Hubbry Logo
FieldTurfFieldTurfMain
Open search
FieldTurf
Community hub
FieldTurf
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
FieldTurf
FieldTurf
FieldTurf
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

FieldTurf
FieldTurf at Bridgeforth Stadium at James Madison University on May 7, 2007
Product typeArtificial turf
OwnerTarkett
Introduced1988; 37 years ago (1988)
Related brandsAstroTurf
Poly-Turf
Websitefieldturf.com

FieldTurf is a brand of artificial turf playing surface. It is manufactured and installed by FieldTurf Tarkett, a division of French company Tarkett. FieldTurf is headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and its primary manufacturing facility is located in Calhoun, Georgia, United States. With a design intended to more accurately replicate real grass,[1] the new product rapidly gained popularity in the late 1990s.[2]

History

[edit]

Jean Prévost bought the patent of the FieldTurf product in 1988, and originally named his Montreal-based company SynTenni Co., a name which would eventually be dropped in favour of FieldTurf Inc.[3] In 1995, John Gilman, a former Canadian Football League player and coach, joined FieldTurf as CEO.

In 1997, FieldTurf made its first major installation for a professional team, at the training facility for the English Premiership's Middlesbrough F.C. As of 2012, FieldTurf has installed over 7000 athletic fields.[4]

In 2005, French flooring manufacturer and minority shareholder Tarkett increased its share in FieldTurf, which led to the integration of the two companies.[5] FieldTurf is a part of the Tarkett Sports division of the holding company Tarkett SA.

In May 2010, FieldTurf acquired the American company EasyTurf of San Diego, California, as a way to gain entry into the rapidly growing residential and commercial synthetic grass markets in the United States.[6]

Product details

[edit]
FieldTurf at Mackay Stadium the University of Nevada, Reno at a view from the upper southeast corner during the game vs. New Mexico on October 10, 2015

The surface is composed of monofilament polyethylene-blend fibres tufted into a polypropylene backing. The infill is composed of a bottom layer of silica sand, a middle layer which is a mixture of sand and cryogenic rubber, and a top layer of only rubber. The fibres are meant to replicate blades of grass, while the infill acts as a cushion. This cushion is intended to improve safety when compared to earlier artificial surfaces and allows players to plant and pivot as if they were playing on a grass field.[7]

Each square foot of turf contains about 3 kg (7 lb) of sand and 1.5 kg (3 lb) of cryogenic rubber. FieldTurf does not use shock-absorbency pads below its infill. The backing of the turf is a combination of woven and nonwoven polypropylene. These materials are permeable and allow water to drain through the backing itself.[8]

Safety

[edit]

Some evidence shows higher player injury on artificial turf. In a study performed by the National Football League Injury and Safety Panel, published in the October 2012 issue of the American Journal of Sports Medicine, Elliott B. Hershman et al. reviewed injury data from NFL games played between 2000 and 2009. They wrote, "...the injury rate of knee sprains as a whole was 22% higher on FieldTurf than on natural grass. While MCL sprains did not occur at a rate significantly higher than on grass, rates of ACL sprains were 67% higher on FieldTurf."[9]

Studies of the safety of FieldTurf are conflicting. A five-year study funded by FieldTurf and published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine found that injury rates for high-school sports were similar on natural grass and synthetic turf. However, notable differences in the types of injuries were found. Athletes playing on synthetic turf sustained more skin injuries and muscle strains, while those who played on natural grass were more susceptible to concussions and ligament tears.[10] In 2010, another FieldTurf-funded but peer-reviewed study was published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, this time on NCAA Division I-A football, concluding that in many cases, games played on FieldTurf-branded products led to fewer injuries than those played on natural grass.[11] However, the NFL's Injury and Safety Panel presented a study finding that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries happened 88% more often in games played on FieldTurf than in games played on grass.[12] In 2012, the Injury and Safety Panel published an independently funded analysis of actual game data over the 2000–2009 seasons. Their statistically significant findings showed a 67% higher rate of ACL sprains and 31% higher rate of eversion ankle sprains.[13]

Uses

[edit]
Further information: List of FieldTurf installations
FieldTurf promotion at Patriot Place

Gridiron football

[edit]

The first installation of FieldTurf in the United States took place at Dick Bivins Stadium in Amarillo, Texas (which was the home field for the Amarillo Independent School District's football teams) in 1998. The first major college football installation was at Nebraska's Memorial Stadium in 1999. The following year, it was installed at the two Pac-10 stadiums: Martin Stadium in Pullman, Washington and Husky Stadium in Seattle. The first installation in an NFL (and by extension, professional) stadium was in 2002, at the Seattle Seahawks' new stadium, known as Lumen Field. Originally planned to have a natural grass field, the Seahawks instead decided to install FieldTurf after they had played the two previous seasons in Husky Stadium on that surface, and to ease conversion and footing concerns for a future Major League Soccer team in the venue, which has been shared with Seattle Sounders FC since 2009 (natural grass is brought in and installed over the FieldTurf for FIFA-sanctioned events).[14]

Association football

[edit]

FieldTurf's first high-profile installation came in January 1997 as English club Middlesbrough chose FieldTurf for its new training field. Only artificial fields with FIFA-recommended 2-star status can be used in FIFA and UEFA Finals competitions. Other FIFA and UEFA competitions require at least 1-star status.[citation needed]

In 2001, Boston University's FieldTurf soccer field became FieldTurf's first to obtain FIFA 1-star status. In 2005, Saprissa Stadium in San José, Costa Rica became the first stadium to host a FIFA World Cup qualifying match on FieldTurf. The Dundalk F.C. Stadium, Oriel Park, received FieldTurf's first FIFA 2-star rating. FieldTurf has 29 FIFA-recommended 1-Star installations and 31 FIFA Recommended 2-Star installations as of 2009.[15][16] In 2007, the FIFA U-20 World Cup Canada had almost 50% of its games played on FieldTurf.[17]

Major League Soccer

[edit]

The use of FieldTurf in Major League Soccer (MLS) has received criticism, especially from the league's international roster players used to playing on natural grass overseas in their home domestic leagues and FIFA competitions.

The installation of the surface at CenturyLink Field in Seattle was approved as mentioned above when the state stadium authority which operates the venue agreed to bring in a natural grass surface for FIFA-sanctioned events.[18]

In September 2006, several top Canadian soccer players appealed to the Canadian Soccer Association to install a natural grass surface at BMO Field in Toronto.[19] The club removed the FieldTurf playing surface and switched to a traditional grass surface starting in 2010.[20]

Following David Beckham's move to Major League Soccer in 2007, he voiced his opinion that the league should convert to grass for all pitches. In an apology, he stated that the surface is fine at lower levels, but that his feelings had not changed about the MLS use because of the toll the harder surface takes on the body.[21][22][23] Thierry Henry opted out of road matches in Seattle when he played for the New York Red Bulls specifically because of the Sounders' use of FieldTurf in that venue.[24][25]

Public works

[edit]

A specialized version of FieldTurf called Air FieldTurf has been installed to cover the edges of runways at several airports.[26][27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

FieldTurf

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
FieldTurf is a brand of synthetic turf systems designed primarily for sports fields, renowned for its infilled, long-pile artificial grass that revolutionized athletic surfaces by improving safety, performance, and durability compared to earlier generations of turf. Invented in 1994 by Jean Prévost and John Gilman as a three-layer system incorporating sand and rubber infill to mimic natural grass, FieldTurf was first installed on a soccer field in 1995 and quickly gained adoption in American football, including at the University of Nebraska under coach Tom Osborne. As a division of the French multinational Group, headquartered in , FieldTurf operates manufacturing facilities in , , and , and serves over 100 countries with a focus on eco-innovations such as the Cradle to Cradle® certified systems and Human-Conscious Design® principles. The company has pioneered advancements like third-generation () synthetic turf, Core fiber technology, and ProMax HydroFlex infill, contributing to its status as the inventor of modern infilled artificial turf. With over 25,000 installations worldwide as of 2025, including in major professional leagues like the and MLS, as well as NCAA programs, schools, and municipalities, FieldTurf has installed nearly 100 million square meters of surface area, making it the most trusted brand in the industry for high-performance athletic and landscape applications. Its U.S. headquarters are in , supporting a global workforce under Tarkett's 12,000 employees across 34 industrial sites.

Company Background

Founding and Early Development

FieldTurf traces its origins to , when Jean Prévost acquired the for an innovative synthetic turf product and established SynTenni Co. in , . Initially, the company concentrated on developing durable surfaces for courts, leveraging Prévost's background as a former tennis professional to address the limitations of existing hard-court materials. In 1995, John Gilman, a former quarterback, was appointed as CEO of SynTenni Co., prompting a strategic pivot toward infilled synthetic turf systems suitable for a wider array of sports. Under Gilman's leadership, the company rebranded to FieldTurf Inc. and focused on creating more natural-feeling playing surfaces that could withstand intensive use while reducing injury risks compared to natural grass or earlier artificial alternatives. During the early , FieldTurf pioneered the development of a third-generation synthetic turf system, featuring long-pile fibers filled with a combination of sand and rubber granules to mimic the cushioning and traction of natural grass. This marked a significant advancement over second-generation products like non-infilled , which had short, dense fibers that often led to abrasions and poor playability; FieldTurf's design improved durability, drainage, and athlete safety through its patented mechanism, which stabilized the fibers and distributed impact forces more evenly. The system's breakthrough was demonstrated with its first major professional installation in January 1997 at the training facility of in , where it provided a consistent, all-weather surface that enhanced training efficiency for the soccer club and signaled FieldTurf's entry into elite European sports applications.

Acquisitions and Global Expansion

In 2005, French multinational acquired FieldTurf, integrating it into its sports surfaces division to form FieldTurf Tarkett and establishing a global leader in synthetic turf manufacturing. This acquisition leveraged 's international footprint, enabling FieldTurf to expand beyond while maintaining its focus on infilled artificial turf innovation. As a subsidiary, FieldTurf has emphasized leadership in product development, including advancements in durable, high-performance surfaces for . A key milestone came in 2002 when FieldTurf entered the market with its installation at what is now , home of the , marking the first use of its long-pile, infilled system in a professional . This breakthrough propelled corporate growth, with over 7,000 installations worldwide by 2012, reflecting rapid adoption in athletic facilities. In 2010, FieldTurf acquired EasyTurf, a U.S.-based company specializing in synthetic grass for , to diversify into residential and commercial markets and broaden its non-sports applications. FieldTurf's global expansion accelerated through strategic regional initiatives, including its 2018 acquisition of Grassman Pty Ltd., a leading Australian synthetic turf manufacturer, which strengthened its presence in the region and supported local production capabilities. In 2024, FieldTurf continued its growth by acquiring several U.S.-based construction firms, including Classic Turf & Tracks in July and Precision Construction Contracting LLC in December, enhancing its design, construction, and installation capabilities in . By 2025, the company had achieved over 25,000 installations across more than 100 countries, underscoring its role as a dominant player in the international sports surfacing industry under Tarkett's ownership. This worldwide reach has been bolstered by Tarkett's operations in over 100 countries, facilitating FieldTurf's distribution and innovation in diverse markets.

Products and Technology

Core Turf Systems

FieldTurf's core turf systems consist of synthetic grass surfaces featuring polyethylene fibers tufted into a durable polypropylene backing, engineered to replicate the look and feel of natural grass while ensuring high performance and longevity. These systems prioritize permeability in their backing materials to facilitate rapid water drainage, allowing play to resume quickly after rain, with cushioning typically provided through integrated infill layers, though optional permeable shock pads are available for enhanced performance in select systems. The design emphasizes fiber resilience and field stability, making them suitable for high-traffic sports environments. Among the primary systems, the CORE represents a flagship multi-layer dual-polymer monofilament construction, developed as the world's first "super " for elite-level facilities, offering a textured, grass-like appearance with exceptional and resiliency to 200,000 cycles in assessments. The 360 XL system utilizes a robust monofilament configuration, prized for its natural , reduced skin friction, and superior resistance, making it one of FieldTurf's most widely adopted options for demanding applications. The Quattro system employs a fibrillated design with a diamond-profile , optimized for multi-sport versatility and enhanced abrasion resistance to support diverse athletic activities. Further key offerings include the XM7, a ridged monofilament fiber system engineered for dense, natural-looking coverage and excellent resilience, particularly in soccer and requiring consistent ball interaction. The Vertex system combines slit-film fibers with high-performance monofilament elements, providing specialized traction and fibrillation for balanced performance in football and similar high-impact uses. These slit-film variants in XM7 and Vertex configurations promote optimal player grip without excessive wear. FieldTurf has evolved its core systems toward next-generation designs incorporating elliptic monofilament s for increased strength and shape retention, even in water-based or sand-dressed setups, alongside customizable options tailored to specific like or . FieldTurf also offers next-generation systems like Ultra360, with dual-fiber 7-filament construction, and PureField Ultra, a low/non-infill 3/8-inch tufted system tested to 300,000 Lisport cycles, designed for and QUALITY certification without polymeric infills. Typical specifications across these systems include fiber heights of 1.5 to 2 inches (40-50 mm) for realistic play dynamics, pile weights ranging from 60 to 80 ounces per to ensure density and durability, and certifications at Quality and Quality Pro levels for verified performance standards. Infill materials are integrated to enhance these systems' stability and shock absorption, though detailed compositions vary by application.

Infill Materials and Installation

FieldTurf synthetic turf systems typically employ a layered structure to provide stability, cushioning, and drainage. The standard configuration includes a bottom layer of silica sand, weighing approximately 3 pounds per , which anchors the turf and supports weight distribution, followed by a middle layer blending sand and cryogenic rubber granules, and a top layer of pure cryogenic rubber at about 3 pounds per for enhanced shock absorption and resilience. Cryogenic rubber, derived from recycled tires that are frozen and shattered into smooth-edged particles, ensures consistent water and reduces fiber wear compared to ambient-ground alternatives. Alternatives to traditional rubber and sand infills include organic options such as PureSelect, made from 100% cores, which offers recyclability, heat reduction, and a natural aesthetic without floating during . Other variants encompass cork-based PureFill for non-toxic cushioning and virgin infills like ProMax, which prioritize durability and environmental compatibility over recycled materials. Additionally, the 2025 CarbonCatch system integrates Enhanced Rock materials into infill, sub-base, or topdressing to passively capture atmospheric CO2 without affecting performance or drainage. Installation of FieldTurf follows a multi-phase layered process beginning with site preparation, where existing and are excavated to a depth of 12-18 inches to accommodate a compacted sub-base of stone or for structural integrity. A permeable drainage system, incorporating perforated pipes and layers, is then installed to facilitate rapid water runoff, achieving rates suitable for high-usage fields. Synthetic turf rolls, featuring or fibers, are unrolled and seamed together across the surface—typically spanning 120 yards by 80 yards for a standard multi-sport field—before is evenly distributed in successive layers using specialized machinery. The process concludes with mechanical brushing to upright the fibers and settle the , ensuring optimal playability; the entire installation generally requires 4-6 weeks, depending on site conditions and weather. Ongoing maintenance for FieldTurf fields emphasizes preserving performance and surface hygiene through regular grooming, which involves brushing every 4-6 weeks with stiff-bristled tools to redistribute materials and prevent matting, without penetrating the layer. replenishment occurs annually or as needed in high-traffic zones, adding targeted topdressing of or rubber to maintain the recommended 1.25-inch depth and support the turf . treatments, such as diluted FieldScrub sanitizer applied yearly and rinsed thoroughly, mitigate on the surface and . FieldTurf has innovated water-permeable designs that integrate advanced drainage bases to capture and repurpose , designed to save up to 2 million gallons of annually per field compared to natural grass, with advanced permeable drainage bases that capture and repurpose for or flood mitigation, as demonstrated in installations like the Maple Manor Soccer Complex.

Safety and Health Concerns

Athlete Injury Risks

Scientific studies have examined athlete injury risks on FieldTurf synthetic turf compared to natural grass, revealing mixed findings depending on the injury type and sport. In National Football League (NFL) games from 2000 to 2009, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) sprain rates were 67% higher on FieldTurf than on grass, based on an analysis of 5,360 team games where injury incidence density ratios showed statistically significant differences (P < .001). A 2024 study of NFL games in 2021 and 2022 further indicated that lower extremity injury incidence rates were 16% higher on artificial turf surfaces, including FieldTurf, compared to natural grass (1.42 vs. 1.22 injuries per game), with odds of season-ending surgeries 1.60 times greater on turf (95% CI, 1.28-1.99; P < .05). These non-contact injuries predominantly affected knees, ankles, and feet, highlighting biomechanical stresses unique to synthetic surfaces. FieldTurf-sponsored research from 2015 to 2025, often conducted in collegiate and professional settings, has reported no significant differences in overall injury rates or specific incidences like groin strains between FieldTurf and natural grass in football and soccer. For instance, a 2025 analysis of NCAA football games found adductor-related groin injury rates equivalent on heavyweight FieldTurf systems and grass, with no elevated risk for sudden-onset strains. Similarly, a 2023 meta-analysis of 20 studies on football injuries showed overall incidence 14% lower on artificial turf than grass (incidence rate ratio 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95), though evidence quality was rated low due to heterogeneity. However, these studies noted higher rates of certain injuries on FieldTurf, such as skin abrasions and muscle strains; a systematic review found lacerations and skin lesions accounted for 8.6% of injuries on artificial turf versus 3.7% on grass, attributing this to friction during slides and falls. Muscle strains, often non-contact, were elevated by up to 20% per play on turf in NFL contexts, linked to inconsistent footing. Several factors contribute to these injury patterns on FieldTurf. Traction levels, which provide grip for explosive movements, can exceed optimal thresholds on synthetic turf, increasing on lower extremities during cuts and pivots compared to grass's more forgiving shear properties. Surface , measured by G-max ratings, is regulated to remain under 200 G's per ASTM standards to minimize impact forces, with FieldTurf systems designed to stay below this threshold through and padding, though aging fields may harden over time. Heat retention poses an additional risk, as FieldTurf surfaces can reach 10°F to 30°F hotter than natural grass on sunny days, with turf temperatures exceeding 120°F while grass stays around 75°F to 95°F, potentially exacerbating fatigue and dehydration-related injuries. Recent 2025 data from observations indicate a 10% higher incidence of ankle and foot injuries on , including FieldTurf CORE systems, compared to grass, based on injury tracking across the 2020-2023 seasons where turf games averaged 2.8 injuries per game versus 2.5 on grass. In the 2025 season, ongoing concerns include a 28% higher rate of non-contact lower extremity injuries on per NFL Players Association data, with notable ACL tears at Stadium's FieldTurf surface. This aligns with broader trends in non-contact lower extremity risks, underscoring ongoing debates about surface optimization for player safety.

Environmental and Chemical Hazards

FieldTurf's traditional crumb rubber infill, derived from recycled tires, contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), heavy metals such as lead, zinc, cadmium, copper, and nickel, as well as potential carcinogens including benzene, arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These chemicals can leach into the environment or expose users through skin contact and inhalation, particularly when the infill is heated during use. In 2025, Washington State Department of Ecology studies identified toxins in artificial turf runoff and initiated projects to limit exposure pathways, including via stormwater and direct contact, while a University of British Columbia analysis confirmed leaching of these substances from crumb rubber under environmental conditions. As of 2025, states like California have enacted bans on PFAS-containing artificial turf sales starting 2027 (SB 730), with Washington advancing similar restrictions to limit toxin exposure. Synthetic turf surfaces like FieldTurf contribute to the effect by absorbing and retaining solar radiation more than natural grass, elevating local temperatures by up to 10-15°C in urban settings. This heat retention can exacerbate broader ecological stresses, such as increased energy demands for cooling in nearby areas. Surface temperatures on these fields often exceed 60°C (140°F) on sunny days, posing burn risks to skin upon prolonged contact and heightening and heat-related illness during athletic activities. Microplastic shedding from FieldTurf occurs primarily through fiber abrasion and infill migration, releasing particles into soil, air, and waterways via wind and stormwater runoff. Estimates indicate that a typical field may shed 1.5-5 tons of microplastics annually, or 15-75 tons over its 10-15 year lifespan, with up to 16% of detached fibers entering drainage systems. This shedding amplifies microplastic pollution in urban stormwater, where turf fields act as a notable source alongside tire wear. In response to these concerns, FieldTurf has shifted post-2020 toward non-rubber infills such as cork, , and , alongside low- or no-infill systems to reduce chemical leaching and microplastic release. Independent testing in 2025 on recent FieldTurf installations detected no measurable PFAS in fibers or , with trace levels in legacy materials falling below EPA screening criteria, reflecting an industry-wide move to PFAS-free manufacturing.

Sports Applications

American Football

FieldTurf's entry into American football began with its first U.S. installation in 1998 at Dick Bivins Stadium in Amarillo, Texas, where the Amarillo Independent School District replaced the 48-year-old natural grass surface with the then-new synthetic turf system. This marked the initial adoption of FieldTurf for gridiron play in the country, providing a durable alternative to grass that could withstand the demands of high school competition. The system's NFL debut followed in 2002 at what is now Lumen Field, home of the Seattle Seahawks, making it the first professional stadium to feature FieldTurf instead of the originally planned natural grass. This installation highlighted FieldTurf's potential for elite-level play, offering consistent performance without the maintenance challenges of sod. As of the 2025 season, eight teams play their home games on FieldTurf surfaces, including the at , at , at , at , and Jets at , at , and at . The Bengals upgraded to the advanced FieldTurf CORE system in 2024, replacing a previous slit-film turf to enhance player safety and performance, marking a return to FieldTurf after its use from 2004 to 2011. In collegiate football, FieldTurf dominates with installations at over 1,500 NCAA programs, emphasizing durability for intense schedules and heavy usage; notable examples include the University of Oregon's , University of Texas's Darrell K Royal-Texas-Memorial Stadium, University of Notre Dame's , and University of Michigan's . These fields support rigorous play, with the synthetic surface maintaining integrity through multiple seasons of games, practices, and events. FieldTurf provides performance benefits tailored to American football's physicality, delivering consistent footing for players weighing over 300 pounds during blocking and tackling, while reducing divots and ruts that plague natural grass under heavy traffic. The system's balanced traction supports speed, agility, and stability, as evidenced by studies showing improved athlete performance metrics compared to grass. However, criticisms persist regarding injury rates, particularly in high-impact plays; some research indicates a 28% higher incidence of non-contact lower extremity injuries on artificial turf like FieldTurf versus natural grass, raising concerns about joint stress in football's explosive movements. Despite this, other analyses find no significant difference in overall injury rates or even lower risks for certain ligament sprains on well-maintained FieldTurf. Notable events underscore FieldTurf's role in major milestones, including in 2006 at , the first championship game played entirely on the surface, where the defeated the 21-10. The system also hosted in 2019 at , further validating its suitability for the NFL's pinnacle event.

Soccer and Other Team Sports

FieldTurf has seen significant adoption in association football (soccer), particularly through its compliance with FIFA's Quality Programme for Football Turf, which was established in 2009 to standardize artificial surfaces for the sport. By meeting rigorous testing criteria, FieldTurf systems have been installed in numerous professional and amateur venues worldwide, enabling consistent play that aligns with natural grass performance. In Major League Soccer (MLS), despite a 2010 shift toward natural grass exemplified by Toronto FC's conversion of BMO Field from artificial turf, FieldTurf remains in use across multiple stadiums as of 2025, including those for Atlanta United FC at Mercedes-Benz Stadium, New England Revolution at Gillette Stadium, and Seattle Sounders FC at Lumen Field. Approximately six MLS venues feature artificial turf surfaces, supporting year-round training and matches. Beyond soccer, FieldTurf supports other team sports requiring precise ball control and durability, such as rugby, where it holds Preferred Producer status for meeting performance, development, and maintenance standards. In field hockey, FieldTurf is an (FIH) Preferred Supplier, providing specialized systems like the Hockey Gold series designed for elite-level play with optimal speed and grip. For , FieldTurf serves over 400 programs in , including NCAA institutions like , offering resilient surfaces that withstand high-intensity stick and body contact. These installations often feature shorter pile heights to accommodate multiple sports on shared facilities, enhancing versatility for schools and communities. FieldTurf's performance in these sports emphasizes ball bounce and roll consistency, adhering to standards that require vertical ball rebound between 90-110% of natural grass and controlled roll distances to ensure fair play. This reliability extends to multi-sport applications, where systems like Hockey Multi allow seamless transitions between as the primary use and secondary activities like soccer or . Globally, adoption began prominently with the 1997 installation at English club FC's training facilities, marking an early high-profile use in European soccer and paving the way for broader integration in club academies. As of 2025, multi-use FieldTurf fields continue to proliferate in youth academies, supporting extended training hours across team sports without recovery downtime.

Broader Applications

Public and Recreational Facilities

FieldTurf has seen widespread adoption in U.S. high schools and colleges, where it provides year-round access to athletic fields for sports like football, soccer, and . For instance, more than 50% of high schools in New York's Section II have installed fields, reflecting a broader national trend where approximately 1,500 new synthetic turf fields are added annually across educational institutions. This shift is driven by the need for durable surfaces that withstand heavy use from student athletes and extracurricular activities, with FieldTurf accounting for a significant portion of installations in North American schools and municipalities. In parks and community centers, FieldTurf supports multi-purpose recreational spaces for youth leagues, family events, and public fitness programs. Notable examples include the Blue Springs Field House in , featuring FieldTurf XT-50 for and versatile recreation. Beyond traditional parks, FieldTurf's Air FieldTurf variant addresses needs in public infrastructure, such as stabilizing runway shoulders at airports to control dust and foreign object debris (FOD) generated by aircraft , thereby enhancing safety and visibility while complying with FAA standards. The primary benefits of FieldTurf in these settings include all-weather playability and extended usability, allowing fields to remain operational in , , or conditions that would close natural grass surfaces. Synthetic turf fields like FieldTurf can support up to 3,000 hours of annual use, compared to 300–600 hours for natural grass to prevent , enabling communities to maximize facility access for programs. Additionally, these installations yield significant savings, with annual for FieldTurf estimated at $5,000–$6,000 per field versus $23,000–$42,000 for natural grass, resulting in net savings of approximately $35,000–$50,000 yearly through reduced watering, mowing, and repairs. Despite these advantages, FieldTurf and similar synthetic turfs face challenges in public facilities, including local bans prompted by concerns over heat retention and chemical toxins. In 2022, prohibited new installations in city parks due to the presence of PFAS "forever chemicals" linked to health risks, alongside issues like surface temperatures exceeding 120°F on hot days, which can deter use and raise safety worries for recreational users. Such regulations highlight ongoing debates in community planning, though FieldTurf continues to innovate for broader acceptance in non-athletic public spaces.

Residential and Landscaping Uses

FieldTurf's residential applications, particularly through its EasyTurf brand acquired in 2010, focus on creating durable, low-maintenance synthetic lawns suitable for home environments. These systems are designed to address common challenges such as shade intolerance and pet damage, offering pet-friendly options like the Ultimate Pet turf, which features a 1.5-inch pile and thatch-free surface for easy cleanup and odor minimization. The turf incorporates fast-draining MaxxFlow™ backing that handles over 400 inches of water per hour, preventing muddy areas and supporting hygiene in high-traffic pet zones. Additionally, UV-stabilized fibers ensure resistance to fading and discoloration, maintaining aesthetic appeal in sunny climates. Low-water designs eliminate the need for , reducing household water use while providing year-round green coverage for backyards and rooftop terraces. In commercial settings, FieldTurf offers specialized products for aesthetic and functional landscaping, such as short-pile systems tailored for golf putting greens and event spaces. The EZ-Putt2 turf, with its 0.50-inch pile height, delivers smooth ball roll and consistent performance, ideal for backyard or facility installations that withstand weather and heavy use without maintenance like watering or fertilizing. These systems support custom contours and elevations for professional-grade greens, often spanning 1,500 square feet on commercial courses, and extend to versatile applications in offices, retail areas, and outdoor events where low-upkeep, durable surfacing enhances visual appeal. Beyond traditional lawns, FieldTurf provides non-sports solutions like playground safety surfacing and urban green roofs, emphasizing durability and protective features. Playground systems include certified fall height protection with shock-absorbing surfaces that meet national standards, offering a softer alternative to or rubber while ensuring ADA and resistance to wear from play equipment. For urban green roofs and rooftop terraces, the turf's lightweight, permeable design integrates seamlessly, providing low-maintenance greenery that improves insulation and management without structural strain. In 2025, FieldTurf applications have gained traction in drought-prone areas like , where installations contribute to significant ; for instance, advanced systems can save up to 2 million gallons annually per site by eliminating needs and capturing . This aligns with broader trends in water-wise landscaping, as leads U.S. adoption for its pesticide-free, low-resource benefits amid ongoing restrictions. Following the 2010 acquisition of EasyTurf and the 2020 launch of the FieldTurf Landscape division, the company has seen expansion in non-sports sales, contributing to the overall market's projected 12.7% through 2030, driven by residential and commercial demand.

Sustainability and Controversies

Environmental Initiatives

FieldTurf has established ambitious goals as part of its broader commitment to environmental responsibility, including the development of 100% recyclable fields that can be fully processed at end-of-life through dedicated programs. Under the company's Goal Zero initiative, FieldTurf aims to achieve to by diverting 100% of manufacturing and job-site waste in by 2025, supported by infill take-back and efforts that processed 146 tons of across 46 projects in 2023 alone. Additionally, customers can opt for a 100% emissions offset program, allowing full compensation for the carbon emissions associated with field production and installation. Key innovations in FieldTurf's environmental strategy include the use of organic infills, such as PureFill (made from 100% cork and ), PureSelect (100% olive cores), and PureGeo (coconut and cork), which replace traditional synthetic materials and help mitigate by avoiding petroleum-based alternatives. The company emphasizes circular design principles, enabling field reuse and through programs like ReStart®, which has collected over 124,000 tons of materials since 2010 for repurposing into new products as of 2024. FieldTurf systems also incorporate advanced capture technologies, repurposing up to 2 million gallons of water per field annually for or other uses, further enhancing . FieldTurf products have earned certifications underscoring their , including Cradle to Cradle Bronze certification for under Version 3.1 as of 2021, validating eco-design across material health, product circularity, and use. Since 2020, the company has reduced reliance on virgin plastics by increasing the proportion of recycled materials in production from 13% to 19% by 2024, incorporating 157,000 tons of recycled content that year and avoiding compared to virgin alternatives. These initiatives contribute to broader , such as significantly lower consumption compared to grass fields, which can require up to 1.5 million gallons annually for on a full-sized sports field, while FieldTurf eliminates routine watering needs. Lifecycle considerations further highlight reduced operational impacts, with FieldTurf's focus on recycled inputs and diversion supporting lower overall carbon footprints through efficient material cycles. FieldTurf, a leading manufacturer of , has faced several legal challenges related to product defects and practices. In 2024, the company reached a preliminary agreement for a $50 million nationwide settlement in a class-action alleging that its Duraspine fields deteriorated prematurely due to defective materials, leading to safety risks and unexpected replacement costs for schools and municipalities. This followed a multidistrict litigation where plaintiffs claimed FieldTurf misrepresented the durability of its products, with final court approval granted in December 2024 and payments distributed starting in 2025. Regulatory actions targeting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other chemicals in have intensified scrutiny on FieldTurf's products. In 2022, became one of the first major U.S. cities to ban new installations in public parks due to concerns over PFAS contamination, prohibiting fields containing these "forever chemicals." In 2023, Governor vetoed AB 1423, which would have banned the manufacture, sale, and installation of with intentionally added PFAS starting January 1, 2026, but signed SB 676 allowing local governments to impose broader bans on synthetic turf as early as 2023. Similarly, adopted state-level initiatives in 2024 to prohibit PFAS in on public property, with several municipalities, including , where voters rejected a on November 4, 2025, to ban new installations amid health debates. In response to these pressures, FieldTurf has emphasized independent testing showing no detectable PFAS in its newer fields, positioning its products as compliant with emerging standards. Proposals for moratoriums in other states highlight ongoing regulatory momentum. Washington state, in June 2025, advanced rules to restrict PFAS in and related products, building on a January 2025 implementation of broader chemical regulations that include labeling and phase-outs for high-risk items. Maine lawmakers introduced LD 1177 in April 2025, proposing a three-year moratorium on new installations and renovations to allow environmental studies on PFAS and other toxins, though the bill faced opposition from industry stakeholders and was carried over without passage as of June 2025. The industry, including FieldTurf, has engaged in to influence these regulations. FieldTurf has lobbied for provisions allowing "feasible alternatives" under state laws, arguing that outright bans overlook innovations like PFAS-free infills, as seen in responses to California's framework. In professional sports, debates over turf mandates have escalated; the NFL Players Association renewed calls in 2025 for all stadiums to switch to natural grass, citing higher injury rates on synthetic surfaces, while continues to permit FieldTurf in several venues despite similar concerns. FieldTurf maintains that its systems meet league safety standards and are used in eight teams for the 2025 season. Internationally, directives have impacted FieldTurf's s. The 2023 REACH regulation (EU 2023/2055) restricts intentionally added , including rubber infill in , with a phased ban starting October 2023 and full implementation by 2031, providing an eight-year transition for existing fields. This has prompted FieldTurf to adapt its European offerings, focusing on organic or non-microplastic alternatives to comply with requirements.

References

  1. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/how-fieldturf-changed-artificial-turf-forever/
  2. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/
  3. https://fieldturf.com/en/page/tarkett-group/
  4. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/innovation/
  5. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/nfl-2025/
  6. https://www.zoominfo.com/c/fieldturf-inc/64522214
  7. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118559171788881054
  8. https://financialpost.com/legal-post/turf-wars-patent-litigation-is-a-full-contact-sport-for-montreals-fieldturf
  9. https://thecomeback.com/general/fieldturf-allegedly-made-millions-knowingly-promoting-and-selling-faulty-fields.html
  10. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/how-fieldturf-changed-sports-forever/
  11. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/20/magazine/this-grass-is-always-greener.html
  12. https://www.foxsports.com.au/the-sideline/the-artificial-edge/news-story/7e592811690588d1dce62ac5c3e220f9
  13. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2005/09/16/333453/2599/en/Historic-Sports-Surfacing-Deal-Completed-With-Creation-of-FieldTurf-Tarkett.html
  14. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/127620-46
  15. https://capstone.capilanou.ca/2024/02/12/reimagining-athlete-well-being-unveiling-the-turf-predicament-in-the-nfl-for-a-healthier-future/
  16. https://aepacoop.org/directory/name/fieldturf-usa-inc/
  17. https://www.installartificial.com/news/top-10-largest-synthetic-turf-companies
  18. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/01/31/1329527/0/en/Tarkett-through-its-FieldTurf-subsidiary-acquires-the-assets-of-Grassman-a-leading-Australian-synthetic-turf-manufacturer.html
  19. https://www.tarkett-group.com/app/uploads/2025/07/31105622/tarkett-half-year-financial-report-2025.pdf
  20. https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/experience/fieldturf-tarkett-usa-holdings-inc-purchases-all-of-the-issued-and-outstanding-membership-interests-in-the-capital-of-precision-construction-contracting-llc
  21. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/tarkett-sports-strengthens-design-and-construction/
  22. https://fieldturf.com/en/
  23. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/shock-pad-systems/
  24. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/next-generation-systems/
  25. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/buying-guide-first-artificial-turf-field/
  26. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/infill-systems-2/
  27. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/carboncatch/
  28. https://fieldturf.com/workspace/uploads/files/brochure-maintenance-guidelines-fieldturf-may2025.pdf
  29. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/water-capture-conservation-sustainability/
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22972855/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363235/
  32. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/no-difference-football-groin-injury-rates-between-turf-and-grass/
  33. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00133-5/fulltext
  34. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/ndownloader/files/17082500/1
  35. https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/en/about/newsroom/articles/turf-vs-grass-fields-sports-injury-prevention
  36. https://www.safehealthyplayingfields.org/heat-levels-synthetic-turf
  37. https://thegccollegian.com/2025/10/15/the-issue-with-turf-why-nfl-players-are-getting-more-hurt-on-artificial-fields/
  38. https://nflpa.com/posts/only-natural-grass-can-level-the-nfls-playing-field
  39. https://sports.yahoo.com/article/nfl-stadium-comes-under-fire-051500159.html
  40. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/documents/2403108.pdf
  41. https://cleanwater.org/2024/09/16/turf-artificial-harm-very-real
  42. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/federal-research-recycled-tire-crumb-used-playing-fields-and-playgrounds
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010022001767
  44. https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/2025/07/02/washington-project-studying-to-limit-exposure-to-toxins-in-artificial-turf-fields/84418787007/
  45. https://sustain.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/2025-042_Understanding%2520and%2520Managing%2520Artificial%2520Turf_Klasios.pdf
  46. https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB730/id/3191117
  47. https://www.nrpa.org/parks-recreation-magazine/2019/may/synthetic-sports-fields-and-the-heat-island-effect/
  48. https://www.thenewlede.org/2024/08/as-the-world-heats-up-so-does-the-debate-around-artificial-turf/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11272752/
  50. https://mountsinaiexposomics.org/position-statement-on-the-use-of-artificial-turf-surfaces/
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749123010965
  52. https://aesm.assembly.ca.gov/sites/aesm.assembly.ca.gov/files/letter%2520from%2520public%2520synthetic%2520turf%252C%2520microplastics%252C%2520Dianne%2520Woelke.pdf
  53. https://wasserdreinull.de/en/blog/microplastics-from-artificial-turf-versus-hybrid-turf/
  54. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/no-detectable-pfas/
  55. https://www.amaisd.org/athletics
  56. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/leading-choice-in-the-nfl/
  57. https://www.bengals.com/news/paycor-stadium-field-turf-update-2024-season
  58. https://fieldturf.com/en/sports/football/
  59. https://www.americanfootballmonthly.com/Subaccess/articles.php?category=&article_id=5322&output=article
  60. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/proven-safety/
  61. https://www.heraldnet.com/sports/ford-fields-fieldturf-is-a-super-bowl-first/
  62. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/super-bowl-liii/
  63. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/fifa-quality-programme/
  64. https://inside.fifa.com/innovation/standards/football-turf/fifa-quality-programme-for-football-turf
  65. https://sbisoccer.com/2009/09/bmo-field-to-have-grass-in-2010
  66. https://the18.com/en/soccer-entertainment/six-clubs-mls-with-turf-fields
  67. https://fieldturf.com/en/sports/rugby/
  68. https://fieldturf.com/en/sports/field-hockey/
  69. https://fieldturf.com/en/sports/lacrosse/
  70. https://fieldturf.com/en/sports/multisport/
  71. https://www.ilkesport.com/fifa-standards-in-artificial-grass-testing-and-certification/
  72. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/turf-systems/
  73. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/cost-analysis/
  74. https://sporturf.com/artificial-turf-football-fields-new-york/
  75. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/26/business/artificial-turf-grass-sports.html
  76. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/faq/
  77. http://www2.fieldturf.com/bluespringsfieldhouse
  78. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/air-fieldturf/
  79. https://fieldturf.com/en/why-fieldturf/sustainability-commitment/
  80. https://www.nrpa.org/parks-recreation-magazine/2020/may/synthetic-turf-the-worlds-fastest-growing-play-surface/
  81. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/turf-vs-grass-cost/
  82. https://www.synturf.org/images/FN9and23_SanFran_www.cityfieldsfoundation.org_Comparison_fieldturf.pdf
  83. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/30/boston-bans-artificial-turf-toxic-forever-chemicals-pfas
  84. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/08/05/artificial-turf-heat-health-environment-cost/
  85. https://fieldturflandscape.com/product/residential/ultimate-pet/
  86. https://fieldturflandscape.com/pets/
  87. https://www.siteone.com/en/pet-c-fieldturf-synthetic-turf-pet-44-oz-face-weight-1-58-in-field-greenolive-green-blades-no-thatching/p/434526
  88. https://fieldturflandscape.com/sustainability/
  89. https://fieldturflandscape.com/product/residential/ez-putt2-turf/
  90. https://fieldturflandscape.com/commercial-golf/
  91. https://fieldturflandscape.com/playgrounds/
  92. https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2025-09-17/californias-love-hate-relationship-with-artificial-turf
  93. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/tarkett-sports-launches-fieldturf-landscape/
  94. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/artificial-turf-market
  95. https://cdn1.sportngin.com/attachments/document/2160-3021358/Handout_-_Environmental_Impact_Research_Guide_-_FieldTurf_-_JUN2023.pdf
  96. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/goal-zero-sustainability/
  97. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/2023-tarkett-csr/
  98. https://fieldturf.com/en/articles/detail/carbon-offset-program/
  99. https://fieldturf.com/en/products/detail/infills/
  100. https://www.tarkett-group.com/app/uploads/2025/04/02161228/tarkett-sustainability-magazine-print-version.pdf
  101. https://cdn.c2ccertified.org/certifications/Tarkett/Artificial_Turf/Tarke_Artif_Bronz_CERT4770_2021-03-11.pdf
  102. https://www.floorcoveringweekly.com/main/consumer-connection/tarkett-releases-2024-sustainability-statement-44840
  103. https://westernresourceadvocates.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2022_WRA_Artifical_Turf_Report.pdf
  104. https://theridgewoodblog.net/fieldturf-settles-50m-class-action-lawsuit-over-defective-synthetic-turf-fields/
  105. https://www.nj.com/middlesex/2024/12/federal-judge-grants-settlement-approval-in-fieldturf-usa-lawsuit-that-included-nj-schools.html
  106. https://calmatters.org/environment/2023/10/california-synthetic-turf-pfas/
  107. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AB-1423-VETO-1.pdf
  108. https://www.saferstates.org/insights/states-in-the-lead-six-key-takeaways-from-2024-state-legislative-sessions/
  109. https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/glastonbury-voters-to-decide-on-artificial-turf-ban/3658585/
  110. https://insideepa.com/pfas-news/washington-state-moves-regulate-pfas-containing-paints-artificial-turf
  111. https://mainemorningstar.com/2025/04/09/maine-lawmakers-contemplate-pause-on-artificial-turf-to-study-potential-health-environmental-hazards/
  112. https://legiscan.com/ME/bill/LD1177/2025
  113. https://www.sierraclub.org/loma-prieta/blog/2024/05/artificial-turf-wars-people-fighting-protect-their-communities
  114. https://www.sportico.com/leagues/football/2024/nfl-turf-debate-medical-legal-lines-1234795521/
  115. https://frontofficesports.com/newsletter/nfl-turf-wars-are-back/
  116. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c00047
  117. https://www.brockusa.com/artificial-turf-the-war-on-microplastics-a-call-to-action/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.