Hubbry Logo
Writing systemWriting systemMain
Open search
Writing system
Community hub
Writing system
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Writing system
Writing system
Writing system
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A writing system comprises a set of symbols, called a script, as well as the rules by which the script represents a particular language. The earliest writing appeared during the late 4th millennium BC. Throughout history, each independently invented writing system gradually emerged from a system of proto-writing, where a small number of ideographs were used in a manner incapable of fully encoding language, and thus lacking the ability to express a broad range of ideas.

Writing systems are generally classified according to how their symbols, called graphemes, relate to units of language. Phonetic writing systems – which include alphabets and syllabaries – use graphemes that correspond to sounds in the corresponding spoken language. Alphabets use graphemes called letters that generally correspond to spoken phonemes. They are typically divided into three sub-types: Pure alphabets use letters to represent both consonant and vowel sounds, abjads generally only use letters representing consonant sounds, and abugidas use letters representing consonant–vowel pairs. Syllabaries use graphemes called syllabograms that represent entire syllables or moras. By contrast, logographic (or morphographic) writing systems use graphemes that represent the units of meaning in a language, such as its words or morphemes. Alphabets typically use fewer than 100 distinct symbols, while syllabaries and logographies may use hundreds or thousands respectively.

Background: relationship with language

[edit]
Further information: Written language
The relationship between spoken, written, and signed modes of language, as modelled by Beatrice Primus et al.[1] While many spoken or signed languages are not written, there are no written languages without a spoken counterpart that they originally emerged to record.

According to most contemporary definitions, writing is a visual and tactile notation representing language. As such, the use of writing by a community presupposes an analysis of the structure of language at some level.[2] The symbols used in writing correspond systematically to functional units of either a spoken or signed language. This definition excludes a broader class of symbolic markings, such as drawings and maps.[a][4] A text is any instance of written material, including transcriptions of spoken material.[5] The act of composing and recording a text is referred to as writing,[6] and the act of viewing and interpreting the text as reading.[7]

The relationship between writing and language more broadly has been the subject of philosophical analysis as early as Aristotle (384–322 BC).[8] While the use of language is universal across human societies, writing is not; writing emerged much more recently, and was independently invented in only a handful of locations throughout history. While most spoken languages have not been written, all written languages have been predicated on an existing spoken language.[9] When those with signed languages as their first language read writing associated with a spoken language, this functions as literacy in a second, acquired language.[b][10] A single language (e.g. Hindustani) can be written using multiple writing systems, and a writing system can also represent multiple languages. For example, Chinese characters have been used to write multiple languages throughout the Sinosphere – including the Vietnamese language from at least the 13th century, until their replacement with the Latin-based Vietnamese alphabet in the 20th century.[11] Likewise, closely related variants of the Latin alphabet have been used to write most European languages, entirely irrespective of the degree of mutual intelligibility (or lack thereof) between them.

In the first several decades of modern linguistics as a scientific discipline, linguists often characterized writing as merely the technology used to record speech – which was treated as being of paramount importance, for what was seen as the unique potential for its study to further the understanding of human cognition.[12]

General terminology

[edit]
This page uses IPA notation for orthographic or other linguistic analysis. For the meaning of how ⟨ ⟩, | |, / /, and [ ] are used here, see this page.
Comparison between double-storey |a| (left) and single-storey |ɑ| (right) lowercase forms of the Latin letter ⟨A⟩

While researchers of writing systems generally use some of the same core terminology, precise definitions and interpretations can vary by author, often depending on their theoretical approach.[13]

A grapheme is the basic functional unit of a writing system. Graphemes are generally defined as minimally significant elements that, when taken together, comprise the set of symbols from which texts may be constructed.[14] All writing systems require a set of defined graphemes, collectively called a script.[15] The concept of the grapheme is similar to that of the phoneme in the study of spoken languages. Likewise, as many sonically distinct phones may function as the same phoneme depending on the speaker, dialect, and context, many visually distinct glyphs (or graphs) may be identified as the same grapheme. These variant glyphs are known as the allographs of a grapheme: For example, the lowercase letter ⟨a⟩ may be represented by the double-storey |a| and single-storey |ɑ| shapes,[16] or others written in cursive, block, or printed styles.[17] The choice of a particular allograph may be influenced by the medium used, the writing instrument used, the stylistic choice of the writer, the preceding and succeeding graphemes in the text, the time available for writing, the intended audience, and the largely unconscious features of an individual's handwriting.

Orthography (lit. 'correct writing') refers to the rules and conventions for writing shared by a community, including the ordering of and relationship between graphemes. Particularly for alphabets, orthography includes the concept of spelling. For example, English orthography includes uppercase and lowercase forms for 26 letters of the Latin alphabet (with these graphemes corresponding to various phonemes), punctuation marks (mostly non-phonemic), and other symbols, such as numerals. Writing systems may be regarded as complete if they are able to represent all that may be expressed in the spoken language, while a partial writing system cannot represent the spoken language in its entirety.[18]

History

[edit]
Main article: History of writing
Diagram comparing the abstraction of pictographs in cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs, and Chinese characters – from an 1870 publication by French Egyptologist Gaston Maspero[c]

In each instance, writing emerged from systems of proto-writing, though historically most proto-writing systems did not produce writing systems. Proto-writing uses ideographic and mnemonic symbols to communicate, but lacks the capability to fully encode language. Examples include:

Writing has been invented independently multiple times in human history – first emerging as cuneiform, a system initially used to write the Sumerian language in southern Mesopotamia; it was later adapted to write Akkadian as its speakers spread throughout the region, with Akkadian writing appearing in significant quantities c. 2350 BC.[22] Cuneiform was closely followed by Egyptian hieroglyphs. It is generally agreed that the two systems were invented independently from one another; both evolved from proto-writing systems between 3400 and 3100 BC, with the earliest coherent texts dated c. 2600 BC.[23] Chinese characters emerged independently in the Yellow River valley c. 1200 BC. There is no evidence of contact between China and the literate peoples of the Near East, and the Mesopotamian and Chinese approaches for representing sound and meaning are distinct.[24][25][26] The Mesoamerican writing systems, including Olmec and the Maya script, are likewise associated with an independent invention.[27]

With each independent invention of writing, the ideographs used in proto-writing were decoupled from the direct representation of ideas, and gradually came to represent words instead. This occurred via application of the rebus principle, where a symbol was appropriated to represent an additional word that happened to be similar in pronunciation to the word for the idea originally represented by the symbol. This allowed words without concrete visualizations to be represented by symbols for the first time; the gradual shift from ideographic symbols to those wholly representing language took place over centuries, and required the conscious analysis of a given language by those attempting to write it.[28]

The Indus script (c. 2600 – c. 2000 BC), found on different types of artefacts produced by the Indus Valley Civilization on the Indian subcontinent, remains undeciphered, and whether it functioned as true writing is not agreed upon.[29] While its origins are not visually obvious, the opportunity for Mesopotamian cultural diffusion to have introduced the concept of writing to the Indus peoples is clear.[30]

Alphabetic writing descends from previous morphographic writing, and first appeared c. 1800 BC to write a Semitic language spoken in the Sinai Peninsula. Most of the world's alphabets either descend directly from this Proto-Sinaitic script, or were directly inspired by its design. Descendants include the Phoenician alphabet (c. 1050 BC), and its child in the Greek alphabet (c. 800 BC).[31][32] The Latin alphabet, which descended from the Greek alphabet, is by far the most common script used by writing systems.[33]

Classification by basic linguistic unit

[edit]
Further information: List of writing systems
Table of scripts in the introduction to the Sanskrit–English Dictionary by Monier Monier-Williams

Writing systems are most often classified according to what units of language a system's graphemes correspond to.[34] At the most basic level, writing systems can be either phonographic (lit. 'sound writing') when graphemes represent units of sound in a language, or morphographic ('form writing') when graphemes represent units of meaning (such as words or morphemes).[35] Depending on the author, the older term logographic ('word writing') is often used, either with the same meaning as morphographic, or specifically in reference to systems where the basic unit being written is the word. Recent scholarship generally prefers morphographic over logographic, with the latter seen as potentially vague or misleading – in part because systems usually operate on the level of morphemes, not words.[36] Some authors make a distinct primary division – between pleremic (from Greek plḗrēs 'full') systems with graphemes that have semantic value in isolation (like logographs), and cenemic (from Greek kenós 'empty') systems with graphemes that lack any such separable meaning (like letters).[37]

Many classifications define three primary categories, where phonographic systems are subdivided into syllabic and alphabetic (or segmental) systems. Syllabaries use symbols called syllabograms to represent syllables or moras. Alphabets use symbols called letters that correspond to spoken phonemes (or more technically, to diaphonemes). Alphabets are generally classified into three subtypes, with abjads having letters for consonants, pure alphabets having letters for both consonants and vowels, and abugidas having characters that correspond to consonant–vowel pairs.[38] David Diringer proposed a five-fold classification of writing systems, comprising pictographic scripts, ideographic scripts, analytic transitional scripts, phonetic scripts, and alphabetic scripts.[39]

In practice, writing systems are classified according to the primary type of symbols used, and typically include exceptional cases where symbols function differently. For example, logographs found within phonetic systems like English include the ampersand ⟨&⟩ and the numerals ⟨0⟩, ⟨1⟩, etc. – which correspond to specific words (and, zero, one, etc.) and not to the underlying sounds.[34] Most writing systems can be described as mixed systems that feature elements of both phonography and morphography.[40]

Logographic systems

[edit]

A logogram is a character that represents a morpheme within a language. Chinese characters represent the only major logographic writing systems still in use: they have historically been used to write the varieties of Chinese, as well as Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and other languages of the Sinosphere. As each character represents a single unit of meaning, thousands are required to write all the words of a language. If the logograms do not adequately represent all meanings and words of a language, written language can be confusing or ambiguous to the reader.[41]

Logograms are sometimes conflated with ideograms, symbols which graphically represent abstract ideas; most linguists now reject this characterization.[42] Chinese characters are often semantic–phonetic compounds, which include a component related to the character's meaning, and a component that gives a hint for its pronunciation.[43]

Syllabaries

[edit]
A stop sign in Tahlequah, Oklahoma written in Cherokee using both the Cherokee syllabary (top) and Latin alphabet (middle), alongside English (bottom)

A syllabary is a set of written symbols (called syllabograms) that represent either syllables or moras – a unit of prosody that is often but not always a syllable in length.[44] Syllabaries are best suited to languages with relatively simple syllable structure, since a different symbol is needed for every syllable. For example, the Japanese writing system has two kana syllabaries (hiragana and katakana) intended for use in distinct circumstances; both have syllabograms for each of the roughly 100 moras found in Japanese. By contrast, English features complex syllable structures, with a relatively large inventory of vowels and complex consonant clusters – for a total of 15–16 thousand distinct syllables. Some syllabaries have larger inventories: the Yi script contains 756 different symbols.[45]

Alphabets

[edit]

An alphabet uses symbols (called letters) that correspond to the phonemes of a language, e.g. its vowels and consonants. However, these correspondences are rarely uncomplicated, and spelling is often mediated by other factors than just which sounds are used by a speaker.[46] The word alphabet is derived from alpha and beta, the names for the first two letters in the Greek alphabet.[47] An abjad is an alphabet whose letters only represent the consonantal sounds of a language. They were the first alphabets to develop historically,[48] with most used to write Semitic languages, and originally deriving from the Proto-Sinaitic script. The morphology of Semitic languages is particularly suited to this approach, as the denotation of vowels is generally redundant.[49] Optional markings for vowels may be used for some abjads, but are generally limited to applications like education.[50] Many pure alphabets were derived from abjads through the addition of dedicated vowel letters, as with the derivation of the Greek alphabet from the Phoenician alphabet c. 800 BC. Abjad is the word for "alphabet" in Arabic, and analogously derives from the traditional order of letters in the Arabic alphabet ('alif, bā', jīm, dāl).[51]

A passage from the biblical Gospel of Luke printed using Balinese script

An abugida is a type of alphabet with symbols corresponding to consonant–vowel pairs, where basic symbols for each consonant are associated with an inherent vowel by default, and other possible vowels for each consonant are indicated via predictable modifications made to the basic symbols.[52] In an abugida, there may be a sign for k with no vowel, but also one for ka (if a is the inherent vowel), and ke is written by modifying the ka sign in a way consistent with how la would be modified to get le. In many abugidas, modification consists of the addition of a vowel sign; other possibilities include rotation of the basic sign, or addition of diacritics.

While true syllabaries have one symbol per syllable and no systematic visual similarity, the graphic similarity in most abugidas stems from their origins as abjads – with added symbols comprising markings for different vowels added onto a pre-existing base symbol. The largest single group of abugidas is the Brahmic family of scripts, however, which includes nearly all the scripts used in India and Southeast Asia. The name abugida was derived by linguist Peter T. Daniels (b. 1951) from the first four characters of an order of the Geʽez script, which is used for certain Nilo-Saharan and Afro-Asiatic languages of Ethiopia and Eritrea.[53]

Featural systems

[edit]

Originally proposed as a category by Geoffrey Sampson,[54][55] a featural system uses symbols representing sub-phonetic elements – e.g. those traits that can be used to distinguish between and analyse a language's phonemes, such as their voicing or place of articulation. The only prominent example of a featural system is the hangul script used to write Korean, where featural symbols are combined into letters, which are in turn joined into syllabic blocks. Many scholars, including John DeFrancis, reject a characterization of hangul as a featural system – with arguments including that Korean writers do not themselves think in these terms when writing – or question the viability of Sampson's category altogether.[56]

As hangul was consciously created by literate experts, Daniels characterizes it as a "sophisticated grammatogeny"[57] – a writing system intentionally designed for a specific purpose, as opposed to having evolved gradually over time. Other featural grammatogenies include shorthands developed by professionals and constructed scripts created by hobbyists and creatives, like the Tengwar script designed by J. R. R. Tolkien to write the Elven languages he also constructed. Many of these feature advanced graphic designs corresponding to phonological properties. The basic unit of writing in these systems can map to anything from phonemes to words. It has been claimed that even the Latin script may have sub-character features.[58]

Classification by graphical properties

[edit]

Linearity

[edit]

All writing is linear in the broadest sense – i.e., the spatial arrangement of symbols indicates the order in which they should be read.[59] On a more granular level, systems with discontinuous marks like diacritics can be characterized as less linear than those without.[60] In the initial historical distinction, linear writing systems (e.g. the Phoenician alphabet) generally form glyphs as a series of connected lines or strokes, while systems that generally use discrete, more pictorial marks (e.g. cuneiform) are sometimes termed non-linear. The historical abstraction of logographs into phonographs is often associated with a linearization of the script.[61]

In Braille, raised bumps on the writing substrate are used to encode non-linear symbols. The original system – which Louis Braille (1809–1852) invented in order to allow people with visual impairments to read and write – used characters that corresponded to the letters of the Latin alphabet.[62] Moreover, that Braille is equivalent to visual writing systems in function demonstrates that the phenomenon of writing is fundamentally spatial in nature, not merely visual.[63]

Directionality and orientation

[edit]

Writing systems may be characterized by how text is graphically divided into lines, which are to be read in sequence:[64]

Axis
Whether lines of text are laid out as horizontal rows or vertical columns
Lining
How each line is positioned relative to the one previous on the medium – in practice only vertical scripts vary whether columns are read in a left- or rightward order, as all horizontal scripts sequence rows from top to bottom[65]
Directionality
How individual lines are read – whether starting from the left or right on a horizontal axis, or from the top or bottom on a vertical axis

In left-to-right scripts (LTR), horizontal rows are sequenced from top to bottom on a page, with each row read from left to right. Right-to-left scripts (RTL), which use the opposite directionality, include the Arabic alphabet.[65]

Egyptian hieroglyphs were written either left-to-right or right-to-left, with the animal and human glyphs turned to face the beginning of the line. The early alphabet did not have a fixed direction, and was written both vertically and horizontally; it was most commonly written boustrophedonically: starting in one horizontal direction, then turning at the end of the line and reversing direction.[66]

The right-to-left direction of the Phoenician alphabet initially stabilized after c. 800 BC.[67] Left-to-right writing has an advantage that, since most people are right-handed,[68] the hand does not interfere with what is being written (which, when inked, may not have dried yet) as the hand is to the right side of the pen. The Greek alphabet and its successors settled on a left-to-right pattern, from the top to the bottom of the page. Other scripts, such as Arabic and Hebrew, came to be written right to left. Scripts that historically incorporate Chinese characters have traditionally been written vertically in columns arranged from right to left, while a horizontal direction from left to right was only widely adopted in the 20th century due to Western influence.[69]

Several scripts used in the Philippines and Indonesia, such as Hanunoo, are traditionally written with lines moving away from the writer, from bottom to top, but are read left to right;[70] ogham is written from bottom to top, commonly on the corner of a stone.[71] The ancient Libyco-Berber alphabet was also written from bottom to top.[72]

Orthographic regularity and depth

[edit]
Polygraphy in English[73]
Phoneme Grapheme Example
/eɪ/ ⟨e⟩ saute
⟨ai⟩ hail
⟨ay⟩ bay
⟨ea⟩ steak
⟨ei⟩ veil
Polyphony in English[74]
Phoneme Grapheme Example
/eɪ/ ⟨e⟩ saute
/ɛ/ red
/i/ area
/ə/ taken
∅ smile

Writing systems, especially alphabets, often include characters that can represent multiple sound values, or conversely sound values that can be represented by multiple characters – this phenomenon is referred to as polyvalence. Orthographies with lower or higher polyvalence are referred to as shallow or deep respectively.[75] While polyvalent graphemes are often perceived as defects, they can serve to distinguish homophonic words, and to indicate etymological or semantic connections between words not clear from pronunciation alone[76] – e.g. between English sign and signal or child and children.[77] Specifically, an orthographic relationship where one grapheme may represent multiple sound values can be termed polyphony, while a relationship where one sound value may be represented by multiple graphemes can be termed polygraphy.[78]

Scholars have increasingly analysed different patterns of phonological spellings versus morphological spellings in a writing system as being better suited depending on the characteristics of the spoken language, with neither principle being ideal in all circumstances. While not adhering strictly to phonological rules, morphological spellings often follow other patterns that allow for transparent identification and parsing by readers and writers.[79][80][81]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Writing system

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A writing system is a visual method for representing through standardized symbols or marks that encode linguistic units such as , syllables, words, or morphemes. These systems enable the permanent recording and transmission of , evolving from prehistoric notational devices to complex scripts used across diverse cultures. Writing systems are broadly classified into two main categories: logographic systems, where symbols primarily represent words or morphemes (e.g., ), and phonographic systems, where symbols represent phonological units like sounds or syllables. Phonographic systems further divide into sub-types including syllabaries (e.g., Japanese kana, representing syllables), abjads (e.g., early Semitic scripts, focusing on ), abugidas (e.g., like , with carrying inherent vowels), and alphabets (e.g., Latin and Greek, representing both and vowels). Logographic elements can appear in phonographic systems as well, creating hybrid forms like the logosyllabary of Sumerian cuneiform. The systems traces back to around 8000 BCE in , where clay tokens served as precursors for and evolved into pictographic notations by 3500 BCE. By 3200 BCE, the Sumerians developed , one of the earliest full writing systems, initially for economic records before expanding to and administration. Independent inventions occurred elsewhere, such as around 3000 BCE and Chinese by 1400 BCE, while Mesoamerican glyphs emerged around 600 BCE. The , a revolutionary phonographic innovation, originated with the circa 1500 BCE and was adapted by the around 800 BCE, influencing many modern scripts. Writing systems play a crucial role in language standardization, literacy, and cultural identity, often linked to societal needs like administration and trade. Today, over 100 distinct systems are in use worldwide, reflecting linguistic diversity and adaptation to technologies like digital input methods.

Fundamentals and Relationship to Language

Relationship with Language

A writing system serves as a visual notation for representing elements of , enabling the recording and transmission of linguistic structures such as sounds, words, or meanings. Unlike non-linguistic notations like pictograms, which convey ideas independently of any specific (e.g., international traffic signs), or mathematical symbols that denote abstract concepts without phonetic ties, true writing systems are inherently linked to the , morphology, or semantics of a particular or group of related languages. This distinction underscores writing's role as a tool for capturing the ephemeral nature of speech into a durable form. Writing systems can be broadly categorized into glottographic types, which encode , and semasiographic ones, which represent meaning without direct linguistic . Glottographic systems include phonographic approaches, where graphemes correspond to sounds (e.g., phonemes in alphabets or syllables in syllabaries), and logographic systems, where symbols denote morphemes or words (e.g., primarily signaling lexical units). , by contrast, bypasses entirely, as in systems like basic icons or numerals that convey concepts universally. In practice, most functional writing systems blend these elements; for instance, the is phonographic, mapping letters to phonemes, but imperfectly so, as evidenced by homophones like "pair" and "pear," which share sounds yet differ in meaning, requiring contextual semantic interpretation. By providing a fixed medium for , writing systems play a crucial role in standardizing linguistic norms, preserving dialects and vocabularies against oral variability, and facilitating language evolution through recorded innovations. This standardization promotes , allowing individuals to access and contribute to cultural knowledge independently of live transmission, thus enhancing and societal cohesion. For example, written records have historically enabled the dissemination of , laws, and across generations. However, not all languages possess writing systems; many indigenous languages, such as Pirahã spoken in the Amazon, remain primarily oral, relying on verbal traditions for cultural continuity without standardized scripts. Conversely, certain writing systems extend beyond their originating language, like the Latin alphabet, which has been adapted for thousands of global languages, from Romance tongues to indigenous ones in and , demonstrating writing's capacity for cross-linguistic utility.

Core Terminology

A writing system is a method for graphically representing the units of a language, such as phonemes, syllables, or morphemes, thereby enabling the encoding of into visible form. Within this framework, a script refers to a maximal collection of characters or glyphs that share common visual characteristics, behavioral patterns, developmental history, and recognition by users as related. An , in contrast, constitutes the standardized set of conventions for applying a script to a specific , encompassing rules for , , , and other conventions to ensure uniformity in written representation. At the core of these systems are fundamental units known as , which are individual characters or sequences of characters functioning as distinct elements within an , such as a single letter representing a . Variants of a grapheme, called allographs, appear in different forms depending on context, such as positional changes in or typographic styles, without altering the underlying meaning or sound. Writing systems are classified based on the linguistic units they represent, leading to key distinctions in terminology. An is a segmental writing system featuring independent symbols for both consonants and vowels, allowing representation of individual phonemes. In contrast, an primarily denotes consonants, treating vowels as optional or omitted, as seen in systems where readers infer vowels from context. A employs symbols to represent syllables, typically consonant-vowel combinations, without breaking them into separate phonemes. An , however, structures syllables as clusters where consonants carry an inherent vowel, modifiable by additional marks, distinguishing it from pure syllabaries. Additional terms describe structural elements within these systems. A digraph is a comprising two components that together represent a single or unit, such as "ch" for a sound. A ligature forms a single by joining two or more characters for aesthetic or practical reasons, enhancing in connected scripts. Diacritics are structurally dependent marks, such as accents or dots, that modify a base character to indicate variations in or meaning, always positioned relative to another symbol. Featural notation represents a rare subtype of writing system, where glyphs encode articulatory or phonological features of sounds—such as place or —rather than whole phonemes or syllables, allowing systematic construction of symbols from component strokes. This approach contrasts with more common systems and is exemplified in limited historical and modern instances due to its complexity in design and use.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Innovations

The earliest precursors to writing systems emerged in prehistoric times through forms of symbolic communication, such as cave paintings, on bones, and symbols that served mnemonic or representational purposes without fully encoding . For instance, the , dating to approximately 6600 BCE in China's Province, consist of simple markings on tortoise shells and pottery, possibly indicating early numerical or ritual notations, though their exact meanings remain unknown. Similarly, the from the , around 5300 BCE, appear on clay artifacts as repetitive motifs that some scholars interpret as , potentially linked to or ceremonial functions, but they lack the grammatical of true scripts. These developments represent a gradual transition from visual symbolism to more systematic notation, laying the groundwork for later innovations. True writing systems arose independently in several regions during the late 4th and early 3rd millennia BCE, marking a pivotal shift from purely ideographic representations—where signs depicted objects or concepts directly—to the inclusion of phonetic elements that captured sounds, enabling the expression of abstract ideas and . In , Sumerian emerged around 3200 BCE as the earliest known full writing system, initially developed for administrative purposes on clay tablets using reed styluses to impress pictographic signs representing goods like or sheep. Over time, these pictograms evolved into abstract wedge-shaped () signs, with phonetic components appearing by the 29th century BCE to denote syllables, allowing for the recording of names, narratives, and laws. developed shortly thereafter, around 3100 BCE, as evidenced by inscriptions on tags and from Abydos, combining logographic and phonetic signs in a flexible system suited for both everyday and sacred use. The Indus Valley script, appearing circa 2600 BCE on seals and tablets from sites like Mohenjo-Daro, features over 400 undeciphered symbols that likely included phonetic aspects, though its full nature remains debated due to the absence of bilingual texts. Later, in , Chinese arose around 1400–1200 BCE during the late , inscribed on animal bones and shells for , primarily logographic but with emerging phonetic loans to represent morphemes. These inventions were driven by practical and cultural imperatives, particularly economic necessities in burgeoning urban societies and religious motivations tied to cosmology and the afterlife. In , the rise of complex trade and agriculture in city-states like necessitated precise accounting, prompting the use of writing to track commodities, labor, and transactions, which transformed proto-accounting into a versatile script. In , hieroglyphs facilitated monumental inscriptions on temples and , serving religious contexts such as recording royal decrees, divine rituals, and spells for the deceased's journey to the afterlife, thereby preserving pharaonic authority and eternal order. This dual role—economic utility fostering innovation and religious imperatives ensuring its elaboration—underscored writing's emergence as a tool for societal organization and cultural continuity across these ancient civilizations.

Evolution and Global Spread

Following the initial development of in around the late fourth millennium BCE, the script was adapted by Akkadian speakers around 2350 BCE to represent their Semitic language, transforming the logographic system into a more syllabic one suitable for expressing Akkadian grammar and vocabulary. This adaptation facilitated the script's spread across the , reaching the by the 17th century BCE, who borrowed and modified it—likely via Hurrian intermediaries—for their Indo-European language in diplomatic and administrative texts. Similarly, around 1400 BCE, the city-state of developed an alphabetic variant, adapting Mesopotamian signs into a 30-sign to write a Northwest Semitic language, marking an early innovation in consonantal scripting influenced by broader Mesopotamian cultural exchanges. In , hieroglyphic writing evolved into the script by around 3000 BCE, a streamlined form used primarily for administrative and religious purposes on , which simplified the monumental hieroglyphs for faster writing while retaining phonetic and ideographic elements. By the 7th century BCE, further developed into demotic, an even more abbreviated script employed for everyday documents, , and legal texts until the 5th century CE, reflecting adaptations to evolving administrative needs within Egyptian society. These Egyptian scripts influenced Mediterranean regions through trade, but the Phoenician consonantal —emerging around 1200 BCE—proved more transformative, as the adopted and modified it by approximately 800 BCE, adding vowels to create the first true and enabling the recording of their Indo-European language. This Greek adaptation spread further: the Etruscans and Romans refined it into the Latin alphabet by the 7th century BCE, which became the basis for Western European scripts, while the Cyrillic , developed in the 9th century CE by missionaries from Greek uncial forms, facilitated the spread of literacy among Slavic peoples. In , the emerged around 300 BCE in the , possibly drawing partial inspiration from the undeciphered Indus Valley script through acrophonic principles where symbols represented initial sounds, serving as an for and later in Ashokan edicts and . Brahmi's descendants, the Brahmic family of scripts, proliferated across South and via trade and religious dissemination, adapting to local languages like , and Tibetan. A distinctive later occurred in Korea with the invention of in 1443 CE by King , a featural designed phonetically to represent Korean sounds systematically, promoting among commoners independent of Chinese logographic influences. Independent evolutions marked other regions: developed autonomously around 600 BCE, including early Olmec symbols circa 650 BCE and by 500 BCE, with the Mayan logosyllabic script—featuring phonetic syllables and logograms—emerging by the 3rd century BCE, used for historical and ritual inscriptions on stelae and codices until the Spanish conquest disrupted its use. In contrast, the Minoan script, undeciphered and syllabic, fell into decline around 1450 BCE amid the collapse of Cretan palace society, replaced by without direct continuity. The global dissemination of writing systems accelerated through colonial expansion, such as the imposition of the Latin alphabet in the after , where Spanish and Portuguese colonizers adapted it for indigenous languages like , often overlaying it on existing pictographic traditions to facilitate evangelization and administration. During the (8th–13th centuries CE), expanded via conquest and trade from the , adapting to Persian, Turkish, and while transmitting knowledge through translated Greek and Indian texts in Baghdad's scholarly centers. Key drivers of these spreads included trade networks exchanging scripts across the and Mediterranean, military conquests imposing administrative systems, and religious missions, exemplified by Arabic's dissemination through starting in the CE to unify Quranic recitation across diverse empires.

Classification by Linguistic Unit

Logographic Systems

Logographic writing systems are graphic codes in which individual symbols, known as logograms, represent words, s, or semantic units rather than sounds or phonetic elements. These systems often incorporate phonetic hints through the principle, where a symbol for a known word is extended to represent a homophonous or abstract concept, allowing for the development of new signs without direct pictorial representation. While purely logographic scripts are rare, most blend logograms with supplementary phonetic or semantic components to resolve ambiguities inherent in representing meaning directly. The most prominent example of a logographic system is the Chinese writing system, using hanzi characters that each denote a or word, often composed of a radical indicating semantic category and a phonetic component suggesting pronunciation. Comprehensive dictionaries like the catalog over 47,000 characters, though modern usage involves far fewer, with 8,105 in the official Table of General Standard Chinese Characters; functional requires mastery of 2,000 to 3,000 characters for everyday reading, such as newspapers. Radicals, numbering 214 in standard classifications, serve as classifiers to organize characters by meaning, facilitating lookup and etymological analysis. Other logographic systems include Japanese , adapted from Chinese hanzi during the 5th century CE, where characters retain semantic roles but pair with phonetic scripts like hiragana; the official Jōyō list designates 2,136 commonly used for general and communication. Ancient Sumerian featured a logographic core, with signs representing words or concepts, augmented by phonetic complements—syllabic indicators added to disambiguate readings or specify grammatical elements. Similarly, operated on a logographic basis, where signs functioned as logograms to depict entire words or ideas, often combined with phonetic complements and determinatives for clarity, forming a mixed system with over 1,000 distinct characters. Logographic systems offer advantages in semantic universality, enabling comprehension across dialects or languages sharing the script, as meanings are tied to concepts rather than pronunciation, promoting interdialectal communication. However, they present challenges, including a steep learning curve due to the need to memorize thousands of distinct symbols and resolve ambiguities through contextual inference, which demands advanced linguistic processing. The Chinese script evolved from inscriptions around 1200 BCE, used for on animal bones and turtle shells, through bronze inscriptions and seal scripts, to modern forms; in the 1950s, the implemented simplification reforms to reduce stroke counts in common characters, aiming to boost literacy rates. In Sumerian, phonetic complements evolved as essential aids, fully spelling out logograms in later periods to preserve pronunciation amid language shift to Akkadian.

Syllabaries

A is a writing system in which each represents a , typically a consonant- (CV) combination or a standalone (V), allowing words to be formed by sequencing these signs to match the spoken language's syllabic structure. This approach contrasts with alphabetic systems by pre-combining sounds into fixed units, making it particularly suited to languages with relatively simple syllable inventories dominated by open syllables (ending in a ) rather than closed ones (ending in a ). Most syllabaries focus on open syllables, as seen in their sign repertoires, which avoid dedicated representations for consonant-final endings and instead approximate them through contextual interpretation or additional conventions. Among ancient examples, the script, used for around 1400 BCE, exemplifies early syllabic writing with approximately 89 signs, primarily encoding open syllables like CV or V forms for administrative records on clay tablets. Similarly, the , employed on the island of from roughly the 11th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE, featured about 55 signs and derived from earlier Aegean scripts, serving to record the local Greek dialect in inscriptions on pottery and stone. These systems highlight the historical adaptation of syllabaries for practical, non-literary purposes in societies. In more recent history, the , invented by in 1821, stands out as an indigenous innovation with 85 characters (originally 86), each denoting a in the and enabling rapid literacy among its speakers without prior exposure to writing. Japanese , comprising hiragana and , developed in the 9th century CE from simplified Chinese characters, with each system featuring 46 basic signs for modern use. Hiragana serves for native words and grammatical elements, while denotes foreign terms and emphasis; uniquely, functions as —small superscript annotations glossing the pronunciation of characters in mixed-script texts. Syllabaries offer a balance of simplicity and expressiveness, requiring fewer signs than logographic systems—often just enough to cover a language's core CV patterns—while providing more phonetic transparency than ideographic writing, which facilitates learning in syllable-timed languages like Japanese or . However, they can become inefficient for languages with complex phonologies involving frequent consonant clusters or closed syllables, as this demands additional signs or diacritics, potentially expanding the inventory beyond practical limits and complicating .

Alphabets and Abjads

Abjads represent a class of writing systems that primarily denote , with vowels typically inferred by readers based on linguistic context or optionally marked through auxiliary devices. The Phoenician script, originating around 1050 BCE in the , exemplifies this with its 22 consonantal letters and absence of dedicated vowel signs, facilitating efficient recording for trade among Semitic speakers. This system relied on the acrophonic principle, whereby letter shapes derived from simplified pictograms evoking the initial sound of the object's name, such as the ' (ox head) for a . Contemporary abjads like Hebrew and build on this foundation; Hebrew employs matres lectionis—consonants such as yod for /i/ and waw for /u/—to indicate long vowels, a practice emerging by the 9th century BCE. In Arabic, matres lectionis similarly serve for long vowels, supplemented by harakat, optional diacritical marks above or below to specify short vowels like fatha for /a/. Alphabets differ by incorporating explicit symbols for both consonants and vowels, enabling a complete phonemic transcription suited to languages with prominent vowel contrasts. alphabet, adapted from Phoenician around 800 BCE, innovated by reassigning unused Phoenician consonants (e.g., to for /eː/) as letters, yielding a balanced set of 24 signs written left-to-right. This adaptation spread via Phoenician trade networks, profoundly influencing subsequent scripts across the Mediterranean. The Latin alphabet, transmitted through Etruscan intermediaries from Western around 700 BCE, began with 21 letters and standardized to 26 by the classical period, supporting Latin's phonetic needs while allowing modifications like the addition of J, U, and W in later European usage. Both abjads and alphabets operate through linear sequences of independent graphemes, where each symbol corresponds to a single , promoting readability and adaptability across linguistic boundaries. Their segmental focus—targeting individual sounds rather than syllables—offers advantages in efficiency, requiring fewer distinct characters (typically 20–30) compared to syllabaries, thus easing acquisition and application to varied phonologies. The Latin alphabet exemplifies this versatility, serving as the basis for writing in over 125 modern languages, from Romance to Austronesian tongues. Similarly, the Cyrillic alphabet, created in the 9th century CE by Byzantine missionaries , extended Greek principles with novel letters for Slavic sounds like /ʒ/ and /ʃ/, facilitating the literary codification of . Systems like , though abugida-like in combining consonants with inherent vowels, incorporate alphabetic elements through detachable vowel signs and standalone consonant forms, enhancing its utility for .

Featural and Other Systems

Featural writing systems represent a distinct category where individual glyphs or their components encode phonetic or articulatory features of speech sounds, rather than directly mapping to phonemes, syllables, or words as in more common scripts. This approach allows for a modular construction of characters, often reflecting the physiological aspects of pronunciation, such as place and . The most prominent example is , the Korean alphabet developed in 1443 under the direction of King Sejong the Great to promote among the common people. In , 24 basic jamo (letter components) are formed from strokes that systematically represent features like tongue position or airflow; for instance, the consonant /k/ is depicted by an angular stroke symbolizing the back of the tongue against the throat. The mechanics of featural systems emphasize a scientific, analyzable design rooted in . Hangul's jamo can be combined into syllabic blocks, where horizontal lines denote the tongue blade, vertical lines the lips, and circles the , enabling users to visually decompose and reconstruct sounds based on their articulatory properties. This systematicity was explicitly intended by its creators, as outlined in the foundational document ("The Proper Sounds for the of the People"), which describes the script's basis in observable . Such designs facilitate phonological analysis and have been studied for their cognitive efficiency in language learning, though on superiority over non-featural systems remains mixed. Beyond pure featural alphabets, other systems incorporate featural elements within mixed or hybrid structures. Abugidas, also known as alphasyllabaries, form a key category here; these scripts, originating in the Brahmic family of South and (e.g., for or ), feature consonant glyphs with an inherent sound (typically /a/), modified by diacritics to indicate other vowels or silence. This semi-featural quality arises as consonant shapes often derive from a baseline stroke adjusted for phonetic traits, blending alphabetic and syllabic principles. Mixed scripts, such as Japanese romaji (Latin alphabet used alongside and ), exemplify atypical combinations where featural or alphabetic elements are integrated for in modern contexts like education or computing. Unique examples highlight the versatility and creativity of featural approaches. In Korean, jamo serve as deconstructible featural units beyond basic , allowing for variant forms and extensions in digital encoding standards like . Constructed scripts, such as J.R.R. Tolkien's from his legendarium, incorporate featural elements where strokes and bows represent phonetic features like voicing or , designed for the fictional languages of to mimic natural linguistic evolution. These invented systems demonstrate theoretical applications in and conlang () communities. Despite their ingenuity, featural and other hybrid systems face challenges in widespread adoption, largely confined to due to cultural and historical entrenchment of alphabetic or syllabic norms elsewhere. Their theoretical value lies in advancing linguistic research on script and , but practical limitations, such as increased learning complexity from feature decomposition, hinder broader use.

Graphical and Structural Properties

Linearity and Script Flow

in writing systems refers to the sequential progression of glyphs along a defined path, typically horizontal or vertical, which facilitates the ordered representation of linguistic units. Most ancient and modern scripts adhere to this linear arrangement to ensure readability and efficient production of texts. For instance, early Greek inscriptions often employed writing, where alternate lines proceeded in opposite directions, mimicking the turning of an ox plowing a field, before standardizing to consistent left-to-right flow. This linear progression contrasts with more disorganized or pictorial notations in pre-literate societies, highlighting how writing systems evolved to impose structure on communication. Script flow describes the predominant direction in which glyphs are arranged within the linear sequence, influencing both production and comprehension. In many contemporary systems derived from the Latin alphabet, flow is horizontal from left to right, a convention that emerged in ancient Mediterranean cultures and became widespread through colonial and typographic influences. Conversely, Semitic-derived scripts like and Hebrew maintain a right-to-left horizontal flow, preserving traditions from early alphabetic developments. Vertical flow, progressing top to bottom, characterizes traditional East Asian systems such as Chinese and Japanese, where columns are often arranged right to left, adapting to formats and brush-based writing. These flows reflect cultural and material adaptations rather than universal linguistic necessities. Stroke order plays a crucial role in the mechanics of production, particularly in complex scripts where the sequence of individual marks affects legibility and structural integrity. In East Asian logographic systems, such as are composed of strokes written in a prescribed order—typically horizontal before vertical, and enclosing strokes last—to ensure balanced proportions and consistent recognition, even when written rapidly. This convention aids learners in memorizing radicals and full characters, as deviations can distort the glyph's aesthetic and semantic clarity. Distinct forms within linear scripts further illustrate variations in flow mechanics, such as versus block styles that alter connectivity and spacing. exemplifies cursive flow, where most letters connect to adjacent ones, changing shape based on position (initial, medial, final, or isolated) to create fluid, ligature-based words, a feature rooted in its origins and optimized for pen-based writing. In contrast, block forms in scripts like Latin maintain discrete glyphs, promoting uniformity in print but less seamlessness in handwriting. Non-linear exceptions appear in ancient Mesoamerican systems, such as Zapotec and early Maya, where glyphs sometimes formed columnar arrangements with pictorial elements that deviated from strict sequential progression, integrating in a grid-like or stacked format rather than unbroken lines. These variations highlight how linearity accommodates diverse graphical needs while exceptions arise in emblematic or contexts. Material constraints have profoundly shaped linear script flow, particularly in antiquity. , the dominant medium in from around 3000 BCE, consisted of rolled sheets with a horizontal grain that favored unidirectional, linear writing to prevent tearing and ensure smooth ink application with reed pens. This format influenced the development of horizontal flows in hieroglyphic and scripts, as vertical or multidirectional arrangements would complicate unrolling and readability on the elongated rolls. Such adaptations demonstrate how substrate properties—durability, surface texture, and portability—dictated the evolution of linearity, transitioning from rigid stone carvings to more fluid, sequential media.

Directionality and Orientation

Writing systems vary in their directionality, which refers to the path along which text is read, and orientation, which concerns the positioning and transformation of individual glyphs. The most common direction is left-to-right (LTR), as seen in Latin-based scripts like English, where lines progress horizontally from left to right and stack from top to bottom. Right-to-left (RTL) directionality predominates in Semitic scripts such as and Hebrew, where text flows horizontally from right to left, with lines also stacking top to bottom. Vertical top-to-bottom (TB) direction is characteristic of certain East Asian and Central Asian scripts, including traditional Mongolian, where columns run from top to bottom and are arranged from left to right. Some writing systems incorporate bidirectional elements, mixing directions within the same text; for instance, Hebrew RTL text embeds LTR segments like numbers or Latin loanwords, requiring readers to switch orientation seamlessly. Orientation adaptations include glyph rotation for certain elements, as in vertical Japanese or Chinese scripts, where remain upright while Latin letters are rotated 90 degrees clockwise to align with the top-to-bottom flow. In writing, used in and Etruscan inscriptions, alternate lines reverse direction—typically LTR followed by RTL—with glyphs mirrored horizontally to maintain legibility, resembling the turning path of an plowing a field. Historically, demonstrated flexible directionality, arranged in vertical columns read top to bottom or horizontal lines from right to left (or left to right, determined by the facing direction of human and animal figures), allowing adaptation to monumental surfaces. In , traditional vertical TB writing shifted toward horizontal LTR post-World War II as part of language reforms to align with Western printing and education standards, though vertical remains common in and signage. The Uyghur script illustrates remarkable orientation versatility; its historical forms, derived from Old Uyghur, could be written horizontally RTL or vertically TB under Chinese influence, while the modern Perso-Arabic variant is strictly horizontal RTL. Typesetting RTL scripts poses challenges, such as mirroring punctuation, reversing list orders, and handling mixed LTR embeds, which demand specialized layout adjustments to preserve visual hierarchy. Cultural factors, particularly the near-universal dominance of right-handedness (affecting about 90% of populations), likely contributed to the prevalence of LTR direction in many scripts, as right-handers find pushing a pen from left to right ergonomically efficient on flat surfaces without immediate smudging. In contrast, RTL systems may have arisen from pulling motions suited to early writing tools like styluses on wax or clay, reflecting adaptations to manual preferences across societies.

Modern Adaptations and Influences

Digital and Computational Aspects

The Unicode Standard, initiated in 1991 by the Unicode Consortium, provides a universal character encoding system that supports over 170 scripts used in the world's writing systems, enabling consistent digital representation across diverse languages. By version 17.0 (released on September 9, 2025), it encompasses 172 scripts, including major ones like Latin, Arabic, and Devanagari, as well as complex systems such as Hangul and Han ideographs; this version added four new scripts—Sidetic, Tolong Siki, Beria Erfe, and Tai Yo—to better support underrepresented languages. A key feature is CJK unification, which merges ideographic characters shared across Chinese, Japanese, and Korean into a single set of code points to minimize redundancy while preserving linguistic distinctions through variant selectors or separate extensions. This approach facilitates interoperability in global software, allowing the same character to represent equivalent meanings in multiple East Asian contexts, though it requires font-specific handling for regional glyph variations. Rendering writing systems digitally presents significant challenges due to their structural complexities. For instance, demands ligature formation, where consecutive letters substitute into joined glyphs (e.g., "lam-alef" as لا), handled via GSUB tables that apply contextual substitutions during text processing. Similarly, Indic scripts like require reordering and positioning of matras—vowel signs that attach above, below, or to the side of consonants—using GPOS features to ensure proper formation, as seen in words where post-consonant matras shift leftward in logical order. , common in scripts mixing right-to-left (RTL) languages like or Hebrew with left-to-right (LTR) elements, relies on the Bidirectional Algorithm (UAX #9), which resolves embedding levels (0–125) and reorders runs based on character types (strong, weak, neutral) to produce correct visual display without altering storage. Innovations in input methods and font design have made digital writing more accessible. Pinyin-based Input Method Editors (IMEs), such as Microsoft's Simplified Chinese IME, allow users to type Romanized phonetic representations (e.g., "ni hao") to select corresponding Hanzi characters from a candidate list, supporting fuzzy matching and double-pinyin shortcuts for efficiency. For , shape-based input methods, often used in , decompose syllables into jamo components by analyzing stroke shapes (e.g., vertical for ㅎ and ㅏ forming 하), enabling intuitive entry on touch devices beyond traditional keyboard layouts. Font design for diverse glyphs involves creating OpenType-compatible families that support thousands of characters, as in SIL International's projects like Charis SIL for Latin extensions or Padauk for script, ensuring legibility and cultural fidelity through features like and optical sizing. Emoji represent a modern semasiographic system, where symbols convey meaning independently of , akin to ancient pictographs, and integrate into text via blocks for cross-platform consistency. Advances in AI-driven script recognition, such as ProtoSnap—a diffusion model from Cornell and researchers—enable (OCR) for by snapping prototype shapes to variable tablet impressions, achieving high accuracy on over 1,000 unique signs and aiding translation of the estimated 500,000 untranslated tablets. Looking ahead, while promotes universal , gaps persist for endangered scripts; official roadmaps identify dozens in development for living communities (e.g., Loma, Naxi Dongba), but broader initiatives like the Missing Scripts Project highlight that nearly half of the world's ~300 active writing systems lack full encoding, risking cultural erasure without accelerated inclusion.

Sociolinguistic and Cultural Variations

Writing systems often undergo reforms to enhance accessibility and align with societal goals, such as boosting literacy rates. In 1928, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk spearheaded the Turkish alphabet reform, replacing the Arabic-based Ottoman script with a Latin alphabet to modernize the nation and facilitate education, which dramatically increased literacy from around 10% to near-universal levels within decades. Similarly, in 1956, China's government introduced simplified Chinese characters through the Ministry of Education's scheme, reducing stroke counts in thousands of characters to promote mass literacy amid post-revolutionary development efforts, though this sparked debates over cultural heritage. Cultural roles of writing systems frequently intersect with prestige and identity formation. The script, used for , holds enduring prestige in as a symbol of classical heritage and Hindu tradition, influencing literature, rituals, and despite 's limited everyday use. In contrast, the revival of Hebrew in the 19th and 20th centuries transformed it from a liturgical language into Israel's modern vernacular, driven by Zionist figures like , who coined thousands of neologisms to foster Jewish and unity. Many writing systems face due to linguistic diversity imbalances, with approximately 7,000 languages spoken worldwide but only about 100 active scripts, leaving most oral languages undocumented and vulnerable to . Preservation initiatives, such as the standardization of for Indigenous languages like , aim to counter this by supporting community-led documentation and education in regions like , where the script aids cultural transmission among over 39,000 speakers. Sociolinguistic impacts of writing systems include phenomena like , where distinct varieties serve different social functions. In Arabic-speaking societies, functions as the high-prestige written form for formal media and , while regional dialects dominate spoken interaction, creating educational barriers and reinforcing class distinctions. Gender dynamics also manifest in scripts like , a phonetic invented by women in China's Jiangyong County around the 13th century, used secretly for centuries to express personal experiences in a patriarchal society that restricted female in . Script borrowing and adaptation for loanwords highlight cultural exchange. In Japanese, katakana serves as the dedicated script for foreign loanwords, such as English terms like konpyūta for "computer," enabling seamless integration while marking non-native origins and reflecting Japan's historical openness to Western influences since the .

References

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119072256.ch5
  2. https://sites.utexas.edu/dsb/tokens/the-evolution-of-writing/
  3. https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article/47/3/477/102776/The-Taxonomy-of-Writing-Systems-How-to-Measure-How
  4. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0_2
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/language-conflict-and-language-rights/role-of-writing-systems/5E9640B744CEDD5E5205D4C1D7D486AA
  6. https://www.grsampson.net/AWsy.html
  7. https://rws.xoba.com/newindex/wsbook.pdf
  8. https://sheffield.ac.uk/english/undergraduate/blog/writing-systems-5-written-vs-spoken
  9. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-worlds-writing-systems-9780195079937
  10. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/bitstreams/920499df-02eb-4712-988e-9eba096d75b4/download
  11. https://scriptsource.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=glossary
  12. https://www.press.jhu.edu/sites/default/files/media/2023/08/9781421443454_UPDF.pdf
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-025-02023-z
  14. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-origins-of-writing
  15. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=3428
  16. https://www.nature.com/articles/526499a
  17. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=1282
  18. https://smarthistory.org/ancient-egyptian-hieroglyphs/
  19. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/items/2a365037-9df0-41ec-8027-1c7db80a5dab
  20. http://science.org.ge/old/moambe/2-3/Gamkrelidze.pdf
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-archaeological-journal/article/negotiating-imperialism-and-resistance-in-late-bronze-age-ugarit-the-rise-of-alphabetic-cuneiform/5DE04581682E949D85A2B7FA6A13BCA9
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.21275882
  23. https://arce.org/resource/demotic-history-development-and-techniques-ancient-egypts-popular-script/
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/early-history-of-the-greek-alphabet-new-evidence-fromeretria-and-methone/DBFA7B52DBCDB48AA5B47D05FC4FB03A
  25. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6e763647ce1e49029b370488f107b2ec
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107624/
  27. https://www.ijrah.com/index.php/ijrah/article/download/82/157/217
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016726810600182X
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12471256/
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-archaeological-journal/article/hieroglyphic-texting-ideologies-and-practices-of-classic-maya-written-evidence/A07C2C7BD978C622D16BC538DCFB52B6
  31. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/linear-writing-system
  32. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/modernlanguages/academic/lines/community/kenilworth/term2-wk9-mignolo-reading_5.pdf
  33. https://www.lib.uiowa.edu/exhibits/previous/arabic/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339959516_Rebus_and_acrophony_in_invented_writing
  35. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=senior_theses
  36. http://hanzidb.org/character-list/general-standard
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265969060_Joyo_kanji_as_core_building_blocks_of_the_Japanese_writing_system_Some_observations_from_database_construction
  38. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51326989.pdf
  39. https://www.qenherkhopeshef.org/articles/Polis_Rosmorduc_2015_FSLoprieno_Bd.I-1.pdf
  40. https://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/app/uploads/2021/05/1_baroni.pdf
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition/article/effects-of-script-variation-literacy-skills-and-immersion-experience-on-executive-attention-a-comparison-of-matched-monoscriptal-and-biscriptal-bilinguals/BD31E158EF8C50AF23A5DDE8C47105B8
  42. https://chem.rutgers.edu/ky-chen-laboratory-research/oracle-bone-inscription/641-chinese-writing-from-5000-b-c-to-present
  43. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/05a51ea6-5ff0-48d9-b168-78f0277c840a/download
  44. https://www.academia.edu/26658232/Syllables_and_Syllabaries_What_Writing_Systems_Tell_Us_about_Syllable_Structure
  45. https://hkotek.com/teaching/intro2015/week5-writing-systems.pdf
  46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/642129
  47. https://sites.dartmouth.edu/aegean-prehistory/lessons/lesson-25-narrative/
  48. https://ctan.math.illinois.edu/fonts/archaic/cypriot/cypriot.pdf
  49. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741088311410172
  50. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=honorscollege_anthro
  51. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4234&context=etd
  52. https://exac.hms.harvard.edu/alphabet-letter-sounds
  53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/497822
  54. https://www.academia.edu/52725296/Matres_Lectionis_in_Ancient_Hebrew_Epigraphs
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000122000225
  56. https://academic.oup.com/book/39869/chapter/340049558
  57. https://mnamon.sns.it/index.php?page=Scrittura&id=17&lang=en
  58. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/ESLO/COM-036203.xml?language=en
  59. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-slavic-linguistics/scripts/55C5DC65FD3ABCC20723F9E38C6CF166
  60. https://www.duke.edu/~wj25/ereserves/WJ-Powell.pdf
  61. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/144701/2/588634.pdf
  62. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/globalization/fonts-layout/text-directionality
  63. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/direction.htm
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/arabic-script
  65. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=bb_pubs
  66. https://www.latinamericanstudies.org/ancient/writing-origins.pdf
  67. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28017/chapter/211799072
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33242-8
  69. https://www.w3.org/TR/mlreq/
  70. https://www.w3.org/International/articles/vertical-text/
  71. https://www.bibalex.org/learnhieroglyphs/lesson/LessonDetails_En.aspx?l=57
  72. https://u.osu.edu/unger.26/online-publications/chapter-1-of-literacy-and-script-reform-in-occupation-japan/
  73. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20191-old-uyghur.pdf
  74. https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-scripts/1000
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37423-8
  76. https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/14830/are-there-practical-reasons-why-languages-developed-left-to-right-or-right-to-le
  77. https://www.unicode.org/standard/supported.html
  78. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode17.0.0/
  79. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode16.0.0/core-spec/chapter-18/
  80. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/develop/processing-part1
  81. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/
  82. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/microsoft-simplified-chinese-ime-9b962a3b-2fa4-4f37-811c-b1886320dd72
  83. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6832203/
  84. https://software.sil.org/fonts/
  85. https://meletis.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Emojis_A_Grapholinguistic_Approach.pdf
  86. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/03/ai-models-make-precise-copies-cuneiform-characters
  87. https://www.unicode.org/standard/unsupported.html
  88. https://type.today/en/journal/missingscripts
  89. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Kemal-Ataturk/The-Turkish-republic
  90. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~dkjordan/chin/SimplifiedCharacters.html
  91. https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/postcolonialstudies/2014/06/21/languages-of-south-asia/
  92. https://jewishstudies.washington.edu/israel-hebrew/reviving-hebrew-persian-ancient-languages-eliezer-ben-yehuda-manekji-limji-hataria/
  93. https://college.lclark.edu/library/endangeredalphabets/
  94. https://guides.loc.gov/quebec/indigenous-peoples
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3218773/
  96. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wuhonors1617206164352421
  97. https://www.hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/spring-2022/8michaloski_waseieigo.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.