Hubbry Logo
Ammophila arenariaAmmophila arenariaMain
Open search
Ammophila arenaria
Community hub
Ammophila arenaria
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ammophila arenaria
Ammophila arenaria
Ammophila arenaria
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ammophila arenaria
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Monocots
Clade: Commelinids
Order: Poales
Family: Poaceae
Genus: Ammophila
Species:
A. arenaria
Binomial name
Ammophila arenaria
Synonyms
  • Arundo arenaria, (Linnaeus)[1]
  • Ammannia coccinea purpurea, (Lam.) Koehne[1]
  • Ammannia teres, (Raf.)[1]
  • Calamagrostis arenaria, (L.) Roth[1]
  • Ammophila australis is a synonym of Ammophila arenaria subspecies australis (Mabille) M.Laínz

Ammophila arenaria (syn Calamagrostis arenaria[2]) is a species of grass in the family Poaceae. It is known by the common names marram grass and European beachgrass.[3][4] It is one of two species of the genus Ammophila. It is native to the coastlines of Europe and North Africa where it grows in the sands of beach dunes. It is a perennial grass forming stiff, hardy clumps of erect stems up to 1.2 metres (3.9 ft) in height. It grows from a network of thick rhizomes which give it a sturdy anchor in its sand substrate and allow it to spread upward as sand accumulates. These rhizomes can grow laterally by 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) in six months. One clump can produce 100 new shoots annually.[5]

The rhizomes tolerate submersion in sea water and can break off and float in the currents to establish the grass at new sites.[6] The leaves are up to 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) long and sharply pointed. The cylindrical inflorescence is up to 30 centimetres (12 in) long. It is adapted to habitat made up of shifting, accreting sand layers, as well as that composed of stabilised dunes.[6]

Life cycle/phenology

[edit]
A single leaf of marram grass, showing the rolled leaf which reduces water loss
100x magnified cross section of a curled leaf

Ammophila arenaria is a perennial plant, which means it can live for many years. It mainly grows in spring when leaf production exceeds leaf senescence. However, the conditions in autumn cause the plant to nearly stop growth while its leaves become aged.[7] In winter, because of the cold temperatures, growth is very slow but does not stop.[8] As a xerophytic adaptation, its leaves curl during drought (see pictures). The relatively high humidity within the curled leaf prevents a rapid water loss. This is facilitated by the bulliform cells located at the base of the V-shaped notch which swells and makes the leaf uncurl when filled with water.[9]

This plant is highly adaptive in sand, and can withstand burial for more than one year. Unlike other plants which will die in sand, marram grass will elongate its leaves when it is buried by sand.[10][11]

Its inflorescences are initiated in autumn of the second year after germination and mature in May or June, and flowers are produced from May to August.[8][12] The fruit is mature by September, and the seeds germinate the next spring. Though the adult plant is strong, the seeds have low viability, and the seedlings also have low survival rates as well because of desiccation, burial, and erosion.[13] The main organ for its reproduction is rhizomes, which are dispersed along the shore by wind and water.[14]

Geographic distribution and habitat

[edit]
Sand dunes densely covered by marram grass at Oxwich Bay, Wales

Natural global range

[edit]

Ammophila arenaria is a European and North African native plant. It occurs in Australia, Canada, Chile, Falkland Islands (Malvinas) (sub-Antarctic), New Zealand, South Africa and United States.[15] In the Northern Hemisphere, it grows between 30 and 63 degrees north latitude.[16]

New Zealand range

[edit]

Usually occurs on sand dunes, sometimes in inland sites with low fertility.[17] It occurs across the North and South Islands, and the Chatham Islands.

Habitat preferences

[edit]

Marram grass grows on coastal sand dunes all over the world. It prefers growing on the active sand area and the windward side of the foredune. It prefers well-drained soils with different kinds of mineral compositions and low in organic matter. The optimal soil conditions for marram grass is a soil pH from 4.5 to 9.0, soil temperatures from 10–40 °C (50–104 °F),[18] and salt concentrations of no more than 1.0–1.5%.[19] Marram grass can also be found on alkaline soils with a high pH of around 9.1 and also acidic soils with pH less than 4.5. Adult plants can tolerate a large range of chemical issues. Marram grass has an ability to adapt dry sand well. Its leaves become rolled and tight when moisture levels are low.[16]

Invasiveness: Pacific coast of North America

[edit]

A. arenaria is one of the most problematic noxious weeds of coastal California. This sand-adapted grass was introduced to the beaches of western North America during the mid-19th century to stabilize shifting sand dunes. It grew readily, and it can now be found from California to British Columbia. The grass is invasive in the local ecosystems, forming dense monotypic stands that crowd out native vegetation, reduce species diversity of native arthropods, and cover vital open stretches of sand used for nesting by the threatened western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus).[6] The plant's spread has changed the topography of some California beach ecosystems, especially in sand dunes. The presence of this grass was a major cause of the destruction of native dune habitat in Oregon and Washington during the 20th century,[20] where it was planted precisely for its dune-stabilizing effect.[21]

Several methods have been employed in attempts to eradicate the grass in California, including manual pulling, burning, mechanical removal followed by saltwater irrigation, and glyphosate application.[20] Studies to find the best methods are ongoing; however, low-intensity treatments such as herbicides and manual pulling are being recommended by some researchers over mechanical treatments such as bulldozing due to potential negative impacts on endemic dune plants and dune geomorphology.[22]

The California Conservation Corps has made major efforts in the removal of the invasive beachgrass, such as an initiative at Morro Strand State Beach in 2000.[23]

Invasiveness: New Zealand and Australia

[edit]

Not only is it invasive in California, it is also a highly invasive weed in coastal areas of New Zealand and Western Australia, where it was introduced for the same purpose in California, to stabilise dunes, outcompeting native Spinifex species. It is named in the Department of Conservation's 2024 list of environmental weeds. However, in New Zealand the larvae of the endemic moth species Agrotis innominata has adapted to using A. arenaria as one of its main host species.[24] It has been suggested that prior to the removal of this invasive grass from the coasts of New Zealand, surveys be undertaken to establish whether this endemic moth is present in order to assist with the conservation of that species.[24]

Predators, parasites, and diseases

[edit]

Marram grass does not carry any major disease in New Zealand, as only three pathogenic fungi (Claviceps purpurea, Uredo sp. and Colletotrichum graminicola) are present on the island. These three fungi result in ergot, rust and leaf spot, respectively, and are found both on flower-heads and leaves. However, in European countries, there are many pests known to feed on marram grass. Those pests can kill 30–40% of the tillers, and also damage other species. The fungi, always found in soil, may decrease vigour on stabilized sand.[25]

Uses

[edit]

The roots of marram grass are edible, although thin and fibrous. The flowering stems and leaves are used for thatching, basketry and making brooms. Fiber from the stem is used for making paper, and the rhizomes are used for making rope and mats.[26]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ammophila arenaria

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
, commonly known as European beachgrass or marram grass, is a rhizomatous grass native to the coastal dunes and beaches of , , and western . It possesses stout, erect culms reaching up to 120 cm in height, grey-green leaves that are typically inrolled to minimize , and an extensive network of horizontal and vertical rhizomes that enable rapid vegetative spread and anchorage in shifting sands. In its native range, A. arenaria plays a key role in stabilizing foredunes by trapping wind-blown , thereby facilitating succession in dynamic coastal ecosystems from latitudes 30° to 63° N. Widely introduced to other continents, including , , and , for and dune building since the , it has established dense monocultures that outcompete native through superior sand accretion and proliferation. This aggressive growth disrupts natural dune mobility, reduces habitat heterogeneity, and negatively affects communities and reliant on open habitats. Despite its utility in engineered coastal defenses, A. arenaria's invasiveness has prompted eradication efforts in regions like the , where it hybridizes with the related A. breviligulata and exacerbates by preventing sand delivery to rear dunes and promoting soil stabilization over natural erosion cycles. Management challenges arise from its resilience to burial and mechanical removal, underscoring the trade-offs between short-term stabilization benefits and long-term ecological degradation.

Taxonomy and morphology

Botanical description

Ammophila arenaria is a , rhizomatous grass in the family , forming dense tussocks adapted for stabilizing shifting sands. It possesses extensive creeping rhizomes that enable vegetative spread and anchorage, supplemented by a deep for nutrient and water uptake in dune environments. The plant exhibits both horizontal rhizomes, which produce new shoots and anchor young plants, and vertical rhizomes that facilitate growth through burial by sand. Culms are erect and robust, reaching heights of 50–120 cm, often supporting the weight of the . Leaves are long, narrow, and characteristically inrolled with sharp margins, appearing green; this rolled structure, visible in cross-section as a cylindrical form with central vascular bundles, minimizes loss and resists abrasion from windblown . Leaf blades measure approximately 1.5–2 mm in when rolled and taper to sharp tips. The is a narrow, spike-like , 12–35 cm long and 15–20 mm wide, densely packed with that are 9–20 mm in length. Each contains 2–7 florets, with glumes equaling or exceeding the florets, and is wind-pollinated; mature turn stramineous or golden. The chromosome number is 2n=28.

Taxonomic history and

Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link belongs to the Poaceae (grasses), subfamily , and is one of two species in the genus Ammophila, alongside the North American A. breviligulata. The genus comprises perennial, rhizomatous grasses adapted to coastal dunes, distinguished from related genera by features such as elongate rhizomes, rolled leaves, and awnless lemmas. The species was originally described by as Arundo arenaria in volume 1, page 154, published on May 1, 1753, based on specimens from European coastal sands. In 1827, Ernst Heinrich Friedrich Link transferred it to the genus Ammophila in Hortus Berolinensis volume 1, page 105, recognizing morphological distinctions from the broader Arundo and aligning it with the segregate genus proposed earlier by Franz Xaver von Zach (as Ammophila in 1805, though attribution varies). Synonyms include arenaria (L.) Roth (from Descriptio et Icones Plantarum Germanicae et Scandinaviae, circa 1800) and Psamma arenaria (L.) Lam., reflecting historical placements in or other dune-grass genera. Two subspecies are recognized in some treatments: the typical A. arenaria subsp. arenaria, with glumes exceeding the lemma and shorter callus hairs, predominant in and ; and subsp. arundinacea (with longer lemmas and hairs), found in and . Recent molecular phylogenetic studies, however, indicate close genetic affinity between Ammophila and , leading some authorities (e.g., ) to treat A. arenaria as a synonym of C. arenaria, subsuming the genus into the broader Calamagrostis based on shared synapomorphies like lemma vestiture and rhizome . This reclassification remains debated, as floras such as Flora of North America and USDA maintain Ammophila as distinct due to ecological specialization and consistent morphological divergence in dune habitats.

Reproduction and life cycle

Phenology and growth patterns

Ammophila arenaria exhibits a growth habit characterized by active periods primarily in spring and fall, with slower rates during winter but no complete . Growth initiates with shoot elongation and tiller production in early spring, driven by increasing temperatures and moisture availability in coastal environments. extension occurs continuously, supporting vegetative spread through horizontal runners that produce new shoots and vertical roots for anchorage, enabling the plant to colonize shifting sands. Flowering typically occurs in summer, from to , producing dense, cylindrical panicles 15–30 cm long that facilitate wind pollination. maturation follows in late summer to early autumn (–October), though is less dominant than clonal via rhizomes and basal buds. In Mediterranean climates within its native range, growth commences in late winter and halts during hot, dry summers, reflecting to seasonal limitations. Overall, the species maintains a growth pattern, forming dense tussocks that expand laterally through prolific rhizome budding, enhancing dune stabilization.

Reproductive strategies

Ammophila arenaria primarily reproduces vegetatively through an extensive network of creeping s that extend both horizontally and vertically, enabling rapid clonal expansion and colonization of sandy environments. This strategy allows the plant to form dense tussocks and spread over large areas without reliance on , with rhizome fragments further dispersed by water, waves, or contaminated . Sexual reproduction involves the production of wind-pollinated inflorescences in summer, yielding caryopses (grains) enclosed in lemmas and paleas, though output is typically low. exhibit limited viability and are dispersed by wind, water, or animals, but survival remains poor, with most succumbing to , , or shortly after . Consequently, clonal via rhizomes dominates establishment and persistence, particularly in dynamic coastal dunes where environmental stresses hinder .

Distribution and habitat

Native geographic range

Ammophila arenaria is native to the coastal , where it inhabits sandy dunes and beaches along the Atlantic, , , and Mediterranean shores, extending from approximately 30° to 63° N latitude. This range includes the , , , the , , , and the Baltic coasts. The species also occurs naturally around the Mediterranean Basin, including southern European countries such as , , and , as well as the coasts of the bordering eastern Europe and western . Mediterranean North African coastlines, particularly in , , and , host native populations adapted to similar dune environments. While primarily coastal, inland occurrences are rare and typically associated with riverbanks or lake shores in , though these are less extensive than maritime distributions. The latitudinal span reflects adaptations to temperate maritime climates with moderate temperatures and high wind exposure, favoring stabilization of shifting sands in foredune zones.

Introduced ranges and spread

Ammophila arenaria, native to the coastal dunes of and , was intentionally introduced to the of starting in the late to stabilize shifting sands. Initial plantings occurred in , , , around the 1890s, with further deliberate introductions in by 1910 near and in 1935 on the Clatsop Plains. By the 1950s, it had proliferated northward to and southward toward , forming extensive foredune systems through rapid rhizomatous vegetative spread. In areas like the North Spit of , , stands expanded at rates of approximately 5 hectares per year between 1962 and 1989, colonizing plains and altering natural dune dynamics. Over the subsequent decades, it dominated coastal dunes from Santa Barbara County northward in , displacing native vegetation and creating dense, monotypic mats. Beyond , A. arenaria was introduced to and in the early for stabilization and protection, where it rapidly became a dominant in temperate coastal systems. In , large-scale plantings led to vegetative spread supplemented by occasional seeding, resulting in its prevalence within 1 km of the across many active fields by the mid-20th century. In southeast , it invaded beach and dry coastal vegetation, promoting foredune progradation but homogenizing habitats. Introductions also occurred in , , and the , primarily for , though its invasive status in remains contested due to limited alteration of native processes despite widespread distribution. In all these regions, spread was facilitated by human-mediated transport of rhizomes and intentional replanting, with natural dispersal limited to coastal winds and sand accretion.

Preferred habitats and adaptations

primarily inhabits coastal sand dunes, favoring mobile or semi-stable substrates with low content and high drainage, such as foredunes and embryo dunes where sand accretion predominates. It thrives in arid, open environments with minimal nutrient availability, tolerating salt spray and periodic inundation characteristic of maritime zones. Optimal growth occurs in shifting sands that actively bury the plant, distinguishing it as a in dynamic coastal ecosystems. Key morphological adaptations enable survival in these harsh conditions. The plant develops an extensive system of tough, creeping rhizomes that penetrate deeply into —often meters in length—providing anchorage against wind erosion and facilitating rapid vegetative across unstable surfaces. Leaves are long, narrow, and , curling into tight cylinders to minimize exposed surface area, reduce , and shield against abrasive sand particles and ; stomata are recessed in pits within these rolls for further . Physiological traits further enhance fitness in dune habitats. A. arenaria exhibits rapid elongation of internodes and leaves in response to sand burial, with growth rates allowing it to emerge above accumulating deposits at up to 1 meter per year, thereby sustaining and promoting stabilization. As a , it maintains low water loss through efficient stomatal regulation and tolerates drought stress, while moderate permits persistence under saline influences from sea spray. Low nutrient demands are met via associations with nitrogen-fixing in the , and opportunistic uptake from organic inputs like stranded supports vigor in oligotrophic sands. These adaptations collectively position A. arenaria as a dominant in foredune formation, though they limit its competitiveness in more stable, nutrient-rich inland dunes.

Ecological interactions

Predators, parasites, and diseases

Ammophila arenaria exhibits resistance to many aboveground herbivores owing to its tough, inrolled leaves and in shifting sands, resulting in few documented predators beyond minor shoot-feeding such as . Laboratory studies have demonstrated interactions between root-feeding s and these , where nematode presence can indirectly influence aphid performance on shoots, though field correlations remain weak. Parasitic s, including ectoparasitic and endoparasitic species, target the s of A. arenaria, reducing vigor particularly in stabilized dunes where sand accretion ceases. These nematodes accumulate in aging zones, suppressing growth by feeding on tissues and disrupting uptake. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can mitigate nematode damage by enhancing defenses, but this protection diminishes as dunes stabilize. In native European ranges, such parasites contribute to the 's characteristic degeneration phase, with burial by fresh allowing escape and rejuvenation. Soil-borne fungal pathogens, often acting synergistically with nematodes, cause root infections and further decline in mature stands. Specific fungal associations have been detected via molecular characterization, confirming their role in the pathosystem affecting dune grasses. These diseases manifest as reduced , chlorosis, and eventual dieback once pathogen loads exceed thresholds in static soils. In introduced ranges like , A. arenaria often experiences reduced pathogen pressure, correlating with heightened invasiveness and lack of degeneration.

Interactions with soil and microbes

Ammophila arenaria forms symbiotic associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which enhance uptake and contribute to acquisition in phosphorus-limited dune s. These fungi colonize the plant's roots, facilitating the exchange of carbohydrates for mineral nutrients and aiding establishment in nutrient-poor sands. Studies have identified specific AMF species, such as Glomus and Rhizophagus taxa, associated with A. arenaria roots, promoting growth and sand stabilization by binding particles. Invasion by A. arenaria alters microbial communities and properties, often increasing organic carbon and total through inputs, though the high carbon-to- (C:N) ratio of its —averaging 70.8—limits microbial due to scarcity for decomposers. effects generally amplify microbial and activity compared to bulk , fostering positive feedbacks that support early plant dominance in dunes. However, in mature stands, harmful soil biota, including pathogenic fungi and nematodes, accumulate in the , reducing root development, nutrient uptake rates for , , and , and overall production, contributing to plant degeneration. Efforts to mitigate legacy effects post-removal, such as soil inoculation with native microbial communities, shift bacterial and fungal compositions toward pre-invasion states but fail to accelerate litter decomposition or fully reverse altered soil chemistry. This persistence underscores the role of A. arenaria-associated microbes in perpetuating invasion impacts, with slowly degrading litter suppressing native microbial functions and hindering restoration.

Effects on associated flora and fauna

In introduced ranges such as the and coasts, Ammophila arenaria forms dense, rhizomatous monocultures that outcompete native dune , including Elymus mollis (American dunegrass), through superior uptake efficiency, rapid accretion, and prolific vegetative spread. This competitive dominance reduces native cover and , with studies documenting declining abundances of endemic dune over periods of 7 years or more in invaded areas, while A. arenaria coverage expands. By stabilizing foredunes and accelerating succession from open to vegetated states, it diminishes early-seral habitats essential for disturbance-adapted natives, leading to overall in communities. Habitat alterations driven by A. arenaria further exacerbate floral impacts by creating steep, narrow foredunes that trap and limit to inland areas, contrasting with broader, more dynamic native dune profiles that support diverse vegetation mosaics. In , invaded dunes exhibit reduced bare and native plant diversity compared to uninvaded references, with legacy effects persisting in soil chemistry even after partial removal. Restoration efforts, such as mechanical eradication, have demonstrated recovery of native flora, achieving levels equivalent to reference dunes after 30 years, underscoring the grass's suppressive role. For fauna, A. arenaria invasion indirectly harms associated by providing dense cover that elevates populations, such as Peromyscus maniculatus (deer mouse), which preferentially nest in its stands and increase seed predation on vulnerable natives like Lupinus tidestromii (Tidestrom's lupine). This proliferation disrupts plant recruitment and cascades to mesopredators, which show reduced activity in heavily invaded dunes despite abundant prey. Direct effects include loss of open sand nesting sites for shorebirds, such as the western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus) and Chatham Island , whose breeding habitats are curtailed by vegetation encroachment. Invertebrate communities also suffer, with invaded dunes hosting lower richness and abundance of arthropods, solitary bees, Diptera, and compared to native-dominated systems. Removal of A. arenaria has been shown to lower densities and enhance survival of dependent , highlighting these causal linkages.

Environmental impacts

Benefits for dune stabilization and erosion control

, commonly known as European beachgrass or marram grass, excels in dune stabilization through its morphological and physiological adaptations that facilitate sand trapping and accretion. Its tough, rolled leaves and extensive rhizomatous root system effectively capture wind-blown sand, binding particles and preventing dispersal. The grass responds to burial by elongating internodes and leaves, enabling vertical growth rates that match or exceed sand deposition, often up to 1 meter per year in active foredunes. This process promotes the formation of taller, steeper foredunes compared to native dune grasses, enhancing resistance to erosion from wind and waves. Historically introduced to the U.S. West Coast in the late , specifically around 1899 in , A. arenaria was planted to control shifting sands threatening coastal settlements and . By the , widespread plantings had transformed dynamic, low-relief dunes into stable, elevated barriers, reducing inland sand encroachment and protecting from storm damage. Studies indicate that these engineered dunes provide superior coastal protection by attenuating wave energy and minimizing overtopping during high-water events, with foredune heights reaching 10-20 meters in some managed systems. In its native European range, A. arenaria has been utilized for centuries in dune fixation, contributing to the preservation of coastal landscapes against . Experimental plantings demonstrate its capacity to initiate development on bare beaches, preventing initial and fostering accumulation without supplemental structures. Overall, its biogeomorphic —where plant growth reinforces trapping in positive feedback loops—yields durable , particularly in high-energy coastal environments.

Drawbacks including biodiversity reduction and habitat alteration

In introduced ranges, particularly along the of , Ammophila arenaria forms dense monotypic stands that outcompete native dune grasses such as Elymus mollis ( Leymus mollis), drastically reducing and threatening associated communities like the Northern Foredune . Invasion correlates with lower richness and abundance of terrestrial arthropods, nematodes, bees, and other invertebrates, while also displacing vertebrate species adapted to native dune habitats. For instance, in and , where the species was introduced in the late 19th and early 20th centuries respectively, it has dominated foredunes, reducing habitat for like sand-verbena (Abronia umbellata) and impacting pollinators through simplified vegetation structure. Habitat alteration stems from A. arenaria's aggressive sand-trapping rhizomes, which create taller, steeper, and narrower foredunes compared to the gentler, more dynamic profiles formed by . This morphodynamic shift disrupts sediment exchange between beaches, foredunes, and inland dunefields, limiting sand supply to rear dunes and promoting their stabilization or decline, which reduces overall heterogeneity. The species tolerates up to 100 cm of annual sand deposition—far exceeding the 30 cm limit for E. mollis—exacerbating these changes and rendering dunes less suitable for early-successional , burrowing arthropods, and ground-nesting birds such as the western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus). In Washington and , where infestations affect approximately 42% of the coastline, this leads to decreased resilience to disturbances like storms or sea-level rise due to diminished complexity.

Legacy effects post-removal

Invasion by Ammophila arenaria induces persistent alterations in soil chemistry that endure after plant removal, complicating restoration to pre-invasion conditions. At in , where restoration occurred between 2014 and 2016, approximately 60% of invasion-induced effects on 19 measured soil variables remained detectable years later, including elevated soil carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratios averaging 70.8:1, which slow . These legacies arise from the grass's accumulation of and necromass, combined with limitation that inhibits microbial breakdown, causing invaded soils to retain chemistry profiles distinct from uninvaded dunes even post-treatment. Removal method influences legacy persistence: herbicide treatments, applied in backdunes, preserve more invasion effects due to undisturbed surface soils retaining altered chemistry and undecomposed litter, whereas mechanical soil inversion mixes contaminated topsoil with less-affected subsoils, reducing legacies but introducing treatment-specific changes like temporary pH shifts. In foredunes, sand deposition from adjacent areas can mitigate legacies by diluting residues, but backdune sites show delayed native plant establishment, with legacies hindering convergence to reference dune profiles. Mechanical approaches thus offer partial remediation but require follow-up monitoring for secondary effects on soil nutrients. Microbial community legacies further impede recovery, as A. arenaria shifts compositions toward cellulolytic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi while reducing nitrifiers, fermentative , and fungal parasites—alterations that persist post-herbicide removal and suppress growth. Experimental from uninvaded dunes at altered microbial richness and increased saprotrophic fungi but failed to accelerate decomposition of beachgrass litter, which remained abundant over five years after treatment, indicating entrenched legacies resistant to microbial augmentation. Such shifts causally limit cycling and survival, as legacy microbes favor decomposer guilds adapted to the invader's high-C litter over those supporting diverse . Beyond soils, legacies manifest in dune morphology and . Removal destabilizes foredune structures, resulting in shorter dunes (approximately 3 m reduction observed in treated plots) and increased potential, as the grass's absence prevents natural sand accretion patterns. For , enduring changes include altered densities of native predators like spp., with removal sites showing persistent deviations from controls that affect rates and hinder native plant during early restoration phases. These effects underscore that plant removal alone insufficiently reverses invasion impacts, necessitating integrated strategies like targeted soil amendments or prioritized treatment of low-invasion zones to overcome biophysical legacies.

Human uses and management

Historical and practical applications

Ammophila arenaria, commonly known as marram grass or European beachgrass, has been employed historically in its native European coastal regions for stabilizing shifting sands and mitigating . Traditional uses include harvesting the for roofs, crafting baskets, brooms, and ropes due to its tough, fibrous leaves and stems. In the , deliberate introductions expanded its applications globally for dune stabilization. For instance, it was introduced to around 1874 from specifically to control sand movement in the area. Similarly, in , by the late , it became a key in coastal stabilization projects along the coastline. On the of the , A. arenaria was first planted in 1869 near San Francisco's to anchor dunes, with further introductions in the early 1900s, such as in 1901 at by the Vance Redwood Company and in 1910 near . These efforts aimed to prevent and facilitate coastal development, leveraging the grass's extensive rhizomatous growth that binds effectively. Practically, A. arenaria remains valued for rapid of bare , forming dense foredunes that reduce speeds and trap , thereby arresting in vulnerable coastal zones. It is propagated via culms, rhizomes, or seeds for large-scale planting in stabilization initiatives, offering a reliable method to initiate dune formation where may establish more slowly. In regions like New Zealand's foredunes, it provides the most dependable means for preventing mobility and promoting accumulation behind crests.

Control methods and challenges

Mechanical removal of Ammophila arenaria involves excavating or uprooting the plant's extensive network, often using for larger infestations, but this method struggles against the grass's regenerative capacity from fragmented rhizomes. In restoration efforts at since 2000, manual and mechanical techniques have been applied across invaded dunes, yet the species' biology—deep, interconnected rhizomes extending up to several meters—necessitates multiple passes and follow-up treatments to prevent resprouting. Studies on 146 hectares of heavily invaded sites demonstrate that mechanical eradication succeeds in killing aboveground and primary rhizomes but often fails to fully eliminate subsurface propagules without supplementary measures. Chemical control relies on systemic herbicides like or , applied during active growth periods (typically spring to fall) at concentrations such as 33% with for selective targeting. These treatments disrupt vascular function and translocation to rhizomes, proving more scalable than mechanical methods for dense stands, with cost-effectiveness noted in state guidelines. However, use raises concerns over non-target impacts on native dune , microbes, and in fragile coastal environments, prompting restrictions in protected areas like habitats. Biological control agents remain undeveloped and ineffective for A. arenaria, with no approved pathogens or herbivores demonstrating sufficient host specificity or impact to suppress populations. Integrated approaches combining initial or mechanical knockdown with revegetation using like Elymus mollis aim to outcompete regrowth, but success rates vary. Persistent challenges stem from the plant's vegetative propagation via s, which survive , fragmentation, and partial disturbance, often requiring 3–5 years of annual monitoring and retreatment for partial control. alters chemistry—elevating pH, , and —creating legacy effects that inhibit native recolonization even after aboveground removal, as observed in dunes where restored sites showed suppressed microbial diversity and slower ecosystem recovery. In dynamic coastal settings, ongoing sand accretion favors rhizome extension, while regulatory hurdles, labor costs, and erosion risks during removal complicate large-scale efforts, particularly on public lands balancing stabilization needs against goals. Complete eradication is rarely achieved without sustained, resource-intensive , underscoring the trade-offs in reversing century-scale invasions.

Restoration efforts and outcomes

Restoration efforts targeting Ammophila arenaria focus on eradicating the invasive grass from coastal dunes, primarily in , to promote native recovery and restore ecological processes such as natural sand accretion and . Mechanical methods, including bulldozing and excavation, have been employed in projects like the Gold Bluffs Beach restoration in , where 32 acres were treated in 2017 using heavy equipment, achieving initial success in grass removal across a 105-acre area. applications, such as combined with , have demonstrated 80-90% efficacy in treating dense stands, as seen in ongoing efforts at Abbotts Lagoon in , where annual retreatment addresses regrowth from rhizomes. Manual pulling and mowing supplement these approaches in smaller or sensitive sites, though they demand intensive labor and repeated interventions due to the species' resilience to burial and drought. Outcomes of these efforts reveal mixed ecological results, with native dune mat species often recolonizing treated areas, indicating potential for recovery where had previously suppressed diversity. However, legacy effects from A. arenaria persist, including elevated , nutrient levels, and from decomposing rhizomes, which inhibit native pioneer plants and prolong restoration timelines, as documented in backdune treatments at . Mechanical removal effectively eliminates the grass but yields lower success in rebuilding diverse vegetation communities compared to methods, which control regrowth better yet introduce chemical residues that may affect non-target . Post-removal has increased in some sites due to loss of stabilization, necessitating like temporary fencing or native planting to mitigate sand loss, while faunal responses include reduced densities of seed-predating , potentially benefiting native seed germination. Large-scale projects, such as those covering 146 hectares of heavily invaded dunes, underscore the challenges of scaling restoration, with eradication achievable through integrated methods but full native succession requiring 5-10 years of monitoring and retreatment to counter reinvasion from adjacent untreated areas. Empirical data from these initiatives highlight that while A. arenaria removal enhances and diversity over time, incomplete control can perpetuate monocultures, emphasizing the need for site-specific strategies informed by pre-invasion dune dynamics.

Recent developments

Hybridization and new invasions

In the U.S. , interspecific hybridization between the invasive Ammophila arenaria (European beachgrass) and A. breviligulata (American beachgrass) has produced a novel dune-building hybrid , A. arenaria × A. breviligulata, first documented in 2021 through genetic analyses of coastal foredune populations in southern Washington and northern . This hybrid occurs predominantly in zones where A. breviligulata dominates (75–90% cover) and A. arenaria is present but sparse, suggesting asymmetric favoring hybrid formation under conditions of partial . Field and greenhouse experiments conducted in 2024 demonstrated that the hybrid exhibits , or hybrid vigor, manifesting as taller stature, denser tillering, greater total , and superior competitive ability compared to either parental species in sand dune environments. These traits enable the hybrid to trap more effectively, accelerate foredune accretion, and potentially exacerbate habitat homogenization beyond that of the parent invasives, which have already transformed open, dynamic dunes into rigid, vegetated barriers since their introductions in the early 20th century. By 2023, hybrid individuals comprised up to 75% of Ammophila populations at select invaded sites along the Washington-Oregon coastline, with rates observed to increase from 3% to 42% annually in monitored areas, indicating rapid spread and establishment. This hybridization event represents a evolutionary mechanism enhancing success, as the hybrid's fitness advantages could facilitate into parental populations or independent range expansion, complicating long-term dune restoration efforts aimed at native recovery. Ongoing monitoring suggests the hybrid's prevalence may continue rising without targeted interventions, potentially altering dynamics across broader coastal regions where both parents co-occur.

Ongoing research on ecology and control

Recent investigations into control strategies for Ammophila arenaria highlight differences in restoration outcomes based on removal methods. At , eradication from 146 hectares using mechanical excavation or herbicide application achieved near-complete beachgrass elimination with annual follow-up treatments, yet mechanical methods produced extensive barren surfaces that supported gradual native recolonization, such as thousands of Lupinus tidestromii plants, while treatments left persistent necromass in backdunes that impeded native establishment for over seven years unless mitigated by overwash in foredunes. By 2021, vegetation in older -treated backdunes and some mechanical sites began converging toward native dune compositions, though full recovery remained limited, particularly in backdunes due to secondary invaders and altered sediment dynamics. Ecological research continues to elucidate factors influencing A. arenaria persistence and impacts. A 2025 Dutch using 300 plots assessed recreational effects on early establishment, finding overall success rates of 4.3% for A. arenaria propagules (rhizomes outperforming seeds), with sharp declines in shoot emergence within 100 meters of beach access points—more pronounced for A. arenaria than co-occurring Elytrigia juncea—indicating human activity constrains dune-building by reducing accommodation space and altering accretion, thus informing balances between coastal protection, , and . Concurrently, biomechanical analyses from 2025 revealed seasonal variations in marram grass tensile strength and flexibility over 12 months, linking these properties to enhanced trapping efficiency during peak growth periods and potential vulnerabilities under changing wind regimes. Hybridization poses emerging challenges to management. A 2024 systematic survey across 250 kilometers of coastline identified nearly 300 instances of the A. arenaria × A. breviligulata hybrid, averaging 8–14 individuals per kilometer of foredune, with hybrid vigor manifesting in 30% faster annual growth, denser shoots, and comparable sand deposition to parental invasives, potentially accelerating habitat homogenization in areas occupied by like the western snowy plover. This hybrid's correlation with high A. arenaria densities suggests ongoing complicates targeted control, necessitating updated monitoring protocols. Post-removal legacy effects on biota remain a focus, as evidenced by a 2024 study documenting persistent alterations in Peromyscus mouse densities following A. arenaria eradication, attributing changes to shifted structure and seed availability, which underscores the importance of long-term faunal monitoring to evaluate restoration efficacy beyond vegetation metrics.

References

  1. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.145092/Ammophila_arenaria
  2. https://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1518
  3. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=13042
  4. https://www.eddmaps.org/species/subject.cfm?sub=5077
  5. https://www.invasive.org/gist/esadocs/documnts/ammoare.pdf
  6. https://nre.tas.gov.au/Documents/MarramGrass.pdf
  7. https://www1.usgs.gov/csas/nvcs/unitDetails/874085
  8. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1936939
  9. https://www.nwcb.wa.gov/pdfs/beach-grass-American-and-European-Ammophila-breviligulata-A.-arenaria-written-findings.pdf
  10. http://portal.nceas.ucsb.edu/working_group/valuation-of-coastal-habitats/meta-analysis/papers-for-meta-analysis-database/dune-articles/Pickart%25201997.pdf/attachment_download/file
  11. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202&context=etd
  12. https://news.oregonstate.edu/news/oregon-state-university-research-shows-two-invasive-beachgrasses-are-hybridizing
  13. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/ES10-00101.1
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10980622/
  15. https://er.uwpress.org/content/36/3/171
  16. https://temperate.theferns.info/plant/Ammophila+arenaria
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8348932/
  18. https://floranorthamerica.org/Ammophila_arenaria
  19. https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000845777
  20. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1141132-2
  21. https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/goodbye-sand-lover-grass-and-a-plea-for-help/47015
  22. https://plants.usda.gov/plant-profile/AMAR4
  23. https://plants.usda.gov/plant-profile/AMAR4/characteristics
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2259356
  25. https://www.cal-ipc.org/docs/symposia/archive/pdf/1997_symposium_proceedings1934.pdf
  26. https://wric.ucdavis.edu/information/natural%2520areas/wr_A/Ammophila.pdf
  27. https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/3917/1/file62bac48df2c14f77b55d3750751914c5.pdf
  28. https://keyserver.lucidcentral.org/weeds/data/media/Html/ammophila_arenaria.htm
  29. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.4898
  30. https://florabase.dbca.wa.gov.au/browse/profile/192
  31. https://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weeds/beach-grass-american-european-and-hybrid
  32. https://vegetation.cnps.org/alliance/317
  33. https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/profile/ammophila-arenaria-profile/
  34. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/59277/32v2-Gadgil.pdf
  35. https://ref.coastalrestorationtrust.org.nz/site/assets/files/8881/5aa91325e5824289337b6ba3ce8dfb6dace5.pdf
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9460503/
  37. https://cdn.naturalresources.wales/r4tawyj5/information-note-marram.pdf
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/ammophila-arenaria
  39. http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/216453.pdf
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3375011/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1915600/
  42. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03035.x
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16441763/
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0929139398001164
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9327549/
  46. https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.63.10.3858-3865.1997
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250076375_Invasiveness_of_Ammophila_arenaria_Release_from_soil-borne_pathogens
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-004-1196-3
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1164556307000441
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10027266/
  51. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01715.x
  52. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management/article/invasion-by-ammophila-arenaria-alters-soil-chemistry-leaving-lasting-legacy-effects-on-restored-coastal-dunes-in-california/7E3648CB67F90B57EF5AAF5DD95D33FB
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351636859_Invasion_by_Ammophila_arenaria_alters_soil_chemistry_leaving_lasting_legacy_effects_on_restored_coastal_dunes_in_California
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969722060600
  55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00379970
  56. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14344
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385870556_Soil_inoculation_changed_soil_microbial_communities_but_did_not_accelerate_the_decomposition_of_European_Beachgrass_Ammophila_arenaria_in_Point_Reyes_National_Seashore
  58. https://escholarship.org/content/qt6r43s3cc/qt6r43s3cc.pdf?t=q6m4dl
  59. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/13/12/629
  60. https://source.washu.edu/2018/02/large-scale-removal-beachgrass-leads-new-life-endangered-coastal-lupine/
  61. https://er.uwpress.org/content/42/4/271
  62. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4830
  63. https://seagrant.oregonstate.edu/sites/seagrant.oregonstate.edu/files/r-17-027.pdf
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723005148
  65. https://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Shore_protection_vegetation
  66. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5870
  67. https://www.nps.gov/articles/coastal-dune-restoration-when-is-invasive-plant-removal-just-not-enough.htm
  68. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rec.14344
  69. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02905118
  70. http://natural-history-journal.blogspot.com/2017/05/invasive-species-european-beachgrass.html
  71. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/zp38wg179
  72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2387202
  73. https://www.conservationevidence.com/individual-study/650
  74. https://journals.flvc.org/jcr/article/view/78645
  75. https://www.nps.gov/pore/getinvolved/planning_dunerestoration_project.htm
  76. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rec.13951
  77. https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/nepa/76469/20005740/250006743/Decision_Record_for_the_use_of_herbicides_within_snowy_plover_habitat.pdf
  78. https://www.par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10537388
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371380418_Method_for_controlling_invasive_Ammophila_arenaria_in_coastal_dunes_alters_restoration_trajectory
  80. https://www.nps.gov/articles/gbbdunerestoration.htm
  81. https://www.nps.gov/pore/getinvolved/planning_dunerestoration_abbottslagoon.htm
  82. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.3501
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38687376/
  84. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10521754
  85. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/w3763f766
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11868219/
  87. https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/13/791/2025/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.