Hubbry Logo
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plotMain
Open search
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot
Community hub
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot
2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cargo planes bomb plot
LocationUnited States of America (target); East Midlands Airport and Dubai International Airport (discovered)
DateOctober 29, 2010 (discovered)
Target2 planes
Attack type
Bombing (failed)
WeaponsTwo packages, each containing a printer cartridge packed with a bomb made from the plastic explosive PETN
Deaths0
Injured0
PerpetratorAl-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

On October 29, 2010, two packages, each containing a bomb consisting of 300 to 400 grams (11–14 oz) of plastic explosives and a detonating mechanism, were found on separate cargo planes. The bombs were discovered as a result of intelligence received from Saudi Arabia's security chief. They were in transport from Yemen to the United States and were discovered at stopover locations: one at East Midlands Airport in the UK and one in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.

One week later, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the bombing plot, and for the September 3 crash of UPS Airlines Flight 6.[1] While the crash of UPS Airlines Flight 6 was later confirmed as a technical issue unrelated to the bombing plot, American and British authorities believed that Anwar al-Awlaki of AQAP was behind the October bombing attempts and that the bombs were most likely constructed by AQAP's main explosives expert, Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri.[2][3] The bombs were probably designed to detonate in flight, with the intention of destroying both planes over Chicago or another American city.[4][5] Each bomb had already been transported on passenger and cargo planes at the time of discovery.

Locating the bombs

[edit]
Prince Muhammad bin Nayef (photo) warned the U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser of the bomb plot

On October 28, Saudi Arabia's deputy interior minister of counterterrorism Prince Muhammad bin Nayef called John Brennan, the U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and former Central Intelligence Agency station chief in Riyadh, to warn him of the plot.[6] The Saudis provided the U.S. and Germany with the tracking numbers and destinations of the packages and informed them to look for toner cartridges.[7][8] The packages had been deposited by a woman at FedEx and UPS offices in Sana'a, Yemen on October 27, and were scheduled to arrive in Chicago on November 1.[8][9]

Saudi Arabia had reportedly learned of the plot through Jabir Jubran Al Fayfi, a former Guantánamo Bay detention camp inmate who had been remanded to Saudi Arabia for rehabilitation in 2006. Al-Faifi had escaped in 2008 and rejoined AQAP, but surrendered to Saudi authorities on October 16, 2010, and provided them with information about the plot.[10][11] Yemeni officials suspected that al-Faifi had not actually rejoined al-Qaeda but had become a double agent.[11] They said that his tip appeared to be based on more recent information than al-Faifi could access, and that the information must have come from a Saudi double agent in AQAP.[12]

England

[edit]
East Midlands Airport in Leicestershire

The first package left Sana'a, Yemen, on a passenger plane, flying to Dubai, United Arab Emirates.[13] It then was next placed on a UPS cargo plane to Cologne/Bonn Airport in Germany, where UPS Airlines has a hub.[13][14] There, it was placed on UPS Flight 232, a Boeing 767 cargo plane bound for East Midlands Airport in Leicestershire.[15][16] From there, it was to fly to O'Hare International Airport in Chicago via Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[3][15][17]

The UPS plane landed at East Midlands Airport at 2:13 a.m. local time on October 29.[18] British military and police explosives experts had been alerted to the existence of the bomb, and conducted an initial search of the plane's cargo in the airport's UPS parcels distribution depot.[19] Officers from Scotland Yard Counter Terrorism Command joined them.[20]

U.S. authorities provided the tracking number of the package, and the computer printer inside was scanned with explosives detection equipment, x-rayed, subjected to chemical swabs, and sniffed by sniffer dogs. No explosives were detected.[21][22] Removing the suspect package for further examination, the authorities allowed the UPS plane to proceed to Philadelphia at 4:20 a.m. local time.[18][23] At 10:00 a.m. the British gave the all-clear, and removed safety cordons from the airport.[9][24][25]

Later forensic examination indicated that the bomb was inadvertently disarmed by Scotland Yard explosive officers, who took the printer cartridge out of the printer during their examination that morning, around three hours before the bomb was due to explode at 10:30 a.m. (5:30 a.m. Eastern time).[18][19][26] The officers were unaware when they took the device apart that it was a bomb.[20]

British officials continued to believe that there were no explosives in the package,[18] but U.S. authorities insisted that the package be inspected again. British authorities then consulted with officials in Dubai, who had discovered a similar bomb in a printer cartridge, and MI6 spoke with the Saudi tipster. Scotland Yard explosives officers flew the printer and the cartridge in a police helicopter to the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Fort Halstead near London, and discovered the bomb at around 2:00 p.m.[18][20][23]

Dubai

[edit]
Cross-section of an Airbus A300 showing how cargo is positioned inside

Qatar Airways said that the package with the second bomb had been carried on two of its commercial passenger jets. The first was a 144-seat Airbus A320 that flew from Sana'a, Yemen, to Doha International Airport in Doha, Qatar, on October 28.[9] The second passenger plane was an Airbus A321 or Boeing 777 flying from Doha to Dubai. The seating capacity of the second plane was anywhere from 144 to 335, depending on which aircraft was used.[14][22][27]

The second package was discovered on a FedEx Express plane at the FedEx depot at the Dubai airport at around 9:00 a.m. GMT on October 29.[28] The plane was scheduled to fly to Newark Liberty International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, and then on to O'Hare International Airport in Chicago.[29][30]

Bombs

[edit]

Addresses

[edit]

The packages were addressed to former locations of two synagogues in Chicago. Investigators believe the terrorists used outdated information that they found online.[31] One package was addressed to a church in Lakeview that had once been the meeting place of Congregation Or Chadash, and the other had been sent to a closed synagogue in East Rogers Park.[2][31][32] Simon Calder observed in The Independent:

Yemen is not a natural provider of office supplies to organisations such as synagogues in the Chicago area. Therefore, you might fondly imagine that the staff in the parcels offices in the capital, Sana'a, might have checked the despatches more closely before allowing them anywhere near an aircraft, cargo or passengers. But they didn't.[33]

The packages were addressed to specific people at the addresses—the names used were those of historical figures from the Spanish Inquisition and the Crusades.[2][34] One package was addressed to Diego Deza, a Grand Inquisitor during the Spanish Inquisition. The other was addressed to Reynald Krak (Raynald of Châtillon), a French crusader who was beheaded in 1187 by Sultan Saladin of the 12th-century Muslim Ayyubid dynasty.[34]

Brian Fishman of the New America Foundation said the choice of names was an inside joke.[34] "The jihadis ... narrative is that non-Muslims are always on the attack, always trying to take Muslim lands. The jihadis like the narrative, because it justifies violence, since they claim that they’re only defending Islam," he said.[34] He felt the destination of Chicago may have had meaning as well, as the latest edition of Inspire (AQAP's online magazine) may have had a photo of Chicago on its cover.[34][35] Fishman points out that this parallels Osama bin Laden posing in front of a map of East Africa shortly before the 1998 United States embassy bombings.[34] U.S. and UK officials believed the planes, and not the addresses on the ground, were the targets.[36]

Contents

[edit]
A toner cartridge from one of the recovered bombs showing white powder and wiring

Each package contained an HP LaserJet P2055 desktop laser printer. Inside each printer's toner cartridge was a sophisticated bomb.[37][38] The cartridges were filled with pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN).[29][37][38] The bomb found in the UK contained 400 grams (14 oz) of PETN, five times the amount needed to destroy a house.[37] The one found in Dubai contained 300 grams (11 oz) of PETN.[37] Hans Michels, professor of safety engineering at University College London, said that just 6 grams (0.2 oz) of PETN—around 2% of what was used—would be enough to blow a hole in a metal plate twice the thickness of an aircraft's skin.[39] The PETN was of "an extremely high concentration", according to British criminal investigators. German investigators felt the device's construction would require "logistics that only state facilities should have access to".[40]

The package intercepted in Dubai was shipped in a cardboard box that also contained souvenirs, clothes, compact discs, and several books written in English.[37][38][41]

The bomb found in the UK was sent to the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Fort Halstead in Kent,[25] and American technicians in the United Arab Emirates examined the other bomb.[42]

Detonation

[edit]
Detonators

Each bomb was triggered by a cell phone alarm, which activated a phone battery to send power through a thin wire filament inside a syringe containing 5 grams (0.18 oz) of lead azide, a powerful chemical initiator.[29][40][43] Once hot, the lead azide would ignite, causing the PETN to detonate.[44][45][46] The device's wiring was set up so that all the printer components would appear to be correct if the device was x-rayed.[43] Features not relevant to the alarm timer function, such as the display, had been removed to extend the battery life.[45] The device was reported to carry markings resembling a Bird D736 cell phone.[47][48]

There had initially been speculation that the bombs might be detonated by receipt of a telephone call or text message, but the SIM cards necessary to receive calls had been removed, rendering the phones unable to receive any communication, but increasing battery life.[37][45][49] U.S. officials said that the bombs were set to go off shortly before the planes landed.[9][45]

Mid-air capability

British Prime Minister David Cameron and officials in the U.S. believe that the bombs were designed to detonate as the planes were in flight, destroying the planes in mid-air.[43] Britain's Home Secretary, Theresa May, said British investigators concluded the UK device was a functional bomb powerful enough to bring down the aircraft, causing a "supersonic blast".[6][40] Brennan agreed with this assessment.

Cargo vs. passenger planes

Brennan said it was not clear whether those attempting the bombing knew whether the packages would be carried on cargo or passenger planes.[43] Since Yemen does not have any regularly scheduled cargo flights, the perpetrators likely knew the bombs would end up on passenger planes.[13] Most of the air freight arriving in the U.S. is on passenger flights.[50]

Detection

[edit]

Like many explosives, PETN has a low vapor pressure. This makes it difficult to detect, because the chemical releases little vapor into the surrounding air.[38] Frank Cilluffo, the director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at George Washington University, said: "It is evident that had we not had the intelligence, our security countermeasures would not have identified these improvised explosive devices."[51] Qatar Airways said that "the explosives discovered were of a sophisticated nature whereby they could not be detected by x-ray screening or trained sniffer dogs", and were only discovered after intelligence services received a tip.[27]

Both packages were x-rayed in Sana'a, and the one in Dubai was x-rayed there, without the bombs being spotted.[8] A spokesman for the German Federal Criminal Police Office, where the Dubai x-rays were reviewed, stated they would not have detected the bomb.[8] When X-rayed, PETN would resemble the cartridge's powdered ink,[9] and the timers resembled the normal printer cartridge electronics.[13]

Preparation

[edit]

Previously, in mid-September 2010, U.S. intelligence intercepted three packages linked to AQAP that had been shipped from Yemen to Chicago.[20][37][52] They searched the packages, but did not find any explosives.[37] One of the packages included the 1860 novel The Mill on the Floss, by English novelist George Eliot, a woman who wrote under an assumed identity.[52] The packages, addressed to "random addresses" in Chicago, were not confiscated.[37]

Authorities surmised, after the October incident, that the September parcels may have been a test run.[37]

Responsibility

[edit]

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

[edit]
Main article: Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

On November 5, 2010, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) took responsibility for the plot,[1] posting on a number of radical Islamist websites monitored by the SITE Intelligence Group and the NEFA Foundation. "We will continue to strike blows against American interests and the interest of America's allies," said the perpetrators. "Since both operations were successful, we intend to spread the idea to our mujahedeen brothers in the world and enlarge the circle of its application to include civilian aircraft in the West as well as cargo aircraft."[53][54][55] U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, British Home Secretary Theresa May, and Dubai police had noted that these types of explosives are "hallmarks" of AQAP, and had suspected they were behind the attack.[14]

AQAP also claimed responsibility for the crash of UPS Airlines Flight 6, a Boeing 747-400 cargo plane that crashed in Dubai on September 3. U.S. and United Arab Emirates investigators had said they had not found any evidence of an explosion or terrorist involvement in that incident, and were skeptical about the claim. They suggested it was probably an attempt by AQAP to bolster its image.[41][56] On September 10, the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security confirmed that the AQAP was not involved in the September 3 crash.[57]

On November 21, AQAP provided a detailed account of the plot, including photos of the printer bombs, in its English-language magazine Inspire. The article said that the mission was a success, because it caused a huge amount of disruption to the world's air traffic and security systems at the very low cost of $4,200.[58][59]

Anwar al-Awlaki

[edit]
Main article: Anwar al-Awlaki
Anwar al-Awlaki, primary suspect of US and UK officials

The Guardian reported that unnamed U.S. counter-terrorism officials suspected that Anwar al-Awlaki of AQAP was behind the plot. "Anybody associated with al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is a subject of concern," Brennan said.[60] The New York Times reported that "some analysts believe the [attempted Chicago bombing] may also be linked to Mr. Awlaki".[61] The Daily Telegraph reported that "U.S. and British security officials believe" al-Awlaki was behind the attack.[62]

Al-Awlaki had also been linked to the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, the failed 2009 Christmas Day bombing, the failed 2010 Times Square car bombing attempt, and other terrorist incidents,[60] and had been placed by U.S. President Barack Obama on a targeted killing list.[63] The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights sued in an attempt to prevent his death.[64] Al-Awlaki was killed in a targeted killing in September 2011.[65]

Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri

[edit]
Main article: Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri

US officials suggested that Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri, the main explosives expert for Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, likely built the bombs. He has a history of creating explosive devices using PETN.[3][29][62] Brennan said that the evidence pointed to the bombs having been built by the same person who made the device worn by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who attempted to detonate a bomb on a plane on Christmas Day 2009.[27] One of the detonators was almost identical to the one used in that attack.[66]

Al-Asiri had previously recruited his younger brother Abdullah as a suicide bomber, hiding a PETN bomb in his rectum in an attempt on the life of security chief Mohammed bin Nayef. Abdullah died in the attempt, but Nayef survived with minor injuries.[27][67]

Released suspect

[edit]

On October 30, 2010, a 22-year-old female Yemeni engineering student was arrested in Sana'a, Yemen, on suspicion of having shipped the packages. Her mother was also arrested. Both were released the following day when it was determined that the woman's identification had been stolen.[43]

Responses

[edit]

Political

[edit]

Obama and his administration reacted quickly to the incident, making public statements that it was a "credible threat". A New York Times opinion piece suggested that the quick response would be well received politically for the 2010 U.S. elections.[63]

Security

[edit]

Security alerts were triggered in the U.S., the UK, and the Middle East.[29] An Emirates flight containing a package in transit from Yemen to the U.S. was intercepted by Canadian CF-18 and U.S. F-15 fighter jets and escorted to New York as a precaution.[9][68] Two FedEx planes containing packages originating from Yemen were also searched.[69]

The UK, the U.S., Germany, France, and Belgium stopped accepting freight package cargo shipments from Yemen, and the Netherlands and Canada suspended all cargo flights from Yemen.[70][71] Germany suspended passenger flights from Yemen until November 15.[3][72][73] Britain and the U.S. stopped accepting air cargo from Somalia, and prohibited passengers from carrying certain printer cartridges on flights.[49] The Swedish government recommended that its citizens not travel to Yemen until further notice.[74][75]

FedEx, UPS, and Mideast-based shipper Aramex suspended their shipping operations in Yemen.[9][29] Emirates Airline and Air Arabia stopped carrying cargo from Yemen, and Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways stopped carrying cargo from Yemen and Somalia.[76]

The U.S. increased air passenger screenings and initiated a more detailed passenger search procedure.[77] American Civil Liberties Union counsel Chris Calabrese said that "Americans now must choose between a virtual strip search and a grope."[77]

The incident was one of the factors leading the European Commission to review the European Union's approach to customs risk management and supply chain security in 2012–13.[78]

Al-Awlaki

[edit]

On November 2, four days after the bombs were discovered, al-Awlaki was charged in absentia in Sana'a with plotting to kill foreigners and being an al-Qaeda member in an unrelated matter.[79] On November 6, Yemeni Judge Mohsen Alwan ordered that al-Awlaki be caught dead or alive.[80]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot was a terrorist operation orchestrated by (AQAP) to detonate concealed bombs aboard U.S.-bound cargo flights originating from . On October 29, 2010, two packages—each containing approximately 300 to 400 grams of the plastic explosive PETN hidden inside printer s, along with electronic detonators—were intercepted on UPS and flights at and in the , respectively, averting potential mid-air explosions over the or . The plot was foiled through a tip provided by a Saudi Arabian embedded within AQAP's courier network, part of a covert infiltration effort led by Saudi officials. AQAP, which claimed responsibility via an official statement and later detailed the operation in its Inspire magazine as "Operation Hemorrhage," designed the low-cost attack (estimated at $4,200) to maximize economic disruption through repeated, inexpensive strikes rather than mass casualties, exploiting gaps in air cargo screening for non-metallic explosives. The bombs, crafted by Saudi bomb-maker Ibrahim al-Asiri, featured synchronized detonators intended to trigger via a timer or signal, building on prior failed attempts like the 2009 underwear bomber plot and underscoring AQAP's focus on aviation targets from its Yemeni base. The incident prompted immediate global enhancements to cargo security protocols, including advanced screening technologies, while highlighting the critical value of human intelligence from Gulf allies in disrupting jihadist networks, as Western agencies had not independently detected the threat.

Background and Context

Emergence of AQAP as a Threat

(AQAP) formed in January 2009 through the merger of the pre-existing al-Qaeda branches in , led by , and in , which had faced setbacks from Saudi campaigns. This unification pooled limited resources, including experienced operatives and logistical networks, enabling a more coordinated structure than its fragmented predecessors, which had primarily focused on local insurgencies against the Yemeni and Saudi governments. The new entity explicitly prioritized "external operations" against distant enemies, including the and its allies, as articulated in early statements from Wuhayshi vowing to extend beyond the Arabian Peninsula. AQAP rapidly demonstrated operational sophistication by August 2009, when it dispatched a Saudi operative embedded with a body-cavity in an attempted of Saudi chief Prince Mohammed bin Nayef; though the attack failed, it highlighted the group's acquisition of advanced bomb-making techniques from Saudi defectors like . Concurrently, AQAP began cultivating appeal to Western sympathizers through propagandists such as , a U.S.-born cleric who joined its ranks and leveraged English-language outreach to inspire transnational recruits, signaling an intent to export via self-radicalized operatives rather than solely relying on Arab fighters. Yemen's entrenched instability—characterized by a weak central authority confined largely to urban centers, pervasive tribal autonomy, and porous borders—provided AQAP with expansive ungoverned spaces in provinces like Hadramawt and Shabwa for safe havens, training camps, and unimpeded planning of external plots. These conditions, rooted in decades of internal divisions and limited state capacity rather than external interventions, allowed the group to regroup and innovate without immediate disruption, as evidenced by its evasion of Yemeni security forces during early merger activities. By late 2009, such indicators positioned AQAP as al-Qaeda's most proactive affiliate for plotting against Western aviation and infrastructure.

Ideological Motivations and Prior Attacks

(AQAP), formally announced on January 23, 2009, through a merger of al-Qaeda branches in and , espoused a Salafi-jihadist centered on establishing an Islamic caliphate in the Arabian Peninsula by overthrowing local "apostate" governments and expelling Western influence from Muslim lands. This worldview framed the as the primary "far enemy" responsible for corrupting Islam via presence in since the 1991 , support for , and backing of secular regimes, necessitating offensive to weaken American power. AQAP's English-language magazine Inspire, first published in 2010 under the guidance of , explicitly promoted "open-source " targeting symbols of U.S. economic and strength, including infrastructure, as a means to inflict mass casualties and sow fear without requiring large-scale coordination. Awlaki, an American-Yemeni cleric serving as AQAP's chief propagandist, rejected any notion of coexistence with non-Muslims, asserting in videos and writings that against America was an individual religious obligation for capable Muslims, extending to civilians as legitimate targets in retaliation for perceived crusader aggression. His , disseminated through AQAP media, emphasized aviation as a recurring , drawing on al-Qaeda's historical successes to inspire lone-actor or small-cell operations that bypassed traditional security. This ideological commitment was evidenced by AQAP's public claims of responsibility for attacks, framing them as divinely mandated strikes against infidel innovation and dominance, with no concessions to reform or dialogue. Preceding the 2010 plot, AQAP's aviation focus built on al-Qaeda's earlier maritime strike, the October 12, 2000, in , , where suicide bombers killed 17 U.S. sailors using an explosive-laden boat, highlighting the group's intent to target American naval assets in the region and influencing subsequent AQAP operations as a model of against superior forces. More directly, the December 25, 2009, attempt by to detonate explosives on en route from to exemplified AQAP's pattern of aviation targeting; Abdulmutallab, trained and equipped by AQAP in under Awlaki's direction, aimed to maximize casualties mid-flight, with the group later praising the effort in Inspire as a blueprint for disrupting Western air travel. These incidents underscored AQAP's empirical prioritization of aircraft as high-profile vectors for , rooted in ideological imperatives rather than opportunistic tactics.

Planning and Execution of the Plot

Bomb Preparation in Yemen

The bomb-making operations for the 2010 transatlantic aircraft plot, dubbed Operation Hemorrhage by (AQAP), were centered in , where the group maintained hideouts and safe houses for assembly. Key operative Ibrahim Hassan Tali al-Asiri, AQAP's chief bomb-maker, directed the construction of two devices concealed within Hewlett-Packard printer toner cartridges, adapting techniques from prior failed attempts like the 2009 underwear bomber plot to evade metal detectors by minimizing metallic components. This iterative process involved integrating detonators using Nokia mobile phone circuits with the cartridges, loaded with plastic explosives such as PETN, sourced or produced locally to mimic ordinary cargo items. AQAP operatives leveraged Yemen's unstable tribal regions, including strongholds in , for secure assembly, employing local couriers to handle sensitive materials and without drawing attention. The design emphasized simplicity and low cost, with materials including two HP printers at approximately $300 each and two phones at $150 each, reflecting a shift toward economically disruptive "thousand cuts" attacks rather than resource-intensive spectacles. Total preparation expenses were reported at $4,200, covering explosives, electronics, and initial within . Conceived in mid-2010 amid AQAP's push for aviation-targeted operations from Yemeni bases, the bombs underwent testing and refinement over several months to ensure reliability in flight conditions, culminating in dispatch via services around , 2010. This phase highlighted AQAP's technical sophistication, with al-Asiri's expertise enabling concealment that bypassed initial screening protocols, though the devices were ultimately non-metallic and reliant on precise timing for detonation.

Shipment Routes and Locations

The two packages containing the concealed explosives were shipped from Sana'a, , on October 25, 2010, using commercial courier services UPS and , with fictitious addresses for synagogues in , , listed as the final destinations to mask their true purpose of mid-flight detonation over populated areas of the . This routing leveraged the packages' transit through international cargo hubs where screening protocols were less rigorous, particularly for outbound shipments from , enabling them to be loaded onto without initial detection. The plotters included tracking numbers on the packages, which they monitored remotely to assess progress and timing. The UPS package followed a path from Sana'a to Cologne, Germany, as an initial transit point, before being transferred to a cargo flight bound for Chicago via East Midlands Airport in England; it arrived at East Midlands on October 29, 2010, where authorities, acting on intelligence, offloaded and inspected it prior to onward travel. This leg exploited gaps in European cargo handling, as the package cleared customs in Cologne without triggering alarms and was queued for loading at the UK hub, which served as a key vulnerability in the transatlantic supply chain. Meanwhile, the FedEx package was routed from Sana'a directly to , , transiting through that hub en route to the ; it was intercepted in on October 29, 2010, after a tip-off prompted targeted screening, having already been transported on passenger flights during part of its journey. The Dubai stop highlighted deficiencies in Middle Eastern cargo transit security, where high volumes and reliance on basic manifests allowed suspicious parcels to evade or explosive trace detection until specifically flagged. Both routes were designed to ensure the devices reached high-altitude transatlantic flights, maximizing potential impact through aerial detonation rather than ground delivery.

Technical Details of the Bombs

Explosive Components and Construction

The explosive devices in the 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot each contained 300 to 400 grams of (PETN), a powerful white crystalline . This amount was significantly greater than the approximately 80 grams used in the earlier underwear bomb attempt, indicating an intent for substantial destructive potential. The PETN was packed into modified printer s, which were altered to conceal the explosive material within the expected powder compartment, exploiting the device's legitimate appearance to evade routine inspections. Construction involved integrating electronic components, including circuit boards salvaged from mobile phones and associated wiring, into the manipulated cartridges to form a viable . The white PETN powder was directly incorporated, with no additional chemical agents noted in forensic examinations, though the overall design demonstrated advanced engineering to bypass airport screening technologies like X-rays. This sophistication reflected refinements based on prior bomb-making efforts by AQAP operative , whose underwear bomb had similarly utilized PETN but in a body-worn configuration. Forensic analysis post-interception confirmed the bombs' viability, with the devices primed and capable of explosion, underscoring the plot's technical feasibility. AQAP's subsequent publication in their Inspire magazine detailed the low-cost assembly—using off-the-shelf printers and phones totaling around $4,200—while claiming successful testing phases to ensure reliability in transit. The dual-package approach from Yemen further evidenced iterative development aimed at overwhelming detection protocols.

Detonation Mechanism

The detonation mechanism of the bombs in the 2010 transatlantic aircraft plot utilized a primary consisting of 5 grams of lead to initiate the main charge of powdered (PETN), a high weighing 300 to 400 grams per device. The lead was housed in a syringe-like , designed to be ignited by a heated thin wire filament powered by a battery circuit. Activation was intended through a cell phone-based triggering system, incorporating Nokia SIM cards linked to an electronic circuit capable of remote detonation via an incoming call or, more feasibly, a pre-set timer alarm due to potential signal interference at high altitudes and over oceans. Experts assessed that direct remote triggering by call from was improbable given the limitations of cellular coverage during transatlantic flights, favoring an onboard for reliability. This setup included redundancy features, such as concealed wiring mimicking normal printer components under screening, to ensure functionality despite measures. The design's sophistication, attributed to bomb-maker Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri, reflected extensive research and development over months to circumvent post-9/11 detection protocols, including the absence of metallic triggers and integration into commercial printer toner cartridges for evasion of standard cargo inspections. This approach built on prior AQAP experiments with PETN-based devices, incorporating non-detectable elements to achieve synchronized activation mid-flight.

Intended Targets and Addresses

The two packages containing the concealed bombs were labeled with addresses for synagogues in , , serving as a deceptive cover to portray the shipments as legitimate parcels destined for religious organizations . This labeling tactic enabled the cargo to enter international air freight networks under the guise of ordinary mail, minimizing scrutiny during initial handling in Yemen and subsequent transshipment points. The true objectives centered on the cargo planes themselves traversing transatlantic routes to the , with the devices engineered for mid-flight over the to maximize destruction from airborne explosions or ensuing crashes into populated areas. Investigators determined the timers were calibrated to trigger approximately three hours into the flight, aligning with transit over the US eastern seaboard if unimpeded. Perpetrators selected freight over passenger flights to exploit less stringent cargo screening protocols, allowing the bombs—disguised within printer toner cartridges—to advance undetected toward American airspace while still posing a threat of widespread casualties through aerial or ground-level impacts.

Discovery and Neutralization

Intelligence Intercepts and Saudi Tip-Off

The foiling of the 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot began with a critical tip from Saudi Arabian intelligence on October 28, 2010, provided by a embedded within (AQAP). This , derived from a long-running Saudi operation to infiltrate AQAP in , alerted authorities to imminent bombs concealed in printer cartridges aboard cargo planes bound for the . Saudi Deputy Interior Minister Mohammed bin Nayef directly contacted U.S. officials, including for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism John Brennan, to relay the specifics, prompting immediate alerts to U.S. and aviation security teams. Complementing the Saudi HUMINT, U.S. intercepts of AQAP communications had previously detected general indications of an aviation-related threat from , though lacking specifics on the cargo method until the Saudi tip provided actionable details. These intercepts, monitored through ongoing programs, corroborated the without prior U.S.-specific warnings about transatlantic flights, highlighting the necessity of international cooperation to piece together fragmented threat streams. The accuracy of the combined intelligence was swiftly validated when suspicious packages were identified and intercepted in and on October 29, 2010, containing sophisticated explosive devices matching the tip's description. This episode underscored the pivotal contributions of non-Western allies like in disrupting jihadist networks, as their infiltration efforts yielded intelligence that Western signals alone could not fully operationalize. The Saudi agent's role, reportedly a former AQAP operative turned informant, demonstrated the value of targeted operations in preempting plots originating from ungoverned spaces.

Detection in Dubai and England

On October 29, 2010, authorities in , , intercepted a suspicious package aboard a UPS cargo flight that had originated in Sana'a, , and was en route to the via . Following an intelligence tip, UAE security personnel conducted an scan of the package, which revealed anomalies within a Hewlett-Packard printer cartridge, including unusual density and visible wiring suggestive of a concealed device. The package was promptly isolated in a secure area, and manual inspection by bomb disposal experts confirmed the presence of detonator components and explosive traces without triggering any activation. Concurrently, at in , a similar package on a cargo flight from was identified and secured on the same day through coordinated international alerts. British authorities, acting on parallel intelligence, performed an examination that detected irregularities in another printer cartridge, prompting its immediate quarantine and controlled inspection, which uncovered comparable suspicious wiring and potential explosive materials. The rapid response involved evacuating nearby areas and deploying specialized teams to handle the device under heightened protocols. Both packages presented a low immediate risk of detonation, as subsequent assessments indicated the triggering mechanisms were either incomplete or disabled during transit, though operations proceeded under full explosive ordnance disposal precautions to mitigate any residual hazards. This synchronized interdiction across jurisdictions underscored the effectiveness of real-time intelligence sharing among UAE, , and U.S. agencies in preventing the devices from advancing further toward their destinations.

Neutralization and Forensic Analysis

The explosive devices were intercepted on October 29, 2010, one aboard a cargo plane in , , and the other on a UPS cargo plane at in the . In , UAE security forces isolated the package containing the printer cartridge and conducted a controlled examination to neutralize the threat, confirming the presence of viable plastic explosives without detonation. In the UK, the device aboard the UPS flight, which had originated from via and , was initially screened upon landing at 2:13 a.m. ; explosive ordnance disposal officers removed the modified printer cartridge at approximately 7:40 a.m., inadvertently disrupting the firing circuit and rendering it safe about three hours before its programmed detonation time of 10:30 a.m. BST. Forensic examination of the device by specialists revealed a sophisticated assembly incorporating at least 300 grams of (), a high undetectable by conventional due to its integration within the cartridge's wiring and components. The detonator was linked to a repurposed circuit board functioning as a , calibrated to trigger mid-flight over the eastern United States seaboard around 5:30 a.m. New York time, with sufficient PETN yield—comparable to prior incidents—to potentially breach the aircraft and cause decompression or structural failure. Traces in the composition and packaging materials corroborated Yemen-origin manufacture, including Yemen Post shipping labels and chemical signatures consistent with regional sourcing. Both devices were preserved intact post-neutralization, with key components such as circuit boards, wiring, and residues cataloged for detailed analysis, enabling forensic matching to known bomb-maker techniques and contributing to subsequent threat assessments of concealed explosives. tests verified the PETN's stability and potency, with no degradation that would have prevented initiation, underscoring the plot's operational viability absent interception.

Attribution and Key Perpetrators

AQAP's Claim of Responsibility

On November 5, 2010, (AQAP) issued a statement claiming responsibility for the plot to detonate bombs aboard bound for the , describing the operation as a successful demonstration of their capabilities despite the packages' interception. The group asserted that the bombs were intended to target flights over the as retaliation for American actions in Muslim lands, emphasizing the plot's aim to inflict economic damage through disruption of networks. AQAP elaborated on the claim in a special edition of its English-language magazine Inspire, released around November 21, 2010, which provided operational details aligning with the recovered devices, such as the use of concealed explosives in printer cartridges and the low cost of approximately $4,200 for the entire effort. The publication framed the attempt as part of a broader "death by a thousand cuts" , shifting from large-scale attacks to frequent, economical operations designed to erode Western economic stability without requiring extensive resources or personnel. In the statement and Inspire article, AQAP rejected any notion of failure, portraying the plot's execution— including the shipment from through multiple international hubs—as evidence of their ingenuity in bypassing security, while vowing continued similar strikes to avenge perceived aggressions by the and its allies. These claims were disseminated via AQAP's media channels, including jihadist websites, and included technical descriptions corroborating forensic findings from the intercepted packages, such as the bomb's design for mid-flight detonation.

Role of Anwar al-Awlaki

, a U.S.-born Yemeni cleric and senior figure in (AQAP), played a central role in the 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot through both ideological inspiration and operational direction. As AQAP's chief propagandist, he leveraged English-language media to recruit and motivate Western sympathizers, positioning himself as a key bridge between the group's Yemeni base and potential attackers in the West. His influence extended beyond rhetoric, with U.S. intelligence assessing him as having masterminded the plot to detonate printer-cartridge bombs on cargo flights bound for the . Al-Awlaki's operational involvement included coordinating aspects of the plot, drawing on his prior success in directing attacks like the 2009 underwear bombing attempt. AQAP's claim of responsibility in its Inspire magazine highlighted the plot's alignment with al-Awlaki's calls for jihad against aviation targets, reinforcing his endorsement through propaganda that detailed the operation's sophistication. Declassified assessments and post-plot investigations linked him directly to the decision-making, underscoring his shift from mere ideologue to hands-on strategist within AQAP's leadership. The perceived threat from al-Awlaki culminated in his via U.S. drone strike on September 30, 2011, in Yemen's , authorized due to his orchestration of multiple plots including the cargo bomb attempt. This action, confirmed by Yemeni and U.S. officials, validated intelligence portraying him as an imminent danger to transatlantic aviation security.

Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri's Bomb-Making Expertise

Ibrahim Hassan Tali al-Asiri, a Saudi national designated as AQAP's chief bomb technician, developed specialized techniques for concealing (PETN) explosives in non-metallic casings to circumvent measures such as metal detectors and scanners. His innovations emphasized minimal wiring, body or object integration, and synchronization with commercial electronics for remote or timed detonation. Al-Asiri's prior construction of a PETN device for the August 2009 suicide attempt on Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Nayef by his brother Abdullah demonstrated early proficiency in body-cavity concealment, where approximately 1 pound of explosives was hidden internally without detection during screening. This approach informed the December 25, 2009, underwear bomb plot, in which he fabricated a similar PETN-based apparatus sewn into for , designed to ignite via a chemical initiator and evade trace detection. Yemeni and U.S. authorities identified al-Asiri as the primary architect of the cargo plot's devices, which adapted his evasion methods by embedding 300-400 grams of PETN within modified toner cartridges, augmented with syringe-based detonators and powered by laptop components to simulate legitimate shipments. Forensic similarities in composition and assembly to his earlier works provided evidentiary links, underscoring his role in escalating AQAP's aviation threats through iterative refinements. Al-Asiri's survival following the plot enabled continued bomb development for AQAP, including subsequent airliner-targeted variants, until his elimination in a 2017 U.S. drone strike in , as confirmed by intelligence assessments. His persistent adaptations highlighted the challenges in neutralizing technically adept perpetrators within jihadist networks.

Other Suspects and Released Individuals

Yemeni authorities arrested a 20-year-old female student in Sana'a on October 30, 2010, on suspicion of dispatching the explosive-laden packages originating from , with officials linking her to the use of a forged address on the shipments. This detention followed intelligence indicating involvement in the operation, prompting searches for additional suspects tied to the group's faction. Subsequent investigations in targeted potential couriers and accomplices within (AQAP) networks, but public records detail limited further arrests directly attributable to the plot, reflecting the difficulties in tracing decentralized jihadist logistics amid ongoing operations. One suspect held in connection with the incident was released by Yemeni officials shortly after, citing insufficient evidence of involvement. Probes into possible international links, including in the where cargo transited en route to the , yielded no confirmed additional suspects or convictions, underscoring the plot's reliance on unwitting commercial shipping channels rather than embedded Western operatives. No credible evidence emerged of insider complicity from aviation or logistics personnel in Western countries, despite initial concerns raised in security assessments.

Immediate Aftermath and Responses

Political and Diplomatic Reactions

President described the incident as a "credible terrorist threat against our country" on October 29, 2010, emphasizing that initial examinations confirmed the packages contained explosive materials and affirming the ' unwavering resolve to combat such attacks. He coordinated directly with British Prime Minister on October 30, 2010, discussing the disrupted plot and underscoring the importance of international intelligence cooperation in preventing the detonation, which forensic analysis later indicated was timed for mid-flight over the . In the United Kingdom, Cameron stated on October 30, 2010, that the device intercepted at was "designed to go off on the aircraft," highlighting the plot's intent to cause mass casualties and praising the swift action enabled by shared intelligence that averted panic while maintaining public vigilance against al-Qaeda-linked threats. He also engaged to press for enhanced counterterrorism measures, reflecting a diplomatic push for accountability without diluting the attribution to jihadist networks originating in . Saudi Arabia's interior ministry played a pivotal role through intelligence provided by a embedded in (AQAP), which triggered the global alert and package interceptions in and the on , 2010; this cooperation was publicly credited by U.S. and British officials as decisive in foiling the attack, demonstrating Riyadh's commitment to disrupting transnational jihadist operations despite its own vulnerabilities to AQAP. The , where one package was neutralized at , facilitated rapid screening in coordination with U.S. and authorities, issuing statements of solidarity against terrorism while avoiding overreaction that could disrupt commerce, thereby prioritizing realistic threat assessment over unsubstantiated hysteria. These responses collectively reinforced a unified front, attributing the plot squarely to without equivocation or appeals to broader geopolitical .

Enhanced Security Protocols

In response to the foiled plot, multiple governments enacted immediate restrictions on from , with the announcing a ban on all freight shipments from on November 1, , later extended to . Similarly, the maintained its ban on from and expanded it to on November 8, , prohibiting high-risk cargo from being transported on passenger aircraft. The U.S. Department of directed enhanced screening protocols for all inbound international identified as high-risk, including requirements for expedited cargo manifests to enable pre-departure and intelligence-based targeting. Additional measures banned toner and cartridges exceeding 16 ounces (453 grams) from passenger aircraft cabins, , and certain inbound international cargo shipments, directly addressing the plot's use of concealed explosives in printer cartridges. Elevated-risk shipments to the U.S., such as personal effects, household goods from unknown shippers, and those paid by cash or cash-on-delivery, were outright prohibited via air, effective , 2010. These protocols emphasized targeted screening over blanket measures, with U.S. and authorities implementing advanced imaging and explosive trace detection for electronics and cargo from high-risk origins like and parts of , while requiring individual certification and screening for inbound international mail from established postal entities. The changes prioritized operational by focusing on intelligence-driven vulnerabilities without imposing universal delays on low-risk routes. The absence of successful follow-on cargo-based attacks on transatlantic routes in the immediate years post-implementation provided empirical validation of these protocols' deterrent effect against similar concealed threats.

Targeted Actions Against al-Awlaki

Following the 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot, which underscored Anwar al-Awlaki's role as a key operational and inspirational figure in (AQAP), the intensified targeted efforts against him. Al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born cleric integrated into AQAP's leadership, had been added to a CIA kill list in April 2010 due to intelligence indicating his direct involvement in directing attacks against American interests, including facilitating plots like the underwear bomber attempt and contributing to AQAP's aviation-focused operations evident in the cargo bomb scheme. On September 30, 2011, al-Awlaki was killed in a drone strike conducted by the CIA in Yemen's Al-Jawf Governorate, where two Hellfire missiles struck his convoy, also resulting in the death of , another AQAP propagandist. The operation was personally approved by President , reflecting a determination that al-Awlaki posed an imminent threat as a senior AQAP commander actively plotting against the U.S. The legal justification for targeting al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen, rested on his status as an active participant in al-Qaeda's armed conflict against the , rendering him targetable under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and principles of national without requiring capture if infeasible. U.S. officials cited empirical evidence of his shift from rhetoric to operational command, including communications with plotters and AQAP's post-9/11 attack patterns, as establishing continued and specific threats justifying lethal action over arrest. Al-Awlaki's elimination disrupted AQAP's capacity to orchestrate and inspire Western-centric attacks, diminishing the group's morale and propaganda reach, as he had been instrumental in recruiting English-speaking radicals and conceptualizing aviation threats like the 2010 plot. While AQAP persisted with fragmented operations, the loss of al-Awlaki's strategic acumen contributed to a measurable decline in successful external plots originating from in the immediate years following, based on assessments tracking reduced attack tempo.

Long-Term Impact and Legacy

Reforms in Global Air Cargo Security

In response to the 2010 plot, the (ICAO) strengthened Annex 17 standards, mandating states to apply security controls across the supply chain, including validation of regulated agents and screening methods like explosive trace detection (ETD) to mitigate concealment risks. These updates, effective through subsequent amendments, emphasized vetting from origin to loading, with ICAO urging immediate implementation of enhanced protocols for suspicious consignments by November 2010. Nationally, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) expanded its August 2010 requirement for 100% screening of cargo on inbound passenger flights to include deeper oversight, coordinating with international partners for harmonized practices and certifying over 1,000 facilities by late 2010. Similar mandates emerged in the via the Air Cargo Security Programme, requiring known shipper validation and ETD for non-EU transfers, implemented progressively from 2011. A transition to risk-based approaches followed, balancing volume with targeted scrutiny; the U.S. Department of launched the Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS) pilot in December 2010, using pre-shipment data to flag high-risk loads for ETD or imaging, reducing reliance on universal physical inspection. , expanded in 2018, has identified substantial threats via algorithmic analysis, enabling efficient resource allocation without compromising coverage for elevated-risk profiles. Yemen-origin cargo remains indefinitely classified as high-risk, subjecting it to mandatory 100% ETD or equivalent, with many operators prohibiting direct loading on passenger due to persistent instability and prior exploitation. This flagging persists in ICAO-compliant regimes, integrating intelligence on activities. Implementation data indicate effectiveness, with TSA reporting compliance rates exceeding 99% for certified screeners by 2012 and no successful transatlantic explosive detonations since, attributed to layered vetting that foiled follow-on probes, including Yemen-linked shipments intercepted via ACAS precursors. Government audits note residual challenges in insider threats but affirm vulnerability reductions through data-driven protocols over reactive measures.

Implications for Counterterrorism Strategy

The successful interdiction of the 2010 transatlantic aircraft bomb plot, achieved through a tip from Saudi Arabian intelligence regarding suspicious packages shipped from , exemplified the critical value of (HUMINT) in preempting sophisticated terrorist operations. This HUMINT breakthrough, involving infiltration or informant networks within (AQAP), allowed authorities to trace and neutralize the devices before detonation, demonstrating HUMINT's edge over technology-dependent screening methods that had failed to detect the concealed explosives during initial cargo handling. Overreliance on procedural or technological defenses, as seen in prior aviation threats, risks missing adaptive tactics like the plot's use of concealed PETN explosives in printer cartridges, whereas targeted human sourcing enables proactive disruption of operational cells. The plot further exposed Yemen's enduring role as a primary launchpad for AQAP-directed attacks on Western targets, underscoring the necessity for sustained, kinetically focused pressure on jihadist infrastructure there rather than expansive efforts. AQAP's ability to orchestrate the shipment of two viable bombs—each containing 300-400 grams of explosives with detonators synced to aircraft power sources—from Yemeni territory highlighted governance vacuums that enable safe havens, yet empirical outcomes from U.S.-led drone and strikes post-2010 degraded AQAP's external plotting capacity without requiring full-scale occupation. Such offensive measures, prioritizing leadership decapitation and logistics disruption, align with causal realities of jihadist resilience, where territorial control illusions often dilute resources, as opposed to precision campaigns that impose continuous attrition on networks. The operation's scale—targeting multiple U.S.-bound flights simultaneously with undetectable devices—served to refute tendencies toward threat minimization in assessments, revealing the perils of discounting AQAP's technical evolution and ideological commitment to high-impact strikes. Analysts noted the plot's refinement from prior failures, such as the 2009 bombing, as evidence of iterative learning that demands unyielding vigilance against underestimation, particularly given AQAP's explicit aim to provoke overreactions while sustaining low-cost, high-yield attempts. This incident reinforced that defensive palliatives alone cannot substitute for offensive strategies that dismantle operational intent at its source, as partial threat dismissal historically correlates with intelligence gaps enabling near-catastrophic breaches.

Evolution of AQAP and Ongoing Jihadist Threats

Following the intensified counterterrorism pressure after the 2010 plot, including the U.S. drone strike killing on September 30, 2011, (AQAP) demonstrated resilience by reorganizing its leadership and operations. Despite losing over half of its senior figures to targeted strikes by 2015, such as emir on June 9, 2015, AQAP exploited Yemen's escalating civil war to expand territorial control, seizing the port city of al-Mukalla on April 2, 2015, and establishing parallel governance through entities like the Hadhrami Domestic Council. This adaptation involved forging pragmatic alliances with local Sunni tribes, such as the al-Hamiqan in February 2015, while conducting over 270 guerrilla-style operations in 2017 alone after losing Mukalla in 2016, underscoring a shift toward localized survival tactics amid fragmentation and infighting. AQAP's propaganda apparatus evolved to sustain ideological recruitment and tactical innovation, with Inspire magazine continuing publication beyond its early issues, releasing editions like the 15th in May 2016 advocating small-scale attacks and the 17th promoting devices. These publications emphasized "lone-wolf" methodologies and DIY weaponry, including IED training videos released on July 20, 2015, building on prior bomb-making expertise to inspire both local and external operations without relying on complex variants. Under leaders like , who assumed the role in February 2020, AQAP revived Inspire content to reaffirm transnational ambitions, such as threats against the U.S. and maritime targets along Yemen's 1,200-mile coastline, while avoiding the overt brutality of rivals like the to preserve local support. The group's persistence into the , amid Yemen's instability, , and over 120 U.S. drone strikes in 2017, highlights the enduring causal chain from Salafi- ideology to action, rejecting assessments of terminal decline in favor of of sustained activity. AQAP's Yemen-centric focus—exploiting sectarian conflicts and vacuums—has enabled splinter factions to blend with opportunism, maintaining operational capacity for attacks like the claimed 2019 Pensacola naval base . This ideological continuity, rooted in targeting the "far enemy" as articulated since Osama bin Laden's era, necessitates ongoing vigilance, as tactical setbacks have not altered the motivational drivers linking doctrine to recurrent threats.

References

  1. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2010/11/aqap_claims_responsi.php
  2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/01/cargo-plane-plot-saudi-agent-gave-alert
  3. https://www.hsdl.org/c/looking-back-air-cargo-bomb-plot-foiled-on-october-29-2010/
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/10/cargo-plane-bomb-us-alqaida
  5. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2010/11/aqap_releases_a_spec.php
  6. https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-promises-us-death-thousand-cuts/story?id=12204726
  7. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-11662143
  8. https://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/files/9003_layout_mission_hall_exhibit_the_evolution.pdf
  9. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111shrg63867/html/CHRG-111shrg63867.htm
  10. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/al-qaeda-arabian-peninsula-aqap
  11. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-11483095
  12. https://www.dni.gov/nctc/groups/aqap.html
  13. https://www.congress.gov/event/111th-congress/senate-event/LC6725/text
  14. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2010/09/13/yemen-terrorism-is-not-its-only-problem/index.html
  15. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a319141.html
  16. https://www.dni.gov/nctc/terrorist_groups/aqap.html
  17. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/twenty-years-after-9-11-the-jihadi-threat-in-the-arabian-peninsula/
  18. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/context/mscmfac_pubs/article/1011/viewcontent/Packaging_Inspiration_SCS.pdf
  19. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/the-enduring-influence-of-anwar-al-awlaki-in-the-age-of-the-islamic-state/
  20. https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/al-qaida-arabian-peninsula-aqap-anwar-al-awlaki-and-samir-khan
  21. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112hhrg72216/html/CHRG-112hhrg72216.htm
  22. https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/uss-cole-bombing
  23. https://www.congress.gov/event/113th-congress/house-event/LC973/text
  24. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-11812874
  25. https://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/11/21/al.qaeda.magazine/
  26. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-11654004
  27. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/11/1/parcel-bomb-puts-spotlight-on-cargo
  28. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2010-11-01/debates/1011019000002/AviationSecurityIncident
  29. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-updates-parliament-on-airline-bomb-plot
  30. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/10/31/passenger-jets-carried-dubai-bomb
  31. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/world/01terror.html
  32. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11729720
  33. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-11664412
  34. https://www.cnn.com/2010/US/10/29/security.concern/index.html
  35. https://www.wired.com/2010/11/could-a-cell-phone-call-from-yemen-blow-up-a-plane/
  36. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/world/middleeast/31petn.html
  37. https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/mail-bombs-plot-us-hunts-bombmaker-ibrahim-al/story?id=12020200
  38. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2010/170256.htm
  39. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/06/world/middleeast/06terror.html
  40. https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-feared-mail-bomb-plot-coming-september-dry/story?id=12025563
  41. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-11666272
  42. https://www.npr.org/2010/11/01/130973861/sources-bomb-plot-tip-came-from-former-detainee
  43. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/10/29/130913768/bomb-found-on-cargo-plane-that-left-from-chicago
  44. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-11-10/yemen-mail-bomb-could-have-exploded-over-eastern-u-s-british-probe-finds
  45. https://www.npr.org/2010/11/10/131217489/police-mail-bomb-could-have-exploded-over-u-s
  46. https://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/11/10/britain.cargo.explosives/index.html
  47. http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/11/05/yemen.security.concern/index.html
  48. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/11/6/al-qaeda-claims-parcel-bomb-plot
  49. http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/11/21/al.qaeda.magazine/
  50. https://www.npr.org/2010/11/22/131520780/al-qaida-magazine-details-parcel-bomb-attempt
  51. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/11/21/al-qaeda-wing-to-target-us-economy
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/31/cargo-plane-bomb-suspect-anwar-al-awlaki
  53. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dead-cleric-anwar-al-awlaki-still-sways-terror-wannabes-n397506
  54. https://www.thetimes.com/travel/destinations/north-america-travel/us-travel/new-york-city/saudi-tip-off-snared-al-qaeda-preacher-anwar-al-awlaki-00n0f85d933
  55. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=nslb
  56. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-15121879
  57. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/01/world/middleeast/anwar-al-awlaki-is-killed-in-yemen.html
  58. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/world/middleeast/qaeda-bomber-death-trump.html
  59. https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/individual/ibrahim-hassan-tali-al-asiri
  60. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ibrahim-al-asiri-al-qaedas-genius-bomb-maker/
  61. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/11/2/yemen-hunts-for-cargo-plot-suspect
  62. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/10/white-house-confirms-top-al-qaeda-bomb-maker-killed-in-2017
  63. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2010/10/31/yemen-makes-bomb-plot-arrest
  64. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna39922412
  65. https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-scrambles-intel-reports-bombs-cargo-planes/story?id=12004110
  66. https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/yemen-arrests-woman-suspected-in-mail-bomb-case/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/01/cargo-plane-bomb-plot-tipoff
  68. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/photos-and-video/video/2010/10/29/president-obama-s-statement-security-alert
  69. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11654390
  70. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/30/readout-presidents-call-with-british-prime-minister-david-cameron
  71. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-11657486
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-11657742
  73. https://www.govexec.com/defense/2010/10/obama-we-will-not-waver-in-our-resolve/32628/
  74. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-11669636
  75. https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2010/11/08/statement-secretary-napolitano-increased-security-measures
  76. https://www.voanews.com/a/yemen-cargo-bomb-plot-sparks-stringent-us-security-rules-107280298/172452.html
  77. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=penn_law_review_online
  78. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/22/us/politics/anwar-awlaki-underwear-bomber-abdulmutallab.html
  79. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/ten-years-after-the-al-awlaki-killing-a-reckoning-for-the-united-states-drones-wars-awaits/
  80. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/oip/legacy/2014/07/23/dept-white-paper.pdf
  81. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/23/us-justification-drone-killing-american-citizen-awlaki
  82. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/al-qaedas-not-dead-yet/
  83. https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/the-death-of-aqaps-anwar-al-awlaki
  84. https://www.icao.int/aviation-security-policy-section/Annex17
  85. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/Security/aircargo/Documents/Moving-Air-Cargo-Globally-Third-edition.EN.pdf
  86. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45082
  87. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0523
  88. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-632
  89. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/06/12/2018-12315/air-cargo-advance-screening-acas
  90. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-11-238t.pdf
  91. https://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/files/tsa_air_cargo_security_roadmap.pdf
  92. https://www.npr.org/2010/11/02/130993646/saudi-intelligence-key-in-detecting-bomb-plot
  93. https://www.npr.org/2010/12/22/132238309/intelligence-officials-al-qaida-learns-from-mistakes
  94. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-u-s-saudi-arabia-counterterrorism-relationship/
  95. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/aqap-a-resurgent-threat/
  96. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/counterterrorism_strategy.pdf
  97. https://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/36CARG7.pdf
  98. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2016/08/a-persistent-and-resilient-adversary-al-qaeda-in-the.html
  99. https://www.adl.org/resources/article/latest-issue-inspire-magazine-encourages-small-scale-attacks
  100. https://acleddata.com/profile/al-qaeda-arabian-peninsula
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.