Hubbry Logo
MicrotraumaMicrotraumaMain
Open search
Microtrauma
Community hub
Microtrauma
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Microtrauma
Microtrauma
Microtrauma
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Microtrauma is any of many possible small injuries to the body.[1]

Muscle fibres may be "microtorn" during microtrauma.

Microtrauma can include the microtearing of muscle fibres, the sheath around the muscle and the connective tissue. It can also include stress to the tendons, and to the bones (see Wolff's law). It is unknown whether or not the ligaments adapt like this. Microtrauma to the skin (compression, impact, abrasion) can also cause increases in a skin's thickness, as seen from the calluses formed from running barefoot or the hand calluses that result from rock climbing. This might be due to increased skin cell replication at sites under stress where cells rapidly slough off or undergo compression or abrasion.

Most microtrauma cause a low level of inflammation that cannot be seen or felt. These injuries can arise in muscle, ligament, vertebrae, and discs, either singly or in combination. Repetitive microtrauma which are not allowed time to heal can result in the development of more serious conditions.

Negative effects

[edit]

Back pain can develop gradually as a result of microtrauma brought about by repetitive activity over time. Because of the slow and progressive onset of this internal injury, the condition is often ignored until the symptoms become acute, often resulting in disabling injury. Acute back injuries can arise from stressful lifting techniques done without adequate recovery, especially when experimenting with more ballistic work, or work where the extensor spinae are stressed during spinal flexion when much of the load is commonly taken up by the slower to heal ligaments which may not adapt progressively to the stress. While the acute injury may seem to be caused by a single well-defined incident, it may have been preventable or lessened if not for the years of injury to the musculoskeletal support mechanism by repetitive microtrauma.

Positive effects

[edit]
Main article: Muscle hypertrophy

After microtrauma from stress (such as lifting weights) to muscles, they can be rebuilt and overcompensate to reduce the likeliness of re-injury.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Microtrauma

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Microtrauma refers to small-scale, microscopic injuries to musculoskeletal tissues, such as muscle fibers and tendons, resulting from repetitive mechanical stress, eccentric loading, or unaccustomed physical activity. These injuries, often involving disruptions at the cellular level like sarcomere overstretching or fiber tears, are typically subclinical and initiate inflammatory and repair processes without immediate overt symptoms. In exercise physiology, microtrauma is a key mechanism underlying exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), particularly from high-intensity or novel eccentric contractions that exceed the tissue's tolerance. The primary causes of microtrauma in include mechanical strain during lengthening contractions, metabolic stress from accumulation, and factors like exercise duration, intensity, and muscle at peak . This damage manifests as increased sarcolemma permeability, calcium dysregulation, and activation of proteolytic enzymes like calpain, leading to protein breakdown and leakage of biomarkers such as into the bloodstream. Consequently, microtrauma contributes to (DOMS), temporary strength deficits (up to 50% loss in severe cases), swelling, and reduced , with recovery typically occurring within 2–7 days through inflammatory resolution and cell-mediated repair. Beyond muscle, microtrauma plays a central role in overuse tendinopathies, where cumulative low-magnitude loading overwhelms repair capacity, causing disorganization, pain, and decreased load tolerance. In tendons, this repetitive microtrauma—often from sports involving cyclic motions like running or throwing—results in failed healing responses, neovascularization, and proliferation, distinguishing it from acute macrotrauma. Notably, while microtrauma can drive adaptive in muscle via mechanisms like mechanical tension and cell activation, excessive or unmanaged instances heighten risk, emphasizing the balance between stress and recovery in training protocols.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Microtrauma refers to microscopic damage inflicted on muscle fibers, connective tissues, or other bodily structures, typically arising from repetitive exposure to low-level mechanical stress that does not produce visible or overt . This form of occurs at the cellular or subcellular level, often without immediate symptoms, and is a common outcome of activities involving repeated contractions or loading, such as resistance training or prolonged physical exertion. Unlike larger-scale injuries, microtrauma involves subtle disruptions that the body can repair through natural regenerative processes, potentially leading to tissue and strengthening over time. Key characteristics of microtrauma include the development of small tears or disruptions in the Z-lines of —the fundamental contractile units within muscle fibers—as well as localized and subsequent repair mechanisms that promote or resilience. These ultrastructural changes, such as sarcomere misalignment and Z-line streaming, trigger an inflammatory response involving immune cell infiltration and satellite cell activation, which facilitates protein synthesis and tissue remodeling for . In contrast, macrotrauma encompasses acute, high-force events resulting in macroscopic injuries like fractures, sprains, or complete tears, which often require medical intervention and extended recovery periods. The term "microtrauma" originates from the Greek roots "micro-" meaning small and "trauma" meaning wound or injury, reflecting its focus on minute-scale damage. It first appeared in scientific literature in the early to mid-20th century, with documented usage in medical and physiological texts by 1942, and became prominent in exercise science contexts to describe sub-clinical muscle and tissue responses to repetitive stress.

Historical Development

The concept of microtrauma in emerged from early investigations into exercise-induced soreness and structural changes. In 1902, Theodore Hough published the first detailed description of (DOMS), attributing it to microscopic ruptures within muscle fibers following unaccustomed eccentric contractions, based on ergographic measurements of finger flexor performance. This work laid the groundwork for recognizing minor tissue disruptions as a response to mechanical stress, though the term "microtrauma" was not yet in use. Subsequent observations in the early , such as those exploring metabolic fatigue, built on these ideas but focused more on immediate exertion effects rather than delayed damage. By the mid-20th century, the notion of microtrauma gained traction in and resistance training research, where it was linked to adaptive muscle growth. Studies in the began quantifying fiber-level changes after heavy loading, with researchers like C.J. Duncan demonstrating in that elevated intracellular calcium could trigger degenerative processes in muscle cells, providing a biochemical basis for subtle injuries during training. This period saw the integration of microtrauma into discussions of in texts, positing that controlled fiber disruptions from stimulated repair and enlargement, though remained limited to animal models and basic biopsies. The marked a pivotal formalization of the microtrauma model through R.B. Armstrong's influential 1984 review, which synthesized evidence for exercise-induced muscle damage involving popping, membrane disruptions, and as precursors to soreness and . Advancements in the and utilized to visualize these changes, with J. Fridén's 1981 biopsy studies revealing myofibrillar overstretch and Z-line streaming in human subjects post-eccentric exercise, confirming microtrauma at the ultrastructural level. J.D. MacDougall's 1995 work further quantified myofibrillar disruptions after resistance bouts, showing greater damage from eccentric phases and its attenuation with . Entering the , non-invasive techniques like MRI provided clinical validation, as demonstrated by L.L. Ploutz-Snyder in 1997, who used imaging to detect subclinical and cross-sectional area increases indicative of damage-driven remodeling in trained individuals. These milestones shifted microtrauma from anecdotal observation to a cornerstone of , emphasizing its role in both injury risk and beneficial adaptations.

Mechanisms and Causes

Physiological Mechanisms

Microtrauma in primarily arises from mechanical disruptions at the cellular level during forceful lengthening contractions. Eccentric actions place sarcomeres on the descending limb of the length-tension relationship, where force production is lower relative to muscle length, causing non-uniform stress distribution across myofibrils. This leads to selective yielding of weaker sarcomeres, resulting in overextension, popped sarcomeres, and streaming of Z-disks, where and filaments become disorganized. Such structural damage compromises myofibrillar integrity, initiating a cascade of proteolytic events. The mechanical strain from eccentric contractions also increases sarcolemmal permeability, allowing uncontrolled calcium influx into the . Elevated intracellular calcium activates proteases, particularly calpains, which cleave key cytoskeletal proteins such as desmin and , exacerbating myofibrillar disassembly and contributing to further membrane instability. This initial damage triggers an inflammatory response, characterized by the rapid release of pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from damaged muscle fibers and resident immune cells. Within hours, neutrophils are recruited to the site, peaking early to phagocytose cellular debris, followed by monocytes differentiating into M1 macrophages that amplify inflammation through additional cytokine production. As subsides, typically within 48 hours, the response shifts toward resolution and repair, with macrophages promoting tissue remodeling via anti-inflammatory signals. Satellite cells, quiescent muscle stem cells located between the and , become activated by growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) secreted by macrophages. These activated satellite cells proliferate, fuse with existing myofibers, and donate myonuclei, facilitating and regeneration of damaged fibers to restore contractile function. A key indicator of these membrane permeability changes is the elevation of (CK) in the bloodstream, released from compromised muscle cells. CK levels typically rise within 24 hours post-damage, peaking at 4-6 days, and correlate with the extent of sarcolemmal disruption and inflammatory activity.

Primary Causes

Microtrauma in muscles and tendons primarily arises from mechanical stresses imposed by physical activities and occupational demands, leading to cumulative microscopic damage over time. In exercise contexts, eccentric contractions—where muscles lengthen under tension, as seen in the lowering phase of or the impact phase of running—represent a key trigger, producing greater structural disruption to muscle fibers than concentric contractions due to heightened mechanical strain and sarcomere overstretching. This damage manifests as focal lesions and , particularly in unaccustomed or novel activities where tissues lack adaptive resilience. Repetitive strain from occupational or daily tasks further contributes to microtrauma, especially in , by inducing ongoing low-level loading that exceeds tissue recovery capacity. Activities such as prolonged typing, work involving repetitive gripping or lifting, and exposure to vibrations from power tools can accumulate microdamage in wrist extensors and forearm , predisposing individuals to conditions like tendinitis. Vibration exposure, in particular, amplifies this risk by transmitting oscillatory forces that disrupt integrity and increase grip-related strain. Overuse in exemplifies activity-related triggers, where repetitive high-load motions lead to localized microtrauma; for instance, the supination and wrist extension in serve as precursors to lateral epicondylitis () through cumulative stress. Nutritional factors, such as low protein intake, impair muscle and resilience by hindering protein synthesis essential for maintaining tissue strength, thereby elevating susceptibility to damage from these mechanical insults. Age-related changes compound this vulnerability, as older tissues exhibit reduced elasticity and slower adaptation to repetitive loading, resulting in greater force deficits and microdamage accumulation compared to younger counterparts. Chronic exposure to these factors contrasts with acute novelty, where sudden activity increases—such as abrupt intensification—heighten risk by overwhelming unadapted structures.

Physiological Effects

Positive Effects

Microtrauma induced by eccentric contractions during resistance exercise contributes to by triggering myofibrillar protein synthesis for repair, which transitions into net muscle growth as damage attenuates with training. This process involves activation of the pathway, elevating anabolic signaling that supports increases in fiber cross-sectional area, typically observed as significant gains in vastus lateralis cross-sectional area after 10 weeks of progressive loading in untrained individuals. Eccentric exercise-induced microtrauma also drives strength gains through enhanced neuromuscular efficiency, including greater corticospinal drive, reduced thresholds, and improved motor unit firing rates, which collectively boost force production capacity. Post-repair remodeling of connective tissues, such as increased content in the and additions in series and parallel, further supports these adaptations by improving and pennation angle. Beyond , microtrauma promotes other adaptations, such as improved and respiratory function that enhance by increasing oxidative capacity and ATP production; resistance training bouts elevate mitochondrial protein synthesis acutely and improve respiratory function after 12 weeks of high-load protocols. In bone tissue, microtrauma aligns with , where mechanical loading stimulates remodeling to increase density and , as evidenced by 8-week high-impact protocols in growing models yielding higher cortical area and ultimate load strength. The repeated bout effect provides key evidence for these benefits, wherein an initial eccentric bout induces protective adaptations—like reduced strain, moderated , and increased passive —that attenuate damage from subsequent exposures while amplifying long-term gains in strength and .

Negative Effects

Microtrauma to , often resulting from unaccustomed or intense eccentric contractions, can lead to acute issues such as (DOMS), which typically manifests 12-24 hours post-exercise and peaks within 24-72 hours. Symptoms of DOMS include muscle , tenderness, swelling, and reduced , impairing daily activities and athletic . Force-generating capacity may decline by up to 50% during peak soreness in severe cases, reflecting disrupted structure and temporary neuromuscular inhibition. When microtrauma accumulates without adequate recovery, chronic risks emerge, including tendinopathies characterized by tendon degeneration and pain from repetitive microscopic tears that exceed tissue repair capacity. In extreme cases, such as prolonged overexertion in untrained individuals or athletes, cumulative damage can progress to , involving massive muscle breakdown, release, and potential . Repetitive microtrauma has also been associated with fibromyalgia-like syndromes, where ongoing strain contributes to widespread pain, fatigue, and tenderness resembling symptoms in patients. Systemic impacts of unmanaged microtrauma extend beyond the affected muscle, with spillover triggering proinflammatory cytokines that induce central and generalized . This inflammatory response can suppress immune function, increasing susceptibility to infections through elevated and altered leukocyte activity. Joint instability may arise from secondary weakening, while estrogen's influence heightens incidence in females by modulating synthesis and reducing stiffness, exacerbating damage from equivalent loads compared to males. Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and untrained individuals, face prolonged recovery from microtrauma due to diminished regenerative capacity and anabolic resistance, often lasting several days longer than in trained athletes. In older adults, and reduced satellite cell activity delay muscle repair, amplifying soreness and force deficits. Untrained persons experience greater initial damage and slower adaptation, heightening risks of chronic issues from repeated exposure.

Applications and Implications

In Exercise Physiology

In exercise physiology, microtrauma serves as a foundational stimulus for muscle adaptation through , where training loads are systematically increased to induce controlled fiber damage, prompting repair and . This principle underpins resistance training protocols, such as those using 8-12 repetitions per set at 60-80% of (1RM), which optimize mechanical tension and metabolic stress to drive protein synthesis without excessive fatigue. Such sets promote selective recruitment of type II muscle s, enhancing force production and size gains via satellite cell following the microtrauma. Periodization models integrate microtrauma into structured training cycles to balance overload and recovery, preventing stagnation or . Linear progresses and intensity across mesocycles (e.g., 3-6 months), starting with higher repetitions for before shifting to lower-repetition strength phases, allowing microtrauma-induced adaptations to accumulate. Undulating varies daily loads to exploit the repeated-bout effect, where repeated microtrauma exposure reduces subsequent damage while amplifying gains. Deloading phases, typically reducing by 50% or more for 1-2 weeks, facilitate supercompensation, where muscle performance exceeds baseline levels 48-72 hours post-stress as repair processes peak. In sport-specific applications, microtrauma from eccentric loading in protocols—such as the lowering phase of squats or deadlifts—enhances maximal strength and by increasing addition and neural efficiency, with studies showing greater cross-sectional area gains compared to concentric-only . Monitoring microtrauma in relies on non-invasive tools like the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, which quantifies session intensity (6-20 scale) to estimate cumulative muscle stress and without biomarkers. Athletes rate post-session RPE to calculate training load (RPE × duration in minutes), enabling adjustments to avoid excessive damage while targeting adaptive thresholds around 13-15 for -focused sessions. This method correlates with electromyographic indicators of fiber , providing a practical gauge for periodized programs.

In Clinical and Rehabilitation Contexts

In clinical settings, microtrauma is often detected through advanced imaging techniques to identify subclinical damage in overuse injuries. (MRI) provides detailed visualization of soft tissue alterations, such as cartilage irregularities and synovial changes associated with (commonly known as ), enabling early diagnosis of microtrauma before overt symptoms manifest. Similarly, serves as a non-invasive tool to assess peripatellar soft tissues and detect subtle inflammatory responses indicative of microtrauma in these conditions. Controlled induction of microtrauma plays a key role in protocols for tendon rehabilitation. For instance, eccentric loading exercises, which deliberately stress the during lengthening contractions, promote tissue adaptation and repair in cases of . Clinical trials have demonstrated that such interventions can reduce and improve function by 37% to 111% compared to no treatment or other exercises. In post-surgical rehabilitation, controlled microtrauma facilitates remodeling by stimulating localized inflammatory responses that enhance reorganization and tissue flexibility. Techniques like instrument-assisted apply targeted mechanical stress to affected s, such as in chronic , leading to improved healing cascades and reduced . However, in patients with inflammatory diseases like , inducing microtrauma is contraindicated, as physical trauma can precipitate or exacerbate chronic and joint inflammation. Emerging therapies, such as (PRP) injections, aim to accelerate microtrauma repair by delivering growth factors to the injury site, modulating the healing process in tendinopathies. Randomized controlled trials from the have shown that PRP can lead to significant improvements in pain scores and function, with one reporting an average 28.9-point increase in the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score following treatment. As of 2025, regenerative approaches including are showing promise in enhancing recovery from microtrauma-related injuries in contexts.

Prevention and Management

Preventive Strategies

Preventive strategies for microtrauma focus on proactive modifications to training, lifestyle, and environmental factors to minimize excessive tissue stress while preserving adaptive benefits. These approaches target the underlying mechanisms of microtrauma, such as novel loading or repetitive strain, by enhancing tissue resilience and optimizing recovery processes. In training protocols, incorporating warm-ups is essential to increase blood flow and muscle , thereby reducing the severity of eccentric-induced . Studies indicate that passive or active warm-ups can decrease perceived soreness by approximately 13 mm on a visual analog scale 48 hours post-exercise. Additionally, leveraging the repeated bout effect—where an bout of eccentric exercise confers protection against subsequent similar bouts—through varied routines helps build tolerance. Lifestyle factors play a critical role in supporting tissue repair and resilience. Adequate sleep, typically 7-9 hours per night, facilitates recovery by modulating inflammatory responses and promoting protein synthesis, with sleep restriction increasing the risk of muscle injuries during high training loads. Proper hydration is important for overall and recovery, though on its direct role in preventing exacerbation of delayed-onset muscle soreness following eccentric exercise is limited. Nutritional strategies, including protein intake of 1.6-2.2 g/kg body weight daily, support muscle repair after intense bouts. Equipment and technique optimization distribute mechanical stress more evenly, lowering microtrauma risk. In running, proper with cushioned heels promotes pronation and attenuates impact forces, reducing overload on lower limb tissues. In occupational settings, ergonomic assessments—such as adjustments and tool modifications—effectively prevent repetitive strain by addressing posture and force distribution, with interventions like wrist supports showing significant reductions in disorders. For specific populations, such as , gradual progression in training volume and intensity is vital to avoid spikes from novel stressors. Novice runners increasing weekly distance by more than 30% face heightened risk, underscoring the need for incremental advancements to allow adaptive responses without overwhelming tissues.

Treatment Approaches

The primary immediate care approach for managing microtrauma, particularly (DOMS), involves the protocol—Rest, , Compression, and —which aims to minimize inflammation and swelling in the affected muscles. Rest limits further damage by avoiding aggravating activities, while ice application (typically 15-20 minutes every few hours) constricts blood vessels to reduce inflammatory response; compression with elastic bandages helps control swelling, and elevation above heart level promotes fluid drainage. Evidence indicates that initiating RICE within 24 hours of symptom onset can lower muscle soreness by approximately 5% and preserve better than passive recovery alone. Pharmacological interventions, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen, are commonly used to alleviate and inflammation associated with microtrauma. Ibuprofen, at doses of 400-1200 mg daily, inhibits synthesis for pain relief, though evidence for reducing soreness intensity in DOMS is mixed and it does not accelerate overall muscle repair. However, caution is advised due to potential interference with adaptive processes; meta-analyses reveal mixed effects on , with some studies showing no impairment from moderate doses during resistance training, while higher doses may blunt satellite cell activity and long-term growth. Systematic reviews confirm that NSAIDs provide no significant superiority over for DOMS resolution, emphasizing their role in symptom relief rather than tissue healing. Advanced recovery modalities include therapy and self-myofascial release techniques like foam rolling, which improve blood flow, decrease muscle stiffness, and lower markers of damage such as (CK) levels. applied 2 hours post-exercise can reduce CK concentrations and DOMS severity, while foam rolling sessions of 10-15 minutes post-workout enhance circulation and yield CK reductions compared to controls, facilitating faster lactate clearance. Electrical stimulation, including neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) or (TENS), promotes muscle activation and pain modulation without voluntary contraction, helping to mitigate soreness and support rehabilitation in cases of persistent microtrauma, though objective reductions in DOMS markers are not consistently observed. These methods are particularly effective when combined with standard care, showing benefits in reducing perceived and improving functional recovery. Recovery from mild microtrauma typically spans 48-96 hours, with symptoms peaking at 24-72 hours post-onset and resolving within 4 days through natural inflammatory resolution. Active recovery strategies, such as light or low-intensity movement, accelerate this process by enhancing blood flow and reducing stiffness more effectively than complete rest, though both approaches lead to similar overall timelines in uncomplicated cases. Monitoring progress is essential, as prolonged symptoms may indicate more severe damage requiring professional evaluation.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8549894/
  2. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00971.2016
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282309/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060187297800317
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20847704/
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9211608/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2278966/
  8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2520441/
  9. https://onelook.com/?loc=beta3&w=microtrauma&history=1
  10. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1902.7.1.76
  11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16153865/
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6392811/
  13. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.78.2.702
  14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00333.x
  15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82524-8
  16. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00043.2011
  17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200211001-00007
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6510035/
  19. https://www.f4cp.org/how-microtraumas-add-up-to-stress-and-repetitive-strain-injuries/
  20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230857/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7091485/
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351550592_Factors_Associated_With_Lateral_Epicondylitis_of_the_Elbow
  23. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/4/819
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5717808/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5157064/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4620252/
  27. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00713/full
  28. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49432-2
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12641640/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7830646/
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360808354_Delayed_onset_muscle_soreness_intensity_affects_muscular_performance
  32. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21184-rhabdomyolysis
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1297319X00002268
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889159109005662
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6341375/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233772138_Sex_Differences_in_Exercise-Induced_Muscle_Pain_and_Muscle_Damage
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10854791/
  38. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-023-00597-1
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7927075/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4637911/
  41. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2017.00612/full
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8896022/
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138008/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12357834/
  45. https://journals.lww.com/ebp/fulltext/2018/12000/are_eccentric_exercises_effective_for_the.21.aspx
  46. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04993105
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5098718/
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080120300832
  49. https://www.sprypt.com/blog/physical-therapy-innovations
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17535144/
  51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34074604/
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16619093/
  53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24435468/
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19225360/
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16005401/
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38844712/
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25155475/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373359152_The_Efficacy_of_Rice_Therapy_in_Treating_Exercise-Induced_Muscle_Damage
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18461099/
  60. https://www.authorea.com/users/726058/articles/708817-use-of-anti-inflammatory-drugs-for-the-treatment-of-delayed-onset-muscle-soreness-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis
  61. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2022
  62. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.1994.19.2.93
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369906549_Foam_rolling_reduced_total_creatine_kinase_in_acute_muscle_inflammation_following_long-distance_running
  64. https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/8/4/146
  65. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Delayed_Onset_Muscle_Soreness
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5932411/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.