Hubbry Logo
J-aggregateJ-aggregateMain
Open search
J-aggregate
Community hub
J-aggregate
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
J-aggregate
J-aggregate
J-aggregate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
1,1'-diethyl-2,2'-cyanine chloride (pseudoisocyanine chloride, PIC chloride)
Fiber-like J-aggregates (yellow) and light-guiding microcrystallites (red)

A J-aggregate is a type of dye with an absorption band that shifts to a longer wavelength (bathochromic shift) of increasing sharpness (higher absorption coefficient) when it aggregates under the influence of a solvent or additive or concentration as a result of supramolecular self-organisation.[1] The dye can be characterized further by a small Stokes shift with a narrow band. The J in J-aggregate refers to E.E. Jelley who discovered the phenomenon in 1936.[2][3] The dye is also called a Scheibe aggregate after G. Scheibe who also independently published on this topic in 1937.[4][5]

Scheibe and Jelley independently observed that in ethanol the dye PIC chloride has two broad absorption maxima at around 19,000 cm−1 and 20,500 cm−1 (526 and 488 nm respectively) and that in water a third sharp absorption maximum appears at 17,500 cm−1 (571 nm). The intensity of this band further increases on increasing concentration and on adding sodium chloride. In the oldest aggregation model for PIC chloride the individual molecules are stacked like a roll of coins forming a supramolecular polymer but the true nature of this aggregation phenomenon is still under investigation. Analysis is complicated because PIC chloride is not a planar molecule. The molecular axis can tilt in the stack creating a helix pattern. In other models the dye molecules orient themselves in a brickwork, ladder, or staircase fashion. In various experiments the J-band was found to split as a function of temperature, liquid crystal phases were found with concentrated solutions and CryoTEM revealed aggregate rods 350 nm long and 2.3 nm in diameter.

J-aggregate dyes are found with polymethine dyes in general, with cyanines, merocyanines, squaraine and perylene bisimides. Certain π-conjugated macrocycles, reported by Swager and co-workers at MIT, were also found to form J-aggregates and exhibited exceptionally high photoluminescence quantum yields.[6] In 2020, a famous cyanine dye (TDBC) was reported with enhanced photoluminescence quantum yield (> 50%) in the solution at room-temperature.[7]

Molecular PIC aggregates exhibiting J-like properties have been shown to spontaneously template into sequence specific DNA duplex strands. These DNA based J-aggregates, known as J-bits, have been sought after as a bottom-up method of self-assembling PIC J-aggregates into large scale multi-functional DNA scaffolds. Critically, J-bits have been observed to engage in energy transfer when in proximity to quantum dots[8] as well as organic dyes such as Alexa Fluor dyes.[9] Prototypical DNA energy transfer arrays, which are based on the molecular photonic wire design, use FRET to transfer excitons step-wise down an energy gradient. Since the FRET efficiency between two Fluorophores decays by their separation distance to the 6th power, the spatial limitations of these systems are highly constrained. It is hypothesized that integrating J-bit relays between FRET nodes would allow some of this energy loss to be recouped. In theory, dense packing and rigid alignment of the PIC monomers enables superposition of the transition dipoles allowing excitons to propagate through the length of the aggregate with low loss.[10]

Kasha's framework

[edit]

In the 1950s, Kasha had developed a framework to bridge the excitonic shifts in optoelectronic spectra of molecular aggregates of chromophores (monomers) to the aggregate underlying structure. In this framework, the transitional dipoles are aligned in a "head-to-tail" fashion, with the excitonic states of all dipoles oscillating in the same phase (wavevector k = 0) is lowered in energy compared to the monomers. This shift from higher energy in the monomer stage to the lower energy of the aggregate leads to a red shift (bathochromic shift). In 1D excitonic systems these aggregates with head-to-tail arrangements are called J-aggregates. This k = 0 is called "bright state" as it has the highest probability of transition according to fermi's golden rule. There is another type of aggregate, where the co-facial (face-to-face or π-π stacking) arrangement is adopted called H-aggregates. These aggregates lead to blue shifting (hypsochromic shift) as the bright state of these aggregates are higher in energy than its monomers. These types of aggregates are found more often in flat and conjugated systems such as perylenes, porphyrins, etc.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

J-aggregate

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A J-aggregate is a type of supramolecular assembly formed by chromophoric molecules, such as dyes, in which the molecules align in a slipped head-to-tail (or bottom-to-head) configuration with a near-zero alignment angle, leading to coherent excitonic coupling that produces a characteristic narrow, red-shifted absorption band known as the J-band, often accompanied by enhanced fluorescence and . These aggregates were first observed in 1936 by Edwin E. Jelley during studies of pseudoisocyanine iodide in aqueous solution, where he noted an anomalously sharp and bathochromically shifted absorption spectrum compared to the monomeric , attributing it to the formation of dye crystals or molecular states. Independently, in 1937, German chemist Günter Scheibe reported similar spectral changes in solutions of dyes, linking them to reversible association-dissociation equilibria influenced by concentration, , and , and coining the term "metachromasy" for such phenomena before the specific J-aggregate emerged. The "J" designation honors Jelley's pioneering work, and these early discoveries laid the foundation for understanding aggregate-induced optical modifications in organic materials. Structurally, J-aggregates typically adopt one-dimensional or two-dimensional arrangements, such as linear chains or brick-stone lattices, where the transition dipoles of adjacent molecules are nearly parallel and displaced along the long axis, minimizing electrostatic repulsion and maximizing delocalization of Frenkel excitons over tens to hundreds of molecules. This configuration contrasts with H-aggregates, which feature face-to-face (side-by-side) packing and blue-shifted absorption due to higher-energy excited states. Optically, J-aggregates exhibit oscillator strengths exceeding 80% for the lowest-energy state, Stokes-shift-free emission (often <10 nm), and linewidths as narrow as 10-20 nm—far sharper than the broader monomeric bands—enabling efficient light-matter interactions and energy transfer rates on picosecond timescales. Formation is driven by non-covalent forces like π-π stacking, hydrophobic effects, and electrostatic interactions, often controlled by solution conditions such as pH, ionic strength, or temperature, and can be templated on substrates like nanoporous alumina for hybrid nanostructures. Beyond their fundamental role in photophysics and supramolecular chemistry, J-aggregates have found applications in light-harvesting systems mimicking natural photosynthetic complexes, such as the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) bacteriochlorophyll aggregates, where J-aggregates enable rapid exciton migration over thousands of units—far exceeding the scale of natural systems. In photonics, they enable amplified spontaneous emission without resonators, with thresholds as low as 0.9 MW/cm², and serve as broadband emitters for bioimaging and sensing due to their high quantum yields and tunability into the near-infrared. Recent advances as of 2025 include NIR-II emissive J-aggregates for deep-tissue bioimaging and superradiant systems for enhanced fluorescence applications. Additionally, their plasmonic enhancement in hybrid devices and use in spectral sensitization for silver halide photography underscore their versatility in optoelectronics and materials science.

Discovery and History

Initial Discovery

The initial discovery of J-aggregates took place between 1936 and 1937 at the Kodak Research Laboratories, where Edwin E. Jelley was examining cyanine dyes for their potential in spectral sensitization of photographic emulsions. While preparing dilute aqueous solutions of these dyes, Jelley serendipitously observed the formation of highly ordered assemblies that exhibited distinct optical behavior, marking the first recognition of this phenomenon in the context of photographic applications. Jelley's key observation involved pseudoisocyanine iodide in aqueous solution under specific conditions, such as controlled temperature and the addition of electrolytes like potassium chloride, leading to the appearance of narrow absorption bands red-shifted from those of the isolated dye molecules. These aggregates manifested as stable suspensions with extraordinarily sharp spectral features, which Jelley detailed in his 1937 publication in Nature, describing both nematic and crystalline states of 1,1'-diethyl-ψ-cyanine chloride. The bathochromic shift and narrowed linewidths of these bands were particularly notable, distinguishing the aggregated state from monomeric solutions. Independently, German chemist G. Scheibe reported analogous findings in 1937, observing the aggregation of merocyanine and cyanine dyes in aqueous media, which produced similar red-shifted and intensified absorption spectra. Scheibe's work, published in Angewandte Chemie, emphasized the role of molecular association in altering the fundamental absorption bands of these chromophores. Early experimental validation of these aggregates' significance came from their incorporation into photographic plates, where they enhanced the sensitivity of silver halide emulsions to longer wavelengths, enabling improved color reproduction and efficiency in light capture. This practical demonstration underscored the aggregates' utility in sensitizing materials, as evidenced by sharper and more intense response curves on exposed plates compared to non-aggregated dyes.

Naming and Early Research

The term "J-aggregate" was introduced in the 1950s to describe ordered molecular assemblies of cyanine dyes exhibiting a characteristic red-shifted and narrowed absorption band, named in honor of Edwin E. Jelley, a researcher at Eastman Kodak who first reported the phenomenon in 1936 while studying spectral sensitization in photographic dyes. This nomenclature distinguished J-aggregates from H-aggregates, the latter termed for their hypsochromic (blue-shifted) absorption relative to the monomer, as observed in earlier work by Günter Scheibe on dye aggregates in solution. Scheibe independently documented similar red-shifted bands in pseudoisocyanine solutions around the same time, contributing to the foundational understanding of aggregate formation. Following World War II, research on J-aggregates intensified at Kodak laboratories and academic institutions, focusing on their stability in aqueous solutions and thin films to enhance photographic sensitivity. In the 1950s, studies at Kodak identified J-aggregates in silver halide emulsions, where they played a key role in spectral sensitization by facilitating efficient energy transfer to silver grains, improving light harvesting for color photography. These efforts built on Jelley's initial observations and Scheibe's 1938 follow-up publication, which explored aggregate reversibility under varying conditions. By the 1960s, publications linked J-aggregates explicitly to sensitized photography mechanisms, emphasizing their role in exciton migration and charge separation at dye-silver halide interfaces, as detailed in works from Kodak researchers and European groups. This period marked a progression from phenomenological descriptions to practical applications in emulsion design, solidifying J-aggregates' importance in high-resolution imaging materials.

Structure and Formation

Molecular Arrangement

J-aggregates are supramolecular assemblies of cyanine dye molecules arranged in linear or helical stacks, characterized by a slip-stacked configuration that facilitates head-to-tail alignment of transition dipoles at angles less than the magic angle of 54.7° relative to the stacking axis. This arrangement, often described as brickwork or ladder-like, promotes delocalization of excitons across the aggregate. Common cyanine dyes forming such structures include pseudoisocyanine (PIC), thiacarbocyanine, and oxacarbocyanine, where the molecules overlap in a displaced parallel fashion to minimize steric repulsion while maximizing electronic coupling. The stability of these aggregates arises primarily from π-π stacking interactions between the conjugated chromophores and hydrophobic forces that drive assembly in aqueous environments, supplemented by van der Waals attractions. Typically comprising hundreds to thousands of molecules per aggregate, with excitons delocalized over 10 to 100 molecules enabling cooperative excitonic effects that enhance collective optical behavior.

Formation Conditions

The formation of J-aggregates from cyanine dyes is highly sensitive to environmental factors, particularly in aqueous solutions where self-assembly is favored at neutral pH and moderate ionic strength. Typically, aggregation occurs readily in water or water-methanol mixtures at near-neutral pH (around 7), as electrostatic repulsion between positively charged dye molecules is balanced, allowing hydrophobic interactions and π-π stacking to drive assembly. Increasing solvent polarity, such as through higher water content, promotes aggregation by enhancing hydrophobic effects, while low temperatures below 20°C stabilize the process by slowing dissociation kinetics. Elevated ionic strength, often achieved by adding salts like NaCl (0.2–6 M), screens charges and facilitates monomer-to-dimer transitions essential for J-aggregate nucleation. Concentration plays a critical role, with thresholds generally exceeding 10^{-5} M (e.g., 10–20 μM for pseudoisocyanine) required to shift equilibrium from monomers or dimers toward aggregates, as higher dye densities overcome entropic barriers to ordered stacking. Counterions significantly influence stability, while surfactants like gelatin or polyelectrolytes can enhance solubility and prevent precipitation at these concentrations. Kinetically, J-aggregate assembly is rapid, often completing in tens of seconds to minutes via diffusion-limited dimer decay, with rates accelerating at lower temperatures, higher dye concentrations, and increased salt levels. The process is reversible; heating above 40–65°C or dilution below threshold concentrations disassembles aggregates back to monomers or dimers by disrupting intermolecular forces. This reversibility underscores the dynamic equilibrium, resulting in head-to-tail molecular stacking arrangements.

Optical Properties

Absorption Spectra

J-aggregates exhibit distinctive absorption spectra characterized by a pronounced bathochromic shift, where the absorption maximum is red-shifted by 50-200 nm relative to the monomeric form. This shift arises from the coherent arrangement of dye molecules in the aggregate, lowering the energy of the lowest excitonic state. A representative example is pseudoisocyanine (PIC), where the monomer displays an absorption maximum at approximately 525 nm, while the J-aggregate peak appears at 570 nm. The absorption band of J-aggregates is notably narrowed compared to monomers, with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) typically reduced to 10-20 nm from the broader 50-100 nm observed in isolated molecules. This sharpening results from homogeneous broadening effects, where excitonic coupling minimizes inhomogeneous contributions to the linewidth. In many cases, the narrowed spectra allow resolution of vibrational fine structure, often involving intensity borrowing from higher-lying electronic states that enhances the visibility of vibronic progressions. The absorption properties of J-aggregates demonstrate temperature dependence, with the structured J-band diminishing as thermal energy disrupts the aggregate assembly, leading to dissociation and reversion to the broader monomeric absorption profile. This reversible transition underscores the dynamic equilibrium between aggregated and monomeric states under varying thermal conditions.

Emission Characteristics

J-aggregates exhibit highly efficient fluorescence emission characterized by superradiance, where the collective excitation of molecules leads to a significant enhancement in the radiative decay rate, typically 10-100 times faster than that of the constituent monomers. This superradiant behavior arises from the coherent delocalization of excitons across the aggregate, resulting in quantum yields that can reach 0.8 to 1.0, approaching unity in optimized nanostructures such as sub-5 nm J-aggregate nanodots. The enhanced radiative efficiency makes J-aggregates promising for applications requiring bright, coherent light emission, with the narrow emission spectrum mirroring the sharp absorption band for minimal spectral broadening. A hallmark of J-aggregate emission is the minimized Stokes shift, often less than 20 nm or even negligible, due to the rigid excitonic structure that preserves the energy alignment between absorption and emission transitions. This small shift contrasts with the larger Stokes losses in monomeric dyes and contributes to the high color purity of the emitted light, with bandwidths as narrow as 6-10 nm in superradiant systems. The emission profile thus closely tracks the excitonic state, enabling resonant fluorescence without significant energy dissipation. The excited-state dynamics of J-aggregates are markedly accelerated, with fluorescence lifetimes shortened to 10-100 picoseconds compared to nanosecond scales for isolated monomers, reflecting the superradiant acceleration of decay. These ultrafast lifetimes, observed across various cyanine-based J-aggregates, stem from the increased oscillator strength of the collective dipole moment. Within the aggregate, energy transfer occurs through coherent exciton migration along the molecular chain, facilitating rapid exciton migration and funneling to emissive sites that further boost collective emission efficiency. This intramolecular transfer enhances the overall photoluminescence by directing excitations toward the lowest-energy states, minimizing non-radiative losses in well-ordered structures.

Theoretical Foundations

Exciton Coupling Models

The Frenkel exciton model provides the primary theoretical basis for describing the collective electronic excitations in J-aggregates, where an excitation initially localized on a single dye molecule delocalizes coherently over multiple aggregate sites through resonant dipole-dipole interactions between transition dipoles. This model treats the aggregate as a lattice of N identical molecules, each with site energy E0E_0 and on-site excitation, coupled via off-diagonal terms that form the excitonic Hamiltonian. The resulting eigenstates are delocalized Frenkel excitons, which account for the narrowing and shifting of absorption bands observed in aggregates compared to monomers. The strength of the exciton coupling, denoted as JJ, is central to the model and is approximated using the point-dipole interaction for intermolecular distances much larger than molecular dimensions. In this approximation, the coupling between two molecules is given by J=μ24πϵ0r3(1−3cos⁡2θ),J = \frac{\mu^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^3} (1 - 3 \cos^2 \theta), where μ\mu is the magnitude of the transition dipole moment, rr is the intermolecular distance, θ\theta is the angle between the transition dipole orientation and the vector connecting the molecular centers. For J-aggregates, the characteristic head-to-tail (parallel and collinear) arrangement of transition dipoles yields a negative value for the dipole-dipole interaction (typically -100 to -500 cm−1^{-1}), but in the exciton model convention, J>0J > 0 denotes the magnitude of this coupling, which lowers the energy of the collective state relative to the while enhancing its , resulting in an optically allowed, red-shifted lowest-energy transition. In periodic linear J-aggregates, the model predicts Davydov splitting of the degenerate monomeric excited states into a band of exciton levels labeled by wavevector kk, with dispersion relation Ek=E0−2Jcos⁡(ka)E_k = E_0 - 2J \cos(ka) for nearest-neighbor coupling and lattice spacing aa. The full bandwidth is 4J4J, representing the Davydov splitting, and the k=0k=0 state at the band bottom is superradiant—possessing NN times the monomeric due to in-phase alignment of all dipoles—and thus dominates the linear absorption spectrum. The onset of the aggregate regime, where collective excitonic effects dominate over monomeric behavior, requires the coupling JJ to surpass both thermal energy kBTk_B T (approximately 200 cm−1^{-1} at room temperature) and static disorder from inhomogeneous site energies or structural fluctuations. Under these conditions, the exciton coherence length exceeds unity, enabling delocalization over 10–100 molecules in typical J-aggregates and giving rise to coherent optical response.

Structural Influences on Spectra

The spectral properties of J-aggregates are profoundly shaped by their molecular arrangement, with exciton coupling serving as the foundational mechanism for these predictions. In helical configurations, the twisted geometry introduces Davydov splitting, where the excited-state degeneracy is lifted into distinct energy levels, leading to bisignate () signals that reflect the aggregate's . This helical arrangement contrasts with linear chains, which exhibit minimal and narrower linewidths due to the absence of such rotational asymmetry, resulting in more symmetric absorption profiles. The altered linewidths in helical J-aggregates arise from the interplay of long-range excitonic interactions along the cylinder axis, broadening the spectral features compared to their linear counterparts. Aggregate size plays a critical role in modulating radiative and broadening effects, particularly for clusters exceeding 20 molecules. Larger aggregates (N > 20) enhance through collective emission from delocalized excitons, accelerating the radiative decay rate proportionally to N while maintaining a sharp J-band. However, this size increase also amplifies disorder-induced broadening, as finite-size effects cause asymmetric line profiles and inhomogeneous contributions that widen the absorption linewidth. Disorder within J-aggregates, often modeled as Gaussian static variations in site energies, significantly reduces the by localizing excitations and limiting delocalization to tens of molecules. Static disorder introduces inhomogeneous broadening, while dynamic components contribute to spectral diffusion, causing time-dependent shifts in the as excitons migrate through energy gradients. These effects collectively diminish the sharpness of the J-band, with coherence lengths typically constrained below 50 sites even at low temperatures due to the statistical nature of the disorder. For non-cyanine dyes such as porphyrins, structural modifications like slipped cofacial arrangements enable J-like bands by promoting side-by-side alignment with minimal face-to-face overlap. In these configurations, the intermolecular , often less than 54.7°, shifts the absorption to lower energies, mimicking J-aggregate red-shifting while avoiding H-type shifts. Covalent frameworks, such as porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks (COFs), enforce this slipped stacking, stabilizing extended J-aggregates with enhanced excitonic coupling and narrow emission linewidths.

Applications and Developments

Sensing and Imaging

J-aggregates of dyes have been employed in sensors through mechanisms involving aggregate disassembly, which induces spectral shifts detectable via or changes. In one platform, J-aggregates of the JC-1 dye assembled on silver nanoplates exhibit plasmon-exciton coupling, with Rabi splitting energies decreasing from 450 meV at 8–11 to 200 meV at 2.5 due to protonation-induced disassembly, enabling sensitive monitoring over the range 2.5–11. For metal ion detection, J-aggregates disassemble in response to specific analytes, leading to measurable quenching or spectral blue-shifts. A notable example uses the chiral dye DMSB complexed with thrombin-binding , where Pb²⁺ ions disrupt K⁺-induced J-aggregates with high selectivity, achieving a limit of detection () of 20 nM for Pb²⁺ and minimal interference from ions like Na⁺, Mg²⁺, or Zn²⁺. In bioimaging, near-infrared (NIR) J-aggregates facilitate in vivo tumor targeting owing to their red-shifted emission and deep tissue penetration. DCP-Cy-based J-aggregates, for instance, have been incorporated into liposomal formulations for enhanced fluorescence around 930 nm, demonstrating tumor accumulation via the enhanced permeability and retention effect in a 2019 study. Similarly, cyanine J-aggregates like those of IR-780 exhibit bright NIR-II emission for dynamic tumor imaging, with super-stable targeting properties and improved signal-to-background ratios compared to monomeric dyes. J-aggregates enable label-free detection of DNA and RNA through intercalation-induced assembly, where dye molecules stack along nucleic acid scaffolds to form ordered aggregates with distinct spectral signatures. For DNA, trimethine cyanine dyes intercalate into double helices, producing J-aggregate bands that shift absorption and enhance fluorescence for quantitative assays without additional labels. In RNA detection, probes like NBE form J-aggregates that selectively disassemble upon binding RNA structures (e.g., hairpins or loops) via a "door-bolt" mechanism, yielding strong NIR fluorescence while ignoring DNA, with rapid response in cellular environments. Post-2015 advances include hybrid J-aggregate nanoparticles for multiplexed , combining organic dyes with inorganic matrices to achieve tunable emissions and simultaneous detection of multiple targets. Organic J-aggregate nanodots (Jdots) of dyes, stabilized in polymer shells, display near-unity quantum yields and narrow emission for high-resolution NIR of tumors and , enabling multiplexed visualization with minimal crosstalk. These hybrids leverage the narrow emission bandwidths of J-aggregates to support high-resolution in complex biological settings.

Optoelectronic Devices

J-aggregates play a pivotal role in organic solar cells (OSCs) as light-harvesting antennas, leveraging their coherent exciton delocalization to extend diffusion lengths and enhance photon absorption efficiency. In non-fullerene acceptor (NFA) systems, slip-stacked J-aggregates formed by materials like Y6 enable superior charge generation and transport, achieving power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) over 18% when blended with donor polymers such as D18. These aggregates promote efficient exciton migration to donor-acceptor interfaces, reducing recombination losses and broadening spectral coverage into the near-infrared (NIR). For instance, squaraine-based J-aggregates in bulk heterojunctions have yielded PCEs exceeding 5%, demonstrating their compatibility with established polymer donors like poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) in device architectures as of 2018. Exciton diffusion lengths in such J-aggregate films often surpass 100 nm, as observed in cyanine dye thin films. In organic light-emitting diodes (s) and lasers, the superradiant emission of J-aggregates—arising from collective dipole coupling—facilitates highly directional and efficient radiative decay, enabling low-threshold lasing. This phenomenon supports organic lasers with pump energy densities below 1 μJ/cm², as demonstrated in J-aggregated cyanine dyes embedded in optical cavities, where narrow linewidths (<10 nm) and high quantum yields (>50%) minimize lasing thresholds. In applications, J-aggregates contribute to enhanced emission efficiency through (), particularly when integrated as sensitizers in multilayer stacks. Recent integrations (2020–2025) with quantum dots (QDs) have shown energy transfer efficiencies up to 90% from J-aggregates to QDs, boosting NIR performance by tuning emission wavelengths and reducing non-radiative losses in hybrid emissive layers. Photodetectors benefit from J-aggregates' narrow absorption bands, which provide spectral selectivity and high in the NIR region. In organic photodiodes (OPDs), merocyanine and squaraine J-aggregates exhibit external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) reaching 84% with full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) values under 100 nm, enabling color-specific detection without filters. Hybrid films combining J-aggregates with perovskites or polymers further amplify (>0.5 A/W at 800 nm) by exploiting the aggregates' sharp excitonic peaks for improved signal-to-noise ratios. These devices, often structured as bulk heterojunctions, achieve detectivities exceeding 10^{12} Jones, making them suitable for imaging and sensing in compact optoelectronic systems.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/j-aggregates
  2. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.8b01457
  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/1381009a0
  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ange.19370501103
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/anie.201002307
  6. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/12/4/330
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010854524007252
  8. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adom.202501565
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6045493/
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/139631b0
  11. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01253
  12. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02213
  13. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.physchem.50.1.117
  14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01772958
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0379677987909805
  16. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp4005696
  17. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/128611480/1_s2.0_S0022286019308701_main.pdf
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-staircase-a-ladder-b-and-brickwork-c-molecular-arrangements-of-dye-molecules_fig1_273996272
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9691386/
  20. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c02020
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386119302034
  22. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/162/5/054311/3333888/The-first-step-of-cyanine-dye-self-assembly
  23. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja0533141
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349500763168
  25. http://functmaterials.org.ua/contents/32-3/fm323-323.pdf
  26. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16509676/
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26806467_J-aggregation_of_cyanine_dyes_by_self-assembly
  28. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/cp/d0cp06205g
  29. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp0026134
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301010420303529
  31. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04928
  32. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/144681
  33. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adom.202501565
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238520305075
  35. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1821493
  36. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10274
  37. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/94/10/6895/597094/Dynamics-of-Frenkel-excitons-in-disordered
  38. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/143/24/244707/967511/Interference-between-Coulombic-and-CT-mediated
  39. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cphc.202300666
  40. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/cpr/article/5/4/041305/3321663/Electronically-excited-states-in-cylindrical
  41. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp026217s
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11088501/
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/chir.23565
  44. https://mukamel.ps.uci.edu/publications/pdfs/213.pdf
  45. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/139/4/044302/72987/Finite-size-line-broadening-and-superradiance-of
  46. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/fd/c9fd00064j
  47. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/155/13/134305/1030657/Scaling-relations-of-exciton-diffusion-in-linear
  48. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/8/085010/pdf
  49. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.8b08088
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6400425/
  51. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10602
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039914019304217
  53. https://www.thno.org/v09p0381.htm
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12002846/
  55. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/19/6367
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0142961218304010
  57. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/qm/d0qm00557f
  58. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1674-4926/42/6/060502
  59. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.201705706
  60. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/137/3/034109/70390/Exciton-transport-in-thin-film-cyanine-dye-J
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237056499_Lasing_through_a_strongly-coupled_mode_by_intra-cavity_pumping
  62. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.7b03796
  63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adma.202104678
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.