Hubbry Logo
Chassis dynamometerChassis dynamometerMain
Open search
Chassis dynamometer
Community hub
Chassis dynamometer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chassis dynamometer
Chassis dynamometer
Chassis dynamometer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A chassis dynamometer, informally referred to as a rolling road[1] or a dyno, is a mechanical device that uses one or more fixed roller assemblies to simulate different road conditions within a controlled environment, and is used for a wide variety of vehicle testing and development purposes.

All Wheel Drive Chassis Dynamometer

Chassis dynamometer types

[edit]

There are many types of chassis dynamometer according to the target application - for example, emissions measurement, miles accumulation chassis dynamometer (MACD), Noise-Vibration-Harshness (NVH or "Acoustic") Application, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) testing, end of line (EOL) tests, performance measurement and tuning. Another basic division is by type of vehicle - motorcycles, cars, trucks, tractors or the size of the roller - mostly 25", 48", 72", but also any other.[2] Modern dynamometers used for development are mostly one roller to the wheel construction, and the vehicle wheel is placed on the top of the roller. Older constructional solutions are two roller per wheel and the vehicle is place between these rollers - this design solution is cheaper and simpler, however, due to the requirements for accuracy and strict limits is no longer used for the development of new vehicles, but only as a test dynamometer at the end of the line or to measure the performance of the engine without dismantling,[3] or performance tuning in "garage" companies.[4]

Basic modes

[edit]
Opel car factory new car testing on chassis dynamometer
Saab 96 on mobile dynamometer
  • Tractive force control/Force constant - in this mode the dynamometer holds set force regardless of speed or other parameters. The specified Force can be distributed evenly between the axles or in different amounts between different axles in the case of multiple axles chassis dynamometers.
  • Speed control/Velocity constant - dynamometer holds the set speed regardless of force or other parameters. For example, if a vehicle tries to accelerate in this mode, dynamometer applies opposite force to maintain set constant speed. This mode is used for example in the static power measurement.
  • Road load simulation - dynamometer simulates road according to set parameters (according to desired simulation parameters = F0, F1, F2 or ABC parameters, simulated inertia and gradient).

Measured variables on a roller dynamometer

[edit]

Directly measured variables are only force on the torque transducer (i.e. loadcell) and revolutions measured on the role encoder dynamometer. All other variables are calculated based on known design (i.e. roller radius and loadcell mounting).

Power measurement on Chassis dynamometer

[edit]

Due to friction and mechanical losses in various parts of the power train, the measured power at the wheels is about 15 to 20 percent lower than the power measured directly at the output of engine crankshaft (measuring device with this purpose is called engine testbed).[5]

Road load simulation principle on chassis dynamometer

[edit]

Because the vehicle is secured to the chassis dynamometer, it prevents variables such as wind resistance to alter the data set. The chassis dynamometer is designed to add the sum of all the forces that are applied to a vehicle when driven on an actual road course to be simulated through the tires and calculated in the test results. Increasing air drag with the speed on the road manifests as increasing braking force of the vehicle wheels. The aim is to make the vehicle on the dynamometer accelerate and decelerate the same way as on a real road. First you need to know the parameters of the "behaviour" of the vehicle on a real road. In order to get "road parameters", vehicle must be driving on ideal flat road with no wind from any direction, gear set to neutral and time needed to slow down without braking is measured in certain intervals e.g. 100–90 km/h, 90–80 km/h, 80–70 km/h 70–60 km/h etc. Slowing down from higher speed takes shorter time mainly due to air resistance. Those parameters are later set in dynamometer workstation, together with vehicle inertia. Vehicle is restrained and so called vehicle adaptation has to be performed. During vehicle adaptation dynamometer automatically slowing down from set speed, changing its own "dyno parameters" and trying to get same deceleration in given intervals as on real road. Those parameters are then valid for this vehicle type. Changing of set simulated inertia it is possible to simulate vehicle ability to accelerate if fully loaded, with setting gradient it is possible to simulate force if vehicle going downhill etc. Chassis dynamometers for climatic chamber does exists, where it is possible to change temperature in give range i.e. -40 to +50 °C or altitude chamber where it is possible to check fuel consumption with different temperatures or pressure and to simulate driving on mountain roads.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chassis dynamometer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A chassis dynamometer, commonly referred to as a "chassis dyno," is a specialized testing apparatus that measures a vehicle's performance by allowing its wheels to rotate on fixed rollers while simulating real-world road loads in a controlled indoor environment. This device replicates driving conditions such as , deceleration, and resistance forces without requiring actual on-road travel, enabling precise evaluation of power output, , emissions, and . Chassis dynamometers have a history dating back to the early , when initial versions emerged to assess vehicle power under controlled conditions, evolving from basic mechanical setups to advanced systems incorporating hydraulic, , and modern technologies for greater accuracy and versatility. Today, they are essential tools in for applications including regulatory emissions compliance testing, such as those mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), where they simulate standardized drive cycles like the Federal Test Procedure (FTP). Beyond emissions, these dynamometers facilitate , noise-vibration-harshness (NVH) analysis, hybrid and validation, and drivability assessments, often using coastdown techniques to model road load forces including , aerodynamic drag, and gravitational effects. Technically, a chassis dynamometer consists of large-diameter rollers (typically at least 120 cm in diameter for regulatory compliance), load-absorbing mechanisms, and sensors that measure variables like wheel torque, speed, and force at frequencies of at least 10 Hz, with NIST-traceable resolution to within ±0.05% of maximum load-cell force. Load simulation is governed by equations incorporating vehicle-specific coefficients for constant (A), linear (B·v), and quadratic (C·v²) road load components, plus inertia (M·a), ensuring repeatable results that closely mimic on-road dynamics despite limitations in capturing variables like tire slip or wind effects. Standards from organizations like SAE International, such as J2264, further standardize procedures for coastdown-based road load simulation, promoting consistency across testing facilities worldwide.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A chassis dynamometer, also referred to as a rolling road or dyno, is a mechanical device equipped with fixed rollers or hubs that enable a to simulate while stationary, allowing sensors to capture data on , speed, and power output directly at the wheels. This setup measures the tractive force generated at the tire-roller interface, providing an assessment of the drivetrain's performance under controlled conditions. The primary purpose of a chassis dynamometer is to evaluate key aspects of vehicle performance, including efficiency, fuel consumption, emissions, and component durability, all within an indoor setting that eliminates the safety hazards, environmental variability, and logistical challenges of on-road testing. It serves as a substitute for track or driving, enabling precise determination of power delivered through the drive tires for heavy-duty road vehicles. By simulating road loads economically and accurately, it supports testing and development optimization. Key benefits include the ability to conduct highly repeatable experiments, integrate with auxiliary such as analyzers for comprehensive emissions profiling, and replicate diverse driving scenarios without external dependencies. These features make it indispensable for automotive research and , facilitating high-volume testing—such as accumulating up to 500,000 kilometers annually in endurance evaluations. At its core, chassis dynamometer testing relies on fundamental concepts of and power: torque represents the rotational force produced by the and transmitted through the , while power is the rate at which work is performed, derived from multiplied by angular speed. These measurements provide a direct gauge of how effectively the vehicle's system converts energy into motion.

Historical Development

The concept of the originated in the , with Edme Régnier developing an early device in 1798 to measure the pulling force of horses, laying the groundwork for mechanical power measurement tools. Chassis dynamometers, specifically designed for whole-vehicle testing, emerged in the early as advanced, enabling evaluation of performance and efficiency without on-road trials. These initial systems relied on heavy rollers to simulate road inertia, providing approximate power assessments for emerging automobile manufacturers during the and . Significant advancements occurred in the mid-20th century, particularly during , when roller-based chassis dynamometers were adapted for military vehicle evaluation to ensure reliability under simulated combat conditions, such as with Clayton models produced around 1945. In the 1970s, innovations focused on absorber technologies; John Petelinsek founded Power Test, Inc. in 1976 and improved the dynamometer with a simpler, deeper pocket design for enhanced durability and absorption in chassis applications. The 1980s marked a shift with the introduction of absorbers, as Mustang Advanced Engineering launched its first power absorber unit-based chassis dynamometer in 1986, offering faster response times over complex systems and supporting growing inspection programs. Concurrently, Dynojet developed its rolling-road chassis dynamometer in the late 1970s and refined it through the for and automotive tuning, including inertial models calibrated against production vehicles like the 1985 . The 1990s saw integration of computer controls, driven by U.S. Clean Air Act amendments that mandated emissions testing via inspection and maintenance programs, with companies like supplying over 450 dynamometers for state compliance by 1994 and pioneering PC-based graphical interfaces for precise operation. This evolution transitioned from basic inertia-based systems—limited by fixed mass and repeatability—to absorption types like and hydraulic for controlled load , and later motoring configurations that could actively drive the vehicle. Post-2000 developments addressed hybrid and electric vehicles, with hybrid AC/ chassis dynamometers enabling efficient calibration of electrified powertrains under simulated road loads. In the , further advancements have included integration with technology for virtual simulations, upgrades for testing autonomous and next-generation electric vehicles, and adaptations to meet evolving global emissions regulations, supporting market growth projected at around 5% CAGR through 2034.

Types

Roller Dynamometers

Roller dynamometers represent the most prevalent configuration for dynamometers, enabling full- testing by simulating conditions through direct contact with rotating rollers while the vehicle remains stationary. These systems typically feature one or more pairs of cylindrical rollers, with diameters commonly ranging from 8 to 20 inches for light-duty automotive applications, though larger variants up to 50 inches exist for heavy-duty testing. Available in single-axle setups for two-wheel-drive (2WD) vehicles or all-wheel-drive (AWD) configurations that accommodate four-wheel-drive systems, they allow the vehicle's wheels to rotate freely against the rollers to measure performance metrics. Key components include the rollers themselves, constructed from durable with knurled surfaces for enhanced grip and traction, or occasionally polyurethane-coated for reduced and improved contact in specialized setups. Power absorption is achieved via integrated absorbers such as units, which use hydraulic resistance for high-torque applications, or eddy current absorbers that generate electromagnetic drag for precise, responsive loading. Safety features are integral, encompassing interlocking barriers to prevent accidental vehicle movement, protective grids over rollers to contain debris, and high-volume ventilation systems with blowers to manage , exhaust emissions, and airborne particulates during operation. Operationally, roller dynamometers quantify forces and torques at the tire-roller interface, capturing wheel-speed data that reflects output under controlled conditions. They are versatile for testing cars, trucks, and motorcycles, with particular popularity in aftermarket tuning shops owing to their straightforward installation and ability to perform quick diagnostics without disassembly. Modern iterations leverage AC motoring technology for exact speed and load control, supporting power outputs exceeding 2,000 horsepower in high-performance scenarios.

Hub Dynamometers

Hub dynamometers represent a direct approach in chassis testing, where the 's wheels are removed and the axles are attached to precision-engineered hubs equipped with sensors. This design simulates road conditions by applying load directly to the , bypassing the s and tires to eliminate variables such as slip or deformation. The setup typically requires lifting the onto a platform, with adapters bolted to the wheel flanges or hubs for secure connection. Key components include high-precision hubs integrated with load cells for torque measurement, encoders for speed and position tracking, and low-friction bearings to minimize mechanical losses. Additional elements often comprise in-line shaft sensors for and speed, along with automated control systems like DynoLAB™ for test sequencing and . These systems support configurations for front-, rear-, or all-wheel-drive vehicles, with no need for a dyno pit, only a smooth floor surface. Operationally, hub dynamometers provide superior accuracy by removing tire-related variables, achieving frictional losses as low as 5 kW at low speeds (10 kph) and 50 kW at high speeds (200 kph), compared to higher losses in indirect methods. This direct attachment enables measurement accuracies of at least 0.05% , closely approximating true output— for instance, capturing 450 kW from a 500 kW engine versus lower readings from tire-contact systems. They excel in high-performance and testing due to their ability to handle speeds up to 6,000 rpm (over 500 mph) and support unattended automated runs without restraints or tire failure risks. Less common in general repair shops owing to the setup complexity involving wheel removal and lifting, they have gained popularity in OEM , as well as facilities for race teams.

Operating Principles

Basic Modes of Operation

Chassis dynamometers operate in several basic modes to evaluate performance under controlled conditions. The primary modes include steady-state and transient testing, each designed to capture specific aspects of while ensuring and . These modes rely on precise setup and techniques to replicate on-road dynamics without external variables. In steady-state mode, the maintains a constant speed or position while a controlled load is applied to the dynamometer rollers or hubs. This mode is used to generate baseline power curves and maps by holding the at fixed operating points, allowing for stable data collection on parameters. Typically, each steady-state point lasts 10-30 seconds to achieve and accurate readings. Transient mode, in contrast, simulates real-world conditions through rapid changes in speed and load, following predefined and deceleration profiles. This approach captures dynamic responses such as lag, gear shifts, and transient fuel consumption, which are critical for emissions and drivability assessments. Common protocols include wide-open (WOT) pulls, where the vehicle accelerates from a low RPM to in a single run, providing comprehensive data on power delivery across the operating range. Prior to testing in either mode, the undergoes a standardized setup process to ensure alignment and . This involves positioning the drive wheels centered on the rollers or hubs, securing the with approved restraints such as straps or chains to prevent forward movement, and initializing the control software to calibrate parameters like vehicle mass and test profiles. restraints are essential to counter the forces generated during , particularly in high-power tests. Key concepts in these modes include simulation, which mimics the vehicle's mass to replicate realistic feel. This can be achieved using physical flywheels attached to the or advanced software algorithms that dynamically adjust load based on calculated inertial effects, eliminating the need for additional hardware in modern systems. Additionally, ramp time settings control the rate of speed increase during pulls, with a minimum of 15 seconds recommended to ensure safe and controlled , preventing excessive stress on components. Outputs from these modes, such as , inform subsequent power calculations.

Measured Variables

Chassis dynamometers capture several primary physical quantities at the vehicle-wheel interface to evaluate under simulated conditions. The core measured variables include wheel torque, rotational speed of the rollers or hubs, and vehicle speed derived from wheel rotation. Wheel torque is typically detected using strain gauges integrated into the roller assemblies or hub structures, which deform under load and convert mechanical strain into electrical signals for precise quantification. Rotational speed, expressed in (RPM), is measured via encoders—either optical or magnetic types—that track angular position and with high resolution. Vehicle speed is then calculated directly from the rotational speed and the fixed of the dynamometer's rollers or hubs, providing a direct correlation to on-road conditions. Secondary variables extend the analysis to broader behavior and metrics. Acceleration is derived from temporal changes in rotational speed, enabling assessment of dynamic response during transient operations. Fuel consumption is quantified through integrated flow meters that monitor fuel delivery rates in real time, often in conjunction with emissions testing protocols. Temperatures, such as those in the or , are monitored using thermocouples placed at key points to ensure operational integrity under load. Sensor specifications emphasize precision for reliable data. Torque transducers, based on strain gauge technology, achieve high accuracies, typically with linearity errors ≤1% of maximum torque to meet regulatory requirements, minimizing measurement errors in high-load scenarios. Encoders provide down to 1.25 arcseconds, supporting accurate speed tracking even at varying velocities. Data acquisition systems sample these variables at rates of at least 10 Hz as required for , with higher rates used for detailed transient analysis to capture rapid changes without . A key distinction in these measurements is that they reflect power at the wheels rather than at the , inherently incorporating losses estimated at 15-20% due to in transmissions, differentials, and other components. This wheel-centric approach provides a realistic indicator of efficiency delivered to the road surface.

Power Measurement

Calculation Methods

The power output on a chassis dynamometer is fundamentally calculated as P=T×[ω](/page/Angularvelocity)P = T \times [\omega](/page/Angular_velocity), where PP is the power, TT is the at the rollers, and ω\omega is the . The is obtained from the roller rotational speed in (RPM) using ω=2π×RPM60\omega = \frac{2\pi \times \text{RPM}}{60} radians per second, with power commonly expressed in kilowatts (kW) or horsepower (hp), where 1 hp = 0.7457 kW. This derives directly from the mechanical work principle, applied to the dynamometer's roller measurements during steady-state or transient operations. To derive engine power from the measured wheel power, adjustments account for drivetrain losses, using Pengine=PwheelηP_\text{engine} = \frac{P_\text{wheel}}{\eta}, where η\eta represents the overall drivetrain efficiency. Typical values for η\eta range from 0.80 to 0.90, varying by vehicle type, gear selection, and condition. These corrections ensure comparability with engine dynamometer results or manufacturer ratings. In acceleration tests, inertia compensation simulates the vehicle's inertial load by setting the dynamometer's effective mass to match the total system inertia. The effective mass is given by meff=mvehicle+mdynom_\text{eff} = m_\text{vehicle} + m_\text{dyno}, where mdynom_\text{dyno} is the equivalent mass from the rollers and flywheels; the tractive force is then F=meff×aF = m_\text{eff} \times a, with acceleration aa derived from speed changes over time, and torque computed as T=F×rT = F \times r, where rr is the effective wheel or roller radius. This approach allows accurate replication of on-road acceleration dynamics. Specific methods enhance calculation reliability, such as the coast-down technique for determining load coefficients. During coast-down, deceleration is fitted to F=A+Bv+Cv2F = A + B v + C v^2, where FF is the total load , vv is speed, AA represents constant , BB accounts for speed-proportional mechanical effects, and CC captures aerodynamic drag; coefficients are solved via least-squares regression from multiple runs to minimize noise. Averaging results across several coast-down trials reduces variability from environmental factors or conditions. For transient power assessment, software algorithms integrate instantaneous power values over the test cycle, summing P(t)ΔtP(t) \Delta t to yield total or average power while compensating for speed fluctuations.

Accuracy Considerations

Accuracy in chassis dynamometers is influenced by several error sources that can deviate measured power from true values. Tire slip in roller dynamometers, arising from tire deformation under load, can introduce errors up to 10% in force transmission, thereby affecting and power calculations derived from roller speed and . Windage and drag from the test setup, including aerodynamic effects and mechanical resistances, contribute additional losses that must be minimized to avoid overestimation of road load. Temperature variations impact accuracy, such as in load cells and speed encoders, leading to thermal drift in readings. Drivetrain flex generates pulsations, causing oscillations in measurements that software filtering must address to maintain precision. Calibration techniques are critical for mitigating these errors and ensuring reliable data. Regular torque verification uses standards like calibrated load cells with known weights to check dynamometer response, typically performed every six months for traceability to national metrology institutes such as NIST. Compliance with ISO 9001 ensures calibration processes maintain documented and . Software-based corrections compensate for baseline , environmental drifts, and inertial offsets, enhancing overall stability. Hub dynamometers offer superior precision compared to roller dynamometers due to direct application without interfaces. These specifications apply to full-scale measurements, where hub systems achieve 0.05% full-scale accuracy compared to 0.1% for rollers. affects roller grip by altering tire-roller friction, potentially increasing slip and errors in high-moisture environments. To verify reliability, testing involves back-to-back runs under identical conditions, targeting variance below 1% to confirm system consistency. The SAE J1349 standard corrects power data to reference conditions of 25°C, 99 kPa dry air pressure (equivalent to ), and 0% , enabling comparable results across varying test environments; this adjustment influences power equations by normalizing for air density effects.

Road Load Simulation

Core Principles

The core principles of road load simulation on a chassis dynamometer center on replicating the physical forces encountered during on-road driving to create realistic testing environments for , emissions, and evaluation. The total road load force, FroadF_{\text{road}}, comprises several key components: , which opposes motion due to tire-road interaction and is expressed as Crr×m×gC_{rr} \times m \times g (where CrrC_{rr} is the rolling resistance coefficient, mm is mass, and gg is ); aerodynamic drag, resulting from air resistance and given by 0.5×ρ×Cd×A×v20.5 \times \rho \times C_d \times A \times v^2 (where ρ\rho is air , CdC_d is the , AA is frontal area, and vv is speed); and inertial/grade forces, accounting for and road incline as m×a+m×g×sin⁡θm \times a + m \times g \times \sin \theta (where aa is linear and θ\theta is the grade ). These components are determined using vehicle-specific coefficients derived from coastdown tests, in which the vehicle is accelerated to a high speed (typically around 115 km/h) and then allowed to decelerate freely on a level, straight test track with the transmission in neutral and disengaged; the resulting speed-time are analyzed to fit a force-velocity that isolates and quantifies each road load element, ensuring the matches real-world power demands. The goal is to apply an equivalent load on the that mirrors the on-road power required to overcome these forces, allowing the vehicle to experience comparable resistance and enabling precise replication of driving conditions without actual road travel. Central to this is the principle of equivalence, where the applies a Tdyno=Froad×rwheelT_{\text{dyno}} = F_{\text{road}} \times r_{\text{wheel}} (with rwheelr_{\text{wheel}} as the effective radius) to produce the same rotational resistance at the wheels as the road forces would, thereby making the vehicle "feel" authentic opposition to motion. This equivalence supports both steady-state load curves, which maintain constant speeds to evaluate efficiency under fixed conditions, and dynamic profiles that incorporate speed transients for simulating , deceleration, and varying loads. Accurate transient response further requires matching the vehicle's rotational on the to its actual , as mismatches can distort behavior and power delivery assessments.

Implementation Techniques

Chassis dynamometers employ various absorber types to replicate road load forces during testing. Eddy current absorbers, which generate variable load proportional to the square of the roller speed through electromagnetic induction, are commonly used for their simplicity and ability to handle high-power applications, such as simulating loads up to 600 horsepower per absorber in heavy-duty vehicle tests. AC electric motors serve as advanced absorbers, enabling both absorption and motoring modes to add power for precise load control, with capabilities extending to high vehicle speeds in modern systems. Control systems in these dynamometers rely on real-time software algorithms, such as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) loops, to dynamically adjust absorber and maintain adherence to predefined speed profiles derived from regulatory standards like the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP) or the Federal Test Procedure-75 (). These systems integrate sensors for continuous feedback on vehicle speed and , ensuring load matches transient driving conditions in controlled environments. Key implementation techniques include pre-loading the dynamometer with selectable inertia masses via flywheels to mimic the vehicle's effective , typically ranging from 1,000 to 3,500 kg, thereby accurately replicating acceleration and deceleration dynamics. Fan systems, synchronized to roller speed, replicate aerodynamic drag by directing over the vehicle, often within climatic chambers to account for environmental variables. For all-wheel-drive (AWD) vehicles, four-wheel independent control allows individual roller pairs to operate autonomously, preventing torque bind and enabling simulation of differential behaviors during traction events. Modern chassis dynamometers incorporate GPS-derived real-road data to generate custom drive profiles, capturing actual route-specific speed, , and variations for more representative simulations beyond standardized cycles. Additionally, integration with facilities validates aerodynamic coefficients (C_d) by correlating on-dyno drag measurements with tunnel-derived airflow data for refined load modeling. Recent advancements as of 2025 include updated standards like SAE J2264 (revised 2023) for improved coastdown-based simulations and integration with technology for enhanced predictive modeling.

Applications

Automotive Testing

Chassis dynamometers play a central role in automotive (R&D) by enabling precise evaluation of vehicle systems under simulated driving conditions. In drivetrain tuning, these devices allow engineers to measure and optimize power delivery from the through the transmission to the wheels, ensuring efficient distribution across various speeds. For instance, gear shift optimization uses chassis dyno testing to refine transmission shift points, improving fuel economy by 4-5% while maintaining performance margins, as demonstrated in controlled dyno runs. calibration benefits similarly, where dynos facilitate mapping of curves to program the (ECU), integrating electric and internal combustion components for seamless power blending during acceleration and . Durability testing on chassis dynamometers simulates extensive real-world usage to evaluate long-term component reliability without the variability of on-road trials. These setups replicate high-mileage conditions, such as accumulating equivalents of 100,000 km or more, by applying controlled loads that mimic resistance and accelerate on elements like transmissions, suspensions, and drivelines. For example, systems capable of sustaining 24/7 operation at speeds up to 250 km/h and axle weights exceeding 12,000 lbs enable rapid assessment of material fatigue and failure modes in a repeatable environment. Performance validation leverages chassis dynamometers to quantify key attributes, providing data for refinement before production. Brake testing involves simulating repeated stops under varied loads to measure stopping distances, fade resistance, and modulation, often in specialized setups that control environmental factors like . metrics, such as 0-60 mph times, are derived from dyno-recorded wheel speeds and during controlled pulls, offering insights into overall drivability. Concurrently, (NVH) analysis during dyno runs captures acoustic and tactile feedback, evaluating comfort levels across speed ranges up to 250 kph for passenger cars and light trucks. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) integrate chassis dynamometers into prototype evaluation workflows to validate designs early in the development cycle. Ford employs advanced all-wheel-drive NVH chassis dynamometers in its engineering centers for comprehensive testing of powertrains and chassis dynamics in prototypes. Similarly, General Motors utilizes chassis dynamometers for brake testing to simulate extreme conditions, ensuring component robustness in production vehicles. In the aftermarket sector, chassis dynos support custom tuning for performance upgrades, such as ECU remapping to boost horsepower by 20-50% on modified engines, allowing tuners to verify gains in wheel torque without track access.

Emissions and Compliance

Chassis dynamometers play a critical role in emissions testing by simulating real-world driving conditions for whole-vehicle , which captures interactions between the , , and exhaust aftertreatment systems that dynamometers cannot replicate. Unlike dynamometers, which test isolated powertrains, chassis dynamometers are essential for because they evaluate emissions from the complete vehicle under load, ensuring accurate representation of tailpipe outputs during . Standardized testing protocols, such as the U.S. EPA's Federal Test Procedure (), utilize dynamometers to simulate urban driving through the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS), measuring pollutants like (CO), nitrogen oxides (), hydrocarbons (HC), and particulate matter (PM). In , the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure (WLTP), which replaced the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), employs dynamometer runs with dynamic speed profiles to assess emissions and fuel consumption under varied conditions, including low-speed urban, medium-speed suburban, high-speed rural, and motorway phases. These cycles integrate constant volume sampling (CVS) systems to dilute and collect exhaust samples proportionally to speed, enabling precise quantification of mass emissions. The setup typically couples the chassis dynamometer with exhaust gas analyzers for gaseous pollutants, condensation particle counters for PM, and fuel metering devices to correlate emissions with consumption, ultimately reporting results in grams per mile or kilometer for compliance verification. This integration ensures comprehensive data collection, where CVS dilutes the exhaust to maintain constant flow, preventing condensation and allowing analyzers to measure concentrations of CO, NOx, HC, and PM accurately. Regulatory mandates for chassis dynamometer testing emerged in the 1970s under the U.S. Clean Air Act, with the EPA requiring it for emissions certification and fuel economy under the (CAFE) standards to reduce urban . For electric vehicles (EVs), protocols adapt to measure rather than exhaust emissions, using similar dynamometer cycles to quantify battery discharge in watt-hours per mile, supporting efficiency labeling and range certification. Post-2020, shifts toward real-driving emissions (RDE) regulations in the incorporate chassis dynamometer for validating portable emissions systems (PEMS) used in on-road testing, ensuring lab results align with real-world conditions through confirmatory dyno simulations. This hybrid approach refines type approval by cross-referencing dyno-measured emissions against RDE conformity factors for and PM.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/chassis-dynamometer
  2. https://www.sae.org/standards/j2264_202301-chassis-dynamometer-simulation-road-load-using-coastdown-techniques
  3. https://static.horiba.com/fileadmin/Horiba/Company/About_HORIBA/Readout/R13E/RE13_01_24.pdf
  4. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-U/part-1066/subpart-C
  5. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-U/part-1066/subpart-C/section-1066.210
  6. https://www.sae.org/standards/j2177_199204-chassis-dynamometer-test-procedure-heavy-duty-road-vehicles
  7. https://www.setra.com/blog/test-and-measurement-dynamometer
  8. https://dewesoft.com/blog/dynamometers-guide
  9. https://www.whichcar.com.au/features/geek-speak-dynamometers
  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6maZRnbHFo
  11. https://powertestdyno.com/history/
  12. https://www.mustangae.com/company/history-of-mae/
  13. https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/dynojet-chassis-dyno
  14. https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/hrdp-0405-chassis-dyno-guide
  15. https://www.mustangae.com/products/dynamometers-and-test-stands/chassis-dynamometers/awd-ac-ec-hybrid-series-chassis-dynamometers/
  16. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/11/13/3187643/28124/en/Automotive-Dyno-Market-Outlook-Report-2026-2034-Opportunities-in-Flexible-Test-Benches-Integration-with-Digital-Twin-Technology-and-Compliance-with-Evolving-Regulatory-and-Safety-S.html
  17. http://www.msstate.edu/newsroom/article/2025/10/cavs-dynamometer-upgraded-continue-next-generation-engine-testing-research
  18. https://www.mustangdyne.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/MustangDynamometer-mini-catalog_v7.pdf
  19. https://www.accio.com/plp/dyno-rollers
  20. https://www.harrop-usa.com/blog/dyno-measurement-and-accuracy/31472
  21. https://www.dyno-one.com/products/hybrid-vehicle-powertrain-dynamometer-test-systems/
  22. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2402
  23. https://www.enginebuildermag.com/2025/03/hub-dynos-revolutionizing-performance-tuning-and-diagnostics/
  24. https://nicholsonmclaren.com/dyno-testing/hub-dyno/
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301366450_Downsized_Boosted_Engine_Benchmarking_and_Results
  26. https://www.cartechbooks.com/blogs/techtips/how-to-tune-your-engine-at-wide-open-throttle
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/restraint-system
  28. https://www.mustangdyne.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/MD-1100.pdf
  29. https://www.dyno.com.au/
  30. https://77performance.co.uk/chassis-dynamometer/
  31. https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/m5lp-0204-chassis-dyno-guide
  32. https://mustangae.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/48_Inch_Chassis_Dynamometer.pdf
  33. https://www.dynocom.net/Brochures/7500Series.pdf
  34. https://www.mustangae.com/products/dynamometers-and-test-stands/chassis-dynamometers/
  35. https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2016-10/documents/2015-01-0589_0.pdf
  36. https://www.mustangdyne.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/MD-2025_FullSize-16-pg_Catalog_v11.pdf
  37. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-U/part-1066/subpart-C/section-1066.220
  38. https://www.onallcylinders.com/2012/05/11/dyno-duel-engine-vs-chassis-dynos-what-you-should-know/
  39. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12239-011-0065-1
  40. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/6594/1/Bennetts_Thesis.pdf
  41. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/documents/sae-2020-01-1064-use-trans-data-isola-indiv-loss-coastdown-road-load-coeff.pdf
  42. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=94005JM5.TXT
  43. https://www.highpowermedia.com/Archive/dynamometers-accuracy-and-repeatability
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259641742_Chassis_Dynamometer_Torque_Control_A_Robust_Control_Methodology
  45. https://powertestdyno.com/chassis-dyno-torque-calibration/
  46. https://blog.auditortrainingonline.com/blog/iso-9001-7-1-5-2-measurement-traceability
  47. https://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tech/data-accuracy-implications-different-dynamometer-designs/
  48. https://www.mustangae.com/products/dynamometers-and-test-stands/chassis-dynamometers/7500-series-eddy-current-chassis-dynamometers/
  49. https://powertestdyno.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/12/EC-Series-Chassis-Dynamometers-BR.pdf
  50. https://powertestdyno.com/products/ac-series/
  51. https://www.horiba.com/usa/mobility/products/detail/action/show/Product/dynas3-94/
  52. https://www.epa.gov/vehicle-and-fuel-emissions-testing/dynamometer-drive-schedules
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128212264000103
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1361920917300068
  55. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/53865.pdf
  56. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/11/13/3187643/0/en/Automotive-Dyno-Market-Outlook-Report-2026-2034-Opportunities-in-Flexible-Test-Benches-Integration-with-Digital-Twin-Technology-and-Compliance-with-Evolving-Regulatory-and-Safety-S.html
  57. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2020-01-1280/
  58. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/951356/
  59. https://www.equipmentworld.com/trucks/pickups/article/15046953/good-vibrations-from-new-gm-brake-test-center
  60. https://www.epa.gov/vehicle-and-fuel-emissions-testing/technical-capabilities-national-vehicle-and-fuel-emissions
  61. https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2021-01-0611/
  62. https://dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/
  63. https://dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/ftp75.php
  64. https://dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/wltp.php
  65. https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/international-light-duty-worldwide-harmonized-light-vehicles-test-procedure-wltp/
  66. https://dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/ece_eudc.php
  67. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-U/part-1066
  68. https://dieselnet.com/tech/measure.php
  69. https://www.horiba.com/usa/mobility/applications/emissions-performance-and-durability/exhaust-emissions/heavy-duty-chassis-testing/
  70. https://www.horiba.com/usa/mobility/products/detail/action/show/Product/cvs-one-36/
  71. https://www.avl.com/en/testing-solutions/all-testing-products-and-software/emission-analysis-and-measurement/avl-slimline-dilution-systems
  72. https://afdc.energy.gov/files/pdfs/conguide.pdf
  73. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=9100X5Y5.TXT
  74. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/HDV_FE_Session1_China.pdf
  75. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC124017/pems_uncertainty_2020_v10.pdf
  76. https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/EU-RDE_policy-update_18012017_vF.pdf
  77. https://dieselnet.com/standards/eu/ld_rde.php
  78. https://saemobilus.sae.org/articles/rde-plus-a-road-rig-development-methodology-complete-rde-compliance-road-chassis-perspective-2020-01-0378
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.