Hubbry Logo
Contact highContact highMain
Open search
Contact high
Community hub
Contact high
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contact high
Contact high
Contact high
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Contact high is a phenomenon that occurs in otherwise sober people who experience a drug-like effect just by coming into contact with someone who is under the influence of a psychoactive drug. In a similar way to the placebo effect, a contact high may be caused by classical conditioning as well as by the physical and social setting.[1][2]

A 1970s glossary of drug users' language describes a contact high as "a psychogenic 'trip' without taking drugs, by being close to somebody while he is on drugs". The term is sometimes incorrectly used to describe the high experienced by a person who has inhaled secondhand smoke.[3]

In Alexander Shulgin's book PiHKAL under the 2C-I entry, a notable reaction was observed in a participant who took a placebo while in an environment with other people who are under the influence of a drug. The participant wrote that he had "absorbed the ambience of the folks who had actually imbibed the material."[4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Contact high

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A contact high is the experience of mild psychoactive effects, such as or altered perception, reported by individuals who have not directly consumed but are exposed to secondhand marijuana smoke in close proximity to users. This phenomenon typically requires extreme conditions, including prolonged exposure in unventilated spaces like a sealed , where detectable levels of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive compound in , can enter the bloodstream and cause subtle impairments in cognitive tasks. For instance, studies have shown that non-smokers in such environments may exhibit minor decreases in performance on and tests, alongside low blood THC concentrations averaging 3.2 ng/mL immediately after exposure. While physiological absorption from accounts for some instances, the contact high is often attributed to psychological mechanisms, including and , where sober individuals unconsciously mimic the relaxed or euphoric behaviors of those under the influence, creating a placebo-like sensation of intoxication. This social dimension highlights how can amplify perceived effects, as observed in user reports of enhanced bonding or altered mood during shared sessions. However, in ventilated settings or with brief exposure, rarely produces measurable THC levels or impairment, underscoring that significant contact highs from inhalation are uncommon outside controlled, high-exposure scenarios. Beyond , the term occasionally extends to other substances like alcohol or psychedelics, but it is most closely associated with marijuana due to the prevalence of and its cultural depiction in social contexts. Health concerns related to secondhand exposure include respiratory and potential cardiovascular effects, similar to those from tobacco smoke, though long-term risks remain understudied. Overall, the contact high illustrates the interplay between environmental, physiological, and social factors in substance-related experiences.

Definition and Terminology

Definition

A contact high refers to the phenomenon where a non-user experiences mild psychoactive effects, such as subjective feelings of or , from close proximity to individuals under the influence of psychoactive substances, often through psychological mechanisms like or rather than direct consumption. The term originated in the movement, initially describing the perceived induced by being near individuals under the influence of psychedelics like , without direct consumption of the substance. It was popularized in contexts like experimental psychedelic theater, where sensory stimuli and proximity to users aimed to simulate drug effects non-chemically. Over time, the concept extended to use within the same era's broader experimentation with mind-altering substances, and in modern usage, it commonly describes physiological effects from passive exposure to secondhand smoke containing (THC), where airborne THC particles may be inhaled and absorbed into the bloodstream in unventilated, high-exposure conditions. Unlike direct intoxication from active , a contact high—whether psychological or from low-dose passive —involves typically milder and shorter-lived effects. These effects are often subtle and may be influenced by psychological factors, such as expectation or environmental cues, distinguishing them from the more intense physiological and cognitive impacts of personal use. In casual discourse, "contact high" is often synonymous with terms like "secondhand high," "passive high," and "environmental high," which describe the perceived psychoactive influence from being near individuals consuming without personal use. These expressions highlight the social and perceptual aspects of indirect exposure in non-scientific settings. An extension of this concept is "third-hand exposure," which involves contact with residual cannabis residues—such as THC-laden particles deposited on surfaces, , or —potentially leading to absorption through contact, , or of re-emitted vapors. Unlike direct , third-hand residues persist in environments long after smoking ceases, raising concerns about chronic low-level transfer in shared spaces. Studies adapting research frameworks have quantified THC on indoor surfaces following use, confirming measurable , though health effects of such exposure remain understudied with limited evidence available. Etymologically, "contact high" emerged in mid-20th-century to capture vicarious intoxication, later formalizing in scientific contexts as "passive exposure to marijuana smoke" or "sidestream smoke effects," terms borrowed from studies to denote emissions from smoldering between inhalations. This evolution reflects a shift from colloquial to empirical terminology, emphasizing measurable detection in non-users.

Mechanisms of Exposure

Pharmacological Basis

The primary psychoactive compound enabling a contact high is delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main in that produces euphoric and perceptual effects when absorbed from aerosols. of these aerosols allows THC to be taken up by non-smokers in enclosed spaces, particularly under unventilated conditions with high-potency . Upon , THC rapidly crosses the alveolar membrane in the lungs and enters the pulmonary bloodstream, achieving detectable plasma concentrations within minutes and mimicking the of direct at reduced levels. From the bloodstream, THC distributes to the , where it binds to cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors in regions such as the hippocampus and , activating the to elicit psychoactive responses similar to those from primary consumption, though with lower intensity due to diminished dosing. This binding partially agonizes CB1 receptors, modulating neurotransmitter release and contributing to the subjective "high" reported in exposure studies. The of THC from is substantially lower than from direct , with non-smokers absorbing roughly 6–18% of the THC dose received by active smokers in extreme, unventilated scenarios involving high-potency (11.3% THC) . This reduction stems primarily from dilution of the smoke in ambient air, which disperses THC and lowers the effective concentration inhaled by bystanders; ventilation further mitigates exposure, often rendering THC undetectable in after brief periods. byproducts in sidestream smoke, such as and particulate matter, may also contribute to decreased potency by altering aerosol dynamics and lung deposition efficiency compared to mainstream smoke. Overall, peak THC levels in exposed non-smokers reach 1–5 ng/mL under such conditions, versus 20–160 ng/mL in direct smokers, underscoring the attenuated pharmacological impact.

Environmental Factors Influencing Exposure

The concentration of (THC) in the air from secondhand smoke is significantly influenced by ventilation levels, with poorly ventilated or unventilated enclosed spaces leading to higher airborne THC levels and increased exposure for non-users. In experimental settings, exposure in unventilated chambers resulted in maximum urinary THCCOOH concentrations of up to 57.5 ng/mL after one hour, whereas introducing ventilation at 11 reduced these levels below detectable limits (no positives >20 ng/mL), demonstrating ventilation's role in diluting smoke particles and cannabinoids. Smaller room volumes exacerbate this effect, as the limited air space confines THC-laden aerosols, elevating particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations comparable to or exceeding those from secondhand tobacco smoke. For instance, studies in sealed 10 ft. × 13 ft. chambers with multiple participants showed sustained high THC detection in non-smokers, underscoring how confined environments heighten risks. More recent studies (as of 2025) confirm that secondhand smoke can produce high PM2.5 concentrations, increasing exposure risks in residential settings, particularly for children. Duration of exposure and physical proximity to the source further modulate the intensity of contact high potential, as prolonged time in a smoky area allows for cumulative of THC particles. Brief encounters, such as passing through a mildly hazy room, typically result in negligible absorption, but extended sessions—e.g., or more seated near active smokers—can lead to detectable THC levels in and , with effects persisting up to 22 hours post-exposure in unventilated conditions. Closeness to the smoker amplifies this, as non-smokers positioned alternately with users in close quarters experience 2–6 times higher emission rates of fine particles per puff compared to more distant observers, directly correlating with elevated uptake. Characteristics of the smoke itself, including cannabis potency and the method of consumption, determine the quantity and persistence of airborne THC, thereby influencing bystander exposure. Higher THC potency, such as 11.3% versus 5.3% in cannabis cigarettes, produces denser aerosols with greater emission rates, resulting in proportionally higher metabolite concentrations in exposed individuals. Smoking methods vary in their particle output: joints and pipes generate bimodal particle size distributions (380–420 nm and 800–840 nm) with emission rates 2–6 times those of secondhand tobacco smoke per puff, while bongs produce similar fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels in home settings. User exhalation patterns, such as forceful expulsion in enclosed spaces, further disperse THC particles, with multiple simultaneous users (e.g., 8–25) intensifying overall air contamination by factors tied to the number of cigarettes lit and room air volume.

Physiological and Psychological Effects

Short-Term Effects

Exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke, particularly in unventilated environments, can produce mild psychological effects in non-smokers, such as increased sensations of and . These are evidenced by elevated ratings on visual analog scales for "pleasant drug effect" (mean 20 on a 0-100 scale) and "tired" (mean 45), alongside a subjective "feel drug effect" (mean 16). Altered may manifest as a mild of being "high" or "stoned," with effects typically peaking within 10-20 minutes and subsiding after 30-60 minutes. Physiologically, short-term responses include a modest increase in , rising from a baseline of about 66 beats per minute to 72 beats per minute immediately following exposure. Additional changes encompass dry mouth, reported by 21% of exposed individuals, and red or irritated eyes, noted in 31% of cases among officers providing security at outdoor concert events. These symptoms resemble those observed with low-dose direct due to absorption of trace THC levels (mean 3.2 ng/mL in ). Impairment potential arises from subtle cognitive and motor deficits, including reduced accuracy (from 97% to 93%) and increased attempts on the Digit Symbol Substitution Task, signaling slower reaction times and compromised decision-making. Such effects, relevant for tasks requiring coordination like driving, peak within 10-20 minutes and generally resolve within 30-60 minutes, contingent on ventilation levels.

Potential Long-Term Impacts

Repeated exposure to secondhand smoke has been linked to potential long-term respiratory issues, including chronic irritation and increased risk of , stemming from the tar and irritants present in the smoke, which mirror those in secondhand smoke. A 2024 study found that adults exposed to secondhand smoke in the past 30 days reported more frequent respiratory symptoms, such as coughing, wheezing, and , with symptom severity heightened among those who also used directly. These effects arise from the byproducts that can cause airway and production over time, potentially exacerbating conditions like in susceptible individuals. However, direct long-term studies on secondhand smoke are limited, with much evidence inferred from similarities to tobacco smoke exposure. Prolonged low-level THC exposure through may pose neurocognitive risks, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant individuals, where absorbed THC could subtly affect , , and development. In a 2025 study of 275 children (mean age 3.6 years), 27.3% had detectable THC equivalents in urine, with odds 5 times higher in households with in-home (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.4-10.4), raising concerns for developmental impacts akin to those from direct low-dose exposure, including potential deficits in cognitive function. For pregnant individuals, secondhand exposure could contribute to fetal THC uptake, potentially linked to long-term offspring outcomes like altered and motivation, though evidence remains preliminary and largely extrapolated from active use studies. Systematic reviews highlight a gap in long-term neurocognitive data specific to secondhand exposure, emphasizing the need for further . Secondhand cannabis smoke contains carcinogenic compounds, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, at levels comparable to or higher than those in tobacco smoke, suggesting an elevated risk of with chronic exposure. These toxins from combustion byproducts deposit in the lungs over time, similar to the established cancer risks from secondhand tobacco smoke. While no large-scale epidemiological studies have definitively quantified cancer incidence from secondhand cannabis smoke, the chemical profile indicates a plausible long-term , particularly for nonsmokers in enclosed environments.

Scientific Studies and Evidence

Key Research Findings

A pivotal study conducted by researchers at in 2015 examined the effects of secondhand cannabis smoke on non-users by exposing participants to smoke from high-potency (11.3% THC) in controlled chamber environments. In unventilated conditions simulating extreme exposure, such as a small, sealed room with multiple smokers, non-smokers exhibited detectable THC levels in blood (averaging 3.2 ng/mL) and mild subjective effects, including altered mood and impaired performance on cognitive tasks such as the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), with no significant changes on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), though no significant motor impairment was observed. In contrast, ventilated conditions mimicking typical indoor settings resulted in negligible THC absorption and no discernible psychoactive effects, underscoring that contact highs require prolonged, high-concentration exposure. A 2020 evaluation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health assessed secondhand cannabis smoke exposure among officers providing security at outdoor events where cannabis use was prevalent. Of the 29 officers surveyed, 34% had low but measurable levels of THC-COOH (a cannabis ) in their urine samples, all below 1.0 ng/mL and far under standard drug testing thresholds of 50 ng/mL for screening. Perceived contact highs were reported infrequently, with an average subjective rating of 1.6 on a 0-10 scale, and only 17% describing moderate to high sensations; no objective impairment was detected in blood THC levels or performance metrics, indicating minimal occupational risk in open-air settings. A 2017 systematic review synthesizing data from multiple experimental and observational studies on secondhand marijuana smoke exposure concluded that psychoactivity risks are minimal under normal ventilation and moderate exposure scenarios, with effects limited to subtle physiological changes like elevated in isolated cases. However, heavy, unventilated exposure could lead to detectable metabolites sufficient to trigger positive drug tests, particularly in screening, though clinical intoxication remains rare without direct . The review emphasized the role of environmental factors in absorption, aligning with pharmacological principles of THC uptake via , but highlighted the of long-term data.

Limitations and Gaps in Research

Research on contact highs, or the effects of secondhand cannabis smoke exposure, is constrained by several methodological limitations that undermine the robustness and applicability of findings. Many studies, including chamber experiments conducted at institutions like , rely on small sample sizes, often involving only 4 to 19 nonsmoking participants, which restricts statistical power and generalizability to diverse populations. This issue is compounded by the homogeneity of study cohorts, typically consisting of healthy adults, further limiting insights into how effects vary across age, sex, or health status. A significant gap arises from the variability in products used in experiments, which often fail to reflect contemporary market realities. Early studies employed strains with low THC potencies (e.g., around 2.8%), whereas modern frequently exceeds 11% THC, potentially amplifying secondhand exposure risks that remain underexplored. Additionally, inconsistencies in environmental factors, such as room ventilation and smoke generation methods (e.g., versus vaping), introduce variables that obscure reproducible outcomes across studies. Ethical and practical challenges further exacerbate knowledge deficiencies, particularly regarding vulnerable populations. Simulating realistic heavy or chronic exposure in controlled settings raises and concerns, resulting in a paucity of data on children, pregnant individuals, or long-term occupational groups like workers. Self-report measures in pediatric studies, for instance, are prone to underreporting due to , especially in regions where use was historically stigmatized or illegal. Moreover, the absence of objective biomarkers for low-level exposure in cohorts highlights the need for advanced detection methods to bridge these gaps. Overall, these limitations underscore the requirement for larger, more diverse, and ecologically valid investigations to inform strategies.

Cultural and Social Aspects

In the realm of film and television, contact highs are often portrayed through exaggerated comedic scenarios in stoner comedies, where pervasive marijuana smoke leads to unintended intoxication for non-users, amplifying humorous chaos. For instance, in (1998), characters navigate absurd situations fueled by heavy use, with secondhand exposure implied in group settings to heighten the effects. Similarly, (2008) depicts protagonists in a haze of constant smoking, where the dense atmosphere suggests passive highs contributing to their paranoid escapades. Literature from the era romanticizes contact highs as a communal aspect of drug experimentation, particularly in works evoking the Beat Generation's influence on life. Tom Wolfe's () captures the ' journeys, where the immersive descriptions of group highs create a "contact high" for readers, reflecting the era's shared altered states without direct consumption. This portrayal underscores passive exposure as a gateway to collective euphoria in bohemian circles. In music, contact highs are referenced to evoke romanticized notions of indirect bliss, often blending literal and metaphorical interpretations. The band Sublime, emblematic of 1990s ska-punk infused with cannabis themes, contributes to this trope through lyrics celebrating laid-back, smoke-filled environments that imply passive intoxication, as in their album 40oz. to Freedom (1992), which romanticizes weed culture's communal haze. More explicitly, later tracks like Iration's "Contact High" (2020) describe a lingering euphoric energy from proximity, mirroring passive highs in social settings. The depiction of contact highs has evolved from hippie lore—where it was a of campus , such as crowding into smoke-filled closets for secondary intoxication—to modern expressions that downplay scientific details in favor of casual humor. A account details students achieving a "contact high" by sealing themselves in confined spaces with joints, creating an "oozy" atmosphere for mild effects without directly, emblematic of the era's experimental ethos. Today, this shifts to lighthearted memes and , perpetuating the idea as a fun, low-stakes cultural shorthand. Concerns regarding drug testing have arisen in contexts involving potential secondhand smoke exposure, particularly in safety-sensitive occupations where urine screens for THC metabolites are routine. Studies indicate that under extreme, unventilated conditions, non-smokers exposed to high levels of smoke can exhibit detectable THC-COOH levels in , potentially leading to positive results at low cutoffs such as 20 ng/mL, though standard thresholds of 50 ng/mL are rarely exceeded. For instance, in policies for roles like transportation or , employers may implement confirmatory testing or ventilation protocols to mitigate risks of false positives from incidental exposure, as emphasized in guidelines from occupational health authorities. Occupational guidelines address secondhand smoke exposure in professions with heightened vulnerability, such as and childcare, to ensure worker and public safety. Among officers providing security at public events, air monitoring has detected low levels of Δ9-THC (up to 480 ng/m³), with 34% showing trace THC-COOH in urine below screening limits, alongside symptoms like itchy eyes and headaches; recommendations include and post-exposure monitoring in high-risk scenarios. In childcare settings, as of 2016, 22 states prohibited marijuana use in centers and 20 in home-based facilities, with regulations aimed at preventing child exposure to due to its links to respiratory and cognitive risks; ventilation requirements, such as adequate in enclosed spaces, are often mandated to minimize during any cannabis-related incidents. In 2018, California's (Cal/OSHA) considered extending indoor smoking bans to cannabis in enclosed , including ventilation standards to control airborne hazards; however, as of 2025, no specific regulations have been enacted for secondhand cannabis smoke, and general safety standards apply, while AB 1775 (effective January 2025) permits cannabis smoking and vaping in certain indoor and entertainment venues. Legal precedents involving secondhand cannabis smoke in custody disputes from the 2010s are rare but highlight child welfare considerations. In In re Drake M. (2012), a appellate court reviewed claims of secondhand exposure from a father's use, ultimately ruling that isolated smoking away from the child did not constitute , provided no direct harm was evidenced, underscoring the need for proof of risk in proceedings. Such cases emphasize evaluating environmental factors like ventilation and proximity in rulings, prioritizing the child's over unsubstantiated exposure fears.

Myths and Misconceptions

Common Beliefs

A prevalent belief surrounding contact highs is that mere casual proximity to individuals smoking marijuana inevitably leads to intoxication for bystanders, regardless of ventilation or duration of exposure. Another common notion holds that the effects of a contact high are equivalent in potency to those experienced from direct cannabis consumption, suggesting that secondhand smoke delivers comparable levels of psychoactive compounds. Anecdotal stories frequently circulate about individuals "getting high from the smell alone," such as in public spaces like parks or concerts where marijuana odor lingers in the air. Similarly, exaggerated claims persist that even brief exposure to guarantees failure on drug tests, with people recounting scenarios of positive results after simply being in the vicinity of smokers. These beliefs vary demographically, often being more pronounced among non-users who express fears of passive impairment from involuntary exposure in shared environments like workplaces or homes. In contrast, cannabis users tend to downplay potential risks to others, viewing secondhand exposure as generally safer or less concerning than that from tobacco smoke.

Evidence-Based Debunking

The notion that contact highs universally lead to intoxication from casual exposure is not supported by . A 2015 controlled study by researchers exposed non-smokers to secondhand smoke under varying conditions, finding that mild subjective effects, such as and increased , occurred only in extreme scenarios: an unventilated 10x10-foot room filled with smoke from high-potency (11.3% THC) smoked continuously for one hour by multiple participants. In contrast, exposure in a ventilated room with 11 produced no significant physiological, subjective, or cognitive impairments, mirroring typical everyday environments. Regarding concerns over drug test reliability, positive results from passive exposure are rare and confined to prolonged, heavy secondhand smoke in unventilated spaces. The same Johns Hopkins study detected THC metabolites in urine above standard cutoff levels (50 ng/mL) in only a subset of participants after extreme unventilated exposure, with levels persisting up to 22 hours in some cases, while ventilated conditions yielded no positives. Standard workplace or legal urine tests are designed to distinguish such low-level passive intake from active use, as confirmed by confirmatory GC-MS analysis, making false positives from casual contact highs improbable. Contact highs deliver a fraction of the THC dose from direct , typically insufficient for significant impairment. In the 2015 study, non-smokers in unventilated conditions reached peak blood THC levels of 3.2 ng/mL, compared to 20.7 ng/mL in active smokers under the same protocol—representing about 15% of the active dose in this extreme setup—and resulted in only minor, transient effects rather than substantial intoxication. Broader reviews indicate that secondhand exposure generally absorbs far less THC due to dilution and ventilation, often below thresholds for noticeable psychoactivity in real-world scenarios.

References

  1. https://www.justthinktwice.gov/article/secondhand-marijuana-smoke
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4747424/
  3. https://druglibrary.org/special/novak/high_culture6.htm
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20465865/
  5. https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/health-effects/secondhand-smoke.html
  6. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/lsd-contact-high/
  7. https://weedmaps.com/learn/cannabis-and-your-body/can-you-really-get-secondhand-high
  8. https://www.medwellhealth.net/secondary-contact-high-is-it-a-real-thing/
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021006887
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-55151-5
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741419/
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3017628/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4342697/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2689518/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4627404/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6177698/
  17. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2829482
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8593821/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345892/
  20. https://cca.virginia.gov/resources/secondhandsmoke
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5015313/
  22. https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/secondhand-marijuana-smoke-and-indoor-air-quality
  23. https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/articles/spotlight/research/first-of-its-kind-research-shows-dangers-of-secondhand-cannabis-smoke
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037687161500160X
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392828788_Secondhand_Cannabis_Smoke_Exposure_Particulate_Matter_and_Effects_on_Physical_and_Neurobehavioral_Health_in_Youth
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10140452/
  27. https://newslang89.wordpress.com/2011/10/17/the-electric-kool-aid-acid-test/
  28. https://www.discogs.com/master/18580-Sublime-40oz-To-Freedom
  29. https://open.spotify.com/track/5Ejki2ita3HfMzNqdgoTxJ
  30. https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2017/06/marijuana-use-surged-1960s/
  31. https://www.webmd.com/drug-medication/ss/slideshow-drugs-false-positive-test
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944871/
  33. https://nes-ehs.com/ehs-news/occupational-exposure-to-secondhand-marijuana-smoke/
  34. https://no-smoke.org/california-rolls-back-smokefree-workplace-protections-for-cannabis-hospitality-venues/
  35. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol13/iss3/15
  36. https://www.healthline.com/health/can-you-get-high-from-smelling-weed
  37. https://everydaydelta.com/blogs/education/contact-highs-and-thc-separating-myth-from-reality
  38. https://www.health-street.net/blog-drug-testing/busting-myths-secondhand-thc-smoke-drug-test/
  39. https://journals.bcit.ca/index.php/ehj/article/view/20
  40. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2808206
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.