Hubbry Logo
Ponte MorandiPonte MorandiMain
Open search
Ponte Morandi
Community hub
Ponte Morandi
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ponte Morandi
Ponte Morandi
Ponte Morandi
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ponte Morandi (English: Morandi Bridge), officially Viadotto Polcevera (English: Polcevera Viaduct),[1] was a road viaduct in Genoa, Liguria, Italy, constructed between 1963 and 1967 along the A10 motorway over the Polcevera River, from which it derived its official name. It connected Genoa's Sampierdarena and Cornigliano districts across the Polcevera Valley. The bridge was widely called "Ponte Morandi" after its structural designer, engineer Riccardo Morandi.[2]

Key Information

On 14 August 2018, a 210-metre (690 ft) section of the viaduct collapsed during a rainstorm, resulting in the deaths of 43 people. The collapse led to a year-long state of emergency in the Liguria region, extensive analysis of the structural failure,[3] and widely varying assignment of responsibility.

The remains of the original bridge were demolished in June 2019. The replacement bridge, the Genoa-Saint George Bridge was inaugurated a year later.[4]

History

[edit]

Design

[edit]

Ponte Morandi was designed by civil engineer Riccardo Morandi, from whom its unofficial name was derived. It was a cable-stayed bridge characterised by a prestressed concrete structure for the piers, pylons and deck,[5] very few stays, as few as two per span, and a hybrid system for the stays constructed from steel cables with prestressed concrete shells poured on.[6][7] The concrete was prestressed only to 10 MPa (1,500 psi),[citation needed] making it susceptible to cracks, water intrusion, and corrosion of the internal steel.[8][9][10] The bridge was similar to Morandi's earlier 1957 design for the General Rafael Urdaneta Bridge in Venezuela[11] except for the stays, which on the Venezuelan bridge are not covered with prestressed concrete.

Construction

[edit]
President Giuseppe Saragat at the inauguration, on 4 September 1967

The viaduct was built between 1963 and 1967 by the Società Italiana per Condotte d'Acqua, costing 3.8 billion Italian lire and opened on 4 September 1967. It had a length of 1,182 metres (3,878 ft), a height above the valley of 45 metres (148 ft) at road level, and three reinforced concrete pylons reaching 90 metres (300 ft) in height; the maximum span was 210 metres (690 ft). It featured diagonal cable stays, with the vertical trestle-like supports made up of sets of Vs, one set carrying the roadway deck, while the other pair of inverted Vs supported the top ends of two pairs of diagonal stay cables.[citation needed]

The viaduct was officially opened on 4 September 1967 in the presence of Italian President Giuseppe Saragat.[12]

Maintenance and strengthening

[edit]

The bridge had been subject to continual restoration work from the 1970s due to an incorrect initial assessment of the effects of creep of the concrete.[13] This resulted in excessive deferred displacement of the vehicle deck so that it was neither level nor flat; at the worst points, it undulated in all three dimensions. Only after continual measurement, redesign, and associated structural work was the vehicle deck considered acceptable, approaching horizontal by the mid-1980s.[14]

In a 1979 report, Morandi himself said "I think [sic] that sooner or later, maybe in a few years, it will be necessary to resort to a treatment consisting of the removal of all traces of rust on the exposure of the reinforcements, to fill the patches, with epoxidic style resins, and finally to cover everything up with elastomers of very high chemical resistance".[6]

In the 1990s, the tendons (the steel wires, cables, and threaded bars, designed to produce the bridge's prestressed concrete) on pillar 11 appeared to be most damaged.[9] About 30% of the tendons had corroded away. The load of the bridge was 7,000 kg (15,000 lb) per tendon, whereas the tendons were originally capable of carrying 15,000 kg (33,000 lb).[citation needed][15] A single truck can weigh as much as 44,000 kg (97,000 lb).[16] As of the collapse of the bridge, only pillar 11 had been internally inspected in the 1990s, showing severed and oxidized strands.[17] From 1990 onward, the easternmost pillar 11 had its stays strengthened by flanking them with external steel cables.[18][19] Pillar 10 had the stays at the top strengthened with steel sheathing in the 1990s.[20] Following the collapse, many questions have been raised about the stays.[21] Morandi's similar[22] bridge in Venezuela suffered one or more stay cable failures in 1979/1980, with collapse imminent.[23][24][25][26][27]

The minister of infrastructures and transport in charge until 1 June 2018, Graziano Delrio, was informed multiple times in the Italian parliament during 2016 that the Morandi bridge needed maintenance.[28][29]

In 2017, a confidential university report in Genoa noted severe disparities in the behaviour of the stays of the pillar 9, which would collapse.[17] The minutes of a February 2018 government meeting report that resistance and reflectometry measurements indicated an "average" reduction of the cross-section of the tendons of 10 to 20%.[30][31] A crack in the road had appeared at least 14 days before the collapse, near the southeastern stay of the subsequently collapsed pillar 9. The crack may have been an indication that the stay had stretched.[32][33] At no point was a suggestion made to reduce the load on the bridge.[30] Traditionally, bridges were designed for a 50-year lifespan;[23] the bridge failed just under 51 years after its opening.

On 3 May 2018, the Autostrade company had announced a call for tenders for a structural upgrade of the viaduct to the value of €20,159,000, with a deadline of 11 June 2018. The work on the reinforcement of the stays on pillars 9 and 10 would have needed to be finished within five years.[34][35]

Workers were installing new heavy concrete Jersey barriers on the Ponte Morandi before it collapsed, reducing the already low-compressive prestress on the concrete of the stays and increasing the loads.[10][21][36]

2017 modal analyses

[edit]

In 2017, Carmelo Gentile and Antonello Ruccolo of the Polytechnic University of Milan studied the modal frequencies and deformations of the stays of the bridge.[17] On pillar 9, they could identify only four global modes, and the deformations of two of these identified modes were not fully compliant.[37] Modal frequencies were more than 10% different, specifically on the southern stays.[31][38] In pre-stressed concrete beams, such a difference could represent the entire effect of the non-linear pre-stresses. As little as a 2% shift could represent severe damage.[39][40] The prestress in the Ponte Morandi was characterised as relatively small from the start. In contrast, with bare tendons, which are relatively under-constrained like the strings in a piano, the effect of prestress is dominant in determining the resonant frequency. Other than prestress, changes in geometry, such as corrosion in the tendons, could impact the resonant frequency. The effects would be reduced by the composite nature of the stays when observing global modes.[41] Gentile had performed similar modal analyses on pillar 11 in the 1990s.[42] Other related methods were applied on the stays of Ponte Morandi in the 1990s, such as reflectometry, which was able to measure the tension, but not strength of the tendons.[41][43]

Replacement proposals

[edit]

By the mid-2000s, the A10 route through Genoa and over the bridge had become highly congested. The city council requested proposals for improvement of traffic flow through Genoa, with the Autostrade company in 2009 proposing the "Gronda di Ponente" project to improve flow, by moving traffic to a newly built Autostrada interchange system located to the north of the city. As part of the initial study and report, the Autostrade company measured that the bridge carried 25.5 million transits a year, with traffic having quadrupled in the previous 30 years and "destined to grow, even in the absence of intervention, by a further 30% in the next 30 years".

The study highlighted how the traffic volume, with daily queues at peak hours joining the Autostrada Serravalle, produced "an intense degradation of the bridge structure subjected to considerable stress", with the need for continuous maintenance.[44] The study showed that, in the option for improving what was termed as the "low gutter", it would be more economical to replace the bridge with a new one north of its current location, and then to demolish the existing bridge.[45][failed verification]

Collapse

[edit]
Main article: 2018 Ponte Morandi collapse

On 14 August 2018, around 11:36 local time (09:36 UTC), during a torrential rainstorm, the span around pillar 9 of the Ponte Morandi collapsed and the vehicles on it fell into the Polcevera river.[46][47] Forty-three people were confirmed dead and 16 injured.[48][49] The disaster caused a major political controversy about the poor state of infrastructure in Italy and raised wider questions about the condition of bridges across Europe.[50] It was later decided that the bridge would not be repaired, but demolished. Demolition began in February 2019[51] and was completed on 28 June 2019.[52][53]

Replacement

[edit]
Main article: Genoa-Saint George Bridge

Construction on the replacement began on 25 June 2019, and it was completed in the spring of 2020. The Genoa-Saint George Bridge was inaugurated on 3 August 2020.[54]

The collapsed part of the bridge is shown in red.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ponte Morandi

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Polcevera Viaduct, commonly referred to as after its designer , was a cable-stayed road bridge in , , spanning the Polcevera River valley along the A10 motorway. Constructed between 1963 and 1967 at a cost of 3.8 billion Italian lire, the structure measured 1,182 meters in total length with a maximum span of 210 meters and featured piers, pylons, deck, and stays—only two stays per span in its innovative balanced design. Inaugurated in 1967 by Italian President , it served as a vital link for over five decades until its partial collapse on 14 August 2018 amid heavy rainfall, which killed 43 people and injured dozens more. Morandi's design represented a bold application of technology, aiming for durability and aesthetic slenderness through encasing steel tendons in concrete to protect against , yet this method concealed progression, complicating inspections. Engineering analyses post-collapse identified the failure originating in the concrete-encased stays near 9, where high-cycle combined with chloride-induced reduced load-bearing capacity below operational demands, exacerbated by inadequate despite documented structural concerns dating back decades. The incident highlighted vulnerabilities in mid-20th-century infrastructure practices, including over-reliance on unproven encasement for resistance and lapses in regulatory enforcement by the concessionaire , prompting Italy's rapid reconstruction of a replacement completed in 2020.

Engineering and Design

Structural Features and Innovations

The Polcevera Viaduct, designed by Italian engineer , was a characterized by its extensive use of throughout the structure, including the deck, piers, pylons, and stays. The viaduct measured 1,182 meters in total length and accommodated four lanes of traffic on a deck approximately 20 meters wide, supported by 11 piers with the central section featuring a main span of 210 meters over the Polcevera River flanked by shorter approach spans. Key structural elements included A-shaped pylons rising up to 90 meters high, inclined at angles to integrate with the cable-stayed system, and a continuous deck constructed using prefabricated segments for efficient assembly. The cable stays, numbering as few as two per roadway section in the main spans, were formed from encased around internal tendons rather than traditional exposed cables, connecting the deck directly to the pylon tops and providing both tensile support and aesthetic continuity. Morandi's innovations centered on minimizing the number of stays to reduce construction complexity and costs while leveraging prestressed concrete's to mimic steel cable performance, an approach he pioneered in Italy amid material shortages. This design allowed for longer spans with fewer visible supports, enhancing visual sleekness, and incorporated stiff cross-girders at stay-deck junctions to distribute loads evenly across the continuous beam system. The use of stays represented a departure from steel-dominated cable-stayed precedents, prioritizing against environmental exposure through encapsulation, though it introduced unique challenges in tendon prestressing and inspection.

Design Flaws and Early Critiques

The Polcevera Viaduct, designed by , incorporated cable stays encased in concrete segments, an innovative approach intended to achieve slender profiles and aesthetic integration of structural elements. However, this configuration inherently limited inspectability and maintenance access to the internal tendons, facilitating penetration and subsequent in the bridge's coastal-industrial setting characterized by high , , and pollutants from a nearby steelworks. The pylons doubled as cable anchorages without supplemental , relying on continuous load transfer through the stays and pillars; this absence of alternative force paths amplified vulnerability to localized failures propagating into . Prestressing levels were conservatively low at approximately 10 MPa, rendering the prone to micro-cracking under service loads and environmental exposure, which accelerated degradation pathways. Early post-construction assessments in the late revealed initial damage, including surface cracking near cable anchorages, attributed to shrinkage and early-age stresses in the match-cast segments. By 1971–1972, severe had eroded protective metal plates on the stays within five years of opening, necessitating their replacement with equivalents to mitigate further ingress. Morandi himself, in evaluations around 1979, conceded that atmospheric factors—sea spray, saline aerosols, and industrial emissions—exacerbated vulnerabilities, underscoring the design's inadequate barriers despite the engineer's prior with similar structures. Critiques from contemporary engineers highlighted Morandi's overreliance on encapsulation for stays, diverging from emerging steel-cable standards that offered better and replaceability in aggressive environments; this choice, while enabling economic construction, compromised long-term resilience without compensatory monitoring protocols. Reports from the , including internal inspections, documented persistent strand and , yet interventions focused on patching rather than redesign, reflecting in assessments of the innovative system's robustness. These early indicators prompted calls for enhanced and externalized cable systems in subsequent Italian viaducts, though Morandi's influence delayed broader adoption of such reforms.

Construction and Initial Operation

Building Process and Timeline

The Polcevera Viaduct, commonly known as Ponte Morandi, was designed by Italian in the early 1960s, drawing on his prior work including the General Rafael Urdaneta Bridge in completed in 1962. commenced in 1963, utilizing techniques for its cable-stayed structure, where steel tendons within the stays were encased in concrete to provide both tension and protection. The building process involved erecting three central towers up to 45 meters high and constructing 11 precast segments spanning a total length of 1,102 meters, with the longest spans reaching 210 meters. This hybrid design integrated cantilevered sections with cable-stayed supports, reflecting mid-20th-century innovations in application to reduce material use and enable longer spans. Work progressed over four years, addressing the challenging over the Polcevera River valley. The viaduct was completed in 1967 and inaugurated on September 4 of that year in a attended by Italian President . This timeline positioned the bridge as a key link on the A10 motorway, facilitating Genoa's connection to western and .

Opening and Early Performance

The Polcevera Viaduct, designed by engineer , was officially inaugurated on 4 September 1967 as part of Italy's Autostrada A10 motorway. The opening ceremony was attended by Italian President , marking the completion of a structure that spanned 1,102 meters across the Polcevera valley to connect Genoa's urban areas with western and international routes toward . Constructed by Società Italiana per Condotte d'Acqua at a cost of approximately 3.8 billion Italian lire, the viaduct featured innovative elements intended to support heavy vehicular loads over its multiple spans. Upon entering service, the immediately assumed a critical role in Genoa's transportation , facilitating the flow of commercial traffic linked to the city's major and industrial zones. In its initial years of operation through the late 1960s and early 1970s, the structure performed without documented major structural failures or disruptions, carrying increasing volumes of road traffic as Italy's boosted demands. However, preliminary assessments of creep effects—deformation under sustained loads—began to inform ongoing monitoring, though no immediate interventions were required beyond routine checks. The 's design, emphasizing slender piers and long spans, was praised in contemporary reports for its efficiency in navigating the challenging topography.

Maintenance History and Decline

Identified Deterioration Issues

Inspections conducted in identified superficial degradation around the bridge's tie-rods, including strongly carbonated and local cracks, indicating early onset of distress in the elements. Subsequent evaluations in 2006 revealed additional structural deficiencies, such as poor weld details, visible on metal components, swaying connections, faded protective paint, and surface across multiple sections, highlighting progressive environmental exposure effects on the aging . was particularly pronounced in the primary and secondary prestressing cables as well as the stay cables, where ingress of and de-icing salts accelerated strand deterioration within protective sheaths, compromising tensile capacity over decades of service. The bridge's innovative but unconventional , featuring encased cables and limited access points, inherently restricted thorough non-destructive testing and visual assessments of internal elements, allowing latent degradation to evade timely detection. External beams exhibited cracking and spalling exacerbated by cyclic loading from , rainfall infiltration, and wind-induced vibrations, further evidencing inadequate durability against Genoa's coastal climate. These issues were documented in operator reports and consultations as early as the , with partial remediation attempts focused on cable strengthening, yet systemic underinvestment in monitoring failed to address the cumulative in load-bearing members.

Maintenance Efforts and Shortcomings

The Polcevera , known as Ponte Morandi, required frequent maintenance from its inception due to its innovative but complex design, which encased steel tendons vulnerable to from environmental factors like sea air and industrial pollution. In 1979, designer issued a report highlighting early risks, recommending ongoing interventions such as filling exposed reinforcement areas and applying protective measures against rust, as structural distress including cracking and spalling had already emerged. Maintenance efforts by concessionaire involved continual restoration works starting in the 1970s, focusing on reactive repairs to address visible and cable reinforcements over subsequent decades. These included patching spalled areas and attempting to mitigate tendon oxidation, with expenditures reportedly reaching approximately 80% of the bridge's estimated replacement cost by 2018. However, internal inspections remained limited; for instance, only select pillars underwent detailed checks in the , revealing severed and oxidized strands, yet comprehensive assessments of the encased cables proved challenging due to the design's inaccessibility. Shortcomings in these efforts stemmed from systemic issues, including deferred due to inadequate allocation under privatized , fragmented oversight between agencies, and a reactive rather than proactive approach that failed to address root causes like progressive . By the early 2000s, expert reports flagged escalating safety concerns, but interventions remained insufficient, allowing deterioration to advance unchecked, as evidenced by post-collapse analyses attributing the failure to neglected cable integrity despite claimed continuous upkeep. Investigations highlighted that while some repairs occurred, the lack of rigorous, design-specific monitoring and resource prioritization contributed to the bridge's vulnerability, underscoring failures in regulatory and concessionaire .

The 2018 Collapse

Event Chronology and Mechanics

On August 14, 2018, at approximately 11:36 a.m. CEST, during a severe with heavy rainfall, a major section of the Ponte Morandi collapsed without prior visible deformation or detectable by . The involved the roadway deck spanning approximately 100 meters, including the area over piers 9 and 10, which plummeted about 50 meters onto the Polcevera River, adjacent railway tracks, and two industrial buildings below, crushing vehicles and in the process. and eyewitness accounts indicate the unfolded rapidly over seconds, with the appearing intact moments before the central pylon (pier 9) suddenly gave way, leading to a progressive of connected spans. The of the initiated at the southern stays attached to the western pylon (pylon 9), where tendons suffered severe and high-cycle damage accumulated over decades. These stays, integral to supporting the deck's weight in the cable-stayed , lost capacity due to internal strand exacerbated by moisture ingress and inadequate protective measures, resulting in tensile rupture under combined dead load, , and storm-induced dynamic stresses. This initial stay failure overloaded the pylon, causing it to laterally and tilt eastward, which in turn destabilized the unbalanced deck sections, propagating the as unsupported segments sheared and fell in a without sufficient to arrest the failure. Forensic analyses confirm that the 's reliance on these vulnerable, non-redundant stays, combined with material degradation, rendered the structure susceptible to such brittle, under nominal loading conditions.

Immediate Consequences and Rescue

The collapse of a 100-meter section of the Ponte Morandi on August 14, , at approximately 11:36 a.m. local time resulted in the deaths of 43 people, including drivers, passengers, and pedestrians in the affected area. Approximately 16 individuals were injured, with several requiring hospitalization for serious wounds sustained from the fall or debris. Dozens of vehicles, including cars and trucks, plummeted up to 45 meters onto the Polcevera riverbed, nearby railway tracks, and industrial warehouses, causing secondary structural damage and a that prompted the evacuation of over 400 residents from surrounding buildings. Rescue operations began within minutes, coordinated by Italy's civil protection agency and involving around 250 firefighters dispatched from across the country, alongside medical teams and heavy machinery operators. Initial efforts focused on extracting survivors from the tangled wreckage of concrete pillars, steel cables, and crushed vehicles, with some individuals, such as a Ukrainian-Moldovan couple trapped in their car, pulled alive from the rubble hours after the incident. Firefighters worked through the night amid ongoing rain, using excavators and sniffer dogs to navigate unstable debris piles, while authorities warned of potential further collapses in the remaining bridge spans. The search for victims extended over several days, with the death toll rising as bodies were recovered from submerged and collapsed structures; operations concluded on August 19, 2018, after the last three victims—a family of three—were located in a crushed car. In the immediate aftermath, the incident severed a critical of the A10 motorway, halting regional traffic and prompting emergency rerouting, while the site's instability necessitated cordoning off a wide perimeter to prevent additional hazards.

Investigations into Failure

Technical Forensic Analyses

The Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport's Ispettiva Commission, formed immediately after the August 14, , collapse, performed initial forensic examinations of and surviving elements, identifying widespread structural degradation as a primary factor. Analyses revealed advanced in prestressed tendons, cable stays, and elements, exacerbated by inadequate drainage systems that allowed ingress and moisture accumulation over decades. The commission's report highlighted that the bridge's horizontal structures and piers exhibited cracking and spalling consistent with long-term prestress loss, with no evidence of acute overload or seismic triggers at the moment of failure. Subsequent academic forensic studies employed finite element modeling to reconstruct the failure sequence, pinpointing initiation at pier P9 (the southernmost collapsed support). A Politecnico di Torino analysis using SAP2000 software and original design drawings simulated the pylon-deck interaction, concluding that prestressing —specifically sets A (288 strands) and B (112 strands)—failed due to cumulative damage under cyclic loading combined with . Applying the Palmgren-Miner linear damage accumulation rule, the model predicted tendon B rupture around 2013 and tendon A around 2014, with progressive capacity loss leading to pier instability by 2018; had reduced cable cross-sectional mass by approximately 20% through localized , severely impairing tensile strength. Alternative criteria (Gerber and Goodman diagrams) projected slightly later, in 2016, underscoring the conservative nature of linear models but confirming - synergy as dominant. Peer-reviewed back-analyses further quantified residual capacities at collapse. A forensic estimation of the ruptured stay cables via nonlinear finite element back-calculation determined that the imposed demands exceeded the degraded material strengths, with compressive capacities reduced by 30-50% due to alkali-silica reactions and prestress ; this approach calibrated models against observed patterns to validate that a single propagated asymmetrically, lacking redundancy in Riccardo Morandi's haunched design. Experimental studies on recovered fragments demonstrated very high-cycle (VHCF) as the mechanism, where gigacycle loading in a chloride-rich environment initiated microcracks at pit sites, propagating to brittle overload without macroscopic yielding—consistent with S-N extrapolations for corroded prestressing showing life reductions by orders of magnitude. Numerical collapse simulations using applied element methods (AEM) and discrete crack modeling replicated the observed , with initial severance at P9 triggering shear failure in adjacent segments and progressive deck unraveling over 3-5 seconds. These models emphasized design-inherent vulnerabilities, such as the integration of stays into pier concrete without protective sheathing, which facilitated de-icing salt diffusion and electrochemical corrosion cells; maintenance lapses, including unaddressed and joint leaks documented since the 1990s, accelerated degradation beyond what periodic inspections could mitigate given the structure's inaccessibility. Independent validations dismissed extraneous factors like nearby downbursts, attributing dynamics solely to internal structural cascade.

Causal Determinations and Evidence

The primary causal factor in the of the Polcevera Viaduct (Ponte Morandi) on August 14, 2018, was the rupture of a diagonal stay cable at 9 (support 9), triggered by extensive of the internal tendons, which resulted in progressive loss of prestress and structural instability. This failure initiated a , causing the connected spans to shear and due to the bridge's inherent lack of in its cable-stayed design. Forensic simulations and post-collapse analyses confirmed that the rupture at support 9 was the initiating event, as the unconventional stays—encasing high-strength strands without adequate barriers—failed under cumulative from environmental exposure in Genoa's humid, saline coastal atmosphere. Evidence from technical investigations, including Italian judicial inquiries and engineering back-analyses, highlighted corrosion initiation as early as the 1980s, when severe degradation was observed in the upper sections of the concrete stays during renovations, with steel strands documented as broken by 1992. Post-tensioned tendons within the stays suffered from ingress of moisture and chlorides, leading to pitting corrosion and section loss, which reduced load-bearing capacity over decades; cumulative damage models indicate critical tendon failures could have occurred as early as 2013-2014, rendering the structure untenable by 2018. Design vulnerabilities exacerbated this, as Riccardo Morandi's 1960s innovation prioritized aesthetic integration of concrete-encased stays over robust redundancy or protective measures against corrosion, with known construction errors in tendon grouting allowing water penetration from the outset. Maintenance deficiencies provided further evidentiary support for the causal chain, as inspections from the onward identified cracking and spalling in the stays but led to only partial interventions, such as limited strengthening at support 11 in 1993, while proposals for external steel cable additions at support 9 were rejected on aesthetic grounds despite evident risks. Italian commission reports and expert testimonies emphasized that the operator, , underreported deterioration and delayed comprehensive retrofitting, allowing corrosion to propagate unchecked; residual capacity assessments post-collapse revealed the stays at pier 9 had lost over 50% of original prestress, insufficient to withstand dynamic loads like traffic or minor seismic activity. No single acute event, such as or overload, was substantiated as primary, with analyses ruling out these in favor of chronic material degradation.

Controversies and Accountability

Political and Institutional Blame

Following the collapse on August 14, 2018, Italy's coalition , comprising the Five Star Movement and Lega, promptly directed blame toward (ASPI), the concessionaire responsible for the bridge's maintenance, accusing it of in upkeep and safety reporting. Transport Minister Danilo Toninelli described ASPI's management as a "criminal" failure, initiating procedures to revoke the company's highway concessions, which had been granted in 1997 and allowed collection of tolls exceeding €8 billion annually by 2018 with insufficient reinvestment in infrastructure. A September 2018 explicitly faulted ASPI for "serious oversights," including delayed or incomplete structural reinforcements despite known deterioration signals dating back to 2013. Institutional critiques extended to regulatory capture, whereby ASPI exerted undue influence over understaffed and underfunded oversight entities like the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, effectively enabling self-regulation. ASPI's ownership of Spea Engineering, its inspection subsidiary, created inherent conflicts, as Spea falsified maintenance data on the bridge's cable stays and piers—admissions emerging from 2019 probes that revealed manipulated reports to evade costly repairs. Public regulators, despite receiving ASPI's annual €600 million in concession fees, conducted minimal independent verifications, accepting the operator's assurances without enforcing mandatory upgrades, a lapse attributed to the ministry's limited personnel and deference to industry lobbying. The privatization framework established in the 1990s under center-left administrations amplified these vulnerabilities, transferring state-owned assets like the Polcevera Viaduct concession to private entities such as the Benetton family's Atlantia (ASPI's parent) for undervalued sums—around €2.5 billion in 1999 despite the network's €20 billion-plus worth—without imposing stringent performance bonds or expertise requirements. This model facilitated dividend payouts exceeding €11 billion from 2000 to , alongside toll hikes outpacing inflation by 50%, while capital expenditures on maintenance lagged, as concession terms shielded operators from full and permitted compensation claims up to €20 billion upon . Successive governments across ideological lines perpetuated this structure, failing to revise oversight protocols despite prior warnings, such as engineer reports in and highlighting the bridge's innovative yet aging design's proneness to . Judicial and parliamentary inquiries, including a 2020 commission, apportioned blame multidirectionally, indicting 59 individuals—primarily ASPI and Spea executives—for and , but also implicating public officials for inadequate supervision, though few faced equivalent charges. A 2019 Ministry of assessment confirmed ASPI's "non-fulfillment of custody duties," yet underscored the state's complicity in tolerating profit-maximizing practices over safety, with arrests of ASPI's former CEO Giovanni Castellucci in 2020 for related neglect underscoring executive accountability gaps mirrored in regulatory inaction. Critics, including analyses, argued that institutional inertia—rooted in fragmented responsibilities among national, regional, and EU-level bodies—prevented timely interventions, as evidenced by unheeded 2017 regional audits flagging the bridge's critical state. Following the August 14, 2018, collapse of the Ponte Morandi in , which resulted in 43 deaths, Italian prosecutors launched a targeting (Aspi), the concessionaire responsible for the bridge's maintenance, along with its subsidiary Spea Engineering and numerous executives. The probe focused on allegations of , failure to predict the disaster, falsification of safety reports, and endangering public safety through inadequate inspections and maintenance. By 2021, charges were formalized against 59 individuals and entities, excluding direct accusations against some due to insufficient evidence of intent, but proceeding on negligence-based counts. The main trial commenced on July 7, 2022, before the Assizes Court, encompassing executives from Aspi and Spea, including former Aspi CEO Giovanni Castellucci and former Aspi chairman Fabrizio Palenzona. Defendants faced potential sentences up to 15 years for charges like road safety endangerment and multiple , stemming from evidence of manipulated inspection data and ignored structural warnings dating back years. In parallel, Aspi and Spea pursued plea bargains; on April 7, 2022, a judge approved settlements totaling over €700 million in fines and victim compensations, acknowledging administrative liability without admitting criminal guilt for the collapse itself. A subsequent €30 million plea was accepted in April 2023 for related falsification offenses. Individual accountability remains unresolved in the primary proceedings, which have extended due to evidentiary complexities and defendant testimonies denying direct causation. Castellucci, a central figure, has acknowledged managerial responsibility for the asset but rejected personal culpability, attributing failure to design flaws rather than maintenance lapses. He is currently serving a six-year sentence from a separate for violations and false certifications predating the . On October 14, 2025, prosecutors Walter Cotugno and Marco Airoldi requested 18 years and six months for Castellucci on the core charges, citing his oversight of deficient monitoring systems and suppression of risk data. Verdicts for remaining defendants, including requests for lesser terms against other executives like Massimiliano Giacobbi (10 years sought), are pending as the trial continues into late 2025.

Replacement and Aftermath

New Bridge Development

Following the collapse of Ponte Morandi on August 14, 2018, Italian authorities prioritized rapid replacement to restore connectivity along the A10 motorway, leading to the commissioning of a new known as the Genova San Giorgio Bridge (Viadotto Genova San Giorgio). A special decree-law enabled an accelerated process, bypassing standard bureaucratic hurdles to expedite of the remnants and new . Demolition of the remaining Morandi structure began on December 15, 2018, clearing the site for the replacement. Genoa-born architect was appointed on December 18, 2018, to lead the design, envisioning a sleek, 1,066-meter-long structure elevated on 18 slender piers to integrate harmoniously with the urban landscape while ensuring seismic resilience. The design emphasized prefabricated elements for speed, with a bright deck intended to reflect daylight and glow at night, contrasting the concrete-heavy predecessor. Construction was awarded to a led by (formerly Salini Impregilo), incorporating advanced BIM modeling by Italferr for precise execution. Site work commenced shortly after demolition, achieving completion in a record 15 months through round-the-clock operations and modular assembly of over 100 steel segments transported by specialized convoys. The bridge, spanning the Polcevera River and serving as a key artery for 25 million annual vehicles, was inaugurated on August 3, 2020, by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, symbolizing national resolve amid criticism of prior infrastructure neglect. This timeline, under two years from collapse to opening, highlighted effective public-private coordination but drew scrutiny over long-term maintenance protocols to avert future failures.

Long-Term Impacts and Lessons

The collapse of the Ponte Morandi on August 14, 2018, inflicted enduring economic damage on , with local companies reporting total losses of 422 million euros, including 63 million euros in direct physical damage to properties, machinery, and stocks, alongside reduced profits and elevated operational costs. The disruption severed east-west connectivity, generating daily economic losses estimated at 6 million euros and affecting the broader north-western Italian region through halted rail services and port access for weeks. Socially, the event displaced over 600 residents, rendering them temporarily homeless and exacerbating urban fragmentation in a city already strained by infrastructural decay. In response, enacted the "Genoa Decree" (Decree-Law 109/2018), converting to Law 130/2018, which streamlined emergency procurement for the replacement bridge and allocated funds for rapid reconstruction, enabling completion in approximately 18 months by July 2020. This legislation also spurred broader normative reforms, including enhanced oversight of privatized infrastructure operators like , whose maintenance lapses were implicated, prompting debates on reversing partial models that prioritized short-term toll revenues over long-term capital investments. Nationally, it catalyzed inspections of over 1,000 aging viaducts, revealing widespread and underinvestment, though implementation has faced bureaucratic delays characteristic of Italy's system. Engineering lessons underscore the vulnerabilities of Morandi's innovative yet flawed design, where non-redundant struts and piers succumbed to unchecked from de-icing salts and alkali-silica reactions, amplified by inadequate monitoring of time-dependent deterioration and traffic overloads exceeding original projections. Experts emphasize proactive strategies like systems—such as fiber-optic sensors for real-time strain detection—and periodic load testing to preempt failures in similar 20th-century structures, while critiquing regulatory incentives that deferred replacement in favor of patchwork repairs. The incident also highlighted geotechnical risks, including unstable foundations in riverine settings, advocating integrated risk assessments that account for environmental factors over isolated structural evaluations. Overall, it reinforced causal principles that longevity demands rigorous, evidence-based maintenance protocols rather than reliance on outdated designs or politically influenced concessions.

References

  1. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8098
  2. https://www.webuildvalue.com/en/facts/collapse-ponte-morandi-genoa.html
  3. https://www.nord-lock.com/en-us/learnings/customer-cases/2021/rebuilding-the-genoa-bridge/
  4. https://resource.midasuser.com/en/blog/bridge/bridgeinsight/morandi-bridge-collapse
  5. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%2528ASCE%2529BE.1943-5592.0001807
  6. https://www.ipcm.it/en/article/corrosion-morandi-bridge-the-story-of-a-predictable-collapse.aspx
  7. https://www.engineering.com/the-rise-fall-and-rebuild-of-the-doomed-morandi-bridge/
  8. https://structurae.net/en/structures/polcevera-viaduct
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141029619331840
  10. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bridge-collapse-design
  11. https://www.engineeringclicks.com/riccardo-morandi-profile/
  12. https://www.monodaq.com/applications/polcevera-viaduct/
  13. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45188668
  14. https://medium.com/political-engineering/the-failure-of-ponte-morandi-1b109803a62
  15. https://www.structuresinsider.com/post/new-genoa-bridge-built-in-a-record-time
  16. https://researchoutreach.org/articles/collapse-polcevera-viaduct-avoidable-tragedy/
  17. https://concrete.ethz.ch/blog/riccardo-morandi-pioneer-of-bridge-design-or-bad-engineer/
  18. https://www.globalhighways.com/wh10/feature/lessons-genoa-bridge-collapse
  19. https://bridgemastersinc.com/italian-morandi-bridge-collapse/
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338330489_Relevant_outcomes_from_the_history_of_Polcevera_Viaduct_in_Genova_from_design_to_nowadays_failure
  21. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Once-upon-a-Time-in-Italy%253A-The-Tale-of-the-Morandi-Calvi-Moratti/cf076256d0a177c77d036cff3f704fc1bf63618d
  22. https://www.academia.edu/77069108/Once_upon_a_Time_in_Italy_The_Tale_of_the_Morandi_Bridge
  23. https://www.domusweb.it/en/from-the-archive/2018/08/31/from-domus-archives-the-original-report-of-the-morandi-viaduct.html
  24. https://www.academia.edu/85643978/Dynamics_and_causes_of_the_collapse_of_the_Morandi_viaduct_in_Genoa
  25. https://iris.polito.it/retrieve/handle/11583/2818042/355336/Post%2520Collapse%2520Analysis%2520of%2520Polcevera%2520Viaduct%252011282019.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354273235_Causes_of_the_Collapse_of_the_Polcevera_Viaduct_in_Genoa_Italy
  27. https://www.online-pdh.com/mod/resource/view.php?id=3419
  28. https://www.academia.edu/110544504/Genoa_Italy_Bridge_Collapse_Effects_on_Neonatal_Emergency_Transport_Service
  29. https://www.engineering.com/italys-morandi-bridge-collapse-what-do-we-know/
  30. https://www.wwltv.com/article/news/nation-world/in-1979-italy-bridge-designer-warned-of-corrosion-risk-39-years-later-it-collapsed/507-585589134
  31. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/14/unusual-span-of-collapsed-genoa-bridge-had-seen-frequent-repair-work
  32. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/world/europe/italy-genoa-bridge-collapse.html
  33. https://www.rfi.fr/en/europe/20201226-inquiry-into-genoa-bridge-collapse-highlights-poor-maintenance-design-flaws
  34. https://etikradet.se/en/articles/bridge-collapse-raises-questions-on-infrastructure-maintenance/
  35. https://commonsciencespace.com/the-death-of-ponte-morandi/
  36. https://structurescentre.com/engineering-lessons-from-the-morandi-bridge-collapse/
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012423007178
  38. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45241842
  39. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45190735
  40. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/14/italian-freeway-bridge-collapses-near-genoa-with-dozens-reported-dead.html
  41. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/08/15/ital-a15.html
  42. https://www.euronews.com/2018/08/16/-i-saw-the-car-disappear-into-the-clouds-survivors-of-genoa-s-bridge-collapse-share-their-
  43. https://www.dw.com/en/genoa-bridge-collapse-search-operation-ends-death-toll-rises/a-45136011
  44. https://www.npr.org/2018/08/15/638793776/death-toll-in-genoa-bridge-collapse-rises-to-39
  45. https://www.mit.gov.it/comunicazione/news/ponte-morandi-online-la-relazione-della-commissione-ispettiva-mit
  46. https://www.quattroruote.it/news/cronaca/2018/09/25/ponte_morandi_le_conclusioni_della_commissione_d_indagine.html
  47. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001807
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372187421_CRITICAL_REVIEW_AND_MODELLING_OF_THE_CONSTRUCTION_SEQUENCE_AND_LOADING_HISTORY_OF_THE_COLLAPSED_MORANDI_BRIDGE
  49. https://nhess.copernicus.org/preprints/nhess-2019-371/
  50. https://researchoutreach.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Janusz-Rymsza.pdf
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/15/genoa-bridge-collapse-death-toll-italy-minister-calls-resignations
  52. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/italy-publishes-report-blaming-autostrade-for-failings-in-bridge-collapse-idUSKCN1M523J/
  53. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/autostrade-rebuffs-government-report-blaming-it-for-failings-in-bridge-collapse-idUSKCN1M524T/
  54. https://undsoc.org/2019/03/06/the-morandi-bridge-collapse-and-regulatory-capture/
  55. https://www.promarket.org/2020/06/30/two-years-ago-the-morandi-bridge-collapse-claimed-43-lives-a-new-stigler-center-case-study-explores-the-link-between-the-disaster-and-crony-capitalism/
  56. https://www.euronews.com/2022/07/07/genoa-bridge-collapse-59-people-go-on-trial-in-italy-over-2018-disaster
  57. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/genoa-bridge-collapse-trial-open-four-years-after-disaster-2022-07-06/
  58. https://www.voanews.com/a/on-trial-in-2018-italy-bridge-collapse-that-killed-43-/6649699.html
  59. https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2021/06/25/620196.htm
  60. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italian-judge-accepts-autostrade-settlement-over-2018-bridge-collapse-2022-04-07/
  61. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7d6af15d-8d32-4dd7-8249-eef63dee41e5
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62076262
  63. https://www.unionesarda.it/en/italy/morandi-bridge-collapse-castellucci-i-feel-responsible-but-not-guilty-j0cyw5wi
  64. https://www.reuters.com/world/prosecutors-seek-over-18-year-jail-sentence-ex-atlantia-ceo-over-genoa-bridge-2025-10-14/
  65. https://en.ilsole24ore.com/art/morandi-bridge-genoa-prosecutor-asks-for-18-years-and-6-months-castellucci-AH8geLAD
  66. https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/law-order/3663233-bridge-to-justice-former-atlantia-ceo-faces-18-year-sentence-in-genoa-collapse
  67. https://infrastructuredeliverymodels.gihub.org/case-studies/the-new-genoa-bridge-italy/
  68. https://www.azuremagazine.com/article/renzo-pianos-hometown-bridge-symbol-of-hope-and-renewal-opens-in-genoa/
  69. https://www.platformarchitecture.it/ponte-genova-san-giorgio/?lang=en
  70. https://www.rpbw.com/project/genova-san-giorgio-bridge
  71. https://www.webuildgroup.com/en/discovery/library/new-genoa-bridge/
  72. https://www.italferr.it/en/technology-and-innovation/BIM/design/genoa-san-giorgio-viaduct.html
  73. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/new-genoa-bridge-inauguration-scli-intl
  74. https://www.designboom.com/architecture/new-genoa-bridge-renzo-piano-56-trucks-inauguration-date-07-22-2020/
  75. https://www.archpaper.com/2020/08/renzo-pianos-saint-george-bridge-inaugurated-in-genoa-italy/
  76. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/bridge-collapse-costs-genoa-companies-422-million-euros-in-damages-chamber-of-idUSKCN1ND2GR/
  77. https://centrum.tdb.uw.edu.pl/the-genoa-decree-and-normative-acts-adopted-after-the-collapse-of-the-morandi-bridge-in-an-economic-perspective/
  78. https://www.publicfinancefocus.org/depth/2019/10/bridge-disaster-how-italy-rebuilding-after-ponte-morandi-collapse
  79. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/morandi-bridge-collapse-reflects-distorted-incentives-by-paola-subacchi-2018-08
  80. https://www.ice.org.uk/news-views-insights/inside-infrastructure/learning-from-the-genoa-bridge-collapse
  81. https://www.nextind.eu/blog/case-study-the-collapse-of-the-morandi-bridge/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.