Hubbry Logo
search
logo
Edward Colston avatar
Edward Colston
Edward Colston
current hub
2093925

Edward Colston

logo
Community Hub0 Subscribers
Read side by side
Edward Colston
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Edward Colston (2 November 1636 – 11 October 1721) was an English merchant, slave trader, philanthropist and Tory Member of Parliament.

Key Information

Colston followed his father in the family business becoming a sea merchant, initially trading in wine, fruits and textiles, mainly in Spain, Portugal and other European ports. From 1680 to 1692 he was a member of the Royal African Company, which held a monopoly on the English trade along the west coast of Africa, in slaves, gold, silver and ivory. He was deputy governor of the company from 1689 to 1690, the Governor being the Duke of York, the brother of Charles II of England.

Colston supported and endowed schools and other public institutions in Bristol, London and elsewhere. His name was widely commemorated in Bristol landmarks, and a statue of him was erected in 1895.

With growing awareness and disapproval in the late 20th century of his involvement in Britain's slave trade, there were protests and petitions for landmarks named after him to be renamed, culminating in June 2020, when his statue was toppled and pushed into Bristol Harbour during protests in support of Black Lives Matter. The city's concert venue, Colston Hall, was renamed Bristol Beacon along with several other locations that held his name.

Early life

[edit]

Colston was born on 2 November 1636, in Temple Street, Bristol, and baptised in the Temple Church, Bristol.[1] His parents were William Colston, a prosperous Royalist merchant who was High Sheriff of Bristol in 1643, and his wife Sarah Batten, daughter of Edward Batten; he was the eldest of at least 11 and possibly as many as 15 children. The Colston family had lived in the city since the late 13th century.[2] Colston was brought up in Bristol until the time of the English Civil War, when he probably lived for a while on his father's estate in Winterbourne, just north of the city. The family then moved to London, and Colston was educated at the Christ's Hospital school.[3] The English Civil War shaped Colston's lifelong support for order and stability in the form of monarchy and High Anglicanism.[4]

Career

[edit]

In 1654, Colston was apprenticed to the Mercers Company for eight years, and in 1673 he was enrolled into it.[3] By 1672, he had become a merchant in London.[2] Like his father, Colston exported in textiles from London while importing oils, wine and sherry from Spain and Portugal. He also traded silk with Virginia and was a regular trader of cod from Newfoundland to Naples.[5] He had built up a successful business trading with Spain, Portugal, Italy and Africa.[3]

In 1680, Colston became a member of the Royal African Company, which had held the monopoly in England on trading along the west coast of Africa in gold, silver, ivory and slaves from 1662.[3] Colston was deputy governor of the company from 1689 to 1690.[2] His association with the company ended in 1692.[2] The company was established by King Charles II, together with his brother the Duke of York (later King James II) as the governor of the company, City of London merchants and other investors.[6][7]

During Colston's involvement with the Royal African Company from 1680 to 1692, it is estimated that the company transported over 84,000 African men, women and children to the Caribbean and the rest of the Americas, of whom as many as 19,000 may have died on the journey.[8] The slaves were sold for labour on tobacco, and (increasingly) sugar plantations.[9]

In 1681 he probably began to take an active interest in the affairs of Bristol, where about this time he embarked in a sugar refinery.[10] In 1682, he made a loan of £1,800 to the Bristol Corporation and the following year, became a member of the Society of Merchant Venturers.[11] By 1685 he appears as the city's creditor for about £2,000.[10]

Although a Tory High Churchman and often in conflict with the Whig corporation of Bristol, Colston transferred a large segment of his original shareholding to William III at the beginning of 1689, securing the new regime's favour for the African Company. The value of Colston's shares increased and being without heirs he began to donate large sums to charities (see below).

Colston used his money and power to promote order in the form of High Anglicanism in the Church of England and oppose Anglican Latitudinarians, Roman Catholics, and dissenter Protestants.[12] He withdrew from the African Company in 1692, but continued working on his private businesses until he retired in 1708. Colston was then an MP for Bristol from 1710 to 1713.[13]

Philanthropic works

[edit]
Colston's Almshouses

Colston supported and endowed schools, houses for the poor, almshouses, hospitals and Anglican churches in Bristol, London and elsewhere. His name features widely on Bristol buildings and landmarks.[8][14]

In 1681, the date of his father's death, he appears as a governor of Christ's Hospital, to which he afterwards gave frequently. During the remainder of his life he seems to have divided his attention pretty equally between the city of his birth and that of his adoption.[10]

In 1691, on St Michael's Hill, Bristol, at a cost of £8,000 (equivalent to $1,700,000 in 2025), he founded Colstons Almshouses for the reception of 24 poor men and women, and endowed with accommodation for "Six Saylors", at a cost of £600, the merchant's almshouses in King Street. He also endowed Queen Elizabeth's Hospital school. In 1696, at a cost of £8,000, he endowed a foundation for clothing and teaching 40 boys (the books employed were to have in them "no tincture of Whiggism"); and six years afterwards he expended a further sum of £1,500 in rebuilding the schoolhouse. In 1708, at a cost of £41,200 (equivalent to $8,000,000 in 2025), he built and endowed his great foundation on Saint Augustine’s Back, for the instruction, clothing, maintaining and apprenticing of 100 boys; and in time of scarcity, during this and next year, he transmitted some £20,000 (equivalent to $3,100,000 in 2025) to the London committee,[10] to be managed by the Society of Merchant Venturers for its upkeep.[3] He gave money to schools in Temple (one of which went on to become St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School) and other parts of Bristol, and to several churches and the cathedral.[3][15]

Death

[edit]
Cromwell House, Mortlake, west London, where Colston died in 1721. He was buried in Bristol.

Colston died of old age on 11 October 1721, aged 84, at his home, Cromwell House (demolished 1857), in Mortlake, south west London, where he had lived since about 1689.[16] His will stated that he wished to be buried simply without pomp, but this instruction was ignored.[17] His body was carried to Bristol and was buried at All Saints' Church. His monument was designed by James Gibbs, with an effigy carved by John Michael Rysbrack.[18]

Colston never married, and settled a "considerable fortune in land" on his nephew Edward Colston (MP for Wells), when Edward married in 1704.[19]

Memorials

[edit]
Engraving of Colston's monument in All Saints' Church, Bristol from Bristol Past and Present (1882)

Buildings in Bristol formerly named in memory of Colston included the Colston Tower and Colston Hall (now Beacon Tower and Bristol Beacon, respectively). Colston Avenue and Colston Street are named after him, as is a regional bread bun, the Colston bun.[3][20] A statue of Colston is on the exterior of Bristol Guildhall, built 1843–1846.[21] There was an 1870 stained-glass window of the Good Samaritan by Clayton and Bell dedicated to Colston's memory in the north transept of St Mary Redcliffe,[22] which was removed in June 2020, following the toppling of his outdoor statue.[23] The largest window in Bristol Cathedral is also dedicated to Colston's memory; the Bishop of Bristol announced in June 2020 that the Anglican Diocese of Bristol would remove prominent references to Colston from the window.[24][25][26][27]

The Colston Society, which had operated for 275 years commemorating Colston, latterly as a charity, decided to disband in 2020.[28]

City-centre memorial statue

[edit]
Main article: Statue of Edward Colston

In 1895, 174 years after Colston's death, a statue designed by John Cassidy was erected in the centre of Bristol, to commemorate Colston's philanthropy.[29] Colston's slave-trading activities were subsequently uncovered in a biography of his life and work written by H.J. Wilkins in 1920,[30] and from the 1990s onwards, there were growing calls for the statue to be marked with a plaque stating that he was a slave trader, or taken down.[31]

In July 2018, Bristol City Council, which was responsible for the statue, made a planning application to add a second plaque which would "add to the public knowledge about Colston" including his philanthropy and his involvement in slave trading, though the initial wording suggested came in for significant criticism from members of the public and a Bristol Conservative councillor, with the result being that the plaque was reworded.[32][33] This wording was edited by a former curator at the Bristol Museum and Art Gallery, creating a third proposal which was backed by other members of the public, though it was criticised by the academic behind the first two versions, who claimed it "sanitised" history, minimising Colston's role, omitting the number of child slaves, and focussing on West Africans as the original enslavers.[8] Nevertheless, a wording was subsequently agreed upon and the bronze plaque was cast.[34] After the plaque was physically produced, its installation was vetoed in March 2019 by the Mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees, who criticised the Society of Merchant Venturers for the rewording. A statement from the mayor's office called it "unacceptable", claimed that Rees had not been consulted, and promised to continue work on a second plaque.[34]

On 7 June 2020, the statue was toppled and pushed into Bristol Harbour by demonstrators during the George Floyd protests; one protester was shown kneeling on the statue's neck, referencing the manner in which Floyd died.[35][36] The statue was retrieved from the harbour four days later by Bristol City Council, and taken to a secure location.[37] After the statue was toppled, the Merchant Venturers said that it had been "inappropriate" for them to have become involved in the rewording of the plaque in 2018, and that the removal of the statue was "right for Bristol".[38]

From 4 June 2021, the statue was put on display in its damaged condition by Bristol's M Shed museum,[39] which stated "this temporary display is the start of a conversation, not a complete exhibition".[40]

A new plaque, with no mention of Colston as a "city benefactor", was installed on the empty plinth on 17 April 2025.[41][42]

Modern reappraisal

[edit]
Statue of Edward Colston by John Cassidy, formerly in The Centre, Bristol, erected in 1895, toppled in 2020 (left) and the empty pedestal on 7 June 2020 (right)

Accounts of Colston written in the nineteenth century were extremely positive, lauding him for his philanthropy and for his 'nobleness' of his spirit. In the opening sentences to Thomas Garrard's 1852 biography, the author cited Pliny the Elder:

It is the especial duty of an Historian, says Pliny, "not to allow the memory of those men to sink into oblivion who have by their deeds merited an immortality of fame." That immortality has seldom been awarded to the lot of a nobler Philanthropist than Edward Colston.[43]

The first critical biography was that by Rev. Henry J. Wilkins in 1920,[44] his being the first account to demonstrate that Colston was a slave trader.[45] Wilkins was also critical of Colston's extreme antipathy to nonconformists. In highlighting these defects, Wilkins suggested that "we cannot picture him justly except against his historical background".[46] Colston's involvement in the slave trade predated the abolition movement in Britain, and was during the time when "slavery was generally condoned in England—indeed, throughout Europe—by churchmen, intellectuals and the educated classes".[47] Wilkins criticisms prompted a strong reaction from many in interwar Bristol who wanted to defend Colston's legacy, which was by this time commemorated annually in a Colston Day celebrations.[48] In 1925 Wilkins provided a further supplementary account of Colston's life with additional evidence of Colston's failings.[49] Noting evidence of his unscrupulousness in his business dealings, as well as charges of personal immorality, Wilkins proposed that:

I have urged (having regard to the unhistorical and ill-proportioned position Bristol has given to Edward Colston through the absence of documentary evidence and political partisanship with its charitable efforts) that Bristol should free herself from such a position, recall her heritage and rise to a true "Commemoration" on November 13th in each year of the noble galaxy of benefactors and worthies of "The Metropolis of the West."[50]

Colston made money from trading in commodities and money lending as well as the slave trade;[51][52][53] the proportion of his wealth that came from his involvement in the slave trade and slave-produced sugar is not known.

Since at least the 1990s, with increasing recognition of Colston's role in the slave trade, there has been growing criticism of his commemoration.[54] The Dolphin Society, which was formed to continue Colston's philanthropy, as of 2015 referred to "the evils of slavery" and recognised that "black citizens in Bristol today can suffer disadvantage in terms of education, employment and housing for reasons that connect back to the days of the trans-Atlantic slave trade".[14]

In April 2017 the Bristol Music Trust, a charity that ran the "Colston Hall",[55] announced that it would drop the name of Colston after a 2020 refurbishment. There had been protests and petitions calling for a name change, and some concertgoers and artists had boycotted the venue because of the Colston name.[56] Following the decision almost 10,000 people signed petitions to retain the name of Colston,[57] but the hall was renamed as the Bristol Beacon in September 2020 after three years of consultation.[58] However after debate it was decided in 2023 that street names in Bristol bearing the name ‘Colston’ would remain,this included the road that the former Colston Hall now Bristol Beacon is situated which is Colston Street and the neighbouring Colston Avenue.

In November 2017, the Colston's Girls' School, funded by the Society of Merchant Venturers, initially announced that it would not drop the name of Colston, because it was of "no benefit" to the school to do so.[59] After later consultations in 2020 with staff and pupils the school changed its name to Montpelier High School.

In April 2018, the Lord Mayor of Bristol ordered that a portrait of Colston be removed from her office, saying that she would not "be comfortable sharing it with the portrait", planning that the portrait would later be hung in the proposed Museum of Abolition.[60]

In summer 2018, Colston Primary School renamed itself Cotham Gardens Primary School after consultation with pupils and parents.[61] In February 2019, St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School announced that it would rename its former Colston house after the American mathematician Katherine Johnson.[62]

In June 2020, the pub formerly known as the Colston Arms temporarily changed its name to Ye Olde Pubby McDrunkface (a reference to the name for a research vessel voted for by the public in 2016), inviting suggestions from the public for a new name;[63] in December 2021 the pub was renamed the Open Arms.[64]

In 2020, at the sight of the toppling of the Edward Colston statue in Bristol, a member of the organisational team for the event "was adamant that Colston's charitable deeds in no way made up for the transportation of thousands of Africans into slavery. 'The statue was glorifying the acts of a slave trader. He gave some money to schools and good causes but it was blood money', she said".[65]

Stained glass windows celebrating Colston have been removed at St Mary Redcliffe church and Bristol Cathedral.[66]

See also

[edit]

Biographical works

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Edward Colston

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Edward Colston (2 November 1636 – 11 October 1721) was an English merchant, slave trader, Tory politician, and philanthropist born in Bristol to a prominent merchant family.[1]
He built his fortune primarily through commerce in London, including significant involvement in the Royal African Company, where he joined as a member in 1680 and served as deputy governor from 1689 to 1690, profiting from the Atlantic slave trade during a period when the company held a monopoly on such activities until 1698.[1][2]
Later in life, Colston directed much of his wealth toward charitable causes in Bristol, endowing institutions such as Colston's Hospital—a school for poor boys to which he contributed £30,000—and various almshouses, churches, and hospitals, while supporting Anglican initiatives and opposing Dissenters.[1][2]
Elected as a Tory Member of Parliament for Bristol in 1710 at age 74, he participated minimally in parliamentary debates due to his advanced age but represented the city's mercantile interests until 1713.[1]
Colston died unmarried at his Mortlake residence in Surrey and was buried with great ceremony in Bristol's All Saints Church, leaving a legacy that intertwined economic enterprise, including slave trading, with substantial civic benefaction.[1]

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

Edward Colston was born on 2 November 1636 in Temple Street, Bristol, and baptised at the Temple Church in the same city.[1][3][4] He was the eldest son of William Colston (1608–1681), a prosperous Bristol merchant who served as High Sheriff of the city in 1643, and Sarah Batten, daughter of Edward Batten, a barrister-at-law of the Inner Temple.[1][3][5] The Colston family had been established as merchants in Bristol for generations, with records tracing back to at least Thomas Colston in earlier centuries, and they were affiliated with the Society of Merchant Venturers.[2] William Colston's staunch Royalist sympathies during the English Civil War led the family to flee Bristol for London after his brief tenure as sheriff, amid Parliamentarian control of the city.[4][6] This relocation shaped Colston's early environment, exposing him to London's mercantile networks while rooted in Bristol's trading heritage.[1]

Education and Initial Influences

Colston received his education in London after his family relocated there from Bristol during his early years, amid the disruptions of the English Civil Wars.[7] Historical accounts indicate he attended school in the city, with some sources proposing Christ's Hospital—a charitable institution founded in 1552 to educate boys from impoverished or orphaned backgrounds—as a possible site, though his family's relative prosperity raises questions about the fit.[5][8] Primary records on his schooling are limited, reflecting broader uncertainties in documentation of his youth prior to mercantile apprenticeship.[1] Key initial influences derived from his immersion in London's commercial milieu and familial merchant traditions, as his father William Colston operated a cloth trading business with royalist sympathies.[1] At age 18 in 1654, he began an eight-year apprenticeship under a London merchant, gaining practical training in trade logistics, accounting, and international dealings typical of the period's guild system.[7][5] This apprenticeship, culminating in his admission to the Worshipful Company of Mercers in 1673, oriented him toward wholesale commerce, particularly in textiles and emerging colonial ventures, while exposure to the Restoration-era economic recovery reinforced a pragmatic, profit-driven worldview unencumbered by ideological abstraction.[7]

Professional Career

Entry into Merchant Trade

Colston, born into a family of Bristol merchants, relocated to London in his youth and began his mercantile career through formal apprenticeship. In 1654, at age 18, he was bound as an apprentice to the Worshipful Company of Mercers, a prominent London livery company specializing in textiles and luxury goods, for an eight-year term that concluded around 1662.[9][10] This training equipped him with skills in international commerce, particularly in woollen textiles, which were a staple of English export trade.[4] Following his apprenticeship, Colston initially engaged in the wine trade, shipping commodities from Bristol and European ports to London markets. He collaborated with family connections, including working under his brother William, another merchant, before launching independent ventures in cloth, wine, and related goods by the early 1670s.[11][12] Operating from London, he traded primarily with Spain, Portugal, Italy, and North Africa, dealing in woollen textiles, oil, fruits, and wines—commodities that leveraged Bristol's port advantages and London's financial networks.[7] By 1673, he had gained freedom of the Mercers' Company, enabling full participation in guild-regulated trade and marking his transition to an established merchant.[9][13] This foundational phase built Colston's commercial acumen outside the African trade, with his early profits derived from legitimate European exchanges rather than colonial ventures. His London base provided access to shipping and credit unavailable in Bristol, allowing expansion into sugar and other imports by the mid-1670s, though slave trading commenced later with his 1680 entry into the Royal African Company.[13][11]

Role in the Royal African Company and Slave Trade

Edward Colston joined the Royal African Company (RAC) as a shareholder in March 1680, acquiring an initial stake of £500 in the chartered trading entity that held a monopoly on English commerce along the West African coast, including the procurement and transport of enslaved Africans to the Americas.[14][1] The RAC, established in 1672 under royal patronage, focused primarily on the transatlantic slave trade, supplying enslaved labor to British and other European colonies in the Caribbean and North America.[15] Colston advanced within the company, serving as an assistant from 1681 to 1683 and again from 1685 to 1691, before briefly holding the position of deputy governor from January 1689 to January 1691 (or 1690 per some records).[14][1] In these roles, he participated in directing operations, including the negotiation of the "Assiento for Negroes" contract with Spain in June 1689, which facilitated the supply of enslaved Africans to Spanish colonies.[14] He also provided financial support, lending the RAC £2,500 in 1686 and additional sums totaling up to £5,000 by 1688, while supplying trade goods such as perpetuanas valued at £60,000, sufficient to outfit voyages for an estimated 20,000 enslaved individuals.[14] During Colston's association with the RAC from 1680 to 1692, the company dispatched 279 slaving voyages from West Africa, embarking approximately 84,500 enslaved Africans, of whom around 65,200 survived the Middle Passage to be disembarked in the Americas, reflecting a mortality rate of about 23% or roughly 19,300 deaths at sea.[15][16] Enslaved captives, often branded with the RAC initials on their chests or shoulders, were purchased from African intermediaries and transported primarily to plantations in the Caribbean, where they were sold to produce commodities like sugar and tobacco for export to Europe.[17] Colston's shareholding grew to £1,600 by the early 1690s, and he sold £1,000 in RAC stock to William of Orange in January 1689, though his direct involvement ended around 1692 amid the company's declining monopoly after parliamentary challenges.[14] As a senior official, he contributed to the management of these operations, which formed a core component of his mercantile activities and wealth accumulation, aligning with the era's prevailing economic practices among English merchants engaged in Atlantic trade.[2]

Other Business Ventures and Wealth Accumulation

Colston apprenticed with the Mercers' Company in London from 1654 to 1662, becoming a freeman in 1673, which positioned him in the trade of luxury textiles such as silks and velvets.[1] [18] His family's Bristol-based mercantile operations, inherited and managed after his brother Thomas's death in 1684, focused on imports including wine, oil, and raisins from Spain and Portugal following the 1660 Restoration.[1] [2] As a freeman of the Bristol Society of Merchant Venturers from 1683, he expanded into European cloth and wine trades, alongside sugar imports from St. Kitts in the Caribbean, where he partnered in a Bristol sugar refinery processing slave-produced commodities.[1] [19] [5] These ventures complemented his broader commercial network, which by 1672 involved shipping goods from London to Spain, Portugal, and Italy, establishing him as a diversified merchant with ownership of over 40 ships in the 1680s.[1] [5] He also engaged in money-lending, extending loans such as £500 to the government and £2,000 to Bristol's corporation by 1682, and sold £1,000 in Royal African Company stock to King William in 1688.[1] Later, in 1711, he served as a commissioner for South Sea Company subscriptions, reflecting ongoing financial interests in joint-stock enterprises.[1] Colston's wealth accumulation stemmed from these multifaceted activities, with the precise apportionment between his family's Bristol operations, Mercers' Company affiliations, European and West Indian trades, and Royal African Company dividends remaining undetermined.[2] By the time of his death in 1721, he had amassed a substantial fortune, which he directed toward philanthropy without direct heirs, having reinvested mercantile profits into lending and civic projects such as £30,000 for Colston's Hospital in 1710.[1]

Political Involvement as MP

Colston was elected as a Tory Member of Parliament for Bristol in the general election of October 1710, topping the poll after a four-day contest despite his advanced age of 74 and initial refusal to stand, as supporters nominated him in absentia owing to his reputation for philanthropy and civic contributions in the city.[1] His victory, aligning with the broader Tory landslide following the Sacheverell affair, was celebrated with a public dinner on 2 November 1710—coinciding with his birthday—which helped establish the Loyal Society, a pro-Tory organization in Bristol.[1] As MP, Colston's participation in parliamentary proceedings was limited by his age and infirmity, though he was classified as a Tory on the 'Hanover list' and numbered among the 'worthy patriots' who criticized the prior Whig administration's financial mismanagement during the 1710–11 session.[1] He occasionally presented petitions from Bristol constituents, reflecting the port city's commercial interests, but records indicate no significant speeches, committee assignments, or recorded divisions attributable to him in the Commons.[1] Prior to his election, in May 1710, he had delivered a grand jury address emphasizing High Church Anglican principles and the primacy of the Church of England, consistent with Tory ideology opposing Dissenters.[1] Colston did not seek re-election in 1713, citing frailty that prevented even his attendance at the Loyal Society's November dinner, where he was represented by the Duke of Beaufort; he died in 1721 without further parliamentary involvement.[1]

Philanthropic Activities

Charitable Donations in Bristol

Edward Colston made substantial charitable contributions to Bristol, primarily from the late 1690s onward, supporting institutions for the poor, education, and religious infrastructure. His donations, drawn from mercantile wealth accumulated through trade including the Royal African Company, totaled approximately £70,000 to £80,000 for Bristol causes during his lifetime and via bequests, funding almshouses, schools, and church repairs.[20][1] In 1695, Colston donated £2,500 to establish almshouses on St Michael's Hill, providing accommodation for 12 men and 12 women, each receiving 3 shillings weekly for maintenance. That same year, he undertook to maintain six poor sailors in the Merchant Venturers' almshouse. In 1696, he contributed £100 toward the establishment of a workhouse by the Bristol Corporation of the Poor. These efforts addressed poverty and supported mariners, reflecting Bristol's mercantile context.[20] Colston's educational philanthropy included funding places for poor boys at existing schools and founding new ones. Beginning in 1695, he supported six boys at Queen Elizabeth's Hospital, increasing to ten in 1702, and donated £500 that year for rebuilding the school. Between 1706 and 1710, he established Colston's Hospital (later known as Colston's School), investing around £40,000 to educate, clothe, and maintain 100 poor boys, with the institution opening in July 1710. In 1710, he also founded Temple School to educate and clothe 44 poor boys in Temple Parish. His will further allocated £30,000–£40,000 to sustain Colston's Hospital.[20][1] For religious causes, Colston donated £100 in 1703 for seating at All Saints' Church and £250 in 1713 toward rebuilding its tower. He also provided funds for repairs to other Bristol churches, including St Michael, St Mary Redcliffe, St Werburgh, St James, and Bristol Cathedral. Posthumously, his 1721 will directed annual payments to 18 charity schools and support for poor clergy via Queen Anne's Bounty. These contributions, managed partly through the Society of Merchant Venturers, aimed to promote Anglican piety and social welfare among Bristol's underprivileged.[20][1]

Support for Education and Almshouses

Colston provided substantial funding for almshouses in Bristol to support the poor and elderly. In 1696, he entrusted the almshouses on St Michael's Hill to the Society of Merchant Venturers for ongoing management, ensuring their operation as intended for housing the needy.[2] These facilities offered shelter to a limited number of residents, typically with requirements for attendance at daily prayers in an associated chapel.[13] His contributions to education focused on charitable schools for impoverished children in Bristol. In 1702, Colston donated funds to Queen Elizabeth's Hospital, an existing school, to support its operations for poor boys.[21] Three years later, in 1705, he pledged an additional £1,000 specifically to establish a girls' school, expanding educational access for females from low-income families.[21] By 1710, he further donated to found Temple School for Boys, aimed at providing basic instruction to underprivileged male youth in a poorer parish.[20] Colston's broader endowments included significant bequests toward institutions like Colston's Hospital, where he allocated over £40,000 to fund education and maintenance for approximately 100 poor boys from Bristol.[22] These efforts, part of his overall charitable giving exceeding £70,000, prioritized Anglican institutions and relief for the deserving poor, reflecting his Tory religious affiliations.[23] Such donations spurred the creation of additional charity schools in Bristol parishes between 1708 and 1722.[20]

Religious and Broader Charitable Efforts

Colston's philanthropy was deeply informed by his adherence to High Church Anglicanism and opposition to Dissenters, Roman Catholics, and Whig influences, which shaped the conditions he attached to many of his gifts.[1] He insisted that beneficiaries of his charities, such as schools and almshouses, adhere to Anglican practices and doctrine, reflecting his commitment to promoting orthodoxy within the Church of England.[1] This stance aligned with his Tory political views, prioritizing ecclesiastical order and royalist traditions over nonconformist or latitudinarian tendencies.[1] In his will, Colston directed significant funds toward augmenting clerical incomes through Queen Anne's Bounty, a fund established in 1704 to support impoverished Church of England livings; his bequest of £6,000 targeted "poor cures" to bolster Anglican ministry in under-resourced parishes.[1] He also left £300—equivalent to over £54,000 in modern terms—to the Archbishop of Canterbury for church purposes, as revealed in archival records.[24] These national-level contributions extended his influence beyond Bristol, aiding the Church's financial stability during a period of post-Revolution recovery. Colston's broader charitable reach included donations to causes in London, Surrey, Devon, and Lancashire, where he supported institutions aligned with his religious and social priorities, such as relief for the poor under Anglican oversight.[10] Upon his death in 1721, he bequeathed approximately half his remaining estate to various charities, emphasizing Protestant Anglican welfare over sectarian alternatives.[10] This distribution underscored a paternalistic approach to philanthropy, rooted in 17th- and early 18th-century mercantile piety, though conditioned by exclusionary religious requirements that barred Dissenters.[1]

Personal Life and Death

Family Relations and Personal Beliefs

Edward Colston was born on 2 November 1636 in Bristol to William Colston (1608–1681), a prosperous merchant who served as High Sheriff of Bristol in 1643, and Sarah Batten, whom William married on 23 January 1636.[20] He was the eldest of eleven children—six sons and five daughters—in a merchant family established in Bristol since around 1340, with six deceased siblings commemorated at All Saints' Church.[20] His father's Royalist sympathies during the English Civil War shaped the family's political environment, as William supported the monarchy amid Bristol's divided loyalties.[20] Colston never married and had no children, living as a bachelor primarily at Cromwell House in Mortlake, Surrey, after moving there by 1689.[20] [1] Among his siblings were brothers Thomas (died 1684), a merchant involved in Spanish trade, and Robert, whose son Edward Colston (born after 1672, died 5 April 1719) Colston initially designated as his heir.[1] [20] Following his nephew's death, Colston's niece Mary Edwards became his chief beneficiary in January 1721.[1] Colston adhered to High Church Anglicanism, emphasizing strict orthodoxy and devotion to the Church of England while opposing Dissenters and Roman Catholics; he imposed conditions on his charities requiring beneficiaries to be Anglicans, participate in daily prayers, and exclude drunkards or religious deviants, as seen in rules for his 1695 almshouses on St Michael's Hill.[20] [1] In 1710, he funded Lenten lectures to promote Church doctrines, reflecting his zeal for ecclesiastical order.[20] Politically, he identified as a Tory, serving as MP for Bristol from 1710 to 1713 and advocating for the public good tied to Church support, though earlier possible nonjuror or Jacobite leanings were not evident later; he opposed Whig toleration policies and James II's Declaration of Indulgence, demanding repayment of a 1686 loan to Bristol's Corporation over religious disputes.[1] [20]

Final Years and Burial

In his final years, Edward Colston resided at Cromwell House in Mortlake, Surrey, where he had retired following his political and mercantile activities.[13] Having amassed significant wealth without direct heirs, he directed much of his fortune toward charitable causes prior to his death.[2] Colston died on 11 October 1721 at the age of 84, reportedly from natural causes associated with advanced age.[1] His body was transported from Mortlake back to Bristol for interment.[13] He was buried in the Colston family vault at All Saints Church in Bristol's Corn Street following a grand funeral procession.[1] [4] The tomb monument, designed by architect James Gibbs, commemorates his life and philanthropy.[25] The exact location of his remains within the church remains uncertain, though the vault and monument persist as historical markers.[26]

Historical and Economic Legacy

Contributions to Bristol's Development

Edward Colston's philanthropic endeavors significantly shaped Bristol's social and institutional landscape in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, channeling wealth accumulated from mercantile activities into enduring public infrastructure. Between the 1690s and 1710s, he augmented existing almshouses and funded new educational facilities, providing for the poor, orphans, and youth in a city reliant on its port economy and burgeoning population. These investments, totaling around £71,000 in charitable bequests upon his death in 1721, supported welfare systems that alleviated poverty and promoted basic literacy, contributing to Bristol's stability as a commercial hub.[20][1] A key project was the construction of almshouses on St Michael's Hill in 1695, funded with £2,500 to house 12 men and 12 women, offering shelter and maintenance to the elderly and infirm in an era of limited public welfare.[20] Colston also established Colston's Hospital in 1710 at a total cost of approximately £40,000 (including £1,300 for the site), accommodating 100 boys with education, clothing, and vocational training, which helped build a skilled labor pool for Bristol's trades.[20][1] Concurrently, he endowed Temple School for 44 boys in 1710, ensuring ongoing support for elementary education amid the city's expansion as a center for Atlantic commerce.[20] Beyond direct endowments, Colston's earlier economic engagements bolstered Bristol's industrial base; in the 1680s, he partnered in a sugar refinery, processing imports from colonial trade and fostering proto-industrial activity that supported the port's growth. Loans to the city corporation, such as £1,800 in 1682 escalating to £4,000 by 1685, provided capital for municipal needs during a period of urban development. These efforts, rooted in his role as a Merchant Venturer, indirectly enhanced Bristol's infrastructure and resilience, though intertwined with the broader mercantile networks of the era.[20] His bequests extended to church repairs and sermons from 1708, reinforcing communal institutions that underpinned social order in a rapidly growing mercantile city.[1]

Balanced Assessment of Wealth Sources and Moral Context

Edward Colston's wealth derived from a combination of inheritance, mercantile trade in commodities such as wine, textiles, and sugar, and substantial profits from the transatlantic slave trade through his stake in the Royal African Company (RAC). His father, William Colston, a Bristol cloth merchant, left him a modest inheritance including cash, rental properties, ships, and mercantile goods upon his death in 1665, providing an initial capital base for expansion.[14][27] Colston augmented this through diverse ventures, trading wine and oil from Europe, fruits and textiles with Spain and Portugal, and sugar from Caribbean plantations like St. Kitts, which indirectly linked to slave-produced goods.[19] However, his most lucrative phase occurred from 1680 to 1692 via the RAC, where he held shares worth £1,600 by 1691, served as Deputy Governor from 1689, and earned dividends totaling seven payments at 70 guineas per £100 share, equivalent to £2.5 million to £26.5 million in modern purchasing power.[14] Additional RAC income included sales of goods like £60,000 in perpetuanas cloth and loans of £2,500 to £4,500 at 5% interest, alongside renting ships for slave voyages.[14] The RAC, under Colston's involvement, transported approximately 84,500 enslaved Africans across the Atlantic from 1680 to 1692, with 65,200 surviving to disembark and over 19,300 dying en route due to the brutal conditions of middle passage voyages, where mortality rates often exceeded 20%.[16] The total value of these enslaved people sold exceeded £1 million in contemporary terms, fueling company profits distributed to shareholders like Colston, whose exit in 1692 coincided with the RAC's financial decline amid competition and losses.[16] While exact apportionment remains uncertain, historical analyses attribute a significant portion of his amassed fortune—enabling later philanthropy—to these slave trade activities, rather than solely general commerce, as Bristol's mercantile elite broadly profited from triangular trade circuits.[17][7] Morally, Colston's direct role in the RAC implicated him in a system that commodified human beings, causing verifiable suffering and death on a massive scale, as evidenced by voyage records showing chained confinements, disease, and violence inherent to slave shipments.[28] This causal chain—financing captures, transports, and sales—contradicts first-principles recognition of individual agency and dignity, rendering participation culpable regardless of scale, though no contemporary records indicate Colston's personal remorse or abolitionist leanings; he remained a Tory Anglican prioritizing economic and religious establishment interests.[14] In historical context, the trade was legally sanctioned by royal charter, economically vital for Britain's imperial growth, and normalized among merchants, with opposition limited until the late 18th century; Colston's divestment aligned more with RAC insolvency than ethical shift.[17] His subsequent philanthropy, while demonstrating charitable intent toward education and the poor, derived from tainted proceeds, complicating assessments that view it as redemptive without addressing the uncompensated human costs upstream.[14] Modern reappraisals, often amplified by institutionally biased narratives emphasizing victimhood over era-specific norms, risk anachronism, yet empirical data underscores the trade's intrinsic brutality beyond contextual excuses.[17]

Monuments and Public Commemoration

Erection of the Bristol Statue

In October 1893, Bristol businessman James Williams Arrowsmith proposed erecting a statue of Edward Colston as part of the city's center redevelopments, leading to the formation of a statue committee in 1894.[29][30] The bronze statue, designed by Irish sculptor John Cassidy, features Colston in mayoral robes atop an ornamental pedestal supported by dolphins and was installed on Colston Avenue, facing south.[31][32] It was unveiled on 13 November 1895—known as Colston Day, commemorating his birthday—by Bristol's mayor, W. Howell Davies, following an elaborate parade and ceremony attended by large crowds.[29][31][33] The monument's plaque described Colston as "one of the most virtuous and wise sons" of Bristol, reflecting 19th-century efforts to emphasize his philanthropy over his role in the Royal African Company's slave trade operations, which transported over 84,000 enslaved Africans.[34][35]

Maintenance and Historical Significance of Memorials

The statue of Edward Colston in Bristol, erected in 1895, was maintained by Bristol City Council as a public monument for 125 years prior to its toppling on June 7, 2020.[36] As a Grade II listed structure, it received routine preservation typical of urban sculptures, including periodic cleaning to preserve the bronze and stone elements against weathering.[37] The accompanying plinth bore an inscription praising Colston as "one of the most virtuous and wise sons" of the city, reflecting late Victorian commemoration practices that emphasized his charitable legacies while omitting his direct involvement in the transatlantic slave trade.[32] Historically, the memorial signified Bristol's mercantile pride and the era's selective veneration of 17th- and 18th-century benefactors, amid competition among tobacco magnates like the Wills family who funded rival statues.[23] Unveiled during a period of imperial self-congratulation, it embodied a "memorial cult" that foregrounded philanthropy funded by slave trade profits, encoding a sanitized narrative of economic success and civic virtue in public space.[38] This upkeep perpetuated an uncritical endorsement of Colston's role until growing awareness of slavery's horrors prompted contextualization debates in the 2010s.[39] Following its recovery from Bristol Harbour on June 11, 2020, the defaced statue underwent conservation in a secure facility, where conservators discovered a rolled 1895 magazine inside the figure, and it was subsequently stored before temporary exhibition in its damaged state at M Shed museum.[40][41] By February 2024, Bristol City Council approved its permanent display there, preserving it as an artifact of protest and historical reckoning rather than reinstating it outdoors.[37] The plinth remains in situ under council oversight, symbolizing ongoing contention over heritage; temporary installations, such as Jen Reid's BLM sculpture in July 2020, were swiftly removed due to legal concerns over unauthorized occupation.[42] In April 2025, the council installed a new plaque on the plinth explicitly referencing Colston's slave trading activities, positioned below the original inscription, amid disputes over wording that sought to balance acknowledgment of his commerce with his philanthropy.[43][44] These evolutions underscore the memorials' shifting significance from unalloyed celebration to contested sites of memory, prompting national reflections on iconoclasm, contextualization, and the causal links between historical wealth accumulation and modern public commemoration.[45][22]

Modern Controversies and Reappraisals

The 2020 Statue Toppling Event

On 7 June 2020, amid Black Lives Matter protests in Bristol triggered by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, a group of demonstrators toppled the bronze statue of Edward Colston from its plinth in the city centre.[46] The protesters used ropes to pull the statue down, after which it was rolled approximately half a mile along the waterfront to Bristol Harbour.[47] Prior to submersion, the statue was defaced with paint and other substances, and one individual placed a knee on its neck in a gesture echoing the restraint used on Floyd.[48] The action occurred during a march attended by thousands, organized under the banner "All Black Lives Matter," focusing on opposition to racial inequality and historical commemorations of slave traders.[29] Videos of the toppling circulated widely online, amplifying the event internationally and sparking debates on public monuments linked to the transatlantic slave trade.[49] The statue, erected in 1895, was dumped into the harbour near Pero's Bridge, named after an enslaved African who arrived in Bristol, remaining submerged until retrieval on 11 June 2020.[50] No injuries were reported directly from the toppling, though the broader protests in Bristol and elsewhere led to isolated disturbances and arrests primarily for public order offences.[46] The act of criminal damage prompted investigations by Avon and Somerset Police, who initially questioned several individuals but made no immediate arrests at the scene.[51]

Immediate Aftermath and Legal Proceedings

The statue was retrieved from Bristol Harbour on June 11, 2020, by Bristol City Council workers using a crane, approximately four days after it was toppled and submerged to prevent navigation hazards and potential crowds.[52][53] Avon and Somerset Police, who had been present but did not intervene during the toppling due to limited officers and concerns over escalation, initiated a criminal investigation reviewing CCTV footage and public videos.[54] The statue, covered in mud and damaged, was subsequently stored and later displayed at the M Shed museum with artifacts from the incident, including the ropes used to pull it down, to contextualize its removal.[53] On December 7, 2020, Avon and Somerset Police charged four individuals—Rhian Graham (29), Milo Ponsford (25), Jake Skuse (32), and Sage Willoughby (21)—with criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 for their roles in toppling and submerging the statue, identified through open-source video evidence.[54] The defendants, who admitted their actions in court, pleaded not guilty, arguing they held an honest belief that the statue's owners (Bristol City Council) would have consented to its removal given its perceived offensiveness as a monument to a slave trader.[55] Their trial began on December 13, 2021, at Bristol Crown Court before a judge and jury. The jury acquitted all four defendants on January 5, 2022, after deliberating for three hours, accepting their defense that they reasonably believed the property's removal was justified to prevent further "harm" from its presence, despite the prosecution's contention that the statue was protected public property listed on Bristol's statutory list of buildings of historical interest.[55] The acquittal drew criticism for potentially undermining property rights and legal precedents against vigilante actions, as noted in analyses questioning whether subjective beliefs about offensiveness could negate criminal liability for significant damage.[56] In response, the Attorney General referred points of law to the Court of Appeal in February 2022, seeking clarification on whether Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of expression) could justify such damage. On September 28, 2022, the Court ruled that the defendants' conduct fell outside ECHR protections, as the damage was not a proportionate exercise of free speech and honest belief in consent does not constitute a lawful excuse under section 5(2) of the Criminal Damage Act for cases involving listed or protected property; however, the acquittals remained undisturbed.[57][58] This ruling limited the precedent's scope but highlighted tensions between protest rights and property law.

Ongoing Debates on Legacy and Iconoclasm

![Empty pedestal following the toppling of Edward Colston's statue][float-right] The toppling of Edward Colston's statue on June 7, 2020, intensified longstanding debates over how to assess the legacies of historical figures involved in the Atlantic slave trade, balancing documented philanthropy against the human cost of their commercial activities. Proponents of reevaluation argue that public monuments like Colston's, erected in 1895, perpetuated a selective historical narrative that emphasized charitable giving—such as funding for almshouses, schools, and docks in Bristol—while downplaying his role as deputy governor of the Royal African Company, which transported tens of thousands of enslaved Africans.[11][59] Critics of this view contend that such assessments impose modern moral standards anachronistically, noting that Colston's era normalized slave trading among merchants and that his donations demonstrably advanced civic infrastructure, with incomplete records preventing precise quantification of slave-derived wealth versus other trading profits.[60] Iconoclasm surrounding Colston's statue has sparked contention over the legitimacy of extralegal removal of public monuments as a form of protest versus the preservation of cultural heritage for contextual education. Supporters of the action frame it as a corrective to institutional inaction, highlighting failed petitions spanning decades—such as a 2017 counter-petition with over 900 signatures to retain the statue—and portraying the event as an expression of communal reckoning with slavery's enduring impacts, rather than historical erasure.[61][59] Opponents, including heritage advocates, criticize the toppling as mob-driven destruction that undermines legal processes and risks broader cultural losses, drawing parallels to historical iconoclasm tied to political instability and arguing that statues serve better as prompts for plaques or interpretive displays to foster informed debate.[62][63] These disputes extend to broader questions of contested heritage management, with academic analyses examining the statue's relocation to Bristol's M Shed museum as a site for interpreting shifting public meanings, rather than reinstatement or outright disposal.[50] While some scholars advocate for "difficult heritage" approaches that retain artifacts to confront uncomfortable histories, others warn of selective iconoclasm that prioritizes contemporary sensibilities over comprehensive historical fidelity, potentially overlooking equivalent scrutiny of non-colonial figures.[32] The 2022 acquittal of four protesters on grounds of reasonable protest further polarized opinions, with defenders citing it as validation of direct action and detractors viewing it as judicial endorsement of vigilantism that erodes democratic discourse on memorials.[59][64]

Recent Developments in Memorialization (2023–2025)

In November 2023, Bristol City Council announced plans to return the toppled Edward Colston statue to permanent display at the M Shed museum, following a public consultation involving over 14,000 respondents that favored contextual exhibition over destruction or indefinite storage.[65] The decision aligned with a "retain and explain" approach to contested heritage, emphasizing educational value amid debates on historical iconoclasm.[66] By March 2024, the M Shed installed a dedicated display featuring the graffiti-covered statue in its retrieved state, alongside first-hand accounts from protesters, counter-perspectives from heritage groups, and artifacts from the 2020 event, framing the toppling as a pivotal moment in Bristol's reckoning with its slave-trading past.[41] This exhibit, which opened to public view, drew on archival footage and participant testimonies to illustrate the protest's dynamics without endorsing the act of vandalism.[67] Critics, including local historians, argued the presentation risked prioritizing activist narratives over Colston's documented philanthropy, such as funding almshouses and schools that benefited thousands in 17th- and 18th-century Bristol.[68] On April 17, 2025, Bristol City Council installed a new bronze plaque on the empty plinth in the city center, inscribed with wording that highlighted Colston's "prominent role in the enslavement of African people" and detailed the statue's 2020 removal by protesters, omitting prior references to him as a "city benefactor."[43] The plaque, proposed years earlier but delayed amid legal and public disputes, provoked backlash from conservative commentators who decried it as ideologically driven "woke" revisionism that ignored empirical records of Colston's charitable endowments exceeding £80,000 in today's terms.[69] [70] Council officials defended the text as fact-based, drawing from historical shipping records confirming Colston's investment in voyages transporting over 84,000 enslaved Africans, though detractors noted similar plaques elsewhere balance such facts with beneficiary impacts. These developments reflect ongoing tensions in Bristol's heritage management, with no new commemorative statues erected and university-linked Colston nameplates retained on buildings after a 2023 review opted against wholesale renaming, instead funding anti-inequality initiatives.[71] Public discourse, as tracked in anniversary coverage by June 2025, continues to debate whether such recontextualizations foster truthful historical engagement or selective moralizing.[48]

References

  1. COLSTON, Edward II (1636-1721), of Mortlake, Surr.
  2. Edward Colston - The Society of Merchant Venturers
  3. Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900/Colston, Edward
  4. Colston; Edward (1636 - 1721) - Bristol Archives
  5. Edward Colston, Slave Trader born - African American Registry
  6. Pushed off the pedestal: who was the slave trader Edward Colston?
  7. Edward Colston - Bristol City Council : Museum Collections
  8. Who was Colston?
  9. [PDF] From apprentices to the elderly - Countering Colston
  10. Edward Colston - Person - National Portrait Gallery
  11. Edward Colston: Listing Controversy – University of Bristol Law ...
  12. [PDF] Histories of Slavery, Memory, and Black Globality. Women
  13. British History in depth: The Business of Enslavement - BBC
  14. Edward Colston Research Paper #2 - Bristol Radical History Group
  15. http://www.slavevoyages.org/
  16. Edward Colston Research Paper #1 - Bristol Radical History Group
  17. Who was Edward Colston and why is Bristol divided by his legacy?
  18. Edward Colston and the statue in Bristol’s harbor
  19. Bristol slave traders | Slave traders | Traders, Merchants and Planters
  20. [PDF] EDWARD COLSTON AND BRISTOL
  21. Joshua Fitch and Colston's Girls' School - Bristol Radical History ...
  22. [PDF] Edward Colston Statue in Bristol (Published) - - Contested Histories
  23. The Colston Statue: What Next? - Who was Edward Colston?
  24. Slave trader Colston left bequest to Church of England, archive shows
  25. Edward Colston (1636-1721) - Find a Grave Memorial
  26. The gruesome tale of the remains of 'Edward Colston' | Bristol Live
  27. “A Legacy fraught with Contradictions…” (Colston's Philanthropy)
  28. https://www.slavevoyages.org/
  29. The Colston Statue: What next? - Bristol Museums Exhibitions
  30. Monumental folly – what Colston's statue says about Victorian Bristol
  31. Edward Colston statue, Bristol (1895) - John Cassidy
  32. Colston's Travels, or Should We Talk About Statues?
  33. 1895, Statue of Edward Colston unveiled in Bristol - Cast in Stone
  34. Edward Colston statue toppled: how Bristol came to see the slave ...
  35. Myths within myths... - Bristol Radical History Group
  36. Who was Edward Colston and why was his Bristol statue toppled?
  37. Edward Colston: Statue could formally move into M Shed Museum
  38. Decolonizing Memory in Bristol | Radical History Review
  39. Colston Revisited - History Workshop
  40. Inside the secret facility restoring Edward Colston statue toppled in ...
  41. New display at M Shed: the toppling of the Colston statue | Bristol ...
  42. Jen Reid statue removal to 'cost Bristol council thousands' - BBC
  43. Edward Colston plaque installed with new slave trade wording - BBC
  44. Controversial second plaque on Edward Colston's empty plinth ...
  45. How the fall of Edward Colston's statue revolutionised the way ...
  46. Edward Colston statue: Protesters tear down slave trader monument
  47. Colston's Toppling Five Years On | History Workshop
  48. Colston statue toppling shows 'history isn't static' - BBC
  49. The Protests Heard 'Round The World : Code Switch - NPR
  50. After the fall, where?: Relocating the Colston statue in Bristol, from ...
  51. Edward Colston statue toppling and Colston 4 trial two-year timeline
  52. Edward Colston statue pulled out of Bristol Harbour - BBC
  53. The Colston Statue - Google Arts & Culture
  54. Edward Colston: Man toppled statue to prevent 'further harm' - BBC
  55. Edward Colston statue: Four cleared of criminal damage - BBC
  56. [PDF] Did the Colston trial go wrong? | Policy Exchange
  57. [PDF] AG Reference (Colston Four) judgment
  58. [PDF] AG Reference (Colston Four) summary
  59. Path of resistance: a timeline of protest against Edward Colston
  60. 'The Future will be Grateful for thy Universal Goodness': Some ...
  61. The toppling of Edward Colston's statue is not an attack on history. It ...
  62. Why toppling statues is (almost always) wrong - History Reclaimed
  63. Debate intensifies over fate of contested heritage
  64. Those who tore down Colston's statue helped lead us to the truth ...
  65. Edward Colston statue to return to M Shed Museum in 2024 - BBC
  66. Statues, Contested Heritage and the Policy of 'Retain and Explain'
  67. Toppled Edward Colston statue to go on permanent display in UK ...
  68. Controversial plaque on Edward Colston's empty plinth finally installed
  69. Fury as 'woke' Colston plaque condemns his 'prominent role in slavery'
  70. Anger at 'woke' Edward Colston plaque - Daily Mail
  71. Bristol University decides not to rename buildings linked to slavery
User Avatar
No comments yet.