Hubbry Logo
MalocclusionMalocclusionMain
Open search
Malocclusion
Community hub
Malocclusion
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Malocclusion
Malocclusion
Malocclusion
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Malocclusion
Malocclusion in 10-year-old girl
SpecialtyDentistry Edit this on Wikidata
Look up bucktooth in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

In orthodontics, a malocclusion is a misalignment or incorrect relation between the teeth of the upper and lower dental arches when they approach each other as the jaws close. The English-language term dates from 1864;[1] Edward Angle (1855–1930), the "father of modern orthodontics",[2][3][need quotation to verify] popularised it. The word derives from mal- 'incorrect' and occlusion 'the manner in which opposing teeth meet'.

The malocclusion classification is based on the relationship of the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.  If this molar relationship exists, then the teeth can align into normal occlusion. According to Angle, malocclusion is any deviation of the occlusion from the ideal.[4] However, assessment for malocclusion should also take into account aesthetics and the impact on functionality. If these aspects are acceptable to the patient despite meeting the formal definition of malocclusion, then treatment may not be necessary. It is estimated that nearly 30% of the population have malocclusions that are categorised as severe and definitely benefit from orthodontic treatment.[5]

Causes

[edit]

The aetiology of malocclusion is somewhat contentious, however, simply put it is multifactorial, with influences being both genetic[6][unreliable source?] and environmental.[7] Malocclusion is already present in one of the Skhul and Qafzeh hominin fossils and other prehistoric human skulls.[8][9] There are three generally accepted causative factors of malocclusion:

  • Skeletal factors – the size, shape and relative positions of the upper and lower jaws. Variations can be caused by environmental or behavioral factors such as a diet of soft, cooked food (as opposed to hard foods such as raw fruits and vegetables) in childhood causing smaller jaws,[10][11] muscles of mastication, nocturnal mouth breathing, and cleft lip and cleft palate.
  • Muscle factors – the form and function of the muscles that surround the teeth.  This could be impacted by habits such as finger sucking, nail biting, pacifier and tongue thrusting[12]
  • Dental factors – size of the teeth in relation to the jaw, early loss of teeth could result in spacing or mesial migration causing crowding, abnormal eruption path or timings, extra teeth (supernumeraries), or too few teeth (hypodontia)

There is not one single cause of malocclusion, and when planning orthodontic treatment it is often helpful to consider the above factors and the impact they have played on malocclusion. These can also be influenced by oral habits and pressure resulting in malocclusion.[13][14]

Behavioral and dental factors

[edit]

In the active skeletal growth,[15] mouthbreathing, finger sucking, thumb sucking, pacifier sucking, onychophagia (nail biting), dermatophagia, pen biting, pencil biting, abnormal posture, deglutition disorders and other habits greatly influence the development of the face and dental arches.[16][17][18][19][20] Pacifier sucking habits are also correlated with otitis media.[21][22] Dental caries, periapical inflammation and tooth loss in the deciduous teeth can alter the correct permanent teeth eruptions.

Primary vis-à-vis secondary dentition

[edit]

Malocclusion can occur in primary and secondary dentition.

In primary dentition malocclusion is caused by:

  • Underdevelopment of the dentoalvelor tissue.
  • Over development of bones around the mouth.
  • Cleft lip and palate.
  • Overcrowding of teeth.
  • Abnormal development and growth of teeth.

In secondary dentition malocclusion is caused by:

  • Periodontal disease.
  • Overeruption of teeth.[23]
  • Premature and congenital loss of missing teeth.

Signs and symptoms

[edit]

Malocclusion is a common finding,[24][25] although it is not usually serious enough to require treatment. Those who have more severe malocclusions, which present as a part of craniofacial anomalies, may require orthodontic and sometimes surgical treatment (orthognathic surgery) to correct the problem.

The ultimate goal of orthodontic treatment is to achieve a stable, functional and aesthetic alignment of teeth which serves to better the patient's dental and total health.[26] The symptoms which arise as a result of malocclusion derive from a deficiency in one or more of these categories.[27]

The symptoms are as follows:

  • Tooth decay (caries): misaligned teeth will make it more difficult to maintain oral hygiene. Children with poor oral hygiene and diet will be at an increased risk.
  • Periodontal disease: irregular teeth would hinder the ability to clean teeth meaning poor plaque control. Additionally, if teeth are crowded, some may be more buccally or lingually placed, there will be reduced bone and periodontal support. Furthermore, in Class III malocclusions, mandibular anterior teeth are pushed labially which contributes to gingival recession and weakens periodontal support.
  • Trauma to anterior teeth: Those with an increased overjet are at an increased risk of trauma. A systematic review found that an overjet of greater than 3mm will double the risk of trauma.
  • Masticatory function: people with anterior open bites, large increased & reverse overjet and hypodontia will find it more difficult to chew food.
  • Speech impairment: a lisp is when the incisors cannot make contact, orthodontics can treat this. However, other forms of misaligned teeth will have little impact on speech and orthodontic treatment has little effect on fixing any problems.  
  • Tooth impaction: these can cause resorption of adjacent teeth and other pathologies for example a dentigerous cyst formation.  
  • Psychosocial wellbeing: malocclusions of teeth with poor aesthetics can have a significant effect on self-esteem.

Malocclusions may be coupled with skeletal disharmony of the face, where the relations between the upper and lower jaws are not appropriate. Such skeletal disharmonies often distort sufferer's face shape, severely affect aesthetics of the face, and may be coupled with mastication or speech problems. Most skeletal malocclusions can only be treated by orthognathic surgery.[citation needed]

Classification

[edit]

Depending on the sagittal relations of teeth and jaws, malocclusions can be divided mainly into three types according to Angle's classification system published 1899. However, there are also other conditions, e.g. crowding of teeth, not directly fitting into this classification.

Many authors have tried to modify or replace Angle's classification. This has resulted in many subtypes and new systems (see section below: Review of Angle's system of classes).

A deep bite (also known as a Type II Malocclusion) is a condition in which the upper teeth overlap the lower teeth, which can result in hard and soft tissue trauma, in addition to an effect on appearance.[28] It has been found to occur in 15–20% of the US population.[29]

An open bite is a condition characterised by a complete lack of overlap and occlusion between the upper and lower incisors.[30] In children, open bite can be caused by prolonged thumb sucking.[31] Patients often present with impaired speech and mastication.[32]

Overbites

[edit]

This is a vertical measurement of the degree of overlap between the maxillary incisors and the mandibular incisors. There are three features that are analysed in the classification of an overbite:

  • Degree of overlap: edge to edge, reduced, average, increased
  • Complete or incomplete: whether there is contact between the lower teeth and the opposing teeth/tissue (hard palate or gingivae) or not.
  • Whether contact is traumatic or atraumatic

An average overbite is when the upper anterior teeth cover a third of the lower teeth. Covering less than this is described as 'reduced' and more than this is an 'increased' overbite. No overlap or contact is considered an 'anterior open bite'.[27][33][34]

Angle's classification method

[edit]
Class I with severe crowding and labially erupted canines
Class II molar relationship

Edward Angle, who is considered the father of modern orthodontics, was the first to classify malocclusion. He based his classifications on the relative position of the maxillary first molar.[35] According to Angle, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar should align with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. The teeth should all fit on a line of occlusion which, in the upper arch, is a smooth curve through the central fossae of the posterior teeth and cingulum of the canines and incisors, and in the lower arch, is a smooth curve through the buccal cusps of the posterior teeth and incisal edges of the anterior teeth. Any variations from this resulted in malocclusion types. It is also possible to have different classes of malocclusion on left and right sides.

  • Class I (Neutrocclusion): Here the molar relationship of the occlusion is normal but the incorrect line of occlusion or as described for the maxillary first molar, but the other teeth have problems like spacing, crowding, over or under eruption, etc.
  • Class II (Distocclusion (retrognathism, overjet, overbite)): In this situation, the mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first molar is not aligned with the mesiobuccal groove of the lower first molar. Instead it is anterior to it. Usually the mesiobuccal cusp rests in between the first mandibular molars and second premolars. There are two subtypes:
    • Class II Division 1: The molar relationships are like that of Class II and the anterior teeth are protruded.
    • Class II Division 2: The molar relationships are Class II but the central are retroclined and the lateral teeth are seen overlapping the centrals.
  • Class III: (Mesiocclusion (prognathism, anterior crossbite, negative overjet, underbite)) In this case the upper molars are placed not in the mesiobuccal groove but posteriorly to it. The mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar lies posteriorly to the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar. Usually seen as when the lower front teeth are more prominent than the upper front teeth. In this case the patient very often has a large mandible or a short maxillary bone.

Review of Angle's system of classes and alternative systems

[edit]

A major disadvantage of Angle's system of classifying malocclusions is that it only considers two dimensions along a spatial axis in the sagittal plane in the terminal occlusion, but occlusion problems can be three-dimensional. It does not recognise deviations in other spatial axes, asymmetric deviations, functional faults and other therapy-related features.

Angle's classification system also lacks a theoretical basis; it is purely descriptive. Its much-discussed weaknesses include that it only considers static occlusion, it does not account for the development and causes (aetiology) of occlusion problems, and it disregards the proportions (or relationships in general) of teeth and face.[36] Thus, many attempts have been made to modify the Angle system or to replace it completely with a more efficient one,[37] but Angle's classification continues be popular mainly because of its simplicity and clarity.[citation needed]

Well-known modifications to Angle's classification date back to Martin Dewey (1915) and Benno Lischer (1912, 1933). Alternative systems have been suggested by, among others, Simon (1930, the first three-dimensional classification system), Jacob A. Salzmann (1950, with a classification system based on skeletal structures) and James L. Ackerman and William R. Proffit (1969).[38]

Incisor classification

[edit]

Besides the molar relationship, the British Standards Institute Classification also classifies malocclusion into incisor relationship and canine relationship.

  • Class I: The lower incisor edges occlude with or lie immediately below the cingulum plateau of the upper central incisors
  • Class II: The lower incisor edges lie posterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors
    • Division 1 – the upper central incisors are proclined or of average inclination and there is an increase in overjet
    • Division 2 – The upper central incisors are retroclined. The overjet is usually minimal or may be increased.
  • Class III: The lower incisor edges lie anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors. The overjet is reduced or reversed.

Canine relationship by Ricketts

[edit]
  • Class I: Mesial slope of upper canine coincides with distal slope of lower canine
  • Class II: Mesial slope of upper canine is ahead of distal slope of lower canine
  • Class III: Mesial slope of upper canine is behind to distal slope of lower canine

Crowding of teeth

[edit]

Dental crowding is defined by the amount of space that would be required for the teeth to be in correct alignment. It is obtained in two ways: 1) by measuring the amount of space required and reducing this from calculating the space available via the width of the teeth, or 2) by measuring the degree of overlap of the teeth.

The following criterion is used:[27]

  • 0-4mm = Mild crowding
  • 4-8mm = Moderate crowding
  • >8mm = Severe crowding

Causes

[edit]

Genetic (inheritance) factors, extra teeth, lost teeth, impacted teeth, or abnormally shaped teeth have been cited as causes of crowding. Ill-fitting dental fillings, crowns, appliances, retainers, or braces as well as misalignment of jaw fractures after a severe injury are also known to cause crowding.[28] Tumors of the mouth and jaw, thumb sucking, tongue thrusting, pacifier use beyond age three, and prolonged use of a bottle have also been identified.[28]

Lack of masticatory stress during development can cause tooth overcrowding.[39][40] Children who chewed a hard resinous gum for two hours a day showed increased facial growth.[39] Experiments in animals have shown similar results. In an experiment on two groups of rock hyraxes fed hardened or softened versions of the same foods, the animals fed softer food had significantly narrower and shorter faces and thinner and shorter mandibles than animals fed hard food.[39][41][failed verification]

A 2016 review found that breastfeeding lowers the incidence of malocclusions developing later on in developing infants.[42]

During the transition to agriculture, the shape of the human mandible went through a series of changes. The mandible underwent a complex shape changes not matched by the teeth, leading to incongruity between the dental and mandibular form. These changes in human skulls may have been "driven by the decreasing bite forces required to chew the processed foods eaten once humans switched to growing different types of cereals, milking and herding animals about 10,000 years ago."[40][43]

Treatment

[edit]

Malocclusion is often treated with orthodontics,[44] such as tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces,[45] followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgical intervention is used only in rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw. Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner like the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth with most problems being minor that do not require treatment.[39]

Crowding

[edit]

Crowding of the teeth is treated with orthodontics, often with tooth extraction, clear aligners, or dental braces, followed by growth modification in children or jaw surgery (orthognathic surgery) in adults. Surgery may be required on rare occasions. This may include surgical reshaping to lengthen or shorten the jaw (orthognathic surgery). Wires, plates, or screws may be used to secure the jaw bone, in a manner similar to the surgical stabilization of jaw fractures. Very few people have "perfect" alignment of their teeth. However, most problems are very minor and do not require treatment.[41]

Class I

[edit]

While treatment is not crucial in class I malocclusions, in severe cases of crowding can be an indication for intervention. Studies indicate that tooth extraction can have benefits to correcting malocclusion in individuals.[46][47] Further research is needed as reoccurring crowding has been examined in other clinical trials.[46][48]

Class II

[edit]

A few treatment options for class II malocclusions include:

  1. Functional appliance which maintains the mandible in a postured position to influence both the orofacial musculature and dentoalveolar development prior to fixed appliance therapy. This is ideally done through pubertal growth in pre-adolescent children and the fixed appliance during permanent dentition.[49] Different types of removable appliances include Activator, Bionatar, Medium opening activator, Herbst, Frankel and twin block appliance with the twin block being the most widely used one.[50]
  2. Growth modification through headgear to redirect maxillary growth
  3. Orthodontic camouflage so that jaw discrepancy no longer apparent
  4. Orthognathic surgery – sagittal split osteotomy mandibular advancement carried out when growth is complete where skeletal discrepancy is severe in anterior-posterior relationship or in vertical direction. Fixed appliance is required before, during and after surgery.
  5. Upper Removable Appliance – limited role in contemporary treatment of increased overjets. Mostly used for very mild Class II, overjet due to incisor proclination, favourable overbite.

Class II Division 1

[edit]

Low- to moderate- quality evidence suggests that providing early orthodontic treatment for children with prominent upper front teeth (class II division 1) is more effective for reducing the incidence of incisal trauma than providing one course of orthodontic treatment in adolescence.[51] There do not appear to be any other advantages of providing early treatment when compared to late treatment.[51] Low-quality evidence suggests that, compared to no treatment, late treatment in adolescence with functional appliances is effective for reducing the prominence of upper front teeth.[51]

Class II Division 2

[edit]

Treatment can be undertaken using orthodontic treatments using dental braces.[52] While treatment is carried out, there is no evidence from clinical trials to recommend or discourage any type of orthodontic treatment in children.[52] A 2018 Cochrane systematic review anticipated that the evidence base supporting treatment approaches is not likely to improve occlusion due to the low prevalence of the condition and the ethical difficulties in recruiting people to participate in a randomized controlled trials for treating this condition.[52]

Class III

[edit]

The British Standard Institute (BSI) classify class III incisor relationship as the lower incisor edge lies anterior to the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors, with reduced or reversed over jet.[53] The skeletal facial deformity is characterized by mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrognathism or a combination of the two. This affects 3-8% of UK population with a higher incidence seen in Asia.[54]

One of the main reasons for correcting Class III malocclusion is aesthetics and function. This can have a psychological impact on the person with malocclusion resulting in speech and mastication problems as well. In mild class III cases, the patient is quite accepting of the aesthetics and the situation is monitored to observe the progression of skeletal growth.[55]

Maxillary and mandibular skeletal changes during prepubertal, pubertal and post pubertal stages show that class III malocclusion is established before the prepubertal stage.[56] One treatment option is the use of growth modification appliances such as the Chin Cap which has greatly improved the skeletal framework in the initial stages. However, majority of cases are shown to relapse into inherited class III malocclusion during the pubertal growth stage and when the appliance is removed after treatment.[56]

Another approach is to carry out orthognathic surgery, such as a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) which is indicated by horizontal mandibular excess. This involves surgically cutting through the mandible and moving the fragment forward or backwards for desired function and is supplemented with pre and post surgical orthodontics to ensure correct tooth relationship. Although the most common surgery of the mandible, it comes with several complications including: bleeding from inferior alveolar artery, unfavorable splits, condylar resorption, avascular necrosis and worsening of temporomandibular joint.[57]

Orthodontic camouflage can also be used in patients with mild skeletal discrepancies. This is a less invasive approach that uses orthodontic brackets to correct malocclusion and try to hide the skeletal discrepancy. Due to limitations of orthodontics, this option is more viable for patients who are not as concerned about the aesthetics of their facial appearance and are happy to address the malocclusion only, as well as avoiding the risks which come with orthognathic surgery. Cephalometric data can aid in the differentiation between the cases that benefit from ortho-surgical or orthodontic treatment only (camouflage); for instance, examining a large group of orthognathic patient with Class III malocclusions they had average ANB angle of -3.57° (95% CI, -3.92° to -3.21°).[58]

Deep bite

[edit]

The most common corrective treatments available are fixed or removal appliances (such as dental braces), which may or may not require surgical intervention. At this time there is no robust evidence that treatment will be successful.[52]

Open bite

[edit]

An open bite malocclusion is when the upper teeth don't overlap the lower teeth. When this malocclusion occurs at the front teeth it is known as anterior open bite. An open bite is difficult to treat due to multifactorial causes, with relapse being a major concern. This is particularly so for an anterior open bite.[59] Therefore, it is important to carry out a thorough initial assessment in order to obtain a diagnosis to tailor a suitable treatment plan.[59] It is important to take into consideration any habitual risk factors, as this is crucial for a successful outcome without relapse. Treatment approach includes behavior changes, appliances and surgery. Treatment for adults include a combination of extractions, fixed appliances, intermaxillary elastics and orthognathic surgery.[32] For children, orthodontics is usually used to compensate for continued growth. With children with mixed dentition, the malocclusion may resolve on its own as the permanent teeth erupt. Furthermore, should the malocclusion be caused by childhood habits such as digit, thumb or pacifier sucking, it may result in resolution as the habit is stopped. Habit deterrent appliances may be used to help in breaking digit and thumb sucking habits. Other treatment options for patients who are still growing include functional appliances and headgear appliances.

Tooth size discrepancy

[edit]

Identifying the presence of tooth size discrepancies between the maxillary and mandibular arches is an important component of correct orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

To establish appropriate alignment and occlusion, the size of upper and lower front teeth, or upper and lower teeth in general, needs to be proportional. Inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) is defined as a disproportion in the mesio-distal dimensions of teeth of opposing dental arches. The prevalence is clinically significant among orthodontic patients and has been reported to range from 17% to 30%.[60]

Identifying inter-arch tooth size discrepancy (ITSD) before treatment begins allows the practitioner to develop the treatment plan in a way that will take ITSD into account. ITSD corrective treatment may entail demanding reduction (interproximal wear), increase (crowns and resins), or elimination (extractions) of dental mass prior to treatment finalization.[61]

Several methods have been used to determine ITSD. Of these methods the one most commonly used is the Bolton analysis. Bolton developed a method to calculate the ratio between the mesiodistal width of maxillary and mandibular teeth and stated that a correct and harmonious occlusion is possible only with adequate proportionality of tooth sizes.[61] Bolton's formula concludes that if in the anterior portion the ratio is less than 77.2% the lower teeth are too narrow, the upper teeth are too wide or there is a combination of both. If the ratio is higher than 77.2% either the lower teeth are too wide, the upper teeth are too narrow or there is a combination of both.[60]

Other conditions

[edit]
Further information: Open bite malocclusion
Open bite treatment after eight months of braces.

Other kinds of malocclusions can be due to or horizontal, vertical, or transverse skeletal discrepancies, including skeletal asymmetries.

Increased vertical growth causes a long facial profile and commonly leads to an open bite malocclusion, while decreased vertical facial growth causes a short facial profile and is commonly associated with a deep bite malocclusion. However, there are many other more common causes for open bites (such as tongue thrusting and thumb sucking) and likewise for deep bites.[62][63][64]

The upper or lower jaw can be overgrown (macrognathia) or undergrown (micrognathia).[63][62][64] It has been reported that patients with micrognathia are also affected by retrognathia (abnormal posterior positioning of the mandible or maxilla relative to the facial structure).[63]  These patients are majorly predisposed to a class II malocclusion. Mandibular macrognathia results in prognathism and predisposes patients to a class III malocclusion.[65]

Most malocclusion studies to date have focused on Class III malocclusions. Genetic studies for Class II and Class I malocclusion are more rare. An example of hereditary mandibular prognathism can be seen amongst the Hapsburg Royal family where one third of the affected individuals with severe class III malocclusion had one parent with a similar phenotype [66]

The frequent presentation of dental malocclusions in patients with craniofacial birth defects also supports a strong genetic aetiology. About 150 genes are associated with craniofacial conditions presenting with malocclusions.[67]  Micrognathia is a commonly recurring craniofacial birth defect appearing among multiple syndromes.

For patients with severe malocclusions, corrective jaw surgery or orthognathic surgery may be carried out as a part of overall treatment, which can be seen in about 5% of the general population.[63][62][64]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Malocclusion

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Malocclusion, commonly referred to as a "bad bite," is a dental condition in which the upper and lower teeth fail to align properly when the mouth is closed, resulting in an improper bite that can affect chewing, speech, and oral health. In normal occlusion, the teeth align ideally with the mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary first molars occluding in the buccal grooves of the mandibular first molars, accompanied by a 1- to 2-mm overjet and overbite. This misalignment occurs due to discrepancies in tooth positioning, jaw size, or skeletal structure, and it affects approximately 56% of the global population, with up to 93% of children and adolescents showing some degree of malocclusion. While many cases are mild and asymptomatic, severe malocclusion can lead to complications such as tooth wear, gum disease, and jaw pain if left untreated. Malocclusion is classified primarily using Angle's system, which categorizes it into three main classes based on the relationship between the molars and overall jaw alignment. Class I malocclusion, the most common type affecting about 60% of cases, features a normal molar relationship but with crowded or spaced teeth, often leading to minor protrusions. Class II involves the upper teeth protruding significantly over the lower teeth ( or overjet). Class III, known as underbite, occurs when the lower teeth extend beyond the upper teeth. Other subtypes include crossbites (side-to-side misalignment) and open bites (gap between upper and lower front teeth when biting down). The causes of malocclusion are multifactorial, with hereditary factors accounting for the majority of cases—only about 8% have a clearly identifiable cause, such as birth defects like cleft lip and palate or habits like prolonged thumb-sucking beyond age three. Environmental influences, including , , or abnormal jaw growth during childhood, can also contribute. Symptoms vary by severity but commonly include difficulty chewing or biting, speech impediments, , and self-consciousness about facial appearance. In advanced cases, it may cause abnormal tooth wear, jaw joint disorders ( issues), or increased risk of dental caries and . Diagnosis typically involves a comprehensive dental examination, including X-rays, cephalometric analysis, and 3D imaging to assess tooth and jaw positioning. Treatment options depend on the type and severity, often beginning in childhood or adolescence when bones are still developing; common interventions include orthodontic appliances like braces or clear aligners, which realign teeth over 1-2 years, and in rare severe cases, orthognathic surgery to correct jaw discrepancies. Early intervention is key for better outcomes, though many mild cases require no treatment.

Definition and Overview

Definition

Malocclusion is defined as the misalignment of the teeth and jaws, resulting in improper contact between the upper and lower dental arches when the closes. This condition disrupts the normal bite function, where the teeth fail to meet correctly, potentially affecting chewing, speaking, and oral health. Occlusion refers to the alignment and contact between the upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) teeth as the jaws come together. In ideal occlusion, the teeth fit harmoniously, with the upper teeth slightly overlapping the lower ones in a stable relationship. Malocclusion represents any deviation from this ideal alignment, involving irregularities in tooth position, jaw relationship, or both. The term "malocclusion" originated in the late and was popularized by Edward H. Angle, widely regarded as the father of modern , who introduced it in his 1899 publication to describe anomalies in tooth position. Although the English term dates back to 1864, Angle's work established its foundational use in dental terminology. Understanding malocclusion requires basic knowledge of and jaw anatomy. encompasses the natural arrangement of teeth within the dental arches, typically consisting of 32 in adults, including incisors, canines, premolars, and molars, embedded in the alveolar bone of the jaws. The jaws comprise the fixed , which forms the upper facial skeleton and supports the maxillary teeth, and the mobile , the lower jawbone that articulates with the via the temporomandibular joints to enable movement. Misalignments in this structure can arise from discrepancies in tooth positioning relative to these bony foundations.

Normal Occlusion

Normal occlusion refers to the ideal alignment and functional relationship of the maxillary and mandibular teeth when the jaws are closed, characterized by harmonious coordination that supports optimal oral health. In this arrangement, the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first permanent molar aligns precisely with the buccal groove of the mandibular first permanent molar, establishing a Class I molar relationship. Key features include an overjet of 1 to 2 mm, representing the horizontal overlap of the maxillary incisors over the mandibular incisors, and an of 1 to 2 mm, indicating the vertical overlap; additionally, the midlines of the maxillary and mandibular arches align with each other and the facial midline, while the incisal edges and buccal cusps form smooth curves for even contact. This ideal occlusion plays a crucial role in facilitating efficient mastication by distributing occlusal forces evenly across the teeth and supporting structures, thereby minimizing and promoting stability during . It also contributes to clear speech articulation through proper positioning of the , , and teeth, which are essential for phonetic sounds, and enhances facial aesthetics by maintaining balanced proportions of the jaws and soft tissues. Variations in normal occlusion occur across developmental stages, particularly between primary and permanent dentition. In primary dentition, normal occlusion typically features a flush terminal plane relationship between the second primary molars, where their distal surfaces align in the same vertical plane, alongside a Class I canine relationship, an overjet of 2 mm or less, and physiologic spacing including primate spaces between the canines and first molars to accommodate erupting permanent teeth. As the transition to permanent dentition progresses, these features evolve, with the flush terminal plane often shifting to the Class I molar relationship, reduced spacing, and refined overjet and overbite to support the larger permanent teeth. Malocclusion represents any deviation from this baseline standard.

Epidemiology

Prevalence and Distribution

Malocclusion affects a significant portion of the global population, with estimates indicating that approximately 50-75% of individuals experience some degree of misalignment to varying severities. Systematic reviews indicate that malocclusion ranks as the third most important oral condition worldwide, impacting 39% to 93% of adolescents and , with a pooled global of around 56% across all age groups. Recent 2024 studies further highlight variations, showing higher rates in urban areas (up to 83.9% in some primary cohorts) compared to rural settings, potentially linked to differences in access to care and environmental factors. Prevalence is notably higher during childhood and , particularly in the mixed stage, where up to 90% of school-aged children exhibit some form of malocclusion. In primary , rates range from 28.4% to 83.9%, often exceeding 50% in half of reported studies from 2010-2024, while in permanent among adolescents, the figure is 72% in and 81% in , compared to the global pooled of 56%. There are no significant differences in prevalence between genders. Among adults, prevalence decreases slightly to about 44-65%, largely due to untreated cases persisting or natural adaptations, though severity may worsen over time without intervention. Geographic and ethnic variations underscore the condition's diverse distribution, with certain malocclusion classes showing population-specific patterns. For instance, Class III malocclusion is more prevalent in Asian populations, affecting approximately 10-16% of individuals (such as 12.6% in Chinese children and 15.8% in Southeast Asian groups), compared to 1-5% in Caucasian cohorts; in ethnic Chinese orthodontic samples, it reaches 27.4%. Conversely, Class II malocclusion is higher among Caucasians, comprising up to 23-31% of cases, while African populations exhibit the highest overall malocclusion rates at 81%, often involving Class I and open bite traits. These differences reflect underlying skeletal and genetic influences across continents.

Risk Factors

Malocclusion can arise from a combination of non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors that influence craniofacial development during childhood. Among non-modifiable risks, plays a significant role, with familial inheritance patterns demonstrated through twin studies showing high concordance rates for specific malocclusion types, such as 100% concordance in identical twins for Class II division 2 malocclusion. Skeletal discrepancies, including disparities in size between the and , further contribute to the development of malocclusion as inherent structural variations. Modifiable risks primarily involve deleterious oral habits that exert mechanical forces on developing . Prolonged thumb-sucking beyond can lead to anterior open bite and overjet by altering tooth positioning and palatal shape. , often associated with nasal obstruction, promotes abnormal tongue posture and mandibular growth patterns that increase malocclusion likelihood. Similarly, extended use after age three heightens the risk of anterior open bite and posterior crossbite, with odds ratios as high as 14.7 for habits persisting beyond two years. Socioeconomic factors, particularly limited access to dental care, hinder early detection and intervention, thereby elevating the risk of untreated malocclusion progression in lower-income populations. Recent 2024 reviews highlight the role of in craniofacial development, noting that soft-textured diets and bottle feeding—compared to —correlate with maxillary constriction and increased malocclusion traits by reducing masticatory stimuli needed for proper jaw growth. Environmental toxins, such as like , also disrupt skeletal development in the craniofacial region, potentially exacerbating malocclusion through interference with bone mineralization and growth processes. These factors collectively contribute to variations in malocclusion prevalence across populations.

Causes

Genetic and Skeletal Factors

Malocclusion often arises from polygenic patterns involving multiple genes that regulate craniofacial development, such as those in the (FGFR) family. Mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3, for instance, are implicated in syndromes like Apert, Crouzon, and , which frequently result in Class III malocclusion characterized by mandibular and midface due to disrupted and growth signaling pathways. Other genes, including COL2A1, TGFB3, LTBP2, and FBN3, contribute to skeletal discrepancies in non-syndromic cases by influencing mandibular growth and formation, with polymorphisms like rs7351083 in FBN3 showing associations with Class III phenotypes in specific populations. Recent 2025 studies highlight the polygenic nature of these influences, where variants in FGFR1 and further modulate anteroposterior jaw relationships. Skeletal factors underlying malocclusion stem from inherent discrepancies in the growth trajectories of the and , leading to mismatches in anteroposterior, transverse, or vertical dimensions. For example, mandibular prognathism occurs when the grows excessively relative to a retruded (retrognathia), as seen in many Class III cases, while the reverse—maxillary prognathism with mandibular retrognathia—contributes to Class II malocclusions. These imbalances arise during fetal and postnatal craniofacial , where dictates differential growth rates, often resulting in relative jaw disproportions that persist into adulthood. Genetic factors manifest differently between primary (deciduous) and secondary (permanent) dentition, as primary malocclusions reflect early skeletal patterns that may intensify or evolve with the eruption of due to ongoing growth. In primary dentition, genetic influences often present as milder spacing or alignment issues, but these can progress to more pronounced skeletal malocclusions in as hereditary craniofacial growth patterns fully express. Longitudinal studies indicate that unresolved primary dentition anomalies, driven by polygenic traits, increase the risk of malocclusion by altering arch development. Recent 2025 reviews estimate the of Class III malocclusion at approximately 40%, underscoring its strong genetic basis while noting interactions with environmental modifiers that can alter phenotypic expression. Twin studies support this, showing higher concordance in monozygotic pairs for skeletal components compared to dental ones.

Environmental and Behavioral Factors

Behavioral habits, such as prolonged thumb-sucking, exert continuous pressure on the , leading to anterior open bite by interrupting eruption and causing maxillary protrusion through labial displacement of upper incisors and lingual displacement of lower incisors. Tongue thrusting, characterized by forward tongue positioning during , similarly results in anterior open bite and proclination of maxillary due to persistent lingual pressure against the . Nail-biting, as a repetitive , contributes to anterior open bites and general dental protrusions by disrupting normal occlusal forces and alignment over time. These habits, if persisting beyond , significantly increase the risk of malocclusion by altering morphology during critical growth phases. Environmental factors also play a key role in malocclusion development. Trauma, particularly mandibular fractures, can damage growth centers like the condyle, resulting in asymmetric growth and subsequent malocclusion, with up to 22% of affected children aged 4-7 requiring orthognathic intervention. Poor , encompassing both malnutrition and the soft, ultra-processed foods prevalent in the modern Western diet, impairs and craniofacial development, leading to underdeveloped structures and higher malocclusion prevalence. Malnutrition specifically correlates with Class I crowding in 44.54% of adolescents with BMI <18.5 due to insufficient space for tooth eruption. Additionally, reduced masticatory stress from soft diets diminishes jaw growth stimuli, resulting in narrower dental arches, smaller jaws, and increased crowding, as observed in animal models and linked to rising orthodontic issues in populations. Airway obstructions from adenoid hypertrophy, which has a prevalence of 42-70% in children and adolescents, promote chronic mouth breathing, which induces sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes in maxillofacial growth, contributing to various malocclusion patterns. Dental factors, including premature loss of primary teeth, facilitate adjacent tooth drift into the resulting space, reducing arch length and predisposing permanent dentition to malocclusion, with significant associations noted for midline deviations following first molar loss. Such losses, often due to caries or trauma, disrupt the normal transition from primary to secondary dentition, exacerbating space discrepancies and occlusal irregularities if not managed promptly. Recent evidence highlights correlations between forward head posture and altered jaw positioning, increasing malocclusion risk through musculoskeletal imbalances affecting craniocervical alignment in children. These acquired factors often interact with genetic predispositions to amplify malocclusion severity.

Signs and Symptoms

Physical Manifestations

Malocclusion presents with various visible signs in the dentition, including irregular tooth alignment such as crowding, where teeth overlap or are positioned too closely together, and spacing issues like diastema, which are gaps between teeth, particularly between the upper incisors. Teeth may also exhibit rotations, where individual teeth are angled abnormally around their long axis, or flared incisors, with the upper front teeth protruding forward beyond the normal plane. These intraoral features are observable during clinical examination and can contribute to uneven wear patterns on the occlusal surfaces due to improper tooth contacts during function. Facial indicators of malocclusion include asymmetry, where one side of the face appears uneven compared to the other, often stemming from jaw discrepancies. Profile alterations may manifest as a convex profile in cases of mandibular retrognathia or a concave profile with mandibular prognathism, alongside vertical discrepancies that result in a gummy smile, characterized by excessive gingival display during smiling. These external signs reflect underlying skeletal imbalances and are evident upon visual assessment. Manifestations differ between primary and permanent dentition, with primary dentition often showing more physiologic spacing and diastema in up to 35% of cases, which typically reduces to about 5% in permanent dentition as arches develop. Crowding is less apparent in primary dentition due to natural spacing but increases significantly to around 39% in permanent dentition, while posterior crossbites decrease from 14% to 7% as the jaws mature. In primary dentition, signs like anterior open bites or excessive overjets may be transient and linked to habits, often self-correcting, whereas permanent dentition reveals more persistent structural irregularities.

Functional and Aesthetic Impacts

Malocclusion impairs masticatory efficiency by reducing the occlusal contact area and altering bite force distribution, leading to difficulties in chewing tougher foods and prolonged meal times. Children with malocclusions exhibit lower chewing efficiency compared to those with normal occlusion, often resulting in inadequate food breakdown and nutritional challenges, potentially contributing to downstream digestive issues such as indigestion, bloating, and reduced nutrient absorption. Severe malocclusions further exacerbate this by associating with diminished quality of life due to persistent masticatory limitations. Mouth breathing is also common, potentially due to nasal obstruction or altered tongue posture. Speech impediments, such as lisping, frequently arise from protrusive or malpositioned anterior teeth that disrupt tongue placement during articulation, particularly affecting sounds like 's' in Class II malocclusions with midline diastema. In Class III malocclusions, speech distortions occur up to 18 times more often than in the general population, stemming from altered jaw positioning that hinders precise phonation. Anterior open bite malocclusions commonly cause interdental lisping by positioning the tongue tip anteriorly against the alveolar ridge. Individuals with malocclusion face an elevated risk of dental trauma, especially from increased overjet, which exposes maxillary incisors to injury during falls or impacts, raising trauma odds by up to 64% in affected children. Malocclusions like protrusive incisors significantly correlate with higher prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in primary and permanent dentitions. Pain-related issues, including discomfort during biting and jaw fatigue, often manifest as precursors to temporomandibular disorders (TMD), with deep bites and open bites serving as risk factors for joint sounds, movement difficulties, and muscle strain. Recent 2025 analyses confirm that occlusal discrepancies in malocclusion heighten TMD symptom severity, including jaw fatigue and pain, particularly in cases with high jaw functional limitation. Aesthetically, malocclusion disrupts facial harmony by creating imbalances such as convex or concave profiles, which negatively influence smile attractiveness and overall dentofacial appearance. Altered tooth alignment and jaw protrusion diminish perceived facial aesthetics, leading to self-consciousness about one's smile during social interactions. Over the long term, malocclusion accelerates tooth wear through uneven occlusal forces, causing excessive enamel loss on affected surfaces, as observed in Class II Division 2 cases where mandibular incisors exhibit pronounced labial wear. It also induces periodontal strain by promoting plaque retention in crowded or misaligned areas, increasing the risk of gingival inflammation and attachment loss. Such chronic biomechanical stress from malocclusion contributes to periodontal breakdown, particularly when hygiene maintenance is compromised by irregular tooth positions.

Diagnosis and Classification

Diagnostic Approaches

Diagnosis of malocclusion begins with a thorough clinical examination, which includes intraoral assessment to evaluate tooth alignment, occlusion, and soft tissue conditions, as well as extraoral facial analysis to assess symmetry, profile, and proportions. This process involves measuring key parameters such as overjet and overbite using precise tools like rulers or digital calipers to quantify horizontal and vertical discrepancies between the upper and lower teeth. During the intraoral evaluation, clinicians inspect for deviations in arch form, crowding, spacing, and midline alignment, while facial analysis incorporates visual and tactile checks for skeletal harmony and lip competence. Imaging techniques play a crucial role in confirming clinical findings and providing detailed skeletal and dental information. Cephalometric radiographs are standard for analyzing skeletal relationships, such as the anteroposterior and vertical positions of the jaws relative to cranial structures, using standardized landmarks and measurements. Panoramic X-rays offer a broad overview of tooth positions, eruption patterns, and potential impactions across the entire dentition, making them essential for initial screening. For complex cases involving asymmetry or three-dimensional discrepancies, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides high-resolution 3D images that allow for accurate volumetric assessment of bone and tooth structures with lower radiation doses compared to traditional CT. Study models, whether traditional plaster casts or digital scans obtained via intraoral scanners, enable precise evaluation of dental arch forms, occlusal relationships, and space analysis. These models facilitate measurements of arch width, length, and tooth angulations, aiding in the visualization of malocclusion patterns from multiple angles. Digital models, in particular, support software-based simulations for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, often integrated with imaging data for comprehensive planning. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced automated tools for early detection of malocclusion in children, leveraging machine learning algorithms to analyze cephalometric images or digital models with high accuracy, often exceeding 80-90% in classifying skeletal discrepancies. These AI systems assist in processing large datasets to identify subtle patterns, facilitating timely interventions while reducing diagnostic variability among clinicians. Such technologies are increasingly applied in initial assessments that inform subsequent classification systems.

Angle's Classification System

Angle's classification system, introduced by Edward H. Angle in 1899, serves as a foundational framework for categorizing malocclusions based on the anteroposterior relationship between the permanent first molars of the maxilla and mandible. The system uses the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar as key landmarks to define normal occlusion and deviations therefrom. This molar-centric approach emphasizes the mesiodistal position, providing a standardized method to identify sagittal discrepancies that guide initial orthodontic assessment. The core classes are distinguished as follows: Class I malocclusion occurs when the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar occludes in the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar, indicating a normal mesiodistal molar relationship, though it may include dental irregularities such as crowding or spacing. Class II malocclusion features a retrognathic mandible relative to the maxilla, with the mesiobuccal cusp positioned anterior to the buccal groove, often resulting in a convex facial profile. In contrast, Class III malocclusion reflects a prognathic mandible, where the mesiobuccal cusp lies posterior to the buccal groove, typically associated with a concave profile. These definitions establish a baseline for evaluating overall occlusal harmony. Subdivisions refine the classification, particularly for Class II, to account for incisor inclinations. Class II Division 1 is defined by proclined maxillary incisors, leading to an increased overjet (often exceeding 6 mm) and a deep overbite, with the upper lip frequently incompetent at rest. Class II Division 2, conversely, involves retroclined maxillary central incisors—often tipped palatally and covered by the lower lip—with lateral incisors that may be upright or proclined, resulting in a reduced overjet and normal or increased overbite. Class I and Class III typically lack formal subdivisions in the original system, though asymmetric cases may be noted as such. The system's strengths lie in its simplicity and reproducibility, facilitating quick clinical communication and serving as a universal reference point that remains integral to orthodontic education and practice over a century later. However, limitations include its exclusive focus on dental (molar) relationships in the sagittal plane, overlooking underlying skeletal discrepancies, vertical overbite variations, transverse arch discrepancies, and soft tissue influences, which can lead to incomplete characterization of complex . This classification is typically integrated into diagnostic workflows through intraoral examinations and cephalometric radiographs to confirm molar positions.

Alternative Classification Systems

Several alternative classification systems have been developed to address the limitations of traditional molar-based approaches, particularly by emphasizing anterior tooth relationships and skeletal patterns for more precise anteroposterior assessments. The incisor classification, notably the British Standards Institute (BSI) system established in 1983, categorizes malocclusion based on the relationship between the lower incisor edges and the upper incisor cingulum plateau, incorporating overjet measurements and incisor angulation. In Class I, the lower incisor edges occlude with or lie immediately below the cingulum plateau of the upper incisors, typically with an overjet of 2-3 mm. Class II Division 1 features the lower incisor edges posterior to the cingulum plateau, with proclined or normally inclined upper incisors and an increased overjet exceeding 3.5 mm, often indicating anterior discrepancies. Class II Division 2 involves retroclined upper incisors with a reduced or normal overjet of up to 3.5 mm. Class III occurs when the lower incisor edges lie anterior to the cingulum plateau, resulting in a positive overjet less than 2 mm, edge-to-edge contact, or a reverse overjet. This system is particularly useful for evaluating anterior aesthetic and functional issues, offering greater reproducibility in diagnosis compared to molar-focused methods. Ricketts' canine relationship classification provides an alternative anteroposterior assessment by focusing on the alignment of canine cusps and interproximal spaces, enhancing accuracy in mixed dentition cases. In Class I, the mesial slope of the upper canine coincides with the distal slope of the lower canine. Class II is characterized by the mesial slope of the upper canine positioned anterior to the distal slope of the lower canine, often by a half or full cusp width. Class III features the mesial slope of the upper canine posterior to the distal slope of the lower canine. This method emphasizes canine cusp-to-interproximal alignments, making it valuable for treatment planning in discrepancies not fully captured by incisor or molar evaluations. Other systems, such as expanded skeletal classifications, integrate cephalometric analysis to evaluate jaw relationships in three dimensions. For instance, a revisited skeletal framework divides patterns into Class I (harmonious maxilla-mandible growth with a straight profile), Class II (convex profile due to mandibular retrusion, maxillary protrusion, or both), and Class III (concave profile from maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion, or combination), using cephalometric landmarks to assess sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes. These approaches address multidimensional skeletal discrepancies, providing a more comprehensive diagnostic tool than two-dimensional models. Recent developments as of 2025 incorporate digital imaging and artificial intelligence to create hybrid classification systems, combining traditional dental relationships with 3D cephalometric and intraoral scan data for automated assessments. Deep learning models, such as the Edge-Region Fusion Swin Transformer, achieve weighted F1-scores of 0.87-0.90 in classifying molar, canine, and anterior overbite relationships from intraoral photographs, enabling objective detection of malocclusion types and integration with cone-beam computed tomography for precise skeletal analysis. These hybrid methods improve diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in orthodontic planning by fusing 2D clinical images with 3D skeletal metrics.

Specific Types of Malocclusion

Class I Malocclusion

Class I malocclusion, as defined in Angle's classification system, features a normal anteroposterior relationship between the maxillary and mandibular first permanent molars, where the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar aligns with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. This neutral molar occlusion, also known as neutroclusion, serves as the foundational "normal" relationship but is classified as malocclusion when accompanied by irregularities in the alignment or positioning of other teeth. Key characteristics of Class I malocclusion include a preserved molar relationship alongside various dental discrepancies, such as crowding, spacing, or rotations of teeth, which disrupt the overall dental arch harmony. Crowding occurs when there is insufficient space in the dental arch for proper tooth alignment, leading to overlapping or tilted teeth, while spacing refers to gaps between teeth due to excess arch length. Rotations involve teeth that are turned around their long axis, often contributing to aesthetic and functional issues within this otherwise neutral framework. These features typically arise from discrepancies in tooth size or arch dimensions, affecting up to 70% of cases and making Class I the most prevalent type. Subtypes of Class I malocclusion further delineate specific variations while maintaining the neutral molar base. For instance, one subtype involves protruded maxillary incisors, where the upper front teeth extend forward excessively, potentially impacting lip competence. Another subtype includes anterior crossbites, characterized by the lower anterior teeth occluding lingual to the upper anteriors, often limited to the incisor region without altering the molar class. Deep bites, where the upper incisors excessively overlap the lower ones vertically (typically more than 3-4 mm), also commonly occur within Class I, leading to reduced incisal guidance and possible gingival trauma. These subtypes highlight the diversity of dental misalignments possible under neutral molar occlusion. Diagnosis of Class I malocclusion emphasizes identifying these dental irregularities beyond the molar relationship, often employing tools like the to assess tooth size discrepancies. The calculates anterior and overall ratios of mesiodistal tooth widths between the maxillary and mandibular arches, with ideal values of 77.2% for the anterior segment and 91.3% overall; deviations can indicate underlying issues contributing to crowding or spacing in Class I cases. This quantitative approach aids in precise evaluation and planning for alignment corrections.

Class II Malocclusion

Class II malocclusion, according to Angle's classification system, is defined by a distal relationship of the mandibular first permanent molar to the maxillary first permanent molar, resulting in a Class II molar occlusion. This condition encompasses a range of dento-skeletal discrepancies characterized by retrognathic patterns, where the mandible is positioned posteriorly relative to the maxilla. It is further subdivided into Division 1 and Division 2 based on the inclination of the maxillary incisors and associated dental features. In Class II Division 1 malocclusion, the maxillary incisors are typically proclined, leading to an increased overjet that often exceeds 6 mm, which contributes to a convex facial profile due to the anterior positioning of the upper lip and teeth. This division reflects a dentoalveolar compensation where the upper anterior teeth migrate forward, exacerbating the anteroposterior discrepancy. In contrast, Class II Division 2 malocclusion features retroclined maxillary central incisors with lateral incisors that may be upright or slightly proclined, resulting in a reduced overjet of approximately 3 mm and a straighter or mildly convex profile. These incisor positions are accompanied by a deep bite tendency, where the lower incisors contact the palatal mucosa or gingival tissue of the upper incisors. Skeletally, Class II malocclusion often involves mandibular retrognathia, where the mandible is underdeveloped in the sagittal plane, or relative maxillary prognathism, leading to an imbalance in jaw positioning. Cephalometric evaluations, such as those using Steiner's analysis, confirm this through an increased ANB angle greater than 4°, indicating a skeletal Class II relationship beyond normal norms (typically 2°). These skeletal patterns can vary in severity, with mandibular retrognathia being more prevalent in many cases. The prevalence of Class II malocclusion ranges from 10% to 25% in the general population, with higher rates observed among females, where it accounts for up to 21.5% compared to 6.6% in males in certain cohorts. Etiologically, it has a genetic component, as evidenced by 2024 studies identifying associations with polymorphisms in the PAX9 gene (rs8004560), where the heterozygous AG genotype increases susceptibility to Division 2 patterns (odds ratio 4.38). These findings highlight hereditary influences on craniofacial morphogenesis, particularly in familial pedigrees showing inherited retrognathic traits.

Class III Malocclusion

Class III malocclusion, as defined in Angle's classification system, features the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar occluding mesially to the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar. This condition is characterized by mandibular prognathism relative to the maxilla, maxillary retrusion, or a combination of both, often resulting in a concave facial profile and anterior crossbite with edge-to-edge or reverse overjet incisor relationships. Subtypes of Class III malocclusion include true skeletal Class III, which arises from inherent discrepancies in jaw growth, and pseudo-Class III, involving a functional mandibular shift due to premature contact of the incisors that displaces the mandible forward upon closure. In pseudo-Class III cases, the mandible can often be repositioned posteriorly to an edge-to-edge incisor relationship, distinguishing it from the fixed skeletal pattern of true Class III. The prevalence of Class III malocclusion ranges from 5% to 15% globally, with notably higher rates in Asian populations, reaching up to 15.8% in Southeast Asian groups such as Chinese and Malaysian individuals. It exhibits strong genetic links, with familial recurrence and evidence of autosomal dominant inheritance patterns, as supported by studies identifying specific genetic mutations associated with mandibular prognathism. A 2025 expert consensus emphasizes the genetic underpinnings and advocates for early intervention to mitigate progression in affected populations. Diagnosis relies on cephalometric markers such as a negative ANB angle, indicating maxillary retrusion or mandibular protrusion, and a negative Wits appraisal, which measures the anteroposterior jaw relationship relative to the occlusal plane. These indicators help quantify the severity of the skeletal discrepancy in Class III cases.

Associated Conditions

Tooth Crowding and Spacing

Tooth crowding refers to the overlapping or displacement of teeth within the dental arch due to an arch length deficiency, where the available space is insufficient for proper alignment. This condition arises when the combined mesiodistal widths of the teeth exceed the arch perimeter, leading to rotations, inclinations, or impingements. Severity is typically assessed by the degree of discrepancy: mild crowding involves less than 4 mm of space shortage, while severe crowding exceeds 4 mm, often requiring more intensive intervention to resolve positional conflicts. Common causes of crowding include developmental factors such as delayed exfoliation of primary teeth, which can hinder the timely eruption of permanent successors and contribute to space loss in the arch. This delay may stem from ankylosis or pathological conditions affecting root resorption, resulting in persistent primary teeth that occupy space needed for erupting permanents. Crowding frequently manifests during the mixed dentition phase, exacerbating misalignment if not addressed early. In contrast, tooth spacing involves gaps or separations between teeth, often termed diastemas when localized, particularly between the maxillary central incisors. These occur due to arch excess, where the dental arch perimeter surpasses the total tooth widths, creating unoccupied spaces that prevent ideal contact points. Such spacing is commonly observed in the anterior region and may result from habits like thumb-sucking or discrepancies in growth timing, though it can also appear physiologically during early eruption before self-correction. Measurement of crowding and spacing relies on arch perimeter analysis, which calculates the total available arch length by measuring the perimeter from the mesial contact of the first molars around the arch, subtracting the summed mesiodistal tooth widths to determine the discrepancy. This method, often performed on dental models or digital scans, quantifies space availability and guides orthodontic planning. Prevalence of crowding among adolescents is estimated at 20-30% in various populations, with higher rates in urban settings influenced by dietary and environmental factors. Crowding poses significant impacts on oral health, including compromised hygiene due to difficulties in plaque removal from interproximal areas, elevating risks of caries and periodontal disease. Additionally, it heightens the risk of tooth impaction, where permanent teeth fail to erupt properly, potentially leading to ectopic positions or cysts, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring. Spacing, while less obstructive to hygiene, can contribute to phonetic issues or food impaction in gaps, though its primary concern is aesthetic. Crowding and spacing discrepancies are notably prevalent in Class I malocclusion, where dental alignment issues predominate without major skeletal involvement.

Tooth Size Discrepancies

Tooth size discrepancies refer to mismatches in the mesiodistal dimensions of individual teeth or between the maxillary and mandibular arches, which can disrupt proper occlusion and alignment in malocclusion cases. The most widely used framework for assessing these discrepancies is the Bolton analysis, introduced in 1958, which quantifies the ratios of tooth widths to predict interarch compatibility. This analysis includes two primary types: the overall ratio, comparing the sum of mesiodistal widths of all 12 maxillary teeth to the 12 mandibular teeth, and the anterior ratio, focusing on the six anterior teeth per arch. Ideal values, derived from subjects with excellent occlusion, are an overall ratio of 91.3% (±1.91%)—indicating the mandibular arch is slightly larger—and an anterior ratio of 77.2% (±1.65%). Discrepancies exceeding these standard deviations (typically >2 mm) signify clinically significant mismatches that may hinder orthodontic outcomes. These discrepancies often arise from developmental anomalies affecting tooth size. Genetic factors, such as mutations influencing odontogenesis, can lead to microdontia (abnormally small teeth) or macrodontia (abnormally large teeth), altering overall arch harmony. For instance, microdontia may occur in conditions like congenital syndromes, while macrodontia is linked to pituitary disorders or familial traits. Environmental influences, including —a defect in enamel formation due to nutritional deficiencies, infections, or trauma during tooth development—can further reduce crown dimensions, exacerbating size imbalances. Such causes are multifactorial, with playing a dominant role in isolated cases of size variation. Diagnosis typically involves precise measurement of widths to evaluate ratios and their impact on occlusal stability. Digital methods, such as intraoral scanning and 3D model analysis software, offer high reliability for assessing mesiodistal dimensions, often surpassing manual caliper techniques in accuracy and reproducibility. These tools allow clinicians to quantify discrepancies and predict post-treatment alignment issues, as unbalanced ratios can lead to unstable intercuspation and relapse in orthodontic corrections. For example, a mandibular excess exceeding 2 mm may cause anterior spacing, while maxillary excess contributes to posterior interferences. Prevalence of clinically significant tooth size discrepancies ranges from 20% to 30% among orthodontic patients, varying by malocclusion type, with higher rates observed in Class III cases. These discrepancies are frequently associated with the need for extractions in treatment planning, as removals can alter ratios and either create or resolve imbalances depending on the initial presentation. In orthodontic cohorts, such mismatches often interplay with crowding by amplifying space deficiencies when sizes do not match arch form.

Deep Bite and Open Bite

Deep bite, also known as excessive , is a vertical malocclusion characterized by the upper incisors overlapping the lower incisors by more than 4 mm in centric occlusion, often resulting in impingement or trauma to the palatal soft tissues by the lower incisors. This condition is frequently associated with low mandibular plane angle growth patterns, indicative of a short height, where the exhibits reduced vertical development relative to the . Deep bite can occur in conjunction with Class II division 2 malocclusion, though it is also observed across other classifications. Open bite represents the opposite end of the vertical dimension spectrum, defined as a lack of vertical overlap or contact between the upper and lower teeth, either anteriorly (most common) or posteriorly, leading to gaps that impair occlusion. Anterior open bite typically arises from habits such as thrusting or , which exert disruptive forces on the during growth, while posterior open bite may stem from unilateral habits or condylar . This malocclusion is often linked to high mandibular plane angle patterns, reflecting a long facial height with excessive vertical maxillary growth. The of these vertical malocclusions can be broadly categorized as skeletal, involving divergent facial growth patterns (short face for deep bite versus long face for open bite), or dental, due to localized or intrusion of teeth influenced by environmental factors like oral habits. Prevalence varies by population and age, with deep bite affecting approximately 15-21% of individuals worldwide and open bite ranging from 1.5-11% for anterior cases, though combined vertical discrepancies occur in 10-20% of orthodontic patients overall. Recent studies from 2024-2025 highlight associations between altered breathing patterns, such as , and the development of open bite, where nasal obstruction promotes positioning that exacerbates vertical discrepancies.

Treatment Options

Non-Surgical Orthodontic Interventions

Non-surgical orthodontic interventions form the cornerstone of malocclusion treatment, employing a range of appliances to realign teeth and jaws through controlled forces without invasive procedures. These methods are effective for mild to moderate skeletal and dental discrepancies, prioritizing patient compliance and gradual biomechanical adjustments to achieve stable occlusion. Fixed appliances, such as conventional braces, involve metal or ceramic brackets cemented to the teeth and archwires that apply continuous pressure to shift teeth into alignment over time. Intermaxillary elastics, often integrated with braces, provide targeted traction between the upper and lower jaws to correct anteroposterior relationships, particularly by distalizing the maxillary relative to the in Class II cases. These elastics are low-cost, easily adjustable, and widely used across malocclusion types due to their ability to enhance sagittal correction without relying on patient growth alone. Removable appliances offer versatility for growth modification and retention, allowing patients to remove them for eating and oral hygiene. Functional appliances, such as the Herbst or Twin Block devices, are removable or fixed intraoral appliances used primarily in growing patients to correct Class II malocclusions by advancing the or restraining maxillary growth, often worn full-time for 12-24 months. devices, worn extraorally for 12-14 hours daily, deliver orthopedic forces to restrain maxillary growth in Class II malocclusion or protract the in Class III cases during mixed . Retainers, such as Hawley or vacuum-formed types, stabilize post-alignment positions but also serve as active appliances for minor corrections in early stages. Compliance is critical for success, as inconsistent wear can prolong treatment or reduce efficacy. Clear aligner systems, exemplified by Invisalign, utilize a series of custom-fabricated trays that patients change every 1-2 weeks to incrementally guide tooth movement, ideal for mild to moderate malocclusions with aesthetic advantages over fixed options. Recent 2024 advancements in digital planning, including AI-assisted simulations and for precise tray fabrication, have improved predictability for complex movements like rotations and extrusions. These interventions apply to various classes, such as mandibular advancement features in aligners for Class II correction. Treatment duration typically spans 1-3 years, structured in phases: initial alignment in mixed dentition to address emerging discrepancies, active correction of alignment and occlusion, and retention to maintain results. Mixed dentition interventions, often using removable or partial fixed appliances, aim to guide development and prevent progression of crowding or bite issues. Factors like malocclusion severity and age influence timelines, with comprehensive phases averaging 18-30 months for non-surgical cases.

Surgical Treatments

Surgical treatments for malocclusion primarily involve to correct severe skeletal discrepancies that cannot be adequately addressed by orthodontic means alone. These procedures reposition the and/or to achieve proper alignment, improve occlusion, and enhance facial aesthetics and function. is typically indicated for adults with significant skeletal malocclusions, such as those exceeding 8 mm in anteroposterior discrepancy, particularly in severe Class III cases where mandibular or maxillary deficiency predominates. Key procedures include the Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for mandibular repositioning. The Le Fort I osteotomy involves a horizontal cut above the teeth to mobilize the , allowing advancement, setback, or vertical adjustments to correct or associated with malocclusion. BSSO, the most common mandibular procedure, splits the bilaterally along the to enable advancement, setback, or rotation, addressing mandibular excess or deficiency. These surgeries are often performed in combination for bimaxillary correction and require preoperative orthodontic decompensation to align teeth with the planned skeletal positions, though surgery-first approaches—where surgery precedes orthodontics—have gained traction in recent years for faster overall treatment and improved patient satisfaction. Case selection emphasizes post-growth adults, typically after age 18 for females and 20 for males, to ensure skeletal stability, with playing a central role in planning. Cephalometric radiographs and tracings predict surgical movements, assess changes, and guide precise osteotomies using measurements like the sella-nasion-A point angle for maxillary position and pogonion to perpendicular for mandibular projection. Digital tools enhance accuracy in 2025 trends, integrating 3D imaging for virtual simulations. Risks associated with these procedures include damage, leading to temporary or permanent sensory disturbances in the lower lip and chin, with incidences reported up to 22.8% at one year post-surgery, though most resolve within months. rates range from 5-10% for skeletal movements, influenced by surgical technique, fixation methods, and patient factors like muscle . Other potential complications involve , unfavorable fractures during BSSO (bad splits in 2-5% of cases), and prolonged , underscoring the need for multidisciplinary care.

Adjunctive Therapies

Adjunctive therapies in malocclusion treatment encompass supportive interventions that address specific contributing factors, such as dental crowding, detrimental oral habits, and discomfort during primary orthodontic procedures. These therapies are integrated alongside core orthodontic interventions to enhance outcomes and patient compliance. Extractions, particularly of , serve as an adjunctive measure to relieve severe crowding in malocclusion cases by creating space for alignment of remaining teeth. This approach is especially effective in Class I malocclusions with significant arch length discrepancies, allowing for more stable positioning without excessive reliance on mechanical expansion. Serial extraction protocols, involving the timed removal of primary and , are typically initiated during the mixed stage—around ages 8 to 11—to guide eruption patterns and prevent progression of crowding into . Premolar extractions in this phase facilitate spontaneous alignment adjustments, reducing the need for extensive fixed appliance therapy later. Habit appliances, such as tongue cribs, are employed to correct and other parafunctional behaviors that exacerbate malocclusion, particularly anterior open bites. These fixed intraoral devices provide a physical barrier to discourage improper tongue positioning during and rest, promoting proper muscle retraining and dentoskeletal adaptation. In mandibular applications during mixed dentition, tongue cribs have demonstrated efficacy in impeding thrust while stimulating forward mandibular growth. A modified tongue crib design can also address associated issues like digit-sucking, offering a multifaceted restraint for cessation. Myofunctional therapy involves targeted exercises to restore orofacial muscle balance, aiding in the correction of malocclusion-related dysfunctions such as abnormal patterns or low posture. These exercises focus on strengthening and coordinating muscles of the , , and cheeks to support stable occlusion and prevent relapse. According to the 2024 American Academy of best practices, myofunctional therapy is recommended as an adjunct for managing habits impacting dentofacial development, based on expert consensus due to limited high-level evidence from recent literature. Emerging reviews indicate potential benefits in improving occlusal stability when combined with , though further randomized trials are needed to substantiate efficacy. Pharmacological adjuncts primarily target during orthodontic activation, ensuring patient comfort and adherence to treatment. Nonsteroidal drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, and acetaminophen are commonly prescribed, with evidence showing superior pain reduction compared to in the first few days post-adjustment. A Cochrane confirms that analgesics effectively mitigate orthodontic discomfort without compromising movement rates. These interventions are tailored to individual pain thresholds, with over-the-counter options prioritized for mild cases.

Complications and Prognosis

Temporomandibular Disorders

Class III malocclusion is associated with an elevated risk of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) through mechanisms involving uneven loading on the (TMJ), which disrupts normal and contributes to joint . Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that individuals with Class II and Class III malocclusions exhibit a higher prevalence of TMD-related pain compared to those with Class I occlusion, particularly in children and adolescents where posterior crossbite and skeletal discrepancies exacerbate the risk. This association is supported by cross-sectional studies showing higher rates of and disc displacement in malocclusion cohorts, with Class III cases often presenting with adaptive osseous changes in the TMJ due to prolonged functional loading imbalances. Common symptoms of TMD linked to Class III malocclusion include TMJ pain, audible clicking or popping during jaw movement, and restricted mouth opening, frequently attributed to anterior disc displacement with or without reduction. These manifestations arise from the protrusive mandibular position in Class III, which alters condylar positioning and leads to intermittent joint locking or grating sensations upon function. Pain is typically aggravated by or yawning, and limited interincisal opening (often below 35 mm) reflects muscle guarding or disc interference, distinguishing these from isolated malocclusion effects. The primary mechanisms connecting Class III malocclusion to TMD involve , which induces uneven force distribution across the TMJ and triggers compensatory muscle hyperactivity in the masticatory system. In Class III configurations, the anterior crossbite and create asymmetric loading on the condyles, promoting disc displacement and degenerative changes over time, as evidenced by biomechanical analyses of spaces. This fosters hyperactivity in muscles such as the masseter and temporalis, leading to fatigue and pain through sustained elevated electromyographic activity during occlusion. Skeletal misalignments in Class III further amplify neuromuscular adaptations, perpetuating a cycle of stress and inflammation. Diagnostic evaluation of TMD in the context of Class III malocclusion relies on standardized tools like the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), now evolved into the Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD), which integrate Axis I physical assessments with Axis II factors. These criteria facilitate identification of overlapping features, such as myofascial or disc derangements, by combining self-reported symptoms with clinical exams of mobility, sounds, and tenderness, ensuring differentiation from pure malocclusive traits. High reliability in diagnosing TMD subtypes (e.g., 0.70-0.90 values) supports their use in orthodontic populations with Class III discrepancies.

Psychological and Social Effects

Malocclusion has been associated with elevated levels of anxiety and depression, particularly in adolescents and individuals with severe cases. A comprehensive indicates that up to 34.1% of adolescents with malocclusion experience severe anxiety, with severity correlating positively to orthodontic treatment need indices such as the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) (p ≤ 0.0001). Similarly, depression prevalence reaches 28.3% among orthodontic patients, rising to 39.6% in those with Class III malocclusion compared to 22.4% in Class I cases (p = 0.003). Body image disturbances are another key psychological consequence, as malocclusion alters facial aesthetics and contributes to negative self-perception. Adolescents with malocclusion often report heightened dissatisfaction with their dental appearance, which exacerbates distress and influences overall . These issues stem from aesthetic impacts that affect during formative years. On the social front, children and adolescents with conspicuous malocclusion face increased risk of , primarily verbal in nature, such as name-calling related to protruding teeth or spacing. Systematic reviews confirm this link, with 88% of studies showing associations between malocclusion traits like prominent maxillary incisors and peer victimization, affecting up to 100% of cases in some samples. In adulthood, aesthetic concerns from malocclusion can lead to employment biases, where individuals are perceived as less intelligent and up to 52% less likely to be hired for roles involving public interaction. Longitudinal evidence underscores these effects, demonstrating that malocclusion negatively influences over time, with improvements observed following correction in multiple studies. A synthesis of research reveals that 37.5% of investigations report significant self-esteem gains post-intervention, highlighting the persistent psychological burden of untreated conditions. Emerging data further emphasize impacts on , as measured by tools like the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), where malocclusion correlates with higher scores in psychological discomfort and disability domains. For instance, individuals with severe malocclusion exhibit statistically elevated OHIP scores across subscales, indicating broader emotional and social impairments.

Prognosis

The prognosis for malocclusion-related complications varies by severity, type, and timeliness of intervention. Untreated severe malocclusion can lead to long-term effects, including accelerated (observed over 20-year periods in certain classes like increased overjet), chronic TMJ degeneration, and persistent periodontal issues. Early orthodontic treatment during childhood or often improves outcomes, reducing TMD risk by 50-70% in responsive cases and mitigating psychological impacts through enhanced aesthetics and function. Surgical interventions for skeletal discrepancies yield favorable long-term stability in 80-90% of Class II/III cases, preventing further complications when combined with . Mild cases generally have excellent prognosis with minimal intervention, while untreated severe forms may result in irreversible changes or social withdrawal.

Prevention and Early Intervention

Preventive Strategies

Maintaining optimal is a foundational preventive strategy against malocclusion, as it helps prevent caries and premature that can disrupt arch development and lead to crowding or spacing issues. Regular brushing with fluoride toothpaste strengthens enamel and reduces the risk of early decay, thereby preserving primary integrity essential for proper jaw alignment. A balanced diet rich in calcium, , vitamins, and other nutrients supports healthy jaw bone growth and , promoting balanced craniofacial development during childhood. Cessation of detrimental oral habits, particularly nonnutritive sucking such as thumb-sucking, is critical to avert malocclusion, with intervention recommended before age 3 years to minimize risks of anterior open bite or posterior crossbite. Early parental guidance and behavioral techniques can effectively discourage these habits, allowing normal occlusal patterns to emerge without interference. Routine dental check-ups during primary stages enable early detection of potential issues like ectopic eruption or space discrepancies, facilitating timely preventive measures to guide proper occlusion. These examinations, ideally conducted at least biannually, allow clinicians to monitor growth and intervene non-invasively if needed. initiatives, including orthodontic screening programs aligned with 2024 expert consensus guidelines, promote widespread early identification of malocclusion risks through community-based assessments and education on preventive care. Such programs emphasize integrating oral health surveillance into pediatric healthcare to reduce the overall incidence of severe occlusal deviations.

Timing of Early Treatment

The American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) recommends that children receive their first orthodontic evaluation no later than age 7, as this allows for early detection of malocclusion and timely intervention if developmental issues are present. This screening age aligns with the emergence of the first permanent molars and incisors, providing orthodontists an opportunity to assess jaw growth, tooth eruption patterns, and potential skeletal discrepancies before problems worsen. Early treatment, often termed interceptive orthodontics, is typically initiated during the mixed dentition phase (approximately ages 7-11), when some primary teeth remain alongside erupting permanent teeth, enabling guidance of skeletal and dental development with minimal invasiveness. Timing of early treatment varies by malocclusion type and severity, emphasizing the importance of individualized assessment over a one-size-fits-all approach. For Class III malocclusions, characterized by mandibular or maxillary retrusion, intervention is ideally pursued in the deciduous phase (ages 4-6) or early mixed (before age 10) to capitalize on maxillary protraction potential and reduce the likelihood of future . Studies indicate that facemask therapy combined with rapid yields optimal skeletal effects when started around age 5, achieving up to 4 mm of maxillary advancement during peak growth periods. In contrast, for Class II malocclusions involving mandibular retrognathia, early treatment in the mixed (ages 8-10) may address habits like thumb-sucking or create space for arch development, but evidence suggests superior skeletal correction often occurs at or post-puberty (ages 11-13 for girls, 12-14 for boys), potentially shortening overall treatment duration compared to prepubertal initiation. For Class I malocclusions with crowding or spacing issues, early intervention focuses on the mixed to guide eruption and prevent impactions, typically between ages 7-9, using appliances like expanders or space maintainers. A scoping review of orthodontic literature highlights that while early treatment does not universally reduce total treatment time or cost across all cases, it provides psychosocial benefits—such as improved —and mitigates risks like trauma to protruding incisors when addressing moderate to severe discrepancies before age 10. Overall, the decision to proceed with early treatment hinges on , growth stage (e.g., via hand-wrist radiographs), and clinical judgment, with many cases entering a two-phase protocol: initial guidance followed by comprehensive fixed appliance in permanent (ages 12-14). Delaying beyond the mixed phase may necessitate more complex interventions later, underscoring the value of proactive monitoring from age 7.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592395/
  2. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22010-malocclusion
  3. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001058.htm
  4. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/dental-disorders/symptoms-of-dental-and-oral-disorders/malocclusion
  5. https://www.dentalcare.com/en-us/ce-courses/ce500/occlusion
  6. https://bos.org.uk/museum-and-archive/appliances-and-equipment/fixed-appliances/edward-h-angle/
  7. https://forestray.dentist/kb/malocclusion/
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=mesh&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=%2522Dentition%2522%255BMeSH%2BTerms%255D
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4897236/
  10. https://europepmc.org/article/med/32567942
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11241413/
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9223594/
  13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20101058211000779
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22900-x
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11958775/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6340198/
  17. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=141290
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7938796/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7456624/
  20. https://www.cureus.com/articles/310412-influence-of-oral-habits-on-pediatric-malocclusion-etiology-and-preventive-approaches
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18302463/
  22. https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/TwpfKq3RKwsh8fNBm7VF5mh/?lang=en
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11945532/
  24. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/4/413
  25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-023-02907-5
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11279028/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11906286/
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71772-7
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6016584/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10608728/
  31. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/2/254
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394267381_ROLE_OF_GENETICS_IN_MALOCCLUSION
  33. https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/45/6/868/7325256
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11617490/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3208338/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8375930/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10526017/
  38. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.7123221
  39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38239150/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449235/
  41. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/12/3463
  42. https://www.ejpd.eu/wp-content/pdf/EJPD_2020_21_2_05.pdf
  43. https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/29/suppl_1/i89/557498
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12348602/
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20578873/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34985577/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11245716/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9127721/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328410/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26481880/
  51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21794080/
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8358361/
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40869440/
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40879224/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8690352/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4055094/
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9160782/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7305683/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8600198/
  60. https://pocketdentistry.com/the-orthodontic-patient-examination-and-diagnosis/
  61. https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_developdentition.pdf
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11958731/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4273277/
  64. https://ijodr.com/archive/volume/8/issue/4/article/4934
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475453/
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006122
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12569338/
  68. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dencos/acf8385.0041.001/267:56
  69. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1282
  70. https://www.wjoud.com/doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1132
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334406161_Classification_of_Skeletal_and_Dental_Malocclusion_Revisited
  72. https://pocketdentistry.com/10-classification-of-malocclusion/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12478310/
  74. https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-024-04779-5
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10475314/
  76. https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-023-03185-7
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11994211/
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/class-ii-malocclusion
  79. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6373/5/2/46
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4697238/
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-93343-0
  82. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623000476
  83. https://ijodr.com/archive/volume/9/issue/2/article/4961
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655015/
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/class-iii-malocclusion
  86. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41368-025-00357-9
  87. https://dentistry.hsc.wvu.edu/media/1179/treatment-class-iii-problems-begin-differential-diagnosis-an-class-iii.pdf
  88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365076600_Orthodontic_Management_of_Pseudo_Class_III_Malocclusion_A_Case_Report
  89. https://www.academia.edu/14615084/A_Missense_Mutation_in_DUSP6_is_Associated_with_Class_III_Malocclusion
  90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7880400_Class_-_III_malocclusion_Genetics_or_environment_A_twins_study
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12407943/
  92. https://www.analyzeceph.com/wits-analysis/
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S1991790221002464
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10222176/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/crowding-tooth
  96. https://publications.aap.org/pediatricsinreview/article/32/1/e4/32902/Delayed-Tooth-Emergence
  97. https://pocketdentistry.com/management-of-incisor-crowding/
  98. https://pocketdentistry.com/spacing-of-teeth/
  99. https://www.aapd.org/GLOBALASSETS/MEDIA/PUBLICATIONS/ARCHIVES/HUANG-17-03.PDF
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6927486/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464309/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3843590/
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398995/
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212443816300790
  105. https://support.clearcorrect.com/hc/en-us/articles/9475342864535-Understanding-Bolton-Analysis
  106. https://www.dentalcare.com/en-us/ce-courses/ce651/alterations-size-teeth
  107. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574555/
  108. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/enamel-hypoplasia
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9192175/
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4296636/
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354404891_Digital_analysis_of_tooth_sizes_among_individuals_with_different_malocclusions_A_study_using_three-dimensional_digital_dental_models
  112. https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article/28/5/491/492860
  113. https://angle-orthodontist.kglmeridian.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/angl/74/4/article-p508.xml
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4516072/
  115. https://ijodr.com/archive/volume/9/issue/3/article/4973
  116. https://pocketdentistry.com/etiology-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-deep-overbite/
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10608509/
  118. https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/publications/archives/ngan-19-02.pdf
  119. https://www.oatext.com/Open-bite-malocclusion-Analysis-of-the-underlying-components.php
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7323810/
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12498458/
  122. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/72
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6794968/
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365070/
  125. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23452973/
  126. https://aaoinfo.org/resources/glossary-of-orthodontic-terms/
  127. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/orthodontic-headgear
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8683054/
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734435/
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096594/
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12357539/
  132. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/releases-20240703
  133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12110745/
  134. http://www.belledental.org/procedures/orthodontics/orthodontic-treatment-phases/
  135. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn018
  136. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5083019/
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10474528/
  138. https://www.clinicsinsurgery.com/open-access/surgical-orthodontic-treatment-in-a-class-iii-patient-with-transversal-7845.pdf
  139. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564372/
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3805998/
  141. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12156840/
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3238557/
  143. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_66
  144. https://www.joms.org/article/S0278-2391%2815%2901574-8/fulltext
  145. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525849/
  146. https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/16/ELOCATOR/e187421062204181/FULLTEXT/
  147. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21457862/
  148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35201405/
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4504050/
  150. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37280305/
  151. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20209173/
  152. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37461777/
  153. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12001237/
  154. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29182798/
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5611706/
  156. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1550110/full
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355311/
  158. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tmj/symptoms-causes/syc-20350941
  159. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/dental-disorders/temporomandibular-disorders/internal-temporomandibular-joint-tmj-derangement
  160. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/5/791
  161. https://www.saspublishers.com/article/19062/download/
  162. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3157036/
  163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4478082/
  164. https://www.mdpi.com/2039-7283/15/3/44
  165. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-70482-4
  166. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37892353/
  167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10297497/
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7014893/
  169. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5620926/
  170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224006729
  171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1010518217302536
  172. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11021504/
  173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-024-00299-8
  174. https://aaoinfo.org/whats-trending/when-should-your-child-see-an-orthodontist/
  175. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10959601/
  176. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9191856/
  177. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.2.e22spe2
  178. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.105571
  179. https://aaoinfo.org/whats-trending/is-there-a-benefit-to-early-treatment/
  180. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28024779/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.