Hubbry Logo
Center of percussionCenter of percussionMain
Open search
Center of percussion
Community hub
Center of percussion
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Center of percussion
Center of percussion
from Wikipedia

The center of percussion is the point on an extended massive object attached to a pivot where a perpendicular impact will produce no reactive shock at the pivot. Translational and rotational motions cancel at the pivot when an impulsive blow is struck at the center of percussion. The center of percussion is often discussed in the context of a bat, racquet, door, sword or other extended object held at one end.

The same point is called the center of oscillation for the object suspended from the pivot as a pendulum, meaning that a simple pendulum with all its mass concentrated at that point will have the same period of oscillation as the compound pendulum.

In sports, the center of percussion of a bat, racquet, or club is related to the so-called "sweet spot", but the latter is also related to vibrational bending of the object.

Explanation

[edit]
Effects of a blow on a hanging beam. CP is the Center of Percussion, and CM is the Center of Mass of the beam.

Imagine a rigid beam suspended from a wire by a fixture that can slide freely along the wire at point P, as shown in the Figure. An impulsive blow is applied from the left. If it is below the center of mass (CM) it will cause the beam to rotate counterclockwise around the CM and also cause the CM to move to the right. The center of percussion (CP) is below the CM. If the blow falls above the CP, the rightward translational motion will be bigger than the leftward rotational motion at P, causing the net initial motion of the fixture to be rightward. If the blow falls below the CP the opposite will occur, rotational motion at P will be larger than translational motion and the fixture will move initially leftward. Only if the blow falls exactly on the CP will the two components of motion cancel out to produce zero net initial movement at point P.

When the sliding fixture is replaced with a pivot that cannot move left or right, an impulsive blow anywhere but at the CP results in an initial reactive force at the pivot.

Calculating the center of percussion

[edit]

General case

[edit]

For a free, rigid beam, an impulse is applied at right angle at a point of impact, defined as a distance from the center of mass (CM).

The force results in the change in velocity of the CM, i.e. :

where is the mass of the beam.

Moreover, the force produces a torque about the CM, which results in the change in angular velocity of the beam, i.e. :

where is the moment of inertia around the CM.

For any point P a distance on the opposite side of the CM from the point of impact, the change in velocity of point P is:

Hence, the acceleration at P due to the impulsive blow is:

The center of percussion (CP) is the point where this acceleration is zero (i.e. = 0), while the force is non-zero (i.e. F ≠ 0). Thus, at the center of percussion, the condition is:

Therefore, the CP is at a distance from the CM, given by:

Note that P, the rotation axis, need not be at the end of the beam, but can be chosen at any distance .

Length also defines the center of oscillation of a physical pendulum, that is, the position of the mass of a simple pendulum that has the same period as the physical pendulum.[1]

Center of percussion of a uniform beam

[edit]

For the special case of a beam of uniform density of length , the moment of inertia around the CM is:

(see moment of inertia for derivation),

and for rotation about a pivot at the end,

.

This leads to:

.

It follows that the CP is 2/3 of the length of the uniform beam from the pivoted end.

Some applications

[edit]

For example, a swinging door that is stopped by a doorstop placed 2/3 of the width of the door will do the job with minimal shaking of the door because the hinged end is subjected to no net reactive force. (This point is also the node in the second vibrational harmonic, which also minimizes vibration.)

The sweet spot on a baseball bat is generally defined as the point at which the impact feels best to the batter. The center of percussion defines a place where, if the bat strikes the ball and the batter's hands are at the pivot point, the batter feels no sudden reactive force. However, since a bat is not a rigid object the vibrations produced by the impact also play a role. Also, the pivot point of the swing may not be at the place where the batter's hands are placed. Research has shown that the dominant physical mechanism in determining where the sweet spot is arises from the location of nodes in the vibrational modes of the bat, not the location of the center of percussion.[2]

The center of percussion concept can be applied to swords. Being flexible objects, the "sweet spot" for such cutting weapons depends not only on the center of percussion but also on the flexing and vibrational characteristics.[3][4]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The center of percussion is a point on a suspended from or pivoted at a fixed point such that an impulsive force applied perpendicularly at that location produces no impulsive reaction force or at the pivot. This point arises in the dynamics of physical pendulums and extended objects under impact, where the translational and rotational effects of the impulse cancel at the pivot. In practical terms, striking an object at its center of percussion minimizes vibrations and discomfort transmitted to the or pivot, making it the "sweet spot" on sports equipment like bats, rackets, and swords. The location of the center of percussion, measured from the pivot, is given by the lp=Ipmdl_p = \frac{I_p}{m d}, where IpI_p is the about the pivot, mm is the of the body, and dd is the distance from the pivot to the center of . It coincides with the center of , the point equivalent to the length of a simple with the same period as the physical . The concept was theoretically developed in the 17th century by in his work on motion, linking impact dynamics to oscillatory behavior. In and , identifying the center of percussion aids in designing tools and implements for efficient energy transfer and reduced user fatigue.

Definition and Principles

Definition

The center of percussion (COP) of a rigid body is the specific point along a line perpendicular to the pivot axis where an applied impulsive force produces no instantaneous reaction force at the pivot support. This point ensures that the body's motion following the impulse arises solely from the applied force, without any counteracting impulse transmitted to the pivot. In rigid body dynamics, such impulses are idealized as short-duration forces that instantaneously alter the body's linear and angular momentum, conserving these quantities in the absence of external constraints beyond the pivot. The location of the COP relative to the pivot depends on the position of the body's and its about the pivot point. Specifically, for a given pivot and body , the COP lies farther from the pivot than the if the is larger, reflecting the distribution of that influences rotational response to the impulse. Pivot reactions during impact typically involve both linear forces to prevent and torques to constrain rotation; at the COP, these cancel exactly due to the coupled translational and rotational accelerations induced by the impulse. This concept underpins the "sweet spot" in like bats, where striking at the COP minimizes vibrational feedback to the hands.

Physical Interpretation

When a pivoted at a fixed point is struck perpendicularly at its center of percussion (COP), the resulting motion consists of about the pivot, with the linear at the pivot point being zero due to the offset of translational and rotational components, leading to zero net reaction or at the pivot point. This cancellation occurs because the inertial forces from and balance exactly, preventing any jarring sensation from being transmitted to the support or . In practical terms, such as with a suspended rod or , the pivot remains stationary immediately after impact, as the forward from is precisely offset by the backward from . In contrast, strikes away from the COP generate unbalanced torques and forces, causing unwanted rotational motion alongside , which transmits shocks or to the pivot. For impacts closer to the pivot than the COP, the body experiences a net backward jerk at the support, while impacts beyond the COP produce a forward push, often accompanied by oscillatory that propagate through the structure. These off-center effects can result in discomfort, such as stinging in the hands when wielding a tool like a , due to the impulsive reaction forces acting on the user. Striking at the COP facilitates maximum efficient energy transfer to the impacted object, such as a , by minimizing energy dissipation into or reactions at the pivot. This efficiency arises because the absence of pivot reaction ensures that nearly all the from the impact contributes to propelling the struck object, rather than exciting internal modes of the striking body. Consequently, less energy is lost to handle , enhancing the overall effectiveness of the collision in applications like or machinery. Experimentally, impacts at the COP produce a characteristic "solid" or "pure" feel, devoid of the rattling or stinging associated with other points, as observed in demonstrations with suspended bats or rods. For instance, when a is struck at its COP—often called the sweet spot—players report a clean transfer of to the without any harsh feedback to the hands, contrasting sharply with the jarring from off-center hits. Similarly, in using a , striking at the COP yields a smooth, controlled motion without the wrist strain from reactive shocks.

Historical Background

Early Concepts

Galileo Galilei discussed the force of percussion in his Discorsi e Dimostrazioni Matematiche (, 1638), exploring impacts on rigid bodies but without fully developing the center of percussion concept. Earlier, in the 1630s, and Gilles Personne de Roberval attempted to evaluate the center of for compound pendulums, laying groundwork for later formulations linking it to percussion. In the , the center of percussion emerged as a distinct concept amid advancing studies of and impacts. The term was first coined around 1646 by and Honoré Fabri, who linked it to the center of in suspended bodies, where an impact produces without reactive force at the pivot. provided the initial rigorous formulation in his Horologium oscillatorium (1673), demonstrating mathematically that for a compound , the center of oscillation coincides with the center of percussion, enabling equivalent simple behavior and applications to clock mechanisms. Isaac Newton's (1687) further advanced the underlying principles by detailing the laws of motion and collision dynamics for , emphasizing how percussive forces propagate without jarring the support point, though Newton did not explicitly use the term. These developments shifted focus from qualitative observations to quantitative analysis of impact and . The 18th century saw refinements through work on compound pendulums and impact mechanics. Leonhard Euler extended this in papers like "On the Force of Percussion and Its True Measure" (1746), formalizing the measure of percussive force in rigid bodies and deriving conditions for the center of percussion in rotational impacts, enhancing its role in broader dynamical systems. Euler's analytical approaches solidified the equivalence between oscillation and percussion centers for non-uniform bodies. The terminology "center of percussion" gained prominence in the 1700s through practical studies of striking implements like and early rackets, viewed as pivoted rigid bodies. In the (1751) by and , the term was defined in the context of impacts, with applications to sword strikes where hitting at this point maximizes force delivery without hand shock. By 1758, military texts like the Dictionnaire militaire portatif extended it to sword design, optimizing blade balance for percussive efficiency in combat. Similar principles were implicitly applied to wooden rackets of the era, as extended levers in striking balls, though explicit links appeared in later refinements.

Modern Developments

In the early 20th century, the center of percussion (COP) was integrated into broader theories of and , building on foundational principles to explain oscillatory behaviors in physical systems. This connection was experimentally verified through studies, demonstrating that strikes at the COP produce negligible at the pivot, as confirmed in setups using suspended rods and bats. These advancements refined the understanding of dynamic stability in mechanical systems, influencing engineering analyses of rotating machinery. The mid-to-late 20th century saw significant developments in , particularly from the 1960s to 1980s, where the COP was applied to optimize striking implements like bats and rackets. Researchers identified the "sweet spot" on bats as the COP, where ball impacts maximize energy transfer while minimizing hand vibrations and jarring forces. Physicists like Alan Nathan (from the 1990s onward) quantified these effects through collision dynamics, showing that the COP on a typical wooden lies about 15-18 cm from the barrel end, reducing sting and improving control. Similarly, studies on rackets by Howard Brody revealed that oversized designs in the shifted the COP into the striking area, enhancing power and reducing wrist strain during off-center hits. These investigations combined experimental impacts with basic modeling to guide equipment design. Recent experiments and computational approaches have further advanced COP studies, particularly for complex geometries. In 2024, a tabletop demonstration using a pivoted aluminum and sensors visually confirmed the COP location by measuring zero pivot reaction during impacts, making the concept accessible for educational and verification purposes. For irregular shapes, finite element analysis (FEA) models simulate modes and impact responses, allowing precise COP prediction in non-uniform objects like composite bats, where traditional formulas fall short. These methods reveal how material variations shift the COP, aiding in . Additionally, the COP's role as a node in the fundamental bending or hoop mode has been emphasized in modern analyses, linking it directly to reduced oscillatory feedback in dynamic systems. As of 2025, the COP concept has been incorporated into biomechanics for , emphasizing equipment that aligns the sweet spot with typical strike zones to minimize vibrational loads on the upper extremities. In , "torpedo" bat designs optimize COP positioning to reduce hand and forearm stress, potentially lowering risks of conditions like medial . Biomechanical studies integrate COP data with to assess how off-center impacts contribute to overuse injuries, informing training protocols and gear standards that prioritize ergonomic alignment. This application underscores the COP's evolution from theoretical to practical health safeguards in high-impact .

Mathematical Formulation

General Case for Rigid Bodies

Consider a rigid body of mass mm pivoted at a fixed point OO, with its center of mass located at a distance rcmr_\mathrm{cm} from OO. An impulsive force delivers an impulse J\vec{J}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.