Hubbry Logo
Donald FindlayDonald FindlayMain
Open search
Donald Findlay
Community hub
Donald Findlay
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Donald Findlay
Donald Findlay
Donald Findlay
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Donald Russell Findlay[1] KC (born 17 March 1951) is a Scottish advocate. He has also held positions as a vice-chairman of Rangers Football Club and twice Rector of the University of St Andrews. He is now chairman of his hometown football club Cowdenbeath.

Key Information

He is well known for a distinctive style of dress and manner, particularly the smoking of a pipe, as well as his staunch support for Unionism in Scotland and the Scottish Conservatives. He has faced some controversy over several incidents where he sang songs and told allegedly sectarian jokes.[7]

Early life

[edit]

Findlay was born on 17 March 1951 in Cowdenbeath, Fife, the son of a church beadle. He was subsequently educated at Harris Academy in Dundee, and later at the University of Dundee and at the University of Glasgow.

As a boy, Findlay was influenced to become a lawyer by following the trial of Peter Manuel and by watching the TV series Boyd Q.C..[8]

Career

[edit]

A combination of high-profile controversies, acute legal skills and a well-cultivated image has generated Findlay a lot of coverage in the Scottish press in recent years and he now has one of the highest legal profiles in Scotland and widely considered to be Scotland's premier criminal law advocate.[9] He took silk, becoming a King's Counsel in 1988,[10] but his behaviour has been censured by the Faculty of Advocates on more than one occasion (see below). He has served as a defence lawyer in many high-profile murder cases including Jodi Jones, Mark Scott and the Kriss Donald murder trials. He represented Peter Tobin, the murderer of Angelika Kluk in the so-called "body in the church" case.[11] Findlay is a member of the Optimum Advocates.

At present, he is also a noted after-dinner speaker[9] and in 1997 was a high-profile campaigner on behalf of the unsuccessful Think Twice campaign which supported a double-no vote in the Scottish devolution referendum.

In 2006, he was a defence counsel in the trial of Mohammed Atif Siddique, which saw the youth sentenced to eight years' imprisonment for collecting and sharing online information about terrorists. Donald Findlay successfully appealed this conviction in January 2010. In April 2010 following an eight-week trial he secured the acquittal of the English solicitor Marshall Ronald in the infamous Da Vinci recovery trial.

He also achieved the acquittal, on a technicality, of William Beggs who had been convicted of the murder of Barry Oldham. Beggs went on to attack others including Barry Wallace, the victim of murder in the "Limbs in the Loch" case.[12]

Glasgow based newspaper Daily Record reported that Donald Findlay was one of the highest paid lawyers in 2007, earning £350,000 from his high-profile cases.

In June 2010 Findlay was elected chairman of the Faculty of Advocates Criminal Bar Association.[13]

Personal life

[edit]

Findlay's academic links with the University of St Andrews (of which Dundee was once part) saw him elected as Lord Rector in 1993 and again in 1996. After his retirement from this position, he took the position of Chancellor of the University's Strafford Club. St Andrews, allegedly, dropped plans to award him an honorary degree after one of his controversial outbursts, most notably being caught on film singing sectarian songs. At this time, he was also noted to be suffering from severe depression and later revealed that he had contemplated suicide.[14]

In the mid-1990s he left his third wife Jennie to set up house with the Reporting Scotland television reporter Paddy Christie. This relationship later foundered.[15]

In May 2011, Findlay was sent a parcel in the post to Cowdenbeath football club where he is chairman.[16] Initially it was thought to contain a bomb but it was later revealed to contain a knife.[16]

Findlay is an atheist,[9] but is mostly noted in Scotland for his support of Rangers, a historically Protestant football club, and for engaging in controversial behaviour that has been widely interpreted as being anti-Catholic in nature.[2][3][4][5][6][17] In May 1999 he was accused of sectarianism, after being filmed singing The Sash at a private party organised by a Rangers Supporters Club.[18] For his role in this event, Findlay resigned from the board of the club.[19] After this incident Findlay admitted to feeling so pursued by the media portrayal of him that he had even considered suicide.[20]

In May 2005, shortly after the death of Pope John Paul II, while speaking at Larne Rangers Social Club in Northern Ireland he said "It's very smoky in here tonight – has another f***ing Pope died?" The Scotsman reported that he went on to tell a vulgar joke about a nun, while The Herald reported that his routine was "alleged to have been littered with obscenities and jokes about Catholics" although Findlay has stated that he also made jokes about Protestantism and about the Protestant clergyman and politician Ian Paisley.[21] It is believed that the Faculty of Advocates passed a vote of no confidence on him following the controversy over his comments.[22] He was also fined £3,500 by the Faculty of Advocates.

Findlay was cleared of an allegation of misconduct before the Faculty of Advocates in 2007[23] following a complaint regarding his conduct at the Rangers Supporters Club in Larne and contribution to a book entitled How Soccer Explains The World – An Unlikely Theory of Globalisation.[24]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Donald Findlay

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Donald Russell Findlay KC (born 17 March 1951) is a Scottish advocate renowned for his extensive practice as a criminal defence lawyer, handling high-profile cases over more than four decades. Educated at Harris Academy in Dundee, the University of Dundee, and the University of Glasgow, he was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in 1975 and has been recognized as one of Scotland's preeminent defence counsel. Findlay has served in prominent roles beyond the courtroom, including as vice-chairman of Rangers F.C. until his resignation in 1999, chairman of Cowdenbeath F.C., and Rector of the University of St Andrews from 1993 to 1999. His public profile includes controversies stemming from expressions of Protestant loyalist sentiments, such as being filmed in 1999 singing songs like The Sash—an Orange Order anthem—and Follow Follow at a Rangers celebration, which prompted backlash, a fine from the Law Society of Scotland, and his departure from the Rangers board despite defenses of cultural tradition over bigotry.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Donald Findlay was born on 17 March 1951 in , , , to a working-class family in a former mining community. His father served as a church beadle, a role indicative of the family's Protestant heritage and involvement in local Presbyterian traditions amid 's sectarian cultural landscape. The family resided initially at 171 Perth Road in , adjacent to a jelly factory, before relocating when Findlay was around six or seven years old. This early environment, characterized by industrial grit and community solidarity, instilled values of resilience, as Findlay later reflected on his father's sharp intellect thwarted by socioeconomic constraints in post-war . Findlay's formative exposure to legal concepts came through popular media and notable events; as a young child, he was drawn to the courtroom drama of the 1950s television series Boyd Q.C., viewed on the family's bulky set with its small screen. Concurrently, the sensational 1958 trial of in heightened his fascination with , mirroring the era's public engrossment in high-stakes advocacy.

Academic and Professional Training

Findlay studied law at the , obtaining his (LLB) degree in the early 1970s. Following his university education, he undertook the standard training pathway for aspiring Scottish lawyers, which at the time involved an with a firm of solicitors to gain practical experience in legal practice before pursuing . This preparatory phase equipped him with foundational skills in areas such as , litigation preparation, and client advisory work, as was typical for those transitioning from solicitor training to the bar. In 1975, Findlay was admitted as an to the Scottish Bar through the Faculty of Advocates, a process that demanded successful completion of rigorous entrance examinations in legal subjects and a period of devilry—supervised practical training akin to —under an established advocate. The Faculty's selection criteria emphasize intellectual aptitude, ethical standards, and courtroom readiness, ensuring only a limited number of candidates advance annually to maintain the profession's exacting standards.

Admission to the Bar and Early Cases

Findlay was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in Scotland in 1975, marking the start of his professional career as an advocate specializing in criminal defense. Following admission, he concentrated on criminal law matters, developing proficiency in common law offenses such as murder, assault, and theft, which form the core of Scotland's indictable crime framework under its mixed legal system. Over the subsequent decade, Findlay handled a substantial volume of criminal cases in the and sheriff courts, gaining recognition among peers for meticulous case preparation, including detailed scrutiny of evidence and witness testimonies. This early workload established his courtroom reputation for commanding presence and persuasive advocacy, attributes noted by contemporaries as instrumental to his rapid professional ascent. In 1988, Findlay was appointed Queen's Counsel (QC), a distinction awarded by the Lord Justice General on recommendation from the Faculty of Advocates, reflecting acknowledgment of his expertise and standing after approximately 13 years of practice. The silk appointment enabled him to lead more complex defenses and underscored his foundational command of procedural and substantive principles.

High-Profile Criminal Defenses

Findlay has defended clients in numerous high-profile murder and culpable homicide trials, earning recognition for his rigorous examination of prosecution evidence and exploitation of Scottish legal verdicts such as "." One of his most notable successes occurred in the 1992 trial of Paul Ferris, accused of the gangland murder of Arthur Thompson Jr. in 1991, along with six other charges including ; after a 54-day trial in —the longest and most expensive in Scottish history at £4 million—Ferris was acquitted on all counts, with Findlay's of over 300 witnesses credited for undermining the Crown's case reliant on informant . In another significant case, Findlay represented Alan Morrison in 2002 for the alleged murder of his infant son Alan on October 7, 1998, by shaking; the jury returned a not guilty verdict after Findlay challenged the forensic and medical evidence linking the father's actions to the child's death, highlighting inconsistencies in expert testimony on . More recently, in the 2020 High Court trial of Callum Owens for the of 13-year-old Grace Handling, Findlay secured a "not proven" verdict by rigorously probing witness reliability and evidential gaps, later defending the verdict's utility in cases of doubt despite public criticism. These outcomes underscore Findlay's mastery of Scotland's three-verdict system, where "not proven" allows juries to express insufficient proof without full . Findlay's approach in such trials emphasizes adaptive without notes, starting with measured questioning to build before intensifying to expose contradictions, as seen in his handling of hostile witnesses in prosecutions. He prioritizes empirical scrutiny of , forensic reports, and alibis, often dismantling prosecution narratives through logical inconsistencies rather than character attacks, a method he attributes to ensuring procedural fairness even in overwhelming cases. This tactical precision has positioned him as having defended more accused than any other Scottish advocate.

Professional Milestones and Recognition

Donald Findlay was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in 1975, commencing a distinguished career in Scottish that reached 50 years by July 2025. He attained the rank of Queen's Counsel in 1988, a designation reflecting his standing among senior advocates specializing in complex . In 1993, Findlay was elected Rector of the University of St Andrews, serving until 1999 and engaging in the institution's governance and student advocacy during that period. He later assumed leadership roles within the profession, including election as Chairman of the Faculty of Advocates Criminal Bar Association in June 2010, where he represented interests of criminal practitioners amid evolving legal aid and procedural challenges. Findlay holds the distinction of Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts (F.R.S.A.), underscoring broader recognition of his contributions to professional discourse. Throughout his tenure, he has been acknowledged by legal peers and media as possessing unrivalled expertise in forensic applications to criminal trials, honed over thousands of cases.

Controversies

1999 Sectarian Songs Incident

In late May 1999, shortly after Rangers Football Club's victory in the Scottish Cup final, Donald Findlay, then the club's vice-chairman, attended a private end-of-season celebration at a Glasgow hotel. During the event, he was secretly filmed leading players and supporters in singing "The Sash," a traditional Protestant anthem, along with a medley of other songs containing lyrics widely interpreted as anti-Catholic, such as references to the Famine Song. The amateur video, captured without Findlay's knowledge, was subsequently passed to the Daily Record newspaper. The Daily Record published the story on 31 May 1999, igniting immediate public outrage across , where longstanding Protestant-Catholic divides, particularly between Rangers and Celtic supporters, remain sensitive. Media outlets, including the and , covered the incident extensively, framing it as emblematic of persistent in Scottish football and , with critics decrying Findlay's behavior as unbecoming of a prominent Queen's Counsel and public figure. Calls emerged for his from the , citing potential damage to the Faculty of Advocates' reputation. Findlay resigned as Rangers vice-chairman later that day, 31 May 1999, stating that his actions had embarrassed the club. No criminal charges were filed, and while the Faculty of Advocates launched an investigation into professional misconduct, initial responses focused on reputational fallout rather than immediate formal sanctions, allowing Findlay to continue his legal practice pending review.

Orange Order Involvement and Public Criticism

In May 1999, following Rangers Football Club's victory in the and , Donald Findlay, then vice-chairman of the club, attended a private celebratory party organized by a Rangers supporters' group in . During the event, he was secretly filmed singing "The Sash," a traditional Protestant anthem closely associated with the , which commemorates the 1690 and symbolizes Ulster Protestant heritage. He also performed "," a Rangers supporters' song containing lyrics interpreted by critics as anti-Catholic, such as references to "Fenian blood." This footage, leaked to the media, symbolized Findlay's affinity for cultural expressions, prompting immediate condemnation for allegedly endorsing sectarian division in a modern, multicultural . The incident drew sharp rebukes from institutional elites, including Rangers' owner David Murray, who demanded Findlay's resignation from the vice-chairmanship on May 30, 1999, citing damage to the club's image amid efforts to distance itself from religious bigotry. The Faculty of Advocates, Scotland's professional body for barristers, investigated Findlay for professional misconduct, resulting in a £3,500 fine in November 1999 for breaching standards of conduct expected of a Queen's Counsel. Media outlets, including outlets with established progressive leanings, framed the episode as evidence of entrenched Protestant supremacism, amplifying calls for Findlay to step back from public roles despite his prominence as a Tory supporter and defender in high-profile cases. Critics argued that such displays by a figure of Findlay's stature normalized hatred toward Catholics and Irish nationalists, exacerbating Scotland's historic tribal divides rather than fostering integration. Findlay's defenders, including some within Rangers supporter circles, contended that the response represented an overreach by establishment bodies intolerant of private expressions of cultural loyalty to Protestant traditions, which they viewed as benign rather than active . He issued an unreserved apology through his lawyers, acknowledging a "serious error of judgment" in a personal context, but emphasized that his actions did not reflect professional bias or impair his ability to represent clients impartially. The controversy highlighted tensions between preserving historic symbols of Unionist identity—often marginalized in —and accusations of fostering exclusion, with Findlay's case illustrating disproportionate applied to Protestant-affiliated expressions compared to analogous Irish republican anthems. No formal membership has been publicly confirmed for Findlay, though the anthem's performance underscored his alignment with its cultural ethos amid broader criticism of the organization's influence in Scottish football.

Broader Accusations of Sectarianism

In 2005, Findlay faced criticism for telling a joke about the recently deceased during a speech at a Rangers supporters' club dinner in . The remark, described by witnesses as involving anti-Catholic elements, prompted calls for his from the position of treasurer at the Scottish Council of Law Reporting, though he ultimately retained the role amid debates over free speech. Findlay defended the incident by stating that he had repeated similar jokes at the same event for several years without prior complaint, framing it as longstanding banter within a specific cultural context rather than targeted malice. Further allegations surfaced in 2007 when Findlay was reported to the Faculty of Advocates for telling two jokes deemed sectarian at another Rangers supporters' club function, one involving simulated pipe smoke and coughing in reference to a , and another referencing the . He denied the jokes were offensive, arguing they did not meet the threshold for professional misconduct and invoking protections for expression. A ultimately cleared him, finding insufficient evidence of unacceptable behavior, despite media portrayals highlighting Scotland's entrenched Protestant-Catholic divides as a backdrop for such scrutiny. These episodes drew attention to a pattern of reported sectarian humor in Findlay's social engagements with Rangers-affiliated groups, yet no formal complaints emerged from his clients—many of whom included individuals from diverse religious backgrounds in high-stakes criminal defenses—indicating that professional relationships remained unaffected by the public controversies. Critics attributed this absence to selective media focus on Protestant expressions amid broader Scottish sectarian tensions, where similar Catholic-oriented rhetoric often evaded equivalent outrage, while Findlay and supporters contended that such jokes reflected historical cultural friction rather than . No disciplinary fines or suspensions resulted from the 2005 or 2007 incidents, contrasting with the 1999 penalty and underscoring inconsistencies in enforcement against private utterances in a society still grappling with legacy divisions from Ulster-linked migrations.

Personal Life and Reflections

Family and Private Life

Findlay has maintained a low public profile regarding his family and personal relationships, with limited verifiable details emerging despite his prominence in Scottish legal circles. He was married to Jenny until the mid-1990s, when their separation attracted media attention as he began a relationship with Paddy Christie, a BBC Scotland reporter. The relationship with Christie, which lasted approximately five years from around 1994 to 1999, also drew publicity but ended without further reported personal entanglements. No confirmed or reports indicate whether Findlay has children, reflecting his evident preference for discretion in private matters amid a career marked by intense scrutiny. This approach aligns with a broader pattern of shielding non-professional aspects of his life from media intrusion, with no subsequent personal scandals documented in reputable sources. In a 2019 , Donald Findlay described the emotional strain of his defence work as occasionally distressing, particularly when reviewing involving extreme violence such as cases with dead children. He noted that after more than 40 years handling such material, the cumulative exposure required deliberate emotional hardening to maintain objectivity. Findlay reported experiencing persistent worry during trials, often carrying the burden home and second-guessing his performance following convictions, which underscored the psychological demands of high-stakes criminal . This self-reported anxiety highlighted the challenge of compartmentalizing professional responsibilities amid intense scrutiny. Reflecting on the broader human cost, he characterized "man’s inhumanity to man" as seemingly endless, necessitating a detached view of horrific details as mere to endure the role without burnout. Despite these pressures, Findlay emphasized resilience through professional discipline, viewing such fortitude as essential for sustained effectiveness in defence practice.

Views on Justice and Society

Critiques of Political Interference

In July 2023, Donald Findlay publicly accused the (SNP) government of pursuing system reforms primarily for "simple vote-gathering," thereby eroding established legal standards without substantive justification. He specifically criticized proposals to abolish the "not proven" verdict—one of Scotland's three possible outcomes alongside guilty and not guilty—asserting that the change lacked empirical grounding and risked undermining protections against miscarriages of . Findlay contended that these reforms, including broader alterations to court procedures, reflected a politicization of the judiciary where ideological priorities supplanted evidence-based , potentially leading to the "dismantling" of Scotland's historic legal framework. He argued for maintaining systems proven effective through historical application, warning that hasty changes driven by electoral motives could compromise and sentencing integrity by introducing inconsistencies not supported by data on conviction rates or error reductions. Drawing on precedents like the 1908 murder case—where political and media pressures contributed to a wrongful conviction later quashed after nearly two decades—Findlay has highlighted the perils of allowing external influences to override rigorous evidentiary scrutiny in verdicts. In discussions of such historical injustices, he advocates prioritizing causal analysis of facts over reformist agendas, cautioning that similar dynamics in modern policy could revive vulnerabilities in . Findlay has consistently advocated for the retention of Scotland's unique "" verdict, describing it as a "great asset" that serves as an essential safeguard against wrongful convictions by allowing juries to acquit without requiring proof of innocence when falls short of the criminal standard. In practical application, this third has enabled acquittals in cases where prosecution , though suggestive, lacked the robustness for a "proven" finding, thereby preventing miscarriages of justice that could arise from binary guilty-or-not-guilty systems forcing convictions on marginal proofs; for instance, its use in high-profile trials has preserved the high threshold for guilt, aligning with empirical outcomes where verdicts correlate with unresolved evidential doubts rather than mere acquittals. He has warned that abolishing it risks eroding this protective mechanism, potentially leading to increased convictions based on insufficient , as juries might default to guilty under pressure from simplified options. Central to Findlay's defense of traditional principles is the advocate's ethical obligation to represent clients zealously, even those accused of heinous acts, grounded in the as a foundational bulwark against state overreach. This duty, akin to the cab-rank principle in Scottish advocacy practice, compels defense counsel to accept instructions without precondition on the client's guilt, ensuring that no one is deprived of rigorous representation solely due to the nature of charges, which upholds the adversarial system's integrity by testing prosecution cases to their limits. Findlay has emphasized that this role demands independence from public sentiment, prioritizing verifiable evidence over moral judgments, as exemplified in his approach to not requiring clients to confess guilt before mounting a defense, thereby preserving the accused's and the state's burden of proof. He rejects proposals to dilute evidentiary standards or verdicts under the guise of addressing specific social concerns, arguing that such alterations prioritize outcomes over the unyielding requirement for proof beyond , which has historically minimized erroneous convictions in Scotland's jurisdiction. By insisting on unaltered norms like corroboration and the option, Findlay privileges causal chains of factual evidence—direct witness testimony, forensic linkages, and absence of contradiction—over reforms that could lower thresholds to accommodate perceived imbalances, such as in certain crime categories, thereby maintaining the system's commitment to acquitting the factually unproven rather than convicting on probabilistic inclinations. This stance underscores his view that legal integrity demands resistance to expedient modifications, ensuring decisions rest on empirical substantiation rather than external pressures.

Recent Activities and Legacy

Ongoing High-Profile Trials

In 2024, Donald Findlay KC represented Finlay MacDonald in the trial concerning a shooting spree on the Isle of Skye on August 10, 2022, where MacDonald was charged with ing his brother-in-law John MacKinnon by discharging a at him multiple times in Teangue, and attempting to MacDonald's wife Fiona, her mother Eileen MacDonald, and osteopath Ross MacKinnon by shooting and stabbing. Findlay advanced a defense centered on MacDonald's post-arrest diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and , arguing that these conditions, combined with perceived humiliation and provocation from MacKinnon's mocking behavior during a prior family gathering, precipitated a "catastrophic" breakdown in an otherwise law-abiding individual with no prior convictions. Findlay contended that expert psychological evidence demonstrated MacDonald's actions stemmed from an acute crisis rather than premeditated intent, emphasizing how undiagnosed autism amplified his vulnerability to emotional triggers and impaired impulse control at the time of the incident. He highlighted the absence of prior violence in MacDonald's history, framing the events as a "genuine " explicable through neurodevelopmental factors rather than the prosecution's narrative of deliberate targeting, and urged the to consider these elements in assessing culpability. Despite these submissions, the convicted MacDonald of murder and the three attempted murders on November 29, 2024. Findlay's involvement in this case exemplified his ongoing engagement with complex defenses invoking mental health mitigations to contest Crown narratives in high-stakes proceedings, consistent with his post-2020 practice amid Scotland's .

Public Engagements and Commentary

In September 2025, Findlay participated in the Franco-British Lawyers Society's annual colloquium in , themed around historical miscarriages of justice such as the and the Oscar Slater case. He concluded the event with a dramatic re-enactment of Slater's 1909 trial in the original High Court courtroom, underscoring procedural flaws and evidential weaknesses that led to Slater's wrongful conviction for the Marion Gilchrist murder. This engagement highlighted Findlay's expertise in critiquing systemic failures in , drawing parallels to modern safeguards against similar errors. Findlay maintains an active online presence through his personal website, launched in , which offers subscribers a delivering insights into Scottish drawn from his extensive practice. Complementing this, he contributes exclusive video commentary to the Scottish Criminal Law Channel, operated by Hey Legal, addressing topics such as the retention of the "not proven" verdict, excessive remand periods, and the challenges of remote jury trials. These materials emphasize the importance of evidentiary rigor and traditional adversarial principles in preserving justice system integrity amid proposed reforms. In interviews, Findlay has positioned himself as an advocate for unflinching legal representation, arguing that lawyers must remain "fearless" to challenge state power effectively, regardless of or political pressures. He critiques contemporary dilutions of prosecutorial standards and processes, drawing on decades of high-stakes defenses to warn against eroding the or over-reliance on untested innovations like virtual trials. These commentaries reinforce his role as a senior voice defending resilient, evidence-based against expedient modifications.

References

  1. https://www.optimumadvocates.com/advocates/donald-r-findlay-kc/
  2. http://www.advocates.org.uk/advocates/donald-russell-findlay
  3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/politics97/devolution/scotland/people/findlay.shtml
  4. https://peterross.scot/articles/donald-findlay-qc/
  5. https://speakout.uk/speaker/donald-findlay-kc/
  6. https://university-collections.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2018/04/13/rectors-of-the-university-of-st-andrews-1993-to-present/
  7. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/jun/01/gerardseenan
  8. https://www.theguardian.com/football/1999/nov/05/newsstory.sport
  9. https://www.centralfifetimes.com/news/19239841.cowdenbeath-donald-findlay-70-life-words/
  10. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12488096.has-it-all-gone-up-in-smoke-donald-findlay-hes-perceived-by-many-as-scotlands-top-criminal-lawyer-but-his-latest-lack-of-judgment-has-seen-him-lose-another-post-and-there-is-a-suggestion-he-could-face-further-disciplinary-action-so-what-has/
  11. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/donald-findlay-qc-tells-i-gonnae-podcast-give-100-dont-mcdonald-
  12. https://www.scotsman.com/news/the-two-faces-of-donald-findlay-qc-2511164
  13. https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/14946056.donald-findlay-on-why-serial-killer-peter-manuel-remains-an-enduring-fascination/
  14. https://www.ltscotland.org.uk/top-5-scottish-law-colleges/
  15. https://www.optimumadvocates.com/author/optimumadvocates/
  16. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/donald-findlay-qc-launches-website
  17. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/donald-findlay-hails-not-proven-25066194
  18. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/donald-findlay-qc-reflects-on-his-most-memorable-case
  19. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/top-scots-qc-donald-findlay-22208585
  20. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17769853.donald-findlay-qc-talks-distressing-toll-work/
  21. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/11961135.father-acquitted-of-infants-murder-mother-of-dead-child-is-disgusted-with-verdict/
  22. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12406775.findlay-set-to-pen-defence-of-not-proven-verdict-victims-families-angered-over-book-on-third-verdict/
  23. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/optimum-advocates-79198481_we-are-delighted-to-celebrate-a-golden-milestone-activity-7349461105066315778-lD7B
  24. https://www.scotsman.com/news/interview-donald-findlay-qc-2460260
  25. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12271451.sectarian-violence-singing-a-history-of-hatred/
  26. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/359039.stm
  27. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/07/rang-j01.html
  28. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12211501.findlay-considered-suicide-as-row-exploded-over-singing-of-sash-at-rangers-party-nearly-one-kick-too-many/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308130363_Let_the_people_sing_Irish_rebel_songs_sectarianism_and_Scotland%27s_Offensive_Behaviour_Act
  30. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/4611415.stm
  31. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/6765143.stm
  32. https://www.heraldscotland.com/donald-findlay-cleared-of-offensive-joke-charge-1.860786/
  33. https://www.scotsman.com/news/top-qc-cleared-over-sectarian-jokes-2479748
  34. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/12136/Top-lawyer-cleared-of-offending-Catholics
  35. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12491346.findlay-could-face-investigation-after-telling-joke-about-pope/
  36. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/6263051.stm
  37. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/11965180.woman-who-worked-with-donald-findlay-escapes-fine-advocate-censured-over-pest-calls-to-qcs-lover/
  38. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/FINDLAY%2BDUMPED%2BBY%2BTV%2BLOVER%2BFindlay%2Bdumped%2Bby%2Bhis%2BTV%2Blover%2BChristie%253B...-a060421186
  39. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/donald-findlay-accuses-snp-of-undermining-scottish-legal-system
  40. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/donald-findlay-slams-snps-legal-30474583
  41. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/donald-findlay-derides-court-reforms-as-snp-vote-gathering-j8f2j6x5v
  42. https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/snp-dismantle-scotlands-proud-legal-30477437
  43. https://lemac.co.uk/supporting-justice-at-the-merchants-house-of-glasgow-oscar-slater-talk-by-donald-findlay-kc/
  44. https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/donald-findlay-talking-on-the-case-of-oscar-slater.268597/
  45. https://www.scotsman.com/news/crime/insight-the-jurys-still-out-on-not-proven-verdict-1483012
  46. https://www.heraldscotland.com/default_content/12761016.great-defender/
  47. https://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com/category/criminal-appeals/
  48. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12235545.qc-urges-that-rights-of-individual-be-defended/
  49. https://www.scottishlegal.com/tag/not-proven
  50. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9xvpgpppgo
  51. https://news.sky.com/story/finlay-macdonald-man-guilty-of-murdering-brother-in-law-during-skye-shooting-spree-13262127
  52. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czd59yy8g84o
  53. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/crime-courts/6639283/lawyer-for-skye-murder-accused-says-autism-counts/
  54. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqx3wyp3peo
  55. https://news.sky.com/story/finlay-macdonald-skye-murder-accused-felt-humiliated-by-brother-in-law-13256721
  56. https://ajfb-fbls.org/events/2025-annual-colloquium
  57. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/event-art-dreyfus-oscar-slater-and-miscarriages-of-justice
  58. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal-hub/articles/dreyfus-oscar-slater-and-modern-miscarriages-of-justice-donald-findlay-kc-and-a-dramatic-re-enactment/
  59. https://www.heylegal-news.co.uk/donald-r-findlay-qc-launches-new-website/
  60. https://www.heylegal-news.co.uk/donald-r-findlay-qc-joins-hey-legals-scottish-criminal-law-channel/
  61. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INzAZU8lGR0
  62. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmBCHcrmeH0
  63. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoYssZ4Zr98
  64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NUc5wGADHM
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.