Hubbry Logo
Hocus-pocusHocus-pocusMain
Open search
Hocus-pocus
Community hub
Hocus-pocus
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hocus-pocus
Hocus-pocus
Hocus-pocus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hocus-pocus is a reference to the actions of magicians, often as the stereotypical magic words spoken when bringing about some sort of change. It was once a common term for a magician, juggler, or other similar entertainers. In extended usage, the term is often used (pejoratively) to describe irrational human activities that appear to depend on magic. Examples are given below.

History

[edit]

The earliest known English-language work on magic, or what was then known as legerdemain (sleight of hand), was published anonymously in 1635 under the title Hocus Pocus Junior: The Anatomie of Legerdemain.[1] Further research suggests that "Hocus Pocus" was the stage name of a well known magician of the era. This may be William Vincent, who is recorded as having been granted a license to perform magic in England in 1619.[2] Whether he was the author of the book is unknown.

Conjectured origins

[edit]

The origins of the term remain obscure. The most popular conjecture is that it is a garbled Latin religious phrase or some form of 'dog' Latin. Some have associated it with similar-sounding fictional, mythical, or legendary names. Others suggest it is merely a combination of nonsense words.

Latin and pseudo-Latin origins

[edit]
Painting titled "Hoc est corpus", for a set of tapestries celebrating the Eucharist, by Peter Paul Rubens, circa 1625

One theory is that the term is a corruption of hax pax max Deus adimax, a pseudo-Latin phrase used in the early 17th century as a magical formula by conjurors.[3]

Another theory is that it is a corruption or parody of the Catholic liturgy of the Eucharist, which contains the phrase "Hoc est enim corpus meum", meaning This is my body.[4] This explanation goes at least as far back as a 1694 speculation by the Anglican prelate John Tillotson:

In all probability those common juggling words of hocus pocus are nothing else but a corruption of hoc est corpus, by way of ridiculous imitation of the priests of the Church of Rome in their trick of Transubstantiation.[5][6]

This theory is supported by the fact that in the Netherlands, the words Hocus pocus are usually accompanied by the additional words pilatus pas, and this is said to be based on a post-Reformation parody of the traditional Catholic rite of transubstantiation during Mass, being a Dutch corruption of the Latin words "Hoc est corpus meum" and the credo, which reads in part, "sub Pontio Pilato passus et sepultus est", meaning under Pontius Pilate he suffered and was buried.[7] In a similar way the phrase is in Scandinavia usually accompanied by filiokus, a corruption of the term filioque,[citation needed] from the Latin version of the Nicene Creed, meaning “and from the Son”. The variant spelling filipokus is common in Russia, a predominantly Eastern Orthodox nation, as well as certain other post-Soviet states.[citation needed] Additionally, the word for "stage trick" in Russian, fokus, is derived from hocus pocus.[8]

Magician's name

[edit]

Others believe that it is an appeal to the folkloric Norse magician Ochus Bochus:

It is possible that we here see the origin of hocus pocus, and Old Nick.

According to Sharon Turner in The History of the Anglo-Saxons, they were believed to be derived from Ochus Bochus, a magician and demon of the north.[9]

Nonsense word

[edit]

As an alternative to other theories, it may simply be pseudo-Latin with no meaning, made up to impress people:

I will speak of one man... that went about in King James his time ... who called himself, "The Kings Majesties most excellent Hocus Pocus", and so was he called, because that at the playing of every Trick, he used to say, "Hocus pocus, tontus talontus, vade celeriter jubeo", a dark composure of words, to blinde the eyes of the beholders, to make his Trick pass the more currently without discovery, because when the eye and the ear of the beholder are both earnestly busied, the Trick is not so easily discovered, nor the Imposture discerned.

— Thomas Ady, A Candle in the Dark, 1656[10]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

External resources

[edit]
Look up hocus-pocus in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hocus-pocus.
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hocus-pocus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hocus-pocus is a pseudo-Latin phrase that originated in early 17th-century as a magician's or , employed by conjurors to captivate or distract audiences during sleight-of-hand performances. The term first appeared in print in 1621 in Ben Jonson's Masque of Augures, referring to the alias of William Vincent, a juggler at the court of King James I, who popularized it as patter during tricks. By the 1630s, it had become a common in magical routines, as seen in the influential manual Hocus Pocus Junior: The Anatomie of Legerdemain (1634), which detailed conjuring techniques and was reprinted multiple times. Etymologically, "hocus-pocus" consists of nonsense syllables mimicking Latin, possibly inspired by medieval conjuring formulas like "hax pax max Deus adimax," though a 17th-century theory by Anglican bishop proposed it as a mocking corruption of the Catholic Mass phrase "hoc est corpus" (this is my body), reflecting Protestant critiques of ; modern linguists consider this link unlikely due to phonetic and historical mismatches. By the 1640s, the noun form had expanded to describe jugglers' tricks or any form of , evolving into broader idiomatic use for nonsensical or behavior designed to conceal truth, as in political or fraudulent schemes. In contemporary English, it remains a versatile term for meaningless or elaborate misdirection, often invoked in discussions of , , or charlatanism.

Definition and Usage

Meaning and Interpretations

"Hocus-pocus" primarily denotes a pseudo-Latin or recited by magicians and jugglers to invoke illusions, tricks, or the appearance of effects during performances. This usage emerged in English around the 1630s as a sham-Latin phrase employed in conjuring acts, often chanted to distract audiences or enhance the mystique of sleight-of-hand maneuvers. The records its earliest attestation in the 1620s as a common name for a juggler or magician, evolving by the 1630s into a specific verbal used in such routines. In a secondary sense, "hocus-pocus" functions as slang for trickery, deception, or any form of meaningless or nonsensical activity intended to mislead. For instance, it might describe convoluted political rhetoric as "all that hocus-pocus," implying deliberate obfuscation. Merriam-Webster defines it as "sleight of hand" in the literal magical context or "nonsense or sham used especially to cloak deception" in the figurative one, with the noun form first known in 1647. Similarly, the Collins English Dictionary outlines it as a meaningless chant for incantation, a juggler's trick, or broader trickery and deception. The phrase carries nuanced interpretations that distinguish its literal application in from its broader figurative connotations of charlatanism or . In literal terms, it evokes the performative of 17th-century shows, where the words served as a theatrical device to simulate enchantment. Figuratively, it critiques any practice lacking substance, such as pseudoscientific claims or evasive language, emphasizing deception over genuine transformation. This duality underscores its enduring role as a term for both playful and cynical manipulation.

Contemporary Applications

In contemporary language, "hocus-pocus" is frequently employed as to denote , , or meaningless ritual, particularly in contexts involving trickery or . According to , the term refers to "nonsense or sham used or intended to ," a usage that persists in everyday discourse to critique dubious practices. This application underscores its role as an for dismissing insubstantial claims without delving into historical origins. In financial and business settings, "hocus-pocus" often describes fraudulent schemes or manipulative . For instance, in a 2024 federal sentencing for a pandemic relief case involving over $9.5 million in intended stolen funds, U.S. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller characterized the defendants' actions as "all a bunch of hocus-pocus," highlighting the deceptive nature of their false representations to obtain loans. Such phrasing emphasizes toward financial maneuvers perceived as illusory or exploitative. Within legal discourse, the term critiques convoluted or evasive arguments. In a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court filing, petitioners described certain standing doctrines as "legal hocus-pocus," portraying them as incantatory maneuvers lacking substantive meaning to hurdle procedural barriers. Similarly, a 2023 Ohio Supreme Court opinion rejected claims of discriminatory intent as "legal hocus pocus, an incantation designed to negotiate a hurdle, but without meaning or substance." These examples illustrate its utility in professional critiques of overly complex or insincere legal tactics. The phrase also appears in discussions of and , where it is used to debunk unfounded beliefs or -laden ideas. In a 2024 New York Times report on right-wing " cures" like medbeds—devices claimed to heal chronic illnesses through unproven quantum technology—the article expressed toward the promotions, questioning "What kind of hocus-pocus are they going to…" amid rising online narratives. This usage reinforces "hocus-pocus" as a tool for rational dismissal in modern debates over evidence-based versus speculative claims. Additionally, "hocus-pocus" influences branding and , particularly in seasonal products and events tied to Halloween or themes, evoking whimsy and illusion. For example, it features in product lines such as scented candles blending and apple notes marketed as "Hocus Pocus" for festive atmospheres, capitalizing on the term's playful association with enchantment. Such applications extend to event slogans, like Miami's 2024 Hocus Pocus promoting ", mischief, and madness" with over 75 DJ performances in a haunted warehouse setting. These instances highlight its commercial appeal in creating thematic immersion without implying validity.

Historical Development

Early Appearances

The earliest documented appearance of the phrase "hocus-pocus" (in variant form "Hochos-pochos") dates to 1621, in Ben Jonson's Masque of Augures, where it is used in a description of an antimasque: "O Sir, all de better, vor an Antick-masque, de more absurd it be... Hochos-pochos. Fabros Palabros." This reflected the era's satirical take on absurd entertainments. A subsequent appearance came in 1624, in the anti-Catholic pamphlet New Shreds of the Old Snare by Anglican clergyman John Gee, who used it to mock perceived deceptions in Catholic practices, writing: "I alwayes thought they had their rudiments from some iugling Hocas Pocas in a quart pot." This usage reflected the intense Protestant polemics of early 17th-century , where itinerant conjurors and jugglers were often lampooned in literature as akin to religious charlatans. By 1625, "hocus pocus" had entered the world of performance as the stage name of , an English juggler and conjuror who received a license to perform feats of legerdemain in 1619. , active during the reign of James I, toured with a troupe specializing in sleight-of-hand tricks, , and illusions, embodying the era's popular entertainment amid growing anti-Catholic sentiments that equated such spectacles with superstitious trickery. The phrase's connection to magic solidified in 1634 with the publication of Hocus Pocus Junior: The Anatomy of Legerdemain, the first English book entirely devoted to practical conjuring instructions, complete with illustrations of tricks like coin vanishing and cup manipulations. Attributed pseudonymously to "Hocus Pocus Junior"—likely or a contemporary—the work framed the term as a standard chanted by performers to captivate audiences during sleight-of-hand routines, as in descriptions of distracting : "Hocus pocus, tontus talontus," to mask manual dexterity. This text marked "hocus-pocus" as synonymous with the deceptive arts of itinerant entertainers in Jacobean , where such performances thrived in fairs and taverns despite clerical disapproval.

17th-Century Popularization

During the mid- to late , the phrase "hocus-pocus" gained widespread currency in English , appearing in political ballads, satirical pamphlets, and religious discourse to denote trickery, jugglery, and deception. For instance, in a 1651 critiquing the Rump Parliament's general following the , the term described the pardon as an illusory "Act of hocus pocus," implying it was a mere sleight-of-hand to mask ongoing political machinations without genuine clemency. This usage reflected the phrase's growing role in everyday polemics, extending from its earlier literary appearances in the 1620s and 1630s to broader commentary on perceived frauds in and society. In the context of the (1642–1651), "hocus-pocus" featured in writings that lambasted Catholic rituals and associated folk magic as superstitious deceptions. Puritans, seeking to dismantle what they viewed as idolatrous practices, invoked the term to critique ritualism as manipulative trickery rather than divine worship. This rhetorical strategy aligned with broader efforts to purify religious practices, equating popish ceremonies with the conjurer's art. By the war's end, such language permeated sermons and tracts, embedding the phrase in religious debates over authenticity and illusion. The Restoration period (1660–1688) further entrenched "hocus-pocus" in theatrical satire, particularly in works lampooning charlatans and social pretenders. Playwright employed it in his 1680 comedy The Woman Captain to mock deceptive schemes, with a character exclaiming "hocus pocus" in reference to illusory tactics aimed at fooling the elderly and unwary. This integration into stage dialogue highlighted the term's versatility in exposing , aligning with Restoration comedy's focus on moral and intellectual frauds. By the 1670s, "hocus-pocus" had become a staple in London's street performances, where itinerant magicians and jugglers used it to herald their feats of sleight-of-hand, drawing crowds with promises of wonder amid the city's bustling fairs. The enduring popularity of manuals like Hocus Pocus Junior: The Anatomy of Legerdemain, first published in 1634 and reprinted multiple times through the century (including editions in the and 1670s), facilitated this adoption, providing performers with scripted patter and tricks that normalized the phrase as synonymous with magical entertainment.

Etymological Theories

Derivation from Latin Mass

One prominent etymological theory posits that "hocus-pocus" originated as a satirical distortion of the Latin phrase "Hoc est enim corpus meum" ("For this is my body"), uttered by the priest during the consecration of the in the Roman Catholic Mass. This phrase, central to the doctrine of , was allegedly truncated and mocked to evoke the rhythmic of a magician's spell, reducing the sacred ritual to mere verbal trickery. The theory gained traction in the context of 17th-century England, where intense Protestant portrayed as superstitious jugglery or popish deception. During the and subsequent religious conflicts, English reformers and preachers frequently lampooned the as fraudulent sleight-of-hand, equating priestly rituals with the performances of itinerant conjurers to undermine the perceived "magic" of . This ridicule aligned with broader polemics that viewed Catholic practices as idolatrous illusions, fostering the phrase's adoption as a term for or deception. Supporting evidence includes early textual references linking the phrase to liturgical . In 1655, Thomas Ady, in his anti-superstition A Candle in the Dark, described a juggler invoking "Hocus pocus, tontus tabantus, vade celeriter jubeo" during tricks, implying a direct association with performative mockery of religious rites. The phonetic resemblance—particularly the alliterative "hocus" echoing "hoc" and the repetitive "pocus" approximating "corpus"—along with the incantatory , reinforces the linguistic from the 's solemn . Such parallels appear in 1640s Puritan sermons and pamphlets that equated ceremonies to "jugglery," though the phrase itself first emerged in print in 1621, with further popularization around 1634 in a magician's manual. The conjecture was explicitly articulated by , (1691–1694), in one of his sermons: "In all probability those common juggling words of hocus pocus are nothing else but a corruption of hoc est corpus [meum], by way of ridiculous imitation of the priests’ transubstantiation-service." Scholarly endorsements include Eric Partridge's 1958 Origins: A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English, which traces the term to this phonetic parody of the Latin rite amid . Similarly, the Oxford Dictionary of English Proverbs (3rd edition, 1970) highlights the connection, noting its roots in Protestant mockery of Catholic sacramental language. However, modern linguists consider this derivation unlikely due to phonetic and historical mismatches, viewing it as a later .

Connection to Magicians

One prominent etymological theory links "hocus-pocus" to the stage name of , a 17th-century English juggler and sleight-of-hand performer active in the 1620s at fairs and public venues. , who specialized in feats like swallowing daggers and producing ribbons from his mouth, adopted "Hocus Pocus" as his professional alias, drawing from pseudo-Latin incantations used in his to enhance the mystique of his acts. Contemporary references provide evidence for this association, including a 1655 pamphlet by Thomas Ady that describes a juggler—believed to be —as "the Kings Majesties most excellent Hocus Pocus," crediting him with popularizing deceptive tricks under this moniker. Additionally, is widely regarded by scholars as the likely author of the 1634 manual Hocus Pocus Junior: The Anatomy of Legerdemain, the first English-language book on magic tricks, which used the pseudonym to lend authenticity to its instructions on sleight-of-hand. Over time, Vincent's evolved from a personal identifier into a generic synonymous with magical , influencing subsequent performers who adopted similar phrases in their routines to invoke . This shift is evident in 17th-century playbills and accounts where "hocus pocus" denoted juggler aliases, transitioning the term from specific performer branding to a broader emblem of legerdemain in English traditions. Magic historians, including Jim Steinmeyer, have debated this connection, arguing that Vincent's prominence as a touring illusionist helped embed "hocus-pocus" in the of magic, distinguishing it from mere nonsense by tying it to real performative practices of the era. While some scholars question the exact attribution of the 1634 book, the consensus affirms Vincent's role in popularizing the phrase among early modern conjurers.

Alternative Explanations

One alternative explanation posits that "hocus-pocus" originated as an invented word, designed to mimic the rhythmic cadence of Latin incantations used by jugglers and performers in the early , without any direct linguistic root. This views the phrase as pseudo-Latin , akin to other magical formulas like "" or "hiccus doccius," which were crafted to sound mystical and authoritative while conveying no specific meaning. Folk etymologies have occasionally suggested connections to Anglo-Saxon or Germanic terms denoting trickery or , such as variants resembling "hocus" from older words for hoaxing, but these lack substantiation and are considered speculative by linguists. Similarly, minor conjectures link the phrase to medieval chants or even expressions for , though such ideas are dismissed due to the absence of historical or phonetic evidence supporting them. These alternative theories are less accepted than the dominant etymological accounts because they rely on broad phonetic resemblances rather than documented usage; for instance, the traces the phrase primarily to jugglers' pseudo-Latin chants in the 1620s, with the hypothesis serving as a supplementary rather than primary explanation.

Cultural Representations

In Magic Literature and Performance

In magic literature, "hocus pocus" has long served as a titular and descriptive term for the art of illusion and sleight-of-hand. The 1830–1831 The Whole Art of Legerdemain, or Hocus Pocus Laid Open and Explained, attributed to masters like Sena Sama and Hamed Ben-Ali, details a range of tricks involving cards, dice, birds, eggs, and rings, positioning "hocus pocus" as synonymous with and deceptive performance techniques demonstrated before royalty and dignitaries. This work exemplifies how 19th-century manuals used the phrase to frame explanations of feats, blending instruction with theatrical flair to demystify yet preserve the wonder of legerdemain. During the , "hocus pocus" emerged as a standard in stage magic, enhancing the dramatic patter that accompanied illusions. Scottish performer John Henry Anderson, dubbed the "Great Wizard of the North," popularized such verbal elements in his acts, including the rabbit-from-hat trick, to captivate audiences in theaters across Britain and beyond from the 1840s onward. This practice carried into 20th-century , where magicians employed "hocus pocus" as rhythmic distraction to facilitate misdirection during rapid-fire routines on variety stages. In contemporary magic, the phrase persists as an ironic homage to its roots, often integrated into performances that blend tradition with revelation. Duos like incorporate "hocus pocus"-style in their shows to underscore the mechanics of , using humor to nod at historical incantations while exposing illusions for educational effect. Over time, "hocus pocus" has evolved in magic theory to symbolize misdirection, the core principle of diverting audience attention through verbal and performative cues. Jim Steinmeyer's Hiding the Elephant (2003) analyzes this evolution, illustrating how such phrases contribute to the psychological concealment of methods in large-scale illusions, from Houdini's feats to modern stagecraft.

In Film, Literature, and Media

The 1993 Disney film Hocus Pocus, directed by , centers on three 17th-century witch sisters—Winifred, Mary, and Sarah Sanderson—who are accidentally resurrected on Halloween night in modern-day , by a teenager named Max Dennison lighting a cursed Black Flame Candle. The witches, portrayed by , , and , embark on a quest to drain the life force from children to restore their youth, leading Max, his sister Dani, and their friend Allison to thwart the sisters' plans with the help of a talking cat and historical lore. Despite underperforming at the upon release, the film gained cult status through annual Halloween broadcasts starting in the mid-1990s, becoming a seasonal staple that evokes nostalgic family viewing. The 2022 sequel, Hocus Pocus 2, revived the Sanderson sisters in a new story involving teenage witches summoning them via another Black Flame Candle, further cementing the franchise's legacy by amassing 2.7 billion minutes of viewership in its Disney+ debut weekend, setting a record for the platform's most-watched original film at the time. This surge highlighted the enduring appeal of the original's campy humor and witchy antics, with the sequel drawing renewed attention to themes of sisterhood and mischief. In October 2025, Bette Midler confirmed that a script for Hocus Pocus 3 has been completed, expressing excitement about the project, though no release date has been set as of November 2025. In literature, "hocus-pocus" appears in Terry Pratchett's series to evoke magical nonsense and subversion of wizardly traditions, as seen in (1987), where the witch employs "a little hocus pocus" to challenge gender norms in sorcery. Similarly, Arthur Conan Doyle's stories use the term to underscore deception and illusion in criminal schemes, reflecting Doyle's own fascination with spiritualism as a form of elaborate trickery, as explored in his interactions with escapologist . Beyond film and books, "hocus-pocus" features in other media, such as the 1960s sitcom , where reviewers described the show's witchcraft as engaging "hocus-pocus" that blends domestic comedy with supernatural hijinks across its episodes. In music, the Dutch progressive rock band Focus released the instrumental track "Hocus Pocus" in 1971 on their album Moving Waves, which became a 1973 hit known for its yodeling vocals, flute solos, and whimsical energy, peaking at number 10 on the Billboard Hot 100. Online, the phrase inspires memes that mock conspiracy theories and superstitious beliefs, often quoting lines like "I don't believe in magic, a lot of superstitious hocus-pocus" to satirize unfounded skepticism. The Hocus Pocus films have significantly influenced global perceptions of Halloween, exporting American traditions of costumes, , and witch lore to international audiences through Disney's distribution, as noted in analyses of its role in popularizing the holiday beyond the U.S. in the highlight the original film's campy , portraying the Sanderson sisters as empowered, childfree women whose chaotic sisterhood subverts patriarchal norms and celebrates irreverent female bonds.

References

  1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/hocus-pocus
  2. https://www.wordorigins.org/big-list-entries/hocus-pocus
  3. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095939913
  4. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/hocus-pocus
  5. https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/phrases/hocus-pocus
  6. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/hocus-pocus_n
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hocus-pocus
  8. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/hocus-pocus
  9. https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/4-sentenced-for-scheme-to-steal-pandemic-funds
  10. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-6444/201449/20211130105616101_20211130-104405-95755197-00000336.pdf
  11. https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/pdf_viewer/pdf_viewer.aspx?pdf=943557.pdf&subdirectory=2023-0628%5CDocketItems&source=DL_Clerk
  12. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/28/us/politics/far-right-miracle-cure-medbed.html
  13. https://magiccandlecompany.com/products/hocus-pocus
  14. https://www.musicfestivalwizard.com/festivals/hocus-pocus-2024/
  15. https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2021/07/its-magic-ye-olde-hocus-pocus/
  16. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/699624
  17. https://www.vanishingincmagic.com/magic-book-reviews/hocus-pocus-junior
  18. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A03420.0001.001?view=toc
  19. https://www.conjuringarchive.com/list/book/1609
  20. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1030/1030-h/1030-h.htm
  21. https://aleteia.org/2017/10/30/is-the-phrase-hocus-pocus-a-parody-of-the-priests-words-at-mass/
  22. https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstreams/bceaf970-bb27-4c98-9e68-5d3877f856db/download
  23. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34375
  24. http://www.worldwidewords.org/ww-hoc1.html
  25. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/6096471.hokey-pokey-hanky-panky/
  26. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003195740-20/hocus-pocus-junior-philip-butterworth-peter-harrop
  27. https://www.npr.org/2025/10/01/nx-s1-5557924/hoax-hocus-pocus-history
  28. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A26476.0001.001/1:10.9?rgn=div1&view=fulltext
  29. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5557924
  30. https://blog.oup.com/2007/10/element_hocus_pocus/
  31. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL23511306W/The_Whole_art_of_legerdemain_or_Hocus_pocus_laid_open_and_explained_by_those_renowned_masters_Sena_S
  32. https://americanrepertorytheater.org/media/the-many-histories-of-magic/
  33. https://www.communitynews.org/princetoninfo/artsandentertainment/penn-teller-quirky-hip-hocus-pocus/article_b81b5017-97dd-5f37-aa55-c760499385a2.html
  34. https://www.dacapopress.com/titles/jim-steinmeyer/hiding-the-elephant/9780786714018/
  35. https://www.npr.org/2013/10/31/241910185/it-just-isnt-halloween-without-a-little-hocus-pocus
  36. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107120/plotsummary/
  37. https://www.thewrap.com/hocus-pocus-oral-history-box-office-bomb/
  38. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/10/hocus-pocus-2-is-now-a-record-breaking-hit
  39. https://deadline.com/2025/10/bette-midler-hocus-pocus-3-update-1236591205/
  40. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/equal-rites-terry-pratchett/1100185712
  41. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2012/03/21/hocus-pocus/
  42. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/bewitched-first-episode-1964-review-817228/
  43. https://bestclassicbands.com/focus-midnight-special-hocus-pocus-6-15-23/
  44. https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianaJonesMemes/comments/uh8s4r/i_dont_believe_in_magic_a_lot_of_superstitious/
  45. https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/hocus-pocus-popularize-halloween-outside-u-s/
  46. https://www.stylist.co.uk/life/hocus-pocus-feminist-film-halloween-movie-sarah-jessica-parker-bette-midler-child-free-witches-feminism/72916
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.