Hubbry Logo
Middle managementMiddle managementMain
Open search
Middle management
Community hub
Middle management
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Middle management
Middle management
Middle management
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Middle management is the intermediate management level of a hierarchical organization that is subordinate to the executive management and responsible for "team leading" line managers and/or "specialist" line managers. Middle management is indirectly (through line management) responsible for junior staff performance and productivity.[1]

Unlike line management, middle management is considered to be a senior (or semi-executive) position as middle managers are authorised to speak and act on behalf of the organisation to line managers, junior staff and customers. Included in this level of management are division, plant and department managers.[2]

American business historian Alfred D. Chandler Jr. argued in The Visible Hand (1977) that in the nineteenth century, Adam Smith's invisible hand was supplanted by the "visible hand" of middle management, which became "the most powerful institution in the American economy". He credited middle managers with a central importance like the inventors, empire builders, and financiers.[3]

A 2023 study in the American Journal of Sociology found that middle management has increased over time and that the role of middle management increasingly revolves around the task of collaboration rather than supervision.[4]

Role in an organization

[edit]

Functions of a middle manager

[edit]

A middle manager is a link between the senior management and the lower (junior) levels of the organization. Due to involvement into day-to-day running of a business, middle managers have the opportunity to report valuable information and suggestions from the inside of an organization.[5] They are in charge of putting into practice guidelines established previously in the strategic plans by top level managers.[2] Moreover, the middle manager is a channel of communication within the organization, as they pass on major decisions of executives and the main goals of an organization to lower levels of employees. This contributes to better coordination between workers and makes a company more united.[6]

The primary responsibility of a middle manager is to implement a strategy, created by the executive level, in the most efficient way possible. In order to reach the target goals, a manager may adjust and interpret the initial plan.[7] Other functions can be divided into three main categories:[8]

  • Technical

Middle managers are responsible for facilitating any necessary changes within an organization and creating an effective working environment. They oversee daily routines, monitor performance, and ensure that everything is done in compliance with the organization's needs.[9]

  • Human resources

One of the most important functions of a middle manager is motivating, leading and inspiring their subordinates. This also includes building a team and supporting any team member when necessary.

  • Strategic

Strategic functions involve analyzing a subordinate group in terms of productivity and financial effectiveness, creating a strategy of improving the current situation and reporting to the executive management in the form of attending a boardroom meeting or a discussion.

Competencies

[edit]

A number of competencies are critical to become an effective middle manager.

  • Leadership. The most important competency that consists of many skills. As an inherent leader, middle managers have to possess sense-making and persuading skills. They must be able to motivate, influence and guide their subordinates, become a role model for them, demonstrate the quality and the level of work contribution necessary for the organization and engage in continuous self-development and learning.[9][10]
  • Decision-making. Ability to quickly solve the problems, make decisions under pressure and take responsibility for the outcome.
  • Creativity & Visioning. Managers should have a clear vision of the strategy implementation and be creative in overcoming the possible difficulties.[8]
  • Performance management. Involves managing the performance of subordinates and, specifically, the line managers, effectively, by setting clear and measurable objectives for them and provide coaching. Middle managers must be also skilled in presenting, persuading and influencing people.[citation needed]

Middle manager vs. line manager

[edit]

A middle management position is often mistakenly described as a similar to the line management one. However, there are some differences:[8]

  • Middle manager is a semi-executive position – line managers are promoted to become middle managers. Thus, middle managers enjoy greater salary, benefits and a closer position to a boardroom.
  • System of subordination – line managers are subordinate to middle managers. Middle managers are responsible for large teams and are unable to control performance of every single individual. Thus, direct or line manager measures the team performance and reports to the middle manager.
  • Set of duties – unlike line managers, who have a clear procedure of work and set of duties, middle managers have only target goals. The way of achieving those goals is decided by the manager independently.

Criticism

[edit]

The role of middle management is subject to a number of criticisms. This position is often seen as unnecessary, and middle managers are blamed or lampooned for holding the organization back from achieving its full potential and using their influence for their own purposes.

Influence

[edit]

Middle management is often accused of possessing too much influence. Their central position in an organization allows them to influence strategy and actions in "both upward and downward direction".[7] When supplying information to the executive level, middle managers interpret it subjectively and may insinuate it with their own opinion and evaluation.[11] Further, proximity to the boardroom makes it easy for the manager to promote their own interests, by "synthesizing" the information and presenting data from a certain strategic perspective.[12] The same level of influence can be exploited by a middle manager towards the lower staff.[13]

Resistance

[edit]

Middle managers' reluctance to lose control in their teams and satisfaction with a settled situation could lead to their resistance in any changes in the strategy or direction of an organization. Usually, the resistance does not take an aggressive form such as refusal to carry out tasks or unconcealed confrontation, but result in a lack of support and eagerness to convey only those tasks, impact of which is clearly visible to the top management.[14] This creates barriers to a growth of a company and lags the overall working process.

Necessity

[edit]

The overall necessity of middle managers in an organization is questioned. They are said to be too costly, non-effective and constantly under-performing employees. It has been stated[by whom?] that middle managers do not carry out their main duties of linking the organization and reporting effectively, which leads to a block of communication between different levels of staff.[15] Thus, as rapid growth of globalization put pressures on businesses in terms of cost effectiveness and speed of information flow within the organization, middle management make companies less flexible and competitive.[16]

Future

[edit]

The development of information technology has enabled an increase in the span of control and reduced the need for middle management. Moreover, an increasing number of modern organizations are becoming flatter and downsized in pursuit of flexibility, higher competitiveness, and innovation. According to David Williams, flat organizations promote greater intercommunication and efficiency among workers.[17] As a result, many organizations are being restructured, middle management is being reduced, and their roles are considered outdated and unnecessary.

At the same time, there is still a need in a middle manager as an employee and they continue playing a significant role in organizations, specifically in setting an overall strategy and targets.[18] Changes in the global market forced them to become more flexible, stress-resistant, acquire new skills.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Middle management

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Middle management constitutes the intermediate layer of , situated between top-level executives and frontline supervisors, tasked with translating broad strategic objectives into actionable operational plans and overseeing their execution. These managers serve as pivotal links in the , as conceptualized by , connecting the strategic apex—where high-level decisions are made—with the operational core of day-to-day activities. In this role, they balance upward responsibilities, such as synthesizing information from lower levels to inform senior , with downward duties like implementing policies and motivating teams. Key functions of middle managers encompass a range of strategic, administrative, and interpersonal activities that drive . Strategically, they contribute by championing initiatives, facilitating adaptation to change, and even influencing policy formulation, evolving from mere implementers to active contributors in dynamic environments. Administratively, they handle budgeting, scheduling, , and hiring to ensure smooth operations. In and capacities, middle managers supervise teams, resolve conflicts, and allocate resources, while their communication roles involve networking, translating strategies across levels, and bridging knowledge gaps to foster cohesion. These multifaceted responsibilities position them as knowledge brokers, particularly in knowledge-intensive settings, where they identify communication barriers and enable information flows between isolated groups. The significance of middle management extends to enhancing , , and adaptability within organizations. Empirical studies demonstrate that effective middle managers can yield substantial gains, such as 10% improvements in or up to 30% in contexts, by streamlining processes and coordinating efforts. They play a critical role in organizational change by communicating benefits to implementers and mediating between hierarchical and networked structures, though their effectiveness often depends on , relational skills, and contextual factors like and organizational form. As of , however, middle management faces evolving challenges from trends such as organizational and AI adoption, which are reducing layers in some firms while highlighting their strategic value in others. Despite their centrality, middle managers frequently face challenges, including role and from both superiors and subordinates, underscoring their underappreciated yet indispensable position in modern enterprises.

Definition and Overview

Historical Evolution

The concept of middle management emerged in the early as part of the shift toward and administrative theory, which required intermediary layers to translate high-level into operational execution. Frederick Taylor's principles of , outlined in his 1911 work , emphasized optimizing worker efficiency through standardized tasks and time studies, necessitating supervisors to monitor and coordinate these processes in growing industrial firms, such as Henry Ford's implemented in 1913. Similarly, Henri Fayol's administrative theory, developed around 1916 and published in General and Industrial Management, introduced functions like , organizing, and commanding, which implied the need for middle-level managers to bridge top executives and frontline workers in complex organizations. These theories formalized hierarchical structures in and , establishing middle management as essential for implementing efficiency-driven strategies. Following , middle management expanded significantly within bureaucratic organizations amid the U.S. economic boom from the to the 1970s, as corporations grew to meet surging consumer demand and technological advancements. American firms, insulated by domestic market dominance, added managerial layers to supervise expanding workforces, with middle managers focusing on coordination and implementation in hierarchical systems that promised and upward mobility. For instance, employment in major U.S. corporations like and surged during this period, reflecting broader bureaucratic growth and solidified middle management's role in stable, large-scale operations. This era marked the peak of middle management proliferation, driven by postwar prosperity and institutional arrangements like the "Treaty of Detroit" labor agreements that supported structured hierarchies. The 1980s brought challenges to middle management through widespread downsizing and delayering initiatives, prompted by , increased competition, and a shareholder-focused revolution that viewed excess layers as inefficient. U.S. corporations, facing pressures from international markets and leveraged buyouts, flattened hierarchies by reducing middle management positions, with surveys indicating up to 10% cuts in managerial roles during mergers and restructurings. This "delayering" trend, adopted by firms like and , aimed to widen spans of control and boost efficiency but temporarily shrank middle management ranks, as evidenced by rising among managers in the Displaced Workers Surveys starting in the mid-1980s. In the 1990s, (BPR) efforts, pioneered by Michael Hammer in his 1990 article "Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate," further scrutinized middle management but ultimately reinforced its adaptive importance. Hammer's approach, detailed in the 1993 book Reengineering the Corporation co-authored with James Champy, advocated radical process redesign to eliminate , leading to significant middle management layoffs, as BPR often involved reductions, though studies in the early 1990s found that 70% or more of initiatives worsened outcomes or failed. However, by the mid-1990s, Hammer acknowledged overlooking human factors, noting that reengineering's focus on cross-functional teams and IT integration highlighted middle managers' role in facilitating change rather than eradicating it entirely. This period marked a pivot, where initial cuts gave way to recognition of middle management's necessity in dynamic environments.

Key Characteristics

Middle management occupies the intermediary layer in organizational hierarchies, positioned between top executives—who primarily focus on long-term strategic planning and vision—and lower-level supervisors—who concentrate on immediate operational execution and frontline tasks. This structural placement enables middle managers to bridge high-level goals with practical implementation, often overseeing departments or teams of 20-100 employees, depending on the organization's size and industry. A defining feature of middle management is its dual reporting structure: managers report upward to senior leadership to align departmental activities with broader organizational objectives, while simultaneously directing downward to translate those directives into actionable plans for subordinates. This bidirectional flow ensures coherence across levels but places middle managers at the nexus of communication and coordination. The balance of authority in middle management is nuanced, with limited involvement in overarching strategic decisions reserved for top executives, yet substantial discretion in areas such as , budgeting within departments, and fostering team to achieve performance targets. This authority allows middle managers to exert considerable influence on daily workflows and without full control over corporate-wide policy. Demographically, middle managers are typically seasoned professionals with 5-15 years of relevant experience, having progressed from entry-level or first-line roles to gain the expertise needed for broader oversight. Common titles include department heads, regional managers, divisional managers, managers, or general managers, reflecting their scope of responsibility over specific functional areas.

Roles and Responsibilities

Core Functions

Middle managers serve as a critical bridge between senior and frontline employees, executing the organization's strategic objectives through operational oversight and guidance. Their core functions revolve around aligning departmental activities with broader goals while fostering an environment conducive to performance and growth. These responsibilities ensure that high-level directives are effectively implemented at the operational level, maintaining organizational coherence and adaptability. One primary function is translating high-level strategies into actionable plans for their teams. This involves breaking down executive visions into specific goals, allocating budgets, and establishing performance metrics to guide departmental efforts. For instance, in a North American bank, marketing middle managers translated overarching business strategies into over 20 targeted initiatives, enabling teams to align daily work with organizational priorities. This process requires middle managers to interpret complex directives and adapt them to local contexts, ensuring feasibility and relevance. Supervising daily operations forms another essential duty, encompassing resource coordination, optimization, and within departments. Middle managers monitor team activities to maintain , allocate personnel and materials effectively, and address interpersonal or process-related issues promptly. In settings, for example, site leaders oversee production workflows to align with strategic targets. This hands-on helps sustain and operational consistency across units. Employee development is a key responsibility, where middle managers mentor staff, conduct performance evaluations, and facilitate training programs to enhance team capabilities. Through regular and feedback, they identify gaps and support individual growth, which in turn boosts overall departmental . A beverage retailer's initiative, for example, equipped middle managers with tools that led to measurable improvements in scores, demonstrating how targeted development amplifies team potential. Effective execution of this function requires competencies in motivational techniques and assessment methods. Finally, middle managers maintain reporting and feedback loops by gathering insights from their teams to inform senior leadership and communicating organizational priorities downward. This bidirectional flow ensures that frontline realities shape strategic adjustments while keeping employees informed of expectations. In an insurance firm, IT middle managers improved communication proficiency, achieving 100% reported gains in synthesizing and relaying information across levels, which enhanced decision-making alignment. These loops are vital for organizational learning and responsiveness.

Essential Competencies

Middle managers require a distinct set of competencies to bridge strategic directives from upper with operational execution at lower levels, ensuring . These competencies encompass interpersonal, analytical, and adaptive skills that enable them to navigate complex hierarchies and dynamic environments. Leadership Skills
Effective for middle managers involves motivating teams, tasks, and building cohesive units to enhance and performance. entails inspiring subordinates through role modeling, earning trust, and providing support during challenges, which fosters commitment and . requires assigning responsibilities based on team strengths while maintaining , allowing managers to focus on higher-level oversight. Team-building emphasizes creating collaborative relationships and developing subordinate skills, which directly supports employee growth and organizational alignment. These abilities apply to core functions such as employee development by enabling managers to identify potential and provide targeted guidance. Communication Prowess
Middle managers must excel in bidirectional communication to relay strategies from executives to teams and convey feedback upward, incorporating and to resolve conflicts. Clear articulation ensures alignment on goals, while builds rapport and uncovers issues early. skills facilitate consensus among stakeholders, such as during disputes, enhancing overall strategy implementation. Studies highlight communication as a foundational factor, ranked highest for managerial success in aligning diverse perspectives. Analytical Abilities
Analytical proficiency allows middle managers to interpret data and metrics for informed , particularly through tools like key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate team and process performance. Data literacy enables the translation of raw metrics into actionable insights, with strong correlations (r = 0.72) between such skills and decision effectiveness in sectors like . For instance, using KPI dashboards in retail and accelerates performance assessment and strategic adjustments. This competency supports and , ensuring tactical decisions align with broader objectives. Adaptability and Problem-Solving
In volatile settings, middle managers demonstrate adaptability by embracing and learning agility, while problem-solving involves creative resolution of issues like disruptions. Adaptability includes resilience and to handle , such as reallocating resources during unexpected events. Problem-solving requires action-oriented analysis to develop contingency plans, as seen in where managers prioritize tasks to mitigate bottlenecks. These skills enable rapid responses, turning potential setbacks into opportunities for improvement.

Comparison with Other Management Levels

Middle management occupies a distinct position within organizational hierarchies, primarily serving as the intermediary layer between top-level executives and first-line supervisors. Unlike top management, which concentrates on visionary , long-term , and formulation to guide the entire , middle management emphasizes tactical implementation and departmental execution. For instance, while top executives such as CEOs and boards of directors set broad objectives and allocate resources across the enterprise, middle managers translate these into actionable plans for specific units, ensuring alignment with overarching goals. In contrast to lower or first-line management, which focuses on direct of individual employees and day-to-day operational tasks, middle involves broader oversight and cross- coordination to achieve departmental objectives. First-line managers, such as supervisors or leads, assign specific tasks, monitor performance, and handle immediate worker issues, whereas middle managers oversee multiple or sections, coordinating efforts and reporting progress upward. This positions middle managers as facilitators of integration, bridging strategic directives from above with practical execution below. Middle managers often blend elements of line and staff roles, combining direct authority over production or operations with advisory functions to support decision-making. Line managers exercise formal command over subordinates in core activities like manufacturing or sales, while staff managers provide specialized expertise, such as in human resources or finance, without direct supervisory power. In practice, roles like operations directors exemplify this hybrid: they direct line activities to meet production targets but also offer staff-like advice on process optimizations to higher levels. This dual nature enhances middle management's versatility in complex organizations. Regarding , middle management operates within a spectrum of moderate , bounded by directives from top executives and the practical constraints of lower-level execution. Top managers hold ultimate power with wide latitude for , while first-line managers have narrower limited to routine operations. Middle managers, however, must navigate both influences—adhering to strategic mandates while adapting to frontline realities—resulting in a balanced but often challenging scope that requires negotiation and alignment across layers.

Challenges and Criticisms

Common Criticisms

Middle managers frequently face the "middle management squeeze," a position that places them between top-down directives from senior executives and bottom-up demands from frontline employees, resulting in heightened stress, burnout, and diluted . This dynamic often leaves middle managers as messengers of unpopular policies while struggling to advocate for their teams, exacerbating role ambiguity and . A 2023 Gallup analysis describes this as the "manager squeeze," noting that managers report lower and work-life balance compared to executives and contributors, with global manager at 27% as of 2024. Critics also point to bureaucratic bloat as a structural flaw, arguing that layers of middle create unnecessary administrative overhead, prolonging and stifling organizational . This proliferation of intermediate roles is seen to inflate hierarchies without proportional value, leading to inefficiencies in communication and . Flat theory underscores this issue, proposing that middle managers extend the principal-agent chain, thereby diminishing and increasing coordination costs. Furthermore, middle management is often accused of stifling by enforcing the status quo and resisting disruptive changes that could undermine established routines or . In fast-paced industries, this tendency to prioritize compliance over can hinder adaptability and novel idea implementation. Seminal research in the Strategic Management Journal illustrates how middle managers' conflicts with strategic goals, impeding during strategy execution. A related concern is inefficiency, with middle viewed as a high-expense layer offering limited direct value, particularly given their substantial salaries relative to output. Gallup quantifies the broader impact of ineffective —encompassing middle roles—as costing the global up to $8.8 trillion annually in lost due to disengagement and turnover as of 2023. This perception drives corporate restructurings that eliminate middle management positions to reduce overhead, as evidenced by widespread "unbossing" initiatives in the aimed at streamlining operations.

Organizational Influence and Resistance

Middle managers exert significant organizational influence through several key mechanisms, positioning them as pivotal intermediaries in hierarchical structures. One primary avenue is gatekeeping the flow of , where they filter, interpret, and disseminate strategic directives from upper to frontline teams while relaying operational feedback upward, ensuring alignment without overwhelming subordinates. This role enhances fidelity but can also create bottlenecks if not managed transparently. Additionally, middle managers shape team culture by modeling desired behaviors, fostering channels, and participating in culture change initiatives, which directly impacts and adoption of organizational values. In meetings with superiors, they advocate for team resources such as budgets, training, or personnel, buffering subordinates from excessive demands and securing support essential for performance. Despite this influence, middle managers frequently encounter resistance that undermines their effectiveness. From subordinates, pushback often manifests as passive compliance during change initiatives, where employees outwardly agree but fail to fully engage, leading to delayed and reduced ; this stems from role overload and anxiety transmitted downward. Superiors may contribute by bypassing middle layers in flatter organizational structures, directly communicating with frontline staff to accelerate decisions, which diminishes middle managers' authority and exacerbates feelings of disempowerment. Such dynamics highlight the precarious middle managers navigate, where their influence is contingent on perceived legitimacy from both levels. A notable case arises during mergers, where middle managers mediate conflicting departmental interests amid heightened resistance. In post-merger integrations, they address subordinates' emotional responses—such as and —by facilitating affective commitment and attitude shifts toward the new entity, often bridging cultural clashes between legacy teams to prevent or turnover. For instance, studies of mergers show middle managers mitigating resistance by interpreting top-down policies for local contexts, though success hinges on their ability to balance without alienating either side. To navigate these challenges, middle managers employ mitigation strategies centered on building alliances and persuasion techniques drawn from conflict resolution models. Forming cross-level coalitions—such as partnering with peers and superiors early in change processes—helps garner buy-in and distribute accountability, reducing isolation during resistance escalation. Persuasion involves informal techniques like active listening, coaching, and collaborative problem-solving, aligned with models such as the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, which emphasizes integrating perspectives to de-escalate tensions without coercion. These approaches, often learned through on-the-job experience rather than formal training, enable middle managers to convert opposition into constructive dialogue, sustaining their influence amid opposition.

Debates on Necessity

The necessity of middle management has long been a subject of debate in , with proponents emphasizing its role in bridging strategic direction and operational execution, while critics highlight inefficiencies and alternatives in modern structures. This discussion draws on foundational concepts like span-of-control theory, which posits that executives can effectively oversee only a limited number of direct reports—typically 5 to 7 in complex environments—necessitating intermediate layers to scale operations without overwhelming top leadership. Arguments in favor of middle management's essentiality center on its function in large-scale organizations, where it provides specialized expertise for translating high-level goals into actionable plans and ensuring across units. According to span-of-control principles, as organizational size grows, direct oversight becomes impractical, leading to coordination failures without middle layers to handle execution and . In hierarchical settings, middle managers mitigate for senior leaders by filtering data, resolving conflicts, and maintaining alignment, thereby enabling efficient scaling in traditional industries like or . Conversely, arguments against middle management's indispensability point to the success of flatter organizational designs, particularly in dynamic sectors, where minimal layers accelerate and foster . Tech firms like in its early stages exemplified this by adopting a relatively flat structure with few middle management tiers, relying instead on cross-functional teams to drive rapid product development and adaptability. Similarly, agile methodologies promote self-managing teams that operate autonomously, making decisions on daily tasks without traditional supervisory intervention, which has proven viable in software and by reducing and enhancing employee empowerment. Empirical evidence reveals mixed outcomes from delayering efforts, underscoring the variability of results. A McKinsey of over 30 organizations found that firms with high-performing middle managers achieved 3 to 21 times greater total shareholder returns compared to those with average performers, suggesting that effective middle layers drive financial success through better execution. However, studies on flattened structures indicate that while some companies experience improved and cost savings post-delayering—such as faster response times in tech environments—others face challenges like increased top-level bottlenecks and employee burnout, with one review noting that fully eliminating middle management often leads to counterproductive centralization of control. Emerging technologies like (AI) are intensifying the debate on middle management's necessity. According to , by 2026, 20% of organizations will leverage AI to eliminate more than half of their current middle management roles, potentially flattening hierarchies further but raising concerns about gaps, obsolescence, and the need for managers to adapt to facilitative or AI-augmented roles. Ultimately, the necessity of middle management appears highly context-dependent, proving more critical in rigid, hierarchical organizations where coordination demands structured oversight, but less so in networked or agile setups that leverage collaboration and . on hybrid structures shows that middle managers adapt by playing a "fixed" role in hierarchies for stability while shifting to facilitative functions in networks to enable fluid , highlighting that their value hinges on the organization's and environmental demands.

Contemporary and Future Perspectives

The shift to remote and hybrid work arrangements, accelerated by the in 2020, has significantly altered middle management's traditional oversight responsibilities, increasing reliance on virtual coordination tools such as Slack and Zoom to maintain team operations. Middle managers now face heightened demands in monitoring remote employees, often through intensive use of information and communication technologies (ICTs), which has led to challenges in providing real-time supervision and fostering informal interactions that build trust. This transition has complicated team cohesion, as remote setups contribute to and reduced sense of belonging among employees, exacerbating relational strains that middle managers must address to prevent disengagement. Consequently, middle managers report elevated stress levels, with studies showing a statistically significant positive (p < .05) between demands and perceived work stress among managers in multiple countries. Digital transformation initiatives have compelled middle managers to integrate data and into their workflows, streamlining processes such as performance tracking and . However, this adoption often reveals substantial skill gaps, as many middle managers lack proficiency in advanced technologies, hindering effective implementation and leading to resistance or inefficiencies in organizational operations. For instance, tools designed to handle routine tasks can reduce administrative burdens, yet they require middle managers to upskill in areas like AI-driven , where a notable divide exists between entry-level experimentation and executive . These gaps are particularly evident in organizations undergoing participant-driven digital shifts, where middle managers' leadership behaviors must evolve to bridge technical and operational divides. The rise of agile and flat organizational structures, exemplified by Spotify's squad model, has prompted a deliberate reduction in middle management layers to enhance speed and innovation, particularly in startups and tech firms. In this model, autonomous squads—cross-functional teams of 6-12 members focused on specific features, such as playlist algorithms—operate with minimal hierarchy, supported by tribes (groups of 40-150 people) for alignment rather than top-down control. This flattening minimizes traditional middle management roles, pressuring surviving managers to shift toward facilitative functions, such as coordinating via chapter leads (specialist groups) and guilds (voluntary knowledge-sharing networks) to promote collaboration without . As a result, middle managers in such environments must prioritize enabling team over direct supervision, adapting to decentralized that accelerates product development but demands new interpersonal and alignment skills. Contemporary diversity trends underscore a push for more inclusive to rectify persistent representation gaps, particularly in gender balance, as highlighted in Deloitte's 2023 Women @ Work report. Women constitute approximately 35-40% of positions globally, yet they encounter barriers like perceived penalties for flexible work requests, with 97% of surveyed women believing such arrangements diminish promotion prospects. This imbalance is compounded by higher burnout rates among women in middle —61% report feeling burned out—driving initiatives for equitable hiring and support structures to enhance organizational inclusivity and retention. These efforts aim to address underrepresentation, fostering diverse that better reflects workforce demographics and improves decision-making outcomes.

Emerging Roles and Skill Shifts

In response to advancing AI and technologies, middle managers are increasingly transitioning from traditional supervisory duties to roles focused on overseeing AI systems, ensuring ethical implementation, and making strategic decisions that align automated processes with organizational goals. According to a 2024 prediction, through 2026, 20% of organizations will leverage AI to flatten hierarchical structures, potentially eliminating more than half of existing middle management positions by automating routine tasks such as performance monitoring and administrative oversight. This shift emphasizes the need for middle managers to develop expertise in , including mitigation and privacy compliance, as highlighted in Deloitte's 2025 analysis of trends, which notes that surviving managers will prioritize ethical AI deployment to foster trust and . The evolution of for middle managers is gaining prominence, with a particular emphasis on enhanced and capabilities to navigate workforce upskilling in dynamic environments. As organizations integrate AI and models, middle managers must cultivate to address employee concerns about job displacement and skill obsolescence, enabling empathetic leadership that supports reskilling initiatives. A 2025 Forbes report identifies and as core leadership skills for the year, underscoring their role in guiding teams through technological disruptions and promoting adaptability. This heightened focus is evident in training programs that prioritize these competencies, as outlined in a DigitalDefynd analysis of middle-level manager skills, which stresses their necessity for fostering resilience and collaboration amid rapid upskilling demands. Emerging roles for middle managers include acting as facilitators in self-organizing structures like holacracy and as ecosystem managers coordinating distributed workforces in gig economies. In holacracy, a distributed authority model, middle managers evolve into role fillers who enable cross-functional circles rather than hierarchical control, as exemplified by Zappos' 2013 adoption of the system, which aimed to enhance agility but revealed challenges in employee retention and implementation. Despite mixed outcomes, with approximately 14% of Zappos employees departing due to the transition, the model illustrates a forward-thinking approach where managers facilitate dynamic team formations. In gig economies, middle managers are reorienting as ecosystem coordinators, managing fluid networks of freelancers and full-time staff through platform-based HRM, as conceptualized in a 2019 Journal of Managerial Psychology study on gig economy platforms, which advocates for ecosystem perspectives to integrate diverse talent pools effectively. Middle managers are also incorporating ESG responsibilities into their strategic execution, bridging high-level sustainability goals with operational practices to drive environmental, social, and governance outcomes. This involves translating corporate ESG strategies into actionable departmental initiatives, such as auditing supply chains for emissions reduction and incentivizing sustainable practices among teams. A 2023 PwC Strategy& report emphasizes middle management's pivotal role in cultural shifts for ESG transformations, noting that their involvement is essential for achieving buy-in across levels and ensuring compliance with evolving regulations. Furthermore, a 2024 guide from Argus Acuity highlights how middle managers link ESG strategy to daily operations, requiring them to engage stakeholders and measure progress on metrics like diversity inclusion and resource efficiency.

References

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.12989
  2. https://symbiosisonlinepublishing.com/family-business-management/family-business-management04.php
  3. https://jbs-ojs-shsu.tdl.org/jbs/article/download/214/192
  4. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2025/future-of-the-middle-manager.html
  5. https://www.betterworks.com/magazine/the-great-flattening/
  6. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-humanresourcesmgmt/chapter/scientific-management-theories/
  7. https://fhsu.pressbooks.pub/management/chapter/the-history-of-management/
  8. https://www.business.com/articles/management-theory-of-henri-fayol/
  9. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/Changing_Manager3__Online_FINAL__cfb3df2a-a606-472e-963f-2620786f026f.pdf
  10. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/corporations-greater-equality
  11. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041515/what-history-corporations-america.asp
  12. https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/media/_media/pdf/key_issues/politics_research.pdf
  13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0256090920050306
  14. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2014/retrieve.php?pdfid=1229
  15. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/19570
  16. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/fundamentalsofbusiness4e/chapter/chapter-9-structuring-organizations/
  17. https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/ideal-span-of-control
  18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK259391/
  19. https://www.niagarainstitute.com/middle-management
  20. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=14097&context=dissertations
  21. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/activating-middle-managers-through-capability-building
  22. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-future-of-middle-management
  23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311975.2025.2472027
  24. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/etd_coll/article/1145/viewcontent/PhDGM_1210_Momin_Zafar__Dissertation_FINAL.pdf
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918287/
  26. https://ijsi.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/18.02.031.20251003.pdf
  27. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/management_levels.htm
  28. https://www.knowledgehut.com/blog/project-management/levels-of-management
  29. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-principlesofmanagement/chapter/types-of-managers-and-their-roles/
  30. https://www.mtdtraining.com/blog/the-3-main-authority-types.htm
  31. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/510326/manager-squeeze-new-workplace-testing-team-leaders.aspx
  32. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
  33. https://www.hrdive.com/news/managers-report-lowest-employee-well-being-ratings/720431/
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/management-and-organization-review/article/management-innovation-and-middle-managers-the-role-of-empowering-leadership-voice-and-collectivist-orientation/AB1057188FD01E5399BD84639052FB47
  35. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/393497/world-trillion-workplace-problem.aspx
  36. https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizelting/2024/08/06/companies-are-slashing-management-roles-is-unbossing-a-career-killer/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8722036/
  38. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=17313&context=dissertations
  39. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tracylawrence/2025/04/08/burnout-by-design-how-cutting-middle-management-affects-company-culture/
  40. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00218863241246284
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232924233_Whither_Middle_Management_Empowering_Interface_and_the_Failure_of_Organizational_Change
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14697017.2021.1888772
  43. https://hal.science/hal-04967062v1/document
  44. https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=deie
  45. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/how-to-identify-the-right-spans-of-control-for-your-organization
  46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41469-022-00133-7
  47. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2015/07/08/the-5-types-of-organizational-structures-part-2-flatter-organizations/
  48. https://research.aalto.fi/files/117588158/SCI_Martela_Journal_of_Organization_Design_2023.pdf
  49. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/investing-in-middle-managers-pays-off-literally
  50. https://hbr.org/2025/04/whats-the-future-of-middle-management
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10905615/
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371285836_Analyzing_the_impact_of_the_shift_to_remote_work_mode_on_middle_managers%27_well-being_in_the_pandemic
  53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100217
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10507628/
  55. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/skill-shift-automation-and-the-future-of-the-workforce
  56. https://www.atlassian.com/agile/agile-at-scale/spotify
  57. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/women-at-work-global-outlook.html
  58. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace
  59. https://www.deloitte.com/an/en/about/press-room/men-face-alarmingly-high-levels-of-burnout-despite-shifting-work-arrangements-rise-in-hybrid-working.html
  60. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-10-22-gartner-unveils-top-predictions-for-it-organizations-and-users-in-2025-and-beyond
  61. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelwells/2024/10/02/5-leadership-skills-every-leader-and-manager-needs-in-2025/
  62. https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/key-skills-for-a-middle-level-manager/
  63. https://www.businessinsider.com/tony-hsieh-zappos-holacracy-management-experiment-2015-5
  64. https://www.retaildive.com/news/inside-holacracy-zappos-radical-new-management-structure/398686/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331064144_Conceptualizing_human_resource_management_in_the_gig_economy_Toward_a_platform_ecosystem_perspective
  66. https://cmr.berkeley.edu/assets/documents/pdf/2025-07-leading-the-green-shift-strategic-levers-for-managers-driving-sustainable-business-transformation.pdf
  67. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/functions/sustainability-strategy/cultural-change-in-esg-transformations.html
  68. https://www.argusacuity.com.au/insights/the-middle-managers-guide-to-esg-implementation
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.