Hubbry Logo
FIGMAFIGMAMain
Open search
FIGMA
Community hub
FIGMA
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
FIGMA
FIGMA
FIGMA
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Finnish Games and Multimedia Association (FIGMA) was a Finnish trade association for video game publishers and distributors founded in 1999.

Key Information

It also acted a video game rating board, to regulates video game content in relation to subjects such as sex and violence and assigns age appropriate certificates.[1][2][3] Figma published the best-selling video games every two weeks, and gave out platinum and gold prizes. It also kept yearly statistics on the size of the Finnish video game market, and organized the Finnish Game Awards from 2008 to 2013.[4]

FIGMA dissolved in 2016 when it merged with three other Nordic trade associations (the Swedish MDTS, Danish MUF, and Norwegian NSM) into the Association for the Nordic Game Industry (ANGI).[5]

History

[edit]

Figma was founded on 12 April 1999. Vesa Artman, Head of Nordisk Film's PlayStation unit, was the first chairman and was responsible for the practical activities. Riku Olkkonen was elected as the association's first Executive Director in March 2007.[6][7]

Organisation

[edit]

Figma was the Finnish representative for Association for the Nordic Game Industry (ANGI) in Finland, whose member companies in 2016 were Activision Blizzard, AMO, Bergsala, Electronic Arts, Game Outlet, Koch Media, Microsoft, Nordic License, Namco Bandai Partners, Nordisk Film, PAN Vision, Ubisoft, Walt Disney Company and Warner Brothers.[8]

Figma was a member of the European Games Federation (ISFE) and the Media Education Centre Metka. The organisation cooperated with the State Film Inspectorate in areas such as the control of age limits and had a representative on the advisory board that planned the activities of the Inspectorate.[9][10]

Figma's Board was chaired by Riku Olkkonen and its Executive Director was Thomas Westerberg.[11]

Activities

[edit]

The purpose of the association was "to improve the cultural policy status and legal protection of recorded music and the conditions for its production, import and distribution, and to develop the enforcement of the rights of rightholders under the law".[8]

Figma published a bi-weekly list of best-selling video games, awarded platinum and gold game prizes, maintained annual statistics on the size of the Finnish video game market and organised the Finnish Game Awards from 2008 to 2013.[8]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

FIGMA

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Figma is a web-based collaborative design platform primarily used for , wireframing, prototyping, and real-time team editing, founded in 2012 by and Evan Wallace during their time at . The tool operates entirely in web browsers, enabling seamless multiplayer collaboration without requiring software installations, which distinguished it from desktop-centric competitors like and Sketch upon its public launch in 2016. Headquartered in , Figma rapidly gained adoption among design teams for features such as vector editing, auto-layout systems, component libraries, and interactive prototyping, serving millions of users across startups and companies by the early 2020s. Its emphasis on and integration with development workflows contributed to displacing legacy tools, with early from designers giving way to widespread preference due to the efficiency of browser-based, real-time co-editing. A pivotal event in Figma's trajectory occurred in September 2022 when announced a $20 billion all-cash acquisition, intended to combine Figma's collaborative strengths with 's creative suite; however, the deal faced intense regulatory scrutiny from the and over antitrust concerns, leading to its mutual termination in December 2023, with Figma receiving a $1 billion reverse termination fee. Post-termination, Figma has continued independent growth, incorporating AI-driven features like automated prototyping and code generation while maintaining its core focus on collaborative design innovation.

History

Founding and Initial Development

Figma was founded in 2012 by Dylan Field and Evan Wallace, computer science students at Brown University where Wallace had served as Field's teaching assistant. Field, who received the Thiel Fellowship grant of $100,000 in May 2012, dropped out of Brown to relocate to San Francisco with Wallace and pursue full-time entrepreneurship. The fellowship enabled early experimentation, initially centered on civilian drone (UAV) applications such as traffic monitoring, with software to automate operations and address operator limitations. The founders soon pivoted from hardware-intensive drone projects—citing regulatory hurdles and privacy issues—to software development leveraging web technologies. This shift was catalyzed by Wallace's WebGL demonstration, a real-time water simulation, which showcased the browser's potential for high-performance graphics via GPU acceleration. Early explorations included and photo-editing tools, briefly considering meme generation, before narrowing to interface design tools amid stagnant innovation in collaborative design software. Initial development emphasized building a vector graphics editor entirely in the browser, using to bypass traditional rendering pipelines and achieve desktop-like performance without native downloads. The core vision, pitched to investors like Index Ventures shortly after founding, targeted collaborative creative tools akin to but for design, enabling real-time multi-user editing. This period involved iterative prototyping in , prioritizing technical feasibility—such as for rendering and web sockets for synchronization—over rapid release, with the team delaying public launch multiple times to refine core functionality.

Product Launch and Early Growth

Figma publicly launched its collaborative interface on September 27, 2016, after operating in closed beta since late 2015. The release emphasized real-time multiplayer editing, allowing multiple users to collaborate simultaneously in a browser without file handoffs or version conflicts, a feature introduced alongside the public debut on September 28, 2016. This browser-native approach addressed limitations of desktop tools like Sketch and , which required local installations and lacked seamless multi-user support, though it faced initial skepticism regarding performance for complex vector editing. The product was initially offered for free to attract early adopters, focusing on core vector design capabilities such as tools, paths, and prototypes. began in 2017 with the introduction of a "Pro" plan, enabling paid features like unlimited projects and team libraries, which supported scaling for professional teams. Early growth stemmed from word-of-mouth among designers, particularly in tech hubs, as the tool's zero-friction lowered compared to native apps. By the end of its first year in October 2017, Figma had iterated on feedback to add features like advanced prototyping and plugins, fostering a growing user base despite competition from established incumbents. This period marked a deliberate focus on product-led growth, prioritizing reliability and over rapid feature expansion, which helped build loyalty among individual designers and small teams before broader enterprise adoption. The company's restraint in early commercialization—delaying paid tiers until core functionality proved viable—contrasted with venture pressures, enabling organic traction through community-driven improvements.

Major Milestones and Expansion

In 2021, Figma expanded its product offerings with the launch of FigJam, a collaborative tool designed for ideation, brainstorming, and remote team workshops, which broadened the platform's utility beyond UI/UX design to encompass early-stage creative processes. This move capitalized on the shift to distributed workforces, enabling real-time multiplayer editing and integration with Figma files, thereby increasing user engagement across non-design roles like product managers and engineers. The company further solidified its ecosystem in June 2023 by introducing Dev Mode, a dedicated interface for developers to inspect designs, extract snippets, and annotate files without disrupting designers' workflows, reducing in the design-to-development handoff. This feature addressed longstanding pain points in cross-functional collaboration, with early adoption evidenced by its integration into enterprise pipelines at major firms. Concurrently, Figma scaled its operations globally, establishing offices in locations including and alongside its headquarters, supporting a that grew to over 1,600 employees by early 2025. User adoption accelerated markedly, surpassing 4 million worldwide by 2024, with 85% originating from international markets despite revenue concentration in the U.S., indicating untapped monetization potential in regions like and . Figma captured over 90% in collaborative , driven by viral features and integrations, while metrics showed 76% of customers utilizing multiple products by mid-2025, reflecting successful platform stickiness and cross-selling.

Initial Public Offering

Figma confidentially filed for an in April 2025, following the termination of its proposed acquisition by in December 2023. The company publicly released its S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2025, detailing the offering of 12,472,657 shares of Class A by Figma and additional shares by selling stockholders. On July 28, 2025, Figma increased its expected IPO price range to $30–$32 per share from an initial $25–$28, reflecting strong investor interest amid a recovering market for tech listings. The offering was ultimately priced at $33 per share on July 30, 2025, $1 above the revised high end, comprising 36,937,080 shares of Class A and raising approximately $1.22 billion before underwriting discounts. Trading commenced on the under the "FIG" on July 31, 2025, with shares opening at $85 and surging as much as 200% above the IPO price during the debut session, marking one of the strongest first-day performances for a major tech IPO that year. The IPO provided liquidity to early investors, including venture firms like , which sold millions of shares, while enabling Figma to fund further expansion in collaborative and AI integrations without relying on acquisition proceeds.

Product and Technology

Core Features and Architecture

Figma's core features enable editing, interactive prototyping, and real-time for . Users create designs using tools for drawing shapes, paths with Bézier curves, , and image import, supporting operations, masking, and effects like shadows and blurs. Auto Layout provides constraint-based positioning for responsive components that adapt to content changes, facilitating efficient scaling across device sizes. Components and variants allow reusable UI elements with customizable properties, promoting consistency. Prototyping capabilities include linking frames with transitions, overlays, and device previews to simulate user flows, incorporating interactions such as clicks, swipes, and animations driven by variants. Developer handoff features, including inspect mode, expose CSS, , and other code snippets directly from designs, alongside asset exports in formats like and . An extensible integrates third-party tools for advanced functionality, such as data visualization or . Architecturally, Figma functions as a browser-based application leveraging for rendering and for accelerated graphics performance, eliminating the need for native installations. The frontend, built with and React, handles client-side operations including local editing and to minimize latency during collaboration. Real-time multiplayer relies on a custom engine inspired by (OT) and conflict-free replicated data types (CRDTs), where edits are broadcast to a central service that resolves conflicts and propagates updates via WebSockets. The backend employs a on Sinatra framework for services, for data persistence, and AWS for hosting, with each design file mapped to a dedicated multiplayer instance for isolated editing sessions. This cloud-native setup supports unlimited scalability for concurrent users, versioning through git-like diffs, and secure access controls, though it requires constant connectivity for full functionality. Offline mode caches recent files for limited editing, syncing upon reconnection.

Evolution and AI Integration

Figma's core design tool evolved through iterative enhancements to its architecture, emphasizing scalability and collaboration. In December 2019, the introduction of Auto Layout enabled dynamic, responsive frames and components, allowing automatic adjustments for spacing, alignment, and content resizing, which addressed limitations in static vector editing. This feature marked a shift toward more flexible prototyping, reducing manual tweaks for varying screen sizes and content states. Subsequent updates refined these capabilities, with a major overhaul in November 2020 improving nesting, padding controls, and counter-axis alignment to better support complex UI patterns like lists and cards. Product expansion broadened Figma beyond interface . April 2021 saw the launch of FigJam, an integrated online for team ideation, diagramming, and workshops, free initially to encourage adoption across non-design roles. This complemented the core editor by enabling pre-design brainstorming in a shared, real-time with stamps, cursors, and templates. In June 2023, Dev Mode debuted as a dedicated developer view within files, offering code inspection (CSS, , Android XML), annotations, and version tracking to bridge design-to-code gaps, with general availability following beta feedback in 2024. These developments transformed Figma from a siloed design app into a unified platform spanning ideation, , and handoff. AI integration accelerated in 2024, positioning Figma to automate repetitive tasks while preserving human oversight. On June 26, 2024, Figma announced its AI suite, leveraging models for native tools including auto-generation, visual search, renaming layers via , and prototype enhancements based on file context. These features remove grunt work, enabling focus on higher-level aspects like system behavior. Early tools also included text generation for UI copy and for asset reuse, initially in beta for select users. By May 7, 2025, at the Config conference, Figma unveiled advanced AI products: Figma Make, an AI-powered feature allowing users to generate editable designs, prototypes, and code from text prompts via an interface with a prompt input bar (often at the bottom or integrated in the workspace) for descriptions (e.g., "Make a financial dashboard with onboarding flow"), a main canvas displaying generated UI elements, layouts, interactive components, or code previews, and tools like point-and-edit for modifications, code editing tabs, and iteration via follow-up prompts—examples of outputs include interactive music players, 3D explorers, dashboards, and data-driven apps; Figma Buzz for conversational ideation in FigJam, and Figma Draw for AI-assisted sketch refinement into editable vectors. AI code generation, promised for weeks post-announcement, aimed to output framework-specific snippets directly in Dev Mode. These AI features exited beta on July 24, 2025, with Figma Make opening to all users, reflecting matured safeguards against hallucinations through and user validation loops. On October 9, 2025, a partnership with integrated Gemini models, enhancing multimodal inputs for design queries, content adaptation, and predictive prototyping. This multi-model approach—spanning and —mitigates while addressing designer concerns over AI accuracy, as evidenced by Figma's 2025 AI report noting 51% of users building agentic tools but emphasizing iterative human-AI over full . Such integrations have drawn scrutiny for potential over-reliance, yet empirical usage data shows productivity gains in tasks like asset creation, with Figma prioritizing opt-in controls and transparency in model sourcing.

Business and Funding

Investment Rounds and Valuation

Figma raised approximately $749 million across multiple funding rounds from 2013 to 2024, primarily through investments and later-stage tenders. The company's early rounds supported product development and initial scaling, while later infusions reflected its growth in the collaborative design software market. The seed round occurred in June 2013, raising $3.9 million led by Index Ventures and Terrence Rohan, with a of $16 million. In December 2015, Figma completed a of $14 million led by , achieving a of approximately $77 million. The Series B in February 2018 brought in $25 million under ' lead, valuing the company at $159 million . Subsequent growth rounds accelerated: Series C in February 2019 raised $40 million led by , with participation from Coatue and , at a $440 million . Series D followed in April 2020 with $50 million from , marking a $2 billion valuation amid remote work demands during the . The Series E in June 2021 secured $200 million led by Durable Capital Partners, elevating the to $10 billion. Later rounds shifted toward secondary market activity. In May 2024, a Series F extension raised $415.7 million, contributing to the overall funding total. A 2024 secondary , involving investors like Alkeon Capital, Coatue, and General Catalyst, established a $12.5 billion valuation, reflecting market adjustments following prior acquisition discussions. Following its initial public offering in 2025, Figma's market capitalization declined. As of early 2026, Figma (NYSE: FIG) has a market capitalization of approximately $11 billion, with shares trading around $21-22 per share. This represents a significant decline from its 2025 IPO valuation and prior peaks.
RoundDateAmount RaisedPost-Money ValuationLead Investor(s)
SeedJun 2013$3.9M$16MIndex Ventures
Series ADec 2015$14M$77M
Series BFeb 2018$25M$159M
Series CFeb 2019$40M$440M
Series DApr 2020$50M$2B
Series EJun 2021$200M$10BDurable Capital Partners

Corporate Structure and Revenue Model

Figma, Inc. is a publicly traded headquartered in , , specializing in collaborative interface design tools. Founded in 2012 by , who serves as CEO, and Evan Wallace, the company transitioned from private ownership to public status via an filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in July 2025, with shares listing on the under the ticker symbol . As of recent filings, institutional investors hold significant stakes, including with approximately 12.77% ownership and with 7.93%, reflecting the company's venture-backed origins prior to going public. The corporate governance includes a board of directors overseeing operations, with key executives managing product development, sales, and engineering teams structured around design, developer, and enterprise functions. Figma maintains a relatively flat organizational hierarchy to foster innovation, as evidenced by its internal org charts showing over 40 senior leaders across departments like product, engineering, and growth. Figma's revenue model centers on a freemium subscription structure, offering a free Starter plan for basic use by individuals and small teams, while generating primary income from paid tiers tailored to professional, organizational, and enterprise needs. Paid plans are seat-based, charging per user type—such as editors (who create/modify files), viewers (for review), and developers—with annual billing discounts; for instance, the Professional plan starts at $12 per editor per month annually, escalating to $16 monthly, while Enterprise reaches $90 per editor annually. This model emphasizes scalable licensing for teams, with features like unlimited version history and advanced admin controls unlocking at higher tiers, supplemented by enterprise customizations. In fiscal year 2024, Figma achieved $749 million in GAAP revenue, a 48% increase year-over-year, driven predominantly by subscription growth from its core design platform without reliance on advertising or one-time fees.

Adobe Acquisition Attempt

Deal Announcement and Rationale

On September 15, , Adobe announced a definitive agreement to acquire Figma for approximately $20 billion in a cash-and-stock transaction, marking Adobe's largest acquisition to date. The deal valued Figma at $10 billion for its fully diluted equity, reflecting its rapid growth as a web-based collaborative interface design platform founded in 2012. Adobe's stated rationale centered on integrating Figma's strengths in real-time, multi-user with Adobe's established creative software ecosystem, including Photoshop and , to address evolving demands for web-native design workflows. executives emphasized that the merger would accelerate innovation in by combining Adobe's AI-driven tools with Figma's browser-based platform, enabling seamless experiences for developers, designers, and stakeholders while expanding Adobe's reach into collaborative creativity beyond desktop applications. This move was positioned as a response to industry shifts toward cloud-based, team-oriented tools, where Figma had gained significant traction among users seeking alternatives to Adobe's subscription-heavy model. Figma's viewed the acquisition as an opportunity to amplify its mission of making accessible and collaborative for broader audiences, leveraging 's resources to enhance platform scalability and global distribution without altering Figma's core independent operation under . noted that discussions had progressed over several months, driven by shared visions for democratizing , though the agreement preserved Figma's distinct product identity post-merger. Critics, however, interpreted 's pursuit as partly defensive, aiming to neutralize Figma's disruption of 's market dominance in and prototyping, where Figma's free tier and multiplayer features had eroded XD's user base.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Termination

The proposed acquisition of by , announced on September 15, 2022, for approximately $20 billion in an all-cash transaction, attracted significant antitrust scrutiny from multiple regulators concerned about reduced in digital . Regulators focused on 's established dominance in creative software—holding over 90% in some segments—and Figma's rapid growth as a collaborative, cloud-based alternative that challenged 's traditional desktop-centric models like Photoshop and . The UK (CMA) initiated a Phase 1 review in late 2022, escalating to Phase 2 by May 2023, provisionally concluding in August 2023 that the deal would substantially lessen in the global market for interactive productivity and , potentially stifling innovation and increasing prices for users. The CMA viewed the transaction as a "reverse killer acquisition," where could acquire and potentially limit Figma's independent development rather than allowing it to evolve as a disruptor. In parallel, the opened a formal Phase 2 investigation on August 7, 2023, expressing fears that the merger would eliminate Figma as an independent competitor in browser-based interactive design tools, where Figma held a leading position with dynamic capabilities not fully matched by Adobe's offerings. By November 16, 2023, the Commission issued a Statement of Objections, outlining preliminary findings that the deal could foreclose rival developers from accessing Figma's and entrench Adobe's , based on internal documents from both companies revealing strategic incentives to integrate Figma's features into Adobe's ecosystem while diminishing its standalone viability. The U.S. (FTC) also launched an inquiry, issuing second requests for information in July 2022 and filing an administrative complaint in December 2022, though its review did not advance to a definitive block before termination, amid broader concerns over Adobe's subscription practices and market entrenchment. On December 18, 2023, and Figma mutually terminated the agreement, citing insurmountable regulatory opposition in the UK and with "no clear path" to approval despite proposed remedies like divesting certain assets, which regulators deemed insufficient to address competitive harms. agreed to pay Figma a $1 billion reverse termination fee as stipulated in the merger agreement, reflecting the high costs of prolonged uncertainty; 's stock rose about 4% on the announcement, while Figma's valuation implications shifted toward independent growth or alternative paths like an IPO. The CMA and Commission subsequently closed their probes without further action. This outcome underscored heightened global antitrust enforcement against acquisitions, prioritizing nascent innovators over synergies claimed by incumbents, though critics argued it overlooked efficiencies in collaborative tools for designers.

Industry Impact and Reception

Adoption and Market Disruption

Figma experienced rapid adoption following its transition from private beta to public availability in September 2016, driven by its innovative browser-based architecture that eliminated the need for software installations and enabled instant multi-user collaboration. This approach resonated with designers seeking alternatives to siloed desktop applications, leading to widespread uptake in freelance, agency, and enterprise settings by the late 2010s. By 2019, surveys indicated Figma had overtaken Sketch as the dominant UI/UX design tool, with usage metrics reflecting a shift toward cloud-native workflows that supported remote and distributed teams. The platform's user base expanded significantly, achieving over 13 million monthly active users by mid-2025, as disclosed in its S-1 filing ahead of an . Annual user growth rates exceeded 159% in peak periods, correlating with the broader acceptance of remote collaboration tools amid the pandemic's acceleration of digital work practices. Figma's pricing model played a pivotal role, allowing unlimited free access for individuals and small teams, which lowered and fostered organic virality through shared files and community templates. In market disruption, Figma challenged incumbents like and Sketch by prioritizing real-time, multiplayer editing as a core feature, which exposed the limitations of file-sharing workarounds and issues in legacy tools. Unlike 's subscription-tied ecosystem or Sketch's Mac-only constraints, Figma's cross-platform, zero-latency reduced design-to-development handoffs and enabled stakeholder feedback loops, fundamentally altering team dynamics in . This causal shift from individual authoring to concurrent creation drove Figma's to 40.65% by 2025, up from under 20% in 2018, while competitors experienced erosion in relevance and developer investment. The platform's disruption extended to enterprise adoption, with integrations for developer handoff and Dev Mode features embedding it into software engineering pipelines, compelling rivals to retrofit similar capabilities post hoc.

Influence on Design Practices and Tools

Figma's introduction of real-time, multi-user collaboration marked a pivotal shift in UI/UX design workflows, enabling simultaneous editing by designers, developers, and stakeholders within the same file, which minimized version control issues and email handoffs prevalent in tools like Sketch or Adobe XD. This feature, operational since Figma's 2016 public beta, facilitated faster iteration cycles, with teams reporting up to 30% reductions in design-to-development handoff times due to embedded comments and live cursors providing contextual feedback. The platform's cloud-native architecture further influenced practices by eliminating dependency on local installations, allowing access from any device and supporting distributed teams, a capability that gained prominence during the 2020 surge. This accessibility democratized participation, enabling non-designers such as product managers to contribute directly, fostering inclusive workflows that integrated feedback loops earlier in the process. Consequently, enterprises adopted Figma as a standard for scaling operations, with surveys indicating improved alignment between and , reducing rework by streamlining asset inspection and code export via features like Dev Mode, launched in 2023. Figma also promoted component-driven design practices through reusable libraries and variants, which standardized UI elements across projects and accelerated prototyping without external plugins, influencing a broader industry move toward modular systems. This integration of vector editing, auto-layout, and interactive prototypes in a single environment reduced tool-switching, with users noting enhanced efficiency in creating high-fidelity mocks that double as developer specifications. Competitors responded by incorporating similar cloud collaboration, evidencing Figma's role in elevating expectations for toward seamless, platform-agnostic ecosystems.

Controversies and Criticisms

Post-Acquisition Fallout and Internal Challenges

Following the termination of the Adobe acquisition agreement on December 18, 2023, after 15 months of regulatory review, Figma faced immediate internal disruptions, including a company-wide town hall that interrupted employee holiday PTO to announce the deal's collapse. This abrupt communication highlighted the uncertainty that had built during the prolonged antitrust scrutiny from the and UK's , which had delayed product roadmaps and employee planning. CEO expressed regret over the outcome, stating that the merger would have enhanced and , though regulators viewed it as potentially anticompetitive. To address potential morale issues and retain talent amid dashed expectations of Adobe's $20 billion valuation payout, Figma implemented an equity refresh program in January 2024, granting additional shares to employees, and offered voluntary severance packages equivalent to three months' pay plus continued benefits to those opting to depart. Approximately 4% of the workforce, or about 52 out of roughly 1,300 employees, accepted the , indicating limited immediate attrition but underscoring underlying dissatisfaction tied to the reset company valuation to $10 billion. These measures followed Adobe's $1 billion breakup fee payment to Figma, which provided financial runway but did not fully offset the loss of anticipated liquidity for staff holding stock options. Internal challenges persisted into 2024, with speculation among employees about impending layoffs due to the need to operate independently without Adobe's resources, though no large-scale reductions materialized at that stage. Figma's leadership, including Field, shifted focus toward an eventual IPO and accelerated independent development, but the episode exposed vulnerabilities in and strategic pivots, as the company had grown by about 500 staff during the deal's pendency. Critics, including some former employees, pointed to the prolonged limbo as eroding trust in executive planning, though Field defended the post-deal trajectory as enabling greater autonomy.

Product and Ecosystem Critiques

Figma's cloud-based architecture, while enabling real-time collaboration, has drawn criticism for performance degradation in handling complex files, particularly those with nested components or large prototypes, leading to delays in rendering and interaction as reported by users in 2024 and 2025. Designers on platforms like Reddit have highlighted sluggish frame rates below 10-20 FPS during panning and zooming in the desktop app, especially on macOS, exacerbating workflow interruptions even for routine tasks such as deleting pages or publishing updates. These issues stem from the tool's reliance on browser-like rendering and server synchronization, contrasting with desktop-native alternatives like Sketch, which offer smoother local performance for Mac users despite lacking cross-platform support. Compared to competitors such as , Figma exhibits limitations in seamless integration with broader creative suites, requiring additional plugins or exports that can introduce compatibility errors during handoff to developers or illustrators. Users have noted that while Figma excels in prototyping versatility, its vector editing tools and auto-layout features occasionally lag in precision for intricate UI elements, prompting some to revert to XD for Adobe ecosystem workflows or Sketch for symbol-heavy design systems. Offline functionality remains restricted, with the desktop app still syncing to the , which disrupts productivity in low-connectivity scenarios—a causal drawback of its multiplayer model over fully local tools. The ecosystem's pricing structure has faced substantial backlash for penalizing collaborative use, charging organizations for viewer access by external parties, including clients or stakeholders, even if those users hold their own Figma subscriptions. This model, which starts at $12 per editor monthly but escalates with "seats" for any file interactor, disproportionately burdens agencies and freelancers engaging in client reviews or dev handoffs, often forcing siloed workarounds or upgrades to costlier enterprise plans. Critics argue this undermines the tool's collaborative ethos, as evidenced by 2024 complaints about unexpected billing for passive dev mode viewers, eroding trust and prompting migrations to open-source alternatives for budget-constrained teams. Plugin and integration extensibility, though extensive with thousands available, suffers from inconsistent quality and dependency risks, where third-party tools can introduce bugs or break during Figma updates, complicating for systems. While integrations with tools like Jira enhance dev workflows, the ecosystem's heavy reliance on Figma's exposes users to potential data privacy vulnerabilities in cloud-hosted plugins, with limited granular controls for enterprise-scale compared to self-hosted options in . These factors contribute to a perceived lock-in effect, where exporting layered files to formats like often loses fidelity, hindering transitions to non-Figma environments.

References

  1. https://www.productmonk.io/p/figma-success-founding-story
  2. https://blog.dfeldman.co/how-did-figma-succeed-a-brief-history-b816492da146
  3. https://techcrunch.com/2023/06/25/figma-design-tool-history/
  4. https://www.figma.com/blog/reflecting-on-figmas-first-year/
  5. https://www.figma.com/customers/
  6. https://www.toptal.com/designers/figma/figma-features
  7. https://news.adobe.com/news/news-details/2022/adobe-to-acquire-figma
  8. https://news.adobe.com/news/news-details/2023/adobe-and-figma-mutually-agree-to-terminate-merger-agreement
  9. https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/18/24005996/adobe-figma-acquisition-abandoned-termination-fee
  10. https://www.figma.com/blog/config-2025-recap/
  11. https://www.figma.com/blog/adobe-figma-faq/
  12. https://www.indexventures.com/perspectives/figma-goes-public-thirteen-unforgettable-years-with-dylan-field/
  13. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/figmas-story-part-1-my-thiel-fellowship-application-2011-dylan-field
  14. https://medium.com/blueprint/interview-with-figma-ceo-dylan-field-d9e05bbd9353
  15. https://www.figma.com/five-years-of-figma/
  16. https://medium.com/craft-ventures/conversation-series-figmas-early-team-how-patience-discipline-fostered-a-killer-product-1c78584eaff2
  17. https://www.news.aakashg.com/p/how-figma-grows
  18. https://www.iconiqcapital.com/growth/insights/celebrating-authentic-customer-obsessed-product-first-founders-figmas-ipo
  19. https://medium.com/%40yilinqi/breaking-the-canvas-figmas-figjam-and-the-evolution-of-its-collaborative-design-ecosystem-479ac1e1c4c2
  20. https://www.figma.com/dev-mode/
  21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHP3_S5kI04
  22. https://sqmagazine.co.uk/how-many-people-work-at-figma/
  23. https://salestools.io/report/figma-headquarters-office-locations
  24. https://cloud.substack.com/p/top-10-insights-from-figmas-ipo-docs
  25. https://www.thezerotoone.co/p/how-figma-grew-to-20billion
  26. https://vestedfinance.com/blog/us-stocks/why-figma-might-be-the-biggest-ipo-of-2025/
  27. https://designbuddies.substack.com/p/figma-ipo
  28. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579878/000162828025035381/figma-sx1a.htm
  29. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/28/figma-raises-ipo-range-to-30-to-32-per-share.html
  30. https://www.figma.com/blog/ipo-pricing/
  31. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/ipos/overview?dealId=909453-114471
  32. https://www.reuters.com/technology/design-software-maker-figmas-shares-surge-158-blowout-market-debut-2025-07-31/
  33. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/31/figma-fig-starts-trading-on-nyse-after-ipo.html
  34. https://www.businessinsider.com/who-got-rich-on-figma-ipo-2025-7
  35. https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/14563969806359-What-is-Figma
  36. https://www.figma.com/
  37. https://www.figma.com/blog/under-the-hood-of-figmas-infrastructure/
  38. https://www.figma.com/resource-library/design-basics/
  39. https://www.figma.com/blog/how-figmas-multiplayer-technology-works/
  40. https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/05/figma-launches-auto-layout/
  41. https://www.figma.com/blog/behind-the-feature-the-making-of-the-new-auto-layout/
  42. https://www.figma.com/blog/introducing-figjam/
  43. https://www.figma.com/blog/introducing-dev-mode/
  44. https://www.figma.com/blog/introducing-figma-ai/
  45. https://www.figma.com/solutions/ai-website-builder
  46. https://www.figma.com/solutions/ai-app-builder
  47. https://www.figma.com/blog/figma-make-general-availability/
  48. https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/09/figma-partners-with-google-to-add-gemini-ai-to-its-design-platform/
  49. https://www.figma.com/blog/figma-2025-ai-report-perspectives/
  50. https://www.clay.com/dossier/figma-funding
  51. https://forgeglobal.com/insights/figma-upcoming-ipo-news/
  52. https://electroiq.com/stats/figma-statistics/
  53. https://www.cbinsights.com/company/figma/financials
  54. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/FIG/
  55. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1579878/000162828025036090/figmas-1a2.htm
  56. https://www.tradingcalendar.com/post/figma-fig-ipo
  57. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/FIGMA-INC-192764947/company-shareholders/
  58. https://www.theinformation.com/org-charts/figma
  59. https://www.figma.com/pricing/
  60. https://businessmodelanalyst.com/figma-business-model/
  61. https://startupspells.com/p/figma-business-model-plg-pricing-gtm-strategy
  62. https://fourweekmba.com/figma-business-model-how-does-figma-make-money/
  63. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/15/adobe-to-acquire-design-platform-figma-for-20-billion.html
  64. https://www.figma.com/blog/a-new-collaboration-with-adobe/
  65. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2022/09/15/adobe-intent-to-acquire-figma-announcement
  66. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/the-real-rationale-behind-adobe-s-figma-acquisition
  67. https://alexandre.substack.com/p/unpacking-adobes-20bn-acquisition
  68. https://www.reuters.com/technology/adobe-figma-terminate-20-bln-deal-2023-12-18/
  69. https://www.gibsondunn.com/termination-of-adobe-figma-merger/
  70. https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/adobe-slash-figma-merger-inquiry
  71. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5778
  72. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/18/adobe-and-figma-call-off-20-billion-merger.html
  73. https://uxdesign.cc/figma-continues-to-skyrocket-63-reported-it-was-their-primary-ui-design-tool-in-2021-bb9390a8b96b
  74. https://thecursormag.substack.com/p/the-fall-of-figma
  75. https://insights.teamignite.ventures/p/evaluating-figmas-s-1
  76. https://www.wearefounders.uk/case-study-how-figma-outdesigned-the-giants-a-20b-disruption-story/
  77. https://www.designsystemscollective.com/figma-is-not-forever-the-design-tools-disruption-is-coming-32dcbae8ea36
  78. https://medium.com/%40erichoward_83349/figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd-which-design-tool-should-you-choose-da6971e20038
  79. https://cropink.com/figma-statistics
  80. https://elements.envato.com/learn/figma-is-changing-the-way-designers-collaborate
  81. https://www.toptal.com/designers/ui/figma-design-tool
  82. https://mfyz.com/how-figma-changed-how-we-collaborate-on-our-ux-and-ui-designs/
  83. https://devoqdesign.wordpress.com/2025/06/12/how-figma-is-revolutionizing-ui-ux-design-workflows/
  84. https://uxdesign.cc/building-a-culture-of-trust-through-figma-towards-clients-d810b41eb109
  85. https://www.fastcompany.com/91270817/figma-most-innovative-companies-2025
  86. https://tei.forrester.com/go/Figma/DevMode/?lang=en-us
  87. https://www.figma.com/scaling-design/10-reasons-brands-changed-the-way-they-design/
  88. https://uxdesign.cc/figma-make-the-biggest-shift-in-ux-ui-since-sketch-5483e18f76d7
  89. https://medium.com/%40siddhartha-arora102/product-stories-how-figma-redefined-design-collaboration-and-became-an-industry-standard-ba9fffc77e19
  90. https://fortune.com/2023/12/20/figma-called-employees-from-company-wide-pto-to-town-hall-to-inform-them-adobe-deal-was-dead/
  91. https://www.figma.com/blog/figma-adobe-abandon-proposed-merger/
  92. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/business/dealbook/figma-deal-adobe.html
  93. https://www.reuters.com/technology/figma-boost-employee-equity-packages-after-adobes-20-bln-deal-collapses-source-2024-01-23/
  94. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/08/technology/figma-adobe-.html
  95. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2024/01/23/figma-offers-employees-shares-buyouts-after-collapsed-adobe-deal/
  96. https://www.teamblind.com/post/layoffs-incoming-at-figma-mark-my-words-lmwbletp
  97. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/the-people-with-power-at-figma-after-the-failed-adobe-deal
  98. https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/16/24075126/figma-ceo-dylan-field-interview-after-adobe
  99. https://forum.figma.com/ask-the-community-7/significant-performance-drops-while-working-with-nested-components-and-design-systems-36298
  100. https://forum.figma.com/report-a-problem-6/bad-performance-of-figma-in-the-past-2-3weeks-46470
  101. https://www.reddit.com/r/FigmaDesign/comments/1cgon1s/what_is_the_deal_with_figma_desktop_app_on_mac/
  102. https://www.toptal.com/designers/figma/figma-vs-adobe-xd-vs-sketch
  103. https://www.animaapp.com/blog/industry/the-ultimate-battle-figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd/
  104. https://medium.com/%40Ramshaq/figma-vs-adobe-xd-vs-sketch-which-tool-wins-in-2025-efb9a3350428
  105. https://www.coursera.org/articles/figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd
  106. https://www.reddit.com/r/FigmaDesign/comments/1b7tt72/figmas_payment_structure_is_absolutely_ridiculous/
  107. https://kamushken.medium.com/the-hidden-cost-of-collaboration-in-figma-and-how-to-avoid-extra-charges-121e3d6d3fd5
  108. https://uxdesign.cc/figma-and-the-cost-of-collaboration-cd6b26d81605
  109. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stebell_figmas-pricing-makes-no-sense-for-agencies-activity-7210968757400158208-u7yJ
  110. https://forum.figma.com/share-your-feedback-26/unclear-figma-billing-practices-20754/index2.html
  111. https://cbtw.tech/insights/opinion-the-growing-concerns-around-figmas-pricing-model
  112. https://synavos.com/blogs/figma-vs-sketch-vs-adobe-xd/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.