Hubbry Logo
LispLispMain
Open search
Lisp
Community hub
Lisp
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Lisp
Lisp
Lisp
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Lisp
Other namesSigmatism
SpecialtyPediatrics

A lisp is a speech impairment in which a person misarticulates sibilants ([s], [z], [ts], [dz], [ʃ], [ʒ], [t͡ʃ], [d͡ʒ]).[1] These misarticulations often result in unclear speech in languages with phonemic sibilants.

Types

[edit]
  • A frontal lisp occurs when the tongue is placed anterior to the target. Interdental lisping is produced when the tip of the tongue protrudes between the front teeth and dentalized lisping is produced when the tip of the tongue just touches the front teeth. The transcription in the International Phonetic Alphabet for interdental sibilants is [s̪͆] and [z̪͆] and for simple dental sibilants is [s̟] and [z̟]. When a fronted lisp does not have a sibilant quality, due to lack of a grooved articulation, the IPA transcription would be [θ, ð] or variants thereof.
  • A lateral lisp occurs when the [s] and [z] sounds are produced with air-flow over the sides of the tongue. It is also called "slushy ess" or a "slushy lisp" in part due to its wet, spitty sound. The symbols for these lateralised sounds in the extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for disordered speech are [ʪ] and [ʫ].
  • A nasal lisp occurs when part or the entire air stream is directed through the nasal cavity. The transcription for sibilants with nasal frication in the extensions to the IPA is [s͋] and [z͋]; simple nasal fricatives are [s̃] and [z̃].
  • A strident lisp results in a high-frequency whistle or hissing sound caused by stream passing between the tongue and the hard surface. In the extensions to the IPA, whistled sibilants are transcribed [s͎] and [z͎].
  • A palatal lisp is where the speaker attempts to make a sibilant while the middle of the tongue is in contact with the soft palate,[1] or with a posterior articulation of the sibilant. The latter may be transcribed [s̠] and [z̠], [ʃ] and [ʒ], or the like.[2]

Causes

[edit]

Successful treatments have shown that causes are functional rather than physical: that is, most lisps are caused by errors in tongue placement or density of the tongue within the mouth rather than caused by any injury or congenital or acquired deformity to the mouth. The most frequently discussed of these problems is tongue thrust in which the tongue protrudes beyond the front teeth.[3] This protrusion affects speech as well as swallowing and can lead to lisping. Ankyloglossia or tongue tie can also be responsible for lisps in children — however, it is unclear whether these deficiencies are caused by the tongue tie itself or the muscle weakness following the correction of the tongue tie.[4] Overbites and underbites may also contribute to non lingual lisping. Temporary lisps can be caused by dental work, excess saliva, mouthguards, dental appliances such as dentures, dental braces, or retainers or by swollen or bruised tongues.[citation needed]

Treatment

[edit]

Frenectomy

[edit]

Lisps caused by tongue tie can be treated by a dentist or otolaryngologist (ENT) with a lingual frenectomy, or laser incision, which takes less than 10 to 15 minutes to complete.[5][6][7]

Speech therapy

[edit]

With an interdental lisp, the therapist teaches the student how to keep the tongue behind the two front incisors.[8]

One popular method of correcting articulation or lisp disorders is to isolate sounds and work on correcting the sound in isolation. The basic sound, or phoneme, is selected as a target for treatment. Typically the position of the sound within a word is considered and targeted. The sound appears in the beginning of the word, middle, or end of the word (initial, medial, or final).

Take for example, correction of an "S" sound (lisp). Most likely, a speech language pathologist (SLP) would employ exercises to work on "Sssssss."[clarify] Starting practice words would most likely consist of "S-initial" words such as "say, sun, soap, sip, sick, said, sail." According to this protocol, the SLP slowly increases the complexity of tasks (context of pronunciations) as the production of the sound improves. Examples of increased complexity could include saying words in phrases and sentences, saying longer multi syllabic words, or increasing the tempo of pronunciation.

Using this method, the SLP achieves success with their student by targeting a sound in a phonetically consistent manner. Phonetic consistency means that a target sound is isolated at the smallest possible level (phoneme, phone, or allophone) and that the context of production must be consistent. Consistency is critical, because factors such as the position within the word, grouping with other sounds (vowels or consonants), and the complexity all may affect production.

Another popular method for treating a lisp is using specially designed devices that go in the mouth to provide a tactile cue of exactly where the tongue should be positioned when saying the "S" sound. This tactile feedback has been shown to correct lisp errors twice as fast as traditional therapy.

Using either or both methods, the repetition of consistent contexts allows the student to align all the necessary processes required to properly produce language; language skills (ability to formulate correct sounds in the brain: What sounds do I need to make?), motor planning (voicing and jaw and tongue movements: How do I produce the sound?), and auditory processing (receptive feedback: Was the sound produced correctly? Do I need to correct?).

A student with an articulation or lisp disorder has a deficiency in one or more of these areas. To correct the deficiency, adjustments have to be made in one or more of these processes. The process to correct it is more often than not, trial and error. With so many factors, however, isolating the variables (the sound) is imperative to getting to the result faster.

A phonetically consistent treatment strategy means practicing the same thing over and over. What is practiced is consistent and does not change. The words might change, but the phoneme and its positioning is the same (say, sip, sill, soap, ...). Thus, successful correction of the disorder is found in manipulating or changing the other factors involved with speech production (tongue positioning, cerebral processing, etc.). Once a successful result (speech) is achieved, then consistent practice becomes essential to reinforcing correct productions.

When the difficult sound is mastered, the student will then learn to say the sound in syllables, then words, then phrases and then sentences. When a student can speak a whole sentence without lisping, attention is then focused on making correct sounds throughout natural conversation. Towards the end of the course of therapy, the student will be taught how to monitor his or her own speech, and how to correct as necessary. Speech therapy can sometimes fix the problem, but in some cases speech therapy fails to work.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lisp

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A lisp is a characterized by the misarticulation of consonants, particularly the /s/ and /z/ sounds (as in "sun" and ""), which are often substituted with other sounds such as /θ/ or /ð/ (as in "thin" and "this"). This functional or anatomical impairment results in unclear speech and is one of the most common articulation errors, especially in children. Lisps typically emerge during and affect the precise placement of the relative to the teeth and . Common types include the interdental (or frontal) lisp, where the protrudes between the teeth; the lateral lisp, where is directed over the sides of the , producing a slushy sound; the palatal lisp, with the raised to the ; and the dental lisp, where the contacts the teeth excessively. Prevalence varies by age: speech sound disorders, including lisps, affect approximately 23% of preschool-aged children and 5% of U.S. children ages 3-17 overall, though many resolve spontaneously by school age; persistent lisps occur in about 1% of adults. Etiological factors may include developmental delays in tongue control, anatomical constraints such as ankyloglossia (tongue-tie), or habits like prolonged pacifier use, though no single cause is universal. Diagnosis involves clinical evaluation by speech-language pathologists, and management ranges from observational monitoring in mild cases to targeted speech therapy; surgical intervention is rare and limited to structural issues.

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

A lisp is a speech sound disorder involving the misarticulation of sibilant consonants, primarily /s/ and /z/, but potentially extending to /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /tʃ/, and /dʒ/, due to atypical tongue placement that disrupts the precise airflow required for these fricative and affricate sounds. This disorder can be functional, arising from learned patterns of articulation, or organic, linked to structural differences, resulting in substitutions, distortions, or omissions that alter the intended phonetic quality. In typical production, sibilants involve a narrow central groove along the tongue blade directing high-velocity airflow over the alveolar ridge to create a hissing or hushing noise; in lisping, this airflow is redirected, often forward or laterally, leading to audible deviations. Phonetically, one common pattern features forward protrusion of the tongue tip between the teeth, substituting /s/ and /z/ with interdental fricatives /θ/ (as in "thin") and /ð/ (as in "this"), producing a softer, lisping quality; for example, the word "sun" (/sʌn/) may be articulated as "thun" (/θʌn/). Another characteristic involves lateral airflow emission over the sides of the tongue, creating a "slushy" or wet distortion of the sibilants without clear substitution, as the air escapes bilaterally instead of centrally. These airflow anomalies reduce the high-pitched, concentrated frication essential to sibilants, though the exact manifestations vary by individual and language context. Lisps can compromise speech intelligibility to varying degrees, particularly in connected where multiple occur, potentially leading to listener misperceptions and communication breakdowns. Beyond clarity, they influence social perception, as listeners may associate the with immaturity or reduced competence, contributing to or exclusion in social settings. In children and adults alike, persistent lisping often erodes , fostering avoidance of verbal interactions and heightened anxiety around speaking, though early intervention can mitigate these effects. The term "lisp" derives from Old English wlispian (attested in forms like āwlyspian), an imitative word describing imperfect pronunciation of /s/ and /z/ sounds, akin to similar terms in Dutch and German. This etymology underscores the disorder's long-recognized auditory hallmark in English-speaking contexts.

Prevalence and Epidemiology

Lisps, as a form of involving distortions of sounds such as /s/ and /z/, affect a notable portion of young children globally. Epidemiological studies estimate that speech sound disorders, including lisps, occur in approximately 8-10% of children aged 3-6 years, with broader ranges reported from 2.3% to 24.6% depending on diagnostic criteria and population sampled.) In community-based samples of children, sibilant errors manifesting as lisps are particularly prevalent. Prevalence appears higher in English-speaking populations due to the phonetic complexity of sibilants, which are among the last sounds acquired in child . The condition is most common during the years, peaking around ages 4-5 when children are actively refining articulation skills. Spontaneous resolution occurs in 50-75% of cases by age 8, as many early errors self-correct with maturation. Gender distribution shows a slight male predominance, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1.5:1 in speech sound disorders. Lisps frequently co-occur with other speech disorders, such as articulation delays or , in 20-30% of affected children, based on clinical and studies. Key risk factors include environmental influences like bilingualism, which may complicate acquisition in multilingual settings, and prolonged use beyond infancy, potentially altering oral motor development. These associations are supported by longitudinal cohort studies from the 2010s in the UK and , highlighting the role of early habits in speech outcomes.

Classification

Interdental Lisp

The interdental lisp, also known as the frontal lisp, is the most common subtype of lisp, occurring when the protrudes between the upper and lower front teeth during the articulation of sounds. This positioning results in the substitution of the alveolar fricatives /s/ and /z/ with the interdental fricatives /θ/ (voiceless) and /ð/ (voiced), producing a "th" sound in place of "s" or "z". Phonetically, the interdental lisp involves the tongue tip advancing forward between the teeth, directing the airflow centrally over the tongue's apex rather than along the alveolar ridge, which generates a fricative noise characteristic of dental articulation. In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), this substitution is transcribed as [θ] for /s/ (e.g., /sʌn/ realized as [θʌn] "thun") and [ð] for /z/ (e.g., /zu/ realized as [ðu] "thoo"). This pattern primarily affects sibilants but may extend to affricates like /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /tʃ/, and /dʒ/ in some cases, though the core error remains the frontal tongue placement. Identification of an interdental lisp often relies on observing the visible protrusion of the tip between the teeth during attempted production of /s/ and /z/ sounds, making it readily apparent in clinical or casual speech assessment. It is particularly prevalent among young children, where it frequently emerges as a developmental feature due to immature of the , typically resolving by age 5 without intervention in many instances. Examples include pronouncing "snake" as [θneɪk] "thnake" or "lisp" as [lɪθp] "lithp," highlighting the distinctive "th" substitution that differentiates it from other lisp variants.

Dentalized Lisp

The dentalized lisp occurs when the tongue contacts or presses against the back of the upper front teeth during sibilant production, resulting in a muffled or distorted /s/ and /z/ sound with central airflow but improper dental placement. Unlike the interdental lisp, the tongue does not protrude between the teeth, but the contact causes the airflow to be directed too far forward, often producing a sound resembling a slight /t/ or /d/ blend with the fricative. Phonetically, this lisp is transcribed in IPA as [s̪] or [z̪] (dentalized alveolar fricatives), where the subscript ̪ indicates dental articulation, or sometimes as affricated [ts̪] for /s/. It primarily affects /s/ and /z/ but can influence other similarly. Identification involves noting the lack of tongue protrusion but audible distortion from dental contact, often requiring closer observation or . This type is less common than interdental but can persist if not addressed, and examples include "sun" as [t̪s̪ʌn] or a lispy "tsun."

Lateral Lisp

Lateral lisp, also known as side lisp, is a subtype of distortion in which airflow is directed laterally over the sides of the during the production of sounds such as /s/ and /z/, rather than centrally through a grooved position. This results in a distinctive "slushy," "wet," or "muddy" auditory quality, often perceived as a hissing or sound with excess saliva-like resonance. In one study of children with and associated speech disorders, lateral lisp accounted for 17.2% of the observed speech issues, highlighting its commonality among articulation errors. Phonetically, the lateral lisp typically involves the substitution of a lateral fricative for the target sibilants, producing sounds such as the voiceless alveolar lateral fricative [ɬ] for /s/ and the voiced counterpart [ɮ] for /z/, or more precisely the extIPA symbols [ʪ] and [ʫ] to denote the lateralized friction. This can also lead to affrication, where the sound takes on a stop-fricative quality, further distorting the intended sibilant. In auditory perception, these realizations are frequently described as "wet" due to the lateral airflow creating a sputtering effect, distinguishing them from other lisp variants. Identification of lateral lisp is aided by the absence of visible tongue protrusion, with the tongue often positioned too low or flat, allowing air to escape bilaterally along the sides of the . Unlike the interdental lisp, which features frontal tongue placement and a "th"-like substitution, the lateral variant lacks this protrusion and is more likely to persist into older childhood or adulthood due to entrenched habitual motor patterns. This persistence is attributed to its non-developmental nature, as lateral lisps do not typically resolve spontaneously without intervention. Illustrative examples include the word "slither," which may be rendered with a pronounced side hiss or slushy distortion, sounding akin to "shlither" with lateral emission. These variations underscore the spectrum of lateral distortions, often requiring targeted phonetic assessment for precise characterization.

Palatal Lisp

The palatal lisp, also referred to as the palatalized lisp, arises when the tongue is raised too high toward the during articulation, causing the /s/ and /z/ sounds to be produced with excessive palatal contact and resulting in a distorted, often "y"-like or "sh"-like quality. This placement directs airflow posteriorly, producing a non- or sound. It is the least common type of lisp. Phonetically, the palatal lisp substitutes /s/ with [ʃ] or -like sounds (e.g., [ɕ] or palatal in IPA), and /z/ similarly voiced, leading to realizations like /sʌn/ as [ʃʌn] "shun." It mainly impacts and can affect clarity in . Identification relies on auditory cues of the "ee" or "sh" substitution without visible issues at the front, often confirmed via spectrographic . This type typically requires intervention as it does not resolve developmentally. Examples include "zip" pronounced as [ʃɪp] "ship."

Etiology

Anatomical Causes

Anatomical causes of lisps primarily involve structural abnormalities in the oral cavity that disrupt normal airflow and positioning during sound production, such as /s/ and /z/. , or tongue-tie, results from a short or tight lingual that restricts mobility, potentially leading to compensatory forward thrusting in and contributing to interdental lisps in some cases. However, evidence indicates that does not directly cause speech disorders like lisps in most individuals, as compensatory articulatory adjustments often produce normal acoustics; its prevalence ranges from 4.2% to 10.7% in newborns, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:1. Dental and oral structural anomalies, such as , anterior open bite, or between the incisors, can alter airflow dynamics and facilitate improper placement, promoting interdental lisps by allowing the tongue to protrude between the teeth. Anterior open bite is the most common associated with articulation disorders, including lisps, as it interferes with precise tongue-tooth contact needed for . exacerbates this by creating a gap that encourages frontal positioning, leading to whistling or lisping sounds during production. Children with speech sound disorders exhibit a higher prevalence of severe compared to those without, underscoring the anatomical link. Neurological factors involving mild motor impairments, such as in , can affect tongue elevation and positioning, resulting in imprecise articulation and lisping errors. In , low muscle tone disrupts orofacial control, contributing to speech sound disorders that may include sibilant distortions resembling lisps. Acquired anatomical changes, such as scarring from oral injuries or post-surgical alterations following or dental implants, can restrict tongue movement or modify occlusion, leading to persistent lisps. For instance, retainers after orthodontic treatment may temporarily induce lisping due to adaptation challenges, while scarring from trauma can permanently alter oral structures. Studies link such occlusal disruptions to a notable portion of persistent articulation issues in adults and children.

Functional and Developmental Causes

Functional and developmental causes of lisps encompass non-structural factors related to motor maturation, behavioral habits, environmental exposures, and psychological influences that affect positioning and production. Immature motor development often manifests as delayed coordination in toddlers, where children exhibit frontal lisps due to incomplete refinement of oral-motor skills during early speech acquisition. This pattern is typically linked to broader delays in speech milestones, such as late acquisition of fricatives, and resolves naturally in many cases by ages 4-5 as matures. For instance, studies on children have identified shared genetic and environmental factors between motor immaturity and specific impairments, including articulation challenges like lisping. Habitual patterns contribute to persistent lisps when immature articulations become reinforced through imitation, lack of correction, or maladaptive oral behaviors beyond typical developmental windows, such as after age 5. A prominent example is the swallow, a retained infantile pattern where the protrudes forward during swallowing, which can distort sibilant sounds and lead to frontal lisps by altering airflow and placement during speech. This habitual misarticulation is classified as a functional , arising from learned motor patterns rather than anatomical issues, and often requires targeted therapy to retrain proper positioning. Clinical observations indicate that uncorrected affects articulation in school-aged children, with myofunctional exercises addressing the underlying swallow-speech linkage. Environmental influences can further shape lisp development by impacting oral-motor practice and sound mastery. Prolonged pacifier use, for example, may weaken or alter tongue and jaw musculature, promoting forward tongue posture that hinders precise sibilant production and increases lisp risk. Speech-language pathology perspectives note that extended non-nutritive sucking beyond infancy limits opportunities for varied oral exploration, potentially setting the stage for lisping patterns. Similarly, bilingual exposure can complicate sibilant acquisition due to phonological interference between languages, delaying mastery of sounds like /s/ and /z/ in one or both systems during preschool years. Research on bilingual preschoolers highlights variable speech sound development timelines influenced by dual-language input, underscoring the need for culturally sensitive assessment. Psychological factors, including and anxiety, can exacerbate existing lisps by inducing muscle tension that impairs articulatory precision, though they rarely initiate the disorder independently. In children with speech sound disorders, heightened anxiety states correlate with increased articulation errors, as physiological responses like elevated disrupt fine of the and airflow. Evidence from child psychology indicates that such exacerbations occur in a notable subset of cases, often linked to comorbid developmental language issues.

Diagnosis

Clinical Assessment

Clinical assessment of a lisp begins with a comprehensive history taking conducted by a speech-language pathologist (SLP), which includes gathering parental or caregiver reports on the child's speech onset, developmental milestones, family history of speech disorders, and any associated behaviors such as tongue thrusting or oral habits. This process often incorporates standardized questionnaires and tools, such as the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation (GFTA-3), to evaluate articulation accuracy across word positions and identify specific sibilant distortions like interdental or lateral lisps. The GFTA-3 involves presenting pictures for the child to name, scoring errors in sounds like /s/ and /z/, and providing normative data to determine if the lisp deviates from age-expected performance. Observational screening follows, where the SLP listens to the individual produce sounds in isolation, words, and connected speech to detect distortions, substitutions, or omissions of sibilants. Age-normed benchmarks guide this evaluation; for instance, the /s/ sound is typically acquired by age 3 years but mastered (produced correctly in 90% of contexts) by age 8 years according to ASHA-referenced norms. Similarly, /z/ mastery aligns with age 8 years, helping clinicians distinguish developmental delays from persistent disorders. During screening, the SLP may note contextual factors, such as whether errors occur more in spontaneous conversation than structured tasks, to assess functional impact. A multidisciplinary approach enhances the assessment by involving SLPs alongside dentists or ear, nose, and throat () specialists to review potential anatomical contributors, such as dental malocclusions or structural anomalies affecting tongue placement. For example, a pedodontist may evaluate oral motor capabilities and dental alignment during the same session to provide a holistic profile. This collaboration ensures that speech observations are contextualized with physical examinations, avoiding misattribution of functional lisps to structural causes. Severity is rated qualitatively by the based on factors like error frequency, intelligibility, and communicative impact, often using scales derived from percentage consonants correct (PCC) metrics. Mild severity involves infrequent substitutions that remain intelligible with context (PCC 85-100%), mild-moderate includes mild noticeable distortions (PCC 65-85%), moderate-severe features more frequent errors affecting clarity in conversation (PCC 50-65%), and severe involves frequent errors leading to significantly reduced intelligibility (PCC <50%). In a case example, a with a prominent lateral lisp on /s/ and /z/ scored in the mild range on the GFTA-3 (2nd percentile) but demonstrated 100% intelligibility in , illustrating how contextual factors influence rating. Another session might reveal severe impact if substitutions persist across types like interdental lisps, prompting further evaluation.

Phonetic and Instrumental Evaluation

Phonetic transcription plays a crucial role in evaluating lisps by providing a standardized method to document precise articulatory errors. The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), particularly its extensions for disordered speech (extIPA), enables narrow transcription that captures subtle details such as direction, , and manner deviations. For instance, an interdental lisp on /s/ may be transcribed as [s̪͡θ̪] to indicate dental frication with interdental protrusion, while a lateral lisp is noted as [s͡ɬ] to reflect lateral escape alongside frication. This level of detail, beyond broad phonemic notation, helps clinicians differentiate lisp subtypes and track changes over time. Acoustic analysis complements transcription by revealing characteristics of lisp productions through tools like spectrograms and tracking. In typical , /s/ and /z/ exhibit high-frequency noise with concentrated energy above 4 kHz, but lisps distort this pattern; for example, lateral lisps often display diffused energy with elevated third (F3) frequencies around 3-4 kHz due to lateral airflow, visible as additional low-frequency components in spectrograms. software facilitates these measurements by automating moment analysis (e.g., center of gravity, skew) and extraction from recorded speech samples, allowing quantitative comparison of distorted versus normative sibilant spectra. Articulatory imaging techniques offer direct visualization of tongue dynamics underlying lisp errors, enhancing diagnostic precision. Ultrasound tongue imaging, placed submentally, provides real-time mid-sagittal views of elevation and grooving deficits, such as excessive anterior bunching in interdental lisps or lateral spreading in lateral variants. Videofluoroscopy captures dynamic vocal tract movements under , highlighting airflow disruptions during production, though it is less commonly used due to concerns. Electropalatography (EPG) maps -to-palate contact via a custom pseudopalate, revealing atypical patterns like incomplete central contact or lateral leaks in lisp-affected /s/ and /ʃ/. These methods collectively inform targeted interventions by quantifying articulatory anomalies. Normative comparisons ground evaluations in developmental benchmarks, with databases like the Child Phonology Project offering age-specific data on sibilant acquisition and error rates in typically developing children. For example, accurate /s/ production emerges by age 4-5 in 90% of English-speaking children, with persistent distortions beyond age 8 signaling disorder. Post-2020 advancements in AI-assisted analysis leverage on acoustic and imaging data for automated detection; datasets like PAVSig enable models to classify lisp distortions with over 85% accuracy by analyzing spectral features and tongue contours, streamlining diagnosis in resource-limited settings.

Management

Surgical Treatments

Surgical treatments for lisps primarily target underlying anatomical abnormalities that impede proper tongue positioning and articulation, such as or contributing to interdental lisps. These interventions are indicated when non-structural causes have been ruled out through clinical evaluation. , also known as or frenotomy, involves the surgical release of a restrictive lingual () to enhance mobility. The procedure can be performed using for a simple incision or for precise cutting with reduced bleeding and faster healing. In children under 7 years with -related articulation disorders, has demonstrated speech improvement rates of approximately 70-96%, particularly in symptomatic cases where preoperative impairments are moderate to severe. Post-procedure recovery typically spans 1-2 weeks, involving minimal discomfort managed with over-the-counter pain relief and instructions to maintain to prevent . Following , many patients require adjunct speech therapy to optimize articulation gains. Orthodontic interventions address malocclusions, such as open bites or dental misalignments, that can precipitate or exacerbate lisps by altering placement during sounds. Braces or fixed appliances realign the teeth and jaws, while techniques like rapid maxillary expansion (RME) widen the upper jaw to correct narrow arches or anterior open bites associated with interdental lisps. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations show improved speech clarity and reduced lisping in patients with malocclusion-linked sound disorders, with articulation enhancements persisting after appliance removal. RME specifically may initially disrupt speech due to appliance adaptation but yields long-term phonetic improvements in affected children. These procedures are most effective when initiated in mixed stages. Other surgical options include myotomy or specialized variants for severe tongue muscle restrictions and cleft palate repairs that resolve secondary lisps arising from structural deficits. Miofrenuloplasty, a myotomy-assisted technique, significantly enhances movement and speech in cases of moderate to severe unresponsive to simpler releases. For children with repaired cleft palates, secondary surgeries such as pharyngoplasty address velopharyngeal insufficiency, indirectly improving articulation errors including lisps, with ENT studies from 2018-2023 reporting secondary speech surgery rates of 5-30% and favorable outcomes in hypernasality reduction that benefit overall . Surgical treatments are reserved for confirmed anatomical etiologies, such as tongue-tie or dentofacial discrepancies, after multidisciplinary assessment confirms structural contribution to the lisp. Risks are generally low, with complications like or occurring in less than 5% of cases, though reattachment of the may necessitate revision in rare instances. Most patients experience uneventful recovery, but follow-up speech therapy is often essential to consolidate surgical benefits and prevent compensatory habits.

Non-Surgical Therapies

Non-surgical therapies for lisps primarily involve speech-language pathology interventions aimed at correcting articulation errors through behavioral and rehabilitative strategies and are typically the first-line treatment per professional guidelines. Speech-language therapy (SLT) is the cornerstone of treatment, employing techniques such as articulation drills to teach precise placement for /s/ and /z/ sounds, often progressing from isolation to conversational speech. Mirror feedback allows children to visually monitor position, while oral motor exercises strengthen the 's lateral edges and promote proper elevation against the alveolar ridge. For persistent lisps, traditional SLT contrasts with the cycles approach, which cycles through phonological patterns to address underlying processes in complex cases, though traditional methods are more directly targeted for isolated distortions. Behavioral interventions complement SLT by incorporating positive reinforcement, such as rewards for accurate sound production, and parent training programs to facilitate home practice. These approaches enhance motivation and generalization of skills beyond sessions. Efficacy studies indicate substantial resolution rates; for instance, a program using clinician-led establishment phases followed by parent-implemented transfer activities achieved 50% of children reaching 90% accuracy in conversational /s/ production after structured intervention. Broader research on speech sound disorders supports that weekly SLT sessions over 6-12 months lead to significant improvements in 70-90% of cases, depending on severity and adherence. Alternative methods include orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) to address associated patterns, involving exercises for proper oral posture and to indirectly support articulation. for OMT's direct impact on lisps is mixed, with high-quality studies showing limited attributable improvements, though it benefits co-occurring myofunctional issues. In the 2020s, integrations like apps (e.g., visual acoustic tools providing real-time positioning feedback) and devices enable home practice, while teletherapy platforms have expanded access to remote SLT, maintaining comparable to in-person sessions. Prognosis is favorable with early intervention before age 6, when supports rapid skill acquisition and spontaneous resolution is common but accelerated by . Case studies illustrate therapy-induced resolution in persistent cases, contrasting with spontaneous correction in milder, developmental lisps by school age, underscoring the role of timely SLT in preventing social or academic impacts.

References

  1. https://www.webmd.com/children/what-is-a-lisp
  2. https://www.speechpathologygraduateprograms.org/lisping/
  3. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-voice-speech-language
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17223125/
  5. https://speech-language-therapy.com/index.php?view=article&id=86:lisp
  6. https://www.speechtherapypd.com/glossary/sibilant
  7. https://connectedspeechpathology.com/blog/is-a-lisp-a-speech-impediment
  8. https://www.openlines.com/blog/what-is-a-lisp/
  9. https://peepskelsay.wixsite.com/speech-pathology/lisps
  10. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2018_PERS-SIG1-2018-0016
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5708870/
  12. https://connectedspeechpathology.com/blog/why-do-people-have-lisps-and-how-they-affect-speech
  13. https://www.etymonline.com/word/lisp
  14. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/91353/etymology-of-lisp
  15. https://www.speechpathology.com/ask-the-experts/at-what-age-does-frontal-1581
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2755217/
  17. https://waismanphonology.wiscweb.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/532/2018/05/PUB92.pdf
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755713000958
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353337392_External_risk_factors_associated_with_language_disorders_in_children
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10912588/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5280061/
  22. https://www.expressable.com/learning-center/lisps/the-4-types-of-lisps-and-what-they-sound-like
  23. https://www.casrf.org/post/the-4-types-of-lisps-explained
  24. https://www.speechandlanguagekids.com/speech-therapy-frontal-lisp/
  25. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0123)
  26. https://www.greatspeech.com/how-does-a-lisp-impact-speech/
  27. https://www.expressable.com/learning-center/lisps/the-four-different-types-of-lisps-and-how-to-correct-them
  28. https://www.speechandlanguagekids.com/types-of-lisps/
  29. https://www.speechandlanguagekids.com/speech-therapy-lateral-lisp-case-study/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9469305/
  31. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/pdf/10.1044/cicsd_36_F_133
  32. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/sites/default/files/extIPA_2016.pdf
  33. https://www.grahamspeechtherapy.com/blog/is-a-lisp-ever-normal
  34. https://www.speechpathology.com/articles/20q-ankyloglossia-myths-and-evidence-20681
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8522341/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1949218/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328410/
  38. https://www.healthline.com/health/open-bite
  39. https://www.colgate.com/en-us/oral-health/developmental-disabilities/what-is-a-lisp-and-what-causes-it
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338153/
  41. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.14592
  42. https://www.betterspeech.com/post/speech-and-language-disorders-among-those-with-cerebral-palsy
  43. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22010-malocclusion
  44. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/13/1/27
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11840507/
  46. https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/-/media/Cincinnati-Childrens/Home/service/s/speech/hcp/doctor-info/information-articulation-PDF-tongue-thrust-4.pdf
  47. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/orofacial-myofunctional-disorders/
  48. https://www.tandemspeechtherapy.com/2018/05/24/pacifier-use/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10568612/
  50. https://jhwcr.com/index.php/jhwcr/article/view/673
  51. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/135502908/ContentServer.pdf
  52. https://connectedspeechpathology.com/blog/how-to-fix-a-lisp
  53. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00168
  54. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/articulation-and-phonology/
  55. https://www.talkshop.com.au/how-we-help/how-speech-pathology-can-treat-a-lisp/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7299882/
  57. https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/sped/pdf/sl-assessment-speech-sound.pdf
  58. https://leader.pubs.asha.org/do/10.1044/2024-0103-speech-sound-disorders-schools/full/
  59. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00150
  60. https://waismanphonology.wiscweb.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/532/2018/07/1984_Shriberg_Kwiat-Hoffmann_Procedure-for-phonetic-transcript.pdf
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303537946_Computer-Aided_Evaluation_of_Sibilants_in_Preschool_Children_Sigmatism_Diagnosis
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12491466/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4272648/
  64. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/1058-0360.0303.67
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5987123_Intervention_for_lateral_s_using_electropalatography_EPG_biofeedback_and_an_intensive_motor_learning_approach_A_case_report
  66. https://phonology.waisman.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/532/2018/07/1994_Shriberg_Gruber_Kwiat_Devel-Phon-Dis-III.pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12446814/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6572914/
  69. https://journals.lww.com/jocn/fulltext/2021/10020/experiences_and_outcomes_of_frenotomy_in_children.7.aspx
  70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12501105/
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8388587/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8398067/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378767221_Speech_Outcomes_of_Frenectomy_for_Tongue-Tie_Release_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis
  74. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00092
  75. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/jshd.3603.390
  76. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK356271/
  77. https://www.mdpi.com/2694-2526/51/1/4
  78. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23454-articulation-disorder
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.