Hubbry Logo
ExcitonExcitonMain
Open search
Exciton
Community hub
Exciton
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Exciton
Exciton
Exciton
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Frenkel exciton, bound electron-hole pair where the hole is localized at a position in the crystal represented by black dots
Wannier–Mott exciton, bound electron-hole pair that is not localized at a crystal position. This figure schematically shows diffusion of the exciton across the lattice.
Condensed matter physics
States of matter
Phase phenomena
Electronic phases
Electronic phenomena
Magnetic phases
Quasiparticles
Soft matter
Scientists

An exciton is a bound state of an electron and an electron hole which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force resulting from their opposite charges. It is an electrically neutral quasiparticle regarded as an elementary excitation primarily in condensed matter, such as insulators, semiconductors, some metals, and in some liquids. It transports energy without transporting net electric charge.[1][2][3][4][5]

An exciton can form when an electron from the valence band of a crystal is promoted in energy to the conduction band e.g., when a material absorbs a photon. Promoting the electron to the conduction band leaves a positively charged hole in the valence band. Here 'hole' represents the unoccupied quantum mechanical electron state with a positive charge, an analogue in crystal of a positron. Because of the attractive coulomb force between the electron and the hole, a bound state is formed, akin to that of the electron and proton in a hydrogen atom or the electron and positron in positronium. Excitons are composite bosons since they are formed from two fermions which are the electron and the hole.

Excitons are often treated in two limiting cases, namely small-radius excitons, named Frenkel exciton, and large-radius excitons, often called Wannier-Mott excitons.

A Frenkel exciton occurs when the distance between electron and hole is restricted to one or only a few nearest neighbour unit cells. Frenkel excitons typically occur in insulators and organic semiconductors with relatively narrow allowed energy bands and accordingly, rather heavy Effective mass.

In the case of Wannier-Mott excitons, the relative motion of electron and hole in the crystal covers many unit cells. Wannier-Mott excitons are considered as hydrogen-like quasiparticles. The wavefunction of the bound state then is said to be hydrogenic, resulting in a series of energy states in analogy to a hydrogen atom. Compared to a hydrogen atom, the exciton binding energy in a crystal is much smaller and the exciton's size (radius) is much larger. This is mainly because of two effects: (a) Coulomb forces are screened in a crystal, which is expressed as a relative permittivity εr significantly larger than 1 and (b) the Effective mass of the electron and hole in a crystal are typically smaller compared to that of free electrons. Wannier-Mott excitons with binding energies ranging from a few to hundreds of meV, depending on the crystal, occur in many semiconductors including Cu2 O, GaAs, other III-V and II-VI semiconductors, transition metal dichalcogenides such as MoS2.

Excitons give rise to spectrally narrow lines in optical absorption, reflection, transmission and luminescence spectra with the energies below the free-particle band gap of an insulator or a semiconductor. Exciton binding energy and radius can be extracted from optical absorption measurements in applied magnetic fields.[6]

The exciton as a quasiparticle is characterized by the momentum (or wavevector K) describing free propagation of the electron-hole pair as a composite particle in the crystalline lattice in agreement with the Bloch theorem. The exciton energy depends on K and is typically parabolic for the wavevectors much smaller than the reciprocal lattice vector of the host lattice. The exciton energy also depends on the respective orientation of the electron and hole spins, whether they are parallel or anti-parallel. The spins are coupled by the exchange interaction, giving rise to exciton energy fine structure.

In metals and highly doped semiconductors a concept of the Gerald Mahan exciton is invoked where the hole in a valence band is correlated with the Fermi sea of conduction electrons. In that case no bound state in a strict sense is formed, but the Coulomb interaction leads to a significant enhancement of absorption in the vicinity of the fundamental absorption edge also known as the Mahan or Fermi-edge singularity.

History

[edit]

The concept of excitons was first proposed by Yakov Frenkel in 1931,[7] when he described the excitation of an atomic lattice considering what is now called the tight-binding description of the band structure. In his model the electron and the hole bound by the coulomb interaction are located either on the same or on the nearest neighbouring sites of the lattice, but the exciton as a composite quasi-particle is able to travel through the lattice without any net transfer of charge, which led to many propositions for optoelectronic devices.

Types

[edit]

Frenkel exciton

[edit]

In materials with a relatively small dielectric constant, the Coulomb interaction between an electron and a hole may be strong and the excitons thus tend to be small, of the same order as the size of the unit cell. Molecular excitons may even be entirely located on the same molecule, as in fullerenes. This Frenkel exciton, named after Yakov Frenkel, has a typical binding energy on the order of 0.1 to 1 eV. Frenkel excitons are typically found in alkali halide crystals and in organic molecular crystals composed of aromatic molecules, such as anthracene and tetracene. Another example of Frenkel exciton includes on-site d-d excitations in transition metal compounds with partially filled d-shells. While d-d transitions are in principle forbidden by symmetry, they become weakly-allowed in a crystal when the symmetry is broken by structural relaxations or other effects. Absorption of a photon resonant with a d-d transition leads to the creation of an electron-hole pair on a single atomic site, which can be treated as a Frenkel exciton.

Wannier–Mott exciton

[edit]

In semiconductors, the dielectric constant is generally large. Consequently, electric field screening tends to reduce the Coulomb interaction between electrons and holes. The result is a Wannier–Mott exciton,[8] which has a radius larger than the lattice spacing. Small effective mass of electrons that is typical of semiconductors also favors large exciton radii. As a result, the effect of the lattice potential can be incorporated into the effective masses of the electron and hole. Likewise, because of the lower masses and the screened Coulomb interaction, the binding energy is usually much less than that of a hydrogen atom, typically on the order of 0.01eV. This type of exciton was named for Gregory Wannier and Nevill Francis Mott. Wannier–Mott excitons are typically found in semiconductor crystals with small energy gaps and high dielectric constants, but have also been identified in liquids, such as liquid xenon. They are also known as large excitons.

In single-wall carbon nanotubes, excitons have both Wannier–Mott and Frenkel character. This is due to the nature of the Coulomb interaction between electrons and holes in one-dimension. The dielectric function of the nanotube itself is large enough to allow for the spatial extent of the wave function to extend over a few to several nanometers along the tube axis, while poor screening in the vacuum or dielectric environment outside of the nanotube allows for large (0.4 to 1.0eV) binding energies.

Often more than one band can be chosen as source for the electron and the hole, leading to different types of excitons in the same material. Even high-lying bands can be effective as femtosecond two-photon experiments have shown. At cryogenic temperatures, many higher excitonic levels can be observed approaching the edge of the band,[9] forming a series of spectral absorption lines that are in principle similar to hydrogen spectral series.

3D semiconductors

[edit]

In a bulk semiconductor, a Wannier exciton has an energy and radius associated with it, called exciton Rydberg energy and exciton Bohr radius respectively.[10] For the energy, we have

where is the Rydberg unit of energy (cf. Rydberg constant), is the (static) relative permittivity, is the reduced mass of the electron and hole, and is the electron mass. Concerning the radius, we have

where is the Bohr radius.

For example, in GaAs, we have relative permittivity of 12.8 and effective electron and hole masses as 0.067m0 and 0.2m0 respectively; and that gives us meV and nm.

2D semiconductors

[edit]

In two-dimensional (2D) materials, the system is quantum confined in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the material. The reduced dimensionality of the system has an effect on the binding energies and radii of Wannier excitons. In fact, excitonic effects are enhanced in such systems.[11]

For a simple screened Coulomb potential, the binding energies take the form of the 2D hydrogen atom[12]

.

In most 2D semiconductors, the Rytova–Keldysh form is a more accurate approximation to the exciton interaction[13][14][15]

where is the so-called screening length, is the vacuum permittivity, is the elementary charge, the average dielectric constant of the surrounding media, and the exciton radius. For this potential, no general expression for the exciton energies may be found. One must instead turn to numerical procedures, and it is precisely this potential that gives rise to the nonhydrogenic Rydberg series of the energies in 2D semiconductors.[11]

Example: excitons in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs)
[edit]

Monolayers of a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) are a good and cutting-edge example where excitons play a major role. In particular, in these systems, they exhibit a bounding energy of the order of 0.5 eV[3] with a Coulomb attraction between the hole and the electrons stronger than in other traditional quantum wells. As a result, optical excitonic peaks are present in these materials even at room temperatures.[3]

0D semiconductors

[edit]
See also: Quantum dot § Quantum confinement in semiconductors

In nanoparticles which exhibit quantum confinement effects and hence behave as quantum dots (also called 0-dimensional semiconductors), excitonic radii are given by[16][17]

where is the relative permittivity, is the reduced mass of the electron-hole system, is the electron mass, and is the Bohr radius.

Hubbard exciton

[edit]
Main article: Hubbard model

Hubbard excitons are linked to electrons not by a Coulomb's interaction, but by a magnetic force. Their name derives by the English physicist John Hubbard.

Hubbard excitons were observed for the first time in 2023 through the Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. Those particles have been obtained by applying a light to a Mott antiferromagnetic insulator.[18]

Charge-transfer exciton

[edit]

An intermediate case between Frenkel and Wannier excitons is the charge-transfer (CT) exciton. In molecular physics, CT excitons form when the electron and the hole occupy adjacent molecules.[19] They occur primarily in organic and molecular crystals;[20] in this case, unlike Frenkel and Wannier excitons, CT excitons display a static electric dipole moment. CT excitons can also occur in transition metal oxides, where they involve an electron in the transition metal 3d orbitals and a hole in the oxygen 2p orbitals. Notable examples include the lowest-energy excitons in correlated cuprates[21] or the two-dimensional exciton of TiO2.[22] Irrespective of the origin, the concept of CT exciton is always related to a transfer of charge from one atomic site to another, thus spreading the wave-function over a few lattice sites.

Surface exciton

[edit]

At surfaces it is possible for so called image states to occur, where the hole is inside the solid and the electron is in the vacuum. These electron-hole pairs can only move along the surface.

Dark exciton

[edit]

Dark excitons are those that cannot be directly excited by light. There are several reasons for exciton "darkness".[23] One of them is the case where the electrons have a different momentum from the holes to which they are bound that is they are in an optically forbidden transition which prevents them from photon absorption and therefore to reach their state they need phonon scattering. They can even outnumber normal bright excitons formed by absorption alone.[24][25][26] The first direct measurement of the dynamics of momentum-forbidden dark excitons have been performed using time-resolved photoemission from monolayer WS2.[27] A scheme by researcher at the University of Innsbruck enables an all-optical control of dark excitons without relying on any preceding decays.[28]

Atomic and molecular excitons

[edit]

Alternatively, an exciton may be described as an excited state of an atom, ion, or molecule, if the excitation is wandering from one cell of the lattice to another.

When a molecule absorbs a quantum of energy that corresponds to a transition from one molecular orbital to another molecular orbital, the resulting electronic excited state is also properly described as an exciton. An electron is said to be found in the lowest unoccupied orbital and an electron hole in the highest occupied molecular orbital, and since they are found within the same molecular orbital manifold, the electron-hole state is said to be bound. Molecular excitons typically have characteristic lifetimes on the order of nanoseconds, after which the ground electronic state is restored and the molecule undergoes photon or phonon emission. Molecular excitons have several interesting properties, one of which is energy transfer (see Förster resonance energy transfer) whereby if a molecular exciton has proper energetic matching to a second molecule's spectral absorbance, then an exciton may transfer (hop) from one molecule to another. The process is strongly dependent on intermolecular distance between the species in solution, and so the process has found application in sensing and molecular rulers.

The hallmark of molecular excitons in organic molecular crystals are doublets and/or triplets of exciton absorption bands strongly polarized along crystallographic axes. In these crystals an elementary cell includes several molecules sitting in symmetrically identical positions, which results in the level degeneracy that is lifted by intermolecular interaction. As a result, absorption bands are polarized along the symmetry axes of the crystal. Such multiplets were discovered by Antonina Prikhot'ko[29][30] and their genesis was proposed by Alexander Davydov. It is known as 'Davydov splitting'.[31][32]

Giant oscillator strength of bound excitons

[edit]

Excitons are lowest excited states of the electronic subsystem of pure crystals. Impurities can bind excitons, and when the bound state is shallow, the oscillator strength for producing bound excitons is so high that impurity absorption can compete with intrinsic exciton absorption even at rather low impurity concentrations. This phenomenon is generic and applicable both to the large radius (Wannier–Mott) excitons and molecular (Frenkel) excitons. Hence, excitons bound to impurities and defects possess giant oscillator strength.[33]

Self-trapping of excitons

[edit]

In crystals, excitons interact with phonons, the lattice vibrations. If this coupling is weak as in typical semiconductors such as GaAs or Si, excitons are scattered by phonons. However, when the coupling is strong, excitons can be self-trapped.[34][35] Self-trapping results in dressing excitons with a dense cloud of virtual phonons which strongly suppresses the ability of excitons to move across the crystal. In simpler terms, this means a local deformation of the crystal lattice around the exciton. Self-trapping can be achieved only if the energy of this deformation can compete with the width of the exciton band. Hence, it should be of atomic scale, of about an electron volt.

Self-trapping of excitons is similar to forming strong-coupling polarons but with three essential differences. First, self-trapped exciton states are always of a small radius, of the order of lattice constant, due to their electric neutrality. Second, there exists a self-trapping barrier separating free and self-trapped states, hence, free excitons are metastable. Third, this barrier enables coexistence of free and self-trapped states of excitons.[36][37][38] This means that spectral lines of free excitons and wide bands of self-trapped excitons can be seen simultaneously in absorption and luminescence spectra. While the self-trapped states are of lattice-spacing scale, the barrier has typically much larger scale. Indeed, its spatial scale is about where is effective mass of the exciton, is the exciton-phonon coupling constant, and is the characteristic frequency of optical phonons. Excitons are self-trapped when and are large, and then the spatial size of the barrier is large compared with the lattice spacing. Transforming a free exciton state into a self-trapped one proceeds as a collective tunneling of coupled exciton-lattice system (an instanton). Because is large, tunneling can be described by a continuum theory.[39] The height of the barrier . Because both and appear in the denominator of , the barriers are basically low. Therefore, free excitons can be seen in crystals with strong exciton-phonon coupling only in pure samples and at low temperatures. Coexistence of free and self-trapped excitons was observed in rare-gas solids,[40][41] alkali-halides,[42] and in molecular crystal of pyrene.[43]

Interaction

[edit]

Excitons are the main mechanism for light emission in semiconductors at low temperature (when the characteristic thermal energy kT is less than the exciton binding energy), replacing the free electron-hole recombination at higher temperatures.

The existence of exciton states may be inferred from the absorption of light associated with their excitation. Typically, excitons are observed just below the band gap.

When excitons interact with photons a so-called polariton (or more specifically exciton-polariton) is formed. These excitons are sometimes referred to as dressed excitons.

Provided the interaction is attractive, an exciton can bind with other excitons to form a biexciton, analogous to a dihydrogen molecule. If a large density of excitons is created in a material, they can interact with one another to form an electron-hole liquid, a state observed in k-space indirect semiconductors.

Additionally, excitons are integer-spin particles obeying Bose statistics in the low-density limit. In some systems, where the interactions are repulsive, a Bose–Einstein condensed state, called excitonium, is predicted to be the ground state. Some evidence of excitonium has existed since the 1970s but has often been difficult to discern from a Peierls phase.[44] Exciton condensates have allegedly been seen in a double quantum well systems.[45] In 2017 Kogar et al. found "compelling evidence" for observed excitons condensing in the three-dimensional semimetal 1T-TiSe2.[46]

Spatially direct and indirect excitons

[edit]

Normally, excitons in a semiconductor have a very short lifetime due to the close proximity of the electron and hole. However, by placing the electron and hole in spatially separated quantum wells with an insulating barrier layer in between so called 'spatially indirect' excitons can be created. This can be achieved using transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures. In contrast to ordinary (spatially direct), these spatially indirect excitons can have large spatial separation between the electron and hole, and thus possess a much longer lifetime.[47] This is often used to cool excitons to very low temperatures in order to study Bose–Einstein condensation (or rather its two-dimensional analog).[48]

Fractional excitons

[edit]

Fractional excitons are a class of quantum particles discovered in bilayer graphene systems under the fractional quantum Hall effect. These excitons form when electrons and holes bind in a two-dimensional material separated by an insulating layer of hexagonal boron nitride. When exposed to strong magnetic fields, these systems display fractionalized excitonic behavior with distinct quantum properties.[49]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Exciton

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An exciton is a neutral formed by the Coulombic binding of an excited in the conduction band and a in the valence band of a or insulator, typically created by the absorption of a . This bound electron-hole pair behaves as a single entity that can propagate through the material, transporting energy without net charge transfer, and serves as a foundational concept in . Excitons are transient, with lifetimes ranging from picoseconds to nanoseconds depending on the material and conditions, and their dynamics influence optical absorption, emission, and energy transfer processes. Excitons are broadly classified into two types based on their binding strength and spatial extent: Frenkel excitons, which are tightly bound with small radii on the order of a single and high binding energies (often >0.1 eV), prevalent in molecular crystals and ; and Wannier-Mott excitons, which are loosely bound with large radii spanning tens of s and lower binding energies (typically 10-50 meV), common in inorganic semiconductors like or . This distinction arises from the degree of electron-hole overlap and screening in the host material, with Frenkel excitons resembling localized molecular excitations and Wannier-Mott excitons more delocalized hydrogen-like states. The concept of excitons was theoretically introduced in 1931 by Yakov Frenkel for molecular systems and independently by Gregory Wannier for extended solids, with experimental confirmation emerging in the through luminescence studies in materials like cuprous . In modern applications, excitons underpin the efficiency of optoelectronic devices, including solar cells where they facilitate charge separation, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for radiative recombination, and emerging technologies like perovskite photovoltaics and two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, where enhanced exciton binding due to reduced dimensionality enables room-temperature Bose-Einstein condensation and . Recent advances have also revealed exotic variants, such as magnetic or topological excitons, expanding their role in and novel phases of matter like excitonic insulators.

Fundamentals

Definition and Formation

An exciton is a that represents a of an in the conduction band and a in the valence band, held together by the attraction between them. Unlike free charge carriers, which are prevalent in metals due to strong dielectric screening, excitons form prominently in insulators and semiconductors where the dielectric constant is lower, reducing screening and allowing the electron-hole pair to remain correlated over a finite distance. This binding distinguishes excitons as charge-neutral, bosonic entities that mediate in these materials. In solid-state band theory, the valence band is filled with , while the conduction band lies above a bandgap and is empty at low temperatures; optical or electrical excitation promotes an across this gap, creating an unbound electron-hole pair unless binding occurs. The primary mechanism for exciton formation is direct optical absorption, where a with energy exceeding the bandgap excites an electron-hole pair that promptly binds into a singlet or triplet exciton depending on the spin configuration. Indirect formation can arise from hot carrier cooling, in which an initially energetic electron-hole pair dissipates excess energy through interactions and binds. Under photoexcitation, the exciton rate GG is given by G=αIℏωG = \frac{\alpha I}{\hbar \omega}, where α\alpha is the absorption coefficient, II is the light intensity, and ℏω\hbar \omega is the . Excitons of this nature have been observed in various solids, such as alkali halides where the binding is relatively localized, and in covalent semiconductors where the pair exhibits more extended character.

Binding Energy and Properties

The of an exciton, denoted as EbE_b, represents the energy required to separate the bound electron-hole pair into free charge carriers, stabilizing the against dissociation. In the hydrogenic model, applicable to delocalized excitons, this energy is given by Eb=μe42ℏ2ε2n2,E_b = \frac{\mu e^4}{2 \hbar^2 \varepsilon^2 n^2}, where μ\mu is the reduced mass of the electron-hole pair, ee is the elementary charge, ℏ\hbar is the reduced Planck's constant, ε\varepsilon is the dielectric constant of the host material, and nn is the principal quantum number. This formula yields discrete energy levels analogous to the hydrogen atom, with the ground state (n=1n=1) exhibiting the highest binding energy. Variations in dimensionality significantly influence EbE_b; in two-dimensional (2D) and one-dimensional (1D) systems, the binding energy is enhanced compared to three-dimensional (3D) cases due to reduced dielectric screening and quantum confinement effects, often increasing by factors of 2–10 depending on the material. Exciton energy levels form a Rydberg series, consisting of a ground state and excited states that converge toward the quasiparticle bandgap as nn increases, enabling observation of higher-order transitions in spectroscopy. The ground state is typically the most stable, with excited states possessing progressively weaker binding. Optical transitions between these levels are characterized by oscillator strengths, which quantify the probability of photon absorption or emission; these strengths decrease for higher nn states due to the spreading of the electron-hole wavefunction, but can be enhanced in low-dimensional systems where overlap is greater. Exciton lifetimes vary from nanoseconds for radiative recombination in bright states to microseconds or longer for dark states, influenced by spin configurations where bright excitons (total spin 0) couple strongly to , while excitons (total spin 1) are optically forbidden and decay non-radiatively. lengths, typically on the order of 1–2 μ\mum at low temperatures, arise from exciton migration via phonon-assisted processes before recombination, with excitons exhibiting longer diffusion due to extended lifetimes. Spectroscopic properties of excitons manifest in sharp absorption and emission spectra near the bandgap, often revealing discrete lines corresponding to the Rydberg series. The , the energy difference between absorption and emission peaks (typically 10–100 meV), arises from lattice relaxation and exciton-phonon interactions following photoexcitation, broadening the emission relative to absorption. Exciton stability exhibits strong temperature dependence, with thermal dissociation becoming prominent as thermal energy kTkT approaches EbE_b, leading to ionization into free carriers. Above a critical density known as the Mott transition density (around 101210^{12}–101310^{13} cm−2^{-2} in two-dimensional systems), excitons dissociate even at low temperatures due to screening, while at higher temperatures, phonon screening further reduces EbE_b by 10–30% at room temperature in many materials.

Historical Development

Early Observations

In the and , initial experimental investigations into in insulators, particularly alkali halides, revealed anomalous optical behaviors that laid the groundwork for understanding excitons. Researchers such as Maurice Curie and Peter Pringsheim observed sharp emission lines positioned below the bandgap energy in these materials during studies of and , interpreting them as indicative of localized bound states rather than free carrier recombination. Key experiments applied the Franck-Condon principle—formulated in 1925—to molecular crystals, emphasizing vertical electronic transitions and the role of vibrational relaxation in producing structured spectra without significant lattice distortion. In 1931, James Franck's analysis of energy transfer processes in condensed media provided phenomenological insights into how excitations could migrate between molecules, suggesting collective excited states in crystalline environments. Early interpretations framed these phenomena through phenomenological models of "excited complexes," viewing them as transient aggregates of electronically excited within the lattice, where binding arose from short-range interactions without invoking detailed quantum mechanical descriptions of electron-hole pairing.

Theoretical Advancements

The theoretical understanding of excitons began to take shape in the early with foundational quantum mechanical models distinguishing between localized and delocalized excitations in solids. In 1931, Yakov Frenkel proposed the concept of tightly bound electron-hole pairs in molecular crystals and insulators, where the excitation is confined to a single or a few lattice sites due to strong electron-lattice coupling, now known as Frenkel excitons. This model emphasized the wave-like propagation of excitations through the lattice while maintaining local character. Complementing this, Gregory Wannier in 1937 developed a theory for more loosely bound excitons in semiconductors, describing delocalized electron-hole pairs that extend over many lattice sites, analogous to atoms but within a crystalline band structure. A central element of these early theories is the Hamiltonian for the two-particle - system, which captures the dynamics under the effective mass approximation. The non-relativistic for the relative motion of the and is given by [−ℏ22μ∇2−e2ϵr]ψ(r)=Eψ(r),\left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} \nabla^2 - \frac{e^2}{\epsilon r} \right] \psi(\mathbf{r}) = E \psi(\mathbf{r}), where μ=me∗mh∗me∗+mh∗\mu = \frac{m_e^* m_h^*}{m_e^* + m_h^*} is the reduced effective mass of the and , ϵ\epsilon is the constant of the medium, and r\mathbf{r} is the electron-hole separation vector; this form neglects higher-order interactions but provides the basis for solving binding energies and wavefunctions. Concurrently, in , Nevill Mott introduced the idea of a density-driven transition where increasing carrier concentration screens the attraction, dissociating excitons into free and , marking a conceptual shift from bound pairs to plasma-like states in dense excitations. Following these foundations, post-1950 developments refined exciton models by incorporating environmental effects and reduced dimensionality. In the 1970s, Leonid Keldysh derived an effective potential for excitons in two-dimensional systems, accounting for the mismatch at interfaces and leading to enhanced binding energies compared to three-dimensional cases; this Rytova-Keldysh potential, V(r)≈e22ϵ0ϵr(1+r/r0)V(r) \approx \frac{e^2}{2\epsilon_0 \epsilon r} \left(1 + r/r_0\right) for small separations (with r0r_0 as the 2D length), has become essential for analyzing layered materials. Additionally, theories began integrating lattice vibrations through concepts, treating excitons as dressed quasiparticles coupled to phonons, which explains broadening and self-trapping in real materials. Key milestones in the included Yukito Toyozawa's integration of exciton theory with solid-state band structures, particularly through methods to describe absorption line shapes under electron-phonon interactions, bridging isolated-pair models with collective lattice effects in . These advancements solidified excitons as fundamental quasiparticles, enabling predictive frameworks for in diverse material classes.

Classification of Excitons

Frenkel Excitons

Frenkel excitons are tightly bound electron-hole pairs that are highly localized within a single or a few adjacent molecules in insulating molecular crystals and organic materials, characterized by a small radius of approximately 1 nm and a high ranging from 0.1 to 1 eV. This high arises from the low constant of these materials, typically 2–3, which provides minimal screening of the interaction between the and , combined with the tight spatial overlap of their wavefunctions due to the atomic-scale proximity within molecular orbitals. In contrast to more delocalized excitons, Frenkel excitons exhibit atomic-scale localization, limiting their extent to the molecular rather than extending over many lattice sites. These excitons form through on-site optical excitation, where a photon promotes an electron from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the same molecule, creating a localized neutral excitation that can hop between lattice sites via dipole-dipole interactions. The dynamics and description of such localized excitations in molecular lattices are captured by the Frenkel exciton Hamiltonian, a site-basis model analogous to the Hubbard model for strongly correlated systems, which accounts for on-site energies, inter-site couplings, and electron-hole pairing on individual molecular sites. Classic examples include anthracene and naphthalene crystals, where Frenkel excitons dominate the optical absorption and emission processes due to their molecular structure. Additionally, J-aggregates of cyanine dyes, such as those formed in solution or thin films, exhibit delocalized Frenkel excitons along one-dimensional chains, leading to narrowed absorption bands and enhanced radiative rates. Optically, Frenkel excitons display strong coupling to intramolecular vibrations because of their localized nature, resulting in pronounced vibronic progressions in absorption and spectra, where vibrational sidebands accompany the pure electronic transition. This vibronic structure arises from the Franck-Condon overlap between ground- and excited-state surfaces, often showing progressions spaced by 1000–1500 cm⁻¹ corresponding to C-C stretching modes in aromatic systems. Unlike Wannier-Mott excitons, which are more delocalized in high-dielectric semiconductors and exhibit weaker phonon coupling with broader, less structured spectra, Frenkel excitons' and localization emphasize molecular-like optical signatures with high oscillator strengths for the S₁ ← S₀ transition.

Wannier-Mott Excitons

Wannier-Mott excitons represent delocalized - pairs in inorganic semiconductors characterized by large spatial extents due to high screening, resulting in Bohr radii typically spanning 10 to 100 nm and binding energies ranging from 10 to 50 meV. These excitons form hydrogen-like states, where the and are bound by screened interactions, enabling extended wavefunctions that span multiple unit cells. Their low binding energies allow thermal dissociation at in many materials, influencing such as absorption edges observed in spectra of compounds like CdS and Si. The properties of Wannier-Mott excitons vary significantly with dimensionality, arising from changes in screening and confinement. In three-dimensional bulk semiconductors, such as GaAs, the is approximately 4.2 meV, supported by a dielectric constant around 12.8 that reduces the attraction. In contrast, two-dimensional systems like dichalcogenides (TMDs), exemplified by monolayer MoS₂, exhibit enhanced binding energies up to 0.5 eV due to reduced screening in the plane, leading to a fourfold increase over the 3D hydrogenic model. In zero-dimensional quantum dots, such as CdSe nanocrystals, confinement further boosts the to several hundred meV, tightening the exciton wavefunction. Representative examples include CdS, where the binding energy reaches about 28–30 meV, manifesting as sharp excitonic absorption features near the band edge, and , which hosts indirect Wannier-Mott excitons with binding energies around 15 meV despite its indirect bandgap. These excitons are observed through optical spectroscopy, revealing series of absorption lines corresponding to excited states. The stability of Wannier-Mott excitons is limited by ionization at high densities, known as the Mott transition, occurring around a Mott density of 10¹⁷ to 10¹⁸ cm⁻³ in 3D semiconductors like GaAs and ZnO, where overlapping wavefunctions screen the binding interaction. Theoretically, Wannier-Mott excitons are modeled using the effective mass approximation, treating the electron-hole pair as a with μ = (m_e^* m_h^)/(m_e^ + m_h^) and screened potential V(r) = -e²/(ε_r r), where material parameters like effective masses m_e^, m_h^* and constant ε_r determine the and radius. This approach yields the ground-state in 3D as E_b = (μ/m_0) (13.6 eV)/ε_r², providing a framework for predicting spectra in various semiconductors.

Charge-Transfer Excitons

Charge-transfer excitons feature partial spatial separation of the electron and hole across material interfaces, distinguishing them from more localized or delocalized exciton types. This separation arises from the electron residing primarily in one material (acceptor) and the hole in another (donor), resulting in an intermediate binding energy typically between 0.1 and 0.5 eV. The resulting dipole moment, often on the order of several debye, imparts sensitivity to external electric fields, manifesting as significant Stark shifts that can tune the exciton energy by tens of meV under moderate fields. These characteristics enable unique interfacial dynamics while maintaining sufficient binding to form stable quasiparticles. Formation of charge-transfer excitons occurs primarily at donor-acceptor interfaces in organic heterostructures or type-II band-aligned semiconductor junctions, where photoexcitation generates an initial local exciton that dissociates via (or ) transfer across the boundary. In organic photovoltaics, this process is driven by the offset in highest occupied and lowest unoccupied energies between donor and acceptor, facilitating ultrafast charge separation on timescales. Similarly, in inorganic type-II heterojunctions, band alignment spatially confines electrons and holes to opposite sides, promoting the formation of these excitons upon optical absorption near the interface. Representative examples include pentacene-C60 bilayers, where charge-transfer excitons form at the organic interface with binding energies around 0.3 eV and exhibit reduced electron-hole overlap due to the molecular separation. In inorganic systems, such as GaAs/AlGaAs type-II heterostructures, these excitons emerge in quantum wells or superlattices, with the electron-hole pair separated across the junction, leading to tunable optical properties. Key properties of charge-transfer excitons include diminished wavefunction overlap between the separated carriers, which suppresses direct recombination and extends radiative lifetimes to approximately microseconds, far longer than those of tightly bound excitons. This reduced overlap also enhances sensitivity to environmental perturbations, such as that induce large Stark shifts via the permanent . Additionally, their character allows for efficient coupling to charge transport processes at interfaces. Theoretically, charge-transfer excitons are modeled using the extended Hubbard framework, which accounts for on-site repulsion, inter-site interactions, and transfer integrals to describe the binding and dynamics of the separated pair. This approach captures the intermediate localization and effects by incorporating nearest-neighbor couplings, providing insights into stability and dissociation pathways.

Specialized Exciton Types

Hubbard excitons represent strongly correlated electron-hole pairs that emerge in Mott insulators, where strong on-site repulsion localizes electrons and prevents conventional charge mobility. These excitons, often termed Mott-Hubbard excitons, form as tightly bound doublon-holon pairs mediated by spin interactions, exhibiting behavior akin to hard-core bosons in the two-orbital t-J model at quarter filling. In this framework, the t-J model, derived from the in the strong-coupling limit, captures the antiferromagnetic exchange that stabilizes these pairs, leading to dispersions with minima at finite momenta such as k=±π/2k = \pm \pi/2. Observations in iridates and ultracold atomic systems highlight their role in novel phases like excitonic density waves, where quasi-condensation occurs without charge order. Surface excitons are confined states localized at material- or interfaces, where dielectric mismatch enhances the attraction between electron-hole pairs through image charge effects. In systems like SiO2_2/Si interfaces, this localization boosts the significantly; for instance, in ultrathin organic-inorganic perovskites on SiO2_2, binding energies reach 470–490 meV, over four times higher than in bulk due to the reduced screening in the vacuum side ( ϵw≈1\epsilon_w \approx 1). The Keldysh potential, accounting for this interface, predicts a screening length of about 10–12 , making these excitons promising for enhanced optoelectronic responses at boundaries. Dark excitons are spin-forbidden states with parallel and spins, rendering them optically inactive and thus long-lived compared to bright counterparts. In dichalcogenides (TMDs) like WSe2_2 monolayers, these excitons exhibit lifetimes up to 110 ps at low temperatures (12 ), far exceeding the ~2 ps of bright excitons, due to suppressed radiative decay. Their includes a zero-field splitting of ~0.6 meV between truly dark and partially allowed "" states, critically influencing physics through spin-valley locking that enables valley-selective control in 2D materials. An example occurs in carbon nanotubes, where dark excitons lie below bright ones by tens of meV, dominating emission efficiency via efficient dark-to-bright conversion and contributing up to large fractions of intensity. Rydberg excitons in semiconductors manifest as highly excited states where the electron-hole pair occupies high principal quantum numbers n≫1n \gg 1, yielding large orbital sizes scaling as n2aBn^2 a_B (exciton Bohr radius aBa_B) and enhanced polarizabilities up to n7n^7, enabling strong dipole-dipole interactions for quantum sensing and blockade effects. These states, observed in materials like cuprous oxide (Cu₂O) up to n≈30n \approx 30, exhibit hydrogen-like series in optical spectra and contribute to nonlinear optical properties. Complementing these, giant oscillator strength arises in bound impurity excitons within doped semiconductors, where shallow impurities act as traps borrowing oscillator strength from the continuum, amplifying the transition dipole by factors proportional to the impurity volume (e.g., α∝r3\alpha \propto r^3, with rr the exciton radius). A classic example is nitrogen-doped gallium phosphide (GaP:N), where isoelectronic N traps form excitons with oscillator strengths enhanced by orders of magnitude, leading to sharp luminescence lines and radiative lifetimes in the nanosecond range.

Dynamics and Interactions

Self-Trapping

Self-trapping of excitons refers to the localization of an exciton through strong electron- coupling, which induces a in the surrounding lattice. This process arises primarily from interactions between the exciton and longitudinal optical (LO) in polar materials, leading to adiabatic relaxation of the lattice to a configuration that lowers the total energy of the system. In this mechanism, the exciton's and components couple to the lattice vibrations, causing a displacement of ions that screens the attraction and stabilizes the localized state. For extended excitons, such as Wannier-Mott types, this manifests as the formation of an excitonic , where the exciton is dressed by a coherent cloud. The Pekar-Fröhlich model provides a theoretical framework for describing large excitonic polarons in the self-trapping regime, treating the exciton as a charge distribution that polarizes the ionic lattice via long-range Coulomb interactions with LO phonons. Self-trapping is favored under conditions of strong electron-phonon coupling, typically in ionic crystals with soft vibrational modes, where the polaron coupling constant α exceeds a critical value of around 5-6. These conditions are prevalent in materials like alkali halides, where high ionicity and low phonon frequencies enhance the interaction strength. The energy lowering due to lattice relaxation in the self-trapped state, ΔE, is on the order of several ħω_LO in strong coupling regimes, providing a stabilization that can exceed several times the LO phonon energy ħω_LO. As a consequence of self-trapping, the exciton's mobility is significantly reduced, confining it to a region spanning just a few lattice sites and limiting diffusive transport. This localization often results in characteristic emission from self-trapped excitons (STEs), featuring broad bands with large Stokes shifts of approximately 1-2 eV relative to the free exciton absorption energy, arising from the substantial lattice relaxation energy. In alkali halides such as (KI), STEs form readily upon photoexcitation, with the relaxed configuration involving a self-trapped akin to a V_k center—a molecular comprising two adjacent halide ions—accompanied by a nearby . Theoretical understanding of self-trapping is often visualized through the configurational coordinate diagram, which plots the of the system against a lattice displacement coordinate representing the relevant mode. In this model, the free exciton state corresponds to a parabolic potential minimum at =0, while the self-trapped state lies at a displaced minimum ( ≠ 0) with lower after relaxation; a potential barrier between these minima governs the probability and dependence. Seminal work by Toyozawa highlighted how the interplay of strength and dimensionality determines the stability of the self-trapped phase over the delocalized one.

Exciton-Exciton Interactions

Exciton-exciton interactions arise when the of excitons becomes sufficiently high, leading to significant many-body effects that influence their dynamics and . These interactions primarily manifest through processes, where two excitons collide and recombine, and scattering events that redistribute and within the exciton gas. At elevated densities, such interactions can enhance optical gain in systems by promoting , while also causing filling, which limits the maximum occupancy of excitonic states and contributes to excitonic bleaching. Exciton-exciton annihilation occurs via two main types: non-radiative and radiative. In non-radiative annihilation, an transfers energy from one exciton to another, ionizing the recipient and dissipating the energy as , which is a dominant loss mechanism at high densities in materials like monolayer dichalcogenides. Radiative annihilation, less common, involves the formation of a biexciton intermediate state that subsequently decays emissively, as observed in lead halide perovskites where the biexciton reaches approximately 250 meV. Exciton-exciton scattering, an elastic or inelastic , governs thermalization and has characteristic rates determined by the product of scattering cross-section and relative velocity, typically σ v ≈ 10^{-10} cm³/s in quantum wells, influencing the linewidth broadening and diffusion of excitons. In high-density regimes, these interactions enable phenomena such as the augmentation of gain in excitonic lasers, where bimolecular processes facilitate population inversion beyond single-exciton limits. Phase space filling further modulates this by Pauli blocking of final states, reducing absorption and enhancing transparency in quantum well structures. A practical example is bimolecular recombination in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), where exciton-exciton encounters lead to non-radiative losses that degrade efficiency, particularly under high current densities in devices based on poly(p-phenylene vinylene) copolymers. At sufficiently low temperatures and high densities, exciton-exciton interactions can drive Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC), where excitons macroscopically occupy the , forming a coherent . In two-dimensional traps, the critical density for BEC is given by nc=gkBT2πℏ2/m∗,n_c = \frac{g k_B T}{2\pi \hbar^2 / m^*}, where g is the degeneracy factor, k_B the , T the , \hbar the reduced Planck's constant, and m^* the exciton effective ; this threshold marks the onset of condensation in systems like coupled quantum wells. An exemplar is the observation of exciton BEC in cuprous oxide (Cu₂O) at around 250 mK, where trapped excitons exhibit a sharp peak indicative of macroscopic coherence under continuous-wave excitation. Theoretically, the dynamics of the exciton gas under these interactions are described by the quantum , which accounts for collision integrals involving annihilation, scattering, and external potentials to model thermalization and condensation kinetics in trapped geometries.

Direct and Indirect Excitons

Excitons are classified as direct or indirect based on the relative momenta of the constituent and . In direct excitons, the and possess the same crystal , denoted as ke=kh\mathbf{k}_e = \mathbf{k}_h, which enables vertical optical transitions conserving both energy and without the need for assistance. This configuration results in a strong , facilitating efficient light absorption and radiative recombination. In contrast, indirect excitons occur when ke≠kh\mathbf{k}_e \neq \mathbf{k}_h, requiring mediation to satisfy conservation during optical processes, which suppresses the transition probability and leads to weaker . The properties of direct and indirect excitons differ markedly in terms of stability and recombination dynamics. Direct excitons exhibit higher radiative recombination efficiency due to their allowed transitions, making them prominent in direct-bandgap where the conduction band minimum and valence band maximum align at the same k\mathbf{k}-point. Indirect excitons, however, are more stable in indirect-bandgap materials, as their formation aligns with the band structure extrema at disparate momenta, though their recombination is less efficient and often non-radiative or phonon-assisted. For instance, in (GaAs), a prototypical direct-bandgap , direct excitons dominate the optical response with rapid recombination on timescales. Conversely, in (Si), an indirect-bandgap material, excitons are predominantly indirect, contributing to the material's poor efficiency despite their relative stability. Beyond momentum alignment, excitons can also be categorized as spatially direct or indirect based on the real-space overlap of and wavefunctions. Spatially direct excitons feature significant overlap between the electron and hole, enhancing binding and oscillator strength, as seen in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). Spatially indirect excitons, by contrast, involve electrons and holes separated in distinct layers of van der Waals heterostructures, reducing wavefunction overlap and thus weakening binding but introducing a permanent dipole moment that can be tuned via external or layer stacking. A key example is the MoSe2_2/WSe2_2 heterobilayer, where spatially indirect interlayer excitons exhibit tunable dipole moments, enabling control over their energy and interaction strengths. These distinctions have significant implications for optoelectronic and quantum applications. In TMDs, direct excitons at the KK and K′K' valleys enable , where circularly polarized light selectively excites specific valleys for information encoding. Spatially indirect excitons, such as those in MoSe2_2/WSe2_2 heterostructures, benefit from extended lifetimes reaching microseconds due to diminished recombination rates from spatial separation, facilitating studies of coherent quantum phenomena.

Emerging Concepts

Fractional Excitons

Fractional excitons represent a class of composite quasiparticles formed by the binding of and holes, each carrying fractional charge, in strongly correlated two-dimensional electron systems under high magnetic fields. Unlike conventional excitons composed of integer charges, these entities emerge in the (FQHE) regime, where they exhibit anyonic quantum statistics intermediate between bosons and fermions. In a landmark 2025 experiment at , researchers observed excitonic pairing coexisting with FQHE states in , identifying two new quantum phases: a fractional exciton condensate at total filling 1, and a non-bosonic exciton phase challenging the traditional bosonic paradigm. These quasiparticles form in fractional quantum Hall states of or dichalcogenide (TMD) heterostructures subjected to perpendicular s on the order of tens of tesla. In such systems, the strong interactions and Landau level quantization lead to the pairing of fractionally charged quasielectrons and quasiholes, stabilized by the magnetic confinement. The binding arises from the interplay of electrostatic attraction and the effective magnetic field experienced by the charges, resulting in neutral composites that propagate coherently through the Hall liquid. Key properties of fractional excitons include non-Abelian anyonic statistics, enabling topological protection against decoherence, which positions them as promising candidates for braiding operations in architectures. Their binding energies are typically on the scale of several meV, sufficient for room-temperature stability in some 2D materials but requiring cryogenic conditions for precise control in experiments. Experimental signatures include quantized transport plateaus and Aharonov-Bohm-like interference patterns, confirming their fractional and extended coherence lengths exceeding micrometers. Prominent examples occur in Laughlin-like states at filling factors such as ν=1/3, where interlayer excitons in manifest as counterpropagating edge modes with fractional charge e/3. Detection has been achieved through techniques, such as Fabry-Pérot setups, which reveal phase shifts consistent with anyonic statistics during tunneling. Similar states have been theoretically predicted in TMD heterostructures like WS₂/WSe₂, where moiré potentials may enhance exciton stability. Theoretically, fractional excitons are described by an extension of the composite fermion model, originally developed for FQHE quasiparticles, wherein electrons bind to an even number of quanta to form s that subsequently pair into excitonic states. This framework accounts for the collective excitations as neutral modes with magnetoroton dispersions, unifying the description of charge fractionalization and excitonic binding in the Hall regime.

Moiré and Topological Excitons

Moiré excitons emerge in twisted bilayer dichalcogenides (TMDs), such as WS₂/MoS₂ heterostructures, where the periodic moiré formed by the lattice mismatch and twist angle modulates the electronic bands, leading to the formation of tightly bound excitonic states confined within moiré potential wells. Recent studies from 2024 and 2025 have observed these excitons through photoluminescence spectroscopy, revealing miniband structures that arise from interlayer hybridization and enable tunable optical responses. In these systems, the excitons exhibit spatiotemporal dynamics, with propagation and diffusion governed by the moiré lattice periodicity, allowing for controlled localization and transport on sub-nanometer scales. Key properties of moiré excitons include their , which can be precisely tuned by varying the twist angle, resulting in enhanced stability compared to isolated 2D excitons due to the additional confinement from the moiré potential. At small twist angles near 0° or 60°, flat bands form in the excitonic spectrum, promoting strong electron-electron correlations and potential Mott-like insulating phases within the moiré . These flat bands facilitate the emergence of correlated excitonic states, where interactions lead to collective behaviors such as or Bose-Einstein under appropriate excitation conditions. Topological excitons represent a class of protected excitonic states predicted in 2024, characterized by finite vorticity in momentum space, arising in quantum spin Hall insulators where conduction and valence bands possess nontrivial . These excitons carry orbital and are stabilized by edge states that provide topological protection against backscattering and disorder, enabling robust propagation along sample boundaries. Notable examples include the observation of Hofstadter butterfly spectra in moiré lattices under magnetic fields, where energy patterns emerge from the interplay of moiré periodicity and , manifesting as quantized Hall conductance plateaus in excitonic transport. Topological Wannier excitons have been studied in Bi₂Se₃, a prototypical , exhibiting nontrivial topology in their dispersion and optical selection rules. Recent advances in 2025 have demonstrated nonlinear emission from excitons through strong exciton-photon coupling in engineered metasurfaces, such as those based on WS₂, where quasi-bound states in the continuum enhance by over an . This coupling allows dynamic control of emission intensity via external parameters like or polarization, opening pathways for tunable nonlinear optical devices leveraging topological protection.

Excitonic Insulators

An excitonic insulator represents a quantum phase of matter in which excitons, bound electron-hole pairs, undergo spontaneous condensation, effectively closing the single-particle through many-body interactions. This instability arises when the exciton surpasses the band gap, leading to a gapped insulating state despite the underlying semimetallic or narrow-gap character. The concept was first proposed in the 1960s by Lev Keldysh, who described the possibility of exciton-driven phase transitions in semiconductors, and further developed by Bennett Halperin and Thomas Rice, who formalized the of coherent exciton pairing analogous to . Despite early theoretical predictions, experimental realization has remained elusive, with candidates debated due to confounding effects like structural distortions. Such phases typically emerge in narrow-gap semiconductors or semimetals where conduction and valence bands nearly overlap, allowing facile electron-hole pairing under weak external doping or . For instance, tunable heterostructures like Si/SiGe interfaces enable band overlap control via strain or thickness, facilitating the conditions for . Key properties include spontaneous quantum coherence of the excitonic order, manifesting as a macroscopic wavefunction for the paired carriers, and an order parameter defined by the exciton amplitude that breaks in the electronic structure. Additionally, excitonic insulators exhibit enhanced diamagnetic susceptibility, akin to a Meissner-like response, arising from the orbital currents of coherent excitons, though the charge neutrality limits perfect field expulsion. Theoretically, the excitonic insulator phase is modeled using a BCS-like framework, where excitons pair via attractive interactions across the bands, opening an excitonic gap Δ\Delta. The critical for the transition follows Tc∼EFexp⁡(−1/λ)T_c \sim E_F \exp(-1/\lambda), with EFE_F the relevant energy scale (such as in degenerate systems) and λ\lambda the dimensionless coupling strength proportional to the exciton interaction. This analogy to Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory highlights the instability as a Cooper-pair-like phenomenon for neutral bosons, with the gap equation solved self-consistently to determine stability. Recent advances have leveraged first-principles computations to design and predict excitonic insulators, notably in 2025 studies on materials like La₃Cd₂As₆, where a putative excitonic insulating state has been proposed. For candidates like 1T-TiSe₂, the ground state remains debated, with 2025 research indicating it is more likely a band insulator driven by lattice fluctuations rather than spontaneous exciton order. In hybrid perovskites, interplay between excitons and polarons—large lattice distortions accompanying carriers—has been shown to potentially stabilize condensation by enhancing effective binding, offering pathways to room-temperature phases through polaronic screening. These developments underscore the shift toward computational screening of bulk materials for verifiable excitonic signatures, with evidence for EI phases reported in systems like Ta₂Pd₃Te₅ as of 2025.

Applications

Optoelectronic Devices

Excitons play a central role in optoelectronic devices by facilitating the conversion between electrical and optical signals through their generation, diffusion, and recombination. In light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), excitons form when electrons and holes recombine after charge injection, leading to upon radiative decay. This process is particularly efficient in organic materials, where excitons mediate emission in displays and lighting applications. In fluorescent OLEDs, only singlet excitons contribute to emission, limiting internal quantum efficiency to approximately 25% due to spin statistics, as triplet excitons (75% of total) typically decay non-radiatively. Phosphorescent OLEDs overcome this by incorporating heavy-metal complexes, such as (III) compounds, which enable strong spin-orbit coupling to harvest triplet excitons for emission, achieving near-100% internal quantum efficiency. For instance, iridium-based phosphors like Ir(ppy)3 have been pivotal in commercial OLEDs, enhancing device brightness and color purity. In photovoltaic technologies, excitons are generated by light absorption in organic solar cells, where they must diffuse to a donor-acceptor interface for dissociation into free charges, a process optimized in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) architectures to minimize recombination losses. The Shockley-Queisser limit, originally derived for inorganic p-n junctions, is adapted for excitonic solar cells, capping single-junction at around 33% under standard illumination, though BHJ designs approach 20% by improving exciton dissociation and charge extraction. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) similarly rely on excitons formed in molecules adsorbed on a , where efficient injection into the conduction band enables charge separation, with certified efficiencies exceeding 14% in lab-scale devices using ruthenium-based dyes. Perovskite-based photodetectors benefit from excitonic effects that enhance by increasing light absorption and carrier generation , particularly in hybrid structures where excitons contribute to detection up to intense fluxes. Recent advances in LEDs (PeLEDs) highlight excitonic recombination's impact, with external quantum efficiencies surpassing 25% for and emitters as of 2025, driven by improved film quality and defect passivation. However, a key challenge in these devices is the high exciton in organic and low-dimensional materials, which impedes charge separation and leads to geminate recombination; this is mitigated by engineering heterointerfaces that lower the effective and promote ultrafast dissociation.

Quantum and Photonic Technologies

Exciton-polaritons emerge from the strong between excitons and cavity photons in microcavities, forming hybrid quasiparticles with half-light, half-matter character that exhibit enhanced optical coherence and nonlinearity. This regime is characterized by vacuum Rabi splitting energies on the order of Ω ≈ 10 meV, where the coupling strength exceeds the linewidths of the uncoupled modes, leading to anticrossing of the dispersion branches. In perovskite-based systems, such enable Bose-Einstein at , as demonstrated in solids embedded in open cavities, with condensation thresholds as low as 0.53 W/cm² and linewidths around 0.5 meV under continuous-wave pumping. In quantum dots and nanowires, single-exciton emission serves as a basis for implementations, where the radiative decay of a confined exciton provides a deterministic source of single s with high indistinguishability, achieving purities exceeding 97% in InAs/GaAs systems. Entanglement generation leverages the biexciton-exciton cascade, where the sequential emission from a biexciton state produces polarization-entangled pairs, with approaching 90% in resonantly excited quantum dots despite fine-structure splitting challenges. These processes enable scalable protocols, including two-photon interference for quantum networking. Valleytronics exploits the valley degree of freedom in dichalcogenides (TMDs) like WS₂ and WSe₂, where excitons in the and valleys carry pseudospin that can be optically addressed and manipulated for spin-valley qubits. Persistent entanglement between valley excitons has been observed, with coherence times extended by integration into cavities, enabling valley-specific control via strain or for robust qubit operations protected by time-reversal symmetry. Recent advances include 2025 demonstrations of strongly coupled exciton-hyperbolic-phonon-polariton hybrids in biased and semiconductor heterostructures, where the hybridization enhances light-matter interactions across mid-infrared wavelengths for tunable polaritonic devices. Topological exciton lasers, realized in lattices at , leverage disclination defects to achieve robust, unidirectional emission with low thresholds, combining band for protected edge states. Key examples include polariton blockade in confined systems, where strong from exciton interactions suppresses multi-photon emission, yielding high-purity single-photon sources with g²(0) < 0.1 under resonant driving. In moiré heterostructures, such as twisted bilayer TMDs, form with tunable dispersion via twist angle, enabling enhanced nonlinearity and in flat bands for advanced photonic circuits.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10708127/
  2. https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/exciton-and-charge-transport-dynamics-organic-semiconductors
  3. https://www.nature.com/collections/ieehbhicff
  4. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4451&context=gc_etds
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41699-018-0074-2
  6. https://physics.berkeley.edu/news/scientists-create-longer-lasting-exciton-may-open-new-possibilities-quantum-information-science
  7. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg0192
  8. https://arxiv.org/html/2510.26221v1
  9. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2981
  10. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045214
  11. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235208
  12. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085303
  13. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/mqqw-qz5d
  14. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.056401
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/exciton-binding-energy
  16. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L201407
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37655-8
  18. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/9pct-k79b
  19. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041048
  20. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/112/15/152106/35550/Exciton-diffusion-in-WSe2-monolayers-embedded-in-a
  21. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.323
  22. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2403434121
  23. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.201308
  24. https://books.google.com/books/about/Luminescence_des_corps_solides.html?id=z81J2fNkP9wC
  25. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-56853-4.pdf
  26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43577-024-00766-x
  27. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.02807
  28. http://laussy.org/images/6/6a/Laussy24a.pdf
  29. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.165410
  30. https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/20/1/53/1937228
  31. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-973-organic-optoelectronics-spring-2003/a21ecb66b23810fe38494f233489dbcf_7.pdf
  32. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-31-16-27041
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8432684/
  34. https://academic.oup.com/book/27412/chapter/197233895
  35. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00645
  36. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/146/8/084112/74169/Spectral-densities-for-Frenkel-exciton-dynamics-in
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022231307003468
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0370157314004104
  39. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035403
  40. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.1726
  41. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.021001
  42. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04159
  43. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.236405
  44. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12292
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37889-9
  46. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.125306
  47. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00911
  48. https://theses.hal.science/file/index/docid/179386/filename/Pietka-PhD.pdf
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7345661/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3552764/
  51. https://arxiv.org/html/2509.24465v1
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231149264_Charge_Transfer_Excitons_and_Possible_Excitonic_Pairing_in_the_Extended_Two-Band_Hubbard_Model
  53. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/epl/i1997-00174-3
  54. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.04094
  55. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.075111
  56. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.07407
  57. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-023-00427-7
  58. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.05398
  59. https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0603085
  60. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43577-024-00775-w
  61. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/45/10/4543/18368896/4543_1_online.pdf
  62. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.036902
  63. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045202
  64. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0953-8984/19/25/255208
  65. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-85236-7.pdf
  66. https://journals.jps.jp/doi/10.1143/JPSJ.30.1555
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022369790901445
  68. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.241304
  69. https://ee.stanford.edu/~dabm/048.pdf
  70. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9193
  71. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11010
  72. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.016403
  73. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18094-4
  74. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/105007
  75. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1489
  76. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.5306
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-97221-x
  78. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/3/11/112104/18742/Improved-value-for-the-silicon-free-exciton
  79. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7242
  80. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.193308
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08274-3
  82. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18224
  83. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.235121
  84. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1332
  85. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03915
  86. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64285-2
  87. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44214-025-00075-7
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024009477
  89. https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.1007/s12274-024-6936-3
  90. http://www.ou.edu/news/articles/2024/august/quantum-researchers-publish-exciting-particle-prediction.html
  91. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2401644121
  92. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L201302
  93. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-32740-z
  94. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ady2108
  95. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01255
  96. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09235
  97. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27231
  98. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011046
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2635741/
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2589778024000046
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079670013000427
  102. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.235320
  103. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp022507x
  104. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adt9952
  105. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ce/d5ce00222b
  106. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15869-7
  107. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article/10/1/011316/2881368/Nanophotonics-of-microcavity-exciton-polaritons
  108. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/photonics-insights/volume-1/issue-1/R04/Microcavity-exciton-polaritons-at-room-temperature/10.3788/PI.2022.R04.pdf
  109. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60553-3
  110. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adr1652
  111. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-018-0092-0
  112. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-08535-z
  113. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.013507
  114. https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.1007/s12274-019-2497-2
  115. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.035404
  116. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.195412
  117. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adom.202501712
  118. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61120-6
  119. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L012020
  120. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05204
  121. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01175
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.