Hubbry Logo
NASA facilitiesNASA facilitiesMain
Open search
NASA facilities
Community hub
NASA facilities
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
NASA facilities
NASA facilities
NASA facilities
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

class=notpageimage|
NASA field centers

There are NASA facilities across the United States and around the world. NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC provides overall guidance and political leadership to the agency.[1] There are 10 NASA field centers, which provide leadership for and execution of NASA's work. All other facilities fall under the leadership of at least one of these field centers.[2] Some facilities serve more than one application for historic or administrative reasons. NASA has used or supported various observatories and telescopes, and an example of this is the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. In 2013 a NASA Office of the Inspector General's (OIG) Report recommended a Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) style organization to consolidate NASA's little used facilities.[3] The OIG determined at least 33 of NASA's 155 facilities were underutilized.

List of field centers

[edit]

NASA has ten field centers.[4] Four of these were inherited from its predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA); two others were transferred to NASA from the United States Army; and NASA commissioned and built the other four itself shortly after its formation in 1958.

Inherited from NACA

[edit]
View of LaRC (left) and its research aircraft (right)

Langley Research Center (LaRC), founded in 1917, is the oldest of NASA's field centers, located in Hampton, Virginia. LaRC focuses primarily on aeronautical research, though the Apollo lunar lander was flight-tested at the facility and a number of high-profile space missions have been planned and designed on-site. Established in 1917 by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, the center currently devotes two-thirds of its programs to aeronautics, and the rest to space.[5] LaRC researchers use more than 40 wind tunnels to study improved aircraft and spacecraft safety, performance, and efficiency. Both Langley Field and the Langley Laboratory are named for aviation pioneer Samuel Pierpont Langley.[6] Starting in 1958, when NASA started Project Mercury, LaRC housed the Space Task Group, which was expanded into the Manned Spacecraft Center and moved to Houston in 1961–1962.[7] The selection of Houston as the location of the Manned Spacecraft Center resulted in some controversy at NASA Langley and in the surrounding area at the time, given they had previously expected either for Langley to be expanded or for a nearby location in the Hampton Roads region to be selected for the center.[8]

View of ARC (left) and of Hangar One (right)

Ames Research Center (ARC) at Moffett Field was founded on December 20, 1939. The center was named after Joseph Sweetman Ames, a founding member of the NACA.[9] ARC is one of NASA's 10 major field centers and is located in California's Silicon Valley. Historically, Ames was founded to do wind-tunnel research on the aerodynamics of propeller-driven aircraft; however, it has expanded its role to doing research and technology in aeronautics, spaceflight, and information technology.[10] It provides leadership in astrobiology, small satellites, robotic lunar exploration, intelligent/adaptive systems and thermal protection.

Glenn Research Center (GRC), formerly the Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory, located in Brook Park, Ohio, was established in 1942 as a laboratory for aircraft engine research.[11] In 1999, the center was officially renamed the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field after John Glenn, an American fighter pilot, astronaut and politician.[12] Glenn supports all of the agency's missions and major programs. Glenn excels in researching and developing innovative technologies for both aeronautics and space flight. A multitude of NASA missions have included elements from Glenn, from the Mercury and Gemini projects to the Space Shuttle Program and the International Space Station. The center's core competencies include air-breathing and in-space propulsion and cryogenics, communications, power energy storage and conversion, microgravity sciences, and advanced materials.[13]

Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC), established by NACA before 1946 and located inside Edwards Air Force Base, is NASA's premier site for aeronautical research and operates some of the most advanced aircraft in the world. On January 16, 2014, the center previously known as Dryden was renamed in honor of Neil Armstrong, the first astronaut to walk on the Moon.[14][15]

Transferred from the Army

[edit]
View of JPL (left) and the Goldstone DSN site (right)

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), located in the San Gabriel Valley area of Los Angeles County, CA, was, together with ABMA, one of the agencies behind Explorer 1, America's first robotic satellite, and also together with ABMA one of the first agencies to become a part of NASA. The facility is headquartered in the city of La Cañada Flintridge [16][17] with a Pasadena mailing address. JPL is managed by the nearby California Institute of Technology (Caltech). The Laboratory's primary function is building and operating robotic planetary spacecraft, though it also conducts Earth-orbit and astronomy missions.[18] It is also responsible for operating NASA's Deep Space Network (DSN) which includes stations in Barstow, California; Madrid, Spain; and Canberra, Australia.[19]

View of MSFC test stands (left) and Saturn V stage assembly at MAF (right)

Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), located on the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama, is one of NASA's largest centers. MSFC is where the Saturn V rocket and Skylab were developed.[20] Marshall is NASA's lead center for International Space Station (ISS) design and assembly; payloads and related crew training; and was the lead for Space Shuttle propulsion and its external tank.[21] From December 1959, it contained the Launch Operations Directorate, which moved to Florida to become the Launch Operations Center on July 1, 1962.[22] The MSFC was named in honor of General George C. Marshall.[23] The center also operates the Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) in New Orleans, Louisiana to build and assemble hardware components for space systems.[24]

Built by NASA

[edit]
View of GSFC campus (left) and of Goddard Institute for Space Studies location (right)

Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), located in Greenbelt, Maryland, was commissioned by NASA on March 1, 1959.[25] It is the largest combined organization of scientists and engineers in the United States dedicated to increasing knowledge of the Earth, the Solar System, and the Universe via observations from space. GSFC is a major U.S. laboratory for developing and operating unmanned scientific spacecraft. GSFC conducts scientific investigation, development and operation of space systems, and development of related technologies. Goddard scientists can develop and support a mission, and Goddard engineers and technicians can design and build the spacecraft for that mission. Goddard scientist John C. Mather shared the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on COBE. GSFC also operates two spaceflight tracking and data acquisition networks (the Space Network and the Near Earth Network), develops and maintains advanced space and Earth science data information systems, and develops satellite systems for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).[26] External facilities of the GSFC include the Wallops Flight Facility at Wallops Island, Virginia, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies at Columbia University, and the Katherine Johnson Independent Verification and Validation Facility in West Virginia.[27][28]

Stennis Space Center (SSC), originally the Mississippi Test Facility, is located in Hancock County, Mississippi, on the banks of the Pearl River at the Mississippi–Louisiana border. Commissioned on October 25, 1961, it was NASA's largest rocket engine test facility until the end of the Space Shuttle program. It is currently used for rocket testing by over 30 local, state, national, international, private, and public companies and agencies.[29][30] It also contains the NASA Shared Services Center.[31]

Aerial view of JSC in Houston, Texas (left) and Kraft Mission Control Center (right)

Johnson Space Center (JSC) is NASA’s center for human spaceflight training, research and flight control. Created as the Manned Spacecraft Center on November 1, 1961, the facility consists of a complex of 100 buildings constructed in 1962–1963 on 1,620 acres (660 ha) of land donated by Rice University in Houston, Texas.[32] The center grew out of the Space Task Group formed soon after the creation of NASA to co-ordinate the US human spaceflight program. It is home to the United States Astronaut Corps and is responsible for training astronauts from the U.S. and its international partners, and includes the Christopher C. Kraft Jr. Mission Control Center.[32] The center was renamed in honor of the late U.S. president and Texas native Lyndon B. Johnson on February 19, 1973.[33][34] JSC also operates the White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, New Mexico to support rocket testing.

Aerial view of Kennedy Space Center showing Launch Complex 39
View of the SLS exiting the VAB (left) and aerial view of Launch Complex 39 (right)

Kennedy Space Center (KSC), located west of Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, is one of the best known NASA facilities. Named the Launch Operations Center at its creation on July 1, 1962, it was renamed in honor of the late U.S. president on November 29, 1963,[35][36] and has been the launch site for every United States human space flight since 1968. KSC continues to manage and operate uncrewed rocket launch facilities for America's civilian space program from three pads at Cape Canaveral. Its Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) is the eighth-largest structure in the world by volume and was the largest when completed in 1965.[37] A total of 10,733 people worked at the center as of September 2021. Approximately 2,140 are employees of the federal government; the rest are contractors.[38]

Other facilities

[edit]
Canberra Deep Space Communication, Australia

Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex (CDSCC) is a ground station that is located in Australia at Tidbinbilla outside Canberra. The complex is part of the Deep Space Network run by JPL. It is commonly referred to as the Tidbinbilla Deep Space Tracking Station and was officially opened on 19 March 1965. The station is separated from Canberra by the Coolamon Ridge, Urambi Hills and Bullen Range that help shield the city's radio frequency (RF) noise from the dishes.

Madrid Deep Space Communications Complex (MDSCC), in Spanish and officially Complejo de Comunicaciones de Espacio Profundo de Madrid, is a satellite ground station located in Robledo de Chavela, Spain, and operated by the Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA) that is a part of the Deep Space Network of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

In addition to JPL (above), there are other Government-Owned / Contractor-Operated NASA facilities operated under grant provisions, such as the Space Telescope Science Institute at Johns Hopkins University which operates the Hubble Space Telescope.

Organization

[edit]

NASA Headquarters

List of minor facilities

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

NASA facilities

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
NASA facilities encompass a nationwide network of research centers, test sites, launch complexes, and specialized installations operated by the to advance , , , and related technologies. These facilities, totaling over 5,000 structures across more than 100,000 acres of federal land as of the early at 10 major field centers and numerous additional sites in the United States, support NASA's core missions of understanding , enabling air transportation, and exploring space, while employing approximately 18,000 civil servants as of mid-2025 alongside contractors and partners, with ongoing reductions planned. With a replacement value exceeding $20 billion as of the early , they include critical assets such as wind tunnels, propulsion test stands, mission control centers, and supercomputing hubs essential for developing , analyzing , and conducting flight research. The ten major NASA field centers form the backbone of this infrastructure, each with distinct expertise and locations tailored to specific operational needs. in Moffett Field, , specializes in , supercomputing, and airspace management tools. in Edwards, , focuses on validating aeronautical concepts and supporting spaceflight operations like the . in , , develops , power systems, and communications technologies for both and . in , leads Earth and observations, managing satellites and scientific instruments. in —managed for by Caltech—oversees robotic missions to other planets and operates the Deep Space Network. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, directs human spaceflight training, mission operations, and the development of crewed spacecraft. Kennedy Space Center in Florida handles launch vehicle processing, payload integration, and ground operations for major missions. Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, pioneers aeronautics research and contributes to space technology through wind tunnels and modeling. Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, integrates propulsion systems and large-scale space hardware like rockets. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi tests rocket engines and supports applied sciences programs. Complementing these are additional facilities such as the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia for suborbital launches, the Michoud Assembly Facility in Louisiana for manufacturing, and NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., for policy and oversight. These facilities collectively provide unique capabilities, including 60 years of expertise in , high-end , propulsion testing, and launch services, fostering partnerships with industry, academia, and international entities to drive . By maintaining sustainable and adapting to emerging needs—like reducing energy use and right-sizing workspaces—NASA facilities ensure long-term support for ambitious goals, from lunar missions to deep-space exploration.

Field Centers

Inherited from NACA

The three original field centers inherited by from the (NACA) formed the core of its early aeronautics research infrastructure, established to advance aviation technology through experimental and theoretical studies. These facilities— in ; at Moffett Field, ; and Lewis Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio—were founded between 1917 and 1941 to address growing demands in , high-speed flight, and propulsion during the interwar and eras. Upon 's creation in 1958, these centers retained their NACA staff, facilities, and expertise, adapting them to support the agency's nascent efforts while continuing aeronautical work. Langley Research Center, NACA's inaugural laboratory, was established in 1917 as the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory in , named after aviation pioneer . Its primary focus under NACA was aerodynamic testing, utilizing pioneering s to investigate lift, drag, and stability for aircraft design. By the 1920s, Langley had developed the world's first pressurized , enabling tests at higher speeds and altitudes that informed advancements in efficiency and shapes during the 1930s. These efforts laid foundational data for military and , with facilities expanding to include variable-density tunnels for scale-model simulations. Ames Research Center was founded in 1939 at the former Moffett Field in , as NACA sought to expand beyond Langley's capacity amid rising aeronautical demands during the . Under NACA, Ames specialized in high-speed flight research, building supersonic and wind tunnels to study compressibility effects and shock waves on . This work included precursors to computational fluid dynamics, with early analog computing integrations for predicting airflow patterns around high-speed vehicles. By the late 1940s, Ames' facilities supported stability analyses for , contributing to safer transitions in military fighters. Lewis Research Center originated in 1941 as the NACA Aircraft Engine Research Laboratory in , , selected for its proximity to the region's aviation industry and to focus exclusively on propulsion systems. Renamed the Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory in 1948 after NACA's director of aeronautical research George W. Lewis, it emphasized through full-scale testing, including fuel consumption optimization and thrust augmentation for and early jet engines. The center's 8- by 6-foot , operational by 1944, allowed integrated engine-airframe evaluations to improve performance under varied conditions. In 1999, it was renamed the John H. Glenn Research Center to honor astronaut and senator . The transition from NACA to on October 1, 1958, preserved these centers' operational continuity, with over 8,000 NACA personnel transferring to the new agency and retaining key infrastructure like wind tunnels and engine test cells. This seamless integration enabled to leverage NACA's expertise for early space programs, including , where Langley engineers adapted aerodynamic data for capsule reentry and Ames contributed simulation tools for orbital trajectories. Lewis supported propulsion adaptations for launch vehicles, ensuring rapid progress in without disrupting ongoing aeronautics research. Among unique contributions, Langley's involvement in the X-15 hypersonic research program from 1954 onward provided critical aerodynamic data from tests and flight analyses, validating designs for speeds exceeding Mach 6 and informing future concepts. Ames pioneered early computer simulations with its 1949 acquisition of the first electronic computer at an NACA site, enabling rudimentary digital modeling of flight dynamics that evolved into advanced simulators for pilot training. At Lewis, the Altitude , completed in 1944, was instrumental during for testing full-scale aircraft engines like the P-47 Thunderbolt's radial engine at simulated high altitudes up to 40,000 feet, revealing performance limitations that improved Allied fighter reliability.

Transferred from the U.S. Army

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, was transferred from the U.S. Army Ordnance Corps to NASA on December 3, 1958, shortly after the agency's establishment, and has since been operated as a federally funded research and development center managed by the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). This transition positioned JPL to lead NASA's early planetary exploration programs, building on its rocketry expertise. Similarly, the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in Huntsville, Alabama, originated from the transfer of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) on July 1, 1960, bringing with it a team of over 5,000 personnel under the leadership of Wernher von Braun to focus on large-scale launch vehicle development. These transfers integrated military-derived rocketry capabilities into NASA's civilian space agenda, emphasizing propulsion systems for orbital and deep-space missions. Prior to their integration into NASA, both facilities contributed significantly to U.S. Army missile programs during the era. At JPL, engineers developed the short-range ballistic missile in the late 1940s, followed by the solid-fuel missile in the 1950s, which became a foundational technology for upper rocket stages. JPL also collaborated on early satellite projects, providing the upper stages and scientific instruments for , launched on January 31, 1958, which discovered the Van Allen radiation belts and marked America's first successful orbital mission. In parallel, the ABMA team at what became MSFC advanced liquid-fueled rocketry, producing the Redstone missile as the U.S. Army's first and adapting it into the configuration for scientific launches, including the successful vehicle that carried into orbit. These efforts laid the groundwork for transitioning military hardware to , with Redstone also enabling early Army probes like the Pioneer series attempts toward the Moon. Under NASA, JPL shifted its focus to unmanned planetary missions, spearheading the , which sent a series of flyby to , Mars, and Mercury starting in 1962, capturing the first close-up images of these worlds and establishing techniques for interplanetary navigation and data relay. For instance, achieved the first successful planetary flyby in 1962, measuring 's extreme surface temperatures, while became the first to orbit Mars in 1971, mapping nearly the entire planet and revealing ancient river valleys. At MSFC, the inherited expertise drove the design of the launch vehicle, a three-stage that powered the Apollo program's crewed lunar landings from 1969 to 1972, with its F-1 and J-2 engines generating over 7.5 million pounds of thrust to enable . This adaptation transformed ABMA's intermediate-range technology into a heavy-lift system capable of assembling the in orbit during subsequent decades. Distinctive assets from these facilities continue to support NASA's modern programs. JPL's Table Mountain Facility near , serves as a key for optical communications testing, featuring the Optical Communications Telescope Laboratory (OCTL) with a 1-meter that transmits high-power beams for deep-space experiments, such as the (DSOC) demonstration on the Psyche mission launched in 2023. At MSFC, legacy infrastructure from the Saturn era, including test stands with reused Apollo-period foundations, has been adapted for structural qualification of the (SLS) core stage, applying vibration and load simulations originally developed for lunar vehicles to ensure reliability for lunar missions. These centers occasionally collaborate with NASA-established facilities on initiatives like , leveraging their rocketry heritage for integrated launch and exploration architectures.

Established by NASA

NASA established four field centers specifically to advance its post-1958 mission in , , and innovative , each designed with purpose-built to address emerging challenges in space and operations. These centers were created to support the agency's rapid expansion following the of 1958, focusing on satellite technology, crewed missions, launch capabilities, propulsion testing, and aeronautical research. The Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, originally established by NACA, complements these with its long history in . The in , was established on May 1, 1959, as NASA's inaugural space flight complex dedicated to space science. Its primary purposes include developing satellites, conducting , and managing scientific missions, with facilities for instrument design and data analysis. A key milestone was Goddard's leadership in the project, including scientific instrument development and ground control, culminating in the observatory's deployment on April 24, 1990, which revolutionized by providing unprecedented views of the universe. Goddard's infrastructure supports ongoing satellite launches and , emphasizing its role in non-crewed exploration. In Houston, Texas, the Manned Spacecraft Center—renamed the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in 1973—was established on September 19, 1961, to serve as the hub for human spaceflight operations. It focuses on astronaut training, mission control, and spacecraft design, housing facilities for simulation and human factors research. The center played a pivotal role in the Gemini and Apollo programs, enabling the first U.S. spacewalks during Gemini missions and supporting the Apollo 11 Moon landing in 1969 through real-time mission control. A unique feature is the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory, a 6.2-million-gallon pool that simulates microgravity for spacewalk training, allowing astronauts to practice extravehicular activities in a weightless-like environment. The Launch Operations Center in Merritt Island, Florida—renamed the John F. Kennedy Space Center in November 1963—was established on March 7, 1962, to manage launch infrastructure for crewed and robotic missions. Its core functions involve vehicle assembly, payload integration, and launch operations, with expansive facilities tailored for large-scale rocketry. Kennedy was central to the Space Shuttle program, hosting all 135 missions from 1981 to 2011, including the construction of the International Space Station. Iconic features include the Vehicle Assembly Building, one of the largest enclosed structures by volume, and the Crawler-Transporters, massive platforms built in 1965 to slowly move rockets over 3 miles to the launch pad at less than 1 mph. NASA's Mississippi Test Operations, located in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi and renamed the John C. Stennis Space Center in 1988, was established on October 25, 1961, for large-scale testing. The center's purpose centers on certifying propulsion systems in controlled environments, featuring massive test stands capable of simulating full-thrust conditions. A significant milestone includes the certification testing of engines for the (SLS), with the second and final certification series completed in 2024 to support lunar missions as of 2025. Its infrastructure, including a 7.5-mile system for access, enables safe, high-volume testing of engines producing millions of pounds of thrust. The High-Speed Flight Research Station in Edwards, California—renamed the Flight Research Center upon NASA's formation in 1958, the Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center in 1976, and the Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center in 2014—was established on September 30, 1946, by NACA to advance experimental aeronautics and hypersonic technologies. It specializes in flight testing innovative aircraft, X-plane development, and atmospheric research, leveraging the site's remote location for high-risk operations. Key milestones encompass numerous X-plane programs, such as the X-15 hypersonic flights in the 1960s that achieved Mach 6.7 and informed reusable spacecraft design. The center's unique high-desert runway, spanning over 15,000 feet amid year-round clear weather and 301,000 acres of restricted airspace, facilitates safe landing tests and supersonic research.

Headquarters and Administrative Facilities

NASA Headquarters

NASA Headquarters, located in , serves as the central administrative hub of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (), providing overall guidance and direction to the agency. Established in 1958 following the creation of NASA by the , the headquarters initially operated from the Dolly Madison House at 1520 H Street, NW, until 1961. Today, it is housed in the Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters Building at 300 E Street SW, formerly known as Federal Office Building No. 10, which was renamed in 2021 to honor the pioneering African American mathematician and aerospace engineer Mary W. Jackson. The core functions of NASA Headquarters include policy formulation, budget allocation, and program oversight across all NASA facilities and missions, ensuring alignment with national space objectives. These responsibilities are led by the NASA Administrator, who serves as the agency's chief executive, and the Deputy Administrator, who acts in the Administrator's stead and handles delegated duties. Key directorates under headquarters include the Science Mission Directorate, which oversees scientific exploration; the Space Operations Mission Directorate, one of two directorates resulting from the 2021 split of the former Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, managing and operations; the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, focusing on advancements; the Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate, overseeing development of systems for human and robotic including the ; and the Space Technology Mission Directorate, advancing innovative technologies for space missions. As of November 2025, the structure remains unchanged despite mid-2025 discussions on potential reorganizations, and these directorates emphasize initiatives such as the for lunar and the (CLPS) for commercial lunar deliveries. Unique aspects of NASA Headquarters include hosting the NASA Advisory Council, a body of appointed experts that provides independent advice to the Administrator on programs, policies, and strategic matters. Additionally, it coordinates international partnerships, such as the collaboration with and the (ESA) on the , fostering multinational efforts in space operations and research.

Shared Services and Support Centers

NASA's Shared Services and Support Centers provide essential administrative, logistical, and safety support to the agency's field centers and programs, enabling efficient operations without direct involvement in mission-specific activities. These centers centralize functions such as , , , , and , allowing field centers to focus on core . Established primarily in the mid-2000s as part of broader efficiency initiatives, they reflect NASA's commitment to streamlining operations and enhancing safety across its distributed network. The (NSSC), located at the Space Center in , was established in 2006 through an (OMB) A-76 public-private competition to consolidate administrative services. It delivers centralized support in areas including , , , and IT services to all NASA centers, missions, and headquarters, processing billions in transactions annually to reduce duplication and costs. For instance, the NSSC handles employee onboarding, payroll, and vendor contracts, supporting over 18,000 NASA personnel. Complementing these efforts, the Safety Center (NSC), founded in October 2006 at the Ohio Aerospace Institute in , , addresses and training needs in response to recommendations from the . The NSC develops safety protocols, conducts training programs, and manages the agency's mishap reporting and investigation processes under NASA Procedural Requirements () 8621.1. It oversees annual analysis of mishap data from across centers, identifying trends to prevent recurrence, and establishes standards such as those in NPR 8715.3D for handling explosives, propellants, and to protect personnel and facilities. Post-2000s consolidation efforts have driven ongoing evolution in these centers, with the NSSC achieving significant efficiencies through service centralization and . As of 2025, the NSSC supports 's broader via the NASA Transformational contract, facilitating cloud-based migration for secure across centers. Similarly, the NSC enhances through advanced tools and resources, including simulation-based modules to foster a strong agency-wide. These initiatives ensure scalable support as pursues ambitious goals like and beyond.

Test and Research Facilities

Propulsion and Structural Test Sites

NASA's propulsion and structural test sites are critical ground-based facilities for validating the performance and durability of engines and structures under extreme conditions, such as high-thrust firings and vibrational loads. These sites enable static fire tests, acoustic simulations, and vacuum environment recreations essential for ensuring the reliability of propulsion systems before flight integration. Key facilities include the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility in , operated by NASA's , which spans over 6,400 acres and houses the world's largest space simulation chambers for comprehensive environmental testing. At the in , A-1, A-2, B-1, and B-2 test stands support engine certifications and core stage evaluations, particularly for the engines powering the (SLS). The in , features the historic Dynamic Test Stand, a 360-foot-high structure originally built in 1964 for full-vehicle vibrational and mechanical stress testing. These facilities provide specialized capabilities for simulating launch stressors, including the Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility (formerly Plum Brook Station), which generates up to 163 decibels to replicate shuttle-era ascent noise and has been used for structural vibration assessments on components. Altitude simulation is achieved through vacuum chambers, such as the In-Space Propulsion Facility's chamber with a 33-foot-diameter test volume capable of reaching pressures down to 5 x 10^{-7} to mimic space conditions up to 300 miles altitude. High-bay test stands across these sites accommodate vertical testing up to 500,000 pounds-force, with integrated cryogenic fluid systems handling and to support realistic propellant flow and cooling simulations during engine operations. Historically, these sites played pivotal roles in the Apollo program, including propulsion testing of Saturn IB stages at Marshall's T-Stand and engine firings that validated the vehicle's structural integrity for Earth-orbital missions. In current operations as of 2025, Stennis conducts hot-fire tests for SLS components, such as the June 2025 certification firing of RS-25 engine No. 20001 on the Fred Haise Test Stand (formerly A-1) at 111% throttle to confirm performance margins for Artemis missions. Marshall continues structural integrity evaluations for Orion spacecraft elements, including load testing of stage adapters to withstand launch vibrations and ensure compatibility with SLS. These efforts underscore the facilities' ongoing adaptation from Apollo-era validations to modern deep-space architectures.

Flight and Environmental Test Sites

NASA's flight and environmental test sites are essential for validating and mission hardware under simulated space conditions, including suborbital flights, drop tests, and extreme environmental exposures such as thermal vacuums and hazardous . These facilities enable engineers to assess performance in dynamic flight scenarios and harsh extraterrestrial environments without risking full-scale orbital missions. Key sites include the , , and elements of the , each contributing specialized capabilities to NASA's testing portfolio. The , located on , , and managed by NASA's , serves as the primary hub for launches and suborbital testing. It features six launch pads supporting suborbital missions for atmospheric and space research, with capabilities for real-time during flights like those using the Black Brant sounding rockets. The facility's Terrier rocket family has been instrumental in numerous atmospheric research campaigns, providing low-cost access to space for scientific payloads. As a unique aspect, Wallops enables agile, rapid-response launches with integrated systems for immediate data analysis during missions. The in , operated under the , specializes in hazardous testing for propulsion systems, pyrotechnics, and materials exposed to extreme conditions. Spanning 28 square miles of controlled remote property, it provides a secure range for evaluating propulsion hazards and explosive ordnance disposal, particularly for hypergolic fuels used in . Historical milestones include critical Apollo abort tests conducted in the , which validated escape systems and command module integrity under failure scenarios. The facility continues to support modern programs through safe handling of volatile propellants and components. At the in , a dedicated drop zone encompassing 301,000 acres of remote land facilitates parafoil landing tests and atmospheric drop simulations for entry, descent, and landing technologies. This expansive area allows for safe, full-scale evaluations of parafoil guidance systems, which predict wind patterns and steer vehicles to precise recovery zones, as demonstrated in prototype crew return vehicle trials. Complementing these flight tests, NASA's thermal-vacuum chambers across facilities like Johnson and Marshall simulate Mars and lunar environments, exposing hardware to cryogenic temperatures, high vacuums, and interactions. As of 2025, these chambers have been pivotal in qualifying (CLPS) landers, ensuring payload resilience through protoflight thermal vacuum testing for lunar surface operations.

Manufacturing and Assembly Facilities

Rocket and Spacecraft Production Sites

NASA's rocket and spacecraft production sites are specialized facilities dedicated to the assembly and integration of large-scale launch vehicles and exploration hardware, emphasizing precision welding, cleanroom environments, and structural integration to ensure mission reliability. The Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana, managed by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, serves as the primary hub for fabricating the core stage of the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, including welding of its massive propellant tanks. At the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, High Bay 2 within the Vehicle Assembly Building handles the final integration of the Orion spacecraft with the SLS upper stage and adapters. Meanwhile, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's (JPL) Spacecraft Assembly Facility in Pasadena, California, focuses on assembling robotic explorers such as Mars rovers, preparing them for planetary missions. Key processes at these sites involve advanced manufacturing techniques tailored to aerospace materials and contamination control. At Michoud, joins aluminum 2219 alloy barrel sections for the SLS liquid hydrogen and oxygen tanks, a solid-state method that minimizes defects by generating frictional heat to plastically deform and fuse the material without melting. This technique, refined from its initial use on Space Shuttle external tanks, enables the creation of seamless, high-strength structures up to 39 meters long. For like the Perseverance , JPL's facility employs integration under stringent protocols, using filtered air systems to maintain low particle counts and prevent microbial during assembly of sensitive instruments and mobility systems. throughout these processes includes non-destructive inspections and robotic precision to verify structural integrity before shipment. These facilities have evolved significantly since their origins, adapting to NASA's shifting priorities. Michoud, established in 1940 for wartime production of like the C-46 Commando, transitioned to rocket manufacturing in the 1960s for stages and later produced all 135 external tanks from 1973 to 2011. As of November 2025, it supports Block 1B SLS configurations, with ongoing production of larger tanks for enhanced payload capacity on missions starting with Artemis IV, including completion of the Artemis II core stage integration earlier in the year. At JPL, the Spacecraft Assembly Facility has prepared hardware for the , including assembly of the Sample Retrieval Lander to collect and launch Perseverance's cached samples, advancing preparations for a sample return targeted for the late 2030s or 2040s following revised mission architectures announced in 2025. Post-assembly testing occurs at dedicated sites to validate performance under launch conditions. Unique infrastructure enables handling of enormous components at these locations. Michoud spans approximately 1.9 million square feet under a single roof, equivalent to 43 acres, with an extensive network including capacities up to 150 tons for maneuvering tank sections in the 45,000-square-foot Vertical Assembly Center. JPL's facility features High Bay 1, a specialized equipped with shaker tables and mobility test rigs to simulate launch vibrations and navigation for rovers, ensuring robust performance on extraterrestrial surfaces. These capabilities underscore the sites' role in scaling human and robotic exploration.

Component Fabrication Centers

Component fabrication centers within specialize in the and production of discrete spacecraft components, such as , structural elements, habitats, and scientific instruments, supporting missions from low-Earth to deep . These facilities emphasize advanced prototyping and small-scale to enable rapid iteration and customization, distinct from large-scale vehicle assembly. Key centers include the Glenn Research Center's Engine Research Building, which houses facilities for developing and testing turbine blades used in components. Goddard's Instrument Systems and Technology Division (ISTD), through its Detector Development Lab, fabricates advanced detectors and micro-electro-mechanical systems () for space instruments. These centers employ cutting-edge techniques to achieve high reliability in harsh space environments. Additive manufacturing using metal powders, such as alloys, allows for complex geometries in components like engine parts, reducing weight and production time compared to traditional methods. fabrication at Goddard's Detector Lab enables the production of (CCD) sensors for telescopes, ensuring contamination-free assembly of focal plane arrays for optical and detection. The Detector Systems Branch within ISTD supports the design and testing of these detectors, from single units to full instruments. Significant contributions from these facilities have advanced NASA's missions. Glenn researchers developed fuel cell components, including alkaline fuel cell power plants, that provided electrical power for the Space Shuttle Orbiter, demonstrating durability over thousands of hours in flight. Ames produced silica aerogel blocks for the Stardust mission, which captured comet particles during its 2004 flyby of 81P/Wild 2, enabling the first sample return from a comet. Goddard's ISTD is fabricating key instruments for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, including the Wide Field Instrument—a 300-megapixel camera for wide-area surveys—and components of the Coronagraph Instrument for exoplanet imaging. Unique capabilities in these centers enhance component performance for space applications. High-precision metrology using laser interferometers ensures sub-micron accuracy in optical and structural components, as applied in facilities like Goddard's X-ray Mirror Laboratory for fabricating mirrors. At , the Radiation Effects and Analysis Group conducts testing for radiation-hardened electronics, simulating deep-space radiation environments to qualify components against single-event effects and total ionizing dose, critical for missions beyond Earth's .

Communication and Tracking Facilities

Deep Space Network

The Deep Space Network (DSN) is NASA's international array of large radio antennas designed to communicate with spacecraft operating beyond Earth's orbit, particularly those farther than 2 million kilometers from Earth. Managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the network consists of three major complexes strategically located around the globe to ensure continuous visibility of deep space targets: the Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in California's Mojave Desert, the Madrid Deep Space Communications Complex in Spain, and the Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex in Australia. Each complex features a 70-meter-diameter antenna for high-sensitivity operations and several 34-meter antennas for supporting multiple missions simultaneously, enabling reliable uplink commands, telemetry downlink, and ranging measurements essential for navigation. The DSN primarily operates in the X-band and S-band frequencies to transmit commands to , receive scientific , and perform two-way ranging for precise distance and velocity determinations. For missions at extreme distances, such as , which is approximately 21 billion kilometers from as of November 2025, the network employs antenna arraying techniques, combining signals from up to 6 antennas across complexes to detect faint signals as weak as approximately -160 dBm. This capability has been crucial for ongoing interstellar exploration, including support for during its Kuiper Belt flybys, such as the 2019 encounter with Arrokoth. Upgrades to Ka-band operations have significantly boosted data return rates, achieving up to 6 Mbps for missions like the (MRO), allowing for efficient transmission of high-resolution imagery and scientific data from Mars. Established in December 1963 to support the of interplanetary probes, the DSN evolved from earlier ad-hoc tracking efforts dating back to , marking a shift to a dedicated global infrastructure for deep space missions. Initial setups focused on S-band communications for early Mariners, with subsequent expansions adding X-band capabilities in the for enhanced reliability during Voyager launches. The network's 24/7 operations are coordinated through the DSN Scheduling System, an automated tool that prioritizes mission requests based on signal strength, data volume, and emergency needs, ensuring over 99% availability for critical events like planetary flybys. While primarily for deep space, the DSN integrates briefly with the Near Earth Network for hybrid missions transitioning from to interplanetary phases.

Near Earth and Space Networks

The Near Earth and Networks, collectively known as the Near Space Network (NSN), form NASA's primary infrastructure for providing communications and services to within approximately 1.25 million miles of , including (LEO) assets and emerging lunar missions. Managed by NASA's , the NSN enables near-continuous data relay and tracking for a wide array of missions, supporting everything from scientific satellites to operations. This system contrasts with longer-range networks by emphasizing high-volume, frequent interactions with Earth-orbiting and assets, ensuring reliable transmission of , commands, and scientific data. As of 2025, NASA is transitioning the NSN from the TDRS fleet to commercial relay services to meet growing demands. Key components include the Space Network (SN), which relies on a constellation of Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (TDRS) positioned in geosynchronous (GEO) to act as orbital relays. As of 2025, the TDRS fleet consists of seven operational satellites, with examples such as TDRS-L (launched in 2014) providing crosslinks between user spacecraft and ground facilities. Complementing this is the Near Earth Network (NEN), a global array of over 40 ground stations—both government-owned and commercially operated—for direct spacecraft-to-ground communications, including sites like Kaena Point in for equatorial coverage. The White Sands Complex in serves as the primary ground terminal for TDRS command, control, and data processing. The NSN delivers high-data-rate links essential for missions like the (ISS) and , with capabilities reaching up to 600 Mbps for downlink from the ISS following upgrades that doubled prior rates of 300 Mbps. These services facilitate the transfer of terabytes of data daily, including real-time video, scientific observations, and operational commands, while supporting for precise . Historically, the system evolved in the from a ground-station-only approach to incorporating relay satellites, with the first TDRS launch in 1983 marking the shift to enable near-constant coverage for LEO users previously limited by Earth's visibility horizons. As of 2025, the NSN is integrating with lunar infrastructure, such as the , through the LunaNet architecture—an interoperable framework for communications, navigation, and timing services across cislunar space. Unique features include the Multiple Access Service, which allows simultaneous support for multiple users via on TDRS transponders, optimizing bandwidth for diverse missions. Additionally, demonstrations of optical laser communications, such as the Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) launched in December 2021, are testing high-speed infrared links up to 1.2 Gbps to augment traditional systems.

Organization and Management

Governance and Oversight

The governance of facilities is structured under the authority of the NASA Administrator, who appoints the directors of the agency's 10 field centers and the , ensuring alignment with agency-wide objectives. These directors report to the Associate Administrator, who oversees the Mission Directorates—such as the Systems Development Mission Directorate—that manage programs spanning multiple facilities, coordinating development for initiatives like the lunar missions. This hierarchical framework promotes integrated resource allocation across centers while maintaining center-specific leadership for local implementation. Oversight of facility management is enforced through NASA Procedural Requirements (NPRs), including NPR 7120.5F, which establishes standardized processes for space flight program and project management to ensure safety, reliability, and performance across facilities. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office conducts regular audits of NASA's major projects, evaluating cost, schedule, and risk management to identify improvements in facility utilization and program execution. Key policies include facility utilization plans governed by 14 CFR Part 1216, which mandates environmental compliance through assessments under the , integrating sustainability into facility operations and expansions. Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives, which previously advanced inclusive practices through center-level participation including leadership councils and employee resource groups that reported to the Office of Diversity and Equal Opportunity, were discontinued in 2025 following an . Historical shifts in governance have emphasized safety and strategic focus, notably the 1986 post-Challenger reorganization recommended by the Rogers Commission, which elevated the Office of Safety, Reliability, Maintainability, and Quality Assurance to report directly to the Administrator for enhanced facility and program oversight. More recently, the era has driven realignments to support lunar sustainability, reallocating facility roles—such as upgrades at for launch infrastructure—to enable long-term human presence on the . In 2025, amid a new administration, underwent further realignments including proposed budget cuts of 24% for FY2026, closure of certain offices, and planning for structural changes under acting leadership, alongside the leaked "" initiative to refocus facilities on advanced propulsion and deep-space goals.

Coordination and Operations

NASA facilities collaborate through structured mechanisms to ensure seamless integration across centers for major missions. Multi-center project teams facilitate this coordination, particularly for complex programs like the , where leads design and development, the handles core stage production, and conducts propulsion testing. These teams enable resource sharing and technical expertise exchange, drawing on contributions from all centers to meet program milestones. Additionally, the Enterprise Service Desk (ESD), operated by the NASA Shared Services Center, serves as a centralized IT support hub, providing 24/7 incident management and cross-center assistance to maintain operational continuity across the agency. Operational efficiency is enhanced by specialized tools for planning and resource management. The NASA Scheduling Management Handbook outlines integrated approaches to time-phasing tasks, , and coordination, ensuring that facilities align schedules for mission-critical activities such as launch preparations and testing campaigns. As of 2025, digital engineering platforms, including (MBSE), support the by creating digital twins and simulations that allow centers to collaboratively verify designs and allocate resources in real-time, reducing integration risks for lunar missions. Emergency response protocols emphasize preparedness and inter-facility support to mitigate disruptions. Under 40 CFR Part 112, NASA facilities with significant oil storage implement Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, including Facility Response Plans that detail containment, notification, and cleanup procedures for potential spills during operations. Inter-center Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) enable surge capacity during crises, allowing facilities to provide mutual aid; for instance, centers like Kennedy Space Center have supported recovery efforts at Johnson Space Center following hurricanes by sharing personnel and equipment to restore mission operations. These protocols ensure rapid response while minimizing downtime across the network. Practical examples illustrate these coordination efforts in action. During the servicing missions, and collaborated closely, with Goddard managing scientific operations and Johnson overseeing flight control and crew training, enabling successful upgrades through integrated planning and real-time adjustments. Internationally, the Multilateral Coordination Board (MCB) for the facilitates cooperation among and partner agencies, addressing operational challenges like crew rotations and utilization schedules to sustain the orbiting laboratory.

References

  1. https://www.nasa.gov/osbp/about-nasa-centers/
  2. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayCA.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PR_8820_002E_&page_name=Chapter1
  3. https://www.npr.org/2025/07/26/nx-s1-5481304/nasa-employees-deferred-resignation-program
  4. https://science.nasa.gov/about-us/nasa-centers/
  5. https://www.nasa.gov/michoud-assembly-facility/
  6. https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/nasa-locations-capabilities-and-points-of-contact/
  7. https://www.nasa.gov/history/the-national-advisory-committee-for-aeronautics-naca/
  8. https://www.nasa.gov/reference/ames-history/
  9. https://www.nasa.gov/glenn/history/
  10. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/naca-at-110-special-feature/
  11. https://www.nasa.gov/history/110-years-ago-the-national-advisory-committee-for-aeronautics-founded/
  12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940022928/downloads/19940022928.pdf
  13. https://www.nasa.gov/reference/the-national-advisory-committee-for-aeronautics/
  14. https://www.nasa.gov/ames/ames-research-center-history/
  15. https://www.nasa.gov/history/center-names-evolve-to-honor-people-and-achievements-in-research/
  16. https://www.nasa.gov/glenn-history-fact-sheet/
  17. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-celebrates-90-years-of-aeronautics-excellence/
  18. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/langley/nasalangley100-a-storied-legacy-a-soaring-future/
  19. https://www.nasa.gov/history/65-years-ago-nasa-begins-operations/
  20. https://www.nasa.gov/history/SP-4219/Chapter6.html
  21. https://www.nasa.gov/naca-lewis-1947-inspection/
  22. https://www.nasa.gov/altitude-wind-tunnel/
  23. https://www.nasa.gov/history/history-of-the-deep-space-network/
  24. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/who-we-are/
  25. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/this-week-nasa-history-army-ballistic-missile-agency-formally-transferred-marshall-july-1-1960/
  26. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/marshall/60-years-of-marshall-space-flight-center/
  27. https://www.nasa.gov/jpl/jet-propulsion-laboratory-history/
  28. https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/monograph/series8/Descanso8_02.pdf
  29. https://www.nasa.gov/history/story-of-explorer-1/
  30. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/marshall/mercury-redstone-launch-vehicle/
  31. https://space.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/Programs/mariner.html
  32. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mariner-2/
  33. https://www.nasa.gov/marshall/marshall-space-flight-center-history/
  34. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/deep-space-optical-communications-dsoc/
  35. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/marshall-engineers-facilities-tools-contribute-to-artemis-success/
  36. https://www.nasa.gov/goddard/about/
  37. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/hubble/overview/the-history-of-hubble/
  38. https://www.nasa.gov/history/history-of-johnson-space-center/
  39. https://www.nasa.gov/johnson/neutral-buoyancy-laboratory/
  40. https://www.nasa.gov/kennedy/kennedy-space-center-history/
  41. https://www.nasa.gov/space-shuttle/
  42. https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/exploration-ground-systems/the-crawlers/
  43. https://www.nasa.gov/stennis/about-stennis/stennis-space-center-history/60th-anniversary/
  44. https://www.nasa.gov/armstrong/
  45. https://www.nasa.gov/armstrong/capabilities-facilities/aircraft-at-armstrong/x-planes-at-armstrong/
  46. https://www.nasa.gov/armstrong/overview/
  47. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-names-headquarters-after-hidden-figure-mary-w-jackson/
  48. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-celebrates-hidden-figure-mary-w-jackson-with-building-naming-ceremony/
  49. https://science.nasa.gov/resource/nasas-first-headquarters/
  50. https://www.nasa.gov/headquarters/
  51. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PD_1000_003F_&page_name=Chapter2
  52. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/
  53. https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/artemis/
  54. https://www.nasa.gov/commercial-lunar-payload-services/
  55. https://spacenews.com/nasa-splits-human-spaceflight-directorate-into-two-organizations/
  56. https://www.nasa.gov/organization/
  57. https://www.nasa.gov/nac/
  58. https://www.nasa.gov/international-space-station/space-station-international-cooperation/
  59. https://www.nasa.gov/nasa-shared-services-center/
  60. https://www.nasa.gov/nasa-safety-center/
  61. https://searchpub.nssc.nasa.gov/servlet/sm.web.Fetch/FY25_NSSC_Services_Catalog.pdf?rhid=1000&did=6907672&type=released
  62. https://www.nasa.gov/nasa-safety-center-mishap-prevention/
  63. https://www.nasa.gov/neil-armstrong-test-facility/
  64. https://www.nasa.gov/stennis/rs-25/
  65. https://www.nps.gov/articles/saturn-v-dynamic-test-stand.htm
  66. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/glenn/space-environments-complex/
  67. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/glenn/in-space-propulsion-facility/
  68. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20070006480/downloads/20070006480.pdf
  69. https://www.nasa.gov/rocket-systems-area-pump-sites/
  70. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/saturn-testing-historic-t-stand/
  71. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/new-rs-25-engine/
  72. https://www.nasa.gov/technology/space-travel-tech/orion-stage-adapter-aces-structural-loads-testing-hjhxs/
  73. https://www.nasa.gov/wallops/
  74. https://www.nasa.gov/white-sands-test-facility/
  75. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/wallopsrangehandbook-lowres.pdf
  76. https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code810/files/SRHB.pdf
  77. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/sounding-rocket-program-handbook.pdf
  78. https://www.nasa.gov/white-sands-test-facility/white-sands-test-facility-history/
  79. https://www.nasa.gov/aeronautics/aircraft/x-38-prototype/
  80. https://www.nasa.gov/reference/jsc-thermal-vacuum/
  81. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250005380
  82. https://www.nasa.gov/michoud-history/
  83. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esdmd/common-exploration-systems-development-division/space-launch-system/artemis-ii-core-stage-vertical-integration-begins-at-nasa-kennedy/
  84. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia23519-high-bay-1-in-jpls-spacecraft-assembly-facility/
  85. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160008018/downloads/20160008018.pdf
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10143485/
  87. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press_kits/mars_2020/launch/mission/spacecraft/biological_cleanliness/
  88. https://www.nasa.gov/reference/nasas-michoud-assembly-facility/
  89. https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2025/03/24/nasas-artemis-ii-core-stage-integration-complete-at-kennedy/
  90. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-explore-two-landing-options-for-returning-samples-from-mars/
  91. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/esdmd/common-exploration-systems-development-division/space-launch-system/nasa-michoud-continues-work-on-evolved-stage-of-sls-rocket-for-future-artemis-missions/
  92. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/maf_factsheet_07_2021.pdf
  93. https://www.facebook.com/3PSinc/photos/looking-down-on-the-nasa-michoud-assembly-facility-in-new-orleans-during-the-ins/780254805435566/
  94. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia26167-cadre-rover-gets-a-big-shake/
  95. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/glenn/engine-research-building/
  96. https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/directorate/division550/
  97. https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/capabilities/facilities-listing/detector-development-lab-ddl/
  98. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230016654/downloads/Metal_AM_Aerospace_Binghamton%2520Univ_11-16-23.pdf
  99. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230014532/downloads/20230014532%2520Doc.pdf
  100. https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/capabilities/facilities-listing/detector-characterization-lab-dcl/
  101. https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/directorate/division550/550-branches/
  102. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20040010319/downloads/20040010319.pdf
  103. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20060024674/downloads/20060024674.pdf
  104. https://roman.gsfc.nasa.gov/instruments_and_capabilities.html
  105. https://roman.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/WFI_technical.html
  106. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/the-roman-coronagraph-instrument/
  107. https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/662/instruments/mirrorlab/lab_facil.html
  108. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170006607/downloads/20170006607.pdf
  109. https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/capabilities/capabilities-listing/radiation-effects-and-analysis/
  110. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20070018806/downloads/20070018806.pdf
  111. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/dsn/
  112. https://www.nasa.gov/communicating-with-missions/dsn/
  113. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/where-are-voyager-1-and-voyager-2-now/
  114. https://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/2010-2019/progress_report/42-214/42-214B.pdf
  115. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19710025828/downloads/19710025828.pdf
  116. https://ai.jpl.nasa.gov/public/projects/sss/
  117. https://www.nasa.gov/near-space-network/
  118. https://www.nasa.gov/technology/space-comms/tracking-and-data-relay-satellite-tdrs-fleet-characteristics/
  119. https://www.nasa.gov/mission/tracking-and-data-relay-satellites/
  120. https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/white-sands-ground-terminal/
  121. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/station/data-rate-increase-on-the-international-space-station-supports-future-exploration/
  122. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/somd/space-communications-navigation-program/nasa-communications-network-to-double-space-station-data-rates/
  123. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1689
  124. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240012437/downloads/2025-AeroConf-OnboardProcessing-FinalAfterComments.pdf
  125. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2002-T2-50
  126. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/tech-demonstration/nasas-laser-communications-relay-a-year-of-experimentation/
  127. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-administrator-announces-new-marshall-space-flight-center-director/
  128. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?Internal_ID=N_PD_1000_003F_&page_name=Chapter4
  129. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?t=NPR&c=7120&s=5E
  130. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107591
  131. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-V/part-1216
  132. https://spacenews.com/nasa-shutters-diversity-offices-to-comply-with-executive-order/
  133. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/artemis_plan-20200921.pdf
  134. https://spacenews.com/nasas-acting-leadership-planning-new-agency-structure/
  135. https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/10/science/nasa-jared-isaacman-project-athena
  136. https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/space-launch-system/profiles/
  137. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/nssc/enterprise-services/
  138. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/420297main_nasa-sp-2010-3403.pdf?emrc=33fd1c
  139. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2025-4022
  140. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/epmc-22.pdf
  141. https://www.nasa.gov/history/SP-4219/Chapter16.html
  142. https://www.nasa.gov/general/multilateral-coordination-board-joint-statement/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.