Hubbry Logo
Cast iron pipeCast iron pipeMain
Open search
Cast iron pipe
Community hub
Cast iron pipe
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cast iron pipe
Cast iron pipe
Cast iron pipe
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Cast iron pipes piled up near the construction site

Cast iron pipe is pipe made predominantly from gray cast iron. It was historically used as a pressure pipe for transmission of water, gas and sewage, and as a water drainage pipe during the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.

In many modern applications, cast iron pipe has been replaced by ductile iron pipe, but this newer product is still often loosely referred to by the older historical name.

History

[edit]
Typical leaded bell-and-spigot joint used for cast iron pipe

The oldest cast iron water pipes date from the 17th century and were installed to distribute water throughout the gardens of the Chateau de Versailles. These amount to some 35 km of pipe, typically 1 m lengths with flanged joints. The extreme age of these pipes make them of considerable historical value. Despite extensive refurbishment in 2008 by Saint-Gobain PAM, 80% remain original.

Cast iron proved to be a beneficial material for the manufacture of water pipes and was used as a replacement for the original elm pipelines utilized earlier. These water pipelines were composed of individually cast pipe sections, often termed sticks, jointed together by a variety of joint mechanisms. Flanged joints consisted of flat machined surfaces that were tightly bolted together with a gasket between them to prevent leakage. This type of pipe joint is still in use today, typically for above-ground pipelines in water treatment and manufacturing plants.

Cast iron pipe was frequently used uncoated, although later coatings and linings reduced corrosion and improved hydraulics. In cast iron pipe, the graphite forms flakes during the casting process, when examined under a microscope. Cast iron pipe was superseded by ductile iron pipe, which is a direct development, with most existing manufacturing plants transitioning to the new material during the 1970s and 1980s. Ductile iron pipe is different than cast iron, because the introduction of magnesium during the casting process causes the graphite to form spheres (graphite nodules) rather than flakes. While this allows the material to remain castable, the end product is much tougher than cast iron, and allows elastic behavior at lower stress levels.[1] Little cast iron pipe is currently manufactured, since ductile iron pipe is widely accepted as a superior product. Many public utilities, municipalities, and private industries still have functional cast iron pipe in service to this day.

Joints

[edit]

In a bell and spigot joint[2] one end of the pipe stick is flared, termed the bell or socket, to enable the opposite end of the next stick, the spigot end, to be inserted to create a joint. The gaps in these joints were stuffed with oakum or yarn to retain molten-lead, which solidified into a waterproof joint. This was a labor-intensive operation, and the quality of the seal was dependent on the skill of the laborer.

Mechanical joints were made by bolting a movable follower ring on the spigot close to the corresponding bell, which compressed a gasket in between. Many water pipes today use mechanical joints, since they are easily made and do not require special skills to install. This type of joint also allows some deflection to occur without sacrificing joint integrity, so that minor alignment adjustments can be made during installation, and the joints retain their integrity when subjected to limited subsidence. Typical joint deflections at mechanical joints today range anywhere from 3 to 5 degrees.

Ball-and-socket joints introduced more "rounded" sockets, allowing a relatively large amount of deflection at each joint. This type of joint, still in use today, was considered a special-purpose joint, and has been used primarily in both submerged and mountainous terrain. This type of joint can typically allow around 15 degrees of deflection at each joint, making 'snaking' of the pipe possible.[3] The advantage of this joint type was that it was quicker than bell and spigot joints, and did not require special skills or tools to install.

Push-on joints, developed in the mid 1950s, allowed a quicker and relatively non-skilled method of jointing pipe. This joint consisted of a bell with a recessed groove which held a rubberized gasket. A lubricated beveled spigot section can be pushed into this joint with care, as not to roll the rubberized gasket, and once installed became watertight. This type of jointing system is popular today with ductile iron and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes.

Manufacture

[edit]

Horizontally cast

[edit]

The first cast iron pipe was produced in horizontal moulds, the core of the mould would be supported on small iron rods which would become part of the pipe. Horizontal casting resulted in an uneven distribution of metal around the pipe circumference. Typically slag would collect at the crown of the pipe creating a much weaker section.

Vertically cast

[edit]

In 1845, the first pipe was cast vertically in a pit and by the end of the century, all pipe was manufactured by this method. Using this method the slag would all collect at the top of the casting and could be removed by simply cutting off the end of the pipe. Pipes cast using this method often suffered from off centre bores caused by the core of the mould being placed off centre, resulting in one side of the pipe being thicker than the other.

Centrifugally cast

[edit]

Subsequent to its invention by Dimitri Sensaud deLavaud, a French-Brazilian, in 1918, much cast iron pipe manufacturing shifted to the dramatically different technique of centrifugal casting. Modern ductile iron pipe production continues to use this general method of casting.

Historically, two different types of molds have been used in centrifugal casting of cast iron pipe: metal molds and sand molds. With metal molds, molten iron was introduced into the mold to uniformly distribute metal over the interior of the mold surface by the centrifugal force generated. The outside mold was typically protected from damage by a controlled water bath or water spray system. When the pipe was cool enough to be handled and hold its shape, the mold was stopped and the pipe removed. Pipe formed in metal molds were typically annealed after casting to eliminate any stresses in the pipe, and were then cleaned, inspected, tested, gauged (for dimensions), coated internally and/or externally, and stored for use. Standards for cast-iron pipe centrifugally cast in metal molds for water were established and published by the American Water Works Association.[4]

When cast with sand molds, two types of manufacturing processes were used. In the first method, a metal pattern was typically positioned in a metal flask and molding sand was rammed into the annular space between the flask and pattern. The pattern was then removed for casting of the pipe using molten grey iron. The second method did not entail a metal pattern, but entailed the forming of the mold centrifugally by lining the heated flask with a measured amount of thermosetting resin and sand. Either way, the casting machine was stopped after the pipe had solidified and the flask was removed. Cast iron pipe formed using this procedure was typically oven-cooled under controlled time and temperature conditions. As with metal molds, pipe was typically annealed to eliminate any stresses in the pipe, and were then cleaned, inspected, tested, gauged (for dimensions), coated internally and/or externally, and stored for use.[5] Standards for cast-iron pipe centrifugally cast in sand molds for water were established and published by the American Water Works Association.[6]

Internal corrosion

[edit]
Severely corroded cast iron pipe at Lane End mine shaft

Corrosion of cast-iron-pipe can occur on both the internal and external surfaces. In electro-chemical corrosion, internal anodes develop where bare iron is exposed to aggressive waters, promoting iron to move into solution. The iron combines with various components in the water, forming a tubercle on the pipe interior. This process of tuberculation can eventually cause significant restrictions in cross-sectional area within the pipe. Since the tubercles are irregularly shaped, buildup of bacterial growths on the surface are likely. As more iron moves into solution, the result is a loss of pipe structure over time potentially affecting pipe integrity. In storm and sanitary sewer systems, the creation of acidic gases (such as hydrogen sulfide) by microbial action can further corrode internal pipe walls but is most pronounced on the inside ‘ceiling’ of the pipe.

Starting in 1922, internal cement linings were introduced to act as a barrier to minimize internal corrosion. In 1929, the American Standard Association (ASA) Sectional Committee issued a tentative standard for cement-mortar linings, which was published in 1932. In 1939, American Standard A21.4 was published, which defined a Type I cement coating on the inside of waterline pipe to be used. When the standard was updated in 1953, the Type I cement was replaced with Type II, since it was believed that Type II was a more closely controlled product. The standard was further revised in 1964, which included the use of either Type I or Type II cement, and making two different mortar thicknesses available.[7]

Standardization

[edit]

The first standardization of cast iron water pipes in Britain occurred in 1917 with the publishing of BS 78. This standard specified a dimensionless nominal size, which approximately corresponded with the internal diameter in inches of the pipe, and four pressure classes, Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D, each with a specified wall thickness and outer diameter. It is noted that the outer diameter is identical between classes with the exception of sizes 12 to 27, where Classes A and B share one diameter and Classes C and D have another, larger diameter.

Nominal size Class
A & B A B C & D C D
Outer diameter
[in (mm)] 		Wall thickness
[in (mm)] 		Internal diameter
[in (mm)] 		Wall thickness
[in (mm)] 		Internal diameter
[in (mm)] 		Outer diameter
[in (mm)] 		Wall thickness
[in (mm)] 		Internal diameter
[in (mm)] 		Wall thickness
[in (mm)] 		Internal diameter
[in (mm)]
3 3.76 (95.504) 0.38 (9.652) 3.00 (76.200) 0.38 (9.652) 3.00 (76.200) 3.76 (95.504) 0.38 (9.652) 3.00 (76.200) 0.40 (10.160) 2.96 (75.184)
4 4.80 (121.920) 0.39 (9.906) 4.02 (102.108) 0.39 (9.906) 4.02 (102.108) 4.80 (121.920) 0.40 (10.160) 4.00 (101.600) 0.46 (11.684) 3.88 (98.552)
5 5.90 (149.860) 0.41 (10.414) 5.08 (129.032) 0.41 (10.414) 5.08 (129.032) 5.90 (149.860) 0.45 (11.430) 5.00 (127.000) 0.52 (13.208) 4.86 (123.444)
6 6.98 (177.292) 0.43 (10.922) 6.12 (155.448) 0.43 (10.922) 6.12 (155.448) 6.98 (177.292) 0.49 (12.446) 6.00 (152.400) 0.57 (14.478) 5.84 (148.336)
7 8.06 (204.724) 0.45 (11.430) 7.16 (181.864) 0.45 (11.430) 7.16 (181.864) 8.06 (204.724) 0.53 (13.462) 7.00 (177.800) 0.61 (15.494) 6.84 (173.736)
8 9.14 (232.156) 0.47 (11.938) 8.20 (208.280) 0.47 (11.938) 8.20 (208.280) 9.14 (232.156) 0.57 (14.478) 8.00 (203.200) 0.65 (16.510) 7.84 (199.136)
9 10.20 (259.080) 0.48 (12.192) 9.22 (234.188) 0.49 (12.446) 9.22 (234.188) 10.20 (259.080) 0.60 (15.240) 9.00 (228.600) 0.69 (17.526) 8.82 (224.028)
10 11.26 (286.004) 0.52 (13.208) 10.22 (259.588) 0.52 (13.208) 10.22 (259.588) 11.26 (286.004) 0.63 (16.002) 10.00 (254.000) 0.73 (18.542) 9.80 (248.920)
12 13.14 (333.756) 0.55 (13.970) 12.04 (305.816) 0.57 (14.478) 12.00 (304.800) 13.60 (345.440) 0.69 (17.526) 12.22 (310.388) 0.80 (20.320) 12.00 (304.800)
14 15.22 (386.588) 0.57 (14.478) 14.08 (357.632) 0.61 (15.494) 14.00 (355.600) 15.72 (399.288) 0.75 (19.050) 14.22 (361.188) 0.86 (21.844) 14.00 (355.600)
15 16.26 (413.004) 0.59 (14.986) 15.08 (383.032) 0.63 (16.002) 15.00 (381.000) 16.78 (426.212) 0.77 (19.558) 15.24 (387.096) 0.89 (22.606) 15.00 (381.000)
16 17.30 (439.420) 0.60 (15.240) 16.10 (408.940) 0.65 (16.510) 16.00 (406.400) 17.84 (453.136) 0.80 (20.320) 16.24 (412.496) 0.92 (23.368) 16.00 (406.400)
18 19.38 (492.252) 0.63 (16.002) 18.12 (460.248) 0.69 (17.526) 18.00 (457.200) 19.96 (506.984) 0.85 (21.590) 18.26 (463.804) 0.98 (24.892) 18.00 (457.200)
20 21.46 (545.084) 0.65 (16.510) 20.16 (512.064) 0.73 (18.542) 20.00 (508.000) 22.06 (560.324) 0.89 (22.606) 20.28 (515.112) 1.03 (26.162) 20.00 (508.000)
21 22.50 (571.500) 0.67 (17.018) 21.16 (537.464) 0.75 (19.050) 21.00 (533.400) 23.12 (587.248) 0.92 (23.368) 21.28 (540.512) 1.03 (26.162) 21.00 (533.400)
24 25.60 (650.240) 0.71 (18.034) 24.18 (614.172) 0.80 (20.320) 24.00 (609.600) 26.26 (667.004) 0.98 (24.892) 24.30 (617.220) 1.13 (28.702) 24.00 (609.600)
27 28.70 (728.980) 0.75 (19.050) 27.20 (690.880) 0.85 (21.590) 27.00 (685.800) 29.40 (746.760) 1.04 (26.416) 27.32 (693.928) 1.20 (30.480) 27.00 (685.800)
30 32.52 (826.008) 0.79 (20.066) 30.94 (785.876) 0.89 (22.606) 30.74 (780.796) 32.52 (826.008) 1.09 (27.686) 30.34 (770.636) 1.26 (32.004) 30.00 (762.000)
33 35.66 (905.764) 0.83 (21.082) 34.00 (863.600) 0.94 (23.876) 33.78 (858.012) 35.66 (905.764) 1.15 (29.210) 33.36 (847.344) 1.33 (33.782) 33.00 (838.200)
36 38.76 (984.504) 0.87 (22.098) 37.02 (940.308) 0.98 (24.892) 36.80 (934.720) 38.76 (984.504) 1.20 (30.480) 36.36 (923.544) 1.38 (35.052) 36.00 (914.400)
40 42.92 (1,090.168) 0.92 (23.368) 41.08 (1,043.432) 1.03 (26.162) 40.86 (1,037.844) 42.92 (1,090.168) 1.26 (32.004) 40.40 (1,026.160) 1.46 (37.084) 40.00 (1,016.000)
42 45.00 (1,143.000) 0.95 (24.130) 43.10 (1,094.740) 1.06 (26.924) 42.88 (1,089.152) 45.00 (1,143.000) 1.30 (33.020) 42.40 (1,076.960) 1.50 (38.100) 42.00 (1,066.800)
45 48.10 (1,221.740) 0.99 (25.146) 46.12 (1,171.448) 1.09 (27.686) 45.92 (1,166.368) 48.10 (1,221.740) 1.35 (34.290) 45.40 (1,153.160) 1.55 (39.370) 45.00 (1,143.000)
48 51.20 (1,300.480) 1.03 (26.162) 49.14 (1,248.156) 1.13 (28.702) 48.94 (1,243.076) 51.20 (1,300.480) 1.38 (35.052) 48.44 (1,230.376) 1.68 (42.672) 47.84 (1,215.136)

BS 78 was finally superseded when the UK harmonised with incompatible European standards, however, the specified outer dimensions continue to remain in effect (albeit in metric form) as the standard pipe outer diameter for ductile iron pipe in Australia and New Zealand through the descendant specification, AS/NZS 2280.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cast iron pipe

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cast iron pipe refers to piping systems made from alloys, primarily gray cast iron historically and its modern variant . Gray cast iron, with flake , offers strength and corrosion resistance but is brittle, while ductile iron features spheroidal for greater flexibility and impact resistance. These pipes are valued for durability in underground infrastructure. They are used for pressure transmission of water, gas, and sewage, as well as non-pressure drainage, waste, and vent (DWV) systems in municipal and building applications. Gray cast iron is common in soil pipe for commercial plumbing, while ductile iron predominates in water mains and sewers, often lined with cement or polyethylene for corrosion protection and exceeding 100 years of service life.

Introduction

Definition and characteristics

Cast iron pipes are cylindrical conduits primarily manufactured from gray , a containing approximately 2.5% to 4.0% carbon, 1% to 3% , and lesser amounts of , , and , where the carbon exists predominantly as flake-like embedded in a ferritic or pearlitic matrix. This microstructure imparts excellent , vibration damping, and castability, making gray cast iron the standard material for such pipes due to its balance of strength and ease of production. , a variant of with spheroidal nodules, is also commonly used in modern applications for its improved tensile strength and impact resistance. Key characteristics of gray pipes include high , often ranging from 80,000 to 150,000 psi, which is typically three to four times greater than its tensile strength of 20,000 to 40,000 psi depending on the class, resulting in a brittle well-suited for applications involving compressive loads but vulnerable to impact or . The 's of about 7.2 g/cm³ contributes to the pipes' substantial weight, which enhances stability in buried installations but requires careful handling during transport and assembly. Additionally, gray offers good thermal conductivity, around 40 to 50 W/m·K, allowing efficient dissipation, and inherent fire resistance owing to its high exceeding 1,100°C and non-combustible nature. While gray cast iron dominates pipe production for its versatility, white cast iron variants—characterized by a microstructure of rather than —are occasionally used in specialized pipes requiring superior abrasion resistance, though their extreme brittleness limits widespread adoption. Cast iron pipes typically range in nominal diameters from 3 to 48 inches, with wall thicknesses varying by pressure class (e.g., Class 50 to Class 250), where higher classes provide thicker walls (from about 0.25 to 1.0 inches) to accommodate elevated internal pressures up to 250 psi. These dimensions ensure compliance with standards like ASTM A48 for general gray iron castings used in pipe fabrication.

Applications and uses

Cast iron have been extensively utilized as pressure pipes for the transmission and distribution of in municipal systems, where they serve as mains capable of delivering potable over long distances with minimal leakage. These pipes are also employed in gravity flow applications for and drainage, handling from residential, commercial, and industrial sources to treatment facilities or natural outlets. Additionally, they have historically supported gas transmission lines, particularly for manufactured gas distribution starting in the late , though many such installations are now being phased out due to aging infrastructure. In municipal systems, pipes offer a exceeding 100 years under typical conditions, making them a reliable choice for underground that withstands loads and environmental stresses. For industrial handling, they provide robust conveyance of corrosive effluents, while their high load-bearing capacity suits underground storm drains in urban areas prone to heavy runoff. Modern applications include high-pressure connections for fire hydrants in municipal networks, leveraging the material's strength and compatibility with variants for potable and lines. Cast iron pipes are preferred over in corrosive s when equipped with protective linings, as their inherent design allows for more effective, lower-maintenance control compared to steel's requirement for ongoing . Relative to plastic alternatives like PVC, cast iron excels in scenarios demanding superior mechanical strength and fire resistance, such as building pipe systems where from fluid flow is beneficial, though plastics may suffice for less demanding, non-pressurized drainage.

History

Origins and early development

The earliest recorded use of cast iron pipe dates to around 1562 in Langensalza, Germany, where short sections were employed to supply water to a public fountain. The first large-scale implementation occurred in 1664 at the Palace of Versailles in France, where engineers under King Louis XIV installed a 15-mile cast iron main from the Marly machine on the Seine River to deliver water for the palace's elaborate fountains and gardens. This ambitious project represented a breakthrough in pressurized water distribution over long distances, and segments of the original piping remain operational more than 350 years later, underscoring the material's durability. By the , pipes gained broader traction in , particularly in urban settings. A pivotal advancement came in 1738 with the adoption of coke as a in iron , replacing costly and enabling more economical production. In , the Chelsea Water Company installed the first mains in in 1746 to meet the demands of the expanding city, facilitating reliable water delivery for households and firefighting. This period also saw the invention of the bell-and-spigot joint by Sir Thomas Simpson in 1785, which simplified assembly and reduced leakage risks compared to earlier flanged connections. Early cast iron pipes, however, encountered significant hurdles that tempered their initial promise. The material's made it susceptible to cracking under impact or uneven loads during transport and installation, often requiring careful handling and leading to higher needs. Unlined interiors exacerbated internal from water's dissolved minerals and oxygen, causing rapid pitting and scaling that compromised flow and longevity in the first generations of systems. The technology reached the toward the end of the , with initial installations in the United States. pipes were first laid in in 1799 as part of an experimental water conduit system. More substantial adoption followed in 1817–1819, when imported flanged pipes from to replace failing wooden mains and began domestic production, laying the groundwork for municipal water infrastructure across growing American cities.

19th and 20th century advancements

In the 19th century, cast iron pipe saw significant advancements in design and standardization, particularly , where the bell-and-spigot joint became a widely adopted feature for distribution systems. This joint type, originally developed in 1785 by British engineer Sir Thomas Simpson, gained prominence in the U.S. during the 1820s as cities like installed the nation's first extensive water mains in 1817–1819, transitioning from wooden pipes to more durable metal alternatives that facilitated reliable urban supply. By mid-century, these pipes were integral to expanding infrastructure, exemplified by their role in the British Empire's initiatives, such as Joseph Bazalgette's constructed in the 1850s and 1860s, featuring over 82 miles of main brick-lined sewers supplemented by pipes in various applications to combat outbreaks and the of 1858. The formation of the (AWWA) in 1881 marked a pivotal step in promoting standardized practices for cast iron pipe in works, addressing inconsistencies in and installation that had hindered earlier adoption. AWWA's efforts culminated in the organization's first standard, AWWA C100, adopted in 1908, which specified requirements for cast iron pipes and special castings, influencing design and quality across North American utilities. Entering the , innovations like the introduction of centrifugal casting in 1921 by U.S. Pipe Company revolutionized production, yielding pipes with smoother interiors and uniform walls compared to traditional pit casting methods. The Centriline process, developed in the 1920s, further enhanced pipe performance by applying cement linings in a centrifugal manner, reducing and improving flow efficiency in and gas lines. Post-World War II, cast iron pipe experienced widespread application in urban sewer and water systems, supporting rapid postwar and rebuilding in cities across the U.S. and , where its durability under high loads proved essential for expanding municipal networks. A major innovation came in 1949 with the patenting of (U.S. Patent 2,485,760), which introduced magnesium treatment to gray , creating a more flexible and impact-resistant variant that bridged traditional 's longevity with steel-like tensile strength. However, by the late , the rise of plastic pipes like PVC and began eroding 's dominance in low-pressure applications due to plastics' lower cost, lighter weight, and ease of installation, though and its ductile variants persisted in high-demand, load-bearing roles such as major water mains and industrial sewers.

Design features

Joint types

Cast iron pipes employ various joint types to facilitate secure, leak-proof connections in piping systems. The evolution of these joints reflects advancements in materials and installation techniques, transitioning from rigid, labor-intensive designs to flexible, gasket-sealed assemblies that accommodate ground movement and simplify fieldwork. Early joints relied on lead-based seals, while modern variants use elastomeric gaskets for enhanced durability and ease of use. The traditional bell-and-spigot joint, developed in 1785 by Sir Thomas Simpson, features a flared bell end on one pipe that receives the plain spigot end of the adjoining pipe. Sealing was originally achieved by packing the joint with or and pouring molten lead, which was then caulked to create a watertight barrier. This design dominated installations through the early , offering reliability for low-pressure water and gas lines, though it required skilled labor for lead pouring and provided limited flexibility. By the mid-20th century, rubber gaskets began replacing lead in some applications to reduce installation complexity. Push-on joints, introduced in the and patented as designs like Fastite in , represent a significant advancement over bell-and-spigot types. In this configuration, a single rubber is seated in a groove within the bell, and the plain spigot end is pushed into place, compressing the gasket to form a self-sealing without bolts or additional packing. This method allows for rapid assembly, even in wet trenches, and supports deflection angles up to 5 degrees for pipes 3 to 12 inches in diameter, enabling curves with radii of approximately 140 to 570 feet over 20-foot lengths. Push-on joints have become the most common for underground water mains due to their leak-proof performance under pressures exceeding 1,000 psi internally. Mechanical joints, originating in the late for gas lines and adapted for systems shortly thereafter, utilize a stuffing-box principle with a rubber compressed by a bolted around the spigot end. The bell includes an integral for attaching the gland via tee-head bolts, providing an adjustable, high-strength connection suitable for valves, fittings, and repairs. These joints offer greater deflection, up to 8 degrees in smaller sizes, and are standardized for pressures up to 350 psi, making them ideal for transitions or high-stress areas. The Simplex mechanical joint, developed in , featured early rubber gaskets and separate follower glands, influencing modern designs. Flanged joints, in use since the , consist of matching flanges on pipe ends or fittings bolted together with a —initially lead or , later rubber or —for rigid, above-ground installations. Rated for 250 psi working pressure, these joints provide dismantlability and stability in pump stations or treatment plants, though they offer minimal deflection and require precise alignment. They evolved from early leather-sealed versions around 550 years ago to comply with standards like AWWA C115. Hubless (no-hub) joints, introduced in the , are used primarily for soil pipe in drainage, , and vent (DWV) systems. These joints connect plain-ended and fittings using a coupling sleeve with an elastomeric inside, tightened by clamps to form a flexible, leak-resistant seal without bells or hubs. They simplify installation for non-pressure applications and comply with Soil Pipe Institute (CISPI) 310 standards.

Linings and protective coatings

Cast iron pipes are commonly protected with internal linings to mitigate corrosion from conveyed fluids, particularly in water distribution systems. The most prevalent internal lining is cement mortar, which has been standard since the 1920s following its first installation in 1922 in Charleston, South Carolina. This lining adheres to ANSI/AWWA C104/A21.4 specifications and prevents tuberculation—a form of iron oxide buildup—by forming a smooth, durable barrier that maintains water flow efficiency. For rehabilitation of existing pipes, especially in potable water applications, epoxy linings such as fusion-bonded epoxy are applied, complying with AWWA C116/A21.16 standards to restore integrity without full replacement. These epoxy options are NSF/ANSI 61 certified for drinking water contact and provide enhanced resistance to chemical attack. External coatings shield pipes from soil and environmental during underground installation. A standard asphaltic coating, approximately 1 mil (0.001 inch) thick, is factory-applied to most pipes per AWWA C151 requirements, offering basic protection against moisture and mild soil conditions. In aggressive soils with high resistivity or stray currents, encasement is recommended, consisting of a tubular film wrapped around the pipe assembly in accordance with AWWA C105/A21.5. Coal-tar enamel coatings, historically used for buried pipelines, provide robust resistance to water and soil chemicals but are less common today due to environmental regulations, often replaced by modern alternatives like . Linings and coatings are applied either at the factory during manufacturing or in the field for rehabilitation. Factory application of cement mortar typically uses a centrifugal process, where the pipe spins while mortar is projected onto the interior, achieving uniform and curing. linings may be sprayed or centrifugally applied similarly. Field methods, such as centrifugal spinning for in-place cement mortar per AWWA C602, allow rehabilitation of installed pipelines 4 inches (100 mm) and larger. Thickness standards for cement mortar vary by ; for example, the minimum for 3- to 12-inch pipes is approximately 1/8 inch (3.2 mm), with double thickness available for demanding conditions, as specified in AWWA C104. External encasement uses 8-mil thick film for standard protection. These protective measures significantly enhance pipe longevity by addressing mechanisms. Cement mortar linings raise the internal water to 9.5–10.5, creating an alkaline environment that inhibits iron dissolution and reduces ion diffusion through the lining, thereby preventing tuberculation and extending service life beyond 100 years in many installations. Epoxy linings similarly act as impermeable barriers, with field applications shown to add 30–50 years to existing pipe life. Overall, properly lined and coated pipes demonstrate durability in potable water systems, with flow tests on 97-year-old cement-lined pipes confirming minimal degradation.

Manufacturing methods

Horizontal casting

Horizontal casting, also known as the static molding process, was a foundational technique for producing pipes by laying molds flat during the pouring phase. This method utilized green molds prepared in metal flasks to form the pipe's exterior shape, with dry or cores inserted to define the interior bore. The molds were arranged horizontally in casting beds, often in sequence, to facilitate efficient pouring. Molten gray , heated to approximately 1400°C in a , was then poured from one end of the mold cavity using ladles, allowing the metal to flow and fill the space under gravity. Following the pour, the molds remained undisturbed for cooling and solidification, typically requiring 24 to 48 hours for large-diameter pipes to prevent cracking and ensure structural integrity. During this period, the iron transitioned from liquid to solid, with heat dissipation through the sand mold providing gradual cooling. Once cooled, the flasks were opened, and the pipes were extracted, cleaned of sand residue, and inspected for defects. This labor-intensive approach allowed for the production of pipes in lengths of about 10 to 12 feet. The process offered key advantages, particularly for manufacturing pipes with large diameters up to 48 inches, where vertical methods were less practical due to core support challenges. It proved cost-effective for low-volume runs and custom fittings, enabling flexibility in design without specialized machinery. Historically, horizontal casting dominated 19th-century production, with early U.S. adoption around 1819 in , for 16-inch pipes using local bog ore; by the , output reached 18,000 tons annually at sites like . This method supplanted less durable wooden and clay pipes in and sewer systems. However, horizontal casting had notable limitations, including the potential for uneven wall thickness as and heavier impurities settled on the lower portion of the mold, exacerbated by the issues of long cores in larger diameters. Sand inclusions could also embed in the metal, compromising strength. These often featured rough interiors from the mold contact, promoting scale buildup and increased in fluid flow. While primary use declined after the with the rise of vertical and centrifugal methods, horizontal persists for specialized, low-volume custom fittings today.

Vertical casting

Vertical casting, also known as pit casting, involves forming cast iron pipes upright in deep sand molds excavated in the ground. The process begins with excavating vertical pits, typically up to 25 feet deep, to accommodate the molds. Damp or dry sand is then rammed around a barrel pattern within cylindrical flasks to create the mold cavity, with a separate bell pattern used for the enlarged end if required; patterns are withdrawn after compaction, and sand-clay cores are baked, assembled, and inserted to define the pipe's interior. Molds are dried in ovens or positioned vertically in the pits with a pouring basin and refractory base at the bottom. Molten iron, produced in a cupola furnace, is poured from the top into the molds using ladles, filling the cavity under gravity. The iron cools sequentially from the bottom upward due to the vertical orientation and contact with the cooler pit base, solidifying into the pipe shape over several hours until reaching approximately 500°F. Once cooled, the core is removed, the flask is lifted, and the pipe is extracted using jib cranes, followed by cleaning, inspection for defects like sand holes or blisters, and testing such as hydrostatic or hammer tests. This method was first developed in 1845 and widely used from the mid-19th century for of longer pipes; significant equipment advancements, such as improved jib cranes, were implemented after 1905 at facilities like the American Cast Iron Pipe Company. It enables the production of longer pipes, typically 12 to 18 feet in length, compared to earlier horizontal methods, facilitating efficient installation in and systems. The vertical setup also supports diameters from 4 to 12 inches commonly, though larger sizes up to 60 inches are possible for specific applications. Equipment for vertical casting includes molding machines or manual ramming tools for sand compaction in flasks, furnaces for , ladles for pouring, and heavy-duty cranes with capacities up to 5 tons for handling molds and finished pipes. These cranes, often featuring box girder frames, vertical masts, and horizontal booms with trolleys, were essential for the repetitive cycle of mold placement and pipe extraction in the pits. Despite its effectiveness, vertical casting is labor-intensive, requiring significant effort for pit excavation, ramming, and mold handling each cycle. It also carries risks of defects such as inclusions or uneven walls if compaction or pouring is not precisely controlled, potentially leading to weaker pipes susceptible to over time. The process was largely replaced by centrifugal methods in the due to these inefficiencies.

Centrifugal casting

Centrifugal casting, also known as spin casting, is a manufacturing technique for producing cast iron pipes by rotating a mold at high speeds to distribute molten metal evenly along the mold walls through centrifugal force. In this process, molten gray or ductile iron, heated to approximately 1,300–1,500°C, is poured into a cylindrical metal mold that rotates horizontally at speeds typically ranging from 300 to 1,000 revolutions per minute (RPM), depending on pipe diameter and alloy type. The centrifugal force—often generating 30 to 100 times the force of gravity—flings the molten metal outward, forming a uniform layer against the mold's inner surface while impurities and lighter elements like slag collect at the center bore. The mold, usually made of cast iron or steel and lined with refractory material, is water-cooled from the exterior to promote rapid solidification, typically completing in minutes, resulting in a dense microstructure with minimal porosity. This method was invented in 1918 by Dimitri Sensaud deLavaud, a Brazilian engineer, and patented as the DeLavaud process, which revolutionized pipe production by eliminating the need for internal sand cores and enabling continuous operation. Adopted widely in the 1920s by major manufacturers like the American Cast Iron Pipe Company, it became the dominant technique for new cast iron pipe installations by the mid-20th century, supplanting earlier static molding methods due to its efficiency and superior output quality. Today, it remains the standard for producing high-pressure pipes used in water, sewage, and gas distribution systems. The advantages of centrifugal casting include the formation of thinner, more uniform pipe walls—often 0.25 to 0.5 inches thick for standard applications—which enhance structural integrity and allow for lighter-weight pipes without compromising strength. The process yields smoother interior surfaces compared to static casting, reducing hydraulic friction losses in fluid conveyance and minimizing or blockages from uneven metal distribution. Additionally, it supports high production rates, with machines capable of casting multiple pipes per hour, making it economical for diameters ranging from 3 to 24 inches, where larger sizes benefit from the method's ability to handle longer lengths up to 20 feet. Variations of the DeLavaud process include horizontal spinning, which is most common for elongated pipes to leverage gravity minimally and ensure even wall thickness, and vertical spinning for shorter or specialized components where is prioritized. These adaptations produce pipes classified under standards like AWWA C151, ranging from Class 150 (lowest pressure rating, suitable for low-head applications) to Class 350 (up to 350 psi working pressure), with higher classes featuring thicker walls for elevated demands in municipal infrastructure.

Performance and issues

Corrosion mechanisms

Cast iron pipes are susceptible to internal corrosion primarily through the process of tuberculation, where dissolved oxygen and in initiate the formation of and deposits on the pipe interior. This begins with oxygen depolarization, oxidizing iron to form initial layers of and , which evolve into denser under low-oxygen conditions as the scale thickens; contributes by generating hydrogen ions that facilitate depolarization and further tubercle growth. These tubercles, composed of ferric and , accumulate over time, significantly reducing hydraulic flow capacity after decades of service due to increased frictional resistance and narrowing of the pipe lumen. External corrosion of cast iron pipes arises from electrochemical interactions with surrounding , including galvanic action where the pipe acts as an relative to more noble soil components or dissimilar buried metals, leading to iron dissolution. in conductive soils, often driven by stray currents from nearby , accelerates this by promoting migration and localized pitting; acidic soils (pH below 7) or those rich in sulfates exacerbate the process by lowering resistivity and fostering aggressive chemical environments that enhance anodic reactions. Sulfate-reducing (SRB) in anaerobic zones further intensify external by metabolizing sulfates to sulfides, which react with iron to form corrosive iron sulfides and create concentration cells that drive localized attack. Several environmental factors influence the rate and extent of in pipes. Water pH below 7 increases acidity, promoting iron dissolution and initiation by destabilizing protective scales; conversely, higher pH levels (around 7.8) can inhibit through enhanced passivation. plays a dual role: high velocities (e.g., above 0.85 ft/s) may erode nascent deposits and promote uniform , while low velocities (e.g., 0.2 m/s) favor elongated formation by allowing undisturbed deposition. Microbial activity, particularly from SRB, accelerates both internal and external degradation in low-oxygen settings by generating biofilms and corrosive metabolites, with sulfate availability directly correlating to their impact. Corrosion in unprotected pipes typically proceeds at rates of 0.1 to 1 mm per year, varying with or aggressiveness, though localized pitting often dominates over attack due to heterogeneous environmental conditions like differential aeration cells. Pitting results in deep, discrete penetrations that compromise structural integrity faster than even , with maximum depths influenced by factors such as resistivity and content; for instance, in sulfate-rich clays, pitting rates can exceed average by factors of 5 to 10. These rates underscore the need for monitoring, as unprotected pipes in aggressive environments may experience wall loss sufficient to cause failure within 50 to 100 years.

Durability and maintenance

Cast iron pipes are renowned for their extended , typically ranging from 75 to 100 years or more when equipped with appropriate protective measures such as linings or encasements. Factors including loading, traffic vibrations, and environmental exposure can influence by accelerating over time. Key advantages of pipes include their high resistance to external loads, making them suitable for buried applications under roadways or heavy structures; variants offer particularly high resistance to impacts due to their flexibility, while gray provides density for quiet operation in drainage systems by effectively dampening from flow. Additionally, exhibits low , minimizing dimensional changes and stress under temperature fluctuations compared to materials like plastics. pipes, with spheroidal , provide enhanced durability with tensile strength over 60,000 psi and reduced rates compared to traditional gray . Despite these strengths, cast iron pipes have notable disadvantages, primarily their substantial weight—ranging from 200 to 500 pounds per standard length—which complicates handling, transportation, and installation without . Gray cast iron's inherent renders it vulnerable to cracking under seismic stresses or ground shifts, potentially leading to failures in earthquake-prone areas, whereas mitigates this with greater flexibility. Effective maintenance of cast iron pipe systems involves regular inspections using closed-circuit television (CCTV) to detect issues like cracks or blockages without excavation. For rehabilitation, techniques such as cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liners are commonly applied to restore structural integrity and extend service life by creating a seamless inner barrier. Slip-lining, which inserts a smaller pipe within the existing one, offers another trenchless option for addressing localized deterioration. When sections are irreparably damaged, targeted replacement ensures system reliability while minimizing disruption.

Standards and specifications

Historical standards

The American Water Works Association (AWWA) established one of the earliest formal standards for cast iron water pipes in the United States with its "Standard Specification for Cast-Iron Pipe and Special Castings," adopted on May 12, 1908. This specification primarily addressed bell-and-spigot pit-cast pipes and fittings, emphasizing joint integrity through requirements for lead jointing and hydrostatic testing to ensure leak-proof connections under pressure. It also focused on material strength by classifying pipes into categories A, B, C, and D based on wall thicknesses that provided tensile resistance suitable for hydraulic pressures, with thicknesses designed in increments of 50 feet of head and classes corresponding to allowable heads of 100 feet (Class A, approximately 43 psi), 200 feet (Class B, 86 psi), 300 feet (Class C, 130 psi), and 400 feet (Class D, 173 psi). In , the British Standards Institution (BSI), through its predecessor the Engineering Standards Committee, developed early codes for cast iron pipes, including BS 78 for pipes used in water, gas, and applications, published on , 1917. This standard stressed casting quality, mandating uniform metallurgical composition and defect-free production to minimize and ensure reliability in gas distribution systems. Key aspects of these early standards across regions included standardized dimensions, such as 12-foot laying lengths for U.S. pipes and comparable spigot-and-socket configurations in British designs, along with pressure classes that prioritized structural integrity over internal linings, which were not yet required. These foundational standards significantly reduced manufacturing variability by establishing uniform dimensions, testing protocols, and quality benchmarks, which facilitated the scalability of production and supported major infrastructure expansions, such as the extensive water works projects during the 1930s under initiatives. For non-pressure applications like drainage, , and vent (DWV) systems, early standards in the U.S. evolved separately, with specifications for soil pipe focusing on hub-and-spigot joints and material quality to handle corrosive without pressure requirements.

Modern international standards

Modern international standards for cast iron pipes, particularly ductile iron variants, are established by organizations such as the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN). The AWWA C151 standard governs the manufacturing, dimensions, materials, tolerances, and testing of centrifugally cast ductile-iron pipes ranging from 3 inches to 64 inches (80 mm to 1,600 mm) in diameter, suitable for potable water, raw water, wastewater, and reclaimed water applications. Similarly, ISO 2531 specifies requirements for ductile iron pipes, fittings, accessories, and joints used in pressure and non-pressure pipelines, including materials, mechanical properties, dimensions, tolerances, and standard coatings like metallic zinc with a finishing layer. For gray iron components such as pipe fittings, ASTM A48 outlines classes based on tensile strength, ensuring suitability for valves, flanges, and related castings. Key specifications include rigorous testing protocols to verify integrity and performance. Under AWWA C151, each pipe undergoes hydrostatic testing at a minimum of 500 psi for at least 10 seconds to confirm resistance, often calibrated to twice the working plus a safety margin depending on the pressure class. Coating adherence tests, such as those for mortar or linings, ensure durability against , while dimensional tolerances typically allow ±1% variation in outside to maintain compatibility and installation precision. ISO 2531 mandates mechanical tests like tensile strength (minimum 420 MPa for pipes) and bending tests, alongside requirements such as a minimum 200 g/m² application for external protection. For soil pipe used in DWV systems, standards include ASTM A74 for hub-and-spigot gray soil pipe and fittings, specifying dimensions, materials, and testing for non-pressure applications, and ASTM A888 for hubless soil pipe and fittings, which emphasizes no-hub joint integrity with couplings. The Soil Pipe Institute (CISPI) provides complementary standards like CISPI 301 for hubless pipe, ensuring compatibility and performance in building drainage. Since 2000, standards have evolved to address environmental and safety concerns, incorporating epoxy linings certified under NSF/ANSI 61 to prevent leaching of contaminants like lead or volatile organics into potable , with multiple revisions (e.g., 2008, 2016) tightening extractable limits for materials like and . Seismic design provisions have also been integrated, as per the (ASCE) guidelines in collaboration with the American Lifelines Alliance, requiring pipes in high-risk zones to withstand ground motions through flexible joints and strain limits to avoid brittle failure. Globally, variations reflect regional priorities; the EN 545, updated in 2010, emphasizes for pipes by mandating recyclable materials, advanced protections like polyurethane linings, and environmental compliance for non-potable uses, while noting a shift toward alternatives like HDPE in some applications due to lighter weight and installation ease. Compliance with these standards ensures cast iron pipes meet modern demands for longevity and safety, building on historical frameworks without delving into early 20th-century specifics.

References

  1. https://www.uspipe.com/faq-items/what-is-the-difference-between-cast-iron-and-ductile-iron-2/
  2. https://dipra.org/about-ductile-iron-pipe/
  3. https://www.cispi.org/why-cast-iron/about-cast-iron/
  4. https://www.mswmag.com/online_exclusives/2019/01/a-brief-history-of-pipe-materials_sc_00125
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/grey-cast-iron
  6. https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=783
  7. https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/rd/FileGet/11936/DTPH56-15-T-00006_FinalReport_2018-02-15.pdf
  8. https://www.pentictonfoundry.com/news/gray-iron-astm-a48-class-30/
  9. https://www.iron-foundry.com/DIN-1691-grade-GG15-gray-cast-iron.html
  10. https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=f3cd25980ab24fdaa5893252cd2bc192
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/white-cast-iron
  12. https://www.petersenproducts.com/pipe-specs/cast-iron-pipe
  13. https://dipra.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Cast_Iron_Pipe_Handbook_1976_-_Fourth_Edition.pdf
  14. https://www.cispi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/CISPAF_Handbook.pdf
  15. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline-replacement/cast-and-wrought-iron-inventory
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/18/us/18water.html
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/cast-iron-pipe
  18. https://american-usa.com/industries/fire-protection
  19. http://www.testing-engineers.com/case1.html
  20. https://www.charlottepipe.com/uploads/documents/technical/CISPI_Tech_Man.pdf
  21. https://www.charlottepipe.com/articles/cast-iron-soil-pipe-a-legacy-of-sustainability
  22. http://www.waterworkshistory.us/tech/castironpipe.htm
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41224630
  24. https://www.cispi.org/green-from-the-beginning/
  25. https://american-usa.com/news/2019/09/16/innovation-drives-iron-pipe-joint-technology
  26. https://www.ndtgroup.co.uk/latest-news/cast-iron-pipework/
  27. https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7329/1/DX202873.pdf
  28. https://www.awwa.org/who-we-are/
  29. https://www.awwa.org/standards/
  30. https://www.mcwaneductile.com/blog/why-do-all-three-ductile-iron-pipe-manufacturers-have-roots-in-birmingham/
  31. https://water360.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/19E9551.pdf
  32. https://www.waterworkshistory.us/tech/castironpipe.htm
  33. https://blog.envirosight.com/a-brief-history-of-pipe-materials
  34. https://www.hartenergy.com/news/history-pe-pipe-52531/
  35. https://downloads.ctfassets.net/e4roza01bro8/2yE0hwt0GzkmT6WQJk6FqF/be9006dbc8b726d24ef76dafbe86d445/Cast_Iron_Pipe_Handbook_1978_-_Fifth_Edition.pdf
  36. https://dipra.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Ductile-Iron-Pipe-Joints-and-Their-Uses.pdf
  37. https://american-usa.com/products/ductile-iron-pipe-and-fittings/linings/standard-cement-lining/standards
  38. https://www.construtec.com/en/why-is-cement-mortar-applied-as-an-internal-protection-against-corrosion-ductile-iron-pipes/
  39. https://store.awwa.org/AWWA-C104-A21.4-22-Cement-Mortar-Lining-for-Ductile-Iron-Pipe-and-Fittings
  40. https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/awwa/preview_c116-09_with_erratum.pdf
  41. https://www.uspipe.com/u-s-pipe-fabrication/ansi-awwa/
  42. https://american-usa.com/products/ductile-iron-pipe-and-fittings/coatings/standard-asphaltic-coating
  43. https://store.awwa.org/AWWA-C105-10-Polyethylene-Encasement-for-Ductile-Iron-Pipe-Systems-PDF
  44. https://www.sdbksteel.com/steel-pipe-coating-types/
  45. https://pe.mcwane.com/upl/downloads/dipra/dip-cement-linings-d40130fb.pdf
  46. https://store.awwa.org/AWWA-C602-23-Cement-Mortar-Lining-of-Water-Pipelines-in-Place4-In.-100-mm-and-Larger-PDF
  47. https://american-usa.com/products/ductile-iron-pipe-and-fittings/linings/standard-cement-lining/thicknesses
  48. https://uspipe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20117151416520.Polyethylenev2.pdf
  49. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/289000414_Cement_mortar_linings_in_cast_and_ductile_iron_pipes_Life_expectancy_and_dependence_upon_water_chemistry
  50. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/2007_09_04_disinfection_tcr_whitepaper_tcr_infrastructure.pdf
  51. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784483602.030
  52. https://www.lawsupply.net/cast_iron/spec/chapter1a.htm
  53. https://www.metaltek.com/blog/sand-casting-process-advantages-and-limitations/
  54. https://www.aesteiron.com/cast-iron-pipe.html
  55. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100HCQ6.TXT
  56. https://hartsservices.com/blog/cast-iron-sewer-pipes/
  57. https://ethw.org/ASME-Landmark:Pit-Cast_Jib_Crane
  58. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/10783/1952Cast-Iron-Pipe-Catalog.pdf
  59. https://www.muellerwaterproducts.com/news/estimating-remaining-lifespans-pit-cast-iron-watermains-using-acoustical-findings
  60. https://www.asminternational.org/results/-/journal_content/56/ASMHBA0005257/ASMHBA0005257
  61. https://www.company-histories.com/American-Cast-Iron-Pipe-Company-Company-History.html
  62. https://www.metalandglass.co.uk/what-is-centrifugal-casting-and-why-does-it-make-for-better-cast-iron-pipes
  63. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/AWWA-C151-ductile-pipe-d_2140.html
  64. https://deltacentrifugal.com/horizontal-vs-vertical-centrifugal-casting-whats-the-difference/
  65. http://ijcsi.pro/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ijcsi-2022_v11-n2-p24.pdf
  66. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/103666/bitstreams/329358/data.pdf
  67. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstreams/9339a8df-25f6-4ec3-a220-56d7efd7bb83/download
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279909941_Iron_pipe_corrosion_in_distribution_systems
  69. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/6940/1/MogharehAbed16PhD.pdf
  70. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/t02-106
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3911074/
  72. https://www.nap.edu/read/11262/page/4
  73. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/41215/PDF/1
  74. https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/historic-preservation/historic-preservation-policy-tools/preservation-tools-resources/technical-procedures/cast-iron-characteristics-uses-and-problems
  75. https://www.cispi.org/why-cast-iron/the-quiet-pipe/
  76. https://www.pambuilding.com/cast-iron
  77. https://www.eng.buffalo.edu/mceer-reports/07/07-0013.pdf
  78. https://www.intrans.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2020/03/14C-2.pdf
  79. https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/rd/FileGet/18861/CAAP_Annual_Report_1_2023_YHuang.pdf
  80. https://www.fs.usda.gov/eng/pubs/pdf/05771201.pdf
  81. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100DQFP.TXT
  82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41253067
  83. https://city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/WaterWorks/images/History-docs/SpecsforCastIronPipe_1908.pdf
  84. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/specification-for-cast-iron-pipes-and-special-castings-for-water-gas-and-sewage
  85. https://american-usa.com/american-ductile-iron-pipe-standards
  86. https://store.awwa.org/AWWA-C151-A21.51-17-Ductile-Iron-Pipe-Centrifugally-Cast-PDF
  87. https://www.mcwaneductile.com/blog/why-are-the-awwa-standards-important-to-ductile-iron-pipe/
  88. https://www.mwalloys.com/product/awwa-c151-ductile-iron-pipe/
  89. https://www.cispi.org/standards/
  90. https://www.astm.org/a074_a074m-20.html
  91. https://www.astm.org/a0888-24.html
  92. https://d2evkimvhatqav.cloudfront.net/documents/NSF-ANSI_61_watemarked.pdf
  93. https://www.americanlifelinesalliance.com/pdf/SeismicGuidelines_WaterPipelines_Comm.pdf
  94. https://www.en-standard.eu/une-en-545-2011-ductile-iron-pipes-fittings-accessories-and-their-joints-for-water-pipelines-requirements-and-test-methods/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.