Hubbry Logo
Michael HallidayMichael HallidayMain
Open search
Michael Halliday
Community hub
Michael Halliday
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Michael Halliday
Michael Halliday
Michael Halliday
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday (often M. A. K. Halliday; 13 April 1925 – 15 April 2018) was a British linguist who developed the internationally influential systemic functional linguistics (SFL) model of language. His grammatical descriptions go by the name of systemic functional grammar.[1] Halliday described language as a semiotic system, "not in the sense of a system of signs, but a systemic resource for meaning".[2] For Halliday, language was a "meaning potential"; by extension, he defined linguistics as the study of "how people exchange meanings by 'languaging'".[3] Halliday described himself as a generalist, meaning that he tried "to look at language from every possible vantage point", and has described his work as "wander[ing] the highways and byways of language".[4] But he said that "to the extent that I favoured any one angle, it was the social: language as the creature and creator of human society".[5]

Key Information

Halliday's grammar differs markedly from traditional accounts that emphasise the classification of individual words (e.g. noun, verb, pronoun, preposition) in formal, written sentences in a restricted number of "valued" varieties of English. Halliday's model conceives grammar explicitly as how meanings are coded into wordings, in both spoken and written modes in all varieties and registers of a language. Three strands of grammar operate simultaneously. They concern (i) the interpersonal exchange between speaker and listener, and writer and reader; (ii) representation of our outer and inner worlds; and (iii) the wording of these meanings in cohesive spoken and written texts, from within the clause up to whole texts.[6] Notably, the grammar embraces intonation in spoken language.[7][8] Halliday's seminal Introduction to Functional Grammar (first edition, 1985) spawned a new research discipline and related pedagogical approaches. By far the most progress has been made in English, but the international growth of communities of SFL scholars has led to the adaptation of Halliday's advances to some other languages.[9][10]

Biography

[edit]

Halliday was born and raised in England. His parents nurtured his fascination for language: his mother, Winifred, had studied French, and his father, Wilfred, was a dialectologist, a dialect poet, and an English teacher with a love for grammar and Elizabethan drama.[11] In 1942, Halliday volunteered for the National Services' foreign language training course. He was selected to study Chinese on the strength of his success in being able to differentiate tones. After 18 months' training, he spent a year in India working with the Chinese Intelligence Unit doing counter-intelligence work. In 1945 he was brought back to London to teach Chinese.[12] He took a BA honours degree in modern Chinese language and literature (Mandarin) through the University of London—an external degree for which he studied in China. He then lived for three years in China, where he studied under Luo Changpei at Peking University and under Wang Li at Lingnan University,[13] before returning to take a PhD in Chinese linguistics at Cambridge under the supervision of Gustav Hallam and then J.R. Firth.[14] Having taught languages for 13 years, he changed his field of specialisation to linguistics,[15] and developed systemic functional linguistics, including systemic functional grammar, elaborating on the foundations laid by his British teacher J.R. Firth and a group of European linguists of the early 20th century, the Prague school. His seminal paper on this model was published in 1961.[16]

Halliday's first academic position was as an assistant lecturer in Chinese, at Cambridge University, from 1954 to 1958. In 1958 he moved to the University of Edinburgh, where he was a lecturer in general linguistics until 1960, and a reader from 1960 to 1963. From 1963 to 1965 he was the director of the Communication Research Centre at University College, London. During 1964, he was also a Linguistic Society of America Professor, at Indiana University. From 1965 to 1971 he was a professor of linguistics at UCL. In 1972–73 he was a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioural Sciences, Stanford, and in 1973–74 professor of linguistics at the University of Illinois. In 1974 he briefly moved back to Britain to be a professor of language and linguistics at Essex University. In 1976 he moved to Australia as a foundation professor of linguistics at the University of Sydney, where he remained until he retired in 1987.[17]

Halliday worked in multiple areas of linguistics, both theoretical and applied, and was especially concerned with applying the understanding of the basic principles of language to the theory and practices of education.[18] In 1987 he was awarded the status of Emeritus Professor at the University of Sydney and Macquarie University, Sydney. He has honorary doctorates from the University of Birmingham (1987), York University (1988), the University of Athens (1995), Macquarie University (1996), Lingnan University (1999)，the University of British Columbia (2007)[19]， and Beijing Normal University(2011).[20]

He died in Sydney of natural causes on 15 April 2018 at the age of 93.[21][22]

Linguistic theory and description

[edit]

Halliday's grammatical theory and descriptions gained wide recognition after the publication of the first edition of his book An Introduction to Functional Grammar in 1985. A second edition was published in 1994, and then a third, in which he collaborated with Christian Matthiessen, in 2004. A fourth edition was published in 2014. Halliday's conception of grammar – or "lexicogrammar", a term he coined to argue that lexis and grammar are part of the same phenomenon – is based on a more general theory of language as a social semiotic resource, or "meaning potential" (see Systemic functional linguistics). Halliday follows Hjelmslev and Firth in distinguishing theoretical from descriptive categories in linguistics.[23] He argues that "theoretical categories, and their inter-relations, construe an abstract model of language ... they are interlocking and mutually defining.[23] The theoretical architecture derives from work on the description of natural discourse, and as such 'no very clear line is drawn between '(theoretical) linguistics' and 'applied linguistics'".[24] So the theory "is continually evolving as it is brought to bear on solving problems of a research or practical nature".[23] Halliday contrasts theoretical categories with descriptive categories, defined as "categories set up in the description of particular languages".[23] His descriptive work has focused on English and Mandarin.

Halliday argues against some claims about language associated with the generative tradition. Language, he argues, "cannot be equated with 'the set of all grammatical sentences', whether that set is conceived of as finite or infinite".[25] He rejects the use of formal logic in linguistic theories as "irrelevant to the understanding of language" and the use of such approaches as "disastrous for linguistics".[26] On Chomsky specifically, he writes that "imaginary problems were created by the whole series of dichotomies that Chomsky introduced, or took over unproblematized: not only syntax/semantics but also grammar/lexis, language/thought, competence/performance. Once these dichotomies had been set up, the problem arose of locating and maintaining the boundaries between them."[26]

Studies of grammar

[edit]

Fundamental categories

[edit]

Halliday's first major work on grammar was "Categories of the Theory of Grammar", in the journal Word in 1961.[16] In this paper, he argued for four "fundamental categories" in grammar: unit, structure, class, and system. These categories are "of the highest order of abstraction", but he defended them as necessary to "make possible a coherent account of what grammar is and of its place in language"[27] In articulating unit, Halliday proposed the notion of a rank scale. The units of grammar form a hierarchy, a scale from largest to smallest, which he proposed as a sentence, clause, group/phrase, word, and morpheme.[28] Halliday defined structure as "likeness between events in successivity" and as "an arrangement of elements ordered in places".[29] He rejects a view of the structure as "strings of classes, such as nominal group + verbalgroup + nominal group", describing structure instead as "configurations of functions, where the solidarity is organic".[30]

Grammar as systemic

[edit]

Halliday's early paper shows that the notion of "system" has been part of his theory from its origins. Halliday explains this preoccupation in the following way: "It seemed to me that explanations of linguistic phenomena needed to be sought in relationships among systems rather than among structures – in what I once called "deep paradigms" – since these were essentially where speakers made their choices".[31] Halliday's "systemic grammar" is a semiotic account of grammar, because of this orientation to choice. Every linguistic act involves choice, and choices are made on many scales. Systemic grammars draw on system networks as their primary representation tool as a consequence. For instance, a major clause must display some structure that is the formal realisation of a choice from the system of "voice", i.e. it must be either "middle" or "effective", where "effective" leads to the further choice of "operative" (otherwise known as 'active') or "receptive" (otherwise known as "passive").

Grammar as functional

[edit]

Halliday's grammar is not just systemic, but systemic functional. He argues that the explanation of how language works "needed to be grounded in a functional analysis since language had evolved in the process of carrying out certain critical functions as human beings interacted with their ... 'eco-social' environment".[31] Halliday's early grammatical descriptions of English, called "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English – Parts 1–3"[32] include reference to "four components in the grammar of English representing four functions that the language as a communication system is required to carry out: the experiential, the logical, the discoursal and the speech functional or interpersonal".[33] The "discoursal" function was renamed the "textual function".[34] In this discussion of functions of language, Halliday draws on the work of Bühler and Malinowski. Halliday's notion of language functions, or "metafunctions", became part of his general linguistic theory.

Language in society

[edit]

The final volume of Halliday's 10 volumes of Collected Papers is called Language in society, reflecting his theoretical and methodological connection to language as first and foremost concerned with "acts of meaning". This volume contains many of his early papers, in which he argues for a deep connection between language and social structure. Halliday argues that language does not exist merely to reflect social structure. For instance, he writes:

... if we say that linguistic structure "reflects" social structure, we are really assigning to language a role that is too passive ... Rather we should say that linguistic structure is the realization of social structure, actively symbolizing it in a process of mutual creativity. Because it stands as a metaphor for society, language has the property of not only transmitting the social order but also maintaining and potentially modifying it. (This is undoubtedly the explanation of the violent attitudes that under certain social conditions come to be held by one group towards the speech of others.)[35]

Studies in child language development

[edit]

In enumerating his claims about the trajectory of children's language development, Halliday eschews the metaphor of "acquisition", in which language is considered a static product that the child takes on when sufficient exposure to natural language enables "parameter setting". By contrast, for Halliday what the child develops is a "meaning potential". Learning language is Learning how to mean, the name of his well-known early study of a child's language development.[36]

Halliday (1975) identifies seven functions that language has for children in their early years. For Halliday, children are motivated to develop language because it serves certain purposes or functions for them. The first four functions help the child to satisfy physical, emotional, and social needs. Halliday calls them instrumental, regulatory, interactional, and personal functions.

  • Instrumental: This is when children use language to express their needs (e.g. "Want juice.")
  • Regulatory: This is where language is used to tell others what to do (e.g. "Go away.")
  • Interactional: Here language is used to make contact with others and form relationships (e.g. "Love you, Mummy.")
  • Personal: This is the use of language to express feelings, opinions, and individual identity (e.g. "Me good girl.")

The next three functions are heuristic, imaginative, and representational, all helping the child to come to terms with his or her environment.

  • Heuristic: This is when language is used to gain knowledge about the environment (e.g. "What is the tractor doing?")
  • Imaginative: Here language is used to tell stories and jokes and to create an imaginary environment.
  • Representational: The use of language to convey facts and information.

According to Halliday, as the child moves into the mother tongue, these functions give way to the generalised "metafunctions" of language. In this process, in between the two levels of the simple protolanguage system (the "expression" and "content" pairing of the Saussure's sign), an additional level of content is inserted. Instead of one level of content, there are now two: lexicogrammar and semantics. The "expression" plane also now consists of two levels: phonetics and phonology.[37]

Halliday's work is sometimes seen as representing a competing viewpoint to the formalist approach of Noam Chomsky. Halliday's stated concern is with "naturally occurring language in actual contexts of use" in a large typological range of languages. Critics of Chomsky often characterise his work, by contrast, as focused on English with Platonic idealisation, a characterisation that Chomskyans reject (see Universal Grammar).

Ordered typology of systems

[edit]

Halliday proposed an ordered typology of systems to account for different types of complex systems operating in different phenomenal realms.[38][39]

He proposed four types of system, in order of increasing complexity—systems of a higher order encompass systems of a lower order:[40][41]

  • Material systems:
  1. Physical systems: First-order systems, the oldest and widest type of system, having emerged with the Big Bang. They are organized by composition and governed by the laws of physics.
  2. Biological systems: Second-order systems. They are defined as physical systems plus life, making individuation and evolution possible. They are organized by functional composition (e.g. an organ is a group of tissues serving a similar function).
  • Immaterial systems:
  1. Social systems: Third-order systems. They are biological systems plus social order (or value), organizing biological populations (human or otherwise) into social groups and defining the division of labour among them.
  2. Semiotic systems: Fourth order systems. They are social systems plus meaning, such as verbal language, gesture, posture, dress, painting, architecture, etc. They further divide into primary semiotic systems, which can only carry meaning, and high-order semiotic systems, which can create meaning.[40][42]

Selected works

[edit]
  • Halliday, M. A. K.; McIntosh, Angus; Strevens, Peter (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd.
  • McIntosh, Angus; Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Patterns of language: papers in general, descriptive and applied linguistics. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.
  • 1967–68. "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English, Parts 1–3", Journal of Linguistics 3(1), 37–81; 3(2), 199–244; 4(2), 179–215.
  • 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language at Google Books, London: Edward Arnold.
  • 1975. Learning How to Mean at Google Books, London: Edward Arnold.
  • With C.M.I.M. Matthiessen, 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar at Google Books, 3d edn. London: Edward Arnold (4th edn. 2014).
  • 2002. Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse at Google Books, ed. Jonathan Webster, Continuum International Publishing.
  • 2003. On Language and Linguistics at Google Books, ed. Jonathan Webster, Continuum International Publishing.
  • 2005. On Grammar at Google Books, ed. Jonathan Webster, Continuum International Publishing.
  • 2006. The Language of Science at Google Books, Jonathan Webster (ed.), Continuum International Publishing.
  • 2006. Computational and Quantitative Studies at Google Books, ed. Jonathan Webster, Continuum International Publishing.
  • With W. S. Greaves, 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of English at Google Books, London: Equinox.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Michael Halliday

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday (13 April 1925 – 15 April 2018) was a British linguist renowned as the founder of (SFL), a theoretical framework that conceptualizes as a social semiotic system shaped by its functions in context and its role in human interaction. His work emphasized the appliable nature of , bridging theory and practice to address real-world issues in , , and . Born in , , , to parents who were both language teachers—his father Wilfrid an English and Latin educator and his mother Winifred a French specialist—Halliday developed an early fascination with . During , he trained in Chinese at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in starting in 1942, served in the in from 1944 to 1945, and returned to teach Chinese at SOAS in 1945 while pursuing further studies. He earned an external BA with First Class Honours in Modern Chinese from the in 1948, having studied at in 1947, and subsequently studied at in in 1949; he completed his PhD at the in 1955, with a dissertation on The of the Chinese 'Secret History of the Mongols', supervised by J.R. Firth. Halliday's academic career spanned several prestigious institutions, beginning as a lecturer in general linguistics at the University of Edinburgh from 1958 to 1963, followed by his role as director of the Communication Research Centre at University College London from 1963 to 1970. He became the foundation professor of linguistics at the University of Sydney in 1976, a position he held until his retirement in 1987, after which he continued as emeritus professor and held numerous visiting appointments worldwide. From 2005 until his death, he served as advisor to the Halliday Centre for Systemic Functional Linguistics at City University of Hong Kong. Key publications include Categories of the Theory of Grammar (1961), which laid groundwork for his scale-and-category approach; Explorations in the Functions of Language (1973), outlining seven functions of language; and Learning How to Mean (1975), exploring language development in children. Halliday's influence extended globally through SFL's applications in , where it revolutionized language teaching by focusing on in social contexts, and in fields like and . He received honors such as the David H. Russell Award in 1981, the AILA Gold Medal in 2002 for lifetime achievement in , and an honorary doctorate from the in 2007. His collaborations, notably with Ruqaiya Hasan on works like Language, Context and Text (), and his mentorship of scholars such as J.R. Martin, ensured SFL's enduring legacy as a major paradigm in . Halliday passed away in Manly, Australia, at age 93, leaving behind an 11-volume collection of his works published between 2002 and 2013.

Biography

Early Life and Education

Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday was born on April 13, 1925, in , , , to Joseph Halliday, an English and Latin teacher who was also a dialectologist and poet specializing in the , and Winifred Halliday, a French teacher. His parents, both educators with a strong interest in languages, fostered an environment that emphasized linguistic exploration and academic achievement from an early age. As an only child, Halliday developed a fascination with languages during his childhood, including an early interest in Chinese sparked by reading about the country at age four. This interest intensified during when, at age 17, Halliday volunteered for the in 1942 and underwent intensive training in Modern Chinese at the , from 1942 to 1943. He was then posted to the Chinese Intelligence Unit in Calcutta, , in 1944, where he conducted counter-intelligence work and debriefed Chinese agents until 1945. Upon returning to , he briefly taught Chinese at SOAS before pursuing formal studies. Halliday's undergraduate education focused on Modern Chinese; he enrolled as an external student at the in 1947 while studying at on a , earning a BA in 1948 with first-class honors. From 1948 to 1950, he continued research in , including dialect fieldwork under Wang Li at in and advanced studies with Luo Changpei at . In 1949, he also obtained a in from SOAS. For postgraduate work, Halliday enrolled in a PhD program at the in 1950, supervised initially by Gustav Haloun and later by J.R. at SOAS, whose prosodic analysis approach profoundly shaped his early research on Chinese linguistics. He completed his PhD at in 1955, with a dissertation on The Language of the Chinese 'Secret History of the '. His early publications included the 1959 article "The Language of the Chinese 'Secret History of the '," which analyzed the 14th-century text using prosodic and grammatical frameworks and was based on his doctoral research. This phase under laid the groundwork for Halliday's later shift toward systemic functional approaches.

Academic Career and Positions

Halliday's academic career commenced in 1954 when he was appointed Assistant Lecturer in Chinese at the University of Cambridge, a position he held until 1958, during which he also lectured in general linguistics and initiated the development of his scale-and-category grammar framework. Influenced by his PhD supervisor J.R. Firth, this period marked the early formulation of his linguistic theories amid his teaching duties in both Chinese and broader linguistic topics. In 1958, Halliday transitioned to the as Lecturer in General , advancing to Reader by 1963, where he contributed to the department's growth and supervised notable PhD students including John Sinclair and Rodney Huddleston. His work at solidified his reputation in systemic linguistics, bridging theoretical grammar with applied computational approaches. From 1963 to 1971, Halliday served at (UCL) as Professor of General , Head of the Department of General from 1965, and Director of the Communication Research Centre from 1963 to 1965, fostering collaborations on projects such as and language processing tools. During this tenure, he directed the Nuffield/Schools Council Programme on linguistics and English teaching (1964–1970), influencing educational policy, and supervised key students like Ruqaiya Hasan, his first doctoral supervisee and later collaborator. Halliday held several visiting professorships in the United States and elsewhere, including at in 1970, the University of Illinois at Chicago Circle as Professor of from 1973 to 1974, and the in 1974–1975, where he supervised J.R. Martin's PhD. These appointments expanded his international influence and allowed cross-pollination of systemic functional ideas with American and European linguistic traditions. In 1976, Halliday relocated to as Foundation Professor of at the , a role he maintained until his retirement in 1987, thereafter becoming Emeritus Professor; in this capacity, he established the Department of , developed undergraduate and honors programs, and launched the first Master of in the . He also advised on initiatives for Australian education, promoting in curriculum design, and continued supervising PhD students who advanced (SFL), including J.R. Martin. Post-retirement, Halliday held additional visiting positions, such as at the in 1986, while remaining active in global SFL scholarship.

Personal Life and Death

Halliday married Ruqaiya Hasan, a fellow linguist and key collaborator in the development of , in 1967. Their extended beyond to scholarly endeavors, including joint explorations of cohesion in texts and the role of context in language use. Hasan passed away on 24 July 2015, an event that profoundly affected Halliday in his later years. Halliday had two children from his marriages. His daughter, Clare, was born to his third wife, Brenda Stephen, whom he married in 1961. With Hasan, he had a son, , born on 29 October 1969 in . The family resided in various locations during Halliday's academic career, including , the , and eventually , , where they settled after his retirement in 1987. Halliday was also a grandfather to four: Bianca, Nicole, Rhona, and Cameron. In his personal pursuits, Halliday maintained a lifelong interest in literature and poetry, rooted in his early exposure to classical texts and his father's work on dialectology. He also developed a daily practice of playing the tabla, the Indian percussion instrument, reflecting a broader appreciation for diverse musical traditions. Halliday's health declined following Hasan's , though he remained engaged with and scholarly correspondence until the end. He passed away peacefully on 15 April 2018 at the Uniting Wesley Heights Nursing Home in Manly, , at the age of 93. Following his , the International Association (ISFLA) and its affiliates, including the Australian Association (ASFLA), issued numerous tributes emphasizing Halliday's role as a mentor and intellectual guide to generations of linguists. These memorials highlighted his warmth, generosity in sharing ideas, and enduring influence on the field, with many recalling personal interactions that shaped their careers.

Foundations of Systemic Functional Linguistics

Intellectual Influences

Michael Halliday's theoretical framework was profoundly shaped by J.R. Firth, his mentor at the School of Oriental and African Studies in during the early , where Halliday pursued postgraduate studies in linguistics. Firth's prosodic , which analyzes phonological features as extending across segments rather than isolating discrete units, directly influenced Halliday's approach to systems, as evidenced in Halliday's 1963 analysis of intonation in . Additionally, Firth's contextual polysystemic perspective, which conceives language as a network of interrelated systems embedded in specific social contexts, informed Halliday's early emphasis on meaning potential tied to situational factors, seen in his 1959 study of the Chinese Secret History of the Mongols. Through , Halliday absorbed the ethnographic linguistics of , who viewed as inherently functional within social interactions and cultural practices. Malinowski's insistence on studying in its ethnographic —rather than in abstraction—resonated with Halliday's 1950s explorations of how linguistic choices serve practical purposes in everyday communication, as articulated in his early papers on and . This influence underscored Halliday's shift toward a functionalist , prioritizing 's role in enacting social relations over purely formal structures. Halliday also drew from European structuralists, particularly Louis Hjelmslev's and the functionalism of the School, during the 1950s and 1960s. Hjelmslev's emphasis on paradigmatic relations and the stratification of linguistic planes—separating expression from content—provided a formal basis for Halliday's scale-and-category , which organized into hierarchical levels of form and substance. Similarly, the School's functionalist principles, advanced by figures like , inspired Halliday's integration of communicative functions into grammatical analysis, adapting their focus on as a tool for social interaction into his emerging systemic model. The ideas of and on further impacted Halliday, whom he encountered early in his career and later adapted within his social semiotic framework. Sapir and Whorf's hypothesis that structures thought and cultural worldview informed Halliday's conception of as a semiotic resource that both reflects and constructs social realities, evident in his 1978 elaboration of as a social process. Finally, Halliday's immersion in Chinese linguistics during the late 1940s and 1950s—while studying at in (1947–1948) and working on dialect surveys in Canton (1949–1950), followed by his position as Assistant Lecturer in Chinese at Cambridge University (1954–1958)—allowed him to blend Eastern traditions of synchronic and diachronic analysis with Western linguistics. This synthesis enriched his systemic approach, incorporating insights from scholars like Wang Li into Firthian and structuralist paradigms.

Evolution of the Theory

Halliday's early theoretical work in the 1950s and 1960s centered on scale-and-category grammar, a framework that organized into hierarchical structures comprising units (such as , word, group, , and sentence), structures (syntagmatic relations), classes (paradigmatic groupings), and systems (choices within classes), analyzed along scales of rank, delicacy, and exponence. This approach was formally outlined in his seminal 1961 paper, "Categories of the Theory of Grammar," which laid the groundwork for a descriptive emphasizing both form and function. During his time at the in the 1960s, Halliday shifted the focus toward systemic networks, prioritizing choice systems over rigid rank structures to better capture the functional options in use. This evolution was influenced by emerging computational modeling efforts, which required representing as networks of paradigmatic choices for applications like . Key publications from this period, such as "The Users and Uses of " (1964) and articles on transitivity and theme (1967–1968), illustrated how systemic choices encode meaning in context. In the 1970s, Halliday reformulated his model as a social semiotic, viewing language not merely as a grammatical system but as a resource for making meaning within social structures, integrating elements of , , and interpersonal dynamics. This perspective was crystallized in his 1978 book, Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, which explored how linguistic choices reflect and shape social realities, drawing on studies of child and social class variations. Halliday's move to in the mid-1970s prompted further refinements, particularly in developing a comprehensive functional grammar that unified lexicogrammar and emphasized metafunctions in context. This culminated in An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1985), a detailed exposition of that integrated earlier systemic insights with social semiotic principles; the book underwent multiple revisions, with the fourth edition in 2014 co-authored by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, incorporating advances in computational systemic modeling. After retiring in 1987, Halliday continued contributing through collaborations that extended SFL into —analyzing evaluative meanings in discourse—and , which examine text structures as social processes; these developments, led by associates like J.R. Martin, built directly on Halliday's foundational systems, as seen in works like The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English (2005) and genre-based pedagogies in Australian .

Core Concepts in Systemic Functional Grammar

Systemic Organization

In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), developed by Michael Halliday, systems are defined as networks of interdependent choices that speakers or writers make to construct meaning, organized along two primary axes: the paradigmatic axis, which represents the choices available within systems, and the syntagmatic axis, which captures the structural relations that realize those choices in sequences. These networks form the structural backbone of Halliday's , modeling language as a resource for selection rather than a set of rigid rules. Halliday identifies three key axes of systemic organization that trace the development of across different timescales: logogenesis, which describes the unfolding of choices within a single text or ; ontogenesis, which pertains to the acquisition and development of by individuals, as observed in studies of learning; and phylogenesis, which examines the historical of systems over generations. These axes highlight how systemic choices operate dynamically in , linking instantaneous text production to broader developmental and evolutionary processes. The organization of these systems follows scales of delicacy and rank to structure choices from general to specific levels. scales progress from broad options to finer distinctions within a , such as in the transitivity of the , where initial choices between , mental, or relational processes branch into subtypes like "creating" or "sensing" for more precise meanings. Rank scales, meanwhile, organize language into hierarchical units—, group/phrase, word, and —allowing choices at higher ranks (e.g., clause-level transitivity) to constrain realizations at lower ones (e.g., verbal group configurations). Halliday conceptualizes language as inherently probabilistic, treating systems not as deterministic rules but as resources where options vary in likelihood based on context, drawing on to model frequencies of choices. Quantitative models in SFL analyze these probabilities through corpus data, estimating option frequencies to reveal patterns in usage, such as the relative prevalence of certain transitivity processes in specific registers. System networks visually represent these choices and probabilities, serving as a foundational tool for computational implementations in SFL, including early systems like Penman for text generation and later tools such as KPML for parsing grammatical structures. These computational applications enable the modeling and simulation of systemic organization, facilitating applications in while preserving Halliday's emphasis on choice-based grammar.

Functional Metafunctions

In , Michael Halliday posits three primary metafunctions through which language constructs meaning: the ideational, interpersonal, and textual. These metafunctions operate simultaneously within every clause, enabling language to represent experience, enact social relations, and organize flow. This tripartite framework underscores Halliday's view of as a resource for making meaning in context, rather than merely a set of rules. The ideational metafunction construes our experience of the world, encompassing both experiential and logical dimensions. The experiential aspect, realized through the transitivity system, models reality via processes (e.g., material actions like "bought" in "Our auntie bought him a nice shirt"), participants (e.g., actor "Our auntie," goal "a nice shirt"), and circumstances (e.g., time "last Easter"). The logical aspect handles relations between clauses or elements, such as through clause complexes that link ideas with conjunctions or hypotaxis. This metafunction thus allows speakers to represent events, states, and entities objectively. The interpersonal enables the enactment of social relationships and exchanges, realized primarily through the mood and modality systems, along with appraisal for evaluative meanings. Mood structures the into an interpersonal core (Subject + Finite, e.g., "Ajo shall" in "Ajo shall play the match") and residue (the rest, conveying additional information), determining whether the functions as a statement, question, or command. Modality adds nuances of probability, obligation, or usuality (e.g., "can" in "Franklin can shoot a gun"), while appraisal systems express attitudes like judgment or affect. This reflects the speaker's role in negotiating power, solidarity, and shared knowledge. The textual metafunction organizes the flow of information, ensuring coherence and relevance in the discourse, through structures like theme-rheme and cohesion. Theme serves as the point of departure (e.g., topical theme "Dakura" in "Dakura lives in a mansion"), while rheme develops the message; multiple themes (e.g., textual continuatives like "and") can layer the structure. Cohesion is achieved via (e.g., pronouns like "her"), conjunction (e.g., "and"), and lexical ties, binding the text into a unified whole. This metafunction adapts the message to its communicative channel. These metafunctions interweave in every , as in the English example "The porter sent us a this morning": ideational content represents the action (process: "sent," participants: "porter" and "us," circumstance: "this morning"); interpersonal elements might tag it as a declarative for exchange; and textual places "The porter" as theme for given . Halliday links this to the context of situation, where field (subject matter) shapes ideational choices, (participant roles) influences interpersonal ones, and mode (channel and rhetorical purpose) guides textual organization, making language a social semiotic system responsive to its environment.

Grammatical Categories

In Halliday's , the fundamental categories provide the descriptive framework for analyzing language as a resource for making meaning. These categories, introduced in his seminal 1961 paper, include unit, , class, and , which operate across scales of rank, exponence, and delicacy to model grammatical organization. The unit category establishes a hierarchy of sizes or ranks within the lexicogrammatical , typically comprising the (highest rank), group or phrase, word, and (lowest rank). This rank scale allows for recursive embedding, where lower-rank units function as constituents of higher ones, such as words forming groups within clauses. Beyond the lexicogrammatical level, Halliday's model integrates a broader stratification of language strata, extending from (the written expression ) and (the spoken expression ) at the base, through lexicogrammar (encompassing morphology for word-internal , , and lexis for wording choices), to semantics (meaning potential), and ultimately to (situational and cultural influences). This hierarchical stratification underscores how grammatical units realize meanings in without rigid boundaries between levels. The category captures the linear, syntagmatic arrangements of units within each rank, organizing them into patterns that realize specific functions. For instance, in the clause rank, the experiential —part of the ideational —typically follows a configuration of Actor ^ ^ , where the (a nominal group) initiates the action, the (a verbal group) encodes the event, and the (another nominal group) receives the impact, as in "The chef cooked the meal." Such vary by rank; at the group level, a nominal group might arrange as Deictic ^ Numerative ^ ^ Thing ^ Qualifier, expanding a core Thing () with modifiers for specificity. These arrangements are not fixed rules but functional realizations, enabling language to construe experience through sequential constituency. Classes refer to sets of units at a given rank that share similar functional roles or paradigmatic behaviors, allowing for across instances. Nominal groups, for example, form a major class at the group rank, functioning primarily to represent "things" such as entities or participants in experiential meanings, as in "a red apple" where the head Thing "apple" is classified by modifiers. Other classes include verbal groups (for processes) and adverbial groups (for circumstances), each exhibiting comparable internal structures and realizations. This classification supports delicacy scaling, where subclasses refine functions, such as definite versus indefinite nominal groups in interpersonal contexts. Systems embody the paradigmatic dimension of choice, presenting networks of options among which speakers select to construct meanings at each rank and class. In the transitivity of the , for instance, process types offer alternatives like material (actions, e.g., "build"), mental (perceptions, e.g., "think"), or relational (attributions, e.g., "seem"), each with associated participant roles. These choices are delicate and context-sensitive, forming systemic networks that prioritize function over form. Grammatical categories integrate with the three metafunctions (ideational, interpersonal, textual) by realizing their meanings; for example, tense operates within interpersonal systems, selecting primary (past/present/future) or secondary (relative) options to enact speaker attitudes toward propositions, as in the finite verbal element "has eaten" signaling present relevance. This integration ensures that units, structures, classes, and systems collectively enable the grammar to serve as a multifunctional resource.

Applications in Language Studies

Language and Social Context

In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), Michael Halliday conceptualized as a social semiotic resource, emphasizing that its meaning potential emerges from interactions within cultural and social contexts rather than as an isolated cognitive competence. This perspective positions not merely as a tool for encoding thoughts but as a dynamic system that realizes social meanings through choices shaped by societal norms and practices. Halliday argued that functions as a semiotic process integral to human social activity, where meanings are constructed collectively and variably across contexts. Central to this view is Halliday's register , which accounts for linguistic variations arising from situational contexts defined by three parameters: field (the subject matter and activity type), (the roles and relationships among participants), and mode (the channel and rhetorical orientation of communication). These variables determine the selection of linguistic features in a text, leading to predictable patterns that form genre structures in , such as reports or narratives tailored to specific social purposes. For instance, a scientific article's register might prioritize a technical field with an authoritative and written mode, resulting in dense nominalizations and passive constructions to enact objective construction. This underscores how adapts to social demands, enabling speakers to navigate diverse situational meanings. Halliday's framework extends to the interplay of ideology and power, positing that language enacts and reproduces social structures by realizing ideological positions through its metafunctional choices. In this light, SFL has informed (CDA), where linguistic patterns reveal how texts sustain power relations, such as in media representations that naturalize dominance or inequality. Halliday's emphasis on as a sociological provides analytical tools for deconstructing these dynamics, showing how ideational meanings construct worldviews that align with hegemonic interests. Halliday's engagement with , particularly the interfaces between English and Chinese, highlighted bilingualism as a resource for in SFL, focusing on structural similarities and differences that influence code-meshing in diverse linguistic ecologies. Drawing from his early work teaching Chinese, he explored how both languages evolve under comparable social pressures, with protolinguistic development in children showing universal patterns despite typological contrasts, such as English's reliance on versus Chinese's analytic . This approach advocates viewing bilingual practices not as deficits but as enriched semiotic potentials for cultural . These theoretical insights profoundly shaped applications, notably in Australian design and programs during the 1970s and 1980s. Halliday consulted on the Language Development Project, a national initiative that integrated SFL principles—learning language, through language, and about language—into materials for primary-to-secondary transitions, influencing statewide teaching across . His ideas also underpinned genre-based pedagogies in the Sydney School tradition, enhancing for migrant and Indigenous learners through initiatives like the Language Development Project.

Child Language Development

Halliday's pioneering research on child centered on a longitudinal of his , , spanning from approximately nine months to two and a half years old during the late to early 1970s. Detailed in his seminal 1975 monograph Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of , this study tracked the transition from —a pre-grammatical system of simple signs and gestures—to the mother tongue, emphasizing as a social semiotic tool for . Halliday documented Nigel's utterances through extensive notes on , intonation, and context, revealing how early communication served practical and social purposes before evolving into structured . The development unfolded in three phases. In the protolinguistic phase (roughly 6 to 18 months), Nigel employed a system of microfunctions using proto-words and intonation patterns, including (to satisfy material needs, e.g., requesting food), regulatory (to influence others' actions, e.g., directing play), interactional (to establish social contact, e.g., greetings), personal (to express emotions), (to inquire about the environment), imaginative (to engage in pretend scenarios), and informative (to share observations). The transition phase (18 months to about 2 years) marked a shift to recognizable adult-like words and , consolidating these into macrofunctions: mathetic (for learning and ) and pragmatic (for interpersonal action), with rapid expansion and rudimentary emerging through social exchanges. By the third phase (after 2 years), Nigel's system approximated adult , incorporating the three metafunctions—ideational (construing experience), interpersonal (enacting relationships), and textual (organizing information)—as the endpoint of functional maturation. Halliday conceptualized language acquisition as an inductive process, where the child actively constructs the grammatical system through ongoing social interactions, rather than relying on innate universals. In this view, caregivers' responses to the child's protolinguistic signs scaffold meaning potential, enabling the child to "learn how to mean" by construing experiences and relationships in context-specific ways. This social semiotic approach contrasted sharply with Chomskyan theories of pre-wired language faculties, positioning development as a culturally mediated induction from simple functions to multifunctional grammar. The implications of Halliday's framework extended to education, particularly early literacy, where systemic functional grammar illuminates how children build cohesive texts from functional meanings. This influenced his collaboration with Ruqaiya Hasan in Cohesion in English (1976), which analyzed textual connectivity—through , conjunction, and lexical ties—as essential for children's progression from spoken to written , informing genre-based pedagogies that support register awareness in classrooms. Cross-linguistic insights from Halliday's early experiences in (1947-1950) informed his later work on child language development, underscoring the social universality of meaning construction across .

Typological Systems

Halliday's approach to typology within () emphasizes an ordered typology of semiotic systems, positioning as a fourth-order system that emerges from physical, biological, and social orders of complexity. This framework construes as varying along parametric dimensions, such as the degree of versus in morphology, or the organization of rank scales in syntax, enabling systematic comparisons through SFL's network-based representations. For instance, English typically exhibits a rank scale of > group > word > , while features a prosodic structure of tone group > foot > , illustrating how systemic choices reflect ecological adaptations to communicative demands. Early explorations in Halliday's typology incorporated pivot concepts to bridge developmental patterns with adult structures, particularly in understanding processes where lexical items evolve into functional elements across types. This linking highlights how pivot-like constructions in simpler systems grammaticalize into more complex adult typologies, contributing to comparative analyses of morphological evolution. Such insights informed Halliday's broader typological models by underscoring the dynamic interplay between simplicity and elaboration in systems. Cross-linguistic applications of SFL under Halliday's influence reveal significant variations in functional realizations, such as theme systems that organize information structure. In English, themes often align with subjects for topical progression, whereas in Chinese, themes may draw more flexibly from temporal or circumstantial elements to suit flow; similarly, Tagalog employs voice systems that alter theme-rheme relations through focus marking, diverging from Indo-European patterns. These studies, extending Halliday's functional to non-Western languages, demonstrate how typological differences arise from contextual priorities rather than universal structural mandates. Central to Halliday's typological perspective are functional universals in SFL, positing that all languages possess ideational resources for construing , interpersonal mechanisms for enacting relationships, and textual means for organizing discourse, despite profound structural diversity. This contrasts with form-based typologies by prioritizing meaning potential over surface features, allowing for empirical comparisons without assuming descriptive universals like fixed word orders. Systemic organization in typological networks thus serves as a tool for modeling these universals across languages. In the and , Halliday's systemic models facilitated computational typology through applications in , notably in projects like the Penman text generation system, which utilized SFL networks to construct multilingual databases and generate varied outputs based on functional choices. These efforts, including the grammar developed collaboratively with Halliday, aimed to typological variations for computational comparison, laying groundwork for database-driven linguistic despite challenges in parsing complexity.

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Linguistics and Education

Michael Halliday's development of (SFL) established it as a foundational in modern , emphasizing language as a social semiotic system rather than an isolated cognitive structure. This approach shifted focus from abstract rules to functional choices in context, influencing by prioritizing real-text analysis and metafunctional meanings. The International Systemic Functional Linguistics Association (ISFLA), formed to promote global scholarship in SFL, reflects the theory's institutionalization and enduring impact. In education, Halliday's ideas profoundly shaped pedagogy through the Sydney School's genre-based approach, which applies SFL to teach by explicitly analyzing text structures and social purposes in diverse classrooms. This method, emerging in the from Australia's Disadvantaged Schools Programme, equips multilingual and socioeconomically varied students with tools to navigate academic genres, such as reports and narratives, fostering equitable access to meaning-making. Halliday's tripartite model—learning language, learning through language, and learning about language—underpins this, promoting language as a resource for social participation and in . Halliday's SFL has extended into , informing fields like through of cohesion and register to identify authorship or intent in legal texts. In translation studies, SFL's metafunctional framework guides equivalence across languages by mapping ideational, interpersonal, and textual meanings, as seen in analyses of English-Chinese translations. Computational (NLP) has also adopted SFL for tasks like text generation and semantic parsing, leveraging systemic networks to model context-dependent choices. The global adoption of SFL spans , , and , with strong uptake in due to Halliday's early studies there and collaborations with scholars like Ruqaiya Hasan on cohesion and J.R. Martin on genre theory. In , SFL informs discourse studies via annual conferences, while in , it supports initiatives. These expansions highlight SFL's adaptability across cultural contexts, often through joint works like Halliday and Hasan's Cohesion in English (1976). SFL's critiques of Chomskyan generativism underscore its emphasis on social over cognitive dimensions, rejecting innate in favor of as a learned semiotic tool shaped by interaction. Halliday argued that generativism's focus on competence isolated from neglects contextual functions, positioning SFL as a counterparadigm that integrates and for practical analysis. This debate has sustained discussions on 's role in society, reinforcing SFL's interdisciplinary legacy.

Extensions to Multimodality

In the 1990s and 2000s, Michael Halliday's social semiotic framework from (SFL) inspired extensions to , conceptualizing images, gestures, and other non-linguistic resources as semiotic systems parallel to language, each capable of realizing ideational, interpersonal, and textual meanings in social contexts. This development addressed limitations in the original theory by broadening its scope beyond verbal modes to encompass multimodal ensembles, where meanings arise from the orchestration of multiple semiotic resources. Prominent extensions were advanced by Halliday's associates, particularly Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen, who in their seminal 1996 work Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design adapted Halliday's three metafunctions to formulate a visual grammar for analyzing static images in media and design. Their approach posits that visuals, like language, construe experience (ideational), enact social relations (interpersonal), and organize information (textual), enabling systematic dissection of how images contribute to discourse. Halliday's foundational theory provided the theoretical unity for these expansions, as he emphasized in his social semiotic writings the interconnectedness of all meaning-making modes within cultural systems. These extensions have fostered applications in multimodal discourse analysis (MDA), particularly systemic functional MDA (SF-MDA), which integrates linguistic and non-linguistic modes to unpack meaning construction. In , SF-MDA examines interactions between text, visuals, and layout in online platforms, revealing how multimodal ensembles shape user engagement and narratives. In , it analyzes classroom resources like slides and videos to understand how multimodal texts support learning processes. In , SF-MDA dissects print and digital campaigns—for instance, by mapping ideational meanings across verbal and visual elements to uncover persuasive strategies. Post-2018 developments have integrated SF-MDA with in digital , such as frameworks analyzing generative AI outputs through SFL lenses to measure gains and losses in multimodal . In education, SFL-based evaluates generative AI feedback systems, highlighting how multimodal outputs enhance learner-centered interactions as of 2025. These advancements underscore the enduring relevance of Halliday's framework in evolving digital .

Selected Works

Major Monographs

Halliday's major monographs form the cornerstone of (SFL), providing detailed theoretical frameworks for understanding as a social resource. These works, primarily authored by Halliday, emphasize the functional organization of in context, influencing fields from to . The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching (1964), co-authored with Angus McIntosh and Peter Strevens and published by Longmans, represents an early application of to . The book integrates insights from structural and scale-and-category grammar to outline how linguistic sciences can inform teaching, stressing the need to address as a system of choices shaped by social purposes rather than isolated rules. It advocates for a that connects phonological, grammatical, and semantic levels to real communicative needs, laying groundwork for functional approaches in by demonstrating how teaching should reflect 's role in social interaction. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language (1975), published by Edward Arnold, draws on longitudinal observations of Halliday's son to explore child through a functional lens. Halliday describes how children progress from proto-linguistic functions—such as (demanding goods), regulatory (controlling behavior), and interactional (establishing relations)—to the metafunctions of ideational, interpersonal, and textual meanings. This work establishes as a process of learning to mean within social contexts, emphasizing that emerges from the child's need to construe and interact, rather than innate structures alone. It introduces the concept of as a semiotic system evolving through stages, influencing studies in developmental . Explorations in the Functions of Language (1973), published by Edward Arnold, explores the functional organization of , introducing seven basic functions (instrumental, regulatory, interactional, personal, heuristic, imaginative, and representational) and their role in across contexts. This work bridges early theoretical developments in SFL to applications in child language and , laying the foundation for the metafunctional framework. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (1978), published by Edward Arnold, articulates Halliday's core theory of language as a social semiotic resource for making meaning in cultural settings. The posits that functions simultaneously to represent experience (ideational), enact relationships (interpersonal), and organize (textual), with meaning arising from social processes rather than isolated signs. Halliday argues that linguistic choices reflect and shape social structures, extending Firth's of situation to include cultural , and critiques Chomskyan generativism by prioritizing use over competence. This text defines SFL's , providing a framework for analyzing how realizes and power in everyday interactions. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1985), first published by Edward Arnold and revised in multiple editions (including a fourth in 2014 co-authored with Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen by Routledge), offers a comprehensive description of English grammar from an SFL perspective. Halliday structures the grammar around the three metafunctions, detailing clause systems for transitivity (ideational), mood and modality (interpersonal), and theme-rheme (textual), while integrating lexicogrammar as a unified resource for meaning potential. The book rejects traditional formal syntax in favor of functional units like rank scale and delicacy, providing analytical tools for texts across registers and illustrating how grammar realizes social semiosis. It serves as the primary reference for SFL grammatical analysis, with editions updating examples and refining theoretical alignments. Spoken and Written Language (1985), initially published by Deakin University Press and reissued by in 1989, examines register differences between spoken and written modes as variations in functional grammar. Halliday contrasts the prosodic, dynamic structure of speech—characterized by lexical sparsity, grammatical explicitness, and interpersonal orientation—with the synoptic, static qualities of writing, which features denser information and . Drawing on SFL, the work analyzes how these modes realize metafunctions differently, such as greater modality in speech for negotiation versus in writing for logical density, and discusses implications for . It underscores language variation as a resource for context-specific meaning, advancing register in SFL.

Key Articles and Edited Volumes

Halliday's seminal article "Categories of the Theory of Grammar," published in 1961, introduced the scale-and-category model as a framework for describing grammatical systems, emphasizing scales of rank and delicacy alongside categories of unit, structure, class, and system to analyze language as a functional resource. This work marked a pivotal shift from structuralist approaches by integrating systemic choices into grammatical theory, influencing subsequent developments in . In his 1970 paper "Language Structure and Language Function," Halliday argued that linguistic structures are inherently tied to social functions, proposing that realizes metafunctions such as ideational, interpersonal, and textual meanings within communicative contexts. The article highlighted how functions to construe experience, enact relationships, and organize , laying groundwork for viewing as a social semiotic system rather than an autonomous module. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan's Language, Context, and Text (1989) delved into the mechanisms of cohesion that bind texts to their social-semiotic contexts, examining how lexical, grammatical, and semantic ties create unity across while reflecting situational variables like field, , and mode. This book advanced the understanding of text as a functional unit by integrating cohesion with contextual parameters, influencing analyses of coherence in .

References

  1. https://hallidaycentre.cityu.edu.hk/02_halliday-intro.html
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13488678.2019.1608720
  3. http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/History/HallidayLifePart1-2-vOct08.pdf
  4. https://www.smh.com.au/national/mak-halliday-university-sydney-chomsky-linguists-20180509-p4zeap.html
  5. http://isfla.org/Systemics/History/HallidayLifePart1-2-vOct08.pdf
  6. https://www.ae-info.org/ae/User/Halliday_Michael
  7. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/brain-sciences/news/2018/apr/pals-michael-halliday-tribute
  8. https://www.humanities.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/AAH-Obit-Halliday-2018.pdf
  9. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2018/04/19/vale-emeritus-professor-michael-halliday.html
  10. https://asfla.net/m-a-k-halliday/tributes-to-m-a-k-halliday/
  11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/firth-and-the-origins-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/ADA96318C41317EC44957F289BA79BCD
  12. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvggx2qk.7
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216610000780
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300836173_MAK_Halliday%27s_functional_grammar_and_the_Prague_school
  15. https://dokumen.pub/systemic-functional-insights-on-language-and-linguistics-the-mak-halliday-library-functional-linguistics-series-9789811687129-9789811687136-9811687129.html
  16. https://functionallinguistics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2196-419X-1-4
  17. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-8713-6_5
  18. https://books.google.com/books/about/Language_as_Social_Semiotic.html?id=KSkLAQAAMAAJ
  19. https://books.google.com/books/about/An_Introduction_to_Functional_Grammar.html?id=k_4vAQAAMAAJ
  20. https://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/
  21. http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/definition.html
  22. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/sfl-the-model/50D167F61D4D34BD096691B548D3F835
  23. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/bloomsbury-companion-to-m-a-k-halliday-9781441172754/
  24. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781441133175_A23998600/preview-9781441133175_A23998600.pdf
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/systemic-functional-linguistics-and-computation/10D8562DE4A1B96E6B6CEACB6E7E34C2
  26. https://ijll.thebrpi.org/journals/ijll/Vol_5_No_2_December_2017/21.pdf
  27. https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsel/article/download/9423/7638
  28. https://www.uefap.org/grammar-sfl/
  29. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/languages/grammar-matters/content-section-2
  30. https://books.google.com/books/about/Categories_of_the_theory_of_grammar.html?id=ZHawuAAACAAJ
  31. https://books.google.com/books/about/Halliday_s_Introduction_to_Functional_Gr.html?id=odUqAAAAQBAJ
  32. https://www.alvinleong.info/sfg/sfgintro.html
  33. https://www.uefap.org/grammar-nominal-group/
  34. https://www.ugr.es/~lquereda/the_unit_group.htm
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332991173_Social_Semiotics
  36. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/06/20.pdf
  37. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/langct.00072.luk
  38. https://functionallinguistics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40554-016-0034-0
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327835008_Halliday_as_an_Educational_Theorist_1
  40. https://www.academia.edu/2419992/SYSTEMIC_FUNCTIONAL_LINGUISTICS_AND_A_THEORY_OF_LANGUAGE_IN_EDUCATION
  41. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003288077-7/learning-mean-jane-torr
  42. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1217945.pdf
  43. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4097&context=ajte
  44. https://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/JuneJuly05/HallidayLangBased.pdf
  45. https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijel/article/download/0/0/40488/41736
  46. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781317383000_A45122933/preview-9781317383000_A45122933.pdf
  47. https://www.academia.edu/77499948/Grammatical_change_theory_and_description
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346153225_hanyufenxidexitonggongnengmoshi_A_Systemic_Functional_Framework_for_Chinese_Analysis
  49. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/language-typology/ECD8D020309D56B61E9EE7110F3833DA
  50. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/58a1dcc3-9d6e-4401-a9a6-b375cb77cda8/download
  51. http://www.isfla.org/
  52. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613711.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49617407_Systemic_functional_linguistics_and_a_theory_of_language_in_education_Systemic_functional_linguistics_and_a_theory_of_language_in_education
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/systemic-functional-linguistics
  55. https://lingua.soloclcs.org/index.php/lingua/article/download/731/679/1738
  56. http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Conferences/Past-Conferences.html
  57. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ920998.pdf
  58. https://semioticon.com/semiotix/2012/03/halliday-and-multimodal-semiotics/
  59. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016441/full
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308277291_6_Social_Semiotic_Multimodality
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249671419_Systemic_functional-multimodal_discourse_analysis_SF-MDA_Constructing_ideational_meaning_using_language_and_visual_imagery
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562517.2018.1527763
  63. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470357208096210
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377112237_A_multimodal_grammar_of_artificial_intelligence_Measuring_the_gains_and_losses_in_generative_AI
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393987190_A_Systemic_Functional_Linguistics_Discourse_Analysis_of_Learner-_Centered_Generative_AI_Feedback_in_Higher_Education_A_Systemic_Functional_Linguistics_Discourse_Analysis_of_Learner-_Centered_Generativ
  66. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26349795251327939
  67. http://www.isfla.org/cgi-bin/SFLBooks.cgi
  68. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae5af9d706babe703bd005aaca6af5ae1b1e10d0
  69. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Linguistic_Sciences_and_Language_Tea.html?id=Bv-mjgEACAAJ
  70. https://newlearningonline.com/literacies/chapter-6/learning-to-mean
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124437012500251
  72. https://www.amazon.com/Explorations-Functions-Language-Michael-Halliday/dp/0598217012
  73. https://semioticon.com/semiotix/2012/03/language-as-social-semiotic-in-hallidays-systemic-functional-linguistics/
  74. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/m-a-k-halliday-language-as-social-semiotic-the-social-interpretation-of-language-and-meaning-london-edward-arnold-1978-pp-256/12CEC8267EFAC14C9CAFAC76112A318F
  75. https://books.google.com/books/about/An_Introduction_to_Functional_Grammar.html?id=0bvXngEACAAJ
  76. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/426000.An_Introduction_to_Functional_Grammar
  77. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Spoken-and-Written-Language-Halliday/d07b58af7d86e727da6f9965e0f516d50bfe372f
  78. https://reclaimingthelanguage.blog/2018/09/01/halliday-on-spoken-and-written-language/
  79. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756
  80. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=amwN0_gAAAAJ&hl=en
  81. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1592905
  82. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137402868_6
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303414552_Language_and_Society_Context_and_Text_the_Contributions_of_Ruqaiya_Hasan
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.