Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Law School Admission Test
View on Wikipedia
| Acronym | LSAT |
|---|---|
| Type | Standardized test |
| Administrator | Law School Admission Council |
| Skills tested | Reading comprehension, logical reasoning, and (unscored) writing[1] |
| Purpose | Admissions to Juris Doctor programs of law schools in the US, Canada, and some other countries[citation needed] |
| Year started | 1948 |
| Duration | 35 minutes for each of the 4 sections, for a total of 2 hours and 20 minutes (excluding breaks) + 50 minutes for Writing section |
| Score range | 120 to 180, in 1 point increments |
| Score validity | Scores of up to 12 tests taken since 1 June 2008 are valid |
| Offered | As of 2023, 9 times a year, with dates listed on the LSAC website. |
| Restrictions on attempts | Starting August 2023, no more than 5 attempts in 5 years, no more than 7 attempts in a lifetime. Exceptions may be granted for special circumstances.[2] |
| Regions | Worldwide |
| Languages | English |
| Annual number of test takers | |
| Fee | LSAT fee: US$238 CAS fee: US$207 |
| Used by | Law schools in the US, Canada, Australia and some other countries[citation needed] |
| Website | www |
| Legal education in the United States |
|---|
| Stages |
| Exams and licensure |
| Organizations |
| Country | Number of applicants |
|---|---|
| Canada | |
| China | |
| South Korea | |
| India | |
| Mexico | |
| Nigeria | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Colombia | |
| Jamaica | |
| Russia | |
| Pakistan | |
| Brazil |
The Law School Admission Test (LSAT /ˈɛlsæt/ EL-sat) is a standardized test administered by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) for prospective law school candidates. It is designed to assess reading comprehension and logical reasoning.[5] The test is an integral part of the law school admission process in the United States, Canada (common law programs only), the University of Melbourne, Australia,[6][7][needs update] and a growing number of other countries.[8]
The test has existed in some form since 1948, when it was created to give law schools a standardized way to assess applicants in addition to their GPA.[9] The current form of the exam has been used since 1991. The exam has four total sections that include three scored multiple choice sections, an unscored experimental section, and an unscored writing section. Raw scores on the exam are transformed into scaled scores, ranging from a high of 180 to a low of 120, with a median score typically around 150. Law school applicants are required to report all scores from the past five years, though schools generally consider the highest score in their admissions decisions.
Before July 2019, the test was administered by paper-and-pencil. In 2019, the test was exclusively administered electronically using a tablet.[10] In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the test was administered using the test-taker's personal computer. Beginning in 2023, candidates have had the option to take a digital version either at an approved testing center or on their computer at home.
Function
[edit]The purpose of the LSAT is to aid in predicting student success in law school.[11] Researchers Balin, Fine, and Guinier performed research on the LSAT's ability to predict law school grades at the University of Pennsylvania. They found that the LSAT could explain about 14% of the variance in first year grades and about 15% of the variance in second year grades.[12]
History
[edit]The LSAT was the result of a 1945 inquiry of Frank Bowles, a Columbia Law School admissions director, about a more satisfactory admissions test that could be used for admissions than the one that was in use in 1945.[13] The goal was to find a test that would correlate with first year grades rather than bar passage rates. This led to an invitation of representatives from Harvard Law School and Yale Law School who ultimately accepted the invitation and began to draft the first administration of the LSAT exam. NYU, in correspondence by memorandum, was openly unconvinced "about the usefulness of an aptitude test as a method of selecting law school students," but was open to experimenting with the idea, as were other schools that were unconvinced. At a meeting on 10 November 1947, with representatives of law schools extending beyond the original Columbia, Harvard, and Yale representatives, the design of the LSAT was discussed. At this meeting the issue of a way to test students who came from excessively "technical" backgrounds that were deficient in the study of history and literature was discussed but no method was adopted. The first administration of the LSAT followed and occurred in 1948.
From the test's inception until 1981, scores were reported on a scale of 200 to 800; from 1981 to 1991, a 48-point scale was used. In 1991, the scale was changed again, so that reported scores range from 120 to 180.[14]
Online test
[edit]Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, The Law School Admission Council created the LSAT-Flex. The LSAT-Flex is an online proctored test that was first administrated during May 2020. While the normal LSAT test consisted of four sections plus an experimental section (1 section of logic games, 1 section of reading comprehension, 2 sections of logical reasoning, and an additional random section), the LSAT-Flex consists of three sections (1 section of logic games, 1 section of reading comprehension, and 1 section of logical reasoning). Though the LSAT-Flex contains one less section than the normal LSAT test, the LSAT-Flex is scored on the normal 120–180 scale.[15] After June 2021, the name LSAT-Flex was dropped and the test was again referred to as just the LSAT, though the format continued to be used through the testing cycle that ended in June 2022. Beginning with the August 2022 administration, LSAC reintroduced an experimental section, having the test consist of three sections plus an experimental section (1 section of logic games, 1 section of reading comprehension, 1 section of logical reasoning, and an additional random section). The writing section is also administered online.
Former analytical reasoning section
[edit]Prior to August 2024, the LSAT contained an analytical reasoning section, commonly referred to as logic games. The section was removed following a 2019 legal settlement between the LSAC and two blind LSAT test takers who claimed that the section violated the Americans with Disabilities Act because they were unfairly penalized for not being able to draw the diagrams commonly used to solve the questions in the section. As part of the settlement, the LSAC agreed to review and overhaul the section within four years. In October 2023, it announced that the section would be replaced by a second logical reasoning section in August 2024.[16]
Administration
[edit]The LSAC previously administered the LSAT four times per year: June, September/October, December and February. However, in June 2017, it was announced that the LSAC would be increasing the number of tests from four to six,[1] and would instead be administering it in January, March, June, July, September, and November.
There were 129,925 LSATs administered in the 2011–12 testing year (June 2011 – February 2012), the largest percentage decline in LSATs administered in more than 10 years, and a drop of more than 16% from the previous year, when 155,050 LSATs were administered. The number of LSATs administered fell more than 25% over a two-year period (from the 2009–10 testing year to the 2011–12 testing year).[17] The October 2012 administration reflected a 16.4% drop in volume from its 2011 counterpart. LSAT numbers continued to drop over the next two cycles but to a lesser degree, with 13.4% and 6.2% drops, respectively, for the 2012–13 and 2013–14 cycles. February 2014 showed the first increase in test takers (1.1%) since June 2010.[18]
In December 2018, LSAC announced that the Microsoft Surface Go tablet will be used exclusively to administer the LSAT beginning in 2019 when the test transitions to a digital only format.[19] However, following the COVID-19 pandemic, candidates are able to sit for the test remotely with their own computer. The writing sample section will be separate from the LSAT starting with the 3 June 2019 test administration.[20] Candidates will be automatically eligible to complete the writing section as early as 10 days prior to test day and up to one year thereafter. Candidates only need to complete the writing sample section once every 5 years, even if candidates re-test before then.
Test composition
[edit]The LSAT consists of four 35-minute multiple-choice sections (one of which is an unscored experimental section) followed by an unscored writing sample section that can be taken separately. Modern tests have 75–76 scored items in total. Several different test forms are used within an administration, each presenting the multiple-choice sections in different orders, which is intended to make it difficult to cheat or to guess which is the experimental section.
Logical reasoning
[edit]As of 2021, the LSAT contains two logical reasoning ("LR") sections, commonly known as "arguments", designed to test the taker's ability to dissect and analyze arguments. LR sections each contain 24–26 questions.[21] Each question begins with a short argument or set of facts. This is followed by a prompt asking the test taker to find the argument's assumption, to select an alternate conclusion to the argument, to identify errors or logical omissions in the argument, to find another argument with parallel reasoning, or to choose a statement that would weaken or strengthen the argument.[22][23]
In October 2023, the LSAC announced that the analytical reasoning (logic games) section would be replaced by a second logical reasoning section in August 2024 pursuant to the implementation of a 2019 settlement agreement with blind LSAT test takers.[16]
Reading comprehension
[edit]The LSAT contains one reading comprehension ("RC") section consisting of four passages of 400–500 words, and 5–8 questions relating to each passage. Complete sections contain 26–28 questions. Though no real rules govern the content of this section, the passages generally relate to law, arts and humanities, physical sciences, or social sciences. The questions usually ask the examinee to determine the author's main idea, find specific information in the passage, draw inferences from the text, and/or describe the structure of the passage.
In June 2007, one of the four passages was replaced with a "comparative reading" question.[24] Comparative reading presents two shorter passages with differing perspectives on a topic. Parallels exist between the comparative reading question, the SAT's critical reading section, and the science section of the ACT.
Unscored variable section
[edit]The current test contains one experimental section which is referred to as the "variable section". It is used to test new questions for future exams. The performance of the examinee on this section is not reported as part of the final score. The examinee is not told which section of the exam is experimental, since doing so could skew the data. Previously, this section has always been one of the first three sections of any given test, but beginning with the administration of the October 2011 LSAT, the experimental section can be after the first three sections. LSAC makes no specific claim as to which section(s) it has appeared as in the past, and what section(s) it may appear as in the future.[citation needed]
Writing sample
[edit]The writing sample appears as the final section of the exam. The writing sample is presented in the form of a decision prompt, which provides the examinee with a problem and two criteria for making a decision. The examinee must then write an essay arguing for one of the two options over the other. The decision prompt generally does not involve a controversial subject, but rather something mundane about which the examinee likely has no strong bias. While there is no "right" or "wrong" answer to the writing prompt, it is important that the examinee argues for his/her chosen position and also argues against the counter-position.
LSAC does not score the writing sample. Instead, the essay is sent to admission offices along with the LSAT score. Some admissions officers regard the usefulness of the writing sample to be marginal. Additionally, most schools require that applicants submit a "personal statement" of some kind. These factors sometimes result in admission boards disregarding the writing sample. However, only 6.8% of 157 schools surveyed by LSAC in 2006 indicated that they "never" use the writing sample when evaluating an application. In contrast, 9.9% of the schools reported that they "always" use the sample; 25.3% reported that they "frequently" use the sample; 32.7% responded "occasionally"; and 25.3% reported "seldom" using the sample.[25]
Preparation
[edit]LSAC recommends advance preparation for the LSAT, due to the importance of the LSAT in law school admissions and because scores on the exam typically correspond to preparation time.[26] The structure of the LSAT and the types of questions asked are generally consistent from year to year, which allows students to practice on question types that show up frequently in examinations.
LSAC suggests, at a minimum, that students review official practice tests, called PrepTests, before test day to familiarize themselves with the types of questions that appear on the exams.[27] LSAC offers four free tests that can be downloaded from their website.[28] For best results, LSAC suggests taking practice tests under actual time constraints and representative conditions in order to identify problem areas to focus on in further review.[27]
For preparation purposes, only tests after June 1991 are considered modern, since the LSAT was significantly modified after this date. Each released exam is commonly referred to as a PrepTest. There are over 90 PrepTests in circulation, the oldest being the June 1991 LSAT numbered as PrepTest 1 and the newest being a July 2020 LSAT numbered as PrepTest 94+.[29] Certain PrepTests are no longer published by LSAC (among them 1–6, 8, 17, 39, and 40), despite the fact that they were in print at one time. However, these tests have been made available through some of the test preparation companies, which have licensed them from LSAC to provide only to students in their courses. For a few years, some prep companies sold digital copies of LSAT PrepTests as PDFs, but LSAC revised its licensing policy in 2016, effectively banning the sale of LSAT PDFs to the general public.[30]
Some students taking the LSAT use a test preparation company. Students who do not use these courses often rely on material from LSAT preparation books, previously administered exams, and internet resources such as blogs, forums, and mobile apps.[31]
Scoring
[edit]The LSAT is a standardized test in that LSAC adjusts raw scores to fit an expected norm to overcome the likelihood that some administrations may be more difficult than others. Normalized scores are distributed on a scale with a low of 120 to a high of 180.[32]
The LSAT system of scoring is predetermined and does not reflect test takers' percentile. The relationship between raw questions answered correctly (the "raw score") and scaled score is determined before the test is administered, through a process called equating.[33] This means that the conversion standard is set beforehand, and the distribution of percentiles can vary during the scoring of any particular LSAT.
Adjusted scores lie in a bell curve, tapering off at the extremes and concentrating near the median. For example, there might be a 3–5 question difference between a score of 175 and a score of 180, but the difference between a 155 from a 160 could be 9 or more questions—this is because the LSAT uses an ordinal grading system. Although the exact percentile of a given score will vary slightly between examinations, there tends to be little variance. The 50th percentile is typically a score of about 151; the 90th percentile is around 165 and the 99th is about 173. A 178 or better usually places the examinee in the 99.9th percentile.
Examinees have the option of canceling their scores within six calendar days after the exam, before they get their scores. LSAC still reports to law schools that the student registered for and took the exam, but releases no score. Test takers typically receive their scores online between three and four weeks after the exam.[34] There is a formal appeals process for examinee complaints,[35] which has been used for proctor misconduct, peer misconduct, and occasionally for challenging a question. In very rare instances, specific questions have been omitted from final scoring.
University of North Texas economist Michael Nieswiadomy has conducted several studies (in 1998, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2017, and 2024) derived from LSAC data. In the 2024 study, Nieswiadomy took the LSAC's categorization of test-takers in terms of their undergraduate college and university academic major study areas, and grouped a total of 154 major study areas into 30 categories, finding the averages of each major:[36] The most recent study is “LSAT® Scores of Economics Majors: The 2022-23 Class Update and 7-Year History”. The Journal of Economic Education, 2024, 55(4): 1-6
- Mathematics/Physics 164.3
- Economics 161.7
- Engineering 160.6
- Computer science 160.4
- Government/service 160.0
- International relations 159.8
- Chemistry 159.6
- Philosophy Religion and Theology 159.4
- History 159.0
- Foreign languages 158.5
- Arts 158.2
- Biology/natural sciences 158.1
- English 158.0
- Social Sciences 157.9
- Interdisciplinary studies 157.3
- Finance 157.2
- Anthropology/geography 157.1
- Accounting 156.3
- Liberal arts 155.9
- Political science/Pre-law 155.6
- Psychology 155.1
- Communications/Journalism 154.8
- Sociology/social work 153.9
- Business management 153.9
- Marketing 153.9
- Health professions 153.8
- Business administration 153.6
- Education 153.1
- Criminology 152.6
- Criminal justice/Law enforcement 148.8
Use of scores in law school admissions
[edit]The LSAT is considered an important part of the law school admissions process, along with GPA. Many law schools are selective in their decisions to admit students, and the LSAT is one method of differentiating candidates.
Additionally the LSAC says the LSAT (like the SAT and ACT at the undergraduate level) serves as a standardized measure of one's ability to succeed during law school. Undergraduate grade points can vary significantly due to choices in course load as well as grade inflation, which may be pervasive at an applicant's undergraduate institution, but almost nonexistent at that of another. Some law schools, such as Georgetown University and the University of Michigan have added programs designed to waive the LSAT for selected students who have maintained a 3.8 undergraduate GPA at their schools.[37]
LSAC says its own research supports the use of the LSAT as a major factor in admissions, saying the median validity for LSAT alone is .41 (2001) and .40 (2002) in regard to the first year of law school.[38] The correlation varies from school to school, and LSAC says that test scores are more strongly correlated to first year law school performance than is undergraduate GPA.[39] LSAC says that a more strongly correlated single-factor measure does not currently exist, that GPA is difficult to use because it is influenced by the school and the courses taken by the student, and that the LSAT can serve as a yardstick of student ability because it is statistically normed. However, the American Bar Association has waived the requirement for law schools to use the LSAT as an admission requirement in select cases. This may be due to the fact that an emphasis on LSAT scores is considered by some to be detrimental to the promotion of diversity among applicants.[40] Others argue that it is an attempt by law schools to counteract declining enrollment.[41]
Most admission boards use an admission index, which is a formula that applies different weight to the LSAT and undergraduate GPA and adds the results. This composite statistic can have a weaker correlation to first year performance than either GPA or LSAT score alone, depending on the weighting used. The amount of weight assigned to LSAT score versus undergraduate GPA varies from school to school, as almost all law programs employ a different admission index formula.
Multiple scores
[edit]Starting in September 2019, students may take the LSAT up to three times in a single LSAC year (1 June – 31 May), up to five times within the current and five past testing years (the period in which LSAC reports scores to law schools), and up to seven times over a lifetime. These restrictions will not apply retroactively; tests taken prior to September 2019 do not count toward a student's totals. Also, LSAC will implement an appeals process to grant exceptions to these restrictions under extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, starting in September 2019, no student who has obtained a perfect LSAT score of 180 within the current and five past testing years will be allowed to take the LSAT. This rule, unlike the other new rules, will be retroactive: a score of 180 obtained prior to September 2019 (but within the past five years) will preclude another attempt.[42]
Between 2017 and July 2019, students could take the LSAT as many times as it was offered. Prior to 2017, only three attempts were allowed in a two-year period.[43]
Every score within five years is reported to law schools during the application process, as well a separate average of all scores on record.[44] When faced with multiple scores from repeat test takers, users of standardized assessments typically employ three indices—most recent, highest, and average scores—in order to summarize an individual’s related performance.[45]
How the law schools report the LSAT scores of their matriculants to the American Bar Association (ABA) has changed over the years. In June 2006, the ABA revised a rule that mandated law schools to report their matriculants' average score if more than one test was taken. The current ABA rule now requires law schools to report only the highest LSAT score for matriculants who took the test more than once. In response, many law schools began considering only the highest LSAT score during the admissions process, as the highest score is an important factor in law school rankings such as those published by U.S. News & World Report.[46] Many students rely heavily upon the rankings when deciding where to attend law school.[47]
Use of scores in admissions to intellectual clubs
[edit]High LSAT scores are accepted as qualifying evidence for intellectual clubs such as American Mensa, Intertel, the Triple Nine Society and the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry.[48][49][50][51] The minimum scores they require depend on the selectivity of each society and time period when the test was administered. After 1982, Mensa has required students to score in the 95+ percentile rank on the LSAT for membership, while Intertel has required an LSAT score of 172 for admission since 1994, and Triple Nine has required an LSAT score of 173 for acceptance since 1991.[52][53][54]
Fingerprinting controversy
[edit]Starting October 1973, those taking the LSAT were required to have fingerprints taken, after some examinees were found to have hired impostors to take the test on their behalf.[55]
A controversy surrounding the LSAT was the requirement that examinees submit to fingerprinting on the day of testing. Although LSAC does not store digital representations of fingerprints, there is a concern that fingerprints might be accessible by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.[56] At the behest of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, the LSAC implemented a change as of September 2007 which exempts Canadian test takers from the requirement to provide a fingerprint and instead requires that Canadian test-takers provide a photograph.[57] Starting with the June 2011 admission of the LSAT, LSAC expanded this policy to include test-takers in the United States and Caribbean; LSAC therefore no longer requires fingerprints from any test takers, and instead requires that they submit a photograph.[58]
LSAT─India
[edit]LSAC started administering the LSAT for Indian law schools in 2009. [5] The test is administered twice a year by a Pearson on behalf of LSAC. There are around 1300 law schools in India, however LSAT─India scores are accepted by only about 10-15 private law schools in the country. These scores are not accepted anywhere else in South Asia, and as a result participation in the LSAT─India has been low.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "About the LSAT". www.lsac.org. Archived from the original on 2 March 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions about the LSAT". www.lsac.org. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
- ^ "LSATs Administered". lsac.org. Archived from the original on 7 April 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
- ^ LSAC. "The Law School Admission Council (LSAC)". www.lsac.org. Archived from the original on 14 April 2018. Retrieved 30 April 2018.
- ^ "About the Law School Admission Council". Lsat.com. Archived from the original on 10 February 2012. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "Apply to study the JD in Australia". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 2 August 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "About the LSAT". Law.unimelb.edu.au. 25 October 2012. Archived from the original on 31 July 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "World Domination, LSAT-Style - PowerScore Test Preparation". LSAT and Law School Admissions Blog. 15 July 2016. Retrieved 1 June 2025.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. Retrieved 26 November 2010.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "LSAT Test Changes: The Digital LSAT – Kaplan Test Prep". Archived from the original on 6 April 2024. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
- ^ Brunet Marks, Alexia; Moss, Scott A. (1 June 2016). "What Predicts Law Student Success? A Longitudinal Study Correlating Law Student Applicant Data and Law School Outcomes". Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 13 (2): 205–265. doi:10.1111/jels.12114. ISSN 1740-1461. S2CID 29033912. Archived from the original on 16 August 2022. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
- ^ "Frontline: Secrets of the SAT: Lani Guinier Interview". Secrets of the SAT. Frontline. Archived from the original on 13 February 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
- ^ "History" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2014. Retrieved 14 May 2014.
- ^ "A Brief History". velocitylsat.com. Velocity Test Prep. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
- ^ "About the LSAT-Flex". lsac.org. Law School Admissions Council. Retrieved 19 January 2021.
- ^ a b Sloan, Karen (18 October 2023). "Law School Admission Test to drop 'logic games' questions from exam". Reuters. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
- ^ Segal, David (19 March 2012). "For 2nd Year, a Sharp Drop in Law School Entrance Tests". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
- ^ "LSATs Administered". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 31 March 2014. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
- ^ Margolis, Wendy (10 December 2018). "LSAC Announces Technology Collaboration with Microsoft". LSAC. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
- ^ "LSAC Announces Technology Collaboration with Microsoft | The Law School Admission Council". www.lsac.org. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
- ^ "JD - The LSAT - Logical Reasoning Questions". LSAC. Archived from the original on 13 July 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "Logical Reasoning | The Law School Admission Council". www.lsac.org. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- ^ Kuris, Gabriel (15 March 2021). "LSAT Logical Reasoning Questions: What to Know". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- ^ "Reading Comprehension Questions". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 9 July 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "LSAC Redirect Page". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 11 May 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "Self-reported Methods of Test Preparation Used by LSAT Takers: A Summary of Responses from June and September 1989 Test Takers (RR-90-01)". Archived from the original on 8 June 2008. Retrieved 8 June 2008.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ a b "Preparing for the LSAT". LSAC. Archived from the original on 10 September 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "Official LSAT Practice Tests". Lsac.org. Retrieved 13 January 2025.
- ^ "The Official LSAT PrepTests". LSAC. Retrieved 21 December 2013.
- ^ "LSAT Content Licensing". LSAC. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2017.
- ^ "Test Preparation Market in the US 2016–2020". Research and Markets. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2017.
- ^ "A History of the Law School Admission Council and the LSAT" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "About your LSAT Score". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 25 July 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "LSAT Score Release Dates". Lsac.org. Archived from the original on 24 July 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ [1] Archived 13 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Nieswiadomy, Michael (25 June 2009). "LSAT Scores of Economics Majors: The 2008–2009 Class Update by Michael Nieswiadomy". Papers.ssrn.com. SSRN 1430654.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Slater, Dan (25 September 2008). "Skip the LSAT, Head Straight to Law School!". Blogs.wsj.com. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "World's Best Genuine Examsoft Decryptor and Examplify Extractor ‣ Only 100% Working Examsoft Decryptor and Examplify Decryptor ‣ 2025". 3 October 2023.
- ^ [2] Archived 8 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Jaschik, Scott (14 January 2011). "ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement". Insidehighered.com. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
- ^ "Should Law Schools Drop the LSAT Requirement?". huffingtonpost.com. 10 March 2015. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
- ^ "Limits on Repeating the Test | The Law School Admission Council". www.lsac.org. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- ^ "Limitations on Test Taking". Law School Admission Council. Archived from the original on 21 December 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
- ^ [3] Archived 4 July 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Sweeney, Andrea Thorton; Marcus, Laura A.; Reese, Lynda M. (2 October 2010). "The Validity of Law School Admission Test Scores for Repeat Test Takers: 2005 Through 2008 Entering Law School Classes" (PDF). The Law School Admission Council. lsac.org. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 2 March 2016.
- ^ "Methodology: Best Law Schools Rankings - U.S. News & World Report". Usnews.com. 11 March 2013. Archived from the original on 6 April 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
- ^ "Law Students Rank Their Future - U.S. News & World Report". Usnews.com. 7 January 2011. Archived from the original on 15 February 2017. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- ^ "Qualifying test scores". American Mensa. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
- ^ "Intertel - Join us". www.intertel-iq.org. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
- ^ "Test Scores". www.triplenine.org. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
- ^ "Tests & Test Scores - International Society for Philosophical Enquiry". www.thethousand.com. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
- ^ "List of High IQ Societies [Find & Compare Organizations]". www.test-guide.com. 27 October 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- ^ "Qualifying Test Scores for Mensa Membership". American Mensa. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- ^ "Intertel - Join us". www.intertel-iq.org. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- ^ Frum, David (2000). How We Got Here: The '70s. New York, New York: Basic Books. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-0-465-04195-4.
- ^ [4] Archived 4 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Canadian Lawyer Home". Canadianlawyermag.com. 21 October 2013. Archived from the original on 5 February 2008. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
- ^ "LSAT Admission Ticket Photo Requirement". LSAC.org. 31 March 2011. Archived from the original on 26 March 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
External links
[edit]Law School Admission Test
View on GrokipediaHistory
Origins and Initial Development
Interest in standardized aptitude testing for prospective law students emerged in the early 1920s amid concerns over high attrition rates in legal education, prompting initial experiments at individual institutions. In 1921, Dean Harlan F. Stone at Columbia Law School initiated exploratory testing to better evaluate applicants' potential. By 1925, Dean M. L. Ferson of the University of North Carolina and psychologist George D. Stoddard at the University of Iowa developed the Ferson-Stoddard Legal Aptitude Test, which several schools adopted to assess verbal and analytical skills alongside academic records. Subsequent efforts included the 1937 California Legal Aptitude Tests, first used in 1938 by the University of California, and the 1943 Iowa Legal Aptitude Test, distributed more widely to gauge predictive validity for first-year performance.[10] The push for a national cooperative test intensified after World War II, as law schools anticipated a surge of veteran applicants with varied educational backgrounds, necessitating a uniform tool to supplement undergraduate grades and predict success in rigorous legal curricula. On May 17, 1945, Frank H. Bowles, admissions director at Columbia Law School, proposed developing such a test to Willis Reese, a Columbia professor, highlighting the limitations of existing credentials in an era of expanded access to higher education. This initiative aligned with broader goals to professionalize admissions and ensure merit-based selection, drawing on prior aptitude models but aiming for broader applicability without reliance on legal-specific knowledge.[11] Development accelerated in 1947 through collaboration with the College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) and Educational Testing Service (ETS), involving key figures like Henry Chauncey (CEEB president) and Erwin Griswold (Harvard Law dean). A Policy Committee of law school representatives formed that year oversaw the process, conducting experimental pretesting in fall 1947 based partly on formats from the Pepsi-Cola Scholarship Test and Navy officer exams to emphasize reasoning and verbal abilities. The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) emerged to coordinate these efforts, administering the inaugural LSAT on February 28, 1948, followed by a second session on May 8. The initial version spanned a full day with 10 sections, focusing on general cognitive skills deemed essential for legal study rather than rote knowledge.[12][11][10]Major Format Evolutions Through the 20th Century
The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) was first administered in February 1948 by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC), consisting of a full-day examination with 10 sections that emphasized verbal reasoning skills, including elements of reading comprehension and analogies.[13] This initial format drew from earlier aptitude tests but was tailored to predict law school performance through multiple-choice questions assessing linguistic and logical aptitudes, without dedicated analytical reasoning components.[13] In 1949, the test incorporated a data interpretation section to evaluate quantitative analysis alongside verbal elements, reflecting an early expansion to measure broader cognitive skills relevant to legal work.[13] By 1961, a writing sample was added, introducing an unscored essay component to gauge written expression, though it was not initially mandatory for all administrations.[13] These modifications shortened the overall test duration slightly while maintaining a multi-section structure, with scores reported on a 200–800 scale until 1981.[14] Significant restructuring occurred in 1975 with the introduction of the Logical Reasoning section, which tested argument analysis through discrete questions on assumptions, inferences, and flaws—shifting emphasis from pure verbal tasks to critical evaluation of reasoning.[13][15] Reading Comprehension was temporarily suspended during this period (1975–1982), as the test prioritized emerging formats for logical skills.[13] The 1982 administration marked a pivotal evolution with the debut of the Analytical Reasoning section (commonly known as Logic Games), featuring diagrammatic puzzles to assess deductive sequencing, grouping, and conditional rules—skills deemed essential for legal argumentation.[13][16] Reading Comprehension was reinstated concurrently, solidifying a core format of two Logical Reasoning sections, one Analytical Reasoning, and one Reading Comprehension, plus an experimental section and writing sample.[13] This configuration, tested for predictive validity, reduced the total sections from 10 to five scored or unscored multiple-choice segments, streamlining administration while enhancing focus on analytical rigor over rote verbal recall.[17] The structure remained largely stable through the 1990s, with minor refinements to question density and timing (35 minutes per section), supporting increased test-taker volumes from approximately 133,000 in 1975 to 152,750 in 1990.[13]Digital Transition and Online Implementation
The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) initiated the transition to a digital format for the LSAT in 2019, marking the end of the paper-and-pencil administration that had been standard since the test's inception in 1948. The first digital LSAT was administered on July 15, 2019, to a select group of test takers at U.S. and Canadian test centers, utilizing tablets pre-loaded with LSAC-developed software.[18] By September 2019, all LSAT administrations in North America had fully shifted to digital delivery on provided tablets, eliminating pencil-and-paper options entirely.[19] This change aimed to enhance test security through features like randomized question presentation and integrated digital scratch paper, while maintaining score comparability via statistical equating to prior paper administrations.[19] In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, LSAC suspended in-person testing in March 2020 and introduced the LSAT-Flex, a remotely proctored online version accessible via personal computers.[20] The LSAT-Flex initially featured three scored multiple-choice sections—reduced from four to accommodate remote delivery constraints—and was administered through April 2020 onward, with LSAC validating its scores as comparable to standard LSAT results through empirical analysis of pilot data.[20] Proctoring occurred via live remote monitoring using webcam and screen-sharing software, enforcing rules such as a 360-degree room scan and restrictions on external aids.[21] Following the pandemic, LSAC restored in-person digital testing at Prometric centers in August 2021 while retaining the remote option, allowing test takers to choose between modalities for most administrations.[22] Both formats remain fully digital, with remote sessions proctored through Prometric's ProProctor application, which includes AI-assisted monitoring for irregularities like eye movement or background noise.[23] As of the 2025-2026 testing year, LSAC continues to offer this dual delivery model, citing expanded access—particularly for those in remote areas—though in-person testing maintains higher security protocols via on-site oversight.[21] Score data from 2020-2023 administrations indicate no significant validity differences between remote and in-person results after equating, supporting LSAC's claim of format equivalence.[22]Elimination of Analytical Reasoning Section
On October 18, 2023, the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) announced the elimination of the Analytical Reasoning section, commonly known as "logic games," from the LSAT, effective with the August 2024 administration.[24][7] This marked the first removal of the section since its introduction in 1991, replacing it with an additional scored Logical Reasoning section to maintain assessment of core reasoning abilities.[24][25] The decision stemmed from a 2019 class-action lawsuit filed by visually impaired test-takers, who argued that the diagramming required for logic games disadvantaged those relying on screen-reading software, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.[7][26] LSAC settled the suit in 2020 by committing to explore alternatives, leading to extensive validity studies and consultations; the organization maintained that the change preserves predictive validity for law school performance while enhancing accessibility.[24] Critics, including some test preparation experts, contended that logic games uniquely measured conditional and deductive reasoning skills essential for legal analysis, potentially diluting the test's rigor in the revised format.[26] Implementation involved updating practice materials, with LSAC releasing new prep tests numbered starting at 101 in February 2024, excluding logic games and featuring two Logical Reasoning sections alongside Reading Comprehension.[27] The August 2024 LSAT proceeded without disruption, scoring on the familiar 120-180 scale, though early analyses suggested no significant shift in overall score distributions.[28] LSAC emphasized that the adjustment aligns with ongoing efforts to evolve the test based on empirical data, without altering the total testing time of approximately 2.5 hours for scored sections.[24]Administration
Test Delivery Options
The LSAT multiple-choice sections are administered digitally, offering test takers the choice between in-person testing at Prometric facilities or live remote proctoring from home for most administrations during the 2025-2026 testing cycle.[29][21] In-person delivery occurs at Prometric test centers located in major metropolitan areas across all 50 U.S. states and select international sites, utilizing provided computers for the four 35-minute sections, including a 10-minute intermission between sections 2 and 3.[29] Remote proctoring, facilitated through Prometric software, requires a personal computer meeting specific technical specifications, such as a webcam and stable internet, with live monitoring via video and audio to maintain exam integrity.[21] The LSAT Argumentative Writing component, an unscored argumentative essay, is delivered exclusively online in a remotely proctored format, accessible on demand from eight days before to one year following the multiple-choice test date.[22] This on-demand availability allows flexibility independent of the multiple-choice delivery mode.[21] While dual-mode options predominate, certain test dates impose restrictions; for instance, the November 4, 2025, administration is available only at test centers, with no remote option.[30] Registration for both modalities remains open through June 2026, subject to capacity and deadlines.[21] Accommodations for disabilities, such as extended time or alternative formats, apply to either delivery method upon approval.[22]Proctoring Protocols and Security Measures
The LSAT employs stringent proctoring protocols administered by Prometric for the multiple-choice sections, available in both remote and in-person formats, to uphold test integrity amid the shift to digital delivery since 2019.[31] These measures include identity verification, environmental scans, and continuous monitoring to deter cheating, with remote sessions utilizing live proctoring software that captures webcam feeds, audio, and screen activity.[31] Violations, such as unauthorized device use or external communication, can result in score invalidation under the LSAC Candidate Agreement.[32] For remote proctoring, test takers must download and launch the ProProctor application at least 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start, completing an enhanced system check to confirm compatibility with required hardware, including a webcam (external for desktops) and stable internet connection of at least 1.0 Mbps download speed.[33] Upon login via LawHub, proctors verify identity using government-issued photo ID, mandate a 360-degree room scan to ensure a private, enclosed space free of prohibited items like additional electronics or notes, and conduct a workspace inspection for compliance with clear-desk rules.[31] During the test, proctors monitor in real-time through video, audio, and screen sharing, prohibiting actions such as leaving the camera view, reading questions aloud (absent accommodations), or allowing others in the room; disconnection exceeding 30 minutes triggers session termination.[33] Post-intermission room scans and prohibitions on test discussion or scratch paper use further enforce security.[32] In-person proctoring occurs at Prometric test centers, where candidates arrive up to 30 minutes early for check-in, presenting valid photo ID and storing personal items—including all electronic devices, food, and beverages—in provided lockers to prevent unauthorized access.[34] Staff oversee seating assignments, distribute pre-approved scratch paper, and enforce rules against discussing test content or using unassigned materials, with a 10-minute intermission requiring ID re-verification and no work resumption until reseated.[34] Security extends to banning items like watches, tablets, or non-center headphones, aiming to minimize distractions and external aids in a supervised environment.[32] Both formats emphasize pre-test preparation, such as disabling notifications and firewalls to avoid technical flags interpreted as security risks, and post-test reporting of irregularities within two days via LSAC channels.[33] These protocols, refined through LSAC's collaboration with proctoring vendors, address vulnerabilities exposed during the 2020 pivot to remote testing, prioritizing empirical detection of irregularities over self-reported compliance.[22]Accommodations for Disabilities
The Law School Admission Council (LSAC) provides accommodations for LSAT and LSAT Argumentative Writing candidates with documented disabilities that substantially limit major life activities relevant to test performance, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other applicable laws.[35] Requests are reviewed case-by-case to determine if accommodations are necessary to ensure valid measurement of skills, requiring evidence that the disability affects performance in a manner similar to the standard test format.[36] To request accommodations, candidates must register for the LSAT, then submit an online Candidate Accommodations Request Form through their LSAC JD Account by the applicable deadline, which aligns with the test registration deadline.[35] Supporting documentation must accompany the request, including a detailed history of the disability, a comprehensive evaluation by a qualified professional (such as a licensed psychologist or physician specializing in the condition), and specific recommendations linking the disability to proposed accommodations.[36] For conditions like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or specific learning disabilities, psychoeducational testing results (e.g., from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale or Woodcock-Johnson tests) administered within the past five years are typically required, along with evidence of functional impact on cognitive processing or sustained attention.[36] Physical or psychiatric disabilities necessitate medical documentation outlining diagnosis, prognosis, and how symptoms impair test-taking abilities, such as reading, writing, or concentration.[36] Requests fall into three categories based on scope: Category 1 for non-time extensions (e.g., assistive devices); Category 2 for up to 50% extended time (or 100% for severe visual impairments) plus aids like readers; and Category 3 for greater extensions, multi-day testing, or format changes, which demand more rigorous evidence of need.[36] Available accommodations include 50% or 100% extended time per section, additional or stop/start breaks (limited to 60 minutes total per eight-hour session starting with the August 2025 administration), separate testing rooms, human readers or scribes, Braille or large-print formats, tactile tools (e.g., raised-line drawings), permission for physical adjustments like standing or verbalizing aloud during remote proctoring, and, in exceptional cases, paper-and-pencil testing or multi-day administration.[37] Non-standard requests, such as food at the workstation or extended breaks beyond limits, require justification and may restrict testing modality to remote or in-person options.[37] Effective August 2025, LSAC implemented changes including reclassifying paper-based testing (except Braille) and certain modality exceptions as Category 3 accommodations, necessitating fresh documentation even for prior approvals; stop/start breaks capped at 60 minutes without extending overall time; and requirements for reapplications in some cases rather than automatic carryover of previous accommodations.[38] [39] Appeals of denials must be submitted within five calendar days of the decision.[35] Scores from accommodated tests are reported without flagging or notation to law schools, pursuant to a 2014 consent decree with the U.S. Department of Justice resolving allegations of discrimination.[40] LSAC data from 2012–2017 indicate that accommodated test-takers received higher average LSAT scores than non-accommodated peers in 18 of 20 administrations examined, with differences typically around 4–5 points, though some analyses suggest up to 7 points; the number of approved accommodations rose from 729 in 2012–2013 to 3,000 in 2016–2017.[41] [42] Approval rates for requests have historically ranged from 46% to 79% annually.[43]Test Composition
Logical Reasoning Sections
The Logical Reasoning sections comprise two scored multiple-choice components of the LSAT, each administered in a 35-minute timed segment containing 24 to 26 questions based on brief passages, known as stimuli, that present arguments in ordinary written English.[44] [45] These sections, which together account for roughly half of the scored questions on the post-August 2024 LSAT format following the elimination of the Analytical Reasoning section, evaluate a test-taker's capacity to dissect argument structure, scrutinize premises and conclusions, and apply deductive and inductive logic without relying on specialized knowledge.[24] [4] Each question features a stimulus of two to five sentences articulating an author's position, followed by a stem directing the respondent to perform a targeted analytical task, such as identifying the argument's primary flaw, selecting evidence that strengthens or undermines the conclusion, recognizing unstated assumptions necessary for the reasoning to hold, or inferring a logically compelled outcome from the given premises.[46] [47] Stimuli draw from diverse topics including sciences, humanities, law, and public policy, but success hinges on formal logical evaluation rather than substantive expertise, emphasizing skills like distinguishing relevant from irrelevant evidence, detecting causal fallacies, and evaluating conditional relationships.[44] [4] Common question subtypes include those requiring detection of reasoning errors (e.g., ad hominem attacks, equivocation, or overgeneralization), assumption-based tasks (e.g., necessary or sufficient conditions for the conclusion), inference questions demanding the most supported extension of the argument, and parallel reasoning prompts that test recognition of structurally analogous arguments among choices.[46] [48] Flaw-identification questions, which ask test-takers to pinpoint descriptive weaknesses in the logic, appear in 6 to 10 instances across the two sections per administration, while strengthen/weaken tasks probe evidentiary impacts on the conclusion's validity.[47] These formats cultivate abilities essential for legal analysis, such as critiquing briefs, spotting gaps in testimony, and constructing persuasive responses, as evidenced by LSAC's design rationale linking performance to predictive validity for first-year law school grades.[44] [4] An unscored variable section, which may replicate Logical Reasoning format to pilot new questions, is indistinguishable in presentation and contributes to test security by randomizing section order, ensuring no strategic advantage from identification.[24] [22] Test-takers must approach each stimulus by first isolating the conclusion, then mapping supporting premises and potential gaps, a method LSAC endorses for maximizing accuracy under time constraints averaging about 1.5 minutes per question.[49] Empirical data from LSAC indicates Logical Reasoning proficiency correlates strongly with overall LSAT scores, underscoring its weight in admissions decisions.[44]Reading Comprehension Section
The Reading Comprehension (RC) section of the LSAT measures candidates' capacity to read, comprehend, and critically analyze dense, long-form texts comparable to those in law school curricula, such as legal opinions, scholarly articles, and treatises.[50] It emphasizes skills like synthesizing information, identifying assumptions, drawing inferences from incomplete data, and applying principles to novel contexts, reflecting the analytical demands of legal practice and study.[50] Passages are intentionally challenging, incorporating high-level vocabulary, sophisticated argumentation, and unfamiliar viewpoints to test resilience in processing complex material under time constraints.[50] The section comprises four distinct sets of reading material, typically three single passages of 400–500 words each and one comparative set with two shorter, related passages (known as Comparative Reading, introduced in June 2007 to evaluate skills in contrasting arguments and perspectives).[50] Each set is followed by 5–8 multiple-choice questions, yielding 26–28 questions in total, which must be answered within a strict 35-minute limit.[51] Topics span humanities, social sciences, biological and physical sciences, and law-related fields, with content selected to avoid requiring prior subject-matter expertise while demanding precise comprehension of structure, tone, and implications.[50] Question types probe various facets of textual analysis, including:- Main point and primary purpose: Identifying the central thesis or author's overarching goal.
- Explicit detail and inference: Locating stated information or logically deducing unstated conclusions.
- Structure and organization: Analyzing passage architecture, such as argumentative flow or evidence placement.
- Author's attitude and tone: Determining viewpoint, bias, or evaluative stance.
- Application and analogy: Extending principles from the passage to hypothetical scenarios or parallel situations.
- Impact of new information: Assessing how additional facts might strengthen, weaken, or alter the author's position.
Unscored Variable Section
The unscored variable section, also known as the experimental section, is a 35-minute multiple-choice component of the LSAT that does not contribute to the reported score but is administered to every test-taker to pretest potential questions for future exams.[4] This section replicates the format of scored sections, containing either Logical Reasoning or Reading Comprehension questions, and can appear in any position among the four multiple-choice sections (first through fourth).[4] [5] Test-takers cannot identify it during the exam, as it is indistinguishable from scored sections in content, difficulty, and presentation.[4] Since the elimination of the Analytical Reasoning section in August 2024, the variable section has been limited to Logical Reasoning (typically 24-26 questions) or Reading Comprehension (typically 26-28 questions).[53] [54] The primary purpose of this section is to allow the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) to evaluate the statistical performance, fairness, and reliability of new questions under real testing conditions before incorporating them into scored sections of subsequent LSAT administrations.[4] By administering it to thousands of examinees, LSAC gathers data on question difficulty, discrimination (ability to differentiate skill levels), and potential biases, ensuring that future scored items maintain the test's validity and psychometric standards.[55] [56] This pretesting process helps refine the LSAT's question bank, with LSAC analyzing response patterns to discard underperforming items and calibrate scoring scales accordingly.[57] Although unscored, the variable section affects test administration by extending the multiple-choice portion to four sections total, contributing to the overall test duration of approximately three hours (excluding breaks).[5] LSAC research indicates that its placement does not systematically influence performance on scored sections, as evidenced by years of data showing no significant score variations based on position.[58] However, its presence requires test-takers to sustain focus across an additional section without knowing which one is experimental, potentially testing endurance as part of the exam's demands.[56] During the LSAT-Flex era (2020-2023), this section was omitted to shorten the remote-proctored test, but it was reinstated with the return to standard in-person and online formats starting August 2024.[59] Scores from tests without the variable section, such as LSAT-Flex, are annotated accordingly to distinguish them from standard administrations.[59]Argumentative Writing Sample
The LSAT Argumentative Writing Sample is an unscored component of the Law School Admission Test designed to evaluate test takers' ability to construct a persuasive argument using provided evidentiary sources.[60] Introduced in its current format starting with the August 2024 administration, the task requires examinees to analyze a decision-making scenario with two conflicting options—such as policy choices or business decisions—and write an essay advocating for one position over the other, incorporating data from supplied sources like reports, studies, or expert opinions.[61] Test takers may also draw on their own knowledge to bolster the argument, emphasizing clarity, logical structure, and evidence-based reasoning over creativity or length.[62] The writing session totals 50 minutes: 15 minutes allocated for prewriting analysis, during which examinees review the prompt and sources without typing, followed by 35 minutes for composing the essay on a digital platform.[61] This on-demand, remotely proctored format is accessed via secure software installed on the test taker's computer, separate from the main LSAT exam, and can be completed anytime after the multiple-choice sections, with results typically processed within one week for inclusion in score reports.[63] Unlike prior versions, which involved selecting and defending one of two simplified arguments in 35 minutes without sources, the updated task demands deeper engagement with multifaceted evidence, mirroring skills needed for legal analysis.[64] Although not factored into the LSAT's scaled score of 120-180, the writing sample is automatically sent to law schools alongside score reports, serving as a supplementary indicator of persuasive writing proficiency under timed conditions.[63] Law school admissions professionals have reported using it to gauge applicants' capacity for coherent argumentation, particularly when personal statements or other essays are absent or inconsistent, though its influence varies by institution and is often secondary to the multiple-choice score.[63] [65] Official preparation resources, including sample prompts on LSAC's LawHub platform, emphasize outlining a thesis, integrating evidence, addressing counterarguments, and concluding decisively to produce a focused response of approximately 300-500 words.[66] Test takers with approved accommodations, such as extended time, receive adjusted protocols to ensure equitable assessment.[67]Scoring
Raw to Scaled Score Conversion
The raw score on the LSAT represents the total number of questions answered correctly across the four scored multiple-choice sections, with all questions weighted equally and no deduction for incorrect or unanswered responses.[59] This score typically ranges from 0 to around 75–101, depending on the exact number of questions administered in a given test form.[59] Test-takers are thus incentivized to attempt every question, as omitting answers yields no benefit over guessing.[59] To enable comparability across test administrations, which may vary in difficulty due to differences in question sets, the raw score undergoes a proprietary statistical equating process administered by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC).[59] This equating anchors scores to a fixed reference scale derived from historical test data, ensuring that a given scaled score reflects consistent underlying ability irrespective of the specific form's challenge level or peer performance on that date.[68] The resulting scaled score ranges from 120 (lowest) to 180 (highest), with scores near 150 corresponding to approximate median performance in recent years.[59] Equating adjustments mean the raw-to-scaled conversion is not fixed but varies modestly per administration; for example, a harder test form might equate a raw score of 80 to a scaled 170, while an easier form could require 82–85 raw correct for the same scaled outcome.[69] LSAC maintains the exact tables and methodology as confidential to preserve test security and integrity, preventing exploitation or prediction of future conversions.[59] Official practice tests released via LSAC's LawHub platform include simulated equating charts for estimation, though these are not identical to live test outcomes.[59] Score reports also include confidence bands indicating the range within which the true score likely falls, accounting for measurement error.[59]Percentile Rankings and Reliability
LSAT percentile rankings reflect the proportion of recent test-takers scoring below a given scaled score, calculated by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) using data from specified testing years and updated annually by the end of July.[70][59] For the 2022–2025 testing years, these rankings provide a comparative benchmark, with higher scores corresponding to progressively rarer performance levels; for instance, a score of 180 aligns with the 99th percentile, while 170 aligns with the 95th percentile.[70] The following table summarizes key LSAT scaled scores and their corresponding "percent below" rankings (whole numbers) for the 2022–2025 period:| Scaled Score | Percent Below |
|---|---|
| 120 | 0% |
| 150 | 38% |
| 160 | 73% |
| 170 | 95% |
| 180 | 99% |