Hubbry Logo
RNAD CoulportRNAD CoulportMain
Open search
RNAD Coulport
Community hub
RNAD Coulport
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
RNAD Coulport
RNAD Coulport
RNAD Coulport
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Royal Naval Armaments Depot Coulport, shortened to RNAD Coulport, on Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland, is the storage and loading facility for the nuclear warheads of the United Kingdom's Trident programme.

Key Information

The base, near the village of Coulport, has up to 16 reinforced concrete bunkers built into the hillside on the eastern shore of Loch Long. It is the last depot in Britain to retain the "RNAD" designation, indicating a Royal Naval Armaments Depot.

The depot was established during the Cold War as the storage, maintenance and loading facility for Polaris nuclear weapons. Today, Coulport is mainly used for handling Trident warheads.

Two docks are located on the shoreline at the foot of the hill. There, weapons are loaded onto Vanguard-class nuclear submarines before they go on patrol and unloaded before they return to base at nearby Faslane. An older jetty is known as the Polaris Jetty, while the newer, covered explosive handling jetty (EHJ) is used for handling Trident warheads.[1]

History

[edit]
Submarine returning from patrol
The explosive handling jetty at Coulport, seen from Ardentinny

Coulport had originally been best known as a holiday retreat for wealthy Glaswegians, with its most notable feature being Kibble Palace, now relocated to the Glasgow Botanic Gardens. It is the site of the farm of Duchlage (historically spelt Duchlass).

The Nassau Agreement was signed in December 1962, and the Polaris Sales Agreement was signed in April 1963. Initial construction took place between 1963, when Faslane was chosen as the new Polaris base, and 1968, when the first Polaris boat began its patrol. Safety considerations required that the armament maintenance and the storage facility have its own berth and be at least 4,400 feet (1,300 m) from the main facility whilst operational considerations dictated that the two facilities should be within an hour's sailing time. Coulport, on the opposite peninsula, met both of these requirements.[2]

The Trident Works Programme at Coulport and Faslane, co-ordinated by the Property Services Agency, took 13 years to complete. Planning work at Coulport began in 1982, and the estimated final cost for the entire programme, at 1994 prices, was approximately £1.9 billion. This made it the second most expensive procurement project in the UK after the Channel Tunnel project.[3]

Prior to the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the implications of a potential vote for Scottish independence from the United Kingdom for the Coulport and Faslane bases were extensively discussed in the media, as it was unclear if any submarine base in England, Wales or Northern Ireland could house the Coulport silos.[4][5][6] Since the Scottish electorate voted against independence, Scotland remained UK territory and so the bases, and the equipment housed there, were unaffected.[7]

A covered floating dry dock for the Trident submarines was built at Hunterston in Ayrshire, and floated to RNAD Coulport where it has been situated since 1993. This explosive handling jetty is one of the world's largest floating concrete structures.[8]

From about 2010 to 2025, due to inadequate maintenance of 1,500 water pipes, some tritium used periodically to replenish the Trident nuclear weapons leaked into Loch Long, constituting a low level of radioactive pollution. Analysis by Scottish Environment Protection Agency suggested that up to half of the pipeline components were beyond their design life when the leaks occurred.[9]

Sister depot at Kings Bay, Georgia

[edit]

The UK's Polaris system was fully serviced at Coulport, but the Trident missiles are randomly selected from the large US stockpile at the Trident Refit Facility at the Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia. The missiles are not owned outright by the UK, which has "mingled asset" ownership rights to 58 missiles from a pool shared with the US Navy. The Trident warheads are designed and manufactured by the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston, Berkshire, England, and are owned by the UK government.[10]

Site management

[edit]

RNAD Coulport is owned by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and is one of four Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) sites. Under a fifteen-year contract agreed in 2012, AWE plc, Babcock and Lockheed Martin UK Strategic Systems, together known as the ABL Alliance, manage and operate Coulport, although the Royal Navy's Naval Base Commander Clyde retains overall control and responsibility for security and activities. The site is regulated by the Office for Nuclear Regulation and Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator.[11][12]

Safety

[edit]

Exercise Bowline is the annual test of the emergency response routines to a nuclear weapon accident at Coulport. It is conducted by the Office for Nuclear Regulation. In 2011 the test failed as "a number of command and control aspects of the exercise were not considered to have been adequately demonstrated".[13]

The exercise was repeated later in the year and recorded "a marked improvement" and that "the agreed objectives and associated success criteria of the 'Command and Control' aspects were met."[14]

Transport of Trident nuclear warheads by road

[edit]
Main article: Defence Nuclear Material Transport Operations

The main logistical movement of nuclear weapons in the UK is between the Atomic Weapons Establishment in Berkshire and RNAD Coulport in Argyll, in both directions. Because the warheads need to be regularly refurbished, batches are shuttled by road convoy several times a year.[15] Convoys use staging posts and crew change locations during this journey.

The Truck Cargo Heavy Duty (TCHD) carriers containing the weapons are escorted in a convoy of MoD vehicles commanded by a Ministry of Defence Police (MDP) Chief Inspector. The crew, of up to 50 people, includes a first aid team, fire crew and personnel equipped to monitor for radiological hazards. The convoy maintains contact by radio and telephone with Task Control, MDP Central Control Room, Wethersfield, Essex, which monitors its movement, and with the civil police forces in the affected areas.

Police forces are notified at least 24 hours in advance of a convoy being routed through their area; this enables them to advise the convoy about any local traffic problems. Police forces may advise fire brigades of the presence of the convoy if it is moving into the vicinity of a fire brigade operation.

Details of nuclear warhead convoys are kept secret by the UK government and the MoD who operate a "Neither Confirm Nor Deny" policy on informing the public regarding convoys. Evidence given by the Nuclear Information Campaign to the Defence Select Committee (based on figures from campaign group Nukewatch UK for 2000 to 2006) give the number of convoys as ranging from two to six return journeys per year from Aldermaston to Coulport. Estimates of the warhead numbers transported during this period are that 88 were moved from Aldermaston to Coulport while 120 were returned, indicating a withdrawal of between 30 and 50 warheads leaving an operational stockpile of between 170 and 150 warheads.[16]

In the event of a nuclear accident the SSC would activate the MoD's Nuclear Accident Response Organisation and would alert the local police. The responsibility for these operations rests with the Director Nuclear Movements & Nuclear Accident Response Group.

Protesters regularly try to stop the convoy and climb onto the TCHDs. The MDP are trained on a regular basis to counter any protest. MDP motorcyclists and traffic car officers make arrests and then hand over responsibility to the local police.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

RNAD Coulport

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Royal Naval Armaments Depot (RNAD) Coulport is a secure installation on in , , operated by the to store, process, maintain, and issue the D5 ballistic missiles and associated nuclear warheads that form the core of the United Kingdom's sea-based nuclear deterrent. Situated approximately eight miles southwest of HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane, RNAD Coulport enables the loading and unloading of warheads onto Vanguard-class submarines during their operational cycles, ensuring the continuous at-sea deterrence posture maintained by the since the system's introduction in the 1990s. The facility handles both strategic nuclear components, produced at the , and conventional submarine munitions, under stringent safety and security protocols managed by a combination of and contractors. While essential to the UK's independent nuclear capability, RNAD Coulport has faced scrutiny over environmental incidents, including a 2025 disclosure of radioactive water leaks from aging infrastructure into adjacent , prompting questions about long-term site management amid ongoing system upgrades.

Historical Development

Origins and Construction (1960s)

The establishment of the Royal Naval Armaments Depot (RNAD) Coulport in the 1960s was driven by the United Kingdom's adoption of the U.S. Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missile system as part of its independent nuclear deterrent strategy during the Cold War. The Nassau Agreement, signed on December 6, 1962, between British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan and U.S. President John F. Kennedy, committed the United States to supply Polaris missiles, launch tubes, and supporting technology to the UK in exchange for the cancellation of the Skybolt air-launched missile project. This agreement necessitated secure facilities for warhead storage and handling, separate from submarine berthing, to mitigate risks and streamline operations. The Polaris Sales Agreement, formalizing technical and logistical transfers, followed in April 1963. Coulport's site, located on the eastern shore of in , , was selected alongside the nearby Faslane naval base (now ) due to its strategic isolation, natural defensibility provided by surrounding hills, and proximity to deep-water access for secure munitions transport. Construction commenced in 1963 on land including the former Blairmore farm, with the depot designed specifically for the receipt, storage, maintenance, and loading of Polaris nuclear warheads onto Resolution-class . Parliamentary records from May 23, 1963, confirm the integrated development of Faslane for submarine operations and Coulport for armaments, estimating combined costs exceeding £100 million (equivalent to over £2 billion in 2023 terms) under the Macmillan government's defense priorities. The construction effort involved excavating reinforced bunkers and magazines into the hillside for blast-resistant warhead storage, alongside jetties for vessel unloading and specialized rail systems for internal transport, all engineered to atomic warfare standards with compartmentalized security. Work progressed amid local opposition over land acquisition and environmental impacts but was prioritized for national security, displacing elements of the pre-existing Coulport village. Completion occurred in 1968, aligning with the first operational patrols of HMS Resolution, the lead Polaris submarine, which entered service that year. This timeline ensured the facility's readiness as the UK's primary nuclear warhead hub, independent of U.S. servicing dependencies.

Cold War Operations with Polaris

RNAD Coulport was established as the dedicated storage, maintenance, and loading facility for the United Kingdom's Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) warheads and missiles during the Cold War, with construction commencing in 1963 following the selection of HMNB Clyde (Faslane) as the Polaris base and completing in 1968. The site featured sixteen hardened nuclear weapons storage bunkers excavated into the hillside overlooking Loch Long, designed to securely house the ET.317 warheads compatible with the Polaris A-3 missiles deployed on the four Resolution-class submarines (HMS Resolution, Repulse, Renown, and Revenge). These bunkers provided environmental control and blast protection, ensuring warhead integrity amid the UK's shift to a sea-based nuclear deterrent under the 1962 Nassau Agreement with the United States. Operational integration with Faslane involved submarines transiting the short distance along the to Coulport's jetties for and handling, distinct from routine berthing to minimize risks from conventional armaments. The Polaris Jetty facilitated the transfer of up to sixteen per , with loaded separately via cranes and specialized handling gear into missile sections under controlled conditions documented in the Coulport Polaris Control Procedures (CPCP). This process supported the Continuous At Sea Deterrence (CASD) policy, initiated with HMS Resolution's first operational patrol on 15 June 1968 and achieving full maturity by June 1969, whereby one maintained constant patrol with a full complement of armed . Maintenance at Coulport included periodic inspections and component replacements to sustain yields of approximately 200 kilotons each, ensuring system reliability against Soviet naval threats. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Coulport managed the logistics of warhead exchanges during submarine refits and upgrades, including preparations for the limited penetration aid retrofit introduced in 1982 to counter Soviet defenses. Transport to the facility occasionally involved sea routes, as evidenced by the 1971 voyage of the armaments vessel Throsk carrying warheads from the . Safety protocols emphasized separation of high-explosive components, with documented incidents—such as a 1977 securing pin failure during re-alignment and a 1987 partial engagement error during loading—highlighting the inherent hazards but also the robustness of procedural redundancies that prevented escalation. By maintaining through covered handling areas and restricted access, Coulport underpinned the force's estimated 229 patrols until decommissioning began in 1994.

Transition to Trident System (1980s–1990s)

In July 1980, the UK government announced its decision to replace the missile system with the D5 submarine-launched ballistic missile system, initiating preparations at RNAD Coulport to adapt its infrastructure from Polaris warhead storage and servicing to support the new platform. This shift was driven by the need for enhanced range, accuracy, and multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV) capabilities amid evolving Soviet threats during the late . Coulport, which had fully serviced Polaris missiles and warheads since the late 1960s, required modifications to handle Trident's larger missile bodies and UK-designed warheads, including the transition from Polaris A3T to Trident's Holbrook re-entry vehicles produced at the . Facility expansions at Coulport commenced in 1982 and continued through 1995, tripling the depot's size to accommodate Trident missile storage in 16 reinforced bunkers originally built for Polaris but repurposed for the new system. These upgrades included enhanced perimeter security, such as fence reinforcements in 1986, and specialized equipment for loading and unloading warheads onto Trident missiles, which unlike Polaris were drawn from a shared US-UK pool at Kings Bay but stored at Coulport prior to submarine integration. The Ministry of Defence invested significantly in these works to ensure seamless continuity of the UK's continuous at-sea deterrent, with Coulport maintaining operational secrecy under heightened security protocols amid public inquiries into the extensions. By the early 1990s, as the first Vanguard-class submarine, , underwent fitting out, Coulport began receiving components, supporting initial warhead-missile matings and tests. The site operated both and systems in parallel during the overlap period, with the last Polaris patrol concluding in 1996 after 28 years of service, fully handing over to by late 1994 when continuous deterrent patrols shifted exclusively to the new missiles. This transition preserved Coulport's core role in warhead handling while adapting to 's reduced UK servicing needs, as missiles underwent periodic maintenance in the rather than on-site.

Facilities and Technical Specifications

Storage Infrastructure

The core of RNAD Coulport's storage infrastructure comprises 16 reinforced concrete excavated into the hillside along the eastern shore of , primarily designed for the secure containment of II D5 missiles and their nuclear warheads. These , constructed during the facility's expansion in the 1980s to support the transition from to systems, feature thick walls capable of withstanding external threats and air-locked doors for controlled access and environmental regulation. Each provides capacity for up to four missiles, accommodating the UK's operational stockpile of approximately 40-50 reloadable missiles stored off-submarine. Non-operational warheads, numbering around 225 as of recent estimates, are housed in adjacent secure magazines equipped for maintenance, with procedures ensuring separation from missile bodies until loading. Supporting infrastructure includes specialized processing buildings for warhead inspection, refurbishment, and integration, utilizing climate-controlled environments to preserve plutonium pits and electronics over extended storage periods. An offshore quay, fitted with high-capacity cranes rated for heavy loads, enables direct transfer of armaments to Vanguard-class submarines moored in , minimizing exposure during handling. The facility also maintains ancillary storage for conventional munitions, though nuclear assets dominate operational priorities.

Loading and Maintenance Capabilities

RNAD Coulport features two shoreline docks equipped for the secure loading and unloading of D5 missiles and their associated nuclear warheads onto and from Vanguard-class . One is enclosed, facilitating unobserved transfer operations using specialized cranes and handling equipment to minimize exposure risks. transit approximately 3 kilometers from HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane to Coulport for these procedures, which occur prior to deterrent patrols and upon return. The depot maintains a dedicated team of trained personnel qualified to perform installation and removal from tubes, ensuring compatibility with systems. These operations adhere to stringent protocols for radiological and safety, with warheads transferred from hardened storage bunkers to loading platforms via secure conveyors or . In terms of maintenance, Coulport conducts routine inspections and basic servicing of stored warheads to verify integrity and operational readiness, including replacement to control humidity. Non-operational or suspect units are periodically exchanged with stockpile reserves, while advanced refurbishment or disassembly occurs at the sites in and , transported by escorted road convoys. This distributed approach supports the UK's continuous at-sea deterrent without on-site full-life extension capabilities.

Operational Role

Warhead Handling Procedures

Warheads at RNAD Coulport are received from the (AWE) sites at and via secure road convoys, where they undergo initial storage in reinforced hillside bunkers known as Re-Entry Body Magazines (RBMs), capable of holding up to 200 units including spares. These magazines maintain warheads in a non-operational state until required, with procedures ensuring separation from missiles during peacetime storage to enhance safety margins. Inspection and basic maintenance occur in the Re-Entry Body Process Building (RBPB), where tasks include replacing gas in the primary stage—due to its 12-year —and verifying components for operational readiness, though major surveillance is conducted at AWE Burghfield. Warheads can be converted between operational and reserve configurations here, with handling limited to minimize exposure risks; detailed protocols incorporate multiple independent safety lines of defense, as outlined in assessments of facility resilience. For loading, Vanguard-class submarines dock at the Explosives Handling Jetty (EHJ), a covered floating berth equipped with overhead cranes and a Service Unit (MSU) for mating warheads to II D5 missiles—either by attaching to pre-stored missiles in Ready Issue Magazines (RIMs) or handling complete assemblies. De-mating follows reverse steps during unloading, with warheads transferred securely between the EHJ and RBMs under stringent and procedures designed to prevent accidents or unauthorized access, supported by specialized teams trained for these operations. All transfers prioritize blast separation, with RIMs spaced 27 meters apart to mitigate propagation risks. Operational handling emphasizes inherent warhead robustness and environmental safeguards, with the EHJ engineered to withstand and seismic events while maintaining low nuclear yield probabilities from external hazards. Specific procedural details remain classified, reflecting the site's role in sustaining the UK's continuous at-sea deterrent.

Integration with Submarine Operations

RNAD Coulport serves as the primary facility for arming and disarming the United Kingdom's Vanguard-class submarines, which are based at the adjacent (Faslane), approximately 3 kilometers to the east. Submarines transit from Faslane to Coulport's dedicated Explosives Handling Jetty—a specialized floating berth designed for secure loading and unloading operations—prior to commencing deterrent patrols and upon return. This integration enables the loading of II D5 missiles with Holbrook nuclear warheads directly onto the submarines, ensuring operational readiness without exposing warheads to prolonged submarine transit risks. The loading at Coulport involves a team of specially trained personnel using purpose-built equipment to transfer warheads from secure storage bunkers to missiles within the Re-Entry Body Process Building for inspection and assembly, followed by crane transfer to the 's missile tubes via the . Each Vanguard-class can accommodate up to 16 missiles, with the maintaining around 120 operationally available warheads distributed across the fleet to support continuous at-sea deterrence. Unloading reverses this sequence, with warheads returned to climate-controlled storage to maintain boosting and other components. This tightly coordinated procedure, conducted under stringent safety protocols, minimizes handling time—typically spanning days—and integrates with Faslane's maintenance cycles to sustain one on at all times. Coulport's separation from Faslane enhances security by isolating storage from berthing and refueling activities, reducing vulnerability to single-point failures or incidents. Warheads arrive at Coulport via secure convoys from the at for periodic servicing, with batch samples transported for maintenance before reintegration into the operational stockpile. This logistical chain supports the UK's nuclear deterrent posture, where Coulport's capacity—handling up to 225 total warheads, including spares—ensures flexibility for fleet rotations amid ongoing upgrades for the future Dreadnought-class submarines.

Strategic Importance

Contribution to UK Nuclear Deterrent

RNAD Coulport serves as the primary storage and maintenance facility for the nuclear warheads of the United Kingdom's Trident D5 ballistic missile system, enabling the arming of Vanguard-class submarines that form the sea-based leg of the UK's nuclear deterrent. Non-operational warheads, part of the UK's total stockpile of approximately 225, are housed in reinforced concrete bunkers at the site, ensuring secure custody separate from the submarines based at nearby HMNB Clyde. This separation enhances operational flexibility, allowing warheads to be loaded or unloaded during submarine refits and patrols without compromising security. The depot's infrastructure supports the UK's continuous at-sea deterrence (CASD) policy, under which at least one of the four Vanguard-class submarines maintains a submerged patrol with up to 48 operational warheads at all times, providing a survivable second-strike capability. Since CASD began in 1969 with the system and transitioned to in the 1990s, Coulport has facilitated the rotation and rearming process, with warheads transported securely between storage and submarines via specialized procedures. This unbroken patrol chain, sustained for over 50 years, relies on Coulport's capacity to handle and maintain warheads in readiness, underpinning the deterrent's credibility against existential threats. Coulport's contribution extends to the reliability of the deterrent through its specialized handling and capabilities, which verify integrity and integration with missiles prior to embarkation. As the sole UK facility for these functions since the decommissioning of earlier depots, it has supported the shift from to , maintaining deterrent continuity amid technological upgrades. The site's role in the Defence Nuclear Enterprise ensures that the UK's minimum nuclear posture remains operationally robust, with hardened facilities designed to withstand attacks and preserve launch authority.

Geopolitical Context and Deterrence Efficacy

RNAD Coulport serves as the primary storage facility for the nuclear warheads integral to the United Kingdom's Trident submarine-launched ballistic missile system, enabling the continuous at-sea deterrence (CASD) posture maintained since 1969. This capability underpins the UK's minimum credible deterrent, designed to ensure a survivable second-strike option against existential threats. In the geopolitical landscape, the facility's operations align with the UK's declaration of its nuclear forces to NATO since April 1962, contributing to the alliance's overall nuclear posture alongside those of the United States and France. Post-Cold War, the UK's deterrent, supported by Coulport, has adapted to evolving threats including Russian nuclear modernization, Chinese expansionism, and proliferation risks from non-state actors and rogue regimes. The maintains approximately 225 warheads, with up to 120 operationally available, reflecting reductions from peaks—such as the elimination of tactical nuclear weapons by 1998—while preserving strategic credibility. This posture deters not only direct nuclear attack but also coercion in scenarios, as evidenced by NATO's reinforced deterrence measures following Russia's 2014 annexation of and the 2022 invasion of . The efficacy of this deterrence rests on mutually assured destruction principles, where the certainty of devastating retaliation precludes rational initiation of nuclear conflict. Empirical evidence supports its role: no nuclear-armed state has suffered direct invasion by a peer adversary since 1945, correlating with the deployment of survivable submarine-based forces like those serviced at Coulport. UK government assessments affirm the system's reliability, despite isolated test anomalies such as the 2016 Trident misfire, which did not compromise operational warheads. Critics, including some parliamentary inquiries, argue ambiguity in deterring sub-threshold aggression, yet historical precedents—like the Falklands War, where Soviet restraint may have been influenced by NATO nuclear dynamics—suggest broader stabilizing effects.

Management and Security

Administrative Oversight

RNAD Coulport falls under the administrative authority of the (MoD), integrated within the broader Defence Nuclear Enterprise framework responsible for the UK's nuclear weapons programme. The depot operates as a component of His Majesty's Naval Base (HMNB) Clyde, with strategic direction provided by the MoD's Strategic Programmes Directorate, ensuring alignment with national defence policy and system sustainment. Operational management and maintenance services at the facility are outsourced to the ABL Alliance, a formed by (AWE) plc, , and Strategic Systems. This arrangement stems from a 15-year contract awarded by the MoD on 27 July 2012, valued at approximately £500 million, covering handling support, facility operations, and integration with submarine loading activities at Coulport and the adjacent Strategic Weapon Support Building at Faslane. The ABL Alliance handles day-to-day execution, including personnel training and equipment upkeep, while adhering to MoD-specified performance metrics and safety protocols. Ultimate oversight and command authority reside with the Royal Navy's Naval Base Commander Clyde, who maintains responsibility for security, compliance, and coordination with broader fleet operations. Regulatory supervision is provided by the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator (DNSR), which conducts independent assessments of administrative and operational practices to enforce nuclear safety standards. This structure balances contracted efficiency with governmental accountability, with periodic parliamentary updates ensuring transparency on programme governance.

Perimeter and Internal Security Protocols

The perimeter of RNAD Coulport is secured by high fencing that encircles the facility and its operational areas, extending beyond the core footprint to enhance physical barriers against intrusion. This multi-mile perimeter, approximately six miles in length, is designed to deter and detect unauthorized entry, though full visual coverage requires extensive patrolling due to the site's scale. Armed external patrols by (MDP) form a key component of perimeter security, implemented since 2003 following comprehensive risk assessments to bolster protective arrangements at both and RNAD Coulport. These patrols operate alongside static guarding and systems to monitor and respond to potential threats, with MDP authorized for armed duties specific to high-security nuclear sites. Internal security protocols emphasize layered defenses within the facility, including restricted access zones around bunkers housing warheads, personnel vetting, and procedural controls for handling sensitive materials, though operational details remain classified by the to prevent exploitation. Unauthorized access incidents, tracked and reported annually to , underscore ongoing vigilance, with 174 such breaches recorded across Clyde bases (including Coulport) from 2019 to 2023, none of which compromised the nuclear perimeter according to MoD assessments.

Safety and Environmental Record

Nuclear Safety Measures and Achievements

RNAD Coulport operates under stringent nuclear safety protocols enforced by the Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator (DNSR), an independent body within the responsible for regulating nuclear and radiological safety across defence facilities. The DNSR conducts regular inspections, audits, and enforcement actions to ensure compliance with safety standards, including the issuance of safety improvement notices where deficiencies are identified; notably, no such notices or immediate safety requirements were recorded for Coulport in the 2012/13 regulatory period. Warhead storage occurs in reinforced bunkers designed to contain potential accidents, with handling procedures adhering to Joint Service Publication 830 standards for safety, emphasizing double-handling verification and radiological monitoring. Emergency preparedness includes routine drills simulating nuclear weapon accidents, coordinated with local authorities and the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), which provides additional oversight for non-defence nuclear aspects. The Clyde Nuclear Safety Committee reviews reported nuclear safety events, ensuring lessons learned are disseminated across operations. Nuclear Site Event Reports (NSERs) are mandatory for any deviation from safety norms, categorized by severity; Coulport's records show predominantly low-level Category C and D events, with no Category A (high consequence) or B (moderate) incidents in audited periods such as 2011/12, where only seven nuclear weapons-related NSERs were logged, all managed without escalation. Achievements in safety include a sustained record of no unsafe radioactive releases impacting the public or environment, as affirmed by the following incident reviews. Post-Fukushima assessments confirmed Coulport's facilities met seismic and resilience standards without identified design flaws. Operational compliance has supported uninterrupted Continuous At Sea Deterrence since the site's activation for warheads in the 1990s, with reductions in reportable events—such as a 76% drop in submarine reactor plant events from 2010/11 to 2011/12—demonstrating effective implementation of operator experience feedback mechanisms. Re-certification under ISO 14001 for environmental management in 2011 underscores ongoing enhancements in radiological protection and waste handling protocols.

Documented Incidents and Responses

On 3 December 1987, during the loading of a onto a vessel at the Coulport , the threads on a securing pin stripped while the missile was being lifted for re-alignment, attributed to incorrect assembly of the hoist mechanism. The operation involved evident delays, frustration, and pressure to complete tasks quickly, creating conditions not conducive to safe handling. The incident was stabilized and declared safe by the at Coulport by 13:30 that day, with no reported release of radioactive material or injury. Multiple incidents of radioactive water leakage occurred due to bursts in aging pipes at the facility. In 2010, a pipe failure allowed contaminated water to discharge into ; similar bursts happened twice in 2019 and twice in 2021. These discharges involved low-level radioactive from warhead maintenance activities, but the (MoD) assessed them as posing no risk to , the environment, or , with levels below regulatory limits. Responses included temporary repairs to the pipe network and monitoring by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), though the site's military exemption from civilian pollution controls limited mandatory remediation; in 2025, SEPA directed the Royal Navy to remove accumulated under a voluntary agreement. RNAD Coulport has recorded numerous lower-category nuclear events annually, categorized by the MoD's system where Category A denotes the most serious (none reported at Coulport), Category B involves potential off-site impact (none recent), Category C potential procedural breaches, and Category D minor administrative issues. In the year ending mid-2025, four Category C and nine Category D events occurred at Coulport, part of broader Clyde-area totals exceeding 50 annually in some periods. All events were contained on-site with no radiological releases, per MoD reports, prompting internal reviews and procedural updates but no operational halts. Critics, including environmental groups, have highlighted aging as a recurring , though evaluations maintain compliance with standards.

Controversies and Debates

Radiation and Environmental Concerns

RNAD Coulport authorizes routine gaseous and solid radioactive discharges under regulation by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), with annual monitoring assessing environmental impacts, including tritium emissions into air and water pathways. These discharges arise from storage, maintenance, and processing activities, but SEPA data indicate habitual levels remain below regulatory limits, with radiological habits surveys confirming negligible doses to local populations from authorized releases. Environmental assessments, such as ERICA modeling for non-human species, evaluate potential ecological effects and support claims of minimal routine impact. However, documented incidents of unauthorized radioactive water releases have raised concerns, stemming from pipe bursts in aging infrastructure handling low-level radioactive effluents. A burst in 2010 initiated issues, followed by two in 2019—including an August event releasing significant volumes into —and further incidents in 2021, attributed by SEPA to "shortfalls in maintenance" by the (MoD), resulting in unnecessary tritium discharges. SEPA files, released after MoD resistance, highlight over 1,500 pipes requiring replacement, with flooding events contaminating , though the MoD maintains no unsafe radioactive material escaped and public risk remained absent. Additional environmental issues include waste—dried radioactive material from warhead humidity control—accumulating onsite, prompting SEPA in 2025 to mandate its removal due to improper storage risks. A breach of waste handling agreements at Coulport necessitated Royal Navy radiological surveys, underscoring ongoing challenges in waste management. Critics, including anti-nuclear groups, argue these lapses reflect systemic neglect, potentially exacerbating long-term marine contamination in despite dilution effects of tritium's short (12.3 years) and low . Official responses emphasize enhanced maintenance protocols post-incidents, with SEPA oversight ensuring compliance, though motions have condemned the releases as alarming. Empirical monitoring continues to affirm no exceedance of dose limits from these events, prioritizing containment over elimination of operational discharges.

Security Breaches and Transport Risks

Since 2018, HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane and the adjacent RNAD Coulport have collectively recorded 104 security breaches, as disclosed by the (MoD) in response to requests. These incidents encompass unauthorized access attempts, perimeter violations, and procedural lapses, though the MoD has stated none compromised the nuclear deterrent's integrity or posed risks to warhead security. By mid-2024, the total for Clyde nuclear facilities over a five-year period reached 174 breaches, highlighting persistent challenges in securing the sites amid ongoing . Notable intrusions include at least two apparent break-ins at Coulport in late 2019, involving activists accessing restricted areas near storage; the initially classified these to avoid public alarm but later acknowledged them under parliamentary scrutiny. Historical precedents trace to the , when Faslane Peace Camp protesters breached submarine controls, prompting Thatcher's authorization for guards to use lethal force against sabotage threats at Clyde bases, including Coulport's linked facilities. Such events underscore vulnerabilities to non-state actors, with campaign groups like Trident Ploughshares repeatedly blocking access roads to Coulport, though without confirmed compromises. Transport risks arise from routine lorry convoys shuttling warheads between Coulport and sites at and , involving up to eight warheads per and requiring approximately 25 such movements for full arsenal maintenance cycles. These overland routes expose warheads to potential accidents, , or radiological in crashes, as analyzed in risk assessments noting higher compared to submarine-based storage; no major incidents have occurred, but critics cite the 2016 parliamentary briefing on safety concerns amid public questioning of MoD protocols. Independent monitoring by groups like Nukewatch UK tracks these convoys, emphasizing their predictability and exposure along public roads, though official records confirm robust escort measures with no verified breaches during transit.

Political Opposition and Pro-Deterrent Counterarguments

Political opposition to RNAD Coulport has primarily emanated from Scottish nationalist groups, peace campaigners, and anti-nuclear organizations, centering on ethical, financial, and sovereignty concerns related to the UK's nuclear deterrent. The (SNP), which has governed since 2007, has consistently advocated for the removal of nuclear weapons from Scottish soil, arguing that represents an "affront to basic decency" due to its indiscriminate destructive potential and incompatibility with an independent 's vision of . In a 2012 motion, 71 members voted to reject replacement, compared to 16 in favor, reflecting broad cross-party support in Holyrood for opposing the program despite Westminster's authority. This stance intensified during the 2014 independence referendum, where the prioritized "the speediest safe transition" of submarines away from Faslane and Coulport. Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and affiliated groups, such as Scottish CND and Trident Ploughshares, have organized sustained direct actions at Coulport and nearby HMNB Clyde (Faslane), including blockades and occupations. Faslane Peace Camp, established in 1982 to protest Polaris upgrades, has hosted ongoing vigils and demonstrations, with notable events like the 2006-2007 Faslane 365 campaign involving daily blockades by rotating activist groups, leading to over 1,000 arrests across multiple years. In July 2017, three activists blockaded RNAD Coulport entrances, citing the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as justification, though they received admonishments rather than convictions in court. Critics, including these groups, contend that storing warheads at Coulport exposes Scotland to unnecessary risks without commensurate benefits, diverting funds from conventional defense and social welfare amid strained budgets. Pro-deterrent counterarguments emphasize the empirical track record of nuclear deterrence in preventing great-power conflict since 1945 and its as a "guarantor of last resort" for sovereignty amid rising threats from state actors like and non-state proliferation risks. defence policy maintains continuous at-sea deterrence via —supported by Coulport's warhead storage—as essential for , arguing that unilateral disarmament would invite aggression in an unstable multipolar world, evidenced by no strategic nuclear use against members despite Cold War escalations and recent invasions like in 2022. Relocation challenges, such as the absence of deep-water alternatives capable of sustaining submarines without multi-billion-pound investments and years of disruption, underscore Coulport's operational indispensability, with experts noting that Scottish secession would not negate the 's NPT-compliant right to retain the deterrent elsewhere if needed. Economically, the program sustains thousands of high-skill jobs in advanced manufacturing across supply chains, bolstering industrial capacity that opponents' cost critiques often overlook in favor of static fiscal comparisons. While acknowledging protestors' ethical qualms, proponents assert that deterrence's causal efficacy—averting existential threats through credible retaliation—outweighs , as verified by historical non-use and alliance dynamics in .

International and Comparative Aspects

Partnership with Kings Bay Depot

RNAD Coulport maintains operational interdependence with , Georgia, as part of the US-UK II D5 program governed by the 1963 Polaris Sales Agreement, extended to in 1982. Coulport specializes in the storage, maintenance, and loading of UK-specific nuclear warheads onto Vanguard-class submarines, while Kings Bay houses and services a shared pool of Trident missiles, to which the UK holds title for 58 units drawn randomly for use. This arrangement ensures missile reliability through US-led refurbishment cycles at Kings Bay, with UK submarines accessing the pool for loading, often at Kings Bay's Explosives Handling Jetty, prior to warhead mating at Coulport. The partnership facilitates joint technical oversight, with US Navy Strategic Systems Programs (SSP) personnel embedded at Coulport to support warhead-missile integration and program sustainment under the bilateral agreement. These teams, comprising American experts, assist Royal Navy operations, enabling real-time coordination on Trident maintenance and deployment protocols that link Coulport's warhead infrastructure directly to Kings Bay's missile logistics. Such collaboration minimizes duplication, as UK facilities lack independent missile reprocessing capabilities, relying instead on Kings Bay for periodic servicing every 3-5 years per missile. This depot-level linkage exemplifies broader US-UK nuclear burden-sharing, where Coulport's secure warhead handling complements Kings Bay's -centric role, sustaining continuous at-sea deterrence without full UK self-sufficiency in sustainment. Annual exchanges and between the sites ensure compatibility, with UK submarines routinely visiting Kings Bay for uploads during extended patrols or refits.

Alignment with US-UK Nuclear Cooperation

RNAD Coulport's storage and maintenance of nuclear warheads exemplify the deep integration of the 's nuclear deterrent with capabilities under the 1958 - Mutual Defence Agreement (MDA). The MDA, originally signed on 3 July 1958 and periodically amended, authorizes the exchange of classified nuclear information, materials, and technology for mutual defense purposes, enabling the to sustain its independent strategic posture while leveraging American expertise and components. This framework directly supports Coulport's role in housing up to 225 warheads compatible with the -developed II D5 ballistic missiles, which the leases from the Navy under a pooling arrangement established in 1982. The warheads at Coulport, produced at the UK's Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), derive from designs closely modeled on the US W76, with ongoing collaboration facilitated by the MDA for enhancements like improved safety features and yield variability. US laboratories routinely evaluate UK Trident missile test firings, conducted from submarines supported by Coulport, ensuring interoperability and reliability; for instance, UK test data from 1980s–2020s firings has informed joint assessments of system performance. Missile maintenance occurs at the US Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific in Georgia, with periodic returns of UK-leased D5 missiles, underscoring Coulport's dependence on transatlantic logistics for operational readiness. Operational management at Coulport further aligns with US-UK ties through the ABL Alliance, formed in under a 15-year contract involving AWE, , and US firm , which provides expertise in weapon handling and security protocols. This public-private partnership, valued at approximately £500 million over its term, integrates American technical input into UK processing and loading onto submarines at nearby . The arrangement reflects causal interdependence: UK sovereignty over warhead targeting and release is preserved, yet practical sustainment relies on MDA-enabled cooperation to mitigate risks like technological obsolescence. Amendments to the MDA, extended through a 2024 protocol ratified on 4 December 2024, renewed provisions for nuclear and material transfers expiring that year, directly bolstering Coulport's long-term viability amid 's submarine replacement program. This alignment counters proliferation risks by pooling resources against common threats, though it has prompted debates on autonomy; officials assert the deterrent remains "operationally independent," with no veto over use, despite shared infrastructure.

Recent Developments (2000s–Present)

Infrastructure Modernization

Infrastructure modernization at RNAD Coulport forms part of the United Kingdom's broader efforts to sustain its nuclear deterrent amid the transition from Vanguard-class to -class submarines, with upgrades focused on enhancing warhead storage, processing, handling facilities, and supporting infrastructure. These developments, integrated into the £1.3 billion, 10-year programme for (encompassing both Faslane and Coulport), aim to accommodate larger submarines, improve operational efficiency, and prepare for future capabilities such as platforms. Initial construction has begun at Coulport for specialized facilities to support the warhead programme, which replaces the existing Mk4A design and involves sovereign modifications for enhanced safety and reliability in arming, fuzing, and firing systems. This work aligns with () investments across , , and Coulport, ensuring compatibility with II D5 missiles and future loading operations onto submarines. Modernization efforts also encompass docks, equipment, and ancillary infrastructure to handle increased demands from extended sizes and patrol cycles. Budget allocations for Coulport-specific infrastructure have escalated to support these initiatives, rising from £32.207 million in 2023-24 to a peak of £120.017 million in 2028-29, before tapering as projects complete. The programme, initiated under planning from around 2017, emphasizes non-tidal maintenance enhancements and berthing upgrades to maintain continuous at-sea deterrence without compromising safety standards. These investments, separate from submarine construction costs, underscore the Ministry of Defence's commitment to long-term facility resilience against obsolescence.

Ongoing Operational Challenges

The maintenance of Coulport's extensive water pipe network has presented persistent challenges, with a reported 1,500 pipes prone to failure due to age and inadequate upkeep, leading to multiple bursts since 2010 that released into . The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) attributed these incidents, including a notable burst in August, to "shortfalls in maintenance," resulting in the discharge of "unnecessary " despite Ministry of Defence (MOD) assertions of no unsafe releases exceeding regulatory limits. Such events underscore vulnerabilities in legacy infrastructure supporting storage and handling operations. Waste management from maintenance adds to operational strains, as materials used to control in storage facilities generate contaminated residues requiring specialized disposal. In September 2025, the MOD was directed by regulators to remove accumulated from Coulport, highlighting delays in processing that risk long-term site contamination if not addressed. These issues are compounded by broader nuclear reporting, with over 789 events logged across Clyde bases (including Coulport) from 2009 to 2018, many involving procedural or equipment lapses in handling radioactive materials. Infrastructure modernization efforts for sustainment have faced delays and cost overruns, with facilities at Coulport rated as high-risk by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority in 2022 assessments, contributing to unachievable timelines for upgrades needed to maintain operational readiness. Climate-related risks, including increased flooding and storm surges projected to disrupt on-site activities, further challenge resilience, as outlined in analyses of environmental impacts on nuclear depots. Contractor-led operations, while intended to enhance efficiency, have not fully mitigated these systemic pressures, as evidenced by recurring regulatory interventions.

References

  1. https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/locations-and-operations/bases-and-stations/hmnb-clyde
  2. https://www.civilservicejobs.service.gov.uk/csr/jobs.cgi?jcode=1971429
  3. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Faslane-Coulport-briefing-digital.pdf
  4. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/article/faslane-and-coulport-nuclear-submarine-bases-a-briefing/
  5. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce873653lv0o
  6. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/RNAD_Coulport
  7. https://www.secretscotland.org.uk/index.php/Secrets/RNADCoulport
  8. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1963/may/23/polaris-submarine-base-scotland
  9. https://www.secretscotland.org.uk/index.php/Secrets/Coulport
  10. https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/uk/coulport.htm
  11. https://www.scottish-places.info/features/featurefirst10049.html
  12. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/RNAD-Coulport-missile-loading-incident.pdf
  13. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-43975011
  14. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Nuclear-Weapons-Accidents.pdf
  15. https://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2024/07/one-of-our-nuclear-warheads-is-missing.html
  16. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/32264
  17. https://www.historyhit.com/trident-a-timeline-of-the-uks-nuclear-weapons-programme/
  18. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/6551/1/2004JamisonPhd.pdf
  19. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/John-Ainslies_No-Place-for-Trident.pdf
  20. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Facts-about-Trident.pdf
  21. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/John-Ainslies_Disarming-Trident.pdf
  22. https://www.navylookout.com/why-relocating-trident-away-from-scotland-is-virtually-impossible/
  23. https://thebulletin.org/premium/2021-05/nuclear-notebook-how-many-nuclear-weapons-does-the-united-kingdom-have-in-2021/
  24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2021.1912309
  25. https://www.medact.org/app/uploads/2014/01/THE-UK-TRIDENT-MISSILE-SYSTEM-FINAL.pdf
  26. https://theferret.scot/navy-told-to-remove-radioactive-waste-from-nuclear-bomb-base/
  27. https://www.declassifieduk.org/britains-nuclear-arsenal/
  28. http://tridentploughshares.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/5.pdf
  29. https://cnduk.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Disarming-Trident.pdf
  30. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a795cf3ed915d0422067cdb/20120716DNSRFukushimaReportFinal.pdf
  31. https://thebulletin.org/premium/2024-11/united-kingdom-nuclear-weapons-2024/
  32. https://www.banthebomb.org/militaryscotland/74.html
  33. https://www.nukewatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Convoy-log-2021.pdf
  34. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-nuclear-enterprise-2025-annual-update-to-parliament/defence-nuclear-enterprise-2025-annual-update-to-parliament
  35. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mod-signs-trident-support-contract
  36. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-nuclear-deterrence-factsheet/the-uks-nuclear-deterrent-the-national-endeavour-explained
  37. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9077/
  38. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2020/06/08/nuclear-deterrence-today/index.html
  39. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2006/MR514.pdf
  40. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/writev/deterrence/dic10.htm
  41. https://warontherocks.com/2023/07/michael-quinlan-was-right-the-enduring-relevance-of-nuclear-deterrence/
  42. https://www.awe.co.uk/about-us/our-locations/
  43. https://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsabl-alliance-support-uk-trident-weapon-system-programme/
  44. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cb5b440f0b65b3de0aaf4/dnsr_annual_report_2012_2013.pdf
  45. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/UK_US_Defence_Industry_Statistics_no_date.pdf
  46. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2017-01-09/59182
  47. https://theferret.scot/fears-expanding-mod-police-role-clyde/
  48. https://www.thenational.scot/news/18237482.revealed-two-secret-trident-break-ins-mod-tried-cover/
  49. https://theferret.scot/security-breaches-clyde-nuclear-bases/
  50. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-01-13/2567
  51. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/662a100855e1582b6ca7e520/Memorandum_of_Understanding_between_the_Ministry_of_Defence_and_the_Office_for_Nuclear_Regulation.pdf
  52. https://www.onr.org.uk/media/zo1ljlv1/faslane-and-coulport-ssg-report-covering-the-period-1-july-to-31-december-2024.docx
  53. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e4bdd40f0b6230268a722/20140710-2014-00216_Edwards_HS_report_201112_redacted_scanned_vers.pdf
  54. https://maritime-executive.com/article/uk-mod-nuclear-safety-incidents-at-sub-base-posed-no-risk-to-public
  55. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/RNAD-Coulport-Jetty-Missile-Loading-Incident.pdf
  56. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/09/radioactive-water-bomb-base-scotland-leak-sea-files
  57. https://www.navylookout.com/royal-navy-submarine-base-records-significant-nuclear-safety-incident/
  58. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-46863064
  59. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13156572.concern-voiced-chilling-nuclear-incidents/
  60. https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/114660/hmnb-clyde-consultation-doc-june-2013.pdf
  61. https://www.sepa.gov.uk/media/594435/faslane.pdf
  62. https://theferret.scot/radioactive-waste-pollution-nuclear-plant/
  63. https://cnduk.org/mod-failures-result-in-radioactive-waste-leaking-into-the-sea/
  64. https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/votes-and-motions/S6M-18525
  65. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/faslane-and-coulport-security-breaches-total-104-since-2018/
  66. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/30/faslane-submarine-base-guards-authorised-shoot-anti-nuclear-protesters-margaret-thatcher
  67. https://freedomnews.org.uk/2017/07/11/protests-shut-down-road-to-nuclear-weapons-site/
  68. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7542/CBP-7542.pdf
  69. https://www.nukewatch.org.uk/
  70. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2014-07/news/scottish-bid-imperils-uk-nuclear-force
  71. https://www.acronym.org.uk/old/archive/dd/dd85/85rej.htm
  72. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmscotaf/676/67607.htm
  73. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-18203818
  74. https://tridentploughshares.org/coulport-blockaders-admonished-as-ban-treaty-used-in-court-for-first-time/
  75. https://basicint.org/news/2016/voting-trident-scotland-question-settled-illogical
  76. https://navalinstitute.com.au/the-uk-nuclear-deterrent-what-now/
  77. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/671b8641956d9b52e8c6d276/Defence_Nuclear_Enterprise_Command_Paper.pdf
  78. https://www.navylookout.com/is-trident-really-necessary-answering-common-objections/
  79. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7353/CBP-7353.pdf
  80. https://news.usni.org/2017/10/29/ncis-u-s-sailors-personnel-not-involved-florida-u-k-royal-navy-incidents
  81. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/8698244/ssp-team-member-meets-kings-charles-iii
  82. https://basicint.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/PUB010301.pdf
  83. https://basicint.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/How-much-does-the-UK-spend-on-nuclear-weapons_-Web.pdf
  84. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10086/
  85. https://battle-updates.com/vital-importance-of-hmnb-clyde-updated-by-howard-wheeldon-fraes-wheeldon-strategic-advisory-ltd/
  86. https://www.navylookout.com/programme-euston-floating-dry-docks-for-royal-navy-submarines/
  87. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/figures-revealed-for-infrastructure-projects-at-faslane/
  88. https://theferret.scot/nuclear-trident-projects-unachievable/
  89. https://www.preventionweb.net/media/73671/download
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.