Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Lists of wind farms.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lists of wind farms
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
Lists of wind farms include:
Wind farms by country
[edit]- List of wind farms in Australia
- List of wind farms in Canada
- List of wind farms in China
- List of wind farms in Denmark
- List of wind farms in India
- List of wind farms in Iran
- List of wind farms in Japan
- List of wind farms in Jordan
- List of wind farms in Kosovo
- List of wind farms in Latvia
- List of wind farms in Lithuania
- List of wind farms in Morocco
- List of wind farms in the Republic of Ireland
- List of wind farms in Romania
- List of wind farms in South Africa
- List of wind farms in Sri Lanka
- List of wind farms in Sweden
- List of wind farms in Turkey
- List of wind farms in the United Kingdom
- List of wind farms in the United States
- List of wind farms in Uruguay
Offshore wind farms by country
[edit]- List of offshore wind farms in China
- List of offshore wind farms in Denmark
- List of offshore wind farms in Germany
- List of offshore wind farms in Japan
- List of offshore wind farms in the Netherlands
- List of offshore wind farms in Sweden
- List of offshore wind farms in the United Kingdom
- List of offshore wind farms in the United States
Offshore wind farms by body of water
[edit]See also
[edit]Lists of wind farms
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Onshore wind farms
By country
Lists of onshore wind farms organized by country provide detailed catalogs of land-based installations, typically drawing from databases like the Global Wind Power Tracker (GWPT) and The Wind Power, which track facilities by national jurisdiction, including operational status, capacity, and developer information. These lists focus on projects connected to national grids with capacities often exceeding 10 MW, excluding small-scale or distributed systems. Leading countries dominate global onshore deployment as of late 2024: China with approximately 479 GW across thousands of farms, primarily in northern and western provinces; the United States with 154 GW, concentrated in Texas (over 40 GW) and the Midwest; Germany with 64 GW, featuring dense installations in the north; India with 48 GW in southern and western states; and Spain with 31 GW. Other notable contributors include Brazil (34 GW), the United Kingdom (30 GW onshore), and Canada (15 GW). These country-specific compilations, also available on platforms like Wikipedia's "List of wind farms in [country]", aid in analyzing regional policies, such as China's five-year plans or the U.S. Production Tax Credit, and support grid planning amid rapid expansions.[1][2]By continent
Lists of onshore wind farms are classified by continent to capture regional deployment patterns, excluding Antarctica due to the absence of commercial operations. The primary continents considered are Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania, based on standard geographic divisions used in renewable energy assessments.[6] As of the end of 2024, global onshore wind capacity exceeded 1,000 GW, with continental distributions reflecting varying levels of development and policy support. Asia led with approximately 596 GW, accounting for over half of the worldwide total, followed by Europe at 285 GW, North America at 179 GW, South America at 47 GW, Africa at 9 GW, and Oceania at 17 GW. These figures represent total wind capacity, predominantly onshore given the limited offshore deployment outside Europe and parts of Asia. Growth since 2020 has been robust in Asia, with a compound annual growth rate of about 15%, driven by large-scale installations; Europe and North America saw around 7-8% annual increases, while Africa and South America experienced higher relative growth from lower bases, at 11-12% and 21% annually, respectively. In Europe, EU-wide initiatives such as the REPowerEU plan, launched in 2022, have accelerated onshore wind expansions by prioritizing renewable integration to reduce fossil fuel dependence, with approximately 12 GW of new capacity added in 2024 and reaching about 254 GW onshore by late 2025. Asia's dominance stems from China and India, which together represent about 80% of the region's capacity, with China's cumulative onshore installations reaching 520 GW by late 2024 through aggressive national targets and supply chain efficiencies. Africa's onshore wind sector remains nascent but emerging, led by South Africa's approximately 3.4 GW as of early 2025, supported by the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme, though the continent's total lags due to infrastructure constraints.[7][8][9][10] Regional challenges include grid integration difficulties in South America, where inadequate transmission infrastructure in wind-rich areas like Brazil and Argentina delays the connection of new farms, limiting the utilization of the continent's 47 GW capacity despite strong wind resources. Farm densities vary significantly, with Europe exhibiting higher concentrations—often exceeding 10 farms per 1,000 km² in mature markets like Germany and Denmark—compared to Africa's sparse distribution of under 1 farm per 1,000 km², reflecting differences in land availability and investment maturity. Notable clusters include North America's Texas Great Plains, home to over 30 GW of interconnected onshore capacity across more than 150 farms, benefiting from favorable winds and grid access.[11][12][13] Inter-continental policy comparisons highlight divergent approaches: Europe's reliance on subsidies and regulatory frameworks, such as feed-in tariffs and the REPowerEU's €300 billion investment push, has sustained steady growth but faces supply chain vulnerabilities; in contrast, Asia's manufacturing hubs in China provide cost advantages through state-backed production, enabling lower turbine prices and rapid scaling that outpaces European deployment rates by a factor of three in recent years. These patterns underscore trans-national trends, with Asia's manufacturing-led model fostering high-capacity additions while Europe's policy-driven strategy emphasizes integration and sustainability.[14][15][16]Offshore wind farms
By country
Offshore wind farms consist of fixed-bottom or floating turbine installations situated in marine environments beyond 3 nautical miles from the shoreline, harnessing wind resources in territorial waters or exclusive economic zones (EEZs) under national jurisdiction.[17] These developments are typically organized by the coastal country overseeing permitting, grid integration, and operational responsibilities, reflecting distinct national policies and maritime boundaries. Inclusion in country-specific lists requires farms to be connected to the host nation's electricity grid, with a minimum capacity of 50 MW, and either operational or grid-connected by the end of 2025.[18] As of late 2025, global offshore wind capacity stands at approximately 87 GW, with key contributors including China at around 52% of the total, the United Kingdom at 17%, and Germany at 10%.[19][20] National policies play a pivotal role; for instance, the United States' Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 has incentivized East Coast developments through tax credits and leasing provisions, spurring projects despite recent implementation challenges.[21] China leads globally with over 41.8 GW installed by the end of 2024, expanding to more than 45 GW by late 2025 through projects in the Bohai Sea and East China Sea, where fixed-bottom farms dominate in shallower waters averaging 20-30 meters deep.[20][22] These installations often feature export cables up to 100 km in length to connect to coastal grids, supported by feed-in tariffs and state-backed subsidies that prioritize rapid scaling.[23] The United Kingdom follows with over 15 GW operational, organized by licensing rounds such as Round 4, which has approved multi-gigawatt zones in the North Sea; farms here operate in water depths of 20-40 meters, with export cable routes averaging 80 km and financed via Contracts for Difference (CfD) auctions that guarantee revenue stability.[24][25] Denmark pioneered large-scale offshore wind since the early 1990s, with the Horns Rev 1 farm (160 MW, commissioned in 2002) marking a foundational project in the North Sea at depths around 10-15 meters, influencing subsidy models like tenders that transitioned to competitive auctions.[26] Germany's contributions, exceeding 8 GW, emphasize North Sea sites with similar 20-40 meter depths and export cables of 50-100 km, backed by auction-based support that has enabled subsidy-free bids in recent years.[10] In the United States, capacity remains nascent at under 1 GW but is accelerating post-2022 via the Inflation Reduction Act, focusing on floating pilots off the East Coast in deeper waters over 60 meters, where longer export cables (often 100+ km) and investment tax credits address higher installation costs.[27][28] These country-led efforts highlight variations in technology adaptation, with shallower European sites favoring fixed foundations and deeper U.S. waters advancing floating designs.[29]By body of water
Offshore wind farms are categorized by body of water to group installations within shared marine environments, such as shallow seas, deep oceans, and gulfs, which influence site suitability, installation methods, and operational challenges due to factors like water depth, currents, and weather patterns. Shallow seas, typically with depths under 60 meters, support fixed-bottom turbines, as seen in the North Sea; deep oceans exceeding 60 meters often require floating platforms, exemplified by projects in the Atlantic Ocean; and gulfs like the Gulf of Mexico present unique coastal dynamics with moderate depths suitable for fixed foundations but high hurricane risks. This classification emphasizes transboundary ecological and regulatory contexts, including exclusive economic zones (EEZs), allowing farms to be attributed to a water body irrespective of the bordering nations' jurisdictions. Inclusion criteria for these lists focus on the geographic location of turbines within a defined water body, determined by marine boundaries and EEZ delineations, prioritizing offshore installations at least 3 nautical miles from shore to exclude nearshore or transitional zones. Farms are included if their primary array lies within the water body, even if cables connect to multiple countries, facilitating analysis of regional synergies like grid interconnections. This approach highlights environmental zones over national borders, enabling assessments of cumulative impacts on shared marine ecosystems, such as sediment disruption or noise pollution affecting migratory species.[20] The North Sea stands as the most developed body of water for offshore wind, hosting multi-country farms from the UK, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium, and Norway, with over 30 GW of operational capacity as of mid-2025 and plans exceeding 50 GW by 2030. This shallow sea (average depth 94 meters) enables predominantly fixed-bottom installations, with average distances from shore ranging 10-50 km, powering millions of households across Europe while facing challenges like strong tidal currents and bird migration disruptions. Cross-border collaborations, such as the North Sea Wind Power Hub initiative linking Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands, aim to integrate up to 100 GW through artificial islands and shared grids, mitigating biodiversity impacts like harbor porpoise displacement through coordinated monitoring. The North Sea accounts for approximately 36% of global offshore capacity, underscoring its role in Europe's energy transition.[18][30][31] In the Baltic Sea, a shallower northern European basin (average depth 55 meters), offshore wind development centers on Sweden, Poland, Germany, and Denmark, with about 2.5 GW operational by late 2025 and 15 GW in advanced planning stages, primarily fixed-bottom farms 10-100 km offshore. Unique challenges include seasonal ice formation, which necessitates robust turbine designs, contrasting with milder North Sea conditions, and potential effects on Baltic ringed seal populations from construction noise. Poland's Baltic projects, targeting 6 GW by 2030, exemplify emerging focus, with auctions in 2025 financing 5.6 GW to support regional decarbonization.[32][33] The South China Sea, a tropical marginal sea with depths up to 5,000 meters, features emerging Chinese projects amid geopolitical tensions, with around 10 GW operational or under construction by 2025, including typhoon-resistant farms like the 500 MW Guangdong installation set for late-2025 commissioning. Fixed-bottom turbines dominate shallower coastal zones (10-50 km offshore), but floating prototypes address deeper areas, facing severe weather that demands reinforced foundations to withstand category 5 storms, alongside biodiversity concerns for coral reefs and endangered sea turtles. These developments contribute to China's broader offshore ambitions, with cross-EEZ planning emphasizing resilience over international collaboration.[34][35] The East China Sea, another key Chinese domain with average depths of 150 meters, hosts over 25 GW of capacity as of 2025, representing about 30% of the global total, primarily fixed-bottom farms in shallower shelves 20-80 km from shore. Projects here grapple with frequent typhoons and dense shipping lanes, prompting innovations in anti-corrosion coatings, while marine impacts include altered fish migration patterns in this biodiversity hotspot. China's 41 GW national offshore total by end-2024 largely stems from this sea, with 2025 additions projected at 10-15 GW to meet 60 GW targets.[20][36] In the Gulf of Mexico, a gulf with depths averaging 1,600 meters but viable fixed-bottom sites in under 60-meter zones, offshore wind remains nascent with no operational capacity as of November 2025, though planned projects total over 2 GW, including U.S. leases offshore Texas and Louisiana auctioned for 2026 development. Hurricane vulnerabilities necessitate elevated platforms, with average distances of 10-30 km, and biodiversity considerations focus on protecting rice whales and sea turtles through site-specific environmental assessments. Potential reaches 50 GW, driven by U.S. East Coast synergies in the broader Atlantic.[37] Deeper oceanic bodies like the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans increasingly host floating wind farms, with pilot projects totaling under 0.3 GW operational globally as of late 2025, including small installations in the Atlantic (e.g., U.S. East Coast and Iberian sites, ~100 MW) in waters over 100 km offshore and depths exceeding 200 meters, addressing challenges like platform stability amid swells and impacts on deep-sea ecosystems such as krill populations. The Pacific, particularly off Japan and California, has pilot floating arrays totaling around 50 MW, with plans for 10 GW by 2030, enduring earthquakes and strong currents that demand advanced mooring systems. These installations highlight the shift to floating technology for untapped deep-water resources, comprising about 0.3% of global capacity but growing rapidly.[20][38]Other classifications
By installed capacity
Installed capacity, also known as nameplate capacity, represents the maximum electrical power output a wind farm can produce under ideal conditions, measured in megawatts (MW) or gigawatts (GW). This rating is based on the combined full-load output of all turbines in the installation and serves as the primary metric for ranking wind farms worldwide, encompassing both onshore and offshore projects. As of end-2024, global operational wind capacity stood at 1,136 GW, projected to exceed 1,300 GW by end-2025 with large-scale farms driving much of the expansion in renewable energy infrastructure.[39][40] Rankings by installed capacity focus on completed and operational facilities, excluding those under construction or in planning stages. The top 50 wind farms, as tracked in 2025 datasets, feature capacities starting above 2 GW and tapering to around 500 MW, showcasing economies of scale in turbine technology and project development. Approximately 80% of these top installations are onshore, benefiting from vast land availability in regions like Asia, while the remaining 20% are offshore, where projects often achieve larger individual scales due to deeper waters and stronger winds. On average, offshore farms in the top 50 exceed 500 MW, compared to onshore averages near 200 MW, reflecting differences in deployment challenges and resource potential.[1][41] Geographically, Asia dominates with about 50% of the top 50 farms, primarily in China where expansive desert and grassland bases enable massive builds; Europe follows with 30%, led by the United Kingdom's North Sea offshore developments; the remainder is distributed across North America and other areas. The largest onshore wind farm is the Inner Mongolia Hinggan League wind power base (phase 2) in China at 2 GW, while the largest offshore is Hornsea 2 in the United Kingdom at 1.32 GW. These exemplify trends where onshore projects prioritize volume through numerous turbines, and offshore ones leverage fewer, larger units for higher output density.[42][43] The following table lists the global top 10 operational wind farms by installed capacity as of February 2025 (reordered for accuracy; Alta Wind Energy Center inserted based on verified 1,548 MW capacity, assuming operational status):| Rank | Name | Country | Type | Capacity (MW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inner Mongolia Hinggan League wind power base (phase 2) | China | Onshore | 2,000 |
| 2 | Ningxia Tenggeli Desert wind farm | China | Onshore | 1,800 |
| 3 | Gansu Guazhou Baofeng wind farm | China | Onshore | 1,750 |
| 4 | Alta Wind Energy Center | United States | Onshore | 1,548 |
| 5 | Inner Mongolia Urad Middle Banner wind farm | China | Onshore | 1,500 |
| 6 | Hornsea 2 | United Kingdom | Offshore | 1,320 |
| 7 | Hornsea 1 | United Kingdom | Offshore | 1,218 |
| 8 | Dogger Bank A | United Kingdom | Offshore | 1,200 |
| 9 | Inner Mongolia Shangdu (phase Zhenglan) | China | Onshore | 1,100 |
| 10 | Seagreen 1 | United Kingdom | Offshore | 1,075 |
