Hubbry Logo
Moore RiverMoore RiverMain
Open search
Moore River
Community hub
Moore River
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Moore River
Moore River
Moore River
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Moore River
Moore River estuary at Guilderton
Map
Location
CountryAustralia
Physical characteristics
Source 
 • locationDalwallinu
 • elevation310 m (1,017 ft)[1]
Mouth 
 • location
Indian Ocean at Guilderton
 • elevation
sea level
Length193 km (120 mi)
Basin size13,550 km2 (5,232 sq mi)[1]
Discharge 
 • average60,860 ML/a (1.929 m3/s; 68.11 cu ft/s)[2]
Basin features
Tributaries 
 • leftYadgena Brook, Moore River East
 • rightCoonderoo River

Moore River (Garban) is a river in the Wheatbelt region of Western Australia.

Geography

[edit]

The headwaters of the Moore River lie in the Perenjori, Carnamah and Dalwallinu Shires. The river then drains southwards through Moora, flows westerly before joining with the Moore River East near Mogumber, then flows in a westerly direction over the Edengerie Cascade, through the northern edge of the Moore River Nature Reserve, then through the Gingin Scarp, discharging into the Indian Ocean at Guilderton.[3]

The river includes a catchment that extends from just south of Three Springs to Guilderton. The catchment has a total area of 13,800 square kilometres (5,328 sq mi) and is 80% cleared for agriculture.[3] The catchment area is used for broadacre farming but with increasing diversification in horticulture and tree plantations. The river mouth at Guilderton typically closes during the summer months due to insufficient water flow, creating a sandbar.

The river has nine sub-catchment areas and has a number of tributaries and lakes along the length of the river. The salinity levels in the river catchment vary from brackish to saline with the exception of Gingin Brook which remains fresh throughout the year.[3]

History

[edit]

The Aboriginal people referred to the lower part of the river as Garban.[4] White settlers named it River Moore in May 1836 by Corporal Patrick Heffron of the 63rd Regiment of Foot, after his expedition leader George Fletcher Moore, Advocate-General. The exploratory party comprised Moore, Heffron and an Aboriginal man named Weenat.[5][6] Heffron was notable for his participation in the Pinjarra Massacre in 1834.[7]

The river is prone to periodic flooding unusually following cyclones and tropical depressions crossing the coast further north. In 1907, the railway lines between Watheroo and Moora were closed for some time when parts of the track were washed away.[8] More floods occurred in 1917 when 1.7 inches (43 mm) of rain fell in three hours at Mogumber with similar falls in surrounding areas. Moora was once again left underwater and rail services in surrounding areas were suspended. Low-lying areas in other towns such as Arrino, Three Springs, and Coorow were also submerged.[9]

In 1932, the river flooded once again following heavy rains in the Midland districts. Railway lines were undermined to a depth of 30 feet (9 m) leaving Moora isolated from Perth by both road and rail. The township of Moora was left 3 feet (1 m) underwater and portions of the town had to be evacuated. Crops and some stock were lost as a result of the floodwaters.[10]

Opened in 1918, near the head of the river, was the now defunct and discredited government-managed-settlement and internment camp known as the Moore River Native Settlement.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Moore River

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Moore River is a river located in the Wheatbelt and regions of Western Australia, with its headwaters arising in the Shires of Perenjori, Carnamah, and Dalwallinu before flowing generally southwest through the town of Moora and discharging into the at Guilderton, approximately 75 km north of Perth. Its catchment encompasses 13,800 square kilometres across eight areas, fed by nine sub-catchments and major tributaries including the East Moore River and Gingin Brook, which joins near the coast. The river supports regional and provides in its , recognized for ecological values including seasonal wetlands and , though it faces ongoing challenges such as gradients rising from fresh upper reaches to brackish-saline lower sections, groundwater salinization, and threats from land clearing and . Historically, the middle reaches near Mogumber hosted the , established by the Western Australian government in under the Aborigines Act as an agricultural and vocational training center intended to promote self-sufficiency among Aboriginal people deemed in need of state oversight. Over its operation until the mid-20th century, the settlement accommodated Aboriginal individuals and families forcibly relocated from across the state, but recurrent , inadequate , and contributed to high mortality rates, particularly among children.

Geography

Course and Hydrology

The Moore River originates from headwaters in the inland Shires of Perenjori, Carnamah, and Dalwallinu, draining southwards through the Shires of Coorow, Dandaragan, and Moora before turning westerly towards the coast. Its incorporates flows from the Moore River East near Mogumber and traverses varied terrain including broad valleys and meandering channels shaped by historical drainage patterns. The river's path reflects a complex geomorphic history, with twists and turns resulting from multiple ancestral stream integrations rather than a single uniform channel development. Major tributaries feeding the Moore River include the Coonderoo River, Moore River North, Yadgena Brook, Gingin Brook, and smaller streams such as Silver Creek, which contribute to its nine subcatchments. The catchment spans approximately 13,800 square kilometers, predominantly cleared for , which influences runoff patterns. The river ultimately discharges into the via an estuary at Guilderton, about 100 kilometers north of Perth. Hydrologically, the Moore River exhibits intermittent surface flows characteristic of many southwestern Australian systems, with seasonal peaks driven by winter rainfall and reduced summer baseflow. Downstream of the Gingin Brook confluence, the river gains significant volume from groundwater discharge, particularly from superficial aquifers like the Bassendean Sand and Mirrabooka formations, sustaining lower reaches even during drier periods. Recorded peak discharges reach up to 320 cubic meters per second, though typical flows, such as 2 cubic meters per second observed at gauging sites like Cowalla Bridge, reflect modest volumes relative to catchment size due to high evapotranspiration and permeable soils. The estuary hydrology integrates catchment runoff with localized groundwater inputs, resulting in variable salinity and periodic closures during low-flow conditions.

Ecology and Biodiversity

The Moore River catchment lies within the biodiversity hotspot, characterized by high plant endemism and diverse ecosystems ranging from woodlands and eucalypt-dominated riparian zones to shrublands on sandy and gravelly soils. Native includes adaptable such as York gum (Eucalyptus loxophleba), salmon gum (), wandoo (), and various like firewood banksia (Banksia menziesii) and slender banksia (Banksia attenuata), selected for revegetation based on soil types from deep sands to saline creek lines. Threatened ecological communities present include endangered Swan Woodlands and critically endangered semi-arid Eucalypt Woodlands and Tuart Woodlands, alongside over 1,000 threatened plant across the catchment shires. Aquatic habitats support native fish such as blue-spot goby (Pseudogobius olorum), freshwater cobbler, nightfish, south-western goby, western pygmy perch, and western hardyhead, with crayfish including gilgie (Cherax quinquecarinatus) and smooth marron (Cherax cainii). Other fauna encompasses the western long-necked turtle (Chelodina colliei) and terrestrial species like the endangered (Calyptorhynchus latirostris), which relies on tree hollows for breeding, and the western spiny-tailed skink (Egernia stokesii badia). The estuary functions as a dynamic, seasonal sandbar system providing and breeding grounds for birds, , and emus, while serving as a linking National Park to the north with Wilbinga areas to the south. Biodiversity faces pressures from , which degrades vegetation and water quality; ; waterlogging; like eastern ; and remnant vegetation loss due to and . Conservation efforts emphasize protecting nature reserves such as Mogumber West, promoting native revegetation with local plants to enhance corridors, and mitigating threats through strategies tailored to the 13,800 km² catchment.

Pre-20th Century History

Indigenous Occupation

The Moore River region in was traditionally occupied by the Yued (also spelled Yuat or Juat) people, a dialectal subgroup of the , who served as custodians of the land encompassing approximately 29,254 square kilometers north of Perth, including areas around Moora, Gingin, and the river catchment. Archaeological evidence from artefact scatters and burial sites near the river and associated water bodies, such as the Karakin Lakes complex, dates human occupation to at least the period, around 5,000 years ago, with continuous use evidenced by stone tools and skeletal remains concentrated near reliable freshwater sources. The Yued relied on the Moore River and its environs for sustenance through practices adapted to the six seasons (e.g., Birak for hunting, Makuru for winter gathering), which dictated sustainable harvesting to ensure resource regeneration, such as timing fish traps or leaving portions of beehives intact. Key resources included like gilgies and cobbler from river pools, terrestrial game such as kangaroos and emus, bush tucker plants yielding yams and berries, and emu eggs; medicinal uses involved leaves for remedies and animal fats for salves. , , and tool-making occurred along the riverbanks, supporting small family groups in a managed through controlled burning to promote and ease . Culturally, the river held profound spiritual importance as a creation site linked to the Waugal (Waugyl), a being in Nyitting () lore that shaped waterways by carrying ancestral creatures and forming the landscape during the world's genesis. This mythological association designated the Moore River as a sacred site for ceremonies, with connected pools serving as women's gathering places for lore transmission and resource collection; oral histories preserved knowledge of these practices, emphasizing the river's role in identity, law, and intergenerational continuity prior to European arrival in the 19th century.

European Exploration and Naming

George Fletcher Moore, an Irish settler and lawyer who arrived in the Swan River Colony in January 1830, conducted multiple inland expeditions to assess pastoral potential amid the colony's early expansion from Perth and the Avon Valley. By 1835, Moore had ventured northward from established settlements, mapping terrain suitable for agriculture and livestock amid challenging logistics and occasional interactions with people. These efforts built on prior surveys, such as Robert Dale's 1830-1831 reconnaissance of the Avon district, but extended further into underexplored wheatbelt regions approximately 100 kilometers north of Perth. In May 1836, Moore's party, including military personnel from the 63rd Regiment of Foot, traced a major freshwater course northward, identifying its path toward the coast near present-day Guilderton. This stream, spanning roughly 160 kilometers from headwaters near Mogumber to its estuary at the , represented a key hydrological feature for potential settlement, offering reliable water in an otherwise arid landscape. The expedition documented the river's viability for navigation and irrigation, noting its perennial flow dependent on seasonal rainfall averaging 500-600 millimeters annually in the catchment. The river was promptly named Moore River by the expedition members in recognition of their leader's contributions to colonial surveying, as recorded in Moore's contemporary journals detailing the journey's routes, , and Indigenous tracks encountered. This followed patterns in early Australian exploration, where features were often designated after patrons or discoverers to facilitate mapping and land grants; Moore himself held pastoral interests nearby, influencing subsequent claims. No prior European records of the river exist, confirming the 1836 expedition as the first documented contact, though coastal surveys by explorers like in 1791 had skirted the region without inland penetration.

20th Century Developments

Regional Settlement and Economy

The Moore River region, part of Western Australia's Wheatbelt and centered on the town of Moora, transitioned into a consolidated agricultural in the early , building on initial leases from 1846 and the first crop in 1847. Moora was gazetted as a townsite on April 12, 1895, marking its formal establishment as an agricultural district with supporting infrastructure such as a hotel, store, post office, police station, courthouse, and school serving 10 students by the early 1900s. By 1910, the Moora Shire had developed into a stable farming area, described in contemporary accounts as the center of a productive district focused on grain and . Economic growth accelerated after the gold mining downturn around 1905, with extensive land clearing—equivalent to the size of over 1900–1930 and 1945–1975—enabling dryland production that rendered the state self-sufficient in and by the mid-1920s. and dominated outputs, supported by agricultural advisory services, including the appointment of Moora's first resident agricultural officer in 1939 to promote innovations and experiments in cropping and . Sheep for and , along with , supplemented farming, which later diversified into , lupins, canola, and oaten hay; reliable annual rainfall exceeding 500 mm over 90 days sustained these activities without severe impacts, even in the . Settlement patterns reflected rural consolidation, with family farms forming the backbone of distribution in a low-density area; the shire's approximate reached around 2,800 by the late , underscoring modest growth tied to agricultural viability rather than . Post-World War I soldier settlement schemes further populated marginal lands, though profitability varied with market conditions and environmental challenges like soil degradation.

Government Policies and Infrastructure

The Western Australian government pursued aggressive agricultural expansion policies in the Wheatbelt during the early , targeting regions like the Moore River catchment to transition from dependency to grain and pastoral production. Following the gold industry's decline around 1905, initiatives under premiers like Newton Moore (1906–1910) advanced the farming frontier northward, offering land grants and subsidies to settlers for cultivation and sheep grazing, supported by the introduction of fertilizers and drought-resistant crop varieties. These policies, rooted in developmentalist , aimed to populate and economically integrate marginal lands, with the Wheatbelt peaking at approximately 150,000 by 1927, representing 41% of the state's total. Transport infrastructure underpinned this growth, as government-owned railways expanded more than twofold in the 1900s, primarily serving the to haul bulk grain from inland districts including those near the Moore River. Lines skirting the Moore River's coastal sandplains connected Moora and surrounding farms to Perth and ports by the 1910s, with further extensions in the 1920s enhancing export efficiency amid rising wheat yields. Road networks, initially rudimentary dirt tracks, saw gradual sealing post-1920s under state programs, though full upgrades awaited efforts to link isolated properties to rail sidings. Water management policies evolved to address arid conditions, culminating in the post-World War II Comprehensive Agricultural Areas Water Supply Scheme, which piped reliable sources to over 1 million hectares of Wheatbelt farmland by its completion, including Moore River-adjacent zones for stock watering and limited . The War Service Land Settlement Scheme (1946–1963) complemented this by reallocating to ex-servicemen, funding dams, bores, and fencing to sustain despite environmental risks like and rising from practices. These interventions, while boosting output to national significance, reflected a state-driven prioritization of over long-term ecological .

Moore River Native Settlement

Establishment and Objectives

The was established by the in 1918 on approximately 9,600 acres of land at Mogumber, near the Moore River, following allocation of the site in 1917. The initiative originated under the oversight of A. O. Neville, building on the Aborigines Act 1905, which authorized the removal of Aboriginal children and adults classified as neglected or in moral danger. Initial residents, numbering around 200, were primarily "fringe dwellers" relocated from urban and regional camps in areas such as the Murchison, , and south-west, with the first arrivals in 1918 under superintendent A. P. Mitchell. The settlement's stated objectives centered on creating a self-sustaining agricultural and vocational training hub to equip residents with farming, trades, and domestic skills for economic independence. Proponents envisioned it as an isolated environment for and moral upliftment, reducing reliance on rations while promoting assimilation through European-style labor and discipline. This aligned with broader protectionist policies aiming to segregate Aboriginal populations from settler communities, addressing colonial concerns over urban encampments and perceived social disruptions.

Operations and Daily Life

The Moore River Native Settlement functioned as a self-sustaining agricultural operation on approximately 11,600 acres, where residents cleared land, cultivated cereals and lupins on 3,000 acres, bred livestock, constructed roads (including a 9-mile project completed in nine months at £40 cost), erected fencing, and built infrastructure such as a 15,000-gallon stone water tank using local materials. Adult men and boys performed these manual labors with minimal or no remuneration, while girls and young women focused on domestic training, including sewing on a dozen machines to produce garments for the settlement and external institutions. Children as young as 14 were dispatched for external farm or domestic work but mandated to return to the settlement between contracts, enforcing ongoing oversight. Daily routines emphasized regimentation and discipline, beginning with morning drills to promote physical health and order, followed by allocated work, , and limited recreational activities such as . Education comprised about three hours daily initially, prioritizing practical skills for assimilation—domestic service and sewing for girls, farming and stock handling for boys—under instructors like Mrs. Rae, who incorporated reading, exercises, and basic arts to "uplift" participants. The settlement enforced strict segregation by sex, age, and , with children housed apart from parents in fenced dormitories locked at night to prevent cultural transmission and escapes; violations led to confinement in a corrugated iron punishment structure known as "the Boob." Living arrangements reflected resource constraints, with families in rudimentary tents, shacks of branches and canvas, or overcrowded quarters exposed to Wheatbelt winters; bathing occurred weekly in facilities or daily in the river. By the late , the site had expanded into a multi-role serving as a creche, , relief depot for the destitute, refuge for the aged and infirm, and aid center for unmarried mothers, all under superintendent authority like A.J. Neal's self-supporting mandate.

Health, Mortality, and Conditions

During its operation from 1918 to 1951, the recorded 374 deaths, with over half (203) occurring among children under 18 years old. Of these child deaths, 73% (147) were infants under 5 years, including over 100 under 1 year, reflecting elevated linked to and inadequate care. Mortality peaked during the 1920s amid the and again during due to funding shortages, with many deaths attributed to treatable conditions. Common causes of death included , , , , (severe undernourishment), and , often exacerbated by limited medical resources. In 1936 alone, the settlement's hospital reported 18 deaths, alongside epidemics of (47 cases, 5 fatalities), (180 cases), and septic sores. Other health issues included (20 cases diagnosed that year), venereal diseases (92 cases), and widespread dental problems requiring 129 extractions among children. Living conditions contributed significantly to poor outcomes, with residents housed in overcrowded tents, shacks, and dormitories exposed to harsh Wheatbelt winters. Poor , reliance on pools for after the main well collapsed, and insufficient provisions amplified transmission and . Disciplinary measures, such as confinement in a 3.5 corrugated iron "punishment shed" known as "The Boob," further strained physical well-being in extreme temperatures. Mortality declined after 1951 when the site transitioned to Methodist management as Mogumber Mission, though records indicate continued burials into the .

Closure and Aftermath

Relocation and Dissolution

On 18 August 1951, the Western Australian government closed the , transferring control of the entire facility—including its residents, buildings, and operations—to the Methodist Overseas Mission. This handover marked the dissolution of the state-run institution, which had operated under the Department of Native Affairs since its establishment in 1918, amid shifting policies toward assimilation and reduced government involvement in segregated Aboriginal settlements. The transition occurred without evidence of large-scale forced relocation of residents to other sites; instead, the settlement continued functioning on-site under church management, renamed Mogumber Mission. Under Methodist oversight, Mogumber Mission operated from 1951 to 1980, focusing on welfare, training, and limited self-sufficiency programs for the remaining Aboriginal population, which had peaked at nearly 500 individuals prior to the handover. Conditions improved modestly, with mortality rates declining after control ended, attributed to church administration and reduced institutional brutality. However, funding constraints persisted, and by , the mission's farm and property operations ceased, with the lease transferred to the Aboriginal Lands Trust, signaling further devolution of control to Indigenous entities amid broader legal reforms like the 1967 referendum on Aboriginal citizenship rights. The Mogumber Training Centre, a key component of the mission, integrated into Sister Kate's Child and Family Care Services in , effectively ending organized mission activities and facilitating gradual dispersal or integration of residents into urban or regional communities as part of national assimilation efforts. This phase reflected causal policy shifts prioritizing economic independence over institutional confinement, though archival records indicate varied outcomes, with some families remaining on or near the site under Aboriginal Lands Trust stewardship. The site's legacy as a site of both continuity and gradual dissolution underscores the uneven transition from coercive government settlements to community-led .

Long-Term Demographic Impacts

The Moore River Native Settlement experienced exceptionally high mortality rates during its operation from 1918 to 1951, with 374 recorded deaths, representing a significant direct demographic toll on the Aboriginal population housed there. Of these, 54 percent were children under 18 years old, and 73 percent of the child deaths involved those under five, often due to treatable conditions such as , , , , , and undernourishment. Peak mortality occurred in the 1920s, during the , and , periods of strained resources and overcrowding at the facility, which reached a population of over 500 by . This , disproportionately affecting infants and young children, reduced the settlement's resident population and severed family lineages, contributing to a localized decline in Aboriginal demographic vitality in Western Australia's southwest. Upon closure in , the approximately 200 remaining residents were relocated, primarily to the nearby Mogumber Methodist Mission or dispersed to urban areas and other reserves, disrupting established communities and exacerbating intergenerational family fragmentation. These forced removals, integral to broader assimilation policies, compounded the demographic effects by hindering cultural transmission and traditional networks, which historically supported higher and rates in Aboriginal groups. Empirical studies on Stolen Generations survivors—many of whom passed through Moore River—indicate persistent health disparities, with 67 percent reporting disabilities or long-term conditions, elevated stress, and poorer general health compared to non-removed Indigenous peers, potentially suppressing through reduced reproductive health and higher adult mortality. Long-term, these impacts manifest in descendants of Moore River residents, who exhibit intergenerational patterns of disadvantage, including higher rates of , , and family violence, which correlate with lower socioeconomic stability and indirectly affect demographic indicators like birth rates and migration. While Australia's overall Indigenous has grown due to factors like improved identification and , subgroups affected by institutions like Moore River show elevated to these stressors, sustaining a legacy of reduced community-level resilience. attributes this not merely to but to the settlement's role in enforcing separation from traditional lands and support systems, which empirical data links to enduring health and social deficits.

Controversies and Assessments

Policy Rationales and Criticisms

The Moore River Native Settlement was established in 1918 under the direction of Auber Octavius Neville, Chief Protector of Aborigines in Western Australia, as part of broader government policies aimed at the segregation, control, and gradual assimilation of Aboriginal people into European settler society. The primary rationale articulated by Neville and the Aborigines Department was to create a self-sustaining agricultural community that would provide vocational training, basic education, and moral instruction to Aboriginal individuals, particularly those of mixed descent, whom officials deemed at risk in fringe camps near white settlements or vulnerable to exploitation in remote areas. This approach was enabled by the Aborigines Act 1905, which empowered the Chief Protector to remove and institutionalize Aboriginal people deemed "neglected" or in need of protection, with the explicit goal of "absorbing" lighter-skinned children into white society over generations through controlled breeding, education, and labor discipline, ostensibly to elevate them above the perceived squalor of traditional or camp life. Neville justified the settlement's isolation—located 135 kilometers north of Perth—as a means to shield Aboriginal people from corrupting influences like alcohol and while fostering through farming and domestic skills, with children receiving up to three hours of daily schooling before being apprenticed out at age 14 for work on stations or in households, returning periodically to the . The Native Administration Act 1936 further expanded these powers, allowing removals of any Aboriginal child until age 21 to enforce assimilation, reflecting a paternalistic view that state intervention was necessary to "civilize" populations seen as biologically and culturally inferior, incompatible with full without intervention. Criticisms of these policies emerged contemporaneously from missionaries, anthropologists, and Aboriginal advocates, who argued that the settlement functioned less as a protective haven and more as a coercive dumping ground for marginalized people, contravening its stated self-sufficiency goals amid chronic underfunding and mismanagement. Figures like missionary Mary Bennett testified before the 1934 Moseley Royal Commission that forced removals inflicted profound psychological trauma, severing family ties without consent and prioritizing state control over welfare, while Aboriginal petitions in the decried the ethics of permanent separation as a violation of parental rights. Historian , reflecting on inspections, described it as a "dump" with grossly inadequate facilities, untrained staff, and no viable pathway to independence, where residents were confined like prisoners despite rhetoric of uplift. Operational failures underscored these critiques: intended for 200 residents, the population ballooned to over 500 by through involuntary transfers, leading to overcrowding in makeshift tents and dormitories exposed to harsh winters, with funding half that of comparable white institutions and reliant on unpaid inmate labor that yielded minimal agricultural output. The exacerbated ration shortages and disease outbreaks, contributing to 374 recorded deaths—primarily children, with 203 under 18 and 149 aged five or younger—attributed to , bronchitis, and rather than inherent racial frailty, as official inquiries later confirmed systemic over policy intent. Later analyses, including the 1997 Bringing Them Home report, highlighted how assimilation rationales masked exploitative labor practices and cultural erasure, with high return rates of pregnant girls from apprenticeships indicating failed safeguards against abuse, though government responses prioritized expansion over reform until Methodist oversight in 1951.

Empirical Outcomes and Debates

Empirical data from the Moore River Native Settlement's burial records indicate severe challenges, with 374 deaths recorded between 1918 and 1964, of which 54 percent were children under 18 years old and 73 percent of child deaths involved those under age five. In the settlement's first decade (1918–1928), 99 individuals died, predominantly from respiratory illnesses such as and , reflecting inadequate , overcrowding, and limited medical resources in an era when such conditions were treatable with better intervention. , , , and epidemics like and contributed to ongoing mortality, with six women recorded as dying in ; overall, funding for the settlement was approximately half that of the lowest-funded European institution in by 1936. Population figures underscore the settlement's role as a transient hub for forcibly relocated Aboriginal people, starting with 19 residents in 1918, surging to 306 by 1922 following the closure of Carrolup, peaking at around 500 in 1932, and declining to 150 by 1955. While intended as a self-sustaining agricultural and al facility to foster assimilation through labor and basic schooling, outcomes in and remain sparsely quantified, with reports noting children were drilled in domestic and manual skills but faced strict controls that prioritized institutional discipline over skill-building for . Debates over the settlement's effectiveness hinge on its dual aims of protection from fringe-dwelling hardships and assimilation into European norms, versus evidence of exacerbated trauma and cultural disruption. Proponents of the policy, including early administrators, argued it provided structure amid widespread destitution, yet high rates—far exceeding contemporary non-Indigenous benchmarks—suggest systemic failures in basic care, prompting criticisms of under-resourcing and coercive removals as causal factors in intergenerational health disparities observed in stolen generations studies. The Australian Human Rights Commission's Bringing Them Home report (1997), while documenting widespread alienation, has been critiqued for emphasizing narrative harms over contextual factors like pre-existing disease burdens from frontier contact; nonetheless, empirical funding shortfalls and death patterns support claims of policy inadequacy without negating intent to mitigate broader societal neglect. Assimilation metrics, such as rates of post-release self-sufficiency, lack comprehensive longitudinal data, but survivor accounts and limited records indicate mixed results, with some achieving partial integration at the cost of and identity.

Modern Significance

Environmental Management

The Moore River catchment, encompassing 13,800 square kilometers across eight shires in , faces environmental pressures including affecting 10% of valleys (104,000 hectares), , waterlogging, , and . Primary management is led by the Moore Catchment Council (MCC), a focused on natural resource health through revegetation, , and conservation. Supporting efforts involve the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) via the Healthy Rivers program for monitoring river condition. Key strategies address land use dominated by 81% dryland , promoting low-recharge farming, perennial pastures like , and controls such as grade banks and remnant . MCC initiatives include community revegetation events, such as the June 24, 2016, planting day at Guilderton dunes, and workshops on seed collection (December 9, 2016) and pyp grass management (November 7, 2016). Weed control targets like Guilderton pyp grass, while broader projects emphasize coastal rehabilitation, Carnaby’s black cockatoo , and native protection. management incorporates environmental water provisions to safeguard ecological values. Conservation prioritizes threatened ecological communities, including critically endangered tuart woodlands under the EPBC Act, and species habitats amid remnant vegetation decline. Flood management plans, such as for the Bidaminna area, mitigate inundation risks, while community groups like Friends of Moore River oppose developments threatening estuary quality and woodlands. MCC's efforts earned finalist status in awards including the 2014 CSBP Environmental Awards and 2015 Community Group Award. Ongoing challenges include mining proposals for mineral sands clearing up to 1,000 hectares of endangered habitats near the river.

Cultural and Recreational Use

The Moore River region encompasses sites of enduring cultural significance to Aboriginal peoples, including traditional camping grounds, spiritual locations, and burial areas associated with heritage and the historical at Mogumber. These elements contribute to its role as a benchmark for interpreting Aboriginal history and culture in , with the former mission site offering insights into early 20th-century government policies toward Indigenous populations. Recreational use centers on the river's near Guilderton, where calm waters support activities such as canoeing, , paddle boating, and chartered river cruises for exploring the surrounding wetlands and . Swimming and beach activities are common along the adjacent coastline, while the river mouth provides opportunities for targeting species including , , whiting, flathead, and mulloway, governed by Western Australian bag and size limits to ensure . Boating launches are available from facilities like Gabbadah Park, with the area drawing visitors for picnics and water-based leisure year-round, particularly in warmer months.

References

  1. https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=rmtr
  2. https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Moore-nrm-shire-guide-March-2020-Web.pdf
  3. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2023-06/the-importance-of-western-australias-waterways.pdf
  4. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/entity/moore-river-native-settlement/
  5. https://bth.humanrights.gov.au/node/101
  6. https://sitefinitypublicblobs.blob.core.windows.net/prod-blob/docs/default-source/aboriginal-history/moore-river-native-settlement-burial-register4bdbbd8d-74e5-4583-8d1d-a2b792b218ab_7277243c-2af5-4ec9-ae75-4db7bc2622f1.pdf?sfvrsn=e141164f_7
  7. https://library.dbca.wa.gov.au/Journals/082574/082574-189.pdf
  8. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=61MUN_INST&filePid=13162447600007891&download=true
  9. https://www.moora.wa.gov.au/profiles/moora/assets/clientdata/document-centre/building-and-planning-documents/flood_management_study.pdf
  10. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2022-05/Northern-Perth-Basin-bulletin-Chapter-5-Aquifers-of-the-northern-Perth-Basin.pdf
  11. https://library.dbca.wa.gov.au/static/Journals/082179/082179-07.pdf
  12. https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Referral_Documentation/Appendix%25202_1.pdf
  13. https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Moore-revegetation-guide.pdf
  14. https://rivers.dwer.wa.gov.au/site/regans-ford/
  15. https://rivers.dwer.wa.gov.au/site/mogumber-west-nature-reserve/
  16. https://guildertonwa.com.au/gvc/guilderton-visitor-centre/present/
  17. https://www.moora.wa.gov.au/tourism/history/aboriginal-history-of-moora.aspx
  18. https://www.noongarculture.org.au/yued/
  19. https://www.gingin.wa.gov.au/Profiles/gingin/Assets/ClientData/Documents/04_BUILD_Menu_Items/Planning/Heritage/Cultural_Heritage_Management_Plan_2016-19.pdf
  20. https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/yued-boodja-booklet_29082025.pdf
  21. https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/moore-george-fletcher-2474
  22. https://westernaustralianexploration.org.au/2021/08/15/george-fletcher-moore/
  23. https://www.noongarculture.org.au/moora-contact-1836/
  24. https://www.watoday.com.au/traveller/inspiration/moore-river-culture-and-history-20081126-6ilx.html
  25. https://www.moora.wa.gov.au/about-us.aspx
  26. https://www.moora.wa.gov.au/tourism/about-moora/our-towns/shire-history.aspx
  27. https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=books
  28. https://inherit.dplh.wa.gov.au/public/inventory/details/57019b91-bd8e-4eee-9e93-b117143aba65
  29. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2020-01/economic-research-papers-economic-history-of-western-australia-since-colonial-settlement.pdf
  30. https://www.britannica.com/place/Western-Australia/Western-Australia-until-the-mid-20th-century
  31. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2022-10/Thematic_History_of_WA.pdf
  32. https://files02.sl.nsw.gov.au/fotoweb/pdf/1476/147661150.pdf
  33. https://inherit.dplh.wa.gov.au/public/inventory/printsinglerecord/de5f8a8a-221f-44aa-8426-9335944df135
  34. https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/back-to-moore-river-and-finding-family/8m1yrp3j0
  35. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-26/moore-river-aboriginal-settlement-journey-into-hell-on-earth/9790658
  36. https://www.cits.wa.gov.au/aboriginal-culture/aboriginal-history/reconciliation-and-history-projects/history-of-moore-river-native-settlement
  37. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/257527274
  38. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/projects/bringing-them-home-chapter-7
  39. https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/digitised_collections/remove/73819.pdf
  40. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/entity/mogumber/
  41. https://inherit.dplh.wa.gov.au/public/inventory/details/de5f8a8a-221f-44aa-8426-9335944df135
  42. https://www.findandconnect.gov.au/entity/mogumber-training-centre/
  43. https://missionsconnect.net/missions/mogumber-mission/timeline/
  44. https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/department-of-the-premier-and-cabinet/noongar-history
  45. https://www.aihw.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/2018/august/new-report-shows-long-term-disadvantage-for-austra
  46. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/indigenous-australians/indigenous-stolen-generations-50-and-over/contents/summary
  47. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-15/stolen-generations-study-impact-of-intergenerational-trauma/10118132
  48. https://bth.humanrights.gov.au/the-report/part-3-consequences-of-removal/chapter-11-the-effects
  49. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/projects/bringing-them-home-chapter-10
  50. https://www.cits.wa.gov.au/department/publications/publication/moore-river-native-settlement-burial-register
  51. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1177180120948277
  52. https://www.moorecatchment.org.au/index.html
  53. https://rivers.dwer.wa.gov.au/catchment/moore-river/
  54. https://www.nacc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Guilderton-Pyp-Grass-Management-Plan.pdf
  55. https://www.victoriaplains.wa.gov.au/your-shire/working-with-us/committees-and-collaborations/moore-catchment-council.aspx
  56. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2022-10/Environmental-considerations-for-groundwater-management-in-the-Northern-Basin.pdf
  57. https://www.ccwa.org.au/friends_of_moore_river_estuary
  58. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-23/image-resources-gains-environmental-approval-banksia-forest/103765190
  59. https://inherit.dplh.wa.gov.au/Public/Inventory/Details/04613827-273f-41cb-90e7-fc6eacac2515
  60. https://www.mooreriverregion.com.au/play/
  61. https://guildertonwa.com.au/gvc/things-to-do-testing/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.