Hubbry Logo
PolymathPolymathMain
Open search
Polymath
Community hub
Polymath
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Polymath
Polymath
Polymath
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Portrait of Benjamin Franklin by David Martin, 1767. Benjamin Franklin is one of the foremost polymaths in US history. Franklin was a writer, scientist, inventor, statesman, diplomat, printer and political philosopher. He further attained a legacy as one of the Founding Fathers of the United States.

A polymath[a][1] or polyhistor[b][2] is an individual whose knowledge spans many different subjects, known to draw on complex bodies of knowledge to solve specific problems. Polymaths often prefer a specific context in which to explain their knowledge, but some are gifted at explaining abstractly and creatively.[3]

Embodying a basic tenet of Renaissance humanism that humans are limitless in their capacity for development, the concept led to the notion that people should embrace all knowledge and develop their capacities as fully as possible. This is expressed in the term Renaissance man, often applied to the gifted people of that age who sought to develop their abilities in all areas of accomplishment: intellectual, artistic, social, physical, and spiritual.

Etymology

[edit]

The word polymath derives from the Greek roots poly-, which means "much" or "many," and manthanein, which means "to learn."[4] Plutarch wrote that the Ancient Greek muse Polyhymnia was sometimes known as Polymatheia, describing her as responsible for "that faculty of the soul which inclines to attain and keep knowledge."[5]

In Western Europe, the first work to use the term polymathy in its title, De Polymathia tractatio: integri operis de studiis veterum (A Treatise on Polymathy: The Complete Work on the Studies of the Ancients), was published in 1603 by Johann von Wowern, a Hamburg philosopher.[6][7][8] Von Wowern defined polymathy as "knowledge of various matters, drawn from all kinds of studies ... ranging freely through all the fields of the disciplines, as far as the human mind, with unwearied industry, is able to pursue them".[6] Von Wowern lists erudition, literature, philology, philomathy, and polyhistory as synonyms.

The earliest recorded use of the term in the English language is from 1624, in the second edition of The Anatomy of Melancholy by Robert Burton;[9] the form polymathist is slightly older, first appearing in the Diatribae upon the first part of the late History of Tithes of Richard Montagu in 1621.[10] Use in English of the similar term polyhistor dates from the late 16th century.[11]

Renaissance man

[edit]
"Renaissance man" redirects here. For other uses, see Renaissance Man.
Portrait of Sir Christopher Wren by Godfrey Kneller, 1711. Best known as an architect, Christopher Wren was also an astronomer, mathematician and physicist

The term "Renaissance man" was first recorded in written English in the early 20th century.[12] It is used to refer to great thinkers living before, during, or after the Renaissance. Leonardo da Vinci has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man of "unquenchable curiosity" and "feverishly inventive imagination".[13] Many notable polymaths[c] lived during the Renaissance period, a cultural movement that spanned roughly the 14th through to the 17th century that began in Italy in the Late Middle Ages and later spread to the rest of Europe. These polymaths had a rounded approach to education that reflected the ideals of the humanists of the time. A gentleman or courtier of that era was expected to speak several languages, play a musical instrument, write poetry, and so on; thus fulfilling the Renaissance ideal.

The idea of a universal education was essential to achieving polymath ability, hence the word university was used to describe a seat of learning. However, the original Latin word universitas refers in general to "a number of persons associated into one body, a society, company, community, guild, corporation, etc".[14] At this time, universities did not specialize in specific areas, but rather trained students in a broad array of science, philosophy, and theology. This universal education gave them a grounding from which they could continue into apprenticeship toward becoming a master of a specific field.

When someone is called a "Renaissance man" today, it is meant that rather than simply having broad interests or superficial knowledge in several fields, the individual possesses a more profound knowledge and a proficiency, or even an expertise, in at least some of those fields.[15] Some dictionaries use the term "Renaissance man" to describe someone with many interests or talents,[16] while others give a meaning restricted to the Renaissance and more closely related to Renaissance ideals.

In academia

[edit]

Robert Root-Bernstein and colleagues

[edit]

Robert Root-Bernstein is considered the principal responsible for rekindling interest in polymathy in the scientific community.[17][18] His works emphasize the contrast between the polymath and two other types: the specialist and the dilettante. The specialist demonstrates depth but lacks breadth of knowledge. The dilettante demonstrates superficial breadth but tends to acquire skills merely "for their own sake without regard to understanding the broader applications or implications and without integrating it".[19]: 857  Conversely, the polymath is a person with a level of expertise that is able to "put a significant amount of time and effort into their avocations and find ways to use their multiple interests to inform their vocations".[20]: 857 [21][22][23][24]

A key point in the work of Root-Bernstein and colleagues is the argument in favor of the universality of the creative process. That is, although creative products, such as a painting, a mathematical model or a poem, can be domain-specific, at the level of the creative process, the mental tools that lead to the generation of creative ideas are the same, be it in the arts or science.[22] These mental tools are sometimes called intuitive tools of thinking. It is therefore not surprising that many of the most innovative scientists have serious hobbies or interests in artistic activities, and that some of the most innovative artists have an interest or hobbies in the sciences.[20][23][25][26]

Root-Bernstein and colleagues' research is an important counterpoint to the claim by some psychologists that creativity is a domain-specific phenomenon. Through their research, Root-Bernstein and colleagues conclude that there are certain comprehensive thinking skills and tools that cross the barrier of different domains and can foster creative thinking: "[creativity researchers] who discuss integrating ideas from diverse fields as the basis of creative giftedness ask not 'who is creative?' but 'what is the basis of creative thinking?' From the polymathy perspective, giftedness is the ability to combine disparate (or even apparently contradictory) ideas, sets of problems, skills, talents, and knowledge in novel and useful ways. Polymathy is therefore the main source of any individual's creative potential".[19]: 857  In "Life Stages of Creativity", Robert and Michèle Root-Bernstein suggest six typologies of creative life stages. These typologies are based on real creative production records first published by Root-Bernstein, Bernstein, and Garnier (1993).

  • Type 1 represents people who specialize in developing one major talent early in life (e.g., prodigies) and successfully exploit that talent exclusively for the rest of their lives.
  • Type 2 individuals explore a range of different creative activities (e.g., through worldplay or a variety of hobbies) and then settle on exploiting one of these for the rest of their lives.
  • Type 3 people are polymathic from the outset and manage to juggle multiple careers simultaneously so that their creativity pattern is constantly varied.
  • Type 4 creators are recognized early for one major talent (e.g., math or music) but go on to explore additional creative outlets, diversifying their productivity with age.
  • Type 5 creators devote themselves serially to one creative field after another.
  • Type 6 people develop diversified creative skills early and then, like Type 5 individuals, explore these serially, one at a time.

Finally, his studies suggest that understanding polymathy and learning from polymathic exemplars can help structure a new model of education that better promotes creativity and innovation: "we must focus education on principles, methods, and skills that will serve them [students] in learning and creating across many disciplines, multiple careers, and succeeding life stages".[27]: 161 

Peter Burke

[edit]

Peter Burke, Professor Emeritus of Cultural History and Fellow of Emmanuel College at Cambridge, discussed the theme of polymathy in some of his works. He has presented a comprehensive historical overview of the ascension and decline of the polymath as, what he calls, an "intellectual species".[28][29][30]

He observes that in ancient and medieval times, scholars did not have to specialize. However, from the 17th century on, the rapid rise of new knowledge in the Western world—both from the systematic investigation of the natural world and from the flow of information coming from other parts of the world—was making it increasingly difficult for individual scholars to master as many disciplines as before. Thus, an intellectual retreat of the polymath species occurred: "from knowledge in every [academic] field to knowledge in several fields, and from making original contributions in many fields to a more passive consumption of what has been contributed by others".[31]: 72 

Given this change in the intellectual climate, it has since then been more common to find "passive polymaths", who consume knowledge in various domains but make their reputation in one single discipline, than "proper polymaths", who—through a feat of "intellectual heroism"—manage to make serious contributions to several disciplines. However, Burke warns that in the age of specialization, polymathic people are more necessary than ever, both for synthesis—to paint the big picture—and for analysis. He says: "It takes a polymath to 'mind the gap' and draw attention to the knowledges that may otherwise disappear into the spaces between disciplines, as they are currently defined and organized".[32]: 183 

Bharath Sriraman

[edit]

Bharath Sriraman, of the University of Montana, also investigated the role of polymathy in education. He poses that an ideal education should nurture talent in the classroom and enable individuals to pursue multiple fields of research and appreciate both the aesthetic and structural/scientific connections between mathematics, arts and the sciences.[33]

In 2009, Sriraman published a paper reporting a 3-year study with 120 pre-service mathematics teachers and derived several implications for mathematics pre-service education as well as interdisciplinary education.[18] He utilized a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to recreate the emotions, voices and struggles of students as they tried to unravel Russell's paradox presented in its linguistic form. They found that those more engaged in solving the paradox also displayed more polymathic thinking traits. He concludes by suggesting that fostering polymathy in the classroom may help students change beliefs, discover structures and open new avenues for interdisciplinary pedagogy.[18]

Kaufman, Beghetto and colleagues

[edit]

James C. Kaufman, from the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut, and Ronald A. Beghetto, from the same university, investigated the possibility that everyone could have the potential for polymathy as well as the issue of the domain-generality or domain-specificity of creativity.[34][35]

Based on their earlier four-c model of creativity, Beghetto and Kaufman[36][37] proposed a typology of polymathy, ranging from the ubiquitous mini-c polymathy to the eminent but rare Big-C polymathy, as well as a model with some requirements for a person (polymath or not) to be able to reach the highest levels of creative accomplishment. They account for three general requirements—intelligence, motivation to be creative, and an environment that allows creative expression—that are needed for any attempt at creativity to succeed. Then, depending on the domain of choice, more specific abilities will be required. The more that one's abilities and interests match the requirements of a domain, the better. While some will develop their specific skills and motivations for specific domains, polymathic people will display intrinsic motivation (and the ability) to pursue a variety of subject matters across different domains.[37]

Regarding the interplay of polymathy and education, they suggest that rather than asking whether every student has multicreative potential, educators might more actively nurture the multicreative potential of their students. As an example, the authors cite that teachers should encourage students to make connections across disciplines, use different forms of media to express their reasoning/understanding (e.g., drawings, movies, and other forms of visual media).[34]

Waqas Ahmed

[edit]

In his 2018 book The Polymath, British author Waqas Ahmed defines polymaths as those who have made significant contributions to at least three different fields.[18] Rather than seeing polymaths as exceptionally gifted, he argues that every human being has the potential to become one: that people naturally have multiple interests and talents.[38] He contrasts this polymathic nature against what he calls "the cult of specialisation".[39] For example, education systems stifle this nature by forcing learners to specialise in narrow topics.[38] The book argues that specialisation encouraged by the production lines of the Industrial Revolution is counter-productive both to the individual and wider society. It suggests that the complex problems of the 21st century need the versatility, creativity, and broad perspectives characteristic of polymaths.[38]

For individuals, Ahmed says, specialisation is dehumanising and stifles their full range of expression whereas polymathy "is a powerful means to social and intellectual emancipation" which enables a more fulfilling life.[40] In terms of social progress, he argues that answers to specific problems often come from combining knowledge and skills from multiple areas, and that many important problems are multi-dimensional in nature and cannot be fully understood through one specialism.[40] Rather than interpreting polymathy as a mix of occupations or of intellectual interests, Ahmed urges a breaking of the "thinker"/"doer" dichotomy and the art/science dichotomy. He argues that an orientation towards action and towards thinking support each other, and that human beings flourish by pursuing a diversity of experiences as well as a diversity of knowledge. He observes that successful people in many fields have cited hobbies and other "peripheral" activities as supplying skills or insights that helped them succeed.[41]

Ahmed examines evidence suggesting that developing multiple talents and perspectives is helpful for success in a highly specialised field. He cites a study of Nobel Prize-winning scientists which found them 25 times more likely to sing, dance, or act than average scientists.[42] Another study found that children scored higher in IQ tests after having drum lessons, and he uses such research to argue that diversity of domains can enhance a person's general intelligence.[43]

Ahmed cites many historical claims for the advantages of polymathy. Some of these are about general intellectual abilities that polymaths apply across multiple domains. For example, Aristotle wrote that full understanding of a topic requires, in addition to subject knowledge, a general critical thinking ability that can assess how that knowledge was arrived at.[44] Another advantage of a polymathic mindset is in the application of multiple approaches to understanding a single issue. Ahmed cites biologist E. O. Wilson's view that reality is approached not by a single academic discipline but via a consilience between them.[45] One argument for studying multiple approaches is that it leads to open-mindedness. Within any one perspective, a question may seem to have a straightforward, settled answer. Someone aware of different, contrasting answers will be more open-minded and aware of the limitations of their own knowledge. The importance of recognising these limitations is a theme that Ahmed finds in many thinkers, including Confucius, Ali ibn Abi Talib, and Nicolas of Cusa. He calls it "the essential mark of the polymath."[45] A further argument for multiple approaches is that a polymath does not see diverse approaches as diverse, because they see connections where other people see differences. For example da Vinci advanced multiple fields by applying mathematical principles to each.[46]

Examples

[edit]
Further information: List of Renaissance figures

Polymaths include the scholars and thinkers of the Renaissance and Enlightenment, who excelled at several fields in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and the arts. In the Italian Renaissance, the idea of the polymath was allegedly expressed by Leon Battista Alberti (1404–1472), a polymath himself, in the statement that "a man can do all things if he will".[47] Leonardo da Vinci is often used as the archetypal example of a polymath.[13]

Many polymaths did not identify as such, since the term was first coined in the 17th century; they were instead described as polymaths by later historians.[6] This includes several philosophers of Ancient Greece and the Islamic Golden Age. Whether or not a person is a polymath is often a subject of debate because of the term's broad definition by nature.

Well-known polymaths include:

  • Abu Bakr al-Razi – Persian physician, philosopher and alchemist (c. 864 or 865–925 or 935)
  • Archimedes – Ancient Greek mathematician and physicist (c. 287–212 BC)
  • Eratosthenes – Ancient Greek mathematician and geographer (276–195 BC)
  • Aristotle – Ancient Greek philosopher and scientist (384–322 BC)
  • Hypatia – Alexandrian philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician (c. 350/370 – 415)
  • Ibn al-Haytham – Arab physicist, mathematician, and astronomer (c. 965 – c. 1040)
  • Avicenna – Persian physician and philosopher (c. 980–1037)
  • Omar Khayyam – Persian mathematician and poet (1048–1131)
  • Hemchandra – Indian scholar, poet, mathematician, philosopher (1088–1172)
  • Hildegard of Bingen – German composer, writer, and nun (c. 1098–1179)
  • Averroes – Andalusian jurist and philosopher (1126–1198)
  • Maimonides – Jewish philosopher, physician, and Torah scholar (1135–1204)
  • Frederick II – Holy Roman Emperor and scholar (1194–1250)
  • Leonardo da Vinci – Italian polymath (1452–1519)
  • Nicolaus Copernicus – Prussian canon, mathematician, astronomer, physician, and economist (1473–1543)
  • René Descartes – French philosopher and mathematician (1596–1650)
  • Robert Hooke – English scientist and architect (1635–1703)
  • Blaise Pascal – French mathematician, inventor, and writer (1623–1662)
  • Isaac Newton – English mathematician, physicist, and alchemist (1643–1727)
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz – German philosopher, scientist, and diplomat (1645–1716)
  • Benjamin Franklin – American Founding Father and statesman (1706–1790)
  • Leonhard Euler – Swiss mathematician and scientist (1707–1783)
  • Mikhail Lomonosov – Russian scientist and writer (1711–1765)
  • Thomas Jefferson – American Founding Father and president (1743–1826)
  • Pierre-Simon Laplace – French physicist, astronomer, and philosopher (1749–1827)
  • Johann Wolfgang von Goethe – German author and scientist (1749–1832)
  • Alexander von Humboldt – German geographer, naturalist, and explorer (1769–1859)
  • Sequoyah – Cherokee neographer and diplomat (c. 1770–1843)
  • Thomas Young – British physicist, linguist, and Egyptologist (1773–1829)
  • Mary Somerville – Scottish mathematician, writer, and astronomer (1780–1872)
  • William Whewell – English poet and mathematician (1794–1866)
  • Thomas Edison – American inventor and businessman (1847–1931)
  • Henri Poincaré – French mathematician, physicist, and engineer (1854–1912)
  • Nikola Tesla – Serbian-American engineer and inventor (1856–1943)
  • Rabindranath Tagore – Indian poet, philosopher, and novelist (1861–1941)
  • Agnes Forbes Blackadder – medical expert, historian and suffragist (1875–1964)
  • Franz Nopcsa von Felső-Szilvás – Hungarian adventurer, Albanologist, geologist, hijacker, paleontologist, scholar, and spy (1877–1933)
  • John von Neumann – Hungarian-American mathematician and physicist (1903–1957)
  • Alan Turing – English computer scientist and philosopher (1912–1954)
  • Hedy Lamarr – Austrian and American actress and inventor (1914–2000)
[edit]

Aside from Renaissance man, similar terms in use are homo universalis (Latin) and uomo universale (Italian), which translate to 'universal man'.[1] The related term generalist—contrasted with a specialist—is used to describe a person with a general approach to knowledge.

The term universal genius or versatile genius is also used, with Leonardo da Vinci as the prime example again. The term is used especially for people who made lasting contributions in at least one of the fields in which they were actively involved and when they took a universality of approach.

When a person is described as having encyclopedic knowledge, they exhibit a vast scope of knowledge. However, this designation may be anachronistic in the case of persons such as Eratosthenes, whose reputation for having encyclopedic knowledge predates the existence of any encyclopedic object.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Polymath

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A polymath is a with wide-ranging or learning, whose expertise spans multiple diverse fields and enables innovative connections and contributions that go beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. The term derives from polumathēs (πολυμαθής), meaning "having learned much," and entered English in the early 17th century, with its earliest recorded use in 1624 by in . Historically, the polymath archetype emerged in , exemplified by (384–322 BCE), a philosopher, scientist, and polymath whose prolific works spanned logic, , , physics, and , profoundly shaping Western thought. During the Renaissance, polymathy flourished amid the revival of classical learning, the invention of printing, and scientific exploration, with (1452–1519) as its quintessential figure—an Italian polymath renowned for masterpieces like the , pioneering anatomical studies, engineering designs such as flying machines, and observations in and . In the Enlightenment era, (1706–1790) embodied the ideal as an American polymath who advanced electricity through his , invented the and , and played key roles in diplomacy, publishing, and the founding of the . The 19th and 20th centuries saw polymaths like (1903–1957), a Hungarian-American mathematician whose groundbreaking work in , , (including contributions to the and the architecture of modern computers), and economics highlighted interdisciplinary genius. However, the rise of academic specialization and professional silos in the modern era has rendered comprehensive polymathy increasingly rare, though figures such as Oliver Sacks (1933–2015), a neurologist, , and amateur who bridged , , and the arts, demonstrate its enduring value in fostering holistic innovation. Today, the polymath concept inspires efforts in interdisciplinary research, education, and problem-solving amid complex global challenges.

Origins and Terminology

Etymology

The term "polymath" originates from the polymathēs (πολυμαθής), meaning "having learned much" or "knowing much," a compound formed from poly- ("many" or "much," from the pele- "to fill") and manthanō ("to learn," from the mendh- "to learn"). This etymological foundation underscores the idea of broad intellectual acquisition rather than specialized mastery. The term appears in ancient texts, such as those by , to describe individuals of extensive learning. The first documented use of "polymath" in English dates to 1624, appearing in the second edition of Robert Burton's , where it referred to individuals of extensive and varied learning. Prior to the coinage of the modern term, ancient figures like exemplified the polymathic archetype through their comprehensive contributions to , , , and logic, embodying wide-ranging expertise without contemporary labeling.

Definition and Historical Evolution

A polymath is defined as an individual whose knowledge and expertise span multiple distinct fields, typically achieving professional-level proficiency in at least three unrelated disciplines, such as , , and . This breadth distinguishes polymaths from mere generalists, emphasizing deep, integrated mastery that enables innovative problem-solving across domains. Unlike a dilettante, who pursues superficial interests without substantial achievement, a polymath demonstrates verifiable contributions and expertise recognized within those fields. Historically, the concept of the polymath evolved from ancient ideals of "universal scholars" in Greco-Roman times, where figures were expected to encompass encyclopedic knowledge across , , and natural sciences as a hallmark of virtue. This persisted through the medieval and periods but began to wane in the 19th and early 20th centuries with the rise of institutionalized specialization in academia and industry, which prioritized narrow expertise over broad erudition, rendering true polymathy increasingly rare. The shift reflected broader societal changes, including the of disciplines and the explosion of knowledge in the industrial era, which made comprehensive mastery across fields practically unattainable for most. In the 21st century, polymathy has experienced a revival driven by the demands of interdisciplinary challenges in areas like and , where siloed knowledge often proves insufficient for complex, systemic problems. Contemporary definitions now incorporate elements of adaptability, cross-domain innovation, and the ability to synthesize insights from diverse sources, facilitated by digital tools that democratize access to . This evolution positions polymaths as key contributors to holistic solutions in an interconnected world, echoing ancient ideals while adapting to modern complexities.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Polymaths

In , (384–322 BCE) embodied the ideal of encyclopedic scholarship, authoring works that advanced through systematic logic and metaphysics, via detailed classifications of over 500 animal species, physics in treatises on motion and natural change, and in analyses of governance forms. His academy promoted integrated inquiry across disciplines, reflecting a cultural emphasis on holistic wisdom over specialization. During the Roman era, (23–79 CE) exemplified polymathy through his Naturalis Historia, a 37-volume encyclopedia compiling knowledge from more than 2,000 sources on topics including astronomy, , zoology, botany, ethnography, medicine, and fine arts, aiming to catalog the entirety of Roman-understood nature and human endeavor. This monumental effort underscored the Roman valorization of practical, imperial-scale knowledge accumulation. The (8th–13th centuries) produced polymaths like , whose synthesized Greek, Persian, and Indian medical knowledge into a standard text used for centuries, while his philosophical works reconciled Aristotelian logic with Islamic theology, and his contributions extended to astronomy (e.g., planetary motion models) and mathematics (e.g., geometric proofs). Similarly, (973–1050) pioneered anthropological insights in Indica by objectively documenting Indian customs, religion, and society without bias; advanced through accurate measurements using trigonometric methods; and contributed to physics via experimental studies in , dynamics, and , including density determinations. In medieval , Hildegard of Bingen (1098–1179), a Benedictine abbess, fused theology with empirical observation in visionary texts like , which explored divine creation, and practical works such as Physica and Causae et Curae, detailing botanical remedies, humoral medicine, and musical theory for healing, drawing on over 200 plants and integrating them with Christian doctrine. Her compositions, including the Symphonia armonie celestium revelationum, further linked music to cosmology and spirituality. These eras' polymathy was enabled by cultural contexts lacking modern disciplinary silos: encouraged broad dialectic pursuit, as seen in Aristotle's integrated ; Roman equestrian , like Pliny's service under emperors, funded expansive compilations; the thrived on caliphal support for translation houses (e.g., Baghdad's Bayt al-Hikma) and religious imperatives to seek knowledge, blending faith with science; and medieval European , amid feudal , allowed figures like to synthesize , , and arts within religious scholarship.

Renaissance Polymaths and the 'Renaissance Man' Concept

The Renaissance marked a pivotal era for polymathy, driven by the humanist revival that emphasized the rediscovery and emulation of classical Greek and Roman learning. In Italy, particularly Florence under Medici patronage, this movement fostered the ideal of the uomo universale, or "universal man," an individual capable of excelling across diverse intellectual and practical domains. This concept, first articulated by the architect and theorist Leon Battista Alberti in the 15th century, promoted the notion that a person could achieve mastery in multiple fields through rigorous education in the studia humanitatis—grammar, rhetoric, poetry, history, and moral philosophy—drawing from ancient texts to cultivate well-rounded virtue and eloquence. The term "Renaissance man," however, emerged later as a label coined in the by Swiss historian in his seminal work The Civilization of the in (1860). Burckhardt used it to describe 15th- and 16th-century Italian figures who embodied multifaceted genius amid the era's cultural dynamism, portraying them as "the first-born among the sons of modern " who broke free from medieval constraints to pursue individual autonomy in politics, art, and science. Key characteristics of this ideal included proficiency in the arts (such as and music), sciences ( and ), humanities ( and ), and practical skills like , , and , all unified by a belief in as the measure of the . This polymathic surge reflected a profound cultural shift from the medieval of the universities, which prioritized theological deduction and Aristotelian logic within a Church-dominated framework, to a more secular, individualistic that celebrated empirical observation and human agency. The invention of the around 1440 by facilitated this transition by democratizing access to classical texts and humanist writings, enabling rapid dissemination of knowledge across and encouraging interdisciplinary synthesis. Concurrently, the Age of Exploration, with voyages by figures like and , introduced new geographical, biological, and cultural data that further expanded intellectual horizons and challenged traditional boundaries of knowledge. The decline of the Renaissance polymath ideal began in the late 17th century, coinciding with the and the rise of specialized disciplines in institutions like the Royal Society (founded ), which fragmented knowledge into silos such as physics, , and chemistry to cope with accumulating complexity. As scientific progress accelerated, the "burden of knowledge" grew exponentially, making it increasingly difficult for individuals to maintain broad expertise without deep specialization, a trend that Burckhardt himself noted as eroding the uomo universale by the 1600s. This shift prioritized depth over breadth, diminishing the cultural celebration of universal genius in favor of professional silos that defined modern academia and science.

Academic and Theoretical Perspectives

Multidisciplinary Frameworks in Scholarship

In scholarship, polymathy is often framed as a form of , where individuals synthesize divergent expertise across domains to drive and problem-solving. This approach emphasizes the ability to identify connections between seemingly unrelated fields, fostering novel insights that transcend disciplinary . For instance, polymathic thinking enables the transfer of concepts from one area, such as biological metaphors in , to generate breakthroughs that specialists might overlook. Robert Root-Bernstein's model provides a structured lens for understanding polymathy through thirteen "tools of thinking" that creative individuals, including polymaths, employ across domains. These tools include observing, imaging, abstracting, recognizing , forming patterns, analogizing, body thinking, empathizing, dimensional thinking, modeling, playing, transforming, and synthesizing—emphasizing habitual boundary-crossing and as key to integrating . Root-Bernstein argues that polymaths master multiple activities to a significant degree and perceive fundamental connections between them, drawing from empirical studies of Nobel laureates who exhibit polymathic interests. This model highlights polymathy not as mere accumulation of but as a dynamic process of creative integration. Peter 's historical sociology of polymathy views it as a socially constructed role that evolves with cultural and institutional contexts, from elite patronage in the —where polymaths like thrived under princely support—to modern academic institutions that constrain broad pursuits through specialization. Burke identifies over 500 Western polymaths across five centuries, illustrating how societal structures, such as the rise of universities and professional guilds, shifted polymathy from a celebrated ideal to a marginalized practice amid increasing knowledge fragmentation. This perspective underscores polymathy's dependence on external enablers, like collaborative networks, rather than individual alone. Bharath Sriraman extends this to mathematical creativity, linking polymathy to domain-general abilities in problem-solving that allow individuals to navigate paradoxes and apply insights across disciplines. In experimental inquiries, Sriraman demonstrates how engaging with mathematical paradoxes cultivates polymathic thinking by developing transferable skills like and interdisciplinary synthesis, rather than domain-specific expertise alone. This framework posits that polymaths excel in creative by leveraging general cognitive processes that facilitate and innovative solutions beyond traditional boundaries. Theoretical perspectives on polymathy also address individual differences in the ability to excel across multiple intellectual domains, such as languages, sciences, history, and writing. Research indicates that such broad excellence arises from the alignment of high general intelligence (g-factor), which has a heritability of approximately 50% based on twin studies, favorable early environments that provide stimulation, resources, and educational opportunities, and strong motivation or self-efficacy, which also shows genetic influences contributing to achievement. These factors interact, with individuals at the upper tails of the bell curve distribution of intelligence and motivation more likely to pursue and succeed in diverse fields, while most people exhibit average levels. Although genes establish potential, environmental factors and personal effort are essential for its realization. The benefits of polymathy in include enhanced and resilience, as diverse pursuits enable adaptive responses to complex challenges, such as those seen in interdisciplinary crises. However, it faces significant challenges in specialized academia, where institutional rewards favor depth in narrow fields over breadth, potentially limiting polymaths' depth in any single domain and hindering recognition or .

Contributions from Key Researchers

Robert and Michèle Root-Bernstein have conducted extensive empirical research on polymathy, analyzing over 300 historical figures noted for their multidisciplinary achievements. Their studies reveal patterns such as early exposure to fostering cognitive tools essential for scientific , with 80% of surveyed and engineers attributing breakthroughs to arts-integrated . In their 1999 book Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, they identify 13 universal thinking tools—such as observing, imaging, and playing—derived from polymathic practices, which enhance across domains. Peter 's 2020 book The Polymath: A Cultural History from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag provides a historiographical analysis of 500 Western polymaths, categorizing them into "simultaneous" types who excel in multiple fields concurrently and "serial" types who shift expertise sequentially across career stages. argues that the rise of in the 20th century contributed to the decline of polymathy, as institutional silos limited cross-disciplinary pursuits. Bharath Sriraman's research in the 2010s focuses on mathematical polymathy, using experimental inquiries to link mathematical paradoxes with in pre-service teachers. In his 2009 paper "Paradoxes as Pathways into Polymathy," Sriraman demonstrates how engaging with paradoxes promotes interdisciplinary thinking, enabling shifts between mathematical rigor and broader creative applications in . His work emphasizes polymathy's role in enhancing adaptability in . James C. Kaufman and Ronald A. Beghetto, along with collaborators, extended their "mini-c" framework to polymathy in 2010s studies, viewing it as everyday multidisciplinary arising from learning processes. In their 2010 chapter "Creativity Polymathy: What Can Teach Your Kindergartener," they argue that mini-c creativity—novel and personally meaningful interpretations—underpins polymathic versatility, contrasting it with domain-specific Big-C genius by highlighting accessible, cross-domain insights. This framework underscores how routine creative acts build polymathic habits. Waqas Ahmed's 2018 book The Polymath: Unlocking the Power of Human Versatility advocates polymathy as vital for addressing 21st-century challenges, including , through case studies of adaptable thinkers who synthesize disciplines like , and . Ahmed posits that polymathic approaches enable innovative solutions to interconnected global issues by reclaiming innate versatility suppressed by modern specialization. Research on polymathy reveals significant gaps, particularly the underrepresentation of non-Western and figures in empirical studies, often due to historical biases in archival and Western-centric historiographies. Burke's , for instance, explicitly limits its scope to Western polymaths, highlighting the need for broader inclusion to capture global patterns. Recent studies as of 2025, such as the development of the Polymathic Orientation Scale, further explore polymathy's foundational role in and , addressing these gaps through psychometric validation and transdisciplinary perspectives.

Notable Examples

Historical Figures

Hypatia of Alexandria (c. 370–415 CE) was a prominent scholar in , renowned for her expertise in , astronomy, and . She edited and commented on key works, including Diophantus's Arithmetica on algebra and Apollonius's Conics, advancing the understanding of conic sections and their applications. In astronomy, Hypatia taught the use of instruments like the for navigation and celestial measurements, and she lectured on Ptolemy's geocentric model, integrating geometric calculations with philosophical inquiry. As head of the Neoplatonic school in Alexandria, she taught these disciplines to students, emphasizing rational discourse and the harmony between science and metaphysics, making her a rare female intellectual leader in a male-dominated era. Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519), the quintessential polymath, excelled in , , , and invention, blending observation with innovation. His iconic painting (c. 1503–1506) exemplifies his mastery of technique and psychological depth in portraiture, influencing artistic realism for centuries. In anatomy, da Vinci dissected cadavers to produce over 200 detailed drawings of the , including the cardiovascular system, which anticipated modern anatomical studies by centuries. As an engineer, he designed practical inventions like canal locks for Florence's waterways and military devices such as scaling ladders, while his visionary sketches of flying machines, including designs inspired by , explored through over 500 drawings and 35,000 words of notes. These pursuits reflected his interdisciplinary approach, where artistic precision informed scientific inquiry. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) was a universal genius whose work spanned , , , and during the late period. Independently co-inventing around 1675, Leibniz developed the notation for integrals (∫) and (dx/dy), providing a systematic framework that facilitated advancements in physics and . In , he authored (1714), positing a metaphysical system of indivisible "monads" as the universe's fundamental units, influencing and later . Trained in , Leibniz earned a in 1665 and contributed to legal theory through works like Nova Methodus Discendae Docendaeque Jurisprudentiae (1667), while in , he served as a privy counselor to the House of Brunswick, negotiating treaties and promoting pan-European unity. Benjamin Franklin (1706–1790) embodied Enlightenment versatility as a statesman, inventor, scientist, and in colonial America. As a statesman, he helped draft of Independence (1776) and negotiated the , securing U.S. independence and shaping early diplomacy. His inventions included the (1752), which protected buildings from electrical strikes, and bifocal glasses (c. 1784), improving vision for near and far distances. In science, Franklin's (1752) demonstrated lightning's electrical nature, leading to his invention of the battery-like "electrical capacitor" using linked Leyden jars to store charge. As a , he published Poor Richard's Almanack (1732–1758), offering aphorisms on thrift and virtue that promoted self-improvement among the populace. Marie Curie (1867–1934), a pioneering physicist and chemist, advanced the study of radioactivity and its medical applications, becoming the first woman to win a Nobel Prize. In 1898, with her husband Pierre, she isolated polonium and radium from pitchblende ore, coining the term "radioactivity" to describe their spontaneous emissions. This work earned her the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physics, shared with Pierre Curie and Henri Becquerel, for investigations into radiation phenomena. In 1911, she received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for successfully isolating pure radium metal, enabling its use in treating cancer through targeted radiation therapy. As a rare female polymath in male-dominated fields, Curie's efforts extended radioactivity's applications to portable X-ray units ("Little Curies") during World War I, saving countless lives on battlefields. Historical polymaths like these shared common traits, including remarkable self-taught breadth driven by insatiable curiosity, often thriving amid era-specific opportunities such as the Renaissance's humanistic revival or the Enlightenment's emphasis on empirical reason. Many pursued self-directed learning across disciplines, leveraging interdisciplinary insights—such as da Vinci's use of anatomy in or Leibniz's mathematical tools in —to innovate beyond specialized boundaries. This curiosity-fueled versatility not only amplified their individual impacts but also exemplified the polymath ideal in pre-modern intellectual cultures.

Modern and Contemporary Polymaths

In the 20th and 21st centuries, polymathy has adapted to institutional specialization and technological advancements, with individuals making significant contributions across disciplines while navigating academic silos and leveraging digital tools. Herbert A. Simon (1916–2001) exemplified this by advancing decision-making theories in economics, for which he received the 1978 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, while also pioneering cognitive psychology through computer simulations of human problem-solving and co-developing foundational AI work with Allen Newell, earning the 1975 A.M. Turing Award. His studies in political science further explored administrative decision-making and organizational behavior. Noam Chomsky (1928– ) profoundly influenced through and theories, revolutionizing the field by linking it to innate human cognitive structures. In and , his critiques of and emphasis on bridged with broader mind sciences, while his political activism critiqued U.S. and media influence from the onward. As of 2025, following a in 2023 that resulted in loss of speech and a hospitalization in 2024, Chomsky's ability to engage publicly is limited, but his intellectual legacy endures. Highlighting diverse representations, (1914–2000) balanced a Hollywood acting career, starring in films like (1938) and Samson and Delilah (1949), with inventive work during . Alongside composer , she patented a system in 1942 (U.S. Patent No. 2,292,387) to secure radio-guided torpedoes against jamming, laying groundwork for technologies like , GPS, and , though initially overlooked by the U.S. Navy. Similarly, (born 1956), with a BS in chemical engineering and BA in African-American studies from plus an MD from Cornell (1981), practiced as a and Peace Corps officer in and before becoming the first African-American woman in space on NASA's mission in 1992. In the tech era, (born 1971) has integrated engineering, business, space exploration, and AI through entrepreneurial ventures. As founder, CEO, and CTO of since 2002, he advanced reusable rocket technology with the , enabling cost-effective satellite deployments like for global . At Tesla, where he serves as CEO, Musk has driven electric vehicle engineering and autonomous driving AI, while co-founding (2016) for brain-machine interfaces and xAI (2023) to explore AI's understanding of the universe. (born 1955), inventor of the in 1989 at —developing HTTP, , and URIs—continues advocacy through the (founded 2009) and W3C (1994), promoting open data policies, , and ethical web governance via initiatives like the platform for user data control. (b. 1999), an Iraqi polymath, is recognized for synthesizing pharmaceutical science, digital fabrication, and classical Arabic calligraphy. He invented the Muntadher Naskh, the first single-line traditional Arabic font suitable for CNC and laser engineering, released on November 28, 2020. Influenced by Leonardo da Vinci, Saleh applies Da Vinci's scientific rigor to modern problems in Arabic typography and digital fabrication, as highlighted in the comparison drawn in the December 2025 research paper "Muntadher Saleh and Leonardo da Vinci: The Neo-Renaissance of the Tigris and the Engineering of Arabic Typography" by Henning Schmidgen of Bauhaus-Universität Weimar. Modern academia poses challenges to polymathy through institutional barriers favoring hyper-specialization, such as fragmented departments, heavy loads, and metrics rewarding narrow expertise, which emerged prominently in the late and intensified in the 20th. This "two cultures" divide, as described by in 1959, limits interdisciplinary pursuits, often relegating polymaths to marginal roles or outside traditional institutions. However, technology has facilitated polymathy's resurgence via open-source collaboration; projects like the Polymath initiative, launched in 2009 by mathematicians and , demonstrate how blogs, wikis, and online forums enable diverse experts to co-solve complex problems, such as proving the density Hales-Jewett theorem through 1,228 collective comments from 39 participants. In the 2020s, polymathy trends toward AI ethics and , where interdisciplinary thinkers integrate with moral and environmental imperatives. AI tools democratize access to cross-domain knowledge, empowering polymaths to address ethical alignment—ensuring AI upholds values—and sustainable innovations in and by synthesizing from physics, , and . As of November 2025, this trend continues with growing emphasis on collaborative AI applications in global challenges like climate modeling and ethical AI governance. Figures like Berners-Lee exemplify this by advocating for decentralized AI governance to mitigate and risks.

Similar Terms and Notions

The term "Renaissance man" or "Renaissance woman" serves as a close synonym for polymath, particularly highlighting an individual's broad expertise in artistic, scientific, and humanistic pursuits during the 15th to 17th centuries. This concept arose amid the 's revival of classical learning, emphasizing holistic development across disciplines rather than narrow focus. Closely related is "homo universalis," the Latin phrase meaning "universal man," which encapsulates the Renaissance humanist ideal of a scholar proficient in multiple fields, embodying comprehensive intellectual versatility akin to the polymath. It underscores the era's aspiration for individuals who integrated knowledge from arts, sciences, and humanities into a unified . In contrast to mere generalists, who possess superficial familiarity across topics, or specialists, who achieve depth in a single domain, the polymath represents an advanced generalist with profound expertise in several areas, enabling innovative cross-disciplinary insights. This distinction highlights the polymath's ability to synthesize specialized without sacrificing rigor, fostering that specialists or basic generalists often cannot replicate. The older term "polyhistor" denotes a of extensive, encyclopedic learning, particularly in historical and classical studies, and was applied to 18th-century encyclopedists who compiled vast repositories of to democratize . Unlike the polymath's emphasis on original contributions, polyhistors focused on curation and preservation of diverse erudition, bridging antiquity with modern scholarship. Cultural variations on the polymath notion include the ideal in early 20th-century design, which promoted the integration of , , and craft into functional wholes, reflecting a polymathic approach to unifying aesthetic and practical disciplines. Similarly, the Chinese concept of "wenren" (literati or scholar-artists) describes educated elites who excelled in , , , and , embodying a harmonious breadth of cultural and mastery.

Distinctions in Modern Multidisciplinarity

In contemporary environments, interdisciplinary practices predominantly rely on team-based , where specialists from diverse fields convene in settings like centers to pool expertise and address complex problems. This approach integrates perspectives through but often struggles with deep synthesis due to communication barriers and differing epistemologies. Polymathy, by contrast, centers on individual mastery across multiple domains, enabling a single person to forge connections and innovations independently, as evidenced by studies showing polymaths' superior ability to leverage interfaces for creative outcomes. Such personal breadth distinguishes polymaths from efforts, where integration depends on external coordination rather than innate versatility. Transdisciplinary approaches extend beyond academia to holistic problem-solving, incorporating stakeholders from and industry, particularly in fields like studies where environmental, social, and economic dimensions intersect. Polymaths facilitate these efforts by serving as brokers who translate disciplinary languages and mediate conflicts, enhancing team effectiveness in projects such as EU-funded environmental initiatives. However, polymathy surpasses transdisciplinary norms through its emphasis on individual scope, allowing profound personal integration of that exceeds the collaborative boundaries often limited by group consensus or stakeholder agendas. This embodied proves vital for formulating innovative research questions in , as seen in interdisciplinary degree programs that prioritize polymathic thinkers. The framework, widely adopted in corporate models, advocates depth in a core discipline paired with shallower breadth in adjacent areas to foster and adaptability in . While inspired by polymathic versatility, this model diverges by confining universality to functional support roles rather than pursuing equivalent depth across varied fields, making it a streamlined for organizational efficiency. In practice, T-shaped professionals excel in environments demanding specialized with collaborative , but they lack the polymath's capacity for autonomous, cross-domain innovation. Modern challenges to polymathy arise from academic silos that isolate disciplines and funding mechanisms prioritizing narrow specialization, which fragment knowledge and discourage broad pursuits amid "publish-or-perish" pressures. These structural barriers limit polymathic development in traditional academia, yet polymaths find fertile ground in innovation hubs like , where figures such as exemplify how multidisciplinary expertise drives disruptive advancements across industries. Despite specialization's dominance, polymaths in such ecosystems counter silos by synthesizing ideas from , , and to accelerate breakthroughs. Looking ahead, artificial intelligence tools are poised to augment polymathic synthesis by democratizing access to vast knowledge repositories, enabling rapid cross-disciplinary exploration and reducing barriers to expertise acquisition. This augmentation could revive the polymath archetype, empowering individuals to tackle global challenges like pandemics through versatile, ethical applications in medicine, energy, and climate solutions. By fostering openness and integrative thinking, AI aligns with polymathic traits to promote innovation in an era of interconnected crises.

References

  1. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/polymath_n
  2. https://www.etymonline.com/word/polymath
  3. https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle/
  4. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/leonardo-da-vinci-1452-1519
  5. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300252088/the-polymath/
  6. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2018/11/benjamin-franklin-social-genius-18th-century
  7. https://www.med.upenn.edu/lbi/personnel.html
  8. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/715948
  9. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polymath
  10. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13246-023-01296-7
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389004386_The_Resurgence_of_Polymaths_in_the_Age_of_AI_and_AGI
  12. https://johnkersey.org/polymathy/
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv15pjzh6
  14. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/the-polymath-in-the-age-of-specialisation/
  15. https://www.academia.edu/142968910/The_Return_of_the_Polymath_How_AI_Is_Reviving_Renaissance_Thinking
  16. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/
  17. https://www.attalus.org/info/pliny_hn.html
  18. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-sina/
  19. http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10064.pdf
  20. https://www.stbernards.edu/blog/st-hildegard-von-bingen
  21. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1059&context=saysomethingtheological
  22. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601508/full
  23. https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/society/2023/pliny-elder-first-encyclopedia
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3621228/
  25. https://www.theartstory.org/definition/renaissance-humanism/
  26. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/jul/10/jacob-burckhardt-civilization-renaissance-italy
  27. https://www.worldhistory.org/Renaissance_Humanism/
  28. https://www.frbsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2_BurdenOfKnowledge.pdf
  29. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300250022/the-polymath/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5985927/
  31. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/traits/intelligence/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4210287/
  33. https://seadnetwork.wordpress.com/white-paper-abstracts/abstracts/the-importance-of-early-and-persistent-arts-and-crafts-education-for-future-scientists-and-engineers/
  34. https://www.diejungeakademie.de/media/pages/arbeitsgruppen/zwei-kulturen-der-wissenschaften/154edf2a52-1670257237/20181219_abschlussbericht_peterburke_en.pdf
  35. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-21375-001
  36. https://s3.amazonaws.com/jck_articles/KaufmanBeghetto2009.pdf
  37. https://hekint.org/2017/01/30/polymathy-in-decline/
  38. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5403581
  39. https://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/hypatia.htm
  40. https://mathwomen.agnesscott.org/women/hypatia.htm
  41. https://edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plans/leonardo-da-vinci-creative-genius
  42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ca.22060
  43. https://illumin.usc.edu/leonardo-da-vinci-the-engineer/
  44. https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/leonardo-da-vinci-and-flight
  45. https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~cherlin/History/Papers2002/leibniz.html
  46. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz/
  47. https://www.neh.gov/explore/the-papers-benjamin-franklin
  48. https://fi.edu/en/science-and-education/benjamin-franklin/inventions
  49. https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/benjamin-franklins-pioneering-electrical-work-influenced-todays-technology
  50. https://knarf.english.upenn.edu/People/franklin.html
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390158/
  52. https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/marie-sklodowska-curie-legacy-innovation-and-empowerment-women-science
  53. https://lemelson.mit.edu/resources/marie-curie
  54. https://philosophynow.org/issues/134/The_Mind_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci
  55. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/downloads/tm70mv51j?disposition=inline&locale=en
  56. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1978/simon/biographical/
  57. https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/simon_1031467.cfm
  58. https://theconversation.com/noam-chomsky-turns-95-the-social-justice-advocate-paved-the-way-for-ai-does-it-keep-him-up-at-night-218034
  59. https://www.goodtherapy.org/famous-psychologists/noam-chomsky.html
  60. https://www.medialens.org/2024/a-message-about-noam-chomsky-an-update/
  61. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/hedy-lamarrs-wwii-invention-helped-shape-modern-tech
  62. https://www.nasa.gov/former-astronaut-mae-c-jemison/
  63. https://www.spacex.com/
  64. https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/
  65. https://webfoundation.org/
  66. https://muntadhersaleh.com/muntadher-naskh/
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399196284_Muntadher_Saleh_and_Leonardo_da_Vinci_The_Neo-Renaissance_of_the_Tigris_and_the_Engineering_of_Arabic_Typography
  68. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jcransh/papers/cranshaw_kittur.pdf
  69. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2025/01/20/in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence-polymaths-are-back-in-vogue/
  70. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/11/tim-berners-lee-web-inventor-save-internet
  71. https://www.weber.edu/WSUImages/leadership/docs/sq/complementary-strengths.pdf
  72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4546034
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/206382301_Bauhaus_Ideology_Concept_and_Method_on_Architecture
  74. https://www.britannica.com/topic/literati
  75. https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/Migrate/DATLFiles/Mar-April_2018/McIlwain.pdf
  76. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environmental-conservation/article/embodied-interdisciplinarity-what-is-the-role-of-polymaths-in-environmental-research/F8D1963B0B30F75AE4E08252756F88B7
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769766/
  78. https://pressbooks.pub/sustainabilitymethods/chapter/inter-and-transdisciplinary-approaches/
  79. https://siliconflatirons.org/documents/publications/report/201509ShapesReport.pdf
  80. https://www.deusto.es/en/home/campus-life/news-events/news/polymaths-will-be-the-most-widely-demanded-profile-in-the-new-digital-era/noticia
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.