Hubbry Logo
Occlusion (dentistry)Occlusion (dentistry)Main
Open search
Occlusion (dentistry)
Community hub
Occlusion (dentistry)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Occlusion (dentistry)
Occlusion (dentistry)
from Wikipedia

Occlusion, in a dental context, means simply the contact between teeth. More technically, it is the relationship between the maxillary (upper) and mandibular (lower) teeth when they approach each other, as occurs during chewing or at rest.

Static occlusion refers to contact between teeth when the jaw is closed and stationary, while dynamic occlusion refers to occlusal contacts made when the jaw is moving.[1]

The masticatory system also involves the periodontium, the TMJ (and other skeletal components) and the neuromusculature, therefore the tooth contacts should not be looked at in isolation, but in relation to the overall masticatory system.

Anatomy of Masticatory System

[edit]
Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint - RCP = Here we see the condyle when teeth are in the retruded contact position, a reproducible position. ICP = Here we see the condyle position when teeth are in the intercuspal position. R = Mandibular opening with rotation of the condylar heads but without translation. T = Maximum opening of the mandible combined rotation and translation of condylar heads. (Institute of Dentistry, Aberdeen University)

One cannot fully understand occlusion without an in depth understanding of the anatomy including that of the teeth, TMJ, musculature surrounding this and the skeletal components.

The Dentition and Surrounding Structures

[edit]

The human dentition consists of 32 permanent teeth and these are distributed between the alveolar bone of the maxillary and mandibular arch. Teeth consist of two parts: the crown, which is visible in the mouth and lies above the gingival soft tissue and the roots, which are below the level of the gingiva and in the alveolar bone.

The periodontal ligament unites the cementum on the outside of the root and the alveolar bone. This bundle of connective tissue fibres is vital in dissipating forces that are applied to the underlying bone during the contact of teeth in function.[2]

The teeth are highly specialised and different teeth are involved in specific functions. The masticatory system is largely influenced by these intra and inter-arch relationships and a wider understanding of the anatomy can greatly benefit those who want to understand occlusion.

Skeletal Components

[edit]

The maxilla forms a crucial aspect of the upper facial skeleton. Two irregularly shaped bones fuse at the intermaxillary suture during development forming the upper jaw. This forms the palate of the oral cavity and also supports the alveolar ridges that hold the upper teeth in place.[3] The lower facial skeleton on the other hand, is formed of the mandible, a U-shaped bone, which supports the lower teeth and also forms part of the TMJ. The mandibular condyle and the squamous portion of the temporal bone, at the base of the cranium articulate with one another.[4]

TMJ

[edit]

The TMJ is formed from the temporal bone of the cranium, specifically the glenoid fossa and articular tubercle and the condyle of the mandible, with a fibrocartilaginous disc lying in between. It is classified as a ginglymoarthrodial joint[5] and can perform a range of gliding and hinge type movements. The disc, which lies in between is composed of dense fibrous tissue and is predominantly avascular and lacking nerves.[2]

Muscles

[edit]

There are various muscles that contribute to occlusion of the teeth including the muscles of mastication and other accessory muscles. The temporalis, masseter, medial and lateral pterygoids are the muscles of mastication and these contribute to the elevation, depression, protrusion and retraction of the mandible. The anterior and posterior belly of the digastric are also involved in the depression of the mandible and elevation of the hyoid bone and are therefore relevant to the masticatory system.[2]

Ligaments

[edit]

There are various ligaments associated with the TMJ and these limit and restrict border movements by acting as passive restraining devices. They do not contribute to joint function, rather exert a protective role. The key ligaments relevant to the TMJ are:

  • The temporomandibular ligament
  • The medial and lateral discal ligaments
  • The sphenomandibular ligament
  • The stylomandibular ligament[4]

Development of occlusion

[edit]
Leeway space is the size differential between the primary posterior teeth (C, D, E) and the permanent teeth (canine, first and second pre-molar). Maxillary space of 1.5mm, mandibular 2.5mm can be seen. (Institute of Dentistry, Aberdeen University)

As the primary (baby) teeth begin to erupt at 6 months of age, the maxillary and mandibular teeth aim to occlude with one another. The erupting teeth are moulded into position by the tongue, the cheeks and lips during development. Upper and lower primary teeth should be correctly occluding and aligned after 2 years whilst they are continuing to develop, with full root development complete at 3 years of age.

Around a year after development of the teeth is complete, the jaws continue to grow which results in spacing between some of the teeth (diastema). This effect is greatest in the anterior (front) teeth and can be seen from around age 4 – 5 years.[6] This spacing is important as it allows space for the permanent (adult) teeth to erupt into the correct occlusion, and without this spacing there is likely to be crowding of the permanent dentition.

In order to fully understand the development of occlusion and malocclusion, it is important to understand the premolar dynamics in the mixed dentition stage. The mixed dentition stage is when both primary and permanent teeth are present. The permanent premolars erupt ~9–12 years of age, replacing the primary molars. The erupting premolars are smaller than the teeth they are replacing and this difference in space between the primary molars and their successors (1.5mm for maxillary, 2.5mm for mandibular[7]) is termed Leeway Space. This allows the permanent molars to drift mesially into the spaces and develop a Class I occlusion.

Incisor and molar classification

[edit]

Classification of occlusion and malocclusion plays an important role in diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. In order to describe the relationship of the maxillary molars to the mandibular molars, the Angle’s classification of malocclusion has commonly been used for many years.[8] This system has also been adapted in an attempt to classify the relationship between the incisors of the two arches.[9]

Incisor Relationship

[edit]

When describing the relationship between maxillary and mandibular incisors, the following categories make up Angle's incisal relationship classification:

  • Class I: Mandibular incisors contact the maxillary incisors in the middle third or on the cingulum of the palatal surface
  • Class II: Mandibular incisors contact the maxillary incisors on the palatal surface, in the gingival third or posterior to the cingulum. This class may be further subdivided into division I and division II:
    • Division I includes maxillary incisors which are proclined (90%) and these individuals have a greater horizontal overlap - this is termed overjet
    • Division II includes those with retroclined (10%) incisors, which leads to an increase in vertical overlap[10] - this is termed overbite
  • Class III: Mandibular incisors occlude with the maxillary incisors on the palatal surface, in the incisal third specifically or anterior to the cingulum
    • In some cases the overjet is reversed (<0mm) and the mandibular incisors lie anterior to the maxillary incisors

Molar Relationship

[edit]
Molar relationship classification, observed when locating the mesial buccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. (Institute of Dentistry, Aberdeen University)

When discussing the occlusion of the posterior teeth, the classification refers to the first molars and may be divided into three categories:

  • Class I: The mandibular first molar occludes mesially to the maxillary first molar, with the mesiobuccal cusp of maxillary first molar occluding in the buccal groove of mandibular first molar
  • Class II: The mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar occludes anterior to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar
  • Class III: If the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar occludes posterior to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar[8]

Any deviation from the normal relation of teeth (Class I) is considered a malocclusion.

Class I relationships are thought to be “ideal”, however this classification does not take into consideration the positions of the two TMJ’s. Class II and III molar and incisor relationships are thought to be forms of malocclusion, however not all of these are severe enough to require orthodontic treatment. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need is a system that attempts to rank malocclusions in terms of significance of various occlusal traits and perceived aesthetic impairment.[11] The index identifies those who would benefit most from orthodontic treatment and onward referral to an orthodontist.

Occlusal terminology

[edit]
Intercuspal Position -The relationship between the mandible and the maxilla when the teeth are maximally meshed. It is the most cranial position of the mandible (Institute of Dentistry Aberdeen University)

Intercuspal Position (ICP), also known as Habitual Bite, Habitual Position or Bite of Convenience, is defined at the position where the maxillary and mandibular teeth fit together in maximum interdigitation. This position is usually the most easily recorded and is almost always the occlusion the patient closes into when they are asked to 'bite together'. This is the occlusion that the patient is accustomed to, hence sometimes termed the Habitual Bite.[1]

Centric relation (CR) describes a reproducible jaw relationship (between the mandible and maxilla) and is independent of tooth contact. This is the position in which the mandibular condyles are located in the fossae in an antero-superior position against the posterior slope of the articular eminence.[12] It is said that in CR, the muscles are in their most relaxed and least stressed state. This position is not influenced by muscle memory, but rather by the ligament which suspend the condyles within the fossa. Therefore it is the position that dentists use to create new occlusal relationships as for example, while making maxillary and mandibular complete dentures.

When the mandible is in this retruded position, it opens and closes on an arc of curvature around an imaginary axis drawn through the centre of the head of both condyles. This imaginary axis is termed the terminal hinge axis. The first tooth contact that occurs when the mandible closes in the terminal hinge axis position, is termed Retruded Contact Position (RCP).[13] RCP can be reproduced within 0.08mm of accuracy due to the non-elastic TMJ capsule and restriction by the capsular ligaments, thus it can be considered a ‘border movement’ in Posselt’s envelope.[14]

Posselt's Envelope of Border Movements - Pr - Maximum protrusion, E - Edge to edge position of the incisors, ICP/RCP - Condylar sliding movement represented clinically as tooth to tooth contact positions, R - Maximum mandibular opening condyles rotate but do not translate, T - Maximum mandibular opening with maximum translation of the condylar heads (Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen)

Centric Occlusion (CO) is a confusing term, and is often incorrectly used synonymously with RCP. Both terms are used to define a position where the condyles are in CR, however RCP describes the initial tooth contact on closure, however this may be an interference contact. On the other hand, CO refers to the occlusion where the teeth are in maximum intercuspation in CR. Posselt (1952) determined that only in 10% of natural tooth and jaw relationships does ICP = CO[14] (maximum intercuspation in CR) and so the term RCP is more appropriate when discussing the occlusion that occurs when the condyles are in their retruded position. CO is a term that is more relevant to complete denture application or where multiple fixed unit prosthodontics are provided, where the occlusion is arranged so that when the mandible is in CR, the teeth are interdigitating.

Posselt's Envelope of Border Movements

[edit]

Posselt’s Envelope of Border Movement (often referred to as the 'border movements of the mandible') is a schematic diagram of the maximum jaw movement in three planes (sagittal, horizontal and frontal). This encompasses all movements away from RCP, and includes:

  • Protrusive movements: When the mandible moves forward from centric relation, this is considered as protrusion.[12] In Class I occlusion, the predominant contacts occur on the incisal and labial surfaces of the mandibular incisors and the incisal edges and palatal fossa areas of the maxillary incisors.[6]
  • Lateral movements: When the mandible moves to the left or right, the mandibular posterior teeth move laterally across the opposing teeth. For example, when the mandible moves to the right, the right mandibular teeth move laterally across their opponents and this is termed the working side of the mandible (the side towards which the mandible is moving). In contrast, the left mandibular teeth move medially, downwards and anteriorly across their opposing posteriors and this is called the non-working side (the side to which the mandible is moving away from).
  • Retrusive movements: This is when the mandible moves posteriorly from ICP. Compared with protrusive and lateral movements, retrusive movements are generally considerably smaller with a range of movement around 1 or 2 mm due to restriction by the ligamentous structures.[2]

Guidance, natural teeth and function

[edit]
Bennet Angle - The TV (orbiting) condyle, as the mandible moves (progressive side shift). (Institute of Dentistry Aberdeen University)

Mandibular movements are guided by two different systems; the ‘posterior’ guidance system and the ‘anterior’ guidance system.

Posterior guidance system

[edit]

Posterior guidance refers to TMJ articulations and associated structures. It is the condyles within the fossa and the associated muscles and ligaments together with its neuromuscular link that determines mandibular movements. Lateral, protrusive and repressive excursions of the mandible are guided by the posterior system.

Lateral excursions

It is important to define the movement of the condyles in lateral excursions:

- Working condyle: This is the condyle closest to the side which the mandible is moving (e.g. if the mandible moves laterally to the right, the right condyle is the working side condyle)

- Non-working condyle: This is the side to which the mandible is moving away from (e.g. if the mandible moves laterally to the right, the left condyle is the non-working side condyle)

  • The maximum lateral movement of the mandible to the left or right side is approximately 10-12mm[2]
  • The primary movement in lateral excursions occurs on the non-working side (NWS) condyle (also called the balancing or orbiting condyle). The NWS condylar head moves in a downward, forward and medial direction. This movement is defined against two separate planes, the vertical and horizontal plane
    • Bennet Angle : the angle of medial movement on NWS condyle relative to the vertical plane
    • Condylar Angle : the angle of downwards movement of the NWS condyle relative to the horizontal plane
  • The working side (WS) condyle (also called the rotating condyle) undergoes an immediate, non-progressive lateral shift. This movement is called the Bennet movement (however this may be confused with the Bennet Angle), so this is more commonly referred to as an Immediate Side Shift. The condyle is seen to rotate with a slight lateral shift in the direction of movement[6]

Protrusive movements

  • The condylar heads predominantly translate forwards and downwards along the distal face of the articular face in the glenoid fossa. Protrusive movements are restricted by the ligamentous structures to a maximum of ~8-11mm (depending on skull morphology and size of subject)[2]

Retrusive movements

  • As for retrusion, this movement is restricted by the ligamentous structures and the maximum retrusive limit is usually ~1mm however 2-3mm is rarely seen in some patients.[2]

We can not influence the posterior guidance system through dental restorative treatment.

Anterior guidance system

[edit]

Anterior guidance refers to the influence of contacting teeth on the paths of mandibular movements. The tooth contacts may be anterior, posterior tooth contacts or both - however termed anterior guidance as these contacts are still anterior to the TMJ. This can be further classified into:

Canine guidance during right lateral excursions (Institute of Dentistry University of Aberdeen)

Canine Guidance

  • Dynamic occlusion that occurs on the canines (on the working side) during lateral excursions of the mandible.
  • These teeth are best suited to accept horizontal forces in eccentric movements due to their long roots and good crown/root ratio
  • It is easy for the dental technicians during wax up and construction of restoration to provide this

Group Function

  • Multiple contacts between the maxillary and mandibular teeth in lateral movements on the WS whereby simultaneous contact of several teeth acts as a group to distribute occlusal forces.
  • It is preferable for this guidance to be as anterior as possible e.g. premolars rather than molars, as there is increased force applied when the contacts are closer to the TMJ.

Incisal Guidance

  • The influence of the contacting surfaces of the mandibular and maxillary incisors on mandibular movements[12] is characterised by the overbite and overjet of the maxillary incisors.

In restorative treatment, it is possible to manipulate and design anterior guidance systems that is in harmony with the masticatory system.

Clinical relevance of guidance

[edit]

Tooth contact involved in guidance is particularly important as these occlude a vast number of times per day and so need to be able to resist both heavy and non-axial occlusal loads. When restoring the anterior guidance system should be compatible with the posterior guidance system. This means that excessive strain should not be applied on the posterior guidance system which is limited by the ligamemtous structures.

Upon restoration of the occlusal surfaces of teeth, it is likely to change the occlusion and therefore guidance systems. It is unlikely the TMJ will adapt to these changes in occlusion, but rather the teeth adapt to the new occlusion through tooth wear, tooth movement or fracture. For this reason, it is important to consider these guidance concepts when providing restorations. Guidance should also be considered before restorations as it should not be expected for a heavily restored tooth to provide guidance alone as this leaves the tooth vulnerable to fracture during function.

Organisation of the occlusion

[edit]

The arrangement of teeth in function is important and over the years three recognised concepts have been developed to describe how teeth should and should not contact:

  1. Bilateral balanced occlusion
  2. Unilateral balanced occlusion
  3. Mutually protected occlusion

Bilateral balanced occlusion

[edit]

This concept is based on the curve of Spee and curve of Wilson and is becoming outdated for the restored natural dentition. However, it still finds application in removable prosthodontics. This scheme involves contacts on as many teeth as possible (both on the working and non-working side) in all excursive movements of the mandible. This is especially important in the case of complete denture provision as contacting teeth on the NWS help stabilise the denture bases in mandibular movement.[15] It was believed in the 1930s that this arrangement was ideal for the natural dentition when providing full occlusal reconstruction in order to distribute the stresses. However, it was found that the lateral forces placed on the restored posterior teeth produced damaging effects on the restorations.[16]

Unilateral balanced occlusion

[edit]

On the other hand, unilateral balanced occlusion is a widely used tooth arrangement that is used in current dentistry and is commonly known as group function. This concept is based on the observation that NWS contacts were destructive[17] and therefore the teeth on the NWS should be free of any eccentric contacts, and instead the contacts should be distributed on the WS thus sharing the occlusal load. Group function is used when canine guidance cannot be achieved and also in the Pankey-Mann Schuyler (PMS) approach where it was deemed better than canine guidance as it distributed the loading on the WS better.[18]

Mutually protected occlusion

[edit]
Mutually protected occlusion - Posterior disocclusion of teeth as the mandible is protruded (Institute of Dentistry Aberdeen University)

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2017) defines mutually protected occlusion as ‘an occlusal scheme in which the posterior teeth prevent excessive contact of the anterior teeth in maximal intercuspal position, and the anterior teeth disengage the posterior teeth in all mandibular excursive movements’[12]

In eccentric movements, damaging forces are applied to the posterior teeth and the anteriors are best suited to receiving these. Therefore during protrusive movements, the contact or guidance of the anteriors should be adequate to disocclude and protect the posterior teeth.

In contrast, the posterior teeth are more suited to accept the forces that are applied during closure of the mandible. This is because the posteriors are positioned so the forces are applied directly along the long axis of the tooth and are able to dissipate them efficiently whereas the anteriors cannot accept these heavy forces as well due to their labial positioning and angulation. It is therefore accepted that the posterior teeth should have heavier contacts than the anteriors in ICP and act as a stop for vertical closure.

Additionally, in lateral excursions either canine or group function should act to disclude the posterior teeth on the WS because, as described above, the anterior teeth are best suited to dissipate damaging horizontal forces, as well as the contact being further away from the TMJ, so the forces created are decreased in strength. Group function or canine guidance should also provide disocclusion of the teeth on the NWS as the amount and direction of force applied to the TMJ and teeth can be destructive due to an increase in muscle activity.[19] An absence of NWS contacts also allows smooth movement of the working side condyle as a contact may disengage the guidance of the condyle and therefore cause an unstable mandibular relationship.[20]

Deflective contacts and interferences

[edit]

A deflective contact is a contact that diverts the mandible from its intended movement.[12] An example of this is when the mandible is deflected into ICP by the RCP-ICP slide, which path is determined by the deflective tooth contacts. This is often involved in function (e.g. chewing), however in some cases these deflective contacts can be damaging and may lead to pain around the tooth (often associated with bruxism).[21] However, some patients may be totally unaware of similar deflective contacts suggesting that it is the patient's adaptability rather than the contact that may influence the patient's presentation.

An occlusal interference is any tooth contact that prevents, or hinders harmonious mandibular movement (an undesirable tooth contact).[12]

Non-working side interference (photograph) detectable with articulating paper or plastic shimstock, as the mandible moves to the left (working side). (Institute of Dentistry Aberdeen University)

The occlusal interferences may be classified as follows:[22]

  1. Working Side Interference: When there is a heavy or early tooth contact between the maxillary and mandibular teeth on the side that the mandible is moving towards, and this contact may or may not discludes the anteriors.[18]
  2. Non-Working Side Interference: An occlusal contact on the side the mandible is moving away from that prevents harmonious movement of the mandible. These have the potential to be more destructive in comparison to WS interferences due to the obliquely directed forces.[23]
  3. Protrusive Interference: Contacts that occur between the distal aspects of the maxillary posterior teeth and the mesial aspect of the mandibular posterior teeth. These interferences are potentially very damaging and may even cause an inability to incise properly due to the close proximity of the interference to the muscle.

When the dentist is providing restorations, it is important that these do not create an interference, otherwise the restoration will receive increased loading. As for deflective contacts, interferences may also be associated with parafunction such as bruxism (although evidence is weak) and may adversely affect the distribution of heavy occlusal forces. Interferences may also cause pain in the masticatory muscles due to altering their activity,[24] however there is large controversy and debate as to whether there is a relationship between occlusion and temporomandibular disorders. Almost all dentate individuals have occlusal interferences, and therefore they are not seen to be an etiology of all TMDs. When there is an acute change or significant instability in the occlusal condition and subsequently represents an etiological factor for a TMD, occlusal treatment is required.

Occlusal adjustment (removal of occlusal interferences) may be carried out in order to obtain a stable occlusal relationship and is achieved by selectively grinding the occlusal interferences or through wear of a hard occlusal splint to ensure true retruded relationship is established.

'Ideal' occlusion

[edit]

When there is an absence of symptoms and the masticatory system is functioning efficiently, the occlusion is considered normal or physiological.[22] It is understood that no such ‘ideal’ occlusion exists for everyone, but rather each individual has their own 'ideal occlusion'. This is not focused on any specific occlusal configuration but rather occurs when the person’s occlusion is in harmony with the rest of the stomatognathic system (TMJ, teeth and supporting structures, and the neuromuscular elements).

However, an optimal functional occlusion is important to consider when providing restorations as this helps to understand what is trying to be achieved. It is defined in established texts[2] as:

1. Centric occlusion and centric relation being in harmony (CO=CR)

  • There should be even and simultaneous contacts of all posterior teeth when the mouth is closed and the condyles are lying in their most superior and anterior position, resting against the posterior slope of the articular eminence (CR)
  • Note that the anterior teeth should also be occluding, but the contact should be lighter than the posterior contacts

2. Freedom in CO

  • This means the mandible is still able to move slightly in the sagittal and horizontal plane in centric occlusion
  • This is also part of the PMS theory of occlusion[17] mentioned earlier in organisation of occlusion.

3. Immediate and lasting posterior disocclusion upon mandibular movement

  • During lateral excursive movements, the working side contacts act to disclude the non-working side immediately
  • During protrusive movements, the anterior tooth contact and guidance acts to disclude the posterior teeth immediately

4. Canine guidance is considered the best anterior guidance system

  • This is due to their ability to accept horizontal forces as they have the longest and largest roots as well as a desirable crown/root ratio
  • They are also surrounded by dense compact bone unlike the posterior teeth which makes them more suited to tolerate horizontal forces[5]
  • Canine guidance is also easier to manage restoratively than group function
  • However, if the patient’s canines are not positioned correctly for canine guidance, group function (involving the canines and premolars) is the most favourable alternative

It is necessary to understand the concepts that influence the function and health of the masticatory system in order to prevent, minimise or eliminate any breakdown or trauma to the TMJs or teeth.

Patient adaptability

[edit]

There are various factors that play a role in the adaptive capability of a patient with regards to changes in occlusion. Factors such as the central nervous system and the mechanoreceptors in the periodontium, mucosa and dentition are all of importance here. It is in fact, the somatosensory input from these sources that determines whether an individual is able to adapt to changes in the occlusion, opposed to the occlusal scheme itself.[5] Failure of adaptation to minor changes in the occlusion can occur, although rare. It is thought that patients who are increasingly vigilant to any changes in the oral environment are less likely to adapt to any occlusal changes. Psychological and emotional stress can also contribute to the patient's ability to adapt as these factors have an impact on the central nervous system.[22]

Occlusal examination

[edit]

In individuals with unexplained pain, fracture, drifting, mobility and tooth wear, a full occlusal examination is vital. Similarly when complex restorative work is planned it is also essential to identify whether any occlusal changes are required prior to the provision of definitive restoration[25] In some people even minor discrepancies in the occlusion can lead to symptoms involving the TMJ or acute orofacial pain so it is important to identify and eradicate this cause.[6]

Occlusal Examination Instruments: Willis gauge, Mosquito forceps with Shim stock, Miller's forceps with thin blue and red articulating paper, College tweezers, Dental probe. Dental mirror (From left to right) by University of Aberdeen.

Instruments Required

  • Miller’s forceps
  • Articulating paper
  • Shimstock
  • Mosquito forceps
  • Mirror
  • Dental probe
  • Willis gauge

The examination should be carried out using a systematic approach whilst assessing the following:

  • Facial appearance
  • Musculature
  • TMJ
  • Each arch individually
  • Intercuspal Position (ICP)
  • Retruded Contact Position (RCP)
  • RCP-ICP slide
  • Lateral excursions
  • Protrusion
  • OVD

Extra-oral examination

[edit]

1) Facial Appearance[26]

The facial symmetry of the patient should be observed.

The skeletal relationship of the patient should then be identified and noted.

  • Class I: The maxilla and mandible are in harmony and coincide
  • Class II: The maxilla lies anterior to the mandible and is retrognathic
  • Class III: The maxilla lies posterior to the mandible and is prognathic[27]

The facial height of the patient should be considered and it should be noted where there may have been a loss.

2) Muscles

Begin by simply palpating the muscles concerned with the occlusion of the teeth. These muscles include the muscles of mastication and other muscles within the head and neck area, such as the supra-hyoid muscles. It is best to palpate the muscles simultaneously and bilaterally.[28] The temporalis, masseter, medial and lateral pterygoids, geniohyoid, mylohyoid and digastric muscles alongside the trapezius, posterior cervical muscles, occipitalis muscle and the sternocleidomastoid should all be checked for any signs of wasting or tenderness.[29] Temporomandibular dysfunction commonly presents with muscular tenderness,[25] but pain or palpable soreness associated with the muscles can also be linked to parafunctional activity.

3) TMJ

TMJ disorders can be detected through occlusal examination. Ask the patient to open and close whilst placing two fingers over the space of the TMJ. Opening of less than 35mm in the mandible is considered to be restricted and such restriction may be associated with intra-capsular changes within the joint.[28] Following this, ask the patient to move their jaw to the right and following this, to the left. Note any clicking, crepitus, pain or deviation.[25]

Intra-oral examination

[edit]

Source:[26]

4) Maxillary / Mandibular Arch

Assess each arch and identify whether there are any signs of occlusal disharmony, overloading, tooth migration, wear, craze lines, cracking or mobility (not due to periodontal causes).[25] Abfraction, faceting and possible vertical enamel fracture lesions should also be noted if present.[30]

5) Contacts in ICP

Begin by assessing the incisor and molar relationship as described above. Similarly examine the overbite and overjet. An overbite of 3-5mm[2] and an overjet of 2-3mms are considered to be within the range of normal.[13]

To look at the ICP, articulating paper should be placed on the occlusal surface and the patient asked to bite together, which will mark their occlusal contacts. It is best to check these whilst the teeth are dry.

  • During ICP, most opposing teeth should be contacting[2]
  • Close examination of these contacts marked by the articulating paper help to identify the nature of the tooth contacts
  • Good stable contacts often appear as small and not very prominent markings when articulating paper is used and there are multiple contacts on each tooth
  • Broad and rubbing contacts identified in ICP may be associated with disturbances in function and may indicate occlusal instability[25]
  • These contacts can be verified using Shimstock (a 12.5μm thick mylar strip) and the stability of the contacts can be checked
  • The operator should pull the Shimstock through the teeth, whilst the patient is biting together
  • This should be carried out for each set of teeth and will highlight if there is adequate contact to hold the Shimstock
  • This material is appropriate as it is thinner and will eliminate any false contacts that may occur with even thin articulating papers that are roughly 20μm thick
  • One is also able to pull shim stock through when patients are biting together unlike other articulating paper, which will tear

6) RCP

The patient may be guided into CR using one of the follow methods;

  • Bimanual manipulation- manipulating the patient's condyles so they are in CR
  • The operator should lightly rest their fingers along the inferior border of the mandible and their thumbs should lie lightly on the anterior aspect of the chin
  • When the patient is relaxed place light downward pressure on the chin and light upward pressure under the angle of the mandible
  • Deprogramme the jaw by guiding the opening and closing of the jaw and once the patient is relaxed, ask them to close gently and stop when they feel teeth first contacting
  • Chin point guidance- one hand is used to apply pressure to the chin guiding the chin posteriorly with some force

In some patients it may be difficult to guide the mandible into CR, for example in those with muscle tension, muscle splinting, occlusal disharmony or parafunctional habit. For these patients a Lucia Jig or deprogramming appliance can be constructed at chair-side.

Mark RCP tooth contacts using articulating paper, note the teeth which are contacting and identify whether this RCP position is causing problems related to the occlusion. For example if there is a heavy contact or interference in RCP this may be the cause of occlusal disturbance. It is important to be able to guide the patient into RCP, as a registration may need to be taken in this position particularly if the occlusion is being reorganised, the OVD is being changed or even just for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes.

7) RCP-ICP Slide

The patient should be supine and relaxed. They should be placed into RCP by the operator and then asked to bite together “normally”, this is moving them from RCP into their position of maximum intercuspation (ICP). Ask the patient to feel the slide and identify whether this is small or large.[25] The slide should be smooth and the direction should be recorded.[30] The operator should evaluate from both the side of the patient and the front of the patient, how far the mandible travels both forward and laterally (however this is difficult and it may be easier to observe by mounting casts onto an articulator). This can be done by observing the maxillary and mandibular incisors during the slide.[25] The RCP-ICP slide for most dentate patients tends to be roughly 1–2 mm in an anterior and upward direction.[30] A deflective RCP-ICP slide, can have some relation to an anterior thrust. An anterior thrust, which is likely to be associated with the anterior teeth or other teeth involved in guidance such as canine teeth, often causes the teeth to exhibit fremitus.

8) Protrusive Movements

The patient is asked to move their mandible forward from ICP. This is commonly around a distance of 8-10mm and would normally be until the lower incisors slide anterior to the incisal edges of the maxillary anteriors. Observe the contacts during this movement. Mark the contacts using coloured articulating paper alongside the ICP contacts, which should be in a different colour - any teeth providing guidance and any interferences should be noted.[25]

9) Lateral Excursions

The patient is also asked to move their lower jaw to one side. Lateral movements should be measured and measurements of 12mm are thought to be normal.[28] Both working side and non-working side should be observed during this movement. Record any teeth that are providing guidance during this movement and any interferences that are present (and the location of these). Smooth and unbroken contacts should be identified when these excursive movements are recorded[25]

10) OVD

If occlusal wear can be seen, a Willis gauge is used to measure the occlusal-vertical dimension and the resting vertical dimension of an individual.

Take a measurement by placing two reference points on the patients face, one under the nose (usually the columella) and one under the chin. Take one measurement whilst the patient is resting (teeth should not be contacting) and one with the patient biting together i.e. in ICP and take this measurement away from the resting measurement to give the freeway space. The normal freeway space is usually 2-4mm.[31]

Patients with considerable tooth wear may have lost occlusal vertical dimension (OVD). When restoring the dentition, it is important to be aware of the exact OVD the patient has and by how much you may be increasing this. Patient’s may not be able to adapt to a large increase in OVD and therefore this may have to be done in phases.

Summary

[edit]
Table 1: Summary of key aspects of occlusal examination
Aspect of Examination What to look for
Facial appearance This involves assessing the face for symmetry and categorising the patient into the appropriate skeletal relationship.
Musculature Palpate and ensure normal muscle mass with no signs of wasting.
Temporomandibular Joint Any pain, clicking, crepitus or deviation should be noted and appropriate questions asked to find out more.
Maxillary and Mandibular Arch Examine each arch individually and note any signs of occlusal loading, faceting and microfractures within the teeth.
Intercuspal Position (ICP) Note overbite and overjet. Assess where the teeth contact in ICP and whether these contacts are stable or not.
Retruded Contact Position (RCP) Put the patient into their RCP using bimanual manipulation, or chin point guidance. Assess their RCP and if any problems in relation to the occlusion exist note these.
RCP-ICP Slide Assess both the quality and the quantity of the slide. The slide from RCP to ICP should be smooth and is usually about 1–2 mm in length, this should be confirmed during examination and any issues recorded.
Protrusive Movement Any teeth providing guidance should be noted. Similarly any interferences should be made note of.
Right Lateral Excursion It is important to examine which teeth the guidance is on and to note any interferences that can be identified on both working and non-working sides.
Left Lateral Excursion It is important to examine which teeth the guidance is on and to note any interferences that can be identified on both working and non-working sides.
Occlusal-vertical Dimension Where necessary, measure the OVD i.e. in cases where there has been a loss of OVD or where interocclusal space is required or aesthetics are poor.

Clinical applications of occlusion

[edit]

Occlusion is a fundamental concept in dentistry yet it is commonly overlooked as it's perceived as being not important or too difficult to teach and understand. Clinicians should have a sound understanding of the principles regarding occlusal harmony in order to be able to recognise and treat common problems associated with occlusal disharmony. Some of the advantages associated with a working knowledge of these include:[32]

  • Improved patient comfort: for example, some people experience pain or sensitivity after the placement of a new restoration due to occlusal overload or an interference which possibly could be avoided should the practitioner consider these at time of placement
  • Increased occlusal stability: teeth are less likely to drift, occlusal contacts are likely to be maintained etc.
  • Increased success of restorations: excessive wear, fractures, cracks are less commonly observed where there is an ideal occlusion
  • Better aesthetics: when the anterior teeth conform to ideal occlusal function and stability, the best aesthetic result is achieved

Simple occlusal adjustment

[edit]

Involves simply grinding down involved cusps or restorations and may be indicated after careful examination when:

  • Overloading of occlusal forces has resulted in pain, tooth fracture or mobility
  • Interocclusal space is required for restoration provision (e.g. in the case of an overerupted tooth where occlusal plane corrections required)

Complex occlusal adjustment or reorganisation

[edit]

May be required in more severe circumstances and some examples of these include:

  • Elimination of an anterior thrust causing pain, wear, drifting or mobility
  • To provide space for anterior restorations
  • Management of bruxism (however, uncommon)
  • The elimination of a temporomandibular joint disorder (however, as previously mentioned, occlusion is rarely an aetiological factor for TMD so there should be significant evidence to support this before alteration of the occlusion is pursued)

Achieving a satisfactory occlusal reorganisation involves choosing a desired jaw relationship (either conforming to existing ICP or producing a new ICP coincident with CR), deciding on the intercuspal contacts (removing deflective contacts and adjusting shapes/inclines of teeth), adjusting excursive contacts (removing interferences) and aiming for a mutually protected occlusion.[25] This is an extremely complex process and entails a clinical occlusal examination as described above, along with detailed examination of mounted study casts and diagnostic wax-ups.

Mounted study casts

[edit]

It is common practice to mount mandibular and maxillary casts (impressions are made of the teeth and poured in dental stone) in an articulator in ICP when constructing restorations that conform to the patient's existing occlusion. Casts mounted on an articulator in ICP are useful for diagnostic purposes or simple restorations, but where more extensive treatment is planned it is necessary to consider occlusal contacts relative to CR e.g. RCP -> ICP slide. Other situations a CR registration may be more appropriate than ICP include where there are plans to reorganise or adjust the existing occlusion (including changes to the occlusal vertical dimension).[25] In these circumstances, in order to accurately stimulate mandibular movement around CR (particularly opening and closing of the mouth), using a facebow transfer, the maxillary cast should be mounted in a semi-adjustable articulator and then the mandibular cast should be mounted using a CR registration. The patient's new occlusion is then arranged so that the new ICP occurs when patient is in CR.

Diagnostic wax-ups

[edit]

Wax-ups are indicated where changes to the occlusion or aesthetics are planned. Diagnostic wax-ups are when changes are made to the shapes of the teeth by methodically adding wax to the articulated stone casts representing the patient's teeth. This can be done in order to demonstrate to the patient what the planned restorations will look like, but can also be invaluable when simulating different occlusal schemes, studying the functional occlusion as well as providing temporary coverage whilst the restoration is being constructed by the lab through use of a matrix. Once an established plan has been constructed using the wax-ups, these can be used as a tool to guide the desired outcome in the mouth and provide a useful communication tool with both the dental laboratory and the patient.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , occlusion refers to the manner in which the maxillary and mandibular teeth come into contact with each other during closure and functional movements, encompassing both static and dynamic alignments. This coordination ensures the biological and functional harmony of the stomatognathic system, including the teeth, , and associated muscles. Proper occlusion is essential for efficient mastication, clear speech, aesthetic facial balance, and prevention of oral health issues such as tooth wear or temporomandibular disorders. Normal occlusion, often termed ideal or Class I occlusion, is characterized by a specific molar and canine relationship where the mesiobuccal cusp of the aligns with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar, accompanied by a 1-2 mm and , minimal crowding, and aligned midlines. It occurs in approximately 60% of the and supports optimal distribution during and , protecting periodontal structures and promoting long-term dental stability. Deviations from this, known as , affect a substantial portion of the , with worldwide estimates ranging from 50% to 90%, and can arise from genetic, environmental, or traumatic factors, potentially leading to functional impairments if untreated. Key concepts in occlusion include intercuspal position, which describes the maximal contact in a closed , and dynamic elements like protrusive and lateral excursions that influence occlusal harmony. In restorative and prosthetic , achieving balanced occlusion—defined as simultaneous bilateral contacts in centric and eccentric positions—is critical for the stability and of and implants, minimizing uneven forces that could cause failure. Overall, occlusal analysis and management form a foundational aspect of dental practice, guiding treatments from to to restore or maintain oral function.

Anatomy and Development

Masticatory System Anatomy

The masticatory system comprises the anatomical structures responsible for chewing and bite function, including the bones of the and , the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), masticatory muscles, ligaments, and periodontal tissues. These components work in concert to facilitate mandibular movements while distributing occlusal forces efficiently. The forms the upper jaw, articulating with the cranium, while the constitutes the mobile lower jaw, connected bilaterally to the temporal bones via the TMJs. The TMJ is a bilateral classified as ginglymoarthrodial, permitting both hinge-like rotation in the lower compartment and translational gliding in the upper compartment. It consists of the mandibular condyle, the of the , and an interposed articular disc—a biconcave structure that divides the joint into two synovial cavities, absorbs shocks, and enables smooth condyle-disc-fossa interactions during movements. The condyle's convex shape articulates with the disc's inferior surface, while the disc's superior surface conforms to the fossa, allowing load distribution across the joint; lubricates these interfaces and nourishes avascular tissues. In mastication, this assembly supports vertical closing forces up to several hundred newtons, primarily from muscle contractions, while maintaining joint stability. The primary —masseter, temporalis, medial pterygoid, and lateral pterygoid—originate from cranial structures and insert on the , innervated by the mandibular division of the (CN V3). The masseter, a powerful , originates from the and inserts on the mandibular ramus, generating substantial closing force for initial bite penetration. The temporalis, fanning from the to the coronoid process, elevates and retracts the , aiding in grinding motions. The medial pterygoid, from the pterygoid plate to the medial ramus, elevates and protrudes the jaw, while the lateral pterygoid, inserting on the condylar neck and disc, depresses and deviates the for lateral excursions. Accessory muscles like the digastric contribute to opening by depressing the hyoid and . These muscles enable precise three-dimensional mandibular paths, with their coordinated action distributing masticatory loads to prevent excessive joint stress. Ligaments provide passive stabilization to the TMJ and , limiting excessive motion during function. The temporomandibular ligament, a thickened lateral capsule with oblique and horizontal fibers, restricts mandibular depression and protrusion, respectively, ensuring controlled translation. The spans from the sphenoid spine to the mandibular lingula, offering medial support, while the from the styloid process to the mandibular angle curbs over-protrusion. These structures collaborate with muscles to maintain joint integrity under masticatory loads. Periodontal structures anchor teeth within the alveolar processes, comprising the periodontal ligament (PDL)—a collagenous connecting to —and associated gingival tissues. The PDL's oblique fibers dissipate occlusal forces, acting as a viscoelastic that transmits loads to the underlying while providing proprioceptive feedback via mechanoreceptors to the , refining bite position and force application. In occlusion, teeth serve as the primary load-bearing elements, with their occlusal surfaces guiding mandibular positioning; posterior molars endure higher compressive forces during , up to 500-700 N, distributed through the PDL to minimize trauma. This system integrates with the TMJ to achieve balanced force transmission across the .

Occlusal Development Stages

The development of occlusion begins prenatally with the initiation of primary tooth formation. Tooth buds for the primary start forming around the sixth week of , with crown calcification commencing between 4 and 6 months , laying the foundation for initial jaw growth and positioning. Postnatally, the primary stage spans from birth to approximately 6 years, marked by the eruption of primary teeth between 6 and 30 months of age. Eruption typically begins with the mandibular central incisors at 6-10 months, followed by maxillary central incisors at 8-12 months, and completes with the second molars by 24-33 months, establishing an ideal occlusal plane as teeth adjust through wear and functional contact. The mixed dentition period occurs from 6 to 12 years, involving the eruption of the first permanent molars and incisors alongside primary teeth, leading to significant occlusal transitions. This phase includes three subperiods: the first transitional (eruption of first molars and central incisors around age 6-7), intertransitional (lateral incisors and cuspids at 7-9 years), and second transitional (premolars and second molars at 10-12 years), during which intra-arch crowding may arise due to larger permanent incisors, and inter-arch relations often self-correct from initial Class II tendencies to Class I through mandibular molar migration. Permanent dentition is established after age 12, as the last primary teeth exfoliate and the full complement of 28 (excluding third molars) erupts, stabilizing the occlusion. By this stage, the arch form and molar relationships solidify, with third molars potentially erupting later at 17-21 years. Throughout these stages, growth influences such as mandibular advancement and maxillary expansion shape occlusal relations. The grows forward relative to the during childhood, promoting posterior occlusion development, while maxillary transverse expansion occurs primarily in the mixed to accommodate erupting teeth. Premature loss of primary teeth, particularly first molars, poses risks of space loss—averaging 0.65 mm in the and 1.24 mm in the over 6-24 months—potentially leading to crowding or shifted permanent tooth positions, though overall arch perimeter and width typically remain unaffected. Overjet and develop progressively, with normal overjet measuring 2-3 mm and 0-3 mm by age 3 in primary . In mixed , both increase significantly from ages 9-13 due to incisor eruption and growth, often resolving to stable values by permanent establishment. Angle's classifications of typically emerge and can be reliably assessed by age 12, as permanent first molars and s define anteroposterior relations, with Class I being most common in this transitional phase.

Classification and Terminology

Incisor and Molar Classifications

The classification of occlusion in dentistry primarily relies on Edward H. Angle's system, introduced in 1899, which categorizes malocclusions based on the anteroposterior relationship between the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first permanent molar and the buccal groove of the mandibular first permanent molar. This dental-focused framework serves as a foundational tool for diagnosing occlusal discrepancies and orthodontic interventions, emphasizing molar alignment as the key indicator while allowing for variations in other teeth. In Angle's Class I malocclusion, the mesiobuccal cusp of the aligns normally with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar, representing a neutral cusp-to-groove relationship; however, this class often includes associated irregularities such as crowding, spacing, or rotations of other teeth without altering the molar position. Class II malocclusion features a distal relationship of the mandibular molar relative to the maxillary one, where the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar is positioned posterior to the mesiobuccal cusp of the by at least half a cusp width; it is subdivided into Division 1, characterized by proclined maxillary incisors and increased overjet, and Division 2, marked by retroclined maxillary central incisors with possible deep . Class III malocclusion, conversely, exhibits a mesial mandibular molar position, with the mesiobuccal cusp of the falling anterior to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar, often resulting in an underbite appearance. Incisor relationships provide additional diagnostic detail within these classes, particularly for anterior alignment. Overjet refers to the horizontal overlap of the maxillary incisors over the mandibular incisors, with a normal range of 1-2 mm; values exceeding 3 mm indicate abnormal protrusion, commonly associated with Class II Division 1 malocclusions and contributing to aesthetic and functional issues. Overbite denotes the vertical overlap of the maxillary incisors over the mandibular ones, typically 1-2 mm in ideal occlusion; an overbite greater than 3 mm constitutes a deep bite, which can trap the lower lip and exacerbate wear on anterior teeth, often seen in Class II Division 2 or certain Class I cases. Molar classifications extend to the buccal segments, encompassing the posterior teeth's transverse and sagittal alignments, where discrepancies in cusp interdigitation can signal broader occlusal instability. In Class I, buccal segments maintain harmonious intercuspation, while Class II often shows distal positioning of the entire mandibular buccal segment, and Class III features mesial shifting of the mandibular buccal segments relative to the . These dental relationships may stem from underlying skeletal discrepancies, such as maxillary retrusion in Class III or mandibular retrognathia in Class II, though Angle's system primarily assesses tooth positions rather than jaw base anomalies. Note that Angle's Class I category includes both ideal normal occlusion and malocclusions featuring the normal molar relationship but with dental irregularities such as crowding or spacing. Prevalence varies by population, but the Class I molar relationship is the most common globally, affecting approximately 75% of individuals in permanent dentition, followed by Class II at around 20%, and Class III at 6%; these rates highlight the Class I relationship as the normative variant in many ethnic groups, with Class III showing higher incidence in Asian populations (up to 14% in some studies).

Core Occlusal Terms

In occlusion dentistry, core occlusal terms establish the essential framework for describing positions, contacts, and relationships independent of dynamic movements, facilitating precise and treatment planning in restorative and prosthodontic care. These terms distinguish between reproducible reference positions of the (TMJ) and habitual interdigitations, highlighting potential discrepancies that can influence masticatory function and long-term oral health. Understanding these concepts bridges static classifications of morphology with functional evaluations, emphasizing positions that minimize joint strain and optimize occlusal stability. A fundamental term is centric relation (CR), defined as a maxillomandibular relationship, independent of tooth contact, in which the condyles articulate in the anterior-superior position against the posterior slopes of the articular eminences; in this position, the mandible is restricted to a purely rotary movement and serves as a clinically useful, repeatable reference position. In contrast, centric occlusion (CO) refers to the occlusion of opposing teeth when the mandible is in centric relation, which may or may not coincide with the maximal intercuspal position. A common clinical observation is the discrepancy between CR and CO, often resulting from premature tooth contacts that guide the mandible forward or laterally; studies in orthodontic patients indicate that 85% exhibit vertical discrepancies averaging 1.3 mm (range up to 3.4 mm), while 87.5% show horizontal discrepancies averaging 0.99 mm (range up to 4.2 mm), with discrepancies up to 2 mm considered typical and clinically relevant in over half of cases. The vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), also known as occlusal vertical dimension, is the distance between two selected anatomic points (typically one on the nose tip and one on the ) when the teeth are in maximal intercuspal position, representing the lower limit of the position range and critical for maintaining height and in prosthetics. Key contact-related terms include centric stops, which are opposing cuspal-fossae contacts that seat the teeth and maintain the VDO between arches during closure in CR. In lateral excursions, working side contacts occur on the side toward which the moves (laterotrusion), supporting efficient mastication, while non-working side contacts (formerly balancing side) arise on the opposite side and can contribute to stability or interferences if excessive. Protrusive guidance involves anterior contacts that direct mandibular protrusion smoothly, minimizing posterior interferences, though the underlying protrusive relation simply denotes the 's forward position relative to the maxillae. Historically, occlusal terminology has evolved to differentiate patient-preferred positions from ideal therapeutic ones. Habitual occlusion describes the patient's normal or preferred bite, which may deviate from CR or maximal intercuspation due to or wear, potentially leading to adaptive but suboptimal function. Conversely, therapeutic occlusion is an engineered arrangement aimed at optimizing the health of the masticatory system, including the TMJ, muscles, and , often prioritizing CR for reproducibility in treatment. The following table provides a concise glossary of 14 core occlusal terms, drawn from standardized prosthodontic nomenclature, to encapsulate these concepts:
TermDefinition
Centric Relation (CR)A maxillomandibular relationship, independent of tooth contact, in which the condyles articulate in the anterior-superior position against the posterior slopes of the articular eminences; restricted to rotary movement; a repeatable reference position.
Centric Occlusion (CO)The occlusion of opposing teeth when the mandible is in centric relation; may or may not coincide with maximal intercuspal position.
Vertical Dimension of Occlusion (VDO)Distance between selected anatomic points (e.g., nose tip to chin) in maximal intercuspal position; synonymous with occlusal vertical dimension.
Centric StopsOpposing cuspal-fossae contacts that maintain the occlusal vertical dimension between arches.
Working SideThe side toward which the mandible moves in a lateral excursion; also known as laterotrusion.
Non-Working SideThe side opposite the working side during lateral excursion (obsolete synonym: balancing side).
Protrusive RelationThe relation of the mandible to the maxillae when the lower jaw is protruded forward.
Habitual OcclusionThe occlusion the patient normally uses or prefers, which may not coincide with centric occlusion or maximal intercuspation.
Therapeutic OcclusionAn occlusion designed to optimize the health of the masticatory system and related structures.
Maximum Intercuspation (MI)The complete intercuspation of opposing teeth, independent of condylar position; synonymous with maximal intercuspal position.
Retruded Contact Position (RCP)The most retruded physiologic relation of the mandible to the maxillae when condyles are posterior in the glenoid fossae, from which lateral movement initiates, often at a lower vertical dimension than MI.
Intercuspal Position (ICP)The mandibular position when maxillary and mandibular teeth achieve maximum meshed occlusion; synonymous with maximal intercuspal position.
Deflective Occlusal ContactA contact that displaces a tooth, diverts the mandible from a normal closure path, or prevents maximal intercuspation; can affect mandibular movement or denture stability.
Occlusal InterferenceAny tooth contact that inhibits stable, harmonious occlusal contacts or hinders mandibular movement.

Border Movements

Border movements in refer to the extreme limits of mandibular motion, determined by the anatomical constraints of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs), ligaments, muscles, and soft tissues, which define the outermost paths of jaw excursion in various planes. These movements encompass maximum opening, protrusion, and lateral excursions, forming the boundaries within which all functional mandibular activities occur. Posselt's envelope provides a graphical representation of these border positions, typically depicted in the sagittal plane as a closed contour outlining the mandible's maximum range of motion from the incisor point. Originating from the work of Ulf Posselt in the 1950s, this envelope illustrates the trajectory starting from the retruded border position (often associated with centric relation, or CR), progressing through the intercuspal position (IP, also known as centric occlusion or CO), to edge-to-edge incisor contact, and extending to maximum opening and protrusive limits. The diagram highlights key components such as the retrusion curve, which traces the posterior limit from maximum opening back to the starting position, and the protrusive pathway, which forms the anterior boundary. Typical measurements of these border movements in healthy adults include a maximum interincisal opening of 40-50 mm, reflecting the combined and at the TMJs. Protrusive excursion generally ranges from 5-12 mm, while lateral excursions measure approximately 8-12 mm per side, allowing for Bennett movement on the working side. In clinical practice, Posselt's envelope from the 1960s remains essential for programming semi-adjustable articulators, enabling prosthodontists to replicate a patient's specific border movements for accurate occlusal reconstruction and diagnosis of discrepancies between CR and IP. This kinematic mapping ensures that restorations accommodate natural mandibular paths without inducing interferences.

Functional Aspects

Guidance Systems

Guidance systems in dental occlusion refer to the coordinated mechanisms involving morphology and function that direct mandibular movements along smooth, interference-free paths during excursive motions such as protrusion and lateral excursions. These systems ensure that occlusal contacts are predictable and protective, primarily through anterior guidance that influences the overall trajectory of jaw motion while the posterior guidance from the joints establishes vertical and horizontal limits. In natural , such guidance is vital for maintaining functional harmony between the dental arches and the masticatory musculature. The main types of occlusal guidance observed in natural dentition are canine guidance, group function, and balanced occlusion, with the first two being predominant. Canine guidance relies on the maxillary and mandibular canines to provide the primary lateral support, discluding all other teeth on the non-working side during excursions to minimize lateral forces on posteriors. In group function, multiple teeth on the working side—including canines and premolars—share the guidance load, distributing occlusal forces more evenly across the segment. Balanced occlusion, involving simultaneous contacts across both arches, is less common in intact natural teeth but can occur with wear or in specific morphologies. A fundamental principle of these guidance systems is the disclusion of non-working side posterior teeth during mandibular excursions, which safeguards the temporomandibular joints from excessive shear forces and protects teeth from premature . This anteriorly mediated separation allows efficient energy transfer for mastication while preventing deflective interferences that could disrupt joint stability. In natural , these principles evolved to optimize mastication by aligning cusps and inclines with mandibular paths, as seen in the helicoidal occlusal plane that facilitates grinding despite evolutionary facial shortening in hominids. Additionally, guidance supports through stable anterior contacts that enable precise articulation of phonemes requiring incisor and canine positioning.

Posterior and Anterior Guidance

In dental occlusion, posterior guidance refers to the role of the posterior teeth in providing lateral stability during mandibular movements through the interaction of their ramped cusps and fossae. The cusps of the maxillary posterior teeth, particularly the palatal cusps, occlude with the widened central fossae of the mandibular posterior teeth, facilitating smooth sliding and distributing lateral forces across multiple contact points. This arrangement ensures efficient load sharing via group function, where the canine, premolars, and mesiobuccal cusp of the first molar on the working side engage progressively to disclude the non-working side teeth, thereby enhancing overall occlusal stability and minimizing stress on individual teeth. Anterior guidance, in contrast, involves the incisal edges of the mandibular incisors and the canines directing protrusive and lateral mandibular paths to achieve disclusion of the posterior teeth. The mandibular incisors slide along the lingual surfaces of the maxillary incisors during protrusion, while the canines provide a steeper incline for lateral excursions, often manifesting as canine rise where the canines alone contact to separate posterior teeth. This mechanism protects the posterior from excessive horizontal forces, with the canine's prominent position leveraging due to its distance from the mandibular fulcrum. The interplay between posterior and anterior guidance establishes a balanced , often termed mutually protected occlusion, where posterior teeth absorb vertical loads in maximum intercuspation to shield the , while anterior contacts disclude the posteriors during excursive movements to prevent interferences. In group function scenarios, posterior teeth share lateral loads to support anterior control, harmonizing with condylar paths for optimal force distribution. Specific biomechanical indicators include canine rise angles typically ranging from 10 to 20 degrees, which guide excursions without overloading adjacent teeth. patterns, such as flat, shiny facets on canine inclines from consistent lateral guidance or reduced posterior from effective anterior disclusion, further reveal the functional dynamics of this interaction.

Guidance in Natural Dentition

In natural dentition, occlusal guidance typically manifests through even and simultaneous contacts of posterior teeth in centric occlusion (CO), where the mandible is in maximum intercuspation, ensuring stable load distribution across the arch. During lateral excursions, canine guidance predominates, with the canines disoccluding posterior teeth to guide mandibular movement and minimize lateral forces on molars and premolars. This pattern is observed in approximately 51% of adults with bilateral canine guidance, promoting efficient force dissipation during dynamic functions. Variations in guidance arise from adaptive changes or minor discrepancies, such as wear facets—flat, polished areas on occlusal or incisal surfaces resulting from attrition during repeated contacts—and , a palpable of teeth under occlusal load indicating premature or excessive contact. Wear facets are common on canines and incisors due to their role in excursions, reflecting long-term functional adaptation, while often signals early overload on . These features highlight subtle asymmetries, with occlusal contacts in natural often showing variations in symmetry. Functionally, effective guidance in natural protects against overload by directing forces away from posterior teeth during mastication and , where occlusal contacts generate up to 40% of maximum bite force. This mechanism reduces shear stresses on periodontal ligaments and temporomandibular joints, supporting efficient chewing cycles and preventing excessive wear or trauma. In , anterior guidance stabilizes the , integrating with posterior support to maintain balanced muscle activity. A high prevalence of guidance exists in natural , with occlusal variations common in the and often linked to initial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms like discomfort or muscle tenderness; however, the relationship between specific occlusal factors and TMD remains controversial, with suggesting multifactorial rather than direct causation. Such asymmetries, including uneven canine disclusion, have been associated with increased TMD risk in some studies, particularly in cases of sagittal or contact weight discrepancies. Early detection of these variations aids in distinguishing normal adaptation from emerging dysfunction.

Occlusal Organization

Balanced Occlusion Schemes

Balanced occlusion schemes refer to occlusal arrangements designed to achieve simultaneous contacts between maxillary and mandibular teeth during various jaw movements, primarily to enhance the stability of removable prostheses such as . These schemes were introduced in the 1920s by Victor Sears for edentulous patients, utilizing non-anatomic teeth with posterior balancing ramps or curved occlusal planes to promote even force distribution and prevent denture displacement. Bilateral balanced occlusion, the most common scheme for complete dentures, involves simultaneous occlusal contacts on both sides of the arch in and during all excursions, including protrusive and lateral movements. This arrangement distributes masticatory forces evenly across the denture-bearing mucosa, thereby minimizing tipping and rotational movements of the prosthesis bases relative to the supporting tissues. To achieve bilateral balance, posterior teeth are typically set with compensating curves—anteroposterior (Curve of Spee) and mediolateral (Curve of Monson)—and articulators are adjusted to simulate mandibular movements, often using condylar guidance angles between 30 and 60 degrees for horizontal inclination and 0 to 15 degrees for lateral settings. A variant of bilateral balanced occlusion is lingualized occlusion, which modifies the setup by having the lingual cusps of maxillary posterior teeth occlude against the central fossae of mandibular teeth, while buccal cusps provide minimal or no contact. This reduces lateral displacing forces on the denture bases, improves masticatory , and preserves esthetic positions, making it particularly suitable for patients with resorbed ridges or when using semi-anatomic teeth. Lingualized occlusion retains the stability benefits of full balanced contact while simplifying laboratory fabrication and reducing wear on prosthetic teeth. Unilateral balanced occlusion, also termed group function occlusion, achieves balanced contacts on the working side only during lateral excursions, with disclusion on the non-working side. This scheme is applied in scenarios involving removable partial dentures or fixed partial dentures opposing , where it harmonizes occlusal forces without requiring bilateral . By limiting contacts to the side of movement, unilateral balance helps distribute loads to natural teeth or implants while preventing undue stress on abutments.

Mutually Protected Occlusion

Mutually protected occlusion, also known as canine-protected occlusion, is an occlusal scheme in which the guide mandibular excursions by disoccluding the posterior teeth, thereby preventing lateral stresses on the molars and premolars during protrusive and lateral movements, while the posterior teeth provide stable support and bear the primary vertical loads in centric occlusion to shield the from excessive forces. This selective contact pattern ensures that only the , particularly the canines, make contact during eccentric movements, promoting harmonious function of the and masticatory muscles. The concept was formulated in the 1970s by Peter E. Dawson, who emphasized its role in achieving functional harmony in both natural and restored dentitions through his clinical teachings and publications, building on earlier gnathological principles. In natural dentitions, mutually protected occlusion is commonly observed in cases with ideal alignment, though prevalence varies by population and study (e.g., canine guidance, a key component, reported in 36-51% of cohorts). One key benefit of this scheme is the significant minimization of lateral forces on posterior teeth, which can reduce shear stresses by directing excursive loads to the more resilient anterior segment and potentially lowering the risk of wear, , and periodontal issues. By disoccluding the posteriors, it also helps prevent temporomandibular disorders associated with non-working side interferences. This occlusal organization is widely applied in to ensure long-term stability of crowns, bridges, and implants by replicating natural guidance patterns, and in to guide tooth alignment toward physiologic excursions that support skeletal and dental harmony. Recent digital tools, such as intraoral scanners and virtual articulators, are increasingly used to design and verify these occlusal schemes for improved precision. In contrast to balanced occlusion schemes, it prioritizes anterior disclusion over multiple posterior contacts during excursions.

Canine Guidance

Canine guidance, also known as canine disclusion or canine protection, is an occlusal scheme in which the maxillary and mandibular canine teeth provide the primary contact during lateral mandibular excursions, thereby separating or disoccluding the posterior teeth to minimize lateral forces on them. This mechanism relies on the steep inclines of the canine cusps and palatal surfaces, which guide the mandible sideways while the posterior teeth remain out of contact, promoting efficient vertical mastication and reducing stress on the and supporting structures. The steep cusp angles, typically formed by the mesial and distal inclines of the canines, ensure immediate posterior disclusion upon initiation of lateral movement, preventing shear forces that could lead to wear or damage. The anatomical features of the canines make them particularly suited for this protective role. Canines possess a long root and a robust crown with a favorable , enabling them to absorb and dissipate high occlusal forces effectively without excessive mobility. Their single, prominent cusp and concave palatal surface in the maxillary canines facilitate smooth guidance during excursions, while the periodontal ligament provides heightened proprioceptive feedback, alerting the neuromuscular system to adjust position and avoid overloading. This structural resilience positions the canines as ideal "guiding abutments" in the , capable of withstanding lateral loads that would otherwise compromise posterior teeth. In natural dentitions, canine guidance predominates in younger individuals with intact teeth, but variations occur, particularly in cases of wear or loss. As canines wear over time due to age or parafunctional habits, group function occlusion may emerge as an alternative, where multiple premolars on the working side share contacts during lateral movements instead of relying solely on the canines. This shift is more prevalent in older patients, with studies reporting overall prevalences up to 81% for group function, increasing with age as an adaptive response to maintain occlusal stability when canine integrity is compromised. Canine guidance is preferred when canines exhibit good structural condition and periodontal support, as it better isolates forces. Failure to achieve or maintain canine guidance can result in increased posterior tooth wear, as lateral forces are redistributed to molars and premolars, accelerating attrition and potential fractures. This protective element integrates into broader mutually protected occlusion strategies, emphasizing anterior guidance to shield posterior .

Interferences and Ideal Standards

Deflective Contacts

Deflective contacts in dental occlusion refer to premature or irregular contacts that divert the from its ideal path of closure, specifically from (CR) to centric occlusion (CO). These contacts occur when the condyles are seated in CR, but initial engagement causes a deflection, often resulting in a slide between retruded contact position (RCP) and intercuspal position (ICP). Types of deflective contacts include vertical deflections, characterized by minimal superior-inferior movement; horizontal deflections, involving forward translation of the ; and lateral deflections, marked by rotational shifts to one side. Detection of deflective contacts typically involves bimanual manipulation to position the in CR, followed by closure to identify premature contacts using articulating paper, which reveals off-center or heavy marks on affected teeth. Advanced methods, such as digital occlusal analysis devices like OccluSense, can quantify force distribution and confirm deflective patterns by measuring uneven loading during closure. These techniques highlight discrepancies that would otherwise go unnoticed in routine examinations. The primary effects of deflective contacts include immediate strain on the (TMJ) due to altered condylar positioning and subsequent from compensatory efforts to achieve stable occlusion. Over time, they contribute to occlusal overloading, exacerbating periodontal damage such as increased probing depths (mean 4.15 mm in affected teeth versus 3.61 mm in adjacent teeth), greater , and alveolar bone loss. Teeth with deflective contacts exhibit significantly higher occlusal forces (mean 208 units) compared to non-affected counterparts, leading to heightened risk of mobility and migration. Deflective contacts are particularly common in adults following , where occlusal instability arises from fractures, displacements, or restorative interventions that disrupt the CR-CO relationship. They can often be resolved through selective grinding, a procedure that precisely reduces high spots on occlusal surfaces to eliminate deflections and restore harmonious contact patterns. This approach, guided by articulating paper or digital tools, aims to achieve stable occlusion without excessive tooth reduction. Such interferences, if unaddressed, may contribute to broader occlusal disruptions during excursions.

Occlusal Interferences

Occlusal interferences refer to premature or excessive contacts between opposing during mandibular excursions that disrupt smooth gliding movements, leading to deviations or discomfort in dynamic occlusion. These interferences primarily occur during lateral and protrusive motions, altering the intended pathways of tooth guidance and potentially compromising masticatory efficiency. Unlike static positional issues, they manifest specifically in functional movements, where the shifts away from . The main types of occlusal interferences are classified based on the direction of mandibular movement. Working side interferences involve early or heavy contacts on the ipsilateral teeth during lateral excursions, where the mandible moves toward the side of deviation, often causing lateral shifts in the path of closure. Balancing side, or non-working side, interferences occur on the contralateral teeth during the same lateral movements, potentially leading to cross-arch deflections if not aligned with ideal guidance. Protrusive interferences arise during forward mandibular positioning, typically involving posterior teeth contacts that impede anterior guidance, resulting in immediate posterior disclusion failure. These types can often be initiated by deflective contacts in centric occlusion, exacerbating dynamic disruptions. Common causes of occlusal interferences include iatrogenic factors from dental restorations, such as high cuspal inclines or improper contouring during placement of crowns or fillings, which create disharmonic occlusal relations. Parafunctional habits, particularly , contribute by generating excessive lateral forces that wear unevenly and introduce premature contacts over time. Attrition, the progressive loss of tooth structure from tooth-to-tooth friction during normal or excessive function, further promotes interferences by flattening occlusal surfaces and altering contact points. Immediate impacts of occlusal interferences include uneven distribution of occlusal s across the , which can overload specific or supporting structures, leading to localized stress concentrations. This imbalance has been observed to cause asymmetrical contraction of periodontal ligaments, disturbing transmission to alveolar . Additionally, such interferences heighten the potential for cracks, particularly in vital posterior , where premature contacts propagate fractures from the occlusal surface through . Digital occlusal analysis using T-Scan systems quantifies these issues by measuring peaks; relative intensities exceeding balanced distributions indicate abnormalities, with high localized peaks signaling interference-related overloads. Occlusal interferences are associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), contributing to symptoms like joint pain and muscle tenderness through altered biomechanics during excursions, though multifactorial etiologies predominate in affected cases.

Ideal Occlusion Criteria

Ideal occlusion in dentistry is defined by a Class I molar and canine relationship according to Angle's classification, featuring an overjet of approximately 2 mm and an overbite of 2 mm, with simultaneous even contacts across posterior teeth in centric occlusion and no premature contacts or interferences during excursions. This configuration ensures stable intercuspation, where maxillary and mandibular teeth interlock harmoniously, supporting efficient mastication and minimizing stress on the (TMJ). In the 1950s, Hans Beyron introduced the concept of functionally optimal occlusion, shifting focus from purely morphological ideals to dynamic principles that prioritize physiologic mandibular movements and occlusal rehabilitation without forcing deviations from natural paths. His framework emphasized bilateral balance and freedom from cuspal interferences to achieve long-term functional stability, influencing subsequent standards in and . Acceptable variations within ideal occlusion include an overjet range of 2-4 mm, allowing for individual anatomical differences while maintaining overall harmony. Contemporary standards in the prioritize functional harmony over static morphological perfection, integrating neuromuscular balance to align position with muscle physiology and reduce TMJ disorders. This approach recognizes that rigid adherence to exact measurements may not suit all patients, favoring adaptable schemes that promote muscle relaxation and health. Recent advancements incorporate digital verification methods, such as intraoral scanners and occlusal analysis software, to precisely assess contact points and excursions in real-time, enhancing accuracy beyond traditional articulating paper techniques. Ideal criteria inherently avoid occlusal interferences to ensure smooth guidance.

Influencing Factors

Patient Adaptability

adaptability in dental occlusion refers to the varying capacity of individuals to tolerate and physiologically adjust to occlusal discrepancies, which directly informs clinical strategies for restorative, orthodontic, and prosthodontic interventions. This tolerance arises from the stomatognathic system's ability to compensate through sensory-motor adjustments, preventing symptoms such as or temporomandibular dysfunction in many cases. Understanding these individual differences is essential, as not all respond uniformly to occlusal alterations introduced during treatment. Key factors influencing adaptability include age, periodontal health, and neuromuscular feedback. In older adults, neuromuscular control may decline, reducing the ability to adapt to changes unless adequate posterior functional units remain intact to support mastication. is pivotal, as intact periodontal mechanoreceptors provide essential sensory input for occlusal , with interocclusal tactility thresholds ranging from 8 to 60 μm in healthy tissues; compromised diminishes this feedback, hindering . Neuromuscular integrity further modulates tolerance, enabling efficient movement reprogramming in response to discrepancies, whereas deficits impair compensatory mechanisms. Neuroplasticity serves as the core mechanism facilitating adaptation, allowing cortical reorganization in the sensorimotor areas to accommodate occlusal modifications. This process supports tolerance to centric occlusion-centric relation (CO-CR) shifts of 1-2 mm without eliciting symptoms, as evidenced by experimental models where such alterations induced reversible motor cortex changes. In clinical contexts, orthodontic patients commonly exhibit average CO-CR discrepancies of 1.3 mm vertically and 0.99 mm horizontally, with over 87% displaying these shifts yet remaining asymptomatic, underscoring the system's plasticity. Adaptation limits exist, particularly when discrepancies exceed tolerance thresholds, often triggering or dysfunction. Shifts greater than 3 mm, especially vertically, frequently surpass adaptive capacity in vulnerable patients, correlating with increased temporomandibular disorder risk. Many individuals can adapt to minor occlusal changes via sensory modulation, though outcomes vary by psychological factors; a 2023 analysis highlighted how anxiety influences motor responses and adaptation during orthodontic procedures. Symptoms from smaller interferences typically resolve within 1-2 weeks in healthy subjects through neuroplastic adjustments.

Parafunctional Influences

Parafunctional habits in refer to non-masticatory oral behaviors that impose excessive forces on the occlusal system, including , clenching, and nail-biting. encompasses both sleep and awake forms, characterized by involuntary grinding or clenching of teeth, while clenching involves sustained without significant tooth-to-tooth contact. Nail-biting, or onychophagia, introduces irregular lateral forces on . These habits affect approximately 20-30% of adults, with global prevalence estimated at 22.22%, including 21% for sleep and 23% for awake . Nail-biting occurs in about 20% of adults, often persisting from childhood and contributing to uneven occlusal loading. These habits lead to accelerated tooth wear, particularly on occlusal surfaces and incisal edges, resulting from repetitive high-impact forces that exceed normal masticatory loads. In cases of , enamel attrition can progress to exposure, altering occlusal morphology and potentially causing . Joint remodeling in the (TMJ) occurs due to chronic overload, leading to adaptive changes such as condylar flattening or osteoarthritic alterations over time. Parafunctional activities contribute to prosthetic complications, including ceramic fractures and debonding. Recent research from 2024-2025 highlights the link between sleep and occlusal alterations, though evidence on the association with wear facets remains mixed, with some studies showing no significant differences between affected individuals and controls. Electromyographic (EMG) monitoring has emerged as a key diagnostic tool for quantifying , capturing muscle hyperactivity patterns during sleep or wakefulness to confirm and guide interventions. Management of parafunctional influences often includes occlusal splints to protect and redistribute forces, reducing wear and fracture risks during episodes of or clenching. These appliances, such as stabilization splints, provide a uniform occlusal scheme that minimizes eccentric loading and promotes muscle relaxation. While patient adaptability can influence the severity of these effects, parafunctional habits often overwhelm baseline tolerance mechanisms in susceptible individuals.

Examination Protocols

Extra-oral Evaluation

Extra-oral evaluation forms a critical initial step in assessing occlusion by examining the (TMJ), associated musculature, and facial structures for signs of dysfunction that may influence jaw relationships. This non-invasive assessment helps identify potential occlusal interferences originating from joint or muscle issues before proceeding to intra-oral examinations. is a primary method, involving gentle digital pressure on the TMJ (both laterally and posteriorly via the external auditory canal) and , such as the masseter, temporalis, and medial pterygoid, to detect tenderness or pain. complements this by listening for joint sounds like clicks or during jaw movements, which can indicate disc displacement or degenerative changes. is evaluated visually and by , checking for deviations in the mandibular midline or asymmetry in the contours of the cheeks and jawline that might suggest skeletal discrepancies affecting occlusion. Key signs observed include tenderness upon , which may localize to one or both TMJs or specific muscles, indicating or overload; deviations in jaw opening, where the veers laterally during excursion; and midline shifts, where the mandibular midline does not align with the facial midline at rest or during function. These findings can correlate with occlusal patterns but require intra-oral confirmation. Tools for quantification include a millimeter or caliper to measure maximum mouth opening, defined as the vertical from the incisal edge of the to the mandibular incisor at full , with normal ranges typically 40-60 mm in adults. Notably, up to 50% of asymptomatic adults exhibit TMJ sounds during , underscoring the need to differentiate benign findings from clinically significant ones.

Intra-oral Evaluation

Intra-oral evaluation involves direct inspection and within the oral cavity to assess occlusal relationships, contacts, and discrepancies that may indicate disharmony. This process begins with measuring key parameters such as overjet and using a millimeter positioned against the lower incisors to quantify the horizontal protrusion of maxillary incisors (normal overjet: 1-2 mm) and vertical overlap (normal : 1-2 mm), helping identify Class II or III malocclusions. Visual examination also notes facets, fractures, or restorations that could influence occlusal stability. Articulating paper, typically 40 μm thick, is a primary technique for marking occlusal contacts during closure in maximum intercuspal position (MIP), protrusion, and lateral excursions; the patient performs repeated opening and closing movements while the paper is inserted between arches, revealing high spots or interferences via ink marks. Shim stock foil, measuring 8 microns in thickness, complements this by testing evenness of contacts; in normal occlusion, it should be retained lightly across multiple posterior (at least four to six) and removable with minimal resistance using cotton , indicating balanced forces without excessive loading on any single . Bimanual manipulation guides the into (CR) by stabilizing the patient's head with both hands and gently seating the condyles in the glenoid fossae while the teeth are slightly apart; the patient then closes to identify initial contacts, ensuring reproducible positioning for accurate occlusal assessment. During closure, clinicians observe for abnormal patterns such as rocking (bilateral seesaw movement due to posterior interferences) or sliding (forward or lateral deviation from CR to MIP, often 1-2 mm), which can signal premature contacts or adaptive shifts. Fremitus testing detects vibrational mobility by placing an index finger on maxillary anterior while the patient taps posteriorly; palpable movement suggests , particularly on canines or incisors. is evaluated separately using two instruments (e.g., mirror handles) to rock the buccolingually and mesiodistally; degree I (slight) to III (severe) mobility may relate to occlusal overload if exceeding periodontal norms. In the 2020s, digital intraoral scanners like the Medit i700 have emerged for occlusal evaluation, capturing static and dynamic contacts at 40 μm sensitivity via software analysis of arch scans and movements, offering higher precision than traditional paper in some cases but fewer detected contacts posteriorly. These tools enhance intra-oral assessments by providing quantifiable data on force distribution and timing, complementing manual techniques.

Occlusal Assessment Summary

The occlusal assessment summary involves integrating data from extra-oral and intra-oral evaluations to form a cohesive diagnostic overview, classifying occlusal relationships such as molar and canine classifications, interference types (e.g., working or non-working interferences), and overall stability in versus maximum intercuspation. This synthesis identifies discrepancies like malocclusions or disharmonies that may contribute to functional instability, emphasizing the correlation between facial asymmetry, (TMJ) findings, and intra-oral tooth alignments to predict potential long-term impacts on oral health-related . According to the American Academy of (AAOP) guidelines (7th edition, 2023), this process prioritizes functional assessments—such as dynamic contacts during lateral excursions and protrusive movements—over static evaluations to better capture real-world occlusal dynamics and avoid over-reliance on resting positions. Risk stratification in occlusal assessment categorizes patients based on TMD susceptibility, with low-risk profiles indicated by stable occlusal schemes, minimal interferences, and adaptive parafunctional habits, while high-risk cases feature multiple quadrants, Class II or III malocclusions, or significant overjet/ that exacerbate joint loading and correlate with increased TMD symptoms like and limited . For instance, more than two quadrants of elevates TMD risk (p < 0.001), necessitating closer monitoring, whereas isolated static discrepancies without functional symptoms suggest adaptability and lower intervention urgency. The 2023 AAOP protocols recommend stratifying based on combined occlusal and musculoskeletal data to guide conservative management, highlighting that dynamic factors like absence of canine guidance pose greater TMD threats than static ones. Documentation of occlusal assessments typically includes detailed charts recording interference locations, wear facets, presence, and mobility indices, supplemented by intra-oral photographs and articulating markings to visually capture functional pathways. Study casts and radiographs provide baseline references for serial comparisons, ensuring of changes in occlusal stability over time as per standard guidelines. This comprehensive recording facilitates interdisciplinary communication and supports evidence-based decisions without delving into therapeutic specifics.

Clinical Applications

Simple Adjustments

Simple adjustments in occlusal therapy involve minimally invasive techniques to correct minor discrepancies in tooth contacts, aiming to harmonize the bite without extensive restorative work. These procedures are particularly suited for patients exhibiting mild symptoms related to occlusal interferences identified during routine examinations. By targeting enamel surfaces only, they preserve tooth vitality and structure while promoting even distribution of occlusal forces. Key techniques include selective enamel reduction and cusp beveling. Selective enamel reduction entails the precise removal of small amounts of enamel (typically 0.2-0.5 mm) from high spots or interfering cusps to eliminate premature contacts. Cusp beveling, on the other hand, involves gently sloping the inclines of cusp tips or marginal ridges to create smoother pathways for mandibular movement, ensuring stable centric and excursive contacts. These methods are performed using fine burs or finishing points to maintain enamel integrity and avoid deeper dentin involvement. Indications for simple adjustments primarily encompass deflective contacts and light interferences. Deflective contacts occur when a tooth prematurely guides the away from its ideal position, often causing a slide greater than 1 mm, which can lead to or joint strain. Light interferences, such as those in working or balancing excursions, manifest as subtle catches during lateral movements, potentially contributing to discomfort without severe . These are confirmed through intraoral evaluation using articulating paper to mark high points. The procedure follows a structured sequence: first, mark interferences by having the patient close in while applying to reveal premature contacts as distinct red or blue spots. Next, grind selectively at these marked areas, removing minimal enamel until even contacts are achieved across the arch, guided by repeated checks. Finally, verify the adjustment by assessing smooth excursions and bilateral simultaneous contacts, polishing the altered surfaces to prevent sensitivity. This conservative approach avoids pulp exposure by limiting reductions to superficial enamel layers. Clinical outcomes demonstrate high efficacy, with 70-80% of patients experiencing reduced symptoms such as headaches or muscle tenderness following these adjustments, particularly when preceded by occlusal to confirm indications. Long-term relies on patient compliance and absence of parafunctional habits, underscoring the importance of follow-up evaluations.

Complex Reorganizations

Complex reorganizations represent extensive occlusal redesigns indicated for severe cases involving widespread tooth wear, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), or temporomandibular disorders (TMD), where simple adjustments cannot suffice. These interventions aim to reconstruct the entire occlusal scheme around a physiologically optimal condylar position, typically (CR), to restore harmonious function across the stomatognathic system, including teeth, muscles, and joints. By addressing systemic imbalances, such procedures enhance masticatory efficiency, esthetics, and long-term periodontal health while mitigating parafunctional overload. Primary approaches include full-mouth equilibration and the strategic placement of crowns and bridges in a new centric occlusion (CO) derived from CR. Full-mouth equilibration entails selective grinding of tooth surfaces to eliminate premature contacts, deflective interferences, and uneven force distribution, thereby achieving balanced occlusion in both centric and eccentric positions. This method is particularly useful in cases of severe bruxism or malocclusion, promoting even cuspal wear and reducing lateral stresses on restorations. Crown and bridge placement in a reorganized CO involves fabricating fixed prosthetics that conform to an adjusted occlusal plane, often incorporating canine guidance or group function schemes to ensure anterior protection and posterior stability during mandibular excursions. Critical considerations encompass VDO maintenance and TMJ health to avoid complications such as , joint pain, or prosthetic failure. VDO is preserved or re-established through precise measurements, including freeway space evaluation (typically 2-4 mm) and diagnostic wax-ups, ensuring sufficient restorative space without compromising aesthetics or patterns. Over-reduction of VDO can lead to pseudoprognathism, while excessive increase may strain the TMJ; thus, gradual adaptation via provisional appliances is essential. TMJ health is safeguarded by positioning the condyles in the most retruded, unstrained location (CR), which distributes occlusal loads evenly and prevents degenerative changes. The procedure unfolds in structured phases, commencing with joint deprogramming to disrupt neuromuscular patterns and habitual centric occlusion. This is accomplished using full-coverage occlusal splints worn for 2-6 weeks, allowing muscles to relax and condyles to seat superiorly in the . Following deprogramming, CR is established via techniques such as bimanual guidance or chin-point registration, verified on a semi-adjustable to simulate mandibular movements. Subsequent phases include diagnostic setups for provisional restorations, which test the proposed occlusion for comfort and function over 4-8 weeks, culminating in definitive prosthetic delivery with periodic equilibration to refine contacts. Complex reorganizations are indicated for advanced occlusal discrepancies, particularly in patients with chronic wear or TMD. Long-term stability reaches about 85% when guided by evidence-based protocols, as posterior occlusal contacts re-establish reliably and restorations exhibit high survival rates with harmonious CR-based designs.

Analog Diagnostic Tools

Analog diagnostic tools in occlusion dentistry rely on physical replicas of the patient's dentition, primarily stone casts mounted on mechanical articulators, to evaluate and simulate occlusal relationships. These tools enable clinicians to replicate movements outside the oral environment, facilitating detailed analysis of static and dynamic occlusion without patient discomfort. Originating in the late , such methods remain integral to diagnostic workflows, particularly for prosthodontic planning and occlusal adjustments. The process begins with obtaining impressions using irreversible hydrocolloid materials like alginate, which are poured into dental stone (typically ADA Type IV or V) to create durable casts within 15 minutes of mixing to ensure accuracy. These casts are then mounted on semi-adjustable articulators, which approximate condylar path inclinations and Bennett movements. A critical step involves the facebow transfer, an instrument introduced by George B. Snow in 1899 alongside the Gritman articulator, that records the maxillary arch's position relative to the temporomandibular joint's hinge axis, minimizing errors in cast orientation—arbitrary facebows introduce about 5 mm of potential inaccuracy, while kinematic variants provide precise recordings. This mounting allows for unencumbered visualization of the occlusal plane, tooth alignments, and edentulous spaces. Mounted casts serve key diagnostic uses, including simulating mandibular excursions—protrusive, lateral, and retrusive movements—to detect premature contacts or interferences that may contribute to occlusal disharmonies. Clinicians can perform wax try-ins on these models to prototype restorations, rehearse preparations, and predict functional outcomes, such as those in fixed partial dentures or . This hands-on approach supports selective grinding simulations and enhances treatment planning by revealing relationships obscured in the , like posterior molar contacts. The advantages of these tools include superior tactile feedback during manipulation, allowing direct and adjustment of models to assess occlusal intuitively. They also offer cost-effectiveness, requiring minimal equipment investment, and promote by visually demonstrating issues like interferences. Despite digital advancements, analog methods persist as a standard in many practices; surveys indicate that approximately 64% of dentists employ simple or semi-adjustable articulators routinely, underscoring their reliability for routine diagnostics.

Digital Occlusion Technologies

Digital occlusion technologies in have advanced significantly since 2020, integrating high-resolution imaging and computational simulations to enhance occlusal analysis and treatment planning. , such as the TRIOS series, capture 3D dental models with precision down to 15-20 microns, enabling accurate static and dynamic evaluations of occlusal contacts without physical impressions. Virtual articulators, implemented in software like Exocad and , simulate mandibular movements using patient-specific data from IOS, facial scans, and (CBCT), allowing for individualized adjustments that surpass default programming for prosthodontic and orthodontic applications. Complementing these, the T-Scan III system provides real-time digital analysis of occlusal force distribution and timing, detecting interferences with a sensitivity that identifies up to 15% more discordances than traditional articulating paper, particularly in fixed restorations like molar crowns. Contemporary workflows leverage these tools for seamless integration in restorative and rehabilitative procedures. CAD/CAM systems facilitate the design and milling of occlusal surfaces in restorations, such as zirconia crowns, by incorporating virtual occlusal records to ensure harmonious force distribution and minimize adjustments. 4D jaw motion tracking, exemplified by systems like Modjaw, records real-time mandibular during mastication and speech, superimposing dynamic data onto 3D models for predictive simulations in full-mouth rehabilitations. AI-driven occlusal analysis further refines these processes, with algorithms adjusting virtual contacts to improve trueness in implant-supported prostheses, particularly in partial edentulism scenarios using scanners like TRIOS 5, where accuracy enhancements are statistically significant (P < 0.01). These technologies offer substantial clinical benefits, including sub-50-micron precision in occlusal mapping that aligns with natural micromovements (10-50 microns for ) and reduces errors in prosthetic fit. Digital workflows have been shown to decrease chair time by approximately 40% in fabrication and full-arch cases, streamlining visits and improving patient comfort through fewer invasive steps. From 2023 to 2025, integrations of 4D patient avatars—dynamic 3D models capturing jaw motion—with electromyography (EMG) have enabled predictive assessments of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), identifying muscle imbalances associated with bruxism and malocclusion for proactive interventions. Meta-analyses of digital verification in implantology report survival rates exceeding 97% over multi-year follow-ups, attributed to precise occlusal guidance that limits bone loss to under 1 mm.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.