment testing and electric multiple unit maintenance, ensuring compatibility with the fleet's transition completed in 2024. Grade crossings along the Caltrain corridor, numbering approximately 98 at-grade intersections between and San Jose, have historically contributed to incidents, including vehicle incursions and trespasser events, prompting targeted management strategies. The Corridor Crossings Strategy (CCS), launched to coordinate corridor-wide improvements, prioritizes grade separations or closures through stakeholder collaboration, elevating these projects in regional infrastructure planning to mitigate collision risks and reduce gate-down times that delay service. Operational safety enhancements include upgraded , reflective delineators, improved pavement markings, and relocated stop bars to enhance and compliance at crossings. In December 2024, Caltrain piloted advanced detection systems to identify stalled or errant vehicles at crossings, issuing automated warnings to prevent collisions. Trespasser prevention measures, such as solar-powered markers and GPS navigation app integrations alerting users to active rail zones, were expanded in 2025 to further decrease unauthorized entries. Grade separation efforts, funded through state and federal programs like those administered by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, have progressed in key locations including Palo Alto and Menlo Park, with cooperative agreements executed by early 2025 to design and construct , aiming to eliminate high-risk crossings and support higher train speeds post-electrification. Active projects continue in parallel with CCS development, focusing on engineering feasibility and environmental reviews to balance safety gains against local disruption.

Rolling Stock

Electric Multiple Units in Current Service

Caltrain's electric multiple units in current service are double-decker trainsets, procured as part of the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project. The fleet consists of 19 seven-car EMUs, which entered progressively starting in August 2024, with full electrified operations launching on September 21, 2024. Each trainset features electric traction motors distributed throughout, delivering a total power output of 7,000 kW (9,387 hp), enabling superior over the prior diesel locomotives. These bi-level units accommodate approximately 85 to 100 seats per car, including two dedicated bike cars with 72 spaces total and 14 seats in those cars, supporting Caltrain's multimodal ridership. The EMUs operate primarily on the electrified core corridor from to San Jose, replacing about 75% of diesel services and facilitating increased frequencies and express patterns. By fiscal year 2025, the fleet contributed to a ridership increase to 9.1 million passengers, up from 6.2 million the prior year, amid ongoing system integration and testing.

Diesel Locomotives and Passenger Cars During Transition

Caltrain's fleet during the transition to primarily consisted of EMD F40PH-series units, which had served as the backbone of operations since the . These included 18 F40PH-2 and F40PH-2CAT locomotives built in 1985–1987, each delivering 3,200 horsepower with (HEP) systems for onboard amenities, supplemented by three F40PH-2C rebuilds from 1998 and six MP36PH-3C units acquired in 2003 offering 3,600 horsepower. The F40PH variants, originally designed for Amtrak's passenger services and adapted for commuter push-pull operations, hauled trains on the Corridor until their progressive retirement in 2024, coinciding with the rollout of electric multiple units (EMUs). Passenger cars paired with these locomotives were bi-level gallery designs manufactured by starting in 1985, featuring open upper decks for enhanced capacity and views. The fleet comprised 26 gallery trailer cars with 142 seats each and 21 gallery cab cars (including bike configurations) with 97 seats, totaling over 40 cars in regular use. These stainless-steel cars, nearly 40 years old by the transition period, provided multilevel seating for up to 5,000 daily passengers but were increasingly maintenance-intensive due to age-related wear. Phase-out accelerated in early 2024 to accommodate incoming EMUs at maintenance facilities, with 32 gallery cars retired and shipped to Petaluma, Sonoma County, for interim storage by Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) pending sale. The remaining cars and most locomotives were decommissioned by September 20, 2024, just before full electrified service commenced on September 21, enabling diesel operations only on non-electrified extensions south of Tamien thereafter. In total, 19 F40PH locomotives and 90 gallery cars were sold to Peru's commuter rail system in November 2024, while others entered auction for static repurposing, marking the end of diesel-hauled gallery train service on the core corridor. This transition reduced emissions and noise but required careful scheduling to maintain service continuity during the overlap period.

Equipment Procurement and Phase-Out Decisions

In 1985, the California Department of Transportation procured 20 diesel locomotives and 92 bi-level gallery cars to replace Southern Pacific Railroad's outdated , marking the start of dedicated operations along the Corridor. These locomotives, manufactured between 1985 and 1987, hauled push-pull consists with cab cars for bidirectional service without turning. The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project prompted a major shift toward electric propulsion, with Caltrain awarding Stadler Rail a $551 million contract in October 2017 for 16 bi-level KISS electric multiple units (EMUs), totaling 96 cars configured as six-car trainsets. This procurement aimed to replace approximately 75% of the existing diesel fleet, enabling faster acceleration, higher capacity, and zero-emission operations upon completion of overhead catenary installation. Contract options were exercised in 2018 to extend trainsets to seven cars and later expanded the order to 23 EMUs to accommodate projected ridership growth through 2030. In August 2023, the Joint Powers Board approved additional Stadler options, including four more EMUs and a pilot bi-level battery-electric multiple unit (BEMU) for potential gap-filling service beyond electrified segments. Phase-out decisions for legacy diesel equipment accelerated with EMU deliveries beginning in 2024, requiring retirement of the 20 F40PH locomotives and 92 gallery cars to free up capacity and storage at centralized facilities. By spring 2024, Caltrain had sold 34 gallery cars and initiated disposal of locomotives through international sales, including shipments to Peru's for continued freight use. This approach faced scrutiny amid California's 2025 legislation, signed October 15 by Governor , prohibiting public agencies from selling intact older diesel locomotives post-retirement to curb emissions from resale abroad, potentially impacting future disposals and requiring removal for scrap or donation. Caltrain officials expressed concerns over the policy's financial implications, estimating costs up to $20 million for compliance like decommissioning before museum donations or scrapping. The transition prioritizes environmental compliance under state zero-emission vehicle mandates while balancing operational continuity during the diesel-to-electric hybrid phase.

Operations

Service Patterns and Scheduling

Caltrain provides three primary weekday service patterns: local trains that stop at every station, limited-stop trains that serve select intermediate stations, and express trains—including the Baby Bullet—that bypass most intermediate stops to achieve end-to-end travel times under one hour between and San Jose. Local service (numbered 1XX) accommodates all regular stops for comprehensive coverage, while limited (4XX) and express (5XX) patterns prioritize speed by omitting stations such as those in mid-Peninsula suburbs like Redwood City or Palo Alto during peak periods. The Baby Bullet express, operating on select rush-hour slots, skips over 20 stations to minimize dwell times and acceleration delays, particularly benefiting the electrified fleet's rapid starts. Following the completion of mainline on September 21, 2024, Caltrain implemented a clockface timetable, standardizing departures at fixed intervals within each hour across service types to enhance predictability and transfer coordination with bus and connections. Weekday operations maintain 104 trains total, with peak-hour frequencies reaching every 15 to 20 minutes northbound and southbound between and San Jose from approximately 6-9 a.m. and 4-7 p.m., transitioning to 30-minute headways midday and in evenings. A minor schedule adjustment effective January 27, 2025, preserved these patterns with tweaks for operational efficiency, such as refined South County Connector extensions to Gilroy (8XX trains) that operate limited peak service beyond Tamien. Weekend service consolidates into a single pattern with 32 local trains per direction, running every 30 minutes from early morning through late evening, covering the core to San Jose route without express options to simplify operations on lower-demand days. has enabled these consistent frequencies by reducing turnaround times and energy costs, though patterns remain constrained by shared trackage with freight and future considerations, limiting all-day express runs. Service operates daily from around 5 a.m. to , with late-night gaps filled by connecting bus bridges during windows.
Service TypeWeekday PatternsKey Stops SkippedPeak Frequency
Local (1XX)All stationsNoneEvery 30 min off-peak
Limited (4XX)Major intermediates onlyMinor suburbsIntegrated with peaks
Express/Bullet (5XX)Endpoints + hubs20+ stationsEvery 15-20 min rush hours

Ticketing Systems and Fare Policies

Caltrain operates a system, requiring passengers to obtain a valid ticket or register a payment via prior to boarding any train; failure to present proof upon request by conductors or fare inspectors results in fines up to $250. Fares are distance-based, determined by the number of zones traversed between origin and destination stations, with six zones spanning the corridor from (Zone 1) to Gilroy (Zone 6, to select rush-hour express services). Adult one-way fares range from $4.00 for one-zone trips to $15.25 for the longest journeys, following a 25-cent base fare increase effective July 1, 2025, as part of periodic adjustments guided by the Caltrain Fare Policy to balance revenue needs and affordability. Day passes, valid for unlimited travel within specified zone limits until the end of the service day, cost twice the one-way fare (e.g., $8.00 to $30.50), while monthly passes offer unlimited rides systemwide for $275 as of 2025. Eligible youth (under 19) receive discounted $1.00 one-way fares across all zones, and seniors, disabled passengers, and Medicare cardholders qualify for half-price adult fares. Tickets can be purchased via station ticket vending machines, which accept , /debit cards, and contactless payments; the Caltrain Mobile app, enabling instant digital ticket activation without physical media; or the regional , which provides additional discounts (e.g., up to 20% on certain passes compared to machine purchases) and seamless transfers with other Bay Area transit agencies. users tap validators at stations before boarding, with virtual cards available via the Clipper app for mobile integration. Employer-subsidized GoPass programs further reduce costs for participating organizations, integrating with for bulk discounted access. Regional transfer discounts apply when connecting to services like or , crediting overlapping zones to avoid double payment. The Fare Policy, a governing framework adopted by the Joint Powers Board, emphasizes equitable pricing, revenue recovery (targeting 25-30% of operating costs from fares), and incentives for off-peak and local travel, informed by periodic studies such as the 2017 Fare Study analyzing rider behavior and elasticity. Enforcement relies on random onboard inspections, with zero tolerance for evasion to sustain system finances amid growing ridership post-electrification. Refunds are limited to specific cases like machine malfunctions, processed through customer service.

Ridership Patterns and Post-Electrification Growth

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Caltrain averaged over 18,000 weekday boardings in fiscal year 2019, supported by diesel-powered service patterns emphasizing peak-hour commutes between San Francisco and Silicon Valley. The pandemic triggered a collapse in ridership, with monthly passengers dropping below 200,000 in early 2020 due to lockdowns, remote work shifts, and reduced office attendance; by fiscal year 2021, annual totals fell to approximately 2.5 million, less than 20% of pre-pandemic levels. Recovery under hybrid diesel operations progressed gradually from 2022 onward, reaching 6.2 million annual passengers in fiscal year 2024 as hybrid work normalized, though weekday averages lingered around 15,000-20,000, constrained by slower travel times and less frequent off-peak service. Electrified service launched on September 21, 2024, enabling faster acceleration, reduced trip times by up to 10 minutes on express runs, and increased frequencies to every 15-30 minutes during peak hours, alongside all-day weekend service enhancements. This transition correlated with immediate ridership acceleration; October 2024, the first fully electric month, recorded 753,000 passengers, a 54% year-over-year increase from October 2023 and 17% above the preceding diesel-heavy August. Monthly totals exceeded 1 million riders for the first time since pre-pandemic years starting in June 2025, with that month alone showing a 75% rise to 1,037,161 passengers compared to June 2024. Fiscal year 2025 ridership climbed to 9.1 million passengers, a 47% gain from fiscal year 2024's 6.2 million, driven by electric operations that boosted average weekday boardings to nearly 40,000 by August 2025—a 61.5% jump from the prior year—while weekend usage more than doubled amid expanded schedules. First-quarter 2025 data reflected a 50% overall increase versus the same period in 2024, with San Francisco-origin trips up 59% from January to May, attributing gains to electrification's reliability and capacity rather than isolated economic factors. Sustained growth into late 2025, including August's 1 million-plus riders (67% year-over-year), underscores electrification's role in reversing pandemic-era modal shifts toward driving, though full pre-2019 recovery remains pending broader office return trends.
Fiscal YearAnnual Passengers (millions)Key Notes
2019~18 (pre-pandemic peak)Diesel service baseline
2021~2.5Pandemic minimum
20246.2Partial recovery, hybrid diesel
20259.1Post-electrification surge

Performance Metrics

Reliability and On-Time Performance

Caltrain defines on-time performance (OTP) as trains arriving at their within six minutes of the scheduled time. This metric excludes delays incurred after the final station but captures systemic issues affecting end-to-end reliability. Prior to full in September 2024, OTP typically ranged from 85% to 95% monthly, influenced by maintenance and external disruptions like grade crossing incidents. Electrification has introduced operational enhancements, including rapid acceleration that allows faster recovery from delays and reduced mechanical failures compared to diesel-hybrid service. A 2025 study analyzing air quality and performance data concluded that Caltrain's electric multiple units (EMUs) exhibit higher mechanical reliability than predecessor diesel locomotives, with fewer breakdowns and smoother operations contributing to overall system resilience. However, post-electrification OTP has shown variability, reflecting both improvements and new challenges. For instance, initial EMU commissioning led to warranty-related delays, with 523 incidents in June 2025 attributed to manufacturer Stadler, potentially reducing that month's OTP from 94.3% absent those issues.
MonthOTP (%)Comparison to Prior YearKey Delay Factors Noted
Nov 202488.2Up from 86.9% (Nov 2023)Trespasser strikes, mechanical issues
Dec 202488.4Down from 90.2% (Dec 2023)9 vehicle-on-tracks incidents, 1 vehicle strike
May 202594.8Up from 92.2% (May 2024)Vehicle-on-tracks events dominating
June 2025~94.3*N/A523 Stadler warranty delays
July 202595.3N/AImproved overall, despite incidents
*Adjusted excluding warranty issues. Persistent delays stem primarily from external causes, including fatalities and vehicle intrusions at ungarded grade crossings, which accounted for multiple multi-train disruptions in late 2024. Mechanical delays totaled 69 minutes from 69 issues in December 2024, alongside EMU-specific problems adding 516 minutes. These factors underscore that while bolsters intrinsic reliability, broader infrastructure vulnerabilities—such as insufficient grade separations—continue to undermine consistent performance, with OTP rarely sustaining above 95% amid high ridership growth.

Economic Viability and Subsidy Dependence

Caltrain's operating model has historically demonstrated relatively strong farebox recovery compared to other U.S. systems, with passenger fares covering approximately 73% of operating costs prior to the . This performance was driven by consistent ridership along the densely populated corridor and zone-based pricing that encouraged higher utilization. However, the pandemic severely eroded revenues, dropping the recovery ratio to around 25% in fiscal year 2023 and 24.5% in fiscal year 2024, as fares generated $46.9 million against $194.2 million in operating expenses. The resulting operating deficit—$144.5 million before depreciation in FY2024—is bridged through non-fare public funding, including $119.6 million from Santa Clara County's Measure RR half-cent dedicated to rail operations, $20.6 million in federal, state, and local operating assistance , and additional investment income. Member agencies such as the City and County of San Francisco, San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) have traditionally shared deficits via formula-based contributions, though none were requested in FY2024 amid recovery efforts and transition. State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, derived from and fuel excise, provide further support but remain vulnerable to economic fluctuations and state budget priorities. Post- in 2024, operating expenses rose due to higher contract service costs ($128.8 million in FY2024) associated with electric multiple units and infrastructure maintenance, outpacing fare revenue growth despite improved ridership. Projections indicate persistent deficits, with an average annual operating shortfall of $75 million anticipated from FY2027 to FY2035 absent new revenue measures, and a cumulative 10-year gap of $690 million as of late 2024. This dependence underscores limited economic self-sufficiency, as capital-intensive upgrades like the $2.3 billion project—largely federally and state-—prioritize capacity and emissions reductions over immediate cost recovery, potentially straining local taxpayers through ongoing subsidies. Regional proposals, such as a parcel under Bill 63, aim to allocate $32.5 million annually each from and VTA to stabilize operations, reflecting recognition of cross-county ridership interdependencies.

Safety Record and Incident Analysis

Caltrain's safety record is dominated by incidents, particularly suicides, rather than collisions between trains or derailments attributable to operational errors. From 2020 to 2024, the system averaged approximately nine fatalities annually, with strikes accounting for the vast majority. In 2024, 19 individuals died on the tracks, while 2023 saw at least 18 such deaths—the highest since 2015. These figures exclude injuries and near-misses, which contribute to operational disruptions, including frequent service delays from strikes. Trespasser fatalities, often ruled as suicides, represent 70-80% of rail strikes nationwide and similarly affect Caltrain due to its dense urban corridor. Caltrain has withheld detailed strike timelines and counts since implementing a media blackout policy, citing evidence from research that publicity can trigger copycat events. Clusters of incidents, such as five youth suicides in Palo Alto from 2009-2010 and four more in 2014-2015, underscore factors over infrastructure deficiencies. Efforts to mitigate include a , right-of-way fencing, tree management to improve visibility, and partnerships for outreach, though panels and enhanced barriers remain in planning stages as of 2025. Grade crossing incidents involve vehicle incursions, with recording 185 such collisions statewide in recent data, ranking second nationally and resulting in 49 fatalities. For Caltrain specifically, incursions from 2020 onward have prompted enhancements like markers, delineators, signage, and camera systems that detect vehicles on tracks, reducing incidents through low-tech interventions alongside monitoring tied to (PTC). PTC, fully implemented by 2020, overlays existing signals to enforce speed limits, prevent overspeed derailments, and avert train-to-train collisions by automatic braking—core safety layers absent in pre-PTC eras. No major train-to-train collisions have occurred post-implementation, contrasting with historical risks. Reportable rail equipment accidents remain low, with employee rates tracked via dashboards showing year-over-year fluctuations but overall improvement. A notable exception was the March 10, 2022, collision between southbound Train 506 and hi-rail construction vehicles near San Mateo, injuring 14 (passengers, crew, and contractors); investigation attributed it to miscommunication during maintenance, not systemic flaws. , completed in 2024, introduces quieter electric multiple units with faster braking, potentially reducing misjudgments, though empirical impact data is emerging. Caltrain received a 2025 Safety Gold Award for these reinventions, including PTC integration and behavioral data from crossings. Analysis reveals causal drivers: high track-adjacent amplifies trespasser exposure, while suicides reflect broader societal challenges rather than rail-specific negligence. Unlike freight-heavy systems, Caltrain's incidents rarely involve cargo hazards, and PTC has neutralized many human-error vectors. Persistent challenges include for full and crossing eliminations, with grade separations in modernization projects projected to further isolate tracks from roadways. Nationwide, 95% of rail deaths stem from trespassers or drivers ignoring signals, a pattern Caltrain mirrors without evidence of disproportionate post-PTC.

Future Developments

Integration with California High-Speed Rail

The California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) project plans to integrate with Caltrain through a blended system on the Peninsula Corridor, where high-speed trains will share the existing two-track alignment between San Francisco and San José with Caltrain's electrified commuter service. This approach allows CAHSR to leverage Caltrain's infrastructure for access to the San Francisco Peninsula and Silicon Valley, with high-speed trains operating at blended speeds rather than full 220 mph capability due to track sharing and urban constraints. The blended operations model, formalized in agreements between the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) and the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB, Caltrain's operator), requires coordination on scheduling, signaling, and capacity to accommodate up to six CAHSR trains per hour alongside Caltrain's frequent local and express services. A critical enabler of this integration is Caltrain's project, completed in September 2024 along the 51-mile corridor from to , which converted the line from diesel to electric multiple-unit () operation using 25 kV overhead systems compatible with CAHSR's power requirements. The CHSRA contributed over $714 million—nearly 40% of the $2.44 billion total cost—to fund this upgrade, explicitly to prepare the corridor for shared high-speed operations and improve state of good repair. (PTC) was also implemented across the corridor, enhancing safety and enabling precise train control essential for blending high-speed and commuter traffic. Full service began in late 2024, with electrified operations extending to Tamien Station by early 2026, aligning with CAHSR's anticipated use of the tracks for through-service from the Central Valley to . Integration extends to station compatibility and extensions, including shared use of key intermodal hubs like 's 4th and King Station (future terminus for blended service) and San José Diridon Station, where CAHSR will connect to and . The proposed Downtown Rail Extension (DTX), a 1.3-mile tunnel project, aims to relocate both Caltrain and CAHSR service underground from the current rail yard to the Salesforce Transit Center, eliminating street-level crossings and enabling direct access to downtown ; environmental clearance was achieved in 2015, but construction funding and timelines remain pending as of 2025. South of San José, CAHSR plans to diverge from the Caltrain corridor onto dedicated tracks toward Gilroy and beyond, potentially allowing Caltrain to maintain diesel-hybrid service in South County while HSR achieves higher speeds. Blended system analyses have identified needs for additional passing sidings, grade separations, and capacity enhancements to mitigate conflicts, with CHSRA committing to joint investments in corridor improvements. Despite these advancements, full operational integration awaits CAHSR's Peninsula segment completion, projected beyond initial timelines amid ongoing environmental reviews and funding dependencies.

Proposed Route Extensions and Infill Stations

The Downtown Rail Extension (DTX), also known as The Portal, proposes to extend Caltrain service 1.3 miles northward from its current San Francisco terminus at 4th and King streets through an underground tunnel to the Salesforce Transit Center. This project would enable through-running into downtown , facilitate integration with , and potentially boost Caltrain ridership by up to 25% by providing direct access to major employment centers. Managed by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority and the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, the extension includes cut-and-cover and mined tunneling methods, along with ventilation and emergency systems; environmental review and early construction enabling works are underway, though full funding and completion timelines remain contingent on federal and state appropriations. Southward, Caltrain service is planned to extend beyond Tamien station to Gilroy, leveraging shared tracks with the system for electrified operations. This approximately 15-mile extension from San Jose would serve growing suburban demand and connect to eastward, but lacks a firm timeline due to unresolved funding for infrastructure upgrades, including electrification and capacity enhancements along the Union Pacific-owned corridor south of San Jose. The has identified Gilroy as a key station community, with planning advanced to 2024 for alignment between and Monterey Road, though Caltrain-specific service implementation depends on coordination with phasing. Among infill station proposals, the Bayview-Oakdale station in 's southeast Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood aims to add a new stop along the existing corridor to enhance equity and connectivity for underserved communities. A feasibility study by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority assessed sites near Oakdale Avenue, evaluating integration with local bus routes, pedestrian access, and potential ridership from nearby residential and industrial areas; the project emphasizes accessibility improvements but awaits funding prioritization amid competing regional needs. No other major stations have advanced to formal planning stages, though long-range visions from entities like suggest opportunities for additional stops in high-density areas such as San Jose's Diridon vicinity, contingent on completion and demand studies.

Ongoing Modernization Projects Including Grade Separations

Caltrain's ongoing modernization initiatives emphasize the elimination of at-grade rail crossings via projects, which aim to mitigate risks, alleviate , and enable higher train speeds and frequencies along the Peninsula Corridor. These efforts build on the completed of the line in 2024, shifting focus to infrastructure upgrades that address the 71 remaining at-grade crossings from to Gilroy. The Corridor Crossings Strategy (CCS), launched collaboratively with local partners, provides a unified framework for prioritizing and delivering separations or closures, including a Crossings Delivery Guide to streamline environmental reviews, design, and construction. Funding for these projects derives primarily from the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA) through measures, including Measure A (allocating approximately $230 million over 15 years) and Measure W ($68 million over 30 years), supporting a pipeline of initiatives projected to total around $298 million as outlined in the 2020-2024 Strategic Plan. Key ongoing projects include the Broadway in Burlingame, where construction continues to depress the roadway beneath the tracks, though recent reports indicate escalating costs as of March 2025. In Palo Alto, designs for separating Churchill Avenue (including Seale Avenue), Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road advanced to conceptual refinement and 15% design stages by September 2025, with community input incorporated into revisions approved earlier that year. Further progress is evident in Sunnyvale, where separate initiatives for Mary Avenue and Sunnyvale Avenue crossings are advancing through planning and environmental phases to enhance multimodal safety. Menlo Park's Ravenswood Avenue project remains in design and environmental review, following a 2019 approved by the city council. Additional sites under active consideration or early implementation include Rengstorff Avenue in Mountain View, South Linden Avenue and Scott Street in South /San Bruno, and planning efforts in Redwood City for Whipple Avenue, Brewster Avenue, and Broadway, with up to $5 million available for non-pipeline advancements. These separations collectively target reductions in gate-down times, which currently average over 45 minutes per hour during peak periods at many locations, thereby supporting broader goals of transit reliability and regional connectivity.

Controversies

Funding Mechanisms and Taxpayer Burden

Caltrain's operating budget is primarily supported by passenger fares, which accounted for approximately 73% of revenues through programs like the Go Pass and standard ticketing as of fiscal year 2024. The remainder derives from local sales tax measures, such as Santa Clara County's Measure RR—a voter-approved 0.125% sales tax extension generating about $100 million annually for rail improvements and operations—and contributions from member agencies including the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, San Mateo County Transit Authority, and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, drawn from their respective tax revenues. These agency contributions, totaling $20-40 million yearly, cover operating shortfalls after fares and other income, with allocations based on each county's share of morning peak ridership. Capital funding for projects like and grade separations relies heavily on federal grants, including over $2 billion from sources such as the Federal Transit Administration's Capital Investment Grants program, supplemented by state appropriations and local measures. For fiscal year 2026, the $34.8 million capital budget draws from federal, state, regional grants, and local funds, reflecting a multi-tiered structure that minimizes direct JPB debt but shifts costs to broader taxpayer pools. Measure RR also allocates portions to capital needs, comprising 50-60% of certain revenue streams, though projections assume 2.5% annual growth amid economic variability. The taxpayer burden manifests through these mechanisms, with Santa Clara County residents facing an ongoing 0.125% increment under Measure RR, effectively subsidizing per-passenger operating costs estimated at 1.411.41-2.47 in recent plans, after fare recovery. Broader transit systems, including Caltrain, required over $10 billion in taxpayer subsidies statewide in fiscal year 2023 to cover operations and maintenance, highlighting systemic dependence where earned revenues like fares represent only 14% of inflows agency-wide. Federal contributions, while reducing local shares, distribute costs nationally via and taxes, while local agency funds often stem from and es, imposing regressive elements on lower-income households. Ongoing advocacy for additional regional es, such as a proposed 0.5-cent increase across counties under Senate Bill 63, underscores persistent fiscal gaps, with Caltrain slated for $75 million annually from such measures to sustain service amid ridership recovery.

Project Cost Overruns and Management Disputes

The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP), a core component of Caltrain's modernization efforts to replace diesel locomotives with electric multiple units along the 51-mile corridor from to San Jose, experienced substantial cost escalations. Initially estimated at $1.2 billion in 2008, the project's budget rose to between $1.47 billion and $1.5 billion by 2014, reflecting updated scope including new signaling and infrastructure upgrades. By December 2021, costs had climbed to $2.44 billion, necessitating an additional $462 million beyond prior funding commitments, with overruns attributed to construction complexities, supply chain disruptions from the , and scope adjustments for integration with . Schedule delays compounded these fiscal pressures, pushing the full electric service launch from an original 2022 target to late 2024. The U.S. () classified PCEP as "At Risk" in 2022 due to persistent delays and overruns, prompting enhanced oversight and a requirement for contingency reserves exceeding $170 million for unidentified risks. Federal funding releases were paused in some instances amid concerns over cost containment, though the project ultimately secured $647 million from the contingent on mitigation plans. Other infrastructure initiatives faced similar challenges, including the San Jose Guadalupe River Bridges replacement, which in June 2025 incurred a $107 million overrun and multi-year delays, elevating Caltrain's overall infrastructure budget by $67 million above projections. These patterns reflect broader pressures on capital programming, with expenditures reaching $2.04 billion by April 2023 for PCEP alone, or 82% of its revised budget, amid ongoing monitoring for fiscal viability. Management disputes within the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB)—comprising , San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties—have centered on administrative accountability, with San Mateo County Transit District () serving as the managing agency. In June 2021, a JPB meeting dissolved amid boycotts by board members and threats of litigation from , stemming from debates over enhancing board oversight of operations, budgets, and potentially replacing in its administrative role to address perceived inefficiencies. A 2022 formalized shared responsibilities for rail operations and planning but highlighted tensions over staff support and project prioritization. Further scrutiny arose from internal allegations, including a March 2024 indictment of a former Caltrain facilities manager and a contractor for misappropriating $50,000 in public funds to construct unauthorized apartments within train stations, underscoring vulnerabilities in and oversight. These episodes, alongside reforms aimed at clarifying property rights and reimbursements, have fueled calls for structural changes to mitigate risks of future overruns and delays.

Service Enforcement and Passenger Experience Issues

Caltrain employs a system requiring passengers to obtain tickets via vending machines, apps, or passes before boarding, with handled by issuing $250 administrative citations for first offenses under a zero-tolerance policy updated in 2018 to avoid court appearances. However, remains inconsistent, with fare inspectors reportedly citing only about one in eleven detected evaders due to limited checks, as noted in rider discussions and board observations. In 2024, San Mateo County Transit Authority board member David Mueller highlighted widespread evasion during a meeting, stating he rode without paying undetected for extended periods, contributing to estimated annual losses of millions in revenue and perceptions of inequity among paying riders. This lax approach has drawn criticism for subsidizing non-payers through taxpayer-funded operations, exacerbating overcrowding and deterring fare-compliant passengers, though Caltrain's 2024 customer survey reported 78% overall satisfaction, potentially underrepresenting -specific grievances. Passenger experiences are further strained by inadequate enforcement of conduct rules amid rising encounters with homeless individuals and disruptive behaviors. Rider testimonies at the May 2025 Joint Powers Board meeting described trains as "mobile homeless encampments" with unkempt , foul odors, feet on seats, and unchecked violations, attributing discomfort to staff's limited authority to intervene. Conductors lack powers to eject hostile or non-compliant riders, deferring to San Mateo County for responses that often involve service delays from "police activity" stops, as reported in 2024 passenger accounts. 2024 incidents involved erratic homeless riders post-substance use with no immediate staff action, amplifying concerns despite Caltrain's station rating of 4.17 out of 5 in surveys. While onboard crime data remains low compared to urban peers like , these enforcement gaps—rooted in policy constraints prioritizing over swift removal—foster environments where paying commuters subsidize unchecked disorder, eroding ridership appeal. New validation introduced in June 2025, using cloud-based scanners taking up to 10 seconds per check versus prior two-second devices, has slowed inspections and heightened evasion opportunities during peak hours. Verbatim comments from prior surveys, such as the 2019 onboard poll, urge conductors to "enforce " more assertively to curb such issues, reflecting persistent calls for balanced without criminalizing minor infractions. Caltrain's reliance on external policing, rather than dedicated onboard enforcers, underscores causal links between under-enforcement and degraded experiences, as lax deterrence invites repeated violations in a system serving over 18,000 daily riders.

Environmental Impact Assessments and Green Claims Scrutiny

The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP), central to Caltrain's modernization, was subject to a comprehensive environmental review under the (CEQA), with a Draft Environmental Impact Report released in February 2014 and a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) certified by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board in January 2015. The FEIR evaluated impacts across categories including air quality, (GHG) emissions, biological resources, and , projecting operational GHG reductions of approximately 48,800 metric tons annually by replacing diesel locomotives with electric ones powered by the regional grid, assuming baseline ridership and a shift from combustion. It identified significant but mitigable impacts, such as removal of up to 1,000 trees along the corridor, temporary construction emissions from production and equipment operation, and localized increases during installation, with mitigations including replanting programs and phased work schedules. Litigation from corridor communities, including the Town of Atherton, challenged the FEIR's adequacy on tree impacts and cumulative effects, delaying implementation until federal jurisdiction preempted certain CEQA requirements in 2019, allowing progress toward full completed in 2024. The review also addressed GHG contributions from project (e.g., embodied emissions in and for 54 miles of overhead wires) and operations, incorporating SF6—a potent GHG used in substation equipment—with projections offset by long-term operational savings, though actual outcomes hinge on grid decarbonization timelines. Post-implementation monitoring confirmed localized air quality gains, with a study documenting an 89% average reduction in passengers' exposure to particulates, a , validating claims of healthier commutes over diesel baselines. Caltrain's green claims highlight cumulative GHG avoidance of over 2 million tons through 2040 and cuts equivalent to 150 vehicles annually, predicated on electric efficiency and California's grid averaging 200-300 grams CO2 per kWh in recent years—cleaner than diesel's 1,000+ grams per equivalent kWh but not zero-emission. Scrutiny reveals dependencies: lifecycle emissions from train manufacturing, imported components, and (unquantified in full beyond FEIR construction estimates) could narrow net benefits if renewables falter, as the grid derived only 33% from in 2024 amid reliance for reliability. performance, recapturing 23% of propulsion energy and feeding it gridward, bolsters efficiency assertions, potentially yielding $1 million annual credits from 2026, though Caltrain's resistance to restrictions on exporting used diesel locomotives abroad underscores tensions between local gains and global emission displacement. Independent analyses affirm operational reductions but caution that unsubstantiated assumptions of perpetual grid greening may inflate long-term claims absent binding enforcement.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.