Hubbry Logo
ColicinColicinMain
Open search
Colicin
Community hub
Colicin
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Colicin
Colicin
Colicin
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Colicin
Structure of TolB in complex with a peptide of the colicin e9 t-domain
Identifiers
SymbolColicin
PfamPF03515
Pfam clanCL0446
InterProIPR003058
SCOP21jch / SCOPe / SUPFAM
Available protein structures:
Pfam  structures / ECOD  
PDBRCSB PDB; PDBe; PDBj
PDBsumstructure summary

A colicin is a type of bacteriocin produced by and toxic to some strains of Escherichia coli.[1] Colicins are released into the environment to reduce competition from other bacterial strains. Colicins bind to outer membrane receptors, using them to translocate to the cytoplasm or cytoplasmic membrane, where they exert their cytotoxic effect, including depolarisation of the cytoplasmic membrane, DNase activity, RNase activity, or inhibition of murein synthesis.

Structure

[edit]

Channel-forming colicins (colicins A, B, E1, Ia, Ib, and N) are transmembrane proteins that depolarize the cytoplasmic membrane, leading to dissipation of cellular energy.[2] These colicins contain at least three domains: an N-terminal translocation domain responsible for movement across the outer membrane and periplasmic space (T domain); a central domain responsible for receptor recognition (R domain); and a C-terminal cytotoxic domain responsible for channel formation in the cytoplasmic membrane (C domain).[3][4][5] R domain regulates the target and binds to the receptor on the sensitive cell. T domain is involved in translocation, co-opting the machinery of the target cell. The C domain is the 'killing' domain and may produce a pore in the target cell membrane, or act as a nuclease to chop up the DNA or RNA of the target cell.[5]

Translocation

[edit]

Most colicins are able to translocate the outer membrane by a two-receptor system, where one receptor is used for the initial binding and the second for translocation. The initial binding is to cell surface receptors such as the outer membrane proteins OmpF, FepA, BtuB, Cir and FhuA; colicins have been classified according to which receptors they bind to. The presence of specific periplasmic proteins, such as TolA, TolB, TolC, or TonB, are required for translocation across the membrane.[6] Cloacin[7] DF13 is a bacteriocin that inactivates ribosomes by hydrolysing 16S RNA in 30S ribosomes at a specific site.[8]

Resistance

[edit]

Because they target specific receptors and use specific translocation machinery, cells can make themselves resistant to the colicin by repressing or deleting the genes for these proteins. Such resistant cells may suffer the lack of a key nutrient (such as iron or a B vitamin), but benefit by not being killed. Colicins exhibit a '1-hit killing kinetic' [citation needed] which does not necessarily mean a single molecule is sufficient to kill, but certainly that it only takes a small number. In his 1969 Nobel Laureate speech, Salvador E. Luria speculated that colicins could only be this toxic by causing a domino effect that destabilized the cell membrane.[9] He was not entirely correct, but pore-forming colicins do depolarize the membrane and thus eliminate the energy source for the cell. The colicins are highly effective toxins.[citation needed]

Genetic organisation

[edit]

Virtually all colicins are carried on plasmids. The two general classes of colicinogenic plasmids are large, low-copy-number plasmids, and small, high-copy-number plasmids. The larger plasmids carry other genes, as well as the colicin operon. The colicin operons are generally organized with several major genes. These include a colicin structural gene, an immunity gene, and a bacteriocin release protein (BRP), or lysis, gene. The immunity gene is often produced constitutively, while the BRP is generally produced only as a read-through of the stop codon on the colicin structural gene. The colicin itself is repressed by the SOS response and may be regulated in other ways as well.[10]

Retaining the colicin plasmid is very important for cells that live with their relatives, because if a cell loses the immunity gene, it quickly becomes subject to destruction by circulating colicin. At the same time, colicin is only released from a producing cell by the use of the lysis protein, which results in that cell's death. This suicidal production mechanism would appear to be very costly, except for the fact that it is regulated by the SOS response, which responds to significant DNA damage. In short, colicin production may only occur in terminally ill cells. The Professor Kleanthous Research Group at the University of Oxford study colicins extensively as a model system for characterising and investigating protein-protein interactions and recognition.[11]

BACTIBASE[12][13] database is an open-access database for bacteriocins including colicins (view complete list).

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Colicin

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Colicins are a family of proteinaceous produced by certain strains of and related , functioning as narrow-spectrum antibiotics that target and kill closely related bacterial strains through specific mechanisms of action, thereby providing a in microbial ecosystems. Discovered in 1925 by André Gratia during studies on E. coli antagonism, colicins were formally named in 1946 by Gratia and Philippe Frédéricq, with significant mechanistic insights emerging from the 1950s onward through work by François Jacob, Élie Wollman, and Masayasu Nomura. Early research linked colicin sensitivity to bacterial outer membrane components, leading to the identification of key import systems like Tol and TonB in the late 1960s and 1970s. More than 25 distinct colicins have since been characterized, with ongoing studies revealing their plasmid-encoded nature and evolutionary adaptations. Colicins are encoded by large, low-copy-number plasmids (e.g., pColE1, fully sequenced in 1985 at 6,646 base pairs), and their production is tightly regulated under the bacterial response, triggered by DNA-damaging agents like and repressed by the LexA protein. Upon induction, colicins are synthesized as precursors that mature into modular proteins, typically 40–80 kDa in size, featuring three functional domains: an N-terminal translocation domain for crossing the outer membrane, a central receptor-binding domain for specific uptake, and a C-terminal cytotoxic domain responsible for cell killing. To protect the producing cell, colicins form tight complexes with small immunity proteins (10–18 kDa) that bind the cytotoxic domain with extremely high affinity (e.g., dissociation constant K_d of 10⁻¹⁶ M for colicin E9 and Im9); release occurs via a dedicated protein that permeabilizes the outer membrane. Notably, colicin M, at 28 kDa, is an exception as a periplasmic inhibitor lacking a dedicated immunity protein. The killing mechanisms of colicins are diverse and highly specific, classified into two main groups based on import pathways: Group A colicins (e.g., E1–E9, A), which depend on the Tol system for translocation and typically act via pore formation or enzymatic degradation in the cytoplasm, and Group B colicins (e.g., B, Ia, Ib, M), which rely on the TonB-ExbB-ExbD system and often target periplasmic or membrane processes. Pore-forming colicins, such as E1 and A, insert into the inner membrane via voltage-gated α-helical bundles (up to 10 helices), depolarizing the membrane and dissipating the proton motive force within seconds of binding. Enzymatic colicins include DNases (e.g., E2, E9), which cleave chromosomal DNA at specific sites; rRNases (e.g., E3); and inhibitors like M, which blocks peptidoglycan synthesis by degrading lipid II precursors. Translocation requires energy from the proton motive force but not ATP, with pore-formers acting rapidly (~30 seconds) compared to nucleases (~20 minutes). Crystal structures, such as those of colicin Ia (1997) and the BtuB-colicin E3 complex (2.75 Å resolution), have illuminated receptor interactions, including binding to porins like Cir or nutrient receptors like BtuB with K_d values of 0.1–1 nM. Ecologically, colicins play a crucial role in bacterial , particularly in nutrient-limited environments like the animal gut, where they mediate intraspecies competition and promote plasmid dissemination through . By selectively eliminating sensitive competitors, colicin producers enhance resource acquisition and foster microbial diversity, with evolutionary pressures driving diversification via recombination and selection for immunity. Their study has broader implications for understanding protein translocation, antibiotic resistance, and potential biotechnological applications in targeted therapies. Recent (as of 2025) continues to explore their potential in targeted antimicrobials and cancer therapies.

Overview and History

Definition and Characteristics

Colicins are narrow-spectrum antimicrobial proteins, also known as , that are ribosomally synthesized by certain strains of and other to target and kill competing of the same or closely related . These proteins typically range in size from 30 to 80 kDa and exhibit high specificity, distinguishing them from broad-spectrum antibiotics by their limited host range, which primarily affects sensitive strains within the Enterobacteriaceae family. Key characteristics of colicins include their heat stability, with many retaining activity after exposure to 100°C for 30 minutes, and resistance to extreme pH conditions ranging from 1.0 to 12.0. They are produced under stress conditions such as nutrient limitation, high population density, or DNA damage, which trigger the SOS response to induce expression. Colicins are typically encoded on large plasmids known as colicinogenic plasmids (pCol), which carry the necessary genetic elements for their synthesis and release. In bacterial ecology, colicins function as molecular weapons that provide cells with a in polymicrobial environments, such as the , by selectively eliminating susceptible rivals and thereby facilitating niche dominance. The basic production process involves synthesis as inactive precursors in the , followed by proteolytic processing to form the mature protein with distinct functional domains, and export through a cell lysis mechanism that involves quasilysis to release the colicin into the surrounding medium. This coordinated release ensures that colicins are deployed precisely when environmental pressures demand microbial warfare.

Discovery and Early Research

The discovery of colicins traces back to 1925, when Belgian microbiologist André Gratia and his colleagues observed an antagonistic interaction between two strains of during experiments investigating susceptibility. Specifically, a filtrate from a virulent strain (E. coli V) inhibited the growth of a phage-sensitive strain (E. coli φ), revealing a heat-labile bactericidal substance that Gratia initially termed "Principe V." This finding, published in Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société de Biologie, marked the first documented example of microbial antagonism mediated by a non-phage agent in , though the term "colicine" (later simplified to colicin) was not formalized until 1946 by Gratia and his collaborator Pierre Frédéricq. Early investigations by Gratia emphasized the specificity of this antagonism, laying the groundwork for understanding colicins as targeted antimicrobial factors rather than broad-spectrum antibiotics. In the 1940s and 1950s, Pierre Frédéricq, working at the , advanced colicin research through systematic studies on strain interactions and immunity. He classified colicins into distinct types—such as E1, E2, E3, and K—based on patterns of producer immunity and target sensitivity, using cross-streak assays to map receptor specificities and bactericidal spectra. Frédéricq's purification efforts confirmed colicins as high-molecular-weight proteins, sensitive to proteases but resistant to certain nucleases, distinguishing them from phage-derived toxins. These classifications, detailed in his 1957 review in Annual Review of Microbiology, highlighted colicins' narrow host range, primarily affecting closely related E. coli strains, and established foundational assays for typing that influenced subsequent studies. A key milestone in the and came from Frédéricq's genetic analyses, which demonstrated that colicin production (colicinogeny) is encoded by extrachromosomal elements resembling , termed Col factors. These non-transmissible genetic units could be cured by dyes, leading to loss of colicin production and immunity, thus linking colicins to early biology. Initial biochemical characterizations during this period further revealed colicins as ribosomally synthesized proteins, with molecular weights ranging from 40 to 90 kDa, and varying mechanisms of action, such as activity for colicin E1 or DNase-like effects for colicin E3. By the late , experiments by Masayasu Nomura and others showed differential inhibition of macromolecular synthesis by specific types, solidifying colicins' role as proteinaceous toxins. Pre-1980s research increasingly positioned colicins as ecological modulators in microbial communities, particularly within the , where they confer competitive advantages to producer strains under nutrient limitation or stress. Studies in the and , including those on mixed E. coli cultures, demonstrated that colicin release promotes niche dominance by lysing sensitive competitors, influencing bacterial diversity in environments like the intestinal tract. Production triggers were linked to cellular stress responses, notably the pathway—first conceptualized in the early —which induces colicin operons via DNA damage signals like treatment, as shown in experiments on colicin E1 expression. This recognition underscored colicins' adaptive significance beyond laboratory settings, as factors shaping E. coli population dynamics in natural habitats.

Classification and Diversity

Types of Colicins

Colicins are primarily classified according to their killing mechanisms, which fall into three main categories: pore-forming colicins that depolarize the cytoplasmic membrane by forming voltage-gated channels; colicins that degrade nucleic acids, including DNases (e.g., colicins E2, E7, E8, E9), rRNases targeting 16S rRNA (e.g., colicins , E4, E6), and tRNases (e.g., colicins E5, D); and enzymatic colicins that inhibit essential cellular processes, such as colicin M, which disrupts synthesis by degrading lipid II precursors in the . Pore-forming examples include colicins A and E1, which insert into the inner membrane to cause ion leakage and . A complementary classification groups colicins by their specific outer receptors and translocation systems, reflecting their to target cell surfaces. colicins, dependent on the Tol system for import, bind receptors such as BtuB (the receptor, used by colicins A, E1–E9), Tsx ( receptor, for colicin K), OmpF porin (for colicin N), and OmpA (for colicin U). colicins rely on the TonB system and include those binding CirA (iron-siderophore receptor, for colicins Ia and Ib), FepA (iron-enterobactin receptor, for colicins B and D), and FhuA (ferrihydroxamate receptor, for colicin M). Over 30 distinct colicin types have been identified in , with sequence homology analyses revealing clustering into two primary groups (A and B) and further subgroups based on shared domains and phylogenetic relationships, such as the E-family (colicins E1–E9), the Ia/Ib family, and others like colicin V (a small, lipoprotein-mediated type historically classified as a colicin despite its microcin-like size and properties). Notable variants include colicin Z, a 26 kDa protein that selectively targets enteroinvasive and strains via the CjrC receptor, representing a narrow-spectrum type with peptidoglycan-degrading activity. The diversity of colicins arises from evolutionary processes, particularly mediated by conjugative plasmids, which disseminates colicin-encoding genes across . This transfer has led to variant colicins and colicin-like (e.g., klebicins) in species such as and Salmonella, enhancing interbacterial competition through diversified receptor specificities and activities.

Relation to Other Bacteriocins

Colicins represent a class of produced exclusively by , particularly within the family, such as , and are characterized as large proteinaceous toxins typically exceeding 10 in size. In contrast, microcins—another subset of from the same bacterial group—are smaller peptides under 10 , often undergoing post-translational modifications like or structures, and exhibit a broader against Gram-negative pathogens. While colicins are predominantly plasmid-encoded and released through a -dependent mechanism involving dedicated lysis proteins, microcins are frequently chromosomally encoded and secreted via ABC transporters or efflux pumps without compromising producer cell viability. Unlike from , such as lantibiotics (e.g., ), colicins lack extensive post-translational modifications like lanthionine bridges or other cyclization events that enhance stability and activity in the latter. are generally smaller (<10 kDa), heat-stable, and produced by lactic acid bacteria or other , targeting primarily other through mechanisms like membrane pore formation, whereas colicins rely on modular domain architectures for receptor binding, translocation, and cytotoxicity without such chemical alterations. Production of occurs via non-lethal secretion pathways, including Sec-dependent or dedicated exporters, avoiding the cell lysis required for colicin release. Despite these distinctions, colicins share core traits with other bacteriocins, including ribosomal synthesis, receptor-mediated uptake into target cells, and co-expression with immunity proteins that protect the producer from self-intoxication. All classes function ecologically to inhibit closely related competitors, often under stress conditions like nutrient limitation or population density signaling via . Colicins and microcins, in particular, co-occur in gut microbiota of pathogens like E. coli, where they exhibit synergistic effects in by reducing adhesion and promoting spatial segregation that maintains microbial diversity through competitive dynamics.

Molecular Structure

Domain Architecture

Colicins typically exhibit a modular three-domain architecture that facilitates their bactericidal activity against target cells. The N-terminal translocation domain (T-domain) is responsible for interacting with periplasmic proteins, such as components of the Tol or TonB systems, to enable passage across the outer membrane. Recent cryo-EM structures of the TolA-TolQ-TolR and TonB-ExbB-ExbD complexes have provided insights into the energy-dependent mechanisms supporting T-domain translocation. The central receptor-binding domain (R-domain) specifically targets outer membrane receptors on susceptible bacteria, such as BtuB for colicin E3 or FhuA for colicin M. The C-terminal killing domain (C-domain) executes the cytotoxic function, varying by colicin type to either form pores or act as an enzyme. Biophysically, the domains display distinct folds adapted to their roles. In pore-forming colicins, such as colicin A, the C-domain consists of an α-helical bundle comprising 10 helices organized in a three-layer structure, with two hydrophobic helices (H8 and H9) forming the core of voltage-gated ion channels in the inner membrane. In contrast, nuclease colicins like colicin E3 feature a C-domain with a mixed α/β fold, including a twisted antiparallel β-sheet flanked by α-helices, where the active site shares catalytic residue arrangement similarities with RNase H enzymes. Colicins are generally monomeric proteins ranging from 40 to 90 kDa in size, lacking natural disulfide bonds but exhibiting high thermal stability, particularly in their helical domains, which supports their secretion and targeting. Their isoelectric points (pI) vary, with examples ranging from approximately 5.4 (colicin A) to 10.5 (colicin Ia).

Variations Across Colicin Types

Colicins exhibit significant structural diversity in their killing domains, which directly correlates with their distinct cytotoxic activities, building on the conserved three-domain architecture common to most colicins. Pore-forming colicins, such as those in groups A and B, feature an extended C-terminal domain composed primarily of α-helices that enable membrane interaction. For instance, the channel-forming domain of colicin E1 consists of a bundle of 10 α-helices arranged in three layers, including a central hydrophobic helical hairpin formed by helices 8 and 9, which is amphipathic to facilitate insertion into lipid bilayers. These helical structures are characteristic of pore-formers like colicins A, Ia, and N, where the C-domain spans approximately 200-250 residues and adopts a compact, globular fold optimized for voltage-gated channel formation. In contrast, nuclease colicins possess more compact C-terminal killing domains equipped with catalytic motifs for nucleic acid degradation. The DNase domain of colicin E2, for example, incorporates an HNH endonuclease motif featuring a conserved His-Asn-His triad that coordinates a divalent metal ion essential for phosphodiester bond cleavage. This motif, spanning about 30-35 residues within a ββα-Me fold, is shared among DNase colicins like E7, E8, and E9, resulting in a tightly folded domain of roughly 90-130 amino acids that contrasts with the elongated helical arrays of pore-formers. RNase colicins, such as E3 and D, display analogous compact domains but with motifs tailored for RNA targeting, maintaining overall structural homology to DNase variants within the E-group. Cell wall-inhibiting colicins represent a distinct structural class, exemplified by colicin M, which lacks the helical or nuclease motifs of other types and instead adopts a unique open β-barrel fold in its catalytic domain for binding lipid II, a key peptidoglycan precursor. The full-length colicin M is notably compact at 271 residues and 28 kDa, with its C-terminal enzymatic region forming an atypical β-barrel where charged hydrophilic residues face outward, allowing periplasmic solubility and specific interaction with lipid-linked substrates to halt cell wall synthesis. Unlike the larger, multi-helical domains of pore-formers or the catalytic pockets of nucleases, this fold is evolutionarily divergent, showing minimal homology to other colicin families. Across colicin types, domain sizes typically range from 10 to 30 kDa per functional unit, reflecting modular adaptations within the 50-80 kDa full-length proteins, while sequence homology varies markedly: pore-forming and nuclease domains within group A colicins (e.g., E1-E9 series) exhibit 50-70% identity, underscoring shared evolutionary origins, whereas colicin M displays near-zero homology to these groups. These variations highlight how domain-specific folds have diversified to target different cellular components while preserving the overarching translocation and receptor-binding framework.

Genetic Organization

Plasmid-Based Encoding

Colicins are encoded on two main types of plasmids: small, multicopy type I plasmids (6-10 kb, mobilizable but non-conjugative) carrying genes for colicins such as E1-E9, A, N, and K; and large, low-copy, conjugative type II plasmids (40-80 kb, often in the IncFII incompatibility group) carrying genes for colicins such as Ia, Ib, B, M, and V. A classic example of a type I plasmid is ColE1 (6.6 kb), encoding colicin E1. Type II plasmids, such as those encoding colicins V and Ia, facilitate maintenance and dissemination in bacterial populations. While plasmid-based encoding is the norm, rare instances of chromosomal integration have been documented, such as cases in Escherichia coli where colicin genes were found on the chromosome, potentially limiting spread but providing stable inheritance without plasmid loss risks. Type I plasmids exhibit high copy numbers (10-20 copies per cell), ensuring robust gene expression, while type II plasmids are low-copy and rely on active partitioning. Crucially, type II plasmids' conjugative nature enables horizontal transfer via cell-to-cell contact, mediated by type IV secretion systems, which drives rapid dissemination of colicin genes across bacterial populations and enhances competitive fitness in microbial communities. This transfer mechanism is particularly effective in dense environments like the gut, where colicin producers can outcompete sensitive strains. Type I plasmids are mobilizable in the presence of a conjugative plasmid. Plasmid maintenance relies on sophisticated systems to ensure stable inheritance during cell division. For low-copy type II plasmids, partition genes, such as those encoding actin-like proteins (e.g., ParM) and DNA-binding adapters (e.g., ParR), actively segregate plasmids to daughter cells, preventing stochastic loss. Additionally, addiction modules based on toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems, like the mazEF or relBE pairs common in IncFII plasmids, impose a post-segregational killing mechanism: the stable antitoxin decays faster than the toxin, selectively eliminating cells that lose the plasmid and thus enforcing retention. From an evolutionary perspective, the plasmid-based architecture allows for rapid adaptation and diversification of colicin genes through homologous recombination and horizontal gene transfer, enabling the assembly of novel operons from modular domains and fostering arms-race dynamics with immunity and resistance mechanisms in target bacteria. This mobility has contributed to the proliferation of diverse colicin types, with evidence of diversifying selection pressures shaping toxin-immunity pairs to evade countermeasures.

Gene Cluster Components

The gene clusters encoding colicins are typically organized as operons on plasmids, featuring three primary genes: the structural gene (often denoted cea for colicin activity), the immunity gene (cia or imm), and the lysis gene (kil or lys). The cea gene encodes the mature colicin protein, while the cia gene produces a cytoplasmic immunity protein that specifically inhibits the colicin's cytotoxic activity within the producing cell. The kil gene encodes a lysis protein that disrupts the outer membrane to facilitate colicin release without immediately killing the producer bacterium. These operons are regulated by a promoter that is inducible under SOS response conditions, where the LexA repressor binds to specific operator sites upstream of the operon, maintaining low basal expression levels to prevent premature auto-lysis of the host cell. Upon DNA damage, RecA-mediated cleavage inactivates LexA, derepressing the promoter and allowing coordinated transcription of the operon genes. The immunity protein binds stoichiometrically to the colicin's killing domain—for instance, in a 1:1 ratio for colicin E3—to neutralize its activity, ensuring producer cell survival during synthesis. Lysis proteins, such as those from the kil gene, form non-lethal pores in the outer membrane, enabling colicin export while preserving inner membrane integrity in the producer. Variations exist across colicin types, particularly in export mechanisms; for example, the colicin V gene cluster includes dedicated export genes (cvaA and cvaB) that utilize a hemolysin-type type I secretion system, involving an ABC transporter and outer membrane factor TolC, to translocate the mature colicin across both membranes without relying solely on lysis-induced release.

Mechanism of Action

Receptor Binding

Colicins initiate their cytotoxic action by binding to specific outer membrane receptors on susceptible Escherichia coli cells, a process mediated by the receptor-binding (R) domain of the colicin molecule. This initial recognition step ensures high specificity, targeting receptors typically involved in nutrient uptake, such as iron-siderophore transporters or porins. The diversity of receptors exploited by different colicins reflects their adaptation to various host surface features, allowing selective killing of competing bacteria. Receptor diversity is prominent among colicins, with many group A and B colicins utilizing TonB-dependent transporters (TBDTs) as primary receptors. For instance, enzymatic colicins like E3 bind to the vitamin B12 transporter BtuB, while colicin B targets the ferric enterobactin receptor FepA. In contrast, colicin N, a pore-forming colicin, engages the general porin OmpF as its receptor. Binding affinities for these interactions are typically in the nanomolar range, with reported dissociation constants (Kd) of approximately 1-2 nM for colicin E9 to BtuB and ~1 nM for colicin E3 to BtuB, underscoring the tight association necessary for efficient targeting. The kinetics of receptor binding exhibit high specificity, driven by a combination of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between the colicin R domain and receptor extracellular loops. These interactions facilitate rapid association, often with cooperative elements; for example, after initial receptor engagement, colicin E2 recruits TolA via its translocation domain to stabilize the complex and promote further uptake. Structural studies reveal that the R domain typically forms β-sheet interfaces with receptor loops, creating complementary surfaces for docking; in the colicin E3-BtuB complex, the elongated coiled-coil R domain contacts multiple loops on BtuB's plug domain, burying extensive surface area through hydrogen bonding and van der Waals contacts. For certain colicins, such as colicin A, binding shows pH dependence, with optimal association at mildly acidic conditions that enhance conformational flexibility in the R domain. Initial receptor binding is a passive process, relying on diffusion and affinity without direct energy input, but it positions the colicin for subsequent TonB-mediated energization, where the proton motive force across the inner membrane drives conformational changes in the receptor to initiate translocation.

Translocation Across Membranes

Colicins traverse the double-membrane envelope of Gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli through an energy-dependent mechanism orchestrated by their N-terminal translocation domain, which hijacks host import systems to facilitate passage from the outer membrane to the periplasm and ultimately the inner membrane or cytoplasm. Group A colicins, including A, E1–E9, K, N, and U, primarily recruit the Tol system (comprising TolA, TolQ, TolR, TolB, and Pal), while group B colicins such as B, Ia, Ib, M, 5, and 10 utilize the TonB system (TonB, ExbB, ExbD). These systems enable the colicin to exploit existing cellular machinery for nutrient uptake, with the translocation domain initiating interactions that drive membrane penetration following receptor priming. Crossing the outer membrane involves the N-terminal domain recruiting Tol or TonB components to form a translocon at the receptor site, often threading the colicin through porin channels like OmpF in a looped or hairpin configuration that unfolds partially to extend into the periplasm. For group A colicins, TolA's periplasmic domain III binds the colicin (with affinities around 0.2–0.6 μM for colicin A), while TolB interacts via specific motifs like the TolB box (residues 35–39 in colicin E9, K_d ≈1 μM), facilitating initial entry without direct energy input at this stage. In group B colicins, TonB shuttles between membranes to energize transport, pulling the colicin across via conformational changes coupled to the proton motive force (PMF). This threading mechanism, observed in structures of colicin N and E9, displaces lipopolysaccharide and establishes periplasmic contacts, allowing the colicin to span the ~150 Å periplasmic gap. In the periplasm, chaperone proteins including TolA, TolB, and the lipoprotein Pal form a complex that unfolds the colicin progressively and guides it toward the inner membrane, with PMF energizing TolQ–TolR interactions to drive conformational changes in TolA for substrate handoff. The Pal–TolA linkage, dependent on PMF, anchors the complex to peptidoglycan, ensuring directional transit and preventing back-diffusion. For TonB-dependent colicins, ExbB and ExbD maintain TonB in a dynamic state, transducing PMF to propel the colicin forward. This chaperone-mediated unfolding is critical, as the colicin's rigid structure must be dismantled to navigate the crowded periplasm. Inner membrane transit differs by colicin type: pore-formers like colicins A and E1 undergo partial unfolding of their C-terminal helical bundle, enabling voltage-gated insertion (requiring >80 mV across the ) to form anion-selective channels that depolarize the cell. In contrast, nuclease colicins (e.g., E2–E9) achieve full translocation of the cytotoxic domain into the via energy-dependent mechanisms involving the proton motive force, potentially recruiting inner proteins such as OmpA, often driven by electrostatic interactions with anionic phospholipids. The PMF remains essential here, powering insertion for both types. Overall translocation efficiency is low, with fewer than 1% of receptor-bound colicins successfully entering the , reflecting barriers like unfolding kinetics and competition for host factors. The rate-limiting step occurs at the inner , spanning seconds to minutes due to energy-dependent insertion and potential bottlenecks in chaperone availability.

Cytotoxic Effects

Colicins exert their cytotoxic effects through diverse intracellular mechanisms that disrupt essential cellular processes, leading to rapid or delayed depending on the colicin type. These actions occur after the colicin domains are delivered into the or via translocation systems. Pore-forming colicins target the inner membrane to collapse the proton motive force, while enzymatic colicins degrade nucleic acids or inhibit pathways, ultimately preventing bacterial survival without eliciting inflammatory responses in eukaryotic hosts due to their proteinaceous nature and bacterial specificity. Pore-forming colicins, such as colicin E1, induce lethal by forming voltage-gated channels in the cytoplasmic . The C-terminal domain of colicin E1, comprising a bundle of 10 α-helices, inserts into the , with a hydrophobic (helices 8 and 9) anchoring deeply to facilitate channel opening under the influence of the . This results in selective efflux, particularly (K⁺) and (H⁺) ions, causing a rapid collapse of the essential for ATP synthesis and transport; for instance, colicin E1 triggers detectable K⁺ efflux within 30 seconds at 37°C, leading to in under 10 minutes. Similar mechanisms operate in colicins A and Ia, where proton-selective pores (with selectivity ratios P_H⁺/P_K⁺ ≈ 10⁴) disrupt integrity, halting energy-dependent processes and causing swift . Nuclease colicins target nucleic acids to inhibit replication, transcription, or . Colicin E2 acts as a DNase, with its C-terminal domain cleaving double-stranded DNA at random sites via an H-N-H catalytic motif, requiring divalent metal ions like Mg²⁺ or Ca²⁺ (optimal at >5 mM and pH >8) for activity; this degradation induces the response within 10-15 minutes and culminates in over hours by preventing and replication. In contrast, colicin E3 functions as an , specifically hydrolyzing 16S rRNA in the decoding center of the ribosomal subunit between nucleotides A1493 and G1494, using residues Glu62 and His58 to activate a 2'-OH nucleophilic attack without metal cofactors; this cleavage impairs codon-anticodon recognition, reduces A-site occupancy, and accelerates tRNA translocation, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis and causing delayed lethality spanning hours. Colicin D, another , cleaves the anticodon loops of specific tRNAs (e.g., tRNA^Arg) as a phosphotransferase, further blocking and contributing to metabolic arrest. Metabolic inhibition by colicins like M targets cell envelope biogenesis in the . Colicin M hydrolyzes the of lipid II, the essential precursor for murein () synthesis, in a Mg²⁺-dependent manner involving key catalytic residues (e.g., Asp226, Tyr228, Asp229, His235, Arg236); this cleavage yields undecaprenol (C55-OH) and a modified nucleotide-sugar, preventing peptidoglycan polymerization and recycling of the lipid carrier, while also arresting O-antigen production. Accumulation of upstream precursors like UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide ensues, leading to osmotic instability and cell lysis over a delayed timeframe of hours, with effects modulated by environmental osmolarity.

Resistance and Immunity

Immunity Proteins

Immunity proteins are small polypeptides, typically ranging from 9 to 18 , produced by colicinogenic to protect themselves from the cytotoxic effects of their own colicins. These proteins bind stoichiometrically and with extremely high affinity—often in the femtomolar to picomolar range (e.g., K_d ≈ 10^{-12} M for the Colicin E3-Im3 complex)—to the killing domain of the colicin, thereby neutralizing its activity intracellularly. For colicins like Colicin E3, the immunity protein Im3 interacts primarily through exosite binding on the RNase domain, employing steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion to prevent substrate access without directly occluding the , as revealed by structural and biochemical studies. This tight association ensures that the colicin cannot exert its lethal effects within the producer cell, forming stable heterodimers (e.g., ~70 for Colicin E9-Im9) that render the inactive. Immunity proteins exhibit remarkable specificity, conferring protection exclusively against their colicin type and showing no cross-immunity across different colicin families, due to variations in binding interfaces that result in 10^6- to 10^8-fold lower stability for non- interactions. This specificity is maintained because the is encoded immediately adjacent to the colicin structural on the same , allowing coordinated expression and co-evolution of the interacting partners. For instance, mutations in the immunity protein can broaden recognition slightly but generally preserve type-specific inhibition, as seen in experimental variants of Im9 that retain high selectivity for Colicin E9. In terms of localization, immunity proteins for colicins are primarily cytoplasmic, where they can rapidly intercept translocated colicin molecules, while those for pore-forming colicins, such as Colicin A, are anchored in the inner via hydrophobic helices to block channel insertion. Producer cells maintain excess immunity protein levels—up to 10^4 to 10^7 times the amount needed for protection—ensuring robust self-immunity even as colicins are released extracellularly via cell triggered by dedicated lysis proteins. This overproduction is regulated to balance fitness costs, preventing unnecessary resource drain while safeguarding against accidental intracellular colicin accumulation. Evolutionarily, immunity proteins diverge at rates several orders of magnitude faster than the rest of the colicin , particularly in regions interfacing with the colicin's killing domain, driven by diversifying selection to enhance binding affinity and specificity. This rapid , inferred from comparisons across colicin clusters, allows producers to adapt to emerging colicin variants while maintaining fitness, with point often sufficient to generate novel immunity specificities that provide a selective advantage in microbial communities.

Target-Site Resistance

Target-site resistance in colicins arises primarily from mutations that disrupt the uptake process or modify the intracellular targets, allowing sensitive Escherichia coli strains to evade killing without relying on producer-specific immunity mechanisms. These alterations typically involve changes to outer membrane receptors or translocation machinery, which colicins exploit for entry. For instance, mutations in the btuB gene, encoding the vitamin B12 receptor, confer resistance to colicin E3 by preventing receptor-mediated binding and subsequent translocation across the outer membrane. Similarly, deletions or loss-of-function mutations in btuB block uptake of other E-group colicins, such as E1, E2, and E7, as these share the BtuB receptor for initial attachment. Such receptor mutations often impose fitness costs due to impaired nutrient acquisition; btuB inactivation hinders uptake, reducing growth rates in B12-limited environments, particularly in strains unable to synthesize the vitamin de novo, like certain metE mutants. In contrast, translocation defects, such as knockouts in the tolA gene of the Tol system, render cells resistant to colicins (e.g., A, E1, , and N) by blocking energy-dependent import through the inner membrane. TolA mutations exhibit pleiotropic effects, including increased sensitivity to detergents and protein leakage, but do not significantly reduce maximal growth rates in nutrient-rich media. These chromosomal mutations frequently result in cross-resistance to multiple colicins sharing the same uptake pathway. At the target level, resistance to colicin M involves modifications to biosynthesis intermediates, such as alterations involving the encoded by cbrA. Overexpression or gain-of-function in cbrA modify undecaprenyl-phosphate-linked precursors, reducing their susceptibility to ColM's activity, which normally hydrolyzes lipid II to inhibit synthesis. In natural populations, target-site resistance are predominantly chromosomal but can occasionally be plasmid-mediated, leading to broader dissemination; however, they often create trade-offs, such as increased sensitivity to certain phages (e.g., BF23 via btuB loss) or other colicins, limiting their selective advantage in diverse microbial communities.

Applications and Future Directions

Therapeutic Uses

Colicins offer significant advantages as targeted antimicrobials due to their narrow spectrum of activity, which minimizes disruption to the host and reduces the risk of compared to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This specificity arises from their dependence on particular receptors and translocation mechanisms for killing closely related l strains, allowing selective elimination of without broadly affecting commensal in the gut. For instance, colicins demonstrate stability under certain gastrointestinal conditions, enabling their persistence in the intestinal tract where they can exert effects against enteric . In animal models, colicin-producing strains, such as the E. coli H22, have been shown to reduce colonization in germ-free mice, rendering the undetectable after six days, highlighting their potential in preventing or treating shigellosis-like infections. Engineering modifications have enhanced colicins' therapeutic utility, including the development of fusion proteins to improve targeting and efficacy. Alternative fusions, such as enterocin A with colicin E1, have demonstrated inhibitory activity against gastric cancer cells (AGS line) by disrupting membrane integrity and inducing . Delivery strategies further support clinical translation, such as encapsulation in nanoparticles for protected transit through the acidic environment to the lower tract, or expression via to sustain local production at infection sites. These approaches leverage colicins' natural mechanisms for receptor binding and translocation to achieve targeted effects. Pre-2025 studies have explored colicins in preclinical models for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, particularly E. coli-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs). Colicins, including colicin M which hydrolyzes lipid II to disrupt synthesis and exhibits potent activity against uropathogenic E. coli strains including MDR variants, have been tested in formulations (e.g., colicins A, E1, N) to prevent colonization by inhibiting formation and extraluminal contamination. and assays confirm their efficacy against UTI isolates, with potential extension to MDR E. coli infections in the gut or , where they show low toxicity to human cells due to species-specific action. While no human clinical trials were reported by 2025, these findings position colicins as promising alternatives for antibiotic-resistant infections. Despite these advances, challenges hinder colicins' widespread therapeutic adoption, including potential in humans from repeated protein exposure and difficulties in scalable production. As foreign proteins, colicins may elicit immune responses, though their natural occurrence in the suggests relatively low risk; strategies like resurfacing (e.g., for colicin N) aim to mitigate this by reducing antigenic epitopes. Production scalability remains a barrier, with traditional bacterial expression yielding low titers, prompting exploration of plant-based systems like Nicotiana benthamiana for recombinant colicin M to meet clinical demands cost-effectively. Addressing these issues is crucial for translating colicins into viable therapeutics.

Recent Research Advances

Recent research has highlighted the potential of colicins as anticancer agents, particularly through their ability to selectively target membranes. Colicin N (ColN), a pore-forming colicin, induces in human cells by upregulating pro-apoptotic Bax protein and downregulating anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 and c-FLIP, demonstrating selective without affecting normal cells. In 2021, resurfacing the receptor-binding domain of ColN with polycationic residues enhanced its binding affinity and cytotoxic activity against A549 cells, increasing cell death by up to 50% compared to wild-type ColN. Subsequent screening in 2022 confirmed that the full-length ColN and its cytotoxic domain exhibit dose-dependent toxicity toward multiple human lines, including , , and colon cancers, via depolarization. These findings underscore colicins' low propensity for resistance development, positioning them as promising adjuncts to conventional chemotherapies. Advances in colicin production have expanded their applicability in and therapies. In 2023, transgenic and plants were engineered to express colicin M (), achieving accumulation levels of 1.06–3.36 µg/mL in leaf extracts, with retained antibacterial activity against enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strains O157:H7 and O104:H4, as well as multidrug-resistant variants. This plant-based production method maintains ColM stability in dried for at least three months at 40°C, supporting its use as a () food processing aid approved by the FDA. More recently, in 2025, cell-free expression systems enabled multiplexed synthesis of colicin cocktails, including and combined with other like SalE1B, yielding up to 4.58 mg/mL of ColM and broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens without detectable resistance emergence. In vivo validation in larvae showed these cocktails effectively combat multidrug-resistant E. coli infections, reducing bacterial loads by over 90%. Colicins have also been implicated in the persistence and spread of (AMR) in bacterial populations. A 2025 study of E. coli isolates from hedgehogs revealed colicin genes in 11–32% of strains across phylogroups, with colicinogenic isolates harboring higher rates of β-lactam resistance genes like blaTEM (26.6%) and blaCTX-M (3.8%), suggesting colicins facilitate horizontal transfer of AMR plasmids in reservoirs. Concurrently, research in 2025 demonstrated that colicin Ib (ColIb) of E. coli releases active , promoting galactose scavenging and cross-feeding that enhances survival in mixed biofilms, revealing an ecological role for colicins in microbial community dynamics beyond direct killing. These insights highlight colicins' dual nature as both therapeutic tools and contributors to bacterial resilience, informing strategies for targeted interventions against AMR.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1847374/
  2. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/14/2676
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128648/
  4. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/5/664
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9517006/
  6. https://rjid.com.ro/articles/2023.4/RJID_2023_4_Art-07.pdf
  7. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kjm1952/30/2/30_2_83/_pdf
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6795089/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/colicin
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381439/
  11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13470810/
  12. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.mi.21.100167.001353
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10729939/
  14. https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/mmbr.00036-06
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10203843/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350706507_Ecological_and_Evolutionary_responses_to_Antibiotic_Treatment_in_the_Human_Gut_Microbiota
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8469651/
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47488-8
  19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811825
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123749840002916
  21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00248-024-02357-4
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51286-z
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533080/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2649078/
  25. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601693
  26. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/1COL
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2279995/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212697002001
  29. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2I88
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022283612000733
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC135741/
  32. https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/73/5/1121/4822282
  33. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01547/full
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4585273/
  35. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jb.00243-07
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096921260080026X
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1206723/
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12902336/
  39. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1010780107
  40. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mbio.01787-21
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1868905/
  42. https://www.bakerlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/1-s2.0-S0022283612000733-main.pdf
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00899.x
  44. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0503567102
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC107532/
  46. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embj.2021108610
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969212698000884
  48. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155427
  49. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00036-06
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4026351/
  51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20852642/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2615495/
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2689447/
  54. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091109
  55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2011.12.019
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC216324/
  57. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/53/4/1019/6757101
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC235696/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7648152/
  60. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/52/5/1270/6757874
  61. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00241/full
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-30729-7
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34131854/
  64. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.670535/full
  65. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/9/1109
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924857919301840
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2077848/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8479544/
  69. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11816-019-00571-y
  70. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14070831
  71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.09.008
  72. https://doi.org/10.21315/tlsr2022.33.1.10
  73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1271757
  74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08639-y
  75. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2029461.4284
  76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ismej/wraf032
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.