Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
| Cod | |
|---|---|
| Atlantic cod | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Actinopterygii |
| Clade: | Ctenosquamata |
| Clade: | Acanthomorpha |
| Groups included | |
|
see text | |
| This article is part of a series on |
| Commercial fish |
|---|
| Large predatory |
| Forage |
| Demersal |
| Mixed |
Cod (pl.: cod) is the common name for the demersal fish genus Gadus, belonging to the family Gadidae.[1] Cod is also used as part of the common name for a number of other fish species, and one species that belongs to genus Gadus is not commonly called cod (Alaska pollock, Gadus chalcogrammus).
The two most common species of cod are the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), which lives in the colder waters and deeper sea regions throughout the North Atlantic, and the Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), which is found in both eastern and western regions of the northern Pacific. Gadus morhua was named by Linnaeus in 1758. (However, G. morhua callarias, a low-salinity, nonmigratory race restricted to parts of the Baltic, was originally described as Gadus callarias by Linnaeus.)
Cod as food is popular in several parts of the world. It has a mild flavour and a dense, flaky, white flesh. Cod livers are processed to make cod liver oil, a common source of vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E, and omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA). Scrod is young Atlantic cod or haddock. In the United Kingdom, Atlantic cod is one of the most common ingredients in fish and chips, along with haddock and plaice.
Species
[edit]At various times in the past, taxonomists included many species in the genus Gadus. Most of these are now either classified in other genera, or have been recognized as forms of one of three species. All these species have a number of common names, most of them ending with the word "cod", whereas other species, as closely related, have other common names (such as pollock and haddock). However, many other, unrelated species also have common names ending with cod. The usage often changes with different localities and at different times.
Cod in the genus Gadus/True cod
[edit]Three species in the genus Gadus are currently called cod:
| Common name | Scientific name | Maximum length |
Common length |
Maximum weight |
Maximum age |
Trophic level |
Fish Base |
FAO | ITIS | IUCN status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic cod | Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758 | 200 cm | 100 cm | 96.0 kg | 25 years | 4.4 | [2] | [3] | [4] | |
| Pacific cod | Gadus macrocephalus Tilesius, 1810 | 119 cm | cm | 22.7 kg | 18 years | 4.0 | [6] | [7] | [8] | Not assessed |
| Greenland cod | Gadus ogac Richardson, 1836 | 77.0 cm | cm | kg | 12 years | 3.6 | [9] | [10] | [11] | Not assessed |
The fourth species of genus Gadus, Gadus chalcogrammus, is commonly called Alaska pollock or walleye pollock. But there are also less widespread alternative trade names highlighting the fish's belonging to the cod genus, like snow cod[12][13][14] or bigeye cod.[13]
Related species
[edit]Cod forms part of the common name of many other fish no longer classified in the genus Gadus. Many are members of the family Gadidae; others are members of three related families within the order Gadiformes whose names include the word "cod": the morid cods, Moridae (100 or so species); the eel cods, Muraenolepididae (four species); and the Eucla cod, Euclichthyidae (one species). The tadpole cod family (Ranicipitidae) has now been placed in Gadidae.
| Common name | Scientific name | Maximum length |
Common length |
Maximum weight |
Maximum age |
Trophic level |
Fish Base |
FAO | ITIS | IUCN status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arctic cod | Arctogadus glacialis (Peters, 1872) | 32.5 cm | cm | kg | years | 3.8 | [15] | [16] | Not assessed | |
| East Siberian cod | Arctogadus borisovi (Dryagin, 1932) | 55.6 cm | cm | 1.5 kg | years | 3.9 | [17] | [18] | Not assessed | |
| Eucla cod | Euclichthys polynemus (McCulloch, 1926) | 35.0 cm | 22.5 cm | kg | years | 3.6 | [19] | [20] | Not assessed | |
| Common ling | Molva molva (Linnaeus, 1758) | 200 cm | 106 cm | 45.0 kg | 25 years | 4.3 | [21] | [22] | [23] | Not assessed |
| Pelagic cod | Melanonus gracilis (Günther, 1878) | 18.7 cm | cm | kg | years | 3.5 | [24] | [25] | Not assessed | |
| Polar cod | Boreogadus saida (Lepechin, 1774) | 40.0 cm | 25.0 cm | kg | 7 years | 3.1 | [26] | [27] | [28] | Not assessed |
| Poor cod | Trisopterus minutus (Linnaeus, 1758) | 40.0 cm | 20.0 cm | kg | 5 years | 3.8 | [29] | [30] | Not assessed | |
| Rock cod | Lotella rhacina (Forster, 1801) | 50.0 cm | cm | kg | years | 3.5 | [31] | [32] | Not assessed | |
| Saffron cod | Eleginus gracilis (Tilesius, 1810) | 55.0 cm | cm | 1.3 kg | 15 years | 4.1 | [33] | [34] | [35] | Not assessed |
| Small-headed cod | Lepidion microcephalus (Cowper, 1956) | 48.0 cm | cm | kg | years | 3.5 | [36] | [37] | Not assessed | |
| Tadpole cod | Guttigadus globosus (Paulin, 1986) | 18.1 cm | cm | kg | 3.5 years | [38] | [39] | Not assessed |
Some fish have common names derived from "cod", such as codling, codlet, or tomcod. ("Codling" is also used as a name for a young cod.)
Other species
[edit]Some fish commonly known as cod are unrelated to Gadus. Part of this name confusion is market-driven. Severely shrunken Atlantic cod stocks have led to the marketing of cod replacements using culinary names of the form "x cod", according to culinary rather than phyletic similarity. The common names for the following species have become well established; note that all inhabit the Southern Hemisphere.
Perciformes
[edit]Fish of the order Perciformes that are commonly called "cod" include:
- Blue cod Parapercis colias
- Eastern freshwater cod Maccullochella ikei
- Mary River cod Maccullochella mariensis
- Murray cod Maccullochella peelii
- Potato cod Epinephelus tukula
- Sleepy cod Oxyeleotris lineolatus
- Trout cod Maccullochella macquariensis
- The notothen family, Nototheniidae, including:
- Antarctic cod Dissostichus mawsoni
- Dissostichus eliginoides, the Patagonian toothfish, is also marketed as "cod"
- Black cod Notothenia microlepidota
- Maori cod Paranotothenia magellanica
- Antarctic cod Dissostichus mawsoni
Rock cod, reef cod, and coral cod
[edit]Almost all coral cod, reef cod or rock cod are also in order Perciformes. Most are better known as groupers, and belong to the family Serranidae. Others belong to the Nototheniidae. Two exceptions are the Australasian red rock cod, which belongs to a different order (see below), and the fish known simply as the rock cod and as soft cod in New Zealand, Lotella rhacina, which as noted above actually is related to the true cod (it is a morid cod).
Scorpaeniformes
[edit]From the order Scorpaeniformes:
- Ling cod Ophiodon elongatus
- Red rock cod Scorpaena papillosa
- Rock cod Sebastes
Ophidiiformes
[edit]The tadpole cod family, Ranicipitidae, and the Eucla cod family, Euclichthyidae, were formerly classified in the order Ophidiiformes, but are now grouped with the Gadiformes.
Marketed as cod
[edit]Some fish that do not have "cod" in their names are sometimes sold as cod. Haddock and whiting belong to the same family, the Gadidae, as cod.
Characteristics
[edit]
Cods of the genus Gadus have three rounded dorsal and two anal fins. The pelvic fins are small, with the first ray extended, and are set under the gill cover (i.e. the throat region), in front of the pectoral fins.[40] The upper jaw extends over the lower jaw, which has a well-developed chin barbel. The eyes are medium-sized, approximately the same as the length of the chin barbel. Cod have a distinct white lateral line running from the gill slit above the pectoral fin, to the base of the caudal or tail fin. The back tends to be a greenish to sandy brown, and shows extensive mottling, especially towards the lighter sides and white belly. Dark brown colouration of the back and sides is not uncommon, especially for individuals that have resided in rocky inshore regions.
The Atlantic cod can change colour at certain water depths. It has two distinct colour phases: gray-green and reddish brown. Its average weight is 5–12 kilograms (11–26 pounds), but specimens weighing up to 100 kg (220 lb) have been recorded. Pacific cod are smaller than Atlantic cod[2][6] and are darker in colour.
Distribution
[edit]Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) live in the colder waters and deeper sea regions throughout the North Atlantic. Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) is found in both eastern and western regions of the Pacific.[41]
Atlantic cod could be further divided into several stocks, including the Arcto-Norwegian, North Sea, Baltic Sea, Faroe, Iceland, East Greenland, West Greenland, Newfoundland, and Labrador stocks. There seems to be little interchange between the stocks, although migrations to their individual breeding grounds may involve distances of 300 kilometres (190 statute miles; 160 nautical miles) or more.[42] For instance, eastern Baltic cod shows specific reproductive adaptations to low salinity compared to Western Baltic and Atlantic cod.[43]
Atlantic cod occupy varied habitats, favouring rough ground, especially inshore, and are demersal in depths between 6 and 60 metres (20 and 200 feet; 3 and 30 fathoms), 80 m (260 ft; 44 fathoms) on average, although not uncommonly to depths of 600 m (2,000 ft; 330 fathoms). Off the Norwegian and New England coasts and on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland, cod congregate at certain seasons in water of 30–70 m (100–200 ft; 20–40 fathoms) depth. Cod are gregarious and form schools, although shoaling tends to be a feature of the spawning season.
Life cycle
[edit]Spawning of northeastern Atlantic cod occurs between January and April (March and April are the peak months), at a depth of 200 metres (660 ft) in specific spawning grounds at water temperatures between 4 and 6 °C (39 and 43 °F). Around the UK, the major spawning grounds are in the middle to southern North Sea, the start of the Bristol Channel (north of Newquay), the Irish Channel (both east and west of the Isle of Man), around Stornoway, and east of Helmsdale.
Prespawning courtship involves fin displays and male grunting, which leads to pairing.[44] The male inverts himself beneath the female, and the pair swim in circles while spawning. The eggs are planktonic and hatch between eight and 23 days, with larva reaching 4 millimetres (5⁄32 inch) in length. This planktonic phase lasts some ten weeks, enabling the young cod to increase its body weight by 40-fold, and growing to about 2 cm (3⁄4 in). The young cod then move to the seabed and change their diet to small benthic crustaceans, such as isopods and small crabs. They increase in size to 8 cm (3 in) in the first six months, 14–18 cm (5+1⁄2–7 in) by the end of their first year, and to 25–35 cm (10–14 in) by the end of the second. Growth tends to be less at higher latitudes. Cod reach maturity at about 50 cm (20 in) at about 3 to 4 years of age. Changes in growth rate over decades of particular stocks have been reported, current eastern Baltic cod shows the lowest growth observed since 1955.[45]
Ecology
[edit]
Adult cod are active hunters, feeding on sand eels, whiting, haddock, small cod, squid, crabs, lobsters, mussels, worms, mackerel, and molluscs.
In the Baltic Sea the most important prey species are herring and sprat.[46] Many studies that analyze the stomach contents of these fish indicate that cod is the top predator, preying on the herring and sprat.[46] Sprat form particularly high concentrations in the Bornholm Basin in the southern Baltic Sea.[47] Although cod feed primarily on adult sprat, sprat tend to prey on the cod eggs and larvae.[48]
Cod and related species are plagued by parasites. For example, the cod worm, Lernaeocera branchialis, starts life as a copepod-like larva, a small free-swimming crustacean. The first host used by the larva is a flatfish or lumpsucker, which it captures with grasping hooks at the front of its body. It penetrates the fish with a thin filament, which it uses to suck the fish's blood. The nourished larvae then mate on the fish.[49][50] The female larva, with her now fertilized eggs, then finds a cod, or a cod-like fish such as a haddock or whiting. There the larva clings to the gills while it metamorphoses into a plump sinusoidal wormlike body with a coiled mass of egg strings at the rear. The front part of the worm's body penetrates the body of the cod until it enters the rear bulb of the host's heart. There, firmly rooted in the cod's circulatory system, the front part of the parasite develops like the branches of a tree, reaching into the main artery. In this way, the worm extracts nutrients from the cod's blood, remaining safely tucked beneath the cod's gill cover until it releases a new generation of offspring into the water.[49][50]
Fisheries
[edit]This section needs to be updated. (October 2022) |
The 2006 northwest Atlantic cod quota is 23,000 tons, representing half the available stocks, while the northeast Atlantic quota is 473,000 tons. Pacific cod is currently enjoying strong global demand. The 2006 total allowable catch (TAC) for the Gulf of Alaska and Aleutian Islands was 260,000 tons.[53]
Aquaculture
[edit]Farming of Atlantic cod has received a significant amount of interest due to the overall trend of increasing cod prices alongside reduced wild catches.[54] However, progress in creating large scale farming of cod has been slow, mainly due to bottlenecks in the larval production stage, where survival and growth are often unpredictable.[55] It has been suggested that this bottleneck may be overcome by ensuring cod larvae are fed diets with similar nutritional content as the copepods they feed on in the wild [56][57] Recent examples have shown that increasing dietary levels of minerals such as selenium, iodine and zinc may improve survival and/or biomarkers for health in aquaculture reared cod larvae.[58][59][60][61]
As food
[edit]
Cod is popular as a food with a mild flavour and a dense, flaky white flesh. Cod livers are processed to make cod liver oil, an important source of vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA).
Young Atlantic cod or haddock prepared in strips for cooking is called scrod. In the United Kingdom, Atlantic cod is one of the most common ingredients in fish and chips, along with haddock and plaice. Cod's soft liver can be tinned (canned) and eaten.
History
[edit]
Cod has been an important economic commodity in international markets since the Viking period (around 800 AD). Norwegians travelled with dried cod and soon a dried cod market developed in southern Europe. This market has lasted for more than 1,000 years, enduring the Black Death, wars and other crises, and is still an important Norwegian fish trade.[62] The Portuguese began fishing cod in the 15th century. Clipfish is widely enjoyed in Portugal. The Basques played an important role in the cod trade, and allegedly found the Canadian fishing banks before Columbus' discovery of America.[63] The North American east coast developed in part due to the vast cod stocks. Many cities in the New England area are located near cod fishing grounds. The fish was so important to the history and development of Massachusetts, the state's House of Representatives hung a wood carving of a codfish, known as the Sacred Cod of Massachusetts, in its chambers.
Apart from the long history, cod differ from most fish because the fishing grounds are far from population centres. The large cod fisheries along the coast of North Norway (and in particular close to the Lofoten islands) have been developed almost uniquely for export, depending on sea transport of stockfish over large distances.[64] Since the introduction of salt, dried and salted cod (clipfish or 'klippfisk' in Norwegian) has also been exported. By the end of the 14th century, the Hanseatic League dominated trade operations and sea transport, with Bergen as the most important port.[65]
William Pitt the Elder, criticizing the Treaty of Paris in Parliament, claimed cod was "British gold"; and that it was folly to restore Newfoundland fishing rights to the French.
In the 17th and 18th centuries in the New World, especially in Massachusetts and Newfoundland, cod became a major commodity, creating trade networks and cross-cultural exchanges. In 1733, Britain tried to gain control over trade between New England and the British Caribbean by imposing the Molasses Act, which they believed would eliminate the trade by making it unprofitable. The cod trade grew instead, because the "French were eager to work with the New Englanders in a lucrative contraband arrangement".[63] In addition to increasing trade, the New England settlers organized into a "codfish aristocracy". The colonists rose up against Britain's "tariff on an import".
In the 20th century, Iceland re-emerged as a fishing power and entered the Cod Wars. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, fishing off the European and American coasts severely depleted stocks and become a major political issue. The necessity of restricting catches to allow stocks to recover upset the fishing industry and politicians who are reluctant to hurt employment.
Collapse of the Atlantic northwest cod fishery
[edit]This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (December 2024) |

On July 2, 1992, the Honourable John Crosbie, Canadian Federal Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, declared a two-year moratorium on the Northern Cod fishery,[68] a designated fishing region off the coast of Newfoundland, after data showed that the total cod biomass had suffered a collapse to less than 1% of its normal value.[69] The minister championed the measure as a temporary solution, allowing the cod population time to recover.[70] The fisheries had long shaped the lives and communities on Canada's Atlantic eastern coast for the preceding five centuries. Societies which are dependent on fishing have a strong mutual relationship with them: the act of fishing changes the ecosystems' balance, which forces the fishery and, in turn, the fishing societies to adapt to new ecological conditions.[69]
The near-complete destruction of the Atlantic northwest cod biomass off the shores devastated coastal communities, which had been overexploiting the same cod population for decades.[70] The fishermen along the Atlantic northwest had employed modern fishing technologies, including the ecologically-devastating practice of trawling, especially in the years leading up to the 1990s, in the misguided belief that fishing stocks are perpetually plentiful and unable to be depleted.[70][71][68] After this assumption was empirically and abruptly shown to be incorrect, to the dismay of government officials and rural workers, some 19,000 fishermen and cod processing plant workers in Newfoundland lost their employment.[70] Nearly 40,000 workers and harvesters in the provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador applied for the federal relief program TAGS (the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy). Abandoned and rusting fishing boats still litter the coasts of Newfoundland and the Canadian northwest to this day.[68]
The fishery minister, John Crosbie, after delivering a speech on the day before the declaration of the moratorium, or July 1, 1992, was publicly heckled and verbally harassed by disgruntled locals at a fishing village.[72] The moratorium, initially lasting for only two years,[70] was indefinitely extended after it became evident that cod populations had not recovered at all but, instead, had continued to spiral downward in both size and numbers, due to the damage caused by decades of horrible fishing practices, and the fact that the moratorium had permitted exceptions for food fisheries for "personal consumption" purposes to this very day.[70] Some 12,000 tons of Northwest cod are still being caught every year along the Newfoundland coast by local fishermen.[68]
The collapse of the four-million ton biomass, which had persevered through several previous marine extinctions over tens of millions of years, in a timespan of no more than 20 years, is oft-cited by researchers as one of the most visible examples of the phenomenon of the "Tragedy of the Commons."[70] Factors which had been implicated as contributing to the collapse include: overfishing; government mismanagement; the disregard of scientific uncertainty;[70] warming habitat waters; declining reproduction; and plain human ignorance.[68] The Northern Cod biomass has been recovering slowly since the imposition of the moratorium. However, as of 2021, the growth of the cod population has been stagnant since 2017, and some scientists argue that the population will not rebound unless the Fisheries Department of Canada lower its yearly quota to 5,000 tons.[73]
| Historical images |
|---|
History Fishing stage for curing and drying cod, Herman Moll 1654–1732 History Manufacturing cod-liver oil, Newfoundland 1858 [74] Cod fishery, Newfoundland 1858 [74] Carlisle Packaging Company, a floating cod cannery, Yukon River, Alaska c. 1918 Paintings Little Girl with a Cod, Anna Ancher Still-life with fish and shellfish, Isaac van Duynen Stamps Cod postage stamp, Newfoundland |
See also
[edit]- The Cod Fisheries: The History of an International Economy, for the Canadian industry
References
[edit]- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 632.
- ^ a b Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Gadus morhua". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Gadus morhua Archived 7 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine (Linnaeus, 1758) FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Gadus morhua". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Sobel, J. (1996). Gadus morhua. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T8784A12931575.en
- ^ a b Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Gadus macrocephalus". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Gadus macrocephalus (Tilesius, 1810) Archived 7 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Gadus macrocephalus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Gadus ogac". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Gadus ogac (Richardson, 1836) Archived 1 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Gadus ogac". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute: Whitefish Buyers Guide. (Memento of the original as of 26 September 2006 in the Internet Archive).
- ^ a b SeafoodSource.com (23 January 2014): Alaska pollock Archived 25 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Doré, Ian (1991): The New Fresh Seafood Buyer's Guide: A manual for distributors, restaurants, and retailers Archived 7 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine, p. 126.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Arctogadus glacialis". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Arctogadus glacialis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Arctogadus borisovi". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Arctogadus borisovi". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Euclichthys polynemus". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Euclichthys polynemus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Molva molva". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Molva molva Archived 20 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine (Linnaeus, 1758) FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Molva molva". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Melanonus gracilis". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Melanonus gracilis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Boreogadus saida". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Boreogadus saida (Lepechin, 1774) Archived 1 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Boreogadus saida". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Trisopterus minutus". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Trisopterus minutus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Lotella rhacina". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Lotella rhacina". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Eleginus gracilis". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ Eleginus gracilis (Tilesius, 1810) Archived 12 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine FAO, Species Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ "Eleginus gracilis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Lepidion microcephalus". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Lepidion microcephalus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Guttigadus globosus". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Guttigadus globosus". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Endo, Clarissa Akemi Kajiya; Vikebø, Frode B.; Yaragina, Natalia A.; Hjøllo, Solfrid Sætre; Stige, Leif Christian (2021). "Cod's Journey Back Home—From Birth to Nursery". Frontiers for Young Minds. 9. doi:10.3389/frym.2021.622088.
- ^ "Cod" Archived 8 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopædia Britannica online 2008
- ^ Kjesbu, Olav Sigurd; Bogstad, Bjarte; Devine, Jennifer A.; Gjøsæter, Harald; Howell, Daniel; Ingvaldsen, Randi B.; Nash, Richard D. M.; Skjæraasen, Jon Egil (4 March 2014). "Synergies between climate and management for Atlantic cod fisheries at high latitudes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (9): 3478–3483. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.3478K. doi:10.1073/pnas.1316342111. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3948268. PMID 24550465.
- ^ Vallin, Lars; Nissling, Anders; Westin, Lars (1999). "Potential Factors Influencing Reproductive Success of Baltic Cod, Gadus morhua: A Review". Ambio. 28 (1): 92–99. ISSN 0044-7447. JSTOR 4314854.
- ^ Brawn, V.M. (1961). "Reproductive behaviour of the cod (Gadus callarias L.)". Behaviour. 18 (3): 177–197. doi:10.1163/156853961x00114. JSTOR 4532991.
- ^ Mion, Monica; Haase, Stefanie; Hemmer-Hansen, Jakob; Hilvarsson, Annelie; Hüssy, Karin; Krüger-Johnsen, Maria; Krumme, Uwe; McQueen, Kate; Plikshs, Maris; Radtke, Krzysztof; Schade, Franziska Maria (March 2021). "Multidecadal changes in fish growth rates estimated from tagging data: A case study from the Eastern Baltic cod ( Gadus morhua, Gadidae )". Fish and Fisheries. 22 (2): 413–427. doi:10.1111/faf.12527. hdl:11585/809386. ISSN 1467-2960. S2CID 233795252. Archived from the original on 21 November 2021. Retrieved 21 November 2021.
- ^ a b Köster, Friedrich W.; Möllmann, Christian; Neuenfeldt, Stefan; St John, Michael A; Plikshs, Maris; Voss, Rüdiger (2001). "Developing Baltic cod recruitment models. I. Resolving spatial and temporal dynamics of spawning stock and recruitment for cod, herring, and sprat" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 58 (8): 1516–1533. doi:10.1139/cjfas-58-8-1516. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. [permanent dead link]
- ^ Casini, Michele; Cardinale, Massimiliano & Arrheni, Fredrik (2004). "Feeding preferences of herring (Clupea harengus) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the southern Baltic Sea". ICES Journal of Marine Science. 61 (8): 1267. Bibcode:2004ICJMS..61.1267C. doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.12.011.
- ^ Nissling, Anders (2004). "Effects of temperature on egg and larval survival of cod (Gadus morhua) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the Baltic Sea – implications for stock development". Hydrobiologia. 514 (1–3): 115–123. Bibcode:2004HyBio.514..115N. doi:10.1023/B:hydr.0000018212.88053.aa. S2CID 59944278.
- ^ a b Matthews, Bernard E. (1998). An Introduction to Parasitology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 73–74. ISBN 978-0-521-57691-8.
- ^ a b Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals. Greenwood Press. 2007. ISBN 978-0-313-33922-6.
- ^ Based on data sourced from the relevant FAO Species Fact Sheets Archived 8 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Based on data sourced from the FIGIS database Archived 30 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, FAO.
- ^ Fisheries, NOAA (18 November 2019). "2019–2020 Alaska Groundfish Harvest Specifications | NOAA Fisheries". NOAA. Archived from the original on 28 July 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
- ^ The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010 Archived 15 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine. fao.org. ISBN 978-92-5-106675-1.
- ^ Kamisaka, Y.; Jordal, A.E.O.; Edvardsen, R.B.; Kryvi, H.; Otterlei, E.; Rønnestad, I (2010). "A case report on the distended gut syndrome (DGS) in cultured larvae of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)". Aquaculture. 309 (1–4): 38–48. Bibcode:2010Aquac.309...38K. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.006.
- ^ van der Meeren, T.; Olsen, R.E.; Hamre, K.; Fyhn, H.J (2008). "Biochemical composition of copepods for evaluation of feed quality in production of juvenile marine fish" (PDF). Aquaculture. 274 (2–4): 375–397. Bibcode:2008Aquac.274..375V. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.11.041. hdl:11250/108219. Archived from the original on 12 April 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2018.
- ^ Hamre, K.; Srivastava, A.; Rønnestad, I.; Mangor-Jensen, A.; Stoss, J (2008). "Several micronutrients in the rotifer Brachionus sp. may not fulfil the nutritional requirements of marine fish larvae". Aquaculture Nutrition. 14 (1): 51–60. Bibcode:2008AqNut..14...51H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00504.x.
- ^ Hamre, K.; Mollan, T.A.; Sæle, Ø.; Erstad, B (2008). "Rotifers enriched with iodine and selenium increase survival in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) larvae". Aquaculture. 284 (1–4): 190–195. Bibcode:2008Aquac.284..190H. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.052.
- ^ Penglase, S.; Nordgreen, A.; van der Meeren, T.; Olsvik, P.; Sæle, O.; Baeverfjord, G.; Helland, S.; Hamre, K (2010). "Increasing the level of selenium in rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis 'Cayman') enhances the mRNA expression and activity of glutathione peroxidase in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) larvae". Aquaculture. 306 (1–4): 259–269. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.011.
- ^ Penglase, S.; Harboe, T.; Sæle, O.; Helland, S.; Nordgreen, A.; Hamre, K. (2013). "Iodine nutrition and toxicity in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) larvae". PeerJ. 1:e20 e20. doi:10.7717/peerj.20. PMC 3628846. PMID 23638355.
- ^ Penglase, S.; Hamre, K.; Olsvik, P.; Grøtan, E.; Nordgreen, A (2013). "Rotifers enriched with iodine, copper and manganese had no effect on larval cod (Gadus morhua) growth, mineral status or redox system gene mRNA levels". Aquaculture Research. 46 (8): 1793. doi:10.1111/are.12332.
- ^ Barrett, James; Beukens, Roelf; Simpson, Ian; Ashmore, Patrick; Poaps, Sandra; Huntley, Jacqui (2000). "What was the Viking age and when did it happen? A view from Orkney". Norwegian Archaeological Review. 33 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1080/00293650050202600. S2CID 162229393.
- ^ a b Kurlansky, Mark (1997). Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World. New York: Walker. ISBN 978-0-8027-1326-1.
- ^ Rollefsen, G. (1966). "Norwegian fisheries research". Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter, Serie Havundersøkelser. 14 (1): 1–36. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
- ^ Holt-Jensen, A. (1985). "Norway and the sea: the shifting importance of marine resources through Norwegian history". GeoJournal. 10 (4): 393–399. Bibcode:1985GeoJo..10..393H. doi:10.1007/BF00461710. S2CID 153579866.
- ^ Kenneth T. Frank; Brian Petrie; Jae S. Choi; William C. Leggett (2005). "Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem". Science. 308 (5728): 1621–1623. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1621F. doi:10.1126/science.1113075. PMID 15947186. S2CID 45088691.
- ^ "Collapse of Atlantic cod stocks off the East Coast of Newfoundland in 1992 | GRID-Arendal – Maps & Graphics library". www.grida.no. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
- ^ a b c d e "The cod delusion". canadiangeographic.ca. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
- ^ a b Hamilton and Butler, 1.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Mason, Fred (2002). "The Newfoundland Cod Stock Collapse: A Review and Analysis of Social Factors". Electronic Green Journal. 1 (17). doi:10.5070/G311710480.
- ^ Pedersen, Eric J.; Thompson, Patrick L.; Ball, R. Aaron; Fortin, Marie-Josée; Gouhier, Tarik C.; Link, Heike; Moritz, Charlotte; Nenzen, Hedvig; Stanley, Ryan R. E.; Taranu, Zofia E.; Gonzalez, Andrew; Guichard, Frédéric; Pepin, Pierre (July 2017). "Signatures of the collapse and incipient recovery of an overexploited marine ecosystem". Royal Society Open Science. 4 (7) 170215. Bibcode:2017RSOS....470215P. doi:10.1098/rsos.170215. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 5541544. PMID 28791149.
- ^ "Fish still missing, traditions extinct 30 years after N.L. cod moratorium | CBC News". 7 January 2024. Archived from the original on 7 January 2024. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
- ^ "After almost 3 decades, cod are still not back off N.L. Scientists worry it may never happen | CBC News". 7 January 2024. Archived from the original on 7 January 2024. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
- ^ a b Girard, Fulgence (1858) La pêche de la morue Archived 30 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine (The cod fishery) Le Monde illustré, 53. 17 April 1858. Google translation Archived 24 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Further reading
[edit]| External videos | |
|---|---|
- Bavington, Dean L. Y. Managed Annihilation: An Unnatural History of the Newfoundland Cod Collapse (University of British Columbia Press; 2010) 224 pages. Links the collapse of Newfoundland and Labrador cod fishing to state management of the resource.
- Cobb, John N. (1916). Pacific Cod Fisheries. Bureau of Fisheries Document. Vol. 830. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. OCLC 14263968.
- Greenberg, Paul (2010). Four Fish: The Future of the Last Wild Food. New York: Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-256-8. OCLC 813929026.
- Mark Kurlansky (1997). Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World.
- Shields, Edward (2001). Salt of the Sea: The Pacific Coast Cod Fishery and the Last Days of Sail. Lopez Island, Wash.: Heritage House. ISBN 978-1-894384-35-3.
External links
[edit]- Codtrace. Archived 1 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine.
- fishbase.org – Scientific Names for Gadus
- Fisheries Heritage website, Newfoundland and Labrador (archived)
- Long term trends in Norwegian cod fisheries – the pioneers
- Species factsheet on cod from the UK Sea Fish Industry Authority (PDF, 2MB)
- . New International Encyclopedia. 1905.
Taxonomy and Classification
True Cod Species in Genus Gadus
The genus Gadus belongs to the family Gadidae and encompasses the true cod species, distinguished by their elongate bodies, three dorsal fins, and chin barbel.[6] These demersal fishes are primarily marine, inhabiting cold temperate and Arctic waters of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Three species are currently recognized within the genus: Gadus morhua (Atlantic cod), Gadus macrocephalus (Pacific cod), and Gadus ogac (Greenland cod).[7] Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758, known as the Atlantic cod, is the type species of the genus and exhibits a wide distribution across the North Atlantic Ocean, from shallow coastal waters to depths of up to 600 meters.[8] It features a robust body with a lateral line, variable coloration from brown to greenish with dark spots, and a prominent barbel on the chin; maximum length reaches 1.8 meters and weight up to 100 kilograms.[9] Subspecies include G. m. morhua (northeastern Atlantic), G. m. callarias (Baltic cod), and others adapted to regional conditions.[10] Gadus macrocephalus Tilesius, 1810, the Pacific cod, inhabits the northern Pacific Ocean from the Bering Sea to California and Japan, typically on continental shelves at depths of 10 to 900 meters.[11] Characterized by a softer, more elongate body than its Atlantic counterpart, with a dusky lateral line and dark spots, it grows to a maximum of 1.2 meters and 23 kilograms; it forms schools and preys on benthic organisms.[12] Taxonomic distinctions from Atlantic cod include differences in vertebral counts and swim bladder morphology.[13] Gadus ogac Richardson, 1836, or Greenland cod, is confined to Arctic and sub-Arctic waters around Greenland, Labrador, and Iceland, at depths from near-surface to 400 meters.[14] Smaller than the other species, it attains lengths of up to 77 centimeters and features a greenish body with faint barring; genetic studies confirm its status as a distinct species, though some analyses suggest close relation to G. morhua.[15] It differs taxonomically by having fewer vertebrae (typically 50-52) compared to G. morhua (around 53-56).[16]Closely Related Gadidae Species
The Gadidae family includes multiple genera outside Gadus that exhibit morphological similarities to cod species, such as the presence of three dorsal fins, two anal fins, chin barbels in many cases, and a demersal or benthopelagic habit in northern hemisphere marine environments.[6] These traits facilitate comparable ecological roles, including bottom-dwelling foraging on invertebrates and fish, though species differ in size, coloration, and distribution. Phylogenetic analyses, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, indicate that some non-Gadus lineages, particularly in subfamily Gadinae, diverged relatively recently from cod ancestors, sharing adaptations to cold-temperate waters.[17][18] Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), the only species in its genus, is among the closest relatives, co-inhabiting North Atlantic continental shelves with Atlantic cod at depths of 40–300 meters and often targeted in mixed fisheries.[19] Adults reach a maximum length of about 94 cm and weight of 11 kg, with a silvery body, dark lateral line, and a characteristic black "thumbprint" blotch at the pectoral fin base, distinguishing it from cod's plain coloration.[19] Haddock spawn from January to June in offshore waters, producing pelagic eggs similar to cod, and juveniles settle in shallower areas where they consume copepods and amphipods before shifting to fish diets.[6] Saithe (Pollachius virens), also known as pollock in some regions, inhabits the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, growing to 130 cm and exhibiting a more protruding lower jaw and greenish back compared to cod.[6] This benthopelagic predator forms large schools, migrates seasonally for spawning from January to July, and preys on herring, capelin, and young gadids, including cod, exerting ecological pressure on cod populations.[6] Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) occupies shallower Northeast Atlantic shelf seas, typically at 10–100 meters over sandy or muddy bottoms, attaining 70 cm in length with a slender profile and faint barring.[6] It spawns year-round in coastal areas, with larvae relying on plankton, and serves as forage for seals, larger fish like cod, and seabirds, highlighting interconnected trophic dynamics within Gadidae.[6] Further north, Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) in genus Boreogadus occupies ice-associated habitats across the Arctic and sub-Arctic, smaller at up to 30 cm, with a more rounded body and lipid-rich flesh adapted to low temperatures.[6] Molecular evidence positions Boreogadus phylogenetically nearer to Gadus morhua than to Gadus macrocephalus, reflecting shared boreal ancestry despite ecological divergence toward under-ice pelagic niches.[17]Other Fish Commonly Marketed as Cod
Lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus), a greenling from the North Pacific, is frequently marketed under cod-related names such as buffalo cod or cultus cod due to its elongated body and flaky white flesh resembling true cod, despite belonging to the family Hexagrammidae rather than Gadidae.[20][21] This species inhabits rocky coastal waters from Alaska to Baja California, growing up to 1.5 meters and weighing over 30 kg, with a diet of fish and invertebrates that supports its lean, mild flavor suitable for frying or baking.[20] U.S. wild-caught lingcod populations are managed sustainably under federal quotas, with landings exceeding 5 million pounds annually in recent years.[20] Sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), known as black cod, originates from the North Pacific and is not a gadid but a member of the family Anoplopomatidae; its cod moniker stems from superficial similarities in texture and market use, though it features higher oil content yielding a buttery taste.[22] Primarily exported to Japan, U.S. sablefish harvests reached about 50,000 metric tons in 2022, concentrated off Alaska where deep-water stocks (200–2,000 meters) sustain commercial longline fisheries.[22] Its rapid maturation—reaching harvest size in 5–7 years—contrasts with slower-growing true cod, enabling quicker population recovery under quota systems.[22] Rockfish species in the genus Sebastes, often labeled rock cod or Pacific snapper, are scorpaenids from temperate Pacific waters and lack relation to gadiform cod, yet their firm fillets mimic cod in fish-and-chips preparations, leading to common market substitution in regions like California.[23] Over 100 Sebastes species exist, with vermilion and canary rockfish exemplifying those sold as rock cod; U.S. West Coast catches totaled around 10,000 metric tons in 2023, regulated by individual fishing quotas to address historical overfishing.[23] These viviparous fish, bearing live young, occupy rocky reefs up to 500 meters deep, differing biologically from egg-laying gadids.[23]Biological Characteristics
Morphology and Physiology
True cods in the genus Gadus, including the Atlantic cod (G. morhua) and Pacific cod (G. macrocephalus), exhibit a fusiform body shape with an oval cross-section, adapted for bottom-dwelling in temperate marine environments. The head is large with a protruding upper jaw, complemented by a conspicuous chin barbel on the lower jaw that likely serves tactile and chemosensory roles. Coloration varies by species but generally features dorsal shades of brown, green, or gray with dark spots or patterns for camouflage, fading to pale or silvery ventrally; the peritoneum is silvery.[24][11] Diagnostic fin structures include three separate dorsal fins with a total of 37-57 soft rays and two anal fins with 31-45 soft rays, alongside a lightly pigmented lateral line—curved above the pectoral fins in Atlantic cod and arching under the first two dorsal fins in Pacific cod—that facilitates vibration detection. Scales are cycloid and small, covering the body. Maximum sizes differ, with Atlantic cod reaching up to 200 cm in total length (TL) and 96 kg, commonly 100 cm TL, while Pacific cod attain 119 cm TL and 22.7 kg.[24][11] Internally, cod possess 49-55 vertebrae and a closed, compliant swim bladder occupying approximately 5% of body volume, primarily filled with oxygen via gas gland secretion and maintained through resorption mechanisms to counteract pressure changes during vertical movements.[25] This buoyancy organ enables habitation from surface waters to depths of 600 m or more, typically 150-400 m. Physiologically, they demonstrate tolerance to hypoxia, sustaining ventilation, heart rate, and swimming activity at dissolved oxygen levels as low as 40-50% saturation before significant stress.[26] Cod are adapted to cold waters, thriving in temperatures of 0-15°C (preferred 0.5-10°C), with rising temperatures eliciting increased metabolic rates, heart rate variability, and swimming activity.[24][27] They also show osmoregulatory adaptations for salinity fluctuations encountered in migrations, maintaining ionic balance across coastal and offshore habitats.[28]Sensory and Behavioral Adaptations
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) utilize a lateral line system embedded in their skin, extending from the head to the tail, to detect subtle water movements and vibrations, facilitating navigation, prey detection, and predator avoidance in turbid or low-visibility environments.[29] This mechanosensory organ complements other modalities by providing hydrodynamic cues over short distances. Hearing in cod is particularly sensitive to low-frequency sounds (below 200 Hz), enabling larvae to orient toward settlement habitats in fjords and adults to perceive acoustic signals from conspecifics or predators; experimental observations of 89 drifting larvae confirmed attraction to such frequencies during early development.[30] Cod can also condition to detect higher-frequency ultrasound pulses, though natural responses emphasize particle motion over pressure waves.[31] Visual adaptations support foraging in dim conditions, with larval cod maintaining attack behaviors on prey at light intensities equivalent to nighttime at 20-40 m depths, where they aggregate; this capability likely stems from rod-dominated retinas suited to the demersal photic zone.[32] Olfaction aids in locating food odors, as in many gadoids, though cod prioritize visual and mechanosensory cues for midwater prey capture once detected.[33] Behaviorally, cod engage in shoaling to dilute individual predation risk, with group cohesion influenced by visual and lateral line inputs; intensive fishing has selected against tight schooling in some populations, favoring solitary or loose aggregations that evade trawls. Feeding is opportunistic and diurnal-twilight peaked, involving bursts of swimming to pursue fish (59% of diet by weight) and crustaceans, with cod 5-90 cm relying on sight for detection but tolerating static prey if conditioned; Northeast Arctic stocks exhibit cannibalism during prey scarcity.[34][35] Thermoregulatory behaviors include vertical migrations to avoid acute temperature shifts exceeding 4°C daily, minimizing metabolic stress in ectothermic physiology.[36] To counter buoyancy changes from swim bladder compression, cod adjust via pectoral fin gliding or tilted swimming, optimizing energy in variable pressures.[37]Distribution and Habitat
Global Range of Major Species
The genus Gadus comprises three primary species recognized as true cod: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), and Greenland cod (Gadus ogac). These demersal fish occupy cold-temperate to Arctic marine environments, primarily over continental shelves.[38] Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) has the broadest distribution among cod species, spanning the North Atlantic Ocean across both western and eastern basins. In the western Atlantic, its range extends from Ungava Bay in northern Canada southward along the coast to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, with concentrations on Georges Bank and in the Gulf of Maine.[9] [1] In the eastern Atlantic, populations inhabit waters from the Bay of Biscay northward to the Barents Sea, including areas off Iceland, the Norwegian coast, and around the British Isles.[39] This species is typically found from coastal shallows to depths of 600 meters, though juveniles favor shallower inshore habitats.[40] Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) is confined to the northern Pacific Ocean, where it ranges from the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands southward to the Gulf of Alaska and as far as northern California in the east, and Japan in the west.[41] The southern boundary approximates 34°N latitude, while the northern limit reaches about 63°N, with abundance peaking in sub-Arctic shelf waters up to 900 meters deep.[42] Seasonal migrations influence local densities, but the core distribution remains tied to continental margins and upper slopes.[43] Greenland cod (Gadus ogac) inhabits Arctic and sub-Arctic regions of the northwestern Atlantic and Arctic Ocean, with its range stretching from Alaska eastward to West Greenland and southward along continental shelves.[44] This smaller species prefers inshore waters and shelf depths up to 200 meters, often in ice-influenced environments, distinguishing it from the more temperate affinities of its congeners.[45] Overlaps with Atlantic cod occur in transitional zones, but Greenland cod predominates in colder, higher-latitude extents.[46]Environmental Preferences and Migration Patterns
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) inhabit cold-temperate to subarctic marine waters, preferring temperatures between 0°C and 10°C, with spawning typically occurring in 3–7°C ranges.[47] They occupy depths from surface coastal areas to 500–600 meters on continental shelves and slopes, favoring demersal habitats over sandy or muddy bottoms where they forage.[48] Salinity tolerance extends to full marine conditions (30–35 ppt), though some populations adapt to brackish environments like the Baltic Sea, where surface salinity has declined to around 7 ppt.[49] Migration in Atlantic cod is seasonally driven, with many stocks moving southward and westward into shallower waters during winter and early spring for spawning, then northward and eastward to deeper feeding grounds in summer.[50] Individuals often follow stable thermal fronts, increasing vertical activity upon reaching feeding areas, with documented movements spanning hundreds of kilometers, such as from the northeast Newfoundland shelf to coastal zones.[51][52] Tagging studies reveal variable patterns, including westward shifts into the English Channel or eastward across the North Sea, influenced by temperature gradients and prey availability like capelin.[53] Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) prefer cold North Pacific waters on continental shelves and upper slopes, at depths of 90–900 meters, with winter distributions often at 90–250 meters.[13] Optimal spawning temperatures fall between 4–6°C, and habitat suitability is limited by temperature, salinity, current velocity, and depth, with demersal preferences near the seafloor.[54][55] Pacific cod exhibit pronounced seasonal migrations, departing winter spawning grounds in mid-March for summer foraging areas, covering 64–394 kilometers in regions like the Aleutian Islands.[56] Long-distance movements up to 1,000 kilometers occur in the Bering Sea, with post-spawning tracking showing returns to deeper habitats; poleward shifts in nursery and adult ranges have been observed amid warming trends.[57][58] These patterns align with prey pursuit and thermal optima, though climate-driven habitat compression may alter future distributions.[59]Life History and Ecology
Reproduction and Development
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), the principal species in the genus Gadus, reach sexual maturity between 2 and 3 years of age, though this varies by population and environmental conditions such as temperature, with higher temperatures accelerating maturation.[1][60] Spawning occurs as broadcast fertilization in offshore waters near the bottom at depths of 50–200 m, typically during winter and early spring, with peak activity in March in regions like the Baltic Sea; water temperatures range from 0–12°C, preferably 0–6°C.[24][61] Females exhibit determinate multiple spawning, releasing 8–22 batches of buoyant, pelagic eggs per season, with total fecundity ranging from 2.5 million eggs in a 5 kg female to 9 million in a 34 kg female; larger, older females produce bigger eggs with neutral buoyancy at lower salinities, potentially enhancing viability.[24][61] Eggs develop over approximately 14 days at 6°C or 4–6°C during spawning, hatching into yolk-sac larvae that remain pelagic.[24][62] Larval development spans a planktonic phase lasting up to 2.5–3 months at 8°C, during which cod undergo metamorphosis around 12–15 mm standard length, marked by finfold absorption and the onset of bottom-oriented feeding; survival and growth depend on factors like temperature, prey availability, and maternal effects from egg quality.[24][63] Juveniles then settle to benthic habitats, transitioning to demersal life.[24] Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) mature similarly but spawn from late summer to mid-winter in deeper waters, with females releasing all ripe eggs in a single batch within 20 seconds; embryonic development requires temperatures above 0°C, and larvae exhibit a comparable pelagic phase before settlement.[11][64]Population Dynamics and Predation Pressures
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) populations display pronounced boom-bust cycles characterized by high fecundity—females producing 3 to 9 million eggs per spawning event—but extreme variability in recruitment success, with year-class strength fluctuating by orders of magnitude across decades.[1] This variability is driven primarily by environmental factors such as temperature and prey availability, which influence larval survival through match-mismatch dynamics between cod spawning timing and zooplankton peaks, alongside density-dependent mortality and fishing pressure.[66] Recruitment is particularly erratic at the species' northern and southern range limits, where environmental stochasticity amplifies fluctuations compared to core habitats.[67] Historical reconstructions indicate that pre-exploitation mortality rates sustained stable production, but intensified harvesting since the Viking era (circa 800–1100 CE) shifted dynamics toward elevated natural and anthropogenic mortality, reducing overall biomass resilience.[68] Predation exerts significant pressure on cod, especially during early life stages, with juveniles vulnerable to cannibalism by larger conspecifics and predation from medium-sized fishes like herring (targeting eggs and larvae) and grey gurnard (on post-larvae).[69] Adult cod face fewer threats, primarily from large sharks and pinnipeds such as harp and harbor seals, though these interactions are localized and opportunistic.[48] Cannibalism within cod populations acts as a density-dependent regulator, intensifying during high-recruitment years and contributing up to 20–50% of juvenile mortality in dense cohorts, thereby stabilizing long-term dynamics but exacerbating collapses in overfished stocks where adult abundance skews size spectra.[70] Observed catastrophic predation events, such as rapid seal depredation on aggregated schools, can alter local predator-prey balances in hours, underscoring predation's role in amplifying environmental variability rather than serving as a primary driver of basin-scale declines.[71] Pollution and climate-induced shifts may indirectly heighten predation vulnerability by impairing cod growth and escape behaviors, though empirical data link these effects more strongly to recruitment failure than direct adult losses.[72]Interactions with Ecosystems and Prey
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) serves as a dominant top predator in North Atlantic marine ecosystems, exerting significant influence on trophic structures by preying on a diverse array of fish and invertebrates, thereby helping regulate prey populations and maintain ecological balance.[73][60] In regions like the Barents Sea, cod consumes over 5 million tonnes of fish annually, functioning as both a key predator—targeting species such as capelin, haddock, and herring—and occasional prey for larger marine mammals and fish, which underscores its pivotal position in the food web.[74][75] Diet analyses reveal that fish constitute the primary prey by weight, yet invertebrates, including crabs, shrimp, and polychaetes, comprise over 40% of consumption even in cod exceeding 70 cm in length, reflecting opportunistic feeding adapted to seasonal and regional prey availability.[76][77] This predation dynamic extends to suppressing populations of commercially valuable shellfish and crustaceans; for instance, cod historically limited abundances of American lobsters, crabs, and shrimp through direct consumption, with reduced predation following stock declines allowing prey species to proliferate unchecked.[60] In predator-prey models of the Barents Sea, cod's high abundance and migratory behavior amplify its ecosystem-shaping effects, as intensified feeding on schooling forage fish like capelin alters energy transfer across trophic levels and influences biodiversity patterns.[78][79] Such interactions highlight cod's role in stabilizing food webs, where its absence—often due to overexploitation—triggers cascading effects, including shifts in prey behavior and increased vulnerability of lower trophic levels to alternative pressures.[80] Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) exhibits analogous predatory interactions in North Pacific ecosystems, primarily targeting teleost fishes alongside crustaceans, cephalopods, and benthic invertebrates, which supports its flexible ontogenetic shift from planktonic to demersal prey as juveniles mature.[81][82] Stomach content and stable isotope studies confirm that walleye pollock, euphausiids, and squid form core diet components off eastern Hokkaido and in the Bering Sea, with cod modulating prey dynamics through size-selective predation that varies by habitat depth and season.[83][84] In these systems, cod's consumption of forage species like capelin and pollock influences energy flows, potentially dampening oscillations in prey stocks; however, intensified predator-prey overlaps in shallower waters can elevate localized depletion risks, as evidenced by higher feeding rates on vertically migrating prey near seafloor banks.[85][79] Overall, both cod species contribute to ecosystem resilience by linking pelagic and benthic food chains, though empirical data indicate that their regulatory influence diminishes under low population densities, allowing prey escapes and altering community compositions.[86][87]Commercial Fisheries
Historical Exploitation and Peak Harvests
The exploitation of cod stocks dates back to at least the medieval period in northern European waters, where dried cod became a staple for trade and sustenance, particularly during Lent in Catholic regions.[88] Intensive commercial harvesting intensified in the late 15th century following the discovery of vast cod shoals on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland, with evidence indicating Basque fishermen were already operating there by the early 1500s, predating John Cabot's 1497 voyage.[89] These early fisheries relied on hook-and-line methods from small vessels, yielding sustainable catches estimated at 100,000 to 200,000 tonnes annually in Eastern Canada from the 16th century through the 1950s.[90] By the 19th century, cod fishing had become the economic backbone of Newfoundland, supporting colonial settlement and export markets in Europe and the Caribbean, with production involving salting and drying techniques that preserved the fish for transatlantic shipment.[91] The introduction of steam-powered trawlers and longline gear in the early 20th century marked the shift to industrialized exploitation, enabling larger fleets from Europe, including Britain and Germany, to target distant grounds like the Grand Banks and North Sea.[88] Post-World War II technological advances, such as diesel engines, echo sounders, and factory trawlers—particularly from the Soviet Union and East Germany—dramatically escalated harvesting pressure, as these vessels could process catches at sea without reliance on nearshore facilities.[88] Peak harvests occurred in the mid-20th century, driven by unrestricted access to international waters before the establishment of 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zones in the 1970s. In Eastern Canada, cod landings surged from 360,000 tons in 1959 to a record 810,000 tons in 1968, representing roughly 80% of the total from offshore operations.[88] [90] For the broader Newfoundland fishery spanning 1508 to 2023, cumulative catches exceeded 200 million tonnes, with annual averages around 398,000 tonnes, though the 1960s boom reflected overcapacity and ignored signs of stock stress.[92] Pacific cod fisheries, primarily off Alaska and Russia, followed a similar trajectory but with less catastrophic peaks, reaching highs of approximately 400,000–500,000 tonnes in the 1980s before stabilizing under management.[92] These maxima underscored the vulnerability of cod populations to exponential fishing effort, as mortality rates outpaced reproductive recovery in long-lived, slow-growing species.[93]Fishing Technologies and Methods
Cod fisheries have utilized a spectrum of fishing methods, evolving from labor-intensive inshore techniques to mechanized offshore operations, primarily targeting Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus). Traditional approaches, such as handlining and jigging, involve single lines with baited hooks or weighted lures dropped vertically from boats to the seafloor, allowing selective capture of cod near structures like reefs or wrecks.[94] These methods, dating back centuries, remain viable for small-scale or recreational fishing, particularly in coastal areas where cod aggregate in shallower waters.[95] In the early 20th century, technological advancements including motorized vessels and synthetic nets expanded cod harvesting capacity, with gillnets—vertical panels that entangle fish by gills—becoming widespread for both inshore and offshore use.[4] Gillnets effectively target schooling cod but can inadvertently capture juveniles and non-target species, contributing to higher discard rates in unregulated fisheries.[1] Concurrently, draggers employing otter trawls—cone-shaped nets towed along the bottom—emerged as a dominant industrial method, enabling high-volume catches over vast areas of the continental shelf.[4] Bottom trawling disrupts benthic habitats by scraping the seabed, though modifications like rockhopper gear allow operation over uneven terrain frequented by cod.[96] Bottom longlining represents a key modern alternative, consisting of a weighted mainline up to several kilometers long, deployed on the seafloor with hundreds of baited hooks on branch lines, buoyed at ends for retrieval.[97] This gear selectively targets larger, demersal cod while minimizing bycatch compared to trawls, as fish must actively bite hooks, and it performs well in areas with rocky bottoms where trawls risk snagging.[98] In regions like the Barents Sea and Alaska, longliners compete with trawlers, often yielding higher-value catches due to reduced damage from net contact.[99] Danish seine methods, using ropes to herd fish toward a central net, supplement these in some European and North American fleets, balancing efficiency with lower fuel demands than trawling.[94] For Pacific cod, techniques mirror Atlantic practices but emphasize jigging machines on factory trawlers for efficiency in the Bering Sea, where automated lines drop and retrieve multiple hooks simultaneously.[100] Across both species, sonar and electronic monitoring systems now integrate with these gears to optimize deployment, detect cod schools, and comply with regulations, though over-reliance on high-seas trawling has historically amplified stock pressures by enabling relentless pursuit of depleting populations.[1] Selective gears like longlines and handlines continue to support sustainable quotas in managed fisheries, underscoring their role in reducing ecological footprint relative to unselective trawls.[101]Yield Trends and Stock Assessments
Global capture production of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) peaked at approximately 1.6 million tonnes in the early 1970s, driven by expanded industrial trawling in the North Atlantic, before declining sharply to around 700,000 tonnes by the 1990s due to overexploitation exceeding recruitment rates.[40] Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) yields have been more stable historically, averaging 300,000–500,000 tonnes annually since the mid-20th century, with peaks exceeding 500,000 tonnes in the 1980s from Alaskan and Russian fisheries, though recent trends show fluctuations linked to environmental variability and fishery removals.[102] Total global cod capture has trended downward since the 1980s, from over 2 million tonnes combined to roughly 1.2 million tonnes in recent years, reflecting persistent pressure on Atlantic stocks outweighing Pacific stability.[40] Stock assessments for Atlantic cod reveal widespread depletion across major North Atlantic management units as of 2024, with spawning stock biomass (SSB) in areas like the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence at historic lows since 1973 and NAFO Subdivision 3Ps at 52% of the limit reference point (LRP).[103][104] In the U.S. Gulf of Maine, SSB remains critically low, with poor recruitment attributed partly to environmental changes alongside historical overfishing, while Northeast Arctic stocks peaked at 2.3 million tonnes in 2013 before declining.[60][105] Pacific cod assessments indicate healthier but variable status; the Gulf of Alaska stock supported an acceptable biological catch (ABC) of 32,272 tonnes in 2024, a 31% increase from 2023 due to improved model projections of biomass, though Bering Sea catches declined 7% in early 2023 amid warmer conditions affecting recruitment.[106][107] These assessments, derived from integrated models incorporating survey data and catch histories, underscore that while regulatory reductions have curbed fishing mortality in some areas, natural factors like temperature-driven regime shifts contribute to ongoing uncertainty in recovery trajectories.[108]Fishery Management and Crises
Regulatory Frameworks and Quota Systems
The management of Atlantic cod fisheries relies on international agreements and national regulations that establish total allowable catches (TACs) and allocate quotas to prevent overexploitation, following collapses in the 1990s that prompted reforms under frameworks like the UN Fish Stocks Agreement. In the Northwest Atlantic, the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) coordinates TACs for transboundary stocks, such as northern cod in divisions 2J3KL, where the 2025 TAC was set at 18,000 tonnes based on scientific advice incorporating rebuilding targets, with quotas distributed among members including Canada, the EU, and the US.[109] NAFO's regulatory measures include observer requirements, vessel monitoring systems (VMS), and penalties for quota overruns, though historical non-compliance by members has undermined enforcement.[109] In the Northeast Atlantic, the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) oversees unregulated areas but defers cod management to regional bodies like ICES for advice, with bilateral agreements setting quotas; for instance, Norway and Russia agreed to a 20% reduction in Barents Sea cod TAC for 2025, totaling approximately 600,000 tonnes, reflecting spawning stock biomass declines.[110] The EU's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) mandates TACs aligned with maximum sustainable yield (MSY) principles, as in Council Regulation (EU) 2025/202, which fixes quotas for stocks like North Sea cod at reduced levels (e.g., 24,549 tonnes EU-wide for 2025) following ICES recommendations, supplemented by effort controls and closed areas.[111] National implementations vary, with Iceland employing individual transferable quotas (ITQs) since 1990 to incentivize conservation, allocating vessel-specific shares of the TAC based on historical catches.[112] In Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) manages cod under the Fisheries Act with integrated management plans, including a 2024 rebuilding strategy for NAFO subdivision 3Ps cod aiming for 20% biomass increase over five years via low TACs (e.g., 3,000 tonnes in recent years) and bycatch limits.[113] The US Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan, authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens Act, uses annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures; for 2025, Framework 69 established separate ACLs for Gulf of Maine (GOM) and Georges Bank (GB) cod stocks (e.g., GOM ACL at 452 metric tons), with trimester TACs for common pool vessels and sector allocations exceeding 90% of quotas to permit banks.[114] These systems incorporate stock assessments from surveys and models, but critics note persistent quota busting and TACs occasionally exceeding scientific advice due to socioeconomic pressures, as evidenced by EU ministers historically setting limits 20-30% above ICES in the 2000s before CFP reforms.[115]| Region/Stock | Governing Body | 2025 TAC/Quota Example (tonnes) | Key Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAFO 2J3KL (Northern Cod) | NAFO | 18,000 (total) | Shared quotas, VMS enforcement[109] |
| Barents Sea Cod | Norway-Russia Agreement | ~600,000 (reduced 20%) | Bilateral TAC cuts[110] |
| North Sea Cod | EU CFP | 24,549 (EU quota) | MSY-based TACs, effort limits[111] |
| GOM Cod (US) | NEFMC | 452 (ACL) | Trimester TACs, sectors[114] |
| NAFO 3Ps Cod (Canada) | DFO | ~3,000 (recent benchmark) | Rebuilding plan, bycatch caps[113] |
Causes of Stock Declines: Human and Natural Factors
Overfishing represents the predominant human-induced cause of Atlantic cod stock declines, with intensive harvesting from the mid-20th century depleting populations to critically low levels. In the Northwest Atlantic, cod biomass plummeted to approximately 1% of historical abundances by the early 1990s, primarily due to escalated fishing mortality enabled by advanced trawling technologies introduced in the 1970s that allowed unprecedented catch volumes. [117] [118] Sustained high fishing pressure persisted into the late 20th century, overriding reproductive capacity and preventing recovery even after partial moratoriums, as evidenced by stock assessments attributing ongoing overfished status in regions like the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank to excessive harvest rates. [1] [119] This exploitation not only reduced absolute numbers but also induced rapid evolutionary changes, such as earlier maturation at smaller sizes, further compromising long-term productivity. [120] Natural factors have compounded these declines, though empirical analyses indicate they play a secondary role relative to anthropogenic pressures. Elevated natural mortality, including predation by gray seals, has intensified in depleted stocks, with seal populations expanding in the absence of historical cod abundance, leading to higher per-capita predation rates on juveniles and adults in areas like the Scotian Shelf. [121] [122] Climate-driven ocean warming has similarly hindered recovery by altering thermal habitats unfavorable to cod, a cold-water species, resulting in nonlinear dynamics where moderate temperature rises amplify vulnerability to fishing and shift distribution patterns, reducing recruitment success. [123] [124] Instances of food limitation and starvation have also contributed to variable natural mortality rates, particularly in overexploited ecosystems where prey bases were indirectly affected. [125] [126] The interplay between human and natural factors underscores a causal hierarchy, wherein overfishing first eroded stock resilience, rendering populations more susceptible to environmental stressors and predators that cod historically withstood at higher abundances. Assessments consistently affirm that fishing mortality suffices to explain collapse trajectories across North Atlantic stocks, with natural mortality estimates varying but not independently driving the observed multi-decadal declines. [127] [128] This dynamic highlights the primacy of harvest controls in addressing root causes, as unchecked exploitation preempts endogenous regulatory mechanisms like density-dependent survival.Moratoriums, Closures, and Economic Consequences
On July 2, 1992, the Canadian federal government imposed a moratorium on commercial fishing for northern cod (Gadus morhua) stocks off Newfoundland and Labrador's east coast, halting nearly five centuries of cod harvesting in the region.[129] Initially planned as a two-year measure to allow stock recovery, the ban was extended indefinitely due to persistent low biomass levels, with spawning stocks declining by over 99% from historical peaks.[89] This action addressed chronic overfishing, evidenced by landings dropping from 800,000 metric tons in the early 1960s to under 100,000 metric tons by 1990, but it reflected regulatory failures in enforcing quotas amid foreign and domestic fleet pressures.[88] The moratorium triggered immediate and severe economic disruptions, representing the largest mass layoff in Canadian history with approximately 30,000 fishers and plant workers unemployed in Newfoundland and Labrador alone, where cod had comprised up to 40% of provincial export value.[130] Nationally, annual economic losses exceeded $700 million from foregone cod revenues, compounding community collapses in rural outports dependent on seasonal processing, with suicide rates and out-migration surging as alternative employment in shellfish fisheries absorbed only a fraction of displaced labor.[131] Total sectoral impacts, including supply chain effects, surpassed $2 billion in direct and indirect costs by the mid-1990s, prompting federal aid programs like the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy (TAGS) that distributed over $3.5 billion in income support and retraining from 1994 to 1998, though these failed to stem long-term depopulation in fishing-dependent areas.[132] Elsewhere, similar closures emerged: in the United States, Gulf of Maine cod stocks prompted de facto moratoriums through strict rebuilding plans under the Magnuson-Stevens Act since the late 1990s, capping harvests at under 1,000 metric tons annually by 2013 amid 80% biomass reductions, devastating New England ports like Gloucester with fleet reductions and quota buyouts costing taxpayers $400 million.[1] In the European Union, Barents Sea cod faced temporary bans in the early 2000s due to illegal overfishing, though less severe than North America's, leading to localized job losses but quicker rebounds via international quotas. These measures underscored causal links between unchecked harvest rates—often exceeding replacement yields by 2-3 times—and socioeconomic fallout, prioritizing stock viability over short-term industry viability despite critiques of delayed enforcement favoring industrial fleets.[133]Recent Rebuilding Efforts and 2024-2025 Developments
In response to persistent stock declines, rebuilding efforts for Atlantic cod have emphasized stringent quota reductions, enhanced stock assessments, and transitions to finer-scale management units. The New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) approved a strategy in 2022 aiming for a 70% probability of rebuilding Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod by 2033 through lowered acceptable biological catches (ABCs) and sector allocations, building on NOAA's existing plan targeting biomass recovery.[134] Similarly, Fisheries and Oceans Canada updated its rebuilding plan for northern Gulf of St. Lawrence cod (NAFO 3Pn4RS) in December 2024, incorporating measures to align total allowable catches (TACs) with stock-specific objectives amid ongoing low biomass.[135] These initiatives prioritize empirical recruitment data and predation impacts over solely harvest controls, recognizing multifactorial declines including environmental variability. Developments in 2024-2025 focused on refining management amid assessment uncertainties. NOAA implemented emergency measures effective May 1, 2025, maintaining two-stock cod units (GOM and Georges Bank) temporarily while apportioning catch limits from four emerging sub-units—Eastern GOM, Western GOM, Southern New England/Mid-Atlantic, and Georges Bank—into legacy frameworks to avoid over-allocation.[136] For GOM cod, 2025 U.S. ABCs were set at reduced levels, including 48 metric tons for Eastern GOM and lower for Western, compared to 75% of 2024's 413 metric tons total, reflecting June 2024 management track assessments showing continued depletion.[137] [138] Georges Bank cod quotas saw minimal adjustment, with Canada allocating comparable levels to 2024 despite no re-assessment until at least 2027, as decided by the Transboundary Resources Assessment Committee in August 2025.[139] [140] In the Northeast Atlantic, ICES revised its 2025 catch advice downward to 15,511 tonnes for Northern Shelf cod substocks (North Sea, Viking, southern) in November 2024, incorporating updated survey data indicating variable recruitment and delaying full recovery.[141] Advocacy groups like Oceana Canada projected an 11-year horizon for northern cod recovery under intensified rebuilding, potentially yielding $233 million in economic benefits, though empirical models highlight risks from capelin prey shortages and warming waters.[142] Overall, 2024-2025 progress remains incremental, with NOAA extending emergency rules into late 2025 to bridge Amendment 25's implementation delays after Commerce Department rejection of the four-unit split in May 2025, underscoring tensions between precautionary reductions and fishery viability. [143]Aquaculture Production
Origins and Early Challenges
Aquaculture of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) originated with experimental efforts in Norway during the late 19th century, primarily aimed at stock enhancement rather than commercial production. The first recorded attempts to rear cod larvae for release into the wild occurred in the 1880s, focusing on hatchery production to bolster depleted natural populations.[144] These early initiatives faced high larval mortality rates, often exceeding 90%, due to inadequate knowledge of nutritional requirements and environmental conditions necessary for survival beyond the yolk-sac stage.[145] Modern commercial cod aquaculture emerged in Norway in the 1980s, driven by research into sea-water enclosures for juvenile production. By 1983, scientists achieved breakthroughs in rearing juveniles to marketable sizes, enabling initial farming trials to supply cod outside peak wild harvest seasons.[145] The industry expanded rapidly in the early 2000s, with production volumes increasing over 60% annually from 2002 to 2008, supported by the establishment of around 20 commercial hatcheries and the launch of the National Cod Breeding Program in 2003 to improve genetic stock through selective breeding.[146][147] Early challenges severely hampered scalability and profitability. High incidences of vertebral deformities, affecting up to 50% of juveniles in initial cohorts, stemmed from nutritional deficiencies and rapid growth demands, leading to skeletal malformations that reduced market value.[148] Disease outbreaks, particularly francisellosis caused by Francisella noatunensis, proliferated in dense rearing conditions, with infections correlating to stocking densities and resulting in mortality rates of 20-50% in affected farms by the mid-2000s.[149] Premature sexual maturation further complicated operations, occurring in 10-30% of fish at weights as low as 1-2 kg, which diverted energy from somatic growth to gonad development and degraded fillet quality through increased fat content and off-flavors.[150] Economic pressures exacerbated biological hurdles, as feed conversion ratios for cod averaged 1.5-2.0 (worse than salmon's 1.1-1.3), combined with slower growth to harvest size (18-24 months versus 12-18 for salmon), inflated production costs to levels uncompetitive with wild-caught supplies during abundant seasons.[151] By 2008-2009, these factors triggered a sector collapse, with most farms ceasing operations amid financial losses estimated in hundreds of millions of euros, underscoring the need for advancements in husbandry and genetics before viable commercialization.[152]Technological Advancements and Scale-Up
Technological advancements in Atlantic cod aquaculture have primarily addressed biological challenges such as high larval mortality, cannibalism, early maturation, and disease susceptibility, enabling a shift from experimental rearing to commercial viability. Key improvements include enhanced broodstock selection programs, initiated through Norway's Atlantic Cod Genomics and Broodstock Development Project, a four-year initiative launched around 2017 that integrated genomic data for faster genetic gains in growth and disease resistance.[148] In 2022, researchers developed genomic tools for individual-based selection, replacing traditional family selection and potentially doubling genetic progress rates by identifying specific markers for traits like feed efficiency and robustness.[153] Genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9 applied to cod cells in 2024, have laid groundwork for targeted modifications to enhance resistance to pathogens like viral nervous necrosis, though commercial deployment remains limited due to regulatory hurdles.[154] Improvements in feeds and husbandry practices have reduced weaning failures and improved survival rates from hatchery to grow-out stages. Formulations with higher lipid content and microdiets have facilitated earlier transition from live prey, cutting costs and mortality during the critical larval phase, where survival historically hovered below 10%.[155] Automated feeding systems and advanced sea-cage designs, including submerged feeding strategies tested in 2025, optimize nutrient delivery and reduce waste, with studies showing up to 20% better feed conversion ratios compared to manual methods.[156] Disease management has advanced via selective breeding for resistance and improved biosecurity, including vaccines against bacterial infections like vibriosis, which contributed to mortality spikes in the 2000s bust; these interventions, combined with better water quality monitoring, have lowered outbreak incidences in modern farms.[157] These innovations have driven scale-up, particularly in Norway, where production rebounded after peaking at around 20,000 tonnes in 2007 and collapsing to under 5,000 tonnes by 2010 due to unresolved biological issues. By 2023, output reached approximately 6,000-8,000 tonnes annually, with companies like Ode harvesting 4,000 tonnes and planning to triple to 12,000 tonnes in 2024 through expanded facilities and optimized lighting regimes.[158] Norcod anticipates 10,200 tonnes in 2024 and 12,000 tonnes in 2025, supported by upgraded equipment and year-round supply chains, though the sector remains dwarfed by salmon aquaculture at about 1.5 million tonnes yearly.[159] Overall, farmed cod's market share in fresh supply grew notably in early 2025, reflecting sustained investments despite ongoing challenges like precocious maturation, prompting regulatory updates in October 2025 to enforce spawning prevention measures.[160][161]Production Metrics and Market Integration
Aquaculture production of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) remains concentrated in Norway, where it constitutes a small but expanding segment of global cod supply amid declining wild catches. As of the end of 2023, total biomass of farmed cod in Norwegian sea sites reached approximately 15,000 metric tons, with major producer Norcod holding 52% or 7,817 metric tons.[159] Harvest volumes in 2024 were limited, exemplified by Norcod's Q2 output of 1,541 metric tons, down from 1,830 metric tons in Q2 2023 due to biological and operational adjustments, though end-of-quarter biomass stood at 3,716 metric tons representing 24% of the national total.[162] Projections indicate scaling potential, with Norcod targeting 11,000 metric tons of harvest in 2026 as production efficiencies improve.[163] Feed conversion ratios (FCR) in cod farming typically range from 1.2 to 1.5, reflecting efficient biomass conversion under optimized submerged and surface feeding strategies, though variability arises from water quality and disease pressures.[156] Survival rates from juveniles to harvest average 40-60% in commercial operations, constrained by early challenges like jaw deformities and swim bladder issues, but recent advancements in hatchery techniques have boosted juvenile production to millions annually across Norwegian facilities.[151] Farmed cod integrates into markets primarily as fresh product, capturing premium segments amid wild stock volatility. In Q1 2024, Norwegian exports of fresh farmed cod totaled 3,251 metric tons, up 5.8% year-over-year, contrasting with a 30.5% drop in fresh wild-caught exports to 10,285 metric tons.[164] This shift accelerated in early 2025, with farmed cod gaining share in Europe and Asia due to consistent supply and quality uniformity, supported by local processing that delivers over 50 million meals annually from firms like Ode.[165][166] Certification efforts, including Atlantic cod's inclusion in the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) program starting late 2025, aim to enhance market access by aligning with sustainability standards favored by retailers, particularly in Norway where most production occurs.[167] Innovations like submersible pens and offshore platforms further enable year-round harvesting, reducing seasonal price fluctuations and competing directly with frozen wild cod imports.[168][169] Despite comprising under 1% of total cod market volume—valued at USD 11.8 billion in 2025—farmed output addresses supply gaps, with optimistic projections from new entrants signaling potential for doubled production by 2030 if biological hurdles are overcome.[170][144]Human Utilization
Nutritional Profile and Health Benefits
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) serves as a lean source of high-quality protein, providing approximately 18 grams per 100 grams of raw fillet, which constitutes nearly complete amino acid profiles supporting muscle maintenance and repair.[171] It contains minimal fat at 0.67 grams per 100 grams, predominantly unsaturated, with zero carbohydrates, yielding about 82 calories per 100 grams raw.[172] Key micronutrients include phosphorus (around 200 mg per 100 grams for bone health), selenium (37.6 mcg per 100 grams, aiding antioxidant defense), vitamin B12 (1.05 mcg per 100 grams for nerve function), and niacin (2.5 mg per 100 grams for energy metabolism).[171]| Nutrient | Amount per 100g (raw) | % Daily Value* |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 kcal | 4% |
| Protein | 17.8 g | 36% |
| Total Fat | 0.67 g | 1% |
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids (EPA + DHA) | ~0.2 g | Varies** |
| Selenium | 37.6 mcg | 68% |
| Phosphorus | 203 mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.05 mcg | 44% |
| Niacin (B3) | 2.51 mg | 16% |
Culinary Applications and Global Trade
Cod's mild flavor and firm texture make it versatile for fresh preparations, including frying, baking, grilling, and poaching across global cuisines. In the United Kingdom, cod fillets battered and deep-fried serve as the staple for fish and chips, a dish originating in the 19th century that remains a cultural icon.[180] Portuguese cuisine features salted and dried cod, known as bacalhau, in over 365 traditional recipes, such as bacalhau à brás (shredded cod with eggs and potatoes) and bacalhau com natas (baked with cream), reflecting its integration since the 15th century explorations.[181] In Spain and France, bacalao or brandade dishes involve rehydrated salt cod mashed with olive oil and garlic, while Caribbean variants like ackee and saltfish pair it with local fruits.[182] Preparation of preserved cod requires desalting through multiple water soaks, often 24-48 hours with changes every 6-8 hours, to remove excess salt before cooking.[183] Salting and drying, practiced since medieval times, preserved cod for long sea voyages, enabling its role in sustaining explorers and slaves during the Age of Sail. This method involves layering fresh cod with salt, allowing drainage, and air-drying, which concentrates flavors and extends shelf life without refrigeration.[184] Smoking and freezing are modern alternatives, though traditional salt cod persists in Mediterranean and Nordic dishes for its enhanced umami.[185] Global trade in cod has historically driven economies, forming part of the triangular trade between Europe, Africa, and the Americas from the 16th century, with salted cod exchanged for rum and molasses.[186] In 2023, international trade in fresh and chilled cod reached $617 million, down 2.52% from 2022, with Norway as the leading exporter at $282 million, followed by Denmark ($101 million) and the Netherlands ($66.6 million).[187] The overall cod market was valued at approximately $11.3 billion in 2023, projected to grow due to demand in processed forms like fillets.[188] Major importers include the United States, which imported $453 million in frozen cod fillets in 2024, and Portugal, reliant on Norwegian supplies post-domestic depletion.[189] Cod, alongside hake and haddock, accounts for nearly 10% of global seafood trade value, underscoring its economic significance despite stock fluctuations.[190]Economic Contributions to Industries and Communities
The cod fishery underpins significant economic activity in North Atlantic commercial fishing sectors, generating revenue through landings, processing, and exports. Globally, the cod market reached an estimated USD 11.8 billion in 2025, with projections for growth to USD 16.1 billion by 2030 at a 6.4% CAGR, driven by demand for fillets and value-added products in food service and retail.[170] In Norway, a dominant exporter, cod forms a key component of seafood exports totaling NOK 175.4 billion (approximately USD 16.5 billion) in 2024, including 40,370 metric tons of fresh cod valued at NOK 2.6 billion.[191] [192] This trade supports processing plants and logistics, with whitefish landings contributing 15% of Norway's seafood export value in recent years.[193] Cod fishing sustains employment in coastal communities, particularly in rural areas where alternative opportunities are limited. In Norway's northern and western regions, the seafood industry, including cod, provides essential jobs in harvesting, filleting, and packaging, bolstering local economies against depopulation trends.[194] In Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, the northern cod fishery yielded CAD 37.5 million in landed value in 2024, directly benefiting thousands of harvesters, crew, plant workers, and suppliers.[195] Rebuilding efforts could amplify this, potentially creating 16 times more jobs than current levels and generating five times the revenue upon full recovery.[196] Historically, cod dominated provincial fish landings, funding infrastructure and social services before the 1992 moratorium shifted reliance to shellfish, which now account for over 80% of the CAD 478 million in 2007 landings.[130] In the United States, Atlantic cod contributed to commercial landings of 1 million pounds valued at USD 2.2 million in 2023, integrating into the broader seafood industry that produced USD 183 billion in sales impacts in 2022.[1] [197] These activities extend to ancillary sectors like vessel maintenance and cold storage, while fostering community resilience in ports such as those in New England and Newfoundland, where fishing heritage drives related tourism and cultural enterprises. Ancillary industries, including cod liver oil production and dried stockfish trade, further diversify economic contributions, with salted cod exports averaging USD 9,708 per ton in 2024.[198]Controversies and Debates
Overfishing Narratives vs. Multifactorial Causation
The prevailing narrative attributes the dramatic declines in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) stocks, particularly in the Northwest Atlantic, primarily to overexploitation through commercial fishing, culminating in Canada's 1992 moratorium on northern cod fisheries after spawning biomass fell to less than 1% of historical levels.[199] This view, advanced by fisheries scientists and environmental advocates, posits that excessive fishing mortality rates—reaching up to four times sustainable levels in the 1980s—directly depleted adult populations and impaired reproduction, with recovery expected to follow fishing restrictions.[119] However, empirical assessments of stock dynamics reveal that while overfishing accelerated declines, it does not fully explain the observed patterns, including persistent low recruitment even after decades of reduced harvests; for instance, Gulf of Maine cod stocks have shown recruitment variability driven more by environmental conditions than fishing pressure alone.[200][201] Multifactorial causation, supported by stock modeling and ecological studies, incorporates natural variability in larval survival, predation, and oceanographic shifts as co-equal drivers. Cod recruitment— the influx of juveniles into fishable stocks—exhibits high interannual variability independent of adult biomass, with poor year-classes often linked to cold-water upwelling disruptions or mismatched prey availability during early life stages, as seen in historical data from the 1960s-1990s where fishing reductions failed to boost survival rates.[202] Predation by recovering marine mammal populations, such as grey seals (Halichoerus grypus), exacerbates this; in the western Baltic and Celtic Sea, seal consumption has been estimated to remove up to 50% of natural cod mortality in some areas, impairing recovery by targeting spawning adults and juveniles at rates that functional response models predict will intensify as cod densities remain low.[203][204] Although some federal assessments downplay seals' role relative to fishing or salinity changes, integrated models incorporating predation show it as a barrier to biomass rebuilding, particularly where seal populations have quadrupled since the 1970s amid protection policies.[205][206] Ocean warming, a consequence of broader climatic shifts, further compounds these pressures by altering cod physiology and habitat suitability; elevated temperatures above 10-12°C reduce larval feeding efficiency and increase metabolic demands, leading to smaller sizes-at-age and higher starvation risks, as documented in Alaskan Pacific cod analogs and projected for Atlantic stocks shifting poleward.[207][208] This environmental forcing amplifies when spawning biomass is already depressed, creating feedback loops where over-reliance on the overfishing narrative—often amplified by institutions with incentives to prioritize human culpability—has led to policies neglecting predator management or habitat restoration, stalling recoveries despite moratoriums in place since 1992.[209][199] Rigorous attribution requires disentangling these interacting causes through time-series analyses of environmental covariates alongside harvest data, revealing that simplistic blame on fishing overlooks the cod's sensitivity to density-independent mortality, which historical cycles (e.g., pre-20th century fluctuations) underscore as inherent to the species' ecology.[210]Government Policy Shortcomings and Market Solutions
Government policies managing Atlantic cod fisheries have frequently exhibited shortcomings rooted in open-access regimes and politically influenced quota-setting, exacerbating overexploitation despite available scientific data. In Canada, the northern cod stock off Newfoundland collapsed by the early 1990s, prompting a moratorium on July 2, 1992, after spawning biomass fell to less than 1% of historical levels due to decades of excessive harvests that ignored early warnings from fisheries assessments. Federal data management failures, including overestimation of catches and underreporting, contributed to misguided quota decisions that sustained high fishing pressure even as stocks declined. Similarly, in the European Union, the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) has repeatedly set total allowable catches (TACs) for cod above scientific recommendations, driven by national bargaining among member states rather than ecological limits, leading to persistent overfishing; for instance, in 2019, ministers opted to exceed sustainable levels despite a 2020 deadline to end overexploitation. These command-and-control approaches foster a "race to fish," encouraging inefficient effort, highgrading, and discards, as fishers maximize short-term gains without incentives for conservation.[88][211][212][213][214] In contrast, market-based solutions emphasizing property rights, such as individual transferable quotas (ITQs), have demonstrated efficacy in restoring cod stocks by aligning incentives with long-term sustainability. Iceland's ITQ system, implemented for demersal species including cod starting in 1975 and fully matured by 1990, allocates harvest shares as permanent, tradable assets, reducing overcapacity and promoting stewardship; following introduction, the cod fishing industry saw productivity gains of up to 20-30% and vessel efficiency improvements, with spawning stock biomass rising from lows around 100,000 metric tons in the 1980s to over 300,000 metric tons by the 2010s. This approach curtails the tragedy of the commons inherent in unregulated access, as quota holders bear the opportunity cost of depleting future yields, leading to lower discards and better compliance without relying on top-down enforcement. Empirical comparisons highlight ITQs' superiority: while Canada's post-moratorium regulatory quotas failed to prevent bycatch and illegal fishing, Iceland's privatized system supported economic value per ton increases from approximately 1,000 USD in the 1980s to over 2,000 USD by 2010, fostering stock recovery amid similar environmental pressures.[215][216][217][218]Predator Management and Seal Population Impacts
Grey and harp seal populations in the North Atlantic have expanded substantially since the mid-20th century, driven by reduced commercial hunting and protective regulations, coinciding with persistent challenges in Atlantic cod recovery despite fishing moratoriums implemented in regions like Newfoundland in 1992. Harp seal numbers off Newfoundland and Labrador grew from approximately 1.8 million in 1970 to a peak of 6.5 million in 1990, stabilizing around 4.4 million by 2024, while grey seals in areas such as the Gulf of St. Lawrence have exhibited exponential increases, with pup production rates exceeding 20% annually in some U.S. colonies from the late 1980s onward.[219][220] These trends reflect successful conservation but have amplified predation pressures on cod stocks, as seals are generalist predators consuming juvenile and adult cod alongside other prey.[221] Predation by grey seals contributes significantly to cod mortality, particularly in eastern Canada, where estimated consumption rose from under 6,000 tonnes annually in 1970 to 39,000–43,000 tonnes by 1993, targeting cod in coastal and shelf habitats. In the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, grey seal expansion has been linked to 60–70% of cod not surviving beyond five years, with seals imposing mortality rates that exceed fishery removals in some models and hinder stock rebuilding. Harp seals exacerbate this, consuming an estimated 88,000 tonnes (95% CI: 46,000–140,000 tonnes) of cod off Labrador and Newfoundland in 1994 alone, with recent analyses indicating harp seals remove 24 times more biomass of exploited fish species, including cod, than commercial fisheries in certain areas from 2018–2020.[222][223][224] Such predation targets vulnerable life stages, including eggs and juveniles, disrupting cod recruitment and amplifying effects from environmental factors or residual fishing.[225] Management of seal predators remains constrained, with Canadian authorities like Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) emphasizing multifactorial causes for cod stagnation over targeted culls, despite fisher reports and modeling suggesting seal reductions could accelerate recovery by alleviating top-down pressures. In Newfoundland–Labrador simulations, elevated harp seal numbers repressed cod rebound rates even under reduced fishing scenarios, yet DFO assessments from 2019 downplayed seals as primary drivers, citing low cod proportions (3–5%) in seal stomachs—though aggregate consumption from large populations yields substantial impacts. Proposals for seal population control, including commercial harvests capped at 40,000 harp seals in 2023, face resistance due to ecological concerns that culling might favor alternative cod predators, but evidence indicates unmanaged growth sustains high predation without offsetting benefits like prey dispersal.[226][227][228] In the Baltic Sea, analogous grey seal increases since the 1980s have prompted limited management, including quotas for problem seals depredating nets—stealing up to 45% of cod catches daily—highlighting potential strategies transferable to Atlantic contexts, though North American efforts prioritize monitoring over aggressive intervention. This approach reflects tensions between conservation imperatives and fisheries sustainability, with some analyses attributing greater relative influence to seal predation than ongoing fisheries or environmental variables in stalled cod recoveries.[229][204][224]References
- https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/37571530_Reproductive_Behavior_of_Pacific_Cod_in_Captivity
