Hubbry Logo
Louis WirthLouis WirthMain
Open search
Louis Wirth
Community hub
Louis Wirth
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Louis Wirth
Louis Wirth
Louis Wirth
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Louis Wirth (August 28, 1897 – May 3, 1952) was an American sociologist and member of the Chicago school of sociology. His interests included city life, minority group behavior, and mass media, and he is recognised as one of the leading urban sociologists. He spent most of his academic career at the University of Chicago.[1]

Key Information

He was the first president of the International Sociological Association (1949–1952)[2][3] and the 37th president of the American Sociological Association (1947).[4]

Early life

[edit]

Louis Wirth was born in the small village of Gemünden in the Hunsrück, Germany. He was one of seven children born to Rosalie Lorig (1868–1948, from Butzweiler/Eifel) and Joseph Wirth. Gemünden was a pastoral community, and Joseph Wirth earned a living as a cattle dealer. The family was Jewish and both of his parents were religiously active.

Wirth migrated in 1911 at the age of 14 to the United States where he lived with his older sister at his uncle's home in Omaha, Nebraska in 1911.[1] Wirth completed high school in Omaha.[1] He was a social worker with the Bureau of Personal Service in Chicago before entering academia.[5] He earned a Ph.B. degree in 1919, M.A. degree in 1925, and Ph.D. degree in 1926, all from the University of Chicago.[1] He was influenced by Robert E. Park.[6]

Research

[edit]

He was a part of Chicago School of Sociology. After completing his PhD at the University of Chicago, he was on the staff at the university.[7] He was appointed at Tulane University over the period 1928–1929, but returned to University of Chicago after that.[1] He became assistant professor at the University of Chicago in 1931, associate professor in 1932 and full professor in 1940.[1]

His interests included city life, minority group behaviour and mass media and he is recognised as one of the leading urban sociologists. Wirth's major contribution to social theory of urban space was a classic essay Urbanism as a Way of Life, published in the American Journal of Sociology in 1938. In this essay Wirth used Weber's notion of the ideal type, seeing the urban and the rural as constituting two distinct types of community at opposite ends of a continuum.[8]

His research was mostly concerned with how Jewish immigrants adjusted to life in urban America, as well as the distinct social processes of city life. Wirth was a supporter of applied sociology, and believed in taking the knowledge offered by his discipline and using it to solve real social problems.

Wirth writes that urbanism is a form of social organization that is harmful to culture, and describes the city as a "Substitution of secondary for primary contacts, the weakening of bonds of kinship, the declining social significance of the family, the disappearance of the neighborhood and the undermining of traditional basis of social solidarity".[9] Wirth was concerned with the effects of the city upon family unity, and he believed urbanization leads to a "low and declining urban reproduction rates ... families are smaller and more frequently without children than in the country". According to Wirth, marriage tends to be postponed, and the proportion of single people is growing, leading to isolation and less interaction.

But Wirth also stressed the positive effects of city life: "The beginning of what is distinctively modern in our civilization is best signalized by the growth of great cities";[10] "metropolitan civilization is without question the best civilization that human beings have ever devised";[11] "The city everywhere has been the center of freedom and toleration, the home of progress, of invention, of science, of rationality"[12] or: "the history of civilization can be written in terms of the history of cities".[13]

The profound social understanding of minority groups that Wirth obtained first-hand as a Jewish immigrant in America, can equally be applied to understanding the problems of other minority groups in society, such as ethnic minorities, the disabled, homosexuals, women and the elderly, all of whom have also suffered, and/or continue to suffer prejudice, discrimination and disenfranchisement from the more numerically dominant members of a host society. It is in this respect that Wirth's path-breaking and insightful work still amply rewards detailed study even today, some seventy years after his original investigations.[14]

A good example of Wirth's work, which includes a comprehensive bibliography, is On Cities and Social Life, published in 1964.

Personal life

[edit]

Soon after arriving in the United States in 1911, Louis met and married Mary Bolton.[15] The couple had two daughters, Elizabeth (Marvick) and Alice (Gray).

He died of a heart attack shortly after giving a lecture at the University of Buffalo in 1952.[1][7]

Bibliography

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Louis Wirth

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Louis Wirth (August 28, 1897 – May 3, 1952) was a German-born American sociologist and key member of , renowned for pioneering empirical studies of urban social structures and dynamics. Emigrating from to the in 1911 at age fourteen, Wirth earned his Ph.D. from the in 1926 and joined its faculty, where he contributed to foundational research on city life through direct observation and ecological analysis. Wirth's most influential work, the 1938 essay "Urbanism as a Way of Life", posited that urban environments—defined by large population size, high density, and social heterogeneity—foster distinct patterns of behavior, including superficial relationships, anonymity, and rationalistic individualism, diverging from primary-group ties in rural settings. This framework, grounded in Chicago's diverse immigrant neighborhoods, influenced subsequent by highlighting causal links between physical settlement patterns and social organization, though later critiques noted its underemphasis on adaptive urban subcultures. Wirth also examined ethnic enclaves, such as in his studies of Jewish ghettos, emphasizing how spatial segregation perpetuated cultural isolation amid assimilation pressures. As president of the International Sociological Association from to , Wirth advocated for sociology's role in addressing postwar global challenges, including and , while maintaining a commitment to value-neutral, data-driven inquiry amid rising ideological influences in academia. His legacy endures in ecological theories of , underscoring how demographic forces shape human interaction without romanticizing pre-modern forms.

Early Life and Education

Childhood in Germany and Immigration

Louis Wirth was born on August 28, 1897, in Gemünden, a small village in , into a Jewish family. He was one of seven children born to , a cattle merchant and small-scale farmer, and Rosalie Lorig. The family belonged to the area's modest Jewish community, comprising only about twenty households amid a rural setting in the region. Despite the limited opportunities for in such provincial locales, the Wirths maintained relative prosperity through their father's trade and farming activities. In 1911, at the age of fourteen, Wirth immigrated to the , joining his maternal uncle who had previously settled there. He resided with his older sister in the uncle's home in , a Midwestern city with a growing immigrant that offered economic prospects absent in rural . This relocation reflected broader patterns of early 20th-century Jewish from , driven by familial networks and the pursuit of better educational and vocational opportunities rather than immediate . Upon arrival, Wirth adapted to by completing high school in Omaha, laying the groundwork for his subsequent academic pursuits.

Academic Training at the University of Chicago

Wirth enrolled at the in 1914 following high school in , initially intending to study pre-medicine before shifting his focus to under the influence of the emerging . He completed his undergraduate studies, earning a Ph.B. degree in 1919. After graduating, Wirth worked in , including as director of a boys' club in , before resuming graduate studies in around 1922, supported financially by his wife's position as a social worker. He obtained his M.A. in 1925 with a on "Cultural Conflicts in the Immigrant " and his Ph.D. in 1926, with a dissertation titled "The : A Study in Isolation," supervised by . Park, a key figure in and , guided Wirth's research on immigrant communities and spatial segregation, aligning with the Chicago School's emphasis on empirical observation of city dynamics. During his graduate training, Wirth engaged deeply with the interdisciplinary approaches of faculty like Park, , and William I. Thomas, contributing to early field studies on urban neighborhoods and minority groups that formed the basis of ecological . His doctoral work examined the as a spatially and socially isolated enclave shaped by economic constraints and cultural persistence among Jewish immigrants, drawing on data and ethnographic insights from Chicago's area. This training equipped Wirth with methodological tools—such as the use of life histories and community surveys—that he later applied in his faculty role at the same institution.

Professional Career

Faculty Role and Mentorship at Chicago

Wirth began his academic career at the University of Chicago as an instructor in the Department of Sociology shortly after receiving his PhD there in 1926, marking the start of his lifelong affiliation with the institution. He progressed through the ranks, becoming assistant professor in 1931—while also serving as managing editor of the American Journal of Sociology—associate professor in 1932, and full professor in 1940. Throughout his tenure until his death in 1952, Wirth contributed to the department's emphasis on empirical urban research, blending fieldwork with theoretical development in line with the Chicago School's pragmatic approach. In his faculty role, Wirth was recognized for integrating teaching with administrative responsibilities, including guiding the department's focus on minority groups and during a period when dominated American . He taught core courses on and , influencing the curriculum amid the department's expansion in the 1930s and 1940s, though he occasionally took leaves for research fellowships, such as his 1930–1931 Social Science Research Council grant. Wirth excelled as a mentor, directing a substantial number of doctoral dissertations and fostering the careers of numerous graduate students who later achieved prominence in . His approach emphasized rigorous empirical analysis over abstract theorizing, as evidenced by his close guidance of Edward Shils, with whom he collaborated on translating Karl Mannheim's Ideology and Utopia in the early , shaping Shils's early sociological outlook. Described as inspiring and effective, Wirth's mentorship extended to dozens of students, prioritizing hands-on research in Chicago's urban settings to instill causal understandings of social processes.

Leadership in Sociological Institutions

Wirth assumed early administrative roles in the American Sociological Society (ASS), predecessor to the American Sociological Association (ASA), serving as secretary, treasurer, and managing editor in 1931, which involved overseeing publications and organizational finances during the society's expansion amid the Great Depression. In 1947, he was elected the 37th president of the ASS, a tenure marked by efforts to integrate sociological theory with policy applications, including his presidential address emphasizing empirical research on social integration amid postwar reconstruction. Wirth's international stature culminated in his election as the inaugural president of the International Sociological Association (ISA) in 1949, a role he maintained until his death in 1952, during which he advanced cross-national research collaborations and standardized sociological methodologies in the wake of disruptions. His leadership extended to committee work in bodies like the Institut International de Sociologie and the Masaryk Sociological Society, reflecting his commitment to bridging American empirical traditions with European theoretical approaches, as evidenced by extensive correspondence and conference participation documented in his archived papers.

Theoretical Contributions to Sociology

Formulation of Urbanism as a Way of Life

In 1938, Louis Wirth published the seminal essay "Urbanism as a Way of Life" in The American Journal of Sociology, presenting a theoretical framework for understanding the city as a distinct sociological entity shaped by its structural features. Wirth, a key figure in the Chicago School of sociology, argued that urbanism emerges not merely from physical form but from the interplay of demographic and spatial conditions that foster a uniform pattern of social behavior and institutions. He defined a city sociologically as "a relatively large, dense, and permanent settlement of socially heterogeneous individuals," emphasizing that these attributes—size (number of inhabitants), density (spatial concentration), and heterogeneity (diversity of social groups)—constitute the causal preconditions for urban modes of life. Wirth posited that large population size necessitates functional specialization and division of labor, as individuals cannot rely on personal of others for coordination, leading to formalized roles and bureaucratic . amplifies ecological pressures, intensifying for space and resources, which in turn promotes mobility—both spatial (frequent movement) and social (weak ties)—and reduces the intimacy of primary relationships in favor of calculative, interactions. Heterogeneity, arising from diverse ethnic, occupational, and cultural backgrounds in urban influxes, further erodes consensus on norms, fostering tolerance through indifference, , and a pragmatic orientation toward pecuniary standards over traditional values. These elements interact cumulatively: as size grows, and heterogeneity intensify, yielding a way of life marked by , , and participation in secondary associations rather than kinship-based communities. At the level of social psychology, Wirth described urban dwellers as exhibiting heightened nervous tension, blasé attitudes, and a shift from sentimental to objective evaluations of others, with relationships becoming segmental and superficial to manage the overload of stimuli. Institutionally, this manifests in weakened family structures, commercialized , and reliance on for news, contrasting rural patterns of insularity and . Drawing on ecological studies of segregation and succession, Wirth framed his thesis as a deductive model testable against empirical observations, though primarily conceptual rather than data-driven, aiming to unify disparate urban under a coherent . He cautioned that urbanism's traits extend beyond central cities to suburbs and rural areas exhibiting similar scale and diversity, underscoring its applicability as a general social type.

Analyses of Race, Ethnicity, and Minority Adjustment

Wirth's doctoral dissertation, The Ghetto (1925), examined the formation and dynamics of Jewish urban enclaves in America as a mechanism of immigrant adjustment to . Drawing on Robert Park's ecological model of urban succession, he described the ghetto as an initial stage of isolation driven by economic necessity, cultural preservation, and host society prejudice, followed by phases of internal organization, economic advancement, and eventual dispersal into broader urban areas. This process, Wirth argued, reflected minorities' adaptive strategies amid rapid , where spatial segregation temporarily buffered cultural shock but ultimately yielded to assimilation pressures as second-generation members gained and mobility. Empirical from early 20th-century Chicago's Jewish districts supported his view, showing declining residential concentration correlating with occupational shifts from peddling to professional roles by the 1920s. In The Problem of Minority Groups (1945), Wirth formalized a sociological definition of minorities, emphasizing not numerical inferiority but systemic disadvantage: "a group of people who, because of their physical or cultural characteristics, are singled out from the others in the society in which they live for differential and unequal treatment, and who therefore regard themselves as objects of collective ." This framework highlighted self-perception and reciprocal dominance-subordination dynamics, extending beyond race or to any group facing exclusion, such as religious or linguistic minorities. He applied it to wartime contexts, analyzing how exclusion eroded group and national cohesion, as evidenced by surveys of intergroup tensions during . Wirth's analyses underscored assimilation as the primary mode of minority adjustment, facilitated by interpersonal contact in diverse urban settings, though tempered by persistent . Influenced by his own Jewish immigrant background, he viewed ghettos as transient rather than permanent, predicting dissolution through and policy interventions like anti-discrimination laws. In Morale and Minority Groups (1943), he advocated inclusive civic participation to mitigate alienation, citing from federal morale studies showing higher loyalty among integrated minorities. Critics later noted his optimism overlooked entrenched structural barriers, but his work grounded in observable urban processes rather than essential traits.

Criticisms, Debates, and Empirical Reassessments

Challenges to the Urbanism Thesis

Sociological critiques of Louis Wirth's 1938 formulation of urbanism emerged soon after its publication, primarily challenging its deterministic portrayal of city life as uniformly producing social disorganization, superficial relationships, and individualism due to population size, density, and heterogeneity. Early empirical community studies, such as those conducted in the 1940s and 1950s by Chicago School affiliates, revealed persistent primary group ties and ethnic enclaves in urban neighborhoods, contradicting Wirth's emphasis on anonymity and weakened kinship. For instance, research on working-class districts in cities like Chicago and Boston documented "urban villages" where residents maintained dense, localized networks akin to rural communities, suggesting that cultural and class factors mediated urban effects more than ecological variables alone. Herbert J. Gans advanced a key critique in his 1962 essay "Urbanism and Suburbanism as Ways of Life," arguing that Wirth's thesis failed to account for socioeconomic and ethnic diversity within cities, where lower-class "urban villagers" prioritized kinship and primary relationships over the cosmopolitanism Wirth described for middle-class residents. Gans drew on his fieldwork in Boston's West End, a predominantly Italian-American area, to demonstrate that residents exhibited low anonymity, strong peer-group solidarity, and resistance to broader urban influences, attributing these patterns to imported peasant cultures rather than inevitable urban forces. He further contended that Wirth's model conflated urbanism with modernization, overlooking how suburbs fostered distinct "suburbanites" with privatized family lives and limited public engagement, thus extending rather than refuting the idea of varied ways of life by settlement type. Claude S. Fischer's , introduced in 1975, offered a more nuanced challenge by positing that urban scale and heterogeneity amplify subcultures, enabling individuals to form optional, supportive communities that offset predicted isolation. Unlike Wirth's view of heterogeneity eroding norms, Fischer argued it fosters , with empirical from national surveys showing urban residents reporting more diverse but not necessarily weaker social ties, particularly within chosen subcultures like or leisure networks. Tests of the theory, including Fischer's own analyses of 1970s U.S. , found that correlated positively with unconventional behaviors and affiliations, supporting selective facilitation of ties rather than uniform disruption. This perspective shifted emphasis from pathology to urbanism's role in accommodating deviant or specialized lifestyles, influencing later network studies that revealed urbanites' access to broader weak ties beneficial for information and opportunities. Subsequent quantitative reassessments, such as those in the using improved measures of , often found weak or context-dependent links between urban residence and Wirthian outcomes like , attributing variations to selection effects—where self-selected migrants bring predispositions—rather than causal urban impacts. Critics also highlighted Wirth's lack of falsifiable hypotheses and reliance on impressionistic evidence, prompting calls for multivariate models incorporating individual traits and historical contingencies. While some defenses maintained partial validity for aggregate trends, these challenges collectively reframed as multidirectional, with privileging human agency and cultural over ecological .

Modern Tests and Causal Interpretations

A series of empirical studies since the late have revisited Wirth's propositions using large-scale survey and registry to test associations between urban structural features—population size, , and heterogeneity—and social-psychological outcomes such as and . For instance, analysis of U.S. Behavioral Surveillance System from over 1.5 million respondents between 2005 and 2010 revealed that urban residents consistently report lower and compared to non-urban counterparts, with size and explaining a portion of this gap even after controlling for socioeconomic factors and urban-specific problems like and . This supports Wirth's characterization of as fostering a "malaise" through impersonal relations and weakened community bonds, rather than attributing unhappiness solely to correlated urban dysfunctions. Similar patterns emerge internationally; cross-national from the indicate that higher urban correlates with elevated stress and reduced , particularly in heterogeneous environments where social heterogeneity amplifies competition for resources and attention. On social networks, modern tests yield mixed but partially confirmatory results. Instrumental variable approaches, leveraging historical discontinuities like post-World War II border adjustments in as exogenous shocks to , estimate that a 10% increase in residential causally boosts reported interactions with non-neighbor friends (secondary ties) by approximately 2-3%, while reducing close neighbor contacts (primary ties) by a similar margin. This aligns with Wirth's causal mechanism wherein intensifies spatial competition, shifting relations toward superficial, instrumental exchanges over intimate, kinship-based ones. Complementary registry-based studies in , using migration as a , further show that relocation to denser urban cores erodes local trust and civic participation, with effects strongest among higher-status individuals who rely less on neighborhood networks. However, heterogeneity's role remains harder to isolate empirically, as self-selection into diverse urban settings confounds direct tests, though suggest it exacerbates by diluting shared norms without compensatory subcultural integration. Causal interpretations of these findings emphasize urbanism's structural while acknowledging endogeneity challenges. Quasi-experimental designs, such as those exploiting transport expansions (e.g., subway extensions increasing effective ), provide credible identification of city size's effects on outcomes like generalized trust, revealing negative causal impacts of 5-10% on interpersonal per doubling of metropolitan population. Wirth's framework thus holds interpretive power for explaining persistent urban-rural gradients in and cohesion, but rigorous mediation analyses indicate that mechanisms like and —rather than size or alone—drive much of the variance, with heterogeneity acting as a moderator rather than a primary cause. These tests underscore the need for longitudinal designs to disentangle , where urban-tolerant individuals migrate to cities, from true causal pathways, yet the preponderance of evidence affirms urbanism's role in reshaping toward and transience.

Personal Life and Death

Family Dynamics and Personal Relationships

Louis Wirth was born on August 28, 1897, in Gemünden, Germany, as one of seven children in a Jewish family headed by Joseph Wirth, a cattle dealer and small-scale farmer, and Rosalie Lorig, both religiously active in the local synagogue. In 1911, at age 14, he immigrated alone to the United States, initially joining relatives influenced by his mother's brother and sister who had encouraged the move and had prior ties there, marking an early separation from his parents and siblings amid economic and cultural transitions for Jewish families in early 20th-century Germany. Wirth met Mary Lilly Bolton, a non-Jewish student from , in 1917 at the , where both studied. They married on February 14, 1923, in , . Following the marriage, the couple supported themselves through roles—Mary as a trained professional and Wirth until completing his 1925 dissertation—reflecting a aligned with their academic and reform-oriented interests in urban social issues. The Wirths had two daughters: Elizabeth (later Marvick, 1925–2005) and Alice (later Gray, 1934–2008). The family lived in , where Mary continued a distinguished in , and the household offered their children exposure to racially integrated environments and intellectual circles connected to Wirth's associates, fostering an atmosphere informed by his research on minority adjustment and community relations.

Final Years and Health Decline

Wirth remained actively engaged in sociological leadership during his final years, serving as president of the International Sociological Association from 1949 until his death in 1952. He continued his role as a professor of at the , contributing to academic discourse on , minorities, and community dynamics without evident interruption from health concerns. On May 3, 1952, Wirth, aged 54, suffered a fatal heart attack in , immediately following the delivery of an address at the University of Buffalo. The event occurred suddenly during his participation in a conference focused on and , with no prior symptoms or premonitions of coronary disease reported. This abrupt collapse marked the end of his career, underscoring the unexpected nature of his demise amid ongoing professional vitality.

Intellectual Legacy

Enduring Impact on Urban Studies

Wirth's conceptualization of , articulated in his 1938 essay, established a foundational framework for examining the structural determinants of city life—population size, , and heterogeneity—and their consequences for social relationships, including increased , instrumental ties, and weakened primary group bonds. This thesis has persisted as a benchmark in , influencing subsequent theorizations of how spatial organization causally shapes behavioral patterns, even as empirical reassessments have qualified its universality. Scholars continue to reference it when analyzing metropolitan dynamics, such as the erosion of in high- settings, providing a lens for interpreting variations in social cohesion across urban scales. In contemporary , Wirth's ideas underpin research on the psychological and attitudinal effects of , including greater tolerance for diversity and among dwellers, as corroborated by studies linking urban residence to progressive views on social issues. His emphasis on ecological processes has informed policy-oriented analyses, such as those evaluating density's role in fostering innovation versus isolation, and has been invoked in debates over sustainable where high population concentrations amplify both opportunities and strains on social . For instance, modern inquiries into growth draw on his propositions to assess causal links between urban form and outcomes like or . The enduring relevance of Wirth's work lies in its value for interdisciplinary applications, extending beyond to , where it supports arguments for balanced density management to mitigate predicted social pathologies like and mobility-induced fragmentation. Despite critiques of overgeneralization, his framework has stimulated longitudinal data collection on urban-rural gradients, revealing persistent correlations between city size and traits like , thus reinforcing causal realism in interpreting environmental influences on . This legacy underscores ' shift toward integrating demographic pressures with policy interventions aimed at preserving relational depth amid expansion.

Applications to Contemporary Social Structures

Wirth's conceptualization of , characterized by large-scale population aggregates, high , and social heterogeneity, finds resonance in contemporary megacities shaped by . For instance, metropolitan areas like Greater Tokyo, encompassing over 37 million residents as of 2020, exemplify intensified heterogeneity through and , fostering instrumental, secondary relationships over traditional bonds as Wirth predicted. Similarly, in Mumbai's 21-million-strong agglomeration (2023 estimates), spatial exacerbates and rational-calculating orientations, with commuters navigating diverse ethnic enclaves via transient interactions rather than deep communal ties. These patterns align with Wirth's thesis that urban scale dilutes primary group , a dynamic amplified by global flows of labor and capital since the late . Empirical studies affirm selective endurance of Wirthian effects in modern urban settings. Research indicates urban residents display heightened tolerance for behavioral diversity—such as non-traditional structures or variances—compared to rural counterparts, attributing this to exposure in heterogeneous environments, as evidenced in surveys of U.S. metropolitan samples from 1972–2000. However, and edge-city growth in places like (sprawl exceeding 4,000 square miles) mitigate pure density effects, yielding hybrid social forms where mobility enables selective homogeneity amid overall . The rise of digital networks extends Wirth's to virtual domains, where platforms replicate size, density, and heterogeneity without physical co-location. like , with 3.05 billion monthly active users in 2023, mirror urban population scales and rank-size hierarchies (e.g., high-user cities like with millions of connections), promoting "segmented selves" through profile management and voluntary, interest-based ties. This fosters superficial engagements and identity compartmentalization, akin to Wirth's portrayal of and rational , yet introduces novel stresses like reputational anxiety reported by 30% of young users in surveys. Scholars interpret this "networked " as evolving Wirth's model, where global connectivity intensifies heterogeneity but risks isolation, as seen in correlations between heavy platform use and diminished face-to-face intimacy. Such applications underscore 's transposition beyond bricks-and-mortar locales into pervasive digital ecologies defining 21st-century .

References

  1. https://www.asanet.org/louis-wirth/
  2. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.WIRTH
  3. https://www.isa-sociology.org/en/about-isa/history-of-isa/isa-past-presidents/list-of-presidents/louis-wirth
  4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2768119
  5. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/217913
  6. https://maxwellhalsted.uic.edu/home/ghetto-living-cheap-economics-west-side/the-ghetto-1928-by-louis-wirth/index.html
  7. https://www.asanet.org/louis-wirth
  8. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/louis-wirth
  9. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/ead/rlg/ICU.SPCL.WIRTH.pdf
  10. https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Odum/BiographicalSketches/Wirth.html
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271236372_The_Young_Shils
  12. http://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/savvy/images/asa/docs/pdf/Rosich%2520Appendix%25202.pdf
  13. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~hoganr/SOC%2520602/Spring%25202014/Wirth%25201938.pdf
  14. https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-biographies/louis-wirth
  15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2572972
  16. https://www.sociopedia.co/author/wirth-louis
  17. https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/11-1-racial-ethnic-and-minority-groups
  18. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/218921
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/800258
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2775401
  21. https://hakka3.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/gans-urbanism-and-suburbanism-as-ways-of-life.pdf
  22. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315008196-36/urbanism-suburbanism-ways-life-re-evaluation-definitions-herbert-gans
  23. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/225993
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777297
  25. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/230753
  26. https://sociology.iresearchnet.com/urban-sociology/subcultural-theory-of-urbanism/
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781994
  28. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/224682
  29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098016645470
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302921672_Urbanism_and_happiness_A_test_of_Wirths_theory_of_urban_life
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257066946_Does_Urban_Density_Promote_Social_Interaction_Evidence_from_Instrumental_Variable_Estimation
  32. https://walton.uark.edu/insights/posts/the-effect-of-urban-density-on-social-capital.php
  33. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jstroebe/PDF/BFKS_SocialConnectednessUrbanAreas_JUE.pdf
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5557022/
  35. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/LZ5N-BW1/louis-wirth-1897-1952
  36. https://cliospsyche.org/profiles/elizabeth-wirth-marvick-1925-2005
  37. https://prabook.com/web/louis.wirth/1106919
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/1952/05/04/archives/dr-louis-wirth-5-soiol06ist-dead-collapsesafter-buffalo-lecture.html
  39. http://www.yorku.ca/lfoster/2006-07/sosi3830/lectures/LOUIS%2520WIRTH_NOTESONURBANISMASAWAYOFLIFE.html
  40. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-socialproblems/chapter/14-2-sociological-perspectives-on-urbanization/
  41. https://sociology.institute/urban-sociology/chicago-school-urban-sociology-influence/
  42. http://blogs.qu.edu.qa/qatarurbanism/urban-design-in-history/urbanism-as-a-way-of-life-louis-wirth-american-journal-of-sociology-44-1938-1-24/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.