Hubbry Logo
M864M864Main
Open search
M864
Community hub
M864
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
M864
M864
M864
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The M864 is an American made 155 mm artillery shell. It carries a DPICM warhead and incorporates base bleed technology to increase its range. The projectile is capable of delivering 24 M46 and 48 M42 dual-purpose anti-materiel/anti-personnel sub-munitions at ranges out to 29 kilometers. Base bleed technology was developed to reduce the amount of base drag on a projectile, thereby increasing the achieved range. The drag is reduced by a gas generator located on the base of the projectile. Once ignited, the gas generator bleeds hot gas into the projectile's wake, which causes the flow of air at the base to be less turbulent. The decrease in turbulence reduces base drag, which typically accounts for 50 percent of total drag. The amount of thrust produced by the base burner unit is negligible and does not serve the same function as the rocket motor on a rocket-assisted projectile (RAP).[citation needed]

Key Information

The M864 projectile is not ballistically matched to any projectile currently in the inventory, but because of the similarity of the trajectories, firing data for the M864 can be determined from M549A1 firing data.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

M864

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The M864 is a 155-millimeter developed for the as an extended-range carrier for dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM), dispersing 72 submunitions—comprising 48 M42 and 24 M46 high-explosive dual-purpose grenades—designed to engage both personnel and armored via airburst dispersion approximately 300–400 meters above impact. Incorporating base-bleed with a 2.6-pound hydroxy-terminated assembly ignited by the firing charge, the M864 achieves ranges up to 28 kilometers, surpassing standard DPICM rounds like the M483A1 through reduced aerodynamic drag. Fired from howitzers such as the M109 or M198 using mechanical-time or electronic-time fuzes to initiate expulsion, it represents the Army's initial extended-range DPICM variant, prioritizing area saturation effects over unitary high-explosive impacts in conventional engagements. While effective for suppressing dispersed forces, its submunitions carry inherent risks due to variable dud rates, influencing post-conflict hazard assessments.

Design and Development

Origins and Predecessors

The concept of cluster munitions in projectiles traces its roots to efforts to disperse submunitions over wide areas for anti-personnel and anti-material effects, with early examples including German SD-2 bomblets and U.S. experimental dispersions, though these lacked the precision and dual-purpose design of later variants. In the U.S., systematic development accelerated during the to counter massed armored formations, leading to the improved conventional munitions (ICM) program in the late 1960s, which emphasized cargo-carrying shells that release multiple bomblets mid-flight for enhanced area coverage compared to unitary high-explosive rounds. The direct predecessor to the M864 was the M483 155mm projectile, first developed in the 1960s and fielded in the early as the U.S. Army's initial dual-purpose ICM (DPICM) round, containing 88 submunitions (primarily M42 anti-personnel and M46 dual-purpose bomblets) expelled via a mechanical time to achieve both fragmentation and shaped-charge effects against and vehicles. An upgraded M483A1 variant, introduced around 1975, incorporated refinements such as improved submunition fuzing for better reliability and spin-induced arming, while maintaining the standard payload of 88 DPICM units, with maximum ranges limited to approximately 22-24 kilometers from 39-caliber howitzers due to aerodynamic drag. These munitions addressed shortcomings in earlier 155mm shells, like the M107 high-explosive round, by providing over larger footprints—up to 20,000 square meters—but suffered from higher dud rates (2-5% per submunition) and range constraints that reduced effectiveness against deep targets. The M864 evolved from these limitations, entering low-rate production in as an extended-range DPICM carrier, sacrificing 16 submunitions (to 72 total) to integrate a base-bleed unit that emits gas to reduce base drag and extend range by 30-40%—reaching 30 kilometers from 39-caliber systems and 40 kilometers from 45-caliber howitzers—while retaining the M42/M46 mix for compatibility with M483 logistics. This iteration reflected U.S. Army priorities post-Vietnam for precision in area effects amid threats, though it inherited dud vulnerabilities that later drew scrutiny in reliability studies.

Engineering Innovations

The M864 155 mm projectile incorporates a base-burn gas generator unit at its rear, which ignites upon firing to expel low-velocity gases into the projectile's wake, thereby reducing base drag by up to 50% compared to conventional shells and extending maximum range to approximately 29 kilometers when fired from an at standard charges. This innovation, distinct from earlier base-bleed systems by utilizing a of solid propellant rather than continuous gas emission, minimizes aerodynamic instability while maintaining through , allowing reliable flight performance modeled via coupled gas dynamics and point-mass equations. The projectile's design advances dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) by housing 72 submunitions—48 M42 and 24 M46 grenades—optimized for both anti-personnel fragmentation and anti-armor shaped-charge effects, dispersed via a mechanical time that triggers an expulsion charge at predetermined airburst altitudes for broader area coverage. This configuration improves over predecessors like the M483A1 by integrating the base-burn element without altering the standard 155 mm separate-loading compatibility, enabling seamless integration into existing artillery systems such as the M109 and M198 while enhancing lethality density over extended ranges. Engineering analyses confirm the base-burn unit's efficiency through principles in gas flow, where chamber pressure and nozzle design dictate mass flow rates that sustain drag reduction throughout the , though susceptible to environmental factors like atmospheric variations. These features collectively represent a pragmatic in and delivery, prioritizing range extension and munition scatter patterns for tactical flexibility.

Technical Specifications

Projectile Components

The M864 is a 155 mm separate-loading featuring a forged body designed to contain and protect its during flight. The body includes an section housing an ejection or burster charge, which functions to rupture the casing and expel submunitions rearward upon initiation. The accommodates 72 (DPICM) submunitions, comprising 48 M42-series and 24 M46-series grenades, arranged in a stacked configuration within the main cavity. At the forward end, the M864 employs a mechanical time fuze (MTF) or electronic time fuze (ETF), which replaces a universal lifting plug prior to loading and is programmed for height-of-burst detonation typically between 300 and 400 meters above the target to optimize submunition dispersion. The aft section incorporates a base-bleed unit, consisting of a gas generator assembly that sustains a controlled efflux of hot gases to reduce base drag and extend maximum range beyond that of standard ballistic projectiles. This unit contains approximately 2.6 pounds of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB)-based propellant, ignited by the main propelling charge during firing. The overall design emphasizes compatibility with 155 mm howitzers having a minimum barrel length of 24 calibers, with the base-bleed mechanism providing aerodynamic stability without significantly altering spin or trajectory characteristics.

Submunition Payload

The M864 155mm incorporates a cargo payload consisting of 72 dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) submunitions, specifically 48 M42 series grenades and 24 M46 series grenades. These M42/M46-type submunitions are older grenade-like bomblets used in cluster munitions, with the M42 featuring a stabilizing ribbon for descent and arming. These submunitions, each weighing approximately 135 grams for the M42 and 185 grams for the M46, combine shaped-charge warheads for armor penetration with fragmentation effects for anti-personnel lethality. Upon expulsion from the carrier shell via a base-ejection system at a predetermined altitude over the target area, the submunitions scatter across a wide , typically covering an area of several hundred in diameter depending on burst height and dispersion parameters. The M42 submunitions detonate on impact using a point-initiating, base-detonating , delivering a high-explosive anti-tank () jet capable of penetrating up to 200 mm of rolled homogeneous armor while producing lethal fragments. In contrast, the M46 submunitions feature an added that orients the grenade downward, induces spin during descent to enhance fragmentation patterns, and incorporates a delay element in the for improved top-attack effects against . This configuration enhances area-denial capabilities compared to unitary high-explosive rounds, with the mix of M42 and M46 types optimizing coverage against both point and dispersed targets such as troop concentrations or vehicle formations. The submunitions employ Composition A5 explosive filler, approximately 58 grams per M42 unit, to achieve dual-mode without reliance on external sensors. Production of the M864 with this began entering U.S. service in 1987, following testing that validated the submunition dispersion and terminal ballistics.

Performance Metrics

The M864 155mm incorporates a base-bleed that reduces aerodynamic drag by approximately 50% during supersonic flight and eliminates it in the subsonic regime, resulting in a range extension of about 23% compared to inert or non-bleed equivalents. Maximum range reaches 28,180 meters when fired with Charge 8S (M203A1 ), while Charge 7WB (M4A2) yields 17,180 meters; these figures assume standard atmospheric conditions and compatible tubes such as M185 or M284. Muzzle velocities vary by charge, attaining 807 meters per second with Charge 8S and 550 meters per second with Charge 7WB, enabling compatibility with propelling charges including M3A1, M4A2, M119 series, and M203A1. The projectile weighs 102 pounds and measures 36.23 inches in length with fuze, delivering a payload of 72 dual-purpose submunitions (48 M42 anti-personnel/anti-material grenades and 24 M46 anti-armor grenades) via an expulsion charge of 105 grams of M10 propellant. Each submunition contains 30.5 grams of Composition A5 explosive, contributing to a total filler weight of 4.81 pounds per projectile, with the base-burner unit fueled by 2.6 pounds of HTPB-AP propellant. This configuration provides over 200% greater area coverage than the predecessor M483A1 projectile, primarily due to the extended range and optimized dispersal pattern upon burst at height.
Propelling ChargeMuzzle Velocity (m/s)Maximum Range (m)
7WB (M4A2)55017,180
8S (M203A1)80728,180
Submunition performance emphasizes dual effects: the M46 grenade penetrates more than 2.5 inches of rolled homogeneous armor via shaped charge, while both M42 and M46 types generate fragmentation for anti-personnel lethality within their burst radius, enhancing overall target engagement across dispersed impact zones. Compatible fuzes include mechanical time-superquick (M577 series), electronic time (M762), and proximity (M732 series), with operational temperatures from -60°F to +145°F for firing.

Operational Deployment

Initial Fielding and Testing

The M864 155mm (DPICM) projectile achieved type classification for low-rate initial production in May 1987, followed by standard type classification in December 1987, marking its approval for full-scale manufacturing and service use by the US Army. This classification process incorporated evaluations of the projectile's base-bleed system, which uses a to reduce drag and extend range beyond predecessors like the M483A1, with initial production commencing that year at facilities including the Milan Army Ammunition Plant. Initial fielding to operational units occurred in the late , positioning the M864 as the Army's primary extended-range cargo-delivering round for 155mm howitzers, capable of dispersing 72 dual-purpose submunitions (48 M42 and 24 M46 grenades) out to approximately 29 kilometers. Production testing began shortly after type , with early lots subjected to ballistic and safety assessments to verify compatibility, submunition dispersal, and structural integrity under firing stresses. Comprehensive initial production testing took place at from February to June 1989, where live-fire trials revealed anomalies such as gaps in the base-body joint on two projectiles, prompting engineering investigations into cargo expulsion reliability. Additional flight performance evaluations, including in-bore pressure and base-region temperature measurements on modified M864 variants, confirmed the efficacy of the base-burn mechanism in achieving predicted trajectories and range extensions, with data supporting refinements to aerodynamic models. These tests underscored the projectile's tactical value while identifying minor production variances addressable through quality controls.

Use in Major Conflicts

The M864 155mm DPICM projectile saw its first major combat deployment during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, where U.S. Army field artillery units employed it alongside other DPICM variants to deliver area suppression against Iraqi Republican Guard and regular army formations. Fired from M109 howitzers and M198 towed guns, the shells dispersed 72 dual-purpose submunitions each to target armored vehicles, troop concentrations, and command posts, contributing to the rapid degradation of Iraqi defenses during the ground campaign from February 24 to 28, 1991. An estimated tens of thousands of 155mm DPICM rounds, including M864 types, were expended in volleys to saturate forward Iraqi positions and minefields, enhancing the effectiveness of coalition artillery fires that fired over 60,000 shells total in the war. In Operation Iraqi Freedom beginning March 2003, U.S. forces again utilized the M864 extensively in the initial invasion phase, particularly by Marine and Army artillery supporting advances toward . Deployed against Iraqi irregulars, paramilitaries, and residual conventional units, the projectiles were fired in support of operations like the Battle of An-Nasiriyah on March 23–29, 2003, where DPICM family rounds including the M864 provided anti-personnel and anti-armor effects over wide areas to clear urban and highway bottlenecks. documented their use in strikes near civilian areas such as al-Hilla on March 31, 2003, resulting in civilian casualties amid the submunitions' scatter pattern. The M864's base-bleed extension allowed ranges up to 29 km, enabling standoff delivery from positions south of . No verified large-scale uses of the M864 occurred in other major U.S.-led conflicts such as in , where unitary warhead artillery predominated due to terrain and operational constraints favoring precision over area effects. Post-2003, U.S. doctrine shifted toward reduced reliance on DPICM rounds in favor of precision-guided munitions, limiting further combat deployments until potential transfers in ongoing aid packages.

Recent Military Aid

In July 2023, the United States approved the transfer of Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition (DPICM) 155mm artillery rounds, including the M864 projectile, to Ukraine as part of an $800 million security assistance package aimed at addressing ammunition shortages in ongoing hostilities. These M864 shells, which disperse 72 M42 and 8 M46 submunitions, were drawn from U.S. Department of Defense stockpiles and integrated into Ukraine's Western-supplied 155mm howitzers, such as the M777. Ukrainian forces reported employing the munitions against Russian infantry concentrations shortly after receipt, with visual evidence confirming their use by late July 2023. Subsequent U.S. aid packages continued to incorporate DPICM rounds, with approvals for additional transfers in September 2023 and beyond, totaling at least five batches of 155mm cluster artillery projectiles by mid-2024, some routed through Germany to expedite delivery. The Pentagon confirmed Ukraine's operational use of these U.S.-supplied clusters within weeks of the initial July announcement, prioritizing them for counter-battery fire and area denial due to their extended range from base-burn technology. Exact quantities remain classified, but the transfers were justified by U.S. officials as a temporary measure to sustain Ukraine's artillery fire rates amid production constraints on unitary shells. No public disclosures indicate M864 inclusions in U.S. aid beyond through October 2025, though broader transfers, such as ATACMS missiles with submunitions, supplemented artillery aid in late 2023. These provisions occurred despite international prohibitions under the 2008 , which the U.S. has not ratified, reflecting doctrinal emphasis on munitions with high submunition density for high-intensity conflicts.

Combat Effectiveness

Tactical Advantages

The M864 155mm projectile disperses 72 dual-purpose submunitions—48 M42 series for anti-personnel effects and 24 M46 series for enhanced anti-armor penetration—across an area approximately 200 meters in diameter, enabling effective engagement of dispersed , unarmored vehicles, and positions that unitary high-explosive shells cannot saturate efficiently. This wide-area coverage compensates for the inherent inaccuracies of , allowing a single M864 to achieve fragmentation and shaped-charge effects equivalent to multiple conventional rounds, with U.S. assessments indicating it is eight times more effective at producing casualties than standard high-explosive projectiles based on data analysis. Against soft-skinned vehicles, peacetime testing has shown up to 60 times greater effectiveness compared to unitary warheads, due to the submunitions' ability to distribute kill mechanisms over a broader footprint. Incorporating base-burn technology, the M864 extends engagement ranges to 28-30 kilometers when fired from modern howitzers like the M109A6, surpassing the 22-24 kilometer limit of earlier DPICM variants such as the M483A1 and permitting strikes on deeper enemy formations without forward positioning artillery batteries. This range advantage reduces exposure to , as fewer projectiles are required to achieve suppressive effects over large areas, conserving ammunition stocks during high-intensity operations where artillery munitions can deplete rapidly. In trench-heavy environments, the submunitions' descent and detonation pattern creates persistent hazards that pin down exposed personnel and disrupt advances, as observed in recent conflicts where DPICM employment has denied enemy maneuver space more effectively than point-detonating alternatives. Tactically, the M864 supports rapid to saturate concentrations or assembly areas, with the submunitions' dual lethality—blast/fragmentation for personnel and explosively formed penetrators for light armor—enhancing its utility against hybrid threats combining dismounted and wheeled . U.S. emphasizes its role in shaping the by forcing adversaries into predictable movements or fortifications, thereby amplifying the impact of follow-on maneuver forces, though its advantages are most pronounced against non-hardened, mobile targets rather than bunkered or heavily armored ones.

Empirical Performance Data

The M864 155mm achieves a maximum range of 29 kilometers through base-bleed technology, which extends flight distance by reducing base drag via controlled gas ejection from a rear-mounted unit. Empirical firing table data indicate range predictions accurate to within 0.4 percent of observed values, derived from extensive test firings incorporating projectile mass properties, aerodynamic coefficients, and environmental variables. Upon deployment, the M864 disperses 72 DPICM submunitions—48 M42 and 24 M46 types—via spin-induced expulsion at altitudes typically between 30 and 150 meters, covering an effective lethal area of approximately 0.3 square kilometers against personnel and light vehicles. Each submunition features a shaped-charge for armor penetration up to 3 inches of and a fragmentation for anti-personnel effects with a 4-meter . Test data on submunition reliability show dud rates of 1.5 to 2 percent under controlled conditions, attributed to fuzes activating after 4 to 15 minutes if impact detonation fails. U.S. Department of Defense assessments from firings as recent as report overall failure rates not exceeding 2.35 percent for DPICM elements in M864 projectiles. However, analyses of older stockpiles and field conditions, including reviews of remnants, indicate realized dud rates up to 14 percent for M42/M46 submunitions, influenced by factors such as age, impact angle, and soil type. In combat applications, such as the 1991 Gulf War, M864 projectiles demonstrated superior area suppression compared to unitary high-explosive rounds, with reports estimating 5 to 15 times greater effectiveness against dispersed infantry and unarmored targets per round fired, based on post-engagement assessments of target neutralization. Yet, empirical casualty data from the same conflict reveal that DPICM unexploded ordnance accounted for 9 percent of U.S. mine/UXO injuries post-hostilities, underscoring reliability variances between test and operational environments.

Criticisms and Risks

Unexploded Ordnance Issues

The M864 155mm projectile disperses 72 (DPICM) submunitions (M42 and M46 grenades), which rely on the M223 mechanical time for arming via rotation during descent and detonation after a short delay or upon ground impact. Failures in functioning, often due to incomplete arming, defects, or environmental factors such as soft absorption or oblique impacts, result in submunitions that remain live but inert, transforming into (UXO). These duds retain full explosive potential and can detonate unpredictably from disturbance, posing hazards akin to anti-personnel mines that endanger advances, post-conflict reconstruction, and civilian populations for years. Official U.S. Department of Defense assessments, based on lot acceptance and reliability testing, report dud rates for DPICM submunitions ranging from 2% to 6%, with claims of less than 2.35% for improved variants tested as recently as 2020. However, historical operational data for older M864 s indicate failure rates of 6% to 14% or higher, particularly in conditions where controlled test parameters do not fully replicate variables like variable terrain or munitions age. U.S. policy established in mandates submunition failure rates below 1% for new production to mitigate UXO risks, but legacy inventories exceed this threshold, necessitating presidential waivers for transfers such as those to in 2023, where submunitions from M864 rounds have contributed to contested areas' contamination. Independent clearance operations by organizations like Norwegian People's Aid estimate real-world dud rates of at least 20% for these submunitions, derived from empirical recovery data rather than simulations, highlighting discrepancies between manufacturer testing and field outcomes. Efforts to address M864 UXO vulnerabilities include retrofitting submunitions with fuzes, budgeted as early as 2003, to limit dud persistence to seconds rather than indefinite hazards, though implementation has been limited to newer munitions like the M1156 Precision Guidance Kit variants. In practice, scattered over wide areas (typically 200-400 meters radius per round), M864 s complicate battlefield clearance, with each unexploded submunition requiring individual detection and neutralization, often via expensive explosive ordnance disposal teams. This has amplified long-term risks in prior U.S. operations, such as the 1991 , where DPICM remnants from similar systems accounted for a notable portion of UXO-related casualties among coalition forces during retrograde movements. The M864 155mm (DPICM) projectile disperses 72 submunitions designed for anti-personnel and anti-armor effects, but its humanitarian impact stems primarily from (UXO) that persists as de facto anti-personnel mines, endangering s long after deployment. Empirical data on s, including DPICM types like the M864, indicate dud rates ranging from 2% to 14% for U.S. legacy stockpiles, with a assessment citing 6% for the M864 specifically, potentially leaving 4–5 submunitions per shell unexploded and hazardous. These failure rates contribute to casualties, as submunitions often land in populated or agricultural areas; global reports document that 98–99% of victims in post-conflict settings are s, disproportionately children due to the bomblets' small size and delayed . In , following U.S. transfers of M864 shells starting in July 2023, Ukrainian forces' use has raised fears of widespread , mirroring Russian strikes that caused at least 193 casualties in 2024 alone, though attribution to specific types remains challenging amid ongoing conflict. Legally, the M864 falls under scrutiny from the 2008 (CCM), ratified by over 110 states, which prohibits munitions dispersing explosive submunitions under 20 kg—criteria met by the M864's payload—due to their indiscriminate effects and UXO risks. The , a non-signatory, maintains that such weapons comply with (IHL) principles of distinction and proportionality when used against military targets, citing U.S. policy since 2008 to phase out unreliable stockpiles and limit transfers to allies with similar standards. However, critics argue transfers to violate customary IHL by foreseeably causing excessive civilian harm, as legacy M864 stocks exceed the CCM's 1% failure threshold for "reliable" munitions, and U.S. assurances of low rates (<2.35%) rely on classified data unverified by independent observers. Debates center on balancing tactical utility against long-term risks, with proponents emphasizing the M864's area-denial effectiveness against massed and —critical in Ukraine's 2023–2025 counteroffensives—where unitary shells proved insufficient against Russian entrenchments. Opponents, including NGOs like , highlight causal evidence from past uses (e.g., UXO impeding reconstruction) that submunitions' wide dispersal pattern inherently risks civilian exposure, regardless of intent, and advocate alternatives like precision-guided unitary munitions despite production constraints. U.S. officials counter that withholding DPICM amid Russia's unrestricted cluster use would cede military advantage, though reports from advocacy groups, which prioritize victim narratives over operational data, often amplify humanitarian framing while downplaying verified dud improvements in controlled testing. By April 2024, multiple U.S. transfers to had intensified calls for domestic policy shifts, yet no congressional ban has materialized, reflecting doctrinal reliance on such munitions for peer conflicts.

Policy and International Context

U.S. Military Doctrine

The M864 155mm (DPICM) projectile is employed in U.S. Army to deliver dispersed submunitions for area suppression and neutralization of enemy personnel, light vehicles, and unarmored targets in the open. Each M864 carries 72 M42/M46 dual-purpose submunitions, which combine anti-personnel fragmentation and anti-armor shaped-charge effects, dispersed over a of approximately 20,000 square meters when airburst-fuzed. This capability supports joint fire missions under FM 3-09, enabling cannon artillery units—such as those equipped with M109 Paladin or M777 howitzers—to generate volume-of-fire effects against dispersed or massed formations that unitary high-explosive rounds cannot efficiently cover. The projectile's base-bleed unit extends maximum range to 28-30 km, facilitating deep fires in offensive operations or counterfire against enemy artillery. U.S. integrates M864 within multi-domain operations, emphasizing its role in shaping the by disrupting enemy maneuver and , particularly in high-intensity conflicts against peer adversaries with large-scale armored or concentrations. Cluster munitions like the M864 provide "an effective and necessary capability to engage area targets," including parks and assemblies, where precision-guided unitary munitions may be insufficient due to volume requirements or target density. tactics, as outlined in ATP 3-09.23, prioritize massed fires for suppression during breaching or exploitation phases, with DPICM rounds selected for targets beyond point-specific threats. Employment principles stress integration with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance to ensure compliance with , targeting only military objectives while accounting for the munition's wide-area effects and potential for (UXO). Department of Defense Policy Directive 3000.03E (2008) mandates that new cluster munitions achieve a submunition below 1 percent, but legacy stockpiles including the M864—estimated to have dud rates of 2-5 percent based on testing—are retained for operational use, reflecting a doctrinal judgment that their utility outweighs risks in existential threats. The U.S. has not acceded to the 2008 , maintaining that such weapons offer "a vital capability" irreplaceable by alternatives in scenarios involving massed enemy forces, as evidenced by their inclusion in aid packages for in 2023 to counter Russian advances. Doctrinal incorporates UXO , such as patterned fires and post-strike assessments, but prioritizes combat effectiveness over full dud-rate compliance for pre-2008 systems.

Global Bans and Alternatives

The , adopted on May 30, 2008, in and entering into force on August 1, 2010, prohibits the development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, transfer, and use of cluster munitions, including dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) like the M864. As of 2024, 111 states are parties and 12 are signatories, totaling 123 states committed to the 's goals, representing a majority of members and countries but excluding major producers and users such as the , , , , , and . Non-party states, which account for significant global military capabilities, continue to stockpile and employ cluster munitions, including the M864 in U.S. transfers to starting in July 2023 despite condemnation from treaty advocates. The , a non-signatory, maintains that cluster munitions like the M864 provide essential area-denial capabilities against massed and , rejecting the convention due to concerns over its restrictions on military effectiveness and lack of universal adherence by adversaries. U.S. Department of Defense policy established in mandates that new submunitions achieve a failure rate below 1% to mitigate risks, leading to the certification of select low-dud-rate alternatives while retaining legacy stockpiles of higher-failure munitions like the M864, which exhibits dud rates estimated at 2-14% in field conditions. This policy has driven efforts to phase out older DPICM variants, though full stockpile destruction remains incomplete as of 2023, with ongoing production halted for non-compliant types. Alternatives to the M864 emphasize unitary high-explosive warheads or precision-guided systems to replicate area effects with reduced collateral hazards. The M795 155mm projectile, a standard unitary high-explosive round, delivers comparable blast and fragmentation via a single charge, serving as a baseline replacement for non-dispersed targeting without submunition dispersal. Precision-guided options include the , a GPS/INS-guided 155mm shell offering extended range up to 40 kilometers and improved accuracy over the M864's 28-30 kilometer ballistic trajectory, enabling fewer rounds for equivalent effects against dispersed targets. Emerging unitary guided projectiles, such as the XM1180 C-DAEM Armor, incorporate extended-range propulsion and advanced fuzing for armored threats, aligning with the <1% failure threshold while avoiding cluster prohibitions. Sensor-fused munitions like the BONUS system, deployed by some non-U.S. forces, use self-destructing submunitions to target vehicles with near-zero duds, though U.S. adoption focuses on domestic equivalents to maintain .

References

  1. https://bulletpicker.com/projectile_-155mm-extended-ran.html
  2. https://cat-uxo.com/explosive-hazards/projectiles/155mm-m864-projectile
  3. https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2008/psa_peo/Demella.pdf
  4. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/m864.htm
  5. https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/cluster-munitions-en-337.pdf
  6. https://kudos.dfo.no/documents/51299/files/33747.pdf
  7. https://www.army.mil/article/195413/the_king_of_battle_gets_stronger
  8. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/munitionChart0806.pdf
  9. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/arms/cluster0705/cluster0705.pdf
  10. https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/land/m864.htm
  11. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA222624.pdf
  12. https://asc.army.mil/docs/pubs/alt/archives/2001/Jul-Aug_2001.pdf
  13. https://jpeoaa.army.mil/Portals/94/Documents/JPEOAAPortfolioBook_2025.pdf?ver=A_B_NzEETpCjNyGj93y_2g%253D%253D
  14. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA292946.pdf
  15. https://cat-uxo.com/explosive-hazards/submunitions/m42-submunition
  16. https://www.militarynewbie.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/TM-43-0001-28-Army-Ammunition-Data-Sheets1.pdf
  17. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/dpicm.htm
  18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/07/06/biden-cluster-bombs-ukraine/
  19. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA222562.pdf
  20. https://armyhistory.org/the-gulf-war-and-european-artillery/
  21. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a235831.html
  22. https://en.defence-ua.com/events/us_fired_only_60000_shells_during_the_entire_war_in_1991_which_explains_a_lot-8870.html
  23. https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/04/01/us-using-cluster-munitions-iraq
  24. https://www.army.mil/article/284612/milan_army_ammunition_plant_formally_deactivated
  25. https://militarnyi.com/en/news/u-s-supplies-m864-cluster-artillery-shells-to-ukraine/
  26. https://sg.usembassy.gov/biden-administration-announces-additional-security-assistance-for-ukraine/
  27. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/07/30/us-sending-cluster-munitions-ukraine-germany
  28. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-now-has-us-supplied-cluster-munitions-pentagon-says-2023-07-13/
  29. https://www.csis.org/analysis/cluster-munitions-what-are-they-and-why-united-states-sending-them-ukraine
  30. https://humanitariandisarmament.org/2024/04/04/us-cluster-munition-transfers-raise-humanitarian-concerns/
  31. https://the-monitor.org/country-profile/united-states/cluster-munition-ban-policy?year=2023
  32. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/ukraine/ua-dpicm.htm
  33. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA209510.pdf
  34. https://forum.cartridgecollectors.org/t/cluster-bombs/55504
  35. https://smallwarsjournal.com/2022/09/08/give-ukraine-right-artillery-ammo-dpicm/
  36. https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/14ulah1/historically_how_well_have_cluster_munitions/
  37. https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2004/fuze/hiebel.pdf
  38. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/arms/cluster0705/2.htm
  39. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/03/28/us-should-send-cluster-munitions-to-ukraine/
  40. https://npaid.org/mine-action-and-disarmament/news/npas-reactions-to-the-us-transfer-of-cluster-munitions-to-ukraine
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/07/us/cluster-weapons-duds-ukraine.html
  42. https://mobile.twitter.com/clashreport/status/1677217529461186560
  43. https://www.hi-us.org/en/news/99-of-victims-are-civilians-new-report-on-cluster-munitions
  44. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/04/04/us-cluster-munition-transfers-raise-humanitarian-concerns
  45. https://www.humanity-inclusion.org.uk/en/cluster-munitions-convention-under-threat-as-civilians-continue-to-pay-the-price
  46. https://www.the-monitor.org/online-reader/cluster-munition-monitor-2024?anchor=Major-Findings-115634
  47. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RS22907
  48. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/07/06/ukraine-civilian-deaths-cluster-munitions
  49. https://www.noclusterbombs.org/news/2024/04/25/us-campaigners-condemn-fifth-transfer-of-banned-us-cluster-munitions/
  50. https://warontherocks.com/2018/05/cluster-munitions-and-rearming-for-great-power-competition/
  51. https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/amd-us-archive/atp3_09x23%252815%2529.pdf
  52. https://media-cdn.dvidshub.net/pubs/pdf_32013.pdf
  53. https://www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2014/oct_dec/Jacobson.html
  54. https://www.clusterconvention.org/states-parties/
  55. https://www.statista.com/chart/27291/non-signatories-of-the-2008-convention-on-cluster-munitions-map/
  56. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/m982-155.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.