Hubbry Logo
Mel WattMel WattMain
Open search
Mel Watt
Community hub
Mel Watt
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mel Watt
Mel Watt
Mel Watt
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Melvin Luther Watt (born August 26, 1945) is an American politician who served as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency from 2014 to 2019. He was appointed by President Barack Obama. He is a former United States Representative for North Carolina's 12th congressional district, from 1993 to 2014. He is a member of the Democratic Party.

Key Information

A lawyer from Charlotte, North Carolina, Watt served one term as a state senator and was the campaign manager for Charlotte mayor Harvey Gantt.

On May 1, 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Watt to lead the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which, among other agencies, administers or has oversight for the FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.[1][2] The U.S. Senate confirmed Watt on December 10, 2013,[3] and he resigned from the House on January 6, 2014.

On September 27, 2018, Watt was called to testify before Congress about allegations that he had sexually harassed a female employee at the Federal Housing Finance Agency. On November 29, 2018, Watt was found guilty of two counts of misconduct.[4] He ended his term as director on January 6, 2019, and issued the following quote: "In my view, it's time for me to ride off into the sunset because the standards have become so confused that it's difficult to operate in them," he said, according to a transcript of his interview with investigators.[5]

Early life, education and career

[edit]

Watt was born in Steele Creek, located in Mecklenburg County.[6] He is the son of Evelyn Lucille (née Mauney) and Graham Edward Watt.[7]

Watt is a graduate of York Road High School in Charlotte. He was a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1967[8] with a B.S. degree in Business Administration. In 1970, he received a J.D. from Yale Law School[8] and was a published member of the Yale Law Journal.[citation needed]

Early career

[edit]

Watt practiced law from 1970 to 1992, specializing in minority business and economic development law.[9] He has been a partner in several small businesses.[8]

Watt was the campaign manager of Harvey Gantt's campaigns for mayor of Charlotte and for the United States Senate election in North Carolina in 1990.[10] Watt served as a member of the North Carolina Senate from January 1985 to January 1987.[11]

U.S. House of Representatives

[edit]
Watt's final Congressional portrait

In 1992, Watt entered the Democratic primary for the newly created 12th District, a 64 percent black-majority district stretching from Gastonia to Durham. He won the four-way Democratic primary—the real contest in this heavily Democratic district—with 47 percent of the vote.[12] He then easily won the general election by defeating Barbara Gore Washington (R) and Curtis Wade Krumel (L) with 70 percent of the vote, becoming the first Democrat to represent a significant portion of Charlotte since 1953.[13] In 1993, the original version of his district was thrown out in Shaw v. Reno, and was reconfigured to exclude its far western and far eastern portions. The new 12th, however, was no less Democratic than its predecessor, and Watt was reelected 10 more times. He only faced one relatively close race against Republican Scott Keadle.[citation needed]

Committee assignments

[edit]

He previously served on the Joint Economic Committee.

Caucus memberships

[edit]

Legislative history

[edit]

In 2010, Watt sponsored the Coin Modernization, Oversight, and Continuity Act.[16] In 2011, Watt became a co-sponsor of Bill H.R.3261, otherwise known as the Stop Online Piracy Act.[17] In 2013, Watts supported the Amash–Conyers Amendment, and was against the Innovation Act.

Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency

[edit]

Nomination and confirmation

[edit]

On May 1, 2013, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Watt to serve as the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Almost immediately, the nomination drew criticism from Republicans, some of whom complained that no politician should lead the agency.[18] Other Republican senators have argued that he lacks technical expertise on housing finance.[19] Obama formally nominated Watt to the post on May 7, 2013.[20]

In July 2013, the Senate Banking Committee advanced Watt's nomination on a party-line vote.[19]

On October 28, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid motioned to invoke cloture on Watt's nomination, setting up a key test of whether his nomination could overcome procedural hurdles and move to a final up-or-down vote.[21] The motion failed on October 31, with 56 votes in favor, shy of the 60 needed to pass.[22]

After a series of procedural votes on December 10, 2013, the Senate voted 57–40 to invoke cloture on Watt's nomination, ending the Republican filibuster under the Senate's recently modified rules for cloture on executive branch nominees.[23] Later that same day, the Senate confirmed Watt in a 57–41 vote.[3]

Watt was investigated in July 2018 for sexually harassing an employee.[24][25]

Controversies

[edit]

Accusation by Ralph Nader of use of "racial epithet"

[edit]

In 2004, Ralph Nader attended a meeting with the Congressional Black Caucus, at which Nader clashed with members of the caucus over his presidential bid. After the meeting, Nader alleged that Watt twice uttered an "obscene racial epithet" towards him. It was alleged that Watt said: "You're just another arrogant white man — telling us what we can do — it's all about your ego — another fucking arrogant white man." Although Nader (who is of Lebanese descent) wrote a letter to the Caucus and to Watt asking for an apology, none was offered.[26]

Opposition to Federal Reserve auditing

[edit]

In 2009, fellow congressman Ron Paul reported to Bloomberg that while Paul's bill HR 1207, which mandates an audit of the Federal Reserve, was in subcommittee, Watt had substantially altered the substance of the bill, a move which had "gutted" the bill's protections.[27] According to Bloomberg News, on October 20, 2009, "The bill, with 308 co-sponsors, has been stripped of provisions that would remove Fed exemptions from audits of transactions with foreign central banks, monetary policy deliberations, transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and communications between the Board, the reserve banks and staff, Paul said today." Paul said there is "nothing left" in the bill after Watt's actions.[27]

Paul responded when he and Alan Grayson of Florida passed a competing amendment hours before the bill cleared the House Financial Services Committee to restore the bill's original language and undo Watt's attempts to weaken its effects. Watt won support from Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts and the Congressional Black Caucus, both of which backed his amendment. Eight of the ten Black Caucus members on the committee voted against the Paul-Grayson amendment. Watt and Frank voted to inhibit the bill's approval. With pressure from the Congressional Black Caucus to delay consideration of the bill by the full House of Representatives, it is unclear when HR 1207 will face a final vote.[28]

The country's largest bank Bank of America is headquartered in Charlotte in Watt's congressional district and has threatened to leave. The Sunlight Foundation reported that 45% of Watt's campaign contributions for 2009 are from corporations in the real estate, insurance and finance industries, the seventh-highest percentage of any member of Congress.[29][30] Watt's largest contributors included American Express, Wachovia, Bank of America and the American Bankers Association.[31]

Support of SOPA

[edit]

Congressman Watt ardently supports the Stop Online Piracy Act, stating that it is "beyond troubling to hear hyperbolic charges that this bill will open the floodgates to government censorship".[32]

Ethics investigation

[edit]

Congressman Watt was formally investigated by the Office of Congressional Ethics over a series of fundraising events he was involved in. On December 9, 2009, Watt held a fundraiser and soon after withdrew a proposal he had introduced to subject auto dealers to more stringent regulations. The fundraiser brought donors mainly from large finance companies such as Goldman Sachs.[33] Watt was later cleared of charges or wrongdoing.[34]

In what the nonpartisan Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) called "disgraceful",[35] Watt introduced legislation to slash funding for the Office of Congressional Ethics.[36]

Racial gerrymandering

[edit]

In 1993, the design of his district was challenged as an instance of racial gerrymandering. The Supreme Court held in Shaw v. Reno that the unusual shape of the district required strict scrutiny of its racial purpose. Although it is rare for a law to survive strict scrutiny, the districting plan was upheld on remand as "narrowly tailored to further the state's compelling interest in complying with the Voting Rights Act".[37]

Political campaigns

[edit]

In 1992, Watt was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from North Carolina's newly created 12th Congressional District and became one of only two African American members elected to Congress from North Carolina in the 20th century, the other being Eva M. Clayton.

Recent election results

[edit]

2010

[edit]
Main article: 2010 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina § District 12
US House of Representatives 12th District General Election 2010[38]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Mel Watt 103,495 63.88
Republican Greg Dority 55,315 34.14
Libertarian Lon Cecil 3,197 1.97
Total votes 162,007 100.00

2012

[edit]
Main article: 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina § District 12
US House of Representatives 12th District General Election 2012[39]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Mel Watt 246,451 79.66
Republican Jack Brosch 62,924 20.34
Libertarian Lon Cecil 0 0
Total votes 309,375 100.00

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mel Watt

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Melvin Luther Watt (born August 26, 1945) is an American attorney and former Democratic politician who represented in the from 1993 to 2013 and served as Director of the (FHFA) from 2014 to 2019. Watt began his legal career after earning a from , practicing for over two decades in , with a focus on minority business and economic development law before entering public office. He served one term in the North Carolina State Senate from 1985 to 1986, where he was noted for advocating civil rights issues, prior to his election to in as part of the Democratic wave that year. In the , Watt secured assignments to the Financial Services Committee, where he influenced housing and banking policy, and chaired the , emphasizing and minority economic opportunities. Nominated by President , Watt was confirmed as FHFA Director by a 57-41 vote on December 10, 2013, succeeding acting director Edward DeMarco and gaining authority over and , which were under since the . During his tenure, Watt prioritized expanding access to mortgage credit for low-income and minority borrowers through increased loan modifications and reduced guarantee fees, though these shifts drew criticism for potentially undermining the enterprises' financial stability. His directorship ended amid an investigation by the FHFA Office of Inspector General into allegations of and misuse of office for personal gain, culminating in his resignation on January 6, 2019, and a subsequent settlement of related claims.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family

Melvin Luther Watt was born on August 26, 1945, in Steele Creek, , to Graham Edward Watt and Evelyn Lucille Mauney. Watt grew up in a tin-roofed lacking and indoor amid the of Mecklenburg County, conditions that underscored his family's working-class status in the Jim Crow-era South. During his early years, he attended segregated public schools, providing direct experience with the institutionalized racial separation enforced across until federal desegregation efforts gained traction in the .

Academic and Professional Training

Watt earned a degree in from the at Chapel Hill in 1967, graduating as a member of and achieving the highest academic average in his class at the university's . These honors demonstrated exceptional scholarly performance, earned through rigorous study amid the competitive environment of a state flagship institution, without reliance on familial connections or external privileges. He subsequently secured a to , where he obtained a degree in 1970 and contributed as a published author to the Yale Law Journal, including two articles that year. This period of legal training coincided with heightened national attention to civil rights issues, providing foundational exposure to constitutional and equity-oriented jurisprudence that shaped his professional orientation. Upon returning to , Watt passed the state and gained admission in 1971, establishing his professional qualifications for independent legal practice. This milestone, achieved shortly after graduation, reflected prompt application of his Yale-honed expertise to real-world advocacy, particularly in domains emphasizing individual rights and institutional reform during the post-civil rights era.

Pre-Congressional Career

Following his graduation from with a J.D. in 1970, Melvin Watt returned to , passed the state bar exam, and joined the civil rights-oriented firm Chambers, Stein, Ferguson, and Becton, led by Julius L. Chambers. This firm, known for handling desegregation and discrimination cases amid the civil rights era, provided Watt an entry into legal work serving minority communities, though specific caseload details for him remain undocumented in available records. His early tenure coincided with firm challenges, including a of its office on February 20, 1971, which underscored the risks of such advocacy but did not deter operations. Over approximately 20 years until 1992, Watt built a practice within the firm—later evolving through partnerships—shifting from civil rights litigation to specialization in business, , and minority within a framework. This focus addressed , commercial transactions, and enterprise support for Black-owned businesses in Charlotte, reflecting a pragmatic orientation toward community viability rather than high-profile litigation alone. His professional competence is evidenced by election as president of the Mecklenburg County Bar Association, a role signaling peer recognition amid a field often marked by institutional barriers for Black attorneys. No public data on firm revenue or individual client outcomes exists to quantify success metrics, but sustained operations and Watt's subsequent political viability suggest effective local service without notable ethical lapses. Watt's legal career intersected with pro bono civil rights efforts through the firm's NAACP Legal Defense Fund ties, though his contributions emphasized behind-the-scenes support over lead roles in landmark cases. By the mid-1980s, as he campaigned for and won a term in the State Senate (1985–1986), his practice began winding down in favor of political involvement, with the firm persisting under other partners post-1993. This transition highlighted his dual competence in law and , prioritizing economic empowerment for underserved groups over adversarial court battles.

Initial Political Involvement

Watt's entry into politics occurred through behind-the-scenes roles supporting Democratic candidates in Charlotte's African American community during the 1980s. He managed Harvey Gantt's campaigns for , where Gantt became the city's first Black council member in 1983, and for mayor, culminating in Gantt's election as Charlotte's first Black mayor in 1983. Watt also handled Gantt's unsuccessful 1990 U.S. Senate bid against , efforts that enhanced his local influence among Black political networks amid North Carolina's evolving urban demographics. In 1984, Watt won election to the North Carolina State Senate for District 33 as a Democrat, assuming office on January 1, 1985, and serving until January 1, 1987. His tenure represented County's growing minority interests, aligning with broader Democratic priorities on local governance and civil rights enforcement following the 1980s that increased opportunities for candidates. Watt declined to seek re-election after one term, citing a desire to devote more time to his teenage sons amid family obligations. This period established his reputation as a coalition-builder within Democratic and Black activist circles in Charlotte, emphasizing pragmatic engagement over prolonged legislative service at the state level prior to his federal ambitions.

Congressional Service (1993–2014)

Elections and District Representation

Watt was first elected to represent in the November 3, 1992, general election, securing 65.7% of the vote against Republican Barbara Gore Washington in a district newly configured as majority- following the 1990 census to address Voting Rights Act requirements for minority representation. The district encompassed urban Charlotte and surrounding Mecklenburg County areas, enabling focus on local economic priorities such as banking regulations and amid the region's role as a financial hub hosting institutions like . This partisan and demographic alignment contributed to Democratic dominance, with the district's population exceeding 50% in the initial mapping, facilitating Watt's path to as one of the first representatives from the state since Reconstruction. Over his 11 terms through 2014, Watt maintained the seat with substantial margins, typically exceeding 70% of the vote, underscoring the 's entrenched Democratic lean driven by urban voter concentrations and limited Republican competitiveness. In the 2012 election under the post-2010 map, he defeated Republican Jack Brosch with 79.6% (247,591 votes) to 20.4% (63,317 votes), reflecting sustained support in a where black voters formed a reliable base. The 2011 redistricting by the Republican-led reshaped NC-12 into a more elongated form, boosting its black voting-age population from 41.1% to 46.7% by incorporating additional minority-heavy precincts from rural counties, which critics argued prioritized racial targets over compactness and community interests. Challengers in subsequent lawsuits, including those culminating in Cooper v. Harris, contended this constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, as evidence showed legislators sorted voters by race to achieve specific demographic thresholds, subordinating traditional criteria like contiguity. North Carolina officials countered that the design prevented vote dilution under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, aiming to preserve a viable minority-opportunity amid shifting statewide demographics; however, a 2016 federal three-judge panel invalidated the map, finding no sufficient justification under precedents like , with the affirming in 2017 that applied and was not met. These debates highlighted tensions between empowering concentrated minority representation and broader equal protection principles, as the packing strategy ensured high win margins but potentially diminished black electoral influence in adjacent s.

Committee Assignments and Leadership Roles

Upon entering the House of Representatives in January 1993, Watt received appointments to the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs (renamed the Financial Services Committee in 1995), where he served continuously until 2014, including on subcommittees addressing capital markets, government-sponsored enterprises, financial institutions, and consumer credit. He also joined the Judiciary Committee in 1993, maintaining membership through his tenure, with assignments to subcommittees on commercial and , , competition, and the . As ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law during the 109th Congress (2005–2007), Watt shaped oversight of civil justice reforms, advocating for measures to protect rights while critiquing proposals seen as overly restrictive on innovation, such as during debates on the (SOPA) in 2011, where he defended the bill against charges of enabling government censorship. In later congresses, he served as ranking member of the Subcommittee on , , and the (later incorporating courts and competition policy), influencing antitrust enforcement and legislation; for instance, he expressed concerns over fee-shifting provisions in the 2013 Innovation Act aimed at curbing patent trolls, arguing they could undermine legitimate inventors' ability to enforce rights. His roles enabled input on housing finance regulation, drawing on his legal background to negotiate protections against practices predating the . Watt's committee influence extended to judicial oversight, where he opposed confirmation of several conservative nominees during the administration, criticizing a compromise on filibusters as insufficient and stating that allowing such judges to secure majority votes would exacerbate perceived judicial imbalances. This partisan stance drew accusations of obstructionism from Republicans, who argued it delayed qualified appointees and prioritized ideological alignment over merit; however, Watt countered that his positions advanced and civil justice equity, leveraging his prior civil rights litigation experience to block nominees viewed as hostile to such protections. Despite these tensions, his subcommittee leadership facilitated bipartisan elements in IP policy, including hearings on cellphone unlocking that informed later legislative restorations of consumer rights in 2013. Overall, Watt's assignments amplified Democratic priorities in and finance, though critics from conservative outlets contended his blocking tactics contributed to broader partisan in confirmations and reforms.

Legislative Priorities and Voting Record

During his tenure in the U.S. House from 1993 to 2014, Melvin Watt focused legislative efforts on expanding access to and credit for low- and moderate-income borrowers, particularly in minority communities, through support for government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and related financial regulations. He advocated maintaining and increasing GSE goals, resisting proposals in the early 2000s to impose stricter capital requirements or oversight on and , on the grounds that such measures would hinder homeownership opportunities. Critics, drawing on empirical data from GSE disclosures, contended that these goals drove the enterprises to relax standards, with purchases of subprime and mortgages rising from negligible levels in the to over 20% of their portfolios by 2006, correlating with elevated default rates amid the downturn and amplifying financial instability. Watt also prioritized civil rights measures, sponsoring H.R. 1173, the States' Choice of Voting Systems Act of 1999, which sought to grant states greater flexibility in adopting election technologies like punch-card or optical-scan systems while upholding federal standards to prevent disenfranchisement. In financial services, he co-sponsored initiatives to modernize aspects of banking and coinage oversight, such as H.R. 6162, the Coin Modernization, Oversight, and Continuity Act of 2010, aimed at streamlining U.S. Mint operations without expanding federal mandates. Post-2008 crisis, Watt supported elements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, including the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to curb predatory lending, though evaluations noted its complex rules failed to fully address GSE implicit guarantees that perpetuated taxpayer exposure. Watt's voting record showed near-total alignment with Democratic leadership on partisan issues, consistent with representatives from heavily Democratic districts. He voted against H.J. Res. 114, the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, on October 10, 2002 (Roll Call Vote 455), joining 126 other Democrats in opposition amid debates over intelligence on weapons of mass destruction. On intellectual property, Watt co-sponsored and voted for H.R. 3261, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), in 2011, endorsing provisions to block foreign websites facilitating copyright infringement, despite subsequent critiques that its broad enforcement mechanisms risked unintended restrictions on lawful online speech and innovation.
Key VotesPositionRationale/Outcome
GSE Reform (e.g., H.R. 1427, 2005)OpposedDefended affordable lending targets to promote equity; bill failed to advance amid partisan divides, leaving GSEs undercapitalized entering .
Housing and Economic Recovery Act (2008)SupportedBacked GSE reorganization and temporary authority, stabilizing markets short-term but deferring permanent reform.
Dodd-Frank Act (2010)SupportedEndorsed enhanced oversight and consumer protections; act passed 237-192, but GSEs remained outside full scope, sustaining risks.

Caucus Affiliations and Partisan Activities

Watt served as chair of the from 2005 to 2006, having been unanimously elected to the position, which positioned him to advance priorities centered on African American interests within the Democratic Party. As a long-standing CBC member, his role highlighted internal party dynamics favoring identity-based advocacy, often diverging from broader Democratic leadership on issues like fiscal restraint. He was also a member of the , aligning with its left-leaning ideological framework that emphasized expansive government intervention and protections, reflecting Watt's voting patterns as a reliable supporter of progressive priorities during his tenure. Additional affiliations included the Congressional Human Rights Caucus and the Democratic Study Group, further embedding him in networks promoting partisan policy coordination on and matters. In partisan activities, Watt advocated for policies, describing them in 1997 as mechanisms for "fair opportunity" rather than quotas, amid debates over their role in addressing historical disparities. His efforts drew substantial support from political action committees (PACs), particularly in the banking sector; for instance, during the 2009–2010 cycle, he received $6,500 from the , $7,000 from , and contributions from other financial entities, comprising a significant portion—up to 84% in some cycles—of his campaign receipts and underscoring ties to regulated industries despite his progressive affiliations.

Tenure as FHFA Director (2014–2019)

Nomination, Confirmation, and Appointment

President nominated Representative Melvin Watt (D-NC) on May 1, 2013, to serve as director of the (FHFA), the independent regulator overseeing , , and the . Watt, who had represented since 1993 and served as ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, was selected to replace acting director Edward J. DeMarco, whose tenure since 2009 had emphasized fiscal conservatism in managing the government-sponsored enterprises' (GSEs) conservatorships amid the post-2008 . Obama's choice drew on Watt's legislative experience with housing finance reforms, including his advocacy for policies like principal reduction on GSE-backed loans, though critics contended it prioritized partisan alignment over regulatory independence. The encountered significant resistance from Republicans, who viewed Watt's Democratic partisanship—evident in his consistent opposition to Republican-led reforms—as unsuitable for an agency designed to operate free from political influence. An initial vote on October 31, 2013, to advance the failed to secure the required 60 votes, sustaining a . In response, Democrats invoked the "nuclear option" on November 21, 2013, by changing chamber rules to allow on most executive branch nominations with a simple majority, thereby bypassing the for Watt and other Obama appointees. Following the rule change, the Senate voted 57-41 to invoke cloture on Watt's nomination on December 10, 2013, and confirmed him later that day in a party-line vote supported by all 53 Democrats present, plus Republicans Richard Burr (NC) and Rob Portman (OH). The confirmation marked Watt as the first sitting House member approved for a Senate-confirmed executive position under the revised filibuster rules, with proponents highlighting his congressional expertise on GSE oversight while opponents warned of diminished agency autonomy. Watt resigned his House seat effective January 6, 2014, and was sworn in as FHFA director that day, assuming full control of the agency previously led by DeMarco in acting capacity.

Policy Directives on Housing Finance

Upon assuming the role of FHFA Director in September 2014, Melvin Watt directed the agency to recalibrate housing finance policies toward expanding credit access for lower-income and underserved borrowers while incorporating risk management measures informed by post-2008 empirical data on default rates. This approach contrasted with the prior emphasis under Acting Director Edward DeMarco on stringent risk reduction, which had suspended certain affordable lending mandates; Watt lifted the suspension on affordable housing trust fund contributions in late 2014, enabling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to resume allocations supporting low-income rental development. Watt reinstated and adjusted affordable housing goals for the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), establishing targets for 2015–2017 that prioritized multifamily lending in underserved areas to foster rental opportunities for low-income households. The final rule adopted on August 19, 2015, set a single-family low-income goal at 23 percent of mortgage purchases, with multifamily goals emphasizing units affordable to families earning no more than 60 percent of area median income, resulting in GSE multifamily portfolios exceeding $100 billion annually by 2017 to support over 500,000 affordable units. These directives aimed to address housing shortages empirically linked to post-recession credit contraction, yet critics, citing Federal Reserve studies showing elevated default risks in low-down-payment loans from the prior decade, argued they risked reinstating subprime-like vulnerabilities without sufficient underwriting buffers. In parallel, Watt authorized amendments to GSE underwriting standards, including the introduction of 3 percent down-payment mortgages for first-time homebuyers in December 2014, which expanded eligibility for borrowers with limited savings but required compensating factors like reserves or scores above 620. These changes facilitated an estimated increase in GSE-backed originations to low-income borrowers, aiding post-recession recovery as evidenced by a 15 percent rise in such loans from 2014 to 2016, though longitudinal data from the Mortgage Bankers Association indicated higher delinquency rates—up to 2.5 times those of conventional loans—for similar low-equity products pre-crisis, prompting concerns over in taxpayer-backed entities. Watt also advocated for GSE capital retention to mitigate systemic risks, culminating in December 2017 letter agreements with the Treasury Department that permitted and to build limited buffers beyond the prior net-worth sweep mechanism, initially capping retention at $3 billion per enterprise while tying dividends to Treasury's . This policy, justified by FHFA analyses projecting improved resilience against economic downturns based on stress-test simulations, aligned with empirical evidence from the conservatorships where zero-capital positions amplified taxpayer losses exceeding $187 billion; however, the modest scale—relative to the GSEs' $5 trillion combined portfolios—drew scrutiny for insufficiently addressing long-term solvency amid ongoing guarantee fee pricing assumptions.

Management of GSE Conservatorships

During Mel Watt's tenure as FHFA director from 2014 to 2019, the of and —initiated in September 2008 amid the with $187.5 billion in funds—remained in place without a defined administrative path to exit, as Watt insisted that recapitalization and release required congressional to reform the finance system's structural vulnerabilities. This stance preserved operational stability, with the GSEs achieving consistent profitability; by the end of 2018, they had collectively remitted over $293 billion in dividends to , exceeding the original amount, while post-2017 amendments to the Senior Purchase Agreements enabled retention of excess profits to build capital buffers. Under these agreements, executed in December 2017 with Secretary , the GSEs retained approximately $23 billion in additional earnings by early 2019, contributing to a combined approaching $50 billion, though still insufficient for standalone viability without implicit government support. Watt prioritized credit risk transfer (CRT) mechanisms to mitigate taxpayer exposure, expanding programs initiated under prior leadership; by 2018, the GSEs had transferred portions of credit risk on over $1 trillion in single-family mortgage principal balances to private investors via securities like Connecticut Avenue Securities (CAS) for Freddie Mac and similar structures for Fannie Mae. These transactions, which involved tranching risk and selling subordinate layers to institutional buyers, reduced the GSEs' retained risk on guaranteed loans by an estimated 5-10% in targeted pools, with private capital absorbing first losses in exchange for yields often exceeding 5-7%. However, critics argued that CRTs primarily benefited Wall Street investors through government-subsidized yields—stemming from the GSEs' lower funding costs due to perceived federal backing—while delaying broader recapitalization that would restore private equity ownership and market discipline. Empirical metrics highlighted uneven progress: multifamily guarantees surged, with GSE acquisitions reaching $54 billion in 2018 (up from $36 billion in 2013), supporting affordable rental but concentrating risk in a sector prone to economic cycles. In contrast, single-family reforms stagnated, with guarantee fee adjustments providing modest transparency but no overhaul of standards or guarantees, perpetuating market distortions such as suppressed private-label and artificially low rates (30-year fixed rates averaging 3.9% in 2018) tied to the GSEs' 50%+ share of originations. This causal persistence of fostered , as the GSEs' and CRTs masked underlying dependencies on liquidity commitments, limiting incentives for innovation in risk or product diversification. Overall, Watt's approach prioritized short-term resilience over structural exit, yielding financial metrics of —such as quarterly net incomes exceeding $3 billion per GSE in 2018—but at the cost of prolonged government dominance in secondary markets.

Evaluations of Performance and Reforms

Under Mel Watt's direction, the FHFA resumed contributions to the National Housing Trust Fund and Capital Magnet Fund in December 2014, directing and to allocate a portion of their earnings—totaling over $1 billion annually by —toward initiatives, a move praised by housing advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers for addressing low-income and minority housing needs but criticized by Republicans as diverting profits from taxpayer protection and core GSE solvency. Watt's policies emphasized equitable access, including revised 2015-2017 housing goals that raised targets for low-income and minority borrowers to 25% for single-family low-income loans and 7% for very low-income, resulting in increased GSE purchases of such mortgages without corresponding spikes in defaults, as serious delinquency rates for Enterprise-backed loans dropped to 0.84% by mid-2017 from crisis-era peaks above 5%. Left-leaning organizations lauded this for expanding credit to underserved communities, while conservative critics, including House Financial Services Committee Chairman , argued it politicized regulation and exacerbated by prioritizing volume over risk management, potentially echoing pre-crisis lending pressures. In a February 2016 speech at the , Watt highlighted operational successes like capital retention and risk-sharing transactions—transferring over $20 billion in by 2016—but warned of mounting vulnerabilities from prolonged , including eroding investor confidence and insufficient GSE capital buffers, underscoring the absence of comprehensive statutory reform during his tenure. Watt's legacy includes stabilizing the GSEs amid low delinquency rates (averaging under 1% from 2014-2019) and no systemic crises, alongside incremental reforms like enhanced standards and fee adjustments, yet fundamental housing finance overhaul remained stalled, with Watt repeatedly testifying that FHFA's actions could not substitute for congressional to end government backstop dependency and mitigate long-term taxpayer exposure.

Major Controversies

Sexual Harassment Investigation and Findings

In July 2018, Simone , a senior advisor in the Federal Housing Finance Agency's (FHFA) Portfolio Management Office, publicly accused Director Mel Watt of , alleging that he pursued a personal relationship with her starting in 2015 by making repeated advances, including suggestive comments during a going-away party and subsequent private meetings. Grimes claimed Watt conditioned professional opportunities, such as pay raises and promotions, on her reciprocating his interest, including withholding a raise after she rebuffed him and threatening her job security; she supported her claims with secret audio recordings of conversations where Watt discussed her career in personal terms. The FHFA Office of (OIG) launched an administrative inquiry in 2018, contracting with the U.S. Office of Inspector General for fact-finding, which substantiated key elements of Grimes's account despite Watt's refusal to fully cooperate or be interviewed without conditions. The OIG's November 2018 report concluded that Watt violated FHFA's anti-harassment policy (Section 702 of the Standards of Conduct) by misusing his authority to attempt to coerce or induce into a personal relationship, including leveraging his position to influence her employment decisions. A follow-up OIG assessment in February 2019 reaffirmed these findings, noting Watt's actions created a and abused his supervisory role, though it did not recommend criminal prosecution. Watt denied all allegations of or , asserting the interactions were consensual and professional discussions about her career, and he resisted calls for from whistleblower advocates and lawmakers, maintaining his post until his term expired on January 6, 2019. No criminal charges were filed against Watt, but the episode drew bipartisan criticism for undermining leadership accountability at FHFA and highlighting risks of unchecked executive authority in regulatory agencies. In September 2019, FHFA reached a confidential settlement with Grimes to resolve her federal lawsuit stemming from the allegations, without admitting liability on the agency's part; Grimes expressed satisfaction with the outcome, which included financial compensation, while the agency emphasized improved internal processes for handling such complaints post-Watt. The incident prompted FHFA to enhance employee training and reporting mechanisms, amid reports of prior cultural issues under Watt's tenure, though it inflicted lasting reputational harm on his legacy without further legal repercussions.

Allegations of Racial and Ethical Misconduct

In 2004, during his independent presidential campaign, Ralph Nader accused Representative Melvin Watt of twice directing an "obscene racial epithet" at him during a private telephone conversation regarding Nader's ballot access efforts. Nader, who is of Lebanese descent, reported the alleged remarks to Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Elijah Cummings, demanding a formal apology from Watt and the caucus. Watt denied using the epithet, characterizing Nader's account as unfounded, and no apology was issued. The accusation received limited media attention and lacked audio recordings, witnesses, or other corroborating evidence, resulting in no formal congressional investigation or disciplinary action. Watt faced ethical scrutiny in June 2010 when the of Congressional Ethics referred him, along with seven other lawmakers from both parties, for review over potential improper coordination between campaign fundraising and legislative activities tied to the Dodd-Frank Reform and Act. The probe focused on Watt's amendment to exempt auto dealers from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's oversight, examining email exchanges with financial industry lobbyists and contributions totaling over $100,000 from related donors in the months preceding the vote. Watt cooperated with investigators, asserting that his amendment addressed legitimate regulatory gaps for small businesses and that all fundraising complied with House rules. The House Committee on Ethics dismissed the inquiry in 2012, concluding insufficient evidence of violations after reviewing records and correspondence. North Carolina's 12th congressional district, which Watt represented from 1993 to 2014, drew repeated allegations of racial gerrymandering due to its elongated, non-contiguous shape engineered to concentrate black voters at over 50% of the electorate, ostensibly to ensure minority representation under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Watt defended multiple iterations of the district map in federal litigation, including post-1990 and 2011 redistrictings, arguing that racial considerations were necessary to prevent vote dilution and that partisan factors predominated over race in drawing boundaries. Courts initially upheld versions of the district in the 1990s following challenges like Shaw v. Hunt (1996), where the Supreme Court remanded but did not invalidate the map outright, allowing Watt's reelections. However, 2011 maps were struck down by a three-judge panel in 2016 and affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2017 for subordinating traditional districting criteria—such as compactness and contiguity—to racial demographics, rendering the process an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Critics, including Republican litigants and good-government groups, alleged that incumbents like Watt tacitly endorsed or benefited from race-predominant mapmaking, potentially entrenching segregationist electoral outcomes despite VRA compliance claims, though no court found personal ethical lapses by Watt and defenses rested on prevailing legal precedents at the time. These episodes highlight unsubstantiated individual claims against Watt contrasted with broader patterns of defended practices later deemed constitutionally deficient, lacking direct evidence of intentional misconduct.

Policy Positions on Legislation and Oversight

During his tenure in the U.S. (1993–2014), Melvin Watt, as a member and later of the House Financial Services Committee, advocated for legislation enhancing government oversight in financial markets while resisting measures perceived as excessive scrutiny of federal institutions. Watt supported the (SOPA) in 2011, co-sponsoring elements aimed at combating online by foreign rogue sites, arguing that inflicted substantial economic harm estimated at billions annually in lost U.S. revenue and jobs; he dismissed critics' concerns over potential and domain seizures as "hyperbolic," prioritizing protection over fears of overreach that could stifle innovation and free speech. This stance aligned with content industry interests but drew opposition from tech sectors, which contended that SOPA's enforcement mechanisms risked unintended collateral damage to legitimate online platforms, potentially increasing compliance costs and reducing economic liberty through vague liability standards. On oversight, Watt opposed full audits of the proposed in Ron Paul's Federal Reserve Transparency Act amendments, such as the 2009 effort to expand Government Accountability Office () reviews into the Fed's monetary deliberations and emergency lending. In November 2009, during House Financial Services Committee markup, Watt attempted to amend or block Paul's measure, viewing it as an unnecessary politicization of independent central banking that could undermine the Fed's ability to respond to crises without congressional interference; proponents, including fiscal conservatives, argued that limited transparency had enabled opaque operations contributing to asset bubbles and , with from the Fed's pre-2008 credit expansions correlating to housing market distortions. Left-leaning defenders, like Watt, emphasized that such audits threatened technocratic expertise essential for macroeconomic stability, though right-leaning analyses highlighted how restricted oversight insulated the Fed from for policies inflating and inequality. In housing finance legislation, Watt backed policies expanding the roles of government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like and prior to the , including votes supporting increased goals and portfolio growth that critics link causally to loosened underwriting standards and subprime securitization. For instance, as a leader, he resisted reforms tightening GSE capital requirements or curbing their implicit guarantees, which empirical studies associate with heightened : GSE purchases of non-prime mortgages rose from 8% in 1994 to over 50% by 2007, fueling a boom that amplified the bubble's collapse and subsequent $187 billion taxpayer . Proponents of these expansions, including Watt, framed them as vital consumer protections against and barriers to minority homeownership, citing data on rising ownership rates among underserved groups from 1994–2006; however, causal analyses from economists attribute much of the meltdown to government mandates distorting market incentives, creating where private lenders offloaded risk to GSEs, ultimately eroding without sustainably boosting liberty or wealth. Right-leaning critiques decry this as overregulation via implicit subsidies, while left defenses prioritize equity over efficiency risks.

Electoral History

Key Campaign Outcomes

Watt first won election to the U.S. House in on November 3, 1992, defeating Republican George Simkins with approximately 64% of the vote in a redrawn to enhance minority representation. His subsequent reelections demonstrated strong entrenchment, with margins consistently exceeding 70% from 1994 through 2008, supported by minimal opposition ; for instance, Republican challengers raised under $100,000 in several cycles according to filings. This pattern persisted amid national Republican gains. In the 2010 midterm elections, characterized by the Tea Party wave that flipped numerous Democratic seats nationwide, Watt defeated Republican Greg Dority with 71.5% of the vote (79,069 votes to 31,781), as turnout in the district reached about 37% of registered voters, driven by high participation among African American constituents who comprised over 40% of the voting-age population. Opposition spending remained low, with Dority's campaign raising roughly $30,000 per FEC data, compared to Watt's $604,719 in contributions. The 2012 general election further underscored resilience, with Watt securing 79.6% (247,591 votes) against Republican Jack Brosch's 20.4% (63,317 votes) in a total of 310,908 votes cast. Brosch's campaign expenditures were limited to under $50,000, per FEC summaries, while Watt raised $852,387, reflecting the district's entrenched Democratic base and heavy voter turnout, which often exceeded 80% support for Watt in exit polling analogs from similar majority-minority districts.
YearWatt (D) %Opponent %Margin %Notes on Opposition Spending (FEC)
1992643628Minimal; district debut with strong Democratic primary win at 47%.
201071.528.543~$30,000 raised by Dority amid national GOP wave.
201279.620.459.2<$50,000 by Brosch; high district turnout ~40%.

District Demographics and Gerrymandering Claims

North Carolina's 12th congressional district (NC-12) was created after the apportioned an additional U.S. House seat to the state, with its boundaries drawn to form a majority-minority district under Section 2 of the , which prohibits vote dilution for racial minorities and encouraged configurations ensuring black voters could elect preferred candidates. The initial design linked dispersed black population centers along Interstate 85 from Charlotte to Durham, yielding a black voting-age population (BVAP) sufficient for effective representation, but its elongated, non-compact shape prompted racial challenges in Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Shaw v. Hunt (1996), which invalidated it for subordinating traditional criteria like contiguity and compactness to race without compelling justification. A 1997 remedial plan adjusted the district to span , Forsyth, and Guilford counties with a BVAP of 43%, upheld by the in Hunt v. Cromartie (1999, 2001) after finding evidence of predominant partisan motives over racial ones, given the strong correlation between black voters and Democratic affiliation in the region. By the 2010 census, NC-12 retained a BVAP of 43.8%, concentrated in urban (Charlotte) and Guilford (Greensboro) counties, where black residents comprised over 30% of the , fostering a partisan lean exceeding D+35 on the . The 2011 Republican-led redistricting increased the BVAP to 50.7% by adding 35,000 black voters from high-density areas and subtracting 50,000 white voters, creating a more serpentine urban core while claiming compliance with Voting Rights Act precedents. This reconfiguration faced racial suits alleging "packing"—excessive concentration of black voters into one district to minimize their influence in adjacent ones, thereby engineering Republican advantages elsewhere and preempting competitive districts that might reflect mixed urban-suburban demographics. A three-judge federal panel ruled in 2016, affirmed by the in Cooper v. Harris (2017), that race predominated over partisan or traditional factors, as legislators targeted a majority-black threshold without narrow tailoring to Voting Rights Act demands, especially absent Section 5 preclearance post- (2013) and given crossover voting patterns allowing black-preferred candidates to succeed in non-majority districts. Mel Watt, NC-12's representative from 1993 to 2013, characterized the district's design as empirically grounded in demographic data to facilitate minority empowerment, aligning with Voting Rights Act goals of countering historical exclusion rather than invidious sorting. During 2011 deliberations, however, Watt cautioned GOP redistricting chair Bob Rucho against overt racial benchmarks for NC-12, testifying that such explicit targets deviated from defensible partisan strategies and risked invalidation—a prediction borne out by Cooper's scrutiny of internal documents revealing BVAP quotas. Critics, including plaintiffs in the suits, maintained the packing suppressed electoral competition by corralling Democratic-leaning black voters (who supported Democrats at rates near 90%), insulating NC-12 while bolstering GOP margins in districts like NC-9 and NC-13, where diluted minority influence contributed to Republican gains amid statewide shifts. The district's heavy black concentration enabled Watt's reelections with margins often over 70%, shielding him from North Carolina's rightward trends that flipped other seats Republican post-2010; subsequent court-ordered 2016 maps lowered the BVAP below 50%, fostering competitiveness (e.g., Alma Adams's 13-point 2016 win), though later GOP adjustments temporarily restored packing before partisan gerrymandering rulings further altered boundaries.

References

  1. https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/w000207
  2. https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/23463
  3. https://www.congress.gov/member/melvin-watt/W000207
  4. https://www.fhfa.gov/news/news-release/u.s.-representative-melvin-l.-watt-sworn-in-as-director-of-federal-housing-finance-agency
  5. https://www.thehistorymakers.org/biography/honorable-melvin-l-watt
  6. https://www.ncsha.org/blog/watt-sworn-in-as-fhfa-director/
  7. https://www.politico.com/news/2019/09/27/mel-watt-sexual-harassment-suit-006249
  8. https://www.cmstory.org/exhibits/mecklenburg-people/melvin-watt
  9. https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/51666/Melvin_Luther_Watt.html
  10. https://dokumen.pub/yale-law-school-and-the-sixties-revolt-and-reverberations-1nbsped-0807829668-9780807829660.html
  11. https://www.thecharlottepost.com/news/2025/05/28/local-state/charlotte-post-foundation-honors-mel-watt-as-luminary/
  12. https://blackpast.org/african-american-history/watt-melvin-luther-1945/
  13. https://keywiki.org/Melvin_L._Watt
  14. https://ballotpedia.org/Melvin_Watt
  15. https://rightdatausa.com/election_results?y=1992&s=NC&t=P&d=all
  16. https://publicintegrity.org/politics/mel-watt-enjoys-close-ties-to-financial-industries/
  17. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1262_db8e.pdf
  18. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/15-1262/
  19. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/backers-defend-controversial-online-copyright-bill/
  20. http://www.allgov.com/officials/watt-mel?officialid=29819
  21. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/house-votes-325-91-to-pass-innovation-act-first-anti-patent-troll-bill/
  22. https://avoice.cbcfinc.org/member/melvin-l-watt/
  23. https://rollcall.com/2005/05/24/cbc-opposes-senate-deal/
  24. https://democrats-judiciary.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-and-senate-judiciary-committees-to-work-together-to-restore-consumers-ability-to-unlock-cell-phones
  25. https://www.wired.com/2013/08/cellphone-unlocking-passes-committee-but-were-not-there-yet-especially-when-it-comes-to-the-environment/
  26. https://financialservices.house.gov/media/pdf/108-51.pdf
  27. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2172&context=ypfs-documents
  28. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/hr1173
  29. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr6162
  30. https://democrats-financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=382990
  31. https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2002455
  32. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-1997-02-11/html/CREC-1997-02-11-pt1-PgH436.htm
  33. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/melvin-l-watt/pacs?cat=F03&catlong=Commercial%2BBanks&cid=N00002328&cycle=2010&seclong=Finance%252C%2BInsurance%2B%2526%2BReal%2BEstate&sector=F
  34. https://ncnewsline.com/2010/07/21/special-interest-donations-and-the-fundraising-advantage/
  35. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/05/01/president-obama-announces-his-nominees-fcc-chair-and-fhfa-director
  36. https://www.congress.gov/nomination/113th-congress/408
  37. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303330204579250532313732434
  38. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/mel-watt-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-regulator-100970
  39. https://rollcall.com/2013/11/21/nuclear-option-to-power-watt-to-confirmation/
  40. https://civilrights.org/2013/12/10/senate-confirms-watt-to-head-fhfa/
  41. https://nlihc.org/resource/fhfa-director-mel-watt-urges-congress-pass-meaningful-housing-finance-reform
  42. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/strong-pivot-new-director-fhfa
  43. https://www.fhfa.gov/news/news-release/fhfa-adopts-final-rule-on-2015-2017-housing-goals-for-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac
  44. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-19/watt-s-fhfa-bumps-up-fannie-freddie-low-income-housing-goal
  45. https://thepeninsulaqatar.com/article/16/11/2014/fannie-freddie-regulator-s-3pc-down-loans-draw-jeers
  46. https://www.mpamag.com/us/news/general/fhfa-wants-to-boost-mortgage-access-to-low-income-borrowers/19378
  47. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm1236
  48. https://www.americanbanker.com/news/treasury-fhfa-strike-deal-to-let-gses-retain-limited-capital
  49. https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hhrg-115-ba00-wstate-mwatt-20171003.pdf
  50. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/Final_Recapitalizing_the_GSEs_through_Administrative_Action.pdf
  51. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R44525
  52. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/fhfa-credit-risk-transfer-program-gse-legislation/
  53. https://www.heritage.org/housing/commentary/mel-watt-setting-another-bailout
  54. https://howardonmortgagefinance.com/2017/09/27/risk-transfer-and-reform/
  55. https://www.fhfa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Freddie_2018-AHAR-AMR_031419.pdf
  56. https://www.fhfa.gov/policy/guarantee-fees
  57. https://www.fanniemae.com/sites/g/files/koqyhd191/files/migrated-files/resources/file/ir/pdf/quarterly-annual-results/2018/q42018.pdf
  58. https://www.housingwire.com/articles/congress-backs-fhfas-move-to-support-housing-trust-fund/
  59. https://thehill.com/policy/finance/226809-republicans-blast-fhfa-plan/
  60. https://democrats-financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=401182
  61. https://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news/58351/rep-hensarling-credit-union-group-slam-principal-reduction-plan
  62. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/mel-watt-rising-risks/
  63. https://www.wsj.com/articles/freddie-mac-to-send-1-7-billion-payment-to-treasury-1455800584
  64. https://www.housingwire.com/articles/40159-fhfas-watt-reiterates-that-housing-finance-reform-must-come-from-congress/
  65. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2018/09/14/government-report-details-sexual-harassment-allegations-lodged-against-mel-watt/
  66. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/27/federal-housing-chief-sexual-harassment-investigation-714779
  67. https://www.fhfaoig.gov/Content/Files/OIG-2019-001.pdf
  68. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/02/15/ig-report-former-congressman-attempted-coerce-relationship-with-employee/
  69. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-14/fannie-regulator-mel-watt-refused-to-aid-sexual-harassment-probe
  70. https://www.housingwire.com/articles/48206-fhfa-report-declares-former-director-mel-watt-guilty-of-sexual-misconduct/
  71. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/15/inspector-general-finds-watt-misused-office-1180421
  72. https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2018/12/whistleblower-attorneys-demand-discipline-departing-housing-agency-chief/153787/
  73. https://www.axios.com/2019/02/15/fhfa-mel-watt-coerce-relationship-female-employee
  74. https://www.wsj.com/articles/report-faults-former-housing-finance-regulator-mel-watt-11550324960
  75. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-27/fannie-freddie-regulator-settles-with-woman-over-sex-harassment
  76. https://www.govexec.com/management/2021/03/federal-housing-finance-agency-improves-its-employee-satisfaction-scores/172426/
  77. https://www.americanbanker.com/news/fhfa-resolves-dispute-with-employee-over-sexual-harassment-claim
  78. https://nationalcenter.org/ncppr/2004/07/15/project-21-press-release-black-representative-black-caucus-must-apologize-to-ralph-nader-reparation-necessary-for-apology-for-obscene-racist-epithet-made-to-presidential-candidate/
  79. https://freedmenvscherokeenation.blogspot.com/2008/03/and-little-info-about-black-caucus-of.html
  80. https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article24587941.html
  81. https://indyweek.com/news/archives-news/mel-watt-one-eight-lawmakers-ethics-scrutiny/
  82. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/103449-ethics-office-focuses-on-watts-auto-amendment/
  83. https://www.wral.com/story/7785758/
  84. https://www.legistorm.com/stormfeed/view_rss/34939/member/524/title/congressman-watts-statement-on-the-dismissal-of-alleged-ethics-violations-against-him.html
  85. http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/politics-columns-blogs/under-the-dome/article152198222.html
  86. https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/north-carolina-redistricting-delay-denied/
  87. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/bizarre-districts-double-standard
  88. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/19/gerrymandering-supreme-court-us-election-north-carolina
  89. https://www.governing.com/archive/tns-scotus-gerrymandering-virginia-north-carolina.html
  90. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/nov/16/sopa-condemned-internet-blacklist-bill
  91. https://www.techdirt.com/2011/12/16/sopa-markup-day-1-we-dont-understand-this-bill-it-might-do-terrible-things-dammit-were-passing-it-now/
  92. https://clclt.com/blogs/mel-watt-tries-to-derail-fed-reserve-audit-2227114/
  93. https://reason.org/commentary/watt-amendment-to-ron-pauls-au/
  94. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/business/20regulate.html
  95. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24459/w24459.pdf
  96. https://www.congress.gov/event/113th-congress/house-event/LC91/text
  97. https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/115-115.pdf
  98. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00002328
  99. https://er.ncsbe.gov/?election_dt=11/02/2010
  100. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00002328&cycle=2010
  101. http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/42923/114047/Web01/en/summary.html
  102. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00002328&cycle=2012
  103. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/african-american-turnout-and-african-american-candidates/FF6959684A37B496F4B02595B482D9BF
  104. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98-85
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.