Hubbry Logo
James Forman Jr.James Forman Jr.Main
Open search
James Forman Jr.
Community hub
James Forman Jr.
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
James Forman Jr.
James Forman Jr.
from Wikipedia

James Forman Jr. (born James Robert Lumumba Forman; June 22, 1967)[2] is an American legal scholar currently on leave from serving as the J. Skelly Wright Professor of Law at Yale Law School. He is the author of Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America, which won the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction, and a co-founder of the Maya Angelou School in Washington, D.C.

Key Information

In 2023, he was elected to the American Philosophical Society.[3]

Early life

[edit]

Forman is the son of James Forman Sr. and Constancia Romilly, who met through their activism and involvement with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, or SNCC.[4] Forman Sr. was the group's executive secretary handling internal operations[5] from 1961 to 1966 and active during the 1964 Freedom Summer.[4] Romilly, daughter of the British aristocrats Jessica Mitford and Esmond Romilly,[4] dropped out of Sarah Lawrence College to join the group in 1962 and would eventually become a coordinator of SNCC's Atlanta chapter.[5] Forman has a brother, Chaka Forman.[6] In the early 1970s, when Forman was seven years old, his parents, who had never been married, separated.[4][7] Forman speculated in an interview that FBI pressure on civil rights groups at the time contributed to the strain on his parents' relationship:[4] "There was also the period when...the FBI was putting incredible pressure on civil rights groups through the counter-intelligence program -- or the COINTELPRO program. And they were fomenting lies and distrust... They [Forman Sr. and Romilly] had a hard time in those years for a lot of reasons but I know, for my mom in particular, that that was one."[4]

After his parents' separation, Forman and his brother lived with Romilly in New York but spent summers and holidays with Forman Sr., and Forman has stated that both parents were active in his life.[4]

Forman was accepted into an elite New York high school: Hunter College High School.[4] The school was almost all white, prompting Romilly to move with her sons to Atlanta so they could grow up in a black community, which she considered important for their racial identities.[4] Forman expressed the importance of this move in an interview, saying: "In a city that has so many African-American people, I would go to school, and the jocks were black. The nerds were black... The artsy kids were black. The band-camp kids were black. The thugs were black -- like, everybody was black. So there wasn't a way to perform that went along with being black. And that, I think, was very powerful and liberating for me as a child because it meant I got to be who I was, which was a nerdy kid. And nobody thought, oh, well, you're not black if you're reading books."[4]

Forman attended Roosevelt High School in Atlanta.[8] He went on to attend Brown University, from which he received his Bachelor of Arts in 1988.[9] He received a Juris Doctor degree from Yale Law School in 1992.[9]

Law career

[edit]

Law clerk

[edit]

In the 1990s, right after graduating law school, Forman began work as a law clerk for William Norris of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.[4] The next year he clerked for Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.[4]

Forman describes working with O'Connor as enjoyable, although they disagreed on many of the social issues that came before the court.[4] In his interview for the job, Forman was asked how his differing political viewpoints would affect his work as a law clerk.[4] In an interview, he stated his response: "I told her that I will argue with you. I'll tell you the truth about what I think. I will try to persuade you. But at the end of the day, you are the justice, and I'm the law clerk. And if I'm taking this job, I'm agreeing to help you do your work, right? I'm helping -- if you decide to come out the other way and assign me the opinion, then I'll write the best opinion I can for you."[4]

Public defender

[edit]

During Forman's stint as O'Connor's clerk, the justice encouraged him to pursue a career in the Department of Justice or with a civil rights organization such as the NAACP.[10] He instead chose to become a public defender, saying in an interview, "I imagined myself doing the civil rights work of my generation."[9]

Forman became a public defender in Washington, D.C., in the fall of 1994, a job he would hold for six years.[11] He wrote about some of his experiences with clients in Locking Up Our Own.

Teaching

[edit]
Forman in 2017

In 2003, Forman began teaching law at Georgetown University.[8] He remained at Georgetown until 2011, when he joined the faculty at Yale.[8] There he teaches Constitutional Law and seminars entitled Race, Class and Punishment, and Inside Out: Issues in Criminal Justice.[8] Forman's Inside Out course meets inside a different prison each semester and creates a space where incarcerated persons and law students can engage in conversation about the criminal justice system.[12]

The Maya Angelou School

[edit]

In 1997, Forman cofounded with David Domenici as part of the See Forever Foundation, a comprehensive educational program for teens, which later became the Maya Angelou Public Charter School.[13] Domenici, a Stanford Law graduate and former corporate attorney first pitched his idea for the school to Forman in a D.C. coffee shop in 1995, and they began planning in earnest soon after.[13]

The school was designed to reach troubled children and provide them high-quality education, counseling services, and employment opportunities.[13] Forman thought the program could be incredibly beneficial to some of his clients as a public defender; he wrote in his book: "Most of my clients had struggled in school or dropped out altogether before they were arrested. If a program like [this one] had existed...they might never have become my clients in the first place."[14]

In 1997, Forman took a leave of absence from public defense work to pursue opening the Maya Angelou School.[14] In the fall, with some grant money and teachers hired on, the Maya Angelou Public Charter High School opened with twenty students selected from the court system,[14] all of them either on probation or committed to the Department of Youth and Rehabilitation Services.[15] The students had poor academic records and had often experienced trauma or struggled with mental health.[16] In addition, Forman writes in Locking Up Our Own about ongoing struggles with local police targeting students of the school for searches and arrests.[16]

Despite these difficulties, the school was successful. By September 2004, the Maya Angelou Public Charter High School had grown significantly and opened a second campus location in partnership with the District of Columbia Public Schools.[15]

In the summer of 2007, the Maya Angelou School took over the school inside Oak Hill Detention Center, Washington D.C.'s juvenile prison.[15] The changes enacted by the Maya Angelou School inside the prison were described by a court monitor as contributing to an "extraordinary" turnaround.[8] The same year, the Transition Center was also opened to help young people transition from incarceration by helping them get GEDs and workplace credentials.[15]

Today the Maya Angelou School system includes the Maya Angelou Public Charter High School, the Maya Angelou Young Adult Learning Center (the Transition Center), and the Maya Angelou Academy at New Beginnings.[15]

The Maya Angelou School's mission statement, described as "the Maya Way" on the school's website, is to provide "a comprehensive approach to education that focuses on academic achievement, social and emotional support, and career and college preparation so students are ready for life after Maya."[17]

The school's name was chosen in a contest from an essay written by Sherti Hendrix, a member of the class of 1999, the school's first graduating class.[18]

Bibliography

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

James Forman Jr. (born June 22, 1967) is an American legal scholar, civil rights advocate, and author whose work examines the intersections of race, in the United States. He serves as the J. Skelly Professor of Law at , where he teaches courses on , , and the historical and social dimensions of punishment. Forman's scholarship emphasizes empirical analysis of policy decisions, particularly how rising rates in black communities during the 1980s and 1990s prompted local black leaders—prosecutors, police chiefs, and politicians—to endorse stricter enforcement measures, contributing to patterns of mass incarceration.
Forman graduated from and , then clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice and worked as a in Washington, D.C., before entering academia. His 2017 book, Locking Up Our Own: in Black America, received the for General Nonfiction and argues that while mass incarceration disproportionately affects black Americans, it arose partly from community-driven demands for public safety in response to intra-racial violence, rather than solely external impositions. This perspective challenges prevailing narratives by incorporating data on crime victimization and policy choices, highlighting causal factors like the crack epidemic's impact on black neighborhoods. Earlier in his career, Forman co-founded the Maya Angelou Public Charter Schools in D.C., focusing on for at-risk youth as an alternative to punitive approaches. As the son of civil rights leader , he has continued engaging with racial justice issues but prioritizes evidence-based critiques over ideological framing, critiquing both overly punitive systems and inadequate attention to victims' experiences in reform debates. His writings have appeared in outlets like and The Atlantic, influencing discussions on decarceration while underscoring the need for strategies addressing underlying drivers of crime, such as family structure and economic opportunity.

Early Life and Family Background

Childhood and Upbringing

James Forman Jr. was born in 1967 to , a leading civil rights activist who served as executive director of the (SNCC) from 1961 to 1968, and Constancia Romilly, a white Anglo-American activist and daughter of British aristocrats. His mixed-race heritage placed him within the racial dynamics of the post-civil rights era, where his father advocated for and reparations while his mother engaged in leftist causes. His parents separated when he was seven years old, after which Forman and his brother primarily lived with their mother in , spending summers and holidays with their father in . He grew up across multiple cities, including stretches in , , and primarily in , Georgia, attending public schools in these locations before graduating from the system. As a child, Forman observed racial disparities in policing and community life firsthand, an experience he later attributed to shaping his views on , though he emphasized being raised to identify as black by his parents.

Influence of Parental Legacy

James Forman Jr.'s father, James Forman Sr. (1928–2005), was a key figure in the , serving as of the (SNCC) from 1961 to 1966, where he organized voter registration drives and coordinated direct-action campaigns in the South. Forman Sr., raised partly on a farm in and later in , shifted from to after witnessing racial , authoring influential works like The Making of Black Revolutionaries (1972) that critiqued and emphasized black . This paternal legacy exposed Forman Jr. to the frontlines of racial struggle from an early age, as he spent summers and holidays with his father after his parents' separation in the early 1970s, fostering a deep awareness of systemic and the costs of . His mother, Constancia "Dinky" Romilly, contributed a complementary activist heritage as a white SNCC member who joined in 1962 and coordinated its chapter, meeting Forman Sr. through shared organizing efforts. Daughter of British investigative journalist and radical , she dropped out of to immerse herself in civil rights fieldwork, embodying interracial solidarity amid FBI surveillance that strained the couple's marriage. Forman Jr., raised primarily by Romilly in New York after the separation, internalized her emphasis on cross-racial justice, with both parents instilling an identity as African American despite his mixed-race background (father black from Chicago's South Side, mother white). This dual legacy profoundly shaped Forman Jr.'s career trajectory, leading him to pursue explicitly to advance racial , as he has stated: "I had gone to because I wanted to fight for racial and civil rights. My parents were in the ." The SNCC-era experiences of his parents—marked by organizing, interracial alliances, and confrontations with state power—directly informed his later focus on , viewing mass incarceration as the civil rights challenge of his generation, distinct yet continuous with their anti-segregation battles. While the parents' activism emphasized community empowerment, Forman Jr. has reflected on how their era's optimism gave way to his scrutiny of black-led policies contributing to incarceration, applying first-hand familial insights to critique unintended consequences without rejecting the core commitment to equity.

Education

High School and Undergraduate Studies

Forman attended public schools in , , and [New York City](/page/New York City) during his early years before transferring to the system. He graduated from Roosevelt High School in , Georgia, a public institution serving predominantly Black students in the city's west side during the . Forman later credited his Roosevelt teachers for providing effective instruction despite resource constraints typical of urban public schools at the time, which he observed firsthand amid broader challenges like underfunding and administrative hurdles. Following high school, Forman enrolled at in , where he pursued a emphasizing open curriculum flexibility. He completed his studies there, receiving a degree in 1988. During his time at Brown, Forman engaged with interdisciplinary coursework that later informed his interests in , policy, and social issues, though specific academic honors or extracurricular involvements from this period remain undocumented in primary biographical accounts. Forman attended , earning a degree in 1992. During his studies, he served as Book Reviews Editor for the Yale Law Journal and achieved national runner-up status in the Frederick Douglass Competition sponsored by the National Black Law Students Association for the 1989–1990 academic year. His early legal training commenced immediately after graduation through two federal judicial clerkships, which provided intensive exposure to appellate and litigation. From 1992 to 1993, he clerked for Judge William A. Norris on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He then clerked for Associate Justice on the from 1993 to 1994, assisting in case preparation and opinion drafting during a period that included high-profile decisions on and civil rights. These positions, among the most competitive entry points for new lawyers, honed his skills in legal analysis and advocacy before transitioning to practice.

Judicial Clerkships

Following his graduation from Yale Law School in 1992, James Forman Jr. clerked for Judge William A. Norris on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the first African American appointed to that court. The following year, during the 1993 Supreme Court term (October 1993 to June 1994), he served as a to Associate Justice . These clerkships provided Forman with early exposure to federal appellate and constitutional adjudication, spanning circuits known for handling a high volume of civil rights and criminal cases. During his time with O'Connor, the justice reportedly encouraged him to pursue roles in , such as at the Department of Justice or civil rights organizations, influencing his subsequent career trajectory in .

Public Defense Practice

Following his clerkships on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and with U.S. Justice , James Forman Jr. joined the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia in 1994 as a staff attorney. He remained in this position for six years, until 2000. In his role at the Public Defender Service—a federally funded agency providing legal representation to indigent defendants in D.C. —Forman handled and cases involving both adult and juvenile clients. His caseload included defending individuals accused of violent and non-violent offenses amid 's elevated crime rates during the mid-1990s, a period marked by ongoing effects of the crack cocaine epidemic and homicide spikes exceeding 400 annually in the early part of the decade. These experiences highlighted systemic challenges, such as clients' limited access to education and employment, which Forman observed contributed to even after successful legal defenses, particularly in . During this period, Forman co-founded the Public Charter School in 1997 with fellow David Domenici, targeting at-risk youth including school dropouts and those with arrest records, as a direct response to the educational deficits he encountered among his clients. The initiative reflected his assessment that courtroom victories alone were insufficient without addressing underlying social factors driving criminal involvement. Forman's public defense work laid the empirical foundation for his subsequent analyses of mass incarceration, emphasizing community-level dynamics in black-led jurisdictions like D.C., where local officials and residents supported aggressive policing and sentencing in response to intra-community violence.

Academic and Teaching Career

Positions at Law Schools

Forman served as of law at from 2003 to 2007, advancing to full professor of law there from 2007 to 2011. During his tenure at Georgetown, he focused on and related subjects, contributing to the faculty's scholarship on and reform. In 2011, Forman joined as clinical of , a role he held until 2016, when he was promoted to of . He was appointed the J. Skelly of at , delivering the inaugural lecture for the chair on February 12, 2024. At , Forman teaches courses including , Race, Class, and Punishment, and a titled Inside Out: Issues in , which pairs Yale students with incarcerated individuals for collaborative study. He also co-founded the Yale and Racial Justice Center in 2022 and directs its Access to pipeline program, launched in September 2020, aimed at broadening access. Forman held a visiting professorship at the during the winter term of 2007. In 2024–2025, he served as the W. Haywood Burns Chair in Human & Civil Rights at , a temporary appointment involving public dialogues and trial advocacy on issues while on leave from Yale.

Specialized Courses and Programs

Forman teaches the experiential seminar "Inside Out: Issues in " at , which he has offered since joining the faculty in 2011. This course integrates approximately 10 Yale Law students ("outside" students) with an equal number of incarcerated individuals ("inside" students) for weekly discussions on topics, held alternately at the Carl Robinson Correctional Institution in Enfield and the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, both in . The format emphasizes interactive circle discussions, often breaking into smaller groups, supplemented by weekly reflection papers, to foster direct engagement with the realities of incarceration, race, class, and policy reform. The seminar draws from the national Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program, originating at , to challenge participants' preconceptions and promote empathy across divides. Incarcerated participants vary in age, background, and sentence length, providing firsthand perspectives that Yale students report as transformative in understanding systemic impacts. administrators, such as William Murphy, have noted its potential to reduce through rehabilitative , while student reflections highlight emotional connections formed via shared personal narratives. In addition to Inside Out, Forman directs the "Access to Law School" pipeline program, launched in 2011, which targets first-generation and low-income residents of New Haven for preparatory exposure to through student-led workshops and mentoring. This initiative aims to broaden pathways into the for underrepresented groups, aligning with Forman's broader focus on equity in institutions like prisons and schools. These programs reflect his integration of practical, community-engaged into legal academia, distinct from traditional classroom instruction.

Involvement in Education Reform

Establishment of Maya Angelou Public Charter Schools

In April 1997, James Forman Jr. and David Domenici, both former lawyers, resigned from their positions to co-found the See Forever Foundation, which established the initial See Forever Public Charter School in , targeted at adolescents entangled in the juvenile justice system. The venture stemmed from their observations during legal work—Forman as a representing youth facing systemic educational failures post-incarceration, and Domenici from corporate practice seeking broader social impact—aiming to deliver a comprehensive, relationship-centered alternative to conventional schooling for dropouts and court-involved students. By late 1997, the school opened its doors, emphasizing small class sizes, individualized support, and reintegration strategies to address the high and illiteracy rates among this demographic, with initial enrollment drawn from D.C.'s juvenile facilities. The was authorized under D.C.'s emerging public framework, enacted in 1996, allowing innovative models for underserved populations without the constraints of traditional district oversight. Forman Jr., leveraging his firsthand experience with clients who lacked viable educational pathways after legal troubles, co-led curriculum development focused on core academics alongside , vocational training, and therapeutic elements to foster trust and . This establishment marked an early application of schooling to justice-involved youth, predating broader reforms, with the See Forever model later rebranded under the name in homage to the poet's emphasis on resilience and literacy, though the foundational operations remained consistent. Initial challenges included securing funding through grants and demonstrating efficacy to skeptics, yet the duo's direct involvement in daily operations underscored a commitment to empirical adaptation over ideological prescriptions.

School Operations and Empirical Outcomes

The Maya Angelou Public Charter School (MAPCS), operated by the See Forever Foundation, functions as an provider targeting disconnected and at-risk youth in , including prior dropouts and students with involvement in the justice system. Established in 1998, it serves approximately 528 students across three campuses, with the high school campus enrolling around 224 in grades 9-12. The student body is predominantly minority (99.6%, primarily Black) and economically disadvantaged, reflecting its focus on underserved populations in Ward 7. Operations emphasize small class sizes with a student-teacher ratio of about 11:1, combining in-person instruction and online elements, and wraparound supports such as , counseling, credit recovery programs, and individualized plans (IEPs) or 504 accommodations. The curriculum aligns with standards, incorporates courses, foreign languages, electives, and career-focused tracks like business or hospitality, alongside requirements for 100 hours of and submission of four college applications per senior. and a residential "RESI" program for select students provide additional structure, including supervised housing from Monday to Friday to address barriers like unstable home environments. Empirical outcomes reveal challenges in academic proficiency despite the targeted interventions. State test proficiency rates remain low: 30% in reading, 8% in math, and 2% in science, with specific 2023-2024 results showing 5.1% proficiency in English II (versus a D.C. average of 33.5%) and 2.6% in Algebra I (versus 19.9%). The high school ranks 33rd out of 34 in D.C., unranked nationally by . The four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate stands at 44%, below district averages for traditional schools but contextualized by the alternative model's service to high-risk students. Postsecondary and career metrics show mixed results, with limited public data indicating low immediate college enrollment; one cohort reported 16.4% postsecondary enrollment, though suppressed in some analyses due to small sample sizes. For adult learners at the Learning Center campus, 47% passed the GED exam in school year 2020-2021, falling short of the 50% goal, while workforce program completion targets were partially met. goals have not consistently been achieved, with in-seat rates at 48% in one prior year against a 60% target, and out-of-school suspension rates exceed sector averages in some grade bands, though restorative approaches aim to mitigate this. These outcomes underscore the school's emphasis on retention and for a challenging population, but highlight persistent gaps in standardized academic measures relative to D.C. public charter sector benchmarks.

Major Writings

"Locking Up Our Own" (2017)

Locking Up Our Own: in Black America was published on April 18, 2017, by , spanning 320 pages in its initial hardcover edition. The work draws on Forman Jr.'s experiences as a in , during the , combined with historical analysis of policies from the 1970s onward. It received the for General , with the citation noting its examination of punitive societal trends and lessons for addressing racial and futures. The book's central thesis posits that mass incarceration in black communities resulted not solely from external impositions like white racism or conservative agendas, but significantly from internal dynamics: rising rates in urban black neighborhoods prompted black residents and leaders—mayors, judges, prosecutors, and police chiefs—to advocate for and implement stringent law-and-order policies. Forman Jr. argues that the post-civil rights era's first cohort of black elected officials, gaining power in cities like , prioritized public safety amid escalating and rates, which had surged from the late due to factors including the crack cocaine epidemic peaking in the late 1980s. For instance, D.C.'s black-majority city council passed mandatory minimum sentences for unlawful gun possession in 1990, a measure supported by black leaders despite its foreseeable impact on incarcerating young black men, as firearms were linked to over 80% of s in the district by the early 1990s. Forman Jr. employs empirical evidence, including FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing black-on-black violent crime rates tripling between 1960 and 1990 in major cities, and local policy records demonstrating black officials' endorsements of "broken windows" policing and enhanced penalties for drug and gun offenses. He illustrates causation through D.C.-specific cases, such as the shift under Mayor , who, after early leniency, signed tougher sentencing laws in response to constituent demands for order following spikes in youth violence. This support stemmed from a pragmatic realism: black communities, victimized disproportionately by intra-racial —where over 90% of black victims were killed by black perpetrators—sought protection, leading to policies that expanded populations from about 12,000 in 1980 to over 300,000 nationwide by 2000, with blacks comprising roughly half despite being 13% of the U.S. population. The analysis critiques simplistic narratives attributing incarceration solely to federal drug wars or racial animus, emphasizing instead shared agency and the of well-intentioned responses to genuine crime threats. Forman Jr. advocates for reforms that confront both over-incarceration and persistent , urging black leaders to acknowledge their historical role to foster effective, evidence-based alternatives like community violence interruption programs over mere decarceration without addressing root criminality. This perspective, grounded in first-hand observations and archival data, challenges dominant academic views that downplay agency in punitive shifts, highlighting how ignoring crime's causal drivers perpetuates ineffective debates.

Subsequent Works and Editorships (Including 2024 Handbook)

Following the publication of Locking Up Our Own in 2017, Forman Jr. continued contributing to criminal justice discourse through essays and op-eds in major outlets. In September 2017, he published "A Prison Sentence Ends. But the Stigma Doesn’t" in The New York Times, examining the persistent societal barriers faced by formerly incarcerated individuals post-release. His writings increasingly addressed juvenile justice and decarceration efforts, including a February 2025 New York Times Magazine feature, "What Happened When America Emptied Its Youth Prisons," which analyzed state-level reforms reducing youth detention populations and their mixed outcomes on recidivism and community safety. In 2024, Forman Jr. co-edited Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change, a 496-page anthology published by under its FSG Originals imprint. Co-edited with Premal Dharia and Maria Hawilo, the volume compiles essays from advocates, policy experts, and formerly incarcerated contributors, offering practical strategies for reducing incarceration rates through alternatives like community-based interventions and sentencing reforms. The handbook emphasizes incremental, evidence-based changes over sweeping overhauls, drawing on data from jurisdictions that have lowered populations without corresponding spikes, such as pretrial diversion programs achieving 20-30% reductions in jail admissions in select states. Forman Jr.'s editorial role involved curating diverse perspectives to counter overly punitive policies, while acknowledging trade-offs like the need for victim-centered approaches in reform advocacy. Forman Jr. has held no formal long-term editorships in academic journals post-2017, though his co-editorship of the 2024 represents a significant curatorial effort in compiling interdisciplinary voices on carceral reform. These contributions build on his earlier by shifting from historical analysis to actionable toolkits, informed by empirical trends like the U.S. population decline from 1.6 million in 2009 to approximately 1.2 million by 2023, per data.

Intellectual Contributions to Criminal Justice

Core Arguments on Mass Incarceration Causes

In Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America (2017), James Forman Jr. contends that mass incarceration emerged not primarily as a top-down imposition of racial animus by white authorities, but as an incremental response by black political and civic leaders to escalating and disorder within black communities during the late 1970s and 1980s. Focusing on Washington, D.C.—a majority-black jurisdiction that gained in 1973—Forman documents how black mayors, such as (elected in 1978), black police chiefs like Maurice Turner (appointed in 1981), and black prosecutors and judges endorsed policies including mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession, strict measures, and aggressive policing tactics. These measures, he argues, were driven by constituent demands for protection amid a epidemic that fueled interpersonal violence, with D.C.'s homicide rate climbing from 188 in 1976 to over 400 annually by the late 1980s. Forman emphasizes that black communities experienced disproportionate victimization from black-perpetrated , including homicides at rates far exceeding national averages, prompting residents to prioritize over leniency in sentencing. Letters to officials and public hearings cited in his analysis reveal widespread black support for "tough-on-crime" initiatives, as leaders framed public as an extension of civil struggles against intra-community threats rather than external alone. This agency, Forman asserts, complicates narratives attributing incarceration solely to the or systemic , as black officials wielded discretion in a politically empowered context yet opted for punitiveness to address immediate causal factors like youth and drug-related turf wars. Central to Forman's thesis is the distinction between drug offenses and : while acknowledging over-incarceration for nonviolent drug possession, he highlights how policies targeting guns and homicides—such as D.C.'s 1980s-era mandatory minimums for armed robbery—gained traction because black leaders confronted undeniable spikes in lethal , with over 80% of D.C. homicides by the involving victims and perpetrators. In his earlier article "Racial Critiques of Mass Incarceration: Beyond the New Jim Crow" (2012), Forman critiques analogies equating modern prisons to Jim Crow segregation, arguing they overlook attitudes favoring punishment for serious offenses and fail to engage non-racial drivers like actual crime surges that necessitated community-endorsed enforcement. This perspective underscores political choices as a key causal mechanism, rather than passive subjugation.

Empirical Evidence and First-Principles Analysis

In , where Forman Jr. centers much of his analysis, rates escalated dramatically during the late and early 1990s, reaching over 400 annually by 1989 and peaking at levels that earned the city the moniker "murder capital" amid the crack cocaine epidemic's violence. rates nationwide, disproportionately affecting black communities, surged from 161 offenses per 100,000 population in 1960 to 758 per 100,000 by 1991, with black victims comprising the majority in intra-community offenses like . This empirical reality of rampant victimization—primarily black-on-black—drove local demands for enhanced , as black-led city councils under mayors like expanded police forces and advocated for stricter penalties in response to constituents' fears, evidenced by policies increasing arrests and sentences for drug and gun crimes. Polls from the era corroborate broad black support for punitive measures: a 1994 Gallup survey found 58% of favoring the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, exceeding white support at 49%, with black mayors and community leaders endorsing its provisions for more officers and truth-in-sentencing laws. Forman's documentation of D.C.-specific actions, such as the black-majority council's push for mandatory minimums and youth curfews, aligns with this, showing incarceration rates rising in tandem with these local initiatives rather than solely federal mandates. From a causal standpoint, the temporal correlation between heightened enforcement and the subsequent decline—homicides in D.C. dropping sharply through the —suggests incapacitation effects, where removing repeat violent offenders reduced community harm, though multifactorial influences like aging populations and economic shifts contributed. First-principles reasoning underscores that mass incarceration's scale stemmed from a rational response to unchecked : in environments of high offending rates, prioritizing victim necessitates swift removal of perpetrators to restore order, as posits that credible threats of punishment curb opportunistic crimes when alternatives like alone prove insufficient amid acute disorder. Empirical studies affirm some incapacitative impact, with U.S. explaining a portion of the drop, countering narratives minimizing policy efficacy. However, Forman's thesis invites scrutiny on proportionality; while local agency amplified incarceration, underlying drivers like family structure erosion and drug market incentives—root causes of the crime wave—warrant addressing beyond punishment, as over-reliance on prisons yields once baseline security is achieved, evidenced by post-2000 decarceration without in select jurisdictions. This analysis reveals Forman's value in highlighting endogenous factors, challenging exogenous-only explanations while recognizing trade-offs in versus safety.

Reception, Criticisms, and Debates

Awards and Positive Assessments

James Forman Jr.'s book Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America (2017) received the for General Nonfiction, awarded by for its examination of African American communities' support for punitive crime policies in The same work was longlisted for the 2017 in Nonfiction by the . It was selected as one of the New York Times ten best books of 2017 and won the Goddard Riverside Stephan Russo Book for . Forman was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2020, recognizing his contributions to legal scholarship on . He has received honorary degrees from and . Critics have praised Locking Up Our Own for its empirical focus on local dynamics driving mass incarceration, with a New York Times review highlighting its explanation of political leaders' embrace of tough-on-crime measures amid rising violence. A Law Review assessment described it as superior to other accounts in detailing communities' agency in incarceration trends, serving as a cautionary analysis for reformers. These evaluations emphasize the book's data-driven challenge to external-only attributions of policy failures.

Critiques of Reform Narratives and Policy Implications

Critics of Forman's reform narrative argue that his focus on black leaders' and communities' endorsement of tough-on-crime policies in the 1980s and 1990s insufficiently accounts for the racist structures that influenced those attitudes, potentially allowing interpretations that align with narratives minimizing white supremacist legacies in criminal justice. For instance, Forman's documentation of black political demands for more policing and incarceration in Washington, D.C.—driven by homicide rates exceeding 400 annually in the mid-1980s and black victimization rates over 30 per 100,000—has been faulted for oversimplifying the social psychology of punitiveness, neglecting factors like implicit bias and authoritarian ideologies embedded in broader American culture. This critique posits that such emphasis risks diluting calls for transformative anti-racist reforms by framing mass incarceration partly as a self-inflicted outcome rather than predominantly exogenous oppression. Forman's analysis of decentralized decisions—spanning prosecutors, judges, and legislators across decades—highlights how fragmented "all-of-the-above" strategies (combining with unmet calls for jobs, , and ) failed, as non-carceral investments were systematically underfunded amid rising violence. Critics contend this historical framing inadequately challenges the punitive turn's roots in racial hierarchies, suggesting it perpetuates a too wedded to incremental tweaks in sentencing and policing rather than wholesale dismantlement. Policy implications of Forman's narrative underscore the necessity of addressing , which accounts for approximately 53% of state prisoners, to build sustainable decarceration; mere reductions in nonviolent sentences, as pursued in initiatives like the 2010 , falter without alternatives that restore community safety. He advocates shrinking prison populations—U.S. incarceration fell from 2.3 million in 2008 to under 1.2 million by 2023—while enhancing conditions for the incarcerated and investing in violence interruption programs, such as those piloted in Oakland reducing by 40% between 2012 and 2018. However, detractors from abolitionist perspectives argue this retains faith in state violence, proposing instead community-led models that bypass reformed policing, which Forman views as essential given persistent black demands for protection amid crime spikes, like the 30% national increase from 2019 to 2021. These debates reveal tensions in reform agendas: Forman's causal emphasis on intra-community violence as a driver—substantiated by FBI data showing black offenders committing 50% of homicides despite comprising 13% of the population in the —implies policies must prioritize empirical safety metrics over ideological purity, yet risks alienating advocates prioritizing racial critique over behavioral factors. Effective implementation thus requires bridging these divides through evidence-based hybrids, such as expanded in , which reduced by 10-15% in randomized trials, to counter critiques of incomplete narratives.

Recent Developments and Ongoing Influence

Post-2020 Activities and Publications

In 2022, Forman co-founded the Yale Law and Racial Justice Center, which collaborates with New Haven community members, Yale students, staff, and faculty to address racial justice issues through legal initiatives. He also serves as faculty director of the Yale Center for Law and Racial Justice and founded the Access to Law School Program, a student-led effort to broaden access. Forman edited and contributed to Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change, published in 2024 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, co-edited with former public defenders Premal Dharia and Maria Hawilo. The volume compiles essays from scholars, practitioners, and policymakers outlining practical strategies for reducing incarceration rates, emphasizing targeted reforms in sentencing, policing, and community interventions over broad decarceration. In early 2024, Forman delivered the inaugural lecture for his appointment as J. Skelly Wright Professor of Law at Yale, discussing pathways to expand access following the Supreme Court's rulings in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC. He holds trusteeships with the Council on Criminal Justice and was appointed the W. Haywood Burns Chair at in June 2024, focusing on racial justice in education and criminal systems. Forman has continued publishing on juvenile justice reforms, including a February 2025 New York Times Magazine article examining the decline in youth incarceration from the 2000s to 2020 amid rising rates in prior decades, and a related Sunday Read piece on emptying youth prisons. He has participated in public discussions, such as a September 2024 Yale interview on evidence-based changes and a January 2025 Penn State lecture titled "Can the System Ever Be Just?"

Broader Impact on Policy Discussions

Forman's scholarship has prompted policymakers and reformers to incorporate community-driven demands for public safety into agendas, challenging narratives that frame mass incarceration solely as a product of external racial . By documenting how black-elected officials, prosecutors, and residents in cities like , endorsed policies such as mandatory minimums and aggressive policing in response to rising violence from the onward—amid homicide rates peaking at over 400 annually in D.C. by 1991—his work underscores the interplay of local crime surges and self-imposed punitive measures. This causal emphasis has influenced bipartisan discussions, evident in the Council on Criminal Justice's efforts to prioritize violence reduction alongside sentencing reforms, where Forman's insights highlight the need for policies addressing offender accountability without reverting to over-incarceration. In juvenile justice policy, Forman's recent analyses have bolstered arguments for deinstitutionalization, citing empirical outcomes from initiatives like Connecticut's shift away from large youth prisons, which reduced commitments by 80% while adult for those cases fell from 50% to under 20% without elevating community crime rates. His critiques of "indiscriminate" adult prosecutions for minors, as referenced in evaluations of state practices, advocate for graduated responses that prioritize rehabilitation over transfer laws, informing ongoing debates in jurisdictions like where such mechanisms persist despite evidence of diminished public safety benefits. These contributions extend to broader strategies, urging integration of economic interventions—such as job programs yielding 20-30% drops in randomized trials—with enforcement, rather than decarceration in isolation, to sustain political support amid persistent urban violence disparities. Forman's framework has also permeated evaluations of post-2020 reforms, where his emphasis on "taking crime seriously" counters overly optimistic decarceration models by drawing on historical data showing black community backlash against perceived leniency during crime waves. This has shaped policy think tanks' consensus-building, as seen in his engagements promoting hybrid approaches that combine pretrial diversion with targeted interventions for high-risk offenders, evidenced by declining rates in reformed systems without proportional rearrest spikes. Overall, his insistence on multifaceted causation—encompassing victim agency, political incentives, and behavioral responses—has tempered ideological divides, fostering discussions that prioritize verifiable reductions in harm over symbolic gestures.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.