Hubbry Logo
ConnotationConnotationMain
Open search
Connotation
Community hub
Connotation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Connotation
Connotation
Connotation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A connotation is a commonly understood cultural or emotional association that any given word or phrase carries, in addition to its explicit or literal meaning, which is its denotation.

A connotation is frequently described as either positive or negative, with regard to its pleasing or displeasing emotional connection.[1] For example, a stubborn person may be described as being either strong-willed or pig-headed; although these have the same literal meaning (stubborn), strong-willed connotes admiration for the level of someone's will (a positive connotation), while pig-headed connotes frustration in dealing with someone (a negative connotation).

Usage

[edit]

"Connotation" branches into a mixture of different meanings. These could include the contrast of a word or phrase with its primary, literal meaning (known as a denotation), with what that word or phrase specifically denotes. The connotation essentially relates to how anything may be associated with a word or phrase; for example, an implied value, judgement or feelings.[2]

Logic

[edit]

In logic and semantics, connotation is roughly synonymous with intension. Connotation is often contrasted with denotation, which is more or less synonymous with extension. Alternatively, the connotation of the word may be thought of as the set of all its possible referents (as opposed to merely the actual ones). A word's denotation is the collection of things it refers to; its connotation is what it implies about the things it is used to refer to (a second level of meanings is termed connotative). The connotation of dog is (something like) four-legged canine carnivore. So, saying, "You are a dog" would connote that you were ugly or aggressive rather than literally denoting you as a canine.[3]

[edit]

It is often useful to avoid words with strong connotations (especially pejorative or disparaging ones) when striving to achieve a neutral point of view. A desire for more positive connotations, or fewer negative ones, is one of the main reasons for using euphemisms.[4]

Semiotic closure, as defined by Terry Eagleton, concerns "a sealed world of ideological stability, which repels the disruptive, decentered forces of language in the name of an imaginary unity. Signs are ranked by a certain covert violence into rigidly hierarchical order. . . . The process of forging ‘representations’ always involves this arbitrary closing of the signifying chain, constricting the free play of the signifier to a spuriously determinate meaning which can then be received by the subject as natural and inevitable".[5][relevant?]

Examples

[edit]
Example seven .
Example seven .

The denotation is a representation of a cartoon heart. The connotation is a symbol of love and affection.

Example one.
Example one.

The denotation of this example is a red rose with a green stem. The connotation is that it is a symbol of passion and love – this is what the rose represents,

Example two.
Example two.

The denotation is a brown cross. The connotation is a symbol of religion, according to the media connotation. However, to be more specific this is a symbol of Christianity.

See also

[edit]
Look up connotation in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Connotation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Connotation refers to the emotional, cultural, or associative meanings that a word or evokes beyond its literal or , which is known as . In , captures the objective, shared of a term—such as "" denoting a type of flower—while connotation adds subjective layers, like romance or fragility for the same word, influenced by personal experiences, societal norms, or context. This distinction originates from semantic theory, where connotation encompasses all non-denotative implications, including attitudinal and evaluative elements that shape interpretation in communication. Connotations can be positive (e.g., "thrifty" implying prudence), negative (e.g., "stingy" suggesting selfishness), or neutral, and they vary across cultures, languages, and historical periods, making them crucial for understanding nuances in literature, advertising, and everyday discourse. In practical applications, such as translation or rhetoric, connotative meanings often pose challenges because direct equivalents may not convey the same emotional resonance, requiring careful selection to preserve intent. Overall, connotation enriches language by layering implied significance onto explicit content, influencing how messages are perceived and interpreted in diverse contexts.

Definition and Etymology

Definition of Connotation

Connotation refers to the secondary, often emotional or associative meanings evoked by a word, , , or beyond its primary, literal, or dictionary-based , which is termed . These additional meanings encompass feelings, ideas, or implications that arise from cultural, personal, or contextual influences, shaping how the term is perceived and interpreted. The concept originates in the disciplines of semantics and semiotics, where it describes the layered, associative dimensions of language that extend past objective reference. In semantics, connotation captures the emotive, evaluative, or stylistic overtones attached to linguistic expressions, such as attitudes or stereotypes, which enrich communication but are not inherent to the term's core sense. In semiotics, as developed by Roland Barthes, connotation functions as a second-order signifying system: the denotative sign becomes the signifier for an additional signified, enabling a chain of further associations that reflect sociocultural ideologies. Key characteristics of connotation include its subjectivity, which varies according to individual experiences, cultural norms, and historical contexts, rendering it unstable and open to diverse interpretations. It is inherently implicit, emerging indirectly through rather than explicit statement, and supports multiple layers of meaning within a single term, where one connotation can trigger successive others.

Etymology

The term "connotation" originates from the Medieval Latin connotationem (nominative connotatio), the of connotare, meaning "to mark along with" or "to note in ." This etymon breaks down into the prefix con- (from cum, meaning "together" or "with") and notare ("to mark," "to note," or "to designate"), evoking the idea of attaching secondary notations or implications to a primary designation. In medieval scholastic of the 13th and 14th centuries, the term emerged in logical discourse to analyze how words signify properties or relations beyond their direct reference. , in his Summa Logicae (c. 1323), introduced "connotative terms" (termini connotativi) as those that primarily signify a substance but secondarily imply associated qualities or modes, such as "white" connoting a body possessing whiteness; this contrasted with "absolute terms" that signify without such secondary implications. The concept addressed nominal definitions (quid nominis), distinguishing implied attributes from essential substance, and influenced later semantic theories. The term entered English around the 1530s, initially in theological and logical contexts derived from scholastic traditions, evolving to denote implied or associated meanings by the 17th century. Philosophers like John Locke discussed related ideas in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), where words signify complex ideas through "nominal essences"—clusters of attributes—beyond simple reference, influencing later semantic theories. By the 19th century, John Stuart Mill formalized connotation in A System of Logic (1843) as the attributes a name implies alongside its denotation, shifting focus toward modern semantics. In the early 20th century, Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistics, through his distinction between the signifier (sound-image) and signified (concept) in Course in General Linguistics (1916), provided a foundational framework that later influenced semiotic theories of connotation as associative, cultural layers of meaning beyond literal reference.

Core Distinctions

Denotation versus Connotation

Denotation refers to the literal, explicit, and objective meaning of a word as defined in a dictionary or by conventional linguistic agreement, representing the core referential function without emotional or cultural overlays. This definition aligns with early semantic theories, such as those in Ogden and Richards' The Meaning of Meaning (1923), where denotation is tied to the direct relation between a symbol and its referent in shared linguistic understanding. In contrast, connotation encompasses the implicit, subjective associations evoked by a word, including emotional, cultural, or experiential implications that extend beyond the literal sense. The key differences between and lie in their scope, stability, and perceptual nature, as outlined in linguistic semantics. is universal and stable across users and contexts, providing a fixed referential , whereas is variable, influenced by experiences and societal norms. This distinction emphasizes 's role in precise, objective communication versus 's contribution to nuanced, affective interpretation.
AttributeDenotationConnotation
ObjectivityObjective and explicitSubjective and implicit
UniversalityShared and agreed upon by language usersPersonal or culturally variable
StabilityFixed and context-independentFluid and context-dependent
FunctionReferential (literal meaning)Associative (emotional/cultural layers)
In language use, and connotation interact dynamically, with determining the balance between them; while denotation establishes a foundational understanding, connotation often modulates interpretation, potentially altering the overall message in . This interplay underscores how effective communication relies on aligning both layers to avoid misinterpretation, as connotation can amplify or obscure the denoted meaning based on situational factors. Implication refers to the logical or suggested meaning that is inferred from the context of an utterance, often involving speaker intent and listener deduction, which distinguishes it from connotation by its more deductive and pragmatic nature. Association denotes the mental linking of ideas, emotions, or experiences to a word or sign, providing the psychological foundation upon which connotations are built beyond literal meanings. In , extension represents the range of denotative referents or objects that a term applies to, while intension encompasses the set of attributes or defining the term; these intersect with connotative layers as intension often incorporates the qualitative implications that give rise to connotations. Within , connotation functions as in sign , building upon the primary denotative relationship between signifier and signified to include socio-cultural and ideological associations.

Types of Connotation

Positive, Negative, and Neutral Connotations

Connotations can be classified according to their emotional valence into positive, negative, and neutral categories, each evoking distinct affective responses beyond a word's literal meaning. Positive connotations refer to associations that elicit favorable , such as , , or approval, thereby enhancing the desirability of the described. These associations often arise from culturally reinforced ideals or personal successes linked to the term, making the word more persuasive in communication. Negative connotations, in contrast, involve associations that provoke unfavorable emotions, including disdain, , or disapproval, which can diminish the perceived value of the referent. Such connotations frequently stem from societal taboos, historical traumas, or repeated negative portrayals, leading to avoidance or in . For instance, a term might imply immaturity or unreliability in specific contexts, underscoring how valence can shift based on usage. Neutral connotations are comparatively rare and represent objective associations devoid of strong emotional polarity, often closely aligning with the word's denotation. These lack the evaluative charge of positive or negative types, serving primarily descriptive functions without evoking bias or sentiment. The formation of these connotations is shaped by multiple factors, including personal experiences that imprint individual emotional responses, societal norms that embed collective values, and repetition in media that amplifies associations over time. In neutral cases, these influences do not introduce emotional polarity, preserving a more factual overlay. Cultural variations can modulate this valence, as explored in subsequent sections.

Cultural and Contextual Variations

Connotations of words and symbols vary significantly across cultures, shaped by deeply ingrained societal values and traditions. For instance, the color white often carries connotations of purity, innocence, and new beginnings in Western cultures, where it is prominently featured in weddings and religious ceremonies. In contrast, in many Eastern cultures such as those in China, India, and Japan, white symbolizes mourning, death, and loss, commonly worn at funerals to signify the soul's departure and spiritual purity in the afterlife. These differences arise from historical and religious contexts, where white's association with simplicity and the absence of color aligns with diverse interpretations of life cycles and spirituality. Over time, connotations can undergo semantic shifts influenced by evolving social attitudes and linguistic usage. A notable example is the English word "," which originally connoted , , or carefree behavior from the onward, as seen in literary works like Chaucer's poetry. By the mid-20th century, particularly from the 1920s, it began to shift toward denoting within subcultural communities, becoming the predominant connotation by the 1970s due to the movement and broader cultural . This evolution reflects broader societal changes, including the of LGBTQ+ identities and the reclamation of by marginalized groups. The connotation of a word is highly dependent on its , including the surrounding , , and situational factors, which can alter its emotional or evaluative implications. In , this contextual dependency means that a term's meaning extends beyond its core through pragmatic inferences, such as when "" evokes in political speeches but restriction in discussions of personal obligations. Grammatical structure and co-occurring words further modulate these nuances; for example, pairing a neutral term with evaluative adjectives can shift its valence from positive to negative. Such variations highlight how connotations are not fixed but dynamically computed based on communicative intent and shared knowledge./05:_Word_Senses/5.04:_Context-dependent_extensions_of_meaning) Several interconnected factors drive these cultural and contextual variations in connotations. Social norms play a pivotal role by embedding collective expectations into language, where terms aligned with approved behaviors gain positive associations while those linked to taboos acquire negative ones. Historical events, such as wars or social movements, accelerate shifts by redefining societal values; for example, post-World War II economic booms in the West infused words related to prosperity with optimistic connotations. Globalization further complicates this landscape by facilitating cross-cultural exchanges, blending connotations through media and migration, yet also risking the dilution of local nuances as dominant languages impose their interpretive frameworks on global interactions.

Usage in Various Fields

In Linguistics and Semantics

In linguistics and semantics, connotation relates to semiotic frameworks, such as 's model of the sign, where choices along the paradigmatic axis—selecting from alternative signs based on associative relations—can evoke secondary, culturally or contextually derived meanings beyond the primary associated with syntagmatic arrangements. Saussure distinguished between the syntagmatic axis, which involves the linear of signs to form coherent sequences (such as in sentences), and the paradigmatic axis, which concerns the selection of signs from a set of alternatives. For instance, selecting "freedom fighters" over "terrorists" in a syntagmatic chain shifts the connotative implications while preserving denotative references to a group of individuals. Connotations contribute to the formation of semantic fields, which are networks of lexically related words organized around shared conceptual domains, influencing phenomena like synonymy and . In these fields, words with overlapping denotations develop connotative associations that differentiate near-synonyms (e.g., "swift" versus "rapid," where the former may connote and the latter mechanical speed) and expand polysemous senses through relational extensions. Such networks highlight how connotations create subtle gradients of meaning, affecting lexical choice and interpretation within a system. Semantic field theory posits that these connotative links are not arbitrary but structured by paradigmatic oppositions, enabling words to evoke broader associative clusters that impact synonymic interchangeability and polysemous ambiguity. Theoretical advancements in linguistics further underscore connotation's role in prototype theory and cognitive linguistics. In prototype theory, developed by Eleanor Rosch, categories exhibit fuzzy boundaries defined by prototypical members rather than strict feature checklists, with connotations shaping these gradients by associating emotional, experiential, or cultural attributes to core denotations (e.g., "bird" prototypically connotes flight and song, marginalizing non-flying instances like penguins). This approach reveals how connotative layers contribute to graded category membership, challenging classical definitional models. Similarly, cognitive linguistics integrates connotation as part of encyclopedic meaning, viewing it as an extension of conceptual knowledge intertwined with linguistic form, where words activate rich, context-sensitive networks of associations rather than isolated senses. Connotations thus bridge linguistic structure and cognitive processing, emphasizing usage-based patterns in meaning construction. To unpack these connotative layers, linguists employ methods like componential analysis, which decomposes word meanings into atomic semantic features, distinguishing denotative from connotative components. Pioneered by Eugene Nida, this technique identifies distinctive features (e.g., [+human, +adult, +male] for "man" denotatively, with [+strong, +provider] as potential connotative additions) to reveal how connotations arise from bundled attributes within lexical entries. By contrasting features across related terms, componential analysis elucidates relational dynamics in semantic fields and prototype structures, providing a systematic tool for dissecting the evaluative and associative dimensions of meaning without reducing it to mere reference. This method has proven influential in semantic theory for its ability to formalize the interplay between core and peripheral senses.

In Logic and Philosophy

In traditional , particularly as articulated by , connotation refers to the essential attributes or properties implied by a term's , comprising its , as opposed to its extension or , which denotes the class of objects the term applies to. This distinction underpins the of categorical propositions and syllogisms, where the connoted attributes determine the term's role in valid inferences, ensuring that predicates capture necessary qualities rather than mere accidental ones. John Locke, in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), distinguished between real essences—the actual, often unknowable constitutions of substances—and nominal essences—the abstract ideas or observable attributes bundled with a name to signify its meaning. These ideas prefigure later discussions of connotation, as names imply the properties we associate with them, influencing how we reason about substance and identity without direct access to underlying realities. This approach highlights connotations' role in shaping philosophical inquiry into knowledge and representation. In modern logic and formal semantics, connotations introduce potential ambiguities that compromise argumentative validity, particularly in syllogistic reasoning where terms must maintain consistent implications across premises and conclusions. For instance, connotations can lead to the equivocation fallacy, as when a term like "light" shifts from denoting weightlessness in one premise to brightness in another, invalidating the inference. Such issues underscore the need for precise disambiguation in formal systems to preserve truth preservation in propositions.

In Rhetoric and Literature

In classical rhetoric, connotation played a foundational role in persuasion by allowing speakers to evoke emotions through subtle word choices, as articulated by in his Rhetoric. emphasized pathos, the appeal to emotion, as one of three modes of persuasion, where connotative language alters audience judgments by associating ideas with feelings like or without direct statement. For instance, he described how defining emotions precisely—such as as a "desire, accompanied with pain, for conspicuous revenge"—enables orators to select words that carry emotional weight, enhancing the persuasive impact of speeches. This use of connotative extended to rhetorical devices like and , which amplify emotional resonance. , highlighted by as a stylistic , transfer meanings to create vivid, connotative associations that make arguments memorable and emotionally engaging, such as comparing to "stubble" to evoke transience. , as indirect expressions substituting milder terms for harsh realities, serve a similar function by softening connotations to maintain audience goodwill while persuading, a technique rooted in avoiding offense in public discourse. Positive and negative connotations, in particular, function as tools for emotional appeal, with favorable associations building sympathy and unfavorable ones stirring aversion. In literature, authors leverage connotations to deepen character development, advance themes, and deploy irony, transforming textual layers into emotional and interpretive depth. For character portrayal, connotative word choices in descriptions or dialogue infuse traits with subtle implications, such as associating a figure with "serpentine" grace to suggest deceit without explicit judgment. Thematically, connotations reinforce motifs by evoking cultural or emotional associations, as seen in where words like "dove" connote amid conflict. Irony, a mode where intended meaning opposes literal expression, relies on connotative discrepancies to highlight contradictions, often critiquing societal norms through understated emotional cues. The persuasive power of connotations in speeches and writing lies in their ability to influence attitudes implicitly, bypassing overt argumentation. Orators select terms with layered associations to align audience emotions with desired views, as in political addresses where euphemistic phrasing veils controversial policies to foster acceptance. This subtlety enhances ethos and pathos, making persuasion feel natural rather than coercive. Historically, the concept evolved from Aristotle's focus on emotional wordplay in to modern , where reframed connotation as a second-order signification tied to and . In Mythologies (), Barthes analyzed how connotative signs naturalize cultural myths, such as imperial symbols evoking unearned grandeur, influencing 20th-century textual by linking to socio-political . This shift marked connotation's transition from a rhetorical tool for immediate to a critical lens for unpacking power in narrative structures.

In Marketing and Psychology

In marketing, brand names are strategically selected to evoke positive connotations that enhance perceptions and drive decisions. demonstrates that the connotative qualities of a name—such as associations with luxury, , or reliability—significantly influence evaluations of the and intentions to purchase, outperforming neutral or negative alternatives in both field surveys and controlled experiments. For instance, names with favorable connotations improve overall attitude by fostering emotional connections that align with desires for status or . In cognitive psychology, connotations function as components of , where they represent the associative networks of emotional, cultural, and experiential meanings linked to words or that and . Schemas organize through these associations, rapid interpretation of stimuli; for example, the connotation of "" might evoke warmth and within a familial schema, influencing how individuals related and experiences. This associative allows connotations to activate broader cognitive frameworks, affecting how new is encoded and retrieved in . Behavioral studies highlight how negative connotations can trigger aversion and alter consumer choices, often through subconscious mechanisms. Word aversions, driven by negative connotative associations like disgust (e.g., "moist" evoking bodily discomfort), reduce purchase likelihood for affected products, particularly in hygiene categories where selection rates drop significantly among averse individuals compared to others. Complementing this, research on subliminal messaging shows that brief, unconscious exposures to connotative stimuli—such as paired images or words—form lasting relational associations in the brain, influencing delayed decisions like brand preferences without conscious awareness. These effects persist over 15-25 minutes, underscoring how negative or manipulative connotations can subtly steer behavior toward avoidance. Ethically, the deliberate manipulation of connotations in raises concerns about , as implied meanings can mislead consumers into false assumptions about product benefits. Regulatory bodies like the (FTC) prohibit practices where connotations create deceptive implications, such as suggesting unproven efficacy through suggestive language, distinguishing them from allowable (e.g., vague superiority claims). Violations can result in actions for detriment, emphasizing the need for substantiation to prevent exploitative use of associative cues. In global contexts, cultural variations in connotations further complicate ethical application, requiring marketers to avoid unintended negative implications abroad.

Examples

Linguistic Examples

In linguistics, connotations often arise from cultural associations that color a word's neutral denotation. For instance, the adjective "slim" denotes a state of being thin but typically carries a positive connotation of attractiveness and health in descriptions of people, as opposed to "skinny," which shares the denotation but implies an undesirable or frail thinness. This distinction highlights how synonyms can evoke different emotional valences, with "slim" suggesting fitness and appeal. Another common example involves the "," which denotes a physical but connotes emotional warmth, , and familial belonging, evoking ideas of comfort and refuge beyond mere . In contrast, "" maintains a more neutral as a building without these affective layers, underscoring semantic shifts where everyday usage infuses words with positive emotional resonance. Cross-linguistically, connotation pitfalls emerge in false cognates, such as the Spanish word "embarazada," which denotes but phonetically resembles the English "embarrassed," leading English speakers to misinterpret it with negative connotations of or awkwardness. This example illustrates how similar forms across languages can trigger unintended valence associations, complicating and comprehension. further modulates connotations, altering a word's valence based on usage. For example, "inexpensive" and "cheap" both denote low , but "inexpensive" carries a positive connotation of affordability and value, while "cheap" often implies inferiority or stinginess. Similarly, "aroma" denotes a smell with a positive connotation of pleasantness, whereas "stench" shares the denotation but evokes negativity and disgust. A third pair, "youthful" (positive: energetic and vibrant) versus "childish" (negative: immature and irresponsible), both denoting childlike qualities, demonstrates how surrounding discourse can shift perceptions from admiration to criticism. These variations emphasize connotations' dependence on sociocultural norms and situational framing.

Literary and Rhetorical Examples

In William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, the word "dagger" exemplifies how connotations extend beyond a simple denotation as a stabbing weapon to evoke deeper emotional and thematic layers, including betrayal and tragic finality. In Act 5, Scene 3, Juliet seizes Romeo's dagger and declares, "O happy dagger! / This is thy sheath; there rust, and let me die," before plunging it into herself upon discovering Romeo's apparent death. Here, the dagger connotes not merely physical violence but the betrayal inherent in the Montague-Capulet feud, which dooms the lovers' union and symbolizes the self-destructive consequences of familial disloyalty and societal conflict, intensifying the play's exploration of forbidden passion and despair. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech, delivered on August 28, 1963, during the March on Washington, harnesses the positive connotations of "freedom" to forge a persuasive rhetorical appeal for racial equality. King repeats "freedom" twenty times, as in his vision of a nation where "let freedom ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city," invoking associations with American democratic ideals, liberation from oppression, and moral justice to stir communal hope and urgency. These connotations build emotional resonance, transforming abstract civil rights demands into a vivid, unifying argument that aligns the movement with foundational national values, thereby amplifying its persuasive impact on a diverse audience. A classic involving connotation is the , which substitutes milder terms to mitigate negative associations, as seen in literary depictions of . The phrase "passed away" softens the stark of "died," carrying connotations of peaceful transition or gentle departure rather than abrupt finality or horror. In Hardy's poem "Afterwards" (), the speaker reflects on his legacy with indirect references to mortality, such as implying a quiet "passing" amid nature's indifference, which tempers the connotation of death's inevitability and infuses the work with contemplative serenity, allowing readers to engage with themes of transience without overwhelming grief. This technique enhances emotional depth by inviting empathy while veiling raw pain. Another illustrative example appears in John Donne's metaphysical poetry, where words like "death" acquire nuanced connotations through conceit. In "Death, be not proud" (Holy Sonnet 10, c. ), Donne personifies Death as a mere "slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men," shifting its connotation from terrifying inevitability to a temporary, even subservient state overcome by eternal . This rhetorical inversion builds , diminishing Death's power and fostering a sense of triumphant spirituality, which deepens the poem's philosophical consolation for readers confronting mortality.

References

  1. https://textbooks.whatcom.edu/cmst101/chapter/3-1-language-and-meaning/
  2. https://un.uobasrah.edu.iq/lectures/9224.pdf
  3. https://www.jrspelt.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Csrao-Denotations-n-Connotations.pdf
  4. https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~lpearl/courses/readings/FengEtAl2013_Connotations.pdf
  5. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/140563/3/Chapter%25207%2520FINAL27.5.18.pdf
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321743805_A_Brief_Study_of_Words_Used_in_Denotation_and_Connotation
  7. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/34596/1/Connotation_and_Language_Culture_2017.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821660600172X
  9. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095632733
  10. http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem06.html
  11. https://ssl.lu.usi.ch/entityws/getattachment.ashx?gidattachment=84C9F7EF-E514-4236-BFC1-2D79A2203EDD
  12. https://www.etymonline.com/word/connotation
  13. http://www.logicmuseum.com/connotation/ockhamconnote.htm
  14. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ockham/#TermTheo
  15. https://faculty.fordham.edu/klima/zheng.htm
  16. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/#LangAbst
  17. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ferdinand-de-Saussure
  18. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Communication/Introduction_to_Communication/Communication_in_the_Real_World_-_An_Introduction_to_Communication_Studies_(Wrench_et_al.)/03:_Verbal_Communication/3.01:_Language_and_Meaning
  19. https://seasite.niu.edu/trans/articles/Language%20Ambiguity.htm
  20. https://www.thoughtco.com/associative-meaning-language-1689007
  21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/kmrp.2008.3
  22. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-realworldcomm/chapter/3-1-language-and-meaning/
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49292254_Positive_Neutral_Negative_Evaluation_in_Connotation
  24. https://skirec.org/wp-content/uploads/Econ20March18DrP-1.pdf
  25. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/color-symbolism
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/english-today/article/gay-paper-why-should-sociolinguistics-bother-with-semantics/7DD1BE3D0DBEDA969AFD0B0501DEE887
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356597366_Factors_that_Determine_the_Meaning_of_a_Word
  28. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol01/09/19.pdf
  29. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/38267
  30. https://www.infoamerica.org/documentos_pdf/chandler.pdf
  31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1259000.pdf
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11043536/
  33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1287508.pdf
  34. https://translation.bible/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/wilss-1976-eugene-a-nida-componential-analysis-of-meaning-an-introduction-to-semantic-structures.pdf
  35. http://www.logicmuseum.com/connotation/millconnotation.htm
  36. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10615/10615-h/10615-h.htm
  37. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ambiguity/
  38. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/
  39. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389257132_Study_of_English_Euphemisms_Functions_Classification_and_Cultural_Implications
  41. https://literariness.org/2016/03/18/connotation-and-denotation/
  42. https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1074
  43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2022.2082016
  44. https://monoskop.org/images/8/85/Barthes_Roland_Mythologies_EN_1972.pdf
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250168928_Creating_New_Brand_Names_Effects_of_Relevance_Connotation_and_Pronunciation
  46. https://www.simplypsychology.org/what-is-a-schema.html
  47. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci20/papers/0832/0832.pdf
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204644/
  49. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/410531/831014deceptionstmt.pdf
  50. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/myths-half-truths-about-deceptive-advertising
  51. https://magoosh.com/toefl/understanding-english-connotation/
  52. https://www.kaptest.com/study/act/word-connotations/
  53. https://homework.study.com/explanation/what-is-the-connotative-meaning-of-home.html
  54. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/meaning-of-things/home-as-symbolic-environment/4BB007B849BA05AB20DEF52B356080EA
  55. https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/jgc/research/vocabstate/
  56. https://quillbot.com/blog/rhetoric/connotation-definition/
  57. https://www.tckpublishing.com/connotation/
  58. https://www.grammar-monster.com/glossary/connotation.htm
  59. https://www.enotes.com/topics/romeo-and-juliet/questions/what-does-the-dagger-symbolize-in-romeo-and-juliet-706960
  60. https://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-analysis-dream-martin-luther-king/
  61. https://literarydevices.net/euphemism/
  62. https://www.litcharts.com/poetry/john-donne/holy-sonnet-10-death-be-not-proud
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.