Hubbry Logo
Mikron GroupMikron GroupMain
Open search
Mikron Group
Community hub
Mikron Group
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mikron Group
Mikron Group
Mikron Group
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mikron Group (Russian: Группа Микрон) is a manufacturer of semiconductor devices in Russia.[citation needed] It has manufacturing facilities in Zelenograd, St.Petersburg and Voronezh.[1]

Key Information

History

[edit]

The plant started as a part of NIIME (Scientific and research institute of molecular electronics), when the Soviet Union attempted follow the Western countries' development on microelectronics.

The plant had adopted its current name and became a standalone entity by 1970. The USSR invested heavily in Mikron, and developed technologies used for the Soviet space program there. The Elbrus computer systems was first produced by that time.[citation needed]

The 1980s US embargo on hi-tech exports affected USSR's ability to produce new chips. Unable to come up with new designs, Mikron and other semiconductor manufacturers resorted to copying foreign designs through the means of reverse-engineering. The ES EVM computer system of the era are unlicensed replicas of the IBM/360 series, and the two were generally compatible.

Following Soviet Union's opening to international trades in 1990, Mikron was contracted by Samsung to manufacture chips for wrist watches and calculators.[2] The company collaborated with STMicroelectronics to start a 180 nm process node in 2007.[3]

Mikron obtained a license to import 90 nm process in 2010.[citation needed] The design and production facilities cost a total of 16.57 billion Rubles, about half of it was financed by Rusnano. Production started in 2012-2013.[citation needed]

Mikron first taped-out experimental 65 nm samples in 2013; it has never produced any 65 nm products as of 2024.[4]

Due to quality control issues, the scheduled production of the Elbrus-2SM never started, with the processor eventually manufactured entirely by TSMC.[5] After international sanctions for Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, TSMC cut ties with the Mikron and supply of Elbrus-2SM ceased, forcing Mikron to bring the production back to its own facilities again. Instead of TSMC's 28 nm process from 2010, the new chips are produced with the 90 nm process from 2003.[6]

By early 2023, Mikron's production consisted entirely of chips for contactless smart cards (i.e., transit cards).[7][8] It started constructing a new plant in Zelenograd.[1][8]

Mikron's 2024 MIK32 microcontroller is a replacement of STMicroelectronics' STM32L0, manufacturerd on its 0.18 μm (180 nm) process. The microcontroller implements a Synacore SCR1 RISC-V instruction set core[9]. MIK32 is the first product to be packaged by Mikron itself.[10]

US Sanctions

[edit]

During 1990-ties the Cold War era COCOM embargo was eased and in 2000-ties Russian chip manufacturing plants cooperated with US companies such as AMD in effort to obtain decommissioned past generation equipment needed to shorten the technological gap. In effort to curb these attempts, in 2012-2016 US government introduced sanctions against major Russian chip makers, Mikron included.[11][12] Export of the US chip making equipment to Mikron became only available if duly licensed by the BIS. In April 2022, the US Treasury Department imposed blocking sanctions on 21 entities and 13 people, including Mikron, for their ties to Russia following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.[13]

[edit]
  • A Mikron engineering building
    A Mikron engineering building
  • Bit-slice processor K589IK02, manufactured 1989
    Bit-slice processor K589IK02, manufactured 1989
  • 16Mbit SRAM 1663RU1, manufactured 2014
    16Mbit SRAM 1663RU1, manufactured 2014

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mikron Group

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mikron Group (Russian: Группа Микрон) is Russia's largest manufacturer and exporter of microelectronics, specializing in the design and production of semiconductors including integrated circuits, RFID chips, power devices, and memory components. Founded in 1964 in Zelenograd as a Soviet-era facility for microelectronic development, the group has evolved into a key domestic supplier for sectors such as consumer electronics, automotive systems, telecommunications, and defense applications. Headquartered in with additional production and R&D facilities in and , Mikron operates fabrication capabilities supporting up to 90 nm, exemplified by its 2014 introduction of 16 Mbit SRAM chips. Despite achieving in output and recent workforce expansions amid import restrictions, the group faces significant challenges from U.S. and imposed since 2014 for its role in Russia's military-industrial complex, limiting access to cutting-edge technology and equipment. These measures have prompted efforts toward technological self-reliance, including partnerships for domestic production and adaptations.

History

Founding and Early Operations

The Mikron Group, originally established as a , was founded in 1964 in , a planned science city in designed to foster Soviet electronics development. This inception aligned with the USSR's strategic imperative to achieve technological self-sufficiency in semiconductors, driven by Western export controls under the Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom) that restricted access to advanced microelectronics during the . Zelenograd's selection as the site leveraged its proximity to and isolation from urban distractions, enabling focused R&D in a controlled environment modeled after but under centralized state planning. Early operations centered on the production of discrete semiconductors and rudimentary integrated circuits (ICs), prioritizing applications in hardware, , and industrial automation to reduce reliance on imported components. State investments funded the construction of initial facilities, equipping Mikron with imported and domestically replicated equipment despite technological gaps vis-à-vis the West. By the late , the facility had scaled to serial production of basic ICs, supporting Soviet initiatives and defense systems amid the and arms buildup. A pivotal advancement occurred in the 1970s, when Mikron pioneered domestic bipolar transistor technologies and early processes, adapting Western designs through and limited licensed transfers. These developments enabled the manufacture of logic circuits and memory devices essential for Soviet mainframes and guidance systems, though yields and complexity lagged behind U.S. counterparts by several years due to material purity challenges and equipment limitations. This era solidified Mikron's role as the USSR's premier IC foundry, with output directed predominantly toward classified military end-users under oversight.

Soviet-Era Expansion and Specialization

During the 1970s and 1980s, the Mikron plant in , established in as a key node in the USSR's cluster, underwent substantial expansion to meet growing demands for domestic production. This growth aligned with state priorities for technological independence, transforming the facility into the Soviet Union's most advanced and high-volume (IC) manufacturer through investments in production lines and process improvements. Equipped primarily with Western machinery obtained through covert channels, Mikron achieved superior yields compared to other Soviet plants, focusing on scaling output for strategic sectors. Mikron specialized in defense-related , developing and manufacturing large-scale and analog ICs critical for , , and systems. As the first Soviet entity capable of such production, it supported self-sufficiency by supplying components resistant to harsh environments, including those used in and guidance systems. This specialization stemmed from Zelenograd's designation as a closed science city dedicated to electronics R&D, where Mikron integrated with institutes to reverse-engineer and adapt foreign designs for domestic needs. The plant contributed to national initiatives like the , producing TTL-compatible logic and support chips that enabled compatible mainframes modeled on architectures. By the late , Mikron's role helped drive total Soviet IC output to approximately 30 million units annually, reducing import dependence despite technological gaps with the West. Facilities emphasized reliability for applications, with production emphasizing bit-slice processors and custom ASICs for computing and signal processing.

Post-Soviet Restructuring and Modernization

Following the in 1991, JSC Mikron in encountered profound economic disruptions, including , the abrupt end of state subsidies, and the inability of Soviet-era facilities to compete in open markets, resulting in sharply reduced output and near-collapse of production capacity across Russia's sector. The transition to a exacerbated these issues, as demand for military-grade chips plummeted while commercial imports flooded in, forcing Mikron to scale back operations and seek foreign contracts, such as early deals for simple chips used in watches and calculators. In 2007, Sitronics—a technology subsidiary of the conglomerate—acquired control of Mikron as part of a broader restructuring effort to revitalize underutilized Soviet assets and integrate them into commercial supply chains. This ownership shift facilitated investments in facility upgrades, including a agreement with for 180 nm process capabilities, enabling Mikron to produce more advanced analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits. By the 2010s, these modernization efforts had matured, with full 180 nm production commencing around 2010 and allowing diversification into civilian applications such as , payment cards, and RFID systems, thereby reducing reliance on defense contracts while preserving Mikron's role in national strategic technologies. Ownership later transitioned amid Sitronics' financial strains, with Mikron integrating into state-supported structures under the Element group by the mid-2010s, sustaining investments in process refinement and yield improvements. In 2021, amid escalating import restrictions on foreign equipment and materials, Mikron advanced domestic localization initiatives, including expanded in-house fabrication and R&D focused on indigenous designs compatible with open architectures to mitigate external dependencies and enhance self-sufficiency in critical components. These steps aligned with federal priorities for technological , enabling scaled production of radiation-hardened chips for domestic markets while maintaining output for strategic sectors.

Products and Technologies

MIK32 'Amur' Microcontroller

The MIK32 'Amur' is a 32-bit microcontroller developed by Mikron Group and released in 2021 as Russia's first fully domestically produced RISC-V-based integrated circuit, encompassing design, fabrication, and packaging within the country. It employs the open-source SCR1 core from Syntacore, implementing the RV32IMC instruction set architecture subset, and operates at up to 32 MHz on Mikron's 180 nm CMOS process node. This design choice leverages RISC-V's royalty-free nature to advance technological sovereignty, avoiding proprietary architectures amid geopolitical pressures for import substitution in microelectronics. Key peripherals include UART, SPI, I2C interfaces, 12-bit ADC and DAC converters, timers, and an interrupt controller, providing functionality akin to ' STM32L0 series for low-power embedded applications. Targeted at industrial automation, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), and general embedded systems, the MIK32 '' retails for approximately 450 Russian rubles (around $6 at 2021 exchange rates), emphasizing cost-effective domestic sourcing over cutting-edge performance. It has been integrated into robotic platforms for control tasks, demonstrating practical deployment in specialized hardware. While commended for enabling verifiable supply chain independence in critical sectors like systems and , the has drawn criticism for its entry-level features, including machine-mode-only operation without physical (PMP) extensions or other advanced capabilities found in more mature implementations. The SCR1 core's simplicity suits basic tasks but limits scalability for complex, security-hardened applications, reflecting trade-offs in Russia's accelerated push toward self-reliant adoption.

Other Integrated Circuits and Applications

Mikron produces a range of integrated circuits beyond microcontrollers, including RFID chips, microprocessors, ICs, and application-specific integrated circuits (). RFID products encompass chips, inlays, tags, and labels used for identification in , , and , with Mikron positioning itself as Europe's largest manufacturer of RFID inlays and tags. ICs support secure applications such as ID documents and payment systems, while ICs handle and energy efficiency in consumer and industrial devices. These ICs are fabricated on 6-inch and 8-inch wafers using CMOS processes with embedded non-volatile memory, spanning nodes from 90 nm to 180 nm, with qualification achieved for 65 nm by 2020. are customized for specialized needs, including logic circuits and embedded systems. Production emphasizes import substitution under Russian programs, registering multiple IC designs in the national industrial products registry to prioritize domestic sourcing for critical sectors. In defense applications, Mikron's ICs support radar systems, , and potentially guidance , leveraging mature nodes suitable for radiation-hardened or high-reliability requirements in harsh environments. uses extend to automotive management and LED drivers via power ICs, though volumes remain constrained by equipment dependencies. Post-2022 sanctions prompted output scaling efforts, focusing on legacy processes amid disruptions, with 90 nm chips enabling defense and technologies despite limitations in advanced tooling.

Corporate Structure

Ownership and Shareholders

AO Mikron, the core operating entity of the Mikron Group, is majority-owned by Element, a that controls approximately 87% of its shares as of 2023 disclosures in Russian corporate registries. Element operates as a between AFK , a private conglomerate founded by , and , Russia's state-owned defense and technology corporation, reflecting a blend of oligarchic capital and governmental oversight that directs strategic priorities toward domestic technological self-sufficiency. Remaining shares, totaling around 13%, are distributed among minor private holders and Rosimushchestvo, the federal agency managing state property, with no significant reported. This ownership configuration facilitates access to state-backed funding for , enabling investments in advanced processes amid import restrictions, but it also embeds Mikron within sanctioned ecosystems, as Element's affiliates and ultimate beneficial owners face U.S. restrictions for supporting Russian military-industrial activities. Rostec's involvement ensures alignment with objectives, such as chip production for defense applications, while Sistema's stake provides managerial expertise drawn from its broader portfolio in and IT, though subject to over evasion tactics documented in sanctions enforcement reports.

Subsidiaries and Production Facilities

The primary production facility of the Mikron Group is situated in , , serving as the hub for , assembly, and testing operations. This site utilizes process technologies including 180 nm, 90 nm, and 65 nm nodes to manufacture semiconductors for industrial, consumer, and defense applications. A significant subsidiary, AO "VZPP-Mikron" (Voronezh Plant of Semiconductor Devices-Mikron), located in Voronezh, focuses on producing discrete semiconductor components and integrated circuits for power supply control, expanding the group's manufacturing footprint beyond Zelenograd. Wholly owned by AO "Mikron," this facility supports specialized production needs and has historically employed around 800-900 personnel, though numbers have fluctuated.) Both facilities adhere to Russian standards equivalent to military-grade requirements, such as certifications, facilitating supply to defense enterprises despite . The combined infrastructure enables scalable output for domestic markets, with handling core IDM processes and providing complementary discrete device fabrication.

Sanctions and International Responses

Imposition of Western Sanctions

On March 31, 2022, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's (OFAC) designated Mikron—a key Russian producer—under 14024, citing its operations in sectors of the Russian economy providing support to the government of Russia, particularly its military and defense industries that enable the invasion of . This action blocked all U.S.-jurisdiction property and interests in property of Mikron and prohibited U.S. persons from transactions with it, as part of broader efforts targeting entities fueling Russia's war machine through technology procurement and production. In April 2022, the U.S. expanded sanctions authorities under the same to further encompass Russian and defense sectors, reinforcing restrictions on entities like Mikron for their contributions to end-uses, including microchip critical to weapons systems. The designated Mikron on December 18, 2023, under its sanctions regime for operating in Russia's sector and holding licenses from the , which authorities linked to support. Similarly, the listed Mikron under the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, identifying it as Russia's largest manufacturer and exporter of microelectronic products used in defense applications, imposing asset freezes and transaction bans effective from May 4, 2022, with ongoing enforcement. On , 2025, OFAC targeted evasion networks linked to Mikron's suppliers, designating entities facilitating illicit of controlled technologies from third countries to sustain Russian production, as part of disrupting cross-border schemes involving China-based actors. Western rationales across these measures emphasize curtailing Russia's capacity to advanced for weaponry, viewing Mikron's output as integral to sustaining aggression against ; Russian counterparts have countered that such restrictions constitute coercive economic measures violating sovereignty and aimed at impeding domestic innovation.

Operational Impacts and Adaptation Strategies

The imposition of Western sanctions following Russia's 2022 invasion of severely restricted Mikron Group's access to advanced equipment and materials, exacerbating pre-existing vulnerabilities from global chip shortages that had already strained supply chains since 2020. Mikron, as Russia's largest domestic producer of integrated circuits, experienced disruptions in importing foreign tools and chemicals essential for fabricating chips below 65 nanometers, leading to reduced yields and halted progress on sub-100 nm nodes. These constraints particularly affected non-legacy production lines, where reliance on Western suppliers for precision machinery had previously enabled limited advancement to 65 nm processes. In response, Mikron pivoted toward domestic substitution and parallel imports from non-sanctioning countries, including , to sustain operations on older process nodes like 90 nm and above, which remain viable for defense applications such as microcontrollers and radiation-hardened chips. The company benefited from broader Russian government initiatives, including a pledged 2.6 trillion rubles (approximately $38 billion at exchange rates) in federal investments for by 2030, aimed at expanding local fabrication capacity and workforce development. Sector-wide adaptations included a reported 13% average workforce expansion in Russian electronics during 2024, signaling drives to address gaps in sustaining legacy production amid import barriers. Empirical data indicates resilience in core operations, with Mikron maintaining output of established products for and systems—claiming a 54% share of the domestic market as of —without facility shutdowns, though advanced node development stalled, perpetuating technological dependencies on pre-sanctions stockpiles and evasion-routed supplies. This continuity underscores partial mitigation through state-backed localization, yet causal analysis links sanction-induced equipment shortages to persistent gaps in sub-65 nm capabilities, limiting scalability for modern computing demands. Partnerships with Chinese firms have been explored for , but verifiable outcomes remain constrained by Mikron's outdated , with no evidence of breakthroughs in leading-edge nodes as of late 2025.

Achievements and Challenges

Contributions to Russian Technological Independence

Mikron Group's production of the exemplifies advancements in domestic capabilities. This 32-bit device, based on the open architecture, underwent full-cycle development and manufacturing within , from design to fabrication, as announced in 2021. The microcontroller supports embedded systems applications, offering an alternative to imported processors reliant on proprietary architectures like , thereby mitigating foreign dependency risks in supply chains critical for industrial and defense sectors. Beyond specific devices, Mikron enables import substitution across , producing over 700 types of integrated circuits used in programmable logic controllers, RFID tags, biometric passports, bank cards, and transport tickets. These efforts localize key components previously sourced abroad, aligning with Russia's national programs for technological by sustaining production volumes despite external restrictions. As Russia's largest manufacturer, Mikron's output contributes significantly to the country's goals of reducing import reliance in semiconductors, with state-backed R&D driving localization of design tools and processes. In defense applications, Mikron supplies radiation-hardened components under government contracts, bolstering by ensuring availability of domestically produced chips for systems. This —from raw wafer processing at 90nm nodes to finished ICs—enhances resilience against global supply disruptions, as evidenced by sustained hiring and capacity expansion in the sector. Overall, these achievements support Russia's broader objective of import substitution, targeting up to 70% replacement of imported semiconductors by 2030 through localized manufacturing ecosystems.

Criticisms Regarding Innovation and Dependencies

The MIK32 'Amur' microcontroller developed by Mikron exhibits functional similarities to STMicroelectronics' STM32L0 series, including comparable peripherals and low-power architecture, raising questions about the extent of original innovation versus adaptation of established foreign designs. Mikron's fabrication capabilities are limited to 180 nm process nodes, a technology commercialized globally in the late 1990s, which constrains chip density, power efficiency, and performance relative to contemporary sub-28 nm standards used by competitors. This technological plateau has drawn criticism for failing to achieve breakthroughs in advanced nodes, with no documented advancements beyond licensed or imported processes from the 2000s. Manufacturing challenges exacerbate these innovation gaps, as Russian semiconductor facilities, including Mikron's, contend with high defect rates—reportedly up to 50% in chip packaging and final assembly stages—stemming from immature localization efforts and inconsistent quality control. These yields hinder scalability for commercial or high-reliability applications, contrasting with global industry benchmarks exceeding 90% in mature nodes. Persistent dependencies on foreign technology underscore vulnerabilities, with Mikron and peers reliant on imported tools from firms like ASML for core processes, despite sanctions prompting evasion tactics such as part-by-part . U.S. Treasury reports highlight broader Russian schemes to procure restricted equipment via third countries, indicating that domestic substitution remains incomplete and reliant on external supply chains. Critics from Western analyses argue this reflects state-subsidized inefficiency rather than viable , while proponents frame military-oriented R&D as pragmatically necessary for defense amid geopolitical isolation, though without empirical demonstration of superior outcomes over imported alternatives. Mainstream outlets often emphasize ethical concerns over military end-use as a driver for such dependencies, prioritizing sanctions enforcement over technological merit.

References

  1. https://www.linkedin.com/company/elfi-strategic-partners
  2. https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/MKRO:RU
  3. https://mapy.com/en/?source=osm&id=1098109496
  4. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/russia-sees-tech-boom-amid-sanctions-microelectronics-industry-sees-massive-hiring-surge-and-increased-salaries
  5. https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/Details.aspx?id=35936
  6. https://www.opensanctions.org/entities/NK-gansNqDGVPcFhbmZghpC8a/
  7. https://osintforukraine.com/publications/microchips
  8. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000484024.pdf
  9. https://inria.hal.science/hal-01568384/document
  10. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498658.pdf
  11. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/mikron-leading-semiconductor-idm-company-in-russia/66827179
  12. https://en.eeworld.com.cn/news/manufacture/eic570425.html
  13. https://www.quora.com/Russia-doesn-t-have-advanced-semiconductor-industries-The-International-Traffic-in-Arms-Regulations-ITAR-forbids-exporting-data-to-Russian-military-industries-So-how-is-Russia-still-able-to-build-such-advanced
  14. https://www.intellinews.com/russia-revs-up-microchip-production-331184/
  15. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG422.pdf
  16. https://www.eetimes.com/is-russias-sitronics-backing-away-from-fab-plans/
  17. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/s/LSE_SSA_2007.pdf
  18. https://meet-global.bnext.com.tw/articles/view/47631
  19. https://www.eetimes.com/ST-Micro-signs-tech-transfer-deal-with-Sitronics/
  20. https://warontherocks.com/2022/06/can-russia-rebuild-its-tech-sector-with-chinas-help/
  21. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/russias-digital-tech-isolationism/
  22. https://tadviser.com/index.php/Product:Micron_MIK_Integrated_Circuits
  23. https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/09/10/mikron-mik32-made-in-russia-32-bit-risc-v-mcu-stm32l0-mcu/
  24. https://www.tomshardware.com/news/russian-risc-v-microcontroller
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396037596_Development_of_Robotic_Platform_on_MIK32_AMUR
  26. https://syntacore.com/products/scr1
  27. https://silicontrust.org/2014/04/27/silicon-trust-welcomes-jsc-mikron-as-new-partner/
  28. https://www.eurasiantimes.com/russias-achieves-big-breakthrough-in-microchip/
  29. https://www.quora.com/How-does-Russia-satisfy-their-need-for-semiconductors-Does-Russia-have-their-own-semiconductor-technology
  30. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/soviet-vs-us-radar-processors-comparison.41644/page-2
  31. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/russia-develops-its-first-lithography-tool-outdated-by-30-years-from-day-one
  32. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5xGnHFhKTs
  33. https://blackterminal.com/news/59244?hl=en
  34. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2785
  35. https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/81671/
  36. https://mikron.ru/company/
  37. https://www.rusprofile.ru/id/1574880
  38. https://www.audit-it.ru/contragent/1023601533273_ao-vzpp-mikron
  39. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0692
  40. https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20220331
  41. https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/perspectives/advisories/2022/04/us-expands-sanctions-authority-to-target-russia
  42. https://data.europa.eu/apps/eusanctionstracker/subjects/160295
  43. https://sanctions.lursoft.lv/person/joint-stock-company-mikron/uk-15324
  44. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Impact-of-Semiconductor-Sanctions-on-Russia.pdf
  45. https://technologyglobal.substack.com/p/russias-semiconductor-industry
  46. https://takshashila.org.in/content/publications/assets/The-Semiconductor-Question-in-the-Russia-Ukraine-Conflict.pdf
  47. https://www.astutegroup.com/news/defence/in-russia-the-chips-are-down/
  48. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2023/07/vital-microchip-sanctions-will-hit-russian-computing-power-hard?lang=en
  49. https://debuglies.com/2025/07/23/report-chinas-role-in-russias-military-technology-supply-chain/
  50. https://tass.com/economy/1808433
  51. https://interfax.com/newsroom/exclusive-interviews/108015/
  52. https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/russias-quest-digital-sovereignty
  53. https://theins.ru/en/society/273488
  54. https://www.trendforce.com/news/2024/12/05/news-china-and-russias-semiconductor-equipment-rise/
  55. https://www.electronics-lab.com/russian-company-develops-a-mikron-mik32-mcu-with-features-similar-to-stm32l0-mcu/
  56. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/half-of-russian-made-chips-are-defective-baikal-struggles-to-meet-russias-demand
  57. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/in-russia-the-chips-are-down/
  58. https://resurgamhub.org/free-people-thoughts/serhii-volkov/the-nanometre-race-what-is-the-state-of-the-russian-semiconductor-industry-
  59. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/articles/2024/01/14/7437218/
  60. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/analysis-russias-lethal-electronics-are-impossible-without-west/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.