Hubbry Logo
WindageWindageMain
Open search
Windage
Community hub
Windage
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Windage
Windage
Windage
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In aerodynamics, firearms ballistics, and automobiles, windage is the effects of some fluid, usually air (e.g., wind) and sometimes liquids, such as oil.

Aerodynamics

[edit]

Windage is a force created on an object by friction when there is relative movement between air and the object. Windage loss is the reduction in efficiency due to windage forces.

For example, electric motors are affected by friction between the rotor and air.[1] Large alternators have significant losses due to windage. To reduce losses, hydrogen gas may be used, since it is less dense.[2]

Causes of windage are:

  • The object is moving and being slowed by resistance from the air.
  • A wind is blowing, producing a force on the object.

The term can refer to:

  • The effect of the force, for example the deflection of a missile or an aircraft by a cross wind.
  • The area and shape of the object that make it susceptible to friction, for example those parts of a boat that are exposed to the wind.

Aerodynamic streamlining can be used to reduce windage.

Hydrodynamic drag is a hydrodynamic effect similar to windage.

Ballistics

[edit]

In firearms parlance, windage is the sight adjustment used to compensate for the horizontal deviation of the projectile trajectory from the intended point of impact due to wind drift or Coriolis effect. By contrast, the adjustment for the vertical deviation is the elevation.

Colloquially, "Kentucky windage" is the practice of holding the aim to the upwind side of the target (also known as deflection shooting or "leading" the wind) to compensate for wind drift, without actually changing the existing adjustment settings on the gunsight.[3]

In muzzleloading firearms, windage is the difference in diameter between the bore and the ball, especially in muskets and cannons.[4] The bore gap allows the shot to be loaded quickly but reduces the efficiency of the weapon's internal ballistics, as it allows gas to leak past the projectile. It also reduces the accuracy, as the ball takes a zig-zag path along the barrel, emerging out of the muzzle at an unpredictable angle.[5]

Automobiles

[edit]

In automotive parlance, windage is parasitic drag on the crankshaft due to sump oil splashing on the crank train during rough driving. It can also be dissipating energy in turbulence from the crank train moving the crankcase gas and oil mist at high RPM. Windage may also inhibit the migration of oil into the sump and back to the oil pump, creating lubrication problems. Some manufacturers and aftermarket vendors have developed special scrapers to remove excess oil from the counterweights and windage screens to create a barrier between the crankshaft and oil sump.[6][7] Windage is eliminated in dry sump designs.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Windage

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Windage is the retarding force exerted by air on a moving object, often manifesting as aerodynamic drag that opposes motion through the atmosphere. In , it specifically describes the lateral deflection of a caused by crosswinds, necessitating adjustments to aiming devices such as scopes to compensate for this effect and maintain accuracy over distance. Additionally, in the context of firearms design, windage can refer to the clearance or space between a and the bore of a gun, which influences initial stability and gas escape. In , windage denotes the energy losses due to viscous drag from air on rotating components, such as gears, rotors, or alternators, which can significantly impact efficiency in high-speed machinery. These losses arise from the interaction between moving surfaces and the surrounding fluid medium, often exacerbated in enclosed systems where becomes turbulent. Mitigation strategies, including shrouding or optimized geometries, are employed to minimize windage power dissipation, particularly in applications like and electric motors. Beyond these primary domains, windage extends to , where it quantifies the exposure of objects—like poles, , or —to wind pressure, influencing stability and loads. In automotive contexts, it affects aerodynamics by contributing to overall drag, while in , excessive windage on non-aerodynamic surfaces can reduce by increasing resistance without generating lift. Overall, understanding and accounting for windage is crucial across disciplines to optimize , safety, and energy efficiency.

Definition and Principles

Definition of Windage

Windage refers to the retarding force exerted on a moving object by air friction or resistance due to relative motion between the object and the surrounding air. This effect encompasses the drag generated when an object displaces air, leading to energy dissipation or trajectory alteration. The term originates from the combination of "wind" and the suffix "-age," denoting action or effect, with its first recorded uses appearing in English around 1700–1710, initially in gunnery and nautical contexts to describe allowances for air-related influences. In various contexts, windage manifests as an impacting objects in motion through air, such as the deflection of by crosswinds in . It also denotes efficiency losses in enclosed mechanical systems where rotating components stir or churn air, converting into heat. Additionally, in firearms, windage specifically indicates the clearance or gap between a and the bore of a gun, which permits propellant gases to escape around the , reducing the effective propelling and . A key distinction in applications involves windage as on vehicles, where external air resistance hinders forward motion and reduces , contrasted with internal frictional losses in rotors, such as those in electric motors or turbines, where air opposes rotation and generates heat.

Physical Principles

Windage represents a form of aerodynamic drag arising from the interaction between a moving object and the surrounding air, primarily due to viscous friction within the air and pressure differences induced by the object's motion. This drag manifests as a resistive opposing the relative motion, stemming from the air's , which causes shear stresses on the object's surface, and , which generates form drag through and wake formation. In physical terms, windage dissipates into heat via these mechanisms, making it a key contributor to energy losses in systems involving high-speed motion. The fundamental equation quantifying windage drag force for objects translating through air is the drag force formula: Fd=12ρv2CdAF_d = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 C_d A where FdF_d is the drag force, ρ\rho is the , vv is the , CdC_d is the dimensionless , and AA is the reference cross-sectional area. This equation derives from Newton's second law applied to fluid , where the force balances the rate of momentum change in the air deflected by the object. The term 12ρv2\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 represents the , rooted in as the kinetic energy density of the flow, while AA scales the interaction volume. The CdC_d encapsulates non-dimensional effects and is determined experimentally, as its value depends on the (Re = ρvL/μ\rho v L / \mu, where LL is a and μ\mu is ), which governs the transition from laminar to turbulent flow; the for effects; surface , which increases skin friction; and overall geometry, such as blunt versus streamlined shapes that alter pressure distribution. For low Re (laminar-dominated), CdC_d is higher due to dominant viscous effects, decreasing as Re increases into turbulent regimes where form drag stabilizes. In rotating systems, such as machinery components, windage leads to power losses through generated by air shear on spinning surfaces. The power loss is approximated by P=kω3r5P = k \omega^3 r^5, where PP is power, ω\omega is , rr is the effective , and kk is a constant incorporating air properties and . This arises from the TT, obtained by integrating τ\tau (proportional to ρω2r2\rho \omega^2 r^2 from velocity gradients) over the surface area, yielding T≈12ρω2r5CmT \approx \frac{1}{2} \rho \omega^2 r^5 C_m for a disk, where CmC_m is the moment analogous to CdC_d. Power then follows as P=TωP = T \omega, resulting in the cubic dependence on speed, which amplifies losses at high rotations. The drag is measured in newtons (N), reflecting transfer per second, while power losses are in watts (), as dissipation rate. Experimental validation occurs via testing, where scaled models are subjected to controlled airflow, and forces are quantified using strain-gauge balances or sensors to isolate drag components. Several environmental factors influence windage magnitude. Air density ρ\rho directly scales the drag force, decreasing with increasing (as warmer air expands and molecules spread out) or altitude, thereby reducing windage; for instance, a 10°C rise can lower ρ\rho by about 3-4%. Humidity indirectly affects ρ\rho by displacing denser dry air with lighter , slightly diminishing drag in moist conditions. The nature of relative motion— at low speeds yields lower viscous drag via orderly shear layers, while turbulent flow at higher speeds enhances mixing and form drag through eddies—further modulates losses, often captured in CdC_d or CmC_m variations with Re.

Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

Aerodynamic Drag

In , windage denotes the external air resistance encountered by a moving body, manifesting as the component of total aerodynamic drag attributable to skin friction and form drag. Skin friction arises from the viscous shearing of air molecules along the body's surface, while form drag results from pressure differences due to flow separation around the body's . These elements collectively oppose motion through the air, with their magnitude determined experimentally via the CdC_d, which encapsulates , surface roughness, and flow regime effects. Windage plays a critical role in applications such as aircraft wings and vehicle bodies, where minimizing it enhances the , thereby improving and range. For streamlined bodies like airfoils, CdC_d values are low, typically around 0.045, reflecting efficient flow attachment that reduces separation. In contrast, bluff bodies such as spheres exhibit higher Cd≈0.5C_d \approx 0.5 at moderate s, due to pronounced and pressure drag. The , Re=ρvLμ\mathrm{Re} = \frac{\rho v L}{\mu}, governs these transitions, where ρ\rho is air , vv is velocity, LL is , and μ\mu is dynamic ; higher Re promotes , elevating drag unless shapes are optimized. Historical advancements in quantifying windage trace to Gustave Eiffel's early 20th-century experiments, which provided foundational drag data on aerodynamic profiles. Beginning with drop tests in 1903 from the , Eiffel measured resistance on approximately 40 shapes by recording terminal velocities along a vertical cable, revealing drag variations with form. He advanced this in 1909 with a at the tower's base, confirming equivalence between body motion in still air and airflow over stationary models, and expanded testing in 1912 at the Auteuil for precise profile analysis. These efforts, detailed in his 1910 treatise La Résistance de l'air, established empirical benchmarks for CdC_d on streamlined versus blunt forms, influencing subsequent aeronautical design. Reducing windage focuses on mitigating both drag components through targeted design strategies. Streamlining contours the body—such as adopting teardrop or profiles—to minimize and form drag, potentially lowering CdC_d by factors of 10 or more compared to bluff shapes. Complementary surface treatments, exemplified by laminar flow control (LFC), employ boundary-layer via slots or porous panels to delay transition to , achieving skin friction reductions of 50-80% over affected surfaces. NASA's research since the 1970s, building on 1940s flight tests, has validated LFC on wings and nacelles, yielding overall drag cuts of 15-30% in subsonic regimes, though practical implementation requires precise manufacturing to tolerate surface imperfections.

Windage Losses in Machinery

Windage losses in machinery refer to the frictional energy dissipation caused by the churning of air or other by rotating components, such as rotors, fans, or impellers, within enclosed or semi-enclosed systems. These losses arise from aerodynamic drag and viscous shear in the fluid surrounding the rotating parts, converting into and reducing overall . In rotating electrical machines and , windage manifests as opposing the rotation, particularly prominent in high-speed operations where fluid motion is intensified. The windage torque TwT_w can be expressed as Tw=12ρω2r5CmT_w = \frac{1}{2} \rho \omega^2 r^5 C_m, where ρ\rho is the density, ω\omega is the , rr is the characteristic radius (often the outer radius of the rotating disk), and CmC_m is the moment that accounts for the and flow regime. This derives from integrating the over the rotating surface, typically for a disk-like , where the results from the tangential forces. The moment CmC_m is determined experimentally or via correlations, such as those for turbulent flow in enclosed cavities, and varies with parameters like the and gap ratio between and . Power loss is then Pw=TwωP_w = T_w \omega, highlighting the cubic dependence on speed that makes windage significant at elevated rotations. For cylindrical rotors, the scaling involves r⁴ multiplied by axial length. In applications like turbines, pumps, and generators, windage losses constitute 10-20% of total mechanical losses in high-speed motors, becoming a dominant factor in ultra-high-speed designs where they can exceed 10% of input power. For instance, in electric generators operating above 10,000 rpm, these losses contribute substantially to inefficiency and heating, necessitating careful to maintain . Influencing factors include size, which affects flow confinement and recirculation; rotor speed, with losses scaling as ω3\omega^3; cooling air flow, which can either augment or mitigate drag depending on directed ventilation; and altitude, where reduced air ρ\rho lowers losses proportionally, beneficial for high-elevation installations. Mitigation strategies focus on minimizing fluid interaction, such as using enclosures to nearly eliminate windage by reducing and thus , common in systems. Alternatively, replacing air with low-viscosity gases like in alternators reduces losses by 80-90% due to its being about 7% of air's, while maintaining effective cooling. This approach originated in the , with proposing cooling for rotating machines in to address windage in large synchronous converters, leading to commercial implementations by .

Ballistics and Gunnery

Effects on Projectiles

In , windage refers to the lateral deflection of a caused by crosswinds. Crosswinds primarily induce lateral drift, where the is deflected sideways due to momentum transfer from the moving to its path. This effect is exacerbated by the 's deceleration from drag, which prolongs its and allows greater cumulative displacement. Additionally, spin decay in rifled s can contribute to instability, amplifying drift as rotational stability diminishes over distance. The physics of wind-induced lateral drift can be derived from the relative motion between the projectile and the air. In a crosswind of velocity vwv_w, the drift distance dd approximates d=vw(ta−tv)d = v_w (t_a - t_v), where tat_a is the actual time of flight in air (accounting for drag-induced deceleration) and tvt_v is the vacuum time of flight (tv=range/vpt_v = range / v_p, with vpv_p as muzzle velocity). This formula arises from momentum transfer: the wind imparts a lateral impulse proportional to the difference in flight times, as drag slows the projectile relative to the no-drag case. These effects are most pronounced at long ranges, where time of flight exceeds several seconds, and are mitigated by high muzzle velocities that shorten exposure to wind. In muzzleloading firearms, windage also denotes the clearance gap between the projectile and the bore, which introduces additional inaccuracies. This gap, typically 0.03 to 0.06 inches in diameter for 18th-century muskets (e.g., a .69-inch ball in a .75-inch barrel), allows compressed air to form a cushion that causes the ball to bounce erratically within the barrel during acceleration. The resulting tumbling or inconsistent engraving on the bore leads to yaw upon exit, reducing accuracy and to 50-100 yards. Tighter windage, as in some French designs using paper-patched balls, minimized this issue but complicated reloading under field conditions. Historical artillery treatises highlight windage's impact on projectile performance. In rifled versus smoothbore guns, the gap exacerbates inconsistencies in smoothbores due to lack of spin stabilization, while rifling partially compensates by imparting rotation, though excessive windage still causes energy loss from gas escape. Measurement of windage deviation often involves the yaw of repose, a small equilibrium yaw angle (typically 0.2-0.5 degrees) induced by crosswinds or gravity, where the projectile orients slightly sideways to balance aerodynamic moments. This yaw interacts with the Magnus effect, a spin-induced lift force perpendicular to the velocity vector, which for right-hand twist projectiles deflects the path rightward in a right-to-left wind. The Magnus contribution arises from asymmetric airflow over the spinning body, amplifying lateral displacement beyond simple drag models.

Compensation Methods

Compensation for windage in involves both historical techniques developed by marksmen and modern technological aids designed to adjust for or mitigate the lateral deflection caused by crosswinds on projectiles. One of the earliest and most informal methods is Kentucky windage, a practice originating from 18th-century marksmanship with the Kentucky long rifle, where shooters visually estimate wind effects and "hold off" by aiming slightly upwind of the target to compensate for drift without mechanical adjustments. This technique, rooted in the limitations of fixed-sight firearms like smoothbore muskets, relied on the shooter's experience to intuitively correct for wind, as formalized in 19th-century musketry doctrines such as those outlined in British School of Musketry texts from 1855, which discussed windage adjustments for accuracy in . Mechanical sight adjustments represent a more precise historical evolution, particularly with the advent of adjustable rifle sights in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Windage knobs on modern rifle scopes allow for lateral corrections by rotating the turret to shift the reticle's point of aim, typically calibrated in increments of 1/4 minute of angle () per click, enabling fine-tuned compensation for drift at various ranges—for instance, four clicks equating to approximately 1 inch of adjustment at 100 yards. These adjustments are zeroed based on known conditions during sighting-in and recalibrated as needed, providing a repeatable method superior to pure hold-off for consistent accuracy in or target . Firearm design features also serve as inherent mitigations against windage effects. in the barrel imparts rotational spin to the , enhancing gyroscopic stability that helps maintain orientation during flight and reduces susceptibility to crosswind-induced yaw, thereby minimizing overall drift compared to unrifled smoothbores. In black powder arms, employing tight bores with minimal clearance—known as gap windage—between the ball and barrel walls limits gas leakage and ensures more consistent propulsion, which indirectly counters wind drift by achieving higher muzzle velocities and shorter flight times. Contemporary methods leverage advanced technology for real-time windage compensation, especially in and long-range applications. Doppler radar systems mounted on or near pieces analyze trajectories by measuring and deviation, allowing operators to infer and correct for influences dynamically during fire missions. Ballistic calculators, such as those developed by manufacturers, incorporate user-input variables like and direction alongside specifics to compute precise and windage holds or adjustments, often integrated into apps or rangefinders for instant solutions. Despite these advancements, variable wind conditions pose ongoing challenges, often necessitating empirical rules of thumb for quick decisions in dynamic environments. For example, a 10 mph full-value typically deflects a bullet by approximately 7-10 inches at 300 yards, highlighting the need for ongoing observation and adjustment as gusts alter the effective drift.

Engineering Applications

In Automobiles

In automobiles, windage primarily manifests as aerodynamic drag, which opposes motion through air resistance on the external body, and as internal parasitic losses within the due to interactions. External windage accounts for a significant portion of total resistance at speeds, typically contributing 30-50% of the overall drag forces as aerodynamic effects become dominant above 50 mph. This drag arises from differences around the body, separation of , and skin friction, directly impacting requirements and . Internal windage occurs in the engine's , where rotating components like the whip oil into a froth, creating churning resistance that dissipates power as heat and turbulence. In high-performance V8 engines operating at 6000 RPM, these oil splash losses can result in power dissipation equivalent to 5-15 horsepower, exacerbating inefficiencies in wet-sump lubrication systems. Mitigation strategies, such as windage trays or dry-sump systems, redirect oil flow to minimize this interaction, potentially recovering several horsepower at peak revs. The historical evolution of windage management in automobiles began in the early with efforts to streamline body designs for reduced external drag. A seminal example is the 1934 , which pioneered wind-tunnel-informed shaping with smoother contours and integrated fenders, achieving significantly less drag than boxy contemporaries and marking a shift toward aerodynamic in . This innovation influenced subsequent designs, emphasizing tapered profiles to delay airflow separation and lower resistance. Windage is quantified in via coast-down tests, where a freewheels from high speed on a flat surface, allowing deceleration to isolate aerodynamic and rolling resistances. These tests yield the (C_d), a dimensionless measure of , with typical values for modern sedans ranging from 0.25 to 0.35 depending on body style and features like spoilers. For instance, a mid-size sedan might record a C_d of 0.28 in controlled coast-down runs, correlating to measurable drag forces at 70 mph. The impacts of windage extend to and optimization. External aerodynamic drag imposes penalties equivalent to 8-12% of total fuel use on average, with a 10% drag reduction yielding about 5% better highway mileage by easing the cubic relationship between speed and power demand. In high-performance racing, such as Formula 1, underbody windage management is critical; teams employ venturi tunnels and diffusers to harness ground-effect , converting potential drag into while minimizing overall resistance for lap-time gains.

In Electrical and Mechanical Systems

In electrical machines such as alternators and motors, windage losses arise from the aerodynamic drag on rotating components like rotors and fans, typically accounting for 1-5% of total power losses or about 20% of no-load losses. These losses become particularly significant in high-speed, high-power-density designs, where they can limit overall and . To mitigate such losses, cooling was introduced in the 1930s for large generators, reducing windage friction to approximately one-fourteenth that of air-cooled systems due to 's lower and ; implemented early hydrogen-cooled units in the late 1930s and early 1940s. In mechanical systems, windage affects components like fan blades in industrial blowers, impellers in centrifugal pumps, in gearboxes, and rotors in compressors, where rotating parts entrain and agitate surrounding , generating drag . In gearboxes, for instance, windage power loss is the aerodynamic non-meshing or meshing , scaling with rotational speed and gear diameter, and can contribute substantially to total parasitic losses at high speeds above 10,000 rpm. Similarly, in centrifugal pumps, induced by rotating elements leads to reductions, with even 2% volumetric gas content causing up to a 10% drop in pump capacity and increased that accelerates bearing wear. In compressors, windage manifests as high-speed impellers, exacerbating energy dissipation in enclosed housings. Mitigation strategies for windage in these systems include the use of baffle plates to disrupt recirculation and reduce drag , as well as low-clearance housings that minimize the air volume exposed to rotating parts, achieving reductions of over 50% in some configurations. In engines, lubrication systems address oil-related windage by scavenging oil from the sump to an external , preventing and drag from crankshaft whipping, which is common in high-performance radial engines. Case studies illustrate these effects in specialized applications. In wind turbines, tip windage contributes to aerodynamic losses through and drag at the blade ends, potentially reducing annual energy production by up to 10% without proper modeling and design corrections. For industrial fans in 1950s HVAC systems, optimizations focused on streamlined profiles and enclosed casings to minimize churn losses, improving ventilation efficiency in factories and buildings by reducing from fan rotation. Quantifying windage losses often relies on empirical relations derived from . For fan windage power PfP_f, a common formula is Pf=ρn3d5KP_f = \rho n^3 d^5 K where ρ\rho is fluid density, nn is rotational speed in revolutions per second, dd is rotor , and KK is an empirical constant depending on and flow conditions; this form captures the cubic speed dependence typical of turbulent drag regimes.

References

  1. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/windage
  2. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/windage
  3. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/windage
  4. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680027690/downloads/19680027690.pdf
  5. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130000783/downloads/20130000783.pdf
  6. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article/145/12/121013/1168889/Windage-Loss-Models-for-Enclosed-Cylindrical-Flows
  7. https://info.midstreamlighting.com/blog/understanding-windage
  8. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/windage
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/windage
  10. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/windage_n2
  11. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aerodynamics/parasite-drag-and-your-airplane/
  12. https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-meaning-of-windage-loss
  13. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/drageq.html
  14. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/dragco.html
  15. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19700023755/downloads/19700023755.pdf
  16. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/shape-effects-on-drag/
  17. https://www.asme.org/about-asme/engineering-history/landmarks/237-eiffel-drop-test-machine-and-wind-tunnel
  18. https://archive.org/details/EiffelLaRsistanceDeLairEtLaviation1910
  19. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19980232017/downloads/19980232017.pdf
  20. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/fluidsengineering/article/82/1/217/397626/Chamber-Dimension-Effects-on-Induced-Flow-and
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/3/1/22
  22. https://www.power-eng.com/hydrogen/cooling-generators-with-hydrogen-is-it-safe/
  23. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11160387/
  24. https://www.vt-tek.fi/articles/could-hydrogen-cooling-come-back/
  25. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA317305.pdf
  26. https://allthingsliberty.com/2013/07/the-inaccuracy-of-muskets/
  27. http://closefocusresearch.com/external-ballistics-summary
  28. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/revolutionary-war-weapons-the-american-long-rifle/
  29. https://www.nrafamily.org/content/how-to-read-the-wind/
  30. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/60441/60441-h/60441-h.htm
  31. https://www.nssf.org/shooting/minute-angle-moa/
  32. https://tacticon.com/shooting-skills/rifle-scope-adjustment-knobs/
  33. https://www.dexadine.com/bexhelp/bexhelp141.htm
  34. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/139707.pdf
  35. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1992019928A1/en
  36. https://www.federalpremium.com/ballistics-calculator
  37. https://jbmballistics.com/ballistics/calculators/calculators.shtml
  38. https://backfire.tv/wind-deflection/
  39. https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editorial/shooting-tips-determing-wind-values/83917
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286228642_Review_of_research_on_vehicles_aerodynamic_drag_reduction_methods
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/aerodynamic-drag
  42. https://www.enginebuildermag.com/2012/11/dry-sump-oiling-systems/
  43. https://blog.cantonracingproducts.com/blog/windage-how-it-affects-your-motor
  44. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/drag-coefficient-d_627.html
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312214347_Aerodynamic_coastdown_analysis_of_a_passenger_car_for_various_configurations
  46. https://symulacfd.com/en/blog-en/aerodynamics/how-do-windloads-affect-the-consumption-of-cars/
  47. https://www.ludisanalytics.com/blog/slicing-the-wind-deciphering-the-role-of-aerodynamics-in-formula-1
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369650734_Electric_Motor_Losses_Quantified_A_Comprehensive_Study_of_Motor_Losses
  49. https://www.ccj-online.com/part-3-generator-cooling-methods/
  50. https://eone.com/images/files/genauxsystems.pdf
  51. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100036224/downloads/20100036224.pdf
  52. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.J055871
  53. https://www.geigerinc.com/blog/air-in-centrifugal-pumps-symptoms-and-solutions/
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301679X20306770
  55. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/20/11080
  56. https://www.kitplanes.com/engine-theory-7/
  57. https://fordsix.com/threads/dry-sumps.11615/
  58. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/155576829/Branlard_2011_TipLosses_MscThesis_Public.pdf
  59. https://www.cortecfan.com/news/history_of_industrial_fans.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.