Hubbry Logo
ConcisionConcisionMain
Open search
Concision
Community hub
Concision
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Concision
Concision
Concision
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In common usage and linguistics, concision (also called conciseness, succinctness,[1] terseness, brevity, or laconicism) is a communication principle[2] of eliminating redundancy,[3] generally achieved by using as few words as possible in a sentence while preserving its meaning. More generally, it is achieved through the omission of parts that impart information that was already given, that is obvious or that is irrelevant. Outside of linguistics, a message may be similarly "dense" in other forms of communication.

For example, a sentence of "It is a fact that most arguments must try to convince readers, that is the audience, that the arguments are true." may be expressed more concisely as "Most arguments must demonstrate their truth to readers." – the observations that the statement is a fact and that readers are its audience are redundant, and it is unnecessary to repeat the word "arguments" in the sentence.[4]

"Laconic" speech or writing refers to the pithy bluntness that the Laconian people of ancient Greece were reputedly known for.[5]

In linguistic research, there have been approaches to analyze the level of succinctness of texts using semantic analysis.[6]

Statements of the principle

[edit]

Polymath Blaise Pascal wrote in a 1657 letter:[7]

Je n’ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n’ai pas eu le loisir de la faire plus courte.

Translation:

I have made this longer than usual, only because I have not had the time to make it shorter.

William Strunk and E. B. White's The Elements of Style, an American English style guide, says of concision that:[2]

A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.

Joseph M. Williams's Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace suggests six principles for concision:[8]

  1. Delete words that mean little or nothing.
  2. Delete words that repeat the meaning of other words.
  3. Delete words implied by other words.
  4. Replace a phrase with a word.
  5. Change negatives to affirmatives.
  6. Delete useless adjectives and adverbs.

Concision is taught to students at all levels.[9][10][11] It is valued highly in expository English writing, but less by some other cultures.[12]

Importance in pedagogy

[edit]

In an influential study by educational psychologist Richard E. Mayer and others, succinctness of textbook and lecture content was linked to better understanding of the material.[13]

In computing

[edit]

In computing, succinct data structures balance minimal storage use against efficiency of access.[14] In algorithmic game theory, a succinct game is one that may be accurately described in a simpler form than its normal representation.[15]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Concision

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Concision is the quality or state of being concise, characterized by brevity of expression or statement that is free from elaboration and superfluous detail. In the context of and writing, it refers to the principle of eliminating and unnecessary words to convey meaning efficiently using the most effective and precise language possible. Achieving concision enhances clarity, readability, and impact in communication, making it a fundamental in academic, professional, and everyday writing. It respects the reader's time by delivering information directly, avoiding wordiness that can obscure ideas or dilute arguments. Unlike mere brevity, which might sacrifice completeness, true concision balances economy with adequacy, ensuring that essential meaning is preserved without excess. Key strategies for concision include replacing vague or weak words with specific, strong alternatives; interrogating every word and sentence to remove dead weight; and combining related ideas to streamline expression. Common pitfalls to avoid encompass redundant pairs (e.g., "full and complete"), unnecessary qualifiers (e.g., "very unique"), overuse of prepositional phrases, and passive constructions that add length without value. For instance, transforming "The reason why it happened was because of the fact that" into "It happened because" exemplifies how concision sharpens focus. These techniques, drawn from established writing , apply across genres, from essays to , promoting professional and persuasive discourse.

Core Concepts

Definition

Concision, also referred to as conciseness, succinctness, terseness, brevity, or laconicism, is a fundamental principle in communication that involves the elimination of redundant words and phrases while fully preserving the original meaning and intent. This approach ensures that messages are streamlined without loss of essential information, emphasizing economy in expression to convey ideas more directly. At its core, concision prioritizes clarity and efficiency over a strict reduction in word count, focusing on the use of the most effective and precise to enhance comprehension and impact. For example, the redundant phrasing "due to the fact that" can be replaced with the simpler "because," maintaining the sentence's meaning while improving flow and . This distinction sets concision apart from mere brevity, which may shorten text at the expense of precision or completeness; concision, by contrast, demands that brevity serves effective communication. The concept of concision has historical roots in classical , where it emerged as a key for achieving persuasive and lucid in and Roman traditions.

Key Principles

One of the foundational principles of concision in writing is to omit needless words, as articulated by William Strunk Jr. in (1918): "Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a no unnecessary , for the same reason that a should have no unnecessary lines and a no unnecessary parts." This rule emphasizes efficiency without sacrificing essential detail, encouraging writers to ensure every word contributes meaningfully to the message. Building on this, Joseph M. Williams outlined six principles of concision in Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace (11th ed., 2014), focusing on systematic reduction of excess: (1) delete words that mean little or nothing, such as fillers like "basically" or "actually"; (2) delete words that repeat the meaning of other words, avoiding redundancies like "each and every"; (3) delete words implied by other words, such as unnecessary modifiers like "completely" before "revolutionize"; (4) replace a phrase with a single word, for instance substituting "carefully read what you have written to improve wording" with "edit"; (5) change negatives to affirmatives, rewriting "Do not write in the negative" as "Write in the affirmative"; and (6) delete useless adjectives and adverbs that add no value. These principles target common sources of wordiness, promoting precision through targeted elimination. Concision principles balance brevity with clarity by prioritizing the strongest words over the fewest, ensuring that reductions enhance rather than obscure meaning, as Williams notes that effective style uses language that conveys ideas efficiently without ambiguity. For example, the wordy phrase "due to the fact that" can be revised to "because," eliminating redundancy while preserving the causal relationship and improving readability, a transformation aligned with Strunk's directive to omit needless words. Similarly, Williams' principle of replacing phrases applies in converting "Productivity actually depends on certain factors that basically involve psychology more than any particular technology" to "Productivity depends on psychology more than on technology," where removed qualifiers sharpen focus without losing intent.

Historical Development

Origins in Rhetoric

The concept of concision, or brevity in expression, traces its roots to rhetoric in the 4th century BCE, where it was valued as a tool for effective . , in his (Book III), emphasized brevity as essential to clear and appropriate style (lexis), arguing that good prose should avoid excess to prevent confusing or boring the audience. He particularly highlighted the use of concise enthymemes—rhetorical syllogisms with omitted premises—to suit the intellectual capacity of public speakers' listeners, noting that overly long deductions could "trip up the hearer" by exceeding expected sentence length (Rhet. 1409b25–30). This approach ensured through succinct, vivid formulations, often enhanced by metaphors that conveyed ideas economically without sacrificing impact. Isocrates, a contemporary of , further advocated for a concise style in oratory as part of his educational , distinguishing it from the verbose and methods of the sophists. In works like To Nicocles, he promoted a pure, restrained style that prioritized brevity and precision to convey and political wisdom effectively, enhancing and clarity. This emphasis on concision reflected Isocrates' belief that true combined philosophical depth with economical expression, influencing later views on oratorical training. Roman rhetoricians in the CE built on these Greek foundations, integrating brevitas—the Latin term for brevity—into discussions of effective . , in , described brevity as a key charm of eloquence, recommending it in metaphors and overall style to maintain audience engagement, as seen in his praise for concise phrasing that rivals the economy of poetry while serving persuasive ends (De Or. 3.37). Similarly, in his (Book VIII) treated brevity as one of the virtues of style, alongside clarity and purity, warning against prolixity in and amplification while lauding its role in making arguments forceful and memorable (Inst. 8.2.2–22). He linked brevitas to practical oratory, where short, pointed expressions enhanced delivery and ethical appeal. Early literary forms also exemplified concision's power in rhetorical practice. , dating to the 6th century BCE but compiled and analyzed in classical , demonstrated brevity through short, moralistic narratives featuring anthropomorphic animals, distilling complex ethical lessons into minimal words for immediate impact. These tales, often no longer than a few sentences, served as models in rhetorical education for their direct style and epigrammatic morals, influencing later uses of fable in persuasive discourse.

Modern Evolution

In the 19th century, the concept of concision gained prominence in English literature through the Romantic movement, particularly with William Wordsworth's emphasis on simplicity and natural . In the (1798), co-authored with , Wordsworth sought to counter the ornate style of neoclassical poetry by drawing on everyday speech and rural life, arguing that poetry should express "the real of men" to achieve emotional authenticity without unnecessary embellishment. This approach was further elaborated in the to the 1800 edition, where Wordsworth advocated for a "selection of the really used by men" and warned against the "gaudiness and inane phraseology" of contemporary verse, promoting a stripped-down form that prioritized clarity and directness. The 20th century saw concision codified in influential style guides and literary theories, shifting toward deliberate omission as a tool for depth and impact. developed his "," also known as the theory of omission, in the 1932 nonfiction work , where he posited that a should omit anything unnecessary to the story, revealing only the "tip of the iceberg" while implying greater submerged meaning through precise, sparse . This technique emphasized clarity and emotional resonance over verbosity, influencing modernist writing by trusting readers to infer unspoken elements. Complementing this, George Orwell's 1946 essay "" critiqued the decay of clear expression in political discourse and outlined six rules for effective writing, including "Never use a long word where a short one will do" and "Never use a passive where you can use the active," to combat pretentiousness and restore precision. Post-1950 developments extended concision into minimalist literary movements and adapted it to digital constraints, fostering brevity as a cultural norm. Raymond Carver's short stories in collections like What We Talk About When We Talk About Love (1981) exemplified American literary , using stark, unadorned sentences and everyday to convey profound struggles, often omitting exposition to heighten tension and realism. This style, rooted in working-class narratives, influenced late-20th-century fiction by prioritizing implication over elaboration. In the digital era since the , platforms like (now X) and other have accelerated adaptations for brevity, with character limits and fast-paced interaction driving linguistic simplification—such as abbreviations and concise phrasing—that boosts engagement and virality, as evidenced by studies showing messages shortened by 30-40% receive higher success rates in likes and shares.

Applications in Communication

In Pedagogy

Concision plays a vital role in by fostering skills among students. Research demonstrates that incorporating writing exercises, which emphasize brevity, significantly enhances performance. For instance, a study in general biology courses found that students who engaged in structured writing assignments showed marked improvements in compared to those who did not, as measured by standardized assessments like the California Skills Test. This suggests that the process of distilling ideas into concise forms encourages deeper analysis and synthesis of information. In educational settings, teaching concision involves targeted methods integrated into composition and writing curricula. Common approaches include iterative editing exercises where students revise drafts to eliminate wordiness, such as reducing redundant phrases or unnecessary qualifiers, thereby honing precision in expression. The Paramedic Method, a systematic revision technique, is widely used in instruction to restructure sentences for clarity and economy by circling subjects and verbs, then eliminating extraneous elements. These methods are staples in first-year composition classes, where they help students meet learning objectives aligned with professional standards from organizations like the Conference on College Composition and Communication. The benefits of emphasizing concision extend to improved clarity in student essays and preparation for professional communication. Concise writing promotes reader comprehension by minimizing , allowing learners to focus on core ideas without distraction from superfluous details, as supported by principles from Purdue University's resources on . Furthermore, evidence from indicates that writing summaries—a form of concise expression—enhances recall of included key points compared to omitted details, though it does not necessarily improve overall retention beyond re-reading activities, as shown in experimental tests where summarized items were recalled more accurately than non-summarized ones. This prepares students for real-world demands, such as succinct reporting in business or academia, enhancing overall communicative efficacy.

In Literature and Journalism

In literature, concision serves as a powerful stylistic tool to heighten emotional impact and invite reader interpretation, often by omitting explicit details to suggest deeper meanings. exemplified this approach through his "," where the surface narrative reveals only a fraction of the story, leaving much implied beneath. In The Old Man and the Sea (1952), Hemingway's sparse prose—employing simple language, metaphors like the sail resembling a "defeated flag," and interior monologues—conveys themes of endurance and isolation without overt explanation, creating poetic depth through brevity. This technique, rooted in modern literary evolution, amplifies the narrative's resonance by engaging readers actively in uncovering subtext. Haiku poetry further illustrates concision's structural brevity, constraining expression to approximately 17 syllables or morae in traditional Japanese forms to capture a fleeting moment with precision and suggestion. This form relies on —often a seasonal reference () and a cutting word ()—to evoke profound insights without elaboration, as seen in Matsuo Bashō's works where fosters and perceptual . English-language adaptations maintain this emphasis on economy, prioritizing clarity and reader inference over syllable count, which distinguishes from longer poetic traditions. In , concision manifests through the inverted pyramid structure, which prioritizes essential facts at the outset to deliver information efficiently amid time constraints. Emerging in the mid-19th century with telegraph use and solidified by the in the early , this format arranges content in descending order of importance, enabling quick comprehension and reducing reader fatigue by allowing skimming without loss of core details. The Stylebook reinforces this by advocating brevity in grammar, abbreviations, and phrasing to ensure clarity and accuracy across outlets. corroborate these benefits, showing that shorter, concise articles correlate with higher completion rates and sustained engagement, as readers are more likely to finish streamlined pieces compared to verbose ones. In , concision is essential to minimize ambiguity and ensure accessibility, particularly through the plain language movement that seeks to replace verbose legalese with straightforward terms. The U.S. Plain Writing Act of 2010 mandates that federal agencies use clear, concise language in documents intended for the public, such as regulations and guidance, to enhance understanding and compliance. This approach extends to private legal practice, where simplifying contracts reduces misinterpretation; for instance, replacing phrases like "party of the first part" with "buyer" and restructuring complex sentences into short, active-voice clauses improves readability without sacrificing precision. Such reforms, advocated by organizations like the , have led to model plain-language statutes in states like New York, limiting litigation over unclear consumer contracts valued under $50,000. In technical writing, concision promotes clarity in manuals, reports, and specifications, adhering to standards that emphasize active voice, bullet points, and logical structure to guide users efficiently. The Society for Technical Communication (STC) endorses these practices in its ethical guidelines, recommending avoidance of passive constructions and redundant phrasing to ensure documents are accessible to diverse audiences, including non-experts. For example, technical manuals often use bullet points to delineate steps—such as "1. Connect the device to power; 2. Press the start button"—rather than lengthy paragraphs, which aligns with university guidelines for engineering documentation that prioritize brevity and readability. This focus on economy helps prevent errors in implementation, as seen in aviation maintenance where concise instructions reduce rework and safety risks. Lack of concision in these domains carries significant risks, including misinterpretation that can lead to legal challenges or operational failures. In legal contexts, ambiguous have prompted appeals; for instance, in Gilmore v. Taylor (1993), the U.S. reviewed a vague instruction on , clarifying that such warrants scrutiny if it risks erroneous interpretations by jurors. Similarly, in patent , indefinite claims due to unclear language can invalidate entire patents, as established in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. (2014), where the ruled that claims must inform skilled artisans of boundaries with reasonable certainty, overturning overly vague formulations. For technical instructions, unclear wording has caused real-world errors, highlighting how contributes to safety hazards and financial losses.

Concision in Computing

Principles in Programming

In , concision refers to the practice of writing code that is efficient and free of redundancy, prioritizing clarity and simplicity to enhance overall program quality. This principle aligns with broader values, such as those in agile methodologies emerging in the early , which emphasize iterative development and lean practices to reduce waste, including duplicated efforts in code. A foundational tenet of concision is the (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, which advocates avoiding duplication of knowledge or logic across a system to prevent inconsistencies and errors during maintenance. Introduced by Andrew Hunt and David Thomas in their 1999 book , DRY encourages abstraction through functions, modules, or classes to encapsulate repeated code, thereby streamlining development and updates. Similarly, the , formalized in Python Enhancement Proposal (PEP) 20 in 2004, encapsulates this ethos with aphorisms like "Simple is better than complex" and "Readability counts," guiding developers toward succinct yet expressive code in Python and influencing similar philosophies in other languages. These principles yield significant benefits for code and . Empirical studies have shown a negative between code —often manifested as or —and , with simpler structures enabling faster comprehension and fewer bugs in large-scale projects. For instance, refactoring verbose loops into concise list comprehensions in Python can reduce code length by up to 50% while preserving intent, making it easier for teams to review and modify. Consider this transformation: Verbose loop example:

squares = [] for x in range(10): if x % 2 == 0: squares.append(x ** 2)

squares = [] for x in range(10): if x % 2 == 0: squares.append(x ** 2)

Concise list comprehension:

squares = [x ** 2 for x in range(10) if x % 2 == 0]

squares = [x ** 2 for x in range(10) if x % 2 == 0]

Such refactors improve maintainability by minimizing cognitive load, as supported by analyses of code constructs in Java programs where reduced complexity directly enhanced developer productivity. However, concision must balance with clarity to avoid trade-offs that undermine these gains. Over-optimization for brevity, such as excessive nesting or cryptic abbreviations, can sacrifice readability, leading to harder debugging and higher long-term costs. Coding standards like Google's Python Style Guide explicitly recommend prioritizing readability over micro-optimizations, advising small functions under 40 lines and avoiding complex comprehensions that obscure logic. This approach ensures concise code remains approachable, aligning with the principle that simplicity enhances, rather than complicates, software evolution.

Tools and Practices

In computing, tools such as linters and formatters play a crucial role in enforcing concision by automating the detection and correction of redundant or verbose code structures. , a static code analyzer for Python developed in 2003 by Logilab and actively maintained thereafter, identifies issues like unused variables, redundant imports, and overly long functions, thereby reducing and promoting succinctness without manual review. Similarly, Prettier, an opinionated code formatter for and related languages initiated in 2016 by James Long and publicly released in 2017, automatically reformats code to eliminate stylistic inconsistencies, such as excessive whitespace or irregular indentation, which often lead to unnecessarily lengthy scripts. Other notable tools include , a Python code formatter released in 2018 that enforces a consistent style to minimize unnecessary variations and promote brevity, and , a pluggable linter started in 2012 that detects and fixes problematic patterns, including redundant code. These tools integrate into development workflows via editors like VS Code, enabling developers to maintain concise codebases efficiently. Best practices in programming further advance concision through paradigms and processes that favor brevity. in languages like enables succinct expressions by leveraging higher-order functions, immutability, and composition, allowing complex logic to be distilled into fewer lines compared to imperative approaches—for instance, list comprehensions and /filter operations replace verbose loops. This paradigm reduces and error-prone repetition, as evidenced in Haskell's design philosophy since its 1990 inception. Integrating systems like supports iterative concision by facilitating small, atomic commits that allow safe refactoring; developers can trim redundant code across revisions while preserving history, fostering cleaner collaboration in team environments. Such practices align with foundational programming principles by emphasizing modularity and reuse over expansion. Case studies from open-source projects illustrate the impact of these tools and practices on concision and collaboration. The , with its codebase exceeding 40 million lines of as of 2025, enforces terse coding through a strict that mandates functions limited to one or two screenfuls (roughly 80x24 characters), no more than 5-10 local variables per function, and an 80-column line limit to avoid verbosity. This approach minimizes redundancy by requiring the use of existing kernel macros and helper functions, which enhances and speeds up contributions from thousands of global developers. By integrating linters like sparse for C and for versioned patches, the kernel community has sustained collaborative efficiency.

Techniques and Challenges

Strategies for Concision

One effective strategy for achieving concision involves replacing verbose phrases with single words or shorter equivalents, such as substituting "at this point in time" with "now" or "due to the fact that" with "because." This technique, outlined in the Paramedic Method, also includes circling prepositional phrases (e.g., "of the," "in the") and converting them to more direct forms to eliminate unnecessary padding. Additionally, employing over passive constructions enhances brevity; for instance, "The ball was thrown by the boy" becomes "The boy threw the ball," reducing words while maintaining clarity. Questioning every word's necessity—by asking if its removal alters meaning—further refines text, as recommended in guidelines that emphasize using the strongest, most effective words. Revision processes play a crucial role in cultivating concision. Word count reduction exercises encourage writers to target specific cuts, such as trimming a 25-word sentence to 9 words by eliminating redundancies and wind-ups like "The point I wish to make is." Reading drafts aloud helps detect redundancy and awkward phrasing, as the ear often catches repetitions or filler words that the eye overlooks during silent . Peer complements this by involving others in identifying wordy sections, providing fresh perspectives to ensure essential content remains while excess is pruned. Adapting concision to specific mediums requires tailored approaches. In email writing, prioritize brevity by limiting body paragraphs to four or five sentences, using bullet points for lists, and avoiding repetitive qualifiers to respect the recipient's time. For abstracts, focus on distilling key elements—background, methods, findings, and implications—into 150-250 words by starting with an overlong draft and editing down, ensuring each sentence advances the core message without extraneous details. Quantifiable goals, such as aiming for a significant reduction in initial drafts through these methods, help maintain focus and improve overall impact.

Common Pitfalls

One common error undermining concision is the use of unnecessary qualifiers, such as "very unique" or "basically unnecessary," which add little value while inflating word count. These modifiers often weaken precision, as in the sentence "The report was essentially complete in a fairly short period of time," which can be streamlined to "The report was complete quickly." Overuse of represents another frequent pitfall, leading to wordier constructions that obscure agency and reduce clarity. For instance, "The experiment was conducted by the researchers using advanced equipment" employs seven words where the active "Researchers conducted the experiment using advanced equipment" uses five, potentially signaling imprecise thinking to readers. Jargon inflation, or excessive reliance on specialized terms without necessity, further erodes concision by complicating comprehension for broader audiences. An example is replacing simple phrases like "use resources" with "leverage synergies," which obscures meaning without enhancing substance. Psychological factors often drive these errors, including a desire to appear more or to preemptively ensure clarity, prompting writers to overcompensate with . Non-native English speakers, in particular, may inflate due to perceived needs for scientific rigor or rhetorical emphasis, stemming from inadequate training in academic style. In the age of AI writing tools as of 2025, an emerging pitfall is over-reliance on generative models, which frequently produce verbose or generic output that requires substantial human editing to achieve concision. Such pitfalls yield consequences like reduced reader attention and cognitive overload, as verbose text bores audiences and obscures key messages. Studies indicate that excessive wordiness confuses readers, diluting argument impact and prompting disengagement. To self-audit, writers can count words in drafts or read aloud to detect , though deeper strategies address root causes.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/concision
  2. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/concise
  3. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/conciseness/index.html
  4. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/conciseness-handout/
  5. https://www.montana.edu/writingcenter/writing_resources/concision.html
  6. https://writing.ku.edu/conciseness-and-eliminating-wordiness
  7. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/concision
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/concision
  9. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/writing-techniques/conciseness/
  10. https://thehabit.co/concision-and-brevity-not-the-same-thing/
  11. https://communicationprogram.wharton.upenn.edu/library/communicating-concisely/
  12. https://russelhirst.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/virtues-vices-of-omission.pdf
  13. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37134/37134-h/37134-h.htm
  14. https://reagle.org/joseph/2015/12/williams-2014-style-11th-ch9-concision.pdf
  15. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/
  16. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/isocrates/
  17. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/8A*.html
  18. https://iep.utm.edu/aesop/
  19. https://anthology.lib.virginia.edu/work/Wordsworth/wordsworth-preface
  20. https://faculty.csbsju.edu/dbeach/beautytruth/Wordsworth-PrefaceLB.pdf
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322520338_Ernest_Hemingway_The_Complexity_of_Simplicity
  22. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/
  23. https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-534
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337123139_Causal_Effects_of_Brevity_on_Style_and_Success_in_Social_Media
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1885902/
  26. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/paramedic_method.html
  27. https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/postsecondarywriting/
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285463001_Does_Writing_Summaries_Improve_Memory_for_Text
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370676154_Ernest_Hemingway%27s_Iceberg_Narrative_Method_of_The_Old_Man_and_the_Sea
  30. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/1/1646.pdf
  31. https://thehaikufoundation.org/juxta/juxta-4-1/the-pig-and-the-boar-the-limits-to-brevity-and-simplicity-in-haiku/
  32. https://www.dna.caltech.edu/Papers/Record-Abdulla-Haiku-translation2016.pdf
  33. https://www.journalistik-dortmund.de/fileadmin/Mitarbeiter/Poettker/Aufsaetze/Poettker__News_and_Its_Communicative_Quality-_the_inverted_pyramid-_when_and_why_did_it_appear.pdf
  34. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/journalism_and_journalistic_writing/ap_style.html
  35. https://chartbeat.com/resources/articles/is-there-an-optimal-article-length-the-relationship-between-word-count-and-engagement/
  36. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/legal-ethics-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2024/03/GT-GJLE230044.pdf
  37. https://www.stc.org/about-stc/ethical-principles-for-technical-communicators/
  38. https://engineering.usu.edu/students/ewc/writing-resources/technical-writing-standards
  39. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/201216.pdf
  40. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/91-1738.ZC.html
  41. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-270_8nj8.pdf
  42. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/pdfs/guide.pdf
  43. https://peps.python.org/pep-0020/
  44. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01760
  45. https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html
  46. https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html#27-comprehensions--generator-expressions
  47. https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html#318-function-length
  48. https://docs.pylint.org/intro.html
  49. https://prettier.io/blog/2018/01/10/1.10.0
  50. https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
  51. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/
  52. https://github.com/prettier/prettier
  53. https://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/functional-programming.html
  54. https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-git/about-git
  55. https://github.com/resources/articles/what-is-version-control
  56. https://www.stackscale.com/blog/linux-kernel-surpasses-40-million-lines-code/
  57. https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-style.html
  58. https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/editing-and-proofreading
  59. https://www.boisestate.edu/writingcenter/professional-email-guide/
  60. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/abstracts/
  61. https://www.iup.edu/scholarlycommunication/our-writing-resources/clarity-and-conciseness.html
  62. https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/very-unique-and-absolute-adjectives
  63. https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/passive-voice/
  64. https://exac.hms.harvard.edu/make-a-sentence
  65. https://armyuniversity.edu/cgsc/cgss/dsfm/files/ImproveYourWriting.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338261913_Writing_Intelligible_English_Prose_Concision_vs_Verbosity
  67. https://rrlinguistics.ru/en/journal/article/3417/
  68. https://www.thetransmitter.org/from-bench-to-bot/from-bench-to-bot-why-ai-powered-writing-may-not-deliver-on-its-promise/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.