Hubbry Logo
HappinessHappinessMain
Open search
Happiness
Community hub
Happiness
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Happiness
Happiness
Happiness
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A 93-year-old man from Pichilemu, Chile; his smile and facial expression may indicate happiness
Part of a series on
Emotions
Emotions

Happiness is a complex and multifaceted emotion that encompasses a range of positive feelings, from contentment to intense joy. It is often associated with positive life experiences, such as achieving goals, spending time with loved ones, or engaging in enjoyable activities. However, happiness can also arise spontaneously, without any apparent external cause.

Happiness is closely linked to well-being and overall life satisfaction. Studies have shown that individuals who experience higher levels of happiness tend to have better physical and mental health, stronger social relationships, and greater resilience in the face of adversity.

The pursuit of happiness has been a central theme in philosophy and psychology for centuries. While there is no single, universally accepted definition of happiness, it is generally understood to be a state of mind characterized by positive emotions, a sense of purpose, and a feeling of fulfillment.

Definitions

[edit]

"Happiness" is subject to debate on usage and meaning,[1][2][3][4][5] and on possible differences in understanding by culture.[6][7]

The word is mostly used in relation to two factors:[8]

  • the current experience of the feeling of an emotion (affect) such as pleasure or joy,[9] or of a more general sense of 'emotional condition as a whole'.[a] For instance Daniel Kahneman has defined happiness as "what I experience here and now".[16] This usage is prevalent in dictionary definitions of happiness.[17][18][19]
  • appraisal of life satisfaction, such as of quality of life.[20] For instance Ruut Veenhoven has defined happiness as "overall appreciation of one's life as-a-whole."[7]: 2  "'Happiness' is often used, in ordinary life, to refer to a short-lived state of a person, frequently a feeling of contentment: 'You look happy today'; 'I'm very happy for you'. Philosophically, its scope is more often wider, encompassing a whole life. And in philosophy it is possible to speak of the happiness of a person's life, or of their happy life, even if that person was in fact usually pretty miserable. The point is that some good things in their life made it a happy one, even though they lacked contentment. But this usage is uncommon, and may cause confusion.'[1] Kahneman has said that this is more important to people than current experience.[16][21][22]

Some usages can include both of these factors. Subjective well-being (swb)[b] includes measures of current experience (emotions, moods, and feelings) and of life satisfaction.[c] For instance Sonja Lyubomirsky has described happiness as "the experience of joy, contentment, or positive well-being, combined with a sense that one's life is good, meaningful, and worthwhile."[24] Eudaimonia,[25] is a Greek term variously translated as happiness, welfare, flourishing, and blessedness. Xavier Landes[14] has proposed that happiness include measures of subjective well-being, mood and eudaimonia.[15]

These differing uses can give different results.[26] Whereas Nordic countries often score highest on swb surveys, South American countries score higher on affect-based surveys of current positive life experiencing.[27]

The implied meaning of the word may vary depending on context,[28] qualifying happiness as a polyseme and a fuzzy concept.

A further issue is when measurement is made; appraisal of a level of happiness at the time of the experience may be different from appraisal via memory at a later date.[29][30]

Some users accept these issues, but continue to use the word because of its convening power.[31]

Happiness vs joy

[edit]

German philosophy professor Michela Summa says that the distinction between joy and happiness is that "joy accompanies the process through and through, whereas happiness seems to be more strictly tied to the moment of achievement of the process... joy is not only a direct emotional response to an event that is embedded in our life-concerns but is also tightly bound to the present moment, whereas happiness presupposes an evaluative stance concerning one period of one's life or one's own life as a whole."[32]

Measurement

[edit]
Worldwide levels of happiness as measured by the World Happiness Report (2023)

People have been trying to measure happiness for centuries. In 1780, the English utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham proposed that as happiness was the primary goal of humans, it should be measured as a way of determining how well the government was performing.[33]

Today, happiness is typically measured using self-report surveys. Self-reporting is prone to cognitive biases and other sources of errors, such as peak–end rule. Studies show that memories of felt emotions can be inaccurate.[34] Affective forecasting research shows that people are poor predictors of their future emotions, including how happy they will be.[35]

Happiness economists are not overly concerned with philosophical and methodological issues and continue to use questionaries to measure average happiness of populations.

Several scales have been developed to measure happiness:

  • The Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS) is a four-item scale, measuring global subjective happiness from 1999. The scale requires participants to use absolute ratings to characterize themselves as happy or unhappy individuals, as well as it asks to what extent they identify themselves with descriptions of happy and unhappy individuals.[36][37]
  • The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) from 1988 is a 20-item questionnaire, using a five-point Likert scale (1 = very slightly or not at all, 5 = extremely) to assess the relation between personality traits and positive or negative affects at "this moment, today, the past few days, the past week, the past few weeks, the past year, and in general".[38] A longer version with additional affect scales was published 1994.[39]
  • The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is a global cognitive assessment of life satisfaction developed by Ed Diener. A seven-point Likert scale is used to agree or disagree with five statements about one's life.[40][41]
  • The Cantril ladder method[42] has been used in the World Happiness Report. Respondents are asked to think of a ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10, and the worst possible life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale.[43][42]
  • Positive Experience; the survey by Gallup asks if, the day before, people experienced enjoyment, laughing or smiling a lot, feeling well-rested, being treated with respect, learning or doing something interesting. 9 of the top 10 countries in 2018 were South American, led by Paraguay and Panama. Country scores range from 85 to 43.[44]
  • The Oxford Happiness Inventory is a comprehensive assessment tool consisting of 29 items, in which the person has to choose one of four options. It is user-friendly and easy to administer. This questionnaire shows the amount of well-being of a person. Providing quality insights of the happiness of one person.[45]

Since 2012, a World Happiness Report has been published. Happiness is evaluated, as in "How happy are you with your life as a whole?", and in emotional reports, as in "How happy are you now?," and people seem able to use happiness as appropriate in these verbal contexts. Using these measures, the report identifies the countries with the highest levels of happiness. In subjective well-being measures, the primary distinction is between cognitive life evaluations and emotional reports.[46]

The UK began to measure national well-being in 2012,[47] following Bhutan, which had already been measuring gross national happiness.[48][49]

Academic economists and international economic organizations are arguing for and developing multi-dimensional dashboards which combine subjective and objective indicators to provide a more direct and explicit assessment of human wellbeing. There are many different contributors to adult wellbeing, such as the point that happiness judgements partly reflect the presence of salient constraints, and that fairness, autonomy, community and engagement are key aspects of happiness and wellbeing throughout the life course.[50] Although these factors play a role in happiness, they do not all need to improve simultaneously to help one achieve an increase in happiness.

Happiness has been found to be quite stable over time.[51][52]

Genetics and heritability

[edit]

As of 2016, no evidence of happiness causing improved physical health has been found; the topic is being researched at the Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.[53] A positive relationship has been suggested between the volume of the brain's gray matter in the right precuneus area and one's subjective happiness score.[54]

Sonja Lyubomirsky has estimated that 50 percent of a given human's happiness level could be genetically determined, 10 percent is affected by life circumstances and situation, and a remaining 40 percent of happiness is subject to self-control.[55][56]

When discussing genetics and their effects on individuals it is important to first understand that genetics do not predict behavior. It is possible for genes to increase the likelihood of individuals being happier compared to others, but they do not 100 percent predict behavior.

At this point in scientific research, it has been hard to find a lot of evidence to support this idea that happiness is affected in some way by genetics. In a 2016 study, Michael Minkov and Michael Harris Bond found that a gene by the name of SLC6A4 was not a good predictor of happiness level in humans.[57]

On the other hand, there have been many studies that have found genetics to be a key part in predicting and understanding happiness in humans.[58] In a review article discussing many studies on genetics and happiness, they discussed the common findings.[59] The author found an important factor that has affected scientist findings this being how happiness is measured. For example, in certain studies when subjective wellbeing is measured as a trait heredity is found to be higher, about 70 to 90 percent. In another study, 11,500 unrelated genotypes were studied, and the conclusion was the heritability was only 12 to 18 percent. Overall, this article found the common percent of heredity was about 20 to 50 percent.[60]

Causes and achievement methods

[edit]
Main article: Well-being contributing factors

Theories on how to achieve happiness include "encountering unexpected positive events",[61] "seeing a significant other",[62] and "basking in the acceptance and praise of others".[63] Some others believe that happiness is not solely derived from external, momentary pleasures.[64]

Research on positive psychology, well-being, eudaimonia and happiness, and the theories of Diener, Ryff, Keyes, and Seligmann covers a broad range of levels and topics, including "the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life."[65] The psychiatrist George Vaillant and the director of longitudinal Study of Adult Development at Harvard University Robert J. Waldinger found that those who were happiest and healthier reported strong interpersonal relationships.[66] Research showed that adequate sleep contributes to well-being.[67] Good mental health and good relationships contribute more to happiness than income does.[68] In 2018, Laurie R. Santos course titled "Psychology and the Good Life" became the most popular course in the history of Yale University and was made available for free online to non-Yale students.[69]

Some commentators focus on the difference between the hedonistic tradition of seeking pleasant and avoiding unpleasant experiences, and the eudaimonic tradition of living life in a full and deeply satisfying way.[70] Kahneman has said that ""When you look at what people want for themselves, how they pursue their goals, they seem more driven by the search for satisfaction than the search for happiness."[71]

Viktor Frankl, a psychiatrist and prisoner in the Nazi concentration camps during World War II, noticed that those who lost hope soon died, while those who held to meaning and purpose tended to live on. Frankl observed that joy and misery had more to do with a person's perspective and choice than with their surroundings. Three key sources of meaning that he highlights in his writings include the following:[72]

  1. Creation of an important work, or doing a deed.
  2. Love, as manifest in thoroughly encountering another person or experience.
  3. Finding meaning in unavoidable suffering, such as seeing it as a sacrifice or learning opportunity.

Psychologist Robert Emmons has identified the centrality of goals in pursuing happiness. He found that when humans pursue meaningful projects and activities without primarily focusing on happiness, happiness often results as a by-product. Indicators of meaningfulness predict positive effects on life, while lack of meaning predicts negative states such as psychological distress. Emmons summarizes the four categories of meaning which have appeared throughout various studies. He proposes to call them WIST, or work, intimacy, spirituality, and transcendence.[73]

Throughout life, one's views of happiness and what brings happiness can evolve. In early and emerging adulthood many people focus on seeking happiness through friends, objects, and money. Middle aged-adults generally transition from searching for object-based happiness to looking for happiness in money and relationships. In older adulthood, people tend to focus more on personal peace and lasting relationships (ex. children, spouse, grandchildren).[74] Antti Kauppinen, a Swedish philosopher and phenomenological researcher, posited that the perception of time affects the change in focus throughout life. In early adulthood, most view life optimistically, looking to the future and seeing an entire life ahead of them. Those that fall into the middle life, see that life has passed behind them as well as seeing more life ahead. Those in older adulthood often see their lives as behind them. This shift in perspective causes a shift in the pursuit of happiness from more tactile, object based happiness, to social and relational based happiness.[75]

Self-fulfilment theories

[edit]
Woman kissing a baby on the cheek

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pyramid depicting the levels of human needs, psychological, and physical. When a human being ascends the steps of the pyramid, self-actualization is reached.[76] Beyond the routine of needs fulfillment, Maslow envisioned moments of extraordinary experience, known as peak experiences, profound moments of love, understanding, happiness, or rapture, during which a person feels more whole, alive, self-sufficient, and yet a part of the world. This is similar to the flow concept of Mihály Csíkszentmihályi.[77] The concept of flow is the idea that after our basic needs are met we can achieve greater happiness by altering our consciousness by becoming so engaged in a task that we lose our sense of time. Our intense focus causes us to forget any other issues, which in return promotes positive emotions.[78]

Erich Fromm said "Happiness is the indication that man has found the answer to the problem of human existence: the productive realization of his potentialities and thus, simultaneously, being one with the world and preserving the integrity of his self. In spending his energy productively he increases his powers, he 'burns without being consumed.'"[79]

Smiling woman from Vietnam

Self-determination theory relates intrinsic motivation to three needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness.[80] Competence refers to an individual's ability to be effective in their interactions with the environment, autonomy refers to a person's flexibility in choice and decision making, and relatedness is the need to establish warm, close personal relationships.[81]

Ronald Inglehart has traced cross-national differences in the level of happiness based on data from the World Values Survey.[82] He finds that the extent to which a society allows free choice has a major impact on happiness. When basic needs are satisfied, the degree of happiness depends on economic and cultural factors that enable free choice in how people live their lives. Happiness also depends on religion in countries where free choice is constrained.[83]

Sigmund Freud said that all humans strive after happiness, but that the possibilities of achieving it are restricted because we "are so made that we can derive intense enjoyment only from a contrast and very little from the state of things."[84]

The idea of motivational hedonism is the theory that pleasure is the aim for human life.[85]

Positive psychology

[edit]

Since 2000 the field of positive psychology, which focuses on the study of happiness and human flourishing rather than maladjusted behavior or illness, expanded drastically in terms of scientific publications. It was introduced by psychologist Martin Seligman in 1998 who argued that psychology had long focused on mental illness and bringing people from "minus five to zero," but that it should also study the conditions that allow individuals to thrive and move from "zero to plus five."[86] It has produced many different views on causes of happiness, and on factors that correlate with happiness, such as positive social interactions with family and friends.[86]

These factors include six key virtues:

1. Wisdom and knowledge, which includes creativity, curiosity, love of learning and open-mindedness.

2. Courage, which includes bravery, persistence, integrity, and vitality.

3. Humanity, which includes love, kindness, and social intelligence.

4. Justice, which includes leadership, fairness, and loyalty.

5. Temperance, which includes self-regulation, prudence, forgiveness, humility, patience [87] and modesty.

6. Transcendence, which includes religious/spirituality, hope, gratitude, appreciation of beauty and excellence, and humor.

Seligman later formalized positive psychology with the PERMA model (Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment), introduced in 2011.[88] The model has since been widely used in positive psychology research as a framework for understanding well-being.[89]

In order for a virtue to be considered a key strength in the field of positive psychology it must meet the demands of 12 criteria, namely ubiquity (cross-cultural), fulfilling, morally valued, does not diminish others, be a nonfelicitous opposite (have a clear antonym that is negative), traitlike, measurable, distinct, have paragons (distinctly show up in individuals' behaviors), have prodigies (show up in youth), be selectively absent (distinctly does not show up in some individuals), and is supported by some institutions.[90][91]

Numerous short-term self-help interventions have been developed and demonstrated to improve happiness.[92][93]

Yale researcher Emma Seppälä has emphasized the importance of compassion for others, balanced with self-compassion. Compassion for others may involve service and volunteering, or simply reaching out to connect, show gratitude, or draw others together.[94]

Spillover

[edit]

A person's level of subjective well-being is determined by many different factors and social influences prove to be a strong one. Results from the famous Framingham Heart Study indicate that friends three degrees of separation away (that is, friends of friends of friends) can affect a person's happiness. From abstract: "A friend who lives within a mile (about 1.6 km) and who becomes happy increases the probability that a person is happy by 25%."[95]

Indirect approaches

[edit]

Various writers, including Camus and Tolle, have written that the act of searching or seeking for happiness is incompatible with being happy.[96][97][98][99]

John Stuart Mill believed that for the great majority of people happiness is best achieved en passant, rather than striving for it directly. This meant no self-consciousness, scrutiny, self-interrogation, dwelling on, thinking about, imagining or questioning on one's happiness. Then, if otherwise fortunately circumstanced, one would "inhale happiness with the air you breathe."[d]

William Inge said that "on the whole, the happiest people seem to be those who have no particular cause for being happy except the fact that they are so."[102] Orison Swett Marden said that "some people are born happy."[e]

Cognitive behavioral therapy

[edit]

Cognitive behavioral therapy is a popular therapeutic method used to change habits by changing thoughts and problematic behaviors. It focuses on emotional regulation and uses a lot of positive psychology practices. It is often used for people with depression, anxiety, or addictions and works towards how to lead a happier life.[104] Common processes in cognitive behavioral therapy are reframing thoughts from problematic thinking patterns by replacing them with beneficial or supportive ones, roleplaying, finding beneficial coping skills, and choosing new activities that support desired behaviors and avoid negative behaviors.[105]

Synthetic happiness

[edit]

Coined by Harvard professor of psychology and author of "Stumbling on Happiness", Daniel Gilbert, synthetic happiness is the happiness we make for ourselves. In his TedTalk titled, the surprising science of happiness, Gilbert explains that everyone possesses a "psychological immune system" that helps to regulate our emotional reactions.[106] Through research that he studied and held, he and his team found that personal happiness is largely based on personal perception. Synthetic happiness as an idea has become more popular as people attempt to define happiness as a journey instead of a destination.[citation needed]

Effects

[edit]

Happiness research understands "happiness" as "life satisfaction" or "well-being". Since it has proved difficult to find a definition of happiness, individual people are instead asked how happy they feel.[107] Numerous surveys are then summarized and analyzed using static methods. Although some researchers believe that the scales are fundamentally unsuitable for estimating happiness,[108] other researchers argue that the happiness indices formed on the basis of the survey have a high statistical correspondence with characteristics that are generally understood to indicate a happy person. For example, individuals who report high happiness on scales smile more often, exhibit more social behavior, are more helpful, and are less likely to commit suicide. For this reason, happiness indices determined on the basis of the survey are considered reliable by happiness researchers.[109]

A meta analysis of 2023 evaluated evidence for common happiness-boosting strategies. The study aimed to shed light on the effectiveness of these strategies and their impact on subjective well-being. As a first step, the authors analyzed numerous media articles on happiness to identify the five most commonly recommended strategies, these were: expressing gratitude, enhancing sociability, exercising, practicing mindfulness/meditation, and increasing exposure to nature. Next, the published scientific literature was searched but limited to the above-described high-quality criteria that tested the effects of these strategies on subjective well-being in everyday individuals. Only 10% of the initially retrieved studies met those rigorous criteria. The findings revealed that unlike so far suggested by scientific studies, there is currently still a lack of robust scientific evidence to support some of the most frequently suggested happiness strategies. Among the five most common happiness strategies, there was "reasonably solid evidence" of positive effects from a) Gratitude messages or lists, b) conversations with strangers or Gratitude and sociability – that is, establishing and maintaining social relationships. In contrast, no convincing evidence could be found that c) sports, d) mindfulness training, or e) walks in the countryside make people happier.[110]

Positive

[edit]

There is a wealth of cross-sectional studies on happiness and physical health that shows consistent positive relationships.[111] Follow-up studies appear to show that happiness does not predict longevity in sick populations, but that it does predict longevity among healthy populations.[112]

Other positive effects of happiness and being in a good mood, that have been studied and confirmed, are that happier people tend to be more helpful, attentive, and generous to others,[113] as well as to themselves.[114] Happy people also have been shown to act more cooperatively and less aggressively,[115] and be more likely to help others in need.[116] They were also found to be more sociable and communicative.[117]

More positive effects that happiness seems to evoke are creative problem solving,[118] persisting through challenges,[119] more intrinsic motivation for work related or responsible tasks,[120] and being more effective at using efficient decision-making strategies.[121]

While some believe that success breeds happiness, Lyubomirsky, King and Diener found that happiness precedes success in income, relationships, marriages, work performance, and health.[122]

Low mood is correlated with many negative life outcomes such as suicide, poor health, substance abuse, and low life expectancy. By extension, happiness protects from those negative outcomes.

Negative

[edit]

June Gruber argued that happiness may trigger a person to be more sensitive, more gullible, less successful, and more likely to undertake high risk behaviours.[123][124] She also conducted studies suggesting that seeking happiness can have negative effects, such as failure to meet over-high expectations.[125][126][127] Iris Mauss has shown that the more people strive for happiness, the more likely they will set up too high of standards and feel disappointed.[128][129] One study shows that women who value happiness more tend to react less positively to happy emotions.[130] A 2012 study found that psychological well-being was higher for people who experienced both positive and negative emotions.[131][132]

Society and culture

[edit]

Government

[edit]
Newly commissioned officers celebrate their new positions by throwing their midshipmen covers into the air as part of the U.S. Naval Academy class of 2011 graduation and commissioning ceremony.
Main article: Happiness economics

Jeremy Bentham believed that public policy should attempt to maximize happiness, and he even attempted to estimate a "hedonic calculus". Thomas Jefferson put the "pursuit of happiness" on the same level as life and liberty in the United States Declaration of Independence. Presently, many countries and organizations regularly measure population happiness through large-scale surveys, e.g., Bhutan.

Richer nations tend to have higher measures of happiness than poorer nations.[133][134] The relationship between wealth and happiness is not linear and the same GDP increase in poor countries will have more effect on happiness than in wealthy countries.[135][136][137][138]

Some political scientists argue that life satisfaction is positively related to the social democratic model of a generous social safety net, pro-worker labor market regulations, and strong labor unions.[139][140][141] Others argue that happiness is strongly correlated with economic freedom,[142] preferably within the context of a western mixed economy, with free press and a democracy.

Cultural values

[edit]
A little girl from Namche Bazaar, Nepal, expressing her happiness towards foreign visitors

Personal happiness can be affected by cultural factors.[143][144][145] Hedonism appears to be more strongly related to happiness in more individualistic cultures.[146] Forcing people to marry and stay married can have adverse consequences. Research has shown that unhappily married couples suffer 3–25 times the risk of developing clinical depression.[147][148][149]

One theory is that higher SWB in richer countries is related to their more individualistic cultures. Individualistic cultures may satisfy intrinsic motivations to a higher degree than collectivistic cultures, and fulfilling intrinsic motivations, as opposed to extrinsic motivations, may relate to greater levels of happiness, leading to more happiness in individualistic cultures.[150]

Cultural views on happiness have changed over time.[151] For instance Western concern about childhood being a time of happiness has occurred only since the 19th century.[152] Not all cultures seek to maximize happiness,[153][nb 1][nb 2] and some cultures are averse to happiness.[154][155] It has been found in Western cultures that individual happiness is the most important. Some other cultures have opposite views and tend to be aversive to the idea of individual happiness. For example, people living in Eastern Asian cultures focus more on the need for happiness within relationships with others and even find personal happiness to be harmful to fulfilling happy social relationships.[154][153][156][nb 1][nb 2]

Religion

[edit]
See also: Religious studies

People in countries with high cultural religiosity tend to relate their life satisfaction less to their emotional experiences than people in more secular countries.[157]

Buddhism

[edit]
Tibetan Buddhist monk

Happiness forms a central theme of Buddhist teachings.[158] For ultimate freedom from suffering, the Noble Eightfold Path leads its practitioner to Nirvana, a state of everlasting peace. Ultimate happiness is only achieved by overcoming craving in all forms. More mundane forms of happiness, such as acquiring wealth and maintaining good friendships, are also recognized as worthy goals for lay people (see sukha). Buddhism also encourages the generation of loving kindness and compassion, the desire for the happiness and welfare of all beings.[159][160][161][unreliable source?][unreliable source?]

Hinduism

[edit]

In Advaita Vedanta, the ultimate goal of life is happiness, in the sense that duality between Atman and Brahman is transcended and one realizes oneself to be the Self in all.

Patanjali, author of the Yoga Sutras, wrote exhaustively on the psychological and ontological roots of bliss.[162]

Confucianism

[edit]

The Chinese Confucian thinker Mencius, who had sought to give advice to ruthless political leaders during China's Warring States period, was convinced that the mind played a mediating role between the "lesser self" (the physiological self) and the "greater self" (the moral self), and that getting the priorities right between these two would lead to sage-hood.[163] He argued that if one did not feel satisfaction or pleasure in nourishing one's "vital force" with "righteous deeds", then that force would shrivel up (Mencius, 6A:15 2A:2). More specifically, he mentions the experience of intoxicating joy if one celebrates the practice of the great virtues, especially through music.[164]

Judaism

[edit]
Main article: Happiness in Judaism

Happiness or simcha in Judaism is considered an important element in the service of God.[165] A popular teaching by Rabbi Nachman of Breslov, a 19th-century Chassidic Rabbi, is "Mitzvah Gedolah Le'hiyot Besimcha Tamid," it is a great mitzvah (commandment) to always be in a state of happiness. When a person is happy they are much more capable of serving God and going about their daily activities than when depressed or upset.[166][self-published source?]

Christianity

[edit]
Further information: The Beatitudes

In Christianity, the ultimate end of human existence consists in felicity, Latin equivalent to the Greek eudaimonia ("blessed happiness"), described by the 13th-century philosopher-theologian Thomas Aquinas as a beatific vision of God's essence in the next life.[167] According to Aquinas and Augustine of Hippo, man's last end is happiness: "all men agree in desiring the last end, which is happiness."[168] Aquinas agreed with Aristotle that happiness cannot be reached solely through reasoning about consequences of acts, but also requires a pursuit of good causes for acts, such as habits according to virtue.[169]

According to Aquinas, happiness consists in an "operation of the speculative intellect": "Consequently happiness consists principally in such an operation, viz. in the contemplation of Divine things." And, "the last end cannot consist in the active life, which pertains to the practical intellect." So:

Therefore the last and perfect happiness, which we await in the life to come, consists entirely in contemplation. But imperfect happiness, such as can be had here, consists first and principally in contemplation, but secondarily, in an operation of the practical intellect directing human actions and passions.[170]

Human complexities, like reason and cognition, can produce well-being or happiness, but such form is limited and transitory. In temporal life, the contemplation of God, the infinitely Beautiful, is the supreme delight of the will. Beatitudo, or perfect happiness, as complete well-being, is to be attained not in this life, but the next.[171]

Islam

[edit]

Al-Ghazali, the Sufi thinker, wrote that "The Alchemy of Happiness" is a manual of religious instruction that is used throughout the Muslim world and widely practiced today.[172]

Philosophy

[edit]
A smiling butcher slicing meat
Main article: Philosophy of happiness

Relation to morality

[edit]

Philosophy of happiness is often discussed in conjunction with ethics.[173] Traditional European societies, inherited from the Greeks and from Christianity, often linked happiness with morality. In this context, morality was the performance in a specific role in a certain kind of social life.[174]

Happiness remains a difficult term for moral philosophy. Throughout the history of moral philosophy, there has been an oscillation between attempts to define morality in terms of consequences leading to happiness or defining it as nothing to do with happiness at all.[175]

In psychology, connections between happiness and morality have been studied in a variety of ways. Empirical research suggests that laypeople's judgments of a person's happiness in part depend on perceptions of that person's morality, suggesting that judgments of others' happiness involve moral evaluation.[176] A large body of research also suggests that engaging in prosocial behavior can increase happiness.[177][178][179]

Ethics

[edit]

Ethicists have made arguments for how humans should behave, either individually or collectively, based on the resulting happiness of such behavior. Utilitarians, such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, advocated the greatest happiness principle as a guide for ethical behavior. This principle states that actions are proportionately right or wrong by how much happiness or unhappiness they bring. Mill defines happiness as that which brings about an intended pleasure and avoids an unnecessary pain, and he defines unhappiness as the reverse, namely an action that brings about pain and not pleasure. He is quick to specify that pleasure and pain are to be understood in an Epicurean light, referring chiefly to the higher human pleasures of increased intellect, feelings, and moral sentiments not what one might call beastly pleasures of mere animal appetites.[180] Critics of this view include Thomas Carlyle, Ferdinand Tönnies and others within the German philosophical tradition. They posit that a greater happiness is to be found in choosing to suffer for others, rather than allowing others to suffer for them, declaring this to be a form of satisfying, and heroic, nobility.[181]

Many studies have observed the effects of volunteerism (as a form of altruism) on happiness and health and have consistently found that those who exhibit volunteerism also have better current and future health and well-being.[182][183] In a study of older adults, those who volunteered had higher life satisfaction and will to live, and less depression, anxiety, and somatization.[184] Volunteerism and helping behavior have not only been shown to improve mental health but physical health and longevity as well, attributable to the activity and social integration it encourages.[182][185][186] One study examined the physical health of mothers who volunteered over 30 years and found that 52% of those who did not belong to a volunteer organization experienced a major illness while only 36% of those who did volunteer experienced one.[187] A study on adults aged 55 and older found that during the four-year study period, people who volunteered for two or more organizations had a 63% lower likelihood of dying. After controlling for prior health status, it was determined that volunteerism accounted for a 44% reduction in mortality.[188]

Aristotle

[edit]

Aristotle described eudaimonia (Greek: εὐδαιμονία) as the goal of human thought and action. Eudaimonia is often translated to mean happiness, but some scholars contend that "human flourishing" may be a more accurate translation.[189] Aristotle's use of the term in Nicomachiean Ethics extends beyond the general sense of happiness.[190]

In the Nicomachean Ethics, written in 350 BCE, Aristotle stated that happiness (also being well and doing well) is the only thing that humans desire for their own sake, unlike riches, honour, health or friendship. He observed that men sought riches, or honour, or health not only for their own sake but also in order to be happy.[191] For Aristotle the term eudaimonia, which is translated as 'happiness' or 'flourishing' is an activity rather than an emotion or a state.[192] Eudaimonia (Greek: εὐδαιμονία) is a classical Greek word consists of the word "eu" ("good" or "well-being") and "daimōn" ("spirit" or "minor deity", used by extension to mean one's lot or fortune). Thus understood, the happy life is the good life, that is, a life in which a person fulfills human nature in an excellent way.[193]

Specifically, Aristotle argued that the good life is the life of excellent rational activity. He arrived at this claim with the "Function Argument". Basically, if it is right, every living thing has a function, that which it uniquely does. For Aristotle human function is to reason, since it is that alone which humans uniquely do. And performing one's function well, or excellently, is good. According to Aristotle, the life of excellent rational activity is the happy life.[193]

The key question Aristotle seeks to answer is "What is the ultimate purpose of human existence?" A lot of people are seeking pleasure, health, and a good reputation. It is true that those have a value, but none of them can occupy the place of the greatest good for which humanity aims. It may seem like all goods are a means to obtain happiness, but Aristotle said that happiness is always an end in itself.[194]

Nietzsche

[edit]

Friedrich Nietzsche critiqued the English Utilitarians' focus on attaining the greatest happiness, stating that "Man does not strive for happiness, only the Englishman does".[195] Nietzsche meant that making happiness one's ultimate goal and the aim of one's existence, in his words "makes one contemptible." Nietzsche instead yearned for a culture that would set higher, more difficult goals than "mere happiness." He introduced the quasi-dystopic figure of the "last man" as a kind of thought experiment against the utilitarians and happiness-seekers.[196][197]

These small, "last men" who seek after only their own pleasure and health, avoiding all danger, exertion, difficulty, challenge, struggle are meant to seem contemptible to Nietzsche's reader. Nietzsche instead wants us to consider the value of what is difficult, what can only be earned through struggle, difficulty, pain and thus to come to see the affirmative value suffering and unhappiness truly play in creating everything of great worth in life, including all the highest achievements of human culture, not least of all philosophy.[196][197]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Happiness

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Happiness is a multifaceted psychological state encompassing , characterized by positive emotions, , and a sense of meaning or purpose, often distinguished into hedonic (momentary ) and eudaimonic (deeper fulfillment). In , it is primarily measured through self-reported assessments of overall on scales like the Cantril Ladder (from 0 for worst possible to 10 for best) and balance of positive versus negative affect, yielding consistent individual differences that predict behaviors such as and . Scientific inquiry reveals happiness as largely stable over time due to a genetic "set point," with twin studies estimating at 30-50% of variance, meaning innate predispositions heavily influence baseline levels regardless of external changes. Life circumstances, including , , and social ties, explain only about 10% of differences, as people adapt quickly to events via the , returning to equilibrium; beyond , further wealth yields . Intentional practices—such as , exercise, and —account for the remaining 40%, offering causal levers for elevation through deliberate habits rather than passive circumstance. The , drawing on Gallup World Poll data from over 140 countries, quantifies national averages via evaluations, attributing variations to six factors: GDP per capita, , healthy , to make choices, , and perceptions of , with Nordic nations consistently topping rankings due to strong institutions and trust rather than mere affluence. Controversies persist over self-report reliability, potentially inflated by cultural biases or memory distortions, yet convergent validity with physiological markers like cortisol levels and health outcomes supports causal realism in these metrics over purely philosophical ideals. Philosophically rooted in Aristotelian , modern causal models emphasize agency and adaptation over utopian pursuits, countering biases in academia that overstate while underplaying genetic constraints.

Definitions

Etymology and Core Concepts

The English term "happiness" emerged in the 1520s as the noun form of "happy" suffixed with "-ness," originally connoting good fortune, , or in affairs. Its root, "happy," derives from the late 14th-century adoption of happ (also appearing in as hap), signifying chance, luck, or happenstance, which imparted an initial sense of being favored by external fortune rather than an endogenous emotional state. This etymological lineage reflects a historical shift from or providential connotations—evident in early uses linking happiness to life's unpredictable outcomes—to a more internalized notion of pleasurable by the , amid Enlightenment philosophical inquiries into human welfare. Core concepts of happiness bifurcate between philosophical ideals of and empirical operationalizations as . In philosophical traditions, happiness often denotes eudaimonia—Aristotelian human fulfillment through virtuous activity and rational potential realization—contrasting with hedonistic pleasure-seeking, though the English term's luck-derived origins align more closely with transient fortune than sustained . Empirically, in , happiness constitutes a composite of cognitive (global evaluative judgments against personal standards) and affective components (prevalence of positive emotions like over negative ones like distress), as validated in large-scale surveys tracking longitudinal outcomes such as and . This framework, drawn from meta-analyses of self-reports, posits happiness not as a unitary trait but a dynamic equilibrium shaped by (heritability estimates around 40-50%), intentional behaviors, and circumstantial variables, with causal evidence from interventions like gratitude practices yielding modest effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.2-0.5). Such definitions prioritize measurable correlates over normative ideals, revealing happiness as probabilistically linked to adaptive functioning rather than guaranteed by any singular pursuit.

Hedonic vs. Eudaimonic Happiness

Hedonic happiness centers on the experience of , positive emotions, and overall , prioritizing subjective feelings of enjoyment and the minimization of discomfort. This approach, rooted in psychological traditions emphasizing hedonia, views as the balance of positive affect over negative affect, often assessed via self-reports of momentary happiness or . Empirical measures of hedonic typically include scales capturing frequency of positive moods and global satisfaction judgments, such as those in inventories. In contrast, eudaimonic happiness derives from the ancient Greek concept of eudaimonia, denoting human flourishing through the actualization of virtues, potential, and rational activity aligned with one's true nature, as articulated by Aristotle. Modern formulations, advanced by researchers like Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci, frame it as involving intrinsic motivations such as autonomy, competence, relatedness, personal growth, purpose in life, and meaningful contributions to society. Eudaimonic well-being is evaluated through indicators like psychological functioning, self-acceptance, positive relations with others, and environmental mastery, often via multidimensional scales that probe deeper existential and developmental aspects rather than transient emotions. The distinction between these orientations lies in their foundational assumptions: hedonic views prioritize what feels good in the present, potentially leading to pursuits like sensory or relaxation, whereas eudaimonic emphasizes what constitutes a good life through effortful and , even if it entails temporary discomfort. Although correlated—typically at r ≈ 0.60–0.70 across studies—the constructs demonstrate empirical divergence; for instance, hedonic pursuits correlate more strongly with short-term positive affect, while eudaimonic ones predict sustained psychological health and resilience. Research indicates that eudaimonic orientations yield stronger associations with long-term outcomes, including lower markers, better immune function, and reduced mortality risk, compared to purely hedonic approaches, which may wane over time or correlate less robustly with health when isolated. A 2021 found eudaimonic motivation mediated gains through enhanced self-growth, while showed weaker, more variable effects on overall happiness. Nonetheless, both contribute to , with optimal often involving their integration; exclusive hedonic focus has been linked to diminished returns, as pleasure-seeking without purpose correlates with lower in meta-analyses.
DimensionHedonic HappinessEudaimonic Happiness
Core FocusPleasure attainment and pain avoidance, purpose, and potential realization
Key ComponentsPositive affect, , growth, meaning, relationships
Temporal OrientationShort-term, immediate gratificationLong-term, developmental striving
Empirical OutcomesStronger ties to momentary moodStronger links to and resilience
Happiness is differentiated from primarily by its cognitive and evaluative components, whereas constitutes an immediate, sensory-driven affective response often tied to hedonic stimuli such as food or physical comfort. indicates that can occur independently of overall assessment and may even diminish in pursuit of escalating hedonic , while happiness requires a broader judgment of , typically emerging in contexts of perceived and resource stability. In contrast to , which manifests as an intense, high-arousal positive emotion frequently triggered by specific events and characterized by shorter duration, happiness encompasses a more sustained state integrating frequent positive affect with cognitive satisfaction over time. Studies in highlight joy's role in momentary undoing of negative emotional residues, such as through cardiovascular recovery, but position happiness as a composite including and efficacy rather than episodic peaks alone. This distinction underscores happiness's relative stability against joy's reactivity to transient circumstances. Contentment differs from happiness in its lower and emphasis on serene without active striving, often reflecting a passive equilibrium rather than the purposeful or central to happier states. Neuroscientific perspectives suggest contentment involves sustained activity linked to reduced desire for change, whereas happiness correlates with broader reward pathways tied to achievement and social bonds. Satisfaction, while overlapping with happiness through fulfillment of expectations, is more narrowly outcome-oriented and contingent on specific achievements, lacking the holistic, enduring quality of happiness that incorporates resilience against setbacks. Empirical models in treat satisfaction as a subscale of , measurable via domain-specific appraisals (e.g., job or relationship), but subordinate it to happiness's multifaceted structure including absence of distress. Bliss and ecstasy represent heightened, often transcendent variants beyond typical happiness, involving altered consciousness or euphoria that may detach from rational evaluation; bliss implies a profound, ego-dissolving serenity, while ecstasy entails overwhelming sensory or spiritual intensity. Psychological accounts differentiate these from happiness by their rarity and potential independence from everyday causal factors, with ecstasy linked to peak experiences that temporarily override baseline hedonic setpoints, unlike happiness's grounding in adaptive functioning.

Biological Foundations

Genetic Heritability

Twin studies, which compare monozygotic () twins reared apart and together with dizygotic (fraternal) twins, provide the primary evidence for estimating the genetic of (SWB), a core measure encompassing happiness, , and positive affect. A seminal analysis by Lykken and Tellegen using data from the Twin Registry, involving over 1,000 twin pairs including those reared apart, estimated the of the stable component of at approximately 44%, indicating that genetic factors explain nearly half of the variance in long-term happiness levels after accounting for shared environments. This supports the "set-point" theory, wherein individuals possess a genetically influenced baseline level of happiness to which they tend to return following life events. Meta-analyses of multiple twin and family studies reinforce these findings, reporting weighted average heritability estimates for SWB ranging from 32% to 40%. For instance, a 2015 review of 30 studies involving measures like and happiness yielded a heritability of 36% (95% CI: 34-38%), with the remainder attributed to unique environmental influences rather than shared environments. More recent global simulations using twin data from diverse populations estimate at 31-32%, highlighting consistency across cultures while underscoring that individual-specific environments, including non-shared experiences and measurement error, account for 46-52% of variance. These estimates derive from broad-sense heritability, encompassing additive and non-additive genetic effects, but genome-wide association studies (GWAS) reveal lower "chip heritability" captured by common SNPs (around 4-10%), suggesting polygenic influences involving many variants of small effect, with potential contributions from rare variants or gene-environment interactions not fully explained by twin designs. does not imply immutability, as genetic influences operate within environmental contexts, and interventions targeting modifiable factors can still elevate SWB above baseline levels despite genetic predispositions.

Neurobiological Mechanisms

Happiness involves the activation of specific systems in the , primarily , serotonin, oxytocin, and endogenous s, which mediate reward, mood stabilization, social bonding, and euphoric states, respectively. release in the , particularly from the to the , underlies the anticipation and experience of and , contributing to hedonic aspects of happiness. Serotonin, modulated in the and projecting to prefrontal areas, regulates overall mood and emotional resilience, with higher levels correlating to sustained positive affect and reduced to negative emotions. Oxytocin, released from the during social interactions, enhances feelings of trust and attachment, fostering prosocial happiness through its effects on the and . Endorphins, peptides acting on mu- receptors in the and , produce analgesia and , often triggered by or . Neuroimaging studies, including functional MRI and PET scans, have identified key brain regions associated with subjective happiness and positive affect. The (OFC) encodes the subjective value of rewards and pleasant stimuli, showing increased activation during experiences of or satisfaction. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and (ACC) integrate emotional evaluation and cognitive control, with greater left-lateralized prefrontal activity linked to approach-oriented positive emotions, as opposed to right-lateralized withdrawal responses. The and ventral process reward prediction errors, amplifying happiness through signaling when expectations of are met or exceeded. The insula contributes to interoceptive awareness of bodily states underlying emotional well-being, while the modulates valence, with reduced reactivity to negative stimuli in happier individuals. Resting-state functional connectivity and structural analyses further reveal correlates of trait happiness. Higher gray matter volume in the and has been observed in individuals reporting elevated , suggesting stable neural substrates for sustained positive outlook. Decreased spontaneous gamma-band oscillations in the during rest may reflect neural efficiency in maintaining happiness, as measured by EEG in self-reported happy subjects. These mechanisms interact dynamically; for instance, serotonin modulates dopamine release to prevent hedonic dysregulation, while chronic stress-induced elevations can suppress these pathways, linking neurobiology to environmental influences on happiness. Overall, happiness emerges from distributed circuits balancing hedonic hotspots for "liking" with broader networks for wanting and , rather than a single localized generator.

Evolutionary Perspectives

From an evolutionary psychological standpoint, human happiness emerged as a set of psychological adaptations designed to promote behaviors that enhanced reproductive fitness in ancestral environments. Positive affective states, such as and , functioned to reinforce actions like resource acquisition, mate selection, and alliance formation, which directly contributed to and propagation. These emotions incentivized persistence in fitness-enhancing activities, with empirical models indicating that happiness correlates with traits signaling high , including health, status, and . Specific mechanisms generating deep happiness include those tied to bonds, where pair-bonding releases rewards to stabilize long-term partnerships beneficial for rearing; deep friendships, which facilitate reciprocal aid in cooperative coalitions; and close kinship ties, which prioritize investment in genetic relatives to maximize . Cooperative behaviors within groups also evoke positive affect to sustain alliances against external threats, as evidenced by patterns where social embeddedness predicts outcomes aligned with ancestral selection pressures. However, evolution did not optimize for perpetual bliss; instead, negative emotions like distress evolved as counterbalances to deter suboptimal choices, such as risk-taking without payoff or neglect of vigilance. Competitive dynamics further constrain happiness, as zero-sum elements in status hierarchies and mate inherently produce discontent for subordinates, reflecting adaptations where relative gains for some necessitate losses for others. The hedonic adaptation process, wherein individuals rapidly habituate to positive changes and revert to a baseline affective set point, serves to prevent motivational stagnation, ensuring continued striving in variable environments rather than satisfaction-induced . Modern mismatches—such as abundant resources without corresponding ancestral cues for —exacerbate dissatisfaction by decoupling happiness signals from their original fitness contexts, leading to elevated baseline distress compared to Pleistocene baselines. This framework underscores that while happiness promotes adaptive outcomes, its intermittent nature aligns with selection for vigilance over complacency.

Measurement

Subjective Well-Being Scales

(SWB) is typically assessed through self-report scales that capture cognitive evaluations of and affective components involving positive and negative emotions. These instruments operationalize SWB as a multifaceted construct, distinct from objective indicators, relying on individuals' introspective judgments rather than external proxies. Prominent scales include global measures and affect-specific inventories, which have demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in numerous validation studies, though they remain susceptible to cultural response styles and transient mood influences. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), developed by and colleagues in 1985, is a widely used 5-item instrument for gauging overall cognitive judgments of . Respondents rate statements such as "In most ways my life is close to my ideal" on a 7-point from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), yielding scores from 5 to 35, with higher values indicating greater satisfaction. The scale exhibits high (Cronbach's α typically >0.80) and test-retest reliability over periods up to two months (r ≈ 0.80-0.84), alongside with other measures (r ≈ 0.60-0.70). It focuses narrowly on global appraisal, avoiding domain-specific or emotional items, which enhances its utility for cross-cultural comparisons but limits assessment of affective dynamics. Affect-based scales complement life satisfaction measures by quantifying emotional experiences. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), introduced by David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen in 1988, consists of 20 adjectives (10 for positive affect, e.g., "enthusiastic," and 10 for negative affect, e.g., "distressed") rated on a 5-point intensity scale over a specified timeframe, such as "right now" or "past week." Positive affect subscales correlate with energy and engagement (α >0.85), while negative affect tracks distress (α >0.85), with low between subscales (r <0.20) supporting their orthogonality. Validation studies confirm its reliability across contexts and predictive validity for behavioral outcomes like resilience, though self-report format may introduce social desirability bias. The Cantril Ladder, originally formulated by Hadley Cantril in 1965 and adapted for modern surveys like the Gallup World Poll, presents respondents with an 11-rung ladder where 0 represents the worst possible life and 10 the best, asking them to place their current standing. This single-item evaluative measure correlates moderately with multi-item scales (r ≈ 0.60-0.70) and shows stability over time, making it efficient for large-scale, international assessments of life evaluation. Its visual analogy facilitates accessibility across literacy levels, but ordinal nature limits nuanced variance capture compared to summed scales. Composite SWB indices often integrate these elements, such as averaging life satisfaction with affect balances, to approximate overall happiness. Reviews of common measures affirm their convergent validity (correlations >0.50 across instruments) and criterion validity against predictors like or , yet highlight limitations including recall biases and lower reliability in non-Western samples where individualistic framings may underperform. Ongoing refinements emphasize brief, psychometrically robust tools for policy-relevant tracking.

Objective Indicators and Proxies

Objective indicators and proxies for happiness include empirically verifiable metrics such as economic , outcomes, , and social stability factors that show consistent cross-national correlations with aggregate self-reported levels. These measures provide an alternative to subjective surveys by relying on administrative data, national statistics, and standardized indices, allowing for comparisons across populations without self-assessment biases. Research distinguishes them from by focusing on observable conditions presumed to underpin , though correlations vary by context and do not imply direct causation. Gross domestic product (GDP) stands as a primary economic proxy, with logarithmic scaling explaining substantial variance in national happiness rankings; for instance, a 2023 analysis of 140+ countries found self-reported rising sharply from low-income levels (below $1,000 GDP ) but plateauing above $30,000–$75,000, consistent with the where relative rather than absolute income drives further gains. Cross-country regressions confirm GDP as the strongest single predictor among objective variables, accounting for up to 70% of differences in average life evaluations in some models. Health metrics, particularly healthy life expectancy (years lived without major ), correlate positively with ; global data from 2024 indicate that each additional year of healthy life expectancy boosts national happiness scores by 0.1–0.2 points on a 0–10 scale, independent of GDP effects, as healthier populations report lower chronic distress and higher functional independence. rates and prevalence of non-communicable diseases serve as complementary proxies, with lower rates aligning with elevated satisfaction in longitudinal studies across developing and developed nations. Educational attainment, measured by average years of schooling or rates, acts as a proxy, with meta-analyses showing a 0.15–0.25 to aggregates; higher education levels facilitate better and , indirectly enhancing objective conditions like stability. Social stability indicators, such as rates and indices, further proxy happiness: countries with rates below 5 per 100,000 residents exhibit 10–15% higher average scores, while lower perceived (e.g., scores above 70 on the 2023 ) aligns with greater trust and perceptions that bolster objective . These proxies, while useful for , often explain only 50–60% of variance in subjective measures, underscoring the role of unobservable factors like personal resilience.
Proxy IndicatorCorrelation with National Happiness (approx. r)Key Data Source (Recent)
Log GDP per capita0.6–0.7Gallup World Poll regressions, 2023
Healthy life expectancy0.4–0.5WHO estimates in World Happiness Report, 2024
Years of schooling0.2–0.3UNESCO data cross-matched with satisfaction surveys
Homicide rate (inverse)-0.3 to -0.4UNODC statistics, 2022–2023

Challenges and Biases in Assessment

Self-reported assessments of happiness, primarily through (SWB) scales, are susceptible to , where individuals overstate positive emotions and understate negative ones in non-anonymous settings to conform to perceived norms. Evidence from longitudinal surveys like the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) cohorts shows that reported happiness levels are significantly higher in phone interviews compared to anonymous self-administered questionnaires, with the discrepancy in depression reporting equivalent to that between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This bias persists even after controlling for individual fixed effects and randomized survey modes, confirming its causal role in distorting measures. Cultural and response style differences further complicate cross-group comparisons, as interpretations of rating scales vary by background, leading to differential validity. For instance, scale elasticity—where individuals recalibrate responses based on personal experiences or cultural norms—undermines between-country rankings, with cultural factors explaining up to 20% of unexplained variance in happiness reports. Single-item measures, common in global surveys like the , exhibit limited measurement invariance across nations, with frequent response shifts (e.g., from "very" to "quite" happy) when repeated, reducing reliability and . Negatively worded items in scales also introduce method effects, loading onto separate factors and yielding lower reliability (e.g., McDonald's of 0.72–0.79 versus 0.87–0.88 for positive items), particularly among cognitively impaired or ethnically diverse groups. Objective proxies, such as income or health metrics, face validity challenges in capturing the experiential core of happiness, often correlating moderately but failing to account for hedonic adaptation, where individuals recalibrate baselines after life changes, masking true shifts in well-being. Adaptation rates vary by domain (e.g., faster for income than health), leading to underestimation of enduring impacts. Reliability issues persist in longitudinal data, as transient mood or recall biases influence global judgments, with vignette-based adjustments confounded by environmental factors like healthcare access. These limitations highlight the need for multi-method approaches, though no single metric fully resolves comparability across diverse populations.

Determinants

Innate and Personality Factors

Twin studies and meta-analyses consistently indicate that genetic factors account for approximately 30-50% of the variance in (SWB), a primary measure encompassing , positive affect, and low negative affect. A 2015 meta-analysis of 30 twin-family studies reported a weighted average estimate of 0.36 for SWB and related constructs like happiness and . More recent genomic analyses, including those from diverse ancestral backgrounds, confirm that polygenic influences on happiness levels remain stable across the lifespan, with about 40% of individual differences attributable to in European-ancestry samples. These findings support the concept of a genetic "set point" for happiness, where baseline levels tend to revert after life events, though specific genes (e.g., those influencing serotonin transport) show only modest associations and require replication. Personality traits, which are themselves 40-60% heritable, mediate much of the genetic influence on long-term happiness and explain stable individual differences in SWB. Among the Big Five traits, low —characterized by emotional stability and low proneness to anxiety or distress—emerges as the strongest negative predictor of SWB, with correlations often exceeding -0.40. Extraversion, involving sociability and positive , and , marked by self-discipline and goal-directed behavior, show moderate positive associations (r ≈ 0.20-0.30), while and yield weaker or context-dependent links. Longitudinal data reveal that these traits predict SWB trajectories independently of or life events, accounting for up to 47% of variance in some adolescent samples. The interplay between and underscores causal pathways: heritable temperamental dispositions shape how individuals appraise and respond to environmental stimuli, fostering resilience or vulnerability to affective states. For instance, high extraversion may genetically predispose individuals to seek rewarding social interactions, amplifying positive affect, while elevated heightens sensitivity to stressors, perpetuating lower SWB. from and twin designs disentangles these effects, showing that non-shared environmental influences further modulate trait expression but do not override innate baselines. This framework implies limited malleability through external interventions alone, as innate factors set durable constraints on hedonic .

Socioeconomic and Lifestyle Correlates

Higher income levels are positively associated with greater , including and positive affect, with the relationship following a logarithmic pattern where marginal gains diminish at higher incomes but show no clear satiation even among the wealthy. However, the persists in cross-national data, whereby long-term within countries does not reliably translate to sustained increases in average happiness levels, potentially due to , rising aspirations, or relative income comparisons. Educational attainment correlates positively with in most populations, though this premium has declined over time and weakens significantly during , suggesting education's benefits operate partly through labor market outcomes rather than intrinsic value. status exerts a strong influence, with linked to substantial declines in —often more pronounced than losses alone—while and overall exhibit bidirectional over time. Physical activity consistently predicts higher across systematic reviews, with regular exercise enhancing happiness through mechanisms like improved mood regulation and reduced depressive symptoms, independent of other factors. Adequate quality and duration further bolster , showing positive correlations with happiness metrics in young adults and mediating the benefits of exercise. Healthier dietary patterns, such as higher and intake, contribute to elevated when combined with physical activity and sufficient , though isolated effects are smaller. Avoiding harmful habits like and excessive alcohol consumption also supports sustained in longitudinal data.

Social and Environmental Influences

Strong social relationships consistently correlate with elevated across empirical studies. Meta-analyses indicate that high-quality connections with and friends predict greater and reduced negative affect, with effect sizes reflecting meaningful associations beyond mere correlation. Individuals reporting robust , such as cohabitation with , exhibit higher happiness levels than those living alone, underscoring the role of interpersonal embeddedness. Social support mechanisms, encompassing emotional backing and practical assistance, longitudinally forecast improved outcomes. Baseline perceptions of support adequacy from networks predict subsequent positive affect and , even after adjusting for prior and demographic factors. , as a primary social bond, yields short-term happiness gains upon entry, with longitudinal data showing elevations within two years that partially persist but often attenuate via ; selection into stable unions amplifies long-term benefits for those in high-quality partnerships. The Harvard Grant Study, spanning over 80 years, identifies close relationships—marital and otherwise—as the paramount predictor of enduring happiness and health, surpassing other variables like or fame. Environmental exposures exert causal influences on happiness via physiological and psychological pathways. Regular contact, such as at least weekly in or spaces, associates with heightened and lower stress, with dose-response patterns evident in population surveys. , conversely, diminishes hedonic happiness; elevated particulate levels correlate with increased depressive symptoms and reduced in both cross-sectional and panel data from urban settings. Urban versus rural locales reveal context-dependent patterns in happiness disparities. Globally, urban dwellers report marginally higher evaluations (average 5.48 versus 5.07 for rural), attributed to better access to amenities, though in developed nations a "rural happiness " emerges wherein rural residents score higher, potentially from tighter communities and reduced urban stressors like noise and density. Green spaces within cities buffer these effects, fostering mood improvements and mitigating pollution's toll through restorative mechanisms.

Theoretical Frameworks

Psychological Theories

Psychological theories of happiness distinguish between hedonic approaches, which emphasize and the absence of , and eudaimonic approaches, which prioritize meaning, growth, and virtue. Hedonic theories often view happiness as , measured via positive affect and , while eudaimonic theories link it to and psychological needs fulfillment. Empirical support for these frameworks comes from longitudinal studies and experiments, though critiques note that , which dominates modern theories, may underemphasize negative emotions' adaptive roles due to selection biases in research favoring optimistic outcomes. The , or hedonic adaptation, posits that people rapidly adjust to positive or negative life events, reverting to a genetically influenced baseline happiness level, typically within months. Originating from Brickman and Campbell's analysis, this theory draws on evidence from lottery winners (who reported lower happiness one year post-win) and paraplegics (who adapted upward), with set points explaining 50-80% of variance in long-term per twin studies. occurs via shifting standards and attentional biases, limiting durable gains from external changes, though intentional activities like gratitude practices can slow it. Barbara Fredrickson's (2001) argues that discrete positive emotions—such as , , and —temporarily broaden individuals' momentary thought-action repertoires, fostering , resilience, and social bonds that accumulate into psychological resources over time. Unlike narrow negative emotions geared for fight-or-flight, positive ones build enduring personal assets; lab experiments show induced positivity enhances problem-solving and cardiovascular recovery, with longitudinal data linking frequent positive emotions to higher independent of negative affect. This upward spiral counters the by compounding resources, though evidence is correlational in non-experimental settings. Self-determination theory (SDT), developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan since the 1980s, frames happiness as eudaimonic arising from satisfying three innate psychological needs: (self-endorsed actions), competence (mastery), and relatedness (secure connections). Need fulfillment predicts intrinsic and , with meta-analyses of over 200 studies showing autonomous motivation correlates with greater happiness (r ≈ 0.30-0.50) than controlled forms, as seen in and educational contexts where support for needs reduces ill-being. SDT differentiates this from hedonic , emphasizing causal links via organismic integration; deficits in needs, common in controlling environments, elevate depression risk by 20-40% in cross-cultural samples. Martin Seligman's PERMA model (2011), central to , decomposes into five elements: positive emotions (hedonic core), (flow-like absorption), relationships (social bonds), meaning (purpose beyond self), and accomplishment ( pursuit). Each contributes uniquely to , validated by surveys where PERMA scores explain 20-30% variance in beyond demographics; for instance, via strengths use boosts daily happiness in interventions. The model integrates hedonic and eudaimonic aspects, with empirical tests in students and workers confirming independent effects, though accomplishment's role shows cultural variability. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's flow theory (1990) describes happiness emerging from "optimal experiences"—states of complete immersion in challenging tasks matching one's skills, yielding intrinsic reward and time distortion. Flow requires clear goals, immediate feedback, and skill-challenge balance, with diary studies revealing it occupies 20% of waking hours for many and correlates positively with (r ≈ 0.40), particularly in personalities who seek it proactively. Unlike passive pleasure, flow builds skills and , supported by fMRI evidence of reduced self-referential processing; however, overuse risks burnout without recovery.

Sociological and Economic Models

In economic theory, happiness is frequently conceptualized through the lens of maximization, where arises from rational choices optimizing consumption, , and preferences within constraints. This neoclassical approach posits a direct positive relationship between and , assuming higher material resources enhance welfare, particularly at low levels where dominate. However, empirical data reveal limitations, as experienced happiness—measured via self-reported —does not consistently track decision derived from choices, with momentary pleasures often diverging from overall evaluations. A pivotal challenge to income-centric models is the , identified by Richard Easterlin in 1974, which observes that while happiness correlates positively with income across individuals and nations at a single point in time, average happiness remains stagnant over decades despite substantial GDP per capita growth, such as the U.S. real income tripling from 1946 to 2004 without corresponding gains. Explanations include relative income effects—where gains are offset by rising aspirations and social comparisons—and hedonic adaptation, whereby people habituate to improved circumstances, returning to baseline happiness levels. Reassessments using longitudinal data from sources like the indicate modest happiness increases in some high-growth contexts, but the paradox holds for many developed economies, underscoring that absolute income beyond ~$75,000 annually yields diminishing marginal returns on . Sociological models emphasize structural and relational factors over individual economics, viewing happiness as embedded in social contexts that foster integration and support. Émile Durkheim's early 20th-century framework linked low social integration to anomie and elevated suicide rates—proxies for unhappiness—suggesting cohesive communities buffer against despair through normative regulation. Contemporary extensions highlight social capital, defined by Robert Putnam as networks of trust, reciprocity, and civic engagement, which empirical analyses across European countries show positively predict happiness, with bridging ties (connecting diverse groups) and bonding ties (within similar groups) each contributing independently to life satisfaction scores. Panel data from 89 nations spanning 1980–2017 confirm that higher generalized trust and associational membership correlate with elevated average happiness, independent of GDP, though declines in U.S. social capital since the 1960s—evident in falling club memberships and interpersonal trust from 58% in 1960 to 20% by 2020—coincide with stagnating well-being metrics. Integrated socio-economic models, such as those in , incorporate both domains by regressing self-reported on variables like income inequality (Gini coefficients) and , revealing that —measured via positional goods—erodes happiness more than absolute poverty in unequal societies, as seen in cross-national studies where a 10-point Gini rise associates with 0.2–0.4 standard deviation drops in . These frameworks caution against over-relying on GDP as a proxy, advocating composite indices that weight non-material factors, though methodological critiques note self-reports' susceptibility to cultural norms and recall biases, with little evidence of universal patterns contradicting individualistic assumptions.

Enhancement Methods

Individual Practices and Habits

Regular physical exercise consistently correlates with elevated (SWB), with meta-analyses indicating moderate positive effects across healthy populations. A 2020 meta-analytic review of and SWB in healthy individuals found a significant association, attributing gains to improved mood, , and physiological mechanisms like endorphin release. Randomized controlled trials further demonstrate , as interventions increasing leisure-time yield small-to-moderate improvements in positive affect and , independent of baseline fitness levels. These benefits persist longitudinally, with active individuals reporting higher happiness in from young to older adults. Adequate sleep duration and quality serve as foundational habits for sustaining happiness, with empirical evidence linking optimal (7-9 hours nightly) to greater . Longitudinal studies show that improvements in sleep duration predict subsequent rises in SWB, mediated by reduced emotional reactivity and enhanced cognitive function. A 2023 analysis across populations confirmed that insufficient —common in modern lifestyles—correlates with diminished self-reported happiness, with variability in sleep timing exacerbating negative effects on mood stability. Interventions targeting consistent , such as fixed bedtimes, yield measurable gains in daily positive emotions, underscoring sleep's causal role over mere correlation. Mindfulness and meditation practices foster happiness by cultivating present-moment awareness and reducing rumination, as evidenced by systematic reviews of randomized trials. A of meditation interventions reported improvements in observable outcomes in 79% of studies, with effects comparable to established therapies for non-clinical populations. Controlled trials of -based programs, including app-delivered sessions, demonstrate small but reliable boosts in SWB, particularly through decreased and heightened emotional regulation. These practices' efficacy holds across diverse groups, though benefits accrue most reliably with consistent daily engagement rather than sporadic use. Gratitude interventions, such as journaling three positive events daily, produce verifiable increments in happiness via toward positives. A 2025 meta-analysis of 145 studies across 28 countries quantified small yet consistent gains from gratitude exercises, outperforming neutral controls in randomized settings. Earlier syntheses confirm these effects extend to and reduced depressive symptoms, with expressed (e.g., writing thank-you letters) showing particular potency in boosting positive affect. Long-term adherence amplifies outcomes, as habituated counters hedonic adaptation, though effects diminish without variety in practice to prevent . Other evidence-based habits include positive experiences and pursuing meaningful goals, which systematic reviews of positive activity interventions identify as effective for SWB elevation in non-clinical adults. Randomized trials of multi-week programs combining these—such as reflective walks or progress-tracking—yield sustained happiness increases, rivaling pharmacological baselines in some metrics. Collectively, these practices operate through overlapping pathways like and , but individual variability necessitates personalization; for instance, extroverts may derive more from social-infused habits, while introverts benefit from solitary reflection. Empirical rigor favors interventions with high adherence rates, as lapses undermine causal chains linking habit to happiness.

Therapeutic and Psychological Interventions

(CBT) targets maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors that contribute to low mood, with meta-analyses indicating it significantly improves and happiness levels, particularly among individuals with depression. In randomized controlled trials, CBT has demonstrated reductions in depressive symptoms by up to 50% in 43% of patients over 46 months, outperforming usual care, which correlates with elevated happiness scores. However, comparative studies suggest that positive psychotherapy, an adaptation emphasizing strengths and positive emotions, may yield larger gains in happiness for patients than standard CBT. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs), such as journaling, acts of , and positive experiences, have been evaluated in numerous randomized controlled trials and , showing small to moderate increases in subjective and psychological . A 2013 of 39 studies found PPIs enhanced with an effect size of g=0.34 for subjective measures, though subsequent reviews have revised estimates downward, noting effects are often no larger than those from active control interventions like relaxation training. -specific interventions, synthesized from 145 studies across 28 countries, produce small but consistent boosts (d≈0.11), with greater efficacy in non-clinical populations. These effects tend to diminish without repeated application, underscoring the need for sustained engagement. Mindfulness-based interventions, including mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and mindfulness-based positive psychology (MBPP), foster present-moment awareness to reduce rumination and enhance emotional regulation, leading to measurable happiness gains in controlled trials. An RCT of MBPP among 138 participants reported significant improvements in well-being compared to waitlist controls, with effects persisting at follow-up. Hospital-based mindfulness programs have also increased happiness and work engagement among staff, with pre-post gains in performance metrics. Meta-analytic evidence confirms these approaches alleviate distress and boost cognitive aspects of well-being, though benefits are more pronounced in stressed or anxious groups than in those already high in baseline happiness. Overall, a 2022 of psychological interventions using the Continuum scale affirmed broad efficacy for well-being enhancement (g=0.40), encompassing CBT, PPIs, and , but highlighted heterogeneity by intervention type and population, with stronger outcomes in clinical samples. Limitations include inflating early PPI estimates and modest long-term retention, suggesting integration with lifestyle factors for durability. These therapies prioritize causal mechanisms like over mere symptom relief, aligning with empirical data on hedonic adaptation's role in happiness trajectories.

Policy and Societal Approaches

Governments have increasingly incorporated measures into policy frameworks, drawing on empirical data from sources like the , which identifies key drivers such as , , expectancy, , , and low perceptions. Policies targeting these factors, including robust social safety nets and universal access to services, show positive associations with national levels in cross-country analyses. For instance, improvements in quality—encompassing effective service delivery, , and reduced —have been linked to measurable increases in average happiness scores within 5-10 years, as evidenced by from 157 countries between 2005 and 2012. Nordic countries, consistently ranking highest in global happiness indices, exemplify effective societal approaches through high-trust institutions, extensive welfare systems, and policies promoting work-life balance, such as generous and universal healthcare. These elements foster social cohesion and equality, with empirical studies attributing up to 40% of their happiness advantage to institutional trust and low inequality rather than solely economic output. Complementary interventions, like investments in public goods and programs, further reduce happiness disparities across income groups. Bhutan's (GNH) framework integrates well-being into policy screening across nine domains, including psychological wellness, health, and environmental sustainability, influencing decisions like free universal healthcare and education. However, despite these efforts, Bhutan's 2023 ranking of 95th out of 156 countries indicates limited empirical success in elevating population-level happiness compared to GDP-focused metrics, suggesting that holistic indices may prioritize cultural preservation over scalable outcomes. Broader evidence cautions against over-reliance on happiness targets, as hedonic adaptation can blunt long-term gains from interventions, though sustained consistently outperforms isolated policies.

Cultural and Religious Dimensions

Cross-Cultural Variations

Self-reported life satisfaction exhibits substantial cross-national variations, with Nordic countries consistently ranking highest in annual assessments. The World Happiness Report 2024, drawing on Gallup World Poll data from 2021–2023, assigns Finland the top score of 7.736 on a 0–10 Cantril ladder scale, followed by Denmark at 7.521 and Iceland at 7.515, while nations such as Afghanistan and Lebanon report averages below 2.5. These disparities persist despite methodological efforts to standardize measures, though cultural response styles—such as modesty norms in East Asian societies—may introduce underreporting biases in collectivistic contexts. Explanatory variables in the World Happiness Report, including GDP , social support, life expectancy, freedom to make life choices, , and perceptions of corruption, account for much of the variance between countries, explaining up to 75% of differences in high- versus low-ranking nations. However, cultural frameworks modulate these effects; for instance, individualistic societies like those in report elevated partly due to emphases on personal autonomy and internal standards of evaluation, contrasting with collectivistic societies where external social appraisals predominate. Empirical analyses link higher national scores (per Hofstede's dimensions) to greater average happiness, alongside factors like low and orientation, though pandemic-era data showed resilience in high-uncertainty-avoidance cultures. East-West divergences highlight deeper mechanisms: Western self-enhancing fosters proactive happiness pursuit aligned with analytic thinking and high relational mobility, yielding higher mean levels, whereas Eastern self-effacing interdependence, dialectical views of as transient, stringent norms, and external referencing often correlate with subdued reports. Five key processes underpin this: (1) prioritization of group over self-promotion; (2) reliance on social rather than internal benchmarks; (3) intensified social under tight norms; (4) acceptance of emotional dialectics viewing positivity as balanced by negativity; and (5) constrained relational networks limiting affirming exchanges. These patterns manifest in situational expressions, with Japanese participants reporting amplified happiness in interdependent scenarios compared to independent ones, unlike . Cultural orientations to happiness further differentiate experiences: individualistic cultures favor hedonic pleasure-seeking tied to gains, while collectivistic ones integrate eudaimonic elements like meaning and relational harmony, sometimes rendering explicit happiness pursuit counterproductive if perceived as self-focused. In the U.S., to pursue happiness inversely predicts (r = -0.26), mediated by individualistic strategies emphasizing personal achievement over social engagement; conversely, in collectivistic and , it positively correlates (r = 0.25–0.31), as pursuits embed communal involvement. Such findings underscore that while universal predictors like social trust elevate happiness globally—stronger in collectivistic settings—cultural priors shape whether ambition for enhances or erodes outcomes. In , happiness is often conceptualized as a profound derived from communion with and adherence to divine wisdom, rather than transient worldly pleasures. Theologians emphasize a "well-ordered life" where psychological arises from virtuous conduct and trust in God's providence, as articulated in biblical texts like Psalm 16:11, which locates fullness of in God's presence. This perspective distinguishes spiritual , which endures amid suffering, from superficial happiness, with figures like arguing that no lasting fulfillment exists apart from . Buddhism views happiness as the cessation of (dukkha) through insight into the true nature of reality, unclouded by desire and illusion. taught that conventional happiness from sensory pleasures is impermanent and leads to attachment; true emerges from ethical conduct, , and via the , culminating in nirvana—a state of unconditioned peace. This approach posits happiness as causally conditioned, arising sequentially from positive mental states like and during liberation practices. In , happiness (sa'ada) is primarily an eternal, otherworldly attainment achieved through submission to , righteous deeds, and preparation for the , with Qur'anic verses portraying it as abiding tranquility beyond material . Worldly is permissible but subordinate, fostered by , , and community like the five pillars, which provide purpose and social harmony. Hinduism equates ultimate happiness with ananda—eternal bliss realized through and union with the divine (), transcending the cycle of rebirth (samsara). Texts like the and describe this as infinite, non-material joy accessed via (righteous living), , and devotion, where individual actions and grace interplay to elevate beyond sensory limitations. Empirical research consistently identifies a positive between and , including self-reported happiness and , across diverse populations. A of 224 studies found positively associated with these outcomes in 78% of cases, with effects persisting after controlling for variables like age and . Another recent confirmed that dimensions such as religious attendance, belief, and each predict higher , with effect sizes indicating modest but reliable benefits. Active religious participation, rather than nominal affiliation, yields stronger links to happiness, as evidenced by data showing congregationally engaged individuals reporting higher contentment and civic involvement globally. Longitudinal studies support causal directionality, with buffering against declines in during stressors like and predicting lower depression over time. Mechanisms include from communities, a sense of purpose, and health-promoting behaviors, though results vary by context—stronger in less affluent nations—and some analyses note small practical magnitudes after confounders. Pan-cultural reviews affirm the association holds internationally, countering claims of 's inherent detriment to happiness.

Philosophical Perspectives

Ancient and Classical Views

placed happiness, termed eudaimonia (often rendered as flourishing or living well), at the center of ethical inquiry, viewing it as the of rather than mere subjective or fortune. This concept emphasized rational activity aligned with one's nature, achievable through rather than external goods alone. Socrates, through dialogues attributed to him by , equated happiness with , arguing that it stems from self-knowledge and the care of the soul over bodily or material pursuits. He maintained that wrongdoing harms the soul and thus precludes true happiness, while no one willingly chooses ; ignorance alone causes , making the essential for . developed this in the , positing that happiness requires justice in the individual soul, where reason governs spirited and appetitive elements, mirroring the ideal state's structure. The philosopher-king, contemplating the Forms, attains the highest happiness, as external success without inner harmony leads to misery; empirical observation of tyrants' discontent supports this, showing 's sufficiency over power or wealth. Aristotle, in the Nicomachean Ethics (c. 350 BCE), refined as "activity of the in accord with " over a complete life, distinguishing intellectual virtues (like ) from ones (cultivated via ). He rejected Plato's ideal Forms as the basis, grounding happiness in human function—rational deliberation—achieved through the , where excess or deficiency (e.g., rashness or ) undermines flourishing; external goods like aid but do not constitute it. Hellenistic schools diverged: (341–270 BCE) identified happiness with pleasure as the absence of pain (aponia) and tranquility (ataraxia), prioritizing static mental pleasures over kinetic ones and advocating to avoid unnecessary desires, countering misconceptions of indulgent . Stoics, from (c. 334–262 BCE), held —practical wisdom, , , temperance—as both necessary and sufficient for happiness, deeming externals "indifferents" since only rational control over judgments ensures living according to nature; Roman exponents like Seneca reinforced this, emphasizing resilience amid adversity.

Modern Ethical and Existential Debates

In modern ethical philosophy, continues to frame happiness—often equated with net pleasure—as the ultimate criterion for moral action, with arguing in his 1861 work Utilitarianism that higher intellectual pleasures contribute more to overall happiness than base ones, distinguishing it from cruder . This consequentialist approach prioritizes aggregate welfare, influencing policy debates on , yet it encounters resistance from thinkers who contend that happiness alone cannot justify overriding individual or reality-based achievements. Robert Nozick's 1974 of the "experience machine"—a device simulating any desired pleasurable life while isolating users from genuine causation—challenges pure experiential by revealing that most reject indefinite immersion, valuing actual doing, connecting with reality, and external accomplishments over optimized feelings. Empirical surveys support this intuition, with participants showing low uptake rates for machine entry even under promises of tailored bliss, underscoring causal realism's role in human valuation beyond subjective states. Existential perspectives further complicate ethical pursuits of happiness by elevating meaning, authenticity, and confrontation with over hedonic equilibrium. , in works like (1889), dismissed happiness as a parochial goal, associating its relentless chase with weakness and stagnation; he defined it instead as "the feeling that power increases—that resistance is overcome," tying fulfillment to struggle and self-overcoming rather than pleasure maximization. , drawing from observations in his 1946 book , developed to assert that humans are driven primarily by a "will to meaning," not pleasure or happiness; he observed that purpose enabled endurance amid suffering, where mere hedonic pursuit failed, positioning meaning as a precondition for any sustainable . Frankl's framework critiques existential vacuums in affluent societies, where absent purpose leads to noogenic neurosis, empirically linked in later studies to higher rates of depression despite material comforts. These debates intersect in contemporary revivals, which contrast eudaimonic flourishing—realized through rational activity and —with utilitarian happiness metrics, arguing the former better accounts for long-term human thriving without reducing to sentiment. Critics of happiness-centric , including some effective altruists, warn of "wireheading" risks in technologies like neural implants, echoing Nozick by prioritizing causal depth over engineered states, though proponents counter that calibrated interventions enhance authentic agency if grounded in empirical outcomes. Such tensions highlight ongoing scrutiny of happiness as either insufficiently robust against existential voids or overly narrow amid diverse human motivations.

Effects

Positive Outcomes

Higher levels of happiness, often measured as positive affect or , are associated with increased in longitudinal studies. A nationally representative sample of U.S. adults followed over 80 months showed that those reporting higher happiness had a lower mortality , with the effect persisting after controlling for demographics, health behaviors, and baseline status. Meta-analyses of positive psychological well-being, including happiness, indicate a 28% reduction in mortality among healthy populations, though much of this association is mediated by and factors rather than direct causation. Experimental evidence suggests positive affect directly contributes to health by enhancing and reducing markers. Happiness correlates with superior physical health metrics, such as lower incidence of chronic diseases and faster recovery from illness. Systematic reviews link frequent positive to improved cardiovascular , reduced , and stronger immune function, independent of negative . For instance, individuals with higher baseline happiness exhibit better metabolic profiles and lower biomarkers of stress-related . These benefits extend to behavioral mechanisms, where happier people engage in more and healthier dietary choices, though reverse causation—health enabling happiness—cannot be fully ruled out in observational data. In occupational settings, happiness causally boosts , as demonstrated in controlled experiments. Workers induced to positive mood via music or incentives showed 12-13% higher output in tasks like fruit-picking or , with effects robust across industries. Broader syntheses confirm that happy employees demonstrate enhanced , , and , contributing to organizational outcomes like higher in service roles. Happier individuals tend to form and maintain stronger social bonds, leading to greater relationship satisfaction and networks. Longitudinal data reveal that positive affect predicts marital stability and friendship quality, with happy people reporting more frequent positive interactions. This extends to community-level effects, where fosters and cooperation, enhancing collective resilience. Evidence from diverse samples underscores that happiness facilitates in groups, amplifying relational benefits over time.

Potential Downsides and Paradoxes

The , or hedonic adaptation, describes how individuals tend to return to a relatively stable baseline level of happiness following major positive or negative life events, such as winning a or experiencing a promotion. Empirical studies, including longitudinal analyses of , show that while initial boosts in happiness occur, adaptation diminishes these gains over time, often within months, rendering sustained increases elusive without ongoing novelty or variety. This process implies that efforts to achieve lasting happiness through material or circumstantial changes may yield , as the brain recalibrates to new norms. The highlights a disconnect between and : while higher income correlates with greater happiness at a given time across individuals or nations, average happiness levels do not rise over decades despite sustained GDP increases. Data from the and Gallup polls spanning multiple countries, including developing economies, confirm that post-subsistence income gains fail to elevate national happiness trends, attributed to relative income comparisons and rising aspirations that outpace material improvements. This paradox challenges assumptions that policy-driven wealth accumulation reliably enhances population-level happiness, as evidenced by stagnant self-reported in high-GDP nations like the from the onward. Pursuing happiness as a primary can paradoxically undermine , with indicating that individuals who highly value happiness experience lower emotional outcomes, particularly in positive contexts where attainment seems attainable. Cross-sectional and experimental studies link this "valuing happiness" mindset to heightened depressive symptoms and reduced , as unmet expectations amplify disappointment and devalue naturally occurring positive emotions. For instance, interventions priming happiness pursuit have shown ironic decreases in mood, suggesting that hyper-focus on positivity fosters and emotional suppression. Excessive or unchecked happiness may also impair adaptive behaviors, such as for achievement or vigilance in threats. experiments demonstrate that induced positive affect reduces analytical thinking and increases overconfidence, potentially leading to poorer in uncertain environments. In organizational settings, chronic high happiness correlates with lower in tasks requiring sustained effort, as diminishes the discomfort that drives progress. These effects underscore a causal : while moderate happiness supports , extremes can foster complacency, echoing findings that eudaimonic pursuits (purpose over ) yield more resilient outcomes than hedonic ones.

Controversies and Critiques

Set-Point vs. Malleability Debate

The set-point of (SWB), also known as the hypothesis, posits that individuals possess a genetically influenced baseline level of happiness to which they tend to return following positive or negative life events, due to processes of hedonic adaptation. Originating from Brickman and Campbell's 1971 conceptualization and supported by twin studies estimating of SWB at 30-50%, the implies limited long-term impact from external changes like gains or losses. Longitudinal data reinforce this stability, with 10-year panel studies showing SWB set-points demonstrated by high intra-individual correlations (r ≈ 0.5-0.7) over time, suggesting adaptation attenuates emotional responses to events such as lottery wins or . Challenging this view, proponents of SWB malleability argue that intentional activities and life choices can produce sustainable shifts in baseline happiness, beyond mere . Sonja Lyubomirsky's sustainable happiness model attributes approximately 50% of SWB variance to genetic set-points, 10% to circumstances, and 40% to volitional behaviors like practices or pursuit, based on early reviews of and intervention studies. However, critiques highlight methodological flaws in this partitioning, noting that variance components are not strictly additive and the estimates derive from selective data aggregation rather than direct partitioning; re-examinations suggest circumstances explain more than 10% when controlling for confounds like . Empirical evidence for malleability includes longitudinal analyses showing that repeated positive interventions, such as acts of kindness or cognitive reappraisal, yield small-to-medium effect sizes (δ ≈ 0.28) on , with slower when incorporating variety or appreciation. Meta-analyses of life events reveal incomplete , particularly for cognitive SWB components, with events like correlating with enduring elevations in over years, contradicting full reversion to set-points. Swiss national further indicate that while most individuals stabilize, a subset experiences permanent SWB changes from cumulative life choices, prompting revisions to set-point theory to incorporate dynamic equilibrium models allowing for baseline shifts. The debate persists due to measurement challenges and sample biases in research, which often emphasizes interventions while underplaying genetic constraints; twin and studies consistently affirm substantial , limiting malleability claims. Recent syntheses suggest a hybrid perspective: SWB exhibits high stability (70-80% of variance) but plasticity through sustained, effortful practices, though effects diminish without maintenance and vary by individual traits like .

Money and Happiness Correlation

Empirical research consistently demonstrates a positive correlation between income and subjective well-being (SWB), measured through self-reported life satisfaction or emotional states, with cross-sectional studies showing that higher-income individuals report greater happiness than lower-income ones within the same society. This association holds across diverse populations, though the effect size diminishes at higher income levels, suggesting logarithmic rather than linear returns where each additional dollar yields progressively smaller gains in reported happiness. For instance, analyses of large-scale surveys indicate that absolute income exerts a stronger influence on SWB for those at lower socioeconomic strata, where basic needs fulfillment drives emotional improvements, while relative income comparisons—such as one's position compared to peers—play a larger role at higher levels. The , identified by economist Richard Easterlin in the 1970s, highlights a temporal disconnect: while correlates positively with happiness at any given time point both within and across nations, long-term rises in national , such as through GDP growth, do not yield commensurate increases in average happiness levels. This pattern, observed in U.S. data from 1946 to 1970 and extended to global trends, implies adaptation or effects, where gains in material wealth are offset by rising aspirations or social comparisons, preventing sustained SWB elevation. Subsequent critiques and reanalyses, however, question the paradox's universality, finding evidence of gradual happiness increases with prolonged in some datasets, particularly when controlling for factors like or . Regarding income thresholds, a seminal 2010 study by and using Gallup-Healthways data from over 450,000 U.S. respondents found that emotional —daily positive affect minus negative—plateaus around $75,000 annual household (adjusted for 2010 ), beyond which further earnings do not reduce negative emotions or boost daily joy, though evaluative continues to rise logarithmically. This suggested money alleviates misery up to a sufficiency point covering needs and comforts but does not purchase deeper fulfillment. Contrasting findings emerged in Matthew Killingsworth's 2021 analysis of real-time experiential data from 33,000 U.S. adults via app sampling, revealing no plateau: experienced increased steadily with even above $75,000, with the happiest 20% showing accelerated gains, implying broader causal links through reduced stressors or enhanced opportunities. A 2023 collaborative reanalysis by Kahneman, Killingsworth, and Barbara Mellers reconciled these views using refined datasets, confirming overall linear-logarithmic growth in happiness with but identifying nuance: for the least happy quartile (often those with challenges), gains flatten around $100,000, while for happier individuals, benefits persist without satiation, underscoring that money's impact interacts with baseline disposition rather than universally capping. These peer-reviewed studies, drawn from large, representative samples, prioritize momentary affect over retrospective reports to mitigate , though methodological debates persist on measurement validity and whether SWB surveys capture true hedonic states or rationalized evaluations. Longitudinal evidence further supports , as income shocks like lotteries or job losses predict corresponding SWB changes, net of .

Ideological Biases and Measurement Flaws

Self-reported happiness metrics, central to much , exhibit ideological influences in responses. Studies consistently find that self-identified conservatives report higher happiness and than liberals, a gap observed across datasets including the General Social Survey, where 37.3% of conservative men and 39.6% of conservative women rated themselves "very happy" compared to 22.3% and 32.0% of liberal counterparts, respectively. This disparity is attributed not solely to political affiliation but to underlying traits and attitudes, such as conservatives' greater endorsement of personal agency, of , and lower , which foster resilience and positive evaluations of life circumstances. Such patterns suggest response biases where ideological worldviews shape interpretive frames: conservatives may prioritize internal and achievement, yielding upward-biased self-assessments, while liberals' focus on systemic barriers and equity can amplify perceived dissatisfaction, even amid comparable objective conditions. This is evident in social desirability effects, where participants adjust reports to align with group norms, as seen in age-happiness studies where correcting for such biases alters U-shaped curves. Academic environments, disproportionately left-leaning, may under-scrutinize these dynamics, prioritizing research on malleable social factors over fixed traits, potentially skewing policy recommendations toward redistribution despite evidence that conservative orientations correlate with baseline happiness advantages. Measurement instruments compound these biases with inherent flaws. (SWB) surveys predominantly use single-item scales, like "All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life?" on a 0-10 ladder, which suffer from low test-retest reliability (correlations around 0.5-0.7 over short intervals), vulnerability to momentary moods, and lack of against objective correlates. Evaluative measures () diverge from experienced happiness diaries, with the former showing stronger ties but weaker policy sensitivity, indicating confounds from focalism or biases where respondents overweight salient domains. Cultural and global indices like the amplify flaws through Western-centric assumptions, equating high self-reported ladder scores with universal well-being while undervaluing non-individualistic metrics in collectivist societies, where over personal fulfillment prevails. Rankings favor Nordic welfare states but poorly predict behavioral outcomes like rates or in some cases, questioning their cross-national comparability and revealing implicit biases toward affective . Overall, these limitations—ideological response skews and methodological imprecisions—underscore the need for multi-method validation, including physiological indicators or longitudinal tracking, to mitigate subjective distortions in happiness assessment.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3008658/
  2. https://nobaproject.com/modules/happiness-the-science-of-subjective-well-being
  3. https://www.worldhappiness.report/faq/
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25715755/
  5. https://sonjalyubomirsky.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Sheldon-Lyubomirsky-2019.pdf
  6. https://www.worldhappiness.report/about/
  7. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/
  8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/happiness
  9. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/happiness_n
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/happy
  11. https://www.dictionary.com/e/happiness/
  12. https://www.amacad.org/publication/daedalus/history-happiness-400-bc-ad-1780
  13. https://positivepsychology.com/philosophy-of-happiness/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3126102/
  15. https://positivepsychology.com/psychology-of-happiness/
  16. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00091.x
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4971059/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11148302/
  19. http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2008_DeciRyan_JOHS.pdf
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12181660_On_Happiness_and_Human_Potentials_A_Review_of_Research_on_Hedonic_and_Eudaimonic_Well-Being
  21. https://aging.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1131/2021/06/Eudaimonic-and-Hedonic-Well-Being.pdf
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8466735/
  23. http://behavioralhealth2000.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Revisiting-the-Empirical-Distinction-Between-Hedonic-and-Eudaimonic-Aspects-of-Well-Being-Using-Exploratory-Structural-Equation-Modeling.pdf
  24. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074026/full
  25. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpr.12276
  26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-021-00396-z
  27. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/deconstructing-illness/202112/happiness-vs-pleasure-the-source-our-discontent
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3122271/
  29. https://www.delicatelybalancedtherapy.com/blog/understanding-the-neuroscience-of-contentment-vs-happiness-exploring-states-of-being-and-feelings
  30. https://positivepsychology.com/happiness/
  31. https://transpersonal-psychology.iresearchnet.com/states-of-consciousness/states-of-ecstasy-and-bliss/
  32. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/debunking-myths-of-the-mind/202501/access-your-ecstasy
  33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x
  34. https://mctfr.psych.umn.edu/happiness
  35. https://midus.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1882.pdf
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10623597/
  37. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222171110
  38. https://www.worldhappiness.report/ed/2022/exploring-the-biological-basis-for-happiness/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4449495/
  40. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/psysoc/54/4/54_4_222/_pdf
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9192961/
  42. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00571/full
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1328523/full
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-48510-9
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12107605/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763422002226
  47. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11392858/
  48. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/entities/publication/97c5b63f-2c8f-43f7-9a78-4044bf8f5789
  49. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-025-00927-y
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167487012000906
  51. https://publichealthreviews.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5
  52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK189567/
  53. https://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/SWLS.html
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16367493/
  55. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1985-27000-001
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3397865/
  57. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%252Ft03592-000
  58. https://news.gallup.com/poll/122453/understanding-gallup-uses-cantril-scale.aspx
  59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK189562/
  60. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4987&context=soss_research
  61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2
  62. https://popcenter.harvard.edu/harvard-research/harvard-research-resources/resources-for-measuring-well-being/measuring-objective-well-being-societal-level/
  63. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-vs-happiness
  64. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/people-in-richer-countries-tend-to-say-they-are-more-satisfied-with-their-lives
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2680297/
  66. https://www.worldhappiness.report/ed/2024/happiness-of-the-younger-the-older-and-those-in-between/
  67. https://hsph.harvard.edu/research/health-happiness/well-being-measurement/
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000272
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272722001475
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5930870/
  71. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02299-1
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6136843/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6098054/
  74. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43193-9
  75. https://positivepsychology.com/is-happiness-genetic/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886902000570
  77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19012276.2022.2065341
  78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37462061/
  79. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-021-00673-9
  80. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613659/full
  81. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231015/Is-your-happiness-hardwired-New-study-dives-into-the-genetics-of-joy.aspx
  82. https://happiness-science.org/money-happiness-satiation/
  83. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-025-00210-z
  84. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2025/06/25/the-easterlin-paradox-revisited/
  85. https://docs.iza.org/dp13923.pdf
  86. https://docs.iza.org/dp16454.pdf
  87. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05694-y
  88. https://psychology.gatech.edu/news/happy-job-happy-life-works-both-ways-new-research-shows
  89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323992118_A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Relationship_Between_Physical_Activity_and_Happiness
  90. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1544194/full
  91. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579205/full
  92. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329689
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9118629/
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12398995/
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7416486/
  96. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9858722/
  97. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-18473-2/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4102493/
  99. https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-getting-married-really-make-you-happier
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214804314000214
  101. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/04/over-nearly-80-years-harvard-study-has-been-showing-how-to-live-a-healthy-and-happy-life/
  102. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-44097-3
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8125471/
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5654562/
  105. https://www.worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/urban-rural-happiness-differentials-across-the-world/
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X21000582
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866723002133
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6888177/
  109. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_SDT.pdf
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956
  111. https://www.verywellmind.com/hedonic-adaptation-4156926
  112. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career-map/sell-side/capital-markets/hedonic-treadmill/
  113. https://positivepsychology.com/hedonic-treadmill/
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1693418/
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103199913823
  116. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/research/psychological-health-and-well-being/
  117. https://ppc.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/permawellbeing.pdf
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9607835/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4337659/
  120. https://positivepsychology.com/mihaly-csikszentmihalyi-father-of-flow/
  121. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/one-among-many/201502/flow-and-happiness
  122. https://bcmj.org/editorials/flow-secret-happiness
  123. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200509.pdf
  124. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/26659/economics/happiness-economics/
  125. https://www.nber.org/papers/w31707
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3012515/
  127. https://andrewmbailey.com/money/readings/easterlin3.pdf
  128. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/2008a_bpea_stevenson.pdf
  129. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.26-Issue6/Series-5/E2606052933.pdf
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9395802/
  131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347621471_Social_capital_as_a_source_of_happiness_evidence_from_a_cross-country_analysis
  132. https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2014f-full.pdf
  133. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340741946_Physical_Activity_and_Subjective_Well-Being_in_Healthy_Individuals_A_Meta-Analytic_Review
  134. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17439760.2017.1374436
  135. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369812/
  136. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10016705/
  137. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sleep/articles/10.3389/frsle.2023.1118384/full
  138. https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/10.5334/jeps.434
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6081743/
  140. https://mental.jmir.org/2019/1/e10844
  141. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.528656/full
  142. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2425193122
  143. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-13575-001
  144. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41042-023-00086-6
  145. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-030818
  146. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32579432/
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657959/
  148. https://crowncounseling.com/statistics/cbt-success-rate-statistics/
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3940016/
  150. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119
  151. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6541265/
  152. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700916/full
  153. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-022-00525-2
  154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317258926_Mindfulness_Can_Make_You_Happy-and-Productive_A_Mindfulness_Controlled_Trial_and_Its_Effects_on_Happiness_Work_Engagement_and_Performance
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982669/
  156. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-022-00545-y
  157. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1818807
  158. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3289759/
  159. https://www.worldhappiness.report/
  160. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_government_policies_make_us_happier
  161. https://www.worldhappiness.report/news/empirical-linkages-between-good-governance-and-national-well-being-journal-of-comparative-economics/
  162. https://www.worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/the-nordic-exceptionalism-what-explains-why-the-nordic-countries-are-constantly-among-the-happiest-in-the-world/
  163. https://files.worldhappiness.report/WHR20_Ch07.pdf
  164. https://consensus.app/questions/what-policies-make-citizens-happier/
  165. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/well-being-knowledge-exchange-platform-kep_93d45d63-en/bhutan-s-gross-national-happiness-gnh-index_ff75e0a9-en.html
  166. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3068254/
  167. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147596718300040
  168. https://data.worldhappiness.report/table
  169. https://www.worldhappiness.report/ed/2024/
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276030287_Cross-national_differences_in_happiness_Cultural_measurement_bias_or_effect_of_culture
  171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4541708/
  172. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1090340/full
  173. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spc3.70078
  174. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/172024/jpr12390.pdf?sequence=2
  175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296321003428
  176. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4658246/
  177. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886921008308
  178. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/across-cultures-one-key-to-happiness-stands-out/
  179. https://cct.biola.edu/happiness-in-the-christian-life/
  180. https://reformedperspective.ca/c-s-lewis-on-real-happiness-and-real-christianity/
  181. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/buddhist-view-of-happiness/F1E04351F8496F5387F783865DAB7F40
  182. https://www.dharmanet.org/bhanteg2.htm
  183. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/the-idea-of-happiness-in-the-quran
  184. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/happiness-and-the-attainment-of-happiness-an-islamic-perspective/149F292361AF0BC2F4C4D042A3D7EE90
  185. https://www.uef.org/the-hindu-concept-of-bliss-and-how-it-applies-today/
  186. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2019/01/31/religions-relationship-to-happiness-civic-engagement-and-health-around-the-world/
  187. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-07616-001
  188. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11193991/
  189. https://academic.oup.com/sf/article/99/2/447/5810065?guestAccessKey=5e6e6500-a0f3-46dd-a268-bab3979f5fa8
  190. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4029596/
  191. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300366049_Religiosity_and_Subjective_Well-Being_An_International_Perspective
  192. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ancient/
  193. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/
  194. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics/
  195. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epicurus/
  196. https://iep.utm.edu/stoiceth/
  197. https://philife.nd.edu/j-s-mills-utilitarianism-promote-the-most-happiness/
  198. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09515089.2017.1406600
  199. https://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org/history-of-happiness/viktor-frankl/
  200. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1442&context=comparativephilosophy
  201. https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Valu/ValuRive.htm
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4724393/
  203. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953615301222
  204. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-1316803.pdf
  205. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044150
  206. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354981/
  207. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01841-8
  208. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/681096
  209. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2019-10-24-happy-workers-are-13-more-productive
  210. https://oxfordre.com/economics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.001.0001/acrefore-9780190625979-e-852
  211. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5533095/
  212. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16719675/
  213. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/loewenstein/HedonicAdaptation.pdf
  214. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-024-00766-3
  215. https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/over-long-haul-money-doesnt-buy-happiness/
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3160511/
  217. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588931/
  218. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2021.1897869
  219. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/nurturing-resilience/202007/when-is-being-happy-not-good-you
  220. https://positivepsychology.com/dark-side-of-happiness/
  221. https://lifehacker.com/the-complex-relationship-between-happiness-and-motivati-1623287744
  222. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9220308/
  223. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/set-point-theory
  224. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/happiness-in-world/201304/how-reset-your-happiness-set-point
  225. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263299064_A_Demonstration_of_Set-Points_for_Subjective_Wellbeing
  226. https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec07/happiness
  227. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_much_of_your_happiness_is_under_your_control
  228. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-019-00128-4
  229. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326138356_Re-slicing_the_Happiness_Pie_A_Re-examination_of_the_Determinants_of_Well-being
  230. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20794/w20794.pdf
  231. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4235657/
  232. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/18500/1/dp607.pdf
  233. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/77545/dp753.pdf
  234. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/stability-and-change-of-wellbeing-across-the-lifespan-a-longitudinal-twinsibling-study/F4F30E64DF24A6D588C4F34E652829FB
  235. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2024-05957-002.html
  236. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01079018
  237. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2016976118
  238. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5023045/
  239. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/subjective-well-being-income-economic-development-and-growth/
  240. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20823223/
  241. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208661120
  242. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/does-more-money-correlate-greater-happiness-Penn-Princeton-research
  243. https://www.aei.org/society-and-culture/sex-politics-and-happiness-in-the-general-social-survey/
  244. https://labsites.rochester.edu/lelab/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Schlenker-Chambers-Le-2012-Conservatives-are-happier-than-liberals-but-why-Political-ideology-personality-and-life-satisfaction.pdf
  245. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009265661100170X
  246. https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/article/view/4839/4839.html
  247. https://phys.org/news/2025-10-common-biases-debunks-happiness-age.html
  248. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/202005/political-biases-in-academia
  249. https://gceps.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/138krueger.pdf
  250. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2597879/
  251. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272708000054
  252. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/are_world_happiness_rankings_culturally_biased
  253. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/the-unbearable-sadness-of-being-happy
  254. https://www.persuasion.community/p/the-world-happiness-report-is-a-sham
  255. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/24112787/world-happiness-report-country-rankings
  256. https://www.mercatus.org/system/files/Problems-Measuring-Using-Happiness-Policy-Purposes.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.