Hubbry Logo
HBOSHBOSMain
Open search
HBOS
Community hub
HBOS
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
HBOS
HBOS
HBOS
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Group headquarters on The Mound, Edinburgh

Key Information

HBOS Office at Trinity Road, Halifax
Halifax offices in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
HBOS offices in Lovell Park, Leeds, formerly those of the Leeds Permanent Building Society before its takeover by the Halifax Building Society

HBOS plc is a banking and insurance company in the United Kingdom, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Lloyds Banking Group, having been taken over in January 2009. It was the holding company for Bank of Scotland plc, which operated the Bank of Scotland and Halifax brands in the UK, as well as HBOS Australia and HBOS Insurance & Investment Group Limited, the group's insurance division.

HBOS was formed by the 2001 merger of Halifax plc and the Bank of Scotland.[1] The formation of HBOS was heralded as creating a fifth force in British banking as it created a company of comparable size and stature to the established Big Four UK retail banks. It was also the UK's largest mortgage lender.[2] The HBOS Group Reorganisation Act 2006 saw the transfer of Halifax plc and Capital Bank plc to the Bank of Scotland, which had by then become a registered public limited company, Bank of Scotland plc.

Although officially HBOS was not an acronym of any specific words, it is widely presumed to stand for Halifax Bank of Scotland. The corporate headquarters of the group were located on The Mound in Edinburgh, Scotland, the former head office of the Bank of Scotland. Its operational headquarters were in Halifax, West Yorkshire, England, the former head office of Halifax.[3]

On 19 January 2009, the group was acquired by Lloyds TSB and became a subsidiary of Lloyds Banking Group after both sets of shareholders approved the deal.

Lloyds Banking Group stated that the new group would continue to use The Mound as the headquarters for its Scottish operations and would continue the issue of Scottish bank notes.[4][5]

History

[edit]

HBOS was formed by a merger of Halifax and Bank of Scotland in 2001, Halifax having demutualised and floated four years prior.

HBOS Group Reorganisation Act 2006

[edit]
Further information: Bank of Scotland and Halifax Building Society

In 2006, HBOS secured the passing of the HBOS Group Reorganisation Act 2006 (c. i), a local act of Parliament that rationalised the bank's corporate structure.[6] The act allowed HBOS to make the Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland a public limited company, Bank of Scotland plc, which became the principal banking subsidiary of HBOS. Halifax plc and Capital Bank plc transferred its undertakings to Bank of Scotland plc.The Halifax brand name was retained, Halifax then began to operate under the latter's UK banking licence.

The provisions in the act were implemented on 17 September 2007.

The share price peaked at over 1150p in February 2007.[7]

2008 short selling and credit crunch

[edit]

In 2004, Paul Moore, HBOS head of Group Regulatory Risk, warned senior directors at HBOS about excessive risk-taking. He was dismissed, and his concerns not acted on.

In March 2008, HBOS shares fell 17 percent amid false rumours that it had asked the Bank of England for emergency funding.[8] The Financial Services Authority conducted an investigation as to whether short selling had any links with the rumours. It concluded that there was no deliberate attempt to drive the share price down.[9]

On 17 September 2008, very shortly after the demise of Lehman Brothers, HBOS's share price suffered wild fluctuations between 88p and 220p per share, despite the FSA's assurances as to its liquidity and exposure to the wider credit crunch.[10]

However, later that day, the BBC reported that HBOS was in advanced takeover talks with Lloyds TSB to create a "superbank" with 38 million customers. That was later confirmed by HBOS. The BBC suggested that shareholders would be offered up to £3.00 per share, causing the share price to rise, but later retracted that comment.[11][12] Later that day, the price was set at 0.83 Lloyds shares for each HBOS share, equivalent to 232p per share,[13] which was less than the 275p price at which HBOS had raised funds earlier in 2008.[14] The price was later altered to 0.605 Lloyds shares per HBOS share.[15]

To avoid another Northern Rock-style collapse, the UK government announced that should the takeover go ahead, it would be allowed to bypass competition law.

Alex Salmond, Scotland's First Minister, previously an economist, said of the takeover:

"I am very angry that we can have a situation where a bank can be forced into a merger by basically a bunch of short-selling spivs and speculators in the financial markets."[16]

Acquisition by Lloyds TSB

[edit]

On 18 September 2008, the terms of the recommended offer for HBOS by Lloyds TSB were announced. The deal was concluded on 19 January 2009.[17] The three main conditions for the acquisition were:

  • Three quarters of HBOS shareholders voted in favour of the board's actions;[5]
  • Half of Lloyds TSB shareholder voted to approve the takeover;[18]
  • UK government dispensation with respect to competition law.

A group of Scottish businessmen challenged the right of the UK government to approve the deal by over-ruling UK competition law, but this was rejected. The takeover was approved by HBOS shareholders on 12 December.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown personally brokered the deal with Lloyds TSB. An official[who?] said: "It is not the role of a Prime Minister to tell a City institution what to do".[19] The Lloyds TSB board stated that merchant banks Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley were among the advisers recommending the takeover.[5]

Lloyds Banking Group said Edinburgh-based HBOS, which it had absorbed in January, made a pre-tax loss of £10.8 billion in 2008. Andy Hornby, the former chief executive of HBOS, and Lord Stevenson of Coddenham, its former chairman, appeared before the Commons Treasury Committee to answer questions about the near-collapse of the bank. Hornby said: "I'm very sorry what happened at HBOS. It has affected shareholders, many of whom are colleagues, it's affected the communities in which we live and serve, it's clearly affected taxpayers, and we are extremely sorry for the turn of events that has brought it about."

Bailout

[edit]

On 13 October 2008, Gordon Brown's announcement that government must be a "rock of stability" resulted to an "unprecedented but essential" government action: the Treasury would infuse £37 billion ($64 billion, €47 billion) of new capital into Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, Lloyds TSB and HBOS Plc, to avert financial sector collapse or UK "banking meltdown". He stressed that it was not "standard public ownership", as the banks would return to private investors "at the right time".[20][21] The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling, claimed that the British public would benefit from the rescue plan, because the government would have some control over RBS in exchange for about £20 billion of funding. Total State ownership in RBS would be 60%, and 40% for HBOS.[22] Royal Bank of Scotland said it intended to raise £20 billion ($34 billion) capital with the government's aid; its chief executive Fred Goodwin resigned. The government acquired $8.6 billion of preference shares and underwrote $25.7 billion of ordinary shares. Thus, it intended to raise £15 billion (€18.9 billion, $25.8 billion) from investors, to be underwritten by the government. The State would pay £5 billion for RBS, while Barclays Bank raised £6.5 billion from private sector investors, with no government help.[23] Reuters reported that Britain could inject £40 billion ($69 billion) into the three banks including Barclays.[24]

Investigation

[edit]

In 2015, an investigation by the Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority blamed the failure requiring the bailout on the bank's executives, as well as being critical of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the then-regulator. A parallel investigation into the FSA's enforcement process concluded it was too late to fine responsible executives, but up to 10 former HBOS executives could be banned from the financial services industry.[25]

Causes of failure were identified as follows:

  • The board failed to instil a culture within the firm that balanced risk and return appropriately, and it lacked sufficient experience and knowledge of banking.[25]
  • There was a flawed and unbalanced strategy and a business model with inherent vulnerabilities arising from an excessive focus on market share, asset growth and short-term profitability.[25]
  • The firm's executive management pursued rapid and uncontrolled growth of the Group's balance sheet. That led to an over-exposure to highly cyclical commercial real estate (CRE) at the peak of the economic cycle.[25]
  • The board and control functions failed to challenge effectively the pursuit of that course by the executive management, or to ensure adequate mitigating actions.[25]
  • The underlying weaknesses of HBOS's balance sheet made the Group extremely vulnerable to market shocks and eventual failure as the crisis in the financial system intensified.[25]

After putting the investigation on hold in 2013, in April 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority resumed its probe of "the way HBOS handled fraud allegations at its Reading branch".[26]

On 21 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority fined the Bank of Scotland £45.5 million over its failure to report suspicions of fraud at its Reading branch which led to the jailing of six people. The authority said that the bank "risked substantial prejudice to the interests of justice" by withholding information. The fine was reduced by almost £20 million because the bank agreed to settle.[27]

Advertising

[edit]
Main article: HBOS Marketing Campaign

Controversies

[edit]
[edit]

In December 2008, the British anti-poverty charity, War on Want, released a report documenting the extent to which HBOS and other UK commercial banks invested in, provided banking services for, and made loans to arms companies. The charity wrote that HBOS held shares in the UK arms sector totalling £483.4 million, and served as principal banker for Babcock International and Chemring.[28]

Mortgage fraud

[edit]
Neighbouring Halifax and Lloyds TSB branches outside Crossgates Shopping Centre, Cross Gates, Leeds

During 2003, The Money Programme uncovered systemic mortgage fraud throughout HBOS. The Money Programme found that during the investigation, brokers advised the undercover researchers to lie on applications for self-certified mortgages from, among others, the Bank of Scotland, the Mortgage Business and Birmingham Midshires.[29] All three were part of the Halifax Bank of Scotland Group, Britain's biggest mortgage lender. James Crosby, head of HBOS at the time, refused to be interviewed in relation to the exposed mortgage fraud. Further examples of mortgage fraud have come to light, which has seen mortgage brokers take advantage of fast track processing systems, as seen at HBOS, by entering false details, often without the applicant's knowledge.

Bank of Wales

[edit]

In 2002, HBOS dropped the Bank of Wales brand and absorbed the operations into Bank of Scotland Business Banking.

HBOS bad loans

[edit]

On 13 February 2009, Lloyds Banking Group revealed losses of £10 billion at HBOS, £1.6 billion higher than Lloyds had anticipated in November because of deterioration in the housing market and weakening company profits.[30] The share price of Lloyds Banking Group plunged 32% on the London Stock Exchange, carrying other bank shares with it.[30]

In September 2012, Peter Cummings, the head of HBOS corporate banking from 2006 to 2008, was fined £500,000 by the UK financial regulator over his role in the bank's collapse. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) also banned Cummings from working in the banking industry. The losses in his division exceeded the initial taxpayer bailout for the bank in October 2008.[31][32]

Reading branch fraud and Operation Hornet

[edit]

On 3 October 2010, Lynden Scourfield, former director of mid-market high-risk at Bank of Scotland Corporate, his wife Jacquie Scourfield, ex-director of Remnant Media Tony Cartwright, and ex-NatWest banker David Mills, were arrested on suspicion of fraud by the Serious Organised Crime Agency.[33][34] The scandal centred around Scourfield's use of his position to refer companies to Quayside Corporate Services, owned and operated by David Mills, for "turnaround" services which Quayside was unqualified to provide. Several members of Quayside's staff had criminal records for embezzlement. Customers were allegedly inappropriately pressured to take on excessive debt burdens and to make acquisitions benefiting Quayside.[35]

On 30 January 2017, following a four-month trial, former HBOS employees Scourfield and Mark Dobson were convicted of corruption and fraud involving a scheme that cost the bank £245 million;[36] Scourfield pleaded guilty to six counts including corruption, and Dobson was found guilty of counts including bribery, fraud and money laundering.[37] The court also convicted David Mills, Michael Bancroft, Alison Mills, and John Cartwright for their parts in the conspiracy.[37] On 2 February 2017, David Mills was jailed for 15 years, Scourfield for 11 years and three months, and Bancroft for 10 years. Dobson was sentenced to four and a half years, and Alison Mills and Cartwright were given three-and-a-half-year sentences for money laundering.[38] Following the convictions, the BBC reported:

"Businessmen Bancroft and Mills arranged sex parties, exotic foreign holidays, cash in brown envelopes and other favours for Scourfield between 2003 and 2007. In exchange for the bribes, Scourfield would require the bank's small business customers to use Quayside Corporate Services, the firm of consultants run by Mills and his wife Alison. Quayside purported to be turnaround consultants, offering business experience and expertise to help small business customers improve their fortunes, but far from helping turn businesses around, Mills and his associates were milking them for huge fees and using their relationship with the bank to bully business owners and strip them of their assets. In cash fees alone, according to prosecutors in the trial, £28 million went through the accounts of Mills, his wife and their associated companies. […] Mills and his associates used the bank's customers and the bank's money dishonestly to enrich themselves."[37]

The police investigation, named Operation Hornet, was carried out by Thames Valley Police, whilst Anthony Stansfeld was PCC. When the trial ended, Mr Stansfeld made the following three observations. Firstly, the investigation took six years at a cost of £7m. Secondly, that a fraud of that size could not have taken place without either complicity or incompetence, or a lack of oversight. Lastly, that if Thames Valley Police had not taken on the case no one else would have, and the crime would not have been investigated.[39]

The BBC added: "A decade on, HBOS's owner Lloyds Banking Group still has not acknowledged the full scale of the fraud - or offered to compensate its victims"; the broadcaster noted that the fraud was first discovered in 2007 by the bank's customers Nikki and Paul Turner, who used publicly available records to uncover it, but that after the Turners submitted their evidence to the bank it dismissed their claims and tried to repossess their home.[37] Following the convictions, the background to the case was reported on BBC Radio 4's File on 4 programme on 31 January 2017.[40] Lloyds is taking a £100 million hit paying compensation to the victims.[41]

Noel Edmonds, a celebrity victim of the scam, reached a settlement with the bank in July 2019.[42] Edmonds had argued that staff at the Reading branch had ruined his business, the Unique Group. Edmonds' campaign against Lloyds included attending the Lloyds 2018 AGM where he berated the board of directors from the floor.[43] In July 2022, insider.co.uk reported that Thames Valley Police has referred Noel Edmonds' case against Lloyds Banking Group to the CPS, following a criminal investigation into a former HBOS banker that led to the liquidation of the TV presenter's Unique Group of businesses.[44]

Dame Linda Dobbs is chairing an independent inquiry into the investigation and reporting of the fraud.[42] This inquiry started in April 2017.[45]

The HBOS Reading trial finished on 2 February 2017. In April 2017 Lloyds Banking Group (LBG) commissioned Professor Russell Griggs to oversee a compensation scheme for the victims of HBOS Reading. The scheme concluded all of the victims businesses would have failed despite the Reading fraud and therefore only awarded compensation for D&I (Distress and inconvenience) and nothing for D&C (Direct and consequential loss). In October 2018 SME Alliance (a not for profit organisation that supports and lobbies for victims of Bank misconduct) concluded the Griggs review was not fit for purpose and issued a complaint under the SM&CR to the FCA about the management of LBG in relation to the Griggs Review. SME Alliance also commissioned Jonathan Laidlaw QC to give an ‘Advice’ on the Griggs Review.[46]

Laidlaw QC concluded the Griggs Review was “procedurally defective” and it referenced “LBG’s failure to adjust the scope of the Review following the public release of the Project Lord Turnbull Report[47] is another important defect.” The Project Lord Turnbull Report [47] was written by accountant Sally Masterton. She had worked for the bank from 1998, first under HBOS and then Lloyds. The report makes several serious allegations about HBOS and Lloyds management, the most important of which are that the Reading Fraud was deliberately concealed, and that the FSA was intentionally misled. Moreover, the report is highly critical of the auditors, KPMG. In section eight the report states, “KPMG have not only just been negligent but their direct involvement in a number of material malpractices and violations regarding HBOS is fundamental and exposes them to claims in relation to misconduct, serious dereliction of duty and breach of regulatory and statutory duties.” In 2013 Sally Masterton, a forensic accountant, provided information that was crucial to the police investigation into the Reading Fraud. Subsequently, Ms Masterton left the bank and brought a case for unfair constructive dismissal, which was settled in 2015.[48]

In December 2018 Kevin Hollinrake MP, Co-chairman of the APPG on Fair Business Banking tabled a debate in Parliament on HBOS Reading and the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, John Glen MP, confirmed LBG would now fund an ‘Assurance’ review about the Griggs review, requested by the FCA.[49]

This led to a report by Sir Ross Cranston, a retired High Court Judge, in December 2019. Sir Ross accused LBG of “an unacceptable denial of responsibility” over its treatment of the HBOS Reading victims.[50] This resulted in questions from the FCA including: “We will also require LBG senior management to explain how and why the failings identified by Sir Ross occurred in the first place.”[51]

Between December 2019 and February / March 2020, Antonio Horta-Osorio, the CEO of LBG, met with many of the Reading victims promising he would now oversee the compensation process personally.[52] Many victims have complained there has been no contact with Mr. Horta-Osorio, who is now allegedly leaving the Bank for a post at Credit Suisse, since May 2020.

In April 2020 the Foskett Panel was formed under retired High Court Judge, Sir David Foskett, to finally compensate the victims of HBOS Reading.[53] The process continues and the Panel have confirmed it could take up to a further two years (2023) to compensate all the victims.

In December 2020, the APPG on Fair Business Banking submitted a formal complaint under the SM&CR to the FCA about the conduct of LBG in relation to their treatment of HBOS Reading victims including the Bank's refusal to support victims or to compensate them for the additional three-year delay caused by the failed Griggs Review.[54]

Three of the six criminals convicted for the HBOS Reading crimes have now been released from jail with a fourth due to be released by the end of 2021[citation needed].

Operations

[edit]

HBOS conducted all its operations through three main businesses:

  • Bank of Scotland plc
  • HBOS Australia
  • HBOS Insurance & Investment Group Limited

Bank of Scotland plc

[edit]

Bank of Scotland plc was the banking division of the HBOS group, and operated the following brands:

United Kingdom

[edit]

International

[edit]

HBOS Australia

[edit]

HBOS Australia was formed in 2004 to consolidate the group's holdings in Australia. It consisted of the following subsidiaries:

  • Capital Finance Australia
  • BOS International Australia

On 8 October 2008, HBOS Australia sold its Bank of Western Australia and St Andrew's Australia Pty Ltd subsidiaries for approximately A$2bn to the Commonwealth Bank.[55]

The group's businesses in Australia were sold to Westpac in October 2013.[56][57]

HBOS Insurance and Investment Group Limited

[edit]

HBOS Insurance & Investment Group Limited manages the group's insurance and investment brands in the UK and Europe. It consisted of the following:

It also used to own UK investment manager Insight Investment Management Limited.[58] The Bank of New York Mellon acquired Insight in 2009.[59][60][61]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

HBOS

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
HBOS plc was a major banking and group formed in 2001 through the merger of Halifax plc, a large former focused on and , and the , which encompassed corporate, institutional, and international banking operations. The merger created a entity with total group assets reaching £477 billion by 2004, positioning it as the fifth largest company in the UK at the time. HBOS adopted an aggressive growth strategy emphasizing revenue expansion, cost control, and increased in key sectors, which drove assets to £690 billion by 2008 at a of approximately 10 percent. This expansion relied heavily on short-term wholesale funding, with £282 billion in such liabilities by the end of 2007, resulting in a of 170 percent that climbed to 192 percent amid the unfolding . Lending practices concentrated 75 to 80 percent of corporate exposures in commercial , including support for entrepreneurial borrowers where the top 30 exposures totaled £30.9 billion by 2008, amplifying vulnerability to property market downturns. The business model's dependence on volatile funding and cyclical lending sectors precipitated HBOS's failure on 1 October , when it could no longer meet liabilities without intervention, prompting a request for Emergency Liquidity Assistance from the following the collapse. Government-orchestrated acquisition by Lloyds TSB ensued, forming and requiring substantial taxpayer support to stabilize the combined entity. Subsequent inquiries by the and Parliamentary Commission identified catastrophic shortcomings in senior management judgment, , and regulatory oversight as primary causal factors, rather than solely exogenous crisis elements. Distinct controversies, such as the HBOS Reading branch where executives facilitated £1 billion in mis-sold loans without adequate reporting of suspicions, further underscored operational and compliance lapses.

Formation and Early Development

Merger of Halifax and Bank of Scotland

The Halifax Building Society, one of the UK's largest mutual building societies, underwent in June 1997, converting to a (Halifax plc) and listing on the to access capital markets and pursue growth through scale. This transformation positioned Halifax as a major player with a focus on mortgages and savings, but it also exposed it to competitive pressures in a consolidating sector, prompting searches for strategic mergers to enhance distribution and product offerings. On May 4, 2001, Halifax plc and the , established in 1695 as Scotland's oldest surviving commercial bank, announced a nil-premium merger valued at approximately £28 billion to form HBOS plc, headquartered in . The rationale centered on combining Halifax's extensive retail branch network and mortgage expertise with 's commercial banking strengths and Scottish market dominance, aiming to challenge the UK's "big four" banks (, , Lloyds TSB, and ) by creating a fifth major force with diversified operations. Halifax shareholders would own about 63% of the new entity, reflecting its larger asset base, while both brands were retained post-merger to leverage established customer loyalty. Shareholder approvals followed in July 2001, with over 98-99% support from both sides, and the merger received necessary regulatory clearances without significant hurdles, including affirmation of credit ratings by agencies like Fitch. The transaction completed on September 10, 2001, with HBOS shares commencing trading on the London Stock Exchange, resulting in a combined entity holding total assets of around £275 billion and ranking as the UK's fifth-largest bank by assets. James Crosby, previously CEO of Halifax since 1999, assumed the CEO role at HBOS, overseeing initial integration efforts projected to yield £305 million in annual cost synergies through administrative efficiencies and £315 million in revenue benefits from insurance and lending products across complementary customer bases. These included branch network rationalization, with about 2,000 job losses anticipated from overlapping operations, primarily in back-office functions, while preserving front-line retail presence to minimize customer disruption. The merger emphasized immediate operational efficiencies over aggressive expansion, focusing on integrating IT systems and supply chains to reduce duplication without altering core models.

Strategic Expansion and Growth (2001-2007)

Following the merger, HBOS adopted a growth-oriented strategy emphasizing high-volume, low-margin lending in its retail division alongside an expansion in corporate banking focused on property development and commercial loans. This model relied increasingly on markets, which by the mid-2000s supplied around 40% of financing, up from lower levels pre-merger, enabling rapid scale but heightening vulnerabilities to market fluctuations. Asset expansion accelerated under this approach, with total assets rising from £275 billion at the end of 2001 to over £600 billion by 2007, driven by double-digit annual profit growth in most years and sustained dividend payouts to shareholders. The bank's international operations grew asset-led, outpacing retail deposit inflows, particularly in markets like via , where HBOS announced in July 2007 plans to open more than 160 branches to compete with dominant local players through aggressive lending in commercial and residential . Similar pushes occurred , leveraging inherited corporate banking presence, though these initiatives amplified concentration in cyclical sectors. To streamline its post-merger structure, HBOS secured the HBOS Group Reorganisation Act 2006, a private that authorized the simplification of entities, including the transition of the Governor and Company of the to status under revised regulatory and management provisions. This legal addressed complexities from combining Halifax's mutual-origins retail focus with Bank of Scotland's commercial heritage, though cultural integration remained uneven, fostering divisional silos that prioritized volume over in pursuit of . By 2007, these efforts had positioned HBOS as the UK's largest provider by assets, with pre-tax profits reaching £5.5 billion, underscoring short-term achievements in scale amid mounting reliance on volatile sources.

Business Model and Operations

Retail and Commercial Banking

HBOS's activities centered on the Halifax brand, which specialized in lending, savings products, and personal banking services for individual customers across the . The merger integrated Halifax's extensive retail footprint with Bank of Scotland's strengths in transactional banking, including current accounts tailored for everyday use. By the end of , the retail division managed customer loans totaling £137 billion and deposits of £97 billion, reflecting its dominant position in domestic . In parallel, commercial banking under HBOS focused on lending to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and larger corporates, leveraging Bank of Scotland's expertise and Halifax's branch infrastructure to expand market penetration, particularly among English SMEs. This segment pursued a volume-oriented strategy, driving average annual growth of 15% in the domestic corporate loan book from 2001 to 2007, often prioritizing lending scale over margin preservation. HBOS operated approximately 1,002 branches in the UK by 2007, providing physical access points for both retail and commercial clients. HBOS's mortgage strategy emphasized accessibility through higher loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, with 35% of the retail loan book featuring LTVs exceeding 70% by the end of , enabling broader customer reach amid rising property demand. This approach underpinned a mortgage market share surpassing 20%, supported by gross lending of £73.1 billion that year. Post-merger enhancements included unified platforms, allowing customers to manage retail and basic commercial accounts digitally, though physical branches remained central to operations.

International and Specialized Divisions

HBOS formed its International Division in to oversee and expand non-UK banking activities, aiming to accelerate growth in overseas markets while integrating disparate operations such as corporate lending abroad. This division encompassed specialized banking units outside the , with a focus on corporate and institutional clients rather than retail services. In , HBOS operated through HBOS Australia Pty Ltd, emphasizing corporate lending to mid-market and large businesses, which expanded amid favorable economic conditions prior to the global financial crisis. The unit's activities generated over AUD 400 million in profit for , reflecting its scale before HBOS initiated partial divestitures amid liquidity pressures. This presence contributed to diversification efforts but exposed the group to commodity-linked sectors vulnerable to downturns. European operations remained limited, with targeted SME financing in Ireland through legacy channels, though these did not achieve significant scale compared to domestic or Australian activities. Specialized divisions, particularly within Corporate and Institutional Banking, concentrated on high-yield areas such as development financing and leveraged loans, which grew aggressively from 2001 onward. HBOS advanced to fifth in European leveraged lending rankings by 2004, surpassing institutions like in deal volume, often funding acquisitions and buyouts with limited on cyclical exposures. Approximately 30% of the group's overall lending portfolio was tied to commercial by the mid-2000s, amplifying risks from and development sectors prone to boom-bust cycles. While this strategy diversified revenue beyond traditional retail, official inquiries later attributed heightened vulnerability to the 2008 crisis to such concentrations, as property values declined and leveraged deals soured without adequate risk controls.

Insurance, Investments, and Other Services

HBOS operated services primarily through the Halifax and brands, offering products such as home, life, and contents , alongside pensions and protection policies via dedicated divisions like Halifax Financial Protection and Bank of Scotland . These offerings were integrated with to provide bundled financial solutions, enabling cross-selling to customers and contributing to revenue diversification beyond core lending activities. The group's operations were housed within the Insurance & division, which encompassed , unit-linked policies, and offshore funds, managing that reached £83.9 billion by the end of , up 7% from the prior year with net inflows of £2.8 billion. This division generated underlying profit before tax of £412 million in , representing approximately 8% of the group's total pre-tax profit of £5.153 billion, through fees from products and insurance-linked investments that subsidized banking margins amid competitive pressures in retail deposits and loans. To enhance profitability, HBOS pursued strategic divestitures and partnerships in its non-banking segments, including the 2008 sale of its general insurer St. Andrew's plc, which reduced exposure to volatile premium income while allowing focus on higher-margin life and investment products integrated with banking services. These efforts aimed to mitigate risks from retail competition by leveraging synergies, such as unit-linked insurance policies tied to investment performance, though the division's stability was noted as not contributing to the group's broader vulnerabilities during the financial crisis.

The 2008 Financial Crisis

Vulnerabilities and Short Selling Episode

HBOS exhibited structural vulnerabilities in its funding model prior to the 2008 financial crisis, characterized by heavy reliance on short-term wholesale markets rather than stable retail deposits. At the group's formation in 2001, the loan-to-deposit ratio stood at 143%, reflecting a customer funding gap of £61 billion, which necessitated substantial wholesale borrowing to support lending activities. By the end of 2007, this ratio had deteriorated to 170%, implying that wholesale funding constituted over 40% of total liabilities and exposing the bank to liquidity strains during periods of market stress when interbank lending rates spiked. This mismatch amplified risks, as short-term wholesale funds could evaporate abruptly, leaving HBOS unable to roll over debts without incurring higher costs or facing solvency pressures. Compounding these funding issues was aggressive asset expansion that outpaced , particularly in high-risk segments. The corporate division's loan book featured a high concentration in , with growth in such exposures contributing to vulnerabilities amid an impending housing market downturn. In 2007, corporate loans and advances expanded by 22%, driven by property-related lending, while the overall portfolio's sensitivity to cycles heightened impairment risks when asset values declined. These dynamics created a precarious where rapid credit growth relied on volatile funding sources, eroding resilience to economic shocks. These weaknesses crystallized in the March 2008 short selling episode, triggered by market rumors of funding difficulties at a major bank, widely interpreted as targeting HBOS. On March 19, 2008, hedge funds intensified short positions amid the speculation, causing HBOS shares to plummet by approximately 17-20% in a single day. The sell-off exacerbated liquidity concerns, prompting HBOS to seek and receive emergency liquidity assistance from the to stabilize operations and avert a broader run on markets. This intervention underscored the perils of HBOS's funding , where external market pressures could rapidly transmit underlying fragilities into acute crises.

Credit Crunch Impact and Government Intervention

The collapse of on September 15, 2008, intensified the global liquidity freeze, severely impacting HBOS by seizing short-term funding markets on which the bank heavily relied for over 40% of its funding. HBOS's wholesale funding maturity profile, with £119 billion maturing within one year by end-2008, exposed it to rollover risks amid evaporating interbank lending. This led to an acute funding gap of approximately £12.5 billion in the week following Lehman's failure, exacerbating deposit outflows and counterparty withdrawal. Consequently, HBOS shares plummeted approximately 90% from their 2007 peak of around 1,400 pence to lows near 100 pence by October 2008, reflecting market perceptions of its vulnerability. HBOS's earlier £4 billion , announced in April 2008 and closing in July, achieved only an 8.29% subscription rate, leaving underwriters with nearly £3.8 billion in unsold shares and signaling investor distrust amid rising concerns over its commercial exposures. By October 1, 2008, HBOS could no longer meet maturing liabilities without support, prompting it to draw on emergency liquidity assistance (ELA) facilities, which provided critical short-term funding against collateral to avert immediate . This reliance underscored HBOS's pre-crisis overdependence on volatile wholesale markets, contrasting with peers like that maintained stronger retail deposit bases. On October 13, , under the government's Banking Stability Plan, HBOS received £11.5 billion in recapitalization from , comprising preference shares and warrants that effectively granted the state a significant stake managed through UK Financial Investments (UKFI), aimed at restoring capital buffers and confidence. This injection formed part of a broader £37 billion allocation across major banks to address systemic solvency risks. Analyses, including the 2015 and FCA/PRA joint report, attribute HBOS's distress primarily to idiosyncratic factors such as flawed , aggressive lending practices in concentrated sectors like (where exposures reached £35 billion by mid-2008), and over-reliance on short-term funding, rather than purely exogenous systemic shocks. These internal weaknesses amplified the credit crunch's effects, distinguishing HBOS from institutions with more diversified, conservative models that weathered the seizure with less intervention.

Acquisition by Lloyds TSB and Bailout Mechanics

On 17 September 2008, Lloyds TSB announced an agreement to acquire HBOS in an all-stock transaction valued at £12.2 billion, based on Lloyds TSB's closing share price of 279.75 pence that day, with HBOS shareholders receiving 0.605 Lloyds TSB shares per HBOS share. The deal aimed to create a combined entity with approximately 30% of the mortgage market and significant retail presence, but raised immediate antitrust concerns under competition law, as the merger would reduce the number of major high-street banks from five to three. Despite these competition issues, the government intervened to facilitate the acquisition, citing from HBOS's deteriorating position amid the ; on 18 September , authorities indicated willingness to override merger review processes if necessary to prevent HBOS's collapse. The approved the transaction under state aid rules on 13 October , conditional on the UK's broader bank recapitalization scheme, which framed the merger as essential to rather than a standard commercial combination. Prior to formal completion, Lloyds TSB extended an undisclosed £10 billion standby loan facility to HBOS in October to bolster its liquidity, a support mechanism not publicly detailed at the time of the initial announcement. Shareholder approvals followed, with Lloyds TSB investors endorsing the deal on 19 November 2008 despite revised terms diluting their ownership to about 43% in the enlarged group, and HBOS shareholders approving on 12 December 2008; the acquisition completed on 16 January 2009, renaming the parent plc, with HBOS operating as a . As part of the UK's 13 October 2008 recapitalization plan, the government subscribed to £17 billion in non-voting preference shares across Lloyds TSB and HBOS—£8.5 billion each—yielding a 12% and granting rights over executive pay and dividends on ordinary shares until repaid, effectively injecting capital to meet regulatory requirements and avert . The bailout mechanics included immediate suspension of ordinary dividends and enhanced capital buffers, with initial taxpayer exposure estimated at over £20 billion for the Lloyds-HBOS entity, later supplemented by the 2009 Asset Protection Scheme (APS) where Lloyds insured £260 billion in assets against losses exceeding a first-loss buffer, though HBOS's riskier loan book bore much of the subsequent impairment costs. This intervention preserved over 70,000 jobs across the combined operations and prevented a potential disorderly that could have amplified the banking crisis, but critics argued it introduced by shielding poorly managed institutions from market discipline, as state guarantees reduced incentives for prudent risk-taking in future lending. Immediate shareholder impacts were severe, with HBOS equity value eroding sharply pre-merger and Lloyds TSB shares falling over 80% from pre-crisis peaks by early 2009, reflecting dilution from the all-stock terms and dilution.

Integration and Post-Crisis Evolution

Reorganization and Brand Integration

Following the acquisition of HBOS by Lloyds TSB on 19 January 2009, the resulting pursued structural reorganization through the migration of HBOS customer accounts and operational data to Lloyds' established platforms. This integration effort included transferring HBOS servicing from the legacy Borrowers platform to Lloyds' Unified Financial Servicing System (UFSS) in March 2013, marking one of Europe's largest migrations. system migrations progressed steadily, enabling the consolidation of disparate IT infrastructures inherited from HBOS. Lloyds opted to retain the Halifax and Bank of Scotland brands to preserve customer familiarity and loyalty, rather than imposing a uniform rebranding. This approach facilitated phased branch rationalization, targeting overlapping locations to eliminate redundancies while sustaining distinct market presences for each brand. Bank of Scotland maintained its headquarters in Edinburgh, supporting its Scottish incorporation and enabling seamless cross-border activities within the United Kingdom under regulatory frameworks. The reorganization entailed significant workforce reductions, with 27,500 jobs cut by mid-2011 to streamline operations across the enlarged group. IT harmonization played a central role in cost efficiencies, yielding £1.3 billion in savings during 2010 through system migrations and the elimination of duplicate technologies. These measures aligned with broader targets of over £1 billion in annual cost reductions from integrating HBOS assets.

Ongoing Legacy Operations under Lloyds Banking Group

plc functions as a ring-fenced within , specializing in personal and business banking services predominantly in . As of 2025, it maintains approximately 90 branches following planned closures aimed at cost efficiency and digital shift. The Halifax brand persists in as a prominent player in the UK market, integrated into Lloyds' retail operations while retaining separate branding. This supports Lloyds' status as the nation's leading lender, with group-wide lending reaching £471 billion by mid-2025, a significant portion attributable to mortgages. Legacy HBOS-originated loans have been managed through Lloyds' impairment frameworks, with charges notably low in recent years—such as £442 million in the first half of 2025—indicating resolution of post-crisis bad debts. HBOS plc, encompassing these assets, reported total assets of £330 billion in 2024. These elements contribute to Lloyds' profitability, including statutory profit after tax of £4.5 billion for 2024, without major divestitures of core HBOS operations since 2010.

Controversies and Criticisms

Fraud Allegations and Internal Misconduct

In the early 2000s, particularly between 2003 and 2007, a major fraud scheme operated at HBOS's Reading branch, centered on its Impaired Assets Team (IAR), which handled distressed small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) loans. HBOS relationship managers, including Lynden Scourfield, referred struggling business customers to external consultants such as David Mills of Quayside Portfolio, approving inflated loans and fees in exchange for bribes including luxury holidays, cars, and home improvements valued at over £500,000 personally for Scourfield. This mechanism, involving the orchestration of asset-stripping practices through forced use of Mills' services, inflated fees, and fabricated reports, drove approximately 200 SMEs into insolvency, enabling consultants to acquire assets at undervalued prices while HBOS extended over £245 million in fraudulent loans, with broader estimates of losses exceeding £1 billion when including downstream effects. The scheme exploited HBOS's aggressive lending volume targets, where managers faced pressure to resolve non-performing loans quickly, often bypassing standard due diligence. The came to light through whistleblower complaints and led to Operation Hornet, a Serious Office investigation culminating in convictions on , 2017. Six individuals were found guilty of , , and , including two HBOS bankers (Scourfield, sentenced to 11 years and 3 months, and Mark Dobson, 4 years) and Mills (15 years), with total sentences amounting to 47 years. A seventh followed for related offenses, underscoring direct perpetrator rather than mere systemic excuses. Victims reported severe personal impacts, including bankruptcies, suicides, and family breakdowns, with owners losing homes and livelihoods amid arguments that the was not isolated rogue behavior but enabled by HBOS's tolerance of high-risk referrals under performance incentives. Separate internal surfaced in Halifax's (HBOS's retail arm) operations, involving deliberate income overstatement and unsuitable self-certification loans to borrowers, contributing to widespread defaults. These practices, driven by sales targets, led to regulatory redress exceeding £100 million for affected customers by the mid-2010s, though convictions were rarer than in commercial fraud cases. Post-2004 integration of Bank of into HBOS exposed SME loan manipulations, where acquired portfolios revealed inflated valuations and unauthorized restructurings to mask deteriorations, amplifying oversight gaps in merged operations. HBOS's systemic lapses were confirmed by a Financial Conduct Authority fine of £45.5 million against for failing to disclose fraud suspicions despite internal alerts as early as 2007, banning four individuals from roles. While defenders cited high loan volumes (tens of billions annually) as context for isolated incidents, empirical evidence from convictions and fines highlights inadequate monitoring, with no proactive whistleblower protections until post-crisis reforms. This contrasted perpetrator gains—personal enrichment via kickbacks—with victim losses, prompting limited compensation schemes that disbursed only to a fraction of claimants by 2017.

Risk Management and Lending Practices Failures

HBOS's corporate banking operations pursued aggressive expansion in the years leading to the crisis, characterized by a sales-oriented culture that prioritized deal volume and market share over comprehensive and . This approach resulted in a loan book heavily concentrated in commercial and leveraged acquisitions, with exposures reaching approximately 20% of total lending by , far exceeding diversified peers. Such practices fueled pre-crisis economic activity by providing substantial financing to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and property development, contributing to housing and commercial expansion. However, the strategy disregarded cyclical downturns in asset values, leading to inadequate and over-reliance on optimistic property market assumptions. Balance sheet vulnerabilities exacerbated these lending shortcomings, as HBOS funded long-term, illiquid loans with short-term borrowings, creating acute maturity mismatches. By mid-2008, this structure left the bank exposed to funding squeezes when markets froze, with comprising over 40% of liabilities compared to retail deposits. Provisions for potential losses were systematically understated, with management resisting upward adjustments despite early warning signs in commercial portfolios, as evidenced by internal models that downplayed default probabilities. Post-crisis revelations showed corporate impairments totaling around £25 billion in the division, dwarfing those at competitors like or due to higher sectoral concentrations. The fallout manifested in sharply rising non-performing loans, particularly in property-related exposures, where defaults surged amid the 2008-2009 recession, eroding capital buffers and necessitating emergency liquidity on October 1, 2008. While the lending model had driven HBOS's assets to exceed £1 trillion by 2008—supporting broader credit availability—it ultimately amplified systemic risks through unhedged concentrations, as causal analyses in official inquiries attributed failure primarily to these internal mismatches rather than exogenous shocks alone.

Ethical and Regulatory Scrutiny

In the pre-crisis period, HBOS and its components, such as , encountered modest regulatory penalties, totaling under £10 million across various compliance matters. A key example occurred in , when the (FSA) fined £1.25 million for systemic failures in customer identification and record-keeping required under money laundering regulations, stemming from inadequate anti- controls rather than deliberate evasion. This contrasted sharply with intensified post-crisis enforcement, underscoring limited proactive oversight prior to HBOS's vulnerabilities becoming apparent. Ethical concerns arose from allegations that Bank of Scotland's corporate accounts indirectly supported arms trade financing, prompting customer complaints and scrutiny from advocacy organizations like War on Want, which highlighted banks' loans to arms manufacturers and exporters without sufficient ethical vetting. No illegality was substantiated beyond identified KYC shortcomings, such as incomplete on high-risk clients, which regulators viewed as operational lapses rather than willful ; left-leaning critics framed these as emblematic of profit-driven moral hazards in banking, while right-leaning commentators contended that stringent KYC mandates risked regulatory overreach, constraining lawful commercial activities without clear evidence of harm. During the March 2008 share price plunge—where HBOS lost £3 billion in amid unsubstantiated rumors of issues—intense short selling exacerbated the drop, leading HBOS executives to urge FSA intervention against perceived market abuse by hedge funds. The FSA investigated and issued warnings on potential manipulation by short sellers, ultimately clearing HBOS while implementing temporary disclosure rules for short positions. HBOS's defensive for curbs on short selling drew criticism from market proponents as an effort to shield weak fundamentals from legitimate , though no formal charges of manipulation were leveled against the bank itself.

Investigations, Reforms, and Legacy

Key Inquiries and Reports

The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards' March 2013 report, "An accident waiting to happen: The failure of HBOS," identified profound executive and cultural failures at the bank, including unchecked aggressive lending in —reaching 41% of total lending by 2007—and a board that deferred excessively to without robust challenge, leading to "colossal" misjudgments in strategy and oversight. While attributing primary responsibility to HBOS's leadership for fostering a high-risk environment, the commission rooted these in broader systemic banking incentives that prioritized volume-driven growth and short-term profitability over sustainable controls, rather than personal malice or isolated errors. The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority's November 2015 joint review detailed HBOS's collapse as stemming from rapid asset quality deterioration—evidenced by non-performing loans surging from 0.6% in to over 5% by mid-2008—exacerbated by a funding model overly dependent on short-term wholesale markets (comprising 41% of liabilities) and voids, such as the board's to integrate risk functions effectively post-merger. It emphasized senior management's role in pursuing unsustainable expansion without adequate capital buffers or , but concluded these reflected structural and incentive-driven lapses rather than deliberate conspiracy, with supervisory shortcomings by the contributing to undetected vulnerabilities. Initiated in April 2017, the independent Dame Linda Dobbs Review examines Lloyds Banking Group's handling of the HBOS Reading branch —involving losses of around £245 million through abusive practices from 2003 to 2007—and what senior management knew, along with subsequent disclosures post-2009 acquisition. As of September 2025, evidence gathering has concluded, but the report remains unpublished with analysis ongoing. These reports collectively underscore causal mechanisms like mispriced risks and weak internal checks as pivotal to HBOS's implosion, informed by data on lending concentrations and market dependencies, while dismissing unsubstantiated claims in favor of evidence-based critiques of incentive structures and oversight failures. Lloyds Banking Group, following its 2009 acquisition of HBOS, implemented compensation schemes addressing (PPI) mis-selling and mistreatment of small customers through improper lending practices. For PPI, which affected numerous HBOS customers pre-acquisition, Lloyds provisioned billions as part of industry-wide redress, with the group setting aside £18 billion by 2017 to cover claims, contributing to total UK bank payouts exceeding £50 billion. Specific to HBOS-related loan mistreatment, particularly the Reading branch involving £245 million in fraudulent loans, Lloyds allocated £100 million in 2017 for victim compensation and later wrote off tens of millions in associated debts by 2020, with additional packages offered to select victims totaling £3 million in 2022. These schemes, including a dedicated HBOS review process—the Griggs Review (2017), criticized for shortcomings and found inadequate by the Cranston Review (2019), which identified serious shortcomings in compensation handling for mistreated small and medium-sized business customers—were subsequently reopened, with the Foskett Panel established in 2020 for reassessments of denied claims. The panel's progress has been slow, contributing to ongoing challenges for victims seeking redress. Overall, these efforts have resulted in over £1 billion disbursed across PPI and targeted redress. Shareholder litigation over the HBOS acquisition yielded no significant recoveries. In November 2019, the dismissed claims by approximately 5,000 Lloyds shareholders alleging that directors misled them on undisclosed risks in the 2008 takeover recommendation, ruling that disclosures were adequate and no breach of duty occurred. Permission to appeal was refused in 2020, marking the first such shareholder in as unsuccessful. Criminal proceedings related to HBOS misconduct produced mixed outcomes, underscoring prosecutorial challenges. The 2017 trials for the Reading fraud convicted six individuals, including two former HBOS relationship managers, on charges of and tied to steering vulnerable small businesses into destructive loans via corrupt intermediaries; sentences ranged up to nine years. However, evidentiary burdens led to some acquittals or dropped charges in ancillary probes, while the fined £45.5 million in 2019 for failing to report fraud suspicions and banned four involved staff. On taxpayer recovery, the £20.3 billion government extended to Lloyds (encompassing HBOS) in 2008-2009 was fully recouped by April 2017 through phased equity sales and receipts, yielding a net profit of nearly £900 million; Lloyds resumed ordinary dividends in 2014 after a post-crisis suspension.

Broader Economic and Systemic Lessons

The failure of HBOS highlighted the systemic dangers of aggressive, asset-led growth strategies decoupled from robust , where rapid expansion—averaging 13% annual asset growth from 2001 to 2007—prioritized volume over credit quality, particularly in concentrated commercial real estate lending that reached £76 billion by 2008. This approach, combined with inadequate and delayed provisioning, amplified vulnerabilities during economic downturns, contributing to £12 billion in impairments in 2008 alone. Such practices underscore the causal risks of pursuing at the expense of resilience, as HBOS's corporate division's focus on over risk-adjusted returns led to sub-investment grade exposures and large concentrations that eroded capital buffers. A core lesson from HBOS's —triggered by heavy reliance on short-term wholesale funding, with maturities shortening to 20% under one month by September 2007 and a climbing to 178%—was the peril of maturity mismatches in funding models, necessitating post-crisis reforms like Basel III's Liquidity Coverage Ratio (requiring banks to hold unencumbered high-quality liquid assets for 30-day stress scenarios) and (mandating stable funding for longer-term assets). These standards addressed the empirical fragility exposed by HBOS, where deposit outflows of £12.5 billion post-Lehman Brothers' collapse in September 2008 demanded £50 billion in emergency assistance, illustrating how volatile funding can propagate shocks across the . While HBOS's 2001 merger of Halifax and initially aimed at operational efficiencies through scale, its execution revealed limits to such models without integrated oversight, yet post-acquisition integration under Lloyds demonstrated potential for cost synergies in stable environments. Government-facilitated bailouts, including the October 2008 Lloyds acquisition of HBOS backed by £17 billion in taxpayer equity and guarantees, averted immediate systemic contagion, as HBOS's scale—second-largest lender—posed risks of broader credit contraction and confidence erosion, with assessments indicating severe macroeconomic repercussions akin to amplified GDP declines observed in the crisis (estimated 3.8-7.5% hit to potential output). However, these interventions fostered by signaling implicit guarantees for large institutions, reducing incentives for prudent behavior and potentially elevating ex-ante crisis probabilities, as theoretical models show bailouts distort market discipline despite short-term stabilization. In the context, HBOS's arc informed the Vickers Commission's 2011 recommendations for ring-fencing from , implemented via the 2013 (Banking Reform) Act to insulate depositors from risks, with 2024-2025 refinements raising the applicability threshold to £35 billion in deposits while preserving structural separation to mitigate intervention costs evidenced by HBOS's £37 billion in ultimate public support. These measures prioritize causal containment of contagion over full , reflecting ongoing scrutiny of state backstops' long-term fiscal burdens.

References

  1. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/publication/hbos-summary-and-recommendations.pdf
  2. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/who-we-are/our-heritage/timeline.html
  3. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14409.htm
  4. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-bank-scotland-failing-report-suspicions-fraud
  5. https://unclaimedassets.co.uk/halifax-unclaimed-shares/
  6. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/who-we-are/our-heritage/halifax-bank.html
  7. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34859067
  8. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2001/may/04/personalfinancenews
  9. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/04/business/halifax-and-bank-of-scotland-said-to-have-26-billion-deal.html
  10. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2001/may/04/7
  11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1312047.stm
  12. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/banks/halifax-bank-of-scotland-to-merge-ratings-affirmed-04-05-2001
  13. https://www.ianfraser.org/dealing-in-futures-and-the-past/
  14. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000155652753970988
  15. https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/combination-of-ambition-and-incompetence-led-to-collapse-1868215
  16. https://www.forbes.com/2006/01/05/crosby-hbos-hornby-cx_cn_0105autofacescan01.html
  17. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/17/hbosbusiness
  18. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/144.pdf
  19. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/publication/hbos-complete-report.pdf
  20. https://www.ft.com/content/899b6eb6-3098-11dc-9a81-0000779fd2ac
  21. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14413.htm
  22. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2006/1/enacted
  23. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14416.htm
  24. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14405.htm
  25. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2595&context=ypfs-documents
  26. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14415.htm
  27. https://www.globenewswire.com/Attachment/DownloadAttachment?articleid=33946&fileId=143629&filename=hbos%2520annt%2520re%2520australia%2520-%25207%2520oct%252008.pdf&filetype=3&islogo=0
  28. https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/lloyds-may-keep-hbos-assets-20081104-j8eop
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/aug/05/hbos-leveraged-loans
  30. http://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/bankofscotlandplc.pdf
  31. https://www.bankofscotland.co.uk/insurance/home-insurance.html
  32. http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4044U_1-2008-5-14.pdf
  33. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5129&context=ypfs-documents2
  34. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/hbos-plc/archive/2009/2009-hbos-ra.pdf
  35. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14412.htm
  36. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/mar/20/hbosbusiness.businessqandas
  37. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1629&context=journal-of-financial-crises
  38. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/sharp-v-blank-HBOS-judgment.pdf
  39. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2008/october/recapitalisation-of-the-uk-banking-system
  40. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/oct/13/marketturmoil-creditcrunch
  41. https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/rns/lloyds-banking-group--lloy/acquisition/1394679
  42. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04907/SN04907.pdf
  43. http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2008-2685/DEP2008-2685.pdf
  44. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/232373/232373_1069315_136_2.pdf
  45. https://www.cnbc.com/2008/11/10/lloyds-backs-hbos-with-16-billion-loan-report.html
  46. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1160106/000093041309002523/c57184_20f.htm
  47. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05748/SN05748.pdf
  48. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-39671843
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/sep/17/lloyds-banking-group-from-bailout-to-selloff
  50. https://www.mortgagefinancegazette.com/features/lloyds-banking-group-undertakes-one-of-europes-largest-ever-mortgage-migrations-08-07-2014/
  51. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240118409/Lloyds-bank-saves-2bn-after-HBOS-IT-integration
  52. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7766612.stm
  53. https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/lloyds-tsb-retain-halifax-bank-scotland-brands/867859
  54. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/investors/investor-news/regulatory-news.html
  55. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-13971159
  56. https://www.computerworld.com/article/1674874/lloyds-migration-of-hbos-core-systems-helping-deliver-1-3bn-savings-this-year.html
  57. https://www.computing.co.uk/news/1828876/lloyds-tsb-hbos-integration-generate-gbp1bn-savings
  58. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/who-we-are/group-overview/ring-fencing.html
  59. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6275z006rjo
  60. https://essential-mortgages.co.uk/mortgages/mortgage-lenders/halifax-mortgage/
  61. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/lloyds-banking-group-plc/2025/q2/2025-lbg-hy-presentation.pdf
  62. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/lloyds-bank-plc/2025/q2/2025-lb-hy-results.pdf
  63. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/hbos-plc/2024/q4/2024-hbos-annual-report.pdf
  64. https://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/assets/pdfs/investors/financial-performance/lloyds-banking-group-plc/2024/q4/2024-lbg-fy-presentation.pdf
  65. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/07/lloyds-hbos-loan-scam-lynden-scourfield-compensation
  66. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38796087
  67. https://www.ianfraser.org/re-examining-hbos/
  68. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-12-18/debates/51504BA8-AAA2-4085-8A3B-E20BC57A748A/HBOSReadingIndependentReview
  69. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38772660
  70. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/02/hbos-manager-and-other-city-financiers-jailed-over-245m-loans-scam
  71. https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-9395273/Outrage-National-Crime-Agency-ditches-probe-fraud-HBOS-Reading.html
  72. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jul/21/lloyds-compensates-only-five-victims-of-hbos-scandal
  73. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-lloyds-banking-group-firms-total-%25C2%25A328038800-serious-sales-incentive
  74. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40738373
  75. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/two-ex-hbos-bank-managers-charged-in-35-million-pound-loan-fraud-idUSLNE908007/
  76. https://lexlaw.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sir-Ross-Cranstons-report-HBOS.pdf
  77. https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/victims-hbos-reading-fraud-offered-3-million-pounds-compensation-2022-06-13/
  78. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201213/jtselect/jtpcbs/144/14411.htm
  79. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/893901468166157283/pdf/488950PUB0mone101Official0Use0Only1.pdf
  80. https://www.waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Banking%2520on%2520Bloodshed.pdf
  81. https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/banks-weapons
  82. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/17/lloydstsbgroup.hbosbusiness1
  83. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2008/03/20/manipulation-suspected-hbos-rumors
  84. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-shortselling/short-sellers-of-rights-must-disclose-positions-idUKL1323166120080613/
  85. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2015/pra-fca-review-into-the-failure-of-hbos
  86. https://www.dobbsreview.com/
  87. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmtreasy/582/582.pdf
  88. https://www.ftadviser.com/your-industry/2019/08/22/ppi-scandal-costs-industry-50bn/
  89. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/27/lloyds-profits-ppi-hbos
  90. https://news.sky.com/story/lloyds-to-write-off-hbos-reading-fraud-debts-11915722
  91. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-berkshire-50733540
  92. https://www.foskettpanel.com/
  93. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/15/lloyds-shareholders-lose-legal-fight-over-hbos-takeover
  94. https://www.brickcourt.co.uk/news/detail/high-court-refuses-permission-to-appeal-in-lloyds-hbos-group-litigation
  95. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/dec/10/lloyds-compensation-claims-hbos-reading-fraud
  96. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/taxpayers-get-all-their-money-back-from-lloyds
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/may/17/lloyds-taxpayer-bailout-banking-group-government-shares
  98. https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/index.htm
  99. https://www.economicsobservatory.com/why-did-the-global-financial-crisis-of-2007-09-happen
  100. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28412/w28412.pdf
  101. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6731f6cb2cccb48648badb02/Consultation_Response_-_Smarter_Ring-Fencing_Reforms.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.