Hubbry Logo
CatenoidCatenoidMain
Open search
Catenoid
Community hub
Catenoid
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Catenoid
Catenoid
from Wikipedia
three-dimensional diagram of a catenoid
A catenoid
animation of a catenary sweeping out the shape of a catenoid as it rotates about a central point
A catenoid obtained from the rotation of a catenary

In geometry, a catenoid is a type of surface, arising by rotating a catenary curve about an axis (a surface of revolution).[1] It is a minimal surface, meaning that it occupies the least area when bounded by a closed space.[2] It was formally described in 1744 by the mathematician Leonhard Euler.

Soap film attached to twin circular rings will take the shape of a catenoid.[2] Because they are members of the same associate family of surfaces, a catenoid can be bent into a portion of a helicoid, and vice versa.

Geometry

[edit]

The catenoid was the first non-trivial minimal surface in 3-dimensional Euclidean space to be discovered apart from the plane. The catenoid is obtained by rotating a catenary about its directrix.[2] It was found and proved to be minimal by Leonhard Euler in 1744.[3][4]

Early work on the subject was published also by Jean Baptiste Meusnier.[5][4]: 11106  There are only two minimal surfaces of revolution (surfaces of revolution which are also minimal surfaces): the plane and the catenoid.[6]

The catenoid may be defined by the following parametric equations:

where and and is a non-zero real constant.

In cylindrical coordinates: where is a real constant.

A physical model of a catenoid can be formed by dipping two circular rings into a soap solution and slowly drawing the circles apart.

The catenoid may be also defined approximately by the stretched grid method as a facet 3D model.

Helicoid transformation

[edit]
Continuous animation showing a right-handed helicoid deforming into a catenoid, a left-handed helicoid, and back again
Deformation of a right-handed helicoid into a left-handed one and back again via a catenoid

Because they are members of the same associate family of surfaces, one can bend a catenoid into a portion of a helicoid without stretching. In other words, one can make a (mostly) continuous and isometric deformation of a catenoid to a portion of the helicoid such that every member of the deformation family is minimal (having a mean curvature of zero). A parametrization of such a deformation is given by the system for , with deformation parameter , where:

  • corresponds to a right-handed helicoid,
  • corresponds to a catenoid, and
  • corresponds to a left-handed helicoid.

The critical catenoid conjecture

[edit]

A critical catenoid is a catenoid in the unit ball that meets the boundary sphere orthogonally. Up to rotation about the origin, it is given by rescaling Eq. 1 with by a factor , where . It is an embedded annular solution of the free boundary problem for the area functional in the unit ball and the critical catenoid conjecture states that it is the unique such annulus.

The similarity of the critical catenoid conjecture to Hsiang-Lawson's conjecture on the Clifford torus in the 3-sphere, which was proven by Simon Brendle in 2012,[7] has driven interest in the conjecture,[8][9] as has its relationship to the Steklov eigenvalue problem.[10]

Nitsche proved in 1985 that the only immersed minimal disk in the unit ball with free boundary is an equatorial totally geodesic disk.[11] Nitsche also claimed without proof in the same paper that any free boundary constant mean curvature annulus in the unit ball is rotationally symmetric, and hence a catenoid or a parallel surface. Non-embedded counterexamples to Nitsche’s claim have since been constructed.[12][13]

The critical catenoid conjecture is stated in the embedded case by Fraser and Li[9] and has been proven by McGrath with the extra assumption that the annulus is reflection invariant through coordinate planes,[14] and by Kusner and McGrath when the annulus has antipodal symmetry.[15]

As of 2025 the full conjecture remains open.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A catenoid is a in three-dimensional , generated by rotating a about its axis of symmetry, resulting in a with zero . It can be parameterized as x(u,v)=(ccosh(v/c)cosu,ccosh(v/c)sinu,v)x(u,v) = (c \cosh(v/c) \cos u, c \cosh(v/c) \sin u, v) for parameters u[0,2π)u \in [0, 2\pi) and vRv \in \mathbb{R}, where c>0c > 0 scales the surface, forming a catenoid of constant width that narrows to a "neck" and flares out asymptotically to catenary ends. Discovered by Leonhard Euler in 1744 and rigorously proven to be a by Jean-Baptiste Meusnier in 1776, the catenoid represents the first known non-planar example of a , predating broader classifications in . As the unique axially symmetric in R3\mathbb{R}^3, it spans two parallel coaxial circles when truncated, analogous to a minimizing surface area between rings, and exhibits finite total of 4π-4\pi with a Morse index of 1. The catenoid is topologically a punctured (genus zero) with two ends, and its Gauss map is anti-holomorphic, covering the unit except for the north and south poles, underscoring its role in the Weierstrass-Enneper representation of s. It is the only properly embedded, non-planar of finite topology in R3\mathbb{R}^3 with these properties, and by theorems such as those of Collin and Nitsche, it uniquely intersects every horizontal plane in a Jordan curve when oriented appropriately. Beyond , the catenoid models physical phenomena like equilibrium shapes in capillarity and serves as a benchmark in for simulating s via .

Definition and Geometry

Catenary Curve Basis

The catenary curve describes the shape assumed by a perfectly flexible, inextensible or cable of uniform when suspended from two points and acted upon solely by . Its standard , with the vertex at the origin, is given by
y=acosh(xa),y = a \cosh\left(\frac{x}{a}\right),
where a>0a > 0 is a scaling parameter that determines the curve's width and sag, related to the horizontal tension at the lowest point and the of the multiplied by (specifically, a=T0/(μg)a = T_0 / (\mu g), with T0T_0 the horizontal tension, μ\mu the mass per unit length, and gg the ).
The catenary's equation arises from either force balance on chain segments or variational principles minimizing subject to fixed length. In the force balance approach, consider a small segment of the chain: the horizontal tension component remains constant, while the vertical component increases with the weight supported, leading to the
dds(dydx)=1a,\frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right) = \frac{1}{a},
where ss is the along the curve; integrating this yields the hyperbolic cosine form. Alternatively, using the to minimize the yds\int y \, ds (with fixed total length) produces the Euler-Lagrange equation (y+h)y=1+(y)2(y + h) y'' = 1 + (y')^2, which integrates to the same solution, confirming its equilibrium shape.
Historically, approximated the as a parabola in his 1638 , based on empirical observations of hanging chains, though this was an inexact model valid only for shallow sags. The true equation was rigorously derived in 1691 by , , and , in response to a challenge posed by to find the curve of a hanging chain. had earlier coined the term "catenary" (from Latin catena, meaning chain) in a 1690 letter to . Key geometric properties include the from the vertex to a point (x,y)(x, y), given by s=asinh(x/a)s = a \sinh(x/a), which reflects the curve's hyperbolic nature. The intrinsic equation relating the ρ\rho and is ρa=s2+a2\rho a = s^2 + a^2, highlighting the 's non-constant . A common misconception, stemming from Galileo's approximation, equates the catenary to a parabola y=kx2y = k x^2; while similar for small angles, the catenary grows exponentially at large distances, unlike the parabola's . When rotated about its axis of symmetry, the catenary generates the catenoid surface.

Surface of Revolution

The catenoid is formed as a by rotating a curve about its directrix, the axis of . Specifically, the generating catenary in the radial-axial plane is given by r=acosh(za)r = a \cosh\left(\frac{z}{a}\right), where a>0a > 0 is a scaling parameter, rr is the radial distance from the z-axis, and zz is the axial coordinate serving as height. This rotation occurs around the z-axis, producing a rotationally symmetric surface that connects smoothly across all azimuthal angles. Leonhard Euler first derived this construction in 1744 while investigating surfaces of minimal area. The resulting geometry yields an implicit Cartesian equation x2+y2=a2cosh2(za)x^2 + y^2 = a^2 \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right), or equivalently in cylindrical coordinates, r=acosh(za)r = a \cosh\left(\frac{z}{a}\right). Visually, the catenoid resembles an , with the narrowest "neck" occurring at z=0z = 0, where the radius r=ar = a. As z|z| increases, the radius expands exponentially, flaring outward to infinity in both directions along the axis, creating two funnel-like ends joined at the . This shape arises directly from the hyperbolic nature of the profile. To describe distances on the surface, the provides the . Parametrizing the surface as X(z,θ)=(acosh(za)cosθ,acosh(za)sinθ,z)\mathbf{X}(z, \theta) = \left( a \cosh\left(\frac{z}{a}\right) \cos \theta, \, a \cosh\left(\frac{z}{a}\right) \sin \theta, \, z \right) for zRz \in \mathbb{R} and θ[0,2π)\theta \in [0, 2\pi), the coefficients are E=cosh2(za)E = \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right), F=0F = 0, and G=a2cosh2(za)G = a^2 \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right). Thus, the line element is ds2=cosh2(za)dz2+a2cosh2(za)dθ2ds^2 = \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right) \, dz^2 + a^2 \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right) \, d\theta^2. The associated surface area element follows as dA=EGF2dzdθ=acosh2(za)dzdθdA = \sqrt{EG - F^2} \, dz \, d\theta = a \cosh^2\left(\frac{z}{a}\right) \, dz \, d\theta
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.