Hubbry Logo
Slate (magazine)Slate (magazine)Main
Open search
Slate (magazine)
Community hub
Slate (magazine)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Slate (magazine)
Slate (magazine)
Slate (magazine)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Slate is an online magazine that covers current affairs, politics, and culture in the United States. It was created in 1996 by former New Republic editor Michael Kinsley, initially under the ownership of Microsoft as part of MSN. In 2004, it was purchased by The Washington Post Company (later renamed the Graham Holdings Company), and since 2008 has been managed by The Slate Group, an online publishing entity created by Graham Holdings. Slate is based in New York City, with an additional office in Washington, D.C.[1]

Key Information

Slate, which is updated throughout the day, covers politics, arts and culture, sports, and news. According to its former editor-in-chief Julia Turner, the magazine is "not fundamentally a breaking news source", but rather aimed at helping readers to "analyze and understand and interpret the world" with witty and entertaining writing.[2] As of mid-2015, it publishes about 1,500 stories per month.[3]

A French version, slate.fr, was launched in February 2009 by a group of four journalists, including Jean-Marie Colombani, Eric Leser, and economist Jacques Attali. Among them, the founders hold 50 percent in the publishing company, while The Slate Group holds 15 percent.[4][5] In 2011, slate.fr started a separate site covering African news, Slate Afrique, with a Paris-based editorial staff.[6]

As of 2021, the magazine is both ad-supported and has a membership model with a metered paywall. It is known, and sometimes criticized, for having adopted contrarian views, giving rise to the term "Slate Pitches".[7][8][9] It has a generally liberal editorial stance.[10][11][12]

History

[edit]

Slate features regular and semi-regular columns such as Explainer, Moneybox, Spectator, Transport, and Dear Prudence. Many of the articles are short (less than 2,000 words) and argument-driven. Around 2010, the magazine also began running long-form journalism. Many of the longer stories are an outgrowth of the "Fresca Fellowships", so-called because former editor Plotz liked the soft drink Fresca. "The idea is that every writer and editor on staff has to spend a month or six weeks a year not doing their regular job, but instead working on a long, ambitious project of some sort", Plotz said in an interview.[13]

Slate introduced a paywall-based business model in 1998 that attracted up to 20,000 subscribers but was later abandoned.[14] A similar subscription model was implemented in April 2001 by Slate's independently owned competitor, Salon.com.

Slate started a daily feature, "Today's Pictures", on November 30, 2005, which featured 15–20 photographs from the archive at Magnum Photos that share a common theme. The column also features two animated "Interactive Essays" a month.

The design of Slate's homepage from 2006 to 2013

On its 10th anniversary, Slate unveiled a redesigned website. It introduced Slate V in 2007,[15] an online video magazine with content that relates to or expands upon their written articles. In 2013, the magazine was redesigned under the guidance of design director Vivian Selbo.

Slate was nominated for four digital National Magazine Awards in 2011 and won the NMA for General Excellence. In the same year, the magazine laid off several high-profile journalists, including co-founder Jack Shafer and Timothy Noah (author of the Chatterbox column).[16] At the time, it had around 40 full-time editorial staff.[16] The following year, a dedicated ad sales team was created.[17]

Slate launched the "Slate Book Review" in 2012, a monthly books section edited by Dan Kois.[18]

The next year, Slate became profitable after preceding years had seen layoffs and falling ad revenues.[2]

In 2014, Slate introduced a paywall system called "Slate Plus", offering ad-free podcasts and bonus materials. A year later, it had attracted 9,000 subscribers generating about $500,000 in annual revenue.[14]

Slate moved all content behind a metered paywall for international readers in June 2015, explaining "our U.S.-based sales team sells primarily to domestic advertisers, many of whom only want to reach a domestic audience. ...The end result is that, outside the United States, we are not covering our costs."[19] At the same time, it was stated that there were no plans for a domestic paywall.[3] In 2025, Slate filed a lawsuit against Google over alleged antitrust violations.[20]

Reputation for counterintuitive arguments ("Slate pitches")

[edit]

Since 2006,[8] Slate has been known for publishing contrarian pieces arguing against commonly held views about a subject, giving rise to the #slatepitches Twitter hashtag in 2009.[9] The Columbia Journalism Review has defined Slate pitches as "an idea that sounds wrong or counterintuitive proposed as though it were the tightest logic ever", and in explaining its success wrote "Readers want to click on Slate Pitches because they want to know what a writer could possibly say that would support their logic".[21]

In 2014, Slate's then editor-in-chief Julia Turner acknowledged a reputation for counterintuitive arguments forms part of Slate's "distinctive" brand, but argued that the hashtag misrepresents the site's journalism. "We are not looking to argue that up is down and black is white for the sake of being contrarian against all logic or intellectual rigor. But journalism is more interesting when it surprises you either with the conclusions that it reaches or the ways that it reaches them."[2]

In a 2019 article for the site, Slate contributor Daniel Engber reflected on the changes that had occurred on the site since he started writing for it 15 years previously. He suggested that its original worldview, influenced by its founder Kinsley and described by Engber as "feisty, surprising, debate-club centrist-by-default" and "liberal contrarianism", had shifted towards "a more reliable, left-wing slant", whilst still giving space for heterodox opinions, albeit "tempered by other, graver duties". He argued that this was necessary within the context of a "Manichean age of flagrant cruelty and corruption", although he also acknowledged that it could be "a troubling limitation".[22]

Podcasts

[edit]
See also: Panoply Media

According to NiemanLab, Slate has been involved in podcasts "almost from the very beginning" of the medium.[23] Its first podcast offering, released on July 15, 2005,[24] featured selected stories from the site read by Andy Bowers, who had joined Slate after leaving NPR in 2003.[23][25] By June 2012, Slate had expanded their lineup to 19 podcasts, with Political Gabfest and Culture Gabfest being the most popular.[23] This count had shrunk to 14 by February 2015, with all receiving six million downloads per month.[25] The podcasts are "a profitable part of [Slate's] business"; the magazine charges more for advertising in its podcasts than in any of its other content.[23]

  • Amicus – legal commentary
  • Audio Book Club
  • Culture Gabfest
  • Daily Podcast – some of everything
  • Decoder Ring – with Willa Paskin
  • The Waves (formerly The XX Factor then Double X, with its own website at DoubleX.com, 2009–2013) – women's issues
  • Hang Up and Listen – sports
  • Hit Parade – pop music history
  • If Then – technology, Silicon Valley, and tech policy
  • Lexicon Valley – language issues
  • Manners for the Digital Age
  • Mom and Dad Are Fighting – parenting
  • Money – business and finance
  • One Year – discussion of affairs from a given year[26]
  • Political Gabfest
  • Spoiler Specials – film discussion
  • Studio 360 – pop culture and the arts, in partnership with Public Radio International
  • The Gist
  • Thirst Aid Kit
  • Slow Burn
  • Video Podcast
  • Trumpcast

Slate podcasts have gotten longer over the years. The original Gabfest ran 15 minutes; by 2012, most ran about 45 minutes.[23]

Staff

[edit]

Michael Kinsley was Slate's founder and was its first editor, from 1996 until 2002. Jacob Weisberg was Slate's editor from 2002 until 2008. Weisberg's deputy editor David Plotz then became editor until July 2014,[27] when he was replaced by Julia Turner.

Turner resigned as editor of Slate in October 2018.[28]

Jared Hohlt became editor-in-chief on April 1, 2019.[29] He stepped down in January 2022.[30]

Hillary Frey was named new editor in chief in May 2022.[31]

Key executives

[edit]
  • Hillary Frey (editor in chief)
  • Dan Check (chief executive officer)
  • Charlie Kammerer (chief revenue officer)
  • Susan Matthews (executive editor)
  • Jeffrey Bloomer (features director)
  • Forrest Wickman (culture editor)

Notable contributors and departments

[edit]

Past contributors

[edit]

Other recurring features

[edit]
  • Assessment
  • Books
  • Dear Prudence (advice column)
  • Dispatches
  • Drink
  • Food
  • Foreigners
  • Gaming
  • Science Denial
  • Shopping
  • The Good Word (language)
  • The Movie Club
  • The TV Club

Summary columns

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Slate (magazine)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Slate is an American online magazine founded in 1996 by Microsoft to pioneer digital journalism, publishing articles, essays, and multimedia content on topics including politics, culture, technology, and science. Initially edited by Michael Kinsley, it emphasized witty, contrarian commentary in a web-native format, introducing features like the "Today's Papers" explainer and early attempts at subscription models before shifting to advertising support. Acquired by The Washington Post Company in 2004 and now owned by Graham Holdings Company, Slate has expanded into popular podcasts such as Political Gabfest and Dear Prudence, which have bolstered its audience amid declining traditional online ad revenue. While recognized for high factual reporting and innovative coverage of elections and cultural debates, Slate is rated as having a left-leaning bias by multiple media watchdogs, with surveys showing its readership predominantly liberal and content often aligning with progressive viewpoints despite an early reputation for ideological independence. This orientation reflects broader patterns in mainstream digital media, where empirical analysis can coexist with selective framing that privileges certain causal narratives over others. The magazine's defining characteristics include a focus on long-form explainers and audio storytelling, though it has drawn criticism for occasional sensationalism in pursuit of clicks, as seen in debates over its handling of politically charged topics like election integrity and cultural history wars.

History

Founding and Launch (1996)

Slate was founded by as an online-only magazine aimed at delivering high-caliber on , culture, and public policy via the [World Wide Web](/page/World Wide Web). The project emerged from 's broader strategy to expand its network with original content, positioning Slate as a pioneering digital publication in an era when online media remained nascent and experimental. On April 24, 1996, announced the magazine's name and leadership, selecting , the former editor of , to serve as editor-in-chief. Kinsley assembled a compact initial staff, including deputy editor Jack Shafer and Washington bureau chief Jodie Allen, with operations centered at Microsoft's Redmond, Washington campus alongside smaller bureaus in Washington, D.C., and New York City. The name "Slate" was chosen for its neutrality, evoking a blank canvas for diverse viewpoints rather than implying a partisan stance, as Kinsley explained in the inaugural issue. This setup reflected Microsoft's intent to foster contrarian, intellectually rigorous commentary unbound by print constraints, though early production relied on emerging web technologies that limited interactivity compared to later standards. The magazine launched its first issue on , 1996, debuting as a weekly with articles accessible exclusively , marking one of the earliest efforts by a major to create a substantive digital periodical. Initial content featured essays and analysis from contributors like Kinsley himself, emphasizing provocative takes on current events without the spatial limits of traditional magazines. Despite technical hurdles inherent to 1996's infrastructure, such as slower load times and basic hyperlinking, Slate's debut was hailed by some observers as a bold step toward web-based , though it faced regarding its viability as a standalone medium.

Microsoft Ownership Era (1996–2004)

Slate was launched on June 24, 1996, as an online-only magazine funded and owned by Microsoft, with Michael Kinsley serving as founding editor-in-chief. Positioned as a platform for analytical commentary on news, politics, and culture, it operated initially from Microsoft's Redmond, Washington, campus, with additional small bureaus in Washington, D.C., and New York City. The publication pioneered web-native journalism by eschewing fixed print schedules in favor of continuous updates, hyperlinks for deeper context, and early multimedia elements, attracting around 15,000 daily readers in its debut year. Under Kinsley's leadership, Slate introduced signature features that defined its contrarian, explanatory style, including "Today's Papers" in 1997 for news summaries, advice column "Dear Prudence," and recurring essays like "The Explainer." A brief paid subscription model launched in February 1998 at $19.95 per year but was abandoned in February 1999 due to low uptake, shifting reliance to advertising revenue amid the emerging dot-com landscape. Microsoft provided substantial support, investing over $20 million across eight years and channeling traffic through its MSN network, which helped Slate reach over 2 million monthly visitors by early 2002. The era saw key hires such as Jacob Weisberg as political correspondent in 1996 and Timothy Noah for the "Chatterbox" column in 1998, fostering a staff focused on witty, skeptical analysis independent of corporate influence, despite initial skepticism about Microsoft's editorial neutrality. Kinsley resigned as editor in February 2002, citing his Parkinson's disease diagnosis as a factor, after which Weisberg assumed the role and relocated the primary office to New York City. The publication earned a National Magazine Award for General Excellence in online media in 2003, reflecting growing recognition for features like election coverage and cultural critiques. Financially, Slate achieved marginal profitability by 2004 on approximately $6 million in annual revenue, though it had operated at a loss for much of the period, subsidized by Microsoft. In July 2004, Microsoft announced plans to explore selling the magazine, leading to its acquisition by The Washington Post Company in December 2004 for an undisclosed sum.

Washington Post Company Acquisition and Growth (2004–2010s)

In December 2004, The Washington Post Company announced its agreement to acquire from Corporation for an estimated $10–20 million, with the transaction completing on January 14, 2005. At the time of the deal, reported approximately 6 million unique monthly visitors, a figure comparable to audiences of other Washington Post Company digital properties like washingtonpost.com. The acquisition integrated into Washington Post Newsweek Interactive (WPNI), which handled its operations while allowing editorial independence under editor-in-chief . This move aligned with the company's strategy to expand its online portfolio amid rising usage, as 's ad-supported model complemented traditional print revenues. Under Washington Post Company ownership, Slate pursued growth through content diversification and advertising innovations. By the end of 2005, the publication achieved unexpectedly strong financial results, leveraging early experiments like "adverblogs"—sponsored editorial series such as "Cool Capitals" funded by European tourism boards. In 2007, Slate launched SlateV, its video channel, to capitalize on emerging multimedia trends. Traffic continued to expand with the broader digital shift, though specific metrics post-2005 reflected industry-wide growth in online news consumption rather than isolated surges. The company formed The Slate Group in June 2008 as a dedicated online publishing unit, with Weisberg as chairman, to oversee Slate alongside new ventures like The Root (an African American-focused site launched that year) and The Big Money (a business news site introduced in 2008 but discontinued in 2010). Double X, a women's issues vertical, debuted in 2009 but was soon folded back into Slate's core site. The 2010s saw sustained operational expansion under the Washington Post Company (renamed Graham Holdings Company in 2013 following the sale of The Washington Post newspaper), though not without challenges from fluctuating ad markets. Slate introduced sponsored content initiatives like Slate Custom in 2012 and began building a podcast network, leading to the 2015 launch of Panoply. Membership program Slate Plus debuted in April 2014, offering ad-free access and exclusive content for $19.95 annually, which grew to tens of thousands of subscribers and contributed to profitability by 2013. However, a 2011 revenue dip prompted staff layoffs, including several senior editors, highlighting vulnerabilities in display advertising amid competition from sites like Politico and BuzzFeed. Overall, the period marked Slate's evolution from a niche online magazine to a multifaceted digital brand, with audience reach bolstered by The Slate Group's portfolio and adaptations to mobile and audio formats.

Digital Adaptation and Challenges (2010s–Present)

In the 2010s, Slate adapted to shifting digital economics by launching its Slate Plus membership program in 2014, offering subscribers ad-free access, bonus content, and early podcast episodes for $5 monthly or $50 annually, as a means to diversify beyond advertising amid declining display ad rates across online media. This initiative, described by then-editor David Plotz as not a traditional paywall but a value-added tier, aimed to foster reader loyalty without restricting free access to core articles. By 2015, Slate expanded the model internationally with a metered system permitting five free articles monthly before prompting subscription, targeting global audiences while maintaining broad accessibility. Further adaptations included a 2020 metered update to boost membership revenue from readers, separate from its podcast-focused appeals, with introductory pricing at $35 for the first year and a two-week ; this reflected broader industry pressures from platform changes and ad market fragmentation reducing to publisher sites. Despite these efforts, remained over 90% of revenue as late as 2016, underscoring reliance on volatile digital ad income vulnerable to economic downturns and competition from . Challenges intensified in the late 2010s and 2020s, with Slate facing identity ambiguity in a crowded digital landscape, leading to key editorial departures in 2022 as staff cited difficulties navigating audience fragmentation and monetization hurdles. Membership growth provided some relief, doubling over two years by early 2024 with a 33% increase in 2023, yet overall profitability required prior layoffs during ad slumps, highlighting persistent tensions between contrarian long-form journalism and short-attention-span platforms. These dynamics mirrored industry-wide issues, where even established outlets grappled with SEO dependency and reader migration to free, algorithm-driven content.

Ownership and Business Operations

Ownership Transitions

Slate was established in 1996 as an wholly owned and funded by Corporation, with the technology giant providing initial capital and infrastructure support as part of its early internet strategy. On December 21, 2004, announced an agreement to sell Slate to Company for an undisclosed sum estimated between $10 million and $20 million, reflecting the publication's growing audience and amid Microsoft's shifting priorities toward broader portal services like . The transaction closed on January 14, 2005, transferring full ownership to the , which sought to expand its digital portfolio beyond print assets. In 2013, following the sale of its flagship Washington Post newspaper to , The Washington Post Company rebranded as Graham Holdings Company to reflect its diversified holdings in education, broadcasting, and . Slate's operations were subsequently consolidated under The Slate Group, LLC—a formed by in June 2008 to manage the magazine alongside other online properties—though ultimate ownership remained with the parent entity. As of 2025, continues to own , with no further divestitures reported.

Revenue Models and Financial History

Slate initially operated on a subscription model upon its 1996 launch under ownership, charging $19.95 annually for access to content, newsletters, and perks like a branded , which attracted between 20,000 and 30,000 subscribers but failed to achieve profitability amid operating costs estimated at around $5 million per year. The was removed by 1999 to boost readership and enable an advertising-supported model, as subscriptions limited audience growth to approximately 220,000 unique monthly visitors, insufficient for ad scale. Following its acquisition by The Washington Post Company (later Graham Holdings) in 2004, Slate relied predominantly on digital advertising, which constituted over 90% of its revenue by 2016, supplemented by minor streams such as affiliate programs, live podcast events, and sponsorships. In response to volatile ad markets, Slate introduced the Slate Plus membership program in 2014 at $59 annually, offering ad-free reading, bonus podcast content, and early access, initially yielding 9,000 subscribers and about $500,000 in revenue by mid-2015. Membership grew post-2016 U.S. election, with a 46% subscriber increase attributed to heightened political engagement, pushing potential annual revenue toward $1.3 million at prevailing rates. By 2019, podcasts drove 65% of Slate Plus revenue, prompting a 2020 metered for articles to convert free listeners—already comprising over half of membership income—into paying users, while remained core but diversified into podcast-specific sales projected to contribute significantly amid industry growth to $1 billion in U.S. ad spend that year. Subscription pricing doubled in 2022 to $119 for renewals, reflecting confidence in value amid challenges. In 2023, Slate achieved its most profitable year in 27 years, with overall revenue rising 28% year-over-year and membership revenue doubling over two years (up 33% in 2023 alone), fueled by podcast expansion and core business investments under The Slate Group management.

Organizational Restructuring

In February 2017, Slate laid off five editorial staffers—politics editor Tommy Craggs, senior editor Rachael Larimore, associate editor Laura Anderson, finance columnist Helaine Olen, and podcast producer Mike Vuolo—while ending the contract of parenthood writer Elissa Strauss. Craggs and Anderson were among the leaders of an ongoing unionization drive that had begun in 2016, prompting speculation among staff about a possible retaliatory motive, though Slate editor-in-chief Julia Turner attributed the cuts to financial pressures and denied any link to union activities. Despite the layoffs, Slate's editorial staff voted 45-7 in favor of unionizing with the , in March 2018, following the company's denial of voluntary recognition earlier that year. In January 2019, the union ratified its first three-year collective bargaining agreement, which established a minimum starting salary of $51,000, guaranteed annual pay increases, protections for derivative works, and safeguards against arbitrary reassignments. In January 2022, editorial director Jared Hohlt stepped down after less than two years in the role, amid internal discussions about Slate's persistent unprofitability and plans for website redesigns led by consultants from parent company Graham Holdings. In August 2024, Slate conducted another round of staff reductions, laying off four employees, including staff writer and podcast host Joel Anderson, whose final day was August 9. These cuts occurred as part of broader industry challenges in digital media, though specific financial rationales from Slate were not publicly detailed.

Editorial Style and Content

Political Orientation

Slate maintains a left-leaning orientation, characterized by predominantly liberal viewpoints in its opinion pieces, political analysis, and cultural commentary. bias evaluators consistently rate it as left-biased: assigns a "Left" rating, citing the platform's lack of right-leaning perspectives and confirming this through a 2024 blind bias survey where respondents across the placed it at -5.23 on a -9 to +9 scale. categorizes it under "Strong Left" , while notes its favoritism toward left-leaning positions. Audience demographics underscore this tilt, with a 2014 Pew Research Center survey finding 76% of Slate readers identifying as consistently or mostly liberal, compared to 10% conservative. Staff political preferences align similarly; in 2008, 55 of 57 Slate staffers voted for Barack Obama, and the staff collectively endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. Coverage of major political events reflects this, often sharply critical of conservative figures such as Donald Trump—evident in pieces framing his potential 2024 victory as reliant on voter self-deception—while offering internal critiques of Democrats from a progressive standpoint. Slate's signature contrarian style, dubbed "Slate pitches," involves unconventional arguments that challenge mainstream narratives, yet these frequently serve liberal ends rather than substantively questioning leftist orthodoxy, as conservative commentator observed in 2006. A 2015 internal reflection acknowledged perceptions of left-liberal bias, attributing it partly to the urban, coastal backgrounds of contributors, which can foster disconnects from non-elite perspectives. This orientation positions Slate within the broader ecosystem of digital outlets where empirical analyses of coverage reveal systemic leftward skews, though its analytical rigor and humor distinguish it from more partisan .

Contrarian Arguments ("Slate Pitches")

Slate has cultivated a reputation for "Slate pitches," a term denoting articles that advance counterintuitive or contrarian theses challenging prevailing cultural, social, or political consensus, often to provoke debate or reexamine assumptions. This approach emerged prominently in the mid-2000s, aligning with the magazine's early web-native format that favored provocative, idea-driven content over traditional reporting. By 2009, the style gained satirical notoriety on Twitter, where users mocked it through exaggerated pitches, such as claiming the Star Wars prequels surpassed the originals or that nu-metal bands like Limp Bizkit represented musical innovation. Exemplary Slate pitches include arguments that oysters qualify as plants ethically, permitting vegan consumption; that trans fats might confer health benefits under certain conditions; or that raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour lacks inherent "ugliness" in economic or social terms. Another instance posited coffee's potential in preventing Alzheimer's disease, drawing on emerging research to upend dietary orthodoxies. These pieces typically rely on selective data, historical analogies, or logical inversion to substantiate claims, though critics contend they sometimes prioritize novelty over rigorous evidence. The contrarian ethos stems from Slate's founding emphasis on intellectual provocation, as articulated by early editors like , who sought to differentiate the publication through bold, non-conformist commentary in a digital landscape. While often aligned with liberal viewpoints, such pitches have targeted left-leaning assumptions, as in defenses of ethnic contrarianism in Republican outreach or reevaluations of cultural artifacts like '90s rock genres dismissed by mainstream tastemakers. This style has influenced online discourse, inspiring imitators but also drawing accusations of contrarianism for its own sake, particularly when theses appear engineered for virality rather than empirical substantiation.

Recurring Columns and Features

Slate maintains several longstanding advice columns under its Human Interest vertical, offering guidance on personal, familial, and relational matters. "," launched in 2006 and hosted by writers including until 2015, from 2015 to 2016, and Daniel Mallory Burnstein (writing as Prudie) since 2016, fields reader-submitted questions on , relationships, and social dilemmas, often with a candid, non-judgmental tone. "," focused on challenges, provides practical advice for caregivers navigating child-rearing issues, with contributions from rotating experts. Additional advice features include "How to Do It," addressing sexual and intimate concerns, and "Pay Dirt," tackling financial and household money problems, both drawing on anonymized reader queries for weekly installments. Explanatory and topical columns form another core of Slate's recurring output, emphasizing clarification of complex subjects. The "Explainer" series, a hallmark since the magazine's early years, dissects current events, scientific concepts, or policy intricacies into accessible breakdowns, often prompted by news cycles and updated as needed; for instance, it has covered topics from quantum computing basics to geopolitical acronyms. "Moneybox," originating in the late 1990s, analyzes economic trends, markets, and personal finance with a skeptical eye toward conventional wisdom, penned by contributors like Felix Salmon. Other semi-regular features include "Spectator," offering cultural commentary on media and entertainment, and niche series like "Transport," which examines mobility policy and infrastructure. Slate's features extend to opinion-driven recaps and pitches, such as "The Gist," a daily newsletter distilling key news with contrarian angles, and reader-engagement formats like juried advice responses or themed essay collections, which recur around holidays or elections to blend analysis with audience input. These elements underscore Slate's blend of journalism and commentary, prioritizing pithy, evidence-based insights over lengthy reporting.

Multimedia and Podcasts

Origins and Expansion of Audio Content

Slate began producing audio content in 2005, shortly after the format's emergence, when executive producer Andy Bowers, a former NPR producer who joined the magazine in 2003, experimented with recording podcasts by reading articles aloud in his bedroom closet. This initiative led to the founding of Slate Podcasts that year, with the launch of its flagship program, Political Gabfest, in December 2005, featuring hosts John Dickerson, Emily Bazelon, and David Plotz discussing political topics. The show marked Slate's entry into the nascent podcasting space, emphasizing conversational analysis over scripted narration, and has continued weekly production for nearly two decades. Expansion accelerated in the late 2000s, with the addition of Culture Gabfest in 2008, focusing on arts and media, which became the second most popular offering. By mid-2012, Slate's lineup had grown to 19 podcasts, including niche shows like Hang Up and Listen on and Lexicon Valley on language, with monthly downloads reaching 1 million—nearly double the 2010 figure—and plans for three more series that year. Episodes lengthened from 15 to about 45 minutes based on listener data, prioritizing personality-driven content to build loyal, advertiser-attractive audiences, while live taping events began around 2009 to boost engagement and revenue. The 2010s saw further scaling through infrastructure and monetization innovations. In 2014, Slate introduced its Slate Plus membership program at $5 per month, bundling bonus podcast episodes to drive subscriptions, alongside launching its first daily podcast, The Gist with Mike Pesca. The following year, Slate debuted in February 2015, an in-house podcast network to produce and distribute both its own content and third-party shows, coinciding with monthly downloads hitting 6 million across about 14 series. Narrative hits like Slow Burn in 2017 amplified growth, pushing annual downloads to 180 million by 2018 and 250 million by 2019, when podcasts accounted for over half of revenue via host-read ads, live events (25 annually by 2018), and memberships exceeding 60,000. evolved into for ad tech in 2018 before its $230 million sale to in 2019, allowing Slate to refocus on core audio production, which by 2021 encompassed over 28 shows.

Key Podcast Series

Slate's Political Gabfest, launched on December 2, 2005, features weekly discussions on current political events and policy issues, hosted by Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz. The podcast marked one of Slate's early forays into audio content and has maintained a consistent format of analyzing news through contrarian lenses, reaching its 20th anniversary in 2025 with live tour events. Slow Burn, a narrative limited-series podcast, debuted in 2017 with its first season on the Watergate scandal, hosted by Leon Neyfakh, and has since explored topics including the Clinton impeachment, the Bush years, and the rise of Fox News. Subsequent seasons featured hosts like Josh Levin and Joel Anderson, focusing on in-depth historical reporting to contextualize contemporary events, earning acclaim for its investigative storytelling and production quality. Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick, introduced around 2014, provides weekly analysis of legal developments, Supreme Court cases, and justice system issues, with Lithwick as host and senior legal correspondent. The series emphasizes accessible explanations of complex jurisprudence, often featuring interviews with experts, and has produced over 500 episodes by 2025. Other notable series include Culture Gabfest, a long-running weekly review of books, film, television, and arts hosted by critics like Stephen Metcalf and Dana Stevens; Hang Up and Listen, a sports discussion podcast launched in 2008 covering professional leagues and cultural angles; and Dear Prudence, an advice show originating from Slate's columns, addressing personal and ethical dilemmas with host Daniel Mallory Burnstein. These podcasts collectively represent Slate's emphasis on intellectual debate across politics, culture, and specialized topics, often available ad-free via Slate Plus subscriptions.

Production and Hosting Changes

In 2015, Slate launched Panoply, a podcast network that took over production, distribution, and ad sales for its audio content, including 16 existing Slate shows and new ones like Whistlestop with John Dickerson. This shift outsourced much of Slate's podcast operations to Panoply, which also hosted content for external partners such as The Huffington Post and New York magazine, aiming to scale audio production beyond Slate's internal capabilities. By 2018, Panoply pivoted away from content creation and sales to focus exclusively on its Megaphone ad technology platform, prompting Slate to reintegrate its podcasts in-house. Slate assumed direct control over production workflows, ad sales, and hosting for its branded shows, separating them from Panoply's remaining operations to prioritize premium content monetization. This change enabled Slate to streamline recording processes, with hosts producing episodes more directly tied to the magazine's editorial rhythm, and boosted podcast revenue to represent 25% of total income by early 2018. The transition continued into 2020, when all Slate podcasts fully returned under the magazine's umbrella, allowing for tighter integration of audio production with digital publishing goals. In parallel, Slate introduced Supporting Cast in 2019, a proprietary membership platform for hosting exclusive podcast episodes and audiobooks, enhancing subscriber retention without relying on third-party networks. These adjustments reflected broader industry consolidation, but positioned Slate to adapt production in-house amid declining external podcast network viability.

Staff and Leadership

Founders and Initial Editors

Slate was established in 1996 as an online magazine under the ownership of Microsoft, which sought to demonstrate the viability of a digital publication independent of print media. The venture was spearheaded by Microsoft executives, including Bill Gates, who envisioned Slate as a "first-rate newsmagazine" operating solely on the internet. Michael Kinsley, previously editor of The New Republic and co-host of CNN's Crossfire, was recruited as the founding editor-in-chief, relocating to Microsoft's Redmond, Washington, campus to lead the project. The initial editorial team was small and distributed across locations to facilitate coverage of , , and public policy. Kinsley oversaw operations from Redmond, while the four original top editors included Jodie Allen based in , Judith Shulevitz in New York, and also in Redmond. This structure reflected Slate's early emphasis on remote collaboration, predating widespread adoption of such models in , with the publication debuting its inaugural issue on June 24, 1996. Kinsley's vision prioritized contrarian, witty analysis over traditional reporting, drawing from his experience at left-leaning outlets like The New Republic, though he aimed for a broader ideological range in Slate's content. The founding team focused on interactive features suited to the web, such as hyperlinks and multimedia, distinguishing Slate from contemporaneous print adaptations. Initial staffing emphasized experienced writers capable of adapting to the medium's constraints, including limited bandwidth and nascent user interfaces in 1996.

Current and Notable Contributors

Slate's current contributors consist primarily of staff writers, senior editors, and columnists who produce regular articles, columns, and content on topics including , , , , and . The publication maintains a core team of around a dozen key writers, supplemented by freelancers and hosts who contribute opinion and analysis pieces. Leadership figures like Hillary Frey, who previously served as executive editor at and editorial director at , oversee editorial direction but focus less on bylined content. Among the most prominent staff writers is Dahlia Lithwick, a senior editor who specializes in Supreme Court coverage and legal commentary; she has authored the book Lady Justice (2022) and hosts the Amicus podcast, drawing on her experience as a freelance legal journalist. Mark Joseph Stern, another senior writer, covers judicial decisions, science policy, and LGBTQ+ issues, often providing detailed breakdowns of court rulings. Jenée Desmond-Harris serves as a staff writer and editor, penning the long-running Dear Prudence advice column after stints at The New York Times and Vox; her work addresses personal and ethical dilemmas with a focus on relationships and identity. Fred Kaplan contributes the War Stories column on military and foreign policy, leveraging his background as a Boston Globe reporter and author of books such as The Insurgents (2013); his analyses frequently reference declassified documents and policy debates. Other notable current writers include Christina Cauterucci, a senior writer and host of the Outward podcast on culture and politics; Scaachi Koul, who covers scams and consumer issues as a senior writer and co-host of Scamfluencers; and Jim Newell, the senior politics writer known for election coverage and partisan critiques. Additional staff such as Henry Grabar (urbanism and infrastructure), Nitish Pahwa (business and tech), Molly Olmstead (news), and Luke Winkie (culture) round out the roster, with many holding prior roles at outlets like The Atlantic, Recode, or regional papers. Podcast contributors like Emily Bazelon, a co-host of the Political Gabfest and New York Times Magazine staff writer, occasionally provide written commentary, bridging Slate's audio and print formats despite her primary affiliation elsewhere. This contributor base reflects Slate's emphasis on contrarian, narrative-driven journalism, with writers often drawing from personal expertise or investigative reporting to challenge mainstream narratives.

Executive Transitions and Departures

Michael Kinsley served as Slate's founding editor from its launch in 1996 until 2002, when he departed to pursue other opportunities, including a role at CNN. Jacob Weisberg succeeded Kinsley as editor-in-chief in 2002 and held the position for over a decade, overseeing expansions in digital journalism and podcasting while also assuming the role of chairman of The Slate Group. Weisberg stepped down in September 2018 to co-found Pushkin Industries, an audio production company, with Malcolm Gladwell, citing a desire to focus on podcast ventures after 22 years at Slate. David Plotz had served as editor from 2008 to 2014 under Weisberg's oversight, followed by Julia Turner, who became editor-in-chief in 2014 and emphasized multimedia growth. Turner resigned in October 2018 amid the leadership shift following Weisberg's exit. Jared Hohlt was appointed editor-in-chief on April 1, 2019, but stepped down in January 2022, part of a wave of high-level departures that included executive editor Allison Benedikt, who announced her exit on January 21, 2022, to join a nonprofit. In February 2022, additional executive-level exits compounded the instability, with Gabriel Roth departing as head of podcasts and leaving her role as editorial director; these changes occurred as grappled with post-pandemic audience shifts and internal debates over its contrarian voice. Hillary Frey, formerly executive editor at , was named on May 11, 2022, by Slate CEO Dan Check, with a mandate to stabilize operations and enhance digital engagement. Frey remains in the role as of 2025, focusing on integrated strategies amid ongoing industry challenges.

Reception, Impact, and Criticisms

Innovations and Achievements

Slate earned recognition as a pioneer in online journalism shortly after its 1996 launch as one of the first daily web-based magazines focused on analysis and commentary. In 2001, it received top honors in the Online Journalism Awards for unaffiliated publications, with judges describing it as "a Web pioneer" for its innovative digital approach to , , and . The magazine advanced multimedia integration by launching podcasts as early as 2005, expanding to multiple series that drove substantial audience growth. By 2019, podcast advertising generated half of Slate's overall revenue, supported by a 39% increase in downloads that year after a 78% rise the previous year, reflecting a strategic emphasis on audio over video trends. This pivot positioned Slate as a leader in audio journalism, with its network achieving millions of monthly downloads by the mid-2010s. Slate received the National Magazine Award for General Excellence in in 2011, affirming its editorial quality amid evolving online formats. Financially, it attained profitability in 2013 following earlier ad revenue struggles and recorded its most profitable year in 2023 across its 27-year history, bolstered by subscriptions and diversified content.

Ideological Bias Assessments

Slate magazine has been consistently rated as left-leaning by multiple independent media bias assessment organizations. AllSides Media Bias Rating assigns Slate a "Left" classification on its scale from Left to Right, a determination reaffirmed in a February 2024 blind bias survey involving respondents across the political spectrum, where Slate's content was rated left-of-center without knowledge of the source. This rating was elevated from "Lean Left" due to the absence of right-leaning perspectives on Slate's platform, limiting viewpoint diversity. Similarly, Ad Fontes Media categorizes Slate's bias as "Strong Left," based on analysis of article bias scores ranging from -42 (far left) to +42 (far right), with Slate's output skewing negatively. Media Bias/Fact Check describes Slate as "moderately Left Biased" through story selection favoring liberal causes, while rating its factual reporting as "Mostly Factual" for proper sourcing, though occasional opinion blending occurs. Audience data supports this ideological profile. A 2014 Pew Research Center survey indicated that 76% of Slate's readership identifies as consistently or mostly liberal, with only 10% conservative and 14% mixed, reflecting a self-selected base aligned with progressive viewpoints. Ground News aggregates these ratings, confirming Slate's left bias via cross-verification from and . These assessments draw from empirical methods like blind ratings and content audits, contrasting with self-reported stances that may understate bias in left-leaning media environments, where institutional norms often normalize progressive framing. Critiques of Slate's bias highlight patterns in editorial choices, such as prioritizing narratives on social justice, identity politics, and critiques of conservative policies while underrepresenting conservative counterarguments. For instance, AllSides notes Slate's failure to feature right-leaning op-eds or analyses, contributing to an echo-chamber effect amid broader media trends where left-wing viewpoints dominate 90%+ of coverage in outlets like Slate, per studies of partisan slant in digital journalism. Internal reflections at Slate, as discussed in a 2015 staff retreat analysis, acknowledged perceptions of urban elite (D.C./NYC-centric) biases that overlook non-coastal perspectives, though the publication defended its contrarian "Slate Pitches" as intellectually rigorous rather than purely ideological. Conservative commentators, including those from outlets like National Review, have labeled Slate's coverage—such as during the Trump era—as reflexively oppositional, with loaded language framing policies like immigration enforcement as inherently xenophobic without balanced causal analysis of enforcement data or economic impacts. Despite occasional self-aware pieces questioning liberal orthodoxies, Slate's output remains structurally aligned with progressive priors, as evidenced by consistent advocacy for policies like expansive government intervention and cultural relativism, often without rigorous scrutiny of empirical counter-evidence such as cost-benefit analyses from sources like or peer-reviewed economic studies on regulation efficacy. This tilt mirrors systemic leftward drifts in U.S. , where 2013-2023 surveys by the American Press Institute show 70-80% of journalists self-identifying as liberal, influencing topic selection and framing at publications like . Bias trackers' methodologies, emphasizing multi-partisan blind reviews over subjective claims, provide a more reliable gauge than internal defenses, underscoring Slate's role in amplifying rather than challenging dominant left-leaning narratives.

Influence on Online Journalism and Public Debate

Slate, established in as a digital-only publication funded by , exemplified early adaptations to web-based by prioritizing integration, concise argumentative essays, and elements tailored to reading habits, distinguishing it from print legacies. This format facilitated real-time updates and reader interactivity, such as embedded debates and newsletters, which by 2002 evolved into a dynamic homepage emphasizing web-native navigation over static layouts. Its experimental subscription model from 1998 to 2004, charging $19.95 annually for ad-free access and perks like email dispatches, tested economic sustainability for long-form amid skepticism about viability. The magazine's signature contrarian style, epitomized by "Slate Pitches"—provocative theses inverting popular assumptions—influenced online opinion journalism by normalizing bold, thesis-driven pieces that prioritize debate over consensus, a tactic that proliferated across digital outlets seeking engagement. This approach, often liberal-leaning yet willing to critique leftist orthodoxies, shaped public discourse by injecting intellectual friction into topics like politics and culture; for instance, pieces challenging environmental alarmism or identity politics norms sparked counterarguments in broader media ecosystems. However, critics argue it veered toward sensationalism, contributing to the argumentative echo chambers of web commentary where contrarianism serves virality over depth. In public debate, Slate's reach—peaking at around 10 million monthly unique visitors by —amplified elite, educated audiences' perspectives, with a 2014 Pew survey indicating 76% of readers identified as consistently or mostly liberal, reinforcing its role in framing progressive critiques while occasionally fostering cross-ideological sparks through hired conservative voices. Its emphasis on "smart analysis and interesting debate" influenced successors like Vox in explainer formats and podcasting precursors, yet systemic leftward bias in selection limited its corrective impact on mainstream narratives, often aligning with institutional media rather than challenging them empirically. This dynamic underscored causal tensions in : innovation in form advanced accessibility, but ideological clustering hindered pluralistic realism in debate.

Controversies and Debates

Editorial Bias and Conservative Critiques

Slate has been assessed as left-leaning by multiple media bias evaluators, with Media Bias/Fact Check rating it moderately left-biased due to story selection and editorial positions that consistently favor liberal causes, such as its 2016 endorsement of Hillary Clinton and headlines framing government shutdowns as harmful and EPA rollbacks of Obama-era regulations negatively. AllSides classifies Slate as Left, citing its failure to include right-leaning perspectives on its website, particularly in partisan topics, which contributes to an unbalanced presentation. A 2014 Pew Research survey indicated that 76% of Slate's audience identifies as consistently or mostly liberal, reflecting and potentially reinforcing its ideological alignment. Conservative critics have long argued that Slate's self-proclaimed contrarianism serves primarily to advance liberal ends rather than challenge liberalism itself. In a 2006 critique published by Slate itself, National Review editor Jonah Goldberg contended that the magazine "offers ‘contrary’ arguments for liberal ends but almost never offers anything contrary to liberalism itself," using figures like Christopher Hitchens as superficial evidence of ideological diversity while maintaining a uniformly liberal editorial stance. Goldberg further described Slate's approach as smug and elitist, exemplified by its rejection of routine fact-checking on the grounds that its writers were inherently reliable, prioritizing stylistic contrarian "pitches" over substantive reasoning. This pattern of critique extends to Slate's coverage of conservative figures and policies, where opponents have highlighted perceived partisan distortions, such as in its Trump-era reporting that emphasized manipulation of media and threats to norms without equivalent scrutiny of left-leaning actors. Internal reflections at Slate, including a 2015 staff discussion, acknowledged reader perceptions of excessive left bias and proposed adding more conservative voices to counterbalance, though implementation has been limited, sustaining accusations of echo-chamber tendencies among conservatives who view the outlet as emblematic of broader liberal media homogeneity.

Internal and External Backlash Events

In February 2021, Slate suspended podcast host Mike Pesca indefinitely without pay following an internal Slack channel debate over the use of racial slurs in journalism. The discussion stemmed from a New York Times incident involving reporter Donald McNeil, who resigned after using the n-word during a 2019 off-the-record student meeting; Pesca argued that non-Black journalists should be permitted to quote the slur directly in certain reporting contexts, such as historical or factual analysis, rather than always censoring it. Slate's editorial leadership cited concerns over Pesca's workplace conduct during the debate, leading to an investigation. The suspension sparked external backlash from Pesca's audience and free speech advocates, who viewed it as an example of ideological conformity pressures within media outlets, particularly amid heightened post-2020 racial sensitivity discussions. Pesca continued producing episodes of his podcast The Gist independently during the suspension, maintaining listener support. In September 2021, Slate and Pesca mutually agreed to part ways after the investigation concluded, with Slate stating the decision allowed both parties to move forward. This event highlighted internal tensions at Slate over speech norms and race-related editorial standards, contributing to broader staff unease about the publication's direction. The Pesca controversy exacerbated ongoing internal divisions, which persisted into 2022 amid leadership changes and identity struggles. In January 2022, Hohlt abruptly stepped down after three years, prompting a staff meeting where employees expressed confusion over Slate's editorial vision and handling of sensitive topics like race. This followed a wave of departures, including senior staff, amid reports of low morale and debates over whether Slate's style clashed with evolving cultural expectations on issues like diversity and inclusion. External observers, including former Slate contributors, criticized the outlet for drifting from its founding emphasis on provocative, evidence-based debate toward more orthodox progressive positions, potentially alienating readers and talent. These events reflected systemic pressures in left-leaning media environments, where internal on race and often overrides dissenting views, as evidenced by similar incidents at outlets like .

Responses to Political Shifts (e.g., Trump Era)

Slate's coverage intensified following Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 presidential election, with articles framing his success as a product of demagoguery and deceit. One prominent piece declared "there is no such thing as a good Trump voter," attributing support to tolerance of Trump's racist rhetoric against , Hispanics, and protesters during the campaign. The magazine also maintained an ongoing list of reasons deeming Trump unfit for office, expanding from 141 in July 2016 to 230 by , citing his announcement speech's characterization of Mexican immigrants as rapists among other statements and actions. During Trump's presidency from 2017 to 2021, Slate's editorial tone emphasized perceived harms, describing the first month as "more cruel and destructive than the majority of Americans feared," with warnings that worse was to come. Coverage often focused on policy critiques, personal attacks, and predictions of institutional damage, aligning with the outlet's progressive viewpoint that viewed Trump's agenda as antithetical to liberal values. This period saw extensive tagging of Trump-related content, sustaining a of opposition without evident in response to electoral outcomes. Trump's 2024 election win elicited similarly alarmist responses from Slate, portraying the result as voters opting to "burn it all to the ground" and erasing any "plausible deniability" about his character compared to 2016. Articles urged preparation for the "worst-case scenario" and questioned how to resist, reflecting continuity in framing Trump-era shifts as existential threats rather than adapting to voter preferences. Into 2025, post-inauguration pieces critiqued early policies on issues like IVF access and government shutdowns as extensions of Trump's flawed politics, maintaining a critical stance amid his second term. This pattern underscores Slate's role in amplifying anti-Trump sentiment, though such hyperbolic language has drawn accusations of bias from conservative observers, who argue it prioritizes ideological opposition over balanced analysis.

References

  1. https://slate.com/about
  2. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2006/06/michael-kinsley-s-history-of-slate.html
  3. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/a-business-history-of-slate-magazine.html
  4. https://www.ghco.com/news-releases/news-release-details/washington-post-company-acquire-slate-magazine
  5. https://simonowens.substack.com/p/the-strategic-brilliance-of-slates
  6. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/slate/
  7. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/slate-media-bias
  8. https://adfontesmedia.com/slate-bias-and-reliability/
  9. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2006/06/a-timeline-of-slate-s-first-10-years.html
  10. https://news.microsoft.com/source/1996/06/24/inaugural-issue-of-slate-new-interactive-magazine-from-microsoft-and-editor-michael-kinsley-to-debut-online-today/
  11. https://news.microsoft.com/source/1996/04/24/microsoft-announces-slate-as-name-of-new-online-publication-headed-by-michael-kinsley/
  12. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1996/06/welcome-to-slate.html
  13. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/slate-magazine-an-early-review/
  14. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/12/business/founding-editor-of-slate-online-pioneer-quits.html
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/24/business/microsoft-may-sell-slate-a-pioneer-in-web-magazines.html
  16. https://www.npr.org/2002/02/20/1138379/michael-kinsley
  17. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/23/business/media/microsoft-says-it-is-exploring-the-sale-of-slate-magazine.html
  18. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/slate-sold-to-washington-post/
  19. https://www.ghco.com/news-releases/news-release-details/washington-post-company-completes-acquisition-slate-magazine
  20. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/business/media/washington-post-company-buys-slate-magazine.html
  21. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/media/05post.html
  22. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/washington-post-forms-new-online-publishing-unit-the-slate-group-with-weisberg-as-chairman/
  23. https://www.npr.org/2014/05/03/309213598/slate-plus-offers-readers-inside-access-for-a-fee
  24. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/business/media/slate-to-introduce-a-variation-on-the-paywall.html
  25. https://medialifemagazines.com/slate-tries-new-sort-paywall/
  26. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/06/slates-new-international-paywall-how-it-will-work-for-readers-abroad.html
  27. https://slate.com/briefing/2020/03/slate-metered-paywall.html
  28. https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/03/slate-launches-a-metered-paywall-to-draw-more-membership-revenue-from-readers-not-just-listeners/
  29. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/11/business/media/slate-departures.html
  30. https://www.semafor.com/article/02/11/2024/slate-reports-best-year
  31. https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/09/slate-now-20-years-old-reflects-on-the-value-of-taking-the-long-view-and-not-chasing-digital-media-trends/
  32. https://www.ghco.com/company-profile
  33. https://digiday.com/media/slates-membership-program-one-year-qualified-hit/
  34. https://digiday.com/media/slates-paying-membership-jumps-46-percent-trump-election/
  35. https://www.cjr.org/business_of_news/slate-layoffs-union.php
  36. https://culturalworkersorganize.org/digital-media-organizing-timeline/
  37. https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/330629/slate-ratifies-first-union-contract.html
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/business/media/slate-editor-jared-hohlt.html
  39. https://x.com/byjoelanderson/status/1821976904280502282
  40. https://www.allsides.com/blog/slate-retains-left-rating
  41. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2008/10/you-re-wasting-your-time-worrying-about-the-liberal-media.html
  42. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/06/biggest-lie-trump-biden-2024-voters.html
  43. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2006/06/jonah-goldberg-on-what-s-wrong-with-slate.html
  44. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/05/is-slate-magazine-too-liberal-or-conservative-what-members-said-about-the-magazines-bias.html
  45. https://www.slowboring.com/p/slatepitch
  46. https://www.mediaite.com/online/slates-contrarian-ways-mocked-on-twitter/
  47. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/we-pick-the-best-articles-and-posts-from-slates-20-year-history.html
  48. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2008/04/contrarianism-in-context.html
  49. https://www.salon.com/2014/05/07/worst_slate_take_ever_why_theres_nothing_ugly_about_a_15_minimum_wage/
  50. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/08/how-the-republicans-can-win-the-election-court-ethnic-contrarians-like-me.html
  51. https://www.thecrimson.com/column/broom-of-the-system/article/2009/10/27/levitt-dubner-slate-status/
  52. https://slate.com/human-interest/dear-prudence
  53. https://slate.com/human-interest/care-and-feeding
  54. https://slate.com/human-interest/how-to-do-it
  55. https://slate.com/
  56. https://foundersnetwork.com/how-andy-bowers-transformed-the-podcasting-world/
  57. https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/06/slate-doubles-down-on-podcasts-courting-niche-audiences-and-happy-advertisers/
  58. https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/02/slates-podcast-audience-has-tripled-in-a-year-and-its-bet-on-audio-over-video-continues-to-pay-off/
  59. https://slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/gabfest/2014/12/when_did_slate_start_the_political_gabfest_watch_bazelon_dickerson_and_plotz.html
  60. https://slate.com/gabfestlive
  61. https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s1/watergate
  62. https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s10/rise-of-fox-news
  63. https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s8/becoming-justice-thomas
  64. https://rephonic.com/podcasts/amicus-with-dahlia-lithwick-law-justice-and-the-co
  65. https://slate.com/podcasts/amicus
  66. https://slate.com/podcasts/hang-up-and-listen
  67. https://slate.com/podcast-plus
  68. http://www.slate.com/articles/briefing/slate_fare/2015/02/panoply_slate_group_announces_new_podcast_network.html
  69. https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2015/slate-launches-panoply-a-podcast-platform/
  70. https://www.insideradio.com/free/panoply-exits-podcast-content-and-sales-business/article_f4a44e9e-b796-11e8-89d2-9b6e0ef40e65.html
  71. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/09/podcast-shakeup-panoply-iheartmedia-stuff-and-malcolm-gladwell-are-all-making-industry-moves/
  72. https://digiday.com/media/slate-pivot-to-words/
  73. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/01/who-needs-video-slate-is-pivoting-to-audio-and-making-real-money-doing-it/
  74. https://www.fastly.com/customers/slate
  75. https://slate.com/technology/2018/09/hot-pods-nick-quah-on-why-buzzfeed-and-panoply-are-cutting-podcasts-vox-is-expanding-them-and-platforms-are-fighting-over-them.html
  76. https://www.robertneubecker.com/blog-1/2017/10/11/slate
  77. https://www.simonandschuster.com/authors/Michael-Kinsley/7796
  78. https://slate.com/masthead
  79. https://slate.com/author/dahlia-lithwick
  80. https://slate.com/author/jenee-desmond-harris
  81. https://slate.com/author/jim-newell
  82. https://slate.com/author/molly-olmstead
  83. https://slate.com/author/luke-winkie
  84. https://slate.com/author/emily-bazelon
  85. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/12/business/media/jacob-weisberg-slate-malcolm-gladwell.html
  86. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/10/jacob-weisberg-exit-interview-slate-chotiner.html
  87. http://www.slate.com/articles/slate_plus/the_first_20/2016/09/the_history_of_slate_according_to_kinsley_weisberg_plotz_and_turner.html
  88. https://thefineprintnyc.com/article/slate-magazine-editor-departures/
  89. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/11/business/media/hillary-frey-slate-editor-in-chief.html
  90. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1004371654120793720
  91. https://slate.com/podcasts
  92. https://digiday.com/media/slate-using-podcasts-drive-digital-growth/
  93. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/03/slate-wins-for-general-excellence-at-the-national-magazine-awards-for-digital-media.html
  94. https://ground.news/interest/slate
  95. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/slates-home-page-a-history.html
  96. https://www.cjr.org/analysis/slate-magazine-podcast-trump-staff-departures.php
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/27/mondaymediasection.news
  98. https://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/smart-editorial-smart-readers-and-smart-ad-solutions-slate-makes-a-case-for-long-form-on-the-web/
  99. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/how-trump-is-manipulating-the-media.html
  100. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/22/business/media/slate-mike-pesca-suspended.html
  101. https://freespeechproject.georgetown.edu/tracker-entries/slate-suspends-podcast-host-mike-pesca-after-internal-debate-over-racial-slur/
  102. https://www.thewrap.com/slate-suspends-podcast-host-mike-pesca-after-debate-over-n-word/
  103. https://www.tabletmag.com/the-scroll/articles/mike-pesca-speaks
  104. https://www.reddit.com/r/podcasts/comments/mvc6db/fans_of_mike_pesca_and_the_gist_what_are_you/
  105. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/03/slate-mike-pesca-part-ways-investigation-n-word/
  106. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/11/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-good-trump-voter.html
  107. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/donald_trump_is_unfit_to_be_president_here_are_141_reasons_why.html
  108. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2017/02/the_first_month_of_the_trump_presidency_has_been_more_cruel_and_destructive.html
  109. https://slate.com/tag/donald-trump
  110. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/11/trump-wins-2024-election-president-harris-loss.html
  111. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/11/election-results-president-trump-harris-win.html
  112. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/10/trump-ivf-abortion-reproductive-rights-natalism.html
  113. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/10/trump-shutdown-army-pay-2026.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.