Hubbry Logo
Fred GoodwinFred GoodwinMain
Open search
Fred Goodwin
Community hub
Fred Goodwin
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fred Goodwin
Fred Goodwin
from Wikipedia

Frederick Anderson Goodwin FRSE FCIBS (born 17 August 1958)[2] is a Scottish chartered accountant[3] and former banker who was chief executive officer (CEO) of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS) between 2001 and 2009.

Key Information

From 2000 to 2008, he presided over RBS's rapid rise to global prominence as the world's largest company by assets (£1.9 trillion),[4] and fifth-largest bank by stock market value[5] and its even more rapid fall as RBS was forced into effective nationalisation in 2008. On 11 October 2008, Goodwin officially announced his resignation as chief executive and an early retirement, effective from 31 January 2009 – a month before RBS announced that its 2008 loss totalled £24.1 billion, the largest annual loss in UK corporate history.[6]

From January 2010, he was employed as a senior adviser to RMJM, an international architecture firm. He left the position after less than a year.[7][8]

Life and career

[edit]

Early career

[edit]

Born in Paisley, Renfrewshire, Goodwin is the son of a Scottish electrician[9] and was the first of his family to go to university,[10] attending Paisley Grammar School before studying law at Glasgow University. He joined accountants Touche Ross, and qualified as a chartered accountant in 1983. Between 1985 and 1987, he was part of a Touche Ross management consultant team at Rosyth Dockyard, and became a partner in Touche Ross in 1988. He was appointed a director of Short Brothers, and tasked with preparing the largest industrial employer in Northern Ireland for its 1989 privatisation.[11] For Touche Ross he headed the worldwide liquidation of Bank of Credit and Commerce International after its collapse in July 1991. At 32, Goodwin was in charge of 1,000 people with teams from London to Abu Dhabi and the Cayman Islands that eventually returned over half the money from one of the most complicated, high-profile financial frauds ever.[12] The extent of his role in the liquidation of Bank of Credit and Commerce International was questioned by finance journalist Ian Fraser.[13]

His move into banking came through his work at Touche Ross with the National Australia Bank, contributing due diligence to its 1987 takeover of Clydesdale Bank from the then Midland Bank and again with its 1995 takeover of Yorkshire Bank.[11] During work on the latter he caught the eye of National Australia Bank executive Don Argus, and was invited to become deputy chief executive of Clydesdale in 1995,[9] and as per his "five-second rule", accepted on the spot[9] rising to chief executive of National Australia's British banking operations in 1996.[14] Around this time he gained the moniker "Fred the Shred" from City financiers, reflecting a reputation for ruthlessly generating cost savings and efficiencies whilst at Clydesdale.[5]

He joined Royal Bank of Scotland in 1998 as deputy CEO to then-CEO Sir George Mathewson, who had ambitions to make RBS a major player rather than a national bank.[5] RBS made waves in 2000 with its £23.6 billion takeover of NatWest, a bank three times its size.[5] Although Goodwin's predecessor Mathewson led the deal, it was Goodwin's diligence and ability to impress investors which secured it against fierce competition from the Bank of Scotland. The Sunday Times wrote that "The NatWest deal was the making of Goodwin," with Goodwin promoted to CEO in January 2001,[15] soon after it was secured, dedicated to continuing Mathewson's vision.[16] Goodwin lived up to his reputation, cutting 18,000 jobs by merging parts of RBS and NatWest.[5]

CEO of RBS (2001–2008)

[edit]

Expansion

[edit]
The Royal Bank of Scotland's office at 1 Fleet Street, London – trading under the historic name Child & Co.

After the purchase of NatWest, RBS made a string of further acquisitions around the world, including the purchase of Irish mortgage provider First Active and UK insurers Churchill Insurance and Direct Line. During negotiations with Credit Suisse over the acquisition of Churchill, it is said that Goodwin maintained silence for an hour at lunch with Credit Suisse's CEO, supporting his demand for indemnity against any potential losses from the associated The Accident Group, which would collapse soon after. He got his way.[16] RBS also bulked up its US Citizens Financial Group, Inc. arm with a string of further deals. Then in May 2004, RBS said it would purchase Charter One Financial Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio for $10.5 billion. The deal, at a price "widely considered too high"[17] spread the RBS's banking web across the Midwest for the first time, and made its U.S. banking operations No. 7 in the United States.[18]

From the time that Goodwin took over as chief executive until 2007, RBS's assets quadrupled, its cost-to-income ratio improved markedly, and its profits soared. In 2006, pre-tax profits climbed 16% to £9.2 billion with significant growth coming from its investment banking business.[19][20] By 2008 RBS was the fifth-largest bank in the world by market capitalisation.[5] One of the factors in its rise was its enthusiasm for supporting leveraged buyouts. In 2008 it lent $9.3bn, more than double its nearest rival.[21]

However, following investor unrest in the build-up to RBS's acquisition of a $1.6bn minority stake in Bank of China in 2005, Goodwin was criticised by some RBS shareholders for putting global expansion ahead of short-term financial returns.[5] Between 2002 and 2005, the share price plateaued at around £17 per share, having nearly trebled between February 2000 and May 2002.[22] Goodwin was accused of megalomania by some shareholders, as reported by Dresdner Kleinwort analyst James Eden (who said he thought the label was 'unwarranted').[23] Following the Bank of China deal, he was forced to promise RBS shareholders he would not indulge in any further big acquisitions and focus instead on growing the group organically.[5]

However, in early 2007, Dutch bank ABN Amro was under pressure from hedge funds, including Chris Hohn of the hedge fund TCI, to break itself up in order to maximise shareholder value. ABN chief executive Rijkman Groenink suspected RBS of acting in concert with the hedge fund Tosca, which was chaired by former RBS Chairman Mathewson and recommended the takeover bid of an RBS consortium, against the proposed merger with Barclays Bank.[24] Goodwin arranged a consortium of RBS, Fortis and former RBS shareholders Grupo Santander, to purchase the assets of ABN Amro and break them up in a three-way split. According to the proposed deal, RBS would take over ABN's Chicago operations, LaSalle Bank, and ABN's wholesale operations; while Santander would take the Brazilian and Italian operations, leaving Fortis with the Dutch operations. In a manoeuvre "labelled in all quarters as a poison pill"[24] ABN Amro agreed to sell key RBS target LaSalle to Bank of America for $21bn, but in July 2007 the consortium offered the same $98bn for ABN's remaining assets, with a higher cash component (93%).[25] The deal was struck in October 2007, just before the 2008 financial crisis, with Barclays withdrawing its EUR61bn bid and ABN's shareholders endorsing the EUR71bn RBS takeover.[24] Coming after the nationalisation of Northern Rock due to the freezing of the wholesale money markets, the deal proved the final straw for RBS, as it severely weakened its balance sheet not only through the size of the acquisition but due to ABN Amro's substantial exposure to the US subprime mortgage crisis.[5]

Collapse

[edit]

Goodwin's strategy of aggressive expansion primarily through acquisition, including the takeover of ABN Amro, eventually proved disastrous and led to the near-collapse of RBS in the 2008 financial crisis. The €71 billion (£55 billion) ABN Amro deal (of which RBS's share was £10 billion[26]) in particular stretched the bank's capital position – £16.8 billion of RBS's record £24.1 billion loss is attributed to writedowns relating to the takeover of ABN Amro.[6]

It was not, however, the sole source of RBS's problems, as RBS was exposed to the liquidity crisis in a number of ways, particularly through US subsidiaries including RBS Greenwich Capital. Although the takeover of NatWest launched RBS's meteoric rise, it came with an investment bank subsidiary, Greenwich NatWest. RBS was unable to dispose of it as planned as a result of the involvement of the NatWest Three with the collapsed energy trader Enron. [clarification needed] However the business (now RBS Greenwich Capital) started making money, and under pressure of comparison with rapidly growing competitors such as Barclays Capital, saw major expansion in 2005–7, not least in private equity loans and in the sub-prime mortgage market.[16] It became one of the top three underwriters of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs).[27] This increased exposure to the eventual "credit crunch" contributed to RBS's financial problems.

The third contributor to RBS's problems was its liquidity position. From a position around 2002 where the bank was essentially 'fully funded' (i.e. was funding its lending positions fully from deposits gathered from customers), the rapid growth in lending within the GBM (Global Banking and Markets) division led to a reliance on external wholesale funding. The combination of this, along with the weak equity capital position, and the massive exposure to losses on CDOs via Greenwich, were the factors that destroyed RBS.[28] The bank experienced severe financial problems, and attempted to shore up its balance sheet with a £12 billion share issue in April 2008, one of the largest in UK corporate history.[5] The attempt to raise an additional £7 billion capital by selling off insurers Churchill and Direct Line failed due to lack of interest in the context of the global liquidity crisis.[citation needed] RBS was forced in October 2008 to rely on a UK Government bank rescue package to support a shareholder recapitalisation of the bank, which resulted in the government owning a majority of the shares. Following two rights issues in 2008, Goodwin resigned as Chief Executive.[5]

On 13 October 2008, as part of the arrangement for government support (of which Goodwin said "This isn't a negotiation, it's a drive-by shooting"[29]), it was announced that Goodwin was to stand down as CEO, to be replaced by Stephen Hester.[26][30] Goodwin formally left RBS on 1 January 2009.[31][32]

The share price, when Goodwin became CEO of RBS, in January 2001, was 442p. After reaching £18 a share (equivalent to £6 per share after each share was split into three in May 2007[33]), on the day of his departure it was announced that the share price was 65.70p[34] reflecting share buybacks, rights issues as well as market valuation. Despite these developments, the Daily Telegraph insisted that "his grasp of finance is in the Alpha class" and that he was "unlikely to be in the growing queue of jobless bankers" for long.[35] In 2008/9, the RBS group was effectively nationalised: the UK Government owns nearly 70% of the ordinary shares of the company owing to its enormous debts. By January 2009, the share price was more than 98% down from its February 2007 peak.[17]

Media commentary and criticism

[edit]

During Goodwin's tenure as CEO he attracted criticism for lavish spending, including expenditure on the construction of a £350 million headquarters at Gogarburn outside Edinburgh, opened by Queen Elizabeth II in 2005[36] (described by one commentator as "comically expensive"[37]), and a $500m headquarters in the US begun in 2006,[38] as well as the use of a Dassault Falcon 900 jet owned by RBS leasing subsidiary Lombard for occasional corporate travel.[39]

Under Goodwin, "access to the RBS Executive Wing used to be extremely difficult, even for those who had enjoyed long careers at the bank". His "penthouse-style office on the top level was a staggering 20 metres long", being "so large that it has since been split in two [after Goodwin's departure) and still comfortably accommodates the bank’s current chairman Sir Howard Davies, CEO Ross McEwan and their staff". Goodwin's "hatred of mess and any form of disorder" led to the bank implementing sloping-top filing cabinets to prevent employees from placing items at the top of the cabinets.[40]

In February 2009, RBS reported that while Goodwin was at the helm it had posted a loss of £24.1 billion, the biggest loss in UK corporate history.[6] His responsibility for the expansion of RBS, which led to the losses, has drawn widespread criticism. During questioning by the Treasury Select Committee of the House of Commons on 10 February 2009, it emerged that Goodwin had no technical bank training and no formal banking qualifications.[41]

In January 2009, The Guardian's City editor, Julia Finch, identified him as one of twenty-five people who were at the heart of the financial meltdown.[42] Nick Cohen described Goodwin in The Observer as "the characteristic villain of our day", who made £20m from RBS and left the taxpayer "with an unlimited liability for the cost of cleaning up the mess".[43] An online column by Daniel Gross labelled Goodwin "The World's Worst Banker",[38][44] a phrase repeated elsewhere in the media.[17][29] Gordon Prentice MP argued that his knighthood should be revoked as it is "wholly inappropriate and anomalous for someone to retain such a reward in these circumstances."[45] A Labour MP from Scotland, Jim Sheridan, repeated the suggestion, and added that the police should investigate the activities of senior bankers.[46]

In September 2011, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the time of the RBS collapse, noted in leaked excerpts from his upcoming book, Back From The Brink: 1,000 Days at No 11, that Goodwin behaved "as if he was off to play a game of golf" while officials struggled to prevent a meltdown. Darling describes the secret discussions which led to the Labour government effectively nationalising RBS and Goodwin being heavily criticised for his management style and conduct and wrote that Goodwin "deserved to be a pariah".

Size of pension

[edit]

Media and government criticism increased on disclosure in February 2009 of the size of Goodwin's pension. The treasury minister Lord Myners had indicated to RBS that there should be "no reward for failure",[47] but Goodwin's pension entitlement, represented by a notional fund of £8 million, was doubled, to a notional fund of £16 million or more, because under the terms of the scheme he was entitled to receive, at age 50, benefits which would otherwise have been available to him only if he had worked until age 60.[48]

Sir Philip Hampton, RBS's new chairman, stated that as a result Goodwin is drawing £693,000 a year (later revised to £703,000[49] due to Goodwin working an extra month in the new financial year[50]), and disclosed that under the RBS pension scheme Goodwin is entitled to draw the pension already, at age 50, because he had been asked to leave employment early, rather than having been dismissed. A pensions expert suggested that this meant Goodwin had received a substantial payoff from his early retirement, as it would cost around £25 million to buy such a pension and his pension 'pot' amounted to £16 million.[31] When the matter became public in late February 2009, Goodwin defended his decision to refuse to reduce his pension entitlement in a letter to Lord Myners on 26 February,[51] pointing out that on leaving in October 2008 he had given up a contractual 12-month notice period worth around £1.29 million and share options worth around £300,000.[52] In March 2009 Lord Myners revealed that part of the reason Goodwin's pension was so large was that RBS treated him as having joined the pension scheme from age 20 (instead of 40, when he actually joined) and ignored contributions to his pension from previous employment.[53]

Stephen Timms, a government finance minister, protested publicly about the matter. He said that it would be referred to the UK Financial Investments Limited.[54] The Chancellor, Alistair Darling, ordered lawyers to explore legal avenues to recover the money,[48] – though the legal options appear to be limited[55] – and Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared that "a very substantial part of it [Goodwin's pension] should be returned."[56] Former deputy PM John Prescott called on the government to withdraw Goodwin's pension and tell Goodwin to "sue if you dare."[56] Liberal Democrats Treasury spokesman Vince Cable said that "What the government could do is say that if the company had gone bust, which it would have had it not been a bank, he would have been entitled to a compassionate payout of £27,000 a year, and if he does not like that he could sue."[56] Cable added that Goodwin "obviously has got no sense of shame."[57]

In evidence to the Treasury Select Committee on 3 March 2009, John Kingman, CEO of UK Financial Investments Ltd, the company set up to manage the government's holdings in banks, directly blamed the Royal Bank of Scotland board for awarding its former CEO a discretionary pension. Kingman said that the government was aware of the size of the pension pot in October 2008 (before UKFI was established), but that "what the government was not told was that this payment was in any way discretionary". He accused the RBS board of not sharing material facts with Financial Services Secretary Lord Myners. RBS could have terminated Mr Goodwin's contract as CEO with 12 months' notice, so avoiding the more expensive pension award. Kingman told the committee that UKFI was investigating whether RBS had "full knowledge of the alternatives" when it granted Mr Goodwin his pension.[58][59] A letter from RBS setting out the background to the October 2008 decision on Goodwin's employment termination, the corporate approval process of the pension award and HM Treasury involvement was submitted to the Treasury Select Committee. Had he been dismissed instead of accepting early retirement, his annual pension would have been £416,000, payable from age 60.[60] If the government had not stopped RBS from going bankrupt, his pension would have been paid out of the pension-protection fund and been £28,000 a year, starting at age 65.[61]

His home in The Grange in Edinburgh was vandalised on 25 March 2009 by an anti-banking group apparently known as "Bank Bosses Are Criminals", according to a newspaper who were sent details of the attack by the group. In their message, they said

Fred Goodwin's house in Edinburgh was attacked this morning. We are angry that rich people, like him, are paying themselves a huge amount of money and living in luxury, while ordinary people are made unemployed, destitute and homeless. Bank bosses should be jailed. This is just the beginning.

Several windows in his house were smashed, and a car damaged in the drive below.[62]

On 18 June 2009, RBS stated that following negotiation an agreement was reached between RBS and Goodwin to reduce his pension to £342,500 a year from the £555,000 set in February after he took out an estimated £2.7 million tax-free lump sum. The agreement followed the completion of RBS's internal inquiry into Goodwin's conduct, which found no wrongdoing.[63] In May 2024, it was reported that RBS was spending about £598,000 a year, adjusting for inflation, on Goodwin’s pension.[64]

Superinjunction

[edit]

On 10 March 2011, John Hemming, a backbench Liberal Democrat MP, referred in Parliament (under parliamentary privilege) to the supposed existence of "a superinjunction preventing [Goodwin] from being identified as a banker".[65] As matters discussed in Parliament can be freely reported by the press, newspapers including The Guardian,[66] The Independent,[67] and The Daily Telegraph,[68] reported that Goodwin had obtained such an injunction, while still remaining unable to explain what information the injunction restricted the publication of.[68][32]

On 19 May 2011, Lord Stoneham, speaking in the House of Lords, asked the Government "how can it be right for a super-injunction to hide the alleged relationship between Sir Fred Goodwin and a senior colleague?"[69] Later that day, the High Court varied the order, allowing Goodwin's name to be published, but continued it in relation to the identity of the lady involved.[70] In his judgment, Mr Justice Tugendhat noted that the order had not been a superinjunction as it had been published in anonymised form on the British and Irish Legal Information Institute website. He also stated that the injunction had not prevented Goodwin being identified as a banker, but instead prevented the person applying for the injunction from being identified as a banker, and that this was done because "if the applicant were identified as a banker that would be likely to lead to his being named, which would defeat the purpose of granting him anonymity". The judge criticised press reporting of the case as including "misleading and inaccurate statements".[71]

Other activities

[edit]

Goodwin has chaired various government task forces including one examining the work of credit unions[72] and the New Deal programme. He is a former president of the Chartered Institute of Bankers in Scotland. Goodwin became chairman of The Prince's Trust in 2003. It was announced in January 2009 that his tenure would not be renewed for another three-year term, which he left in June 2009.[73]

In January 2009, it was rumoured that Goodwin was being considered as a replacement for Max Mosley as President of the FIA (Formula One's governing body) as Mosley was due to step down in 2009. Goodwin, a motoring enthusiast, had been "instrumental" in RBS's sponsorship deal with the Williams Formula One team.[74] In February 2009, RBS announced that the £10 million-a-year deal, struck in 2005, would end in 2010, as part of a strategic review of all sponsorship activity.[75]

Personal life

[edit]

One of Goodwin's hobbies is restoring classic cars – the first, a Standard 8, bought from the proceeds of a summer job.[74] He is also a keen golfer and Formula One racing fan.[76] Other pastimes have included annual shooting trips to Spain with Santander chairman Emilio Botín.[16]

In August 2011, Goodwin moved out of the family home in Colinton after being asked to leave by his wife and returned to their house in The Grange. The move followed media reports of Goodwin's extra-marital affair with a colleague at the Royal Bank of Scotland, after which Goodwin filed a super-injunction to protect the identity of his former mistress.[77][78]

Honours

[edit]

Goodwin was knighted in the 2004 Birthday Honours for his services to the banking industry.[79] However, on 1 February 2012, Goodwin's knighthood was "cancelled and annulled" by the Queen on the advice of Her Majesty's Government and the Honours Forfeiture Committee.[80][81] A Cabinet Office spokesman said:[82]

The scale and severity of the impact of his actions as CEO of RBS made this an exceptional case. Both the Financial Services Authority and the Treasury Select Committee have investigated the reasons for this failure and its consequences. They are clear that the failure of RBS played an important role in the 2008 financial crisis, which, together with other macroeconomic factors, triggered the worst recession in the UK since the Second World War and imposed significant direct costs on British taxpayers and businesses. Fred Goodwin was the dominant decision-maker at RBS at the time. In reaching this decision, it was recognised that widespread concern about Fred Goodwin's decisions meant that the retention of a knighthood for 'services to banking' could not be sustained.

The annulment proved controversial amongst political and business figures, who pointed out the three-and-a-half-year gap since the near-collapse of RBS, and the coincidence of the referral taking place during a political argument over bonus payments to the current head of the bank. Alistair Darling described the annulment as having appeared to have been taken "on a whim", whilst the Institute of Directors warned against creating "anti-business hysteria".[83] Darling declared "There is something tawdry about the government directing its fire at Fred Goodwin alone; if it’s right to annul his knighthood, what about the honours of others who were involved in RBS and HBOS?” In addition, the Queen and Prince Charles were sympathetic to Goodwin and concerned about the implications of the annulment, as Goodwin had been a good custodian of their charities and served quietly after his departure from RBS.[32]

Other awards received by Goodwin include:

  • December 2002 – Forbes (global edition) "Businessman of the Year", which described him as an original thinker with a fast-forward frame of mind who had transformed RBS from a nonentity into a global name
  • 2003 – 2006 – No.1 in Scotland on Sunday's Power 100[29][84][85]
  • December 2003 – "European Banker of the Year" in 2003
  • June 2004 – awarded an honorary doctor of Laws by the University of St Andrews[86]
  • July 2008 – awarded an honorary fellowship by the London Business School[87]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Frederick Anderson Goodwin (born 1958) is a Scottish banker best known for his role as chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) from 2000 to 2007. Under his leadership, RBS pursued an aggressive expansion strategy, acquiring rivals such as in 2000 and completing over two dozen deals that elevated the bank to the world's largest by assets, with £1.9 trillion on its balance sheet by 2007. However, the €71 billion acquisition of Dutch bank in 2007—RBS's share amounting to around £10 billion—severely strained its capital amid the emerging global , leading to the institution's near-collapse and a £45 billion emergency from the government in late 2008. Goodwin, nicknamed "Fred the Shred" for his focus on cost-cutting and efficiency, received a knighthood in 2004 for services to the banking industry but had it annulled in 2012 due to his perceived responsibility for RBS's catastrophic losses and the resulting taxpayer burden.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

Frederick Anderson Goodwin was born on 17 August 1958 in , , into a working-class family. His father worked as an , while his mother was a homemaker, reflecting the modest socioeconomic circumstances typical of post-war Scottish industrial communities. Goodwin grew up in the Ferguslie Park housing estate in Paisley, an area characterized by high levels of and economic hardship during the mid-20th century. He attended , a local institution that provided to academically inclined students from varied backgrounds, underscoring his early engagement with formal schooling amid these challenging surroundings. This environment, marked by limited resources and reliance on family trade skills, likely fostered foundational traits of diligence and self-reliance in a context of industrial decline in .

Academic and Initial Professional Training

Goodwin attended before enrolling at the to study , from which he graduated with a degree in the subject. Following university, he joined the accounting firm Touche Ross (now ) as a trainee, where he pursued professional qualifications in accountancy. He qualified as a through the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland in 1983. This dual foundation in and rigorous training equipped him with analytical and financial expertise that informed his subsequent in and banking.

Pre-RBS Career

Early Roles in and Banking

Goodwin qualified as a in 1983 and joined the firm Touche Ross, where he gained experience in and advisory work. By 1988, at the age of 30, he had risen to partner, demonstrating early proficiency in managing complex financial distress cases. A notable early assignment involved leading the Touche Ross team in the of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) in the early , a multinational involving and regulatory failures across multiple jurisdictions, which honed his reputation for meticulous oversight in high-stakes . This role underscored his detail-oriented approach, as the BCCI unwind required dissecting intricate cross-border assets and liabilities, contributing to his progression through operational efficiency. In the mid-1990s, Goodwin transitioned to banking by joining , the UK subsidiary of , initially focusing on and functions. He drove cost-reduction initiatives and efficiency reforms, including staff reductions and process optimizations, which earned him the moniker "Fred the Shred" for aggressive operational streamlining. These efforts supported 's acquisition of in 1995, where Goodwin played a key advisory role in integration and merger execution. His performance at Clydesdale led to promotion as chief executive in 1995, reflecting recognition of his competence in delivering measurable improvements in profitability through disciplined cost management and risk-focused banking operations. This period solidified his track record in transforming underperforming units via rigorous financial controls, prior to his recruitment by larger institutions.

Entry into Senior Management

In 1995, Fred Goodwin transitioned from accountancy to banking executive roles, joining as deputy chief executive before his rapid promotion to chief executive in of that year, making him the youngest head of a clearing bank at age 37. His prior work leading the liquidation of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) in the early had impressed executives at Clydesdale's parent company, (NAB), highlighting his expertise in managing distressed assets and complex financial restructurings. As chief executive of from 1996 to 1997, Goodwin spearheaded turnaround initiatives focused on , including significant cost reductions through staff reductions and process streamlining, which earned him the nickname "Fred the Shred" within financial circles for his rigorous approach to eliminating inefficiencies. These efforts positioned Clydesdale for improved profitability under NAB's ownership and demonstrated Goodwin's proficiency in mergers and asset integration, as he contributed to aligning operations with , another NAB subsidiary, amid ongoing post-acquisition adjustments. Goodwin's performance at Clydesdale garnered recognition in the UK banking sector, where his reputation for decisive financial management and turnaround capabilities facilitated networking with Scottish financial leaders. This culminated in his headhunting by the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), leading to his appointment as deputy group chief executive and board member on 1 August 1998.

Leadership at Royal Bank of Scotland

Ascension to CEO in 2001

Fred Goodwin succeeded Sir George Mathewson as group chief executive of the (RBS) in 2001, with Mathewson transitioning to the position of chairman. This leadership change occurred in the wake of RBS's successful acquisition and integration of , completed on March 6, 2000, in a £21 billion deal that had tripled RBS's size and positioned it as a major banking player. The RBS board endorsed Goodwin's elevation, viewing him as the natural successor to sustain the aggressive growth trajectory established under Mathewson, including a focus on mergers and international expansion. Market reception to the appointment reflected initial optimism, with RBS shares trading at approximately 270 pence amid expectations of continued post-merger momentum. Goodwin's immediate mandate emphasized stabilizing operations following the NatWest merger, which involved integrating customer bases, IT systems, and staff to realize synergies such as cost savings and revenue enhancements from the enlarged entity. Parallel efforts targeted scouting viable avenues for further development in competitive global banking sectors, aligning with RBS's established of opportunistic scaling without immediate execution of major new initiatives.

Aggressive Expansion and Pre-Crisis Successes (2001-2007)

Under Fred Goodwin's leadership from 2001, the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) executed an aggressive expansion strategy centered on bolstering its retail and corporate banking franchises, particularly through its U.S. subsidiary . A pivotal move was the acquisition of Charter One Financial in August 2004 for $10.5 billion (£5.8 billion), which added over 1,000 branches across six Midwestern and Northeastern states, nearly doubling Citizens' deposit base to approximately $50 billion and enhancing RBS's transatlantic retail presence. This deal, financed partly through a £2.5 billion , exemplified RBS's focus on scalable, deposit-rich retail operations to drive long-term revenue stability. The strategy yielded robust financial metrics, with total assets expanding from around £500 billion in to £870 billion by the end of , reflecting organic lending growth and integration of prior acquisitions like the Mellon Financial asset management unit. Profitability surged, as evidenced by net profit rising to £6.2 billion in from £5.39 billion in 2005, accompanied by a increase that rewarded shareholders amid favorable environments. By 2007, group operating profit reached £10.3 billion, up 9% year-over-year, underscoring operational efficiencies with a cost-to-income ratio maintained below 45%. These gains positioned RBS as a top-tier global player, with total assets exceeding £2 trillion by year-end 2007, briefly making it the world's largest bank by that measure. RBS's market capitalization grew markedly, from approximately £25 billion in 2001 to over £70 billion by mid-2007, placing it among the top five banks globally by prior to broader market disruptions. Shareholder returns benefited from escalating dividends and share price appreciation, peaking as total shareholder return outpaced many peers through compounded earnings growth. Diversification across retail ( and U.S.), corporate, and institutional segments helped mitigate sector-specific risks, with international exposure via Citizens and emerging markets providing revenue buffers against domestic cycles. Pre-2007 analyst commentary, including from , highlighted these achievements as exemplars of disciplined expansion in a competitive .

ABN Amro Acquisition and the 2008 Crisis

In May 2007, under Fred Goodwin's leadership, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) formed a consortium with Fortis and Banco Santander to launch a hostile bid for ABN Amro, valuing the Dutch bank at approximately €71.1 billion (around £49 billion). This offer outbid a prior agreement between ABN Amro and Barclays, escalating into a bidding war amid ABN Amro's internal divisions and undervaluation concerns. The consortium's cash-heavy proposal—€38.40 per share, 13.7% above Barclays' terms—aimed to dismantle ABN Amro, with RBS targeting its U.S. operations (including LaSalle Bank) and Chicago investment banking unit for strategic expansion into global wholesale banking. RBS shareholders approved the deal on August 10, 2007, with 94.5% of votes in favor, exceeding the required threshold despite warnings of execution risks and the £20 billion-plus financing burden on RBS. shareholders followed suit, tendering 86% of shares by early October, enabling completion on October 10, 2007, in what became the largest banking ever at €70 billion. The tripartite structure complicated integration from the outset, as Fortis assumed Dutch and Belgian retail assets while Santander took Latin American operations, leaving RBS with fragmented, high-cost wholesale segments requiring rapid restructuring. The acquisition unfolded against the emerging , with liquidity strains evident from summer 2007—marked by events like the BNP Paribas fund freezes in August and Bear Stearns hedge fund collapses—exacerbating global credit tightening. RBS's had ballooned to over £1.2 trillion by mid-2007, with leverage ratios ( to total assets) around 4.3%, far below peers like (over 5%) and reflecting heavy reliance on short-term wholesale funding vulnerable to market freezes. Integration efforts faltered as credit markets seized: ABN Amro's assets yielded lower-than-expected returns, regulatory delays in approvals hampered capital relief, and RBS faced immediate write-downs on acquired exposures tied to U.S. subprime losses. By October 2008, amid ' collapse and acute liquidity evaporation, RBS's £12 billion —launched in June to bolster capital post-acquisition—proved insufficient, as share prices plummeted and investor confidence eroded under the weight of £24 billion in anticipated write-downs from ABN-related assets and broader trading losses. The bank's funding costs spiked, with over 50% of liabilities maturing within a year, amplifying vulnerabilities from pre-crisis overexpansion and the ABN deal's synergies failing to materialize amid frozen interbank lending. This triggered emergency funding strains, directly precipitating government intervention to avert collapse, as RBS's capital buffers—strained by the acquisition's leverage amplification—could not withstand systemic shocks.

Resignation and RBS Bailout

Goodwin announced his resignation as chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland on 11 2008, amid acute liquidity pressures and mounting losses triggered by the global financial crisis, with the departure effective from 31 January 2009. This followed the collapse of in September 2008, which intensified market turmoil and exposed vulnerabilities across interconnected banking systems reliant on short-term wholesale funding. RBS, having pursued aggressive expansion including the acquisition of , faced a funding crisis as interbank lending froze, reflecting broader systemic risks rather than isolated mismanagement. To avert collapse, the government announced a package on 13 October , injecting £37 billion initially into RBS and other major banks, with RBS receiving £20 billion in capital that December, part of a total £45.5 billion taxpayer-funded rescue over 2008-2009. This intervention secured an 84% stake in RBS, ensuring continuity of operations critical to the economy given the bank's extensive domestic lending and deposit base. The measures addressed immediate threats from asset writedowns and frozen markets, underscoring how global evaporation amplified institution-specific exposures like RBS's heavy dependence on volatile funding sources. Subsequent inquiries, including the Financial Services Authority's 2011 report, attributed RBS's near-failure to a combination of internal factors—such as inadequate capital buffers, over-reliance on short-term funding, and flawed integration of the acquisition—with external pressures from the systemic crisis. The report highlighted regulatory shortcomings, including insufficient challenge to RBS management's risk assessments and gaps in the pre-crisis global supervisory framework that permitted excessive leverage across the sector. While critiquing board and executive decisions, it emphasized that no single failing caused the outcome, but rather a of market-wide disruptions and institutional vulnerabilities that propagated through leveraged balance sheets.

Post-RBS Professional Activities

Advisory Roles and Business Ventures

Following his resignation from the Royal Bank of Scotland in October , Goodwin assumed a senior advisory role with RMJM, an international architecture and firm headquartered in , . Appointed in late 2009, he focused on advising on international business development, drawing on his prior expertise in managing large-scale operations and expansions. This position marked his initial post-RBS engagement outside the financial sector, emphasizing strategic growth in non-banking fields such as design and projects. Goodwin's involvement with RMJM remained limited in public disclosure, with no detailed announcements of specific projects or outcomes attributed to his advisory input. The role concluded prior to 2012, aligning with his broader shift toward lower-profile activities amid ongoing scrutiny of his RBS tenure. No further advisory positions or independent business ventures in private equity, consulting, or board directorships have been publicly documented, reflecting a deliberate maintenance of professional discretion.

Involvement in Philanthropy and Public Service

Goodwin chaired the Credit Unions Taskforce in 1999, appointed by the government to examine how banks and building societies could support credit unions' development and operations. The taskforce's report, published that year, recommended legislative reforms and policies to enhance credit unions' role in , emphasizing their potential as community-based alternatives to high-cost lending. He also led a government taskforce reviewing the employment programme, focusing on integrating with welfare-to-work initiatives to aid unemployed individuals' financial stability. From 2003 to 2009, Goodwin served as chairman of the , a charity founded by the then-Prince of to support disadvantaged youth through , , and programs. In this role, he oversaw fundraising and strategic direction, contributing to the organization's expansion of services such as skills training and business start-up grants for young people aged 16 to 30. His tenure aligned with the charity's efforts to deliver over 100,000 intervention programs annually by the mid-2000s, though specific personal donations or initiatives under his leadership remain undocumented in public records. Goodwin held trusteeships in royal-affiliated charities, including the Queen's Trust from around 2009 until his in February 2012, where he advised on financial matters for distributions to community projects. These positions reflected pre-crisis recognition of his banking expertise in contexts, predating the financial turmoil. Post- from RBS, his philanthropic activities shifted to lower-profile engagements, with no major verifiable commitments to or startup initiatives reported in subsequent years.

Controversies and Public Scrutiny

Pension Pot Dispute and Public Backlash

In February 2009, shortly after the government's injection of £45 billion in taxpayer funds to rescue amid its near-collapse, media reports disclosed that former CEO Fred Goodwin was entitled to an immediate annual of £703,000, commencing at age 50 despite his contractual being 60. This arrangement stemmed from a defined benefit scheme accrued over Goodwin's more than two decades of service at RBS, with provisions for early tied to his executive tenure and performance-linked enhancements approved by the board prior to the crisis. The revelation triggered intense public backlash, particularly in tabloid press coverage that framed the payout as an undeserved "reward for failure" in light of RBS's £24 billion pre-tax loss for —the largest in corporate history—and the subsequent stake exceeding 58%. Outlets such as the highlighted the disparity between Goodwin's benefits and the austerity facing ordinary pensioners, fueling calls from politicians and unions for forfeiture, though legal experts noted the pension's contractual enforceability absent proof of gross misconduct. On 18 June 2009, following negotiations prompted by threats of litigation from RBS and an internal review that cleared Goodwin of breaches, he voluntarily agreed to surrender approximately £360,000 annually from the , reducing it to £342,500 while preserving the £2.7 million tax-free lump sum already withdrawn. This adjustment, announced by RBS, was presented as a concession to public sentiment rather than a legal , with the retained portion reflecting core accrued rights under the scheme's terms.

Stripping of Knighthood in 2012

Frederick Goodwin received a knighthood in the Queen's on 12 June 2004, designated "for services to banking," at a time when his tenure as chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland was associated with substantial growth and international acclaim. On 31 January 2012, the Honours Forfeiture Committee, a panel of senior civil servants, recommended the cancellation and of Goodwin's knighthood, a decision approved by Queen Elizabeth II and announced via the . The committee cited Goodwin's "misconduct" in leading RBS to the verge of collapse during the , which necessitated a £45.5 billion taxpayer bailout, as bringing the honours system into disrepute. This marked the first revocation of a knighthood for non-criminal reasons since at least the early 20th century, diverging from precedents typically involving criminal convictions or wartime . The process unfolded amid intense public and political pressure, with the committee convening in late January 2012 following media campaigns and parliamentary calls for accountability in the wake of RBS's role in the crisis. Critics, including business figures and Conservative peer Lord Tugendhat, condemned the action as "hysteria" driven by populist sentiment rather than measured justice, arguing it exemplified of Goodwin for systemic regulatory and industry-wide failures. Figures such as Formula One executive Sir described Goodwin as a convenient target, emphasizing the absence of personal criminal liability or formal in the forfeiture, which bypassed . Debates surrounding the revocation highlighted concerns over retrospective punishment, as the honour predated the crisis by four years and Goodwin's decisions, while aggressive, aligned with prevailing banking norms under lax oversight from regulators like the . Proponents viewed it as a necessary signal of to restore in institutions, yet opponents contended it politicized honours, potentially deterring risk-taking in business without addressing collective culpability among shareholders, boards, and governments.

Superinjunction and Media Privacy Battles

In early 2011, Fred Goodwin obtained a superinjunction from the prohibiting the publication of details regarding an alleged extramarital affair with the wife of a senior colleague at the Royal Bank of Scotland. The order, granted by Justice Sharp on 9 March 2011, extended to anonymizing Goodwin entirely and barred even references to his professional background in connection with the matter. This legal measure aimed to shield private conduct unrelated to his prior role at RBS, amid ongoing public scrutiny of his banking legacy following the . The injunction's existence entered the public domain on 8 March 2011 when Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming invoked parliamentary privilege during a House of Commons debate to disclose that Goodwin had secured a superinjunction preventing media identification of him as a banker in relation to unspecified personal reporting. Hemming's intervention highlighted tensions between judicial privacy protections and legislative oversight, though it initially avoided specifics of the affair. By May 2011, further details emerged when Liberal Democrat peer Lord Stoneham raised the case in the House of Lords, explicitly linking the injunction to the alleged affair and prompting a High Court review. On 19 May 2011, Justice Tugendhat partially lifted the order, permitting reporting of the relationship's existence while upholding anonymization of the other party, citing evolving public awareness via parliamentary discussion. Concurrent with parliamentary revelations, platforms like played a pivotal role in circumventing the , as users anonymously identified Goodwin and disseminated details, fueling a broader controversy over superinjunctions' enforceability in the digital age. This circumvention underscored empirical limits to court orders against non-traditional media, with warning on 7 June that users risked contempt charges for breaches, though no prosecutions followed in Goodwin's case. The episode exemplified causal frictions in privacy law, where high-profile individuals leveraged —often costing tens of thousands in legal fees—to suppress non-criminal personal matters, yet faced erosion through protected speech in and unregulated online discourse. On 9 June 2011, Justice Sharp ruled that aspects of the affair entered the domain due to Goodwin's prominence and the potential relevance to his 2009 proceedings, though the core elements remained intact absent evidence of or professional misconduct. The case amplified debates on reforming superinjunctions, with critics arguing they disproportionately favored elites amid post-crisis vilification of bankers, while proponents emphasized over speculative public curiosity unmoored from accountability for economic failures. No criminal allegations arose, distinguishing the matter as a purely civil dispute rather than one implicating or impropriety tied to RBS's collapse.

Shareholder Litigation and Regulatory Inquiries

In 2017, a group of approximately 9,000 (RBS) shareholders initiated proceedings in the of against RBS and four former directors, including Fred Goodwin, alleging and misrepresentation in the June 2008 rights issue that raised £12 billion. The claimants contended that the prospectus failed to adequately disclose the risks associated with the acquisition, including integration challenges and overexposure to deteriorating credit markets, leading to losses when RBS required a government bailout later that year. Goodwin and the other directors defended the action by asserting that the transaction had received prior approval from the RBS board and a of shareholders at an , and that disclosures complied with regulatory requirements at the time. The case, which would have required Goodwin to testify, was adjourned multiple times amid settlement discussions; RBS offered up to £200 million to resolve claims, and the ultimately approved a settlement in June 2017, averting a full trial without admitting liability. Regulatory scrutiny of Goodwin's role centered on the Financial Services Authority's (FSA, predecessor to the ) December 2011 report, "The Failure of the Royal Bank of Scotland," which examined the bank's collapse without identifying fraud or deliberate misconduct. The report attributed RBS's downfall to a series of strategic and execution failures under Goodwin's , including overambitious expansion via the deal, inadequate , excessive reliance on short-term wholesale funding, and a centralized process that sidelined warnings from subordinates. It highlighted Goodwin's "flawed" management style and insufficient challenge to his decisions by the board, but concluded that these constituted errors of judgment rather than breaches warranting personal regulatory sanctions. The FSA's enforcement division investigated potential individual accountability but declined action against Goodwin in December 2010, citing evidentiary challenges in proving personal regulatory violations amid collective board responsibilities. Parliamentary inquiries, including the Treasury Select Committee's 2012 review of the FSA report, reinforced findings of governance deficiencies and aggressive at RBS but echoed the absence of illicit conduct, with no recommendations for further personal penalties beyond reputational consequences. Separate probes, such as the 2016 Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service decision not to pursue criminal charges over the , similarly found insufficient evidence of wrongdoing by Goodwin or other executives. These outcomes underscored that while Goodwin's strategies amplified RBS's vulnerabilities during the global , they fell short of legal thresholds for or in subsequent evidentiary assessments.

Personal Life

Family and Relationships

Fred Goodwin married Joyce McLean in 1990. The couple had two children together. Their marriage ended in separation in 2011, followed by divorce proceedings filed by Joyce Goodwin in 2015. Goodwin has consistently sought to shield his family from public scrutiny, maintaining a low profile for his children and avoiding disclosure of personal details beyond basic marital history. Post-separation, both he and his former wife have resided in separate properties in , with limited verifiable information emerging about ongoing family dynamics or relationships.

Privacy and Lifestyle Choices

Following the vandalism of his Edinburgh residence in March 2009, Goodwin temporarily relocated for approximately five months to escape heightened public scrutiny and security threats. He subsequently returned to Britain and purchased a new £3.5 million property in an exclusive suburb in 2010, after abandoning his previous home in Colinton due to ongoing risks. Goodwin has adopted a reclusive since the RBS , minimizing public appearances and media interactions to maintain personal autonomy amid persistent backlash. In 2014, his mansion was removed from following a successful invocation of the European "" ruling, further shielding his residence from online visibility. Among his documented personal interests, Goodwin pursues and the restoration of classic cars, the latter beginning with a Standard 8 acquired from early job earnings. These pursuits reflect low-profile hobbies consistent with his post-scandal preference for discretion over public-facing activities.

Legacy and Balanced Assessments

Economic Contributions and Achievements

Under Fred Goodwin's leadership as group deputy governor and later CEO of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) starting in 2000, the bank executed the £21 billion hostile takeover of the larger Bank, marking a pivotal expansion from a regional Scottish to a major player. The subsequent integration, completed ahead of schedule, generated over £2 billion in combined cost savings and revenue synergies by 2003, surpassing initial targets through streamlined operations and branch rationalization. By , these efforts had realized £1.4 billion in annual cost savings via 154 specific initiatives, enhancing RBS's market dominance in retail and commercial banking. This merger-fueled growth propelled RBS's profitability, with pre-tax profits rising 21% to £7.9 billion in 2005, driven by expanded investment banking and international operations. In 2006, profits increased another 16% to £9.2 billion, reflecting strong performance across core divisions. By 2007, RBS achieved record operating profits of £10.3 billion, positioning it as the fifth-largest bank globally by market capitalization and delivering substantial returns to shareholders through dividend hikes and share price appreciation to a peak of 7,166 pence. These metrics underscored RBS's transformation into a diversified global entity with assets exceeding £1 trillion by mid-decade, fostering economic activity via lending and job expansion in banking services. Goodwin's emphasized operational efficiency and scale, enabling RBS to outpace domestic peers in profitability per employee and prior to , while advocating for consolidation in a competitive sector. This approach not only boosted financial sector competitiveness but also supported broader economic contributions through increased capital availability for .

Criticisms of Management Style and Risk-Taking

Goodwin's management at RBS was characterized by centralized decision-making, with him as the dominant figure, limiting effective challenge from the board or executives. The FSA's report into RBS's failure highlighted longstanding concerns about his "assertive and robust" style dating to 2003–2004, which fostered an environment where dissent was discouraged and non-executive directors struggled to scrutinize or risks. Internal dynamics, including a negative atmosphere in executive committees, contributed to , as evidenced by unanimous board approval of high-risk moves like the acquisition despite inadequate due diligence. Critics, including former directors, attributed this to a culture of intimidation, where Goodwin reportedly used his to bully staff and inhibit contrary views during meetings. However, some ex-colleagues acknowledged his drive and ability to execute complex decisions as factors in RBS's pre-crisis growth, viewing his intensity as effective rather than solely detrimental. No substantiated evidence of illegal conduct emerged from investigations. On risk-taking, RBS pursued aggressive leverage under Goodwin, with ratios escalating from 25:1 in to 42:1 by , alongside an estimated Basel III-equivalent CET1 ratio of 1.97% at year-end —among Europe's lowest. This structure, while prevalent in the era's , magnified losses on exposures like structured (rising to £33.5 billion in ) and the €71.1 billion deal, financed partly with €22.6 billion in short-term debt. The FSA concluded such strategies reflected reasonable judgments at the time, absent dishonesty, precluding sanctions.

Broader Context of the Global Financial Crisis

The 2008 global financial crisis originated from a confluence of factors, including prolonged loose by central banks, which maintained low interest rates from 2001 to 2004 and fueled a through affordable adjustable-rate mortgages. This environment encouraged excessive in the United States, where high-risk borrowers received mortgages that were securitized into complex financial products and exported globally via investment banks, amplifying vulnerabilities across interconnected markets. Regulatory shortcomings, such as the framework's overreliance on internal bank models for without sufficient capital buffers for exposures, failed to curb leverage buildup in the banking sector, contributing to systemic fragility rather than isolated managerial errors. The Royal Bank of Scotland's (RBS) near-collapse mirrored failures at institutions like and , where acute liquidity strains emerged post-Lehman bankruptcy on September 15, 2008, amid frozen credit markets and widespread asset devaluations tied to subprime exposures. , a UK mortgage lender, experienced a in September 2007 due to its heavy reliance on short-term wholesale funding, necessitating ; similarly, RBS's global ambitions exposed it to the same contagion effects, with funding drying up as counterparties withdrew amid generalized panic, not unique overexpansion. These events underscored causal chains driven by market-wide and implicit state guarantees that had previously incentivized risk-taking, as banks operated under the expectation of bailouts in systemic distress. UK government interventions, including the October 2008 bailout injecting £45.5 billion in equity into RBS alongside guarantees on assets, exemplified arising from pre-crisis state-backed and lender-of-last-resort functions, which distorted incentives by signaling that large institutions were "." Shareholders bore partial responsibility through approving high-leverage strategies and rights issues, such as RBS's 2008 capital raise, yet post-crisis narratives often fixated on executive scapegoats amid media and political demands for , overlooking broader complicity in the prevailing risk culture. Under partial exceeding 80% initially, RBS stabilized and returned to profitability by 2017 after cumulative losses near £60 billion, resuming dividends in 2018 and enabling gradual government divestment, with shares fully privatized by May 2025 despite an overall taxpayer loss of £10.5 billion—evidence of institutional resilience amid systemic repair rather than irreparable individual mismanagement. This recovery trajectory highlights how government equity stakes facilitated and , mitigating deeper economic fallout from the crisis's structural origins.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.