Hubbry Logo
Electrostatic levitationElectrostatic levitationMain
Open search
Electrostatic levitation
Community hub
Electrostatic levitation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Electrostatic levitation
Electrostatic levitation
Electrostatic levitation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Sample of a titanium-zirconium-nickel alloy inside the Electrostatic Levitator vacuum chamber at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.

Electrostatic levitation is the process of using an electric field to levitate a charged object and counteract the effects of gravity. It was used, for instance, in Robert Millikan's oil drop experiment and is used to suspend the gyroscopes in Gravity Probe B during launch.

Due to Earnshaw's theorem, no static arrangement of classical electrostatic fields can be used to stably levitate a point charge. There is an equilibrium point where the two fields cancel, but it is an unstable equilibrium. By using feedback techniques it is possible to adjust the charges to achieve a quasi static levitation.

Earnshaw's theorem

[edit]
Main article: Earnshaw's theorem

The idea of particle instability in an electrostatic field originated with Samuel Earnshaw in 1839[1] and was formalized by James Clerk Maxwell[2] in 1874 who gave it the title "Earnshaw's theorem" and proved it with the Laplace equation. Earnshaw's theorem explains why a system of electrons is not stable and was invoked by Niels Bohr in his atom model of 1913[3][better source needed] when criticizing J. J. Thomson's atom.

Earnshaw's theorem holds that a charged particle suspended in an electrostatic field is unstable, because the forces of attraction and repulsion vary at an equal rate that is proportional to the inverse square law and remain in balance wherever a particle moves. Since the forces remain in balance, there is no inequality to provide a restoring force; and the particle remains unstable and can freely move without restriction.

Levitation

[edit]

The first electrostatic levitator was invented by Dr. Won-Kyu Rhim at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in 1993.[4] A charged sample of 2 mm in diameter can be levitated in a vacuum chamber between two electrodes positioned vertically with an electrostatic field in between. The field is controlled through a feedback system to keep the levitated sample at a predetermined position. Several copies of this system have been made in JAXA and NASA, and the original system has been transferred to California Institute of Technology with an upgraded setup of tetrahedra four beam laser heating system.

On the Moon the photoelectric effect and electrons in the solar wind charge fine layers of Moon dust on the surface forming an atmosphere of dust that floats in "fountains" over the surface of the Moon.[5][6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Electrostatic levitation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Electrostatic levitation is a technique that suspends charged objects or particles in a using feedback-controlled electrostatic forces to balance their weight without physical contact, enabling containerless processing and precise positioning in various environments. The fundamental principle relies on , where the electrostatic force on a charged sample is generated by applying high-voltage electric fields across electrodes, such as parallel plates, to counteract ; for instance, the vertical force can be approximated as fz=12ϵ0AV2z2f_z = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 A \frac{V^2}{z^2}, where ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the of free space, AA is the electrode area, VV is the applied voltage, and zz is the gap distance, though this exhibits inherent negative stiffness requiring active control for stability. Energy densities achievable range from approximately 40 N/m² in air (limited by dielectric breakdown at ~3 × 10^6 V/m) to over 4 × 10^4 N/m² in vacuum (up to 10^8 V/m), allowing levitation of objects from microscale particles to macroscale components like silicon wafers at gaps of 100–400 μm. Historically, concepts of electrostatic suspension trace back to the , with Samuel Earnshaw's 1842 theorem highlighting the instability of static electrostatic equilibria, necessitating dynamic feedback; practical advancements emerged in the 1960s for vacuum gyroscopes, followed by 1990s innovations in clean-room applications and silicon wafer levitation at 400 μm gaps. Key applications include containerless materials processing at , where electrostatic levitation enables contamination-free studies of molten samples under microgravity or terrestrial conditions to minimize gravitational effects and container interactions. In microelectromechanical systems (), it facilitates pressure sensing via pull-in instabilities and high-performance switches. Such switches can be paired with triboelectric transduction for self-powered operation. Additionally, it supports sterile handling in and wear-minimizing handoff in () photolithography, achieving sub-200 nm positioning noise over 200 μm gaps in air. As of 2025, recent advances include metasurface-based stable levitation and containerless experiments on the Chinese Space Station.

Principles

Electrostatic forces

Electrostatic force refers to the interaction between charged particles or objects, governed by , which states that the magnitude of the force FF between two point charges q1q_1 and q2q_2 separated by a rr is given by F=k∣q1q2∣r2,F = k \frac{|q_1 q_2|}{r^2}, where kk is Coulomb's constant, approximately 8.99×109 N⋅m2/C28.99 \times 10^9 \, \mathrm{N \cdot m^2 / C^2}. This force is attractive if the charges have opposite signs and repulsive if they have the same sign, and it acts along the line joining the charges. In electrostatic levitation, charged generate E\mathbf{E} that exert forces on charged objects, with the force on a charge qq expressed as F=qE\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{E}. These fields are produced by applying high voltages to electrodes, creating non-uniform distributions that can direct the force vector as needed. To enable levitation, the object must acquire charge through methods such as , where a high-voltage electrode ionizes surrounding air to transfer ions to the object, or contact charging, involving direct transfer of charge from a charged surface upon physical contact. The vector nature of electrostatic forces allows them to oppose vertically, achieving equilibrium when the upward electric force balances the object's weight, satisfying mg=qEmg = qE for a particle of mm in a uniform field component EE, where gg is . However, static configurations often exhibit instability, as later addressed by .

Earnshaw's theorem

Earnshaw's theorem, formulated by Earnshaw in 1842, states that no stable equilibrium exists for a in a static electrostatic field where the ϕ\phi satisfies ∇2ϕ=0\nabla^2 \phi = 0 in charge-free regions. The proof begins with the concept of potential wells. For stable equilibrium, the of the charged particle must exhibit a local minimum, providing restoring forces in all directions upon small displacements. However, since ϕ\phi is a satisfying , it cannot attain a local minimum or maximum in the interior of the domain; instead, any critical point is a where the potential decreases in at least one direction. This property arises from the for harmonic functions, which implies that the value at any interior point equals the average over a surrounding , precluding isolated extrema. A more precise mathematical derivation considers the force on a test charge qq, given by F=−q∇ϕ\mathbf{F} = -q \nabla \phi. At an equilibrium point, ∇ϕ=0\nabla \phi = 0. Stability requires that small displacements lead to a restoring force, meaning the U=qϕU = q \phi has a local minimum, so the HH of ϕ\phi (with elements Hij=∂2ϕ/∂xi∂xjH_{ij} = \partial^2 \phi / \partial x_i \partial x_j) must be positive definite—all eigenvalues positive. Yet, the trace of HH is ∇2ϕ=0\nabla^2 \phi = 0, implying the eigenvalues sum to zero. Thus, not all can be positive; at least one must be non-positive, ensuring in some direction. These results imply that pure static electrostatic fields permit only neutral or unstable equilibria for charged particles, posing a fundamental barrier to levitation without additional mechanisms, as any apparent equilibrium will be disrupted by perturbations.

Stability mechanisms

Electrostatic levitation faces inherent instability due to , which demonstrates that no stable static equilibrium exists for a in an electrostatic field alone. To achieve stability, feedback control systems and hybrid enhancements are employed, creating effective restoring forces that confine the levitated object. Feedback control systems provide another key stability mechanism through real-time monitoring and adjustment of electrode voltages based on the levitated object's position. Position sensors, such as high-speed CCD cameras operating at frequencies around 700 Hz with sub-millimeter accuracy, detect deviations from the desired equilibrium, enabling precise corrections. The control algorithm typically implements a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) strategy, where the applied voltage V(t)V(t) is computed as V(t)=Kpe(t)+Ki∫0te(τ) dτ+Kdde(t)dt,V(t) = K_p e(t) + K_i \int_0^t e(\tau) \, d\tau + K_d \frac{de(t)}{dt}, with e(t)e(t) representing the position error, and KpK_p, KiK_i, KdK_d as tunable gains that respectively address proportional response, accumulation of error, and of transients. This configuration generates electrostatic restoring forces proportional to displacement, ensuring robust stability against disturbances like residual or . Hybrid enhancements incorporate weak diamagnetic or magnetostatic effects to augment electrostatic dominance, providing additional without altering the primary charge-based . In such setups, the electrostatic maintains the primary suspension, while diamagnetic repulsion from materials like introduces a positive elastic constant (e.g., on the order of 10^{-9} N/m for electrostatic components, supplemented by magnetostatic contributions up to 0.68 N/m), stabilizing oscillations at frequencies around 0.19 Hz for electrostatic modes and higher for hybrid . These auxiliary effects are particularly useful in microscale or low-gravity environments, where they fine-tune the potential landscape for enhanced confinement.

History

Theoretical foundations

The theoretical foundations of electrostatic levitation emerged in the through mathematical of electrostatic forces and their implications for equilibrium and stability. Earnshaw's seminal 1842 paper established a key limitation by proving that a collection of point charges cannot be maintained in a stable stationary equilibrium solely by electrostatic or other forces, such as gravitation or magnetism. This result, derived from , highlighted the inherent instability of static configurations in such fields, laying the conceptual groundwork for understanding why requires additional mechanisms beyond simple charge balancing. Earnshaw's focused on the nature of molecular forces in the luminiferous ether but extended directly to , emphasizing that small perturbations would displace charges from equilibrium positions without restoring forces. Michael Faraday's mid-19th-century experiments provided empirical insights that complemented these theoretical constraints, demonstrating how could manipulate charged suspended objects. In his Experimental Researches in Electricity (1839–1855), Faraday described observations of light suspended bodies, such as bits of or threads, being attracted to or repelled by charged rods, illustrating the directional influence of electrostatic fields on isolated charges. These demonstrations of induction and force on suspended particles underscored the potential for field-induced suspension, even if transient, and established basic principles of charge-field interactions that informed later concepts, though they predated quantitative stability analyses. In the late 19th century, John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, extended these ideas by exploring multipole field configurations and their effects on stability within dielectric media. In his 1882 paper on the equilibrium of charged liquid conducting masses, Rayleigh analyzed the electrostatic pressures on spherical and deformed conductors, deriving conditions under which charged droplets become unstable due to repulsive forces exceeding . This work incorporated higher-order multipole terms in the potential expansion to model field distortions around dielectrics, revealing how non-uniform fields could alter equilibrium in insulating environments and providing theoretical tools for assessing levitation-like stability in composite media. Wilhelm Wien's 1898 investigations into the trajectories of charged particles further predicted instabilities in electric fields, building on Earnshaw's framework. Wien's studies of positive rays (canal rays) showed that charged particles in uniform or non-uniform fields exhibit deflections leading to unstable paths, particularly when velocities interact with field gradients, prefiguring challenges in maintaining levitated positions without dynamic correction. These predictions emphasized the transient nature of particle suspension in static fields, reinforcing the need for theoretical advancements beyond classical electrostatics to achieve practical levitation.

Experimental developments

One of the earliest experimental demonstrations of electrostatic levitation was Robert Millikan's oil-drop experiment, conducted between 1909 and 1913. In this setup, tiny oil droplets were charged and suspended in air between two horizontal plates by applying a vertical DC electric field to balance gravitational force against electrostatic repulsion or attraction, depending on the charge sign. This allowed precise measurement of the elementary while effectively levitating the drops for extended periods, though limited to atmospheric conditions and microscopic scales. The experiment highlighted practical challenges like air currents and charge leakage but validated the use of feedback-free electrostatic balancing for short-term suspension. A significant advancement came in 1985 with US Patent 4,521,854, granted to Won-Kyu Rhim, Melvin M. Saffren, and Daniel D. Elleman at NASA's (JPL), describing a closed-loop electrostatic levitation system. This invention utilized multiple electrodes—such as paired concave-convex or tetrahedral configurations—combined with position sensors like CCD cameras and feedback circuits to dynamically adjust voltages up to 15 kV, enabling precise three-dimensional control of levitated objects in without physical contact. The system addressed stability issues by compensating for gravitational perturbations, marking a key step toward practical applications beyond microscopic particles. In 1993, Rhim and collaborators at /JPL demonstrated the first practical electrostatic levitator for high-temperature containerless materials processing, capable of suspending 2-4 mm diameter metal and alloy spheres in vacuum. This device employed feedback-controlled electrostatic fields for positioning and beam heating to achieve temperatures exceeding the , such as 2128 K for , allowing studies of thermophysical properties, undercooling, and metastable phases without container . Unlike prior systems, it supported superheating-undercooling cycles in a 1-g environment, proving viable for Earth-based simulations of microgravity processing. During the , NASA's (MSFC) advanced containerless processing through its Electrostatic (ESL) facility, part of the broader Containerless Processing Group efforts. The MSFC ESL enabled non-contact studies of thermophysical properties like , , and for molten metals and oxides at temperatures up to 3400°C (approximately 3673 K), with examples including processing at around 2000 K for materials. This system decoupled levitation forces from heating, supporting phase equilibria and microstructure formation research in chambers, and served as a ground-based analog for space experiments. Post-2010 developments integrated electrostatic levitation with microgravity environments, notably through facilities on the (ISS) starting in 2015. Japan's Aerospace Exploration Agency () launched the Electrostatic Levitation Furnace (ELF) in 2015, which levitates up to 15 samples using feedback-controlled fields and laser heating to investigate properties like interfacial tension and of metals and oxides in reduced gravity, minimizing effects. Complementary efforts, such as NASA's support for ELF proposals, have enabled batch processing of alloys for and applications, enhancing precision over ground-based systems. More recently, as of 2024, China has operationalized an electrostatic levitation facility aboard the Chinese Space Station (Tiangong), supporting containerless experiments on high-temperature melts with ground-space matched capabilities for thermophysical measurements.

Methods

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems in electrostatic levitation employ (DC) voltages applied to arrays to actively stabilize charged objects against gravitational and other perturbations in real time. These systems typically utilize or octupole configurations of s surrounding the levitated object, generating adjustable that counteract deviations in position. Position detection is achieved through optical sensors, such as collimated beams that capture the object's shadow, or capacitive sensors that measure proximity to s. The core of the control mechanism is a closed-loop feedback system that processes data to dynamically adjust voltages. Proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithms are commonly implemented, where the error between the detected position and a setpoint drives voltage corrections to restore equilibrium. For instance, in adaptive setups incorporating recursive least-squares estimation and , sub-micron position stability has been demonstrated for levitated samples. This active adjustment ensures robustness against disturbances like residual or system noise, with response times on the order of milliseconds. In vacuum environments, these systems enable containerless processing of millimeter-sized samples, such as metals and alloys, heated to temperatures up to 2500 using lasers without contact to crucibles that could introduce or melting. The electrostatic forces balance while allowing independent control of heating, facilitating precise thermophysical measurements under high (10^{-7} to 10^{-8} ). The vertical force balance in such feedback-controlled systems can be modeled as qEz(t)=mg+k(z−z0),q E_z(t) = mg + k(z - z_0), where qq is the charge on the object, Ez(t)E_z(t) is the time-varying vertical electric field adjusted by the controller, mm is the , gg is , kk represents the effective spring constant from feedback stabilization, zz is the instantaneous position, and z0z_0 is the desired equilibrium position. This illustrates how dynamic field variation provides both and restorative forces.

AC field techniques

AC field techniques utilize alternating electric fields to levitate dielectric particles through the ponderomotive force, which arises from the time-averaged interaction between the induced dipole moment in the particle and the gradient of the root-mean-square electric field. The force on the particle is given by F=(p⋅∇)Erms,\mathbf{F} = (\mathbf{p} \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{E}_\mathrm{rms}, where p\mathbf{p} is the induced dipole moment, proportional to the particle's polarizability and the local field strength. This approach induces polarization without requiring net charge on the particle, enabling stable levitation in non-uniform AC fields where the time-averaged potential provides confinement. Unlike static fields constrained by , the dynamic nature of AC fields allows for effective potentials that support equilibrium. Common configurations include linear or hexapole traps, where pairs of electrodes are driven with AC voltages phased to create oscillating quadrupolar or higher-order fields. These setups typically operate at frequencies between 10 and 100 kHz to minimize conductive effects in air or gas media while maximizing the dielectrophoretic response for micron-sized spheres. For instance, planar quadrupole microelectrodes have demonstrated passive of particles along the axis, with higher multipoles enhancing force uniformity. Hexapole arrangements further improve stability by distributing field gradients more evenly, allowing levitation heights on the order of tens of micrometers. The primary advantages of AC field techniques are the absence of need for net particle charge, which avoids charging instabilities, and reduced risk of arcing due to the lower peak voltages compared to DC methods. These features make the technique suitable for levitating sensitive materials in ambient conditions. Representative examples include the levitation of water droplets, which exhibit negative dielectrophoresis at appropriate frequencies, and silica particles, stably suspended in air for spectroscopic studies. Stability in these systems stems from field asymmetries that generate virtual restoring forces; the AC modulation creates time-averaged potentials that violate the static Laplace equation conditions, enabling confinement at field nulls or minima.

Dielectrophoretic approaches

Dielectrophoretic approaches to electrostatic levitation exploit the motion of neutral particles in non-uniform , where arises from the interaction between induced dipoles and field gradients, enabling levitation without net charge on the particle. This method is particularly suited for small-scale objects, such as microparticles or cells, suspended in a medium, and operates effectively at frequencies from kilohertz to megahertz ranges. The dielectrophoretic force, FDEP=ϵm2Re⁡[K(ω)]∇∣E∣2\mathbf{F}_{\text{DEP}} = \frac{\epsilon_m}{2} \operatorname{Re}[K(\omega)] \nabla |\mathbf{E}|^2, acts on the particle, where ϵm\epsilon_m is the permittivity of the medium, K(ω)K(\omega) is the Clausius-Mossotti factor, and ∇∣E∣2\nabla |\mathbf{E}|^2 is the gradient of the squared electric field magnitude. The Clausius-Mossotti factor K(ω)=ϵp∗−ϵm∗ϵp∗+2ϵm∗K(\omega) = \frac{\epsilon_p^* - \epsilon_m^*}{\epsilon_p^* + 2\epsilon_m^*}, with complex permittivities ϵ∗=ϵ−jσω\epsilon^* = \epsilon - j \frac{\sigma}{\omega} for particle (p) and medium (m), depends on the relative permittivities ϵ\epsilon, conductivities σ\sigma, and angular frequency ω\omega, determining whether the force attracts (positive DEP, Re[K(ω)] > 0) or repels (negative DEP, Re[K(ω)] < 0) the particle from high-field regions. At low frequencies, where the particle's permittivity exceeds the medium's, positive DEP predominates, attracting particles to field maxima for stable levitation against gravity in appropriately designed non-uniform fields. Typical setups employ insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP), utilizing insulating structures like slanted pillars, constrictions, or posts within microfluidic channels to create field gradients without direct electrode-particle contact, thus minimizing electrochemical effects. In these configurations, DC or low-frequency AC voltages applied across channel electrodes generate the non-uniform fields, allowing particles to be trapped and levitated at equilibrium positions where the upward DEP force balances sedimentation. Fluidic channels with integrated insulators enable continuous-flow operation, facilitating particle trapping in regions of intensified fields near the insulators. Examples include the levitation of biological cells, such as human leukemia cells, in microfluidic devices where positive DEP counters , achieving stable positions for separation based on dielectric properties. Similarly, beads like 6 μm particles have been levitated to heights of tens to hundreds of microns in iDEP setups under 1 MHz fields, with equilibrium heights tunable by medium conductivity and applied voltage. These demonstrations highlight levitation scales from microns for cells in confined channels to millimeters in optimized insulator geometries, supporting applications in biomolecular handling.

Applications

Materials science

Electrostatic levitation enables containerless processing of high-temperature materials by suspending charged samples in an , preventing contact with container walls and minimizing contamination. This technique facilitates the and undercooling of metals and alloys to study their in a pristine environment. For instance, liquid droplets have been levitated and undercooled by up to approximately 300 K below the (1941 K), with measurements extending to 2000 K, which reveals insights into kinetics and metastable phases. In-situ measurements of thermophysical properties are conducted on these levitated droplets, often heated using CO₂ lasers to achieve precise up to 3400 . Techniques such as droplet oscillation analysis yield data on , , and ; for example, measurements of undercooled Ti₃₉.₅Zr₃₉.₅Ni₂₁ alloys achieve resolutions of approximately 300 ppm, while and are determined through non-contact optical methods. The Electrostatic Levitation (ESL) facility at , operational since 1997, exemplifies such infrastructure for materials research under vacuum conditions from 10⁻⁸ to 3800 . This setup supports rapid solidification studies by enabling controlled cooling rates and recalescence observation in samples like and superalloys, contributing to advancements in high-performance materials for applications. A primary advantage of electrostatic levitation is the avoidance of heterogeneous triggered by container surfaces, which promotes the formation of deeply undercooled melts and novel amorphous alloys. This containerless approach has led to the development of metallic glasses, such as Zr₄₁.₂Ti₁₃.₈Cu₁₂.₅Ni₁₀.₀Be₂₂.₅, with enhanced strength and unique properties unattainable through conventional casting.

Planetary and space environments

Electrostatic levitation plays a significant role in the dynamics of dust on airless celestial bodies, particularly the , where low-pressure and conditions enable the suspension and transport of fine particles. During the Apollo missions, astronauts observed phenomena such as the "lunar horizon glow," attributed to off levitated dust particles lofted to heights of several meters above the surface. These observations, combined with later analyses, indicate that micron-sized particles are charged through photoelectron emission induced by solar , creating surface potentials of +10 to +18 V and outward exceeding 10 V/m on the dayside. Post-2000 modeling has refined these processes, showing that the photoelectron sheath—a region of enhanced and —dominates the charging environment, with lengths around 1 m and fields of approximately 3 V/m near the surface under nominal solar conditions. The primary mechanism for dust lofting involves the balance between electrostatic repulsion from the positively charged surface and gravitational forces, allowing sub-micron to micron-sized particles to levitate to heights up to 1-2.5 m depending on and charge. Once aloft, horizontal transport occurs primarily through electrostatic forces in the varying sheath fields, with contributions from E × B drifts in the presence of magnetic fields, enabling particles to migrate across the surface and potentially escape into ballistic trajectories. Simulations of these dynamics suggest substantial mobilization, with estimates indicating that electrostatic levitation could lead to significant mass redistribution over a lunar day-night cycle, though exact rates vary with solar activity and surface . In space applications, electrostatic levitation principles extend to microgravity environments for propulsion testing, particularly in electrospray ion ers designed for small satellites like CubeSats. These devices, developed in the , use high-voltage fields to extract and accelerate charged droplets from ionic liquids, providing precise without mechanical components and leveraging electrostatic forces to maintain beam stability in . Such systems have been tested in microgravity to evaluate performance for attitude control and orbit maintenance, demonstrating specific impulses over 1000 s and enabling extended mission durations for CubeSats. Experimental analogs on replicate these planetary conditions using vacuum chambers to study levitation thresholds and transport. For instance, tests with lunar simulants under irradiation in high-vacuum environments (pressures below 10^{-5} Pa) confirm that particles charge positively and loft when applied exceed approximately 2.7 × 10⁴ V/m in lab setups, providing data to validate models of the natural photoelectron sheath with fields around 3 V/m. These setups, often incorporating UV lamps and plasma sources, have quantified reduction and mobility, providing critical data for mitigating hazards in future lunar missions.

Microscale devices

Electrostatic levitation has been integrated into microelectromechanical systems () switches to enable reliable operation by preventing , a common failure mode where components adhere upon contact. In designs featuring beams, electrostatic pull-in is achieved using a bottom to close the switch at low voltages around 2-3 V, while side electrodes apply repulsive forces for and release at voltages of 50-120 V, lifting the cantilever by 4-6 μm without physical contact. This approach, demonstrated in a 2021 study from , employs dimples on the cantilever to limit contact area and fringe fields from side electrodes (28 μm wide) to generate the necessary upward force, ensuring over 10^6 cycles of operation under vacuum conditions. In devices, dielectrophoretic (DEP) facilitates non-contact manipulation and sorting of biological cells by exploiting differences in their properties under non-uniform . For instance, bacteria such as can be and separated from non-bioparticles in microfluidic channels using AC fields at 1-10 MHz, achieving stable suspension heights up to 100 μm for selective trapping and analysis. Similarly, cancer cells, including circulating tumor cells, are isolated from blood components via DEP in insulator-based systems, where positive or negative DEP forces direct cells into collection streams without labels, enabling high-throughput sorting at flow rates of 1-10 μL/min. These methods, rooted in seminal work on DEP , maintain cell viability above 90% during due to low applied voltages (5-20 V). Aerosol studies utilize single-particle electrostatic levitation traps, often combining electrostatic and optical elements, to enable precise chemical of micron-sized particles in isolation. Developed in the through electrodynamic balances (EDB), these hybrid systems levitate charged using AC quadrupole fields (50-200 V at 100-500 Hz) while optical feedback stabilizes position for , allowing real-time monitoring of , , and composition changes without substrate interference. Early implementations traced heterogeneous reactions on levitated or salt particles, providing insights into atmospheric processes with mass resolutions down to 10^{-15} g. At scales below 1 mm, faces scalability challenges, particularly in maintaining field uniformity and minimizing power consumption for sustainable operation. Non-uniform fringe fields in compact geometries can lead to unstable , requiring precise patterning to achieve gradients within 10% variation over 100 μm. Power demands, though low (microwatts at 10-50 V), escalate with higher frequencies or multi-particle handling, posing integration issues in battery-limited microsystems and necessitating advanced dielectrics to prevent breakdown.

References

  1. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/143356/bhushan-brij-phd-meche-2022-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20000069801
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/levitation-melting
  4. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10327400
  5. https://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=mechanical_fac
  6. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sstr.202500335
  7. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JPhCS2977a2076F/abstract
  8. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html
  9. https://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/coursenotes/modules/guide02.pdf
  10. https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/osuniversityphysics2/chapter/coulombs-law/
  11. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020021192/downloads/20020021192.pdf
  12. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1567.pdf
  13. https://harrislab.yale.edu/files/thesis/Brown_Thesis.pdf
  14. https://www.mit.edu/~kardar/research/seminars/Casimir2010/pdf/EarnshawPaper.pdf
  15. https://www.aproged.pt/biblioteca/MaxwellI.pdf
  16. https://www.numdam.org/item/10.5802/slsedp.56.pdf
  17. https://simion.com/info/earnshaws_theorem.html
  18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345915/
  19. https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/10.1049/iet-smt.2020.0014
  20. https://library.oarcloud.noaa.gov/docs.lib/htdocs/rescue/Rarebook_treasures/QC503F211839_PDF/QC503F211839v1.pdf
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786448208628425
  22. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1911/wien/lecture/
  23. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/history/millikan.html
  24. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4521854A/en
  25. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144475
  26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120004018/downloads/20120004018.pdf
  27. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20000083211/downloads/20000083211.pdf
  28. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180007894/downloads/20180007894.pdf
  29. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2977/1/012076
  30. https://ishikawa.isas.jaxa.jp/01_esl_en.html
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924424722000425
  32. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.IAC-04-J.5.02
  33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00102-8
  34. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050181938
  35. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830000228
  36. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3456626
  37. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511574498
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(98)00061-8
  39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(93)90094-O
  40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(97)00159-9
  41. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/bmf/article/4/2/022811/385758/Review-Article-Dielectrophoresis-Status-of-the
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535553510000171
  43. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/18/5095
  44. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac048196z
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224044353_The_dielectrophoretic_levitation_of_latex_beads_with_reference_to_field-flow_fractionation
  46. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/matertrans/58/12/58_L-M2017835/_html/-char/en
  47. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article/64/10/2961/342640/An-electrostatic-levitator-for-high-temperature
  48. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/g-29859_esl.pdf
  49. https://d-nb.info/1354494059/34
  50. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20080015655/downloads/20080015655.pdf
  51. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00562976.pdf
  52. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010JA015286
  53. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015286
  54. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1271&context=smallsat
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335334_Micro-machined_ionic_liquid_electrospray_thrusters_for_Cubesat_applications
  56. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015JA021738
  57. https://orb.binghamton.edu/mechanical_fac/37/
  58. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/ra/c9ra05886a
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3980488/
  60. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.201300424
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021850223001209
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12194837/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.