Hubbry Logo
Military Unit NumberMilitary Unit NumberMain
Open search
Military Unit Number
Community hub
Military Unit Number
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Military Unit Number
Military Unit Number
Military Unit Number
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A sign on the barracks of the 35th Guards Air Assault Brigade of the Kazakh Air Assault Forces, indicating its Military Unit Number 32363.

A Military Unit Number (Russian: войсковая часть, в/ ч; Ukrainian: військова частина, в/ ч) is a unique numeric code assigned to military units of the Soviet Union and some Post-Soviet states. It is usually a four or five digit code for the purpose of identifying units of the armed forces and internal troops.

Military Unit Numbers for ground forces are assigned for a specific military unit (corps, division, brigade, etc.) while for the navy it is assigned to an individual ship. The number is also used for the unit's military mail and other logistics.

Military Unit Number standards for post-Soviet states

[edit]
Country Forces type Code rules Example
 Russia Armed Forces 5 digits 28376
 Ukraine Armed Forces 1 Cyrillic letter and 4 digits А0104
National Guard 4 digits 2837
 Belarus Armed Forces 5 digits 37615
Internal Troops 4 digits 2837
 Kazakhstan Armed Forces 5 digits 32363
National Guard 4 digits 6506
 Tajikistan Armed Forces 5 digits 08050
Internal Troops 4 digits 6506
 Uzbekistan Armed Forces 5 digits 08050
National Guard 4 digits 6506

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Military Unit Number

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Military Unit Number (Russian: воинская часть, abbreviated в/ч; transliterated as voyskovaya chast') is a unique numeric code, typically consisting of five digits, assigned to individual military units, subunits, and separate establishments within the armed forces and of the and its post-Soviet successor states. This designation serves primarily as an administrative identifier for postal services, correspondence, and official records, functioning analogously to a U.S. (APO) number in Western militaries. It enables discreet communication and without revealing unit locations or compositions, a practice rooted in operational . Originating in the Soviet era following the 1918 formation of the , the system was expanded during to manage the vast structure of millions of personnel across numerous fronts. By assigning sequential or categorized numbers—often prefixed with "в/ч" in documents—the Soviet military could track units efficiently amid frequent reorganizations, such as the activation of guards units or the redeployment of divisions. Following the 1991 dissolution of the USSR, the practice persisted in the and those of countries like , , and , with numbers retained, reassigned, or adapted (such as Ukraine's alphanumeric format) to maintain continuity in military administration. In contemporary usage, Military Unit Numbers are integral to Russian and post-Soviet operations, appearing on official paperwork, markings, and personnel documents to denote affiliation without disclosing sensitive details. For instance, formations like the 74th Separate Guards Motor are identified as в/ч 21005, linking them to specific garrisons such as Yurga in the Region. The codes also facilitate , as leaks or captures of documents can reveal force structures, though their opacity limits full disclosure of capabilities. This enduring system underscores the emphasis on centralized control and secrecy in these militaries.

Origins and History

Development in the Soviet Union

The Military Unit Number (VCh) system originated in the Soviet era as an administrative identifier for units, formalized during the to support growing military structures and . Under the for Military and Naval Affairs (later the for Defense), the Soviet military transitioned from a territorial to a regular standing army in the 1920s and , standardizing designations for efficient . By the late , this included refined tables of organization, with the system enabling centralized management across forces that had been reduced post-Civil War. During , the VCh system expanded significantly for operational security and logistics amid massive mobilization. Numbers served as discreet addresses for correspondence and supplies, allowing communication without revealing unit locations. Established following the 1941 German , the "voennaya chast'" framework supported secure mail handling of around 70 million items monthly in the war's later stages, connecting over 34 million personnel who served in the . This postal role underscored the system's emphasis on secrecy and efficiency in a force that grew rapidly to counter the . Post-1945, refinements incorporated expanded formats to manage and new branches, such as the Strategic Missile Forces established in 1959, while overall strength reduced from 11.3 million to 2.8 million by 1948. The evolution supported centralized control under 21 military districts by 1946, with VCh numbers tied to administrative hierarchies integrating mechanized and nuclear elements.

Transition to Post-Soviet States

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991, the successor states inherited the bulk of the Soviet Armed Forces' conventional units on a largely territorial basis, with formations and garrisons located within each republic's borders being transferred to the newly independent militaries. Most units initially retained their original Soviet-assigned military unit numbers (VCh) to ensure administrative continuity during the chaotic transition, though selective reassignments occurred to resolve duplicates arising from the fragmentation of shared Soviet structures into separate national forces. Between 1992 and 1995, the Russian Federation undertook significant reorganization under its newly established Ministry of Defense, centralizing control over inherited units and streamlining the VCh system as part of broader efforts to consolidate the largest share of Soviet assets. These changes were complicated by the profound military drawdowns triggered by and geopolitical shifts, as the Soviet forces—numbering around 4 million personnel in —were rapidly reduced, leading to the disbandment of thousands of units and the recycling of VCh codes for reassignment to reformed elements by the early 2000s. The establishment of the (CIS) in December 1991 and the Collective Security Treaty in 1992 played a key role in preserving elements of the Soviet numbering framework, promoting standardized retention and compatibility for joint operations among members including and . This focus, which later evolved into the (CSTO) in 2002, extended to logistics and armaments coordination, minimizing disruptions to unit identification during bilateral and multilateral agreements. Soviet-era VCh numbers continue to appear in declassified archival materials from the period, supporting ongoing historical analysis of the and the evolution of successor state forces.

Format and Structure

Numerical Composition and Encoding

The , known as voinskaya chast (v/ch), is a numeric identifier used in the armed forces and of to designate units in a standardized manner. These numbers are typically 4 or 5 digits long, serving as unique administrative codes assigned by the General Staff to facilitate identification without revealing operational details. This encoding logic is intentionally non-sequential to enhance operational , obscuring the and preventing adversaries from inferring unit strength, location, or precedence from the numbers alone. Elite formations, such as units, receive deliberately non-obvious codes to further mask their status and role. The system lacks a publicly documented explicit , but allows for categorization of thousands of units. In , minor variations exist, but the core principles remain consistent across , , and other successors.

Variations by Military Branch

In post-Soviet militaries, military unit numbers, denoted by the prefix "в/ч" (voinskaya chast'), exhibit variations across branches primarily in their application and integration with service-specific identifiers, while maintaining a core five-digit format for most armed forces units. Ground forces units, such as motorized rifle divisions and , typically employ five-digit в/ч numbers for administrative and operational identification. For instance, the 138th Motorized Rifle is assigned в/ч 02511, reflecting its role in operations within the . These numbers facilitate tracking of personnel, equipment, and deployments in large-scale ground maneuvers. Naval forces adapt в/ч numbers for fleet units, often integrating them with hull numbers or project designations for precise identification of squadrons and naval infantry. Naval infantry and coastal units follow the five-digit standard, as seen with the 336th Naval Infantry Brigade's в/ч 06017, which supports amphibious and defensive operations. For individual warships, such as destroyers in , separate hull and numbers are used, while в/ч assignments apply to parent squadrons for coordinated fleet . This system ensures during joint exercises but emphasizes maritime-specific tracking beyond basic unit numbering. Air forces utilize four- to five-digit в/ч numbers, frequently tied to air base locations or designations for tactical regiments. For example, anti-aircraft missile regiments may use numbers in the 2xxx range, such as в/ч 23662 under the Northern Fleet's air defense command. Post-1991 reforms, including the 1997 merger of the (VVS) and Air Defense Forces (PVO), streamlined these numbers by disbanding over 580 units and reducing overlaps with ground forces , shifting operational control to districts for enhanced joint air-ground integration. This consolidation minimized redundant identifiers, prioritizing efficiency in a downsized force structure reduced from 500,000 to 170,000 personnel. Internal troops and militia units, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD), diverge by using four-digit в/ч numbers to denote gendarmerie-like roles in border security and riot control. Examples include units like в/ч 2837 for border guards in Belarus, aligning with regional post-Soviet adaptations for non-combat security functions. Strategic rocket forces reserve unique five-digit blocks within the armed forces framework to identify nuclear-capable missile brigades, ensuring secure classification. The 27th Guards Rocket Army, for instance, operates under в/ч 43176, with subordinate units like missile regiments using sequential extensions to denote strategic assets. Across branches, the в/ч prefix remains consistent in official documentation for interoperability, though naval and air records often append service-specific suffixes (e.g., fleet or air army codes) for detailed logging. Post-Cold War reforms in the 1990s further harmonized these systems by eliminating duplicative air force designations, reducing administrative overlaps with ground units through centralized high command oversight.

Usage in Post-Soviet Militaries

Identification and Operational Roles

Military unit numbers, known as voennaya chast (VCh) designations in post-Soviet militaries, serve as unique numerical identifiers for quick recognition of units during operations. These five-digit codes are often displayed on vehicle exteriors, such as Russian T-72 tanks, and at base entrances to facilitate rapid visual identification in combat and training environments, reducing the risk of incidents. For instance, in the , VCh numbers painted on equipment enable ground forces to distinguish allied units amid chaotic maneuvers. In structures, VCh numbers are integral to issuing orders and coordinating actions via radio traffic and digital channels, providing a standardized alternative to descriptive names that could lead to confusion. Operators reference specific codes, such as "Unit 28376, advance to grid 45-67," to direct movements precisely without revealing sensitive details like unit honors or locations. This practice ensures efficient communication across hierarchical levels, from to commands, in post-Soviet doctrines emphasizing centralized control. During modern conflicts, VCh numbers have gained prominence through captures and , exposing unit deployments. In the 2014-2025 Ukraine war, for example, the Russian 810th Naval (VCh 13140) was identified via seized documents and equipment markings, highlighting how these codes trace operational involvement despite efforts at . Such exposures have informed assessments of force composition and losses. In training exercises, VCh numbers are temporarily assigned to maneuver units to simulate real-world operations without compromising permanent identifiers. The Zapad-2021 drills, for instance, utilized provisional codes for participating formations from the , allowing evaluation of joint Russian-Belarusian tactics while maintaining flexibility in unit rotations. Secrecy protocols classify VCh numbers until unit , with changes implemented during to reassign reserves and obscure reorganizations. Following the 2022 partial , Russian authorities reassigned VCh designations to newly formed territorial defense units, limiting of exact strengths and locations to enhance operational . Integration with technology has embedded VCh numbers in digital systems for real-time tracking since the . The Russian Automated Control System (ASU), including variants like Akatsiya-M, employs these codes to monitor unit status, positions, and in automated command posts, enabling commanders to process data efficiently across echelons.

Administrative and Logistical Functions

In post-Soviet militaries, the military unit number, known as VCh (voinskaya chast), serves as the primary identifier for personnel management, linking individual service members to their assigned units for administrative purposes such as record-keeping, , and assignments. Personal files of active-duty personnel, including conscripts, are maintained directly within the VCh, containing essential documents like service contracts, medical records, and disciplinary notes, which facilitate efficient tracking and transfers between units. Upon discharge or reassignment, these files are transferred to regional military commissariats, but the VCh remains the foundational reference for verifying service history and benefits eligibility. For instance, conscripts are directed to report to a specific VCh upon induction, ensuring seamless integration into unit rosters for pay and administration. The VCh also integrates with supply and procurement systems, functioning as a logistics code that directs the delivery of essential , including , , and equipment, to designated units across . In logistical operations, VCh designations enable centralized planning and distribution, where supply chains route resources based on unit location and operational needs, minimizing delays in backend support. This encoding ensures in , as units must report inventory against their VCh to higher commands, aligning with broader material-technical support frameworks. A longstanding administrative role of the VCh is in services, established as a core function during the Soviet era in to maintain communication between frontline units and home fronts amid wartime disruptions. Envelopes for military correspondence are addressed using the VCh number combined with a postal index, allowing secure and expedited without disclosing geographic locations, a practice continued in post-Soviet forces for internal and family . This system handled millions of items monthly during and remains integral to personnel welfare in modern contexts. For historical archiving, declassified VCh numbers are cataloged in state archives, aiding benefits claims and scholarly on post-Soviet unit histories. The Russian Ministry of Defense's Central (TsAMO) maintains databases tracking units from 1941 to , where VCh entries link personnel records to wartime service, enabling verification for pensions and commemorations. or descendants access these via VCh queries, which cross-reference awards, deployments, and casualties, preserving while supporting legal entitlements. In broader post-Soviet contexts, such archiving ensures continuity for benefit programs, with digitized indices facilitating remote searches. Reforms in the emphasized , integrating VCh into () systems across Russian forces to enhance administrative efficiency and reduce paperwork in and personnel tracking. These initiatives automated VCh-based workflows for supply allocation and file , aligning with broader modernization efforts to streamline backend operations. By embedding unit numbers in digital platforms, post-Soviet militaries improved , though implementation varied by country. Legally, VCh numbers feature in international agreements like the Conventional Forces in (CFE) , where states were required to disclose unit record numbers during verification to confirm compliance with armament limits. The treaty's protocols mandated reporting formation or unit record numbers for objects of verification, including brigade-level holdings of tanks and , enabling on-site inspections and data exchanges among signatories. This transparency mechanism, applied to post-Soviet successors, used VCh equivalents to track reductions and prevent imbalances, underscoring the administrative role in arms control.

Country-Specific Implementations

Russia and Belarus

In the , military unit numbers, designated as VCh (воинская часть), follow a standardized 5-digit format inherited from the Soviet system, serving as unique identifiers for administrative, logistical, and operational purposes across Forces. This numbering encodes information such as formation type, location, and historical lineage, with units like the exemplifying ceremonial and guard roles within the structure. Following the 2008-2012 military reforms initiated under President , restructured its ground forces from a division-centric model to permanent readiness brigades, reducing the total number of units from 1,890 in 2008 to 172 combat brigades by 2012 and necessitating the reassignment of designations for enhanced mobility and rapid deployment. The Republic of Belarus maintains a comparable 5-digit VCh system for its Armed Forces, reflecting the shared post-Soviet heritage, while its under the Ministry of Internal Affairs use 4-digit designations for policing and functions. Notable examples include the 6th Separate Guards Mechanized Brigade, a key armored formation in the Western Operational Command, which traces its roots to World War II-era Soviet units and supports border defense operations. Both nations preserve Soviet-era district codes within their numbering schemes, facilitating continuity in , and aligns its assignments closely with Russian practices through the framework established by the 1999 treaty, which promotes integrated defense policies and joint force planning. Illustrative of these systems, Russia's represents a high-priority mechanized force headquartered in , equipped for large-scale armored operations and assigned under the . In contrast, Belarus's 11th Guards Berlin-Carpathian Mechanized Brigade, based in , functions as a unit optimized for rapid reaction within the Northwestern Operational Command. These examples highlight minor adaptations, such as Belarus's emphasis on lighter mechanized elements suited to its terrain, while retaining interoperability with Russian counterparts. Amid the 2022-2025 period, underwent significant military expansion in response to the Ukraine conflict, forming new combined-arms and motorized rifle units to bolster frontline capacities, with active personnel growing from 1 million in 2021 to 1.5 million by December 2024 under President Vladimir Putin's decree. This included the creation of additional brigades and divisions, often drawing from higher numerical blocks to accommodate contract-based formations, though exact VCh allocations remain classified. has supported this dynamic through enhanced basing agreements, mirroring Russian expansions in equipment and training without major numbering overhauls. The shared numbering legacy enhances interoperability during joint operations, particularly in (CSTO) exercises like Zapad-2025, where Russian and Belarusian units—totaling up to 150,000 personnel—conduct coordinated maneuvers across Belarusian territory, enabling seamless integration of command structures and logistics. This compatibility stems from the 1999 Union State accords, which formalized military-technical cooperation and standardized procedural elements for collective defense scenarios.

Ukraine and Kazakhstan

In , the Armed Forces adopted a military unit numbering system featuring one Cyrillic letter followed by four digits to designate specific formations and denote branch or functional type, marking a departure from the purely numeric Soviet-era conventions retained in neighboring states like and . This format facilitates internal organization and operational identification within the Ground Forces, Air Assault Troops, and other components. For instance, the 80th Brigade is assigned A0284, while the 92nd Mechanized Brigade uses A0501. The , operating under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, employs a distinct four-digit system without prefixes, emphasizing its role in internal security and rapid response. An example is 3001, assigned to the Northern Territorial Administration headquartered in , which oversees units in northern regions during both peacetime and subordination to the Armed Forces. These adaptations in Ukraine's system, introduced post-independence, prioritize national distinctiveness and security, particularly amid heightened threats since , though specific wartime protections for unit disclosures during the 2022 Russian invasion remain classified operational measures. In Kazakhstan, the Armed Forces maintain a five-digit numbering system inherited from Soviet structures, typically prefixed with "VCh" (voinskaya chast, or military unit), to catalog units across ground, air defense, and airmobile forces. This format supports administrative tracking and deployment in the vast Central Asian theater. The 35th Guards Brigade, for example, is designated VCh 32363, reflecting its elite airborne role based near . Kazakhstan's uses a four-digit system, aligning with its functions under the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Unit 6506, located in , exemplifies this, focusing on border security and counter-terrorism in the southern Ontustik Regional Command. Post-1991 independence, restructured its forces from the dissolved Central Asian , retaining the numeric VCh convention while integrating regional commands to address local geographic and security needs, such as steppe defenses and border patrols. Recent 2023 security enhancements under the framework emphasize broader interoperability with U.S. and Central Asian partners, though unit numbering remains largely consistent with post-Soviet norms. Compared to Ukraine's alphanumeric hybrid, Kazakhstan's purely numeric approach for the Armed Forces—exemplified by the 92nd Mechanized Brigade (A0501) versus the 35th Guards Brigade (VCh 32363)—simplifies legacy compatibility but poses challenges in multinational exercises, where Ukraine's prefixed system can hinder seamless data sharing with allies during joint operations.

Other Post-Soviet States

In the smaller , military unit numbering systems largely retain the Soviet-era format of 4-5 digit codes, serving as internal identifiers for administrative, logistical, and operational purposes, with many units recycling pre-1991 designations due to limited resources and close ties to Russian . This structure is influenced by ongoing training and equipment support from , which emphasizes standardized numbering for interoperability within organizations like the (CSTO). For instance, in , the Armed Forces assign 5-digit numbers to ground and mobile units, such as military unit No. 06870 for elements involved in exercises. Internal Troops in use 4-digit codes, exemplified by unit 6592, which participates in national defense ceremonies. Uzbekistan follows a similar 5-digit convention for its units, with an emphasis on numbering that supports border security and guards formations. integrates its unit numbering with CSTO standards, assigning codes like those for battalions to facilitate operations and Russian base coordination, though specific digits remain closely held for security reasons. In contrast, Georgia has pursued military reforms aligned with standards since the mid-2000s. Examples from other states highlight the pattern's persistence among smaller militaries. Kyrgyzstan's 25th Brigade, known as Scorpion, operates under a 5-digit code system derived from Soviet practices, focusing on mountain and border operations. Moldova's limited ground forces reflect the country's small scale and neutral stance, with units like the 1st Brigade tasked with national defense. In , isolationist policies have led to minimal transparency in unit numbering, but 2020s developments show a shift toward digital tracking systems for internal management, enhancing secrecy amid neutrality commitments. Overall, these states adapt the system minimally, prioritizing cost-effective recycling of Soviet numbers over wholesale changes.

International Comparisons

NATO and Western Systems

In NATO and Western military systems, unit identification prioritizes interoperability among allied forces through standardized symbology and codes, rather than opaque internal numbering. The primary mechanism is outlined in STANAG 2019, which establishes (APP-6 series) for representing units, equipment, and installations on maps and in documents. This system uses a 20-character Symbol Identification Code (SIDC) to uniquely define symbols, enabling rapid recognition across member nations during joint exercises or deployments. Unlike the numeric-centric approaches in other traditions, NATO symbology incorporates visual icons, size indicators (e.g., division as three slashes), and alphanumeric labels drawn from national designations to facilitate shared . A key example is the United States, where the Department of Defense employs a six-character alphanumeric Unit Identification Code (UIC) to track units in manpower, readiness, and logistics systems; this code typically begins with a service-specific prefix followed by unit-specific digits and letters. U.S. Army units often use sequential numeric designations for higher echelons, such as the 1st Infantry Division, reflecting historical organization from World War I onward, while Marine Corps units like the 2nd Marine Division combine ordinal numbers with branch abbreviations for clarity in multinational contexts. For allied operations, these national codes integrate into NATO's Order of Battle (ORBAT) frameworks, sometimes augmented with four-digit numeric identifiers plus modifiers for tracking in coalition databases. This structure supports philosophical differences from post-Soviet systems, where internal secrecy limits external sharing; NATO's emphasis on transparency, as per STANAG 2019, enables real-time collaboration without compromising operational security through classification levels. NATO's unit identification evolved post-1949 founding, with early STANAGs focusing on procedural harmonization to counter Soviet threats, contrasting the origins of centralized numeric systems in the . The 1990s marked significant expansion, incorporating former nations like and in 1999, which required adapting diverse Eastern European unit labels into the alliance's symbology without a unified numeric overlay. Advantages of this approach were evident in operations like the 1999 [Kosovo Force](/page/Kosovo Force) (KFOR), where standardized codes and symbols allowed 40 contributing nations to coordinate over 50,000 troops effectively, demonstrating enhanced flexibility for multinational missions compared to more rigid, unilateral-focused alternatives. There is no direct NATO equivalent to secretive internal unit numbers like the Soviet VCh, though partial alignments emerged in post-Cold War frameworks such as the (CSTO). In contrast to the numeric focus of post-Soviet militaries, NATO's system underscores alliance cohesion.

Non-Soviet Bloc Examples

In non-Soviet bloc militaries, unit numbering systems often blend numeric identifiers with local traditions, adapting elements of Soviet-style hierarchies for administrative efficiency while prioritizing cultural or operational nuances. The of , for instance, assigns five-digit military unit codes (MUCD, or junshi danwei daihao) to regimental-level and higher formations, serving as unique identifiers akin to postal zip codes for and command. These codes underpin a structure, where group armies like the 78th—designated Unit 31669—oversee combined-arms brigades with subordinate five-digit identifiers, such as 65301 for specific mechanized units, facilitating rapid mobilization across vast territories. This approach echoes Soviet hierarchies but emphasizes joint operations under five strategic theaters established in 2016. India's military, shaped by its post-colonial British legacy and Cold War-era Soviet arms acquisitions after the 1962 , employs simple numeric designations for regiments without a centralized postal integration mechanism like the Soviet VCh. Regiments such as the reflect this hybrid model, where numbers denote seniority and ethnic composition for battalions, supporting a force structure that incorporates Soviet-influenced equipment like tanks while retaining British-style regimental loyalty and battle honors. In the , the (IRGC) of uses alphanumeric designations that fuse numeric sequences with religious honorifics, as in the 31st Division, a formation based in responsible for northwestern defense. This system highlights ideological symbolism over pure numerics, with the IRGC's ground forces comprising around 150,000 personnel organized into 30+ divisions and brigades for . A shared trait among these systems is the use of numeric codes to handle large-scale forces affordably, as seen in North Korea's (KPA), where divisions like the 4th Infantry employ sequential numbering mirroring Soviet designs for of over 1.2 million personnel. Unlike Soviet emphasis on postal-linked VCh numbers for wartime correspondence, these militaries deprioritize such integration, favoring honorifics for —exemplified by Saudi Arabia's Imam Muhammad bin Saud Mechanized Brigade within the National Guard's 90,000-strong force. Globally, post-colonial armies in the Global South often hybridize Soviet models for their low-cost equipment and scalable organization, blending them with Western or indigenous elements to suit resource constraints and national identities.

References

  1. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA022762.pdf
  2. https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-regular-ground-forces-order-of-battle-russian-military-101-2/
  3. https://www.criticalthreats.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Russian-Ground-Forces-OOB_ISW-CTP.pdf
  4. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA150175.pdf
  5. https://www.blavatnikarchive.org/story/war-in-mail
  6. https://www.historyhit.com/facts-about-the-red-army/
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA243946.pdf
  8. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/books/SIPRI98An/SIPRI98An09.pdf
  9. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2021-12-21/end-soviet-union-1991
  10. https://understandingwar.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/October20122C20202320Russian20Orbat_Final.pdf
  11. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/av-orbat.htm
  12. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/96437/02_Jul_3.pdf
  13. https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/russia/rvsn-orbat.htm
  14. https://rochan-consulting.com/zapad-2021-strategic-operational-exercise-part-15-unit-numbers/
  15. https://jamestown.org/program/russian-military-introduces-new-automated-command-and-control-systems/
  16. https://www.gosuslugi.ru/help/faq/docs_military/103438
  17. https://scienceforum.ru/2014/article/2014003096
  18. http://www.antikwar.com/camo
  19. https://tadviser.com/index.php/Article:Digitalization_of_the_Russian_army
  20. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/9/14087.pdf
  21. https://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/History/On-Site%20Inspections%20CFE%20Treaty--final.pdf
  22. https://ova.mil.ru/upload/site16/document_file/NWTJRWFiKw.doc
  23. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/154-rgt.htm
  24. https://cdm21069.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/ppl1/id/239007/download
  25. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/belarus/6-bde-mech.htm
  26. https://mfa.gov.by/en/bilateral/russia/
  27. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-orders-russian-army-grow-by-180000-soldiers-become-15-million-strong-2024-09-16/
  28. https://my.rusi.org/resource/wartime-zapad-2025-exercise-russias-strategic-adaptation-and-nato.html
  29. https://militaryland.net/ukraine/air-assault-forces/80th-airassault-brigade/
  30. https://militaryland.net/ukraine/armed-forces/92nd-mechanized-brigade/
  31. https://militaryland.net/ukraine/national-guard/headquarters-of-the-national-guard/
  32. https://militaryland.net/ukraine/national-guard/
  33. http://www.ww2.dk/new/vdv/35gvodshbr.htm
  34. https://www.enbekshiqazaq.kz/en/news/387456-servicemen-of-the-national-guard-held-the.html
  35. https://auezov.edu.kz/eng/military-department-news/7731-cooperation-between-auezov-university-and-military-unit-6506-strengthening
  36. https://kz.usembassy.gov/c51-leaders-joint-statement/
  37. https://www.state.gov/c51
  38. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2023/7/18/ukraine-war-is-exposing-nato-interoperability-gaps
  39. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/centralasia/tajik-mobile.htm
  40. https://old.vkd.tj/index.php/en/information/news-archive/17641-artishi-mill-iftikhori-millat-ast-3
  41. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_38988.htm
  42. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/Other_Pubs/ms_2525d.pdf
  43. https://www.dla.mil/Defense-Data-Standards/Committees/DODAAD/
  44. https://angrystaffofficer.com/2020/01/12/army-unit-numerical-designations-where-do-they-come-from/
  45. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/conf_proceedings/2008/CF182part2.pdf
  46. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/78ga.htm
  47. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA1500/RRA1554-1/RAND_RRA1554-1.pdf
  48. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2019/iran-military-power_2019.pdf
  49. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/sang.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.